The URL can be used to link to this page

2026-08-12 WS City Council Agenda Richfield City Council Agenda August 12, 2026 -- 4:45 PM Richfield Municipal Center Bartholomew Conference Room 6700 Portland Avenue South 1. Call to Order 2. Item Discussion a. Preview the preliminary 2027 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update as summarized in the Financial Management Plan (FMP). Preview proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2027 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2028- 2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 3. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9739. Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City of Richfield website. Page 1 of 220 City Council Meeting 8/12/2026 Agenda Section: Item Discussion Agenda Item: 2.a. Report Prepared By: Steve McDaniel, Budget, Cash, and Debt Manager Department Director: Mary Bogie, Interim Finance Director Item for Consideration: Preview the preliminary 2027 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update as summarized in the Financial Management Plan (FMP). Preview proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2027 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ehlers will present a new long-term Financial Management Plan (FMP). The FMP is a multi-year fiscal plan for all tax-supported funds. Tax-supported funds include the City's General Fund, Economic Development Authority General Fund, Housing and Redevelopment Authority General Fund, Local Option Sales Tax, Communications, Utility Franchise Fees, Ice Arena, Swimming Pool, Capital Improvements, Parks Capital, Central Garage, Information Technology, Self Insurance, Building Services, and all Debt Service Funds. The presentation will include an overview on some of these tax- supported funds. Staff will present a high-level overview of the preliminary budget, utility rates and fee increases in order to seek council feedback in finalizing the proposed 2026 Revised and 2027 Proposed budgets, which will be presented in more detail on August 25. Staff is also seeking feedback on the proposed 2027 CIB and 2028-2031 CIP. Both the operating and capital budgets will determine the preliminary levy, which is scheduled to be considered by City Council on September 22, 2026. The City must certify its preliminary property tax levy for payable year 2027 to the County Auditor and set a date for its Truth in Taxation public meeting on or before September 30, 2026. Once the preliminary levy is approved, it may be further reduced at a later City Council meeting, but it legally cannot be increased over the preliminary approved amount. City Council is scheduled to conduct a Truth in Taxation hearing on December 8, 2026, and consider the adoption of the final budget and levy on December 8, 2026. RECOMMENDED ACTION HISTORICAL CONTEXT Page 2 of 220 EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.) CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES The 2026 Revised and 2027 Proposed budgets are still being developed. City staff will present the budgets in more detail on August 25, 2026. FINANCIAL IMPACT The 2026 Revised and 2027 Proposed budgets are the financial plan for the City for funding City services and programs. The FMP is a comprehensive tool that shows the financial forecast of future tax levies, general fund operations, future debt issuance, and can show the big picture. Proposed utility rates and City fees impact the financial operations of the utility funds, general fund and special revenue funds. The 2027 CIB and the 2028-2031 CIP is a plan of proposed future capital projects. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) ATTACHMENTS 1. 08-12-2026 Work Session updated 2. 2027CIB-2028-2031CIP - 08.12.2026 Work Session 3. XX-XX DRAFT Bill No. 2026-XX Appendix D 4. 2026-XX-XX Draft Resolution XXXXX Appendix D 2027 License Permit and Misc Fees - Update 1 5. Ehlers Presentation - Richfield FMP - 8-12-2026 - FINAL (004) 6. FMP Summary Pages - 2026 Financial Management Plan - Richfield MN (003) Page 3 of 220 2027 Budget Preview Page 4 of 220 Timetable and Key Events •August 12, 2026:Tonight –2027 Budget Preview, Financial Management Plan (FMP), Utility Rates & City Fees, 2027 CIB/2028-2031 CIP •August 25, 2026: Budget Work Session- departments present their budgets •September 22, 2026:Adopt preliminary tax levy •December 8, 2026:Truth in Taxation meeting •December 8, 2026:Certify final levy, adopt Budget & CIB/CIP Page 5 of 220 Budget Update •Labor force participation continues to remain below pre-pandemic levels. •Cost of living increase at 3%, average step increase at 2.75%, and average negotiated contract step increases 3%-5.5% •Personnel continues to be approximately 71% of the General Fund budget. •Debt issues planned for late 2026 funded with local sales tax. Debt issues planned for 2027 funded with utilities and property taxes. •Continued inflationary pressure expected to persist into 2027. Page 6 of 220 Budget Update •2027 Local Government Aid (LGA)increase about 1.59% or a total of $54,694 over 2026. •2026 Fiscal Disparity Aid increase about 1.27%or a total of $61,191 over 2026. •Licenses and permits revenue for 2027 is projected to be similar to 2026 revised and less than 2025 actuals. •Rolling stock/building/tech levy at $2,300,805. This includes a 3.5% increase over 2026 for IT and Building Services. As mentioned in the FMP presentation, the Fleet equipment levy is now at $1,775,457. •EDA levy at $667,741 which is a 3.5% increase. •Proposed levy increase is 4.50%. Page 7 of 220 2027 Proposed Preliminary Levy General Fund Levy Equipment Levy EDA Levy -Base Levy Total Debt Service Levy -Total 2027 Levy $26,308,418 $2,300,805 $667,741 $29,276,964 $3,916,828 $33,193,791 2027 Proposed Levy is $33,193,791 which is an increase of 4.54% over the 2026 Levy Page 8 of 220 Gross Tax Levy History 2027 $33,193,791 4.54% increase 2026 $31,749,380 6.16% increase 2025 $29,907,569 5.45% increase 2024 $28,363,158 5.89% increase 2023 $26,784,954 6.60% increase 2022 $25,127,419 4.98% increase 2021 $23,934,632 5.50% increase 2020 $22,687,471 4.90%increase Page 9 of 220 2027 Proposed General Fund Budget The 2027 proposed General Fund Budget of $35,837,871 is a: •2.00% increase from the 2026 adopted budget •2.65% increase from the 2026 revised budget Page 10 of 220 General Fund Revenues 2026A 2026R 2027P Taxes 25,223,647 25,223,647 26,308,418 Licenses and Permits 1,130,850 1,123,340 1,157,740 Intergovernmental 5,766,368 5,899,230 5,733,988 Charges for services 1,830,300 1,939,370 1,891,465 Fines and forfeitures 220,000 225,000 225,000 Miscellaneous 129,255 113,400 185,400 Transfers 833,695 387,600 335,860 Total Revenues 35,134,115 34,911,587 35,837,871 Page 11 of 220 General Fund Expenditures 2026A 2026R 2027P Legislative/Executive 1,360,777 1,308,196 1,284,676 Administrative 1,067,194 1,037,066 1,141,770 Human Resources 360,783 412,419 562,852 Finance 701,628 812,080 705,066 Public Safety 13,642,788 13,332,315 14,312,605 Fire 6,641,729 6,426,700 6,846,680 Community Development 1,916,110 1,884,350 1,972,361 Public Works 5,949,340 6,021,652 5,751,837 Recreation Services 2,561,200 2,562,139 2,871,320 Transfer Out 372,250 372,250 388,704 0.44% Paid Family Medical Leave 115,000 0 0 40%Fund Balance Reserve 445,316 742,420 0 35,134,115 34,911,587 35,837,871 Page 12 of 220 General Fund Expenditure History Year Amount YOY Increase %Change 2021 26,530,517 -- 2022 27,443,767 913,250 3.44% 2023 28,978,191 1,534,424 5.59% 2024 31,077,894 2,099,703 7.25% 2025 31,872,015 794,121 2.56% 2026R 34,911,587 3,039,572 9.54% 2027P 35,837,871 926,284 2.65% Expenditure reported is based of actuals for 2021 to 2025,revised budget for 2026 and proposed budget for 2027. Page 13 of 220 Staffing Update 2026R Proposed Position Additions •Recreation Services -Event Coordinator, Oct 2026 2027P Proposed Position Additions •Recreation Services -Natural Resources Coordinator, Jan 2027 Page 14 of 220 Forecast of City Reserves •Planned Capital Reserves transfers since 2021 to bring negative reserves in the Ice Arena and Pool into the black by 2028. •The Pool ended positive in 2025 at $208,840. •Reduced transfers to GF to zero in 2024 (LGA increase funded previous budget gap). •Budgeting surplus to fund General Fund 40% reserve requirement in 2026. The General Fund will be above the 40% reserve requirement in 2027, so no additional reserve amount is included in the 2027 proposed budget. •Rolling stock/building/tech levy at $2,300,805. This includes a 3.5% increase over 2026 for IT and Building Services. Fleet portion of the equipment levy is now at $1,775,457.Page 15 of 220 2027 City Fee Update Page 16 of 220 Fee Increases –Community Development Reflect cost of doing business: -Minimum inspection fee increased $65 $83.50 (impacts approx. 200 permits/year; State increased minimum to $135) -Exempt Commercial & Residential re-roof from plan review fee -House moving fees $65 $200 within City limits; $200 or $83.50/hour outside City limits (whichever is greater), plus mileage Page 17 of 220 Fee Increases –Public Safety/Support Services Reflect cost of doing business: •3% increase across most business license fees New Fee: •Mobile Food Unit fees Planning for increase of Wine fee to $2,000 to align with surrounding cities. Will require a public hearing Page 18 of 220 Fee Increases –Public Works Water Shut Off/On:Currently $75 Proposing $150 fee for after hours Erosion Control Permit Fee: Related to approved building permits this fee is to recover time reviewing, approving, and inspecting erosion control to ensure it is following state requirements. Proposed Fee Schedule: •$40 -Less than ¼ acres •$250 –¼ to 1 acres •$750 –> 1 acres +$1 / (100 SF above an acre) Page 19 of 220 Fee Increases –Recreation Services Park Buildings: $5 Increase ($70 weekday, $80 weekends) Wood Lake Nature Center: •Program Rooms (2 hour minimum): $85/hour, Non-Profit $70/hour •All Rooms Combined (10am –11pm) : $2200 Non-Profit $1,900 Add-ons (flat Rate) •Deck : $120 •Exhibits after hours: $75 •Conference Room(4 hour minimum): $75/hour, Non-Profit $60/hour •Amphitheaters (4 hours): $85 (M-TH), $95 (F-Su) •Fire Pit (4 hour minimum): $40/hour, $25 Non-Profit •Catering Commission: 10% of food and beverage sales Page 20 of 220 2027 Utility Update Page 21 of 220 Utility Funds Summary Page 22 of 220 Street Light User Fee •No proposed rate increase for 2027 •$7.21 (Quarter Residential) •$36.06/acre (Quarter Commercial) •Electricity and Maintenance Page 23 of 220 Utilities (2027 Utility Bill) Page 24 of 220 Franchise Fees Xcel CenterPoint Total Franchise Fees Revenue of approximately $2,462,155 annually. No proposed rate increase for 2027 Page 25 of 220 2027 Capital Improvement Budget 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan Page 26 of 220 Capital Budgeting Process •Preliminary report is prepared by the City Manager and Finance Director and presented to the Planning Commission. •The Planning Commission reviews the projects based on the following consideration: -The proposed projects conformance to the Comprehensive Plan •CIB/CIP as recommended by the Planning Commission is returned to the City Manager and Finance Director and included in the annual budget. Page 27 of 220 2027 Capital Improvement Budget Recreation/Open Space, $3,235,768 , 12% Right of Way, $10,038,000 , 38% Public Facilities, $9,375,000 , 36% Buildings, Fleets & Technology, $3,733,827 , 14% CAPITAL PROJECT TOTALS Recreation/Open Space Right of Way Public Facilities Buildings, Fleets & Technology Total 2027 Capital Improvement Budget $26,382,595 Page 28 of 220 Total 2027 CIB Funding by Source (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 16%(BSR) Building Special Revenue 1% (BST) Bonds-Sales Tax 8% (BU) G.O. Bonds- Utility 6,827,000 26% (C) Hennepin County 1% (F) Federal Grant 6% (FF) Franchise Fees 5% (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 7% (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 0% (M) Municipal State Aid 9% (O) Other Funding 3% (S) State 8% (SR) Special Revenue 2% (U) User Fee 8% TOTAL BY SOURCE Total $26,382,595 Page 29 of 220 Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan Project Totals Recreation/Open Space, $58,315,270 , 43% Right of Way Improvements, $45,808,500 , 33% Utilities, $12,760,000 , 9% Buildings, Fleets & Technology, $20,404,923 , 15% Recreation/Open Space Right of Way Improvements Utilities Buildings, Fleets & Technology Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan $137,288,693 Page 30 of 220 Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 21% (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 0% (BST) Bonds-Sales Tax 38% (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 17% (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 6% (F) Federal Grant 2% (FF) Franchise Fees 3% (M) Municipal State Aid 5% (SR) Special Revenue 1%(U) User Fee 5% (S) State 1% (X) Xcel Energy 1% Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan $137,288,693 Page 31 of 220 Purpose: •Maintain safe, reliable, and efficient public facilities. •Address aging infrastructure and deferred maintenance. •Ensure compliance with applicable codes, regulations, and operational standards. •City Priority:Sustainable Infrastructure •Preserve City assets through proactive planning. •Support long-term, sustainable infrastructure financing. •Wold Architects and Engineers hired in late 2025 to conduct a comprehensive facilities assessment. •Priority facilities evaluated included: •City Hall •Fire Station #2 •Liquor Stores •Public Works Building •Park and Recreation Buildings •Staff reviewed and validated consultant recommendations and project priorities with modifications to priorities. •Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) developed for each department included in Wold's Facility Assessment Needs Study. •Projects incorporated into the City's Financial Master Plan (FMP) to support long-term capital planning. Wold’s Facility Assessment Needs Study Page 32 of 220 Priority 1 (0 -2 years)Life Safety Issue As noted by Fire Marshal/Life Safety OfficialsDeterioration Item Further deterioration will create higher future repair costs or will damage other areas in the building Health Issue Rooms with no ventilation or items that do not meet state health code.Accessibility Issue Must be completed to provide access into the building, to the curriculum within the building, or to access a restroom. Hazardous Materials Item posing a significant impact on building occupants Priority 2 (2 -5 years) Energy Issue Item or system upgrade that results in a payback in 10 years or lessDeterioration Item Material or system that currently functions but will require replacement or maintenance within 5 yearsHealth Issue Inadequate exhaust and ventilation in lab environments and other areas lacking adequate ventilation Accessibility Issue Modification required to meet state code guidelinesHazardous Materials Removal of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 2.Modernization Modification required to support future modernizations Priority 3 (6 -10 years) Energy Issue Item or system upgrade that results in a payback in more than 10 yearsDeterioration Item Material or system that currently functions but will require replacement or maintenance within 6 to 10 years Health Issue Non-tagged items that do not meet state health code requirements Hazardous Materials Removal of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 3. Priority 4 (would like to do within 10 years)Aesthetic Item which impacts the visual environment Hazardous Materials Removal of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 4. Priority 5 (would like to do after 10 years)Aesthetic Item which impacts the visual environmentHazardous Materials Removal of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 4. From Wold: Priority Breakdown Page 33 of 220 Total 2027-Beyond 2030 Facility Assessment Needs Study (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 57%(BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 15% County Grant (C) 1% Other Funding (O) 27% Total 2027-Beyond 2030 Wold Facilities Assessment Projects $20,198,554 Page 34 of 220 Projects for Municipal Building: 2028:City Hall Carpet Replacement 2029:Chiller, Boilers, and Pumps 2031:Fire Alarm and BAS Control Beyond 2031:Parking Lot and Painting Financing: The funding sources for the above projects will include a mix of Buildings Fund and G.O. Bonds. Total CIB/CIP Cost:$8,718,286 Facilities Assessment Building Services Page 35 of 220 Facilities Assessment Liquor Operations Projects: •Water Intrusion •Mechanical •Parking Lots and Concrete Work Financing: The funding sources for the above projects will all be funded by the Liquor Fund. Total CIB/CIP Cost:$3,780,327 Page 36 of 220 Projects: 2027:Basement Water Intrusion 2029:Roof Replacement 2031:Carpet/Office Remodel Beyond 2031:Parking Lot and HVAC Financing: The funding sources for the above projects will include a mix of Buildings Fund and G.O. Bonds. Total CIB/CIP Cost:$4,680,000 Facilities Assessment Public Works Page 37 of 220 Ice Arena 2027 –2032: Locker Room Updates 2029: Rink 1 Roof 2029: Dehumidifier Rink 2 2031: Heating System Park Buildings 2027:Electrical Other upgrades based on Master Plan Financing: The funding will be a mix of liquor store funds, grants, special revenue funds, long-term capital, and G.O. Bonds Total CIB/CIP Cost:$3,019,941 Facilities Assessment Parks and Recreation Page 38 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (Henn. Co. & Richfield) •Estimated Project Cost (post-letting) –$18,952,525 •Estimated City Share –$7,000,000 •Includes $2,000,000 of State bond funds awarded in 2026 legislative session •Construction 2026 –2027 Page 39 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects 73rd St/Diagonal Ave Sidewalk •Portland Ave to Cedar Ave, north side of roadway •Estimated Project Cost –$1,321,000 •Includes $865,000 in state active transportation funding •2026/2027 Construction 64th St Sidewalk Sidewalk •Lyndale Ave to Portland Ave, south side of roadway •Estimated Project Cost –$1,310,000 •Includes $854,000 in state active transportation funding •2027 Construction Page 40 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects Penn Ave Reconstruction (Henn. Co. & Richfield) •Estimated Project Cost – $32,600,000 •Estimated City Share – $12,800,000 •Construction 2028 –2029 Page 41 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects Traffic Signal Replacements (76th Street/77th Street) •Estimated Project Cost –$2,665,000 over 3 years •Meridian Crossing (2027), 12th Avenue (2028), Newton Avenue (2029) Page 42 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects 69th Street Reconstruction (Xerxes Avenue to Penn Avenue) •Estimated Project Cost -$7,690,000 •2028 construction (coordinated with Penn Avenue) Page 43 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects 76th Street/Knox Avenue Roundabout •Estimated Project Cost –$4,350,000 •Includes $2,687,000 in regional solicitation funding •2029 Construction DRAFT – Concept Drawing Only Page 44 of 220 Emergency Water Interconnect •Total Project Cost -$5,000,000 •Includes $1,092,000 in Congressional Appropriation funding •Construction 2027 Public Works: Capital Projects •Connection to 48-inch Minneapolis water main •Alignment under west-side boulevard of 5th Ave •Tunneled under Hwy 62 •Connection to 18-inch Richfield water main Page 45 of 220 Public Works: Capital Projects Sanitary Sewer Lining •Total Project Cost: $900,000 •Construction: Annually Water Treatment Plant Elevator •Total Project Cost: $200,000 •Construction: 2026-2027 Water Treatment Plant Generator •Total Project Cost: $2,500,000 •Construction: 2027 Page 46 of 220 Recreation Services: Capital Projects Parks Master Plan Page 47 of 220 Recreation Services: Capital Projects Veterans Park (Local Sales Tax) 2026 •Ice Arena Lobby -$1.8M 2027 •Trail, Pavilion, Building -$3M Park Buildings & Field Lights (Grant) 2027 •Electrical Pannel -$220,000 Playgrounds 2027 •Adams Hill Park –$150,000 Page 48 of 220 Recreation Services: Capital Projects Outdoor Pool 2026 •Umbrella Canopies –18,000 •Pump and Boiler Refurbishment -$43,000 2027 •Pool Filter Sand -$62,000 •Shade & Birthday Structures –$100,000 Ice Arena Improvements 2026 •Rink 1 Locker Room Roof –$79,000 •Rink 1 Flooring –$99,000 2027 •Rink 2 Locker Rooms –$60,000 Page 49 of 220 Community Center (Local Sales Tax) Recreation Services: Capital Projects 2027 -2031 Project estimate: $55M Page 50 of 220 CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND 2028 - 2031 PLAN Page 51 of 220 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The Richfield Capital Improvement Budget and Plan is a comprehensive list of major improvements necessary to meet the needs of the community over a five-year period. This list is prepared through compiling the project needs requested by the various city departments. The Capital Plan sets forth the proposed scheduling and details of specific projects by year, estimated cost, and a justification or description to those responsible for making policy decisions regarding expenditures for new facilities. In addition, the Plan provides information so that individual project requests can be better evaluated against community needs and the community’s ability to pay for and maintain these facilities in the succeeding years. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GOALS The specific goals of the Capital Improvement Plan are: • To develop a realistic list of capital improvement needs which relates proposed projects to the City’s capacity to finance such projects. • To minimize the impact of projects on the residents’ ability to pay. • To schedule various projects and improvements in a way which allows adequate time to detailed design and engineering of the projects, preparing environmental statements or grant applications or exploring alternative methods of financing. • To provide coordination between City departments, various units of special and general local government, and public utilities. • To implement the community’s Comprehensive Plan in an orderly fashion. • To keep the public involved and informed about needed public improvements and to better enable the public to schedule private improvements. OVERVIEW Richfield’s Capital Improvement Plan is a process for identifying annual project needs and priorities for project coordination as well as for financial planning. In addition, the Capital Improvement process provides for public discussion of short range City improvements. The Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)/Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are identified through discussions of the various City commissions and the City departments. From these discussions City staff compiles estimated costs, scope and potential funding sources for the projects. A preliminary report is then generated by the Finance Director based on these discussions and presented to a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission then reviews the projects and scheduling based on the following consideration: • The proposed project’s conformance to the Comprehensive Plan. The CIB/CIP, as recommended by the Planning Commission, is then returned to the Finance Director, and submitted to the City Council as part of the annual budget process. The Council may delete projects from the Plan or may change the scheduling and priority of the allocation of funds. In accordance with state statutes, the City Council should refer any new project they may add to the Capital Improvement Plan to the Planning Commission for review. Accordingly, the 2026 Revised/2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) reflects funding for several improvement projects throughout the City. Included are costs for the Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction, multi-year Pavement Management, multi-year ADA Page 52 of 220 Improvements, multi-year Bicycle Improvements and multi-year Pedestrian Improvement projects. The capital spending plan also includes funds for park and recreation and water and wastewater projects. The funding for the right of way projects is expected to come from sources such as Federal and State grants, Municipal State Aid (MSA), street reconstruction bonds, and utility franchise fees. Funding for other projects included in the CIB will come from intergovernmental revenues, special revenues, and user fees. The City’s main operating budgets should not be materially affected by the planned projects as all funding is outside those budgets. The only possible effect would be on the maintenance of the newly constructed projects. In some cases the maintenance costs may increase, but in others, it is expected to decrease. The Capital Improvement Plan, which represents the next four-year period, also contains a number of significant proposed projects including, several park projects, major street improvement and reconstruction projects throughout the city, replacement of rolling stock and technology equipment, and several projects to improve public facilities throughout the City. 2027 Capital Improvement Budget Projects Recreation Open Space Community Center Building Repair - $20,000 Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repairs and replacement of existing capital items. This annual budget will be discontinued after 2027 in preparation for a new community center building, funded by local sales tax. Community Center - $150,000 The Community Center needs a complete rebuild the current building is more than 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community, including gym space, a walking track and community spaces. The total project costs are $55 million and the funding sources are the following: $45 million would come from a local sales tax and $10 million would come from bonds. The initial 2027 estimated costs of $150,000 is related to the building design. Ice Arena Improvements - $30,000 Ice Arena improvements are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. Improvements to the arena include HVAC, lobby area, doors, the addition of an elevator, new flooring, and improvements to locker rooms 5 and 6. A new roof is planned for 2029 and the funding for this will be G.O. property tax bonds. Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance - $55,000 Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects include tennis/basketball court replacement, trail resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partial replacement of existing park capital items. Specific improvement projects and their priorities will be identified through the Parks Master Plan process. Page 53 of 220 Outdoor Pool Improvements - $100,000 Improvements to the Outdoor Pool are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. 2026 projects include replacing umbrella canopies along with refurbishing pumps and boilers. 2027 projects include replacing pool filter sand, and adding shade structures. Parks Master Plan - $90,000 Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks Master Plan, a document within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall philosophy around park management and development, as well as specific park development plans, and serves as a guiding document for future capital improvement planning and other operations. The plan was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a consultant to help coordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement process. Veterans Park Complex - $2,420,768 Improvements to the park infrastructure, including the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility, trails, green space, marsh, etc.). The improvements being made in 2025-2028 are funded by local sales tax ($1.9m), special revenue ($500k), and a possible MN DNR grant ($500k). Projected improvements outlined in the facility assessment are planned for years beyond 2031 would be funded by general obligation bonds serviced by property tax. Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement - $150,000 Replace the play equipment structure at Adams Hill Park in accordance with the Play Equipment Replacement Schedule. Parks Building Improvements - $220,000 Pending the acceptance of a grant from Hennepin County, the lighting controls and breakers will be upgraded in 2027 at Christian, Donaldson, Augsburg, and Taft Parks. Then, looking beyond 2031, general obligation bonds serviced by property taxes would fund the Renovation of the Christian Park building ($1,500,000) and Donaldson Park Building ($1,500,00). Right of Way Improvements 77th Street Pavement Maintenance - $1,100,000 The concrete pavement panels and pavement joints on 77th Street are beginning to fail in certain areas and will need major maintenance in the near future to avoid full reconstruction. This work will address the worst areas of pavement failure, primarily east of Portland Ave. 78th Street Lighting - $200,000 MnDOT will be adding pedestrian level lighting (paid for by the city) to several trail segments constructed in Phase 1 of the I-494 project. Due to issues with the way the design-build contract was written, there are several gaps in the trail network that will not have lighting constructed, and the City will need to backfill with pedestrian and street lighting. These areas are 78th Street west of Penn, 78th Street from Pleasant Ave to Nicollet Ave, and 78th Street from Nicollet Ave to Portland Ave. Page 54 of 220 Multi-Year ADA Improvements - $200,000 Staff completed a City-wide inventory of pedestrian ramps and sidewalks in 2023. This inventory will be used to identify missing or non-compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way and program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. This may include sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure. Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements - $40,000 As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities are made on a regular basis. $40,000 of funds are identified each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain available for future use. Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements - $40,000 Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. $40,000 of funds are identified each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain available for future use. Multi-Year Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction - $5,740,000 Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 77th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant led a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s public engagement process to guide the roadway design in 2023 and 2024. Staff are pursuing state bond funding to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27). Early project expenses are paid from existing City resources and will be reimbursed following the sale of G.O. bonds closer to project construction. Multi-Year Pavement Management Program - $755,000 In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements. Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacement - $900,000 The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the ends of their expected life cycles between 2025 and 2035. The signals will need to be replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total cost of signal replacements is $2.67M, with the first signal components being replaced no earlier than 2027 due to the ongoing 494 project. 69th Street Reconstruction - $413,000 The project includes reconstruction of 69th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including narrowing of the roadway to add sidewalk to one side, reconstruction of retaining walls, lining or replacement of sanitary sewer, and replacement of storm sewer. The final roadway section will be determined following the City’s public engagement process. Page 55 of 220 Penn Avenue Reconstruction – $300,000 This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street led by Hennepin County. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement/rehabilitation. 76th and Knox Improvements - $350,000 This project consists of the conversion of the existing signalized intersection at W 76th St (MSAS 361) and Knox Ave S in the City of Richfield to a roundabout, including improvements to active transportation facilities that use the intersection. Ultimate design of the intersection will be determined through the City’s public engagement process. Permanent right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Project was selected for Regional Solicitation in the 2024 cycle, with a FY 2029 construction date. The Regional Solicitation grant covers 80% of the estimated construction costs and City is responsible for funding the remaining construction costs and all design and right-of- way costs. Public Facilities SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade - $50,000 The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system cybersecurity upgrade will modernize all hardware within the SCADA network that controls the water treatment plant and other utility systems in Richfield. Much of the existing equipment is outdated (some components are nearly 20 years old), which increases the risk of failure and makes the system more vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. Upgrading to new hardware will significantly improve system reliability and performance, enabling faster response times to operational changes. In addition, the new equipment will incorporate enhanced security features designed to better protect critical infrastructure from unauthorized access and cyberattacks. Water Plant Elevator Replacement - $50,000 The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it has become difficult to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily to transport equipment, chemicals, visitors, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It also satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with modern technology. Water Plant Generator - $2,400,000 The generator at the water treatment plant has reached the point where maintenance and problem solving are too frequent. In addition, the integrated fuel tank and housing are badly corroded. Repairing the current unit is not advantageous due to the age, the cost to implement the needed repairs, and the minimal return on such an investment. There has also been a shift in the industry and technology for more efficient ways of providing a generator backup system for a building of this type and power demand. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. A study was commissioned in 2024 to ascertain the design needs and future costs. Page 56 of 220 Sanitary Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation - $300,000 Rehabilitation of lift station 6, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Project also will improve concrete slab around wet well to solve drainage issues. Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System - $200,000 The storm sewer collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced concrete pipes. A cleaning and inspection program is conducted annually to determine the condition of the sewer mains and structures. Sewer mains and structures that are identified as being in poor condition will be replaced or rehabilitated with the means and methods that are in line with industry standards. The rehabilitation will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years. Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining - $900,000 The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP). As these VCP pipes age, tree root intrusion and cracking become more common. In order to preserve an appropriate level of service to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, portions of the wastewater collection system undergo cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining. Lining consists of placement of a liner in the existing clay pipe, which is adhered to the pipe wall and cured through the use of steam, hot water, or ultraviolet light. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, effectively restoring structural integrity. This rehabilitation technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the line. It is anticipated that this program will be ongoing until the entire wastewater collection system is rehabilitated, based upon funding availability. Restroom Renovations – WTP Second Floor - $200,000 The restrooms at the water plant date back to the 1960s and remain largely unchanged. The second-level restrooms, in particular, are in urgent need of renovation to address outdated conditions and to meet current ADA accessibility standards. This project will renovate existing water plant restrooms for ADA compliance and modernization. Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements - $100,000 The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room floor inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor. Water Plan Personnel Safety Systems Improvements - $125,000 The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 revealed certain health and safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water plant has the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA compliant. Public works staff retained a consultant to formulate a design that mitigates these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards. Page 57 of 220 Water System Interconnect - $4,900,000 The water treatment plant was built in 1963 and to date has been a standalone system. If it were to have a catastrophic failure and unable to produce water, the city is not equipped with a long-term emergency backup water source. Connecting to another city’s water system would create the needed level of service redundancy. As part of the DNR’s water supply plan, they encourage all cities to have an emergency backup water source. Well #3 Water Service - $50,000 A ¾ inch water service extends out to the Well #3 building at the water plant. The water service was constructed in a manner that exposes a length of copper to the outside elements as it traverses from within the plant to the well house. This length of pipe has burst on several occasions due to the cold weather rendering the well useless. This project will include the design, construction, and oversight of construction of a water service extension that is frost protected. Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation - $100,000 The Wilson Pond subwatershed is located in the southeast quadrant of the City. This subwatershed is subject to flooding during heavy rain events. The low-lying nature of the subwatershed makes it challenging to manage stormwater within the regional pond (Wilson Pond) system. Public Works staff have updated the stormwater model to reflect current flood risk conditions based on available data. The results of the model will be used to explore engineering alternatives to reduce the flood risk to the immediate neighborhoods. A design will be selected from the alternatives analysis that yields the most benefit. Buildings, Fleet and Technology Richfield Liquor Cedar Point - $260,560 Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below garage to eliminate water intrusion (199,699.50), Replace damaged concreate sidewalks and calling (56,785.30), add blower fans to prevent moisture accumulation on cooler doors (4,075.50). Multi-Year Fleet Purchases - $1,785,000 The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to provide City Services. This project is ongoing in which the Division makes vehicle purchases every year. Public Works Facility Building Improvements - $460,000 A number of building maintenance items that need to be addressed were found in a recent Facility Study. The building items vary from HVAC component replacement to repairing water intrusion into the building. This is an ongoing project and maintenance items have been prioritized by City Staff. Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades - $290,000 The Public Works Department is running out of office space and room for additional staff. Currently there is not an identified work area for a GIS Analyst that has not been hired and an identified hire date of June 1, 2026. This project includes adding 2 offices and some HVAC components. This project will fulfil an immediate space need but does not eliminate the need for other area upgrades that are needed in the future including new carpet, new office cube equipment, and HVAC repairs. Page 58 of 220 Computer Workstation Replacement - $70,000 Annual replacement of City desktop and laptop computer workstations based on the established four-year lifecycle replacement schedule to maintain reliable, secure, and supported technology for City operations. This project also includes funding for additional computer workstations needed to support departmental growth, operational needs, and changing staffing requirements across the organization. Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System - $85,000 Fire Station 1 was built with a commercial exhaust detection system that uses the apparatus bays normal HVAC system to evacuate. The industry standard for fire station apparatus bays is to have a dedicated ventilation system that activates when trucks are started to capture all exhaust fumes and diesel particulate. Fire Station 2 was upgraded with a dedicated exhaust system in 2026 with funding from a federal FEMA Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG). An AFG will be applied for in 2027 to fund the placement of the same dedicated exhaust system in Fire Station 1. This type of grant requires a 10% match that the city is expected to fund and will be accounted for in the 2027 proposed budget. Fire Station 2 Repairs - $306,406 Fire Station 2 was originally built in 1964 and remodeled in 2013. The city just completed a facilities study that looked at multiple city buildings, one being Fire Station 2. This study identified many structural, safety, cosmetic and programmatic changes required to protect the structural asset as well as the employees working and living within it. The study assigned priorities and costs to each identified need, and this list was reviewed and refined by Interim Fire Chief Coppa. The estimated repair and replacement costs needed to satisfy the items identified in the facilities study total $2.454M (2027 costs) over six years. While this addresses the currently identified needs, it fails to address the lack of essential modern safety features and needed programmatic spaces that will need to be addressed in the near future. The current station would need to be replaced with a building costing approximately $7,150,000 in 2027 dollars with a projected cost increase of 5-6% per year after. A policy discussion needs to determine where the financial priorities lie and whether it makes more sense to pay for repairs and maintenance to the existing building or consider a new building. Richfield Liquor Downtown - $399,535 Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below grade to eliminate water infiltration (321,964.50), Replace damaged sidewalk (31,788.90), replace damaged caulk joint around entire building perimeter (6,384.95), replace water heater, near end of life (5,434.00), replace corroded stainless-steel flue for boilers (33,962.50). Network Infrastructure Replacement - $77,326 This project provides for the phased replacement of network switches that have reached or are approaching Cisco end of support status over a three-year cycle. Much of the City’s network infrastructure replacement schedule had previously been deferred, resulting in aging equipment with increased risk of failure and cybersecurity concerns. Cisco end of support means the manufacturer no longer provides security updates, software patches, or technical support for the equipment. Switches will be replaced in priority order based on their end of support dates to maintain reliable and secure network infrastructure for City operations and services. Page 59 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Community Center Building Repair 2a. Total project cost:$40,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$40,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2019 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 Varied by year 2027 CIP $20,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $20,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $20,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $40,000 $40,000 Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Community Center Building Repair 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $40,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $40,000 $40,000 8. Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. This annual budget will be discontinued after 2027 in preparation for a new community center building, funded by local sales tax. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 60 of 220 % of Total 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Community Center Building 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $55,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $55,000,000 $55,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The Community Center needs a complete rebuild the current building is more than 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community, including gym space, a walking track and community spaces. $45 m would come from a local sales tax and $10 m would come from bonds. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $45,000,000 $45,000,000 82%Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $10,000,000 $10,000,000 18%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $4,150,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $18,000 2029 CIP $6,000,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2026 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $150,000 2030 CIP $44,682,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Community Center Building 2a. Total project cost:$55,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$55,000,000 3. Years to complete:5 Page 61 of 220 % of Total 60% 100% 1. Project:Arena Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$2,999,941 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,999,941 3. Years to complete:8 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2025 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $30,000 2030 CIP $30,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $30,000 2031 CIP $30,000 2026 CIB Revised $207,941 2029 CIP $1,672,000 Beyond 2031 $1,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $1,200,000 $1,200,000 40%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$1,799,941 $1,799,941 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Ice Arena Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,999,941 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $2,999,941 $2,999,941 8. Brief summary of project: Improvements to the arena include a new roof, HVAC, lobby area, doors, the addition of an elevator, new flooring, and improvements to locker rooms 5 and 6. Improvements to the Ice Arena are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. A new roof is planned for 2029 and the funding for this will be G.O. property tax bonds. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 62 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Parks Major Maintenance 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,855,000 * Annually Beyond 2031 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,855,000 $1,855,000 8. Brief summary of project: Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects include tennis/basketball court replacement, trail resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partial replacement of existing park capital items. Specific improvement projects and their priorities will be identified through the Parks Master Plan process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $1,855,000 $1,855,000 Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $275,000 2028 CIP $105,000 2031 CIP $355,000 2026 CIB Revised $275,000 2029 CIP $355,000 Beyond 2031 *$355,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?1999 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 Varied by year 2027 CIP $55,000 2030 CIP $355,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Parks Major Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$1,855,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,855,000 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 63 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Outdoor Pool Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$297,690 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$297,690 3. Years to complete:2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2025 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $100,000 2030 CIP $0 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $0 2031 CIP $21,270 2026 CIB Revised $18,000 2029 CIP $0 Beyond 2031 $158,420 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$297,690 $297,690 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Outdoor Pool Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $297,690 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $297,690 $297,690 8. Brief summary of project: Improvements to the Outdoor Pool are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. 2026 projects include replacing umbrella canopies along with refurbishing pumps and boilers. 2027 projects include replacing pool filter sand, and adding shade structures. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 64 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Parks Master Plan 2a. Total project cost:$180,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$180,000 3. Years to complete:2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2026 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $90,000 2030 CIP $0 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $180,000 2028 CIP $0 2031 CIP $0 2026 CIB Revised $90,000 2029 CIP $0 Beyond 2031 $0 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $180,000 $180,000 Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand X Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Parks Master Plan 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $180,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $180,000 $180,000 8. Brief summary of project: Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks Master Plan, a document within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall philosophy around park management and development, as well as specific park development plans, and serves as a guiding document for future capital improvement planning and other operations. The plan was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a consultant to help coordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement process.  9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 65 of 220 % of Total 5% 5% 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Veterans Park Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $10,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $10,000,000 $8,350,413 8. Brief summary of project: Improvements to the park infrastructure, including the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility, trails, green space, marsh, etc). The improvements being made in 2025-2028 are funded by local sales tax ($1.9m), special revenue ($500k),and a possible MN DNR grant ($500k). Projected improvements outlined in the facility assessment are planned for years beyond 2031 would be funded by general obligation bonds serviced by property tax. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $500,000 $500,000 Hennepin County (C)State (S)$500,000 $500,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $9,000,000 $7,350,413 90%Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $5,000,000 2028 CIP $250,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $5,679,645 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2025 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 $1,649,587 2027 CIP $2,420,768 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Veterans Park Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$10,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$10,000,000 3. Years to complete:8 Page 66 of 220 % of Total 1% 46% 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Wood Lake Nature Center Building 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $26,225,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $26,225,000 $14,175,481 8. Brief summary of project: Wood Lake Nature Center needs a complete re-build as its current building is 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community and region that are placed on the center. Grants have been secured for the project: $3m from a Federal grant and $12m from a State of Minnesota bonding grant. The largest remaining segment of funding, $11m, would come from local sales tax, if approved in November 2024 by referendum. The final funding component is from liquor store revenue ($225,000). 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)$3,000,000 $0 11%Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $225,000 $0 Hennepin County (C)State (S)$12,000,000 $12,000,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $11,000,000 $2,175,481 42%Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $1,000,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $14,175,481 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2022 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 $12,049,519 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Wood Lake Nature Center Building 2a. Total project cost:$26,225,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$14,175,481 3. Years to complete:5 Page 67 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $150,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $150,000 $150,000 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Adams Hill Park in accordance with the Play Equipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:XCommunity support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $150,000 $150,000 Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $150,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 2a. Total project cost:$150,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$150,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 68 of 220 % of Total 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Park Building Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $220,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $220,000 $220,000 8. Brief summary of project: Pending the acceptance of a grant from Hennepin County, the lighting controls and breakers will be upgraded in 2027 at Christian, Donaldson, Augsburg, and Taft Parks. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)$220,000 $220,000 100%State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $0 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $220,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Park Building Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$220,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$220,000 3. Years to complete:8 Page 69 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form - Playground Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $600,000 * Annually Beyond 2031 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $600,000 $600,000 8. Brief summary of project: The Play Equipment Replacement Schedule dictates an annual check of the age and condition of the play equipment lots around the city to determine the need to completely replace the equipment. Equipment wears and ages differently at different parks, depending on level of use, sun exposure, quality, and other factors, so age is not the sole determining factor. So, planning years in advance, it is most prudent to decide exactly which play equipment is in need of replacement closer to the actual project date. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) $600,000 $600,000 Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $120,000 2031 CIP $120,000 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $120,000 Beyond 2031 *$120,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?1990s 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 Varies by year 2027 CIP 2030 CIP $120,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Playground Replacement 2a. Total project cost:$600,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$600,000 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 70 of 220 % of Total 35% 65% 100% 1. Project:64th Street Sidewalk 2a. Total project cost:$1,310,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,230,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $80,000 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $165,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $1,230,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $456,000 $376,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$854,000 $854,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 64th Street Sidewalk 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,310,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,310,000 $1,230,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along W 64th St from just east of MSAS 363 (Lyndale Ave) to CSAH 35 (Portland Ave). The new sidewalk will be separated from the roadway by a boulevard, and new ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. A new ADA-compliant at-grade railroad crossing will be constructed across the Progressive Rail line located along Pleasant Ave. Minor right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Sidewalk is programmed to be constructed on the south side of the street to minimize negative impacts to trees and driveways. Project was awarded Active Transportation funding through the 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. Staff are currently working with Progressive Rail and Canadian Pacific Kansas City to resolve concerns with a new railroad crossing, which may delay construction to 2027. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking systemA. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 71 of 220 % of Total 36% 64% 100% 1. Project:73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal Blvd) 2a. Total project cost:$1,401,200 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,336,200 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $65,000 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $200,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $1,336,200 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $500,000 $435,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$901,200 $901,200 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal Blvd) 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,401,200 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,401,200 $1,336,200 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along E 73rd Street and Diagonal Blvd to MSAS 369 (Cedar Ave S). Sidewalk location along the north side of the corridor was determined by the City’s public engagement process. New ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. Minor right-of-way acquisitions and temporary construction easements will be required. Project was awarded Active Transportation funding through the Met Council’s 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 72 of 220 % of Total 31% 69% 100% 1. Project:Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 2a. Total project cost:$580,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$548,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $32,000 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $694,500 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $548,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $179,000 $147,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$401,000 $401,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $580,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $580,000 $548,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct approximately 0.25 miles of new sidewalk near Sheridan Hills Elementary School, including traffic calming and pedestrian safety features at the intersections of 64th/Thomas, 64th/Sheridan, and 64th/Russell. Project was identified during the 2024 SRTS Design Assistance study and was awarded Safe Routes to School funding through the 2024 Infrastructure Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 73 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,200,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $1,200,000 $1,200,000 8. Brief summary of project:The concrete pavement panels and pavement joints on 77th Street are beginning to fail in certain areas and will need major maintenance in the near future to avoid full reconstruction. This work will address the worst areas of pavement failure, primarily east of Portland Ave. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $1,200,000 $1,200,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $100,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $1,100,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:77th Street Pavement Maintenance 2a. Total project cost:$1,200,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,200,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 74 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:78th Street Lighting 2a. Total project cost:$500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$500,000 3. Years to complete:3 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $200,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $100,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$500,000 $500,000 100%User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 78th Street Lighting 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 8. Brief summary of project:MnDOT will be adding pedestrian level lighting (paid for by the City) to several trail segments constructed in Phase 1 of the I-494 project. Due to issues with the way the design-build contract was written, there are several gaps in the trail network that will not have lighting constructed, and the City will need to backfill with pedestrian and street lighting. These areas are 78th Street west of Penn, 78th Street from Pleasant Ave to Nicollet Ave, and 78th Street from Nicollet Ave to Portland Ave. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 75 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:ADA Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$1,100,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,000,000 3. Years to complete:6 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2024 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $100,000 2027 CIP $200,000 2030 CIP $200,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $200,000 2028 CIP $200,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$1,100,000 $1,000,000 100%User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - ADA Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,100,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,100,000 $1,000,000 8. Brief summary of project:Staff completed a City-wide inventory of pedestrian ramps and sidewalks in 2023. This inventory will be used to identify missing or non- compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way and program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. This may include sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 76 of 220 % of Total 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $280,000 * Annually Beyond 2031 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $280,000 $280,000 8. Brief summary of project:As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities are made on a regular basis. $40,000 of funds are identified each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain available for future use. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$280,000 $280,000 100%User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $40,000 2028 CIP $40,000 2031 CIP $40,000 2026 CIB Revised $40,000 2029 CIP $40,000 Beyond 2031 *$40,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2019 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $40,000 2030 CIP $40,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$40,000 annually 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$40,000 annually 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 77 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$40,000 annually 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$40,000 annually 3. Years to complete:Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2019 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $40,000 2030 CIP $40,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $40,000 2028 CIP $40,000 2031 CIP $40,000 2026 CIB Revised $40,000 2029 CIP $40,000 Beyond 2031 *$40,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$280,000 $280,000 100%User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $280,000 * Annually Beyond 2031 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $280,000 $280,000 8. Brief summary of project:Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. $40,000 of funds are identified each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain available for future use. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 78 of 220 % of Total 25% 100% 1. Project:Nicollet Ave Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$8,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$7,860,000 3. Years to complete:4 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2024 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $140,000 2027 CIP $5,740,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $7,500,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $2,120,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $5,000,000 $4,860,000 63%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 13%Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$2,000,000 $2,000,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Nicollet Ave Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $8,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $8,000,000 $7,860,000 8. Brief summary of project:Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 77th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant led a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s public engagement process to guide the roadway design in 2023 and 2024. Staff are pursuing state bond funding to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27). Early project expenses are paid from existing City resources and will be reimbursed following the sale of G.O. bonds closer to project construction. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 79 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Pavement Management Program 2a. Total project cost:$4,230,000 over six years 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$4,230,000 3. Years to complete:Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2019 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $755,000 2030 CIP $845,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $737,000 2028 CIP $795,000 2031 CIP $770,000 2026 CIB Revised $345,000 2029 CIP $720,000 Beyond 2031 Varies annually Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$4,230,000 $4,230,000 100%User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Pavement Management Program 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $4,230,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $4,230,000 $4,230,000 8. Brief summary of project:In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 80 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Traffic Signal Replacements 2a. Total project cost:$2,665,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,665,000 3. Years to complete:3 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $900,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $805,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $120,000 2029 CIP $840,000 Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $2,665,000 $2,665,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Traffic Signal Replacements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,665,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $2,665,000 $2,665,000 8. Brief summary of project:The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the ends of their expected life-cycles between 2025 and 2035. The signals will need to be replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total cost of signal replacements is $2.67M, with the first signal components being replaced no earlier than 2027 due to the ongoing 494 project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 81 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:69th Street Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$7,690,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$7,690,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $413,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $7,000,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $277,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,240,000 $3,240,000 42%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$4,450,000 $4,450,000 58%Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 69th Street Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $7,690,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $7,690,000 $7,690,000 8. Brief summary of project:The project includes reconstruction of 69th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including narrowing of the roadway to add sidewalk to one side, reconstruction of retaining walls, lining or replacement of sanitary sewer, and replacement of storm sewer. The final roadway section will be determined following the City’s public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 82 of 220 % of Total 20% 80% 100% 1. Project:76th Street & I-35W Intersection Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$750,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$750,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $750,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $150,000 $150,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$600,000 $600,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 76th Street & I-35W Intersection Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $750,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $750,000 $750,000 8. Brief summary of project:The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail currently passes through the on and off ramps to I-35W at 76th Street, creating a safety risk for pedestrians and bicyclists using the trail. This project would modify the interchange ramp terminal designs to create a safer intersection for pedestrians and bicyclists using the trail. Ultimate design would be done in coordination with MnDOT and via the City’s public engagement process following a joint study beginning in 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 83 of 220 % of Total 6% 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $12,800,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $12,800,000 $12,600,000 8. Brief summary of project:This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street led by Hennepin County. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement/rehabilitation. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$5,000,000 $5,000,000 39%Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $7,000,000 $7,000,000 55%Municipal State Aid (M) $800,000 $600,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $300,000 2028 CIP $6,000,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $300,000 2029 CIP $6,000,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 $200,000 2027 CIP $300,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$12,800,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$12,600,000 3. Years to complete:2 Page 84 of 220 % of Total 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 76th and Knox Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $4,350,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $4,350,000 $4,350,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project consists of the conversion of the existing signalized intersection at W 76th St (MSAS 361) and Knox Ave S in the City of Richfield to a roundabout, including improvements to active transportation facilities that use the intersection. Ultimate design of the intersection will be determined through the City’s public engagement process. Permanent right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Project was selected for Regional Solicitation in the 2024 cycle, with a FY 2029 construction date. The Regional Solicitation grant covers 80% of the estimated construction costs and City is responsible for funding the remaining construction costs and all design and right-of-way costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)$2,687,040 $2,687,040 62%Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $1,662,960 $1,662,960 38%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $150,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $50,000 2029 CIP $3,800,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $350,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:76th and Knox Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$4,350,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$4,350,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 85 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland) 2a. Total project cost:$1,800,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,800,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP $1,625,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $175,000 Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$1,800,000 $1,800,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland) 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,800,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,800,000 $1,800,000 8. Brief summary of project: Construction of a sidewalk along 68th St from Lyndale Ave to Nicollet Ave was included in the 2018 Pedestrian Master Plan; the 2023 Active Transportation Action Plan further identified 68th St between Lyndale Ave and Cedar Ave as a Priority Neighborhood Route. This project programs a sidewalk between Lyndale Ave and Portland Ave to fulfill goals in both plans and better fit current grant funding opportunities. Project includes narrowing the roadway by reconstructing a curb line, reconstruction of storm sewer, and reconstruction of any utility conflicts. Project will be advanced if awarded grant funding through Regional Solicitation. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 86 of 220 % of Total 67% 100% 1. Project:73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 2a. Total project cost:$7,500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$7,500,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP $7,500,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $2,500,000 $2,500,000 33%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$5,000,000 $5,000,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $7,500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $7,500,000 $7,500,000 8. Brief summary of project:Replacement of 73rd St pedestrian bridge over I-35W. The existing bridge is not ADA accessible, narrow, and disconnected from the existing pedestrian and bike network. MnDOT has indicated that funding is available for this project in FY2030. The City will continue to identify and apply for grant funding opportunities to cover the local costs for this project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 87 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale) 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,113,500 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,113,500 $1,113,500 8. Brief summary of project:Construction of a 10' bituminous trail from 35W to Lyndale Ave along 73rd Street is included in the Pedestrian Master Plan. Project includes narrowing the roadway by reconstructing a curb line, reconstruction of storm sewer, and reconstruction of any utility conflicts. Project will be advanced if awarded grant funding through Regional Solicitation. This project will likely be constructed concurrently with the 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$1,113,500 $1,113,500 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $113,500 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP $1,000,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale) 2a. Total project cost:$1,113,500 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,113,500 3. Years to complete:1 Page 88 of 220 % of Total 18% 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 76th Street West Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $5,700,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $5,700,000 $5,700,000 8. Brief summary of project:Reconstruction of 76th Street between Sheridan Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including intersection control at Upton Avenue, replacement of City utilities, undergrounding of overhead utilities, retaining wall and sidewalk replacement. The exact design of the roadway will be determined through a public engagement process. The City will continue pursuing grant funding, however the project will need to be completed due to deteriorating stormwater utilities, regardless of if grant funding is obtained. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X)$1,000,000 Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: $1,000,000 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$600,000 $600,000 11%Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $4,100,000 $4,100,000 72%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $700,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP $5,000,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:76th Street West Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$5,700,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$5,700,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 89 of 220 % of Total 30% 100% 1. Project:63rd Street Greenway 2a. Total project cost:$3,700,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$3,700,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $3,700,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $1,100,000 $1,100,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)$2,600,000 $2,600,000 70%Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 63rd Street Greenway 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $3,700,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $3,700,000 $3,700,000 8. Brief summary of project:This project would create a trail connection on 63rd Street between Taft Park and Veterans Park. Project would include removing thru access on 63rd Street from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave, creating a linear park while maintaining driveway access for all residents. Ultimate design of the linear park would be based on a public outreach and engagement process. This project would only be implemented if grant funding can be secured. Current estimate assumes a grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs and all of the design/engineering costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 90 of 220 % of Total 29% 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 70th Street Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $4,450,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $4,450,000 $4,450,000 8. Brief summary of project:Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd Avenue and 5th Avenue, including sidewalk, curb, and gutter as well as undergrounding of parallel utilities. Additionally, reconstruction will replace City utilities, including an 84” storm sewer pipe that will connect to the storm system installed with the Portland Avenue project. The existing pipe is being monitored for condition, and rate of deterioration may impact the year of reconstruction. The current conditions have been identified as high risk through the Stormwater Risk Assessment. Design of the roadway will include a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$3,150,000 $3,150,000 71%Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $1,300,000 $1,300,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $4,450,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:70th Street Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$4,450,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$4,450,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 91 of 220 % of Total 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $3,600,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $3,600,000 $3,600,000 8. Brief summary of project:Currently, the intersection of 76th Street and 77th Street—two of the highest volume local roads in Richfield—is an unsignalized “T” intersection that carries approximately 16,000 vehicles per day. The exact design of the intersection and the intersection control method will be determined through a technical analysis. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,600,000 $3,600,000 100%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $3,600,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:76th/77th Street Intersection Control 2a. Total project cost:$3,600,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$3,600,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 92 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:77th Street Reconstruction - Lyndale to Portland 2a. Total project cost:$25,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$25,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $25,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $25,000,000 $25,000,000 100%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 77th Street Reconstruction - Lyndale to Portland 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $25,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $25,000,000 $25,000,000 8. Brief summary of project:Reconstruction of approximately 1 mile of 77th Street between Lyndale Ave and Portland Ave. Project goals would address pedestrian/bicycle access in the corridor and right-sizing of the roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the roadway would be determined through the City’s public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 93 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:77th Street Reconstruction - Penn to Lyndale 2a. Total project cost:$25,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$25,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $25,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $25,000,000 $25,000,000 100%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 77th Street Reconstruction - Penn to Lyndale 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $25,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $25,000,000 $25,000,000 8. Brief summary of project:Reconstruction of approximately 1 mile of 76th and 77th Street between Penn Ave and Lyndale Ave. Project goals would address pedestrian/bicycle access in the corridor and right-sizing of the roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the roadway would be determined through the City’s public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 94 of 220 % of Total 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - 77th Street Reconstruction - Portland to Richfield Parkway 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $10,500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $10,500,000 $10,500,000 8. Brief summary of project:Reconstruction of approximately 0.8 miles of 77th Street between Portland Ave and Richfield Parkway. Project goals would address pedestrian/bicycle access in the corridor, intersection safety at 12th Ave, Chicago Ave, Bloomington Ave, and 14th Ave, and right-sizing of the roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the roadway would be determined through the City’s public engagement process. Project vision is a boulevard design acting as a gateway to the City from MSP Terminal 2 and the Mall of America through the 77th Street Underpass. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 10%Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $9,500,000 $9,500,000 90%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $10,500,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:77th Street Reconstruction - Portland to Richfield Parkway 2a. Total project cost:$10,500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$10,500,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 95 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd 2a. Total project cost:$1,800,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,800,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $1,800,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $1,800,000 $1,800,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,800,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,800,000 $1,800,000 8. Brief summary of project:Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash rate. Multiple intersections nearby have sharp angles and difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Permanent intervention requires realignment of three intersections (Bloomington/72nd, Diagonal/72nd, Bloomington/Diagonal). A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 96 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway 2a. Total project cost:$1,800,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,800,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $1,800,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $1,800,000 $1,800,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,800,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,800,000 $1,800,000 8. Brief summary of project:Bloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash rate. Multiple intersections nearby can have difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Metro Transit Route 14 also runs through the intersection area. Permanent intervention requires realignment of two intersections (Bloomington Ave/63rd St, Bloomington Ave/Richfield Pkwy). A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 97 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$11,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$11,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $11,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $7,000,000 $7,000,000 64%Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$4,000,000 $4,000,000 36%Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $11,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $11,000,000 $11,000,000 8. Brief summary of project:Reconstruction of Humboldt Avenue and Lake Shore Drive between 69th Street and 75th Street. A public engagement process will take place to identify the future road section and continuity. The reconstruction will include replacement of City utilities. Portions of this project may be included in the 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge project; if that occurs, this project scope and funding would be adjusted accordingly. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 98 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2a. Total project cost:$4,900,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$4,900,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $4,900,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $4,900,000 $4,900,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $4,900,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $4,900,000 $4,900,000 8. Brief summary of project:This project includes reconstruction of Lyndale Ave between 65th St and Hwy 62. The project would “right-size” the roadway and modernize the corridor to match the Lyndale Ave corridor south of 66th St. The project would include a full public engagement process to determine the final design. The Lyndale Ave Reconstruction project is not planned to occur until the existing pavement and surface infrastructure reach end-of- life. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 99 of 220 % of Total 5% 5% 90% 100% Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form - TH 62 Noise Barrier East 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $11,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $11,000,000 $11,000,000 8. Brief summary of project:Richfield is interested in installing a noise wall on the south side of TH 62 from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave. This installation requires collaboration with MnDOT and City of Minneapolis. Installation will only be pursued if the City is successful in obtaining funding from MnDOT’s Standalone Noise Barrier Program. Currently, this project does not have identified funding from City of Minneapolis, but does have Minneapolis’ continued interest. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S)$9,900,000 $9,900,000 G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$550,000 $550,000 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $550,000 $550,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $11,000,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:TH 62 Noise Barrier East 2a. Total project cost:$11,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$11,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 100 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $200,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $200,000 $200,000 8. Brief summary of project: The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system cybersecurity upgrade will modernize all hardware within the SCADA network that controls the water treatment plant and other utility systems in Richfield. Much of the existing equipment is outdated (some components are nearly 20 years old) which increases the risk of failure and makes the system more vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. Upgrading to new hardware will significantly improve system reliability and performance, enabling faster response times to operational changes. In addition, the new equipment will incorporate enhanced security features designed to better protect critical infrastructure from unauthorized access and cyberattacks. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$200,000 $200,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $50,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $50,000 2029 CIP $50,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $50,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade 2a. Total project cost:$200,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$200,000 3. Years to complete:5 Page 101 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Elevator Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $200,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $200,000 $200,000 8. Brief summary of project: The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it has become difficult to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily to transport equipment, chemicals, visitors, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It also satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with modern technology. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$200,000 $200,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $175,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $150,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $50,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Water Plant Elevator Replacement 2a. Total project cost:$200,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$200,000 3. Years to complete:2 Page 102 of 220 % of Total 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Generator 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $2,500,000 $2,500,000 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at the water treatment plant has reached the point where maintenance and problem solving are too frequent. In addition, the integrated fuel tank and housing are badly corroded. Repairing the current unit is not advantageous due to the age, the cost to implement the needed repairs, and the minimal return on such an investment. There has also been a shift in the industry and technology for more efficient ways of providing a generator backup system for a building of this type and power demand. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. A study was commissioned in 2024 to ascertain the design needs and future costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$2,500,000 $2,500,000 100%Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $100,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $2,400,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Water Plant Generator 2a. Total project cost:$2,500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,500,000 3. Years to complete:2 Page 103 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Sludge Pump #2 Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $50,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $50,000 $50,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project will include the procurement and installation of one new sludge pump at the water treatment plant (the last of three sludge pumps to be replaced). The frequent efforts required for maintenance and repair has become untenable for plant operations9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$50,000 $50,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $50,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $50,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Water Plant Sludge Pump #2 Replacement 2a. Total project cost:$50,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$50,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 104 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $300,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $300,000 $300,000 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station 6, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Project also will improve concrete slab around wet well to solve drainage issues9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$300,000 $300,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $300,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Sanitary Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation 2a. Total project cost:$300,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$300,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 105 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,400,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $2,000,000 $2,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The storm sewer collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced concrete pipe. A cleaning and inspection program is conducted annually to determine the condition of the sewer mains and structures. Sewer mains and structures that are identified as being in poor condition will be replaced or rehabilitated with the means and methods that are in-line with industry standards. The rehabilitation will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$2,000,000 $2,000,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $200,000 2028 CIP $200,000 2031 CIP $200,000 2026 CIB Revised $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2031 *$200,000 * Annually beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2019 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 NA 2027 CIP $200,000 2030 CIP $200,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System 2a. Total project cost:$200,000 annually 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$200,000 annually 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 106 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $5,400,000 * Annually Beyond 2031, through 2050 (estimated) Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $5,400,000 $5,400,000 8. Brief summary of project: The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP). As these VCP pipes age, tree root intrusion and cracking become more common. In order to preserve an appropriate level of service to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, portions of the wastewater collection system undergo cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining. Lining consists of placement of a liner in the existing clay pipe, which is adhered to the pipe wall and cured through the use of steam, hot water, or ultraviolet light. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, effectively restoring structural integrity. This rehabilitation technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the line. It is anticipated that this program will be ongoing until the entire wastewater collection system is rehabilitated, based upon funding availability. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$5,400,000 $5,400,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $900,000 2028 CIP $900,000 2031 CIP $900,000 2026 CIB Revised $900,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 *$900,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2017 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 NA 2027 CIP $900,000 2030 CIP $900,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 2a. Total project cost:$900,000 annually 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$900,000 annually 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 107 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Restroom Renovations - WTP Second Floor 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $200,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $200,000 $200,000 8. Brief summary of project: The restrooms at the water plant date back to the 1960s and remain largely unchanged. The second-level restrooms, in particular, are in urgent need of renovation to address outdated conditions and to meet current ADA accessibility standards. This project will renovate existing water plant restrooms for ADA compliance and modernization. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$200,000 $200,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $200,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Restroom Renovations - WTP Second Floor 2a. Total project cost:$200,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$200,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 108 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$225,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$225,000 3. Years to complete:2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2025 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $100,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $100,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $125,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$225,000 $225,000 Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $225,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $225,000 $225,000 8. Brief summary of project: The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room floor inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 109 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$125,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$125,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $125,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$125,000 $125,000 Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $125,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $125,000 $125,000 8. Brief summary of project: The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 revealed certain health and safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water plant has the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA compliant. Public works staff retained a consultant to formulate a design that mitigates these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 110 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Water System Interconnect 2a. Total project cost:$5,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$5,000,000 3. Years to complete:2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2025 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $4,900,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $100,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$3,909,000 $3,909,000 78%Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)$1,091,000 $1,091,000 22%Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Water System Interconnect 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $5,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $5,000,000 $5,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The water treatment plant was built in 1963 and to date has been a standalone system. If it were to have a catastrophic failure and unable to produce water, the city is not equipped with a long-term emergency backup water source. Connecting to another city’s water system would create the needed level of service redundancy. As part of the DNR’s water supply plan, they encourage all cities to have an emergency backup water source. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 111 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Well #3 Water Service 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $50,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $50,000 $50,000 8. Brief summary of project: A ¾ inch water service extends out to the Well #3 building at the water plant. The water service was constructed in a manner that exposes a length of copper to the outside elements as it traverses from within the plant to the well house. This length of pipe has burst on several occasions due to the cold weather rendering the well useless. This project will include the design, construction, and oversight of construction of a water service extension that is frost protected. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$50,000 $50,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $50,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Well #3 Water Service 2a. Total project cost:$50,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$50,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 112 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 8. Brief summary of project: The Wilson Pond subwatershed is located in the southeast quadrant of the City. This subwatershed is subject to flooding during heavy rain events. The low-lying nature of the subwatershed makes it challenging to manage stormwater within the regional pond (Wilson Pond) system. Public Works staff have updated the stormwater model to reflect current flood risk conditions based on available data. The results of the model will be used to explore engineering alternatives to reduce the flood risk to the immediate neighborhoods. A design will be selected from the alternatives analysis that yields the most benefit. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $400,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $100,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 2a. Total project cost:$500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$500,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 113 of 220 % of Total 45% 45% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - HUB Redevelopment Participation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,560,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,560,000 $1,560,000 8. Brief summary of project:In conjunction with redevelopment of the HUB shopping center property, the City will work with the developer to construct stormwater infrastructure that will address regional flooding of public right-of-way near the HUB property. The infrastructure will be designed to handle runoff from public right-of-way, as well as anticipated developed conditions on the HUB property. The costs for this infrastructure will be shared between the City and the developer. The City will also likely share cost to complete sidewalk installation along 65th St that was not constructed with the 65th St Reconstruction Project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$160,000 $160,000 10%User Fee (U)$700,000 $700,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$700,000 $700,000 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $1,560,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:HUB Redevelopment Participation 2a. Total project cost:$1,560,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,560,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 114 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Water Plant Filter Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 2a. Total project cost:$500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$500,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $500,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000 Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Filter Meda Replacement and Rehabilitation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 8. Brief summary of project: The filter media at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Industry standards state that filter media of this type has a lifespan of roughly 20-years. The current media was replaced in 2006. This project will include a full exchange of the current sand media, or an engineered media, in the event of the water chemistry changing and driving this need. This effort will also include a coatings improvement effort to the walls of the filter bays and new actuating valves. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 115 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station 4 Rehabilitation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $350,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $350,000 $350,000 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of sanitary lift station 4, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment including pumps and valves. Dry well pit to be updated to current safety standards 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $350,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Sanitary Lift Station 4 Rehabilitation 2a. Total project cost:$350,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$350,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 116 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 2a. Total project cost:$137,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$137,000,000 3. Years to complete:50-75 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP $3,000,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP $3,000,000 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 *$131,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $137,000,000 Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$137,000,000 Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $137,000,000 * $3,000,000 Annually Beyond 2031, through 2075 (estimated) Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X TOTAL $137,000,000 $137,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The water distribution system is nearing the end of its functional life. Industry standards for cast iron pipe – which is the primary pipe material within the distribution system – is 75 years. This watermain rehabilitation program has been structured to either replace or rehabilitate (in-situ) the distribution system within the next 50-75 years. A recent study revealed that the present worth for replacement/rehabilitation is whole is $137 Million. As years pass we expect this cost to increase, which is why this is programmed for years beyond 50-years. This will be ongoing replacement and may be accelerated using bonding as needed and/or to avoid inflation. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 117 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Sanitary Lift Station #1 Rehabilitation 2a. Total project cost:$350,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$350,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP $350,000 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000 Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station #1 Rehabilitation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $350,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $350,000 $350,000 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station #1, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Update building with new HVAC and new roof. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 118 of 220 % of Total 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Logan Water Tower Coating 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $2,000,000 $2,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The 1 million gallon Logan Ave water tower was originally constructed in 1962. The tower provides water pressure and storage to the residents of Richfield. The interior and exterior were last reconditioned in 2011. This tower still has the old city logo. The typical life span of these types of coatings is 15-20 years. This project is programmed for 2035. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$2,000,000 $2,000,000 100%Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $2,000,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Logan Water Tower Coating 2a. Total project cost:$2,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 119 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Penn Tower Coating 2a. Total project cost:$2,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $2,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$2,000,000 $2,000,000 100%Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Penn Tower Coating 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $2,000,000 $2,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The 1.5 million gallon Penn Ave water tower was originally constructed in 1963. A reapplication of the interior and exterior protective coatings will be required at Penn Tower. The interior was last reconditioned in 2007, and the exterior of the tank was repainted in 2017. Recent inspections revealed that the integrity of the coating is intact and the need is very low for corrective actions. This project is scheduled for 2037. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 120 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Lobby Restroom Renovations 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $185,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $185,000 $185,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project would renovate the lobby restrooms, bring them up to date with the current ADA standards. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$185,000 $185,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $185,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Water Plant Lobby Restroom Renovation 2a. Total project cost:$185,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$185,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 121 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station #2 Rehabilitation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $350,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $350,000 $350,000 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of sanitary lift station #2, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Update building with new HVAC and new roof. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $350,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Sanitary Lift Station #2 Rehabilitation 2a. Total project cost:$350,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$350,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 122 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station #3 Rehabilitation 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $350,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $350,000 $350,000 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of sanitary lift station #3, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $350,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Sanitary Lift Station #3 Rehabilitation 2a. Total project cost:$350,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$350,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 123 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $100,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $100,000 $100,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project would bring all of the handrails and guardrails in the water plant up to current ADA standards. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$100,000 $100,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $100,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement 2a. Total project cost:$100,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$100,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 124 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Painting 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $40,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $40,000 $40,000 8. Brief summary of project: Painting the wall and floors through out the interior of the water plant along with the exterior concrete pilings. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$40,000 $40,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $40,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Water Plant Painting 2a. Total project cost:$40,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$40,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 125 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 2a. Total project cost:$500,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$500,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $500,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000 Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $500,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 8. Brief summary of project: An evaluation was completed in 2023 to review the integrity of the coatings on the pipes within the water treatment plant pipe gallery. The evaluation revealed a loss of the protective coatings on the pipes along with observations of corrosion of the pipe, pipe-joints and hardware, and supporting beams in certain locations. The coatings effort will need to be completed within the next ten- year cycle. This project will fund the work and oversight of this effort. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 126 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Well #2 Generator 2a. Total project cost:$1,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $1,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 Land use compatibility: Community support:X Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Well #2 Generator 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:X TOTAL $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at Well 2 is nearing its life-cycle and will require replacement. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 127 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1. Project:Well #5 Generator 2a. Total project cost:$1,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 $1,000,000 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Utilities Project Summary Form - Well #5 Generator 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at Well #5 is nearing the end of its useful life-cycle and will require replacement. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 128 of 220 % of Total 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Carpet Replacement - Fire Station #1 and Police 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $120,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $120,000 $120,000 8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the police and fire department is worn and past it's life expectancy. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $120,000 $120,000 100%Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $120,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $120,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Government Buildings Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Carpet Replacement - Police and Fire 2a. Total project cost:$120,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$120,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 129 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F) Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Richfield Liquor Cedar Point 2027 Capital Budget (CIB)2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $774,502 Fleet Special Revenue (FSR)Xcel Energy (X) TOTAL $774,502 $774,502 2026 - $7,500.00 - Replace 1 of 2 cooler compressors 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: 2027 - $260,560. - Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below garage to eliminate water intrusion(199,699.50), Replace damaged concreate sidewalks and calking (56,785.30), add blower fans to prevent moisture accumulation on cooler doors (4,075.50) 2029 - $11,126.37 - Replace weatherstripping seal on cooler doors (2,373.63), replace asphalt paving at south of building and calking joint to building (8,752.74) 2030 - (17,053.02) - Replace electric water heater, near end of life (5,452.96), replace cracked concrete receiving dock slab and site drainage system. 2031 - (38,556.87) - Replace fire alarm system, near end of life. 2031< - (439,705.83) - Parking lot repair/replacement & geotechnical survey (39,411.24), Roof replacement (266,219.08), repaint trim in office suite (1,615.09), replace worn carpet in office suite (3,633.95), repaint gypsum walls in office suite (10,901.85), replace worn countertops and casework (33,035.89), prep and paint walls in stairwell (4,463.38), replace damaged bollards by loading dock (1,545.54), replace damage dock bumper (5,409.39), replace damaged block by loading dock wall (21,444.35), clean water stains from exterior leaks on concrete blocks in basement (12,364.31), Landscaping allowance for site improvements (40,377.20). Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve (X)Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$774,502 $774,502 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $0 2031 CIP $38,557 2026 CIB Revised $7,500 2029 CIP $11,126 Beyond 2031 $439,706 1. Project:Richfield Liquor Cedar Point (Wold Assessment) 2a. Total project cost:$774,502 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$774,502 3. Years to complete:10 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Liquor Operations Government Buildings Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $260,560 2030 CIP $17,053 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: Page 130 of 220 % of Total 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Fleet Vehicle Purchases 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $14,122,906 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $14,122,906 $14,122,906 8. Brief summary of project: The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to provide City Services. This project is ongoing in which the Division makes vehicle purchases every year. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $14,122,906 $14,122,906 100%Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $1,664,726 2028 CIP $1,874,250 2031 CIP $2,295,400 2026 CIB Revised $1,664,726 2029 CIP $1,967,960 Beyond 2031 $2,410,170 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?N/A 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $1,785,000 2030 CIP $2,125,400 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Fleet Vehicle Purchases 2a. Total project cost:$14,122,906 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$14,122,906 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 131 of 220 % of Total 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Public Works Facility Building Improvements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,427,700 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $2,427,700 $2,427,700 8. Brief summary of project: A number of building maintenance items that need to be addressed were found in a recent Facility Study. The building items vary from HVAC component replacement to repairing water intrusion into the building. This is an ongoing project and maintenance items have been prioritized by City Staff. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $37,700 $37,700 2%Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $2,390,000 $2,390,000 98%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $235,000 2031 CIP $415,000 2026 CIB Revised $37,700 2029 CIP $235,000 Beyond 2031 $695,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $460,000 2030 CIP $350,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Public Works Facility Building Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$2,427,700 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,427,700 3. Years to complete:Ongoing Page 132 of 220 % of Total 15% 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $340,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $340,000 $340,000 8. Brief Summary of Project: The Public Works Department is running out of office space and room for additional staff. Currently there is not an identified work area for a GIS Analyst that has not been hired and an identified hire date of June 1, 2026. This project includes adding 2 offices and some HVAC components. This project will fulfil an immediate space need but does not eliminate the need for other area upgrades that are needed in the future including new carpet, new office cube equipment, and HVAC repairs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $290,000 $290,000 85%Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$50,000 $50,000 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $50,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $290,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades 2a. Total project cost:$340,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$340,000 3. Years to complete:2 Page 133 of 220 % of Total 44% 34% 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Public Works Storage Facility 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $1,475,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $1,475,000 $1,475,000 8. Brief summary of project: The City built its current maintenance facility with an understanding that ongoing storage needs could be accommodated off-site. Historically, the City had relied on the MnDOT Cedar Ave Station to provide the salt needed for the winter season via an ongoing agreement and did not need to store salt on site. This agreement was modified in 2021 and MnDOT has chosen to no longer provide salt to the city. In addition, the site the City is currently using for temporary storage for tree debris, sweepings, water main break debris etc., is a short-term solution, requiring the City to identify a new location to be used for its storage needs. In 2025 MnDOT conveyed a parcel of land along the west side of TH 77 and north of Diagonal Blvd to the City which will become the future storage site. Construction is anticipated in 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X10. Priority ranking systemA. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility:X Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)$325,000 $325,000 22%User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000 Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$650,000 $650,000 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $1,475,000 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised $1,475,000 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Public Works Storage Facility 2a. Total project cost:$1,475,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$1,475,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 134 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Computer Workstation Replacements 2a. Total project cost:$458,511 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$458,511 3. Years to complete: 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Information Technologies Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $70,000 2030 CIP $77,610 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $72,450 2031 CIP $80,327 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $74,986 Beyond 2031 $83,138 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) $458,511 $458,511 100% Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Computer Workstation Replacements 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $458,511 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $458,511 $458,511 8. Brief summary of project: Annual replacement of City desktop and laptop computer workstations based on the established four-year lifecycle replacement schedule to maintain reliable, secure, and supported technology for City operations. This project also includes funding for additional computer workstations needed to support departmental growth, operational needs, and changing staffing requirements across the organization. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 135 of 220 % of Total 10% 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $85,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $85,000 $85,000 8. Brief summary of project: Fire Station 1 was built with a commercial exhaust detection system that uses the apparatus bays normal HVAC system to evacuate. The industry standard for fire station apparatus bays is to have a dedicated ventilation system that activates when trucks are started to capture all exhaust fumes and diesel particulate. Fire Station 2 was upgraded with a dedicated exhaust system in 2026 with funding from a federal FEMA Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG). An AFG will be applied for in 2027 to fund the placement of the same dedicated exhaust system in Fire Station 1. This type of grant requires a 10% match that the city is expected to fund and will be accounted for in the 2027 proposed budget. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No10. Priority ranking systemA. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)$76,500 $76,500 90%Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$8,500 $8,500 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Fire Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $85,000 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System 2a. Total project cost:$85,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$85,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 136 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 1.Project:Fire Station 2 Capital Needs 2a. Total project cost:$2,348,286 (2027 dollars) 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,348,286 3.Years to complete:6 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Government Buildings Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP $306,406 2030 CIP $324,007 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $599,601 2031 CIP $379,403 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $352,173 Beyond 2031 $386,696 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST)Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)$2,348,286 $2,348,286 Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Fire Station 2 Repairs 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,348,286 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $2,348,286 $2,348,286 8.Brief summary of project: Fire Station 2 was originally built in 1964 and remodeled in 2013. The city just completed a facilities study that looked at multiple city buildings, one being Fire Station 2. This study identified many structural, safety, cosmetic and programmatic changes required to protect the structural asset as well as the employees working and living within it. The study assigned priorities and costs to each identified need, and this list was reviewed and refined by Interim Fire Chief Coppa. The estimated repair and replacement costs needed to satisfy the items identified inthe facilities study total $2.454M (2027 costs) over six years. While this addresses the currently identified needs, it fails to address the lack of essential modern safety features and needed programmatic spaces that will need to be addressed in the near future. The current station would need to be replaced with a building costing approximately $7,150,000 in 2027 dollars with a projected cost increase of 5-6% per year after. A policy discussion needs to determine where the financial priorities lie and whether it makes more sense to pay for repairs and maintenance to the existing building or consider a new building. 9.Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No 10. Priority ranking systemA. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 137 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% 2a. Total project cost:$2,120,114 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,120,114 3. Years to complete:10 Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Richfield Liquor Downtown2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Richfield Liquor Downtown (Wold Assessment) 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $399,535 2030 CIP $0 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Liquor Operations Government Buildings 2026 CIB Revised $0 2029 CIP $0 Beyond 2031 $37,349 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $21,720 2031 CIP $1,661,509 TOTAL $2,120,114 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$)CIB-CIPAmount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M)$2,120,114 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O)$2,120,114 Hennepin County (C)State (S) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve (X)Expand $2,120,114 2027 - (399,534.85) Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below grade to eliminate water infiltration (321,964.50), Replace damaged sidewalk (31,788.90), replace damaged caulk joint around entire building perimeter (6,384.95), replace water heater, near end of life (5,434.00), replace corroded stainless steel flue for boilers (33,962.50) 2028 - (21,720.38) replace crumbling concrete steps and galvanized hand rail by receiving dock (15,332.03), add glycol and chemical treatment to hydronic loop to prevent freezing coils in the future (6,388.35). 2031 - (1,661,509.45) replace damaged block by exterior stairs (648.01), patch cracks along fault line in block foundation wall (2,916.07), replace damaged cooler double door weatherstrip (810.02), replace toilet, lave and utility sink plumbing fixtures (qty 5) ($29,970.68), replace exhaust fan, duct and grills in restrooms (14,580.33), replace baseboard head on sales floor and restrooms (12,150.27), replace existing heaters (2) near end of life (11,340.26), replace parking lot and conduct a geotechnical survey (568,146.81), replace rusting HM doors and frames on the exterior of the building (27,054.61), replace warn entry aluminum door and frame (11,340.26), replace leaking coping segment around parapet (1,782.04), replace boiler (243,005.48), replace main supply/return ductwork and insulation in loading dock (40,500.91), add supply air duct to restrooms (7,290.16), service replacement 400A panel and other panels (112,592.54), fire alarm system is near end of life (46,657.05), replace damaged tuck point brinks (14,580.33), clean water stained block (162), renovate single bathroom to include ada code (154,713.49), paint HM frames in receiving area (972.02), replace warn vct flooring and vinal base in office (1,620.04), replace countertops and case work on the sales floor (23,490.53), Replace roof (316,555.14), Seal polished concrete floor $14,418.33), removed abandoned McQuay heat reclaim blower in basement (1,944.04), install roof hatch and ships ladder (22,207.46), Landscaping allowance (15,141.45). TOTAL $2,120,114 Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Page 138 of 220 % of Total 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Network Infrastructure Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $600,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $600,000 $600,000 8. Brief summary of project: This project provides for the phased replacement of network switches that have reached or are approaching Cisco end of support status over a three-year cycle. Much of the City’s network infrastructure replacement schedule had previously been deferred, resulting in aging equipment with increased risk of failure and cybersecurity concerns. Cisco end of support means the manufacturer no longer provides security updates, software patches, or technical support for the equipment. Switches will be replaced in priority order based on their end of support dates to maintain reliable and secure network infrastructure for City operations and services. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources: Health/safety: B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) $600,000 $600,000 100% Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $50,186 2031 CIP $100,000 2026 CIB Revised $0 2029 CIP $172,488 Beyond 2031 $100,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2025 5. Responsible department:Information Technologies Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $77,326 2030 CIP $100,000 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Network Infrastructure Replacement 2a. Total project cost:$600,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$600,000 3. Years to complete: Page 139 of 220 % of Total 100% 1. Project:Carpet Replacement-City Hall 2a. Total project cost:$190,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost: 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Government Buildings Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP $190,000 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP Beyond 2031 Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR)Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $190,000 $190,000 100%Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Carpet Replacement - City Hall 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $190,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $190,000 $190,000 8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the main area's of City Hall are worn and need of replacement. We have past the life expectancy. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Page 140 of 220 % of Total 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - City Hall Wold Assessment 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $6,180,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $6,180,000 $6,180,000 8. Brief summary of project: As a result of the facilities study by Wold. Capital cost is expected in 2029 and continue for the next ten years. In 2029, they include, but not limited to replacing chiller, boilers, and pumps. In 2031, the fire alarm and BAS control is at the end of life. Beyond 2031, replacement of parking lot and painting all of City Hall. Funding sources will include $1.8 million that was transferred from Elections Fund to Capital Fund in 2026 and Building Fund. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $2,630,000 $2,630,000 43%Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,550,000 $3,550,000 57%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP $2,700,000 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $1,630,000 Beyond 2031 $1,850,000 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?2029 5. Responsible department:Government Buildings Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Municipal Building - City Hall 2a. Total project cost:$6,180,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$6,180,000 3. Years to complete:10 Page 141 of 220 % of Total 100% 100% Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve (X)Expand $885,711 2029 - (219,857.07) Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing eliminate water infiltration (204,725.20), replace sidewalk & building caulk joint to eliminate water infiltration (14,835.16), replace precast plank joint sealant in basement (296.70) 2031 - (33,858.76) Replace water heater, near end of life (5,670.13), Replace fire alarm system, near end of life (28,188.64) 2031< - (631,955.65) Parking lot repair/replacement & geotechnical engineering survey (325,552.01), replace damaged receiving dock bumper guards (5,652.81), replace damaged exterior brick NE corner of building (3,633.95), replace ceramic tile wall near base of cooler (807.54), paint gypsum walls on sales floor (10,296.19), replace warping gypsum wall board in office (2,018.86), paint office walls (1,816.97), clean water stains from exterior leaks on concrete blocks in basement storage (1,816.97), landscaping allowance for site improvements (15,141.45), roof replacement (265,218.90) TOTAL $885,711 Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X)Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Hennepin County (C)State (S) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Municipal State Aid (M) $885,711 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST)Other Funding (O)$885,711 TOTAL $885,711 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) 2026 CIB Revised $0 2029 CIP $219,857 Beyond 2031 $631,996 2026 CIB Adopted $0 2028 CIP $0 2031 CIP $33,859 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: Spent to Date – Through 2025 $0 2027 CIP $0 2030 CIP $0 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Liquor Operations Government Buildings 2a. Total project cost:$885,711 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$885,711 3. Years to complete:12 Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Richfield Liquor Penn Central 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Richfield Liquor Penn Central (Wold Assessment) Page 142 of 220 % of Total 100% Buildings IT & Fleet Project Summary Form - Public Works Facility Roof Replacement 2027 Capital Budget (CIB) 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) TOTAL $2,000,000 Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: TOTAL $2,000,000 $2,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The roof at the Public Works Facility is past it's useful life and is in need of replacement. A number of smaller maintenance items have been completed to extend the life which includes sealing the overhead skylight windows and making minor repairs where leaks have occurred. The Public Works Facility was constructed in 2008 and the average life span of a roof is 20 years. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) Xcel Energy (X) Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness:X Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand Protect existing resources:X Health/safety:X B. Indicate points for the following: Internal Special Revenue (ISR) Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL) Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U) Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) Special Revenue (SR) Hennepin County (C)State (S) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) Other Funding (O) G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation Funding (OR) Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) % of Total Funding Source Project Total Amount ($$) CIB-CIP Amount Total ($$) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $2,000,000 $2,000,000 100%Municipal State Aid (M) 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: 2026 CIB Adopted 2028 CIP 2031 CIP 2026 CIB Revised 2029 CIP $2,000,000 Beyond 2031 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department:Public Works Spent to Date – Through 2025 2027 CIP 2030 CIP 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 1. Project:Public Works Facility Building Improvements 2a. Total project cost:$2,000,000 2b. CIB/CIP cost:$2,000,000 3. Years to complete:1 Page 143 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE -$ B 3,273$ B - BST 14,727 BST20,000 SR 20,000 SR- O 207,941 O275,000 SR 275,000 SR- O 18,000 O 180,000 SR 90,000 SR 5,000,000 BST 5,339,645 BST - SR 90,000 SR - S 250,000 S1,000,000 BST 2,175,481 BST Community Center Building Community Center Building Community Center Building Repair Ice Arena ImprovementsMulti-Year Parks Major Maintenance Outdoor Pool Improvements Parks Master PlanVeterans Park Improvements Veterans Park Improvements Veterans Park Improvements Wood Lake Nature Center Building Wood Lake Nature Center Building - S 12,000,000 SWood Lake Trail Updates 50,000 O - OWood Lake Trail Updates 200,000 S - STOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 6,725,000$ 20,484,067$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 64th Street Sidewalk 165,000$ M 376,000$ M 64th Street Sidewalk - S 854,000 S69th Street Reconstruction - BU 277,000 BU73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)200,000 M 435,000 M73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)- S 901,200 S76th & Knox Improvements - F 50,000 F77th Street Pavement Maintenance - M 100,000 M Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 737,000 FF 345,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF 40,000 FFMulti-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF - FFMulti-Year Traffic Signal Replacements - M 120,000 MNicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)4,000,000 B 1,325,000 BNicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)3,500,000 BU 795,000 BUPenn Avenue Reconstruction 300,000 M 300,000 MSheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 150,000 M 147,000 MSheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 544,500 S 401,000 STOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 9,926,500$ 6,706,200$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U 900,000 U SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade - U 50,000 UWater Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 100,000 U 125,000 UWater Plant Elevator Replacement 175,000 U 150,000 UWater Plant Generator - BU 100,000 BUWater Plant Program Space Renovation 100,000 U - U Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 50,000 U 50,000 U Water System Interconnect - U 100,000 BU TOTAL UTILITIES 1,525,000$ 1,675,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Carpet Replacement - Fire -$ BSR 50,000$ BSR Carpet Replacement - Police 120,000 BSR 70,000 BSR Fiber Infrastructure Projects - Information Technologies 45,000 O 45,000 O Fire SCBA Purchase 450,000 O - O Laptop Purchases - Information Technologies 34,260 ISR 34,260 ISR Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment - O 7,500 O Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 1,664,726 FSR 1,664,726 FSR Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 10,650 ISR 10,650 ISR Public Works Facility Building Improvements - FSR 37,700 FSR Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades O 50,000 O Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 FF 325,000 FF Public Works Storage Facility 650,000 O 650,000 O Public Works Storage Facility 500,000 U 500,000 UTOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 3,799,636$ 3,444,836$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 21,976,136$ 32,310,103$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 4,000,000$ 1,328,273$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 120,000 120,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 6,000,000 7,529,853 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 3,500,000 1,272,000 (C) Hennepin County - - (F) Federal Grant - 50,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,392,000 950,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,664,726 1,702,426 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 44,910 44,910 (LTCR) Long Term Capital Reserve - - (M) Municipal State Aid 815,000 1,478,000 (O) Other Funding 1,195,000 978,441 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - - (S) State 744,500 14,406,200 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - - (U) User Fees 2,025,000 1,975,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 21,976,136$ 32,310,103$ 2026 Capital Improvement Budget 2026 Budget 2026 Revised Page 144 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 150,000$ SR27,273 B 122,727 BST 20,000 SR30,000 O55,000 SR 100,000 O 220,000 C90,000 SR2,010,768 BST160,000 SR Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement Community Center Building Community Center Building Community Center Building Repair Ice Arena ImprovementsMulti-Year Parks Major Maintenance Outdoor Pool Improvements Parks Building ImprovementsParks Master Plan Veterans Park ImprovementsVeterans Park Improvements Veterans Park Improvements 250,000 STOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 3,235,768$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 69th Street Reconstruction 413,000$ BU 76th & Knox Improvements 350,000 F77th Street Pavement Maintenance 1,100,000 M78th Street Lighting 200,000 FF Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Pavement Management Plan 755,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 900,000 MNicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)3,535,000 B Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)205,000 BUNicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)2,000,000 SPenn Avenue Reconstruction 300,000 MTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 10,038,000$ UTILITIES Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation 300,000$ U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 UMulti-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Restroom Renovations-WTP Second Floor 200,000 USCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade 50,000 U Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 100,000 UWater Plant Elevator Replacement 50,000 U Water Plant Generator 2,400,000 BUWater Plant Personnel Safety Systems Improvements 125,000 U Water System Interconnect 3,809,000 BUWater System Interconnect 1,091,000 F Well #3 Water Service 50,000 UWilson Pond Flood Mitigation 100,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 9,375,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Computer Workstation Replacement 70,000$ ISRFire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System 76,500 F Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System 8,500 OFire Station 2 Repairs 306,406 BLiquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment 260,560 OLiquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment 399,535 OMulti-Year Fleet Purchases 1,785,000 FSRNetwork Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 77,326 ISR Public Works Facility Building Improvements 460,000 B Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades 290,000 BSRTOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 3,733,827$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 26,382,595$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 4,328,679$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 290,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 2,133,495 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 6,827,000 (C) Hennepin County 220,000 (F) Federal Grant 1,517,500 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,235,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,785,000 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 147,326 (M) Municipal State Aid 2,300,000 (O) Other Funding 798,595 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 2,250,000 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 2,075,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 26,382,595$ 2027 Capital Improvement Budget PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 145 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 754,545$ B 3,395,455 BST 30,000 O 105,000 SR 120,000 SR Community Center Building Community Center Building Ice Arena Improvements Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance Playground Replacement Veterans Park Improvements 250,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 4,655,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 69th Street Reconstruction 3,240,000$ B69th Street Reconstruction 3,760,000 BU 76th & Knox Improvements 150,000 F76th Street & I35W Intersections 150,000 M76th Street & I35W Intersections 600,000 S 78th Street Lighting 100,000 FFMulti-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Pavement Management Plan 795,000 FFMulti-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 805,000 MPenn Avenue Reconstruction 3,500,000 B Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2,500,000 BUTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 15,880,000$ UTILITIES HUB Redevelopment Participation 160,000$ FFHUB Redevelopment Participation 700,000 O HUB Redevelopment Participation 700,000 U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade 50,000 UWater Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 500,000 U Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 400,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 3,610,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGYCarpet Replacement - City Hall 190,000$ BSRComputer Workstation Replacement 72,450 ISR Fire Station 599,601 BLiquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment 21,720 O Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 1,874,250 FSRNetwork Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 50,186 ISRPublic Works Facility Building Improvements 235,000 B TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 3,043,207$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 27,188,207$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 8,329,146$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 190,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 3,395,455 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 6,260,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F)Federal Grant 150,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,335,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,874,250 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 122,636 (M)Municipal State Aid 955,000 (O) Other Funding 751,720 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S)State 600,000 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U)User Fees 2,750,000 (X)Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 27,188,207$ 2028 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 146 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Community Center Building 1,090,909$ BCommunity Center Building 4,909,091 BST Ice Arena Improvements 1,200,000 B Ice Arena Improvements 272,000 O Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 355,000 SRPlayground Replacement 120,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 7,947,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)175,000$ S 73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)113,500 S76th & Knox Improvements 1,662,960 B76th & Knox Improvements 2,137,040 F 76th Street West Reconstruction 700,000 X 78th Street Lighting 200,000 FF Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 720,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 840,000 MPenn Avenue Reconstruction 3,500,000 B Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2,500,000 BU TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 12,828,500$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ USanitary Lift Station 4 350,000 U SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade 50,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 600,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY City Hall Wold Assessment 1,630,000$ BSRComputer Workstation Replacement 74,986 ISRFire Station 352,173 BLiquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment 11,126 O Liquor Operations (Penn Central) - Wold Assessment 219,857 O Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 1,967,960 FSRNetwork Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 172,488 ISRPublic Works Facility Building Improvements 235,000 BPublic Works Facility Roof Replacement 2,000,000 B TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 6,663,590$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 28,039,090$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 10,041,042$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 1,630,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 4,909,091 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 2,500,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 2,137,040 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,200,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,967,960 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 247,474 (M) Municipal State Aid 840,000 (O) Other Funding 502,983 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 288,500 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 600,000 (X) Xcel Energy 700,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 28,039,090$ 2029 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 147 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Community Center Building 8,124,000$ B Community Center Building 36,558,000 BST Ice Arena Improvements 30,000 O Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 355,000 SR Playground Replacement 120,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 45,187,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)1,625,000$ S 73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 2,500,000 B 73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 5,000,000 S 73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)1,000,000 S76th Street West Reconstruction 4,100,000 B 76th Street West Reconstruction 600,000 BU 76th Street West Reconstruction 300,000 X Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 845,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FFTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 16,250,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 3,000,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 4,100,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Computer Workstation Replacement 77,610$ ISRFire Station 324,007 B Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment 17,053 O Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 2,125,400 FSR Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 100,000 ISR Public Works Facility Building Improvements 350,000 B TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 2,994,070$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 68,531,070$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 15,398,007$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue - (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 36,558,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 600,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 1,125,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 2,125,400 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 177,610 (M) Municipal State Aid - (O) Other Funding 47,053 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 7,625,000 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 4,100,000 (X) Xcel Energy 300,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 68,531,070$ 2030 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 148 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Ice Arena Improvements 30,000$ O Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 355,000 SR Outdoor Pool Improvements 21,270 O Playground Replacement 120,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 526,270$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000$ FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 770,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 850,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 3,000,000 U Sanitary Lift Station 1 350,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 4,450,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY City Hall Wold Assessment 1,700,000$ B City Hall Wold Assessment 1,000,000 BSRComputer Workstation Replacement 80,327 ISR Fire Station 379,403 B Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment 38,557 O Liquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment 1,661,509 O Liquor Operations (Penn Central) - Wold Assessment 33,859 O Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 2,295,400 FSRNetwork Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 100,000 ISR Public Works Facility Building Improvements 415,000 B TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 7,704,055$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 13,530,325$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 2,494,403$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 1,000,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility - (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 850,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 2,295,400 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 180,327 (M) Municipal State Aid - (O) Other Funding 1,785,195 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 4,450,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 13,530,325$ 2031 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 149 of 220 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Ice Arena Improvements 1,000,000$ O Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 355,000 SR Outdoor Pool Improvements 158,420 O Playground Replacement 120,000 SRTOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 1,633,420$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 63rd Street Greenway 2,600,000$ F63rd Street Greenway 1,100,000 M 70th Street Reconstruction 3,150,000 BU 70th Street Reconstruction 1,300,000 M76th/77th Street Intersection Control 3,600,000 B 77th Street Reconstruction Lyndale to Portland 25,000,000 B77th Street Reconstruction Penn to Lyndale 25,000,000 B77th Street Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Parkway 9,500,000 B 77th Street Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Parkway 1,000,000 BUBloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd 1,800,000 MBloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy 1,800,000 M Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 7,000,000 BHumboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 4,000,000 BU Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Pavement Management Plan 800,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 4,900,000 MTH62 Noise Barrier East 550,000 M TH62 Noise Barrier East 550,000 OTH62 Noise Barrier East 9,900,000 STOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 103,630,000$ Utilities Logan Tower Coating 2,000,000$ BU Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 UMulti-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 3,000,000 U Penn Tower Coating 2,000,000 BUSanitary Lift Station 2 350,000 U Sanitary Lift Station 3 350,000 UWater Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement 100,000 UWater Plant Lobby Restroom Renovations 185,000 U Water Plant Painting 40,000 UWater Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 500,000 U Well 2 Generator 1,000,000 U Well 5 Generator 1,000,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 11,625,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY City Hall World Assessment 1,850,000$ BComputer Workstation Replacement 83,138 ISRFire Station 386,696 BLiquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment 439,706 O Liquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment 37,349 OLiquor Operations (Penn Central) - Wold Assessment 631,996 OMulti-Year Fleet Purchases 2,410,170 FSRNetwork Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 100,000 ISRPublic Works Facility Building Improvements 695,000 BTOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 6,634,054$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 123,522,474$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 73,031,696$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue - (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 12,150,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 2,600,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 880,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 2,410,170 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 183,138 (M) Municipal State Aid 11,450,000 (O) Other Funding 2,817,470 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 9,900,000 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 7,625,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 123,522,474$ Capital Improvement Plan - Beyond 2031 PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 150 of 220 Spent to Date CIB Adopted CIB Revised CIB CIP CIP CIP CIP TOTAL*CIP Total** Through 2025 2026 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 CIP Cost Beyond 2031 Project Costs RECREATION OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT 26-Community Center Building Repair 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR - 40,000 26-Community Center Building - Replacement 3,273 B 27,273 B 754,545 B 1,090,909 B 8,124,000 B 9,969,455 10,000,000 26-Community Center Building - Replacement 14,727 BST 122,727 BST 3,395,455 BST 4,909,091 BST 36,558,000 BST 44,862,545 45,000,000 26-Ice Arena Improvements 1,200,000 B 1,200,000 1,200,000 26-Ice Arena Improvements 207,941 O 30,000 O 30,000 O 272,000 O 30,000 O 30,000 O 362,000 1,000,000 O 1,599,941 26-Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 275,000 SR 275,000 SR 55,000 SR 105,000 SR 355,000 SR 355,000 SR 355,000 SR 1,170,000 355,000 SR 1,855,000 26-Outdoor Pool Improvements 18,000 O 100,000 O 21,270 O 21,270 158,420 O 297,690 26-Parks Master Plan 180,000 SR 90,000 SR 90,000 SR - 180,000 26-Veterans Park Improvements 1,649,587 BST 5,000,000 BST 5,339,645 BST 2,010,768 BST - 9,000,000 26-Veterans Park Improvements 90,000 SR 160,000 SR 250,000 SR 250,000 500,000 26-Veterans Park Improvements 250,000 S 250,000 S - 500,000 26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 8,824,519 BST 1,000,000 BST 2,175,481 BST - 11,000,000 26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 225,000 SR - 225,000 26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building - S 12,000,000 S - 12,000,000 26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 3,000,000 F - 3,000,000 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates 50,000 O - - 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates 200,000 S - - 27-Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 150,000 SR - 150,000 27-Parks Building Improvements 220,000 C - 220,000 28-Playground Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 SR 120,000 SR 120,000 SR 480,000 120,000 SR 600,000 TOTAL RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 13,699,106 6,725,000 20,484,067 3,235,768 4,655,000 7,947,000 45,187,000 526,270 58,315,270 1,633,420 97,367,631 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax - - 3,273 27,273 754,545 2,290,909 8,124,000 - 11,169,455 - 11,200,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 10,474,106 6,000,000 7,529,853 2,133,495 3,395,455 4,909,091 36,558,000 - 44,862,545 - 65,000,000 (C) Hennepin County - - - 220,000 - - - - - - 220,000 (F) Federal Grant 3,000,000 - - - - - - - - - 3,000,000 (O) Other Funding - 50,000 225,941 130,000 30,000 272,000 30,000 51,270 383,270 1,158,420 1,897,631 (S) State - 200,000 12,250,000 250,000 - - - - - - 12,500,000 (SR) Special Revenue 225,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 1,900,000 475,000 3,550,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 13,699,106 6,725,000 20,484,067 3,235,768 4,655,000 7,947,000 45,187,000 526,270 58,315,270 1,633,420 97,367,631 PROJECTS Spent to Date CIB Adopted CIB Revised TOTAL*TOTAL** RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS Through 2025 2026 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 CIP cost Beyond 2031 Project costs 26-64th Street Sidewalk 80,000 M 165,000 M 376,000 M - 456,000 26-64th Street Sidewalk - S 854,000 S - 854,000 26-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)65,000 M 200,000 M 435,000 M - 500,000 26-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)901,200 S - 901,200 26-Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF - FF - - 26-Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 32,000 M 150,000 M 147,000 M - 179,000 26-Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 544,500 S 401,000 S - 401,000 27-77th Street Pavement Maintenance 100,000 M 1,100,000 M - 1,200,000 27-78th Street Lighting 200,000 FF 100,000 FF 200,000 FF 300,000 500,000 27-Multi-Year ADA Improvements 100,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 600,000 1,100,000 27-Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements - FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 160,000 40,000 FF 280,000 27-Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements - FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 160,000 40,000 FF 280,000 27-Nicollet Ave Reconstruction 140,000 B 4,000,000 B 1,325,000 B 3,535,000 B - 5,000,000 27-Nicollet Ave Reconstruction 3,500,000 BU 795,000 BU 205,000 BU - 1,000,000 27-Nicollet Ave Reconstruction 2,000,000 S - 2,000,000 27-Pavement Management Program - FF 737,000 FF 345,000 FF 755,000 FF 795,000 FF 720,000 FF 845,000 FF 770,000 FF 3,130,000 800,000 FF 5,030,000 27-Traffic Signal Replacements 120,000 M 900,000 M 805,000 M 840,000 M 1,645,000 2,665,000 28-69th Street Reconstruction 3,240,000 B 3,240,000 3,240,000 28-69th Street Reconstruction 277,000 BU 413,000 BU 3,760,000 BU 3,760,000 4,450,000 28-76th Street & I35W Intersections 150,000 M 150,000 150,000 28-76th Street & I35W Intersections 600,000 S 600,000 600,000 28- Penn Avenue Reconstruction 3,500,000 B 3,500,000 B 7,000,000 7,000,000 28- Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2,500,000 BU 2,500,000 BU 5,000,000 5,000,000 28- Penn Avenue Reconstruction 200,000 M 300,000 M 300,000 M 300,000 M - 800,000 29-76th & Knox Improvements 1,662,960 B 1,662,960 1,662,960 29-76th & Knox Improvements 50,000 F 350,000 F 150,000 F 2,137,040 F 2,287,040 2,687,040 30-68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)175,000 S 1,625,000 S 1,800,000 1,800,000 30-73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 2,500,000 B 2,500,000 2,500,000 30-73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 5,000,000 S 5,000,000 5,000,000 30-73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)113,500 S 1,000,000 S 1,113,500 1,113,500 30-76th Street West Reconstruction 4,100,000 B 4,100,000 4,100,000 30-76th Street West Reconstruction 600,000 BU 600,000 600,000 30-76th Street West Reconstruction 700,000 X 300,000 X 1,000,000 1,000,000 31-63rd Street Greenway - 2,600,000 F 2,600,000 31-63rd Street Greenway - 1,100,000 M 1,100,000 31-70th Street Reconstruction - 3,150,000 BU 3,150,000 31-70th Street Reconstruction - 1,300,000 M 1,300,000 31-76th/77th Street Intersection Control - 3,600,000 B 3,600,000 31-77th Street Reconstruction Lyndale to Portland - 25,000,000 B 25,000,000 31-77th Street Reconstruction Penn to Lyndale - 25,000,000 B 25,000,000 31-77th St Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Pkwy - 9,500,000 B 9,500,000 31-77th St Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Pkwy - 1,000,000 BU 1,000,000 31-Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd - 1,800,000 M 1,800,000 31-Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway - 1,800,000 M 1,800,000 31-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction - 7,000,000 B 7,000,000 31-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction - 4,000,000 BU 4,000,000 31-North Lyndale Reconstruction - 4,900,000 M 4,900,000 31-TH62 Noise Barrier East - 550,000 M 550,000 31-TH62 Noise Barrier East - 550,000 O 550,000 31-TH62 Noise Barrier East - 9,900,000 S 9,900,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS 617,000 9,926,500 6,706,200 10,038,000 15,880,000 12,828,500 16,250,000 850,000 45,808,500 103,630,000 166,799,700 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 140,000 4,000,000 1,325,000 3,535,000 6,740,000 5,162,960 6,600,000 - 18,502,960 70,100,000 93,602,960 (BU) Govt Bond Utility - 3,500,000 1,072,000 618,000 6,260,000 2,500,000 600,000 - 9,360,000 8,150,000 19,200,000 (F) Federal Grant - - 50,000 350,000 150,000 2,137,040 - - 2,287,040 2,600,000 5,287,040 (FF) Franchise Fee 100,000 1,067,000 625,000 1,235,000 1,175,000 1,200,000 1,125,000 850,000 4,350,000 880,000 7,190,000 (S) State - 544,500 2,156,200 2,000,000 600,000 288,500 7,625,000 - 8,513,500 9,900,000 22,569,700 (M) Municipal State Aid 377,000 815,000 1,478,000 2,300,000 955,000 840,000 - - 1,795,000 11,450,000 17,400,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - - - - 700,000 300,000 - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 617,000 9,926,500 6,706,200 10,038,000 15,880,000 12,828,500 16,250,000 850,000 45,808,500 103,630,000 166,799,700 2026 ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2026 REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2028 - 2031 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Page 151 of 220 2026 ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2026 REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2028 - 2031 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA PROJECTS Spent to Date CIB Adopted CIB Revised TOTAL*TOTAL**UTILITIES Through 2025 2026 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 CIP cost Beyond 2031 Project costs 26-SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade - 50,000 U 50,000 U 50,000 U 50,000 U 100,000 200,000 26-Water Plant Elevator Replacement 175,000 U 150,000 U 50,000 U - 200,000 26-Water Plant Generator - BU 100,000 BU 2,400,000 BU - 2,500,000 26-Water Plant Program Space Renovation 100,000 U - U - - 26-Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 50,000 U 50,000 U - 50,000 27-Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation 300,000 U - 300,000 27-Multi-Year Rehab of Stormwater Collect. Mains 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 800,000 200,000 U 1,400,000 27-Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 2,700,000 900,000 U 5,400,000 27-Restroom Renovations - WTP Second Floor 200,000 U - 200,000 27-Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 100,000 U 125,000 U 100,000 U - 225,000 27-Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Impr 125,000 U - 125,000 27-Water System Interconnect 100,000 BU 3,809,000 BU - 3,909,000 27-Water System Interconnect 1,091,000 F - 1,091,000 27-Well #3 Water Service 50,000 U - 50,000 27-Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 100,000 U 400,000 U 400,000 500,000 28-HUB Redevelopment Participation 160,000 FF 160,000 160,000 28-HUB Redevelopment Participation 700,000 O 700,000 700,000 28-HUB Redevelopment Participation 700,000 U 700,000 700,000 28-Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replace & Rehab 500,000 U 500,000 500,000 29-Sanitary Lift Station 4 350,000 U 350,000 350,000 30-Multi-Year Watermain Rehab 3,000,000 U 3,000,000 U 6,000,000 3,000,000 U 9,000,000 31-Sanitary Lift Station 1 350,000 U 350,000 350,000 >31-Logan Tower Coating - 2,000,000 BU 2,000,000 >31-Penn Tower Coating - 2,000,000 BU 2,000,000 >31-Restroom Renovations - 185,000 U 185,000 >31-Sanitary Lift Station 2 - 350,000 U 350,000 >31-Sanitary Lift Station 3 - 350,000 U 350,000 >31-Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement - 100,000 U 100,000 >31-Water Plant Painting - 40,000 U 40,000 >31-Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings - 500,000 U 500,000 >31-Well 2 Generator - 1,000,000 U 1,000,000 31-Well 5 Generator - 1,000,000 U 1,000,000 TOTAL UTILITIES - 1,525,000 1,675,000 9,375,000 3,610,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 12,760,000 11,625,000 35,435,000 (BU) Govt Bond Utility - - 200,000 6,209,000 - - - - - 4,000,000 10,409,000 (F) Federal Grant - - - 1,091,000 - - - - - - 1,091,000 (FF) Franchise Fee - - - - 160,000 - - - 160,000 - 160,000 (O) Other Funding - - - - 700,000 - - - 700,000 - 700,000 (U) User Fee - 1,525,000 1,475,000 2,075,000 2,750,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 11,900,000 7,625,000 23,075,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE - 1,525,000 1,675,000 9,375,000 3,610,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 12,760,000 11,625,000 35,435,000 PROJECTS Spent to Date CIB Adopted CIB Revised TOTAL*TOTAL**BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Through 2025 2026 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 CIP cost Beyond 2031 Project costs 26-Carpet Replacement - Fire 50,000 BSR - 50,000 26-Carpet Replacement - Police 120,000 BSR 70,000 BSR - 70,000 26-Fiber Infrastructure Projects - IT 45,000 O 45,000 O - 45,000 26-Fire SCBA Purchase 308,005 O 450,000 O - O - 308,005 26-Laptop Purchases - Information Technologies 34,260 ISR 34,260 ISR - 34,260 26-Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) Wold Assessment 7,500 O 260,560 O 11,126 O 17,053 O 38,557 O 66,736 439,706 O 774,502 26-Liquor Operations (Shops at Lyndale) Wold Assessment - - 26-Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 1,664,726 FSR 1,664,726 FSR 1,785,000 FSR 1,874,250 FSR 1,967,960 FSR 2,125,400 FSR 2,295,400 FSR 8,263,010 2,410,170 FSR 14,122,906 26-Network Infrastructure Replacement - IT 10,650 ISR 10,650 ISR - 10,650 26-Public Works Facility Building Improvements 460,000 B 235,000 B 235,000 B 350,000 B 415,000 B 1,235,000 695,000 B 2,390,000 26-Public Works Facility Building Improvements 37,700 FSR - 37,700 26-Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades 290,000 BSR - 290,000 26-Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades 50,000 O - 50,000 26-Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 FF 325,000 FF - 325,000 26-Public Works Storage Facility 650,000 O 650,000 O - 650,000 26-Public Works Storage Facility 500,000 U 500,000 U - 500,000 27-Computer Workstation Replacement 70,000 ISR 72,450 ISR 74,986 ISR 77,610 ISR 80,327 ISR 305,373 83,138 ISR 458,511 27-Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System 76,500 F - 76,500 27-Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System 8,500 O - 8,500 27-Fire Station 2 Repairs 306,406 B 599,601 B 352,173 B 324,007 B 379,403 B 1,655,184 386,696 B 2,348,286 27-Liquor Operations (Downtown) Wold Assessment 399,535 O 21,720 O 1,661,509 O 1,683,230 37,349 O 2,120,114 27-Network Infrastructure Replacement - IT 77,326 ISR 50,186 ISR 172,488 ISR 100,000 ISR 100,000 ISR 422,674 100,000 ISR 600,000 28-Carpet Replacement - City Hall 190,000 BSR 190,000 190,000 29-City Hall Wold Assessment 1,700,000 B 1,700,000 1,850,000 B 3,550,000 29-City Hall Wold Assessment 1,630,000 BSR 1,000,000 BSR 2,630,000 2,630,000 29-Liquor Operations (Penn Central) Wold Assessment 219,857 O 33,859 O 253,716 631,996 O 885,711 29-PW Facility Roof Replacement 2,000,000 B 2,000,000 2,000,000 TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECH 308,005 3,799,636 3,444,836 3,733,827 3,043,207 6,663,590 2,994,070 7,704,055 20,404,923 6,634,054 34,525,645 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax - - 766,406 834,601 2,587,173 674,007 2,494,403 6,590,184 2,931,696 10,288,286 (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue - 120,000 120,000 290,000 190,000 1,630,000 - 1,000,000 2,820,000 - 3,230,000 (F) Federal Grant - - - 76,500 - - - - - - 76,500 (FF) Franchise Fee - 325,000 325,000 - - - - - - - 325,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - 1,664,726 1,702,426 1,785,000 1,874,250 1,967,960 2,125,400 2,295,400 8,263,010 2,410,170 14,160,606 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - 44,910 44,910 147,326 122,636 247,474 177,610 180,327 728,047 183,138 1,103,421 (O) Other Funding 308,005 1,145,000 752,500 668,595 21,720 230,983 17,053 1,733,925 2,003,682 1,109,050 4,841,832 (U) User Fee - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - - - 500,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 308,005 3,799,636 3,444,836 3,733,827 3,043,207 6,663,590 2,994,070 7,704,055 20,404,923 6,634,054 34,525,645 SUMMARY PROJECTS Recreation/Open Space Development 13,699,106 6,725,000 20,484,067 3,235,768 4,655,000 7,947,000 45,187,000 526,270 58,315,270 1,633,420 97,367,631 Right of Way Improvements 617,000 9,926,500 6,706,200 10,038,000 15,880,000 12,828,500 16,250,000 850,000 45,808,500 103,630,000 166,799,700 Utilities - 1,525,000 1,675,000 9,375,000 3,610,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 12,760,000 11,625,000 35,435,000 Buildings, Fleet and Technology 308,005 3,799,636 3,444,836 3,733,827 3,043,207 6,663,590 2,994,070 7,704,055 20,404,923 6,634,054 34,525,645 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 14,624,111 21,976,136 32,310,103 26,382,595 27,188,207 28,039,090 68,531,070 13,530,325 137,288,693 123,522,474 334,127,976 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 140,000 4,000,000 1,328,273 4,328,679 8,329,146 10,041,042 15,398,007 2,494,403 36,262,599 73,031,696 115,091,246 (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue - 120,000 120,000 290,000 190,000 1,630,000 - 1,000,000 2,820,000 - 3,230,000 (BST) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax 10,474,106 6,000,000 7,529,853 2,133,495 3,395,455 4,909,091 36,558,000 - 44,862,545 - 65,000,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility - 3,500,000 1,272,000 6,827,000 6,260,000 2,500,000 600,000 - 9,360,000 12,150,000 29,609,000 (C) Hennepin County - - - 220,000 - - - - - - 220,000 (F) Federal Grant 3,000,000 - 50,000 1,517,500 150,000 2,137,040 - - 2,287,040 2,600,000 9,454,540 (FF) Franchise Fees 100,000 1,392,000 950,000 1,235,000 1,335,000 1,200,000 1,125,000 850,000 4,510,000 880,000 7,675,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - 1,664,726 1,702,426 1,785,000 1,874,250 1,967,960 2,125,400 2,295,400 8,263,010 2,410,170 14,160,606 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - 44,910 44,910 147,326 122,636 247,474 177,610 180,327 728,047 183,138 1,103,421 (M) Municipal State Aid 377,000 815,000 1,478,000 2,300,000 955,000 840,000 - - 1,795,000 11,450,000 17,400,000 (O) Other Funding 308,005 1,195,000 978,441 798,595 751,720 502,983 47,053 1,785,195 3,086,952 2,817,470 7,989,463 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - - - - - - - - - - - (S) State - 744,500 14,406,200 2,250,000 600,000 288,500 7,625,000 - 8,513,500 9,900,000 35,069,700 (SR) Special Revenue 225,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 1,900,000 475,000 3,550,000 (U) User Fees - 2,025,000 1,975,000 2,075,000 2,750,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 11,900,000 7,625,000 23,575,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - - - - 700,000 300,000 - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 14,624,111 21,976,136 32,310,103 26,382,595 27,188,207 28,039,090 68,531,070 13,530,325 137,288,693 123,522,474 334,127,976 * Total CIP costs only include project costs between 2028 and 2031. ** Total Project costs include all spent to date through 2025, CIB Revised 2026, CIB 2027, CIP 2028 - 2031, and CIP Beyond 2031 costs. Page 152 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 1 of 108 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Background 1.01 Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those adopted by Ordinance. 1.02 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be adopted by Ordinance. The City Council has previously established certain fees by Transitory Ordinance No. 19.41. The City Council has established other fees by resolution, which resolution is also part of Appendix D. 1.03 The City Council has determined the need to update the schedule of fees under Transitory Ordinance No. 19.41. Section 2. Fee Schedule Adopted 2.01 The fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A are hereby adopted by Ordinance. 2.02 The fees adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance shall be amended only by Ordinance. Any fees established by resolution, other than those adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance, may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Section 3. Effective date; codification. 3.01 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. 3.02 This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2027. 3.03 A copy of this Ordinance shall be included in Appendix D to the Richfield City Code, immediately prior to the resolution establishing fees. 3.04 This Ordinance supersedes Transitory Ordinance No. 19.41. Page 153 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 2 of 108 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this XXrd day of September, 2026. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Supple, Mary Supple, Mary Burk, Walter Burk, Walter Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori Mary B. Supple, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk Page 154 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 3 of 108 EXHIBIT A. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES A. Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit: Investigation. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set forth in Section 2. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. B. Permit fee refunds: The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permitted not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Building Permits 400.03 — 400.09 Fee Schedule to follow MN Statute 326B.153 + State Surcharge 326B.148. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/st atutes/cite/326B.153 Except values of $1-$2,000, the fee is $6583.50 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/st atutes/cite/326B.148 $83.50 (2) Driveway, Parking Area Permits 515.05 (No permit fee for sidewalks). $100 (3) Swimming 420.00 Permanent or portable pools are based on building permit fees with a minimum of: $65 $83.50 Page 155 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 4 of 108 (a) Existing single-family dwelling minor nonstructural alterations. (b) Single- and two- family dwelling repair and maintenance work. (c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance work not exceeding $1,000.00 or where plans are not required. (d) Reroof (all building types) Plan Review fee for similar buildings Maximum 25% of permit fee based on Minnesota State Building Code 1300.0160. (5) Contractor License Verification Fee Contractor applies for permit(s). $5 (6) Moving- Buildings 845 Moving Permit Fee $65 $200 within City limits; $200 OR hourly rate of $83.50 outside of City limits; whichever is greater, plus mileage (7) Structure Demolition 400.00 — 400.09 (a) Commercial Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of: $65 $83.50 (b) Residential Demolition $65 $83.50 (4) Plan Review Fee 400.03 — 400.09 25% for decks/porches, gazebos, bathroom remodels, etc. 35% of building permit fee for one- and two- family dwelling basement remodels. Plan review fee for similar buildings 65% of building permit fee for all other building permits, except no fee for the following: Page 156 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 5 of 108 (8) Plumbing Permit 400.03 — 400.09 Residential Minimum Fee 2% of Total Job cost with a minimum of (includes one inspection). $65 $83.50 Each additional inspection. $65 $83.50 (9) Plumbing Permit 400.03 — 400.09 Commercial/Industrial/Multi- family based on total job cost 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of (includes one inspection). $65 $83.50 Each additional inspection $65 $83.50 (13) Solar Photovoltaic System Rating* Based on 2% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of (separate electrical permit required for signs). 2027 FEE CHANGE 400.03 — 400.09 0—5,000 watts $65 $83.50 5,001—10,000 watts $150 10,001—20,000 watts $200 20,001—30,000 watts $250 30,001—40,000 watts $300 (14) Residential Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Commercial Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration 400.03 — 400.09 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of (Includes one inspection) $65 $83.50 Each additional inspection. $65 $83.50 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of: $65 $83.50 (15) Sign Installation 549.07- 549.11 (a) Temporary sign permit (b) Permanent sign (any size) Building permit is required for sign support structures fees based on building permit fee schedule. $65 $125 $83.50 Page 157 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 6 of 108 (16) Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 400 A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued before completion of the entire work covered by the permit, provided the Chief Building Official deems that the building is safe to occupy. $200 Plus a letter of credit or cash escrow equal to 125% of the remaining City Code requirements Page 158 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 7 of 108 ZONING, LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Planned Unit Development 542 (a) $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of: $5,000 (b) Major PUD Plan Amendment—$1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of: $5,000 (c) Minor PUD Plan Amendment $400 (2) Site Plan Review 547 (a) Standard Review: $500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of: $3,500 (b) Administrative Review $500 (c) Major amendment—$500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of: $3,500 (d) Minor amendment $350 (3) Variance 547 Residential $350 Non-Residential $500 Variance Appeal Residential and Non-Residential $350 (4) Conditional Use Permit 547 (a) $500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of: $3,500 (b) Major amendment—$500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of: $3,500 (c) Minor amendment $350 (5) Interim Use Permit 547 $1,000 plus $100/year monitoring fee up to a maximum fee of: $1,500 (6)* Zoning District or Code Text Change 547 $2,000 (7)* Subdivision Approval 500.13 $500 Subdivision Waiver 500.25 $350 (8) Street/Easement Vacation 820/State Statute $1,000 (9) Appeal to Board of Adj. & Appeals 547 $350 Page 159 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 8 of 108 (10) Special Request to City Council $350 (11) Zoning Compliance Letter $75 (12) Comprehensive Plan Amend. $1,000 (13) Plats* 500 Preliminary/Final Plat $500 / $275 (14) Sketch Plan Review $500 (15) Extension Extension of a Land Use Approval (rezoning, site plan approval, conditional use permit, variance, etc.) beyond its original approval period. $250 (16) Escrow Administration Fee $125 + $250/year after stipulated completion date if not complete. (To be accrued/char ged on the day following expiration and annually on this anniversary date until complete). (17) Special Exception Review for Fences or Walls 509.15 Subd.13 A special fence exception may be issued per the restrictions of Section 509.15 for corner lots or through lots. $250 (18) Public Tree Planting Fund 544.03 Subd.8 For the planting of trees in public parks or public boulevards. $160 per caliper inch. *Any additional expenses incurred by the City in the course of processing a request will be charged to the applicant. Page 160 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 9 of 108 FIRE SERVICES FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (6) Fire Extinguishing System Permit Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: (a) No plan review fee for valuations of $1,000 or less; minimum fee applies as listed. (b) Plan submittal is required for all fire sprinkler systems with 10 or more sprinkler heads. $50 (7) Fire Alarm Systems Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building fee, except no fee for the following: (a) No plan review fee for valuations of $1,000 or less; minimum fee applies as listed. (b) Plan submittal is required for all fire alarm system installations or modifications. $50 (8) Flammable or Combustible Liquid or Gas Storage Tanks and Piping (a) Tanks (installation or modification). $150 Installation or alteration of piping Each unit or dispenser. $50 Underground Tank Removal. $100/Tank MISCELLANEOUS FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (3) Antenna Commercial Wireless Telecommunication Service (CWTS) 425 & 544 (a) CWTS antenna permit application fee. $100 (b) Antenna permit fee for additional antennas added to an existing antenna location or replacement of existing antennas at a location. $35 Page 161 of 220 City of Richfield County of Hennepin State of Minnesota September XX, 20XX BILL NO. 2026-XX TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX 10 of 108 (Bill No. 2020-12, §§ 1—3; Bill No. 2022-12, § 3; Bill No. 2023-1; Bill No. 2023-9; Bill No. 2024-09; Bill No. 2025-15; Bill No. 2026-XX). Page 162 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Motion by: Seconded by: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2027 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO 12346 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: Section 1. Establishing Fees A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in the sections of this resolution. B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this resolution. C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of the license. D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not been paid in a timely manner. Section 2. Construction and Related License Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Heating and Ventilating Installer 400.07 1 Year $80 (2) Sign Installer 416.01—416.13 1 Year $80 (3) Electrical Installer 400.03—400.09 State License Required (4) Plumber 400.03—400.09 State License Required (5) Well Driller 620 State License Required Section 3. Public Works Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Benches 805.01— 805.27 First Year $80 Renewal $30 (2) Boulevard feature permit 811.07 a) Application to place a privately owned feature in the boulevard $30 b) If applied for after installation of feature has begun $60 (3) Excavation in Public Right-of-way 800.01— 800.15 a) For each transverse excavation and each 500 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation and for each 500 feet of curb and gutter or portion thereof installed or driveway apron installed, except when survey and grade stakes are set by City $200 $0 .20 per foot > 500' b) If applied for after excavation has begun $400 c) For each pothole $20 Commented [KA1]: missing decimal point $0.20 Page 163 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Page 164 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Section 3. Public Works Fees Continued (4) Pole Attachment /Small Cell Facilities Permit 802 a) Application to attach or collocate pole attachment on City facilities in the City Right- of-way $500 /≤ 5 units $100/unit thereafter b) Application to construct/install new small cell pole w/ attachment in the City Right- of- way $1,000/unit c) Annual rental fee per attachment to collocate on the city structure, per agreement Up to $150/unit d) Annual maintenance fee associated with the collocation, per agreement Up to $25/unit Monthly Electrical Fees a) Radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts b) Radio node over 100 maximum watts c) The actual cost of electricity $73/node $182/node (5) Forestry Permit 810 Applies only to trees on City property and public ROW $100 (6) Seasonal Load Limit Exemption a) Per load $25 b) If applied for after delivery $50 (7) Obstruction Permit 802.17 (a) Short term, temporary single lane closure of less than four hours No fee (b) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $60 Collector Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $30 Local/Residential Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $15 Sidewalk/Bike Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $30 Parking Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion $7.50 Page 165 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX thereof) (c) If applied for after obstruction closure has begun, regardless of duration of closure Arterial Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $120 Collector Per Day for Each Lan (per block or portion thereof) $60 Section 3. Public Works Fees Continued Local/Residential Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $30 Sidewalk/Bike Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $60 Parking Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $15 If the closures are not removed by the permitted completion date, then additional Days will be charged at double the rate (8) Noise Ordinance Exemption 930.35 (a) With conditions added as required $50 (b) If applied for after violation $100 (9) Certification Charge 705.03— 705.21 All delinquent accounts $50 (10) NSF Check Charge $30 (11) Utility Services Sanitary Sewer 700.05 All land uses New Service $125 Repair $125 Disconnect $125 Replacement $125 Sewer Service Line Televising $100 Page 166 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Appointment Fee, No-Call, No-Show For failure to appear/be available at scheduled appointment time without reasonable advance notice to the City Reasonable advance notice to the City is considered at least 1 hour before the scheduled appointment time $75 Water Service 715.01 All land uses $125 New Service $125 Repair $125 Disconnect $125 Replacement Turn on/off After hours $75 $150 Meter Installation $75 Private Hydrant $75 Hydrant Meter Fee $75 Section 3. Public Works Fees Continued Appointment Fee, No-Call, No-Show For failure to appear/be available at scheduled appointment time without reasonable notice to the City $75 Backflow Device Registration Fee 710.23 All properties, excluding SFH and Duplex residential properties $50 SFH and Duplex residential properties No fee Storm Sewer 720 All Land Uses New Service $125 Repair $125 Disconnect $125 Replacement $125 Erosion Control 428.03 For review, approval, and inspection of erosion control plans related to approved building permits. less than 0.25 acres = $40; between 0.25 and 1 acres = $250; greater than 1 acre = $750 + $1 per each 100 square feet above an acre $40 $250 $750 +$1/100 SF above an acre (12) Street Light Banners 855.05 First time applicant to hang street light banners within a district of for an event $50 Per street light banner installation (no existing hardware) $20 Per street light banner installation if supporting hardware exists on the light pole $10 Per street light banner removal $10 Page 167 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Permit Renewal: Annually for both decorative and event banners, unless banner design has changed, then full application fee is charged If annual renewal is not completed, the permittee risks removal of all banners at the permittee's expense $10 (13) Utilities Special Charges 715.03 Transaction fee for utility accounts paying by credit card (excludes ACH withdrawals, checks, or debit card payments) 2.95% of utility bill or $1.95, whichever is greater Section 4. Fire Services Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Fire Prevention Code (Fire Safety) 400.21— 400.29 For initial fee required under code Per Year Covers activities or materials requiring fire department approval per fire code, including tents, hazardous materials, open flames, and other regulated uses $100 Section 4. Fire Services Fees Continued For each additional fee required under code: Applies to each additional regulated item under the same permit (e g , multiple tents at one location) $20 Penalty if not renewed within 2 months of notification Applies to permits not renewed within 2 months of official notice (e g , fire safety permit for hazardous materials) $75 (2) Daycare/Adult Foster Care Facility Inspection $100 (3) Reimbursement Fee for Fire/Rescue Unit Per Hour $400 Page 168 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (4) Sale of Consumer Fireworks 1131 (a) License per location selling only consumer fireworks Per Year Fireworks sales under temporary membrane structures (e g , tents) require a fire safety permit $350 (b) License per location of each other retail seller (Each physical store) Per Year $100 (5) Display of Commercial Fireworks 5608 Licensed per display by qualified vendor $350 Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Arcade 1105 1 Year $708 729.00 (2) Amusement Device 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball) 1 Year $17 18.00 (b) Mechanical Music Box 1 Year $17 18.00 (c) Video Games 1 Year $17 18.00 Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits Continued (3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs State Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE Investigation Fee $250 (4) Itinerant Place of Amusement 1100.05— 1100.11 1 Day $381 392.00 (5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held: 1 month: $6 $56 7.00 58.00 No fee for locations holding tavern licenses Page 169 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (6) General Amusement 1100.03 (a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 Year $17 18.00 1 Coin operated 1 Year $17 18.00 (b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 Year $56 58.00 (c) Circus 1 Year $214 220.00 (d) Dance Hall 1 Day $214 220.00 (e) Golf 1 Miniature 1 Year $49 50.00 2 Driving Tee 1 Year $49 50.00 (f) Mountback 1 Day $205 211.00 (g) Rides, mechanical/animal of any kind (ea) 1 Year $17 18.00 (h) Shows, any kind 1 Day $205 211.00 (i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 Year $18 19.00 (j) Other games 1 Day $17 18.00 (7) Musical Concert 1110.01 Per event $62 64.00 (8) Theatre Cinema 1120 1 Year $297 306.00 Section 5 Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits Continued Plus a notice publication fee $9 10.00 (9) Roller Rink 1115 1 Year or portion thereof $297 306.00 (10) Commercial Adult- Oriented Enterprises 605 1 Year $3,537 3643.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $3,537 3643.00 (11) Masseur/Masseuse 605 Certificate fee 1 Year $115 118.00 Page 170 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Investigation fee 1 Year $288 297.00 (12) Public Baths 610 1 Year $4096 4219.00 Investigation fee (actual cost minimum) $4096 4219.00 (13) Fortune Teller and related trade 1130.05— 1130.07 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month 1 Year $237 $705 $1,410 $2,360 244.00 726.00 1452.00 2431.00 (14) Adult Establishments 1196 Annual license 1 Year $3,537 3643.00 Investigation fee (new license) $3,537 3643.00 Section 6 Animal Licenses and Permits Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Animals 905.01— 905.29 (a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered) with option to purchase a multi- year license 1 Year $15 (b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered) 1 Year $25 Section 6 Animal Licenses and Permits Continued (c) Duplicate Animal License $7 (d) Late Penalty $10 905.31— 905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel 1 Year $256 264.00 (f) Residential Kennel 1 Year $122 126.00 (g) Veterinary $256 264.00 Page 171 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX 905.37— 905.39 (h) Pigeons 1 Year $45 46.00 905.41 (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary Permit) $32 33.00 905.01— 905.29 (j) Impounding (each animal) 1st time $79 81.00 2nd Time $142 146.00 3rd time (each impound after) $213 219.00 (k) Dangerous dog registration fee State Statute 347 51) $500 906.13 905.37 (I) Beekeeping Registration + Inspection fee Fowl Registration +Inspection Fee $50 $50 52.00 52.00 Section 7 Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Aircraft 1340 1 Day $62 64.00 (2) Garbage and Refuse Collection 601.01— 601.33 Commercial and Residential First vehicle 1 Year $353 364.00 Each additional vehicle 1 Year $75 77.00 Section 7. Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees (3) Motor Vehicle Dealer 1155 Per place of business 1 Year $528 544.00 Each additional place of business 1 Year $200 206.00 (4) Motor Bicycle Business 1160 Per place of business 1 Year $307 316.00 Page 172 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Per place of business to sell, rent or lease 1 Year $141 145.00 (5) Sound Truck 1165 Per vehicle 1 Year $307 316.00 Per vehicle 1 Day $45 46.00 (6) Taxicab 1170 First vehicle or auto livery 1 Year $765 788.00 Each additional vehicle or auto livery operated at any time within license period 1 Year $94 97.00 (7) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 Year $72 74.00 (8) Rental or Utility Trailers and Trucks 1185 Each place of business 1 Year $141 145.00 Section 8 Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Firearms Dealer 920.01— 920.05 1 Year $2,360 2431.00 (2) Food Establishments 617 (A) Type I Establishment, a large 1 year high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day (1) Food service establishment $1,059 1091.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $778 801.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $778 801.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued Page 173 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (B) Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day (1) Food service establishment $909 936.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $606 624.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $606 624.00 (C) Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment (1) Food service establishment $778 801.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $386 398.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $386 398.00 (D) Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended or mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat on-site, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere (1) Food service establishment $507 522.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $235 242.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $235 242.00 (E) Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging Page 174 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (1) Food service establishment $312 321.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $194 200.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $194 200.00 (F) Supplemental Facility (1) High Supplemental Facility (like Type I or II) $194 200.00 (2) Medium Supplemental Facility (like Type III) $155 160.00 (3) Catering Supplemental Facility (for Food Catering Vehicles and equipment Vehicle(s) and equipment) $235 242.00 (4) Low Supplemental Facility (like Type IV or V) $115 118.00 (G) Temporary Food Establishment (1) Complex Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type I or II) $194 200.00 (2) Complex Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type I or II) $351 362.00 (3) Simple Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type III, IV or V) $80 82.00 (4) Simple Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type III, IV or V) $187 193.00 (5) Temporary Food Multi-Vendor $984 1014.00 (H) Farmer's Market Stand (stands not exempted from licensing in Minnesota Statue Chapter 28A) $235 242.00 (3) Automobile Washing Establishment 1125 Per calendar Year or fraction thereof $235 242.00 (4) Cesspools 925.03 Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contents of each cesspool into City sewer $36 37.00 (5) Incinerator 601.29— 601.31 1 Year $70 72.00 Page 175 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (6) Tobacco No licenses being issued 1146 01(M S 461.12) Retail Sale and Distribution - License Issued renewed on calendar Year (cigarette vending machines prohibited) (Bill No 1998-19) $591 $609.00 (7) Transient Merchant 1181.01— 1181.09 1 Day $150 155.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued (8) Wagon Peddler 1181 1 Year $354 365.00 (9) State hawker or Peddler license 1181 6 month/per person covered $87 90.00 (10) Canvasser or Solicitor 1181 6 month/per person covered $87 90.00 (11) Christmas Tree Sale 1130.03 1 Year $192 198.00 (12) Lodging Establishments 618 (A) Hotel/Motel $327 337.00 (1) Each Guestroom $27 28.00 (13) Outdoor Merchandising 1135 Permit $149 154.00 (14) Storage Enclosure 1135 Per Enclosure $128 132.00 (15) Pawnbroker 1187 (a) Pawnbroker 1 Year $6,148 6332.00 (b) Owner investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $3,534 3640.00 (c) Manager investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $1,278 1316.00 (d) Employee investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $122 126.00 (e) Transaction fee - per transaction $2 (16) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1186 (a) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 Year $674 694.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs in excess of above with total not exceeding $2,586 2664.00 Page 176 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Applicant shall deposit $1,200 with Licensing Clerk along with application Amount in excess of actual application costs shall be refunded (17) Auto Detailing Establishment 1195.01 1 Year $525 541.00 (18) Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Painting or Body Branding 630 (a) Tattoo, body piercing, body painting or body branding 1 Year $1,176 1211.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) $1,109 1142.00 1 Year (19) Temporary Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Branding and Body painting events 630 Per booth $70 72.00 (20) Massage Therapy Enterprise License (Business license) 1188 Annual license 1 Year $1,142 1176.00 Investigation fee (new license) $1,142 1176.00 Massage Therapist (Individual License) Annual license 1 Year $112 115.00 Investigation fee (new license) $115 119.00 Temporary Massage Therapist License Per temporary location $236 248.00 (21) Public Swimming Pools 619 (A) Indoor (1) First pool $312 321.00 (2) Each additional pool $155 160.00 (B) Outdoor (1) First pool $312 321.00 (2) Each additional pool $155 160.00 (C) School, K through grade 12, pools Page 177 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (1) First pool $202 208.00 (2) Each additional pool $112 115.00 (D) Pool opening reinspection fee, operator makes an appointment for an inspection, but the pool is not ready to open $106 109.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued (22) Motion pictures and commercial photography permit 1197 Per event Photography Motion picture (based on application) $54 $212 56.00 218.00 (23) Adult-Use Cannabis 1198 Cannabis Retailer Cannabis Renewal (The initial registration fee shall include the fee for initial registration and the first annual renewal. Any renewal fee imposed by the local unit of government shall be charged at the time of the second renewal and each subsequent annual renewal thereafter) $500 $1,000 Low-Potency Hemp Edible 1198 Lower Potency Hemp Retailer Registration Annual Renewal $125 $125 Short Term Rental License 1199 Initial application license fee for short- term rental $700.00 Short Term Rental License Renewal 1199 Annual renewal fee for short-term rental license $500.00 Page 178 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR FOOD, THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AND LODGING PERCENTAGE OF FACILITY INVOLVED WILL BE DETERMINED BY STAFF Descriptions Type I Establishment, a large high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat onsite, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging Environmental plan review—includes the physical remodeling, updating, equipment replacement, equipment additions and the general overall review of all plans/work This also includes all new development projects New Construction and/or Major Remodel (over 50% of facility involved) Extensive Remodel (25— 50% of facility) Minor Remodel 0— 24% of facility) Non-remodel approval consultation ($5,000 or less in costs) Type I $3,757 3870.00 $1,959 2017.00 $1,058 1090.00 $180 185.00 Type II $2,588 2666.00 $1,418 1461.00 $780 803.00 $180 185.00 Type III $1,419 1462.00 $789 813.00 $471 485.00 $180 185.00 Type IV $695 716.00 $271 279.00 $137 141.00 No fee Type V New project or change of owner - $180 185.00 Minor remodel - permit but no plan check fee Therapeutic Massage $180 185.00 $180 185.00 $180 185.00 $180 185.00 Page 179 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Section 9. Liquor and Related License and Permit Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) 3 2 Malt Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $912 (b) Tavern (dance) 1 Year $745 (c) Wholesale 1 Year $44 (d) Growler (Micro Brewery Off- Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $175 (e) Off-Sale 1 Year $264 (f) Club (Bottle Club) 1 Year $603 (g) Temporary per event $191 197.00 (2) Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $12,029 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1 Year $200 (c) Wine 1 Year $1,325 (d) Taproom (Micro Brew On-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $700 (e) Cocktail Room (Micro Distillery On Sale) 1 Year $800 (f) Micro Distillery Off Sale 1 Year $600 (g) Veterans' Organization (Ex- Sunday) 1 Year $863 (h) Temporary per event $191 $197.00 (3) Employee License On-Sale Liquor Establishments 1208.01 Effective 10/1/95 all licenses issued shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of initial application $37 (4) Investigation Fee 1202.01— 1202.21 (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization $824 and Each person shown on application $247 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application (excluding Veteran's Organizations) $247 1202.11 (b) Wine, Taproom, Brewpub, Distillery, and $824 Each person shown on application $247 Page 180 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application $247 1202.11 Investigation of substitute manager $103 Page 181 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Section 10. Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) License for Apartment Houses and Rental Homes (includes up to two inspections) 407 (a) Apartment House, 1 Year $190 Each unit $15 (b) Rental Home - single family dwelling, 1 Year $190 (c) Duplexes/double bungalows/townhouses First unit, 1 Year $190 Each additional rental unit, 1 Year $125 (d) Late Fee—Charged each month the license is late $100 or 25% of the annual license fee, whichever is greater, up to a maximum monthly fee of $500 (e) License Transfer Fee $50 (f) Reinstatement of suspended license 100% of license fee (minimum $80) (g) Reinstatement of Revoked license 200% of license fee (h) Re-Inspection Fee (for inspections over the first two) 1 Multi-family 3rd inspection: $100 4th inspection: $200 5th inspection: $400 6th inspection and more: $800 Up to $3,000 maximum 2 Single-family and duplex 3rd inspection: $50 4th inspection: $100 5th inspection: $200 6th inspection and more: $400 Up to $1,500 maximum Page 182 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Re-inspection fees shall be payable at the time of license renewal and no renewal license shall be issued unless all inspection fees are paid (i) Provisional license for apartment house Includes first unit $380 Section 10. Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees Continued Each additional unit $30 Provisional license for Rental Home— single-family dwelling 1 Year $380 Provisional license for duplex First unit $380 Each additional unit $250 (j) Investigation fee for operating a rental property without a license $500 (2) Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance (Includes up to two inspections) 408 Single-family home $190 2-family home $270 Condominium $140 Re-inspection Fee 3rd inspection $50 4th inspection $100 5th inspection $200 6th inspection and more $400 Up to $1,500 maximum Fee to process cash escrow agreement $125 Fee to process Agreement to Comply $125 (3) Richfield Apartment Managers' Association Fee 407 Fee to support RAMA services $1.50/unit Page 183 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (4) Permit Fee for Rooming House 406 1 Year $210 Section 11 Miscellaneous Fees Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE (1) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six Months $17 (2) Permit to Carry a Gun Permit Issued By County (3) False Alarms (billable) (a) in excess of 2 for calendar Year $100 Section 11 Miscellaneous Fees Continued (b) in excess of 10 for calendar Year $200 (c) in excess of 20 for calendar Year $300 (4) Nuisance Conduct Fee 925 Third call to a property for nuisance conduct within a 365-day period $400 (5) Copying Services Provided Flat rate (per page) $.25 Special rate (a) Black & White Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $.25 8.5 x 14 (per side) $.25 MN Statute 13 03C 11 x 17 (each) $.50 24 x 36 (each) $2.50 X-Large $2.50 Color Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $1 8.5 x 14 (per side) $2 11 x 17 (each) $4 24 x 36 (each) $18 X-Large $3/sq ft (b) Labor hourly wage and 33% (c) Postage Prevailing Rate (d) Fax per page $.50 (e) CD of meeting (per CD) $5 Page 184 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX (f) DVD of meeting (per DVD) $15 (g) Electronic copies (CD or disk) $5 (h) As builts (per image) $.50 (6) Notary Fee Fee Set By State (7) Candidate Filing Fee City Charter 4.04 $25 (8) Photo Fee Includes 2 photos $16 including tax (9) Assessment Search Fees Special Special Assessment Search Fees - Per PID $25 Creation of New or Special Report Section 11 Miscellaneous Fees Continued - Fees to be based on time and materials to create report - Minimum Fee $25 Review of Comparable Property Records Residential Field Card Report $.25 - for up to five comparable properties (per copy) Commercial/Industrial/Apartment Field (10) Domestic Partnership 120 Registration $30 (11) Certified copy of various documents To certify documents i.e., resolutions, ordinances, minutes, registration forms, etc., on file (per copy) $5 (12) Vacant Building Registration Fee 925 Single-Family Home or Duplex— Vacant one to two years $600 Single-Family Home or Duplex— Vacant three to four years $800 Single-Family Home or Duplex—Vacant five or more years $1,000 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $618 Page 185 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one Year or longer $1,133 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $1,390 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one year or longer $2,678 (13) Violation of Conversion Therapy Ban 635 Providing conversion therapy to a minor or vulnerable adult $1,000 per instance 14) Passport No Show Fee Failure to appear for scheduled passport appointment $20 per instance Page 186 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Section 12 Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees Location or Type Description Fee Classification Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE Richfield Municipal Center Bartholomew Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $75/HR (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $100/HR (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $500/4-hour block Heredia Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $69/HR (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $82/HR (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $400/4-hour block Fred Babcock Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $69/HR (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $82/HR (2-hour minimum) Richfield Community Center Augsburg, Fireside, Nicollet, or Ruth Johnson Rooms Non-Profit Private $42/HR $60/HR Combined Nicollet/Augsbur g or Richfield Rooms Non-Profit Private $69/HR $95/HR Kitchen All Renters $80/4-hour block, $15/additional hour Free with combined Nicollet/Augsb urg room rental Wood Lake Nature Center Wood Lake Amphitheater $75/4-hour block Cottonwood Room $85/hour 2 hour min; $75/hour Page 187 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX non-profit Coneflower Room $85/hour 2 hour min; $75/hour non-profit Cattail Room $85/hour 2 hour min; $75/hour non-profit All 3 rooms $2200 (10a-11pm); $1900 non-profit Deck (w/3 room rental) $120; $100 non-profit Exhibit (w/3 room rental) $75; $60 non- profit Woodland Amphitheater $85/4 hour block Mon-Thur $95/4 hour block Fri-Sun Glaus Amphitheater $85/4 hour block Mon-Thur $95/4 hour block Fri-Sun Conference Room $75/hour 4 hr min; $60/hour 4 hour min non-profit Fire pit $40/hour 4 hour min; $25/hour non-profit (wood included) Catering Commission 10% Park Shelters Wood Lake Nature Center - Emily Day Pavilion Monday - Thursday $85/4-hour block Friday- Sunday $95/4-hour block $50 Damage/ Compliance Deposit Section 12 Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees Continued Page 188 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Fairwood, Monroe, Augsburg Park Shelters Monday-Thursday $46/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $56/4-hour block $50 Damage/ Compliance Deposit Sheridan Park Shelter Monday-Thursday $65/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $75/4-hour block $50 Damage/ Compliance Deposit Veterans Park Shelter Monday-Thursday $120 per section/3-hr block Friday- Sunday $141 per section/3-hr block $75/section Damage/ Compliance Deposit Enclosed Park Buildings Jefferson Park, Washington Park, Madison Park Monday-Thursday $65/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $75/4-hour block $100 Damage/ Compliance Deposit Monday- Thursday $70/4- hour block Friday-Sunday $80/4-hour block $100 Damage/Compli ance Deposit Athletic Fields Premier Baseball Fields (Donaldson) Resident Non-Resident $57/HR $284/day (first 8 hrs) $69/HR $357/day (first 8 hours) Premier Youth Baseball/Softball Fields (Roosevelt & Lincoln) Resident Non-Resident $464/HR $273/day (first 8 hrs) $59/HR $336/day (first 8 hrs) Page 189 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Premium Softball Fields (Taft) Resident Non-Resident $33/HR $126/day (first 8 hrs) $44/HR $183/day (first 8 hrs) General Baseball/Softball Fields Resident Non-Resident $26/HR $115/day (first 8 hrs) $37/HR $209/day (first 8 hrs) Section 12 Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees Continued Premier Soccer/ Football Fields (Taft & Washington) Resident Non-Resident $70/HR $100/HR General Soccer/Football Fields (Christian & Donaldson) Resident Non-Resident $55/HR $81/HR Neighborhood Soccer Field (Monroe) Resident Non-Resident $42/HR $63/HR Broomball/Hockey Rink All outdoor rinks Resident Non-Resident $30/HR $41/HR Tennis Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $16/court/HR $26/court/HR Volleyball Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $19/HR $27/HR Basketball Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $19/HR $27/HR Open Space All parks Resident Non-Resident $19/HR $27/HR Athletic Facility Light Use Softball, Baseball, Soccer, Football, Hockey, Tennis All renters $31/HR Page 190 of 220 City of Richfield September XX, 202X County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX Additional Field Usage Fees All parks All renters $75/HR maintenance fee $30 administrative fee (Permit changes/ cancellation) $500 Damage/ Compliance deposit Richfield Band Shell Stage and Equipment All renters Stage $165/HR Equipment $75/booking Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this XXrd day of September, 20XX. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY Supple, Mary Supple, Mary Burk, Walter Burk, Walter Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean Mary Supple, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk Page 191 of 220 City of Richfield, Minnesota Financial Management Plan August 12, 2026 Page 192 of 220 •To review the Financial Management Plan (FMP) and receive guidance from the City Council on: Property Tax Levy Changes Debt Issuance Assumptions •Preview of the 2027 Budget Goals for the Work Session Key Takeaway The FMP works with the budget development process and there will be ample opportunity to discuss changes Page 193 of 220 •A multi-year fiscal plan for all tax-supported funds •Integrates: Existing debt Capital Improvement Plans Future debt Tax base growth Future operating costs •Assures all capital, maintenance, staffing needs are met and there are sustainable funding sources What is a Financial Management Plan? Page 194 of 220 4 •City General •EDA General •HRA General •Sales Tax •Communications •Utility Franchise Fee •Ice Arena Tax -Supported Funds Included •Pool •Capital Improvements •Parks Capital •Central Garage Fund •Information Technology •Insurance •Building Services •All Debt Service Page 195 of 220 5 •General Fund within fund balance policy of 40% of expenditures Plan assumes maintaining 40% throughout the planning window •All capital projects are funded per the respective Capital Improvement Plans and most recent project estimates. •2% increase in existing tax base, no new growth included Includes decertification of Lyndale Gateway West & City Bella TIF Districts in 2029 & 2030 •2.0% increase in revenues, 4.0% increase in expenditures Assumptions and Other Factors Page 196 of 220 6 Impact on Median-Valued Home Next 10 Years •Assumes 2% annual increase in existing property values for 2028 & beyond•2027: $130/year ($11/$.36) = 7.5% Based on early valuation data from Hennepin County $72/year due to changes in tax base and tax levy•2031: $153/year ($13/$.43) = 7.0%•2032: $152/year ($13/$.42) = 6.5%•2033: $145/year ($12/$.40) = 5.8%•2034: $143/year ($12/$.40) = 5.4%•Other Years: $103/year average = 4.8% Page 197 of 220 7 Tax Levy Trends Key Takeaways •Projected Debt Levies include bonding for street projects and Community Center •General Fund Levy averages 4.8% increase / year 5.4%6.2%4.5%5.0%5.0%6.0%6.3%6.0%5.4%5.0%3.8%3.3% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% $- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Tax Levy Trends with Projected New Debt Levies General Fund Levy Existing Debt Levies Special Levies Projected Debt Levies Page 198 of 220 8 General Fund Key Takeaways •General Fund Balance remains at 40% of Expenditures •$1.5M from Public Safety Aid in 2028-2031 •Includes support for: Swimming Pool Fund Ice Arena Fund Communications Fund Page 199 of 220 9 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY Actual Revised Budget Prelim Budget PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED RevenuesProperty Taxes 23,306,044$ 25,223,647$ 26,308,418$ 27,223,756$ 28,512,524$ 29,893,501$ 31,368,446$ 33,281,230$ 34,879,484$ 36,545,787$ 38,282,981$ 40,094,021$ Contingency to Maintain Fund Balance - - - 317,721 598,342 622,674 647,997 674,354 701,787 730,339 760,058 790,990 Intergovernmental 5,674,793 5,899,230 5,733,988 5,804,050 5,875,513 5,948,405 6,022,755 6,098,592 6,175,946 6,254,847 6,335,326 6,417,415 Other Revenues 4,120,302 3,401,110 3,459,605 3,550,995 3,647,445 3,750,367 3,841,321 3,918,553 3,997,531 4,078,297 4,160,896 4,245,374 Total Revenues 33,101,139$ 34,523,987$ 35,502,011$ 36,896,522$ 38,633,824$ 40,214,947$ 41,880,519$ 43,972,729$ 45,754,748$ 47,609,270$ 49,539,261$ 51,547,800$ ExpensesCurrent Expenses 31,519,762$ 33,795,978$ 35,449,167$ 36,886,581$ 38,382,436$ 39,939,120$ 41,559,112$ 43,244,996$ 44,999,464$ 46,825,311$ 48,725,457$ 50,702,933$ Capital Expenses - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses 31,519,762$ 33,795,978$ 35,449,167$ 36,886,581$ 38,382,436$ 39,939,120$ 41,559,112$ 43,244,996$ 44,999,464$ 46,825,311$ 48,725,457$ 50,702,933$ Revenues Over / (Under) Expenses 1,581,377$ 728,009$ 52,844$ 9,941$ 251,389$ 275,828$ 321,408$ 727,733$ 755,284$ 783,959$ 813,804$ 844,867$ Other Sources / (Uses)Transfers In 508,490$ 387,600$ 335,860$ 708,339$ 759,782$ 772,374$ 765,261$ 398,896$ 412,857$ 427,307$ 442,263$ 457,742$ Transfers (Out)(352,250)$ (372,250)$ (388,704)$ (400,559)$ (412,829)$ (425,528)$ (438,672)$ (452,275)$ (466,354)$ (480,927)$ (496,009)$ (511,619)$ Total Other Sources / (Uses)156,240$ 15,350$ (52,844)$ 307,780$ 346,953$ 346,846$ 326,589$ (53,379)$ (53,497)$ (53,620)$ (53,746)$ (53,877)$ Ending General Fund Balance 13,766,419$ 14,509,778$ 14,509,778$ 14,827,499$ 15,425,841$ 16,048,515$ 16,696,512$ 17,370,866$ 18,072,652$ 18,802,991$ 19,563,050$ 20,354,040$ Ending Unassigned Fund Balance 13,693,552$ 14,436,911$ 14,436,911$ 14,754,632$ 15,352,974$ 15,975,648$ 16,623,645$ 17,297,999$ 17,999,785$ 18,730,124$ 19,490,183$ 20,281,173$ % of Total Expenses 43%43%41%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40% General Fund Page 200 of 220 10 •$180.8M in capital projects over next ten years (2027–2036) Excludes utility funds and funds not included in the FMP Overall Capital Project Needs •Capital Imp: $86.9M •Parks: $63.6M •Central Garage: $23.4M •Building Services: $3.1M •Information Tech: $1.9M •All Others: $1.9M Page 201 of 220 11 Potential Bonding Projected Bonding by Fund 2027 Prelim Budget 2028 PROJECTED 2029 PROJECTED 2030 PROJECTED 2031 PROJECTED 2032 PROJECTED 2033 PROJECTED Capital Improvements Fund 5,625,000$ 10,075,000$ 11,250,000$ 7,275,000$ 2,495,000$ 6,530,000$ 7,000,000$ Parks Capital Project Fund - Sales Tax - 10,000,000 - 35,000,000 - - - Parks Capital Project Fund - General Obligation - - 10,000,000 - - - - Total Projected Bonding by Fund 5,625,000$ 20,075,000$ 21,250,000$ 42,275,000$ 2,495,000$ 6,530,000$ 7,000,000$ Page 202 of 220 12 2027–2036 Street Projects Amount Penn Ave Reconstruction $12,300,000 TH62 Noise Barrier East 11,000,000 Multi-Year PMP 7,885,000 73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge 7,500,000 Humbolt Ave/Lake Shore Dr 7,000,000 76th St W Reconstruction 5,100,000 Nicollet Reconstruction 3,535,000 76th & Knox Improvements 4,300,000 76th/77th St. Intersection Control 3,600,000 All Others 24,691,986 TOTALS $86,911,986 Capital Improvements Fund Page 203 of 220 13 Capital Improvements Fund Next 10 Years •$50.25M Recommended Bonding 2027: $5,625,000 2028: $10,075,000 2029: $11,250,000 2030: $7,275,000 2031: $2,495,000 2032: $6,530,000 2033: $7,000,000 Key Takeaway Fund balance reserves are healthy over time Includes Capital Improvement Reserve Page 204 of 220 14 Parks Capital Project Fund 2027 - 2036 Projects Amount Community Center Building $54,982,000 Veterans Park 2,670,768 Multi-Year Parks Major Maint.3,070,000 Outdoor Pool Improvements 1,307,307 Play Equipment Replacement 1,080,000 All Others 480,000 TOTALS $63,590,075 Page 205 of 220 15 Next 10 Years •Sales Tax Bonding: $10M Community Center in 2028 $35M Community Center in 2030 •General Obligation Bonding: $10M Community Center in 2029 •Other Revenue Sources: $475k Annual Transfer In from Liquor Store Fund •Fund Balance declines over time Parks Capital Project Fund Page 206 of 220 16 •City currently collects $0.005 sales tax until 2045 or up to $65M $45M – Community Center $11M – Wood Lake Nature Center $9M – Veteran’s Memorial Park •All projects are/will be bonded for •Projected sales tax needed to pay debt: $65M – Principal $23.7M – Interest •Current projections estimate sufficient revenues collected by 2044 Sales Tax Fund Page 207 of 220 17 Ice Arena Fund Next 10 Years •$1.8M in capital projects •No bonding recommended •Assumes 3.97% annual increase in charges for services •Negative fund balance resolves by 2028 Key Takeaway Sufficient fund balance projected beginning in 2028 Page 208 of 220 18 Swimming Pool Fund Next 10 Years •$280k in capital projects •No bonding recommended •Assumes 4.02% annual increase in charges for services •Projected to receive some General Fund support in later years Key Takeaway Fund is projected to remain stable going forward Page 209 of 220 19 Next 10 Years •Operating revenues currently cover operating costs, excluding depreciation •Recommend increasing charges 5%/year to maintain •$23.4M in Capital Projects Supported with Equipment Levy Central Garage Fund Key Takeaways Fund may need additional support in later years as fund balance declines after 2030 Page 210 of 220 20 Next 10 Years •Operating revenues do not cover operating costs, excluding deprecation Supported with Equipment Levy •Recommend increasing charges 4.5%/year •$1.9M in capital projects •Fund expected to be negative by 2033 Information Technology Fund Key Takeaway Fund balance may need additional support from other funds or higher annual charges for services Page 211 of 220 21 Next 10 Years •Current operating revenues do not cover operating costs, excluding depreciation •Recommend increasing charges 4%/year •$3.1M in Capital Projects $1.8M from Capital Improvements Reserves Supported with Equipment Levy Supported with interest earnings from Capital Improvements Reserve Fund Building Services Fund Key Takeaway Strong fund balance and sufficient reserves Page 212 of 220 22 Impact on Median-Valued Home Next 10 Years •Assumes 2% annual increase in existing property values for 2028 & beyond•2027: $130/year ($11/$.36) = 7.5% Based on early valuation data from Hennepin County $72/year due to changes in tax base and tax levy•2031: $153/year ($13/$.43) = 7.0%•2032: $152/year ($13/$.42) = 6.5%•2033: $145/year ($12/$.40) = 5.8%•2034: $143/year ($12/$.40) = 5.4%•Other Years: $103/year average = 4.8% Page 213 of 220 23 •The FMP responds to the strategic direction of the City Council as well as the needs of the Richfield community Some of the issues may take a few year to address Need to balance financial needs with Strategic Priorities Monitor the balances of various funds Property tax impacts depend on the timing of additional expenditures Borrowing limited as much as possible to meet capital needs and lessen property tax impact Conclusion Page 214 of 220 24 AQ & Page 215 of 220 25 Ehlers is the joint marketing name of the following affiliated businesses (collectively, the “Affiliates”): Ehlers & Associates, Inc. (“EA”), a municipal advisor registered with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); Ehlers Investment Partners, LLC (“EIP”), an SEC registered investment adviser; and Bond Trust Services Corporation (“BTS”), a holder of a limited banking charter issued by the State of Minnesota. Where an activity requires registration as a municipal advisor pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act of 1934 (Financial Management Planning and Debt Issuance & Management), such activity is or will be performed by EA; where an activity requires registration as an investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Investments and Treasury Management), such activity is or will be performed by EIP; and where an activity requires licensing as a bank pursuant to applicable state law (paying agent services shown under Debt Issuance & Management), such activity is or will be performed by BTS. Activities not requiring registration may be performed by any Affiliate. This communication does not constitute an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any investment (including without limitation, any municipal financial product, municipal security, or other security) or agreement with respect to any investment strategy or program. This communication is offered without charge to clients, friends, and prospective clients of the Affiliates as a source of general information about the services Ehlers provides. This communication is neither advice nor a recommendation by any Affiliate to any person with respect to any municipal financial product, municipal security, or other security, as such terms are defined pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act of 1934 and rules of the MSRB. This communication does not constitute investment advice by any Affiliate that purports to meet the objectives or needs of any person pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or applicable state law. Important Disclosures Page 216 of 220 City of Richfield, Minnesota 40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40% FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FMP)LONG RANGE BUDGET PROJECTIONS Inflation Assumptions 1 Revenue (Non-property tax)2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% 2 Expenses 4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0% 3 Interest Earnings 5.64%1.74%1.90%0.73%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50% 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036GENERAL FUND Revised Budget Prelim Budget Revenue4General Property Taxes 21,040,066 22,211,293 23,306,044 25,223,647 26,308,418 27,223,756 28,512,524 29,893,501 31,368,446 33,281,230 34,879,484 36,545,787 38,282,981 40,094,021 5 Contingency to Maintain Fund Balance 40%- 317,721 598,342 622,674 647,997 674,354 701,787 730,339 760,058 790,990 6 Licenses & Permits 981,777 1,133,987 1,293,755 1,123,340 1,157,740 1,180,895 1,204,513 1,228,603 1,253,175 1,278,239 1,303,803 1,329,879 1,356,477 1,383,606 7 LGA 2,038,711 3,392,552 3,410,633 3,448,397 3,503,091 3,573,153 3,644,616 3,717,508 3,791,858 3,867,695 3,945,049 4,023,950 4,104,429 4,186,518 8 Intergovernmental 1,612,150 1,780,525 2,264,160 2,450,833 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 9 Charges for Services 1,919,962 2,011,939 2,353,340 1,939,370 1,891,465 1,929,294 1,967,880 2,007,238 2,047,383 2,088,330 2,130,097 2,172,699 2,216,153 2,260,476 10 Fines & Forfeits 180,391 221,719 221,454 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 11 Special Assessments 4,308 19,141 6,889 - - - - - - - - - - - 12 Interest Earnings 659,981 198,320 222,216 100,000 116,078 145,098 177,930 215,962 240,728 250,448 260,563 271,090 282,045 293,446 13 Miscellaneous 49,918 27,950 22,648 13,400 69,322 70,708 72,122 73,565 75,036 76,537 78,068 79,629 81,222 82,846 14 Total Revenue 28,487,264 30,997,426 33,101,139 34,523,987 35,502,011 36,896,522 38,633,824 40,214,947 41,880,519 43,972,729 45,754,748 47,609,270 49,539,261 51,547,800 Expenses15Current16Legislative / Executive ALL 1,034,837 1,162,137 1,266,192 1,308,196 1,284,676 1,336,243 1,389,881 1,445,673 1,503,705 1,564,067 1,626,855 1,692,162 1,760,094 1,830,752 17 Administrative Services ALL 959,262 1,250,239 1,212,918 1,449,485 1,141,770 1,188,119 1,236,352 1,286,546 1,338,781 1,393,140 1,449,710 1,508,581 1,569,847 1,633,605 18 Human Resources ALL - - - - 562,852 585,366 608,781 633,132 658,457 684,796 712,187 740,675 770,302 801,114 19 Finance ALL 1,046,114 1,359,854 547,896 812,080 705,066 733,525 763,136 793,943 825,995 859,343 894,038 930,135 967,690 1,006,765 20 Public Safety ALL 11,133,159 11,907,830 12,680,034 13,332,315 14,312,605 14,891,509 15,493,877 16,120,668 16,772,870 17,451,516 18,157,684 18,892,492 19,657,106 20,452,735 21 Fire ALL 5,618,697 5,902,146 6,239,563 6,426,700 6,846,680 7,122,479 7,409,404 7,707,905 8,018,451 8,341,527 8,677,642 9,027,321 9,391,115 9,769,594 22 Community Development ALL 1,652,012 1,736,430 1,688,853 1,884,350 1,972,361 2,051,765 2,134,369 2,220,301 2,309,698 2,402,699 2,499,448 2,600,098 2,704,804 2,813,732 23 Public Works ALL 5,064,179 5,104,976 5,377,729 6,021,652 5,751,837 5,990,652 6,239,454 6,498,662 6,768,718 7,050,078 7,343,221 7,648,642 7,966,862 8,298,421 24 Recreation Services ALL 2,209,931 2,324,290 2,506,577 2,561,200 2,871,320 2,986,923 3,107,183 3,232,289 3,362,437 3,497,830 3,638,679 3,785,205 3,937,638 4,096,215 25 Total Expenses 28,718,191 30,747,902 31,519,762 33,795,978 35,449,167 36,886,581 38,382,436 39,939,120 41,559,112 43,244,996 44,999,464 46,825,311 48,725,457 50,702,933 26 Revenue Over / (Under) Expenses (230,927) 249,524 1,581,377 728,009 52,844 9,941 251,389 275,828 321,408 727,733 755,284 783,959 813,804 844,867 Other Financing Sources/(Uses) 27 Transfers In Capital Improvements Fund 639,598 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 Transfers In Liquor Fund 3.5%347,927 622,290 508,490 387,600 335,860 347,615 359,782 372,374 385,407 398,896 412,857 427,307 442,263 457,742 29 Transfers In Public Safety Aid - Fire - - - - - 60,724 100,000 100,000 21,598 - - - - - 30 Transfers In Public Safety Aid - Police - - - - - 300,000 300,000 300,000 358,256 - - - - - 31 Transfers (Out)Utility Franchise Fee Fund - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 Transfers (Out)Ice Arena Fund 3.5%(140,000) (180,000) (220,000) (255,000) (244,625) (294,587) (304,898) (315,569) (326,614) (338,045) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) (100,000) 33 Transfers (Out)Swimming Pool Fund (120,000) (50,000) (80,000) (40,000) (40,000) - - - - - (49,876) (62,122) (74,796) (287,914) 34 Transfers (Out)Communications Fund - - - (25,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) 35 Transfers (Out)Other Funds 3.5%- (100,000) (52,250) (52,250) (54,079) (55,972) (57,931) (59,959) (62,058) (64,230) (66,478) (68,805) (71,213) (73,705) 36 Sale of Fixed Assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38 Total Other Sources / (Uses)727,525 292,290 156,240 15,350 (52,844) 307,780 346,953 346,846 326,589 (53,379) (53,497) (53,620) (53,746) (53,877) 39 Net Change in Fund Balance 496,598 541,814 1,737,617 743,359 - 317,721 598,342 622,674 647,997 674,354 701,787 730,339 760,058 790,990 39 Prior Period Adjustments40Ending General Fund Balance 11,486,988 12,028,802 13,766,419 14,509,778 14,509,778 14,827,499 15,425,841 16,048,515 16,696,512 17,370,866 18,072,652 18,802,991 19,563,050 20,354,040 41 Nonspendable - Prepaid Items 61,640 317,975 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 42 Unassigned General Fund Balance 11,425,348 11,710,827 13,693,552 14,436,911 14,436,911 14,754,632 15,352,974 15,975,648 16,623,645 17,297,999 17,999,785 18,730,124 19,490,183 20,281,173 43 % of FB to Current Year Exp (basis for City Policy of 40%)40%40%38%43%43%41%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%44 % of FB to Current Year Revenues (calcs used by Moody's)40%38%41%42%41%40%40%40%40%39%39%39%39%39% PROJECTED GENERAL FUND BUDGETACTUAL 8/11/2026 Page 1 - Summary Page 217 of 220 City of Richfield, Minnesota 40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40% FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FMP)LONG RANGE BUDGET PROJECTIONS Inflation Assumptions 1 Revenue (Non-property tax)2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% 2 Expenses 4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0% 3 Interest Earnings 5.64%1.74%1.90%0.73%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50% 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036GENERAL FUND Revised Budget Prelim Budget PROJECTED ACTUAL 45 General Fund Operating Tax Levy 21,236,477 22,442,251 23,654,051 25,475,883 26,308,418 27,541,477 29,110,866 30,516,175 32,016,443 33,955,584 35,581,271 37,276,126 39,043,039 40,885,011 46 Annual Increase 5.7%5.4%7.7%3.3%4.7%5.7%4.8%4.9%6.1%4.8%4.8%4.7%4.7% Debt Service Funds 47 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2013A 2034 161,138 158,723 161,438 149,730 161,018 162,330 158,235 109,390 110,387 135,978 136,818 - - - 48 General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2015 2036 280,868 284,570 279,451 279,582 284,832 279,320 283,756 212,653 205,861 249,274 252,371 254,904 256,873 - 49 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B 2028 523,289 523,919 518,827 530,750 298,657 - - - - - - - - - 50 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016C 2029 731,719 736,969 736,443 697,313 744,581 462,613 - - - - - - - - 51 General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2017 2038 624,068 621,810 624,488 588,500 622,650 621,338 619,763 498,175 470,944 473,700 550,813 552,913 619,369 620,813 52 General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bon 2029 355,005 359,520 360,728 339,675 362,198 367,710 - - - - - - - - 53 General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2018 2039 284,339 284,393 284,288 284,025 309,544 313,829 312,866 211,731 205,174 258,776 271,384 268,765 271,209 273,296 54 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A 2040 386,190 382,410 378,420 356,700 374,850 380,520 367,238 380,363 332,358 348,538 355,468 356,675 347,068 358,460 55 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A 2041 195,137 196,607 197,920 187,570 194,822 195,820 196,660 197,342 169,442 181,187 183,182 185,072 181,607 183,392 56 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B 2033 130,867 133,912 131,602 126,985 132,127 134,962 132,442 71,056 44,794 43,088 - - - - 57 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A 2043 427,980 430,710 427,770 405,200 431,550 432,810 428,400 429,030 279,240 399,030 398,400 402,600 400,920 398,820 58 Total Debt Service Funds 4,100,600 4,113,543 4,101,375 3,946,030 3,916,828 3,351,251 2,499,359 2,109,740 1,818,199 2,089,571 2,148,435 2,020,929 2,077,046 1,834,781 Special Levies 59 Economic Development Authority Fund 579,096 599,364 623,343 645,160 667,740 691,111 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,067 820,824 849,553 879,287 910,062 60 Capital Improvements Central Garage (Fleet) Levy 700,000 850,000 1,135,000 1,174,725 1,775,457 2,187,075 2,172,791 2,172,791 1,737,614 1,737,614 1,737,614 1,737,614 1,737,614 1,737,614 61 Capital Improvements Technology Levy 168,400 358,000 393,800 407,583 421,848 436,613 451,894 451,894 451,894 451,894 451,894 451,894 451,894 451,894 62 Capital Improvements Building Services Levy - - - 100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 110,872 110,872 110,872 110,872 110,872 110,872 110,872 63 Total Special Levies 1,447,496 1,807,364 2,152,143 2,327,468 2,968,545 3,421,922 3,450,857 3,475,893 3,066,628 3,093,447 3,121,204 3,149,933 3,179,667 3,210,442 64 Total Tax Levy 26,784,573 28,363,158 29,907,569 31,749,381 33,193,791 34,314,650 35,061,082 36,101,808 36,901,270 39,138,602 40,850,910 42,446,988 44,299,752 45,930,234 65 Potential Debt Levy (See Page 5 for details)- - 529,359 1,517,776 2,657,789 4,291,868 4,536,642 5,177,274 5,864,015 5,864,015 5,864,015 66 Total Tax Levy and Potential Debt Levy 26,784,573 28,363,158 29,907,569 31,749,381 33,193,791 34,844,009 36,578,858 38,759,597 41,193,138 43,675,244 46,028,184 48,311,003 50,163,767 51,794,249 67 Percent Change 5.9%5.4%6.2%4.5%5.0%5.0%6.0%6.3%6.0%5.4%5.0%3.8%3.3%68 Less: Fiscal Disparities (3,688,262) (3,724,374) (4,699,663) (4,834,171) (4,895,336) (5,060,433) (5,221,581) (5,357,824) (5,532,399) (5,790,746) (6,031,218) (6,242,677) (6,437,225) (6,559,769) 69 Net Levy to Taxpayers 23,096,311 24,638,784 25,207,906 26,915,210 28,298,455 29,783,576 31,357,277 33,401,773 35,660,739 37,884,497 39,996,966 42,068,326 43,726,542 45,234,480 70 71 Existing Urban Tax Base 45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755 49,684,525 50,056,016 51,057,136 52,387,983 54,042,753 55,123,608 56,226,080 57,350,602 58,497,614 59,667,566 72 New Tax Capacity (See Page 3 for details)(610,000) - 303,632 595,108 - - - - - - 73 Total Tax Capacity 45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755 49,074,525 50,056,016 51,360,768 52,983,091 54,042,753 55,123,608 56,226,080 57,350,602 58,497,614 59,667,566 74 Urban Tax Rate on Net Tax Capacity 50.841%52.248%54.734%55.783%57.664%59.501%61.053%63.042%65.986%68.726%71.136%73.353%74.749%75.811% 75 Tax Rate % Change 2.77%4.76%1.92%3.37%3.18%2.61%3.26%4.67%4.15%3.51%3.12%1.90%1.42% 76 City Taxes $326,900 (prior to homestead credit) as of 2026 1,518 1,612 1,650 1,728 1,858 1,961 2,058 2,174 2,327 2,478 2,623 2,765 2,882 2,98877% tax increase/decrease avg home $326,900 value 6.21%2.38%4.72%7.51%5.55%4.94%5.62%7.04%6.52%5.83%5.44%4.20%3.68% 78 Existing Tax Base Inflation / (Deflation)3.8%-2.3%4.8%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND TAX IMPACTFinal Year 8/11/2026 Page 2 - Summary Page 218 of 220 City of Richfield, Minnesota Financial Management Plan HRA General Fund Inflation Assumptions1Revenue (Non-property tax)3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2 Property Tax Revenue 0.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 3 Interest Earnings 1.50%1.75%2.00%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50% 4 Expenses 3.50%3.50%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% Revised Budget Prelim Budget HRA General Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Maximum Tax Levy Calculation:Estimated Market Value 4,868,218,300 5,061,837,200 5,039,434,100 5,050,617,100 5,202,135,613 5,238,550,562 5,343,321,573 5,482,247,934 5,657,679,868 5,770,833,465 5,886,250,134 6,003,975,137 6,124,054,640 6,246,535,733 (Per M.S. 469.033 Subd. 6) x 0.0185%900,620$ 936,440$ 932,295$ 934,364$ 962,395$ 969,132$ 988,514$ 1,014,216$ 1,046,671$ 1,067,604$ 1,088,956$ 1,110,735$ 1,132,950$ 1,155,609$ REVENUE5General Property Tax 666,533 688,925 705,344 742,230 742,230 764,497 787,432 811,055 835,387 860,449 886,262 912,850 940,236 968,443 6 Intergovernmental 100,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Miscellaneous 165,897 20,494 42,752 12,260 13,000 13,390 13,792 14,206 14,632 15,071 15,523 15,989 16,469 16,963 8 Interest Earnings 90,253 119,540 110,876 80,000 80,000 81,262 110,843 120,946 131,398 142,206 153,375 164,912 176,823 189,113 9 Total Revenue 1,022,683 828,959 858,972 834,490 835,230 859,149 912,067 946,207 981,417 1,017,726 1,055,160 1,093,751 1,133,528 1,174,519 EXPENSES 10 Current 11 Personnel services 291,350 311,878 343,031 351,990 357,810 372,122 387,007 402,487 418,586 435,329 452,742 470,852 489,686 509,273 12 Other serices and charges 238,578 114,356 106,555 26,750 45,320 47,133 49,018 50,979 53,018 55,139 57,345 59,639 62,025 64,506 13 I.T. Fund 73,190 30,830 32,217 33,667 35,182 36,765 38,419 40,148 41,955 43,843 45,816 14 Building Services Fund 11,860 28,331 29,464 30,643 31,869 33,144 34,470 35,849 37,283 38,774 40,325 15 Capital Outlay 16 Community Development 9,250 - 36,696 - - - - - - - - - - - 17 Total Expenses 539,178 426,234 486,282 463,790 462,291 480,936 500,335 520,517 541,513 563,357 586,084 609,729 634,328 659,920 18 Revenues Over / (Under) Expenses 483,505 402,725 372,690 370,700 372,939 378,213 411,732 425,690 439,904 454,369 469,076 484,022 499,200 514,599 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES / (USES)19 Transfers In - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 Sale of Fixed Assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 Transfers Out (8,009) (7,600) (7,600) (38,620) (90,890) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) 23 Total Other Sources / (Uses)(8,009) (7,600) (7,600) (38,620) (90,890) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) 24 Prior Period Adjustments 25 Ending General Fund Balance (FB)2,688,756 3,083,881 3,448,971 3,781,051 4,063,100 4,433,713 4,837,845 5,255,935 5,688,239 6,135,008 6,596,484 7,072,906 7,564,506 8,071,505 26 % of FB to Current Year Exp (basis for City Policy of 35% - 50%)0%724%709%815%879%922%967%1010%1050%1089%1126%1160%1193%1223% 27 % of FB to Current Year Revenues (calcs used by Moody's)0%372%402%453%486%516%530%555%580%603%625%647%667%687% 28 HRA Fund Operating Tax Levy 675,960 699,617 720,610 742,230 742,230 764,497 787,432 811,055 835,387 860,449 886,262 912,850 940,236 968,443 29 Annual Increase 3.5%3.0%3.0%0.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0% 30 Total Tax Levy 675,960 699,617 720,610 742,230 742,230 764,497 787,432 811,055 835,387 860,449 886,262 912,850 940,236 968,44331Less: Fiscal Disparities (95,159)(93,657)(115,584)(116,053)(113,908)(112,329)(114,347)(115,049)(115,313)(116,892)(118,384)(119,876)(121,368)(122,860)32 Net Levy to Taxpayers 580,801 605,960 605,026 626,177 628,322 652,168 673,085 696,006 720,074 743,557 767,878 792,974 818,868 845,5833334Existing Tax Base 45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755 49,684,525 50,056,016 51,057,136 52,387,983 54,042,753 55,123,608 56,226,080 57,350,602 58,497,614 59,667,566 35 New Net Tax Capacity (See Page 7 for details)0 0 0 0 (610,000)0 303,632 595,108 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total Net Tax Capacity 1E+07 45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755 49,074,525 50,056,016 51,360,768 52,983,091 54,042,753 55,123,608 56,226,080 57,350,602 58,497,614 59,667,566 37 Tax Rate on Tax Capacity (Line 32/Line 36)1.279%1.285%1.314%1.298%1.280%1.303%1.311%1.314%1.332%1.349%1.366%1.383%1.400%1.417% 38 Tax Rate % Change 0.00%2.26%-1.22%-1.39%1.80%0.61%0.23%1.37%1.28%1.26%1.24%1.23%1.21% 39 City Taxes on $160,000 Residential Homestead 18 18 18 19 20 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 2740% Tax Increase / (Decrease)0.00%0.00%-0.66%4.79%2.27%2.66%3.15%3.45%5.33%3.71%3.76%3.74%3.61%3.64% 41 Existing Tax Base Inflation / (Deflation)3.8%-2.3%4.8%3.0%0.7%2.0%2.6%3.2%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%HRA GENERAL FUND BUDGETActual PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND TAX IMPACTProjected 8/11/2026 Page 3 - HRA General Fund Page 219 of 220 City of Richfield, Minnesota Financial Management Plan Economic Development Authority Fund Inflation Assumptions 1 Revenue (Non-property tax)3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%2 Property Tax Revenue 3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3 Interest Earnings 1.50%1.75%2.00%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50% 4 Expenses 3.50%3.50%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% Revised Budget Prelim Budget EDA Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 REVENUE5General Property Tax 579,486 599,364 623,343 645,160 667,740 691,111 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,067 820,824 849,553 879,287 910,062 6 Intergovernmental - 38,875 12,500 12,500 - - - - - - - - - 7 Miscellaneous 2,400 2,515 203,871 7,850 2,650 2,730 2,812 2,896 2,983 3,072 3,164 3,259 3,357 3,458 8 Interest Earnings 36,230 57,775 46,213 35,000 35,000 21,962 20,449 13,016 4,988 (3,669) (12,994) (23,022) (33,795) (45,354) 9 Total Revenue 618,116 659,654 912,302 700,510 717,890 715,803 738,561 756,248 774,219 792,470 810,994 829,790 848,849 868,166 EXPENSES 10 Current 11 Personnel services 107,924 141,951 161,049 163,810 189,790 197,382 205,277 213,488 222,028 230,909 240,145 249,751 259,741 270,131 12 Other services and charges 320,791 414,559 581,947 710,010 754,580 784,763 816,154 848,800 882,752 918,062 954,784 992,975 1,032,694 1,074,002 13 IT Fund - - - - 13,210 13,804 14,425 15,074 15,752 16,461 17,202 17,976 18,785 19,630 14 Capital Outlay 15 Community Development - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 Total Expenses 428,715 556,510 742,996 873,820 957,580 995,949 1,035,856 1,077,362 1,120,532 1,165,432 1,212,131 1,260,702 1,311,220 1,363,763 17 Revenues Over / (Under) Expenses 189,401 103,144 169,306 (173,310) (239,690) (280,146) (297,295) (321,114) (346,313) (372,962) (401,137) (430,912) (462,371) (495,597) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES / (USES)18 Transfers In - - - 55,000 - - - - - - - - - 19 Sale of Fixed Assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 Transfers Out - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 Total Other Sources / (Uses)- - - - 55,000 - - - - - - - - - 23 Prior Period Adjustments 24 Ending General Fund Balance (FB)1,183,639 1,286,783 1,456,089 1,282,779 1,098,089 817,943 520,647 199,534 (146,779) (519,742) (920,878) (1,351,790) (1,814,161) (2,309,758) 25 % of FB to Current Year Exp (basis for City Policy of 35% - 50%)0%231%196%147%115%82%50%19%-13%-45%-76%-107%-138%-169% 26 % of FB to Current Year Revenues (calcs used by Moody's)0%195%160%183%153%114%70%26%-19%-66%-114%-163%-214%-266% 27 EDA Fund Operating Tax Levy - 599,364 - 645,160 667,740 691,111 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,067 820,824 849,553 879,287 910,062 28 Annual Increase 0.0%0.0%-100.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5% 29 Total Tax Levy 0 599,364 0 645,160 667,740 691,111 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,067 820,824 849,553 879,287 910,062 30 Less: Fiscal Disparities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 031Net Levy to Taxpayers 0 599,364 0 645,160 667,740 691,111 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,067 820,824 849,553 879,287 910,0623233Existing Tax Base 45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755 49,684,525 50,056,016 51,057,136 52,387,983 54,042,753 55,123,608 56,226,080 57,350,602 58,497,614 59,667,566 34 New Net Tax Capacity (See Page 7 for details)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,431,180 0 0 035Total Net Tax Capacity 1E+07 45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755 49,684,525 50,056,016 51,057,136 52,387,983 54,042,753 55,123,608 57,657,260 57,350,602 58,497,614 59,667,566 36 Tax Rate on Tax Capacity (Line 31/Line 35)0.000%1.271%0.001%1.337%1.345%1.381%1.401%1.413%1.418%1.439%1.424%1.481%1.503%1.525% 37 Tax Rate % Change 0.00%0.00%-99.92%133600.00%0.60%2.68%1.45%0.86%0.35%1.48%-1.04%4.00%1.49%1.46% 38 City Taxes on $160,000 Residential Homestead 0 17 0 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 24 26 27 2839% Tax Increase / (Decrease)0.00%0.00%-99.92%137023.33%3.11%5.25%4.06%3.32%2.81%3.97%1.44%6.49%3.97%3.89% 40 Existing Tax Base Inflation / (Deflation)0.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%EDA FUND BUDGETActual PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND TAX IMPACTProjected 8/11/2026 Page 4 - EDA Fund Page 220 of 220