062215 PacketPLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
June 22, 2015
7:00 p.m.
Introductory Proceedings
Roll Call
Approval of Minutes: Study session and regular Planning Commission meeting of May 27, 2015.
Opportunity for Citizens to Address the Commission on items not on the Agenda
New Business
ITEM #1 PC Letter#13 Consideration of the 2017-2020 Capital Improvement Plan
and a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of
the Capital Improvement Program and the 2016 Capital
Improvement Budget.
Public Hearing
ITEM #2 15-CUP-03, Consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance
15-VAR-02 to allow construction of a cluster housing development
consisting of five townhomes at 2517—76th Street West
Old Business
Liaison Reports
Community Services Advisory Commission
City Council
Housing and Redevelopment Authority(HRA)
Richfield School Board
Transportation Commission
Chamber of Commerce
Other
City Planner's Report
Next Meeting Date: July 27, 2015
Adjournment
Auxiliary aid for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612/861-9738".
Planning Commission
Study Session Minutes
May 27, 2015
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Rick Jabs, Commissioners Susan Rosenberg,
Gordon Vizecky, Erin Vrieze Daniels, and Sean Hayford
Oleary
MEMBERS ABSENT:Commissioners Dan Kitzberger and Charles Standfuss
STAFF PRESENT: John Stark, Community Development Director
Melissa Poehlman, City Planner
Matt Brillhart, Planning Technician
OTHERS PRESENT: Councilmember Pat Elliot, Councilmember Edwina Garcia
Chairperson Jabs called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ITEM #1 Discuss parking in the Penn Avenue Corridor.
City Planner Melissa Poehlman presented the results of the parking study. Possible
options for code modifications include: take a site by site approach, get rid of parking
minimums altogether or significantly reduce existing standards.
Chair Jabs stated that relaxing the requirements would be a business-friendly move.
Councilmember Pat Elliot agreed and added that "buy-in" was needed from residents on
Queen Avenue and Oliver Avenue.
Commissioners and staff continued discussion. General consensus was that parking
requirements for businesses in the Penn Avenue Corridor should be significantly
reduced, more similar to Minneapolis' current standards. Outreach should be conducted
with businesses and area residents, possibly at the Open Streets event.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:45 p.m.
Gordon Vizecky, Secretary
Planning Commission
y Minutes
May 27, 2015
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Rick Jabs and Commissioners Susan
Rosenberg, Gordon Vizecky, Erin Vrieze Daniels and Sean
Hayford Oleary
MEMBERS ABSENT:Commissioners Charles Standfuss and Dan Kitzberger
STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, City Planner
Matt Brillhart, Planning Technician
James Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director
Karen Shragg, Woodlake Nature Center Director
OTHERS PRESENT: See Item #3.
Chairperson Jabs called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Rosenberg, S/Vrieze Daniels to approve the minutes of the March 23, 2015 regular
meeting.
Motion carried: 5-0.
OPEN FORUM
No members of the public spoke.
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
ITEM #1
15-SP-01 — Consider a request for site plan approval to allow demolition of an
existing 2,211 sq. ft. building (7528 Lyndale Avenue) and construction of a new
two-story addition to the existing building at 7524 Lyndale Avenue.
City Planner Melissa Poehlman presented the staff report.
M/Rosenberg, S/Vizecky to close the public hearing.
Motion carried: 5-0
May 27, 2015
M/Rosenberg, S/Vizecky to recommend approval of the Site Plan.
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #2
15-IUP-01 — Consider a request for an interim use permit to allow a temporary 75-
foot telecommunications tower at 6401 Penn Avenue.
Planning Technician Matt Brillhart presented the staff report.
M/Vrieze Daniels, S/Vizecky to close the public hearing.
Motion carried: 5-0
M/Vizecky, S/ Rosenberg to recommend approval of the Interim Use Permit.
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #3
15-SP-02 — Consider request for site plan approval to allow construction of a
community band shell at Veterans Park.
Poehlman presented the staff report.
Chair Jabs asked speakers to sign in and limit comments to three minutes or less.
Eleven speakers expressed various concerns with the location, design, materials,
sustainability, funding, and potential noise impacts of the proposed bandshell. Speakers
also stated concerns regarding potential impacts on wetlands and bird species at
Veterans Park. Speakers also stated concerns that the bandshell would be duplicative,
referencing the possibility of a bandshell at the Lyndale Gardens redevelopment site.
One speaker noted support for the bandshell by the Richfield Symphonic Band.
The following individuals spoke at the public hearing:
Ann Laughlin Minneapolis Audubon Society
Margaret Scheirman 6856 Oliver Ave
Birgit Johnson 6332 13"Ave
Carol Propotnik 6400 11th Ave
Steve Lavictoire 4308 15t Ave (Minneapolis)
Heidi Gaibor 6915 Wentworth Ave
Steve Harris 6715 Portland Ave
Grover Dodds 661212 1h Ave
Rene Anderson 701 66 1h St E
Julie Opitz 6500 12"Ave
Susan Myers 62264 1h Ave
Jon Clay 6600 Columbus Ave
Robert Hall 7309 Oliver Ave
2
May 27, 2015
M/Rosenberg, S/Hayford Oleary to close the public hearing.
Motion carried: 5-0
In response to questions from Commission Hayford Oleary, Nature Center Director
Karen Shragg stated that the Raptor Center and Minnesota DNR had been consulted
and did not anticipate impacts on birds at Veterans Park. Recreation Services Director
James Topitzhofer stated that the proposed hours were written to match the City's noise
ordinance.
In response to questions from Commissioner Vrieze Daniels, Topitzhofer stated that
most performances would be small groups. The present budget did not include sound
amplification equipment, but groups could provide their own equipment. Topitzhofer
stated that noise levels would be monitored on site, and further described noise
ordinance thresholds, set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Poehlman stated
that The Cornerstone Group had not yet applied for building permits for the Lyndale
Gardens site, but had recently been granted an extension by the City Council.
In response to a question from Commission Hayford Oleary, Topitzhofer stated that the
City Council had voted to select the Veterans Park site over the Lyndale Gardens site,
citing issues regarding site ownership and parking availability at Lyndale Gardens.
M/Rosenberg, S/Vizecky to recommend approval of the Site Plan.
Commissioner Vrieze Daniels stated concerns regarding noise levels and the lack of
information on that issue.
Motion carried: 4-1 (Vrieze Daniels dissenting)
NEW BUSINESS
None.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
LIAISON REPORTS
Community Services Advisory Commission: Commissioner Rosenberg
City Council: No report
HRA: Commissioner Vrieze Daniels
Richfield School Board: No report
Transportation Commission: Commissioner Hayford Oleary
Chamber of Commerce: Commissioner Vizecky
3
May 27, 2015
CITY PLANNER'S REPORT
Poehlman noted that training sessions were available for commissioners if interested.
ADJOURNMENT
M/Vizecky, S/Hayford Oleary to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried: 5-0
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:08 p.m.
Gordon Vizecky
Secretary
4
AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM# 1
REPORT# 13
CASE#
J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PC MEETING DATE: .TUNE 229 2015
ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of the 2017-2020 Capital Improvement Program and a finding of consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan of the Capital Improvement Program and the 2016 Capital
Improvement Budget.
II.RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
By motion:
1. Recommend approval of the 2017-2020 Capital Improvement
Program; and
2. Adopt a resolution finding that the 2016 Capital Improvement
Budget and 2017-2020 Capital Improvement Program are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
II. BACKGROUND
Each year, the City Manager makes a recommendation to the City Council regarding
the Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) for the upcoming year. The Planning
Commission is responsible for reviewing the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and
making a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission is also responsible for
ensuring that the CIB and the CIP are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Finance Manager, Chris Regis will present a summary and answer questions.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
The CUCIP is the City's immediate budget and five-year plan for making
investments in publicly owned facilities and infrastructure.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
The Planning Commission is being asked to recommend approval of the CIP
and to adopt a resolution finding that the CIB and the CIP are consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
C. FINANCIAL
See the CIB/CIP document attached.
D. LEGAL
The Planning Commission is required by City Charter to prepare and
recommend a CIP for inclusion in the annual budget message of the City
Council.
The Planning Commission is required by State Statute to review all proposed
capital improvements within the City and make written findings to the City
Council for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
Recommend approval of the CIP with changes.
Do not recommend approval of the CIP and determine that the CIB is not consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Richfield City Charter, Chapter 7, Sections 7.05 and 7.06, Subd. 2(ii) and 2(iii) and
Minnesota Statute, Section 462.356, Subd. 2
2016 Capital Improvement Budget and 2017-2020 Capital Improvement Program
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
Chris Regis, City Finance Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE RICHFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDING THAT THE 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND
2017-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan regarding
the proposed capital improvements in the 2016 Capital Improvement Budget and 2017-2020
Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed capital
improvements is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that the
proposed capital improvements found in the 2016 Capital Improvement Budget and the 2017-
2020 Capital Improvement Program are in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted this 22nd day of June, 2015 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota.
Rick Jabs, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Gordon Vizecky, Secretary
CHAPTER 7
RICHFIELD CITY CHARTER
TAXATION AND FINANCES
Section 7.05. Preparation and Submission of Annual Budget. At a special budget meeting of
the Council on or before September 8, the City Manager must submit to the Council a
proposed budget and a budget message in the form and containing the information specified in
Section 7.06. In preparing the budget and the budget message, the Manager must obtain from
City department heads information regarding (i) proposed expenditures for the ensuing fiscal
year, and (ii) capital projects and capital expenditures proposed to be undertaken in the
ensuing budget year and in the following four fiscal years. The Council must hold one or more
informational meetings on the proposed budget at which the public may provide comments and
may thereafter revise the proposed expenditures and capital projects contained in the
proposed budget document. (Amended Bill 1990-13; Bill No. 2003-23)
Section 7.06. Form of Annual Budget. Subdivision 1. The budget must contain a
financial plan for the ensuing fiscal year. The financial plan must include: (i) a budget
message, (ii) a general summary of the financial plan, (iii) estimates of revenues applicable to
proposed expenditures, and, (iv) proposed expenditures. Proposed expenditures may not
exceed proposed revenues. Proposed expenditures for the general and special revenue funds
must (i) be listed by organization, unit or activity, and (ii) be in parallel columns opposite the
major and minor object of the expenditure showing the amount of expenditure for the last fiscal
year, the amount estimated for the current fiscal year and the proposed expenditure for the
ensuing fiscal year. The revenues attributable to each general and special fund must be
presented in a similar manner. The statement of revenues must include the source of and
amount of miscellaneous revenues, the amount of surplus of prior fiscal year revenues, and
the amount of revenues raised by property taxes in the prior fiscal year and estimated to be
raised in the current fiscal year. (Amended Bill 1990-13; Bill No. 2003-23)
Subd. 2. The Budget Message. The budget message may be submitted by the
Manager as a separate document but it must accompany the budget. The message must
contain the following elements: (Amended Bill No. 2003-23)
ii) Capital Improvements. The message must contain a description of pending and
proposed capital projects together with estimates of the costs of those projects and the
sources of funds to be used to pay for them. (Amended Bill 2003-23)
iii) Capital Program. The message must contain, or have attached to it, a Capital
Project Plan for the four fiscal years following the fiscal year of the budget. The Capital Project
Plan is to be prepared by the Manager after consultation with the department heads and any
informational meetings conducted under Section 7.05. (Amended Bill 1990-13; Bill No. 2003-
23)
462.356 Procedure to affect plan: generally.
Minnesota State Statute
Subd. 2. Compliance with plan. After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has
been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no
publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of,
nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special district or
agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until
after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital
improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or
political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition,
disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Failure of the planning
agency to report on the proposal within 45 days after such a reference, or such other period as
may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements
of this subdivision. The governing body may, by resolution adopted by two-thirds vote dispense
with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed
acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the
comprehensive municipal plan.
2016
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
2017-2020
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
City Manager's Draft
2016 Capital Improvement Budget
PROJECT EXPENDITURE
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Park Maintenance 45,000 R
Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal 5,000 R
Lincoln Field Loan Repay 156,700 R
Community Center Boiler and Air Conditioning 143,800 R
Community Center Parking Lot Sealcoating 10,000 R
Swimming Pool Heaters 52,500 R
Wood Lake Nature Center Rest Room Improvements 37,000 R
TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 450,000
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
66th Street Reconstruction 2,500,000 M
76th Street Reconstruction 100,000 FF
77th Street Underpass 1,250,000 SB
Mill and Overlay Program 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 7,100,000
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Replacement Central Garage Equipment 575,000 T
Technology Replacement 125,000 T
Water Plant Lime Slaker Replacement 250,000 U
Public Works Facility Concrete Sealing 140,000 U
Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 70,000 U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 1,160,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 8,710,000
ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
FF) Franchise Fees 3,350,000
M) Municipal State Aids 2,500,000
R) Special Revenue 450,000
SB) State Bonding 1,250,000
T) Property Taxes 700,000
U) User Fees 460,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 8,710,000
2017 Capital Improvement Plan
PROJECT EXPENDITURE
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Park Maintenance 45,000 R
Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal 5,000 R
Ice Arena Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration 170,000 R
Ice Arena Parking Lot Sealcoating 15,000 R
Ice Arena Rink 1 Dasher board Replacement 160,000 R
Wood Lake Nature Center Carpet 30,000 R
Community Center Carpet 25,000 R
TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 450,000
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
66th Street Reconstruction 9,000,000 B
29,550,000 C
7,840,000 F
1,000,000 M
750,000 X
Mill and Overlay Program 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 51,390,000
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Replacement Central Garage Equipment 575,000 TL
Technology Replacement 125,000 TL
Public Works Facility Concrete Sealing 110,000 U
Emergency Water Interconnect w/Neighboring Comm. 500,000 U
Water Plant Roof Replacement 350,000 U
Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 70,000 U
Liquor Operation Capital Improvements 50,000 U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 1,780,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 53,620,000
ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
B) G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 9,000,000
C) Hennepin County 29,550,000
F) Federal Funding 7,840,000
FF) Franchise Fees 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aids 1,000,000
R) Special Revenue 450,000
TL) Tax Levy 700,000
U) User Fees 1,080,000
X) Xcel Energy Rate Payers 750,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 53,620,000
2018 Capital Improvement Plan
PROJECT EXPENDITURE
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Park Maintenance 45,000 R
Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal 5,000 R
Ice Arena Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration 400,000 R
TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 450,000
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
66th Street Reconstruction 2,000,000 B
1,000,000 M
Mill and Overlay Program 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 6,250,000
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Replacement Central Garage Equipment 575,000 TL
Technology Replacement 125,000 TL
Water main(s) replacement under 1-35W 500,000 U
Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 70,000 U
Penn Avenue Liquor Store Relocation 2,500,000 U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 3,770,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 10,470,000
ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
B) G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 2,000,000
FF) Franchise Fees 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aids 1,000,000
R) Special Revenue 450,000
TL) General Tax Levy 700,000
U) User Fees 3,070,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 10,470,000
2019 Capital Improvement Plan
PROJECT EXPENDITURE
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Park Maintenance 45,000 R
Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal 5,000 R
Ice Arena Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration 400,000 R
500,000 S
TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 950,000
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
66th Street Reconstruction 1,000,000 M
Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction 4,200,000 B
7,500,000 C
Mill and Overlay Program 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 15,950,000
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Replacement Central Garage Equipment 575,000 TL
Technology Replacement 125,000 TL
Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 70,000 U
Liquor Operation Capital Improvements 50,000 U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 820,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 17,720,000
ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
B) G.O.Street Reconstruction Bonds 4,200,000
C) Hennepin County 7,500,000
FF) Franchise Fees 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aids 1,000,000
R) Special Revenue 450,000
S) State Grants 500,000
TL) General Tax Levy 700,000
U) User Fees 120,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 17,720,000
2020 Capital Improvement Plan
PROJECT EXPENDITURE
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Park Maintenance 45,000 R
Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal 5,000 R
Ice Arena Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration 400,000 R
TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 450,000
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
65th Street Reconstruction 3,800,000 B
1,600,000 M
Mill and Overlay Program 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 8,650,000
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Replacement Central Garage Equipment 575,000 TL
Technology Replacement 125,000 TL
Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 70,000 U
Liquor Operation Capital Improvements 50,000 U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 820,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 9,920,000
ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
B) G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 3,800,000
FF) Franchise Fees 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aids 1,600,000
R) Special Revenue 450,000
TL) General Tax Levy 700,000
U) User Fees 120,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 9,920,000
Capital Improvement Plan - Beyond 2020
PROJECT EXPENDITURE
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Park Maintenance 45,000 R
Ice Arena Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration 1,130,000 R
TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 1,175,000
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
77th Street Underpass of TH 77 10,000,000 F
3,600,000 S
4,000,000 M
2,000,000 C
76th Street West 1,600,000 B
700,000 CID
900,000 X
Humboldt AvelLakeshore Drive Reconstruction 3,000,000 B
Lyndale Avenue Improvements 6,060,000 B
Penn Avenue Reconstruction 3,750,000 B
7,300,000 C
400,000 X
Mill and Overlay Program 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 46,560,000
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 70,000 U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 70,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 47,805,000
ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
B) G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 14,410,000
C) Hennepin County 9,300,000
CP) CenterPoint Rate Payers 700,000
F) Federal Funding 10,000,000
FF) Franchise Fees 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aids 4,000,000
R) Special Revenue 1,175,000
S) State Grants 3,600,000
U) User Fees 70,000
X) Xcel Energy Rate Payers 1,300,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 47,805,000
2017-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-CITY OF RICHFIELD,MINNESOTA
Recommended and Scheduled for Four Year Period
TOTAL'
PROJECTS CIP COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
RECREATION
OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT
1 Park Maintenance 225,000 $ 45,000 R S 45,000 R $ 45,000 R $ 45,000 R $ 45,000 R
2 Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal $ 20,000 6,000 R 5,000 R 5,000 R 5,000 R
3 Ice Arena Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration S 2,500,000 170,000 R 400,000 R 400,000 R 400,000 R 1,130,000 R
4 500,000 500,000 S
5 Ice Arena Parking Lot Sealcoating 15,000 15,000 R
6 Ice Arena Rink 1 Dasher Board Replacement $ 160,000 160,000 R
7 Wood Lake Nature Center Carpet 30,000 30,000 R
8 Community Center Carpet 25,000 25,000 R
TOTAL RECREATION&OPEN SPACE 3,475,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 950,000 $ 450,000 $ 1,175,000
R) Special Revenue 2,975,000 $ 450,060 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 1,175,000
S)State Grants 500,000 500000_
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 3,475,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 950,006 $ 450,000 S 11175,000
PROJECTS TOTAL'
CIP COSTS 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
RIGHT OF WAY IM PROVEMENTS
9 66th Street Reconstruction 12,000,000 9,000,000 B 2,000,000 B 1,000,000 M
10 30,550,000 29,550,000 C 1,000,000 M
11 7,840,000 7,840,000 F
12 1,000,000 1,000,000 M
13 750,000 750,000 X
14 NicolletAvenue Reconstruction 4,200,000 4,200,000 B
15 7,500,000 7,500,000 C
16 65th Street Reconstruction 3,800,000 3,800,000 B
17 1,600,000 1,600,000 M
18 77th Street Underpass of TH 77 S 10,000,000 10,000,000 F
19 4,000,000 4,000,000 M
20 3,600,000 3,600,000 S
21 2,000,000 2,000,000 C
22 76th Street West Reconstruction 1,600,000 1,600,000 B
23 700,600 700,000 CP
24 900,000 900,000 X
25 Humboldt Avell-akeshore Drive Recon.3,000,000 3,000,000 B
26 Lyndale Avenue Improvements 6,060,000 6,060,000 B
27 Penn Avenue Reconstruction 3,750,000 3,750,000 B
28 7,300,000 7,300,000 C
29 400,000 400,000 X
30 Mill and Overlay Project 16,250,000 3,250,000 FF 3,250,000 FF 3,250,000 FF 3,250,000 FF 3,250,000 FF
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS 128,800,000 $ 51,390,000 $ 6,250,000 $ 15 950,000 S 8,650,000 $ 46 560,000
e)G.O.Improvement Bonds 33,410,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 14,410,000
C)Hennepin County 46,350,000 29,550,000 7,500,000 9,300,000
CP)CenterPoint Rate Payers 700,000 700,000
F) Federal Funding 17,840,000 7,840,000 10,000,000
FFI Franchise Fees 16,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aid 8,600,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,600,000 4,000,000
S)State Grants S 3,600,000 3,600,000
X)Xcel Energy Rate Payers 2,050,000 750,000 1,300,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 128,800,000 $ 51,390,000 $ 6,250,000 $ 16,950,000 $ 8,650,000 $ 46,560,000
2017-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN-CITY OF RICHFIELD,MINNESOTA
PROJECTS TOTAL'
CIP COSTS 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
PUBLIC FACILITIES
31 Replacement Central Garage Equipment $ 2,300,000 $ 575,000 TL $ 575,000 TL $ 575,000 TL $ 575,000 TL $
32 Technology Replacement 500,000 125,000 TL 125,000 TL 125,000 TL 125,000 TL
33 Public Works Facility Concrete Sealing 110,000 110,000 U
34 Interconnect with Neighboring Communities $ 500,000 500,000 U
35 Water Plan Roof Replacement 350,000 3S0,000 U
36 Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 350,000 70,000 U 70,090 V 70,000 U 70,000 U 70,000 U
37 Water Main(s)Replacement Under I.35W $ 500,000 500,000 U
38 Relocate Penn Avenue Liquor Store 2,500,000 2,500,000 U
39 Liquor Operation Capital improvements $ 150,000 50,000 U 56000_ U _ _ 5_0,000_ U
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 7,260,000 $ 1,780,000 $ 3,770,000 $ 820,000 $ 820,000 $ 70,000
TL)Tax Levy 2,800,000 $ 706,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $
U) User Fees 4,460,000 1,080,000 3,070,000 120,000 120,000 70,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 7,260,000 $ 1,780,000 $ 3,770,000 $ 820,000 $ 820,000 $ 70,000
SUMMARY PROJECTS
Recreation)Open Space Development 3,475,000 450,000 450,000 950,000 450,000 1,175,000
Right of Way Improvements 128,800,000 51,390,000 6,250,000 15,950,000 8,656,000 46,560,000
Public Facilities 7,260,000 1,780,000 3,770,000 820,000 82_0000 _ 70,000
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 139,535,000 $ 53,620,000 $ 10,470,000 $ 17,720,000 $ 9,920,000 $ 47,805,000
B)G.O.Improvement Bonds 33,410,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 3,800,000 $ 14,410,000
C)Hennepin County 46,350,000 29,560,000 7,500,000 9,300,000
C)CenterPoint Rate Payers 700,000 700,000
F) Federal Funding 17,840,000 7,840,000 10,000,000
FF)Franchise Fees 16,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,260,000 3,250,000
M) Municipal State Aid 8,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,600,600 4,060,000
R) Special Revenue 2,975,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 1,175,000
S)State Grants 4,100,000 500,000 3,600,000
TL)Tax Levy 2,800,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000
U) User Foes 4,460,000 1,080,000 3,070,000 120,000 120,000 70,000
X)Xcel Energy Rate Payers 2,050,000 750,000 1,300,000
TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 139,535,000 $ 53,620,000 $ 10,470,000 $ 17,720,000 $ 9,920,000 $ 47,805,000
Total CIP costs do not include any project costs reflected in the 2016 CIB.
AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA ITEM# 2
REPORT#
CASE# 15-CUP-03, 15-
VAR-02
J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PC MEETING DATE: JUNE 229 2015
ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Public hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow
construction of a cluster housing development consisting of five townhomes at the intersection
of 76th Street and Sheridan Avenue.
I.RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend
approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow the
construction of a five-unit cluster housing development at 2517 — 76th
Street West.
II. BACKGROUND
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) purchased the six-bedroom single-
family home located at 2517 — 76th Street West in 2010 after it had been for sale for
several years. The home was subsequently sold and moved in 2011. In March of this
year, the HRA approved the sale of this vacant lot to the Greater Metropolitan Housing
Corporation (GHMC) for the development of five townhomes. Upon completion of the
development, the existing lot will be separated into five individual parcels, with an
association to manage common elements such as irrigation and roof maintenance.
The property is zoned Single-Family Residential (R) and guided for Medium-Density (7-
10 units per acre) Residential by the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed cluster-
housing development is able to meet all but one requirement of both designations (lot
coverage). The proposed homes offer 1,400 square feet of finished living space on the
main level and include two bedrooms, two baths, and an attached two-car garage.
Buyers will have the option of finishing the basement for additional bedroom and living
space; however, as proposed the homes will provide single-level living. The
development has a traditional design and height that will complement the existing
homes in the area, while providing some transition to the high-density complex to the
east.
Cluster housing development regulations were adopted in 1996 and intended to provide
additional opportunities for infill development and allow for a wider variety of housing
choices. Regulations were intended to allow high-density housing while insuring that
the design of that housing would be compatible with the single-family character of the
surrounding neighborhood. There is only one other "cluster housing development"
within the City; the Penn Place development at 69th Street and Penn Avenue was
developed under these regulations in 2004.
The applicant is requesting a variance to exceed the maximum allowable lot coverage
of 35 percent; as proposed, the structure covers 39.4 percent of the lot. With an
existing sample size of"one" it's difficult to determine whether or not the regulations
adopted in 1996 are truly workable standards. The development is unique by the fact
that it's only the second of this type that has been considered by the City. The
maximum building coverage allowed for cluster housing developments is the same as
coverage allowed for a single-family home. Staff believes that the proposed variance is
reasonable and will have no adverse impact on surrounding properties.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
There are a number of different review criteria that apply to this proposal. A full
discussion of all requirements has been included as an attachment to this report.
General and Conditional Requirements of Cluster Home Developments:
The proposed development meets all conditional and dimensional requirements (design
compatibility, landscaping, parking, open space, density, lot size, setbacks, height,
impervious surface) for a cluster home development, with the exception of lot coverage.
The maximum permitted lot coverage is 35 percent; the proposed development covers
39.4 percent of the lot. The applicant has requested a variance to allow this increased
coverage in order to construct units that offer single-level living; a product that is largely
missing in the community and is in high demand. Staff believes that the criteria
necessary to approve this variance are met; specifically the fact that the cluster housing
regulations have been tested only one other time in the community and we don't have
the history to determine whether or not these regulations are reasonable and
appropriate. The proposed project advances community goals for providing a variety of
housing choices and is complimentary to the single-family units across Sheridan Avenue.
A full discussion of the variance criteria related to this request is included in the attached
requirements document.
Conditional Use Permit
In addition to the criteria specific to cluster home development permits, there are eight
criteria required for the issuance of any Conditional Use Permit. These criteria primarily
address whether or not a proposal is consistent with the goals of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code and the general regulations of the District in
which is it located. The Medium Density Residential designation of the Comprehensive
Plan is intended for attached housing, primarily townhomes or condominiums, in slightly
higher densities. The Single-Family Zoning Designation accommodates these slightly
higher densities through the specific design guidelines for cluster home developments.
Staff believes that these general CUP criteria are met.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
The only development option that can meet both the current zoning and
Comprehensive Plan designations is a cluster housing development. Alternatively,
the property could be rezoned to allow a more traditional multi-family building.
C. FINANCIAL
The required processing fee has been paid.
D. LEGAL
Notification: Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current in
accordance with State and Local Requirements. Properties (including individual
apartments) within 350 feet were notified by mail.
Council consideration is scheduled for July 14, 2015.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
Recommend approval of the proposal with modifications.
Recommend denial with a finding that the proposed use does not meet requirements
V. ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Requirements document
Proposed plans
Planning & zoning maps
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
Bill Buelow, Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
Julie Urban/Kate Aitchison, City of Richfield Housing Specialists
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AND VARIANCES FOR A
CLUSTER HOME DEVELOPMENT
AT
2517 — 76TH STREET WEST
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests
approval of conditional use permit for a cluster home development on the parcel of land
located at 2517 — 76th Street West (the "Property"), legally described in the attached Exhibit A;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed conditional use permit includes a building that covers 39.4
percent of the lot;
WHEREAS, the City Codes allows a maximum building coverage of 35 percent for
cluster home developments in the Single-Family District;
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6, provides for the
granting of variances to the literal provisions of the zoning regulations in instances where their
enforcement would cause "practical difficulty" to the owners of the property under
consideration; and
WHEREAS, based on the findings below, the Richfield City Council approves the
requested variance from Richfield City Code Subsection 514.11, Subd. 2; and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval for the conditional
use permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council makes the following general findings:
a. The Property is zoned Single-Family Residential.
b. Cluster home developments are conditionally permitted in the Single-Family
Residential District.
C. The proposed site plan will fully comply with all but one Code requirement.
d. Code states that the maximum building coverage permitted is 35 percent of the
site. The proposed structure will cover 39.4 percent of the lot. A variance from
Subsection 514.11, Subd. 2 is required.
2. With respect to the application for a variance from the above-listed requirement, the City
Council makes the following findings:
a. Strict enforcement of Richfield Zoning Code Subsection 514.11, Subd. 2 would
cause a practical difficulty. The residential product that is proposed, single-level
living, is in high demand and is largely unavailable in the community. In order to
provide adequately-sized units, in a single-living format, that also meets the
City's density requirements, this development needs to cover more space than is
generally permitted. Considering that one of the City's goals is to provide a
variety of housing products, it is reasonable to consider an exception to make
that possible.
b.Unique circumstances affect the Property that were not created by the land
owner. Rules regulating cluster homes developments were development were
adopted in 1996; however, they have only been tested once. Such a small
sample size makes it difficult for City staff to gauge whether or not the rules are
reasonable and appropriate. These circumstances were not created by the
applicant. The proposed development does not overwhelm the site.
C.Granting the requested variances will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood. The requested variance is relatively small and will not alter the
character of the neighborhood. .
d. The variances requested are the minimum necessary to alleviate the practical
difficulty. The proposed variance is the minimum necessary to allow construction
of the proposed single-level living units. A reduction of the square footage would
reduce the marketability/viability of the units.
e. The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance
and consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance will allow
construction of the type of housing envisioned for this site by both the zoning
ordinance and the comprehensive plan.
3. With respect to the proposed conditional use permit, the City Council makes the
following findings:
a. The proposed development is consistent with the Medium Density guiding of the
property in the comprehensive plan.
b. The proposed use of the site for a cluster home development is consistent with
the purposes of the Zoning Code and the Single-Family Residential District.
C.The proposed use will be in compliance with Code guidelines related to
performance standards.
d.Undue adverse impacts to government services or public safety, health and
welfare are not anticipated.
e. There is a public need for such a use at the proposed location. The City has
been working for a number of years to develop medium-density housing on this
site.
4.Based upon the above findings, a variance is hereby approved to permit a maximum
building coverage of 39.4 percent.
5.Based upon the above findings and variance, the proposed conditional use permit is
hereby approved according to the terms of Richfield City Code Subsection 547.09,
Subdivision 6, with the following additional stipulations:
a) The property must be platted and the plat recorded, prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all
requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated
May 29, 2015, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. Permits are
required prior to commencement of any work;
c) That the recipient of this conditional use permit record this Resolution with the
County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's
Zoning Ordinance Section 546.05, Subd. 7. Proof of recording is required prior to
the issuance of a building permit;
d) Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall submit a surety
equal to 125% of the value of any improvements (based on two bids including labor
cost) not yet complete.
6. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it
are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use
has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning
Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this _th day of
2015.
Debbie Goettel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
That part of the East 3/4 of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of SE 1/4)
of Section Thirty-two (32), Township Twenty-eight (28), Range Twenty-four (24), described as
commencing at the northwest corner of said East 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4; thence East
along the North line of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 170 feet; thence South parallel with the West
line of said East 3/4 of SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 258 feet; thence West parallel with the North line
of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 170 feet to the West line of said East 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SE
1/4; thence North along said West line of East 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 to the point of
beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
Code Requirements / Required Findings
Part 1 — Cluster home developments in the Single-Family (R) District:
Permitted provided that the following conditions are met (514.07, Subd. 3).
1. The design of the development must be compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood in terms of building materials, architectural design, scale and
mass of the structure, or other similar urban design characteristics. The roof
pitch, building materials, front porches, landscaping, building height and
setbacks have been chosen/designed so as to compliment the single-family
homes across the street.
2. Landscaping must be provided in accordance with the Performance
Standards. The applicant has provided a plan that exceeds requirements.
3. Two off-street parking spaces, at least one of which must be enclosed in a
garage, shall be provided for each dwelling unit. Each dwelling includes a
two-car garage.
4. There must be a minimum of 500 square feet of outdoor open space provided
on the lot per dwelling unit. There is over 1,800 square feet of open space
behind each unit.
5. The number and location of driveways and curb cuts shall minimize conflict
with vehicular traffic and should not adversely impact adjacent land uses.
The proposed development will have one more driveway/curb cut facing
Sheridan Avenue than a stand-alone single-family development (50-foot lots)
of four homes would likely have. The Public Works Department has reviewed
the proposal and has not indicated any concern. No adverse impacts are
anticipated.
6. The density of the development may not exceed the density recommended in
the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan calls for densities of 7-10
dwelling units per acre (du/acre) in this District. The proposal has a density of
7 du/acre.
Part 2 — Conditional Use Permit: The findings necessary to issue a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (547.09, Subd. 6):
1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. This property is guided for Medium Density
Residential development. This guiding district is intended to provide areas for
townhome and/or condominium-type development of attached single-family
housing. The proposal provides this type of housing.
2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the
purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the
proposed use. The purpose of the Zoning Code is to protect and promote the
public health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare
of the City. One of the purposes of the Single-Family Residential District is to
provide opportunities for cluster housing development. Additional purposes
include minimization of traffic congestion and the protection of safe, attractive
and quiet neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with these purposes.
3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment
plans or urban design guidelines. There are no specific redevelopment plans or
urban design guidelines that apply to this parcel.
4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards
specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development will exceed the
applicable standards of Section 544.
5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental
facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City's
Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do
not anticipate any issues.
6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or
welfare. No adverse impacts on public health, safety or welfare are anticipated.
7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. The City has
been working for a number of years to develop medium-density housing on this
site.
8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this
code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement shall be
met and is guaranteed through the conditions included in the proposed
resolution.
Part 3 -Variance:
The applicant has requested a variance from Subsection 514.11, Subd. 2 to
increase building coverage from the permitted 35 percent to 39.4 percent. The
findings necessary to approve a variance are as follows (Subd. 547.11):
1. There are "practical difficulties"that prevent the property owner from using the
property in a reasonable manner. The residential product that is proposed,
single-level living, is in high demand and is largely unavailable in the
community. In order to provide adequately-sized units, in a single-living
format, that also meets the City's density requirements, this development
needs to cover more space than is generally permitted. Considering that one
of the City's goals is to provide a variety of housing products, it is reasonable
to consider an exception to make that possible.
2. There are usual or unique circumstances that apply to the property which
were not created by the applicant and do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone or vicinity. Rules regulating cluster home
developments were developed in 1996, but have only been tested once with a
development constructed in 2004. Such a small sample size makes it difficult
for City staff to gauge whether or not the rules are reasonable and
appropriate. This is not fault of the applicant.
3. The variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood or the locality.
The proposed increase in lot coverage is relatively small and would not alter
the character of the neighborhood. The proposal does not overwhelm the
site.
4. The variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty.
The proposed variance is the minimum necessary to allow construction of the
proposed single-level living units. A reduction in the square footage would
reduce the marketability/viability of the units.
5. The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
ordinance and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed plans
provide the type of housing envisioned for this site.
CL
CL
0
S any 7UQd na Ll 0 Sany mod np 0
m
N g ang uova a3
J Ln r/
C)0
b $
o
tom¢ Q Q ::
5 E O3
Z a c }} m ae O T O L U)
zON
Z Cn D
s v vul o J
SaaV.e5inyy saryefiow r Q O O_ J O z z
rL
s)Alf uoanwPl m Z O U
Co
AA-V N
ant/uudd r~ t Penn Ave 5
S any uuad O O f'r]
m
WwANZWnn5anauaan }'3
2 LLJ
v!
S qu
aS
n
W 3 Z M Duzo)I.7 J Q
ah assn
1 3 N O N Co m
o
E
3aeVuepuayS W N_
v
s"E g any sewoyl r a TF,6mas Ln
r E S ahV mi z
5 any uoldq 1C 11 1 O + U
y c LLJ
Q
S:anVUwd
Sant/]ua u m to
m
S any wngyseM
3 5any>v
s`
5 anq sa uax
lqin c° a
ONallfl8 1NlW12]Vdd J.21OlS 5'Z ONIlSIXI
0N
N .............................................................................
o D N
m
cd m
a
x
ocaIrox
m
x x
x x
x
I
rt ou
o N
T N NM rm
13, c6ri MC o d ro U m
0 o o o U mo
x v]
v
N x
x x
o
x
10H
r'] 018b8... ..I..... J of
o
s I ma y .......
N
I
I
x
00'8sZ mblx X k,,Z lfo:00s::: : ......_....... , x W x
g 8 doi x
doi x wLn
68-Lt8 wN cc I
0 p
W
CO 9t8
Z
VZ'8 '8Z'1 `Z2 '03S 30 b/L 3S 3H1 Z
o.' 0 0 m d0 V/L 3S 3H1 30 t/9 1SV3 3H1 d0 w DO
x x
X m 3NIl 1S3M 3H1 H11M 37V IVd 3NI1 mz m° z w cmLr
m m U x
Z LL
j fn sZ
T M Nm \
W m W
CY
x O
TN
U x
x
ux
x x
o
N=
3
w x
x LL
Ld OD\
W N4j
w.................. y rom
s U m
W 0) CD
O
U)°O
w n- r -iLo N o 0
J It Q cNn
W
LLI MY Z=
x O Q
W N
F-I
v
rt
O x x /
1 O F
w
W
U
w o ram
cl
I
J (n W UDC mm .
ems
N7 Fx cn ci
Q
I I J w N
x x
x
fl . o N
a I
Q = wo
F-
M w o m x dO n o
W wZZ W m m
x m m
Cl) x cal
rnN
Mco
W O W
ro Z
7
r
m
60
m
z)x
ti
oLwvx
m
f LS-9ti9 L9-Bb8 ZO'Bti3
qD
4,a _ 916ti9 o9Ebg 16-8tR - 96Ltq 9S_t9 lC'Lb9 Ll-Lt9 02 9t,2
bow 8699-c1 9698-C1 I 6t'8t8 w
b 99 9tS cti 8ti9 26 LtiQ. ry - _ `'8-Lti9 8688-1 9698-C1 9698-d1 9698-01
St'Lt9 90-Ltg 89919 65 919
8698-31 8698-1 O
90 gt9 29-Ltg IP
999998Z 'ON 000 aid 1N3W3SV3 133b1S-_ j tiZ'b '8Z'1
sz O
Z2 '03S 30 VL 3S 3H1 d0 ti/L 3S -
L/
I 3H1 30 ti/2 1SV3 3H1 d0 3NIl 1S3M \
ccca
oo-BSZ n„zV,T moos S gnNgA b' NVG/2J9H9
I
w N
I
H
W w r.°
O cn
w
M°I g 699—oL
99'91,
w\_I
w w0
W W
W w t
0
Z 0 N
J V J V J / I— / V I V — J / \ J / \ / V I
1 O O
O O
Q
4-j _
LC) 4-' o O O + O O 00Ln LC)
o o °
N
o , — > z °-
Cn o O O o > II
a1 N v o
O O .- (n O J
LLJ n
fn O O N W
O O m0 • 0 C1C'IU
o CION
Ld
cn f!) O O W
W o
L0 C 0 > a < J Cn
O O -C .-
Cn > U Ul — Q W z LJ
O + O
O J O
c a m o = o
U) C/) O W `) L O w Q z >
W U z
N N 0O U — L (/) W U Q zOO
cn E o N L Q
N O
O Uj W 0
LL_ z W OQ O
OCn 0 + O O z z W Cn zQ W
O 04 C U O
O W W W O z OC Cn n
Z 4 O O O z li Cn W Q
CA
N O C C O y O
O Cn z z >
Q Q w W W W
L
Q
0 o o Q z
CD CD
z
O C) O U) o o C U o o N 0 W I— I— U
C p ° 0 +, a w Q O a a Z z z z z cn Cn cn cn A
N un c 4.1 C C O O x x O w w w w 1t/
G) Q) 0 o a) ; 04- - Z T O N U m m cn W W U m W 0000 CoN °
o a cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn Q z z z z L. N
Q W w w w W W W W W w w w w r
O W O
Co O Cn 3
4_1 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O W I ! O M
W a E C)
o o u °
W
N
O
O N >' N [n ` 0 0 O °
O
00 W W W W W W W W i 1
W Z
oW
ail\ __ — o o U o U N0 ~ ~
oo -C can 0 °- o- C Q ° I moo' ;' pLU0L_ r, 0 0-
C) 4 can Q o ° o a a z Z x
T Q C a O a Co
o
Co _0 r
IL
i
O
O + O O L O N O Q Q
CnWo ° C
oU °
00 o a
n °' n BCD
N + + O N
0- ° ° o -1, ° ° o o •- i m U mo _0 m
C Cn
oo oo NJ M
O N o r
CL #40
E
O
LU o y
Ca
W
1
3
3
3
Q CL
U
ei/L
0
Santl 7UQdna v 1 Sany 7nodn0 00 m m r
N g ang uova a3
J Ln
0 0 Lo r
M1 w Sand PaMg
Z m ae O T ° — L Ul zON
s-tl AQUA
z m o C)
LnLIUj
S aay.e5inyy s y efi o w Q\ O O_ J O z z U a
4- N .uiuoa+wn m z 4-
LC) 0 U
ON Y
s a.sy angq T
any uudd r~ Penn Ave 5
S antl uuad
O O m
wLLnZpt) }$ r r
v
N °
m
i
S anV ua:Bna n ~ 1 3
Z
O N
W m Q 2
CD
11 0
LL 5 aetl uepwgi m W N
O v 3 N N U
M E g any sewoyl r Th6mas Ln Z
r E Sahymi Z z
5 anV uoldq 4 11 1 E +U
Q
Sanq•uwd
Sang]uMu!A m to
m
v.
QWAV
S any wngyseM
3 1v
s`
5 anq s ax
lqin
n
ONallfl8 1NlAi2]VdV J.2101S 57 ONIISIXI
V
G / _
0
l
I I
L _ J a n o S 'anV uuad 009L :ssajppy
07 d IV P 0 0 0uuasDoJSSOJ :Jaunt
L _ J v,000-tt-tZ-8Z0-Z2 'ON Nld r
tZ'J '8Z'1 'Z2 '03S JO t/L 3S 3Hl y
I V JO t/L 3S 3Hl JO t/2 1SV3 3Hl JO
T
3MI 1S3M 3H1 HilM 37VJVd 3NII--,y>
00'8sz X11„zt,I1o00s
CD 00'22 s L'tS 9 L'Lt L L'Lti L L'LV 6 L'Lti W Ino_N
O I I
aco
Z
o
I Ln Ln
I N N I Uui
L z
a
L J_
M
1
T W
LJ[ I I
v y>
cn
JCD
L 1 _ 1
n Ld r
0 I o cnCDoCyot' o 1- o o v,
u Z \T Do Ld z O 0 co a W 00 0 N
O w o
zw z
LL U j wQH o
N LV ow 1 w N
W
r7
W C W LLJ J
7
J (n w
cn
C5 Cl)ONimi 8 a SOdO Id y;, ow
Do > o uJ
w o o\
o <Z0 0'9- w W
JI
c
0
U) Q ZZW
J
NFL N 0 L'ii
0
Lo J71
D
c
I
O
o O
0 0< s L —
00
r
S.
v
n I
CN Ov OJ
6S'S 9 L'L
n
N
I7VmaIS i alSOd02ld
C
o
J
0
I V o
I M V
N V
SVO SVO SV SVO SVO VO S ssV SVO SVO SVO SVO SVO SVO SVO SVO SVO SVOSVO „2 'X3 929998Z 'ON 80 J3d 1N3N3SV3 33J1S=\
CD .
oo-8sz n„ ,Tmoos
tZ"J qz'1 I S gnNgA b' N
r Z2 '03S JO t/L 3S 3Hl JO t/L 3S I
l V
3Hl JO -0 1SV3 3Hl JO ]NI-1 1S3M-/
I
I -
Lu
N 7
O H
L, WOfn
M
w\
V I
w Ld
w w
L 1 J O
0 N
I \ I I I I I I I \ / I I \ I I - I I I I I V I \
I 00 U I \ J \ J V J V \ / - J / I- / V I V - J / \ J / \ / V
W C1J
4 a z U) S anV UDpuagS 009/ :ssaJppV S anV uoplJa4S 809L :SsaJppV S anV uopJGgS tLgL :SsaJppV S anV uopuayS OZ9L :SsaJppV
I\ \
l
a alpplJ J gDUUDH :JaUMO Joslo UIJ3 V pinD(] :JaUMO 3 J /fgnS Jal}n8 sInD4 :JaUMO ua993 gDJDS UOSDr :JaUMQ
N 6 a 9000-tt-tZ-8Z0-Z£ ON Nld 9000-tt-tZ-8ZO-Z2 'oN Nld LD00-tt-tZ-8Z0-Z 'ON Nld 8000-tt-tZ-8Z0-Z9 'ON Nld
J <
Do ICI o
L - J N ,t
O'4)'tLO
L J_ _ L U ..
L 1 _ <
I wo<
L —
L 1 J
I I
L 1 J
L_
L 1 _
O
4_1 O _0 O O o CO
ID (D D
4- p O lf 0 +LL O LCD
o
o
ON °
cn (D o II
o
O 0
O c
O
L O Q o W J J
II
0 w
01- C) c uO w
ci 0
L 0 O N
N
E O 0 w N
Q
w mIME
a -0 U) rn rn o + L O fn Y
1 0 0 — O 0
0 0 0 0 0 v O Q Q z
o -C 0 + p m o z O O
0 Ca D
0o0L-= m Ln D J ~a y
4_, ° cLi w 04- 00 O w m w U LL o
y w Z mU) .O 0) c
NW
O
CJ N —
N -O -O N
Cn E
L (
N o Q J O Q Q
W
Q C) W
C C L_ 4— 0 '0 O 0 Q) +
N
T
F-- F-- W
O LL W'
Ln
im 0 0
4- L_
T 0 o o 0
w w z w O O m
un rNa°i r/r o u C) Z Z w Q O O D w o Ln o N N N ° co iLumoo '- E •- cn w F--0000 ( r
c 0 CD O L .- , 0 W m =
O +-
1 O O O m O O CD (n W n d co co co Ln
CL Q
W 0)L_ N
o o Q CY
z z O z O LCj L(j L(j ( NW
o C n 0 0 0 0 O O z N Q
z z ~ m W w m o wOWa.) w c O Z z o o cn Cl) O z DLIJZc , + 0 D O
T Q -c0
0 -W Q I_ x x o Q W O:*
m ° o Q cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn Q LL, C c0W
C -C , °, Dn o W w w w w w w w w w w w o L. N L
co
0 =a
o O O O O O O
I
O
I
O O O O
CA ca
Z M
Oa °5 o
V) N0- LuOO0NWwwwwLJLJLJwLdLJLJo
LL] O O 0 D D Ncco
mod
Lo Z
cliNfnOLNQ0LQzCO
N
0
7 + __ 0
0
N
O
CO 0
Q CD N - N LO 'O
Lu 04i
LL c N O N 4 N Q) O ' _ fn -0 N 0 O IN
a LL.
0 0 0 0 o
W
121 >
z 0,O
CD
Z W o o 0 0 =
O ° L Qo ° O + Q) Q OH
C) 4- a) am4_1 o a) X 4 o O NOWLnIn +- L_ N Cn Cn
Q IQ0 - 0 0 0 = = 0 0 cn . m wco m w v o w 0 '-
N 0 0 N N 0 0 .-
w Q
r-
4- o cn
W L H M
O
LCL00 oo
O
C-
E cnw cncn
O
c H J
O
ca O ,O
a o O
CL HZO
NW
Q
C
co
r
H
V
W
W
3
C 3
3
WOO'SOPDOgJjDWJ90-MMM o CD C=) N C
OZL8 9ZZ'1993 2Z9B'9ZZ'199d N cz
IoI49 NIN'Insd'IS'008 allnS'}aal;S gLinoA 4sed 9LZ v a
S 10 311 H 0 N d c-:'
ZV99 d10S3NNIW `01313H0lH C
S30VOHN AVNN30 13hiSHAL1S3MLNZ
CD
d.zoD utsnoH u lijodo.zqay SVIIIA nT3T3
0
za a.z ar Z
O ._ p
Z i o
Lo
U w
NVId In OAVI 311S m z
LuNUN
i W Q °
Z
W C/
z cc
w ¢ Q
J ZE
Y wN ¢
w m C Q O
w o o cr
z
Lu
U d Q
206-11
ol w
1 T
z
N c
Q
a
C?
J
0z
cn
zCD
I 1 I
m
5'-0"
U
wIwwcn
FEE]F1 F1 I z
w I 1
Lu
pC 1 I
C!) 1 1 I
I
M ¢
i
Lo
1
I
1 1 I
1 1 I
1 I .
O
I
c 1 w
w
w
12'-0"
1 1
0
I 1
I 1
1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK
I 1
I
I
CIO
z
z w
SHERIDAN AVENUE w
r7
m
z
J
CL
o
CD II
Q °
W u,
Li
T
z
I
I
I
I I
I I
w
oLu
I I
Lu
U)
CD
J o-o[
w
w i m
cnw
a Lu
I CDw
6 .9
0°
co
YJ
a
Lo
o
cn
wLuw
Uz
U
I
I
cn
w
c
O =d U
ZEO O
I
U
L - - - - - - - - - - - -
o =
a
W < J fI
CD o °z
Z p J
O O O X
U d U w
O
J
W
Q o
W II
C
Q T
J J
Z
W Un
N
WOO'SO PDOyJ O WOO-MMM C >
m
N a'
OZL9'9ZZ'159f £Z98'9ZZ'199d
TOTSSNIN'Itted'IS'OOS a} S'aaaiaS q}anod Ise]SZZ
o
aN
r
m
S 10 31 I H 0 ? b SZti95 dlOS3NNIW `01313H01d co
S3 (IV 0HN AVV4830 w m w 133 I1SH19ZMMZL9Z
o
d.zo uisnoH u tjodo.z ay SVIIIA NVOlH3HS
oo
U Q'6
JY z
0LU
N ? N ¢ co W
cn
SN011VAIll H01 31X] ° m w
O
W
L W Q J
U-
CO C3 C3
z m z m z m
Q o z o o
w wco z wco z
m - 1 m ti W m ti w
W
n M W _ M W _CO M W
Cn M O Co - co cn p Co - M cn p
CC
M
O m O
m c0 m co m
CC
r
O[ r LL CS) m 0 Oc r U- M m 0
fm
w z w z
j z ¢ w cn w z w cn LU Q m C7
W C] d ¢ J Q Y J 0 J Y U
J
W W Y z
En IM0J c-- Z CD Q p w ¢ m z co w w ¢
a cn d d J O m cn W C] mm
j L¢L 0 (n W C] W W M J W W C]z
z W W Q
cn p m cn = z H z J p
cn H z z ofm
CD H H ° Q cn Ud ¢ Cn ¢ W u] CO
o
W Cn
co Q m ¢z
z cn cn cn
z zo ao mm ' z m m =m cn mmzo00zLJzC3
a 0- 0- z C a w 0 m Q w z a W o QWocooczo2 > o cc o cn o 0 0 x o Q CD
0 0 0 0 o C a ¢ 0- ¢ CD cn a_ C) w ¢ CD CD CD cn U- C cn m
U U U U C/)
II IIIIII
II II
II
II II
II
II II
II
II II
II
II II
II
II II I
II II
J i I
El
II
L
WOO'SO PDOyJ O WOO-MMM C >
m
N a'
OZL9'9ZZ'159f £Z98'9ZZ'199d
TOTSSNIN'Itted'IS'OOS a} S'aaaiaS q}anod Ise]SZZ
o
aN
r
m
S 10 31 I H 0 ? b SZti95 dlOS3NNIW `01313H01H
S3 (IV 0HN AVV4830 w m w 133 I1SH19ZMMZL9Z
o
d.zo uisnoH u tjodo.z ay SVIIIA NV01H3HSC _ za a.z auZ
oo
N ? N Q co
LU
W
L]
ZEcn
SNV]d u00ij 1Su1j aN`d 1NINISVIG a z
uj
En U_
Z4 9-.6Z 1.0 1-ZZ
I
I
C.0Q m
I II
I I CD
oIr
r
I o oNNIuow
m I Z/1 9 lli Z .S L .L N °' mF- M M I VNNr
I
z I o 0 .Z
CD
I 0 1 ZZ Z/101 b
CD I
N o I
cm
M
q rn m
r o
C7 v w w
I z I m I
co of
r
GI
IT I_
co
Im
to z
N J w
ti
Y o
N
I
z U
M I D Z p M I M 2 m N
rI
r
cc z_ C3
O ¢ I
I m o o I I
fn co crfnLU
CO co
OrC?
r m I co
I CD
o
w CD I o m
m i— I o m I C Q
I I N
II
O
I u O
X N
W
r Z/1 9 ZZI S L .L Q
VN
M I N M I
m
I cn I
z ° L---------- 0 .Z I
CD
N a J cc
c - N O I 01 ZZ Z/1 01 b 1101 .1
o
I° N
IM
I I m of
Z r
O
ti
Lo
pl
cc
C O -
co I o z
N J w
Y
O o I
O U w 1 0
OC N r ti z I) r
co I M m c2
I z o I
r
1 w °°
it
I I Y O m
I m
IM
I
I
m o o I
I
OJ
O
CO co
r m
M
I IImI
1rill, o
o
o CD o m<
m
I ti U
L>L
N
i Z/1 9-lli 5 L .L a O
L N M I
m
V
H o i I
I
z ° L----------
I
o .Z
I a a ° I
o o I O1 ZZ Z/101 .b 0 1 .L
N O to N OC
CO CO ltl' '
ocli I z I
o oC\j
v m cw GI
r O
I-
m I
QI
I Z .6
CID l
oclj w
E CD
Y N
O I
O Z 0
M I z
co I M m ch
I
I Q z m I
r
l wo
r
I ED
OJ
o°
r MI
I r
will,
I I I
M
I oOwo
to fm LUmtimI°
I
Q
CDO
U
N
u = O XW
Z/1 9-lli 5 L .L o m
N
M
N M I V
z CD I
CD
O O1 ZZ Z/101 b 01-1
r OC
le N
D ATHr
G4 w w p lIzrIm
I
r I z
I= I L"
co
GI
II
Z .6co IL7Iw
0
Y
O O I U W O
F_ OC N ti U) r
O
M I M co 7
CC Z U Q I O
r
I
r
U O
cc
0 I I Y
O m
I w
Eli o o
m
IF-
I I V
O L F_
M
r
m I co
LU
O°
O
O Ito m I T
LU
CD
I I o
m
Q
rn
N I— C_,)o
z Wz
2/19-14 S HL-1 F a' m Vtic
N M I
j r_ —I
N
z ° L---------- 0 .Z I
a ° r — I
o
cc
N o I 01 ZZ Z/1 O1 .b
m
le Q
U
I
w w O
z m o I
F— Zo z
II= I I
L"
m
I I
I
r
to
J w
19—2--
O I Q ZE I _
Y
O O z O U w 0
OC N p)
LU°
z
LL 2
I J c 2 co c`J z
C-3 CD
LU
O J
w Y Lo m r1cc
r
O
eee
I
I
in W o
cA ii iiOCQ
L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J
A c m----
TD
oq
1-.8b 01 1
T
19-19 110-it 1 6-,91 19-18 6-.Z J Ld
w Lw L UQU_
p p m
Z .6 119-19t z Q
Z o Q Z
J w
CD CD
CD LU8 .L5
cc:
210sauUM `PI611 0% `ISOM IS 419L G L2Z
XVrld rddVDSC.iXVrl VrIIIA XVCII2IAI-IS'-
W4
x
z a wd
as w 9:60
A z z
Ua
Iti 5; I'u;IMW I Yfy'ItiI't'f r ' •f I ^t ' rI tf•yk"an IVp^ I
T',•irJ"
rR'..;i;{
y
I rJ r^,
t° y%
IV '2c¢•r.G`.b •,
11II1.
I F', ' '^t-f,
t
af+
y
1
nl
l'q,
y I ,S'yf I I
p$'IIJ r,l'
n
ul
l',I
1
kyJ'..t"C:'t e}I.4 t'r,'r ;` n 1: r 1',4 N 7 ',.• w
r J 1 6d 1 N• ,':q i''',', II'I t'p} 'tf'gQJ kEI „'v }1
I W
ki+.'
F{^
11: R'i`p" ,1 qI I.
7i d•I. J3i[,'6 1,sp ql IP,N t ,?. `
I I
5•' V,',i'
L Eti^I 7 :1 'Vu i."I t!f'i, I a(,,s~Ikli ,Ir%
t ,,
l•.pp II'p',ri',' i r I''en I' I 33 }u"I, '' i I' l<Sll' ti.,.^
Y-r.
i h 91;i^e,!q n°IJ,,9,.y6 rr Ig as lff,, j}, ,fI I ''
LY I.¢
1+ C,`i+'.' kv J{,P*r.
t,T
GLLl IIt lji 7 I Y c'.i h''I^t35'' 'l . :U . "•LL'.'.''yL4 f'f.: J•-i°I'
qyj V V ,
rvo pu,roRNy;6„fir :Y jrt Y l 'k
F-.I"'_ J y,.^,r", t to
t}1,'"u•r.` i!'
fib' us•r'n i f
E'R'14• k,•,F.''1 'i": n3 Y'I U ,fQ I,..'I iB h Yi J G
I IF s,'N,'yJj'1 l i ,I I. i:j I o-n: iq ci'''P'V V,'!I'u,l•..J°
I 1 I"Glti f 1'' 1 4.•'.kl II;"6,.;;' V.':6 "7'>!L'Y, 'ICr11"fa l.il'I,!' ' u3 ''''.^' ' }} I},Gpi J'
t IQ,•y'Jil',li'Y 7 1H; I h l:'
I.
It y: 'lul T i 114'19:Vti r (rel•I
I '''
Pv§,, `' p Ii I, it d,,
H ,:i,,'.,,'rrr' d Id f 1,,.'9-N k'f y''i',`.n i'•7 I al 'i.,lU
tie: 1'I i ' G 1 i 1Y z q' , Y
W4
0` Q a,,"'t[4r`1:}`}t'
jEl1.
u"'":Cw',
t
I
t
F '1'Y 't•^y 'R
1.u1 I 9.•ra`^'(.(:,y',rr'
r LI:.'. 1 4'''t ~,' F "''
qn ,. .,"`'1 t"P+hi
Q Oh'l;rINI'' ry„fi rrI'lYd • P1+ 1ry{,11:' },I ,1; li1.11 t'14 1 T q l?` c,
I.,,,:.,fI,G i 9 ( In, , C{ u 'yr t.ICr•' J I I ^t','.d'q..l,;'” 'p,p',
Q 1:.,«.••,+; u''gj`i ta',"`q'
r^. !
l t g2
S
rfe= `7" A i u• v„
lt4lv..:.1..
conh". 2 I'. 'd'' q ' I j I r 1° ,. '1 I id
F-i
Q yh'i. Igj'InJ'Y+rf I,.
r' ,i ''1•, " "
tl :' ^
q'
u sM P:l' I(Q S D
7d
1. 1 If,Pl`%°ur @ l'1'L ' ' q a 1 j'F,y, • R N. ,
4
W4 yNI' PIIa t°jvll y.
j 'n,
11k"
r.
G1
w I
tGCI
b 7• 1
N
T
v y1" I fIy
ri w Q Y:'d •a,'Y tl,^ a,.t 1 1 ill'.j2,! ' q' ,'I
I
lum OOC=)a. W
I
I
Q
w0 Ole
Rr,ll4'"':'`7t.°•'Ad1'r"".r''^r qr 'Ii I,
Lr1{ ,/Q
w /
Lli I Q
i' "Ii"I' '`OIF;!,,.
II,^V
h} W '/I"I, ;a tt'!R', .:Jq'!hr^ '+ 1 II .hl'• 'L,,..," I.'-f ,
F+i FJnI rJ
N j Z z
tu.,l•:,IIpp,I.,`Ch l i '
J,''' '
r4- ,II h'': !1, , I It i `FBI fi,
t f}CI,.,":` ,. 4 I!'' ar.'e.f, ,
Lli
I Q I f_
k ah•fu{R'1,:}r?Y I '"I• 4 I ,f' ",
j '''' ,
1 .t+: ,•. t`;4'i 1,[
y
mac N,ti,.,r i3Y"1•st :u" .m•: °i' ti. '
I?',
7, 'i v,R, 11'` I m
U , 'q'
i,.to,°'''4'' i t;
rQl '
t'
I;`
n''' 9i b t..,x l ;"r?iFf;i{'GI;'i'Ys.••.n,dlk't'II,^y',k 1,R 1 ili nL IY•7• 'yQ I I,I.,I I'I i '; I• I.J ' II
m 5 ,;'• ,, k III;,'151 I`',.v.• u I ,..E;I .,'>;ri ' , ,;,d',I.I„'h,i:.^.,Jh I,LL1IF'y,.,c,14'}III.N..,,I ,;.II:I,+} I.I'I IL..
Iytl
i q.t,„ '}qI'I• ISI, t.T".•,, Po f'•'mt
hI 1 rI`p dJ,n 1 I::V; 1 .'•I 7 I ,h'.'I I J.I '' I'r }{I• I
ti;f Cs"i Ir•f.,l• }I.'., J{ Il' J ,
II 'I ''
y
I;;`i;s Ip9,1 '•I Ir'a' 'y`'' I ry 1J 'i I I I I
rlGfl}I•I k';, I 1 `l'
s}. t ' j '' Xl JI srll I P{yl'",'I
q'
s
M
iti"'SxS`
I,
2 y,t'"Iri]I.'y'. y:."i,7tF,'
rr ,
1
1
J
rf:•. '
c!>7'J$
2
7 y1 P,gip.{yY+,
m``'{
y
C '1:{?.,
r, , ' ;
I •,,,,{
1
N
r(';a F6l l}i,,aVWMh:5'"V,.,d ,..z r :`I''
j`}dra I
I rrsll'"'',+iy'1'. ,s -1 14i' `•,i o''•:i?l rf -
If I,VI,l;ill Y 'sAyl•'r'f{ .' ' 'p
ti
r il+a n11' L
l
v; I' :..,•,..ai;' Ip. '.."°,Q w
LU
LU
ococ c000
Q
A
W4 W4 .Q tt• ttt8
I N
r
Lu A
V] - w w
0.0
W z
0-4 A
q x
jr
2517 W 76th Street - CUP 7/2015
Surrounding Zoning
LU
R
Q
R R LU
Q R
Z R Z
OR R
R W
a
H R R LV
R2
76TH STREET
R R
R R R
R R
R R
R
R R
R R
MR-3
77TH STREET
Feet
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
MR-3 - High Density Multi-Family Residential
R- Single Family Residential N
I:\GIS\Community Develop ment\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\2517 W 76th -Z.mxd
2517 W 76th Street - CUP 7/2015
Surrounding Comprehensive Plan
W
CHURCH
QLDR
LDR
QLD LDR
Q
LDR Z
OLDR LDR
LDR W
J_
j
a
H LDR LDR W
76TH STREET
LDR LDR
LDR LDR MDR
LDR LDR
LDR LDR
LDR LD
LDR LDR
LD LDR
L
HDR
77TH STREET L___
Feet
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
HDR- High Density Multi-Family Residential
MDR- Medium Density Residential N
LDR- Low Density Residential
CHURCH - Church
I:\GIS\Community Develop ment\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\2517 W 76th - CP.mx