Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
090913 Packet
SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA September 9, 2013 7:00 p.m. Introductory Proceedings Roll Call Approval of Minutes: Regular Planning Commission of July 22, 2013 and Study Session of August 12, 2013. Opportunity for Citizens to Address the Commission on items not on the Agenda Public Hearing ITEM #1 13-APUD-04 Amend Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit for the Cedar Point Commons Planned Unit Development. The amendment requests permission to allow a McDonald's restaurant to occupy one half of the vacant site at the northwest corner of 66th Street and Richfield Parkway. New Business Old Business Liaison Reports Community Services Advisory Commission City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Richfield School Board Transportation Commission Chamber of Commerce Other City Planner's Report Next Meeting Date: October 28, 2013 (September 23, 2013 meeting is cancelled) Adjournment Auxiliary aid for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612/861-9738". Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 2013 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Rick Jabs and Commissioners Susan Rosenberg, Dan Kitzberger, and Josh Root MEMBERS ABSENT:Commissioners Dennis Schuller, Tom Rublein, and Gordon Vizecky STAFF PRESENT: Matt Brillhart, Planning Technician Karen Barton, Assistant Director of Community Development OTHERS PRESENT: Yi Li You (adult day care business representative) Skip Melin (property management representative) Chairperson Jabs called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Kitzberger S/Root, to approve the minutes of the June 24, 2012 regular meeting. Motion carried. 4-0 OPEN FORUM No members of the public spoke. PUBLIC HEARING(S) ITEM #1 13-SP-01 — Consideration of a request for site plan approval that would allow an adult day care serving up to 29 persons at 6722 Penn Avenue. Staff note: Following the meeting, a clerical error was found on the staff report for this item. The staff report was incorrectly dated July 23, 2013. Staff report should have been dated July 22, 2013.] Planning Technician Matt Brillhart presented the staff report and recommended approval, based on compliance with all criteria. Chairperson Jabs opened the public hearing. July 22, 2013 In response to a question from Commissioner Root, Skip Melin of Cushman & Wakefield I Northmarq (property management) stated that the building was repainted recently and that an awning would be installed as required. M/Root, S/Kitzberger to close the public hearing. Motion carried. 4-0 Chairperson Jabs stated that he felt the use was a good fit and that improvements to the building will enhance the Penn Avenue corridor. M/Root, S/Rosenberg to recommend approval of the site plan. Motion carried. 4-0 NEW.BUSINESS None. OLD BUSINESS None. LIAISON REPORTS Community Services Advisory Commission: No report City—Council: No=report- HRA: No report Richfield School Board: No report Transportation Commission: No report Chamber of Commerce: No report Other: None CITY PLANNER'S REPORT Karen Barton reminded commissioners about the August 12 bike tour of homes built under the Richfield Rediscovered program. ADJOURNMENT M/Root, S/Rosenberg to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried. 4-0 The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:18 p.m. 2 July 22, 2013 Dan Kitzberger Secretary 3 Planning Commission Study Session Minutes August 12, 2013 MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Josh Root and Dan Kitzberger MEMBERS ABSENT:Chairperson Rick Jabs, Commissioners Susan Rosenberg, Tom Rublein, Gordon Vizecky, and Dennis Schuller STAFF PRESENT: Karen Barton, Assistant Community Development Director Melissa Poehlman, City Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member Sandahl Assistant Director Karen Barton led the Commission on a biking tour past a variety of new homes that have been constructed as a result of the Richfield Rediscovered Program. ADJOURNMENT T-h-e-meeting-was adjourned-by-unanimous-cons-ent at 7:15-p.m. ---- Dan Kitzberger, Secretary AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM# I REPORT# CASE# 13-APUD-04 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 99 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Public hearing regarding a proposed major amendment to the Cedar Point Commons Planned Unit Development. The requested amendment would allow for a McDonald's restaurant on approximately one-half of the currently vacant land at the northwest corner of 66th Street and Richfield Parkway. Currently approved plans call for four retail buildings on this site (entire site). The applicant withdrew the previous PUD Amendment application and has submitted new plans that reflect feedback from City staff and the Planning Commission. 7approvalCOMMENDED ACTION: nduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend or denial of an amendment to the Planned Unit Development, nditional Use Permit and Final Development Plan for Cedar Point mmons that would allow construction of a Class III (Fast Food) staurant with drive-up facilities. II. BACKGROUND The City Council approved a final development plan for the Cedar Point Commons project in June of 2006. The project included approximately 370,000 square feet of building, comprised of a Super Target, Home Depot, full-service restaurant, bank, and seven smaller multi-tenant buildings. Four of the smaller buildings were proposed for the northwest corner of 66th Street and Richfield Parkway. These buildings were not constructed along with the rest of the site in 2007, and the area has remained vacant. In May of this year, property owner Ryan Companies submitted an application requesting approval of a major amendment to approved plans in order to reconfigure the area to the west of Richfield Parkway for a McDonald's restaurant. The proposed building orientation, site design and materials led staff to recommend denial of the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission also recommended denial and that application was withdrawn prior to consideration by the City Council. Ryan Companies has submitted a new application intended to address staff and Planning Commission concerns. The restaurant is approximately 450 square feet smaller than what was previously proposed, and faces both Richfield Parkway and 66tH Street. Exterior building materials have also changed in an effort to better-coordinate with the existing Cedar Point Commons development across the street. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY In 2004, the City completed a redevelopment master plan for the Cedar Avenue Corridor area. The plan called for a mix of commercial and higher density housing that would be more compatible with airport noise and would be centered upon a greenway. A resolution approving the Cedar Point Commons project was approved in June of 2006. An amendment to the approved plans must meet both Code requirements and the requirements of the Cedar Point project resolution unless modified by the City Council. Zoning Requirements: Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resources and to encourage innovation in planning and building. PUDs provide flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements, density and land uses if the proposed development is well-designed and can be successfully integrated into the neighborhood. PUDs are expected to provide superior design and/or benefit to the community in exchange for the requested flexibility. The following variations from standard requirements are proposed: Site Design/Setbacks: 1. Drive-thru setback—Any drive-up service window, teller or order station must be located at least 150 feet from any residential parcel. This requirement is not met; the northern portion of the existing Church parcel is designated as Single-Family Residential. The nearest residentially used parcel is greater than 150 feet from all aspects of the proposed drive-thru. Parking: 2. Parking —The applicant has requested a reduced parking requirement based-on-their-operationaLknowledge and_experience._Staff has ty p'cally__ supported a reduction based on internal requirements when the proposed retailer is prolific in an area. City requirements calls for 60 parking stalls (3,915sf/1000 ' 17 — 10% = 60). McDonald's internal calculations call for 1 space per peak shift employee plus 1 stall/3 seats. (15 + 69seats/3 = 38 parking stalls.) The proposed plan includes 47 stalls; 15 stalls short of requirements. The proposed reduction is further supported by Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) parking estimates. ITE standards estimate a maximum demand of 44 parking stalls. Staff supports the proposed reduction. 3. Delivery traffic — Despite the change to a smaller delivery truck, this site will remain quite challenging. There are a number of parking stalls that cannot be occupied if a delivery truck is expected to successfully navigate the site. The proposed application indicates that deliveries will not be made during peak hours; however, that fact alone does not guarantee that the impacted parking stalls will be available. A similar issue (impacting different parking stalls) is present for garbage pick-up. Limiting hours of operation to allow for deliveries and waste hauling when the restaurant is closed is a possible solution. The parking of delivery vehicles on Richfield Parkway and/or 66th Street shall be prohibited due to safety concerns. Landscaping: 4. Parking lot islands -A minimum of 5 percent of parking lots that provide for 25 vehicles must be devoted to landscaped islands with overstory shade trees. The applicant provided the required amount of landscaping; however, the proposed ornamental trees will not meet the intent of shading the parking stalls. Staff recommends that an approval be conditioned upon further review and possible revision of the landscape plan. Other site requirements: 5. Lighting -The proposed plan exceeds permitted levels. While staff has historically allowed for modest variations from Code requirements, the proposal exceeds historical tolerances and should be modified. The proposal also exceeds requirements of the final PUD Resolution for the Cedar Point Commons project which states that light levels shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles at any residential property line. A revised plan addressing these issues and all other lighting requirements shall be required if approved. 6. Signs -As proposed, site signage does not meet the minimum setback requirement of five feet. Given that the boulevard will be exceptionally large in order to accommodate the Three Rivers Bike Trail, staff recommends allowing for a reduction to a two-foot setback. In combination with the required three-foot trail clear zone" this would meet the intent of the regulation. Additionally, the applicant has requested permission for an off-site sign. An entrance sign is proposed for the north side of the shared driveway; property that will be retained by Ryan Companies. In the case of a shared driveway, this is both reasonable and necessary to promote safe traffic movement. Comprehensive Plan Agreement: PUDs and the accompanying Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) also require agreement and conformance with the goals and policies of-th€-Gi -'s=C-orn rehens+ve-P-tan T4i+s= ro ert -is-des ate -as-Regional--- P P p }F Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan and is within the Cedar Avenue Corridor Master Plan area. A wide variety of commercial uses are permitted in this area. A stated policy of the Comprehensive Plan is to "accommodate business growth" that respects the values and standards of the citizens of Richfield." Development is expected to be "responsive" to the surrounding neighborhood. Cedar Point Commons PUD Agreement: Approved plans for the Cedar Point Commons project call for four retail buildings which would be oriented in a similar fashion to those east of Richfield Parkway. The requested amendment introduces a use that was not originally contemplated (Class III - Restaurant with drive-up service) and changes the design of this portion of the project from one that mirrors the redevelopment across the street. The Commission and Council must find that the proposed amendment remains consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of City plans (Comprehensive Plan and Cedar Avenue Corridor Master Plan). Required findings: All of the following findings must be made in order to approve a PUD application 542.09 Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. 3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the development. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest. All of the following findings must be made in order to approve a CUP application 547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 [Performance Standards]of this code. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. 8=-The=proposed=use-meets=or--wql=meet=alk the-specific=conditions-seWthis=codA for the granting of such conditional use permit. B. CRITICAL ISSUES The purpose of PUD regulations is to provide an opportunity for innovative and creative development, while assuring that the development will complement existing neighborhood character. The area of land in question has been vacant for approximately seven years. Encouragement of quality development is a goal of the community. If approved, there are a number of required and recommended stipulations: o Consider stipulations related to delivery and trash services. o Applicant must coordinate with and address comments of the Three Rivers Park District. This includes relocation of all utilities within the trail "clear zone." An agreement between parties is required. o The property must be platted and the right-of-way necessary for trail construction provided. o A cross access agreement between the proposed McDonald's property and the remaining Ryan property to the north must be filed. o An odor control system shall be required. A revised lighting plan is required. A revised landscape plan may be required following review by the City Forester. Approval would include variations to sign locations; however, sign permits must be applied for separately. C. FINANCIAL Required application fee has been paid. D. LEGAL Zoning: Existing: PC-2 (Planned General Commercial) Proposed: No change Land Use: Existing: Vacant Approved: Multi-tenant retail Proposed: Fast food restaurant Comprehensive Plan: Regional Commercial Notification: Notice of the hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the proposed development and published in the Sun Current Newspaper. Other Actions: Council: Scheduled — September 24, 2013 IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) Recommend approval of a resolution amending the Cedar Point Commons Planned Unit Development to allow for a Class III Restaurant. Possible findings: The-proposed=amendment-onforms-to=the=goals=and-objectives-of-the-City's ------ Comprehensive Plan and/or the Cedar Avenue Corridor Master Plan. Pedestrian and bike-compatibility issues, of particular importance along a major greenway, have been sufficiently addressed in the design of the site. Deviations from Zoning Code requirements related to the location of drive-thru component setbacks, parking supply and delivery service are justifiable, reasonable and are off-set by either superior design and/or benefit to the Community. Recommend denial of a resolution amending the Cedar Point Commons Planned Unit Development to allow for a Class III Restaurant. Possible findings: The proposed amendment is does not conform to the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and/or the Cedar Avenue Corridor Master Plan. A Class III restaurant with drive-up service is not compatible with a pedestrian and bike-friendly environment to be centered upon a primary greenway. Deviations from Zoning Code requirements related to the location of drive-thru component setbacks, parking supply and delivery service cannot be justified either on their own or in a cumulative manner and are not counterweighted by off-sets. V. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 9772 approving Cedar Point Commons Proposed plans Renderings Parking reduction request Planning & Zoning maps VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING Representative(s) of Ryan Companies Representative(s) of McDonald's RESOLUTION NO. 9772 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CEDAR POINT COMMONS PROJECT WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a final development plan and conditional use permit for a commercial development of 29.6 acres on land generally located between 17th Avenue and Trunk Highway 77 (TH 77) and 63rd and 66th Streets, legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request for a final development plan and conditional use permit on April 24, 2006 and voted unanimously to recommend approval; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the project has been found adequate; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property on June 1, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the final development plan and conditional use permit on June13, 2006; and WHEREAS, the proposed commercial use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan: A. The Comprehensive Plan Guide Plan designates the project area as Regional Commercial/Office and the proposed development is consistent with this designation. B.-An-_objeotiv"-the-OompTehensive-plan_is_to-"advD_c-ate - - --- and support with municipal investment a high quality visual environment throughout the City and particularly along major transportation corridors." The proposed development is consistent with this objective. C. The development is also consistent with the following goal of the Comprehensive Plan: "Provide an economic climate within Richfield that will encourage the availability of quality goods, services and employment opportunities for residents." D. The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goal to, "Promote diverse development that will broaden the tax . base while reinforcing the residential character of Richfield," and with its accompanying objective, "promote development that can support itself and broaden the tax base." E. The development is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan objective: "promote Richfield's locational advantage within the greater metropolitan area." F. The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan objective to "address the means to improve the visual quality throughout the City, concentrating on design districts and transportation corridors, beginning with land use coordination." G. The development is consistent with the description of the Cedar Avenue Corridor subarea plan that states as follows: "The proposal for the Corridor area between East 63rd Street and Diagonal Boulevard is proposed to be largely redeveloped to attract regional commercial and office." WHEREAS, the commercial use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines: A. A redevelopment project area has been established. The proposed project is consistent with that project area. B. The project area provides for the facilitation of redevelopment of land for the construction of commercial/retail development better suited to withstand airport noise. C. The project area provides modern transit stops with bus pullouts and landscaping. D. The project area provides newer designed, high-volume street intersections better able to control traffic and interface with pedestrian traffic. E. The project area provides for bikeways, pathways for non-vehicular traffic. F. The project area enhances streetscape with decorative concrete, pedestrian lighting, and landscape features. WHEREAS, the commercial use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 541 of this code: A. Lighting will provide adequate levels for safe use of parking areas. The lighting will meet City ordinance requirements for less than 0.5-foot candles at any residential property line. One hour after store closings, only safety lighting will remain on. B. The development will include 1,521 parking stalls, which is approximately 92 percent of the number of stalls that would be required under the City's parking standards. The reduction in parking- stalls is—acceptable--because_—of—the—transit-oriented-- nature of the development. It is expected that many shoppers and employees will use modes of transportation other than cars. Shared parking and differences in peak parking needs for the different businesses are also expected to reduce the parking demand. C. Several traffic improvements are planned in the vicinity of the development, including a new roundabout at 17th Avenue and 66th Street and improvements to TH 77 and 66th Street. Those improvements, which have received necessary approvals, will accommodate the traffic of the development as well as future development south of 66th Street. The development includes transit-oriented elements, including bus pull-outs on 66th Street, twenty-foot sidewalks throughout the development to allow for comfortable walking and strolling space for shoppers, and bike racks to be located throughout the development to allow shoppers and employees the choice of using alternative modes of transportation to the development. The project will be accessible by foot, public transportation, bicycle, and motor vehicle. D. The City Zoning Ordinance requirements for landscaping are exceeded by the proposed landscaping plan. The developer will provide trees of 3 '/ inch and 4 inch caliper, where the code requires only 2-% inch caliper. Shade trees will be planted along the perimeter every 30 feet as required by code. The development will include approximately 462 trees, where the code requires only 329 trees. The east side of 17th Avenue has a 27-foot wide berm that will be planted with multiple layers of over-story and ornamental trees and shrubs from 65th Street to 64th Street to separate the parking from the street and minimize the intrusion of headlights into the neighborhood. From 64th Street to 63rd Street the berm will turn to a heavily landscaped edge with evergreen shrubs for year-round screening. E. Trash will be accommodated inside the truck wells of Home Depot and SuperTarget. Trash will be accommodated inside the buildings for all other buildings. F. Electrical and utility service lines will be installed underground. G. The west elevation of the SuperTarget and Home Depot buildings and the south elevation of the SuperTarget building will use a concrete block material that looks like brick. The building materials on the other buildings will include the concrete block material, metal panels and glass, and the architecture for the buildings is four-sided architecture. H. Roof-top mechanical equipment will not be visible ' from surrounding roadways, and if it is found to be visible all roof-top mechanical equipment will be screened with like material of the building(s) and approved by the Community Development Department. I. The development complies with the City's surface water management plan. The developer will construct a regional pond in the MnDOT right-of-way that is located to the north of Cedar Point Commons and to the west of TH 77. The regional pond will be designed and constructed to retain and treat stormwater runoff for- -1-3 acres, "including h"04dre edaT—F}nf Commons development as well as future runoff from the west of 17th Avenue and portions to the south of 66th Street in the Cedar Avenue Corridor. The stormwater design takes advantage of the soil conditions that will allow infiltration of stormwater. The majority of the storm sewer will be perforated pipe to allow water to be dispersed throughout the site as the water flows to the pond. The developer has also included a water infiltration landscape area in the parking lot between SuperTarget and Home Depot as a way to reduce stormwater runoff. WHEREAS, the commercial use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements: There are adequate facilities, utilities and services to support the development. With the proposed improvements as identified in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, there will be adequate roadways to serve the development; and WHEREAS, the commercial use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare: A. The development is designed to be pedestrian-friendly and transit-oriented, and planned traffic improvements will accommodate additional traffic generated by the development. B. The development includes a screen wall approximately 800 feet in length along TH 77. The wall will screen almost all delivery activity behind Home Depot and SuperTarget. Complementary plantings will blend with the screen wall and architectural facades. C. The development includes significant landscaping to provide a buffer and screening from residential development to the west. D. The developer has consulted with a noise consultant to mitigate the noise impacts on the development caused by the neighboring airport. The developer has incorporated several features into its development in order to mitigate noise, including: orientating the site to the west, away from the airport; locating the majority of doors to face north, south and west, away from the airport; limiting the number of windows facing east — only .02% of all the building facades is comprised of windows; and using building materials (other than windows) that reduce noise levels so as to meet applicable noise standards; and WHEREAS, there is a public need for such use at the proposed location; the Comprehensive Plan description of the Cedar Avenue Corridor plan states as follows: "The intersection of East 66th Street and Cedar Avenue affords the opportunity to attract a major regional commercial use such as a regional retail center;" and WHEREAS, the commercial use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of a final development plan and conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of the final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above, and all the facts set forth in the Background Section of City Council Report No. 142. 2. A final development plan and conditional use permit are approved for a commercial use as described in City Council Report No. 142, on the Subject Property legally described in Exhibit A. 3. The final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to completing the following conditions before being issued: Ongoing Conditions and Requirements 1) The site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below a) Site Plan, dated 6/1/06 b) Elevations, i)Target, including wall signs and roof logo, dated 3/20/06 ii) Home Depot, including wall signs, dated 1/20/06 iii) Retail Building, dated 4/4/06 iv) Outbuildings, dated.3/31/06 c) Building materials, dated 2/27/06 d) Grading Plan, dated 6/1/06 e) Utility Plan, dated 6/1/06 f) Lighting Plan, dated 6/1/06 g) Landscaping Plan, dated 6/1/06 h) Removals Plan, dated 6/1/06 i) Traffic Signage and Striping Plan, dated 6/1/06 j) Project signs, dated 4/27/06 and 3/31/06 k) Cedar Point Operations, Appendix A 2) Uses not allowed in the planned unit development include: stereo installation, taxi or limousine service, vehicle parts store, tree trimming services, assembly, light manufacturing, and warehouse, auto or boat sales/leasing, service stations, auto detailing, car washes, public-mechanical garage, and public-auto body garage. 3) Future buildings and additions require major planned unit development amendment. 4) Design of future buildings shall be similar to SuperTarget and Home Depot. 5) Maximum height of buildings should be 100 feet (based on Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Zoning Ordinance). 6) The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 7) Property owner and tenants are responsible for ensuring all appropriate and reasonable measures are taken so that shopping carts will stay on the property. 8) Concrete commercial driveway aprons required at all entrances between public streets/private & City property. 9) Trash containers shall be stored inside buildings or within the Target or Home Depot truck wells. 10)Plans approved by City Council are subject to any changes set forth by required code compliance and policy. 11)Buildings shall be constructed to meet noise standards set forth in the report of Orfie-I-d--,_dated May-18, 2005. Improvements for noise shall include: a) Orientation of the entire siteto a wes b) Majority of all doors in the development face north, south, and west. Away from the north-south runway. c) Cedar Point Commons building materials meeting all Orfield requirements, except windows. 12)During construction, 17th Avenue and 66th Street must be kept free of debris and sediment, and the tree protection fencing and erosion control fencing must be maintained. Before the issuance of the Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit 1) If applicable, evidence of watershed district approval. 2) The developer must provide to_the City Attorney for review a declaration of covenants or similar instrument that provides for common access and shared parking consistent with the development plan and that provides for ongoing maintenance of property. Before issuance of demolition permits 1) Installation of tree preservation fencing according to approved tree protection plan, wetland protection fencing, temporary rock driveways and erosion control measures, as developer acquires property. 2) Attend a pre-construction meeting. Before issuance of grading permits (not including the interim -grading permit for the utility relocation) 1) Submit construction-parking plan for Public Works review and approval. 2) Submit Sanitary Sewer Extension permit from MPCA. 3) Submit NPDES Permit—Construction Stormwater—from MPCA. 4) Purchase wetland banking credits for stormwater pond. 5) Submit wetland replacement permit from Corps of Engineers, if applicable. 6) Submit encroachment permit for grading from MnDOT. 7) Submit watermain extension approval from Department of Health. 8) Submit permit for connection to interceptor sewer from Met Council, if applicable. 9) Submit tax abatement county funding approval. 10)Submit revised site plans with the following changes for staff review and approval: a) Sidewalks should be at least 6 feet wide only if there is at least 4 feet of landscaping between the curb and sidewalk for snow storage, otherwise sidewalks should be at least 10 feet. b) Add bollards in front of Home Depot between sidewalk and parking lot. c) Add trash containers in front of out buildings' entrances to the stores. 11)Submit revised removals plan with the following note: "Removal of structures shall be permitted by the City of Richfield."The City of Richfield will require the removal of watermain and related structures by Ryan, but the watermain remains property of the City and the City will recycle the watermain. The City will take hydrants for spare parts. The City may also salvage signs and streetlights. Any utility or structure not taken by the City for salvaging or recycled will need to be disposed of by the contractor. 12)Submit revised utility plans for staff review and approval with the following change: add "and all requirements and standards of the City of Richfield"to all utility notes mentioning construction shall conform to standard specifications. 13)Submit a final stormwater management plan to and approved by the Public Works-Director. 14)Submit a final plan for walkways and sid l sk;boftubtcand private, for review and approval by staff. 15)Submit financial escrow to ensure compliance with grading and erosion control plans. The city will not release the letter of credit or cash escrow until the developer submits as-built drawings and a letter certifying that the utilities and grading have been completed according to the plans approved by the city. 16)AII concrete work on the right-of-way must be inspected by the City' s Engineering Department prior to pouring the concrete. A 24-hour notice is required. Before issuance of a building permit(s) 1) Submit performance surety for landscaping for 100% of the value. 2) Submit irrigation plan for staff review and approval. 3) Submit building samples to ensure color coordination. 4) Submit maintenance agreement for public improvements and a copy of the maintenance agreement for the private property. a) Maintenance Agreement shall include clarification on maintenance of landscaping and snow removal on 66th Street and 17th Avenue. b) Maintenance agreement shall clarify responsibility of temporary maintenance of landscaping in the roundabout and medians on 66th Street and 17th Avenue. 5) Submit MnDOT approval of landscaping plan along TH 77. 6) Submit amenities plan with benches with backs for staff review and approval. 7) Submit design of Home Depot's cart corrals. . 8) Submit revised lighting plan for staff review and approval with the following changes: a) Show lighting effects on the building elements, particularly the trellises, fins and signs. b) Have sufficient light levels at entrance from 17th Avenue. c) Have the circuits for Fights along 66th Street and 17th Avenue separate from site lighting. d) Use high-pressure sodium lights along public streets. e) Provide manufacture cut sheets for lighting fixtures. D All wall packs shall be shielded. 9) Submit revised building elevations for staff review and approval with the following changes: a) Removing the Home Depot lettering on the fins on the east fagade. b) Reducing the lettering of the Home Depot sign on the north fagade from five feet to four feet. 10)Submit hook-up fees for SAC and WAC. 11)Submit roof top plan and cross section elevations demonstrating roof top equipment on all buildings will be screen from the public right-of-way. 12)Submit recorded copy of this resolution. Before issuance of occupancy permit(s) 1) Receive approval and record final plat. 2) Provide staff a copy of cross access and parking agreements between lots. 3) Complete all work within 17th Avenue and 66th Street right-of-way. 4) Mill and overlay of 17th Avenue. On other streets that are to be paved, paving needs to be stopped perpendicular to the curbline. 65th Street, 17th and Cedar Avenue show stepped patches, pave street full width up to furthest extent of patching. 5)__ Need to screen or paint service doors, mechanical equipment and gas and eetrical meter boxes to match wallcolor. 6) Approval does not include the signs shown on the drawings. Separate sign permits are required. 7) Target logo on roof must receive approval from City Council. The City Council must deem the site as an unusual location. 8) The developer must provide evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney that the declaration of covenants establishing access and parking rights and maintenance obligations, as approved by the City Attorney, has been recorded against the property and is enforceable against all entities that hold interests in the property. 4. The final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 546.05, Subd. 9. 5. This resolution shall be effective upon the rezoning of the properties in accordance with Transitory Ordinance No. 2006-9. 6. The City Clerk is directed that this resolution shall bear the same number as the previous resolution. i Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of June, 2006. This resolution replaces and supercedes the resolution as adopted on June 13, 2006 t Martin J. Ki , Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, gity Clerk Exhibit A Legal Description That part of the following described parcels of land: Lots 1-6, Block 3; and Lots 1-12, Block 4; and Lots 1-16, Block 5; and Lots 3-8 and Lots 9- 14, Block 6; all in IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION; and Lots 1-14; Block 1; and Lots 1- 14, Block 2; and Lots 1-5 and Lots 9-14 and the Southerly 25 feet of Lot 6, Block 3; and Lots 1-4, Block 4; and Lots 1-2, block 5; all in IVERSON'S THIRD ADDITION; and Lots 1- 10, Block 5; and Lots 1-12, Block 8; and Lots 3-12, Block 15; all in the NEW FORD TOWN; according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota 0 N'I RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROP CH RESIDENTIAL ZONED ER (CHURCH USE) PROPER (RESIDENTIAL USE) r.1W DRIVE THRU SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL ZONING 295'DRIVE THRU SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL USErr 4 I:,.< i 1 Y r r '+.• 6 r-r•r 281' s• . . . . . . : . o 15 PARKING LOT SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAiO) , 21 28' 23' 150.0' N 1 Q F F 1` 1 E 7101 1 RYAN PROPERTIES SITE DATA I PATIO SEATING TO a 0 173' I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW MCDONALDS RESTAURANT O 13 BE LOCATION S-T-R 26-028-2421' BY OWNER DETERMINED LIF- .:a.• :;O' I ZONED PC-2 1 AWARD. UPON a PARCEL ID: 26-028-24-14-0137 CSrT`. i16' 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF CEDAR POINT COMMONS SECOND ADDITION Gyi.- 4587 AT RECORDED IN HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA. 3'HIGH9' FIFE$47.5 TRACK _-Q 1' —— — SURMOUNTABLE ADDRESS: TBO 17TH AVENUES.,RICHFIELD,MN o iIMAXBLDGSE CURBED MEDIAN FLOOD ZONE: NSFHA-ZONE X NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA), AS w .: W ' ' ' 1 SHOWN ON FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD NOT FUTURE ACCESS INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER XXXXXX. j ci1 s :z^-"^•--i y t a ENTER'SIGNS TO ADJACENT LOT SITE AREA: 45,679 S.F. (1.05 AC.) Nx T ? , &:,` b R50'A 1$' 1`` ZONING DISTRICT: PC-2(PLANNED GENERAL COMMERCIAL) FAST FOOD RESTAURANT: CONDITIONAL USE miA a r d1` 9' t FLOOR AREA RATIO:3.915 S.F. /30,798 S.F.m 0.13 c§ t POTENTIAL ROW LINq LOT C04ERAGE: REQUIRED PROVIDED5 k ',\\\ TOTAL SITE AREA N/A S.F. 3,915 S.F. (1.05 AC) 100 a.._ BUILDING AREA: N/A 32,71 S.F. ( 0.775 AC) 71.49 S 66{1 IMPERVIOUS AREA: BSX MAX.32,714 S.F. o v \r + +• S. . LANDSCAPE AREA: 15%MIN. 9.110 S.F. (0.21 AC) 20.0 B b E 1 f rx y PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING: 5% MIN. 3.670 S.F. (0.08 AC) 8.02K r19s 8 - k. i o N a rc c t •'"-"'-T:k <_. 4•. e. . c.^, >,;\ a x_,,.,>-:.=,,=.- Y..F.z.,,. REQUIRED 5 r F Y a C A C• E IRD REAR 8Zzz 8•W 3 STREET/FRONT 60'MAX..._ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE DRIVE—THRU Y Q 8 PARKING SETB TS: C ACK MIN. 150•FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY 3 TRAIL CLEAR DISTANCE L CLEAR DISTANCE3TRAI RI rn 3 c g-- s-_-___ ___- -' r" --`>• i. T. r g::: 1': n;_•..___,__.__.Y`.-_.__°_.-__-:-;__ te-.:.-r_.._,._ u..:.__._....__---._._-..__..___'_-..--._.:_>....__-."..__'.___.__-_._-._.___._.-._.- PARKING SETBACKSMOUENTACURB(PUSUCSTREET)R 6'_ SUR SIDE-wES 8 STREET SOUTH.EA S B' SIDE B• 1515' SIDE RESIDENTI ) e PARKING SUMMARY: REQUI RED I R IR E D D- PROVIDEDODED STANDARD B S r ACCESSIBLE 2 2 it 0 w moD: wx2 8.79 12 01RATIO Q INCLUDING PULL AHEAD STALLS 18.78 12.52 N a to PARKING STUDY HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO JUSTIFY REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENT Q J o Z Q J QWa fr w 1. ALL RADII ARE 3'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CALL-OUT LEGEND SYMBOL LEGEND 2. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON 8 r" 3' 2 ADA TRUNCATED DOME DEVICE TYP. ANDEXISTINGSOILSANDPAVEMENTDESIGN. o ACCESSIBLE ROUTE w a ADA CURB RAMP.REFERENCE MNDOT yr ""'" D ( LOCATION PURPOSES ONLY.DO NOT PAINT) STANDARD ASPHALT PAVEMENT Q 0 3. CONTRACTOR MUST USE MCDONALD'S APPROVED STENCILS FOR STANDARD PLATE p m - PAVEMENT MARKINGS. ONLY TEMPLATES RECEIVED FROM THE 0 6'WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT ZFOLLOWINGCOMPANYWILLBEACCEPTED: a 2 g'D 14'WIDE WHITE STOP BARS1, PAVEMENT STENCIL COMPANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN LANDSCAPING J 2 P.O.BOX 18034 OD DIRECTIONAL ARROW(TYP.) SEE SHEET C3.2 FOR SIGN TYPE AND MOUNTING L ROANOKE. VA.24014 Q 0_ 5547 FAX(540)427-1326 OX PARKING STALL COUNT STRIPING. STRIPES SHALL BE PAINTED WHITE PH 800-25G DRIVE-THRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS U SWSL/4'AT 2'-0'O.0PAVEMENT57ENCILNET J Qo PROPOSED LIGHT POLE UJ F 10'TRANSITION FROM B612 TO 3'CURB y LL4.SEE SHEET DT2.1 FOR DRIVE-THRU DETAIL O DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CURB j o BOLLARD TRANSFORMER PAD U a WRVS ME CURB DEMO C Of o ti yzoT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PAVEMENT MARKINGS O 0 0 u..,• ..',m Hy„:,,.SEE SHEET C3.2AFOR DETAIL TIONAL SIGNAGE I I I,I Q tD of w e BUILDING SETBACK 2 w MCDONALDS STANDARD SIGNAGE- SEE NOTE 3 w w c PROPERTY LINE c=_) o L CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB.SE DETAIL DATE 3 Z PROPOSED THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT TRAIL 28/2013 O t G A HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS PROJECT N0. 160631010 BIKE RACK E - SHEET NUMBER 0 20 40 C3.1 o SCALE FEET o Q y SCALE FEET D 0 70 FT LANE w PROVIDED IN y ACCORDANCE WITH 1 - SECTION 534.07, a 70 SUED. 7 1. m 4587 AT r Iz 4581 AT 18 n I t r GARBAGE TRUCK ROUTE RICHFIELD PARXII 2 PAS ANGER VEHICLE 34.50' gu < E STACKING RICHFIELD PARXIIAY a 19.00 G r % 5.0' 15.0' FRONT LOADING GARBAGE TRUCK Rig o NOTE Q11 a 1. MAJORITY OF METRO GARBAGE TRUCKS ARE FRONT 3.00co3.00 11.00 LOADING. AUTO TURN DEMONSTRATES A FRONT LOADING 8 Q W LLJ IwsT 1 4587 AT V flI a SURMOUNTABLE mwJ 3" WIIICURBr t t N Z °W s DELIVERY TRUCK ROUTE FIRE TRUC ROUTE s 8 750 4250 26.25 10 u- RICHFIELD P a-.---.. 1; aure>w¢a RICHFIELD PARRIIAY U p ° 300 35.50 0: a 0.00 O o 3.00 1250 cos a+••. v - ` 4.59 12.50 m WB-50 r..t I ° Tractor Wkt9, :9.00 Lack to Lock 1k- :9.D BRANDWEERAU &et V 5 Tmker Width 9.50 StwrMq A. 17.7 Width 1 D t Tractor Track :9.00 ArOcWatinq Z4 :70.0 W h 7. 5 s 7mihr Tmck 9.50 Track 7.15 8/28/2013 Y NOTE Lock to Lock Time :6.0 Steering Angle :33.1 PROJECT NO. 1. EXACT DELIVERY HOURS TIED.DELIEVERIES WILL NOT BE 160631010 E J MADE DURING HIGH PEAK HOURS(BREAKFAST, LUNCH, OR SHEET NUMBER E DINNER)SUCH THAT IT WILL MINIMIZE PARKING AND CIRCULATION. C3.5 oIF- 0 m ss OTES NDLE LEVELS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING L. .:.:::._\ .1. ':>_..'\ CRITERIIA, ANY SUBSTITUTIONS IN SPECIFIED FIXTURES OR CHANGES B SERIES 1 A fulA wij,t LIL and direcdona:ligntUng SYS . TO LAYOUT WILL AFFECT LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN AND WILL NOT des'gm. lfarmwftum rada:aywa.ix:Caacl;,xsar l i BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SECURITY LIGHTING. tnay's ll'llg rleeJS.?cG;1sr.+pe rroun]rn,.aSxIar 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 '\ 0.1 0.0 0.1 0,1 0. 0.0 0,0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0:p\ 2. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE METAL HALIDE SOFFIT/BUILDING npn)45°n?aCla>'har"varnalgrimrcne;famreczV 00 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 `tl.t o.1 0.1 a1 o.t o.1 0.l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1, F6 ar-•I nlcu,u, LIGHTING IS NOT REFLECTED ON THIS DRAWING. RluarAas ma wraF the.am: 0.1 0.1 01_ 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 bT 0.1 Fat ....01..21. ..a..t_ 0,1.__Q,i 0,1_,0.1 0.1 YaUe-p6ce%L'1 r,*-' O1 0.1 '.(.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 f!` 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 01 v0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1', 0.1 0. 3. DISTANCE BETWEEN READINGS 10' 0.1 1.01[l 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 P.-2 b 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ,0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 ?0.1 0. m 4. FINAL ADJUSTMENTS TO AIMING ANGLE/DIRECTION OF FIXTURES MAY z I p\\\`..\. 0 0.1 10.1 D.2 0.2 0.3 0.3; 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0' :0.2,22` D!O:Z'D:2'_ 0.7 '0'T" 01 p.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 10. 1 0. ADJOININGEPROPERTIESNOREROADWAYSRESPASS OR GLARE ONTO D1 0.2 0.3 0.4 ',4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 04 03 :3 0.2 b; 0.4 Qa. `.4 --03 0-2 •0;2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1. 0.1 c\ y - S- w Y S - -- - --- FOOT CANDLE LEVELS SHOWN A MAINTAINED. X101 5 CA LE S S N RE 0.1 0a2` 0;4 0.4 0.5%0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 07 j 4 10.4 0.5 0.,.0.7 Ot., 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.4 0,7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 1,0.2 0. MAINTENANCE FACTOR USED ON THIS DRAWING IS .75 SI D2 10.5 0.6 0.7 7„ Y- 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0" 5' 6! O,Si 0.6 1.4 :"T 1.1 '6Y 1.3 1.0 04 1.3* 1.1 0.9 0,6 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0 0.3? 0.111 O L-.0.3 t 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9 0 '"T'3°`-"l: ba` 2.2 Tag 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.3 2.5 1,7 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.2 7.1 1.2 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.6..,. 0.4 0.30.30.2- 22Q 0.2 02 D40..,•..• • i ,:...... 0.8..50.40. 40. 3L.` 02..._ X 0.1 01 ° r r.1' W Fixture Specifications may. QE•© 3 0.60.8 A 2.7 2.1 2.0 2.6 5-••4.7 8.2 10.1 8.9 6.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 8.2 8.7 9.2 8.6 4.3 1.4 1.4 0.8 0.30.3 1 r lmea a.mhum rou4ng ry;:e C:ara:ar_s<v'ljlerd)c rrna: z 0.1p < 0:2 X0'5 1.2 0.70.50.4 0.2 j 7,4 A.-to W,.p and Lana$[ adao[a S rb:3.` A' 0.71.2 I 2.4 1.0 0.3 1 nml>alalxn:lnnx =i-6 ddsl •mcrude5 rveglavaapa5sc vgb. x C30. - 1 3.7 3.3 2.7 2.9 7 4.9 .8 8.7 8.2 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.5 8,9 9.0 5.7 4.9 4.6 4.4 4.4 6.9 9.0 8.8 8.6 3.8 3 0.4 11 x rsy ct,1,ff eld L- _ 0.1 - `.0.6 I 0 1 0.70.50.4 0.3 o.,e-pece:eTa edalass lc,s •ea'°uc:`a ly rareearzr0,1'r- in y r 03 M..x 1.17.7 1 2•a 0.9 0.3 1 b:)ct'of.•.ys nfaU,'t':tcslufpl:3sl:f s<:mo;x:, i 2 r: 9 4.5 4.5 3.6 2.9 42 4.2 5.0 5.6 5.1 4.6 3.8 3.4 4.0 4.8 5.4 5.5 3.4 3.5 4.3 5.1 7.3 8.1 5.0 4.3 2 0.4 p etdallnlTyper7 T J 0'8.. 7.5 1 aumima::lrr:.da oarnm,; •uxt,<e51an! eO 1 0 0.60,50.5 0.3 0.2°? eRc:exy fo•'a':arltl•KdelieFt •AVe2Ulexid'e pna[u til La<, C•C) t 1.1 2.3 .5 8.5 5.0 3.9 3.0 J5 3.2 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.4 2.3 2.0 2.5 3.7 3,7 3.8 2.9 2.1 2.3 3.3 3.3 21 1,5 0.7 0.40.4 arsrbvtse: swmlk rarwal m°undAq S j 1.0 nMndi(e rmKF.CEnvr;,heti)nv:` •UI.FSRd blYYt.:d'ia".5 Z I bet p0:3 c 0.1 Dq x,. 8 0.50.50.4 0.3 1;'p`2, { PAVED SURFACE READINGS yr+ ' K" wpm x)r )- y•• o. ,. s_ 0.30.5 I ,5 8.0 6.5 3.6 2.8 2. 2 3.3 3.1 3.1 .1 1. 1.00.8 p,g 0.40.3 CORDERINGINFORMATION 0:'', 6 0.50.50.4 0.3 1 6 0.1 Q;} 1 Average 3.9 R mcs cmxz lavwux 0", 1 Maximum 10.5 1 R 7.1 2.3 1 ,2 7.8 4.8 3.8 2.7 1I8 1.5 1.6 1.7 7.6 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.0 2. 3 of 0.80.7 0.5 0.40.3 Minimum 0.7 A58 JC XX1000fx xX XX yT 0.1 . at• F0:51 6 0.50.40.4 0.3 Avg:Min 5.62 I177.3:{' ti11.7 I i 0.7 Max:Min 15.00 1 4.4 4.2 3.0 1.0 0 0.6 0.5 0.30.30.3 alu nn+,...tsnea. INFORMATION ORDERING p• it 1 6 0.50.40.4 wn1• 0.10.1': 1 ii•`:is•. i 3 1a 3 Ig tj2 ii, 0.5}1.2 3 5 3.0 1.7 0 3 PROPERTY LINE READINGS s 0.10.2: O ,. ., 1 40.40.4 az 0 e 9 0.7 6 0.5 D. 0.3 ac.•a.•.,.wr f Y ` , yq lit . 1 2.5 1.8 0.8 8 '0.60.6 0.5 0.30.3 Maximum 2.6 nano vs,.ar°.:c- n,aR w ..r - y E 0.2 0 2 `+ ` a a 4587 AT 5 0.40.40.3 0.2 e 01 i, I Minimum 0.3 i. s ..Oi50.7{, .4 1.5 .2 0.9 •: \ FFE 8473 L9 9 n 17 J.3 D2 1.4 1.4],§_ 3 .Q_0.6 0.5 p. 0.3 Avg:Min 3.38 m... r r ._.nt'M1"°4FI c j- a 0.2 ..4 0.6 5 0.40.40.3 0.2 Max:Min 8,67 z3.. - a:a.'.,.c» m„«...., mr c } SI0.2. 0. .=... ' 1 9 1 6 O6 0.5 0.3 In ir:.« '__..._____.. r..:a...w•e..,d.....ue.., iai1.8 2.4 2.9 2.7 2.6 1.9 0.3 f`b 1 a 0.50.6, t, .9 1.0 I 0.6 1 6 d,2 0 S ,• 5 0.40.40.3 0.2 READINGS BEYOND PROPERTY LINE I j 0.20.2 0.311o. 2 9 1.2 i.8• 2,7 3.2 r 3.0~.3.3'` 2.7 1.8.-•1.6 .2.7••3.2 ..3.5 3.3 3.7 2.9 2.3 2.6 3.7 4.0 3.6 3.8 3.0 1.8 1.1 0 0.6 0.5 0,30.30.6 0.40.3 0.2 Average 0.2 48n0.20. 2' A4 t. _,_ \ 5 0.4 Maximum 2.0 1 rte. .,p.:a..,..°a iE R2 0.3 ' 1.6 2.8 4,0 4.6 4.8 4.6 4.0 3.0 2.7 3.5 4.4 5.0 5,1 5.0 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.9 5.3 6.5 4. 4.2 2.8 1. 0.7 0.5 0.30.2 Minimum 0.0 S i5 n i' 0.20.3 '< 4.. ::_ ` i 0.6 Av Min N/A 1 n- Roducts p yM,v.:x. e F' o p.2 0.3 a•aY+ti 5 0.40.40.3 0.2 Maz:Min N/A a D rigid 1 I 1085 M',r,.mE]:Fe:•(4rezh r,lexr:,F 600A9•TU,..I ECU-Skq-gA4tl•aurr R9/-719-Jfi21•r.<tlg7-?.I9-176<). aFgop 0,4- x, 3.6 4.9 7.2 8.5 6.2 5.1 4.4 4';,3 4.6 5.2 7.9 9.0 6.2 5.7 5.5 5.3 5.2 8.7 8.3 7. 4.4 3.4 2. 0.80,6 0.5 0,30.2 e} RR 0.3 0. ' r 5 0.40.30.3 0.2 a t!-.:3.-2:0.2 D.S c 5 5.7 8.5 9.5 9.0 5.0 4.6 4,6 4.4 6.9 9.1 9.6 9.8 5.2 5.0 5.0 6.9 8.0 10.5 7. 4.9 2.9 2 0.8 0 6 0.4 0.2 6 0. A ESn0.2 D.2 3 0$ 0 i 0.3 .2 0'2 SQU/1RE STRAIGHT STEEL POLES 0.7 0. 2003 a ' 1{7. 65 0.2 0.3 0 i 0 a:z o.a z z a m~ Specifications a 0.1 0.2 0.2 04 1 0.1 0!„_--0' Y3.g fi a. 0. 0 7 n Q F ssP SERIES A-, 0.2 0,2 0.3 r, rn ,`•., 0.1 0.1 swarcsnapt'nr 1SVa r -:'•xxtd tAygaWa^led tt J,lma.,ncr M:„ Qr3-r`-D'.'--0'2 82-a R 3, 0.2 0.2 Or xns.ara 3kc adc na:,ni aiy dpg •vea pale t•rs lr lnD3- -fl:2=__12,"._.':U.2-0.2 0.2 0.1 0:`-' O:2' 0.2 0.1"'" 1~ Oce Ix+ YR wa 5-2,1-2 ¢:pNtelececaarn.,-br, IsIrwls ix•I I:ucTl U U e. 'ca•`aas'•.. p; O.Y 0.1 0.2 •.,,. a 0.1 0.1 1 e '• .<•"'..;^,,; 0..:_::::.:_ .._..n T..._.n r.,•a4tiil...27-wD; ni n. p1 n) ^1> e,.fl 0 Graare w4 samlald si we,rt;•xrapcwav<oaz w.lr V n . af• 5ke;base plate c s+am:haTalxlk standard 0.1 0.1 9 a.° ..._.:..... - - t 0.1 0.1 0.1 , o. 0.1 D:r o:r o.i o.l i}CF IE PRKMAYo.1 0.1 0.l 0.1 oass>,,.0,1 at o.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 C i r ....._.:: r...p.: E a_#. 0. 0,1 0.1 0.1 0. (I:kz:4ET. 1: 0:1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 (P C STREILT) 0.1 0.1 0.1_, 0.1 r 0.1 0.1 ".O<" "-'`°..0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 W g z' „ " ..x. 0.1 0.1 0.1 _" 7 T^wv r"D.i 7-0.f"7B -0. 111 at 0.1 a.l 0.1 obi o i '==ar °6 G o.t o.t o.1 0l 0.1 0.1 .1 0.1 c 0.7 O.Q_.,0.0 0.0 0.1 0:,. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _O.o 0 - r Q.,a.._-..00_.. ......:o: ':;04:_: TtII....._a::: a_o...i re;7-j p.p p.o ORDERING 1lRPOREIATION F'. ._..G:::>.,0..O.t3 .'3I:0,--=0•-__..06 ..'II.......QO..` 0.0 0. q--0 0 0.0 0.0 (1.0._.0:0: A0::3: & kLxY ;Tk :.:6V':r::::pXj' ... ....- - a' :: -°i 0.0 p• p...a.R;: 0.0,.47.f7:-..._..::_: .-_9:0 0 0.0_0.0 0.0 _0.0.._ 0.0 O.Oi Fb lalJ11LAOFF( 13.R 135 &3 fi.i i£Y '0.13 1' - il"w TO E2 FfriYxxx•)IX Zs ]L4 I>i 13.: 10.: S :I' I" 113 10.:3.5 4' 153 n JAM NUT --. W-vT»awwl )5 13.3 s.a ns 3' tr I• Is it":3. :.o LL• SPECIFY COLOR STRUCTURAL NUT w FIXTURE TYPE SYMBOL auav+rnv CONFIG QUANTITY enu:111:3s QUANTITY EPA nE1CHi POLE TYPE: QUANTITY vem uvu• cAA Q N ° ASB-C-320PMH--MT-MT - 14 DBL 7 TT-2A 7 5.54 21' SSP-4118-GL-**-TT(4) 7 90mph 13.8 PLATE WASHER(PER LIGHT O E POLE MANUFACPJRER} f1=-+0 z a m LEVELING NUT- J p CATALOG LOGIC a m xxRwvn uTxiaa wwne+e n Q 0- ssP xx xx x x x xx xx cn o w s..Yes•.p,.s:a i zare'a:r r.,.v,,.sealx,.::aYanu-, _ U 0 0 * PROJECT WIND LOAD CRITERIA BASED ON: 1"f}pNCHQ(t BOLT^ i ro °C O o2ASCE7-10 WIND SPEEDS (3-SEC PEAK GUST MPH) a z 50 YEAR MEAN RECURRENCE INTERVAL c> --- -'- O u„.n.a.so• O o LU u s..arcxa..,,,evo:,x-M c e:a:• w o NOTE: u saYC• w 0 0 - ALL ASB FIXTURES TO BE INSTALLED TILTED AT A ZWITHI•' OROETOBR mt5n U 111TH1Y 0HOLE TO BE Ji 30 DEGREE ANGLE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.zo EMBEDDED INFOUNOA71oN 3 L A I .sef.rm zsra,.wl.>„~v.ral.:.uae 8/28/2013 A E BUILDING LIGHTING WILL BE INCLUDED ON THE BOTTOMktRFOR1.0 I j Y t FINAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN UPON COMPLETION OF J F a,.a PROJECT N0. BLDG ELEVATIONS AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. ANCHOR BUT .<160631010o E . 2 F 2D 4D JAM NUT__., vJ SHEET NUMBER E Tx s uartlac w3TOw nweswrs IwR1IINnw laysis oxaa vTCa Ixd uaaaaTOm w>a SCALE FEET Per(ormalrce Designed Lighting Pnoduds xx%>RVwRa,s..•e V(7••1rnemcRmnwamrnlmmoaixwvimiweiwnxaaalxaxlx5swimITn,.urnRC„mc ,m,u, ,asuewx u',wrw.ranwzcwnx.IlezxrvelrlRC,o ANCHOR BOLT DETAIL IOESO'nscalClRe•'3•JiabGreve.:L600F9•+x 'ae:A00-Sq4-0A4A•rRax=:F47-279-0627•nu847-]]9-Cb42 1.1, 3 MI.TIaI rx aECTR[C/l Y¢TIlE,3°IERxfE IR lxPS,tMa aT1ER YMI•r•'t16D CaalTiai. O° € Y ry DGN zO 7_ N 50 r GREEN PARKING. WALL REACH 4'-5•HEIGHT AT AD MATURITY zo DL - 7w 1 P P N C h 2 E 7x a T coo L POTENTIAL.} EVERGREEN/YEAR-ROUND SHRUBS TO ROW LINE a SCREEN TRANSFORMER,WILL REACH 4•-s' LEGENDo Ni....HEIGHT AT MATURITY P SOD xz ^N 7 N OMITS OF FUTURE IRRIGATION PHASE 1) X. q P 4"PVC IRRIGATION CONDUITq LL Y a 6N LIMITS OF FUTURE IRRIGATION a O PHASE 2) f53 6 a in z EVERGREEN/YEAR-ROUND SHRUBS TO 0] m SCREEN LL REACH 4-5 HEIGHT............_._. .__---.. Zm In PLANTING SCHEDULE e A 9 " DECIDUOUS TREES e QTY SYM COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT SPACING REMARKS d a o g NWM NORTHW00D MAPLE ACER RUBRUM'NORTHWOOD' 2.5'CAL. B&B I PER PLANS SINGLE STEM.SPECIMEN W a a D 20 40 EVERGREEN TREES n" QTY SYM COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT SPACING REMARKS VINGPLANSCALEFEET1PLANT p o 3 BHS BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA 8'HT. B&B PER PLANS - v, w L1.1 w o 2 AP AUSTRIAN PINE PINUS NIGRA 8'11T. B&B PER PLANS Q ZORNAMENTALTREES QTY SYM COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE R00T SPACING REMARKS J j 7 PRE PRAIRIE ROSE MALUS'PRAIRIE ROSE' 2"CAL. B&B PER PLANS SINGLE STEM,SPECIMEN F t 6 SAB SE RMCEBERRY'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE 2"CAL. B&B PER PLANS SINGLE STEM,SPECIMEN Q w °w c 8 ISL IVORY SILK LILAC SYRINGA RETICULATA'IVORY SILK 8'HT. B&B PER PLANS MULTI STEM,SPECIMEN pNLd E SHRUBS U z w NOTES: QTY SYM ICOMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT SPACING REMARKS J p ° 1 SEE SHEET L1.2, AND L1.3 FOR PLANTING DETAILS & REQUIREMENTS. 14 EDW NEON DWARF WNGED SPIREA US ALAN$ EON FLASH' y3 POT CONT. 7z'OC Y Q 27 NFS NEON FLASH SPIREA SPIREA JAPONICA'NEON FLASH' p3 POT CONT. 36"OC - Qp2. INSTALL SOD TO LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD SHALL BE MINERAL TYPE, PRIMARILY COMPOSED OF KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS. v a 3. PLACE PREEN IN PLANTING BEDS AFTER PLANTING AND PRIOR TO PLACING MULCH. se FPR FO%I PAVEMENT ROSE ROSA RUGOSA OX[PAVEMENT" g3 POT CONT. 36"OC - J 75 E 4. INSTALL 4" OF PREMIUM DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL PLANTING BEDS. INSTALL 3• DIAMETER MULCH RING AROUND ALL TREES IN SOD AREAS. 40 YEW TAUNTON YEW TAXUS X MEDIA'TAUNTON' q3 POT CONT. 4B"OC - to 5. INSTALL 3/16"x4" BLACK STEEL EDGER, WITH 4' STAKES AT 4' O.C. MIN. WHERE SOD ABUTS PLANTING BEDS. TYPICAL ON ENTIRE SITE. s MKL MISS KIM LILAC SYRINGA PATULA'MISS KIM' 3 POT CONT. 60"oc -a = i o 6. INSTALL 16" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PER THE DETAIL. a DGN DART'S GOLD NINEBARK PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS DARTS GOLD'A3 POT CONT. 4a"Oc -C K INCORPORATE COMPOST AND PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER INTO ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TREE PLANTINGS PER THE DETAILS. 48 MJJ JUNIPER,MINT JULEP JUNIPERUS X CHINENSIS'MONLEP' M3 POT CONT. 60"OC - a IRRIGATION TO BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS. IT IS THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE FULL COVERAGES AND START DATES. COORDINATE WORK WITH O o 37 D8H DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE DIERMLLA LONICERA 3 POT CONT. 36"OC -Cl o a IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. HAND WATER ALL PLANTS UNTIL IRRIGATION IS RUNNING ACCORDINGLY.U m o e 9. PROVIDE SCHEDULE 40 4" PVC SLEEVING UNDER ALL PAVEMENTS FOR IRRIGATION BY OTHERS. DUCT TAPE ENDS AND MARK WITH #3 REBAR PIECES, PAINTED WITH BRIGHT RED PAINT FOR PERENNIALS ANNUALS w LOCATING IN THE FUTURE. SET FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE. 10. MAINTAIN SOD BY WATERING AND MOWING FOR 45 DAYS FROM DAY OF INSTALL. QTY SYM COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT SPACING REMARKS o £ U 11. MAINTAIN, GUARANTEE, AND WATER ALL TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS FOR ONE YEAR FROM PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. REMOVE WEEDS MONTHLY AND MAINTAIN MULCH IN ALL PLANTING 7s sDL STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY HEMEROCALLIS'RUBY STELLA' 2 YEAR- i coNT, ia"oc AREAS, DURING THE ONE YEAR PERIOD. REPLACE ALL DEAD MATERIAL PER DIRECTION OF OWNER DURING THE ONE YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD.117 CAT WALKER'S LOW CATMINT NEPETA X FAASENI'WALKER'S LOW 2 YEAR-N1 coNT. 24'Oc - 3 12. STANDARDS SET FORTH IN "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" REPRESENT GUIDELINE SPECIFICATIONS ONLY AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT OnrE 94 C85 LITTLE BLUESTEM SCHlZACHYRIUM$COPARIUM 2 YEAR- 2 CONT. 18"OC 8/28/2013 E MATERIAL. 1a BES BLACK EYED SUSAN RUDBECKIA,GOLDSTRUM 2 YEAR-#1 CONT. 18"OC - PROJECT NO. Y c 160631010 E SHEET NUMBER 2 PLANTING SCHEDULE L1.1 3 a L1.1 O .9 a III k T/ROOF CAP ELEMENT ELEV.+23'-4" l TYP. BEYOND T/BLOCKING®HEARTH CJ CM MF CJ RE 5 MF Cl {E CJ L MF L BR ELEV, + 21'-4° 2 CI 2 2 t 2 u T ROOF CAP ELEMENT 2 B1 T/aLK'G®PARAPET Ij T/BLOCKING PARAPET ELEV. +2D'-3' T BLOCKING®PARAPET' o ELEV.+ 9 i/2• ELLV.+ 18'-9 1/2• ELEV. a EIR B/METAL PANEL 17 ® i/BLOCKING®ARCADE ELEV, + 15'-10 1/2° n ELEV.+ 10'-a• B/CANOPY B REWS T WINDOW ML Y WINDOW ELEV.+9'-4• ELEV.+9'-4' T/DOOR Ti wt ED OU ELEV. +7 L wt X XX BEYOND v CM ct ACCESSIBILITY SIGNAGE SEE GEN NOTE#6 ON A1.0 wt W7 wt wt wt T SILL OR Wt wt ELEV.+2-0 T SLAB T/SLAB T SLAB ELEV. +D'-0• ELEV. +0'-0" ELEV.+0'-0 a-] PB E PB BR CJ CM C2 C1 LE CJ BR Bt BUILDING ADDRESS 132 Cl C1 L3 BEYOND B2 6'H.CHARACTERS r3'\ NON DRIVE—THRU ELEVATION AND 3/4"STROKE FRONT ELEVATION LE MF S L1 2 BEYOND BEYOND BEYOND K-4-1 ML A L BR CJ L 01 NF MF LE CM T2 RO T1 C2 T/BLOCKING PARAPET 2 2 1 Lt C1 81 2 1 2 2 0 ELEV.+ 1a'-9 1/2"J nogg°o a uosiE a T BlJ<G O ARCADE ELEV.+ T qU,V cR`o`ooS elcome B/CANOPY, N T WNDOW I I Ygo ELEV.+9'-4' n Wt W1 m Cl X E C n Pa El 2 m T SILL wt W1 w1 x m 6 REVEAL .,__.._-._..__ a L° 1 IV ELEV.+3'-4'1 is°-5 wl T SLAB 18 ELEV.+0'-0' I o I oo U CR CM LE BR CJ CJ CM CJ BR L C1 BR D FB FB 0 BR 0 P a BEYOND ci 3 82 86YOND 2 1 DEYON 2 D B2 LE BI 80 W2 of F M ACCESSIBILITY SIGNAGE SEE 3 GEN NOTE#B ON A1.0 za BUILDING ADDRESS 6"FI. CHARACTERS AND 3/4'STROKE NON DRIVE—THRU ELEVATION U I 0 o J I s o DO p KEY NOTES: m 0n00 2 41 N BR FACEBRICK CORRUGATED METAL PANEL LIGHT FIXTURE(WAIL SCONCE)-SEE ELECTRICAL PB PIPE BOLLARD-PAINTED YELLOW T7 ALUMINUM TRELLIS SYSTEM Q 3 m Bi-COLOR: C 0 ° 81='PARK ROSE'BY INTERSTATE BRICK COLOR: ACCENT LIGHTING-SEE ELECTRICAL RMHC)COIN COLLECTOR a O 5 g w Cl -'CBYSCAPE'BY METAL-ERA PT UNIT DT2000 CMU TRELLIS TIE-BACK SYSTEM mB2='MODULAR WHFATFIELD VELOUR A'BY BELDEN BRICK Lt-LED UGHT: WPT CALL 1-888-743-7435 TO ORDER H 3 L1 UP AND DOWN FIXTURE ALUMINUM TREWS 2'.8'WALL FASCIA SYSTEMHOLLONMETALODOR-PAINT TO MATCH COLOR OF V7 o Dt D SURROUNDING MATERIAL l2=OONTI ONLY FlXNRE T3 d N ALUMINUM CANOPY SYSTEM(COLOR:GOLD) L3 INTEGRAL CANOPY FIXTURE ROOF CAP ELEIAFM BY OTHERS REFER TO SUM.DETAIL 3 ON SHEET A5.1 M r °d n INSULATED OVERHEAD DOCR-PAINT TO MATCH L4=UP ONLY RXTURE J E COLOR OF SURROUNDING MATERIAL ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW PPE PAINT TO MATCH wi -EXTERIOR INDOW SEE ASSEMBLY NNOORS ASSEMBLY-TEMPERED GLASS O Y S o22ALUMINUMCANOPYTIE-BACK SYSTEM ML METAL LETTERING-BY OTHERS E SURROUNDING MATERW. G5 w CO2-CO2= METAL FASCIA-COLOR TO MATCH CORRUGATED Mc00NAID'S SIGNAGE BY OTHERS-UNDER SEPARATE DRWE-THRU WINDOW BY READY ACCESS 600 SERIES.36"SERNCE BULK CO2 FlLL BOX EOPM SCHEDULE ITEM 49.00) W2 HEIGHT WITH TRANSOM-MANUAL OPEN;ELECTRONIC RELEASE 022-0532.00.0 CX TYPE. JOINT BO =DULK OIL FlLL BOX(EOPM SCHEDULE ITEM 700.16)- METAL PANEL-SEE 1/A5.0 PERMIT,pI 1 •OX-T'PE: 1 = MASONRY. CONFIRM USE WITH MCD PRQIECT MANAGER 1-TYPE WALNUT'BRUSH STROKE TILES IRIS U.S. L2=MASONRY.SEE DETAIL 7/A4.1 GUARD RAIL-SEE SITE PLAN 1=PRE-FAB ANCHOR-TDE FASCIA TL BY EUROWEST DECORATIVE SURFACES ) DIRECTION: RL=PoGMT TO LEFT 2=PRE-APB CUSTOM ARCADE FASCIA LR a LEFT TO RK3lT ELEVATIONSFOREXACTLOCATION- EE SI AND LENGTH CONTACT: IAN DETER TIVE 57.7500 Y m T/ROOF CAP ELEMENT BEYOND EU s LE ce cM MF Gt BR cJ L T/BLK'G®HEARTH L2 SP-C7 ct t 2 BI 2 ELEV. +21'-4" o T/BLOCKING®PARAPET t e1 1 Bt TW.z 1'; T PARAPET BLOCKING U ELEV.+1/2" ELEV.+ 18'-9 1/2" wo0 Tz EQUAL" EQU El EWSB/TRELLIS _ B/TRELLIS ELEV. T BRICK REVEAL - T INDOW EIINDOWB_p• TI ELLV. +B'-0' wt T DOOR T/SILL T/SIgB T SLAB T/SLAB Y ELEV. +0'-0' ELEV.+0'-0" ELEV. +0'-0" BR PB gR PT cm BR RO Eli 0 S2 E7J et B1 TL C1 B2 31 2 2 PARTIAL DRIVE-THRU ELEVATION i1 REAR ELEVATION 2.1 1 4 = 1'-0° A2.1 1 4" = 11-0° EQUAL SIGN EQUAL T ROOF CAP ELEMENT E T BLK'GW, V se ELEV.+21'-4' EARTH w L CJ CM L RO 5 L T7 CM CJ L T1 RO L CJ CM T1 L CJ NF ae o v ao`u° z c1 ct 2 2 z c1 z 1 T PARAPET BLOCKING J ° E^` 65 o N E5 P 8 a N E o n n 8?epSco N B TRELLIS Q `°c kk di e o I Tt _ EST+ WIBOpOW l C o; PaY, CIA A W2 W2 W2 BR LR Ut c 8O z SILLT 0 W PT tt BR 5 n CR rL m Bt m 132 EQUAL EQUAL ct za S 2 1 PARTIAL DRIVE-THRU ELEVATION o F o J I a o m s ynKEYNOTES: O o O y 4 N BR FACEBWK CM CORRUGATED METAL PANEL Ej LIGHT FIXTURE(WALL SCONCE)-SEE ELECTRICAL FM]PIPE BOLLARD-PAINTED YELLOW T1 ALUMINUM TRELUS SYSTEM B7—COLOR: 01,-COLOR: RMHCB7:'PARK ROSE"BY INTERSTATE BRICK LE ACCENT UGHTING-SEE ELECTRICAL COIN COLLECTOR gS S 3 Cl -"CITYSCAPE"BY METAL-ERA Z O m w B2'•"MODULAR WHEATFlEID VELOUR A'BY BELOEN BRICK i F-•3 a sPTUNITWPf072000CMU R TREUJS TIE-BACK SYSTEM Q Lt-LEO UUFIT: CALL 1-OBB-713-7435 TO ORDER 3 HOLLOW METAL DOOR-PAINT TO MATCH COLOR OF L1 s UP AND DOWN FIXTURE ALUMINUM TRELLIS EI c e"WALL EFTA SYSTEM N i SURROUNDING MATERIAL L2=DOWN ONLY FIXTURE RE RODE CAP EIEMENf of OTHERS REFER TO SIM.DETAIL 3 INI SHEET A5.1 I n Ci ALUMINUM CANOPY SYSTEM(COLOR:GOLD) L3 INTEGRAL CANOPY FIXTURE a o n INSULATED OVERHEAD 000R-PAINT TO MATCH L4 s UP ONLY FIXTURE Ih J E COLOR OF SURROUNDING IAIERML w1 EXTERIOR OYES ASSEMBLY-TEMPERED GLASS LO o C2 ALUMINUM CANOPY TIE-BACK SYSTEM YL METAL LETTERING-BY OTHERS q0 ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW PIPE PAINT TO MATCH Cy'd NO MATERIAL ORNE-THRU WINDOWANSO BY READY ACCESS 6L SERIES, RONIC 36'SERVICE 022-0532.00.0 w CO2-CO2=BULK CO2 FILL BOX(EQPM SCHEDULE REM 49.00) METAL FASCIA-COLOR TO MATCH CORRUGATED M°DONALO'S SIGNACE BY O1HER5-UNDER SEPARATE W2 HEIGHT WITH TRANSOM-MANUAL OPEN;ELECTRONIC RELEASE U CONTROL JOINT BO =BULK OIL FILL BOX(FAPM SCHEDULE ITEM 700.18)- MF METAL PANEL-SEE 1/A5.0 PERMIT.pT IaI-- A2. 1SX--TYPE 1=E F6 CONFIRM USE W M MCD PROJECT MANAGER 1-TYPE: WALNUT'BRUSH STROKE TILES(IRIS U.S.) SUDE DIRECTION: RL=RIGHT 70 LEFT i2-MASONRY,SEE DETAIL 7/A4.1 1:PRE-FAS ANCHOR-TILE FASCIA TC GR GUARD RAIL-SEE SITE PLAN 2-PRE-FAB CUSTOM ARCADE FASCIA BY EUROWEST DECORATIVE SURFACES LR- LEFT TO PoCHT Y FOR E%AC7 LOCATION AND LENGTH CONTACT;JAN DETER 714.937.75DD ELEVATIONS Materials Legend Face Brick(Main Building) Park Rase'by Interstate Brick I Face Brick(Arcade) Wheat.Velour A'by Belden Brick Wood Plank Tile(Accent) Walnut'Brushstroke Ser es Eurowest Corrugated Metal Cityscape'by Metal-Era Canopy(Metal) Pant— 09c Glazin9(Windows&Storefront) 1'Insulated pear Glass Aluminum Trellis(Prefinished) I c Metal(Coping) Front Elevation Rear Elevation 11-4 Welcome pq oil 1 rr Non-Drive-Thru Side Elevation n I F 1--, i I U S Drive-Thru Side Elevation Proposed McDonald's Restaurant - Color Elevation Study R D Highway 66 & Highway 77 27 August 2013 Richfield, MN Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Parking Memorandum Suite 238N 2550 UnNersity Avenue West To:Melissa Poehlman 55114 From: 55114 From: Trish D. Rothe, P.E. Date: August 9,2013 Subject: Proposed McDonald's Restaurant Cedar Point Commons 66th Street E&17th Ave S Richfield, MN INTRODUCTION The proposed McDonald's restaurant is part of the Cedar Point Commons Planned Unit Development. The proposed 3,915 SF McDonald's restaurant is located in the northwest quadrant of 66th Street E. and Richfield Parkway with one shared access from Richfield Parkway. This memorandum documents the parking demand calculations utilizing the new land use for the site, and requests a reduction from the City of Richfield parking requirements in order to adequately serve the proposed use without over-parking and unnecessarily increasing impervious area. PARKING SUPPLY CALCULATIONS Section 544.13 Subd 6. of the City of Richfield, Minnesota Code of Ordinances requires minimum parking supply of 17 stalls per 1,000 SF of gross floor area for Class III restaurants(fast-food/convenience). For a 3,915 SF fast food restaurant, 67 spaces would be required. Section 544.13 Subd 8.(b) of the Code allows for a 10% reduction for parking that is located within %mile of a frequently operating transit line provided that separate pedestrian ways are provided which connect the parcel. A frequently operating transit station is located directly southwest of the Site and serves the site with two separate pedestrian ways. With the abovementioned reduction, 60 spaces would be required for this use which equates to a 15.33(stalls per 1,000 SF building area) parking ratio. MCDONALD'S USA,LLC PARKING DEMANDS McDonald's has improved their site and building designs to optimize operations, ease of access and customer experience. Building locations are evaluated to have the best lot flow correlation with ingress-egress points,drive-thru and parking requirements. Through a long history of site development, McDonald's has found the highest parking demand to be at peak shift. At this time the TEL 651 645 4197 FAX 651 645 5116 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. actual demand equates to one parking space per employee(15 parking spaces) and one space per every three seats allocated in the restaurant(69 seats requiring 23 spaces)for a total of 38 utilized parking spaces,which equates to a parking ratio of 9.71 stalls per 1,000 GSF. The number of necessary parking spaces is lower for a McDonald's restaurant than that demanded by similar establishments due to the high volume of drive-thru traffic. The proposed McDonald's development includes 47 parking stalls,equating to a 12.01 parking ratio. Compared to actual restaurant demand,there will be a 9 stall surplus. INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS(ITE) PARKING DEMANDS Based on the Parking Generation, 4th Edition manual published by ITE, for a Fast Food with Drive Though Window" with a 95% confidence interval, this land use would require a parking ratio of 8.69 to 11.27 on the weekdays, and a 6.89 to 10.43 parking ratio on the weekends. For a 3,915 SF building, this equates to a 34-44 space weekday requirement and a 27-41 space weekend requirement. Compared to the ITE parking demand analysis, the proposed McDonald's provides a surplus of parking supply of up to 20 stalls. OPERATION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT(OEA)PARKING DEMANDS The Operation and Easement Agreement for Cedar Point Commons Shopping Center, as recorded by Hennepin County on December 19, 2006, further stipulates specific use park—iwg req-uirements-forthe Development:Section 3 2.5 of the OEA requires 4.5 stalls per 1,000 SF of Floor Area or outparcels, plus 5.0 stalls per 1,000 SF of Floor Area for a single Restaurant which has less than 5,000 SF of Floor Area. For the proposed 3,915 SF McDonald's building, this equates to a minimum parking supply of 37 parking stalls. Compared to the OEA parking requirements,the proposed McDonald's provides a surplus of 10 stalls. BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED TRAFFIC Due to the City's streetscape improvements, commitment to sidewalks and trails, proximity to public transit and overall pedestrian nature of the Development, McDonald's has increased the pedestrian connectivity and safety on the Site. Pedestrian connections to both 66th Street and Richfield Parkway are provided, as well as a connection to Mt. Calvary Church located directly west of the proposed McDonald's parcel. A Three Rivers Park District Trail will be constructed adjacent to the property along Richfield Parkway and 7 bike parking spaces will be included in accordance with section 544.17 of the City Code. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. SUMMARY&PARKING SUPPLY REDUCTION REQUEST PROVIDED CITY McDONALD'S ITE REQ. OEA REQ. REQ. REQ. STALLS 47 60 38 34-44 weekday 37 27-41 weekend SURPLUS -- 13 9 3 weekday 10 6 weekend Based on the actual demand, ITE industry standard demand, the OEA, McDonald's commitment to pedestrian and bike access, and desire to minimize unnecessary impervious area,this memorandum serves as an official request to be granted a 13 stall parking reduction, from the City of Richfield requirements, in the supply requirement for the proposed McDonald's Restaurant. 6540 Richfield Parkway = APU D 9/2013 Surrounding Zoning R R MR-3 MR-3 R R R MR-3 MR-3 65TH STREET PC-2 R R MR-3 R R PC-2 MR-3 R R R Q R R W PC-2 Y Z Q PC-2 R R W PC-2 Q PC-2 R W R PC-2 L.L_ C-2 M: U ry C-2 R PC-2 PC-2 PC-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 s. 66TH STREET yp C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 R R R R C-2 C-2 PC-2 R R R R C-2 C-2 C-2 -General Commercial Feet PC-2 - Planned General Commercial 0 50 100 200 300 400 500 R-Single Family Residential N MR-3 - High Density Multi-Family Residential Path: IAGIS\Community Development\StafflPlanning Tech\Projects\6540 Richfield Pkwy-McZ.mxd 6540 Richfield Parkway - APU D 9/2013 Surrounding Comprehensive Plan LDR LDR HDR HDR LDR LDR LDR HDR HDR 65TH STREET RC LDR LDR RC LDR LDR RC RC LDR LDR LDR Q LDR LDR W RC OC RC a LDR LDR Q RC 0 RC J LDR F— W LDR RC PUB U Of CHURCH LDR RC RC RC CCO CCO CHURCH s 66TH STREET O CC CC CC CC CCO CCO CC CC CC O O CC CC CC CC LDR LDR LDR LDR 7 O CC O LDR LDR LDR LDR O CC RC - Regional Commerical Feet CC-Community Commercial 0 50 100 200 300 400 500 CCO -Community Commercial/Office N O-Office LDR- Low Density Residential HDR -High Density Residential PUB - Public Path: I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\6540 Richfield Pkwy - Mc CP.mxc