Loading...
022513 PacketPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 25, 2013 7:00 p.m. Introductory Proceedings Roll Call Approval of Minutes: Regular meeting minutes of November 26, 2012 and study session minutes of December 10, 2012. Opportunity for Citizens to Address the Commission on items not on the Agenda Public Hearing ITEM #1 13-IUP-01 6529 Penn Ave—Consider a request for renewal of an interim use permit to allow used car sales (CarHop). ITEM #2 13-ASP-01 6630-6632 Penn Ave—Consider a request for site plan approval that would allow an adult day care serving up to 29 persons. ITEM #3 13-CUP-02 6501 Nicollet Ave- Consider a request for a conditional use permit for a funeral establishment (office/retail use only). ITEM #4 13-RZN-01, 13-PUD, 6330 &6400 Lyndale Ave - Consider a request for a 01, 13-CUP-01, 13- rezoning, planned unit development, final development plan 01-FDP and conditional use permit to allow a mixed use development including 151 units of housing; 11,600 square feet of retail/restaurant and outdoor activity areas. Ordinance Amendment—Consider changes to dimensional ITEM #5 PC Letter No. 1 standards of parking stalls and drive aisles. New Business ITEM #6 PC Letter No. 2 Resolution finding that property acquisition, street improvements and the conveyance of property to the HRA in order to efPectuate fhe coris ruc ion of Richfield Parkway is consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan ITEM #7 PC Letter No. 3 Discuss Upcoming 2013-14 Study Session Topics ITEM #8 PC Letter No. 4 Approval of Planning Commission Bylaws ITEM #9 PC Letter No. 5 Election of Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary ITEM #10 PC Letter No. 6 Appointment of Liaisons to the Community Services Advisory Commission, City Council, Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), School Board and Transportation Committee Old Business Liaison Reports Community Services Advisory Commission City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Richfield School Board Transportation Commission Chamber of Commerce Other City Planner's Report Next Meeting Date: March 25, 2013 Adjournment Auxiliary aid for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612/861-9738". Planning Commission s`-;;;• . M i n utes November 26, 2012 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Rick Jabs and Commissioners Robert Hall, Dan Kitzberger, Josh Root, Tom Rublein, Maureen Scaglia, Dennis Schuller and Gordon Vizecky MEMBERS ABSENT:None STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, City Planner Karen Barton, Assistant Community Development Director OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member Pat Elliot Chairperson Jabs called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Root, S/Vizecky to approve the minutes of the October 22, 2012 regular meeting. Motion carried: 8-0 OPEN FORUM No members of the public spoke. PUBLIC HEARING(S) ITEM #1 12-CUP-08 — Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow seating to be added to the take-out only restaurant at 811-813 66t" Street East (Cinco de Mayo). City Plannpr PoPhlman (PoPhlm n pres?nted the staff report. Chairperson Jabs opened the public hearing. Patricia Reiman & Nancy Griemann, owners of 811 & 817 66th Street East, indicated that they were opposed to the required parking lot screening for reasons related to cost, existing trees, aesthetics and 4t" of July parade seating. November 26, 2012 The Commissioners discussed the future redesign of 66t" Street (scheduled for 2016), alternative screening options including fencing, grasses, berms or "lasagna garden" plantings to build up the soil, and interstitial panels. M/Rublein, S/Hall to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 8-0 Ms. Griemann and Ms. Reiman stated that they were not in favor of any of the options presented. M/Hall, S/Rublein to recommend approval of an amended resolution that removes the requirement for parking lot screening. Motion carried: 6-2 (Jabs, Root dissenting) ITEM #2 12-SP-02 — Consideration of site plan that would allow an adult day care serving up to five persons at 6630 Penn Avenue. Poehlman presented the staff report stating that all Code requirements were met. Chairperson Jabs opened the public hearing. In response to a question from Commissioner Rublein, applicant Mr. Huan Gao stated that operating hours would be from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. M/Root, S/Hall to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 8-0 In response to a question from Commission Rublein, Poehlman stated that the Building Official administers the Accessibility Code. M/Rublein, S/Root to recommend approval of the proposed site plan. Motion carried: 8-0 ITEM #3 12-SP-03 — Consideration of site plan that would allow an adult day care serving up to 28 persons at 6341 Penn Avenue. Poehlman presented the staff report stating that all Code requirements were met. Chairperson Jabs opened the public hearing. No members of the public came forward. M/Vizecky, S/Root to close the public hearing. Motion carried: S-0 2 November 26, 2012 In response to a question from Commissioner Rublein, applicant Mrs. Michelle Moin stated that operating hours would be from approximately 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. M/Rublein, S/Scaglia to recommend approval of the proposed site plan. Motion carried: 8-0 ITEM #4 PC Ltr #16 — Cancel the public hearing to consider an amendment to the City's Zoning Ordinance related to parking lot dimension standards. Poehlman stated that staff would like additional time to discuss changes internally. This item will likely come before the Commission again next year. M/Root, S/Rublein to cancel the public hearing. Motion carried: 8-0 NEW BUSINESS ITEM #5 PC Ltr #17 — Consideration of a resolution finding that the acquisition and disposition of 6400 17t" Avenue by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority HRA) for removal and future redevelopment as multi-family residential housing is consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. Poehlman presented the staff report. In response to a question from Commissioner Rublein, Assistant Director Karen Barton Barton) stated that the funds used in the purchase do not include affordability requirements for the future development and that demolition of the home is expected in the next 2-3 months. M/Root, S/Rublein to approve the attached resolution. Motion carried: 8-0 ITEM #6 PC Ltr #18 — Consideration of a resolution finding that the acquisition and disposition of 7600 Pillsbury Avenue by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) for removal and future redevelopment as multi-family residential housing is consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. Poehlman presented the staff report. In response to a question from Commissioner Rublein, Barton stated that the funds used in the purchase do not include affordability requirements for the future development. 3 November 26, 2012 M/Root, S/Rublein to approve the attached resolution. Motion carried: 8-0 ITEM #7 PC Ltr#19 — Consider cancelling the December Planning Commission Meeting, scheduled for December 24, 2012 (holiday). M/Root, S/Rublein to approve cancellation. Motion carried: 8-0 OLD BUSINESS None LIAISON REPORTS Community Services Advisory Commission: Commissioner Rublein City Council: No report HRA: No report Richfield School Board: Commissioner Kitzberger Transportation Commission: Commissioner Scaglia Chamber of Commerce: Commissioner Vizecky Other: Commissioner Hall discussed: Packet distribution timing; Apartment vacancy rates; and Announced that he will not apply for reappointment. ADJOURNMENT M/Rublein, S/Root to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried: 8-0 The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:20 p.m. Dan Kitzberger Secretary 4 1 111i1' «' Planning Commission StudyfJci;1] p I Session Minutes December 10, 2012 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Rick Jabs, Commissioners Josh Root, Robert Hall, Maureen Scaglia, Daniel Kitzberger and Dennis Schuller MEMBERS ABSENT:Commissioners Gordon Vizecky and Tom Rublein STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, City Planner Jeff Pearson, Transportation Engineer OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member Elliot The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. Transportation Engineer Jeff Pearson presented an overview of 2012 transportation work and upcoming projects in and around the City. Two members of the Planning Commission were chosen as liaisons to participate in the 66t" Street Visioning project that will begin in January (Commissioners Root and Kitzberger). ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:03 p.m. Gordon Vizecky Vice-Chairperson/Acting Secretary AGENDA S1:CT10N: PUBLIC HEARING AGFNDA ITEM# 1 REPORT# CASr:# 13-tUP-01 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Public hearing to consider a request for an Interim Use Permit to allow the continued use of 6529 Penn Avenue for used car sales. I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend approval of a three-year interim use permit for used car sales at 6529 Penn Avenue CarHo ). II. BACKGROUND The property at 6529 Penn Avenue was first approved for use as a used car sales lot in 1990. The use was not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan then, and remains at odds with the current Comprehensive Plan. This use has always been considered temporarily acceptable while waiting for the Penn Avenue Corridor to redevelop. The existing permit for this use expires June 8, 2013 and the applicant is applying for a new five-year interim use permit. In 2007 the City Council adopted a revised Zoning Ordinance that made used automobile sales permissible only as an integral part of a new automobile sales business (Section 534.07, Subd. 7e). The business at 6529 Penn Avenue has been operating as a legally nonconforming use since the adoption of the new Ordinance. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY The purpose of an interim use permit is to atlow a use that may not be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan to operate for a limited period of time. Interim use permits are designed to meet the problem that arises when a City designates an area for redevelopment or revitalization, but the market has yet to react to those changes. In evaluating a request for an interim use permit, the Planning Commission and City Council shall also consider its compliance with the criteria outlined in Subsection 547.15 of the City Code, further articulated in the attached document. The Council may waive ordinance provisions upon a finding that the temporary nature of the interim use will eliminate the adverse effects the provisions were intended to prevent. The Council must find that the temporary nature of this permit makes the nonconforming use permissible at this time. The result of the Penn Avenue Corridor Study on this property was to change the zoning designation from Industrial to Mixed Use — Community, with the Penn Avenue Overlay. Mixed-Use Districts prohibit used auto sales unless they are an integral part of a new car dealership. The Penn Avenue Overlay also prohibits auto mechanical and/or body repair shops and auto detailing establishments. These types of businesses currently remain in the Corridor as legally non- conforming uses. Staff believes that given current market conditions and the existence of similar auto-related businesses in the area, an interim use permit for continued use of the property for used auto sales is warranted provided that the property continue to comply with the stipulations of the existing interim use permit. Staff recommends a three-year interim use permit so that the compatibility of this use with the Corridor can be re-evaluated in 2016. By Ordinance, interim use permits terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: a) The date stated in the permit; or b) Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was issued. In addition to termination at the end date of the permit or upon violation of the conditions under which the permit is issued, staff recommends that the permit terminate upon termination or sale of the current business (CarHop), or upon the sale of the property by the current owner (Penn Avenue Partners II LLC), whichever occurs first. B. CRITICAL ISSUES The site has been used for auto sales and leasing for 23 years. In 2009, the City completed a visioning process for the Penn Avenue Corridor. The vision for this area does not include used car sales businesses. Current market conditions have stalled redevelopment/revitalization projects and no major changes have occurred within the Corridor since adoption of the Penn Avenue Plan. Approval of an interim use permit would be conditioned upon continued compliance with the landscape plan (submitted April 2010 with previous interim use permit), maintaining window planter boxes throughout growing season, compliance with sign rules, and compliance with the Penn Avenue Design Guidelines. Staff recommends a three-year interim use permit so that conditions in the Corridor can be re-evaluated and the continued compatibility of this use considered again in 2016. In order to approve the interim use permit, the Council must find that the temporary nature of the business warrants waiving certain provisions of the Zoning Code, specifically, the prohibition of used car sales businesses in this future pedestrian-friendly district and the allowance of nonconforming uses. C. FINANCIAL N/A D. LEC a Zoning: MU-C with PAC Overlay (Mixed Use — Community with Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay) Land Use: Current: Used Auto Sales Proposed: Used Auto Sales Comprehensive Plan:Mixed Use Notification: Neighbors Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current in accordance with State and Local requirements. Properties within 350 feet were notified by mail. Other Actions: Council consideration is scheduled for March 12, 2013 IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION S Recommend approval of an interim use permit with additional conditions. Recommend approval of an interim use permit for a different length of time (up to five years maximum). Recommend denial with a finding that the requirements necessary to issue an interim use permit are not met. V. AT"I'ACHMENTS Resolution Interim Use Permit Requirements Existing site plan Landscape plan Consent Agreement Planning & Zoning maps Photos I. PRINCIPAL PARTICS EXPECT D AT MC TING CarHop Representative — Dave Grimm RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT TO ALLOW USED AUTO SALES BY INTERSTATE AUTO GROUP DBA CARHOP AT 6529 PENN AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Richfield (the City) adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 2009 to guide the development of the community; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Zoning Ordinance or other official controls to assist in implementing the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests an interim use permit to allow Interstate Auto Group dba CarHop (the "Applicant") to conduct used automobile sales at 6529 Penn Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Property is zoned Mixed Use — Community (MU-C) and within the Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay District (PAC); and WHEREAS, the requested interim use of the property is not permitted in the MU-C District; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the temporary nature of the proposed interim use eliminates the adverse effects the prohibition was intended to prevent. Compliance with performance and landscape standards, Penn Avenue Design Guidelines and termination of the permit in three years time eliminates the detriment that a used auto sales business will have on the creation of a pedestrian-friendly corridor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 25, 2013 to review the application for an Interim Use Permit, following mailed and published notice as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all materials submitted by the Applicant; considered the oral and written testimony offered by the applicant and all interested parties; and has now concluded that the application is in compliance with all applicable standards and can be considered for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Ths pro osed !nterim Use Permit request meets all applicable conditions and restrictions stated in Subsection 547.15 of the 2007 Zoning Ordinance except as follows: a. The proposed interim use is not a permitted use within the Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay District. In accordance with Subsection 547.15 Subd. 3e the City Council finds that the temporary nature of the interim use eliminates the detriment that a used auto sales business will have on the pedestrian-friendly vision of the Corridor given that pedestrian upgrades have yet to occur elsewhere in the area. b. In accordance with Subsection 547.15, Subd. 3e the City Council finds that the purpose of the Interim Use Permit in this instance is to allow productive use of a property that is not yet "ripe" for redevelopment given current market conditions. The temporary nature of the interim use will ensure that the nonconforming use not be allowed to continue so long as to become a detriment to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. An Interim Use Permit for used auto sales by Interstate Auto Group dba CarHop at 6529 Penn Avenue, as described in City Council Staff Report No. is approved with the following conditions: a. The Interim Use Permit will expire three (3) years from its effective date (June 8, 2013), or upon termination or sale of the current business (Interstate Auto Group dba CarHop), or upon the sale of the subject property by the current owner (Penn Avenue Partners II LLC), or upon violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued, whichever occurs first. b. That a 22-foot minimum drive aisle be maintained in the parking area. c. That a maximum of 32 vehicles be on site, including inventory, customer and employee parking. d. That no vehicles be parked or stored on grass buffer areas. e. That landscaping be installed and maintained in accordance with the previously approved plan, dated April 2010, by May 1, 2013. f. That all trash containers be kept inside the building and not stored in the parking lot. g. The Interim Use Permit shall be reviewed periodically by the City to ensure compliance with the conditions set forth in this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of March, 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk Interim Use Permit Requirements Subsection 547.15 Subd. 3. a) The period of time for which the interim use permit is to be granted will terminate before any adverse impacts are felt upon adjacent properties. Staff recommends that the permit expire in three years. At that time, if conditions continue to warrant, the Council may issue a new Interim Use Permit to the applicant. b) The use will terminate upon a date or event that can be identified with certainty. Interim use permits may not be granted for a period greater than five (5) years. Staff recommends termination on June 8, 2016. c) The use will not adversely impact the health, safety and welfare of the community during the period of the interim use. It is not anticipated that used auto sales will adversely impact the community or this area within the next three years. d) The use is similar to existing uses in the area. Used auto sales and other auto-oriented businesses are no longer permitted within this area; however see below. e) An interim use shall conform to zoning regulations except the City Council may waive ordinance provisions upon a finding that the temporary nature of the interim use will eliminate the adverse effects the provisions were intended to prevent. The rezoning and preparation of design guidelines for the Penn Avenue Corridor is intended to create a cohesive, inviting and pedestrian-friendly environment. Auto-oriented businesses were not found to be consistent with this vision and most are not permitted under the Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay. However, market conditions at this time do not make it imperative that nonconforming uses be ushered out as quickly as possible. As the pedestrian improvements in particular have yet to happen along the Corridor, the continuation of an auto-related business for a limited period of time is not detrimental to this vision. The proposed interim use of this property will allow the property to be used productively for the short-term and avoid a potentially vacant storefront. Expiration of the interim use permit in three years will assure that this use, which is not compatible with the overall revitalization plan for the area, will not impede future efforts to that end. Further, the property will be required to meet landscaping, performance standard and Design Guideline requirements to partially mitigate and screen the impact of this auto-oriented use. fl There is adequate assurance that the property will be left in suitable condition after the use is terminated. N/A. g) By agreement, the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. The property owner has signed a consent agreemeni agreeing io inis conditi i. h) The property owner, by agreement, agrees to any conditions that the City Council has deemed appropriate for permission of the use, including a condition that the owner will provide an appropriate financial surety to cover the cost of removing the interim use and interim structures upon the expiration of the interim use permit. The applicant must continue to comply with all conditions of the existing interim use permit. i) The property owner agrees to abide by any additional conditions that the Council deems appropriate for permission of the use. fl""@\ li1LA t''\ EX I S B f l G 3 Z S`>...S ez, I •, o;.,r; .r :.:., ,. N89°j0'S0"W 1 G6'.01r 4!.5 ` - , 4.4? c:r.n;. __ . ,r.=.•!G T :v^_ I I - ------- . - _._:- — a.. j i --- --1?--- -r---- i,- r - - < <- ii i i l i I I I I' I '--'f•:.. CL:!13 I I I } ii /, II • e I I I' I ' I I I liii i l i3 i'- I ,,j I I I ! 1 I I 1 (i i J, I I I, I I I I I L? /ij ij II . i i: ,.iC-i i r i i i t i i r- ;;,,;;'„1 i) : r iJ I I 1 I I I ! ii ii . i i J I I I I 1 I I I ii ii• , I hd'I I I I I I I d I I( JJ I I I I I I I L.i G.L U ' r; ...9 S f/!_LS i id,: mr IGG ii ,; I I I • , , p :, i Nr;u`: r ' ' ,.. , .. i _. __y' i' .' lT I I Ir'\., 1 I i:(v I ,I I. ii7STALLS r, ' I (-j'31 ! I I I I P.i_ _ ' r• ' . i i iii I (ii I I I I I 2_" i ii1 F i i I I I I I i, i/il I . / I I I _l CJ i_ iic,'i C: ii F1 ._ii I I I I I I:f. z [ ,I --i yTJ::ri; F:.:L - iii I I I I I i _ li.} ( ) I Vy i I 1 I I I i '- it. i; . I ri i I {'p.i! I I I I I I' 1 II, i i —1 -K.}4,1. I - ------ .- -,-- I .._ i' ,; \,, . . , ' T = • , ,'i tx i : !I ; ° 7:'.. I I c ` II . i• i i I.I XIS iN' FUIi UING r; r., . I:,t:.: ., •i - X ,E_.IU? I `_1!'? SCF T. J j n ^ i f l<5T I I_COk'. I 1..(VAIIGN--E360.rb r i 5.4I I e . . a I ,,:,.i i - - vr,r,J- - i ___ i i C, ' ,. i .i:: v„i. i I t•i i I I I I I I i I V ii,) I I I ,I ,-r... I'i i 1 Yi i,i I I I I i i V .I i 1 Yi ii.l I I I I ii ri ii I I I i I , il I r ii I I I I I I ili ii i iii4 I I I I I i i . I .,', ._, J I I:_l. I J I I I j . 7 STAt._LS Q- I I i'I i h ir J.`::I' i.:i,.,, .3 lui, I! i ' c,., iii; I'fl. Z.9 -:. I , . 9 STALLS f1 rr 7 I I I I I I I I f-i-'->-l ilf_I-.--'iil I I I I I I I I i i/ I I . `l!% I I 1 I I I I I ii ii i I I I I I i -n; ( I _,.o /.i I I , i l I)It- 1`., Y y i T C f f c,i;l I ^— I I I I I . Flf.lf'I: C j./,; ;' °•,' - _ J ! 1 ! I I i_.1 L /'ii I_ I i %i 11OU\7 `:.PI[ _1 . '- I ' I GP CI "l l.'.[i I I I I ! `i i JIriiiNCKeri i `. I ='— - l .—+-- . .---...-.L__ _ -_ _:. ., .,,i„_ . . .. i x;= z-:y ll . I — .,Ii..-- i - _ —--._-I _ = r- -- -- .--fI i I II il . L_ I . I . ' 1 ' .,. . ` , ii1 j Y., 1 Y n_ G i uv rJ, o - v - m. ._ _ a o 7. s r-===-;=----„ i i f .. 4,, r d n ii Z I i - z 4 , Q I Si t" r,,— — r-_..:u.--- @ a t Y J @ b ei 4 ' 1.:.-r L, p [ 2 , Q ; g a p 2 c Z o I J r i c I - -r f-a a ,t P, i z Q O F-_ a r c a I Q`I j t 1 J{ a • • • D o o _.: i c a- c ysr,NT AGREENIENT WH R:1S,on November I 3, ?0 7 thc City Council of thc City ol RicMield adopted Ordinance No. 2007-19, hich establishes 1'ramework for rc ulating tcm orary usc of land IIlI'OLl ll flle 1StillallCC OI`lillCl'lill 11SC }Cl'1111tS; and WI-IER l1S, Se tic n 7 47.1_"> 5ubdivis n 2 af this Ordinancc rcc uires an applicant lor an interim usc pertnit to si n a 't n ent 1 reement hercit thc plicant ackno}lcdgcs and agrccs tll it thc prop cd intcrim use vill not iinpos idclitiunal cc sls on thc public if thcrc is a futurc need lor public acquisition ot thc applicanl's properiy through eminent domain, that the applicant IIZS il0 t;t7l11I 1110111 1(l Itllill'e I'Cil})1'OV3I Of tI7C Il1CCYli11 LISC )Cl'i1111 flllC lll ll llle 8 jlIlC llll V1I abide hy tllc conditioils of ap rov l that the Ci y Coimcil attaches to the interim use permit; 1OVV, '1'I II;IZI;I ORI., Pcnn lvenue Partner 11_LLC as ap}licani for an intcrin use permit lor J ised car salcs_at __(i 29 I'enn Ave S, Itichfi ld, 1N usc ofproperly) location) rec as tollo a-s: 1.If this a plicatior is appi c ved by the Itichtield ('it° C OL111C1I £11]( 111 II1LC1'llll USe permil i:; is tte:d, llle in erim tisc of thc property vill nol inipose additional costs on thc City or ny ot}cr public entity if it is neccssary to acc uire the pro erty or a portion thcrc f hy en ii cnt dom in aftcr issuancc oC the interim usc permit. 2.I he pplicarit <<cknowledges that tlie proposecl tise is tempor try a ld terminates up n expiratic n of the interiii use permit. l he ap licant h s no legal or eyuit-able ribht to futurc rca}?proval ol ilie intei im use c-nlit and musl lile a new applicatioii for illzlt piiip se. i. "I'I e ap ilicant vill coii E l}' 'ith all conditions imposcd hy thc ('ity C'ouncrl on ihe iriterim use perinit. 4. This Cousent Agr cn icnt Shall be bindin on ar y o ncr, operator, tenant and/or user of tlic E ropert lor llich thc ii tcrim usc per t it has beeil ranted and thc applicant is authori ecl lc sign this ('c n c»t 1\greement on bchalf of 5ai l o ner, peralor, lenant and/or uscr c f thc E ropct t.v.i ; ' i , f I:L7: _{j ''Z 1,;1._ 1 1 1 1 'cant m11.>>lica it A»I' ttst be the Properly (wnet) j: - ,_u k i` , s r rr ol ii n:r ) r r 1,rtaufK COUN I'Y O1 1 [N\?I;l'[' ) 1'he foregoin instrumcnt as ckt o lecl ed before tne tllis l .s d iy of 0- hy , t}ic ' - 'p`-_-f f _._i ', _. ' ` ` _ i:_.`_f i ; ., _e S t 111111e,501 i i`i'.1 Lt L,OI i._I_Ll!L!-v:r, 011 beh ilf of saicl company. s r t .; ,. ; E r<istit q R Mcr nNiF i s Not-n•y Put lic U: 1 State af Minnesota r% My Commission Expires Januvey 31, 201 7 6529 Pe n n - I U P 2/2013 Surrounding Zoning 65TH STREET MU-C/PAC R C/PAC MU-C/PAC MU C/PAC MU-C/PAC R MU-C/PAG R R MU-C/PAC MU-C/PAC W R R Q Z MU-C/PAC W MU-C/PAC Z R R W J MU ClPAC R R MU-C/PAC R 3 J{ 1 _ MU-C/PAC /P GMU-C/PACM C!P C R 66TH STREET cz MU-ClPAC MU-C/PAC G2 R MU-C/PAC PAC z__ -. MU-ClPAC Fee± 0 50 100 200 300 400 500 MU-C - Mixed-Use Community PAC - Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay C-1 - Neighborhood Business C-2 - General Cornmercial R - Single Family Residential Path: 1:1GIS1Community DevelopmentlStafflPlanning Tech\Projects16529 Penn Z.mxd 6529 Pe n n - I U P 212013 Surrounding ornprehensiv I I r i 657H STREET 1 I M XED IXFI) I MDR II MIXED I MIXED MIXFIJ MDR I- LDR MIXEO MI)It j MDR t_R MIXED MIXED lu I' MUR ', DRj Q Q I Z MIXEf W MIXFD Z MDR DR W O MIXED MUR UR MIXED NC 35{` I MIXED'X D MIXED (41XC NL NC 667H STREET MIXF-U I _ R I h41XED MIXCD ~ MIXFI) MIXED i LDR E U I R MIXED Feet 0 50 100 204 300 40C 5nn MIXED - Mixed Use LDR- Low Density Residential MDR- Medium l7ensity Residential NC- Neighborhood Commerciai Path: I:1GIS\Community DevelopmentlStaff Planning TechlProjects16529 Penn CP.rnxd 6529 Penn Ave — CarHop IUP RenewaL 12 February 2013 Au o S°g Finan e N C rt WE FINA E yfa b ecarhop.com w -.sr+- y .M.rr"• e , f:t rf . . :. n— 1 — 4 S'_ l. 1 i ; ,. It`-- - ' r ;:,~ c I-o...r_. t;:t j 1' M1 1 _ 1 y. n w r'i-I'Fy . a'. . r r N -.... r "i i.rr c . ": s rr y a rt a. r . ya-K.'M y4N"n" 'I y J F .A"''/' Y."1""vp-+ '°' ±" ~ yy . r ° s Nf'u4 yy ct) l / ' / vxk 2h.st..:" 4 - • 7F r"r . ` ti"` a K°+` y e'7'f'1 ya;,s:.fd....9b.:,vx,cir i-F ` Z l .i!:.1' i y, - .. r er"° l f f _{.' I" ,d.. y:' L: r,.. l.l•;'t .'',_ 71.n): i" /y .r:. 1•+R a F: 1 .l. _ .iY2-. '#T'.11 l_9 . w i f N' r.' h y , , .... 1 d``. i r -. wr r 1M L. rI I r. j,' y tES ? 7I' I ir _' .( 4' .. I '; '' i' _ l. y 4 R+A! lfi,n'`,., ` i7. i La,,. 1 ..-,_ ,'.-,,,. '- .., Y v; r " . AGF,NDA SECTION: PUE3LIC HEARING AGENDA I"fEM# 2 REPORT# Cns:# 13-ASP-01 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FESRUARy 25, 2013 ITEM rOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Public hearing considering a Site Plan that would allow an adult day care serving up to 29 persons at 6630-6632 Penn Avenue. This site is currently approved for an adult day care servin up to five ersons and an art aller / ift sho . I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend approval of the attached resolution granting approval of a Site Plan that will allow a day care serving up to 29 persons at 6630-6632 Penn Avenue. II. BACKGROUND The owner of 6630-6632 Penn Avenue has applied for an amendment to a Site Plan that was approved by the City Council in December. That approval allowed the existing art gallery/gift shop to remain, and for the existing acupuncture clinic space to be converted into an adult day care service. The applicant has reconsidered his proposal based on a reexamination of the Fire Code, and now proposes to convert the art gallery/gift shop into day care space as well. This proposal asks for permission to serve up to 29 persons. III. BAS1S OF RECOMMENDATION 1. POLICY A change in the use of a building requires Site Plan Approval. Day care uses require 1 parking space per 5 enrolled persons. The proposed center will serve a maximum of 29 persons and thereby requires 6 parking stalls. The proposed site plan includes two (2) on-street stalls and five (5) stalls behind the building. Parking in the rear must be striped in accordance with the proposed plan. T e site plan approved in December 2012 included u ;eC.11!"°mon f;±ho u ition of planters along Penn Avenue. This requirement will remain in effect so as to meet the intent of the Penn Avenue Design Guidelines. The existing building is legally nonconforming and no external changes are proposed. There is an opportunity to add a limited amount of pervious surFace behind the building; hovvever, staff does not believe that there would be any tangible benefit. In evaluating a site plan, the Planning Commission and Council shall consider its compliance with the seven criteria outlined in Subsection 547.13 of the City Code and further articulated in the attached document. B. CRITICAL ISSUES Staff recommends approval based on compliance with all criteria. The applicant has stated that the Day Care Center will provide transportation for all clients. Parking witl be needed for staff only. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report and compliance with all other City and State regulations. Permits are required prior to the commencement of any work. C. FINANCIAL The required processing fee has been paid. D. LEGAL Notification: Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current in accordance with State and Local requirements. Properties within 350 feet were notified by mail. Council consideration is scheduled for March 12, 2013. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMCNDATION S Recommend denial of the proposed Site Plan and change in use with a finding that the proposal does not meet Code requirements. V. ATTACHMrNTS Resolution Site Plan approval requirements Proposed plans Planning & zoning maps Photos VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING Mr. Huan Gao, owner/applicant RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO ALLOW A COMMERCIAL DAY CARE FACILITY AT 6630-6632 PENN AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of site plan to allow a commercial day care facility serving up to 29 persons for the parcel of land located at 6630-6632 Penn Avenue, legally described as: Lot 9, Block 1, Tingdale Brothers Lincoln Hills Addition, except Highway, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the requested site plan has been reviewed by the City Council and meets City requirements; and WHEREAS, the proposed site plan will adequately serve the purpose for which it is proposed and will not have an adverse effect upon the public safety or general welfare; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval for the site plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Required planters in front of the building must be continuously maintained and include live plant materials during the spring, summer and fall and decor over the winter; 2. All trash must be stored inside the building or in an approved enclosure. Trash plans must be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 3. Parking must be striped in accordance with the approved plan; 4. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report and compliance with all other City and State regulations. Permits are required prior to the commencement of any work; 5. This approval shall expire one year following the date of approval unless the use has commenced or a building permit has been obtained and construction begun. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of March 2013. Debbie ette, ","Qy r ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk Site Pian Approval Requirements Subsection 547.13 a) Consistency with the various elements and objectives of the City's long range plans, including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Plan; In the Penn Avenue Corridor, the Mixed Use District is intended to be a vibrant, pedestrian-oriented neighborhood center. The District can accommodate a variety of uses. The proposal is in keeping with these intentions. b) Consistency with the purposes of the Zoning Code; The proposal is in keeping with the purpose of the Zoning Code and the Mixed Use - Community District. This District is intended to provide locations for a variety of shops and services that serve the surrounding community. The proposal is in keeping with these intentions. c) Preservation of the site in its natural state, insofar as practicable, by minimizing tree and soil removal, and designing any grade changes so as to be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed or developing areas; N/A d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with the terrain and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the proposed development, N/A e) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features including. i. Creation of an internal sense of order for the various functions and buildings on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community; ii.Appropriateness of the amount and arrangement of open space and landscaping to the design and function of the development; iii. Appropriateness of the materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept of the project and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and functions; and iv. Adequacy of vehicular, cycling and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian, cycling and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking so as to be safe, convenient and, insofar as practicable, compatible with the design of proposed buildings, structures and neighboring properties. The striping of parking spaces behind the building will improve circulation along the alley and the addition of planters along Penn Avenue will improve curb appeal of the building. There is limited opportunity to improve the site further given the placement and size of the building. fl Creation of an energy-conserving design through design location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures, and the use of landscape materials and site grading; N/A g) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for such matters as surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air, and those aspects of design, not adequately covered by other regulations, which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses; No changes to surFace water drainage, sound and/or sight impacts, views, etc. are anticipated. i i i i Existing i Signag i Sidewalk I f t,{ U .f . a o e 10'-0" i.q 1 q I VJ I 70'-0" a 1 rn Existing E3uilding--6630 i o , o o co E ° n 4 X 3 IO n at v, n n x stmg Awm I ouer_€d ensranc,_ I I e r I C Plnnters 4 a Live plants and cold weather decor a q JJJ Existing Building—6632 i 2'-9 1/2"J 6630 Per n 4venue - SP 2/13 Surrounding Cornprehensive 'la Design tions 66TH STREET WEST CCO CED __---- MIXED MIXED MIXED LDR MHD MIXED MIXED LDR O cv LDR MIXED LDR MHD LDR LD MIXFD MIXED MIXED LD W MIXED LDR MHD Z W LDR MIXED Q Z z MIXED w MHD MIXED a MIXED LDR LDR 67TH STREET WEST LDR LDR MIXED LDR MHD LDR LDR MHD a- - - -._ __ _ II ('OMPREHENSIVE PLAN N Mixed - Mixed Use CCO- Community Commercial/Office LDR - Low Density Residentiai MHD - Medium-High Density Residential _..______.__ _ .._.____._______,___.___ w-_--._.__.____,._..___..____._ 0 40 80 160 240 320 Feet I:\GIS\Community Development\StafflCity Planner\Projects Zoning Cases\6630 Penn Ave-CP.mxd 6630 Pen n I ven ue - S P 2/13 Sur ounding onQ g 66TH STREET WEST C-2 PAC G2 M U-C/PAC MU-C/PAC ------- R MR-2 MU-C/PAC MU-C/PAC R MU-C/PAC M R R MR_2 R R MU-C1PAC MU-C/PAC MU-C/PAC R W MU-C/PAC R M R-2 Z W MU-C/PAC Q -- ------- _ --- -- R M U-C/PAC MR-2 MU-C/PAC MU-C/PAC R R 67TH STREET WEST R R-1 MU-C/PAC R R-1 R R-1 MR-2 ZONING DISTRICT i 1 MU-C/PAC -Mixed Use Community w/ Penn Ave Overlay C-2 -General Commercial MR-2 - Multi-Family Residential R -Single-Family Residential R-1 - Low Density Single-Family Residential 0 40 80 160 240 320 d.___-------_.._.___.---__.._....-- a Feet I:\GIS\Community Development\StafflCitv Planner\Projects Zoninq Cases\6630 Penn Ave -Z m c 663 P n Ave — SIlte P i' A d t, yc e•. 12 br•u•y 2013 4 t.-a,--- ..-r - F --1+ -=-. -. - F ' - 1 1. -::.• f .. - t c r ;.e.,a . 1 Y - F Y j' , v,SKP f Ti 4'1 ,'i'> ti.y,, t y tfl f-: {1 ..A L'!`i.':.: y t l { ' ,¢ ?.: Y'7t'.) C t4 t t` A Aa t ,r f it il tYFr+if i r 1 (' 3N. + _'. I f ' lf tat + t ti .4 ipi t.. i».-' t't "Y7 f y ti.' i t3 tj lk+.t.rf ' r r ..^ t '5. ' i ..,:,_. i P T l.r / '4 "3.bl, a`'§;. '1'. - 1 . r s4 t ._t 1 .. S,} ; t i +.i c l:-Y -- P iy rn .s[ 3 5 •:"st f h ;, ja 1. " kir i ?[ +°1 ,y { Et . , i , ,,:i it ¢ I. {4 f lr ,.'i'. f1 Jf •'y .} '.au;?f/, 1- } .G},-` .f.. e F:Fely( Yj, i : 1; i TY3- iy k S 4-,Ft itk t j li:e 1`''' - i', ! >`:r '$- 5". ^ l .z'; k, ? -.5..f 3 .c+. ,1 e1 i? i'3 ti - 4 l! i.3}' .i' J '. !f,L t•Zr {„r t y,. . 2 > t2 3 e Lr Y . iL* ft '.' f/. .I#'' f..o- c%tf f. - s t , t i `rs K ':a: l-V ? Ft r Z j ; 5 ld.? v y: h.. r ; ! s -. S* 'i f< ir ).4 f iF a . 7'1. }. 1 '! Y w r:;h b 4 R , e'.4 .2 I y( ., '4 i':c. 3v t Yf . r 1 f #}: y? .ji 91F F.kil't° T..t i .4 itF i4 1 r$}3.+t. " t,;,'''4` 1 Ssr,: N:;q ;s f,',i, i1> q;"if,.uf.1 s r rbx,,,, ^},a s ) ',,"-vt , ' I ,tT..''t ai E- . . t,[j1 S"%. .r` .9e x.!'' ' Fe: fta i k't/'.t. A,'. i i S7 t' 7 i .+ I.. 1;',' i A 1-'T-" i (dyp( .1+^ . ' N d" , . a r ' y` ^ 5.xi ' y , y 9"e. +' . t°d:.a i xri.p.iy+c.., ya.r , a,r r t ' !'v t d :. ,y. `. . s-.k . - s-,_ y ,^ 7 l,w f l. a; '.L k. ti°rL` ,p,'r, t.r s-..; . s€x q .M,'" + , _=e. " r'n. ,;!.,7,,...v- , '„ cP . ,+ +, ., 4 „- ,.i P 3_: i ., i !• . R_' 12' '=4.',: sx:.. .. 4h asc+^'.'.,+s+N .- iC.,u.; 1wG 'S,'.x . t c z , 1 aSt' M. i- . .. n .. :.. . . y I ikSl ti i r` , M r T f 4 t • . . F T I 7 . 1 i 1 I I u l l t V'. J t.: i -. . i . .. _ . . t dlfery ' u. , 1 ' p f` Ys e' x. . Y".. y"M x^1. r7..!' d ` . h 1 z t ` f } i r' ",`' - t j 4 . r t ` `[y_R r i:'.fi'" y,.," r M t_ - Y... i r` dt. r 4 j.S'J f .N'S:t r.-+_ . AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM# 3 REPORT## CASE# 13-CUP-02 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: F BRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Public hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a funeral establishment at 6501 Nicollet Avenue (Richfield Shoppes). The proposal is for office/retail use only. L RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a funeral home at 6501 Nicollet Avenue. IL BACKGROUND The National Cremation Society has proposed to open a retail store front with sales and administrative offices at the Richfield Shoppes shopping center located at 6501 Nicollet Avenue. The office would sell pre-arranged and pre-paid cremation plans, as well as aiding in immediate need cremation arrangements. Typically, this use would be considered a retail/office use and allowed by right within the shopping center; however, State Law requires that the office apply for and receive a "Funeral Establishment" license. As part of this licensing requirement, the National Cremation Society is obligated to construct and maintain an embalming room, despite that fact that this room will never be used for such purposes. The presence of the embalming room makes a conditional use permit for a funeral home necessary. The City's Zoning Ordinance allows for "funeral homes" in the General Commercial (C- 2) District so long as the lot on which they are located abuts an arterial or collector street. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY Funeral homes are conditionally permitted in the General Commercial (C-2) District so long as the lot abuts an arterial or collector street. This requirement is met (lot abuts Nicollet Avenue). In evaluating a request for a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission and Council shall also consider its compliance with the eight criteria outlined in Subsection 547.09 of the City Code and further articulated in the attached document. The applicant will not be using the embalming room. The location will be used for retail and office space only. That said, the embalming room will be in place and a conditional use permit runs with the land, rather than with a particular tenant. The Planning Commission and Council must consider the use as proposed and as a more typical funeral home when considering Code requirements. Staff recommends a stipulation that will prohibit formal memorial ceremonies, viewings or other activities that would be cause for the congregating of larger numbers of people. The existing parking is nonconforming and is 18 stalls short of minimum requirements (including a reduction for transit proximity). Further evaluation and parking analysis is needed for any use that would initiate concentrated parking demands. The existing shopping center is nonconforming in regard to a number of other requirements as well and City Ordinances require that nonconforming sites be brought into compliance when possible. Staff evaluated the potential for parking lot screening improvements, but parking already encroaches upon City boutevard and additional landscaping and/or fencing is not feasible. Staff also finds that the fence along the eastern property line, as well as the fence extension at the north end of the property, meets the intent of the trash enclosure requirements. There is opportunity for additional impervious surFace along the northern end of the building; however, limited sunshine could make it difficult to establish and maintain plants. With a commercial neighbor to the north, staff sees minimal benefit. B. CRITICAL ISSUES All requirements necessary for the issuance of a conditional use permit are met. Limitations on the permit should prohibit formal gatherings that would be associated with a traditional "funeral home" establishment. If approved, this permit will remain valid for one year unless a Building Permit has been issued and substantial work completed. C. FINANCIAL The required processing fee has been paid. D. LEGAL Notification: Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current in accordance with State and Local requirements. Properties within 350 feet were notified by mail. Council consideration is scheduled for March 12, 2013 IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION S Recommend denial with a finding that the proposed use does not meet the requirements necessary for issuance. V. ATTACHMENTS Reselufier Conditional Use Permit requirements Proposed plans Planning & zoning maps Photos VL PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING Applicant representative RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FUNERAL HOME AT 6501 NICOLLET AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit to allow a funeral home at property commonly known as 6501 Nicollet Avenue, property legally described as follows: Lots 1-15 inclusive except that part of Lot 9 lying south of the north 49,00 feet thereof and east of the west 38.00 feet of said Lot 9, Town's Edge, Village of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield recommended approval of this requested conditional use permit at its February 25, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, this requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section 547.09; and WHEREAS, this requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit for a funeral home as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section 534.07, Subdivision 4; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of the conditional use permit; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a funeral home, as described in City Council Letter No. on the Subject Property legally described above. 2. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: Memorials, burial services or other gatherings associated with a typical funeral home are prohibited; All site landscaping must be maintained and tended appropriately; All parking stalls, crosswalks etc. must be striped in accordance with previously approved plans; Any property changes including lighting, utilities, landscaping, etc. must comply be approved by the City and comply with Code requirements; Sign permits must be applied for separately. This approval does not constitute approval of any signs; That the recipient of this conditional use permit record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 546.05, Subd. 7. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the Developer shall submit a copy of the recorded conditional use permit. 3. This conditional use permit shall expire one year after it has been issued unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 4. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of February 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk Conditional Use Permit Requirements Subsection 547.09 a) The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. This requirement is met. This property is designated as "Community Commercial/Office" in the Comprehensive Plan. Community Commercial/Office areas are intended to provide space for a wide variety of retail goods and services that serve residents of Richfield and the immediate vicinity around Richfield. b) The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. This requirement is met. The General Commercial (C-2) District is intended to provide space for a wide variety of retail and service businesses that may serve a trade area encompassing Richfield and beyond. Uses are expected to be compatible with nearby residential properties and not to significantly degrade the level of serve or safety on nearby roads. c) The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. N/A d) The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this Code. The existing shopping center is nonconforming in regard to a number of requirements. City Ordinances require that nonconforming sites be brought into compliance when possible. The City finds that additional landscaping and/or fencing to provide required parking lot screening is not feasible given that parking already encroaches upon City boulevard. The City also finds that the fence along the eastern property line, as well as the fence extension at the north end of the property, meets the intent of the trash enclosure requirements. There is opportunity for additional impervious surface along the northern end of the buiding; however, limited sunshine would make it difficult to establish and maintain plants. With a commercial neighbor to the north, the City finds that there would be minimal benefit associated with this change and shall not require the conversion. The City finds that the existing parking is legally nonconforming. The City finds that memorial and/or burial services that are typically be associated with a funeral home would exacerbate parking shortages and internal circulation issues. These uses are prohibited. e) The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on government facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements. This requirement is met. The submitted plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and no undue adverse impacts are anticipated. fl The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety or welfare. The applicant must comply with all requirements of the Administrative Review Committee Report dated February 6, 2013. g) There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. This requirement is met. h) The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this Code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. The proposed use is located on an arterial road, as required by Section 534.07, Subd. 4. i j / o„ 12"PLANTING MEDIA f. ' ' ., d 2'-0"DRAINAGE-SFlND/ROCK MATF21AL BF_LOW z 'i r - XISTING - XISiINGi j/ ' pITUUI'JOU$ - . 1 '. BITURIINOUS f T ; 3 i _ S,M a«:w 7&v'o-f 7 n9i!,t ff"9 ?'' li s I p A1l fCIIEXISTINGPR c z iF'O`'"'pnv[ou w I I 2'-G"11ROf'EDGE 7-fi"OROP EDGF ON R'CURB ON A'CUR6 I OFILE M11ATC iF%ISIINGPI20FILt r 7 HANDICF P SIGN z..HANDICAP RAMP____ j j PLANTWG F2EA F I Iz s s i rs n4 's g '- i : PI.ANTINGS TO E S[L[CTED BV CONTRFlCTOR-Af'PROVED BY OWNER. IXg•a 1A',Wy S Y y:' I U I a' ',.f, j C i r I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 a 14 15 16 P 18 19 20 27 22 23 24 ZS J . ... \ Ew.a Ea.os I - - _ ' I n,4;/"//Uf . N-1—L L G'li'! J NI m -i i i i i i I I I i i y ~`` ';z e . ,. ., ° i PLAN7INGAREA I I I I I ; I , , ; I 1 jI 1 1I , I I I (; I ;7 . I . , -, IPlNTINGSTOBESGL[CTED V CONTRAC70R-APPROVED 6V OWN R. i,:i i ; I I i i' I 1 1 1' l: '1 ; I I I I I :, I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I l , I — ,, . _i 1 R, I I I I I I I I I I I II I ,I ; I, I I f w sy e i S N ; , o, c J I i f Q I. i -; I c:,= . J I I I j I I I j II II F, 11 I I I, ; I I I a - i . D I .!- , 1 L . . i', C%ISTIN<,V!<KIN(ItSSlf..lSlI I t:..O v>'i:' x.t i.... n p n«....., .__ __ .. ... t f o. I Z G O O .N F-Q r Y C I i. r I _ L LL w i w .. m ' ' ' ° • ' T I I W i w,rc I i a w o Iz I' s r.,cc.c_..,,.. FLAT CUR6 W EXPANSION h.1ATF_RIAL O aPAITGkI[XISTING PROFILE RFC1-S i CONC SLAB 1"FOR TILL(V[RiFy) PI AN IINGS TO[3f-SELECTED BY CONTRACTOR-AI'PI20VED NY OWNER I Q ,Fi"'0 2'PLANTING MF.UTA/DRAINAGE-SAND'ROCY.P,IATERI I.I3[LC'N Q t CMU-0 10 5/B'ARTSTON[CAST STON[CAP W Q ' l , i vz oveaHnvc n w Q chy 7 1 -i\ r Ii F \_ S1 „ A CMU 1 STO F OV 4 CMU W i'ERPROOh INTE;IOR v150n eOF2N O J I yv v '. IXISI'Ih( CONCftrTE SLA W TH XT[RIC1R PAVFRS(P nf31I11A11NUUS _ { _ r 2 I USC 6X6 W 7.4x1.A WOVEN WIRE FA6RIC i (J S CT W/2'SAND RAS[(S OPE 1/A"PER FOOT) PIN TO E%ISTING W LKWI;IS REB R L 2'O.G s o . H c t n - z-e-oaoNeoce i w I 3 - w-° ' oNCURH - r,-1 I ( I' . U .. I t coNCrz=.re FooriNC i O J . SITE PLAN I s,E r a SECTON(PLANTFR) CA 1 -10255 100 ; SEATING AREAm PAV[I2(P-1)-C/SALGfiANDF.-PIETRFNATNFSF_IZl`rS-(POR ID011E"x11' f'L N71NGST03C-SE ICIf=1Jf3'CO llt l(:ltlf2-AI'PIiOVI f)I1Y(1W ER I30' f'l N1IIJG5lO J1=Sl lf:(;T fl[5YC()NTRA(;IOR-/Wf'f20VED13YObVN1:R 111-.E..; SCALE W FEET II 6501 N co i f et - C U P 2/2013 Surrounding Cornprehensive Pl n C CC LDR LDR LDR DR CC CC LDR LDR MIXED CC LDR LDR 65TH STREET MIXED LDR LDR LDR LDR W W 1- LDR- ---LDR- --- w a z LDR LDR MIXED O CCO r' z LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR CO o 66TH STREET CHURCH LD CHURCH SCH CCO LDR LDR R FeefMIXED- Mixed Use 0 60 120 240 360 480 600CC -Community Commercial A 1 CCO- Community Commercial/Office v LDR - Low-Density Residential SCH - School CHURCH -Church Path: I:\GIS\Community Development\StafflPlanning Tech\Projects\6501 Nicollet CP.mxd 6501 N icol le - C U P 2/2013 Surro nd ng Zoning G R R R R R G2 C-2 R R C_2 G2 R ---R 65TH STREET PG2 R R R R W W Q W R R J R R W pC-2 PG2 V Z R R R R R R R G2 o 66TH STREET R R R R C-2 R R Feet 0 60 120 240 360 480 600 n' C-1 - Neighborhood Commercial 1 V C-2 -General Commercial PC-2 - Planned Generai Commercial R - Single Family Residential Path: I:\GIS1Community Development\StafflPlanning Tech\Projects\6501 Nicollet Z.mxd M i y a^^f5 a i 6 S t3ti: y 4 i 1 C ; P n. fX !i-a f b ;hf { r . t j t r..F,=# a, ,f . r Y' 3( ; }) I:K 4. l 3 ).J 8 e 6ti 9 ,: t f { t' l r' ' ,* a i ;a 't L i r`t R s r ` Y'jg f ..ati'q 1:. kr c R s.:9 +'' i;- i ..* _ ±.. p t. i, -:t l V Y. J• iry. j { i I f i i yq3alk6:`'S » 1k.,.,t af i r d; o f j'' r b}' i `f, d . Fy L t f rt jL ..:i. 1 j ` ,` x 3 f.#l s,e Ya 5 1a+4k t 1 C f ,' x ``'" O a f s ' F-, 3'' r ri° i eti 5{,' r: st' t # t r x r j r'' ' O I X T . S as..'' t ' h i.;.ww f - [, ` a Fy c1; l.rVy y !{,:,Y ; P 1 X+rY) - I t 1 i.r a. r'r , tt . 2"`S'Fh`` ,'` x r V d , , r rgf'F?„_'6 rrc. 7 ; Ft i -` t` µ. .r,r r t;{i { 1 v , 4rS L l S., t 7N,N', i.li . '; f'" l 3Y.+ Ii 1'^ . r !fq x fki`}= o1a-Pps . p 3 e i y` Y -t71"'' I IIf2fi,3 L {F:7; tl1' I c, f"k- `- 5 S- 1 ES 1 j% R ' ty+ T' 2. t t f'°' f' a y c , e E} . !i .o J'O r 11tl i. i: 4 Y. i 1 f h S;Ia , . J.. F..: ;_._ t4 a, a `4 - r3`` `.:° f V s, t# t f i- 4 : f a0 .c:d r ' O s l iil'i,yi JTPSS''F.( - I' t' . t , j t - y 1 7' J r g k 7 h• e . v..;{ d Y O+ s.+ ..EY t Fr6 4 L .1 . a 1 Y: t `':P, G4 i -.i t l/ 1 s `' - y E ,>y rti .r A Y i ': 1 i a : { M1 r- t L `jY f; `'F M x 1 r 1F 2 2tv b - : i+' 3_ tir 31r; t § i 1r} nS T"d.{ f 7" '!` r. t° 4 n y,p7/. y ,[S, lj F-, 1t Y _ Yc y4 4 k y+,' .F p$ t k ,• F3" 9 n 3.'`t. g- i+ E .-. + Q s11 y1\ , K9 gYd.''r FpS Y I #" "} -. t ; ( t{''.I 3 Y sj C + t F .. f, YI ' 2 d4`t y yt{b3iaf''. z. tx+y i' ! d t. 'x j - }. f 4 3.. S,'!t 's f`'s w t; # r a_ ,, T };'= Y i 5:'i y r 0 y ¢ V g r+ x.` r;t'C y ' z tFx;'` 1 i.,.,. — A c 1 i, ..-,. ...,.._. . . {!':?' . ' AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM# 8 REPORT# 4 CASE# 13-RZN-01, 13-PUD- O1, 13-CUP-01, 13- FDP-O 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT r PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Public hearing regarding a proposed Planned Unit Development. Consider a change in zoning and required land use approvals to allow construction of a 151-unit apartment building; 11,600 square feet of retail/restaurant space; and outdoor activity area in coordination with a future ad'acent retail develo ment. I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: 1) Recommend approval of the rezoning of 6330 Lyndale Avenue from General Commercial (C-2) to Planned Mixed Use (PMU); 2) Recommend approval of the rezoning of 6400 Lyndale Avenue, with the exception of the proposed Outlot A, from Planned General Commercial (PC-2) to Planned Mixed Use (PMU); 3) Recommend approval of the rezoning of the proposed Outlot A of the existing 6400 Lyndale Avenue from Planned General Commercial PC-2) to Single-Family Residential (R); 4) Recommend approval of a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit and Final Development Plan to construct a 151-unit apartment building; 9,000 square feet of retail space; 2,600 square feet of restaurant space; and outdoor activity areas in coordination and a reement with a future ad'acent retail develo ment. II. BACKGROUND The Lyndale Garden Center site has been vacant since the store closed its doors in 2006. In the intervening years, the property has suffered from frequent vandalism and occasional criminal activity. This property is located within what the Comprehensive Plan designates as the City's "downtown" area. This city center is intended to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. The currently proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) is divided into two primary sections for which two separate developers will apply for approvals. The requests before the Commission tonight involve the rezoning of all of the land involved in the project, and the specific land use proposal for the northern portion of the site. Consideration of these approvals depends on an understanding of the agreements that will be in place between the two site halves, and the coordination between this northern portion of the site and the future development of the south portion. The Cornerstone Group is proposing a mixed use development that includes a 151-unit, 6-story apartment building; 11,600 square feet of retail/restaurant space; and public amenities. Lakeside amenities include performance space with built-in seating, new connections to the existing Richfield Lake walking path, gardens, a splash pad and an outdoor pizza oven. The development will also include a market area that will be the new home of the Wednesday Richfield Farmers Market. The development will be built to coordinate and share parking and access with the future Lakewinds Natural Foods Co-op on the south half of the site. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. PoLicY In 2008, the City approved designation of the entire Lakes at Lyndale area as a "Mixed Use" area that would allow a variety of uses including high-density residential, commercial, office and recreation. Zoning Changes: A Mixed Use zoning designation is more appropriate than a General Commercial designation for a redevelopment that will include such significant housing and public improvements. The area extending into and along the shore of Richfield Lake and the retention pond (Outlot A) shall be rezoned to Single-Family Residential (R). This is the standard zoning designation of parks throughout the City and is not an indication of future development of single-family homes. The developer plans to dedicate this land to the City as a part of the platting process. These changes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Code requirements: Planned unit developments are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resources and to encourage innovation in planning and building. PUDs provide flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements, density and land uses if the proposed development is well-designed and can be successfully integrated into the neighborhood. The guiding districts for a Planned Mixed Use development are the Mixed Use Districts (MU-R, MU-C, MU-N). The Mixed Use Districts were created in order to develop areas that would support multiple land uses that are complementary to one another, and support the ability to live, work, shop and play within a development pattern of horizontally or vertically mixed uses. o This sheer size of this particular piece of property makes its redevelopment key in determining the future character of the Lakes at Lyndale area. Careful consideration of all elements of the proposal is warranted to ensure that development will be complimentary to the area and that this property will once again be an asset to the community. As mentioned above, PUDs provide flexibility in the application of requirements so long as a development is well-designed and can be successfully integrated into the neighborhood. The following variations from standard requirements are proposed: Setbacks - The residential building exceeds the maximum permitted setback (15 feet). The particulars of this site make this a logical deviation from regulations. The proposed housing seeks to maximize views of the park and lake. Signs - While this development is designed to function as a cohesive and identifiable area, it will be divided (through a platting process) into a number of separate parcels. This would prohibit shared signs throughout the development because the Code prohibits off-site signs. The unique aspect of this development warrants shared signage as proposed. Building Height - The minimum building height in the Mixed Use Districts is two stories. The proposed retail component including the future co-op grocer on the south side of the site) is only one story (the residential building is six stories). The additional square footage that would come with a second story would require additional parking and is not feasible. The intent of this regulation is to increase the overall density of development in the areas of the City where it's found to be appropriate. The intent of this regulation is met when the site is evaluated as a whole. Building Stepbacks and Shadows —The Code requires that buildings over 50 feet be stepped back so as to avoid a monolithic street fa ade and to protect adjacent properties from shadows. The proposed building is 58 feet tall. The north side of the residential building includes all of the architectural detail that is included on the other sides of the building and a monolithic farade is not an issue. The shadows; however, do impact the residential neighborhood to the north. A shadow study is included as an attachment to this report and has been shared with the neighborhood on multiple occasions. Significant shadows are present in the blocks immediately north of the project during the winter; however, during the rest of the year the shadows impact only two single-family properties. Staff sent a copy of the shadow study directly to the owners of these two properties. As of the preparation of this report, staff has not been contacted with any concerns. Parking Lot Location — In an effort to increase walkability, parking in the Mixed Use Districts is to be located behind buildings. In this case; however, there is a major amenity to the rear of the property. The building, parking lot and pedestrian improvements have been located such that the residential building is able to take advantage of the Park/lake views; the commercial building is readily available to both vehicles and pedestrians; and the overall site is opened in a way to provide a view of the park. There will be a market structure within the parking lot that will provide additional street presence. Parking Quantity & Sharing —At the request of staff, the developer commissioned an independent parking study to help quantify both daily and event-related parking needs (attached). Staff also conducted an analysis of need based on code requirements. Both examinations are based on shared parking amongst the co-op, retail and surface residential parking areas and limiting restaurant space to 2,600 square feet. It is our belief that the proposed parking will be sufficient on a daily basis. Staff believes that parking adequacy could be a concern during the Farmer's Market, although the independent study disagrees. Both staff and the consultant find that a parking management plan is needed in order to host concurrent events (Farmer's Market and lake-side event). A parking management plan for the site would likely involve valet and off-site parking. The developer has already begun to look into options. Based on both of these examinations, staff recommends approval of the parking as proposed with the understanding and added stipulation that prior to the scheduling of any events (other than the Farmer's Market), the developer must submit to staff a parking management plan. Further, because the shared parking is such an integral part of this development, staff recommends that approval of tonight's actions be contingent upon approval of plans for the co-op grocer on the south half of the site. Zoning Code requirements related to building design, landscaping, impervious surface, outdoor open space, lighting, trash and recycling, screening of inechanical equipment, bicycle parking, pedestrian connections, irrigation, etc. are met. B. CRITICAL ISSUES The Comprehensive Plan calls for a mix of uses throughout the Lakes at Lyndale area. The Comprehensive Plan describes the area around 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue as the city center, the downtown and the center of commerce in Richfield. Further, it states that this area has been developing over the last decade and that development is intended to continue and expand. The proposed development adds new housing, new retail and new public/quasi-public improvements to the City's core. The development maximizes the site, encourages pedestrian and general outdoor activity, deemphasizes parking, and connects directly to a City Park pathway. Shadows will impact the single-family homes to the north. The developer has attempted to contact all homeowners in this neighborhood in order to solicit feedback. A copy of the shadow study was also sent directly to the most heavily impacted property owners by the City. Parking analysis has been based on the assumption of shared parking throughout the north and south halves of the site. Approval of the current requests should be contingent upon approval of plans for the co-op grocer. A parking shortage is anticipated when multiple events are scheduled. A parking management plan must be approved by staff prior to the scheduling any event other than the Wednesday Farmer's Market. C. FINANCIAL Required application fee has been paid. D. LEGAL Zoning: Existing: C-2 (General Commercial), PC-2 (Planned General Commercial) Proposed: PMU (Planned Mixed Use), R (Single-Family Residential) Land Use: Existing: Commercial building, vacant Proposed: Mixed Use Development Comprehensive Plan: Mixed Use Notification: Notice of the hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the proposed development and published in the Sun Current Newspaper. Additional notification was sent to the owners of 6328 Aldrich Avenue and 6327 Bryant Avenue. Other Actions: Council: 1St Reading of rezoning scheduled for March 12, 2013. 2nd Reading of rezoning & PUD approvals scheduled for March 25, 2013 Stipulations of Approval: 1. This approval is contingent upon the receipt of land use approvals for the remaining portion of 6400 Lyndale Avenue. Building permits shall not be issued until land use approvals for the anticipated co-op grocer have been granted. 2. A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The property must be platted and the plat recorded prior the issuance of a building permit. 4. Cross-access and shared parking agreements must be recorded against all parcels prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 5. Restaurants require odor control unless deemed unnecessary by the Community Development Director. 6. Restaurant space may not exceed 2,600 square feet unless supported by parking analysis. 7. This approval includes sign locations only. Separate sign permits are required. 8. Final building plans/elevations for the retail building must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of uuiiuing pernits. 9. Final lighting plans must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. 10.A final sediment and erosion control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. 11. Final stormwater management plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. 12. Final plans for sidewalks and improvements in and along the right-of-way must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. 13.A maintenance agreement related to sidewalks and landscaping must be executed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 14. Final utility plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. 15.The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report and compliance with all other City and State regulations. 16. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete. 17.The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 18.This permit shall expire one year after is has been issued unless: 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; 2) building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. IVo ALTERNATNE RECOMMENDATION S Recommend approval the proposed rezoning, planned unit development plan, final development plan, and conditional use permit with additional conditions. Recommend denial of the proposed planned unit development, final development plan, and conditional use permit with a finding that the proposed project does not meet City requirements. V. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance (draft) Resolution Code Requirements Proposed plans Parking Study and follow-up materials City parking standards calculation table Neighborhood open house invitation & submitted comment summary Shared parking memo Event parking management memo Planning & Zoning maps Photos VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING Representative(s) of The Cornerstone Group DRAFT Ordinance shall be prepared upon submittal of proposed plat ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX 1 TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING 6330 LYNDALE AVE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) TO PLANNED MIXED USE (PMU); REZONING 6400 LYNDALE AVE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF OUTLOT A FROM PLANNED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (PC-2) TO PLANNED MIXED USE (PMU); AND REZONING OUTLOT A FROM PLANNED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (PC-2) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R) THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section _of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code is amended by Sec. 2.Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code is amended by Sec. 3. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 6330 AND 6400 LYNDALE AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a final development plan and conditional use permit for a planned unit development to include a 151-unit, 6-story residential building; 9,000 square feet of retail space; 2,600 square feet of restaurant; and outdoor activity areas in coordination vvith an adjacent retail development, on land generally located at 6330 and 6400 Lyndale Avenue and legally described as: INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION] WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing and recommended approval of the requested final development plan and conditional use permit at its February 25, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on February 12, 2013; and WHEREAS, the requested final development plan and conditional use permit meets those requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. and WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of a planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are approved for a mixed use development as described in City Council Report No. , on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. The approv d nlanned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: This approval is contingent upon the receipt of land use approvals for the remaining portion of 6400 Lyndale Avenue. Building permits shall not be issued until land use approvals for the anticipated co-op grocer have been granted. A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. The property must be platted and the plat recorded prior the issuance of a building permit. Cross-access and shared parking agreements must be recorded against all parcels prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Restaurants require odor control unless deemed unnecessary by the Community Development Director. Restaurant space may not exceed 2,600 square feet unless supported by parking analysis. This approval includes sign locations only. Separate sign permits are required. Final building plans/elevations for the retail building must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Final lighting plans must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. A final sediment and erosion control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. Final stormwater management plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. Final plans for sidewalks and improvements in and along the right-of-way must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. A maintenance agreement related to sidewalks and landscaping must be executed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Final utility plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report and compliance with all other City and State regulations. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies, This permit shall expire one year after is has been issued unless: 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; 2) building permits have been issued and substantial work perFormed; or 3) upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. 4.The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or upon written request by the developer, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9. 5.The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 25th day of March, 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk Required Findings Part 1: Development proposals in the Mixed Use Districts shall be reviewed for compliance with the following (537.01, Subd.2): 1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan and any redevelopment plans established for the area. The City's Comprehensive Plan designates these properties as part of a larger mixed use district encompassing the 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue area. The intent of the mixed use category is to focus on creating a city center in Richfield that will serve as a "downtown." The city center is to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. The emphasis on public areas, a connection to the lake, and improved sidewalk and street presence along Lyndale Avenue is also consistent with the currently- under-development Lyndale Connectivity Plan. 2. Consistency with the regulations of the Mixed Use Districts as described by Section 537 of the Code. The proposed development meets the intent of the Mixed Use District regulations. The proposal deviates from regulations as follows: Setbacks - The residential building exceeds the maximum permitted setback (15 feet). The particulars of this site make this a logical deviation from regulations. The proposed housing seeks to maximize views of the park and lake. Signs - While this development is designed to function as a cohesive and identifiable area, it will be divided (through a platting process) into a number of separate parcels. This would prohibit shared signs throughout the development because the Code prohibits off-site signs. The unique aspect of this development warrants shared signage as proposed. Building Height - The minimum building height in the MU Districts is two stories. The proposed retail component (including the future co-op grocer on the south side of the site) is only one story, while the residential component is six stories. Additional square footage would require additional parking and is not feasible. The intent of this regulation is to increase the overall density of development in the areas of the City where it's found to be appropriate. The intent of this regulation is met. Building Stepbacks and Shadows —The Code requires that buildings be stepped back above 50 feet so as to avoid a monolithic street fa ade and to protect adjacent properties from shadows. The proposed building is 58 feet tall. The north side of the residential building includes all of the architectural detail that is included on the other sides of the building. The shadows; however, do impact the residential neighborhood to the north. A shadow study is included as an attachment to this report and has been shared with the neighborhood on multiple occasions. Significant shadows are present in the blocks immediately north of the project during the winter; however, during the rest of the year the shadows exceed Code limitations on only two single-family properties. Staff sent a copy of the shadow study directly to the owners of these two properties. Parking Lot Location — In an effort to increase walkability, parking in the Mixed Use Districts is to be located behind buildings. In this case; however, there is a major amenity to the rear of the property. The building, parking lot and pedestrian improvements have been located such that the residential building is able to take advantage of the park/lake views; the commercial building is readily available to both vehicles and pedestrians and the overall site is opened in a way to provide a view and a major pedestrian access to the park. There will be a market structure within the parking lot that will provide additional street presence and help to minimize the impact of the parking lot. 3. Creation of a design for structures and site features which promotes the following: i.An internal sense of order among the buildings and uses. The location of buildings, drives, amenities and pedestrian connections provide a safe and accessible site. ii.The adequacy of vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width or interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. See above (i). iii. Energy conservation through the design of structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading. The proposal includes solar panels to provide power to the market area and reduces paved areas as much as possible. iv. The minimization of adverse environmental effects on persons using the development and adjacent properties. The proposed development will cast shadows on adjacent properties to the north. The largest impact is limited to two properties. Part 2: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application 542.09 Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. See above — Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. See above — Part 1, #3. 3.The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development. The development is in substantial compliance with the intent of the guiding MU Districts. Deviations from MU and Performance Standard regulations have been allowed in order to maximize development in the City's downtown" and to take full advantage of the Park as an amenity for both residents of the development and the larger community. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that se ve or area proposed to serve the development. The City's Public Works, Engineering and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties. The developer has worked to solicit feedback from the neighborhood throughout the development design process. Requests and concerns have been addressed when possible. City staff sent direct mail notice to the property owners that will be most heavily impacted by the shadows that the residential building casts. The redevelopment of a blighted site will improve the livability and safety of the neighborhood. This requirement is met. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest. The final development plan, which establishes the terms and conditions of the development, meets this requirement. All uses are conditional uses in the PMU District. The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (Subd. 547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. See above — Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The proposed use will assist in the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan by adding additional uses to the City's downtown" area. The use is consistent with the intent of the Planned Mixed Use District and the underlying Mixed Use Districts. 3. 1he proposed use is consistent with any officialiy aaopted redeveiopmer r plans or urban design guidelines. The mission of the Lakes at Lyndale Plan is to create a "thriving urban center" by "provid[ing] more housing opportunities, upgrad[ing] commercial properties and offer[ing] greater enjoyment of the natural and recreational amenities of Wood Lake and Richfield Lake." The proposed use is consistent with this mission. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development complies with performance standard requirements. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City's Public Works, Engineering and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public heath, safety and welfare. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. The City has designated this site as a target for redevelopment. The existing vacant building is detrimental to the area. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT PARCEL DIVISION EXHIBIT e`a R° ` r.o,um me rw a a I O-Ir onume t Sef d MnkeC Oi1M1LicenseNo.3J968 p O Scnlicry Se«er Monhc'e 2 ` o=s w„s..,ua nda i Part of Sections 27 & 28 end RLS 675 & RLS 1560, B°,'" Q•; "`'VICINITY MAP ca voiK Townshi 28, Ran e 24, Henne in Count , Minnesota r"°°^", a°' Vl P g P Y o ---- 6 E«,a aa. a 1_ci«i,<u,i, w ° o cie i.o Ho e rm,. i -'" Eleclrc Powe.Pcle Z p y0 y n Gas Mefer W O Ov r So G ._ . ° __.. yG—..—.--- Llyht Paircn lorn=i 6ox I a y J t. THE CORNERSTONE GROUP, INC SB9. o < <o u oJ• i RaolOr,in I ` p V S,gn Co 'i 58971 50"W O ' S88'24'S0"W R. ca un. - c.n smP W ¢° ot DEED=zo2.00 123.49-- .ro•.ro n o.k e.202.02 _sas•>>so^w 50^ P o,Bo. a a LYNDALE GARDENS 28.0, , '' N88 z4 5o E _, 176.50 n r ea c a s m 4 w«,.,e.I lI.6 1 5' 5 ifory Se»-. e' 11.00 . . 7 +,35. aua c ne«. i N01'35'10 W Y08 .9.5 0"g, j neoa eia in n. es- I 3S o, . _ .: . y.:N t v a o r m cacEa r a::o Zh4WUntlertroundLableTe'ev"!on WLOT3ZTeo k y F' l 109.396 (L u aergrou a rono e Nb poo2 d . ... 9 Q. pO po . rm.oou r<<nno o a 2 e ce n-- A6pNco„o-o.a oo.s O e a a0" e -oe<m ou n, OUTLOT A n N N o e,a s,.e W Z Z Q iza.zs.a.n. a y W Ho I I -o;m.,,00s s.ro Q Q ln L co o<m so,m o W i r ° Q n C nus M 0: Z e.i ee.i f F:B: riE'S Q Q z S6>4j e i\ 8 gg as•4< __ W h' Nso za so e 6 e o h z W pIrE s Z J J k9„O"c' Pond I 1 i . . . s'o pc, J V LL 55 1) s i LOT 2 y s°s g, A• Z v NN \ 15.028 W.k. P' F Q p a >- i D 4r e o ir W J ais-nnr -.u.:ck i n:u.,c,.,,.i_,n rii.....c..i.:y.iro...ac„n.:irveu i uimi-..-..i i.u.z rni,.n-.-.. .....rs.n.n._zuin . intp J qee o '_ N'c \\ ° LO 1T xa n. Grass Lake N O 93 52 a9.k. i - r_ n. .i. i... : y. i rn . yi a . n i yn i . . .p ei. im r:. -i i. .i -r x r. ac . i s n i 9 n o,i>. ...., a...e o n o eoi.o 6 1 ar,,m I) 1.. . ..fl I. 5 N Z• / f IL Lc.e Su fh A IJIII(1 F t . 1 1 J : I 1 I I -I El S 'I I 1 1 L \ II J Jbl A ItAYSLY'IIUIt51 p i o ,..b. ii. as 2. . Un w I::J I t I 1 S 11 L 4 II A2 1' I :Ir I II .I 5 I fl I f: h5 I I 1 I O Y` y i , s s s ni i . r . ai . i is;ii . z . r s n ia-i 0T7TI.OT A A .. I . I II' L-A-I S I I J I J J I C l... 4 1 N -1 I k JL l . • S . I ' .I I S.I h '.ti 1 I . I I I 4 I I I It: 1 I S I i . I I. 1 1 I.. 'T..:.i V i i y i i . ..ri n i i a i r r. r i< .,s: e . r\ I 'i n I .I p 'n, p n r I .. 1 -y 1 1.. n n I I I I ..c 1 . b N n .I1 h1 r2>J J Y n : c i .v i x .i .i n i.: i i . ., i.. n a .n is . i u c.. i i n ti i v r i a- n r . i i 2 Z \\ SN T 36 . .. F µn- . s - ir.un., i_,w< du,...,.,n ds n n..,u.o-.i, t a,.:r. i,nn»...: , :dr,.<..,.s,.i i r 6 3)5( \SOe`," Z p ia . i i ro 1 SS? J s' p' O u,, i t ,.ni,i , .r i...<. ..t,..n, I . \\ ySX6` D d N ic _ i.n . __ I i . .../ `oa9 7 k_ t',,OIITLOT C' e v O N II I S I I I' .I .I .I I I II L . I.Itb...IL:Sn f.iE'lSH.i...4 nC.nY li.,v 11\ 1 FP r ,) 19.17]9.(l. Y F' O u ,i i i r,.. i . i i i i i i i .. i ti s i :. i II J ry h3 S'p6'j. n W Ntn11f.I I- I 11 . I i I .I I I I ' J - L I ' S 1 1 .' I.- I l7 u 4 I J I...A I.... I 5 1 11 I H A.'_YSL1 Ill I Q N y. r O3. Z Z I f I 5 I I I I I I I I I 5'riiri i i...: . .i i ,.i.i i i i i r i i - ni w i..r i ii i i i}u s 4i hN 1 51 I.IIIII I .I II I 1 1 I I I III A 'I 1 Ll Ill 1 I111 I I : J 1 I n OF/ S( O I.I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I i I S I I I I O n .i ..i i i i i ,n i i .i i .a i i i i i .i j=-' h N ' O x i . y m ,: i i is i y i i i i ( i i i i i i s :. i a i-i ii i - Q Al`. n 1 c [Ni 1 IL C i li il.. .ily,il ! J1 In,:l i,i. ,I.i ktl. I.rl.l i JG6 .AL JS n..'i/ L i.. dGi u..,iLV J. I F j a/ LeiJ.r..15..i nl.s.I '..1'.:il r..H I.«..n I .. .'...:,iln I 51..i i'i Iil..i'.i:ii . .I.,. i:i i ...I>I_ I:.0 . i i- OJIr1I_ ..[. . v m .. ii lu.:.11 .I,. s. L . ,. 1 .!]5 I. ( N ...... .J.J l.. lG)_3.. ..nl'vr]1 i.\ . ii I.nslC.f..aflilcYO I4U1 1. U nmm n>.ni ann<n-nasca anoNS. W naaci< s .rkurrkiiurs<iarno,.,:i..,,i.i.;i,y .,,,.,n i ii i.i-.,..<<.i r„ n,.. -.n.i zn- .n.-«n-..,..,n ett IL:iiP.ni il:i.mir_r,i4 il.Su.7inii2tl.l.i .I F 1._.'il,..lii.11illi w.i._.E,v .i.i..,..ac,,..,.i n,ini.r..s mu, .Nn..,...._ar,,,., „<„ ..,.ae- ,,i,.-a ..,F...,. _r........ PROPOSI7DPLANNIiDDGV13LOPMFNTARF,ATA[31. 1.nflil ...li 1 Fh ngl.:..i..l .l>1 n.n fl.- ..ti v iM1 liili.r timl -E N..imm hcponto bcenn c.\.nn_ E ..1]L31u.iF. :., li... i . . ..II . I uim fF .iii REVI510 5 ABEA TABLE I.ol I 93,527 sq.fl. or 2.I5 acres r, ar n.i..H- •• Lot 2 75,029 sq.ft or 1.72 acres I....in f i 3 S 2P ux. 1 .k. b ... i 1 I. ' I I . S I 4 J f f 1 N 1- ', 1 I . I I.. -f I . I.E c. I .I li- I U(a.l f.,'1.11 i.+ i ...i i e„_.nv< ,.n, _„-.eu,., .n.. i..... E_er _.,._ ,.x_n o i „ , .. .-, __,r,=,. 3q.Lot 10J,396s ft. or 2.51 acres I i .,i a.i i., ..iK:,,., 51. i Y.rn.l i 5ii..ini.M1,.i. a r,, Outlot A I2R,267 sq.ft. or 2.94 acres i .<.,-n.• i.i,r xi i,".. _ . _ .._. , „ i .,.«..Oirtlot I3 26,537 sq.ft. or 0.61 acres nFlC nore ais.oa, F_ ..,Outiot C 19,117 sq.fl. or 0.44 acres y,i i.i,:,., i,I:;E..J ru i . ... I'.I.li. .Ii.,J[ . .. .. I fir.n.'. nl+.nsu r,ecri Lyndalc Avenue 7,452 sq.fr or 0.17 acres oa pa.reoreu rv n;-snur i ioN icmi rnerci ricn n rn v(¢uuN.vr Tolal Sile Area 459,324 sq.fl. or 10.54 cres ir.<no n i.i n.i i . ,.a i: . ,,. . y n. i o . ..,s, m cad:o„ uccam,. G002 G3I_nitu.drig .. I LJJ l. GENERAL NOTES FOR SITE LAYOUTAND CONSTRUCTION BREAKTHROUGH G TE 6' 'CONCRETE . _ EN O 6 ^NEW 4'WOOD FEI ICE p lh ' d 6n C 1 I Of iJ ' I' t I ' IFNEW"WOO UTILITV PAD 6 CONC.WALK START OF NEW 6 WOO FENCE Y i F i '' ' Y P - - ' 5'XB'GONCRETE ' j-f \ UTILITYPAD -- P.Cor 1 Y:I {J/hf .' t L,C ph 5.0 C I. 3 9 h b prormll99n9 i r:'76i-7,i i r r . i r s a rp es a n iir w r r i r o r<mr GENERATOR LANDSCAPEBUFFER,Cr p.tl d I In t I 6r. Im I. Ip'9n C blhJl ihe3f EMERGENCYEGRESS R- ..`..J..Ymm.'y.` N SCREENFENCEW/GATE RE:LAN SCAPEPLAN cfedp . Tr .M1l.gsha.ii_. F«e[enceo.erarybcxionssne cnl etle dr,g,l.iJr.g,sha.l NEW 6'FENCE i ONLV ftOUTE,GR SS P VE 6'CONC.WALK on t ih d y 'ih I Q E`I 1 C C N F1 y SU FACIN 4 i. O ' v Cor t I f :',' 1 i -II . g N . G y '.AI N'y J.e i 7 tl rr F 1 tl d t llb G ld( yd p I 1 tl. PILASTERSIGN Rxprt ytl F bC Ih tl 5 A5-4 tl 1 he0 tRp 1.' I CI ly. TRAIL- G LANDSCAPE CONNECTION _ '3 . PLANTER,TYP. CONC.WALK q.Cor r l L N SCAPE PLANTWG t: I k .I -I I d A' 5 I 1 II f cr errolln ACCESSWALK DONNTO I I I TYP. a: P o. r,h r f I r C r Ac n ,,, I-` r- PLANTINGPAREA PARKING - LIGHTPOLE, ,. 5 Ccr h I - I t , t- 1 . . Y 9 P F I 7 r 1 j I PC et a a s ei iF € ci. oe a oa.i V TOWNHOP.1E nu 1 I 6.Contr t M1 Icoorr:r 3l,.cc< <JS=g:ngareau.n 1'.O relsH re,=ra"._. a u u y 1 co,. „n iz.i n.c:c i.,.na rY„i:no,n_:ap.....z,r.wo,meey..cngeiarycor..ncna C—__ I ne . i B.LOW GRADE GARAGE OROINNRV HIGH J ., . R_'ARCtI. OPEN,AIR PAARK A,A'Id' -'crs relo CS=Ga=en. I'll. I d h I CONC.STEPS II__... ATERLINE(826.1) " . .. - ____. HIGH WATER I y 1 n.AICI ' .h i S.I I d C II Ay IJ' . ryl LEVELLINE 830.0') 6 , II Irr TERRACE f R F1 f h P'. F :9 g oA R V i I" t .o,!R V r:tx.lv RETAINING WALLS, . GARDEN OUTDOOR I! 7yp, GRIWKITCHEN Io.Cor 1 h,I ,1 IF . 1'dl a f h'e F h( ert,..,:I. id p r'„st r.er.:A 8'P A T H FIRE PIT cc r I . . LANDSGAPE 6'A11N.CONC. SIDEWALK I II.A9c ..eshelber..vdS Ywncre.cc. F f..raiena_tl_2S. COMRIUNITY PLANTING I S \\ TERRACE BIKERACK,BIKERACK,- 125cePa:cmer.tOc!=Slorzlancre;xu=: iFp-rlen'clr,a ticurrc;'cen:ac!bn'ceteot i,.TB TVP.x10 TVP.(n5) IOVERHEAD- 1 Cl 25'SETBACK ` i `\``\ ¢ I AOVERHEAD LANDRTAIN STEPSNTER I 13.'=nycwA ruc-1nx_o.eao.it.fre nrg_s„ch. nl.,, r.c rd'.e,..i:Jf lou.e-..,vi;zJietex'_'.ng f',.9RCi2IPT€RRACE ` PLANTE , STRUCTURE —\ ETFOU w.R,: I--= 15.COrV It spo t.. p ' a..,fre...<ant/I :zPtrc.J,:.n:Coi...c.,r,.l.l'e!a'I Clienl..f\ STOR 1 WATIER r ` ` E p r,g oC.>ar 5 CHANNEL T' I l l I VC S u u 61KF.RACK. 15.COr 1 h IH In ork e.,.e NeerA f'.gC.R ht h C b ssl alheWxGZAZ JC >,1 O TYP.(x3) fi gG.l.. d,,proCUC'nanaeG pm..rt.,Jbesnretlt or5_rietllz.taie.,d c'..4Cyllabvr rs RePle_f zi'. p \.• O \/ e/ APPftOXIM1iNTE 1 ,. eus sTOa ocnnoN V t ., 1 1 t c ONC.STEPS, i ' \ CansuPzm 7yp,LFlNDSCFPEACCENT STbRM WATER ELEMENT,TVP. GHANNEL Jf RAI$ED STAGE , 8'PATH `' J 4 PLANTING AREA. L RE:LANDSCAPE PLAN CONC.WALK 1 l \ OUTDOORTERRACE 1 \ Q Revisicns..... ... . ...... ABIO WALLS CONC.STEPS WITH O SEATS oa e :.In io GA N GCENT '• U ELEP.1ENT,WITH LI HT 8 GONC. PLANTI \POT.TYP. u d f CONC.STEPS 17 f RETAINING WALL /G` ` / \ \ TVP. l j J SEATING 2, `. ` \ I yL TERR CE T'.p i OUTOOORPIZZn- OVEN GARDENPLOT y\',\ 9 5- \ 1 PLANNINGIZONING oaoiNnRV HicH—APPLICATION•PUD WATER LINE(826.1') G ` j HIGH WATER r j SUBMITTAL LEVEL LINE(P30.0') j \ \ B PATH FUTUREDEVELOPMENT C GFlROEN PLOT BV OTHERS,SHOWN FOR REFERENCEONLYC Dv+-rlC e:e F O FE55 o y EeR,.A" w,a ADAACCESS R eca5 GARDEN PLOT 6 V a R ProleclTlJS Z r' f" f/ LYNDALE GARDENS ya j LYNDAl.E;GARDENS I 0 i iQj J.. 0 vr fS a./ OUT PARCEL O \\. I/ f FOR FUTURE j f DEVELOPMEN'I' 5haetTltb LANDSCAPE NEw o, SITE PLAN T@ MATCk1%I9TIN PILASTER SIGN TRAIL CONNECTION r i SnectNUmber L 100 D 15 30 60 120 n:...-...-,.r,.u.-,.... L I3)PROFUSION CRABAPPLE p SvASS S70NE PWE 5)Sv/ISS S70NE VWE PLANTING NOTES IIIQ6)GREENSPIRE LIND tl 4)SWISSSTONEPINE 3 AUTUI.111RADIANCEREDMAPIE I.SeeGENERAl1:01ESFOR:IiElAYOJTN DCONSiRUC ION l 2)AUTUM.N BRILLIAN E I ERVICE6ERRYI-__'_ P.i1,C. I IC I i I n or l J IL_ ___ 1 J J ih.C 1 1 poJlkl alWkgl IIaII xrLngarxas FdudmgwaeAg p g iMlJngnwalno L--" tti.iTe l`R- - er4l g ) dlh bk ccdllibyNeLar scaPeMhMM ao QUF7Ik'1AC.1G1F5 i'„s.__ i,,, C o'rt - r e w sa enmsiaN a a .oi . m a .en aa,«,a e e o i9 ,. y- } i , .. , 41arlsneslCehzalny tll.heeolpeslsa+02: 0.1 Jar. nnt awai 0 7 a«o a 9m 1"°" " ' T'_j ..., n 51BL BEECH 7 1 sutlM' heaPV Ikfv . IaryYn y,'- f, L. 4.M g S k J j ',w ' ' onixtlorsnallberesp nvdalopla.smreYrgs(ec cabn.CcMaclws^alllmmEEWl lyremovxappintmaledalFalGOes Y. IO AUTUMHBRILLIANCE S PR(IrUSIONC APPLE S olco'o m'os ec cab SERVICEBERRY y e -- §. _ S CR NSPIR G.Pllrophalkshallwr or 1 Ut slz dardssalloMln'M ifcanSx•dmJSbr urs ryS'ack' j, V ` OAK COn a;torlos trt IS'a F ]o n-.wt plal Iltloiexork y r ., 1 i,so e co,am iosa<eteau,mvdai eP e m«Rr me, cu su;., u I a o o i i s.. I 2)CRI.NSONSPIRF I 9 FIIFJa:.lrre!enals 96eorofx;edLOm tinJEuiingtrac=porl i OAK I F 61JMeiJ) 4.. I SP RE O - -..... -._ 10.A'I 'It I h W U IWIh M 11 G.rtm p d. G' «.T 1 pq:p 141CRUA. 4 4)AUTU.4.N BRILLIANCE I OAK r II.AIN I F IheN g'.Y H d r f Pn lopl SERVICEBERRY II ./ I` r I I IP.Ins.alio.0.1{V A ted,l haOt IrsaNetl E, k_ 3 . eranaacwrE nghactepLLOgaoO{Jar7r.gr/ I 4ra f i.s x FSeGU ityo flariRS1.+41s shcrd.aYCrCeuMeJ.yp I' I 13.Can'acicr shall assure Crolrage anE perml.>bn el all Flartng F+s F o Imiaielbn c Warl rz.,=fkJ.Corliacloi Is S RED'oUD u /,I ewo;uz m ew:emen o xu War s iosi a.o i,aw a e e;kwq co eaao: 11 ^r"L/ I 14.NIGIarledaee.,slulC .1hJ .li]bc•zReas reo a7Pra'J Wd 73)YMRE PINE ; o ' L 15.CO.adarlo5varan e4t A..Idl purla 112 lF 9 aaleal.iC.r.J:lm. 716UROAK J T I m.G! Vaceie;¢d[tl[1drlmacAalx$h t:orc2.so.c%e.o -0' 4 Tii' rnl I I I IG.GOn attorlorx Q h(;1 AUTLLi1N 6RILLIANCE 7 tr iEnY10E8ERRY I1.SoLS:.nlalwm A:GOncensia.:esMxbeSirrmgolg.ararteepedoA. 3 PRINCETO ELh1 J I IRRIGATION NOTES TURFGRASS- I i I Glientoaoe I)PRINCETONELAI 0 4 I.AI{ar1:n:.,otelri aleUnran nCe GroerJbiga'ens sEn. 131 PRIN FIAM C Or- S o I 111 GREENSPIRE LIN EN e 1. a 4 1 y __ rl 1 I CO VREROUSTFEE Q,,I \I 7. /l-C 7J\GREiNSPIRE LINDEN rC E L VVI S l y O v D[CIOUOUSOV[flSiGRYTqC[ i ` i . O I qF \ OOO ECIDUOUSOPIJA1.1Ef1IAlTHEE NATNESEEDING V\ \\. . \ %- '' / y 'N j-i- \, CansuXanl i)PRWCET N ElA1 `J` OOo DECIDUOUS/COtlIFEflOUSSHRUB 1 U 0 • c;: P[ftit:111AL HATNE SE[DI.':G C,_. ..,,' / @9 1 R 4TUflfGflA55i a cn oci i-- r i q,q a..i:io: No. Da a Das<rlpllon PUD SUBMITTAL PLANT SCHEDULE 0\' \ Y 2)PROFUSION CRABAPVLE OUANTIN C01'1'01!flAM11E BOTAY,ICAL NA1!E SRE RE1dANK5 DECIDL'CUSOVEfl$TORYTREE$ t\ ......._. - 171PRINCETONEUA N-- 5 U 10 PArcelenElm Ulusan.ercna'Pnncelon' 4.5°9R Disease-ieslsL=nlcWtl ia l} 1.5•lil3 r i! 7 B Oxk 0 C5 iCOaF 1 30 Gcensf eLinden Ti„'acorJalaCieens e' 96'0 l 11 I:orlhern Pin Oai Ouercus eY;psa:tla'is 4)3.5•B 7)2.5'9B 2)AUTUMN 6RILLIANCE SERVICE6ERRY 8)HONEYCRISPAPPLE 11 CAmsonSflreOak OuercusaPoaxOuemrsiobui 2.SBB eclumnxrhrCil WRDEN (r 3 AulumnRxJianceRedldaf AcerNb/nmNUfun:nRaOiancE' 4.51717 ueaouausoa ar.+er Tn Taees s S/ PLANNINGIZONING APPLICATION-PUD NATIVE SEEDINGmvwsioaai:anoi E."t'us'Piolusian•1.5•68 j SUBMIITAL 71)NORTHERN PIN OAH 5 Y,crinxin Clump FedCuO Cercis car=erris 6'BB cinmp Icrm.No ihem s126i crl GARDEN 1 e SCOTCtI PI E V 71 AulumnBrilliaaceServlceC¢rry rurleldr.cl!z x.9iaL011cra'Aclo'ninOn'°ance' 6'Pfl clumplarm C p HcneS'cilsp fFle M1fa'usxHorc/ciisp I.5'UD d nahlor i S r---FR03ft 5 BIuCBecCh Carylnustl.r.lii;lana G'BB t6implcim GARDEII\ j 3:: fEE,.wvri.z;i GARDEN FK<lc C07:IF(ROI15TflEE5 p.,p s 13 WM1R;PIne P;nusslrobus II'HEIGHi cr::.._e 16 Prahie5la!esmxnSr,ISS51onePine P iwsrembru'Hertnam GHHGHi N cFs ii 8 S olchPii e Pln issYlaesliis 6'IIEIGiIi e\ ,_ - Pr;;c tuto DECIDUOUSRCOtiIF[ROUSSHRUBS LYNDALE GARDENS J38 G'IXEDVMI[TIES SCOYT i `'-./ ;` LYNDAI.E',GARDFNS i._` .!,/ GARDEN y, \ PUD REQUIREMENTS FOR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT REOUIREA ENT pCSPOWSE 1 85 REOUIRED TflEES-(25)2.5'CAL OR 6'HEIGMT,(34)3.5'CAL a` ^ SECiION 544.03,SUB IVISION 4e(TREE SI2ES-FOR BUILDMf,S OVEfl 5 i STOftIES Ofl 8.5'HEIGHI,(2fi)4.5'CAL.OF 71'M[IfHT I J H[IGHT AAD FEOUIRItiG 1,!ORE TH;J 10 TP[ES.TH[1C,!.tUl.I OVERSiOHV TflFE SIZCS SH LL 6E'(JOA)2.5'C L(40h)3.S CAL.(301)45'CAL 5hoo Tllb LANDSCAPE SECiIOH 544.09.SI;BDIVISIOt!Eb(dUA4TIiIES-OKE TREE PER 2,500 SOUAftE 2.607 SF DEVELOPNBLE LA1:D AREA=85 TflEES B 212 SHNUdS. FEET OF DEVELOPABLE LRIlOSCNFI\G AfiEA 8 0tiE SHRU P[R 1 000 SOUAfl[ 158 iREES 8 398 SHRUBS PflOPOSED. y <PLANTING FEET OF DEVElOPABLE LAIlOSCAPI%G AflEA(IYHICH C7CLUDES THE PLA17TIt:GS PLAN FOR PARNI::G LOT$) l_ 200 FEET OF STREET FflOYTAGE-(5)TREES flEOUIflED AT PARKClG SECiIOf 544.03.5U UIVI510t 7a(PkN151E1ER PLAqiIt;GS t OVERSTONV OR LOT PENI`.7ETEft 8(17 SHRUBS PlAN1ED 7'O.C. COI:IFEROUS 7FEE PER 40 FEE7 OF SiREEi EDGE OF ALL PANKL`:G LOiS 8 25Y OF TIIF GROUND SfIOLLD 9F COVFRED BV SkIflUNS AtlD(R VFNFti1:lA1.5(1:OT TO RE ADDEO TO THE TOTNI AA7011WT FRO!.7 SECTI077544.03,SUBOINSIO d 6b) SneetNVmber J L200 0 15 30 60 120 p.:,..:..,,...,n.,.-...... I iBRUNIiTYPES 2BRl.:IiTVPE$ I i Z I Q X I _ I _ III I a o N = = o wJ o 0 a Q ZQ w m z m m m mm o 0 oZ o eveic iaa I CUNINGHAM G R O U P s'.s• a. zsz a' LEVELI 22 3 4 10 17 I I I I 19 r I LEVEL2 4 7 ' 7 6 2 I -_.. .__.. ..__...__-_. p nr,ns LEVEL3 5 7 5 i 7 1 yg a 5 . .. i G .1 I LEVE a 5 7 5 1 1 6 2 1 I t p9 EPROPOSED i HOUSING I I I y. i -- ----- -', LEVEtS 5 7 5 7 1 6 2 1 1 29 o i y___-o .:'ti nr.+ei so'-o' I I LEVEL6 5 7 5 1 6 2 7 1 pg M a I__. .... .__._— uT SLBANPE 35 ' 20 5 4 4 I 1 25 10 5 I TOTAL BY fi2 27 69 40 5 70 157 TOTAL UNITSI1NITTYPE I zz PERCENT I107.3i<11.9:5 45.% 26.5': 3 'A BB;SIIni.o. r }I Ii o f.. I OFTOTNL i.._.._L"__-- -J I BUILDING COVERAGE rea s nea ie c e a y i I i +mo ame e ei i a ea PROPOSED PROPOSED o ;,,_: ' I HOUSING RETAIL 1 ooi oici e eici aszoasF I i 101 L 11 A x L velt 8875 SF . i G0 ' '` 100 L 11 11 I L velt 22]]eSF i..'= .}" 1 f..-1 --._ — .—___ cEEo.e n,,:». i I 200 L 12 L 12 32698 SF 300 L 13 L 13 31898 SF 400 L 14 L 4 31899SF 1 o l U'.i'I rfSlUill- . 500 L IS L 5 37898 SF s 64TH STREETnfEmv 600 Level6 Level6 31059 SF Grantllo af.8 2403095F 6 j V Cons M T. „JN.i PROPOSED RETAIL Re-- oe:np___ . i. I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY OTHERS;SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY PLANNING20NING APPLICATION-PUD SUBMITTAL RICHFIELD LAKE ox,-, o w, cr: V v un.c.e^dee . SwOi..:i'oi . . . y BI IC-I:o It- IPro;=<ITiLe LYNDALE GARDENS IiLYNDALEbGARDENS i 1` I I J I II Architectural Site Plan I I SheetNUmber II! A001 i Site Plan I i=ra p:i,,.n.,.....H. ..., I l I w IIIZ i r----------- QwJ r- z------------ I J CUNINGHAM ' PYLON OR MONUMENT SIGN FOR G H O U P FOLLOWWG ADDRESSES: r=-- L_-- 6330 LYNDALE AVE S I I 6340-6348 LYNDALE AVE S h,w,<, i I 6400-6418 LYNDALE AVE S PROPOSED 6420 LYNDALE AVE S p:;s'sE' HOUSING I u n:= 6330 Lyndale Ave S i N" I i r-i r_I I Pa...,o,, A` i>i ti, j 3.,,,_, I 1 j PROPOSED i I 1PROPOSEDRETAIL I I ` HOUSWG 6340-6348 Lyndale Ave SI I ADDRESSESFORFOLLOWING c .u,r' ,:',; II7f 6340-6348 LYNDALE AVE S 64TH STREET 6400-6418 LYNDALE AVE S 6420 LYNDALE AVE S I c«.:.n,i WALL MOUNTED SIGN FOR FOLLOWING ADDRESSES'. S 6330 LYNDALE AVE S 6340-6348 LYNDALE AVE S PROPOSED RETAIL 6400-6418 LYNDALE AVE S 6400-641 S Lyndale Ave S 6420 LYNDALE AVE S r/ RevYbns VOatc FUTUREDEVELOPMENTBY OTHERS I6420LyndaleAveS I I PLANNING20NING APPLICATION•PUD I SUBMITTAL RICHFIELD LAKE I o«_.mr __ _ w.aFESS ox. reeFU;avu.xn P.CI0.'L CNCK. I Diz.i6l I..K ' c<-ri1.o/ It Pro,eclTM1'a --....-- I LYNDALE GARDENS i \ LYNDALE,,GARDENS . J Site Signage Plan I i Shre Number i. I 1,SIfeSignegePlan oo p:.........,,..a..,... iii a, a o . December 21 w e r sa:nce AN I*xI nGN^ k ry r. . \ L_ —6 r .. r E R .. h M k f 4 . . , j , i'- g i j _ '`. ; L f j <g e ! 3 F e ma:i s i i S f r r M 1. h.a] ` I I I e ..,... Av i i 1 t.,._ j i I ... _... d.l r E 1 Y— e March 20/September 22 E i o, r- , j , i i u o ur r I' i , ; r°i_ -_ S r f s I ' ; - _ _ _ _. ` i - "1 - ; i:, -_ -, 3 i 1'I- r , .... r rr r I . f _ 11 ' 1 -, 1 ry fi 77 : t r r i , -I s , ( u._. , r r R..=o,No. Dale June 21 s..,E,s,i i e y i I i ' I i APPLICATION NP D R - _ i _ ' r i I -I I SUBMITTAL y d , i n .i } r r_ - ; f r ! ' ( i j = . — s - _ _ 1 s i _ - i _ i I ; t i i i i I I ; g , ,_ , : ' ,- i 1 - ' -- I _ f ' -. . s Ii 1 i I f r ( I i a. FFO FE:s r r r f , 1, i— , I EE;.,, I k,,. e,. o. 4 i i . I d i, I `'`", t . "'". i y i P I 1 TIII i i I . t-.,_....._,..I I, I m_m_. ,I `61: LYNDALEGARDENS LYNDAI.F:,GARbENS SheelTltle SHADOW STUDY sr.ee a.reer A003 II I II) i 0 PARKING NOTES C U N I N G H A M , 1.PARKiMGSTALLD'!ENS:OHSARETYPICALLY9'-0"Xib'-0'UfiLESSNOTED G R O U P OTHERL'rISE. 2.CO`.!PACTPARKi GSTALLSARENOTEDVJITNA"C"01JTHEPLAN.CO\'PACT STALL,f."EN51045 ARE TVPICALLY 9'0"%i6'0'UI:LESS Y.OTED OiHER':iISE I 3.ALLGASl.!ETERS'."i LLBEFROTECTEDFRO dCARS'!lIiHCO tiCRETE BOLNRDS. I, s.n;..,;F•.; Isve ..v ws..c tiM'anur I 1 2 ...._ 5 6 21 20 19 7 8 9 C1T0 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 C1T8\ J1 10 3' t9'.o' 19'.0' 19'-0' 19.0' _.__..-19'-' 19'.0' 19'.' 19'.0-..___. -...-!-.__}a—.0'_ 19'.0' _...0''ti'.... . 29'.6'._. _ b.G' 28'6' 2fi'-6' 2a_E-_...-1 I 319'.A'I I I I I I I I_p IIIII I I -_.__' - - o .-.-. .. a I — -_.._..-_._ II . GASl..ETERS- AS!lETERS ... GASl.1ETERS L_ O i T ,. I I ct C C I C C C C C C EO C C z, J = ._ , , s T ,e E u A. z , 9 s . Y`1 sc trt rdrit>;ior,. l9 ,i, i I a_` _ S 872' 833' a87i I RN.!PUP qp PUP 1.10 I J._. _ . ai « s c 3 v v 3 e> a m y i : n ss :: v x ;a .,a < i I I t i o I;co s n,mldUA•... m r i . i i r iQ_ _ — - D I o- - --- -- I I I i I ,.I I I I I° E`"`°" I L„ E SJ l5 H Il li i] e3 1135 1. 6 t e ti iH5 Ila i.o I 51 ry l R v:sbns No. O t __ p 5iF_ 2-.C'__-_.l. F 9 s . c. .e .z » . i .. .. . . ii i i3 .i_ i I I I o O. .... .__ fl f y i 5=m .._.5.. I I l A I F P e1 e, B1 i pLANNINGIZONING APPLICATION•PUD SUBMITTAL J ry 51'1 f c 6 .a 6 L5 w , ce _i .i i ie i. z, n e 9 .J o i_ . P ti _ , t l I (__.v r'. .___.i r.._...,. .. , .... ..: ----'—---- 7— r_. __...—._..__ __ r cia c c.,,a. CK` ... . . .... GAISNETEftS I I I -- GASl.1ETER5 I I I GAS1."ETERS I ... ytl Ii U e z o' c, . Ed.+ c mia Pro,e<IT^.'a LYNDALE GARDENS LYNUALE;GARDENS ', Sh etT11^..... .. Level G1 Plan I I I Shx INumbxr n e e, m A100 r o,,...w_..... i i I I III ICUNINGHAM I G R O U P r_____—___—_.__—_ —, I I N I.K eGNcP 51 P'^51 9E S;c,,.,J Fa,E,B„t 1 wxx.unKH+T.c*. 1 1J 2 b 4 5 6 21 20 79 7 Ce 1 9 C0 I 11 I 72 13 14 75 16 17 18 1 i o n o --19'...n .ts:o' -:o s'.o' .o' ':..... ° l.s_ .. . ..\J \.... _ _ Qso _ a za-a ze a Ze s za-s a-s I i i 3, iizei3 _ I I C— .——l __ __---I--- 1 ——_ 1 _ 1 __ ——---I— I ---- r f f fi I I — i i I II_ ' , I , I B 1-- - a _s .eE } Y r ra Lvl t I u. i. us i.s in = I s .. t5 ts i t ! s3 isti . .. • I BLW:ERV.0 Io r . .. ._ o` .:.;HO ,1 .a xc :n .v:ne. n.:rd ro.any ,n .c...rvcne. rv.;nn•ec,r a,a c+•ev va tO ` i ci:.dnr I o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 i I ji; » M1oc ,,. o f ,F ry a,° zoo a ea.i t l I O e c I c ,n.m I J Y I IES, ie a v e 3 I o ' E m i G V R ns i I N ._._... .! IdI S1C0.-Gf iqs .ou,. i I m- Lr t1Y . o i i I ' i I ,Eo:_ io oa r rFO: asrw a.r Ea,,R a.. F.,.F a•r a-ry d« o o i o m I; I PLANNINGIZONING J j APPSUBMITTALPUD i z i - -i i 7 - r i 93_.1_ 11L IP'__.L73.L_14 15 16 17 18 ji o«..,nr.:, caocucss . on ___ ee.;u:nr tzau i v un.c. c vca. I o;s--n i.aen .____.. e,x c r___ _—iz_ Pro;eclTil!a I LYNDALE GARDENS I LYNDALE;LARbENS i lil J I s,«r, Level 1 Plan i s N. i A110 I e ei, j\ U„6_-0 i i I II 0 CUNINGHAM G R O U P l a>p umi.n.r.. aa.eN.xs., voi u.,,,s se xs;:'x N.x ia citvax,tisiznsun x . i I I I i iil I o..: _ie'--_ '-o. 1 iii CUNINGHAM G R O U P , amiK..ie.e<. I I v.N sE, i sw< 7 2 9 A 5 6 21 20 19 I ' fl 10 1 11 1P 13 74 15 F 1 17 18 0 3Q_ — ____f9_ .__ _19_.0____ 19 0 19_0` ~' 19'.0'_--19'-'-. 19 0 /-....1n'_o'._ i9'.o' ]6 s'..._. `- d-6 a ._. _..._..\).... .n 4 I 1 _.... I _. .I_. __L I I 262_6 i_-__ L_ __L. - __ I...I.. I L_-___ . I i y-- l..._ i i i i i _,. l,1_. _- .,. i i i i II I 6 'I.i Io ,r Jr 15. F i63.... II I L 1 .....- I__._..._..___ ERi-vV:. y Z fr- I qs II CF 1 I I I C;ii?i;t'.-IU:h i s 4LP11:1 £Ofll'0 a6'RileG4L:I` L+• I 111 13 5 IiL- - f]15 - 1335F m JI _ - P M1;CECOn.iRU`:r L . 5 la'.L1. ' fI, llt v I I I ._-__-_ V ._. _ _. 6:i5i I a. i F„«.3. cas na, i E l. ft«vons iy wn . iL'h'i 0 50. a. d o s o•, E,,E E I o- z' 0 oi iN s ,, R R 0 0 s as PLANNINGRONINGo o 0 0 0 APPLICATION-PUD SUBMITTAL z J_ - --'y i i i j---' I— 3 d ___— — 1 FEE::;" ' I i x_a, a_. 03 P,o;,iLS I LYNDALE GARDENS LYNDALE;iGARDENS , I j I slxxlitk I Level 3-5 Plan Sh.xIN:mGr e e 3.5 m A130 I i. V:5'-J' 00 o..........xvea:,.... I I iii P p i n o s - '. . i' EcACE cN SC:• E i W LW LL I---- ` -- - - -- - =-- W Ll I_JJ _ N oG H A M I ' I I I ' i i W W I LL'I JJ L. W LL J JJ W_r; M ,. III 1I i i 1 Q I f---- 2=iti-S YU'i tn7iTb-P V:2]IZ 27f D31f2Y1Zt ru i-rtf"4 b3bS 7b:Ibzbzrr,i U.t\i -.o--___ . 00 a D.o R.o b.o vu A.o_b.o b.o- - . ..._. A. . k. A• V e___y.._ _. o O.o 4 0 o a b.o -o U.-o 6.0 o b.o5:0 0:o L.o 6 b.a b. r i o i.i s n 1 - _ U.r aueai[ra irs, nxe n z e 2 i I s .. o o.a e i? o N i EE r , E FII IIjIFI ,.: ,.. k 4 _ _ .._c}. C C E E E C E I I[I r I 41 1 FI(l , _ I T. I ,:i" ( 9 7.'I 31-' .P r DD ti 15/I :E'I J N.J.0'TO I_.:1.5'J.1 I b.b OOWN °^•.^\ .-1 1 0 2 6..:I`I 7 b I.'t1.ft I o I. 1.1 G 9[. i b = 70 13{ ARKINL e> 1-;4 I f 1.1`1 1 t l.:.I.O i. 1 n- "I.(J •! CC e,. U',Yb .fi I.r .) FT O`BBi51.52.2'16 . ;1f 914I8 1. 1 B E 1 1.!i: o.a.:oo... :a„n.:e.:e w.. .:c m.i c i.e i} r 1 — l.i M ..Vr o.s p i[i U.'0 7513 J Jy. Zl.,3 l I J ro I!2 2'1 f 1 0 ).5 I I-1 J?C 1.. 3 I. 1 1:1 I I 1 I 1 I.0"1 1 t I.1'I.I'1.1 7 I _ 61. L'I .l I 15`_2 b - c, -- e, -_e.:, ea,- z4-.--n*oAab obsb-0fi oL ab.o b.o b o Q.o b o I.5 1.fi i.i 1,4.5 - 1 J".,J 9 G 1.1 i-. w. - Q,l49. tl'°_ 7V .,:,,, n ir.o.oz ui. irit,. i _, b. U d 7 [ 'l.' I 7 1 5 f . I C l ! I :( .....' 1.0'1'1.9`I J'M1 t +6'i-.7,7 d,.4-f- . l l.. 1 a I b b L..,1 Y rl . 1 .'i r r -r re-i.9 a Y D -' , 4 e— a _ Il aor'A i '4.a'is o ,n'o o G_ 3 r -'i'. .. , 7, q i'fi lTT3 I 5 G T J' i I./ I 6 Y.G r.. b.o 7 a z a i^ f U.o b.o _n._i 5_v 1 r t s ti t.i3.r,.:.z.-.° c E. r 7 i c u i i:; i i.i i.h.¢ t. 1 s u.; hu7 a o bA — . T (=7 rr t Y7 -CC I. I 2 1 . . I.0 I 9'I. {i. ii I.f rc ._: I. U7= B6'- O BB l.t r P p r - O r -i_( I t S 7 'I . 'I.. I U`1_I 1. \\\ O6 U.I•r ff,e4j . L . 1.Q2.125201 1 ts . 2.3311 `r ppp Y,i. -- IJ il 11. ! f. U. LY« CC U. _1,'.5'L.0`l._1A i Ai.l.:1'"1.4-K."{ < ,/ 7. OD i 1' I I fF "(I.. Q rr i 9;i. it n a i.s1.s-2-i i} e uu. ,, , L 7.5 1rF Fr Tf Fr r I r rc iUI7LD f )'i- 19.e6:i .:__ t. i.4u y_, ...; i I -c I^ c + I \/t i ac_i.:_U. __ 3t.t !. J "-' U` l7 I J l,r l, W 1., uu iao O 7 v i.o., ub. r e2. e..,.. b i a i H.e°r 3.i i, A, a. i i A'. DD U. ; _ C D D 11: D [.. Il .rc n ., . e r o. ^,. , i ,y' t= i.'-e.o is i. i`9.• _ . cc r.i cw:miam D r\I.1\!1 I 5 .fi:' CC 0 7 7J...` U D c. 0 iLJJl\ G/ 11.6 1 Mi CD c. u'. V.. 0 Q t . b. A U. c 0 f \ O. O p 0 ue 9. \A\ o b. 6 0 ss. , ,.. o b. 0 0 , ..<<.,., ee i i 0. No. o e oe:<ano 11.' DO U \„'. o` ,),) r•\D \ .UO ( b` b o l 4 0 o i, o , o 0 C/ PRELIMINARY qo ( NOT FOR r bo (l CONSTRUCTION uu o / o / U: b,o ) i b. a b o U o V u, aai. OC 0 u n w. UO Pro:eclTAlc c V v.,Y e o LYNDALE GARDENS a o u. u. on y.. seeai nna ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS PLAN ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRI CAL 3IILATIONS PLAN Sh`e N mbe` EOOOa xa f` v- 1y e "' Y$ Y .` ... .. y..} 5. C q. l ''N .{ 0d_4. 1l t-; "..,-.' r' , y Q( fi.. ,,* i-' i._' ' L T. 0.` l. 5::t [ t Yp r. n A: R'.Y i St f x`. a 'T. Rz :::L<i,. Z., w i`tr i, Fn t A,.' x; i s isY. s 14 1f 1 r i.-', ..:..,. . .:__,A.. 4. e3,i, 5, q r r 2 j '> i: ti,a_ ,ia' ,j y }4 r. ar, i. y . py . esa p, v s 2W ' i: T,. f Tf;. , s 1. ,t • 4.- b' s,,e t _:, d.f r I a-.S s h:_'7'' -d 4t i-s iz.' i f 1 dEftxa r 4kr -rti a• M1:. i`t,. l s^i F, V Cr + t _,; y f ElS t 7 r;4,. s:a j r y 7 6 s- . v.i t E tiMk:rtf, i m fi5. a'• o:4 yeih s • j i. ti r P s dm' i W fi 1 t151+ .w . Ejf'ta s i 4 t t f s r z _ xtOtLA! C r' m'= ti t i'. , t t S, • . cv '.j y. h r r - r-: y, ,f n z 4 t e fr -a;i 4` h.;;r s e,', i" a I IY; e; y p l tF# c a"w F i:: s` r r'ic'. ? ti . t' 3 . i i'. ti a31. -„ y' _ J f zt 4.-'_'' ^' r . Y-y,l.. _ aF- :..?` `tt+- T' r.. p c. ,., , :,,, e 3. .., '[ .. ei l,' f i!(k E t; t t- . 3 i}''!,.Y . f, CT y, 4 " j . f S[ :Z-' .',c `:} y'` -; Er.9 t- F 3,'i,_ f_`_ E.c ..._ ,;i,:;. ., i` i t--• tt Fy_ ,'. . S b F-.....x t 1T'. s ' I i Tu+.{ y Q.fi y •. n-' IY _ d .. 47k4 T3 ki1`t Y - r li i.._ _ _. f` #r Z . Fy p`_'E` r f E. g t t c# . os' a aw-».lf s 7 e?r 4 .,_ #,_}. y • . _ a + F. :7 4 3 7t .,: RI $ 1s j9 p.x a, , i .i.: } t; '- 1:si a . e f-•+ a"` .• ` j 6 # y . . *` F a'piF Y - d . , q, . i[ a` . Y< • n 1 - 1.. I{ y a y F - YaA r.. - i'. L . t L-I p - jgY 151tr' y` a ., •, '.^ F ,. y.? v 5 ' F,- t- T' . . . y ry-.++@c. 'x-, c. .. y c . e - r y1, e. 3 'i s4";"7.'{. r t, . q,. Sy,`,_ .> e. '..'. a F 's x;y ll,' 'Y' +# . xr y s r 4 i} t" ' ,,yti in : g ` i ,• 3 . AC." k. 3 .k' Y',.-.xF J .. . 1y.r' x,, a Y 1L+i . r 'Sr B, i R; -w.{ s `\ r' .a..r-v_r,^ fa.. t,+ " '',. F `-, .1`. x i i a. _ i i- . . . , .,z r." 7-: 1 s i, A as y -_ i`-.._ 1\• `a i"`. i",:: Ig^M i3- 9 .. Sb'* `' ; T t? - . . . .. i i ti _ ^ t i. J f i 't?; y. , $ :F - y x - n."`- .z` a - r t as. C•S' F i ^':'4 n _ t. ... .. , . yA k;ei7 . j` -:a. . s 1, 4 ai` - .e '.* ' _ F .: t- z. . r. yi, 2 f S , 1 6 `'' . - J 'r y r 5 f tµ I N 1 s 3,"4°F. ar s L. y• a1"- 4"v i ... Yf "-'. f . 4 ._at_. Y, t' SZP, i,ti:, s i y - 7. a It:' E'.. . ,. \ i-,. w t; i . . . . . . . p ,e J' ti G.' . C 1t k „- : f_. 1F.i i i x e x,.. t f'-'`.r , d ,_'.... x t sr -., `3'r t.:' ;. Jl' y:- vt' .. ' < A` l' 4Y'' r. s j 3,=-r A; . .. :._ ,, E _,. x:.,, R c r 1, rk >.- F' y`° - - , y.'t' t I3 ` M If rs.. L R Y Y- C-y h' . M , Y f . . l si, G . -^: t r .. t ,. 1 z " F`Y r F? . i "`.-_--' ytx s r e' t 4 a: u ..: l ^ ti. f j i r , l..x .ft^_,.h `t:. __ ia.T1; h 2 c, a+i":.:_ 4i:;:y 6•y. xrrf. s=:it`.; _ q: t.k. r '•e bd? i F x ys r f-. ' 4.. 1 ?:?1-F, f}.•c a'-t. a:i' r r ,a. v :r t. : ; s a ; e ;,yr.. •x e.a:.;,. 1 3, `+.'< t.. yph' S ti. 'Yr :s;:, .EP6- a .h yt*q'y`si ' " r. 3 1. r., E Y i.. F:' j,<,5 _ <€ t s:;. C-`:.y' I Jir, 4 f, s- 4..,.,. t t. - ,'z t a 1`. - t ' Z`.` . r a aH i,-s=;:' Ri" R 7"'r,- 4 1 A i e ' . . v fL'. 7 R5n 1..r .. .: . . , .l.. fi° ., ' t ` '. C e.,-<' t: ', t < t _ _ !. da..-{',.,r3i,. E. . . h , y, -'! ;. 'f. .+J:7 f.- i i iE t `^: n '" . . y*'f .-'R r'_ r' h : i a t" d. 9 a k p : s`... ., < ".' ," x.` . t; s f k... yW••*.w a_ 5 2. t. Y. a 1`` 4, y:. .. y t. . i l .( j1 ...t,;. L r i%" c.F yb ., . .ti- _ Y t.2. a -v . a- .:.. -- . .Y^,. .Y.i , .. .-fh° .: ' . ..'.S t Qe . i r .:.._ y S 4 4'h' @"}'... + 4'.T ? 4. t -3. i ,. t". t r t k. i ti. _ j.: .F ' '3 ' ' t^i f Yx,:t", y ti. y f 3'. .t y, r u S x... y }_.-et. l N': n` f- t - C C_.k k ;. ' r- R,° ' y, i3; g f- 1`f '':- :} ti i c 5_ .... . a - . ' • a P f ` s..s x, _ a. i y M^ F - s '_ ' '",,' '} l'.:•.. s' ' ' ` f s' ° v b' t 3 9y x " a ar` t$ r yr., z3. a q...4 tt a:-xvyjqp,,, t. a: - i .:- '"s t. v q.4, .• r y : .... .F . . . . `w:4ti4 iG°['r ` y - s.;: z. 1'' E. S' p .k rir . o g, J 0 3* : .: y.. Y x i:.." 'k't . f y c.. r t 7 i k :{.f iY i' yj t I X 54 . _ . ... , Y .. f: y'` i v.s ..1 3 r Y.;'+. N[{ij F-. _ t,. i b.-..\ d , i" x si. f I t q R ' 4_ T ^, '# ,,., !. w? e t 3 ".:,IDB.: _ r T ' j i a;. . _ : >. - •till _ .._._ _ . .'} j ,k'. _ Q`ciale Gar deris uNinr i AM , rvnaLF;e,R fNsCiROUP r e i<; c,,E o` .k 7 r--- FE,, L ..:- __ _ i r- ; it: . . , t E__. f i'fdentiai parkiny T,, fibii i yarayebelow l.O1pS'C ICiTI S i ; L1_.,1=1_ ' c , ' ' .1is e l a l `- -' -~' irn Around 34 residential Open air t _ L op off t»rking spa<es . markat ' , c.- Gar ii, , t, rr°`-. . . __ Es z9 . - , 9 inf a ,I I E 4a' t k., o o i: R*M' mniurntY \GL. .r "'" { "'" Terrace \`;' 4 i 74i r muhii,N 1 '' 1. rn,nr,u iiry r,csicl,nti+!rth fn „unn , ti I 41 ,+,i '' i 1 t"1" f'I,„ i3iiil;iin,;ti r e' h - x. ;. s. t ti r;,;, pM'} ut,„ g 7y,h rp/ . . . . , li:. C , s; t C\` 1 i 1 s ,,; w. tagej l.- i u:o,y.ii.j Y' . ` tnr 1, ri, ,., i' ,:•. 4fJ 1 1,UU:1 f ,a' . o;,, , If i . LP.Ki nO k Y/ a i t!' y 7ti 7 It}1... i . . . r. .-` "- p n . A,E_' E$ A 2: 4 i r r,. . f,'°- a' gpQ9S f`" - . / Y. Bndli' match Fjcist-- : Trail .; 1 Conn ction i/l N ; yr dal C ar d hs v i n s N i t, i;{yj; G R O U P 7':v'€'`' rs,. k r. e S- yk•. k':,ac ' ,y6 " i Y_ d l r+ 9 t e 4 r u . ` h s S k ` t k Y S . . g ' i z - d ' 3' . " S._ Y-`+ ! _R eJ .1 ,', z 4 .;..: a t. ' r yl J2 Y q. 4'}z- t c i_ 7'`3-_- rrr'4.a},+o •. . k_. . 4 '$ 4-.. 3` . y . / ' C d7,: 1 _ i i . , i j rv.... t ea...r' _ai i. r : s j,; '` . r,[ . s4 s c+arm, f V. ' .. f f• i F g. ' , i j:, i 4.ri.- t' i i w ' tt,; y.: -._ - i;r. s, i r... t v n d o- ... ` i- T` ^•. L 1aP_ !r d z t r I t 7.'!R'!F t Y ' P'" p I y j,ar' k+ ` r" y t , * Jt , f. i S•=y-" a , 6' -y}If Y y' a.. .Y, ) f.... .2Y'. ^1{ u •' ja( 1 S t . P a# s' y F . 34 f IC. a+ j1 i"L. ` 1 ". e t T . i'xg - er, b,(f$ . _y, 1 <. x " ^ s ,. a, .Y s } i.. : ?' \ P , s< s .'` "' t-.1.{ t'f. iir t j i - y. ` x r, v,t.. i - f isr /". y;i s t',s k- t r ! a y .;,y R' ryi * " ' p•p3 :; ' 7 ,,," +; d 1 f i. S'. xic_,. aF xA'y•4 s' y+y i• y 5.: ai M,+r, 7 T'f y 4 Y'I r J' _ t 4 r -r3:.,. '. g.. f'ti ' j I E.:.' _! '.t-x t r aMt. Y , t0.' c J> F 1 µ3'! 5" y ` .. r} T y : F s r r" F3' F . k jj' .r.4.L:`'- . U• x f t ' S k 1 ';y v { u, , f',¢ a i.. . I `+' H K s¢ , . + p, r f' F ` q. i< + a i'. A d' c 3 F2.> . q T . i_ . 5" t t t'° _ A w. a r 'Y .' l. tF $...4 0 I t' ': k I. g_ y y D ,_.9 N L 2 i sF' . . y K,, g' t y i, @A 3. 4 p , r .` M., u l'1.. N Y'[ k.#3. 3.fY.. J . jt'. 4 e_ `!'e'i :± . s: x. y x`. 63 ! d z'. . . S xx L.yr d le (ar cl ns c.u vi v Han r, R o u `NDALE; r y -,`. 5".'...kar,'`.<`?K;-s - : 'v' '' + .r` r,,Ct.<. , . .. . r2,,, ' 4 6 y 6.¢f. 1 s, ' K'`<'— r LYt 7DAi;GARt?Et S : f e+:! Ni r..:' k 1 a.n...... :.:. ..,« C k': r' Y, y h'; t f 1 P3 ' r w -: t `,' .<, '„ t r tEA1? j t++aY_) 1!'.'.}!, p_ ' - - - . ` _- ; 3. ., R E .,,. 1'. t ' 3:S I R x.._ _ .c - f..+ 1 p C j r;- rs 3 y= :}. r i t sr i d s it 1:f 1 7 14 '• J!'7 t- -S+ '3 k . a ts ? T'. c t? r' Y I. i"4, ( 4' pF. . v.a i , -f 1 a ,' ,a } i i:. i# 3 . f I! .. . 1a,{' F 4 i' e yv.. . t i . gft .._: s • : .i. f 1 1. s t j.:-ds i 4 4:-. - s F - t: 1 k i T... 4 a:.a°e'. g: a' ti::-b g .,..: , t,: y i 3 i !r. " " A. __. ..._ '"'^ - w rs x -z:.i }•'`!1b`.._ .,_'''`: i - a :'.t z L. i .3 y 2 a - . .. i,` .'' .r•.,.. . I, - .; 3 i:, s i t 3 d . " . v r.... T., _ u. f ,. . L ..;.. t.r- S ." . Y i x.. t 7 '.,5 I .. . . t . t? { S . F .L.. T 14. €..¢ /' r _ _., t` 1*j ... {4 .. r-' s,k ' , .:, T r, -i+ , 4 d I z t a.y''s'*wialy l___ _ ._ y * 4 at,e'a y."`a' g, 4T iy--.. yi'Ff#..R1}y 43'@ dv.r. fl-.--at.— di.__.lY_-- 0 ri`j i w'}E.`' i;'''` E y . iR" 4` i ' K . j+r'. 3 tA.. j i - F- yti . Q.t . S'_ C. Y . 5 t 1;x, n ' { 4 r . h T'C. l yndale Garden u rv i N t nr C'N"(l Fiti.11, i, Ii, i ii , s.,°..: i CiARUENS °` "` w G R n U P r . . ,. h: :. j -Y: t c„.._ j, '4 r. s Y x J 4 _ «. . + l } l ft u f:x^ a.^-.'C?."' . _ ._. G : ; t:: k_ : r f T A. ss-» i 33 f k t'.a> s i t g.i i k i'F-`+ cat S fh s i i ': x- " i s. - a'T,; i ' $ . ( i Fi k .-. i l i. ' . k. .... . R.R.. j M't:a e ..1 2 . '.4 k 1'`,}j 1 y .;f #.. l`.&' -'.y' -(r ... ... -:. . r ,. .. t. y.._ j t ' . C._ 1'.I (V a k 5 {_ 4rw'T ! t. 4 ; - t. 4 i nN e.'.-:-`- P' - .e' 1; 4..:- t. -: J . . . - e lll: : aR?7 fr 11 i - t s,.-, a. igE 5 7 i 4 x t t n 1 * p q c . ... I_ ...- i au r ..x_ i':''r:i,t:. e I it g ,f • R. >Xc al4 .. i: F F.; t z 3, i;- fi_ I E M1. ..{ ti::i / : v- S' f:: ip S ff4 . $';:`-" , . i'ti r c'r i+.a J s;. 1 r t. s . S. p, p', ` +ii fl K, y• 4, 1 . r 4 .$ . i 1.rY t Y,.,r.. r'. .- fi s,v- Fa'" 1^.A s iCi'- r : rt `t,er e. jt,. . . 't" x . a. r J:. , l_ 4. y." - <'- r r k. A. t .a' ,y `$``b_ r._ gr-' b,e k:'. - 4 ' 7'T'v to-: - E i-' R,. . -' '.k f g`' t r f i i. sf.+ a•. r' az. y isb?t ; c 3x v Vaw naP,: cy Cr° e,' t.f S` x.. si#.:" ..< •, ,,_ . , , . „ 4 .er ...,fll S`;,a K t ` _ w iz.'-. ..s . ,, x+ _. ..y: ' t'.` ;;;.. i:, ... r ...,° a[:. . _. 2. y s rs ? . > ... 4 .. _...s t _ . : ,k,. ..,,'. y...a.a,,. , q< 9 a p r x. a-c .- f :K. s .3" ' s, r F.. dQ ia: -f,f f i'a. e - - r.. . .. '• ..,"+ .....# -.:, :. "W: ° s«` e . ' aAk-., t y a C 1 4 l d ih E:' 4'n., t ' :``r e. f fi%` 1' . 'F . y d 4 ti. 'e a s` '+',.f r a b._ t. y 'I: t ...f,' ti. a v. , t i r. N R. 3.t .A b i . v. . ... . A:.:, : .'. ... .M; f9" y a V 1.' aC*'.. r: .: ' 1. .^ . .:,:, r ffi ,... p. : q q: i y. r w zi ... i r. ,. P .. :,. :.', V ' • °+bE #` 5 ` l ti.' fi r i Ys,- VW H.. h .. rP.. si ' '-' ... i $. "F," ' il,.. T i8-<' 3 i.rv'f' :4 ,s.. i ,. a L;a z. Z .. ,. s - F = r .:. r _, - ; : F''Sf' x» f. :3. r . ,<. .. ,` „_x;. • s + , 6'_+ > .., . e. r .,,Y. r " ..'I..- .,,,. t'A.a . r.-.., .. , d::.d _... t 7 •t s z ' 'F:Y ., F.',,qM .._ a. 1z. 4y`fi Z.. _{-' ..3':. . lAg" a ' 3e, i ° ._ x'2R. t L n F c t i E j F 5, f. 1t1" - `$- -..=. : t .' l. k'- ''y I .I a` @. i mx "•7' .ti• .; i r°S' tt4 I 1 i.. j x I x` t. s 1 ,:fi 4 if. . 4 j e y 2 +.. -''' '=1 e F..: i t_ 1iMYi i. i, t' i_R R_y.'- ;'$_ . . . _ t e .. . c. 3A . . il 4:i•.l I . , s:s : Lyridal (ard ns Y: , cun+iNGFi,n i , ,: ; ; i, r,rar, , .. f. .a:•. i..1. r.i-r.: c n n u r Z ,. s" n' a `•t , g E - x sa i` . d•w : x x1 . . y.- r 3 " y" k s a' R , ; s g'$ " r .` y * F F tgx Sa.,. y`"",''` r '.. 'F' d SL ' t k! L V{;' 4 H Z9:''+W 5," v +B J a{, p L'i,i q.)' { xe.Y` .1 SF.v }. G' f F- `{,`,, Z. • @y_ 4 I! I i l '7 $ 1 F,E t t, TC... 1.;4.[ y 9`. 1.. + 4:. v`.''. '+C fw:'. ;ti, i t r.. Yf y, F 1R i.i. y, S'.. . . . Y'':: .;,,I1- .A....,t r f qe t t r '`.r.: f ..., .t.r -. sr r.. -. a ..if„t "4>R' '' r, a,?r', a 1 f G ' a.. . a' t l f y 96,1 y4. j l) i. jy f f- :i t k ' f r, , c 4 1 T r T' y ', w s tF ,f t . 4 1 F""t is. i 1 s y- f = { s , . l:,s rt q F Li a. i 3 jj e P i S : S r I ! ' c a . 1 P j R' e E j '..'..'-.:R` p4 f s<{`_' g- a Y pr , ' I- ' f : N 4 .._.'.. a `••. rt I Xr 3 I . 3 f F i 1. Y ., T. 1"'s 3 h :4; 4 _ 3 . . ' I .-_ C 7`R'TM' .. F t s -` F f. r, ti' s . < s• 'r- i 3` T n i p,; i 4` 5 I" . f X . t F .t[(. K i--ffi . . . ' .T'-: r;-. G .14;1 i:. 3;, 3: [' r i E y{ i.. t r., t t_ Y y,` fi .' c9t... e M.1 5., . e 1 e. Y' ' f rt F r _ ..::,.; f5 y t i i:<; Y--. . , f V: .:.':. s. ..-'.......t' 4j C{ 4:.}' 6 ' j . 6 p ' j d ':, S._3y _4E' a. ;', t ;., y,a ' Y Y s-;-s , r t s a-:.,• _, z. - r ail! ws„ i` s d.. _ 4:.. sr. .. 5,:: ry u.. T :. ' i _ k d' t .t m T i . t;: r t Y AY;Y L. +k}- 43 l 1}R r; _=a r t. j ,, t s t t i 4, m ._ q,) 't'c +r ,. i - u,: tq .dl`1 -.--. .i. . t '' '7 a ,.`.>. ; rr'' .i` a.; `'. L %,:2 ,"f,""' k.a T l ; 2` t,..- f y b 3jp 4,y.c' '`-g..F w iN.? rt` j: t 1°11 1 '"_'Za`' t YF e.s 4 t R. 1'i .: V.. n+Z d'. c X_i i ' t:'. 1 j t4A' .'6r ._ . . V".' r .... `1t,. ,...Z,,jE l* I 1 ,1{ f 1. f I S n . 2 i Lynd le Gard ns UNINGHA111t: ; ; i , rdi ,,, c, o i Parking Suppiy/Demand Analysis Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Richfield, Minnesota Prepared for: The Cornerstone Group loomington, MN Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota OKimley-Horn and Associates,lnc. January 2013 160702000 i ` Kir iey-Harri and Associates, Inc. Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment 4 Parking SupplylDemand AnalysisiandAssociates, I1C. Richfieid,Minnesota deficiency on site. Figures 1a, 1b,2a,and 2b on the following page illustrate this concept and show the specific time-of day distributions for the preferred uses on the Lyndale Gardens site. Figure 1a Site Time of Day Trends -Weekday I 120% i 100% s,i•.J.. . . . ;:: .. i gp/ Townhome Apartment 60% Officei Retail 40% Food Co-op g "' "' ;"~ Amphltheater 20% Restatn ant i; j E E E E E E E E E E E E E pE., E E ro m rt o ro n. . Q. a n. n. 0. 0. OD O NjDhODO O — N — N M d' 1 O I i '2 Figure 1a shows that during the week,the residential uses have higher demands in the mornings and evenings and less demand in the afternoon. The office,food co-op, restaurant,and retail land uses all experience a similar demand pattern with higher demands in the afternoon.The restaurant and retail uses, as well as the amphitheater, have demands that continue into the later part of the evening.This indicates that office, retail, restaurant,and the food co-op uses are able to take advantage of reduced residential demand during daytime hours. Conversely, increased residential demand periods in the evening are acceptable given the reduced demand experienced by the office, retail, restaurant, and the food co-op uses.Additionally, since demand for the office and food co-op uses decreases earlier in the evening, the amphitheater use can take advantage of the space made available as demand for office and food co-op space diminishes.These relationships serve to confirm that a shared parking approach to parking demand mitigation on site will be acceptable. January 2013 4 Parking SupplylDemand Analysis Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Richfield, Minnesota Prepared for: The Cornerstone Group Bloomington, MN Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota I heceby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision,and that I am a duly Licensed Professib ial Eugineer uuder the laws of the State of lyfit pespta. t 11 By -- i ',,; Brian R:3malkoski,P.E.,AICP,PTP,PTOE P.E.License No.47531 Date: Januarv 11,2013 r Kimfey-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment and Associates, I1C. Parking SupplylDemand Analysis Richfieid,Minnesota Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has prepared the following parking analyses for The Cornerstone Group at the proposed Lyndale Gardens redevelopment site in Richfield, Minnesota.This report documents the methodology and findings of the parking supply and demand analysis and provides recommendations to better utilize temporal parking surpluses and/or deficiencies. This document provides an overview of the proposed redevelopment land uses and parking supply,a brief review of inethodology and assumptions,and a discussion of results in the subsequent sections. Project Overview This analysis evaluates parking demand and supply based on the type and scale of the proposed land uses on the site, as well as the inventory and allocation of on-site parking,Table 1 below provides the on-site land uses and Table 2 documents the on-site parking considered in this analysis. Table 1—Proposed Development Land Uses Land Use Category Units Townhome (Units) 10 d.u. Apartment(Units) 141 d.u. Office(SF) 1,500 s.f. Retail (SF) 7,400 s.f. Food Co-op(SF) 20,000 s.f. Amphitheatre(seats) 200 seats Restaurant(SF) 2,600 s.f. Farmer's Market(SF) 8,400 s.f. Table 2—Proposed Parking Supply Site Location Number of Spaces Underground Parking 150 spaces Parking Behind Townhomes 20 spaces Visitor 34 spaces Retail 98 spaces Co-op 119 spaces On-Street 12 spaces Total 433spaces January 2013 Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Parking Supply/Demand Analysis and Associates, t1C. Richfield,Minnesota Methodology This section provides the methodology for analyzing parking for the Lyndale Gardens site.The evaluation of parking supply and demand for the site used parking generation rates from the City of Richfield Code of Ordinances(Section 544: General Building and Performance Standards), Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),and Urban Land Institute(ULI).Table 3 below provides a comparison of parking generation rates recommended by each source.These parking generation rates were used to establish a peak parking demand for each land use. It should be noted that demand for the Farmer's Market use will only occur during the summer on Wednesday evenings. It is included in Table 3, but is discussed separately in the Results section of this report. Additionally,the demand for the Amphitheater use will occur on a non-routine basis, as events are scheduled.This analysis considered site parking demands with and without the demands for an event at the amphitheater. Tabte 3-Parking Generation Rates ULI Parking Generation Rates ITE Parking Land Uses City Parking Generation Weekday Weekend Requirements Rates Resident/ Resident/ Employee Visitor Employee Visitor Townhome 1 1.52 1.7 0.15 1.7 0.15 Apartment 2 1.94 1.5 0.15 1.5 0.15 Office* 3.64 3.45 3.5 0,3 0.35 0.03 Retail** 5 5.05 0.7 2.9 0.8 3.2 Food Co-op^ 1.25 2.83 2.83 2.83 Theatre 0.4 0.32 0.7 0,3 0.07 0.33 Restaurant^^ 10 17.4 1.5 9 2.25 12.75 Farmer's Market 1.25 2.83 2.83 2.83 For the City Parking Requirements, Office<SO,OOOSF was used. The rate is 1 space per 2755F. For ULI rates, Office 25,OOOSF was used. For ULl rates, Retail<400,OODSF was used For the City Parking Requirements, Other Business was used for the Food Co-op at 1 space per SOOSF. For both the ITE and ULI rates, the ITE Grocery use was used. For the City Parking Requirements, Restaurant Class l and ll was used. Note:The Farmer's Market will only occur in the summer on Wednesday evenings. January 2013 2 Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Parking SupplylDemand Analysis and Associates, inc. R nfie a,Minnesota The parking rates listed in the table above were applied to the various land uses on the site to determine single use parking demand,which is a measure of how much parking each individual land use would need if it were a standalone development. Table 4 and Table 5 demonstrate the parking demand for each of the individual uses. Table 4—Parking Demand for Individual Land Uses(Weekday) Site Land Uses Total Demand Townhome 19 spaces Apartment 233 spaces Office 6 spaces Retail 25 spaces Food Co-op 53 spaces Amphitheatre 69 spaces Restaurant 26 spaces Farmer's Market 22 spaces Site Total 453 spaces Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates Table 5—Parking Demand for Individual Land Uses(Weekend) Site Land Uses Total Demand Townhome 19 spaces Apartment 233 spaces Office 1 spaces Retail 28 spaces Food Co-op 53 spaces Amphitheatre 74 spaces Restaurant 36 spaces Farmer's Market 0 spaces Site Total 444 spaces Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates Due to the mixed use nature of the site,the analysis evaluated parking demand reductions based on several factors, including time-of-day variation, multimodal trip percentages,and internal capture of trip demands on the site. First,the peak parking demands were reduced based upon the principles of shared parking for weekdays and weekends,as described in the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Manual.The theory of shared parking indicates that several uses can share the same pool of parking,largely based on fluctuations in time of day demand between the uses.As an example,a restaurant's peak demands might be in the evening. When coupled with an office complex,whose peak demands are mid-day,the two uses can share a smaller pool of parking,without fear that their peak demands will overlap and cause a parking January 2013 Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Parking SupplylDemand Analysis and Associates, I1C. Richfield,Minnesota Figure 1b Site Time of Day Trends -Weekend 120% 100% x_,.. 80% i Townhome i ; Apartment I 60% Officet 1 Retail 40% Food Co-op I Amphitheater 20% j.,. :>_.._-:``' Restaurant 0% , E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Evm s m w a. a n. a n. n. a a n. a n. rojO1 00 O O — N — N M d' .O 1 00 O O — N I "2 Similar to the patterns experienced during the week, Figure 1b shows that the office, retaif, restaurant,and food co-op uses can take advantage of reduced residential demand during the daytime hours. One notable difference between the weekday and weekend demands is that on the weekends the amphitheater use has the potential to experience a high mid-afternoon demand (matinee performance)as well as a high evening demand (evening performance). Based upon event type,this may not occur very frequently. However,this afternoon demand occurs when residential demand is lower, providing potential space for parking during an event at the amphitheater. In addition to time-of-day reductions for shared parking,demand reductions were applied to account for the internal capture of parking demand on the site. Internal capture assumes that a certain portion of the users will trip chain while visiting the site, visiting two or more land uses without leaving the single parking space they have occupied at the beginning of their trip. For example, a resident is likely to use the retail or restaurant uses without moving their vehicle from their typical parking space near their residence. Or,an office user may walk to lunch, leaving their vehicle parked near their place of employment.Table 6 shows the internal capture percentages used as part of this analysis.These percentages were derived from typical ITE internal capture for these land uses, and were applied to those uses with the highest likelihood of being a second trip in a typical trip chaining experience. January 2013 5 I!j . Ki nley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Y alld ASSOCI"r3tE',S; C1C. Parking SuppR c hfieldnM nnesota Table 6—Internal Capture Reductions Time of Townhome Apartment Office Retail Food Amphi- Restaurant Farmer's Day Co-op theater Maricet 6am 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 7am 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 8am 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 9am 0°/a 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10am 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 11am 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 12pm 0% a% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 1pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 2pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 3pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 4pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% Spm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 6pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 7pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 8pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 9pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 11pm 0% 0% 0% 10% 10% 0% 10% 0% 12am 0%u 0% 0% 10% 10% 0°/u 10% 0% The values in this table represent the percentage of trips at any given time that are generated from within the site. For example,the retail internal capture reduction suggests that 10 percent of all retail, restaurant, and food co-op related trips are associated with internally generated users(residents or employeesj at any given hour throughout the day. Finally, a multimodal trip reduction for transit trips was also applied, largely based on the proximity to transit stops adjacent to the site. Based on 2011 U.S. Census data for the City of Richfield,8%of the working population commutes via transit. Therefore, an 8%reduction was applied to incorporate trips that would be made to the site by transit. This reduction was applied to all demands except residential uses,which were assumed to need full auto parking capacity.This theory assumes that while residents may be inclined to take transit for a portion of their trips,there will still be a need for auto storage because residents will not make 100%of trips from non-vehicular means, requiring auto ownership on site. January 2013 g Kimley-Horn Lyndate Gardens Redevelopment Parking Supply/Demand AnalysisandAssociates, It1C. Richfield,Minnesota Analysis Results Based on the input factors and assumptions described in the previous section,the shared parking analysis was developed for the Lyndale Gardens site,for weekday and weekend conditions, with and without an event. For the purposes of this document, variations to the events wi l be described separately to help define the magnitude of event demands on the site.The next few tables describe demand patterns for various land use groupings based on their location on the site.The site consists of two buildings, one in the north that has residential and office uses, and one in the south that has the retail, restaurant, and food co-op uses. As a result,the site was divided into these north and south areas.Table 7 and Table 8 below provide the general land use demand conditions for weekday and weekend conditions, respectively.The results in each table are based on ULI parking generation rates, which were preferred based on their reliance on shared parking methodology and reduced parking rates to account for heavier mixture of uses on a site. Rates using ITE and the City code were also evaluated and are included in the Appendix. Table 7—Weelcday Pealc Demand Results(No Events) Land Use Grouping Total Demand Peak Hour North Area: 253 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 95 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Site Total 319 spaces 7pm Note: Va/ues in this table are based on ULI rates Table 8—Weekend Peak Demand Results(No Events) Land Use Grouping Total Demand Peak Hour North Area: 6am, 10pm, 252 spaces Townhome/Apartment/Office 11pm, and 12am South Area: 103 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Site Total 337 spaces 7pm Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates January 2013 I Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment and Associates, t1C. Parking SupplylDemand Analysis Richfield,Minnesota The previous tables and chart provide a review of the land use specific parking demands generated on the site.Table 7 shows that during normal weekday conditions,the land uses on site have varying peak conditions, with the northern land uses peaking early in the morning and later in the evening, due to the nature of the uses and the heavy prevalence of residential uses.The land uses in the southern portion of the site peak in the afternoon. Retail, restaurant,and amphitheater uses all have similar peaking patterns throughout the early evening,which could create potential parking demand issues,especially on days when event conditions are at capacity. However,the peak demand during weekday conditions without an event,which occurs at 7pm, is 319 spaces,which is approximately 74 percent of the 433 estimated parking spaces on-site, indicating that there is enough parking to accommodate uses on the site during peak conditions as il ustrated in Figure 2. Table 8 indicates that the weekend parking conditions are adequate to meet the demand,when compared to the overall estimated parking capacity on-site. However, similar to the weekday conditions, events at the amphitheater and/or the farmer's marl<et could create potential issues with parking demand on-site.Scenarios showing events at the amphitheater and the farmer's market are presented following Figure 2. Figure 2 i Demand vs.Supply(No Events) soo aso noo 3so Total 5upply 300 i250 , Weekday Total 200 ' Demand I 150 ' Weekend Total 100 , Demand i 5p ; I 0 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E EarommraruQnnnQQaafl. Q n Q. caIl0f 00 Ql O -1 N M /1 l0 f 00 Ol O -I N i i Events held at the amphitheater will occur periodically both during the week and on the weekends.The foflowing tables and charts show the demand for parking when there is an event held at the amphitheater.This scenario does not include an event at the farmer's market. January 2013 8 Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Parking Supply/Demand AnalysisandFlssociates. Inc. R nre d,Minnesota Table 9—Weekday Peak Demand Results(Amphitheater Event Only) Land Use Grouping 7otal Demand Pealc Hour North Area: 253 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 95 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Amphitheater 69 spaces 6pm-9pm Site Total 388 spaces 7pm Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates Table 10—Weelcend Peak Demand Results (Amphitheater Event Only) Land Use Grouping Total Demand Peak Hour North Area: 6am, 10pm, 11pm, 252 spaces and 12amTownhome/Apa rtment/Office South Area: 103 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Amphitheater 74 s aces 1pm-3pm and 6pm- p 9pm Site Total 391 spaces 7pm Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates An event at the amphitheater,whether it is during the week or on the weekend, significantly increases the demand on the site. However,with 433 available spaces for the various land uses,there should be available parking capacity to accommodate an event. By tal<ing advantage of time of day demand patterns and available parking in the north and south areas of the site, event managers should be able to allocate overflow demands appropriately on site. Events will lil<ely require specific traffic and parlcing management plans, but with an additional 40+/- spaces available over the projected demands,the overall site parking system should be able to support an event with a seating capacity of 200 seats. Figure 3 below illustrates the demand versus supply during an event at the amphitheater. January 2013 9 Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment and Associates, I1C. Parking Supply/Demand Analysis Richfieltl,Minnesota Figure 3 Demand vs.Supply(Amphitheater f:vent Only) i 500 450 400 i 350 Total Supply 300 250 WeekdayTotal Zpp . Dernand i 150 Weekend Total 100 Demand i 50 ' p . E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Ecocora co ra cx. u c a Q. a a n n a a a. mDI` 00 Ol O -1 N M CY l0 I 00 Ql O '-1 N ri --I -i In addition to events at the Amphitheater,the site expects to have recurring Farmer's Market events during the summer on Wednesday evenings. During these events, a portion of the parking supply will be converted to an open air market,with approximately 32 spaces removed from the regular parking supply, resulting in 401 spaces on the site. Additionally,the farmer's market creates a new demand for parking, with approximately 8,400 square feet of retail/grocery space.Table 11 shows the demand on the site during the Farmer's Market event,without a concurrent event at the amphitheater. Weekend demands are not shown for a Farmer's Market event because this event type is expected to only occur on weekdays. Table 11—Weekday Peak Demand Results(Farmer's Marlcet Only) Land Use Grouping Total Demand Peak Hour North Area: 253 spaces 6am and 10pm Town home/Apartment/Office South Area: 95 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Farmer's Market 22 spaces 4pm Site Total 333 spaces 7pm fVote: Values in chis table are based on ULI rates January 2013 10 r Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Parking SupplylDemand Analysis and Associates, Inc. R nre d,Minnesota As shown in Table 11, in the event of a farmer's market,the overall demand for parking space increases to 333 spaces. However, even with the increased demand and the reduced parking supply to 401 spaces, parking conditions are adequate to meet the projected demand. Figure 4 illustrates the supply versus demand for a Farmer's Market event. Figure 4 Dernand vs.Supply(Farmer's Market Only) 4 50 400 350 300 Total Supply 250 200 150 Weekday Tutal Demand 100 50 0 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E a a a v m a n n fl. a n. n. n Q a Q n ca O h 00 61 O '-1 N M V l iD h CO a1 O rl e-I The final event demand scenario includes two events held simultaneously at the Amphitheater and the Farmer's Market. For this analysis, only the weekday demands are evaluated,since it is expected that the Farmer's Market will only occur on weekdays. Table 12 and Figure 5 show the demand on the site with concurrent events. As with the previous scenario,the supply for concurrent events reduces the overall parking supply from 433 spaces to 401 spaces. January 2013 11 Kimley-I orn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment lfld ASSOCIdtf;S, I1C. Parking SupplylDemand Analysis Richfield,Minnesota Table 12—Weekday Peak Demand Results(Farmer's Marlcet and Amphitheater Events) Land Use Grouping 1'otal Demand Peak Hour North Area: 253 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 95 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Farmer's Market 22 spaces 4pm Amphitheater 69 spaces 6pm-9pm Site Total 402 spaces 7pm Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates Figure 5 Demand vs. Supply(Farmer's Market and Amphittieater Events) nso I noo i 350 i i 300 I iotal SupplyI250 , 200 i I 150 Weekday Total Demand j 100 i 50 ' i j ' E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E to a cv m m m n n a. n. n o. c Q. o. n. a n ccn oo rn o .- rv m v n n oo m o .- N N The overall demand for parking space increases to 402 spaces when concurrent events are held, essentially matching the total supply. During these types of events it will be critical to have well defined event traffic and parking management plans to ensure that the available parking on site is utilized appropriately and demands are balanced across the entire site.With the parking fully utilized, it will lil<ely be difficult for motorist to find the final available parking spaces,without the aid of parking management,wayfinding, and enhanced operations, such as valet conditions. January 2013 12 Kimley-Horn Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment Parking Supply/Demand AnalysislfldASSOCI1tL'S, nC. Richfield,Minnesota Conclusions The typical peak weekday and weekend parking demands shouid be satisfied with the current proposed parking configuration. Because the projected peak parking demands for residential uses are at off-setting times of day than the demands for the other uses on the site,there is opportunity to utilize the underground parking for overflow from the other uses, assuming proper signage and security protocols are established by parking and site management.This analysis evaluated four scenarios,each varying in their demands,with all but one resulting in a surplus of parking availability. Table 13—Summary of Pealc Parking Demands Scenario Total Demand Peak Hour Surplus No Events Weekday 319 spaces 7pm 114 spaces Weekend 317 spaces 7pm 116 spaces Farmer's Market Event Weekday(parking supply of 412 spaces)333 spaces 7pm 68 spaces Amphitheater Event Weekday 388 spaces 7pm 45 spaces Weekend 391 spaces 7pm 42 spaces Farmer's Market and Amphitheater Event Weekday(parking supply of 412 spaces)402 spaces 7pm 0 spaces Note: Values in this table are based on ULI rates Opportunities for reserved parking will be limited and should be implemented carefully to closely monitor their impact to the parlcing operations. The townhomes will have dedicated 1 space per unit and visitor parking will be dedicated, resulting in 51 dedicated spaces.The only evaluated scenario that could potentially cause parking issues on site is the concurrence of two events held at the same time, resulting in fully utilized parking supply. When two events are held simultaneously, parking issues can be mitigated through the use of parking management,wayfinding,and enhanced operation, such as use of a valet. Implementing these strategies will direct event traffic to appropriate parking locations on the site,ensuring that the site parking is utilized effectively. January 2013 13 APPENDIX Table A1—Parking Demands Using City Code Requirements Land Use Grouping Peak Demand Peak Hour No Events North Area: 293 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 76 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Site Total 349 spaces 7pm Amphitheater Event Only North Area: 293 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 76 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Amphitheater 74 spaces 6pm-9pm Site Total 423 spaces 7pm Farmer's Market Event Only North Area: 293 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 76 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Farmer's Market 10 spaces 4pm and 5pm Site Total 355 spaces 7pm Amphitheater and Farmer's Market Events North Area: 293 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 76 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Amphitheater 74 spaces 6pm-9pm Farmer's Market 10 spaces 4pm and 5pm Site Total 429 spaces 7pm Table A2—Parking Demands Using ITE Rates Peak Demand Land Use Grouping Total Demand Peak Hour No Events North Area: 291 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 118 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Site Total 377 spaces 7pm Amphitheater Event Only North Area: 291 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 118 spaces 1pm Retai/Restaurant/Food Co-op Amphitheater 59 spaces 6pm-9pm Site Total 436 spaces 7pm Farmer's Market Event Only North Area: 291 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 118 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Farmer's Market 22 spaces 4pm Site Total 391 spaces 7pm Amphitheater and Farmer's Market Events North Area: 291 spaces 6am and 10pm Townhome/Apartment/Office South Area: 118 spaces 1pm Retail/Restaurant/Food Co-op Amphitheater 9 spaces o r-9pm Farmer's Market 22 spaces 4pm Site Total 450 spaces 7pm tir iley-}--iorri and !-rssociates, rlc. Mernorandum Suite 238N 2550 University Avenue West St.Paul,Minnesota 55114 Date: January 11,2013 To: Beth Pfeifer,LEED AP Fi•om:Brian Smalkoslci,P.E.,AICP,PTP,PTOE Subject: Lyndale Gardens Parking Analysis Food Co-op Parking Demand In addition to the Lyndale Gardens Parking Supply/Detnand Analysis(presented as a separate report),a peer site review of parking sufficiency was conducted for the site's food co-op land use.The food co-op on the Lyndale Gardens site is approximately 20,000 square feet and has a proposed 1 19 u•!<ing spaces available. "1'l e purpose of this peer site analysis is to deter nine the appropriate number of spaces for this use,as it will impact the number of spaces that can potentially be shared with other land uses on the Lyndale Gardens site.This memorandum documents the methodology and results for identifying parking sufficiency for the food co-op that is located on the Lyndale Gardens site. To determine the appropriate number of spaces for a food co-op of similar size,a number of other sitcs, similar to the food co-op,werc evaluated in the area.Parking inventory counts were conducted using aerial photography for five different sites in the area. The following table summarizes those sites and the counts. Table 1—Summary of Similar Sites Syuare Number of Spaces per Name Locatiou FootageY Spaces 1KSF Kowalski's L ndale and 54`' 21,800 SF 74 s aces 3.39 Seward E.Pranklin and Riverside 23,300 SF 62 s aces 2.66 Lakewinds Ch<inhassan _ 16,900 SF 64 s aces 3.79`* Lakewinds Minnetonka 20,800 SF 99 s aces 4.76** Linden Hills Co-o 3815 Sunn side Ave 18,400 SF 40 s aces 2.17 Avera e S aces Per IICSF 2.74 Square f'ootages used are estintate.r and are not exact xGf•ocery uses are part of a larger r•etail str ip cerrter• TEI.: 651 645 4197 r.nv r.FanFF a Page 1 of 1 Melissa Poehlman From: brian.smalkoski@kimley-horn.com Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:47 PM To:Melissa Poehlman Cc: bpfeifer@tcgmn.com; pstewart@cuningham.com Subject: Lyndale Gardens Redevelopment- Parking Questions Melissa, It was nice speaking with you this afternoon.The following is a brief summary of our conversation. Residential/Tandem Stalls Residential is proposed to be a blend of market and affordable units All market rate units get one underground parking stall o Exception, Townhomes get 2 stalls behind their unit o Exception, 3 bedrooms get a tandem stall Affordable units have the option of renting a parking stall under the building or on the surface Anyone can rent an additional stall while they are available. Excess tandem stalls will be available at a slightly higher price than a single stall Shared Parking Our analysis assumed few barriers to truly sharing the surface lots We don't anticipate a demand for the Food Co-op to exceed 53 or so spaces, meaning that there will be 66 surplus spaces in that area of the site Parking in the south lot will be necessary to accommodate event scenarios In scenarios other than events, the 314 spaces in the north lot, underground, and on-street will accommodate the peak demand of the residential, retail (non-Food Co-Op), and office uses at 292 spaces—although it is likely that some retail and restaurant users may park in tf e soutf lot due to proximity I believe this captures the key points of our conversation. If you need any additional information or have additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Have a great afternoon, Brian R. Smalkoski, PE,AICP, PTP, PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone: (651) 643-0472 Fax: (651) 645-5116 br i r.tnall osl:i(Icin iley_h r n.c t7 wwwJ<i>>>Icy-horn.co n 2/14/2013 ro a d' N N N L LL I Q Z p O Cfl, 00 y N y y N O W WO p`. a a IC l0 M N N f~. _ a a Y° r 0 H c o N M N 'V 0 L O C O p U Q d F-Z Q = H N c A LL Z r i Y u n N o Q N a V o c c O O O N O O C - r- p Q' O d' n. N L L Q LL O N 0 d O p r- (fl V N N N r C ' a N N N d N C 6 C 1- Q C a C cf7au ii`v l 1. ;'41) 1+_:li:;sa I'c>cP lrrti ttt l l :, ,. E11' (51 B.f9fli:i{ i"r4:)t_) 'ot t3;:. . -.en.ie° d ECI I; ,I i, i 9! . .:12..i i.'ii +.1` It:)C?til;li". l'f::.._ li.i:! 1;. <:i i J«, '°5i7ttr.i 1'u],Bn„rtd "L.c.it I't'lei:" j`,n. in ri:.i,r s t* lic l(.'V`; `ill F4\•'1\4' O I:1` ', I':1' j•P-'dl',1' f. CI1 tP' l?i. .i`t1};I[Lil. ! i: (U't'i-)li L'' C:I tiN C enu.t 71 ,, : , ,,i, ,I : -,i i. lah:i.• .; .; i ,.:ii i :: `13. , t:;ii ,_isc ea1; i.i; l .: : , l'l til(('(. f 1'lj..' I. il: ' _ ;t!'..' l.`. lli'l'?l'17 !I':: ;li t ll: .tilll-:i!lJ;1cllllr C.1',.I.i`.. il `ft_ ., .. It ' .'i' I?i' i .tl' f I;l;_ `i''ill`. i- f .. Ii; i , iiL.'il. (!'. c':t'?"i,'. i:l i i. '':1 i'iil'.i'i IllClllO. ' \'(U li t'l'. i111g ;{ll:t:+lit ll- ;tf,!l!1 t 1C JI]:I')?1 1Ut31; j''1':\Il t'' ]Il (i t',;, i;1t71(?5 j)' :,. i 11 fllll .` Il,. . .,; t't tll;lc'1 f'ti•. C c`1 C: i!!.`. c' , _..-. ,! Ul :1 1J 1', ; t'1`llC' :; I:,_ ,. I'C'l:lill t ;)lll'.I:I l4'1 Ut . :l.' IS; ll. ...'l:, h; t._ : llt` ,t .il:).I)\', iS' I-t{1:'I1111'i l+ lt' l[!.l 4 1c, j(`\,,,' i'.l.j', .i . ii..'l'13 wui-?t i ti.:€ ii yi?.i. a lcr scp ir tic .;,;. il:it isiE>;tr:ii ti ?l i=. ; is,u hc i t tl, E;i:i n; I'(1Ci`ti5 ; , i.. _l- ,t . ii 7.-Ill. ll' t t;'I'.'1',t il'' {i!'i'IlJI 11, 1':[?1.."tj '!I"y l` li) :I',t';` . 1C'•1?' t i ; I: I`..' iti>>i'C'1 .1'I;'.1. 1 }I] .;L'IUII1'i' 1. (1, t'.' 1!11'IiC I 1. I l ll t C5 I l[!f ti,'i};`t' ttT t;1' ,. :i:: 1-cL (fi:i1,; tlil til :1 i1'i'I'.: ?) flt'iil'';'i)I11'I1, lti ;:l ,"iCt'I 1 Iil''(sll,.l ;dl e?!.1 YI ,.. ! !i`.'ll`; I lc' Ilt1"''; Jl1'it''i'1 il?L. i' 'l lllt C i 1b S'i tl'l L'I' ( i:l''!l:il.lt}11 lt! t:.::i: t'ia.til(t'.Ill`i. i (I'l ;Ii ;11';';i•l'< [illt (,'li 11111i::fii?Il 15 :LI iClil"ii. ! l:i i7tl >;(!t'i\ . ,.. GSCi9flt( ii ( _ :1 _ 1_i11( Ill'I")2Uf':, t1111i1C cllifli'C 1; IL' I!;II)fll'l Ufl ill'.]' ;lilflit,+ i I lE=i'717r', A i.3 t'1"V -,l ..If(1'i' Ilt; (',.'•I'tf til',l r fti! . . ' i_,_ ::l•k' li.? U;:I,i.' i_i ,i ; l tS It? I.1:,. i; i . _ i ,. ,.: , . il. ;i, . , 11 n,i:l,, .. . . 1 , .4 i ,., ; nris.hl t c;, .4ic ..v irc.d t i1 5h i f eti,antl e nu. . i;:; i.l i ,: ; i. ;iruir lic rnc ; 1. ;.'It;)1H. 0°i'C 1\'7 i'}L: }l l'111f l i1C1;)':"i i'r'li.?c il l? ,1;1[1;iC Clll , . i Y' ] , 1 1 tI'[Tltl ce.(i Pl i . i,. -c nc;•,i,:; c.i ttt,ton 4 ir <iii ci i il; ; .. :i tli tic•i;ta. r'C` Y'tiD fi?1 ', I'.i $(? 'f11i1:: '..'U919FlF1iSlt li 8'C'1'tS' i1I L 1C 'I'.. _'.l t[]i R:t'nl Ellll[611' 1O 1'II Y'; tiC)C.1 1 L(A illileil 'ilt (4V4 4)'ii;;:tl i& lll"L' fiill.'Cti5 (?I"1 1;.' .'l l' l) °.3l'If1:1C 1. ' Stll:l l'l'\', Clil `Ol'l ci- t)ircc c u-il'1 c t c lc,rcic n. i4 1 Ly:1a ' c vr nu- ;. St f)i3 fdichfielr: , h1N S5f 7i P ny? , 7 16,JG U tc};i>r .i:in T•aiflk r ;,TCG i!it f LYNIDA,` ;GAR NS a.;._ ..azw.,,.,r L t Y E W O R K P 1.A Y January 2, 2013 Dear Neighbor(s), We hope you had an enjoyable holiday! Please marl< vour calendar for Tuesday, January 8t", from 5:30-6:30 p.m. We are inviting you and your neighbors thai live in close proximity to the Lyndale Gardens redevelopment to join us at our project office to review tlie project plans and give us your feedback. We are lool<ing for specific input regarding connections to the project site from your neighborhood and to address any other questions or concerns you may have. Please take this opportunity to meet with us now so that we may incorporate your ideas into the final site plan. We look forward to meeting you. Happy New Year! Meetin Details: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 5:30 p.m. — 6:30 p.m. 6334 Lyndale Avenue South Light refreshments and beverages will be provided Children are welcome to attend RSVP with number of adults and children, and any special accommodations needed, by January 5 to cbrooks@tcgmn.com or 612-236-3881. Sincerely, Caryn Brool<s Development Proj cis Co rc ina or The Cornerstone Group cbroolcs@tcgmn.com LYNDALEGARDENS.COM Lvndale Gai-dens NeighUoi-Meeting 1/8 The Coi nerstorle Gi•oup - Beth Pfeifer, Ca yil Broolcs Cuningham Group - I3ruce Jacobson, Milte I{untz NeigliUor Attendees: Sharon Stocltwell - 6325 Aldricli - since `85 Larry Stocicwell Christine Stockwell (daughter) Virginia Huseby- 6311 Biyant- since `66 Roger Huseby ric Pousard - 6320 Aldrich - si lce `11. Ann Sewich - 6324 Aldrich - since `81 Doug Sewich Ron Snyder- 6308 Aldrich - since `79 jean Snyder Greg Catnpion - 1000 Mildred - since `0 3 Neighbor Coininents/Ouestions Wllat will landscaping be along fence - trees, shrubs? Peter's Billial-ds Ilas emei•gency vehicle only driveway How far is building from fence/property line - 35' Emergency egi•ess is 20', gated 6 stories, 5 3' feet tall How many cai•s will drive on road adjacent to fe lce li ie? 0 225 total parlcing stalls, including underground and surface Will there be a traffic light? o The city is not plannii g to add a light at this point o City will do pedestrian improveme its at 64tt & Lyndale - ti•affic calming island What is price i•a»ge and unit mix? A•e tlley rentals oi•condos? What do shadow studies say? Will it interfere with satellite dish reception? Trees along feilce line would help buffe•sound f•om development- wa lt ti•ees that provide a "sci•een° fi om the apai•tment building- ti-ees t iat are very tall a e preferred Don't want people loolcing down orl tlleii-bacicyard 75 1& Penn - new school - riglit against house -woi•st case scenaT•io - don't want to see this here Pedestrian Coii lectio l Want to use existing connection via par-lc bi idge Don't want another entrance -want to prevent foot and car traffic fi-om entering their neighborhood Had crime problems before with bicycles stolen, etc. -want to lceep people off tllei pl-opel ty Simplify and not encoul•age use of bacic 1•oad by pedesti-ia is Lighting Ve y da•lc at eild of alley- a small liglit would be lice - need to checic with llomeowners on alley (they're iot here) Fence Sound proof fence that you can't see through is preferred What will fence height be - 8 feet? Will stabilize slope to help with erosion - landscape it, etc. New par}cing lot will be a couple of feet higher than current grade - will level off emUankment What are development plans, if any, for neighboring older apartment buildings? What is construction schedule? r s t/ iV t AL G ,AR E N ac.-:*' LIVE WORK AI.AY Shared Parking at yndale Gardens The developer has been worlcing with a security company to develop a system that will allow a portion of the underground parlcing garage to be available for employee parl<ing during typical worlcday haurs when fewer residents are typically at home. Residents will have the option of renting one of these shared spaces at a reduced rate or a traditional parking stall at the regular rate. We are still worlcing through the details of the system, but have been provided tf e following information by USA Security on the proposed operation of the system: Sliaied I'arkiiig det,il: I he Residents will l e mana;ed by access control into and out of the gara;e, with emergency egress avail ble f r code. This will be managed anc integrated in the access control for thc L uildin. l{e employees will also have access conirol to the garage. The prograrnrnecf access contrc l will limited them to the following: 1. 1 ime frame they cari enter the garage 2. Days they can enter tf e garage To maintain a mixed used space tf ere needs tc be intelligence on top of the access control, therefare guiding and direr.ting the spaces to be parked in and maintaining lo;s of vacant aiid no vacant spots to ensure the residents maintain their p rking while managing the employees parking. To do this we will be aciding the following: 1. a "Self Parkii g ValE t" software a. Able to manage 1-500 parking spots Ground loops in stalls and t Kiosk a, 1 his will sense car weight notifying systen of vacancy's 3. Green/fied lights to notify parking spot for emplc yee a. This will turn green while they are looking for the parking spot b, Red will notify ther i c>f being over their allott.ed tirne frame of LYNDALEGARDENS.COM f 6 \ 1 M '/ A t,XVt WI RK P1.AY lr<Itl(; 4, IriYe;i tiar irifi ccess coi itro) iI. IVltl(7 t{lf?Il"1 f'ilS,/ i1CC[?SS W11:f1 l ,Cf'/!)) /(?i S I I"11 111"cl lll il iIII VJI II tllt'. `SC 1 II UII; Uc! (' Uf1W It(`. In addition, we are continuing efforts to attract a shared vehicle to the site through a potential partnership with "HourCar". We will continue to work with security companies and other service providers to make sure all parking stalls on site are used to their maxirnum efficiency. LYNDALEGARDENS.COM tl/ VT At GARt NS se:; : r LTVE WURK YLAY Event Parlcing Management Traffic Cops - Citv of Richfield Police Department (612-861-9800) Lt. Milce I<oob stated that officers are available to assist with managing/directing traffic for our events. Officers ar e available at $75/hour for a minimum of 3 hours. Contact Lt. Koob in advance with dates and number of attendees expected so he can advertise for officers who want to work overtime and/or volunteers. No permit necessary as long as traffic is not blociced off on Lyndale. Total Cost per Event: $225+ (depending on number of officers needed) Renee's Roval Valet (763-551-1919) Can provide shuttle bus or trolley to bring attendees from parking to event and bacl< 31 passenger shuttle bus: $450 for 3 hour event (plus 20% gratuity& 5%fuel) e 22 passenger trolley: $525 for 3 hour event (plus 20%gratuity & 5%fuel) Will provide discounted rate for weelcly concert series Total Cost per Event: $567 for shuttle/$656 for trolley Class A Valet / Parkin Mana ement Services (612-677-0071) Class A used to operate valet parking for Champs in Richfield Can provide valet services for individual events or manage entire parking plan including outsourcing shuttles m Would work with us to establish parking plan and locate overflow parlcing Can provide directional signage to alleviate traffic congestion and direct attendees to appropriate areas Generally, expect to have half as many cars as guests for night time events Can work in conjunction with police officers to manage traffic Total Cost per Event: customized plan, will provide quote once we have more detail LYNDALCGARDENS.COM 6400 Lyndale - PUD 2/2013 Surrounding Zoning h Z U O J o Qo m __ Q 63RD STREET L_—J R R R R C-2 W MR-3 R R R R R R - aRRRRRRR R W R R R R G2 Q MR-3 R R R J G7 M -2 M R-2 R- R- PC_2 64TH REET M R tn PMR P M R PC-2 C-2 MR-3 2 C- W Q C-2 G2 Z O MR_ W 5 W 6( Rq O,A L' 66T l' STRFFT -- C-2-General Commercial Feet PC-2 - Planned General Commercial 0 100 200 400 600 800 1,000 R-Single Family Residential MR-2 Multi-Family Residential MR-3 - High Density Multi-Family Residential PMR - Planned Multi-Family Residential Path: 6400 Lyndale - PUD 2/2013 Surrounding Cornprehensi e Plan XZQ Q U J QO m Q 63RD STREET _ LDR LDR CCLDRLDR w LDR LDR LDRMHD p DR D LDR Q D L LOR LDR LDR LDR LDR _ LDR J MHD LDR LDR CC Q LDR LDR Z J MIXFD H HD I MHD H H - I MIXED 64TH REET IXE 0 MIXED M MI I IX I MIXED MIX PRK MIXED IX E W Q-=Z IXE IXED Z O MIXE W C. W 65 F0,4, 66T STRFFT o v 2 LDR- Low Density Residential Feet MHD - Medium-High Density Residential 0 100 200 400 600 800 1,000 MIXED - Mixed Use NCC -Community Commercial PRK- Park Path: I:\GIS\Community Development\StafflPlanning Tech\Projects\6400 Lyndale CP.mxd 6400 LyT dale A e — Lyndale Gardens I'UD. 12 Feb•u ry 2013 az- ,. s .,'`, A,f i 1r.`,r !: .; r° '.. f' 5.'i 6 " r Y t+r Y tl: t l. Jf,. . f f P J%/ r i, , — n.' J./ / . t .y` y trf :o ''1' 4 ry^. i. i f]Y. ,` l' f t-fl R : ' ,4,i .. f.. r, .k Y y ( 3'' L%-F ..(.4 ff S v _ t ' S" S-i -Is/ i* I c 1 y, t' 1i1, u ' j j r f!i ' t, _ i hl ji ii+ 1 j ,. i • li,-1N i tr ri.:,Y I LYNLiAtEGARDxtaF c 7r.• I. i y , , i 1lflll ! ( lllll lllliil ! II1ii ! I i f, i, ; i i r Loolciiig soi th aloiig L>ndalc A c v . r 3 i B F,-':; .= V,y ll P qr ,,,, i.'. ", . t ' '@' s. ,i r"r' _ g , : S T S, \ 1 f L. 5 r , F R Y:. $ p 1!C y,: ' 4. ez-: ' ,-r t` m d i::tt9'ly t k -.. J g, r.. 4 t a ., i t i Y ,- S` t4z'b. 1 .l ' w, ... y,,. r r;s. ,.,,,;., r°.,•:... Looking nol•th at 6330 Lyndale building t r , _i' L t t€. 7 i#% t x' 4} k ka. " .. t; ti <;j t f,:' : a .. ti '{ k h, b l - f '{} AJ ;W..ht S. S Y'- f 7 { z. iAyl4 . k 9 ,t."f i _: ..., 42.S ri ' x j r7i7 y ej L l.f i ` l•"•---' y * il : r, 4 R; a g^q j - ` S jT, c r K a{ t {}'`tj f_' T L R ' tw i i.c+14'iF r v/'". i l t h i, • 5n t{itr-, G' ..t?, i. . „ a - . ,,_ t,_s` z,__. i ~~ _ b. y -' r 4 a f•Y Lou ci ig noi•91 r-est from building 6.; 1 , -.r1 i ' k Y V 1 t. a.. ti: i.,.,. .. s 1 ;'"r ,. .:.. .,,_: .... . f ,. 'K `'- ,. Yr FIRk'-M1C!M w 9- j' i...err -h?£ =f,9R'Y i.,..c.. '..i-... ._ ZS=-_ f ri Sa .ti# ly,`.y.'" a''. } y i . i 7. . 9 r. t, t a y,r, Lr...''+;"•$!_ . ... ,. _. 5.,. .. . - c.' . N W". q,...1,p±-'"a' i P . I,009cing soutl at existing building Ac[:Nnn Se:c ioN: PUBLIC HEARING AGL:NDA I"I'k;M# S RLPOR7'# 1 Cns.# PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Public hearing to consider amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance. The proposed ordinance will change the dimensional requirements for commercial parking stalls and drive aisles. I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend approval of the attached ordinance amending Subsection 544.13, Subdivision 3 related to parking lot design. II. BACKGROUND City staff continually monitors and notes areas of the Zoning Code that may require review. Public Works staff has identified deficiencies in the City's parking lot design standards and has proposed the following changes to improve safety and maneuverability. In one particular case (13-foot drive aisle for 90 degree stalls), the permitted dimensions would be physically impossible to maneuver within. The proposed changes are based on a review of local and national standards. Subd. 3. Parkinq lot desiqn. Parking lots should be designed and constructed in conformance with the following standards and the accompanyinq Fiqure 18. Exceptions to these standards must be approved by the City Enqineer. Angle Stall ; S aN Curb Stall Aisle Width : Width : L-ength Length* Depth ; (one-way/ two-waY) ; 90 degrees : 9' 9' 19' ; -3'/24' ; 60 degrees 9' a-3' 10.4' 21'18'/ 22' ` 45 degrees _ 9' 9' 12.7' ; 19.8' 13.4' /22' Parallel 8.5' 23' ' 8.5 13'/4' 22' T____ .. Compact . 8' 8' 16' ; '/24' 90 degrees) An additional 18 inches shall be required when a stall abuts a landscape area. Figure 18 0 Paikfng Hr qle+i Farkin F'aralleP Parkin;:i Sta'I a,siE i,`e;cn_` b1',<ICh—` stau a ste Depth'I rryi lth 3tall Depth IJ C1 La_r.grh St ll b'idti° i Curb Length tita l k er yth gta11 J r dth Ar g e t f Farkmg III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY The regulations of the Zoning Code are intended to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare. Ongoing review and periodic updating of the Code is necessary to ensure that regulations are serving their intended purposes. B. CRITICAL ISSUES The proposed changes are based on a review of local and national standards. C. FINANCIAL N/A D. LEGAL Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current in accordance with State and Local requirements. Other Actions: Council: The recommendation of the Planning Commission will go to the City Council for two readings. If the City Council adopts the recommended changes, they will take effect 30 days after the approved Council resolution is posted in the Sun Current newspaper. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION S Recommend approval of the proposed ordinance with additional changes. Recommend denial of the proposed ordinance. V. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MCETING N/A BILL NO. AMENDMENT TO RICHFIELD CITY CODE SUBSECTION 544.13, SUBDIVISION 3 RELATED TO PARKING LOT DESIGN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Subsection 544.13, Subdivision 3 of the Richfield City Code is amended to read as follows: Subd. 3. Parking lot design. Parking lots should be designed and constructed in conformance with the following standards and the accompanyinq Fiqure 18. Exceptions to these standards must be approved by the City Engineer. Angle Stall Sta 4 Curb Stall Aisle Width : Width ' ° ; Length* Depth , (one-way/ ! two-waY) 90 degrees 9' 9 19 a-'/24' 60 degrees 9' 10.4' 21'18' 22' : 45 degrees 9' 9' 12 7'19.8' 13.4' / 22' _ e Parallel 8.5' 23' 8.5' 13'/4' 22' Compact 8' 8' 16' 24' 90 de rees) An additional 18 inches shall be required when a stall abuts a/andscape area. Figure 18 F.,-I w 1 i F IP<va-P.iiVir.a tii.i:l A Ja I DzA1h—' 45`t Y,—` JWU Ais'e R:h'I--4'in]h Si:;lD.:ptl t;ub 1- I.aigUi cl ll';.'.tl'i L•il Le yll sisi - e,:i, tr,: I i t;:e:n a e F•o-.,h Sec. 2 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of March, 2013. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGBNDA SBCTION: NIiW BUSWESS AGBNUA I"fBM# 6 RI'POR"I'# 2 CnSE.# PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution finding that property acquisition, street improvements and the conveyance of property to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in order to effectuate the construction of Richfield Parkwa is consistent with the Richfield Com rehensive Plan. I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Approve the attached resolution finding that property acquisition, street improvements and the conveyance of property related to the Richfield Parkway Phase II project is consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. IL BACKGROUND 1 The establishment of Richfield Parkway as a vehicular and greenway corridor extending from the City's northern border is an identified goal of the Comprehensive Plan. The area has been identified as a future greenway since the adoption of the Cedar Avenue Corridor Master Plan in 2004. The area immediately adjacent to the Parkway, the 6300 and 6400 blocks of 17th Avenue have been identified for future high-density, multi- family housing. Plans are now in motion to move forward with the capital project known as Richfield Parkway Phase II. The project includes reconstruction and widening of the road, construction of a separate bike trail, relocation of a sidewalk, replacement of utilities and more. The project requires the acquisition of 12 properties along 17th Avenue (in addition to two already acquired by the Richfield HRA). Excess property not needed for the Parkway construction will be conveyed to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority HRA) for future redevelopment. III. BAS[S OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that whenever any public agency buys or sells property within the City, the Planning Commission must review the proposed use of the site for consistency with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. B. CRITICAL ISSUES N/A C. FINANCIAL Funding sources have been identified. D. LEGAL Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that whenever any public agency buys or sells property within the City, the Planning Commission must review the proposed use of the site for consistency with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION S None V. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Maps VI. PRINCIPAL PARTICS EXPECTGD AT MEETING N/A RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE RICHFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THAT PROPERTY ACQUISITION, STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY RELATED TO THE RICHFIELD PARKWAY PHASE II PROJECT ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan regarding the construction of Richfield Parkway; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the acquisition and disposition of the following single family properties for street improvements and future high-density, multi- family housing development would be consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan: Lots 9-14, Block 1, Iverson's Second Addition 6314, 6320, 6326, 6332, 6338 & 6344 17th Ave) Lots 9-12, 14 and 15, Block 2, Iverson's Second Addition 6408, 6414, 6426, 6432, 6438 & 6444 17t" Ave) NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that the acquisition of the above described property by the City, the construction of street improvements for the Richfield Parkway Phase II Project, and the conveyance of remnant land to the HRA for high density, multi-family residential use, are in conformance with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. Adopted this 25th day of February, 2013 by the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. Rick Jabs, Chairperson ATTEST: Daniel Kitzberger, Secretary Richfield Parkway - Finding of Consistency 2/13 Properties to be Purchased Taft Park 63rd St I; i. 6314 i 1 I I 6320 j i j i i I 6326 '; i'4 i i f-.. j; 6332 ' i 6338 ; fi , 6344 I a 64th St Q 6400 v 1 6408 ;, N 6414 I - i L- 6420 6426fi 6432 i i 6438 ' 6444 [ N 65th St i i: i1 v-T'-- ; I I i Legend 0 80 160 320 480 640 i To be purchased Feet Previously purchased by HRA I:\GIS\Community Development\StafflMelissa\Projects\FOC maps\Richfield Pkwy - Properties to be purchased.mxd Richfield Parkway - Finding of Consistency 2/13 Comprehensive Plan Designations LDR LDR pRK Taft Park LDR PUB LDR LDR PRK 63rd St I LDR LDR LDR LDR HDR I RC LDR LDR HDR HDR LDR LDR i I LDR LDR HDR HDR ' i i I LDR LDR HDR HDR I i i i I LDR LDR HDR r,' HDR RC LDR LDR I I HDR HDR i. I LDR LDR j LDR LDR HDR HDR ` y I E . 64th St Q a I "I LDR LDR HDR HDR v R LDR LDR LDR HDR i HDR i II LDR HDR HDR LDR -- t LDR LDR HDR HDR LDR LDR I i HDR I HDR LDR LDR i LDR LDR HDR HDR j i i I RC ; LDR LDR HDR , HDR -. i i i LDR LDR I RC I LDR LDR HDR HDR ij Nf I 65th St LDR LDR RC LDR LDR RC I Legend To be purchased Rc RC, RC Previously purchased by HRA i Comprehensive Plan Designations LDR - Low Density Residential 0 80 160 320 480 640 HDR - High Density Residential Feet RC - Regional Commercial PUB - Public PRK- Park I:\GIS\Community Development\StafflMelissa\Projects\FOC maps\Richfield Pkwy - CP.mxd i s I o o N ,— 3pCQut+s: .,. i x.sz --- iaa.9z ` L LA 0 i . y 1T T1Tfn! a c o u- i 3 U v 33) 5 Z d U d 135.03---- Q O 'O 751 $ zesui r:es 7 L .i v U U M1 v V r/131.98 I y y LL LL LL n Y w, n I 6 93 o J n U M 5 35) d C O17) N C N 31.BJ. L m U o 6 0 T ,, 5 a a 18) i 3E) a(..az ii i 7 N e C n I lJ.. d .. 19) `° ai e i n i3a E- 137) n nn 20) '° nn ix n 38) n ae.s- k IIn a 9 6.39 21) `° IIilII r. 131.65 IIB 10 39; 9 22i II 13e G 135.39 i II L 111111 6 13a.fi j 13:G 96.2e II LO u l in76 . J m 11 134.55 __ i I 2 J o n, d Q s s , c z W 126) p N 36) o isc ae. U Q q i 177) a ( 6) I 56J5 t31.c L O I L 5 I 79 134 35 IJJ I m 1 I i s (y 1 1 YU o. ma - o i aia E I -p0 m N 5 o A/ .. . o (80) a 8) I m r ii 3a s I 4- s N a I I U 135) a (81) < I'I 3. i, s '' N n 9 ,e 9) i( )1 I U 82) a a t3a t5 R ---------m iL, io i S3)C ias.i__ 10) O a n i d 7 84) u e- v a 31.05 I Q 2' iz__..—._. 11) Im 1 , v (is5) I @ m o 13-0 13i O Q a i t LL U - N i u 13A I 3B 1lN J] n m 1 O O 1 . n n ', g7 I 3) II V v U 13392_ , Ir n p I 3 z v c9$) G nol c 33_8B 7 a f CS 2) r• Li. 3 aee 133.6: AGI;NDA SI:CTION: NEW BUSIN[;SS AGLNt n I'rk:M# 7 PC L[:'r'rt;a# 3 CASI:# PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION. Discuss dates and topics for the 2013 Planning Commission Study Sessions. L BACKGROUND The Planning Commission typically holds six regularly scheduled study sessions each year. Those meetings are generally scheduled for the fourth Monday of the month preceding the regular meeting) at 6:00 pm, although this schedule is subject to change based on the timeliness of topics and whether or not the session with be held jointly with another body. Staff attempts to hold a study session every other month. Tentative dates and topics are as follows: Tuesday, March 12 at 6:00 pm - Joint session with City Council to discuss barriers to business development (parking and sprinkler requirements). March/April — Center for Energy and the Environment (CEE) kick-off event for new Home Energy Squad partnership program with the City. Tuesday, June 15 at 6:00 pm — Joint session with City Council to hear results of Housing Visioning Process Monday, August 12 at 5:30 pm —Walking or biking tour of specific area. Monday, October 28 at 6:00 pm — TBD Monday, December 9 at 6:00 pm —Transportation project update Potential additional topics include: Your Role as a Planning Commissioner" training/refresher Recreation Services project update Joint meeting with Edina and Bloomington Planning Commissions AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 8 PC LETTER# 4 CASE# PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Review of Planning Commission Bylaws. I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review the attached Planning Commission Bylaws. II. BACKGROUND Part 3, Section 3 of our Bylaws requires the Planning Commission to review the Bylaws each year at the February organizational meeting. Staff is recommending no changes. III. BASIS OF'RECOMMENDATION The above action is required by the Planning Commission Bylaws. IV. ATTACHMENTS Planning Commissions Bylaws. BYLAWS AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA The following Bylaws and Rules of procedure are adopted by the City's Planning Commission to facilitate the performance of its duties and functions as empowered under Chapter III, Section 305.05, Subdivision 1-8 of the City Ordinance Code. PART I.MEETINGS Section 1. Reqular Meetinqs Regular meetings of the Planning Commission shall be on the fourth Monday of each month commencing at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Section 2. General Ptanninq Meetinqs Approximately six times per year, the Commission will meet to discuss and deliberate on general planning matters related to property development and future well being of the Community. These meetings shall be held on the fourth Monday of the month commencing at 6:00 P.M. whenever possible. In the event of a conflict or need for additional discussion time, meetings shall be held on the second Monday of the month commencing at 7:00 P.M. Section 3. Special Meetinqs Special meetings of the Planning Commission can be called by the Chairperson and one member or by three members of the Commission or at the request of the City Council. Notice, designating the time and place of the meetings, shall be given to all members in accordance with the open meeting law. Section 4. Deadline for Hearinq Items The Planning Commission will accept all applications to be heard before it, no later than 28 days preceding the regular Planning Commission meeting in accordance with the regulations of the Richfield Zoning Code. Upon written notice to the Community Development Director prior to the Planning Commission meeting, an application may be withdrawn. Once an application is withdrawn, it must be re-filed with the Community Development Department, City of Richfield, before any Planning Commission hearing is held. Section 5. Quorum Five members of the Planning Commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. No action shall be taken in the absence of a quorum with the exception that the Planning Commission members present may take testimony for use at a later meeting at which a quorum is present, and may adjourn a meeting to a later time without further notice. Section 6. Votin At all meetings of the Planning Commission, each member attending shall be entitled to cast one vote. Voting shall be by voice. An affirmative vote of a majority of inembers present shall be necessary for the passage of any matter before the Planning Commission, except as otherwise provided in these Bylaws. Section 7. Proceedinqs a) Format of Meetinq At a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, the following format shall be followed in conducting the business of the meeting. 1) Recording secretary will note the attendance 2) Approval of Minutes 3) Regular Business and Public Hearing Items 4) New Business 5) Old Business 6) Liaison Reports 7) Adjournment b) Public Hearinq The purpose of a hearing is to collect information and facts in order for the Commission to develop a planning recommendation for the City Council. At a public hearing the following procedure shall be followed for each case for which a public hearing is held: 1) Chair shall state the case to be heard. 2) Chair shall call upon the Community Development Director or designee to present the staff report. 3) Chair shall ask the applicant to present his/her case. 4) Members of the Planning Commission shall be allowed to question the applicant about his/her proposal. 5) The Chair shall open the public hearing and all interested persons may address the Commission, giving relevant information regarding the proposal before the Commission. a) All questions or statements by Richfield staff personnel, planning commissioners, applicants or interested citizens will be directed through the Chair. b) All who wish to speak will be heard, but only in accordance with the above procedure and after recognition by the Chair. c) No individual may speak longer than five (5) minutes, except through previous arrangement with the Chair, or by vote of the Commission. d) The spokesperson for a group will be allowed ten (10) minutes. e) In addition to the statements by individual or groups, there will be a period, not to exceed thirty (30) minutes, during which the public may question the City's staff members present, the applicant or their representatives or any member of the Planning Commission. Questions must be directed through the Chair. 6) The hearing shall be closed. Interested persons shall not be heard again unless the hearing is reopened by a majority vote of the Commission. 7) The Commission shall discuss and clarify the item before it, and take action on it. 8) Any decision of the Commission on the merits of any planning question before it shall be embodied in the form of a motion, resolution, or report, and referred to the City Council for action. c)Rules of Procedure At all regular meetings of the Planning Commission where formal action is required on a matter before the Commission, the meetings shall be governed by Sturgis' Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure. At general meetings of the Planning Commission no formal parliamentary procedure shall govern the conduct of the proceedings unless found to be necessary such as when a formal motion is before the Commission. Every motion to be voted upon shall be read prior to voting so that all members clearly understand the motion or amendment. PART II. ORGANIZATION Section 1. Election of Officers At the first regular meeting in February of each year, the Commission shall hold an organizational meeting and elect from its membership a Chairperson, Vice- chairperson, and Secretary. Each member shall cast a ballot for the member he/she wishes to be elected Chairperson. If no one receives a majority of all the mem rs of e Co missic, ba!l ting h ll cor#inue ;ntil or e memhsr recP ves majority support. Vice-chairperson and Secretary shall be elected from the remaining members by the same procedure. If the Chairperson resigns from office before the next regular organization meeting, the Vice-chairperson shall automatically become acting Chairperson. If both Chairperson and Vice-chairperson resign, the Secretary shall become acting Chairperson. In any instance, where an officer of the Commission resigns or retires from office a new officer shall be elected to the vacated position at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Chairperson, Vice-chairperson, and Secretary are absent from a meeting, the Commission shall elect a temporary Chairperson by voice vote. In the event that the Secretary is absent from a meeting, the Chairperson shall appoint a member of the Commission to approve the minutes of that meeting. Section 2. Tenure The Chairperson, Vice-chairperson, and Secretary shall take office immediately following their election and hold office until their successors are elected and assume office. Section 3. Duties of Officers The duties and powers of the officers of the Planning Commission shall be as follows: a) Chairperson 1) Presides over all meetings of the Commission. 2) Appoints committees and perForms such other duties as may be ordered by the Commission. 3) Signs documents of the Commission. 4) Sees that all actions of the Commission are properly taken. 5) Calls special meetings of the Commission in accordance with these Bylaws. 6) Works with appropriate city staff in organizing agendas of all general Planning Commission meetings. b) Vice-chairperson Performs all of the duties and responsibilities of the Chairperson in his/her absence. c) Secretary 1) Assumes duties and responsibilities of the Chairperson when both Chairperson and Vice-chairperson are absent. 2) Signs all minutes of the Commission as well as other official documents of the Commission. PART III. MISCELLANEOUS Section 1. Suspension of Rules The Commission may suspend any of these Rules by a 2/3 vote of those members present. Section 2. Amendments These Rules may be amended at any regular meeting by a 2/3 majority of the members of the Commission, provided that the amendment was presented and written into the minutes of a previous meeting. Section 3. Review The contents of these Bylaws and Rules of procedure should be comprehensively reviewed, evaluated, and modified where necessary, at the organizational meeting held in February of each year. Adopted this 26th day of March, 2012 Chairperson, Richfield Planning Commission Secretary, Richfield Planning Commission AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 9 PC LETTER# 5 CASE# PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Election of Planning Commission Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary. I.RECOMMENDED ACTION: Elect a Planning Commission Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary. II. BACKGROUND The Bylaws require that the Planning Commission hold an annual organizational meeting at the first regular meeting in February and elect from its membership a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary. According to the Bylaws (Part II, Organization), a majority vote is necessary to first elect a Chairperson and second to elect the remaining officers. The Chairperson, Vice- Chairperson and Secretary are to take office immediately upon election and hold office until their successors are elected next year. The Chairperson is responsible for conducting all Planning Commission meetings and public hearings. The Chairperson is also responsible for representing the Commission in dealing with the City Council and staff. The Vice-Chairperson is responsible for the duties of the Chairperson in the event the Chairperson is absent. The Secretary is responsible for taking brief minutes during the meeting and reviewing the minutes that staff provides. All approved minutes are signed by the Secretary. The 2012 election results were as follows: Chairperson Jabs, Vice-Chairperson Vizecky and Secretary Kitzberger. III. BASIS OF RECOMMLNDATION A. LEGAL An annual organizationai meetiny is requir U i y the Piai i ing Co r ir issior Bylaws. AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 10 PC LETTER# 6 CASE# PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2013 ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: Appointment of liaisons to the Community Services Advisory Commission, City Council, Housin and Redevelo ment Authorit , School Board and Trans ortation Committee. I.RECOMMCNDED ACTION: The following Planning Commission actions are recommended: Approve members to serve as liaison and alternate liaison to the Community Services Advisory Commission, City Council, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, School Board, and Transportation Committee. IL BACKGROUND Community Services Advisory Commission: The resolution establishing the Community Services Advisory Commission provides that a liaison and alternate from the Planning Commission be appointed to the Community Services Advisory Commission. The Community Services Advisory Commission meets on the third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 P.M., at the Community Center. The Planning Commission should appoint two members to serve as liaison and alternate liaison to the Community Services Advisory Commission. Commissioner Rublein served as liaison to the Community Services Advisory Commission for 2012. City Council: The City Council meets every second and fourth Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Commissioners Hall and Schuller served as co-liaisons to the City Council for 2012. Housing and Redevelopment Authority: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority meets every third Monday at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Commissioner Root served as liaison to the HRA in 2012. School Board: The Commission also appoints a liaison and alternate liaison to the School Board. The School Board generally meets the first and third Monday of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the District Office Board Room. Commissioner Kitzberger served as liaison to the School Board for 2012. Transportation Commission: The Transportation Commission was appointed by the City Council to review transportation-related topics and make recommendations to the City Council. The Committee meets the first Wednesday of each month at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Commissioner Scaglia served as liaison to the Transportation Committee in 2012.