The URL can be used to link to this page

082211 PacketPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA August 22, 2011 CITY PLANNER 7:00 p. m. IntroductoryProceedingsRollcall Approvalof Minutes: Meeting of July25, 2011 andthe Annual BikeofAugust8, 2011 pportunity for Citizens totheCornrnissionon itemsnot on theAgenda Public Hearing ITEM #ASP-03arequestfor a major site plan amendment to construct an9,600 square foot, two- story additionat160078thStreetECOsmarte). Thisitempreviously approved in2009. ITEM # 2' Letter # 20ITEM # 11- CUP- 01 NewBusinessan amendment tothe Zoning Ordinance. The proposedordinanceremove/clarifyusesintheUse District. Conditional Use Permitfor 6439 & 6463Lyndale Avenue continuedJuly 25, 2011 - iIVITH® RAV161V ITEM #PC Letter #21 Business Liaison Reports Findingof Consistency ofTIFtheComprehensivePlanCommunity Services Advisory Commission City Council Housing andRedevelopment Authority ( HRA)RichfieldSchool Board TransportationCommissionof Next Meeting Date: September 2011 Adjournment Auxiliary aid for disabilities are availableupon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advanceto the City Clerk at 612/861- 9738". Planning Commission i n utes July 25, 2011 MEMBERS PRESENT: ChairRublein, Dennis None STAFFPRESENT: Poehlman, City Planner KarenBarton, AssistantCommunityDevelopmentDirectorOTHERSPRESENT: PatElliot, CouncilMember Chairperson Jabscalledthe meetingtoat7: 00 p.m. APPROi/AL OF MINUTES M/Vizecky, S/ Roottoapprove theminutes ofthe June27, 2011 regularmeeting July11,2011 study session. Motioncarried: 7-® OPEN FORUM None PUELIC HEARING( S)ITEM # 1 Case No. 11-CUP- 01 -Continuethe publichearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit allowing a restaurant with seatingat 6439 and6463 LyndaleAvenueto August22, 2011. City Planner MelissaPoehlman ( Poehlman) explained that theapplication relatedtothis requestincomplete. The applicant hasbeen notifiedofthe outstandeng items and this item willbe considered once the materials have beensubmitted. July 25, 2011 M/Root, SNizecky to continue the public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit allowing a restaurant with seatingat 6463 toAugust22,2011.Motioncarried: 7-0ITEM #2CaseNos. 11-PUD- 01 & 11-FDP-01 -Considerationofafinaldevelopmentplanandconditionalusepermit adevelopment and and land. report, deviations from the underlyingzoningspecificstaff.iftoL.wouldpatrons. Poehlman and Assistant Community Development Barton (there are a variety ofthis staffoutcome disruptive. TanyaBellPeteKeely (Keely), PaulSchroeder) and Ali Newton ( Newton}.Commissioner Scaglia arrived.Various commissionersstated that theyfoundthe redesign thesite to be a significant improvement; however the areaalong 65t" Street is lacking.Schroeder to Streetthat.responsepermitting of withasthe July 25, 2011 M/Vizecky, S/Hall to recommend approval of a final development plan and conditional user permit for a at 6501 Lyndale Avenue to resolution: Stipulation # 2 read: That developeranacquirestheHousing RedevelopmentAuthorityparcel. Stipulation # 5 to read: Thatrevised building renderings including 1) vertical architectural elements at thenorthwest cornerof theL. A. Fitness building and the southern endof theretailbuilding and2) additional windows with two- way visibility on both the L. A.fitness ( mir, i°,,.,°„ ~~o~ ^ f, w,., ll ., r°.~ along eastsideand along65t" Street) and retail building be submittedtoand approved by the CommunityDevelopment Director.Stipulation #15 toread: Priortothe issuance of an occupancypermitforeither L. Fitness the retailWellingtonManagement, Inc. shall:1 LI^~ i° n° ni ~r° rlh~ iilrlinrr r°rmi+~ fnr Dhno° II of +h° r~rni°n+ b) Submit a surety equal to125% ofthevalue of any landscaping improvements not yet complete. Motion carried: 8- 0ITEM # 3PCLetter # 18 - Consideration of amendments to thesZoning that wall increase permissions for horticulture/community gardens, animal kennelstattoo certain setbacks and remove contradictory minimum lotmulti-presentedhighlighting specific thatproposed.The Commission discussedcommunity decidedthis. to close the public hearing.ed: S/approval of theordinance animal minimum areas, shops.Carr/IVE16V ~ July 25, 2011 PC Letter #19 -Consider adoption of a resolution finding that1) amodification tothe Redevelopment Plan for theRichfield Redevelopment ProjectArea is consistenttheRichfieldComprehensivePlan; and 2) establishment ofLyndaleGardenTax IncrementFinancing District andTax Increment Financing PlanwiththeComprehensivePlan.Barton presented the staff report and answered questionsfromCommission.Barton emphasized that this did notconstituteapprovalaspecificbutratherthatof Tax Incrementin this areaconsistent withthe Plan. M/ Vizecky, S/Kitzbergerapprove the attachedresolution. 6- 2 ( Root dissenting, HallOLDBUSINESSLIAISONREPORTSCommunityAdvisory Commission: No report CityCouncil: No reportHRA: Report byRoot Richfield SchoolBoard: No report Commission: Noreport of Commerce: No reportOther: No reportsVizecky, toadjourn themeeting. Motion carried: 8- 0 The meeting wasadjourned by unanimousconsentat 9: 21p.Robert 4 Planning Commission Study Session Minutes August 8, 2011 MEMBERS PRESENT: Rick Jabs, Gordon Vizeckyand DanielKitzbergerMEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners RobertHall, JoshRoot, Tom Rublein,MaureenScaglia, Dennis Schuller STAFF City PlannerBarton, AssistantCommunity DevelopmentDirectorJeff Pearson, Transportation EngineerJimTopitzhofer, RecreationDirector OTHERSPRESENT: CouncilMemberSue Sandahl study began at 30 p.m. Staffled members ofthe PlanningCommission, CityCouncil, Bicycle TaskForce andCommunityServices Commission of redevelopment along LyndaleAvenue andpotentialbicycle routeson thenorth sideofthe City. Developer representativewerepresent to their projects at former Lyndale Garden Centersite, former Kmart site andfuture apartmentsiteat 64t" Street and Lyndale Avenue. ADJOURNMENTThe meeting was adjourned at 7: 00 p. m. DanKitzberger Vice-Chairperson AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # CASE # PUBLIC HEARING 11-ASP-03 J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC' l~EET'ING 1~'I'E: A~ Publichearing regarding request amajor plan to at1600 78th East. itemwasreviousl IZECOIvIMENDED andand motion: Recommendapprovalof attachedresolution approvalofamendment 1600 78thStreetofattotheiroperations by constructing a2- story, approximately9, 600 squarefootbuildingaddition. The retail showroom and three residential units onthe second floor. The residentialunits areintendedfor useby out- of-town employees for extendedstays, although they could be rentedjust asany other apartment units. Inaccordance withSection547. 13, Subdivision 9 ofthe City building must be andconstruction begin no later than one year following the dateof approval or site plan approval shall lapse, unless an extension is granted by the City Council. At the time of the initialapproval, theownersbelieved thatconstruction would beginquickly and an extensionwasnot discussed. That said, a new approvalof the project is required. The only changeis to the exterior finishes of the addition. III. BASIS OF I~ECOIvIMENDATION A. POLICY An additionconstituting more than a 25percent changeinfloor arearequires a major amendment to the existingsite plan. Major amendments require a public hearing before thePlanningCommission and final approval by the CityCouncil. In evaluating a site plan, thePlanningCommission and its the redevelopment plansfor thearea;082211 - ASP160078`" StE - ECOSmarte The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Commercial. The existing business is truly regional in the largest sense -serving customers throughout the United States andabroad. TheZoningOrdinance designated this propertyas MixedUse -Regional. Theproposedadditionembodiesexactly the the City whenrezoningthe I-494 Corridor. b) Consistency withtherequirementsofthe ZoningOrdinance;Theproposalmeets thelandscaping, screening,architectural, utility, andwaterrequirements of theCode. In instances where astructure containstwoor moretypes of uses, the Zoning Code requires the total off- street parking each calculated aarrangementapplied. case, requiresthere30onAnrequestofrequiredparkingsubmitting trafficwas SpackConsultingandsupportsareducedrequirementbasedonthepeakrequirementofeachuse. Thestudyrecommendsthat35parkingstallsbeprovidedand thatany semi-truckdeliveriesbescheduledforthemorningpriortothetimeofpeak demand.Theproposedsiteplanincludes39parking spaces. This reductionis supportedby staffgiventhefindingsof parking reduced requirement is further supposed by the fact that the ownersintendto hire only two additionalAlightingmustbe submitted and reviewedcomplianceprior to the issuanceany permits. c) Creation ofdesignforstructuressitefeatureswhichpromote the following: i. Aninternal sense of order among the buildingsanduses;The site has building.ii. Theadequacyofvehicularandpedestriancirculation, includingwalkways, interiordrivesandparkingintermsoflocationandnumberofaccesspoints, generalinteriorcirculation, separationpedestrianvehiculartraffic of parking; isprovidedfacilitate movement alongsouth thethe door.Energythroughdesignstructurestheof materials site The owners wish to be models of sustainable environmental business practices. The proposalincludes asystem tocapture stormwater run- off for irrigation andpotable wateruse, rain barrels, photovoltaic panels andmore. iv. The minimization of adverse environmental effects on the adjacent properties.The captureof all stormwater run-off willeliminateany impacton adjacentproperties.CRITICAL ISSUES previously approved theCity Council inNovember2009. Thebuilding additionwillprovideanexample ofthetypeofredevelopment the see continue theI-494 Corridor.C. FINANCIAL Therequired applicationfee hasbeenpaid. D. LEGAL Notification: Notificationof this in the CurrentNewspaper in accordancewithState andLocal requirements. Mailednoticewassent toownersandresidentswithin 350 subject property. ALTERNATNERECOMMENDATION(S) Recommendapproval of theproposed majorsite planamendmentwith additionalstipulations oramendments.Recommend denial major site amendment.V. ATTACHMENTS ResolutionProposedplans Parkingstudy memorandumAreazoningandland usemapsVI. I~RINCIPAL I~ 1VIEETING Larry Jr. - co-owner RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 1600 78TH STREET EAST WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of requests of major160078th00feet the 480 feetthe Quarter of180.26 thereof,• to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.WHEREAS, the requested site plan has been reviewed by staff and meets City requirements; and WHEREAS, the proposed siteplanis consistent andany redevelopmentplansestablishedforthe area; and WHEREAS, the proposed siteplan promotes anWHEREAS, hasfullyconsideredtherequest for approvalforthesiteplan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by thetheCityassiteincludingparkingandindicated, herebyspacesaccordancewithstandards.spacesmustyearmaintainedbeordisrepair.AplanbeapprovedDevelopmentObtainneedstobeboulevard.issueofOccupancythemetand/anisincompleteThisincludesignsondrawings. signrequired.siteoneyearapprovalunlessobtainedprojectbegun; orrequestedissuedtheby13, Subd. of Adopted by the City of the City of Richfield, 13th day ofSeptember 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk TREE PRESSRVATON NOTES'PER RICHFIELDCITYCODE 544.03. SUB0.4, GENERAL LANDSCAPING REOUIflEMENTS ~ ' PflOTEGTNEFENCING CONSISTING OF STEEL POSTS AND CQ43PIGUOD6LY CGLCAEO FENCEAilEA3T 4a WCHES INHEIGHT SHALL DISPOSAL SrtE SERVING TxE GITYDISEASEDWCODCUiFRgAnNY31TE5NALL0EDISFOSEDOFATTXETREE RWNDWG TN PPAT Ci iREES30 ixgi THEYWILl NOt BE OAMAGEDOq JEOPARDREDBVBEPLACED4YALCOATION6lWEEEO CDYSiRUCTION. THE PROTEGRVE FENDING SHALL BE PLACEOPPoOP iO THE ISSUANCEOFgNY DEVELOPANNiPERINiS M'OSNALL IFROOTSOF igEES TOBEPROiECiED APE DISTURBED OR DAMAGED BYGONSTRUGipN. THEY SHgLLBEI!R&gATGYANOCLEANLY RRIP ' I GCOOCIX4DIiNN IniILANYCONSTAUCTIONWORK iHATM4YJE0PA iNEHFALTH OF INSEMAW N LADE AAD NIiPTH OFSIXINCHES i060UNDHFA iNYTIS6U ANDCOVEREDWIiH TOPSOL BADE GIiOACNl E COMPLETED. SH PROTECTN fENCWG SHALL BE INSTALLEDAiTHE EOGEOF THE TREEGANOPYORPHOTECTEDTPEES HASBEEN E E OPIPLINEORAi ALOCATION OEFMEDBYTHEDIRECTORi 1 IATELYCOVERED WITH COV BYCONSTAUCTIONOPEPA pN3SHALL BE ANYROOTS OFPROTECTEQ TREE THAT AAE CWERED tOP301LTOADEPTH OFSIx INCHES AREAS WITHINTHEPROTELTNEfBJCINGSHALLBEOFFLIMITG IOWROKEA3. VISDOgS. OPEAATWGEQUIPMENT. PARKED EWIPMENT. PAWtED VEHICLES. 3TORAGE OF MATERIALS AAOPEOEfiTF4ANTPAFFIC PROTECTED TREES. ANDESPECIALLYANVTAEE OAMAGEOOA DISTURBEOBYCONSTRUCTIONCPEPATIGN3.54NLL BE WATEIIED DUPING THE GROWING SEASONW ORDER TO MAIMAIN ADWBATE &R NOTENCESSIVE SOIL MOSTUAE 1 S.GOLUTIONSAND WASHING EQUIPMENT SHALL B NOC D6 RTNAN75 FEET FROM FENCED AREAS STOMGEOf FUELS. CHEINU L E L E P IPM i YODA IFIEQ PER60NNEL PLLWOPN SHALL BEPEAFOAMEOIVITHIHEPAOEREWENBLWHENANYCONSTAUCTIONTRAFFICMUBTPASSNEAPERi0APROTECTEDTREE THPN Ii30gIPUNE.A 11 FOOT WIDEOV 121NCH DEEPLAYER OFSHPEDDEO HARDWQCAMULCH SHALLBEPIACEDOVEPiHEWNACTEOAAEA. THE I2 FOOT WNIH BY 1244 DEPTH WHEREFILL hAU5T8ERAGEDMOUND PAOTEGTEDTREE3.ASECTNNOFPROTECTIVEfENCIAG3NALL OE PIACEOPNWMIHE SHALL BE MAWTPINED WRTNEENTIRE PENODOFCOIJSTAUCTYJNiNATAFFECT9 iFlE PROTECTEDTREE. IHE PAJLCHSH4LL BE iRI,WKOFTNE TNEE.INCLUOING ROOT FLARES. HEAVYEWIPMENiSHALI NOTBEUSEDTO REAIOVESOIL NEARER THAN IOFEEi FROM AEPWVEO ENTIRELYAT hIE ENDOFCONSTRIICTION APgpTEOTF-1NEE REPdOVAL OFSOR NEARER THAN Ia FEET F90MAPROiECTED tAEESHALLBE PfRFOPMEDOY NAND AIAyOFFFAOM iHECON3iRUC11IXJ&ITEAW&i BE DNERTEOTO PREVEM ENTAANCEOR PINDLI1q IN NiE15 WITHIN IHE OAKSAREVERY 9103CEPTI&E iO RODS DAMAGEBYSOtCOMPACTION AWN RACING FRL AROUAro OAN TREES THIS WILL AVOID PROIECINEFENCWG COMPACTION BYTNE FlLL Ii30.F ANDBYEOUIPMENi USEDiOPEMOVER FAOMPRODND hIETREEiPEESREMOVEDINTHECON6TRUCTIONPREASHAILBEFELLEDAWAYFgOMAREA30FPROTECTEDTREESiOAVUIDDISNRBANCEFOA 9ITESWI7N SIGNIFIGANi E%ISDNGTAEES iO BEPROIECTED.ORWHERELIA!ITEDSPACE EXISTSAROUNO TREESi00EPROTECTED.OA DAMAGE THE QIRECTOR MAYREWIPE iHATAOUALIFIEO ARBORISi OR FORESTER BE'ONCALL'WAWG hIE PAO)ECT IN IHISCASE. THE NAME ANOIELEfMiONENUkBEP OF THE QllALIFlC-0ARBORISTORFORESTERSHALL BE RACED PAOTIWENRY DNTHE APPROVED STUMPS M1IUSTBE GROUfNTOADEPRIOFI FCOi BELOW GAOUNDLEVEL WOODCHIPS MU6TBE RFI.pVF-ANp THE HOLE FlLLED.CONSTRLICTIONDOCUPAENTS '.PP PPW TOPSOIL FORME AREA VNTHA AO iE US DAMAG TOAIR SROOi BYSLEMRNOi IPM. 4EPpATELY I1P CANNOTBEAVOIDED. AND BECA E E EE BEC0.uSE SOMECOPbiAUCT10Y A ACTS PAUNING Of PROTECTED TREES WILL BE ALLOWED ONLYFOP REM1LOVAL OFOAMAGED DISfIGURfDORCROSSWG BRANCHES;EVIDENT, iHEDIRECiORMAYAEOUIRE SUBMTTAL OFAPWBFOAPOSTCONSTRUCigN CAPE FOR SITESVVITH PgOiECTEDiREES I.CUAffiWG SPINES SHALL NOT BE USED i0 PERFORMPRUNING ERIAINEDBY,THE CItt PoAE6iEq.OF4~ 8INCNCALIPER9HOULDBE TRANSPLgNTE0QY SITE OA i0 ANO1HER ~, O ALL BRUSHfM3i BE REMOVED EWHElV P09518LE S LANDSCAPEREQUIREMENTSPEARICHFIELDCITVCODE544.83, SUED. 4, GENERAL UN0.SCAPING REQUIREMENTS C) MINIMUM SIZESOP OgNAMENTAI TREES & SHRUBS MINIMUM CALIPER OF11121NCHESSHR MIN SI =UES ZE 5GALLONS e(iREE SIZES BUILDING HEIGHT MW. OVERSTORY TREE SIZE 25TORIES 26'(80°b)7s° (204=(DoA 4.5 2 PER flICHFIELOCI7Y CODE544. 03, SUED & COMMERCIAL AND MIXE0.USE SITES b) OVANTITIESI (TREE PER 2,508 SFOF DEVELOPABLE IANDSCAPING AREA =14. 1 TREES Ii.15HAU0 PER 1, 000 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPNGAREA =35.25HRUBS 0EVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING RRER = 35,245 SF TOTAL TREES REQUIRED ON SRE 15 TREES iAL SHRUBS REWIR li 36 SHRUBS TO ED ONS E TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED 15 TREES TOTAL NUMBER OF SHRUBS PROPOSED 36SHRUBSTREE SCHEDULE CODE OTY COMMON NAMEILATINNAME G 4 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE /Acer lreemmni'JaAersred' S2E 25' GAL ROOT B88 PLANT TYPE I EX87MG g 5 I SWAMPWHITE OAKIOUercus bledor ----CAL BBB CL HAWTHORNICralae us laevi is 7 CRIMSON OUD 9 9 2.5" AL B88 FOPO SEO ' /SHRUBSCHEDULECODE O7Y ~MMON NAPAE ILATINNAME BIZE fl00i PLANTTYPE D 33 JAPANESE WHITE BPIRAEA7 Spiraea albllba b6 CONL li ETIBTWG E 4 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEIDieDMlalonicerab5CONT.F NoiusrD M SPIR A ! S irea Wmalda Gald Flame'fi GOLD FLA E E P G b5 CONY H 9 AMERICAN ARBORVITAE, HOLMSTAUPI Thlga occidenlelis p5 CONY PROPOSED' ,ti~4~ ro 0 RIB ~~ EXISTING TURF TOREMAIN , NEWPLANTING BEDS. C D , NEWIANDSCaPE ~ 5) ~ ~g~ H ( V) -'- SS--BLOCKRETAINING. WALL Isssl' a7os _ - ----- _ 63RD - - - - PROPERPY 21'-- e29P.' / J .~ ~- 4 ~" r ~ , ' eao6 ~- 6614. ~ ~ -- B2850 8378 _- -- -__-- \ - - _. \._ _ _ \ REMAIN _ _ ' ~\ \ \ \ 831 A ~~ Ow----w _ ~ \ ` ~ w 69, 4 ~ ~ y5LBOARO = I2BUILDINGSS PER0" ADDITION ~~627I871 _ FFEa 80' I ; S . ~~ FS ~''~' Main 3) FloorFFEP°83171831'ISTINGV ~ •\ \ ~ ~Q 1 I „~~,A ~~ ' 3) IWB31fl• 7 _ _ B __ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ ~~501 --=~~5 ~ ~, 4. yB1fBOR ',sag ~''~ IIG~ 49~ -~;~ (I ~859 ~~ - Bli ~ ~ - 483]r~ `" ~, ~;~/~ I _530.J ~ / ~~705 _ ~ 870.TO6n.24' ~ ~ I7.S' EI827fi '.'r _'{{, - 851,, Bn.3 6288 ~ j Ii`L50~ ~ -~'8~7 .6103 ~ PROPERiYt~ 1 A •~ _~ (~) A `~ ( i) B ~ "~ UTILITY POLEIDI II 1 TOREMAW 16. 4i~ LANDSCAPEPLAN PgRTHof` My~ ~ z I+ NJ = CG r A _O U CSC z j x3a wEdcid a ~ ~ (~ j yYQ~+ wwwcz zz° ~ z~ E d' ~~/ z K~ o ~ ~ IQ ~ ~ 0 3afa ~Ia 5 -r~~~ Z J 1l~ W a QVN W c c'~ Vl~ t .a o m ~ d O L a~ o~Q ~~~A~101r1A0908 EXIST 565SFI FURNACE 300 2 UP E)MECHRNICAL 1r7. E)STORAGE, 1145F: ~ 300 1 ' CE) STORAGE E)STORAGE I~ 4SF~ '` 423 SF 300 ; Tao I I 2 . E)EIEGTRIDAL 772SF 1300 1 t E%ISTING AREA WELLWI , EXTERIOR SHIPSIADDEfl '1 BASEMEN FIRE ESCAPE) , HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN NO WORK THIS AREA) UP ,t--_F 1:20 E) RAMP IgNDINc I N UP 9 TRANSFORMER - HATCHEDAREA REPRESENTS -I EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN NO WORK THIS AREA) 1 CODE PLAN -BASEMENT G•~Qi SCALE 3132"=1'-G" NOflrH 7" A z GROUP' 4272 SA 100 1 '43 F~ Up22 ~.. ~ l MEN ~"'- WOE4EN JANrEJENTRY ~ 0- E EXIST7: 38' STAIR3 EXTERIOR SHIP5 1--; CODEMAIN PLAN t~ 4' 1I I -~ 9 EQUIP. ~I ~ 1.35 108- • 34,UP ' H. UP ~ HALL 111 JOCCUPANCY= I G MERCANTILEGROUP' M107OCCUPANCY= S. 2 4 j STORAGE I 109 LAUNOR ELEV ~ 6 I 1 104 25415E 0 i6 7 9 n Cti I i f - EMflY kj Y TRAS WSTAIRS uP 108 l~'~- I Cl I IJ-~~ fa~ilFY t nH 0 r' r LOADING -7 SW'DO K PLATFORM -~ 9 5 35 IIP 34 CODE SYMBOL LEGEND: NORTH SCALE: 3132" = t'~C"OCCUPANCY-BUSINESS GROUP'B' STAIR208 E) OPEN OFFICE 5 d2J7 SF -100 43 ''2 ~i E) IEMEN WOMEN JAN'ai \ 4'DN(-lJ ~ 3a? I HATCHED AREAROOFBELOW REPRESENTS EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAINNOWORK THIS AREA)CODE PLAN -UPPER FLOOR PLANI ~ d BA~ II GUARDRAIL lIHOUR RATED WRLLS AS REQUIRED BY IRC SECTION708) HAU OCCUPANCY=I gas RESI 5 DENTIAL R-]' z LOBDY I KITCHEN 2_Jq1 I~1LIVING ROOh1RESIDEMIALIII72 ~. ' I' 1GNDp712,2'DN ~ STAIR1978 SFI111203206 '5JinlDBEOPOOMBATH~~ I STOR C '207,KITCHENiLI41NGROOM11205FSFp12W ~J(270' S " u CI HOUR RATED FIREWALLS6 ,IRS REQUIRED BY BC SECTION706)RESIDEMIAL 10175E uxrzs2 2oa '.51iLIVING ROOM IJAN C ~tl`1206KITCHENr$BRTHG BEDfl00M19 C ' SCALE: 3132" = 1'- 0" NORTH 1211ROOM FLOOR AREA ( SFfIOaOCCUPANTLOAD FACTOR NUMBEfl DF 13OCCUPANT LOAD21OCCUPAMSEXITING175OCCUPANTSE% ITING 26. 25 REQUIRED EXITWIDTH (INCHES)68ACTUAL EXIT WIDTH QNCHES) IFIREE% TINGUISHER LOCATION2 EXISTING DRINKING FOUNTAIN 3EXISTINGBARRIER~FREETOILET 4 EXISTINGPROP RINK5RA7E0 DCORASSEMBLY~SEEDOORSCHED. 6NEW DRINKINGFOUMAIN 7NEIVBARRIEP~FREETOILET e HANDICAPCURB CUT WITH TACTILE WARNING 9 HANDICAP PIATFORM LffT PLUMBING: PLUMBING FIYTURE COUNT: 20061n1emalDots BuiltlngCd ( T b1e 2902. 11Bas¢a¢ nseparacenn' le g P ti¢s. I.Offica'B lExisrcg) 86 ( 43M 843 Women)2 Ydarehcuw/S~2 (FNasel) 9 ( 45Men845Worren]ioWOccupancy - 95 WATER CLOSETS REQUIRED.4. 34.5I.OIfrEll per 25)- I.MNan and 1.72 Women 2. Warehouse! 5211 pet 100) D 045Menand0.045'NOmenE) Women:dWa1a Gosels Provided E)Men2WaterGosels82UnnalsProvded NewWaehouselRelarl _ 1 Water Clasethovided TOTAL WATER CLOSETS PROVIDED = 9LAVATORIES REQUIRED -2.24 =3I. ONkaIB ( Iper W) • 1 Men antlI.O75Women 2Warehouse! S4IIper 100) = 0.645 Men and0. 045WommIE) Women. 2Lavabdes Provided E) Men= 2 LavatotlesProvided Nary WarehouscvAelail =1 Lavalaries ProvidedTOTALLAVATORIESPROVIDED = 5 DRINKINGFOUNTAINS REQUIRED .2 8852(1. 17= 22) ExistDrinkng Fountains near (E) MEN and ) E) WOMEN TOTAL DRINKINGFOUNTAINSPROVIDED. 2SERVICE SINK REQUIRED. 1 2 Em1 Serviee SINrs Provided in ( E) JAN ( one per Ilea) I New ServiceSink Provided TOTAL SERVICE SINKCODE SUMMARY:ZONING:SITE:rmalslea¢a s1 acrea 13s,z4ssq 20NE: _Mizell Use Regional ~MU~fl STRUCTURE SETBACKS:Gfyof R chFeld Zoning Ordinance (&eclmn 537.07, Table 2 Mizell Use Bulk g Olm Standards)Frain OFT MIN, MA% Side ~ Buld' 2 NO SETBACKS: Cityd RChfeld ON' wnre (544.Subd.Parkngibe feel lrom N Section537. 3M" SF7PF.F1500 =545pacesungalohaS2 (baWhereof21occupancyHebWldingNo CansWChan Class Ir [FIP025] FP, 30) h ( azs] 3orAO-~12.I,-I System 506. sorry) 46, 000 SF. Tata' AllowaNeArea !perStory) 81,0605E Existing Bu ld' rgM Fba ~ 6,7505E Proposed Addlon PAain floor 5, 620 SFExisting & rlklrig Upper flwr ', 5, 750 Upper 770 TOTAL 922 SF ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: BusinessB Oaupxrryper 22 SICry EI(Plans ilGIOI la Capacity, Widths. Spralklers= 15' 3 Canmon Travel B: shall npre 100' 82: shell oat charIOtlwlsainklersystem [ exception 1076, 1 dlstanrelimilalions. Csoap omaP s~ z. 2a Fes, °~„ ~ z~ ~ u G J. I.d ¢ ~ N ; C7 f3 raoza~ o ~ sg a o W J L y~ r L li I. V N E ~ u! ti c II o ~ d O L, Q ~~~ G•101 A0908 i THE TRAFFIC STUt~Y COMPANY e randu To: Chris Hanson, Vanman Architects & Builders Frorn: Mike Spack, P.E. Date: 10/16/2009 Re: ECOsmarte Parking Lot Analysis - Richfield, MN afterrequiredexpanded 00lot utilization. The results are shown in Table 1. The peak parking lot usage was 18occupied stalls. The building square footage is proposed to increase by 96%. Factoring the peak parking demand by this ratio means 35 parking stalls should be provided for the expanded building. Therethe ECOsmarteshouldParkina Lot Utilization8:00a. m. e 5 i ®e 1 i 6 8:14 a.m. 1 7m.11: 19a.m.1 16 1 1 1. 8 11: 25 a. m. 1151 117 a.11113 4: 44 . m. 110 1 1 12 5:00 . m. 10 1 112 1600 78th St E -SitePlan Amendment08/ 11Surrounding Comprehensive PlanLDR LDR LDR PRKPRKLDRPPRK77th StE h~M RC DRO QRCRC RC O C O 0050 100200 300400 Feet nIHDRO -High Density Residential / Office 9 V RC - Regional Commercial PRK - Park LDR - Low Density Residential I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Melissa\ Projects\ Zoning Cases\ 1600 78thStCP. 1600 78th St E -SitePlan Amendment08/ 11Surrounding Land UseDPLX RES DPLX PRKPRKRESPPRK77th StE ~~ VACd Q COM COMAPTO r COM O m OM100 200300 400Feet N COM -CommercialAPT -Multi- Family Residential DPLX - Two- Family Residential ICI PARK - Park VAC - Vacant I:\ GIS\ Community Development\StafflMelissa\Projects\ Zoning Cases\1600 78th St LU. mxd 1600 78th St E -Site PlanAmendment 08/ 11 SurroundingZoning MR-1 R MR- 1 RRC- C- 2 C- 2 77thStEh~ MU- RU- Cm d MU-R MU- R MU-R of C GQiE100400MU-Use -V Mixed C-Commercial 1 -78th AGENDA SECTION AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # CASE # PUBLIC HEARING 2 20 I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC METING SATE: AUGUST consideranamendment totheCity's Zoning Ordinance. The proposed change will clarify which uses are considered "conditional uses" inthe various mixed use districts. This Chan eis a clarification as opposed to apolicchape.II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: II Conductand close apublic hearing and bymotion: Recommend approval of the attached ordinance amendingSubdivisiontomixeddistricts.BACKGROUNDtheCodedistrictstablewhetherparticular uses are permitted, permitted as anStipulationsconditionallyusesaresubsection05); sentencetosubsection andlead residents/ownersto believe that the uses permittedinalluselistedtable. proposedtheNo useare proposed.OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY Clear and ordinancesthatdescribetoserviceconsistentoftheperiodicupdating that regulations are serving theirintendedB. and/contradictorymisunderstandingsunintendedconsequencesnot C. FINANCIAL N/A D. LEGAL Notice of this publichearing waspublishedin theSunCurrentinaccordance withandLocalrequirements. Other Actions:Council: Therecommendation ofthe PlanningCommissionwill gototheCityCouncil for the City adoptstherecommended changes, theywill take effect 30daysaftertheapproved Councilresolutionispostedin the IV. ALTERNATIVES~ofwithadditionalchanges.RecommendV. ATTACHMENTS OrdinanceCurrent CodeSubsection 537. 03and537. 05 (partial) forcontext VI. PRINCIPALPARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETINGN/A BILL NO. AMENDMENT TO RICHFIELD CITY CODE RELATED TO ZONING SUBSECTION 537.SUBDIVISION 1RELATED TOCONDITIONALUSES IN THE MIXEDUSE DISTRICTSTHECITY OFRICHFIELDDOESORDAIN:Section 1 Subdivision 1the RichfieldCity Codeisamended toread asfollows:537.05. Conditional Uses. Subdivision 1. ~I~e- uses- ted- this- s~~ ro ,.,, nom,,+;,,,,~~ ~,~o~ ;,, + Conditionaluses u,~,.,, ,~.,, u~~ ,-,,,-z , listedinTable1are subjectto theconditionaluse permit Subsection 547.of thiscode andthefollowing conditions.Section XThis Ordinanceiseffective inaccordancewithSection3. 09 the City Charter. by the City Councilof the City of Richfield, Minnesota this27thday ofSeptember, 2011. Debbie Goettel, MayorATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk Richfield City Code (7onin~) MU District X37.03 537.03. Permitted Uses. Subdivision 1. "1'he following table establishes peri]]itted, conditionally permitted ses Districtfollowing abbreviations withinthe use table: P= permitted useA= accessory r. C= permitted I2 - N__i~(?! Yl~' K(' r---- --1011a1lallC oral services ~P PCN_ services _ P serving alcohol) P GRestaurant Class cafeteria)P P Restaurant ClassIII (fast food/ convenience}C1V ( only} P Station / convenience store P N vemence I'clinics A motel (defined as 6 or more rooms) PP _ N _ andNathleticIf\ uto salesor lease -C rentalfacilities accessory a primaryAN aftice or use to a rdul~ establishmentsas defined and Cit}~ day p P SInEN77A!_ Dwellingtownhouse Pruin. 3 units) P P Pbut see X37. 07. Subd. 2a) L, ive -N Y living facilities, nursin<?, rest hones P Richfield CityCode X37- 3 Richfield City Code (Z,oning) Mt1 District 537.03, Strbd. 1 (cont.) Use MU-R MU-C MU-N I r~:S TI T UTIO~V A L/ PURL snotsimilar areand are subject to the conditional use permit provisions outlined in Subsection 547. 09 of this code and the following conditions. Subd. 2. Regional retail services in MU- C. Regional retail services in the MU- C district provided that retail uses with over 50, 000 square feet ofamulti- multi-Subd. met: The retailusesfronton an arterial street andmeet the area requirements ofSubsection 537.07, Subd. RestaurantservedUses withdrive-up window or teller service provided the following conditions are met: a) Nodrive- upwindow shallofpedestriandevelopment.adequately address circulation issues andpotential noise or light pollution;Kichfiicld City Code x; 7_4 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM # 3PC LETTER #CASE # 11- CUP-01 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTDATA: ATJGLTST22, 2011 ITEMF® IZPLANNING C® MISSI®NINF®I~ MATI® N: The hearing tofor arestaurant at6463 Lyndale Avenueiscancelled.I. BACKGROUND On August 9, 2011, City staff was notified by the applicant that the applicationfora Conditional UsePermit to operate a restaurant withseatingat Avenuewas being withdrawn. AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # CASE # NEW BUSINESS 4 21 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PC 1VIEETING D~4TE: AUGUST 22, IZ PL, C®NSII~EI~resolutionfinding that the Redevelopment forProjectAreaHousingTax Increment Tax Increment Financing Planwith the Richfield 1 Financing District ( IlVoodlake Housing) onrith the Richfield 12, 2010 the Richfield PlanningCommission consideredaresolutionfinding that the modificationtothe Redevelopment Plan far the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area andestablishment oftheWoodlakeHousing Tax Increment Districtand Tax FinancingPlan consistentwith the ComprehensivePlan voted5 to 1 to approve the request. Since that time minor changeshave been made to thedevelopment that requires the Planning Commission to review a finding of consistencyagain for the project.The basic development concept remainsthe same as itwaslast presented to the Planning Commission. The project entails thedemolition oftheexisting25, 000 sq. ft. multi- tenant retailbuilding and the construction of mid- to- upper level rental housing with 20% of that meeting statestandards as " affordable" tohouseholdsearning atorbelow50% of the areamedian income. There have been, however, a few revisions to the site and building plans.The revisedproposal increases the overall value the projectbycreating unitsthatwillrent atahigherratethanthe previousplan. lJnit sizes the projecthave increased byapproximately15-20 percentperunitand the interior amenitiesof the project have been improved. The community and fitness rooms are over 200 percent larger, interior finishes have been improved and offices and a business center added. The revised proposal increases the unit count from 90 to 94 and includes 5 size hasapproximately20, revision also includes expansion spaces. increase allow forfinishes. entire exteriorisbrick, cement board or metal panel. Previously, the project included large areas of vinyl siding, all of which has beenremoved. In addition tophysical changes to the development proposal, the Developer has also changed the mannerbybeof $than payable only if the Developer pays real estate taxes for the Project in the amount of more than $ 144, 000 in any calendar year. Payment of the B Note would not decrease the amount of payment that the HRA would receive ( either for its property or for payment towards administrative costs). In order to allow for this request, and consultants and TaxPlan second pay- as- you- go note in the TIF Plan' s budget. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, a change in the TIF Plan' s budget requires another public hearing before the City Council. On August 9, 2011 the Richfield City Council made a call for a Public Hearing to be held before the Council on September 13, 2011 regarding the amended andrestated TIF District. Before the Council can consider the establishment of a TIF District, state requires that the writtenopinion (theofwhether the redevelopment plan conforms to a general plan for the development of the locality as a whole. The following is an identification of the manner in which the proposed redevelopment plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan: Land Use Richfield' s Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as " Mixed Use," which is a category that was created specifically totheAvenue, the The intent of this designation is to aid in the creation of a city center that would include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. Residential housing in this area is intended tobedensity, 50+ Theproposed is feet; the 94units, therefore, achievea of approximately units perFurthermore, Landchapterthe the following: Bn order continue outdated andto living in local, community threatening existing lower density residential neighborhoods.Infact, done correctly, redevelopment can help " protect" single- family neighborhoodsby serving as a buffer to more intensiveuses." The Redevelopment Plan, therefore, meetscategoryasidentified ComprehensivePlan as as spiritand ofwitha communitysurvey was conducted as part ofRichfield' Comprehensivethefromthe Plan,including: 67% the respondents saidit appropriate for expandhousing76% said appropriatefor Richfield pursue redevelopmentopportunities; ofrespondentsisRichfieldexpanddensityunits/ acre) opportunities { as to thatsaidwasinappropriate didHousingof theComprehensive Plan provides several thatrelate thefollowing:Encouragecreation throughnew construction and remodeling;" the proposedhousingbe thanof andwould represent a " move formost apartmentPolicy: Promoteadditional stagesof their cycle...;" proposeddevelopment offerthatthecurrenthousingin Richfield.Policy: Promote development... affordablehousing thealternativeandcreationpartnershipsmission itis to low moderateincome housing;" theTIFto keeping rents affordable. Housing FDistrict notthat be "blighted" or that existing buildings be "substandard," instead, it requires that 20-40% of the housing units be affordable to households at 60% to 80% of the medianthe Redevelopment intent of GoalEncourage of andsiteactivity a theComprehensivePlan resulted intheidentificationof theconsistenciesidentified above, therewerenoaspectsoftheproposedRedevelopmentPlanthatwere in conflictwithRichfield'sComprehensivePlan.III. BASISOF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICYPursuanttoMinnesotaStatutes, thePlanningCommissionisrequiredtoreviewRedevelopmentPlansandcommentonconformance to theCity'sComprehensivePlan (typically means Resolution). A finding that the Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan would not construe the granting of land approvals; Developer will likelytotoPlanning Commission at later into seekland approvals ( a rezoning or a site plan approval)moredetailedsiteand building plans and a application.CRITICALISSUESTheCityCouncilhasmadeacallforaPublicHearingto be heldattheirSeptember13, 2011meetingtoconsiderfinalapprovalforthe establishment ofthe amendedandrestated TIF Districtandmodificationofthe Richfield RedevelopmentProjectArea.C. FINANCIALEhlersAssociates, Inc., theHRA'sfinancialconsultant, has preparedthetaxincrement plans district.Theis upto $ 822, TIF Plus 500, only their 144, any TIF be pay- go" the paid newtaxes Their documentationthatthis development notwithout level ofAsa the ondevelopment (which the otherage-restricted development developed in pastyears) received a portion of the $10 million in TIF that wasthe Centre housing development, a ramp and a McDonald's restaurant).TheComprehensivePlanincludesTax IncrementFinancingasa recommended implementationtool.D. LEGALChapterofthe Minnesota StateStatutes requires that whenever the Cityadoptsor modifiesaredevelopment plan, the Planning. Commission mustreviewthe planfor consistencywiththe City's ComprehensivePlan.ICI. l~ LTERNATNE RECOMMENDATION( S) Reject theattached Resolution and find that the proposedModifiedPlan anddisposition of City and HRA parcels does not conform to the ComprehensivePlan. V. 1-~TTACHMENTS ResolutionModificationto theRedevelopment Plan for the RichfieldRedevelopment Project Area and establishmentof theAmendedand RestatedIncrement Financing Plan forthe 2010-1Housing Tax Increment Financing District ( Woodlake Housing).VI. hRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING Arepresentativeof MichaelDevelopment. RES®LUTI®N N®. WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield,Minnesota, (the °'HRA") has proposed toadopta Modification totheRedevelopmentPlanfor the Richfield Redevelopment ProjectArea ( the " Redevelopment Plan Modification") and theHRAand CityCouncil for the the Increment forHousing Tax istrict ( WoodlakeHousingare referredasWHEREAS, HRA have submittedthe Modifications to Planning Commission ( pursuant to Sections 469. other law, the Commission the Modifications, Restated Tax in accordance provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section2027 to conformityplansfor the and redevelopmentofthe City as thetheCity. N® THEREE®RES®LVE®, by CommissionAmended and Increment Plans conformthe general plans for the development ofa whole. 22nd day 2011Commissionof the City ofRichfield, Minnesota. RickHaBI, Secretary s of~_=1u~ar.1~~ 10. 2011 I~ rclfJ jbrH1Z.~~ _~hp1•rn~~il ModificationtotheRedevelopmentPlan forRichfieldRedevelopmentProject Area andthe Amendedand RestatedTax IncrementFinancingPlan forthe2010-1Ho- using District 11Voodlake ahousingdistrict) withintheRichfield Redevelopment Project AreaIZichtieldI~[ousingand l~edevel®ptnent ~i.titl7ot• ity id IennepinuntyIi~April27, 2010Adopted: forAmended Plan: Septembe~° 1;° 201 3 Adopted:EH LE RS 306651697 8500e flax ~ G51697~8b SlnAwwwta155113- 1N0. 5 ehlers inc.com Table ®f C®ntents for reference purposes only) Section 1 -Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area Foreword ............................................................. 1- 2 - FinancingPlanforthe 2010-1HousingTaxIncrementFinancingDistrict (Woodlake Housing)Subsection 2-1.Foreword ...............................................2-1Subsection2-2.StatutoryAuthority ........................................2-1Subsection2- Statement2- Redevelopment Subsection Description District To Be Acquired 2-2Classification2-7.Yearof3Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and NetIncrement and Notification of Prior3 Sourcesbe 4 Subsection2-FiscalDisparitiesElection ..................................2-Subsection 2- 12. Business Subsidies .......................................2- 7 Subsection2-13.County Road Costs .......................................2-7 Subsection 14.Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions .................2- 8 Subsection2- 15.Supporting Documentation ................................. 2-9 2- 22.2-Assessment2- 2- BofD1 Appendix E HousingQualifications the E- 1 Appendix F Findings for theF-1 Secgl®e~ 1 ° 9Vl®d®ficata®rt $® flee Redev~f® pme~BileiE$ ~ area represents aModification the Redevelopment Plan fortheRichfieldRedevelopmentProjectArea: Thismodification representsacontinuationof the goalsandobjectives setforththeRedevelopment Plan forthe Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. Generally, thesubstantive changesincludethe approvalof anamended andrestatedTax IncrementFinancing Planforthe 2010-1 HousingTaxIncrement Financing District ( Woodlake Housing). For furtherinformation, a review of the Redevelopment Planforthe RichfieldRedevelopment Project Area is recommended. It is available from the Community DevelopmentDirector at theCity ofRichfield. Other relevantinformation is contained in theTax Increment Financing Plans forthe TaxIncrementFinancing Districtswithin the Richfield RedevelopmentProject Area.RichfieldHRA Modification to the Redevelopment Plan forthe Richfield Redevelopment Project Area 1- 1 Section 2 -Amended and Restated Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2010-1 Housing Tax increment Financing District (Woodlake Housing} Subsection 2-7. Foreword The Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Richfield ( the "City"), staff and consultants haveprepared the followinginformationtothe of anand Tax IncrementPlan 2010- 1TaxIncrement WoodlakeHousing) ( the " District"), a housing increment Project Area. redevelopment to occur. To thisend, the HRA and Cityhave certain statutory powers pursuantto Mit7nesotaStatutes (" M. S.'), Sectio7~ s169. 001 to - X69. 0=~ 7, inclusive, as amended, and M. S., Sections = X69. 17-{ to 169. 1799, inclusive, asamended (the "Tax Increment FinancingAct" or " TIF Act"), to assist in financingpublic costs related to this This sectioncontainstheAmendedandRestated Tax IncrementFinancing TIFfor District. relevantModificationtheRedevelopmentArea.Districtcurrently consists 3andconstructionanthePleaseAenteredthethis201anagreementThistheRedevelopmentforojectPlanprecluderedevelopmentaretheProjectArearedevelopmentofDistrict. remainingwithindescribedPlan.toM.andrelatingnecessary land toadeveloper. 4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or allnecessary acquisition, construction.relocation, demolition, and required utilitiesand public street workwithin the District.RichfieldHRA Tax IncrementFinancing Plan for 2010- Housing TaxFinancing 2- Subsection 2-5. ®escription of Property in the ®istrict and Property To Se Acquired The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of--way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed in Appendix C of thisTIFPlan. Please also seethe map inAppendixBfurther on theof District. Thecurrently one parcelbeincluded District.Subsection Z- 6. Classificatior- of istrict need to inclusive, find that the District, to be established, is ahousing district pursuant to M.S., Section =169. 174, Subd.. ll andM. S., Section = 169. 1761 as defined below: M. S., Section = 169. 17= 1, Subd. ll: Hozxsing distx"ict" meansatypeof tax increxazent~xaancixagdistrict ti~> hicbconsists of a px"oject, or a poz"tion a pi°oject, intendedfoz° occupafzcy, in pay" t, by familieslo~~~ moderateonze, 4, Housingof1, StatesHousingAct of asofxzzzxxzicipcxlacts, theofSection {orthatfcationsnotdxst7"act.61:ementfitzaTZCingicthozxsingbe20thatomconsistnonresidentialuses.sectionlandthaxaAzxthority'ofofnot4620.02e).toas for thatdoesnot meet the requirexzzents of paragraph ( a), clause (2), if it is tx"eatedas a separate building, the addition leas tzotcontexzzplated by the tax increment frxaancing plan ~a4zich ix~ zclzxdes theexisting sh" uctux"Richfield Tax IncrementPlan 1 FinancingWoodlake Housing) Subd. 2. Owner occupied housirZg. For owner occupied residential property, 95 percent of the housing tcnits must be initially pur°cTzased and occupied by individuals wTzose family irzcorne is less than or equal to the income requirements for mortgage InternalRevenue Code.Subd3. property.For• rental property, proper° tysatisfyirzcorneegzrir•for rentalr°district.withtheCityvdill ofmulti- familypersonofM.doesthe273.calendarbeforeforofTax1, 176, and176, Subd. 25yearsHRACity (whichlaterofincludingTIF phasesotherchanges, orwhentheisThereservesthedate.OriginalTaxValue/Increment NotificationSection-17=7andM.S.,I, certifiedDistrictwillonplacedpropertydeveloperbyforfrompropertyto M. 169. Subds. I the in year ( beginning payment the by the original increased as result 1. Changeexempt status of property; 2. Reduction orenlargementofthegeographicboundaries of thedistrict; RichfieldHRATaxIncrement FinancingPlanfor the 2010- 1 HousingTax Increment FinancingDistrict ( VVoodlake Housing) 2- 3 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year which oftheDistrict declinesbelowthe novalue be captured no taxwillpayabletheThe rateassumingtheappearin2, Project the projectsshownCitytheitsProjectanofincrement (ProjectCapaeityNTC) $8,LocalPayTaxcapacitytheDistrict. thetax127,toHRArequestCounty noticetheDistrictS.,Section =~69.withlistingwithinofbeeneighteen (immediatelythemunicipalityMS., AuditorincreasenettaxbywhichpermitwasCityebetlaeDistrictbuildingeccdiugapprovale of be primarily through collection HRA the City right bonds other as a the HRA Increment Plan for1 Housing Tax Increment Financing District ( WoodlakeHousing) 2-4 Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by apay-as-you-go note. In addition, the HRA intends to enter into an interfund loan pursuantNHS., Section =;t69.178to reimburse itself for funds advanced for the project through the conveyance of land to a developer for less than fair market value and administrative costs. It is estimated issuedto adeveloperandpayablefrom taxincrement revenues. Additional indebtedness maybe required toHRA toincurdebt. TheHRA or theCitywillissuebondsorincurother debt only upon the determinationisinofTheestimatedincrementforshowntheTOTAL000Interest $000000TheCityTIFinparttheinprincipalof $2,bondsinrevenuebondsorbonds, ofindebtednessiscumulativeauthoritytmdet• TIFofSubsectionUsesunderforDistrictatoconstruction94-developmentwithHRAandwillassistancetothecosts, described. HRAoforredevelopmentpropertytheestablishmentdevelopmentredevelopmentthistheusetoforcertainThecostsassociatedthepage.TAX INCREPdIENTAcquisition $000Improvements/500OtherQualifyingAdministrative000889,500ANDTOTAL000forTaxWoodlake The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in Appendix D. Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories aof the Districtboundaries. S~absec~i®r~ 2-' l 'l. Fis~a6 ® isg~~ ri~ ies E9~~~ i®~ Pursuant to M. S., Section = 169.177, Subd. 3, the City may elect one of two methods tocalculate fiscal disparities. If the calculations pursuant to NHS., Section = 169. 177, Subd. 3, clazase b, ( within the District) are followed, the following method of computation shall apply:1~ Tlie o~°iginalnettax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscaldisparit}-~provisions ofChapter 276A or ={ 73F. The cuF° rent net tax capacityshall exclude any fiscal disparity commei°cial- industi° ialnet tax capacity increase beh~~ een theoriginal year and the currentyeai° multiplied by tlae fiscaldispaT° ityT° atio deter° mined pui° szaarrt to A7. S., Section276A. 06, subdivision 7 or M.S., Section = 1%3F. 08, renttaxcapacityandthe shall exclude the retait~~ ed captured net tax capacity of the authoritti~ fi°oi7~ the net tax capacity of the local taxing dish° icts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The local tax ~° ates so determined are to be extended against t1~ e ~° etained captu~° ed net tax capacity of the authority as well as tlae net tax capacity of the local taxing dish° icts. The tax generated by the extension of the less of ( A) the local taxing district taxratesor• (13) theoriginal local tcrx rate to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax inci° el77ent of the authorit}'. the Ci$ y vviil c9noose $ o caflcula$ c ~ scai dispari$ ics by clause i~. ~ o~' e~~ er, i$ is ~ ao$ aar$ icipa$ ed $ ha$ $~ e lDis$ ric$ ~' i)! 9 coar$ ain couaruerciai/ a~ adus$ rial proper$ y. As a resui$, $ herc shou9d be > rao i>< npac$ due $ o $ he i~ scat dispari$ ies pro~~ isioaa on $ tae 1~ is$ ric$. According to M. S., Section = 169. 177, Subd. 3: c) Tlae method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to pay° crgraph ( a) or b) shall remain the same for tl2e duration of the district, except that the go>> erning body may elect to change its election fi° om the method of computation in paragraph ( a) to the method in paragraph (b). Stabs~ c~ icae~ 2-' 92. l~ aasi~ ess ~ t~ bsi~ ies Pursuant to M. S., Section 116J993, Subd. 3, the following forms of financial assistance are not considered a business subsidy: 1) A business subsidy of less than $ 150, 000; 2) Assistanceto businesses or to classIncrement 3) Public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the state or local government that serve a public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at the time the improvements are made; 4) Redevelopment for designated historic preservation districts, provided that t11e assistance is equal to or less than 50% of the total cost; 6) Assistance to provide job readiness and training services if the sole purpose of the assistance is to provide those services; 7) Assistance for housing; 8) Assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance for a tax increment financing hazardous substance subdistrict as defined under M. S., Section = X69. 17-1, Szabd. 23;9) Assistance for energy conservation; 10) Tax reductions resulting conformitywithfederaltaxcompensationand12) derived Indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions; 14} Funds from bonds allocated under chapter 474A, bonds issued to refund outstanding bonds, and bonds issued for the benefit of an organization described in section 501 ( c) ( 3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1999; 1 ~) Assistance for a collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business; 16) Assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under M. S., Section 69. 17~, Subd. 19; 17) Redevelopment when the recipient' s investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation is 70 percent or more of the assessor' s current year' s estimated market value; 18) General changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally technical nature; 19) Federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to, and reinvested by, the state or local government agency; 20) Funds from dock and wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority; 21) Business loans and loan guarantees of $ 150, 000 or less; 22) Federal loan fiords provided through the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration; and 23) Property tax abatements granted under M. S., Section -; x69. 1813 to property that is subject to valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100. The HRA will comply with M. S., Sections 116J. 993 to 116J. 99~ to the extent the tax increment assistancePlan any Road Costs Pursuant to M. S., Section = i69. 17~, Subd. la, the county board may require the HRA or City to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgment of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requu• ing construction or the next five years under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the HRA or City within forty- five days of receipt of this TIF Plan. In the opinion of the HRA and City and consultants, the proposed developmentoutlined this TIF or TIF not forwarded to the county 45 days prior to the public hearing. The HRA and City are aware that the county could claim that tax increment should be used for county roads, even after the public hearing. Richfield HRA Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2010- 1 Housing Tax Increment Financing District ( VVoodlake Housing) 2- 7 Subsection 2-14. Estimated impact on ®their Taxing Julrisdictions The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creationthe District. Through an analysis of the project financials, a financing gap exists and assistance is needed to move the project forward. The estimated fiscal impact of the Districtwouldbe as Captaared2010/ Pay2011axCapacity (C~' C)Percent of CTC T® talNet Up® n100 1.2462°/®RichfieldISDNo. 280 32,204,673 308,757 0.9587°/®Il~' IPAC' I' ® N TAX I2A'Pay2011tialT'®CTCHennepin0.308,141,567970175,3651SD26759019.757308,319100.estimates abovecapturedcapacitywhencompleted. raterate. Thetotaltheon201 ] figures. DistrictcertifiedunderactualunavailabletimePlantoS. 469.Szibd. b):ofincrement. thetotalthatwillof900,000;2) Distt°onrovidedissueprobableimpactthetobeWithadditionesidentscallsforThedoestheinwillinvestmentDistrictfirenot expectednewfewifareconstruction. Thehaverelatedis notincreaseinvestmentorPlanHousingDistrict ( The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements in the area. The current infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will able proposeddevelopment. Basedonthe plans, there no additional associated withmaintenance, plowing, andThe Districtofforminimal. Itbedebt of taxthethethatthetaxing1,thatamountlifeDistrictcounty'remained2,informationschooldistrictcountyormustadditionalfinancingrequestsdistrictreceived.Documentation S. z469,clause7themustidentificationstudiesmaketheDistrict. aatthethatApplicationMichaell5, 2010.Research, value20l1.16. lncrernentto469.17=~, fromsources:1. capacity, tangible to extent the purchased tax 3, Principal received or advances by the tax HRA Increment Plan for1 Housing Tax Increment Financing District ( WoodlakeHousing) 2-9 4. Interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; 5. Repayments or return of tax increments made to the Authority under agreements for districts for which the request for certification was made after August 1, 1993; 6. Authorityunder r11S., Section273. Subsecti®n 17. M® ns t® istrictaccordance1115., t69. any:reductione);tobe4. HRA in thebeincrement6. thediscussion, forgeographicofthestealbetheisanddeterminationTherequirementsonlymodificationict2) (thoseinB} 469.original willreducedbycurrentnettaxthes) District.mustmodificationenlai°geographicDistrictinformofboundariesrecordedinnNf.169.174, administrativeexpendituresNRAtlaarr:1. ofvices, includingwith in ict; 4. Amounts pay fund reserve for, at bonds pursuant M. S., 178; Amounts to other financialthe extent those obligations were used tofinancecostsdescribedinclauses ( 1) to (3). RichfieldHRATaxIncrement FinancingPlanfor the 2010- 1 HousingTax Increment FinancingDistrict ( Woodlake Housing) 2- 10 For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, l 982, and before August I , 2001, administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. PursuanttoM. S., Section 169.176, Subd. 3, to pay any and administrative expenses for the up notpercent thetotal estimated tax incrementexpenditw- es authorized bythe TIF l~ fS., Section ~ 169. 17q, Subd. 2~, clause 1~, fromtheDistrict, whichever isless. For districts for whichcertificationwas requestedafterJuly 3 I , 2001, no tax increment may be usedto pay anycostswhich Plan total clazrse ( is less. Pursuant to M. S., 1h, taxactualincurred connection notpercentage limits 176, Subd. county may require expenseswere M. Section = or Treasurer mttheTreasurergeneral tax examiningfinancing. This Limitatian ofpledgedbemayfunds the providematurity169.Szrbd. 6:yearsoriginal relzabilztation ofadjacentto has ithirzauthor~otir~r. incr°incr~theoriginaltaxIfthesite ration ofaccordanceraith thetaxincr~erraent fi. nancingplan, the authority shallcer~tifyto the countycn- azrditorcapacityrecently original capacity=Theevidence has forRichfieldHousing) 11 submitted by February 1 of the fiftb year follo~a~ing the yectr• in i~~bicb the par-cel was cer-tified as included in the district. For purposes of dais subdivision, qualifed improvements of a street are limited to ( 1) the District by approximately September 2016 and report such actions to the County Auditor. Subsect6~ n 2- 20. lJse ® f Tax Increment The HRA or City hereby determines that it will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable property located in the District for the following purposes: 1. To pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to financea project; 2. to finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs ofthe Richfield Redevelopment ProjectArea pursuant to M.Sections =169.001to =Topaycostsidentified set forth in the TIF Plan; 4. To finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in M. S., Section - 169. 176, Subd. 4; 5. To pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf of the HRA or City or for the benefit of the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area by a developer; 6. To finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the T[ F Plan or pursuant to M. S., Chapter- 462C. M.S., Sections 469.12 tlar-ough 469. 16, and/ or M. S., Sections = 169. 178; and 7. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M. S., Chapter 462C, M. S., Sections = 169. 12 through 469. 16, and/ or 1~ 1S., Sections =169. 178.Revenuesderived frown tax increment frown a housing district must he used solely to finance the cost of housiaag projects as defined in 191 S., Sections 469. 174, Subtl. I1 caFtd 469.. 1761. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing projects and the allocated administrative expenses of the RRA or City may he included in the Bost of a housing project. These revenues shall not be used to circumventapplicable for 176, Sztbd. 4. Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by Hennepin County to the HRA for the Tax Increment Fund of said District. The HRA or City will pay to the developer( s) annuallyanamountnottoexceedanamount as specified in a developer' s agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public improvements, site City administration ( up to 10 percent) and the costs of housing projects outside the District. Sa~ bsectl~ an 2- 21. Excess Increments Excess inc~° ements, as defined in M. S., Section 469. 176, Szrbd. 2, shall beusedonlytodoone or more of the following: 1. Prepay any outstanding bonds; 2. Dischat° ge the pledge oftax for any into of bonds; or 4. Return t11e excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their local tax rates. Richfield HRA Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2010- 1 Housing Tax Increment Financing District ( VVoodlake Housing) 2- 12 The HRA or City must spend or return the excess increments under paragraph (c) within nine months after the end of the year. In addition, the HRA or City tnay, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose modify publiccosts intheRichfield ProjectArea the District. 2- 22. forwithDeveloperHRA reviewandmayplan, construction, narrativeCity HRA orrelated115., nopropertyPlano~bondspursuanttoincrementsexcessagreementofwhich111S., mayenterwithdevelopertheassessmentwhoimprovementsthe assignedthelandaretobesoasvalueagreementassessor, reasonableCountyvalueagreement.2-thewillbythe2-S., 17, Szabds. ~, 6bCityfinancialtaxincrementof1ofSzcbd. ~ the to a disclosure a required fl S., 17 Subd. the will direct Auditor the of increment fromRichfield HRA Tax Increment Financing Plan forthe2010-1HousingTax Increment FinancingDistrict ( VVoodlakeHousing) 2-13 Saabsecti®n 2-26. Reas®rDabie Expectati®ns As required by the TIF Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been made that the anticipated development would reasonablyoccur through ritten representation byeffects upon rt2-the or publicredevelopmentcosts of thetheRichfieldRedevelopment ProjectAreapursuant to M.S., Sectio~zs =169.001to469.0=~7, Tax increments maynotbeusedtocircumventexistinglevylimit law. Notaxincrementmaybeusedfortheacquisition,construction, renovation, operation, ormaintenanceofabuildingtobe used primarilyandregularlyforconductingthe of county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the state or federal government. This provision does prohibit use revenues derived fromincrementstheuction or renovation a structure.Housing DistrictExce~ to on Pooling; Five Year Limit. Tax incrementfromDistrictmust be used solely to costofhousingprojects (includingadministrativeexpensesandpublicimprovementcosts) asdefinedinM. S. Section =169.174, Subd. 11andsubjecttotherequirementssetforthin M. S. SectzoT~ =169.1761.Pursuant to M.S. Section469. ] 763, Subd. 3 (the "FiveYearRule"), expendituresof tax incrementforhousingpurposeswithin the RichfieldRedevelopmentProjectArea considered anactivitythe andtherefore, such be with without to S~ 2~. Richfield Authority the an residential safe life theCity. TIF forDistrictwas prepared Ehlers & Inc., Centre PointeMinnesota5~ 13- telephone (697-8500. HRA IncrementPlanfor 2010- Increment VJoodlake 2- Appendix A Project Description The Amended and Restated TIF Plan for the 2010-1 Housing TIF District Woodlake Richfield Apartments, LLC, thepropertyis obsoleteas be located 2 the will studio apartments, 50 one bedroom apartments, 30 two bedroom apartments and9 three bedroomapartments. It isplanned that 20 percent oftheunits will beaffordable at 50percent of median income. The current design provides two three- story elementsdefining the edge of Lyndale Avenue. Between these two there isa landscaped courtyardthat will provide avery "liveable" amenity for theresident, and ~~% ill provide green space along Lyndale Avenue. Parkingis available with sixty- ninebelow grade and sixty- five above grade stalls. It is anticipated that the developer willbe issued two pay- as- you-go notes. TheNote A will reimburse the developer for a portion of the land acquisition expenses, andthe Note B will reimburse the developer for theremainder of theland acquisition expensesand a portion of the siteimprovements.In addition, the HRA willbe paid for the property it owns within the Districtthat itconveys to the developer. It is estimated that the fair market value is $ 85, 000.Appendix A- 1 Appendix B Mapof Richfield ent Project Area and the District Appendix ichfeflc~ ~-I®usflr~~ ~ncv ..e~evel®p~~aei~t 1~~th®~-ity lZflchfiefldR~dev~1® pi~ent P~~®~~ ct . A~°e~2010- 1 FioL~sing' TIF District (~e P-1®usi~~~) 67nq n: ird 5th661hfilthSRth 641h7fllh 7otn rzISt tst ttz 2ndhhi61h7IIhIftl I- 4' W z to ~' G TZOt Y y 1 ~ 4 rWOGm ~ ~ X r ~ w_ W - 7 ^ ~ OO O OK u > ? O ~ w 0 •- ~ O vOC ~ K ~' -~ ~ ~ Zm X i t- cnnaOY , _ 2t7 ~ ~ [ 4 ¢ ~ K ~ ~ U ~ _ O 2Na_ o ~ ~ _. ~ wb hc bottnciariesthe ~ ichfcJc~ Rcdcvcio~7enc~ lt m E1rea arecote~•~ obzs avith the Corpo~•ate lit~ litsity62nd63rd6?th 661h 7th 6[ ith fi9th ion, tsland 73th nth75t1i6th 77tH AlhegendT~ R Redevelopment Project AreaBoundary) Appendix C escription of Property to beIncluded inthe Listrict TheDistrict encompasses all propertyandadjacentrights-of-wati~ andabutting roadwaysidentified by the par°cels listed below. Parcel Numbers vnei• 27-L}~ ndaleAvenue SouthWoodlal: e PlazaPartnership27-028- 24- 23- 0060 521 64r'' Street West Woodlake Plaza Partner° ship 27- 028n24- 23- 005951564` x' StreetWest Richfield HRA Appendix C-1 Appendix D EstimatedGash 1® far the C~ istriet Appendix D- 1 011 L~~~A' m nssocin*rs irvc. Woodlake Richfield Apartrrtents, ~~~ -- l~~stannin¢~ i~o InfBation Coty ®f 92ic9~foeDol sirsg ?tc s.r>e,-.~? ro,- r.,.a~:„r~,6npmeni oz Woodlake Pta-r_a s; gF,' BaseValueAssumptlurrs - Page 1 DistrictType:Housing Maximum/ FrozenLocalTax138. Pay 2011Name/ 2010- 1Local Rate: ( UseofCurrent 138.5680% Pay 2011 County District #: State- for total taxes) 0. 14047 % Pay 2011Existing District - Specify No. YearsRemaining Inflation Rate - Every Year:4. 00%HRA Interfund Loan Rate 4.00 % PROPERTY TAX CLASSES AND CLASS RATES: Interest Rate for Note A and Note B 6. 75 % # ExemptClass Rate (Exempt)0.00% Present ValueDate:1- Feb- 12Commercial Industrial Preferred ClassRate ( C11 Pref.) First Period 2- Aug-12 First $150,0001 50 TaxYear Certified:2011 5150.2IncrementClassC,2,HousingClass Rate ( 1.TaxDisparitiesNon-H125%TotalRes.)41.500,3270 % 25%.Agricultural TaxOriginalTaxAfterAddresskgarketTax0092L.100%2012C/488171,2012IRental80.OD0OQO7,roAnoCouer, or roarceNi„ Fa2sed or ostimv,tcs N4 rtnosf likei5/ w¢p~R Yoe sdpu~red rrrrtt '. Erne as _e'i ,; ecc:.._,~ .anal. ca~ md~ ue _snrrot_c: tag ,o„ ~a'iuceil meiror~ e!~Ir ~ 80, OQti ad > QtO~^. PreparedEhlers F_ Minnsota\Housing- ED- Woodlake 6- 2011 - 8i~~r2011 EHLERS s nssncinres ;Nc Woodlake &Zichfie0d Apartaneots, Lied -- Assaaa~r>lioc~ Rio 6o'aflstior~ City ®ff RichfficOd Housing TIF District for redevelopment of Woodlake Base Assumptions -PageHousingTOTAL _117.897 897 Market Value 8.842.275 2,240,043 19, 082,318 Property Tax Class Rental Aff. Rental Project Tax Capacity 110,52£6,800 12 ,329 Percentage Completed 2011 0 %Percentage Completed 2012 100 %100 %ercentage Completed 2013 100 %100 %Percentage Completed 2014 100 %100 %First ear Full Taxes Payable 2014 2014 Subtotal Residential 94 11,082,318 127,329 Subtotal Commercial/ IPersk ancreeo[enti~n20iG,. k;tln I c~ ~ aNuES .. ne ?aaseq~ 2^ aormFiscal ManketTaxDisparitiesTaxProperty Disparities PropertyValueTotalTaxesPerNewUseCapacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes TaxesSq. Ft./110,1570421578Rental16,28026,426390.t..827,12 ,567o'n~.Iran aotocanrl, go~01. _-.us, sa~~olaarmTotal192,004Market1.410.lessMarket11,lessD672,lessValue15,ValueIncrementBaseValue7,255.ValueTaxIncrementisEhlersAssociatesEstimatesRedevelopmennTlF\2010-1WoodlakeTIFPlan Tax Increment C. -Page 3 EHLE~tS 8 hS5'C CIhTf S 'NC IMoodlake Plaza Redevelopment ~~ Assuming ['ay 201'6 IVlarket Values, per Biennepin bounty Gity of Ric6~field Flouring TIF ®istrict for redevelopment of 9~Poodlake Rlaza site Project Original Fiscal Captured Local Annual Semi-Annual State Admin. Semi-Annual Seml-Annual PERIOD of Tax Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross Tax Auditor at Net Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTCCapacitCapacitIncremental CapacityRateIncrementIncrement0,36% 101. Increment Value Yrs. Year Date 08/02/1202/02/13 08/02/13 100%127,329 17, 625)109,704 139%152,014 76,007 274)7, 573) 68.160 57,737 0.5 2014 02/02/ 14 08/02/ 14 100%127. 329 17,625)109 704 139%014 152 76,007 76 007 274)74 7,573)68.160 113, 589 1 2014 02/02/15 2 7,8,02/202093,10.1155530694599302/02/From Appendix ~ Housing Qualifications for the ®istrict INt'~?V~E Tf;~ I~ TIt)U> IU~~CE; L~ hOF2FAn= IIL,Y ~ f~F i4)~1~~NG 1)i~T~i~-~~ , HE1~ lj~;( H1~ 1~1~ I~1N t:°tlUNTY >IT~ T~I~ 1~ I1`dC`~~1~'IE: X83,906 No. ofPei° sons of Income 60% Median Incomel- person29,400 3542&0 2~person 33,60040, 3203~person370800t~. 360 000 j0.source: Departmentof HousingandU~° banDevelopment andMinnesota HousingFinanceAgenc} Thetwooptionsforincome limits a housing district 20% of the unitsat ~ 0% of median incomeor 40% ofthe unitsat 60% of median income. There ar• e no rent restrictions foc a housing district.Appendix E-1 Appendix F Findingsfc~ the istrict To he ~~ dded~ rio~° to thelaeu~°AppendixF- 1