10-24-2005w9A PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr*t i %-, ri ri E L U
October 24, 2005
7:00 P.M.
Introductory Proceedings
Roll Call
Approval of Minutes: Planning Commission regular meeting of August 22, 2005 and Planning
Commission Work Session of September 12, 2005.
Opportunity for Citizens to Address the Commission on items not on the Agenda
Public Hearing
New Business
ITEM #1 P:C Letter #21 Approve Resolution finding that the acquisition of the
property at 6601, 6609, 6615, 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639 and
6645 17th Avenue are consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan
ITEM #2 PC Letter #22 Review land use guiding principles at 66th Street and
Portland Avenue give the Transportation Commission's
recommendation of the roundabout intersection design
Old Business
Liaison Reports
School Board
Community Services Advisory Commission
H RA
City Council
Human Services Planning Council
Welcoming Initiative Task Force
Transportation Commission
Adiournment
Auxiliary aid for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be
made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 861- 9738 ".
Planning Commission Minutes
Regular Meeting
August 22, 2005
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Donna Drummond, Commissioners: Gordon Hanson,
Maureen Scaglia, Greg Van Sickle, Kyle Hartnett, Kim Houle, Jeff
Karr, Jeff Walz and David Schneider.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Kyle Hartnett
COUNCIL LIAISON: Martin Kirsch, Mayor
STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, Zoning Administrator
Bruce Nordquist, Housing & Redevelopment Manager
OTHERS PRESENT: Tony Heppelmann, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Chairperson Drummond called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Hanson, S/Van Sickle to approve the Planning Commission regular meeting minutes of July
25, 2005.
Motion carried: 7 -0
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NEW BUSINESS
ITEM #1 PC Letter #20 — Review and authorize sending a list of land use
guiding principals to the Transportation Commission.
ZA' Poehlman presented the staff report highlighting the Background section. Housing and
Redevelopment Manager Bruce Nordquist and WSB Vice - President, Tony Heppelmann were
then introduced to carry on with the presentation.
HRM Nordquist presented land- use concepts A -F, highlighting the two new concepts E and F.
As requested by the Planning Commission, concept E depicts the minimum required change for
the intersection, while concept F depicts the ideas advanced by the Comprehensive Plan.
Tony Heppelmann continued with a discussion of the intersection options that the Transportation
Commission is examining and the criteria being used for evaluation. Mr. Heppelmann stated that
a frequent question at the public open house on August 10`h, was what difference changes in
signalization would make at the intersection. The addition of left turn signals on the two legs of
the intersection that do not currenity have them would temporarily improve the function of the
intersection, however increased volumes will soon.negate any gains. Mr. Heppelmann also
stated that WSB is continuing to examine the issue of pedestrian safety. Initial data suggests that
two -lane roundabouts are as safe or safer than traditional intersections. As the Transportation
Commission moves closer to choosing an alternative, members are seeking alignment input from
the Planning Commission.
Mr. Heppelmann fielded questions from Commissioners regarding emergency vehicle access,
roundabout sizes, educational campaigns, and more.
Chairperson Drummond stated that although this meeting was not intended as a pubilc hearing,
people with questions could come forward and address the Commission or presenters.
Councilman Fred Wroge requested traffic counts from Mr. Heppelmann.
In response to a question from Councilman Wroge, HRM Nordquist explained that all
alternatives have been examined for shifting the alignment of the intersection.
Doris Lattery of 66015
1h Avenue stated that she did not believe businesses would remain
throughout the construction period. Ms. Lattery suggested signs be posted stating "congestion
ahead."
Chairperson Drummond reminded everyone that both 66`h Street and Portland Avenue are
County roads and Hennepin County is requiring that the roadway be improved.
Kathy Murphy of 6601 5th Avenue stated her belief that the City favors the apartment building at
500 -66`h Street over her building. Ms. Murphy believes all of the necessary right -of -way should
be taken from the park, rather than the homes and businesses in the area.
Chairperson Drummond suggested that stronger language recommending civic uses and
potentially a new City Hall in the Northeast corner be added to the guiding principals.
Councilman Wroge, a member of the City Hall Task Force, requested that this language be left
out so as to not inadvertantly influence Task Force members.
The Commission agreed to comply with his request.
M /Walz, Shan Sickle to authorize sending the attached list of land use guiding principals to the
Transportation Commission.
Motion carried: 8 -0
OLD BUSINESS
LIAISON REPORTS
School Board: Report from Gordon Hanson
Community Services Advisory Commission: No Report
HRA: No Report
City Council: Report from Mayor Martin Kirsch
Human Services Planning Council: No report
Transportation Committee: Report from Maureen Scaglia
Welcoming Initiative Task Force: Report from Gordon Hanson
City Hall Task Force: Report from Councilman Fred Wroge
ZA Poehlman reminded Commissioners of the I -494 Joint meetings and open houses that will be
coming up and that suggestions regarding the revising of the Zoning Ordinance can be submitted
to her at any time.
ADJOURNMENT
M/Karr, S/Houle to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 8 -0.
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:15 p.m.
Kyle Hartnett
Planning Commission Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes
Work Session
September 12, 2005
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Donna Drummond, Commissioners: Kim Houle, Dave
Schneider, Gordon Hanson, Jeff Karr, Kyle Hartnett, Maureen
Scaglia, and Greg Van Sickle
MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice Chairperson Jeff Walz
COUNCIL LIAISON: Mayor Martin Kirsch
STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, Zoning Administrator
Patrick Smith, Community Development Manager
OTHERS PRESENT:
Chairperson Drummond called the Planning Commission special study session to order at 7:04
p.m.
ITEM #1 Discussion: Comprehensive Plan Review
ZA Poehlman opened the discussion with a brief overview of the timeline for the comprehensive
plan review, the required elements of a comprehensive plan, and plans currently underway that
will be incorporated into this revision.
Feedback from the Planning Commission included the following:
Incorporate work already done for the Richfield 2020 Plan, provide consultant with a
copy.
In the past, draft plans were brought before various organizational groups for
feedback— Optimist Club, Chamber of Commerce, sports boosters, etc.
Possible community survey as part of the process — possibility of posting the survey
on website (note possibility of skewed results if only this method is used),
publication via cable channel
Post process updates on website
Look into which consulting firms helped Bloomington and St. Louis Park put
together their current plans.
Look at plans for the Lyndale /Crosstown gateway area, 66`h Street & Penn Avenue,
the area near 72nd Street and Chicago Avenue, and potential changes due to the
Crosstown reconstruction.
Planning Commission Study Session
September 12, 2005
Page 2
ITEM #1 Discussion: Public Works Update
ZA Poehlman presented a summary of Public Works projects prepared by City Transportation
Engineer, Tom Foley.
The study session ended at 8:00 p.m.
Kyle Hartnett
Planning Commission Secretary
J
AGENDA SECTION
AGENDA ITEM #
REPORT #
CASE #
NEW BUSINESS
21
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PC MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2005
ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of resolution regarding the finding that the acquisition of the properties at 6601,
6609, 6615, 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639, and 6645 17th Avenue are consistent with the Richfield
Comprehensive Plan.
U. RECOMMENDED ACTION: II
By Motion: Approve the attached resolution finding that the
acquisition of the property at 6601, 6609, 6615, 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639,
and 6645 17th Avenue are consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
II. BACKGROUND
On August 15, 2005 the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) approved the
expenditure of funds to acquire four residential properties along 17th Avenue; 6627,
6633, 6639, and 6645 17th Avenue). The City of Richfield (City) would purchase the
four properties at 6601, 6609, 6615 and 6621 17th Avenue. All eight properties are
located within the 2007 DNL 65 contour as approved by MAC and the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA). Under the FAA Part 150 Program, MAC has the option either to
soundproof or acquire property to mitigate for airport noise impacts. MAC has decided
to purchase. The City would purchase for street purposes.
The purchase of the properties makes it possible for the homeowners to proceed with
their plans and minimizes the negative impacts of an uncertain future for them. This
portion of 17th Avenue will be the southern leg of the roadway coming off of the new
intersection at 66th Street and 17th Avenue.
The Comprehensive Plan identifies 6601, 6609, and 6615 17th Avenue properties as
Community Commercial /Office. The properties at 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639, and 6645
17th Avenue are identified as Single Family Residential. Currently all the properties are
being used as single - family residences. The properties at 6601, 6609, and 6615 17th
Avenue are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The three properties are used
as single - family residences since at least 1950; they have never been used as a
commercial or office building. It is common in Richfield to have a land use that does not
correspond to the Comprehensive Plan designation.
At the time of acquisition the Comprehensive Plan designation does not affect the
purchase of the properties. Before the properties go through disposition the
102405_17thAven ue Properties_F i nd i ngofConsistency
Comprehensive Plan will be amended so that the land is reflective of what will be
developed besides what is taken for roadway. Therefore, at the time of disposition the
Comprehensive Plan will reflect the appropriate designation for the area.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
The properties at 6601, 6609, and 6615 17th Avenue are currently zoned
C -2 (General Commercial). The properties are being used for single -
family residential uses.
The properties at 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639, and 6645 17th Avenue are
currently zoned R (Single - Family Residential), and all of the properties are
being used for single - family residential uses.
The Comprehensive Plan map currently identifies the first three northern
properties (6601, 6609, and 6615 17th Avenue) parcels for Community
Commercial /Office use. The remaining five (6621, 6627, 6633, 6639, and
6645 17th Avenue) parcels are identified as Single - Family Residential.
This property is needed for road purposes and to mitigate noise for people
living in impacted areas.
In order to prevent degradation of the Airport Impact zone (which the eight
properties are located in) from occurring, the Governor's Task Force
Report recommended the City buy out the residential and business
properties within the Airport Impact zone to redevelop the area into
commercial and residential uses that would be more compatible with the
neighboring airport.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
The acquisition of these properties is necessary in order for the
intersection and roadway work for the Cedar Avenue Corridor.
C. FINANCIAL
MAC is acquiring the southern four (6627, 6633, 6639, 6645 17th Avenue)
homes, and the City is acquiring the northern four (6601, 6609, 6615,
6621 17th Avenue) homes, with funds to be determined at the October
25th City Council meeting.
D. LEGAL
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that whenever any
public agency buys or sells property within the City, the Planning Commission
must review the proposed use of the site for consistency with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and the
resolution.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
Reject the resolution, finding that the acquisition of 6601, 6609, 6615, 6621,
6627, 6633, 6639, and 6645 17th Avenue by the City.for roadway purposes is not
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Map showing the location of 17th Avenue properties
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
N/A
0 RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE RICHFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THAT
A PROPOSED PUBLIC ACQUISITION OF LAND CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
6601, 6609, 6615, 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639, 6645 17TH AVENUE SOUTH)
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota, has proposed to purchase the parcels of land
having a street address of 6601, 6609, 6615, 6621, 6627, 6633, 6639, 6645 17th Avenue
South, (the "Property ") and located on land legally described as Lots 9 -16, Block 2, Wexlers
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City is proposing changes in use of the Property, and has plans to
demolish the single family structures presently located on the site for the 66th Avenue and
17th Avenue roadway work; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested that the City Planning Commission (the "Commission ")
review the proposed acquisition pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.356, Subd. 2;
and
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the proposed acquisition to determine its
relationship to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as
described in the Comprehensive Plan for the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that the proposed acquisition
is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that it has no relationship to said plan.
Adopted this 24th day of October, 2005 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Donna Drummond, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Kyle Hartnett, Secretary
LOCATION OF 17TH AVENUE PROPERTIES
FOR A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY
OCTOBER 24, 2005
I
F-
66TH ST.
j 6601
6609
6615
j j 6621 W W
a a a a
6627
6633
W
6639 V
6645
67TH ST.
100 0 100 200 300 400 Feet N
10 -12 -05
Ugis /com dev /staff /bilUprojects/17th ave props consistency.apr
AGENDA SECTION:
AGENDA ITEM #
REPORT #
CASE #
NEW BUSINESS
2
22
o
mwM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PC MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 249 2005
ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Review land use guiding principles at 66th Street and Portland Avenue given the
Transportation Commission's recommendation of the roundabout intersection design.
F. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 11
By Motion: It is recommended that a north and east alignment best
facilitates land use planning and accommodates pedestrian, transit,
and streetscaDe elements.
II. BACKGROUND
At the October 24 Planning Commission meeting the City Transportation and Land Use
Consultants will review their work as it relates to a roundabout design. New exhibits are
being prepared the week of October 17 and will be brought to the meeting.
The Planning Commission met on August 22, 2005 and approved a "Guiding Land Use
Principles for Intersection Alignment Options at 66th Street and Portland Avenue ". A
north and east alignment was recommended. On October 5, the Transportation
Commission recommended the roundabout intersection design. The Transportation
Commission requested the Planning Commission consider alignment more specifically
and report these findings on Tuesday, October 25 to the City Council.
On October 25, the City Council is considering:
Approval of a two -lane roundabout as the preferred design for 66th Street and
Portland Avenue.
Approval of a preferred alignment that provides roadway, pedestrian, transit and
streetscape elements.
III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION
A. POLICY
The Planning Commission plays a guiding role in land use discussion.
The Planning Commission leads discussion on the City policies related to
Blending Public Spaces and Private Development ".
Transit, pedestrian pathways, and streetscape improvements are part of
that discussion. -
The Planning Commission is studying land use options to compliment
roadway design.
B. CRITICAL ISSUES
The improvement of the intersection impacts land uses in each quadrant.
An appropriate mix of single family, multifamily, and commercial uses can
be better determined once the roadway and alignment decision is made.
The City Council benefits from the Planning Commission recommendation
as a preferred alignment offers the best response to retaining existing
uses where possible and the best opportunities for new uses in the future
where existing uses are impacted.
C. FINANCIAL
Hennepin County is paying for the land use study and contributing funding
that emphasizes transit oriented design.
D. LEGAL
The project area has a moratorium on improvements and changes to
buildings while the land use study is conducted.
The moratorium period ends in December.
IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
The Planning Commission can reconsider the August 22 principles.
Alternative alignment options can be recommended.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Guiding Land Use Principles
VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING
Tony Heppelman, WSB, (Transportation Consultant)
Carolyn Krall, Landform, (Land Use Consultant)
Planning Commission Guiding Land Use Principles for Intersection
Alignment Options at
66th Street and Portland Avenue
August 22, 2005
The City Council established a moratorium on major building and land use changes at the
referenced intersection in December 2004. Primarily the Transportation Commission and
Planning Commission have been studying roadway and land use impacts and alternatives.
Community leader visioning, neighborhood and community open houses, and ongoing
comment, feedback and analysis have occurred. The following guiding principles are both a
summation and a framework for roadway and land use decisions throughout the rest of 2005.
Strategic
Roadway design is scheduled to be reviewed and approved by the City Council in October
2005.
Final land use considerations and market analysis can follow in response to the approved
design.
Plan approval secures necessary funding and allows property acquisition to proceed for
impacted property.
A construction start of spring 2008 is anticipated (date pending).
Remainder parcels are available to modify land uses and redevelop starting in spring 2009.
Visioning
The intersection is an identifiable gateway and transportation route.
The intersection is unsafe, visually unappealing, congested, and devoid of greenery and
attractive, coordinated pathways and lighting that have become a community standard at
other gateways.
The intersection is a focal point and connection to Veteran's Park.
The intersection is part of a neighborhood of commercial, multi -unit housing and single
family housing uses.
A community campus is envisioned.
A complementary and improved mix of commercial multi -unit housing and single family
housing is envisioned.
Comprehensive Plan /Zoning and Land Use Considerations
While the intersection design continues to be evaluated, the roadway alignment of the selected
design is influenced by existing and future land uses. A northern and eastern alignment is
proposed. This offers the best response to retaining existing uses where possible and the best
opportunities for new uses in the future where existing uses are impacted. The following
information summarizes that position, quadrant by a quadrant.
The Northwest Quadrant
Make the quadrant more. park like with a coordinated effort with the existing adjacent
apartment owner. Parking, green space and property access and circulation must be
improved.
The existing commercial area is not adequate in terms of size, off - street parking space, and
buffering to adjacent multi unit residential after roadway improvements are installed.
The commercial property Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation at the corner should
be modified to allow for medium density multi residential or mixed use.
Near term, single family homes along Portland Avenue and north of 66th street should be
rehabilitated, resources need to be identified.
Long term, higher density single family housing should continue to be designated in the
Comprehensive Plan.
08220566th Street & Portland Ave
The Southwest Quadrant
The commercial property and multi -unit housing has the potential to remain or be converted
to new commercial and medium density housing uses long term.
The commercial and higher density single family property Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
designation should continue with a new mixed -use configuration also possible.
Near term, single family homes along Portland Avenue and south of 66th street should be
rehabilitated; resources need to be identified.
The Southeast Quadrant
A north and east alignment affects both the commercial and residential property uses.
The existing T &T service commercial property is reduced in size and may require adjacent,
commercially zoned property that presently has residential uses to remain viable.
The printing shop is removed.
Single family homes between 66th Street and 67th Street are removed.
The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation allows commercial uses to be retained
and /or reconfigured; including consideration of a mixed -use option.
The Comprehensive Plan calls for higher density single family uses along Portland Avenue.
The roadway project allows the planned uses to be implemented. Redevelopment
resources need to be identified.
The Northeast Quadrant
The BP commercial property is removed by roadway improvement; the size reduction does
not allow independent commercial uses.
As a first step, the remaining parcel at BP introduces a new, sought public realm.
However, the corner parcel remains disconnected from Veteran's Park as the Funeral
Chapel surrounds the remainder.
The Funeral Chapel has expressed concern about the viability of their commercial property
with the roadway improvement.
The Zoning (commercial) is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan (Public and multi -unit
housing).
The American Legion and Funeral Chapel need to be redesigned to match roadway
improvements.
Additional resources need to be identified long term to expand the desire for a greater
public realm.
Miscellaneous Guiding Principles:
All changes /removal of existing uses should coincide with the planned addition of properly
design buffering next to adjacent single family property.
Marketing experts have insufficient information to determine if roundabouts offer viable
commercial locations.
Streetscape elements (lighting, plantings, pedestrian walkways) need to be introduced
throughout the roadway improvement area. Additional resources need to be identified to
fund these improvements.