06-22-1999PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
June 22, 1999
7:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Approval of Minutes
Regular Planning Commission meeting of May 25, 1999.
Public Hearing
New Business
ITEM #1 PC Letter #21
ITEM #2 PC Letter #22
ITEM #3 PC Letter #23
ITEM #4 PC Letter #24
Old Business
Liaison Reports
Adjournment
Lyndale Gateway Project, Update by CSM Properties,
Inc.
Review Proposed Rezoning Schedule.
Discuss Land Use Issues Relating to Liquor Licenses
Review Information Relating to Check Cashing
Businesses
School Board
Community Services Advisory Commission
HRA
City Council
Auxiliary aid for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be
made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Service's Director at 861-9702".
Planning Commission Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 25, 1999
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Brenda Bjorklund; Commissioners: Terry Ahlstrom,
David Gepner, Bill Kilian, Daniel Linnihan and Ken Meter.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Pamela Dmytrenko and Roger Gordon
COUNCIL LIAISON: Martin Kirsch, Mayor
STAFF PRESENT: John Stark, Community Development Manager
Julie Urban, Planning & Zoning Administrator
Mark Andrle, Community Development Technician
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairperson Bjorklund at 7:10
p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/ Gepner, S/ Linnihan to approve the minutes of the regular Planning Commission
meeting of April 27, 1999.
Motion carried: 6 -0
M/ Gepner, S/ Linnihan to approve the minutes of the study session Planning
Commission meeting off Ma1999.
Motion carried: 6 -0
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
May 25, 1999
Page 2
NEW BUSINESS
PC Letter #19
ITEM #1 Finding of Consistency with the Comprehensive
Plan — Interchange West and Lyndale Gateway
Tax Increment Financing District and Plan.
Community Development Manager John Stark, reviewed the resolution being considered
which would establish the Interchange West and Lyndale Gateway TIF District and TIF Plan.
Mr. Stark then gave a brief description and history of the projects included in the TIF District
and Plan.
Commissioner Meter suggested that references to Lyndale Gateway be removed from the
TIF District and Plan on the basis that the development proposed by CSM Properties, Inc. is not
consistent with the Lyndale Gateway Redevelopment Plan and Strategy.
M/Meter, S /none to remove references to Lyndale Gateway from the Interchange West
and Lyndale Gateway TIF District and Plan.
Mr. Stark stated that it is his understanding that the resolution being considered was
intended to find that the geographic area and the funding mechanisms contained in the proposed
TIF District and Plan were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. That while the TIF District
and Plan contain references to specific uses, those uses are referred to as "proposed" only for the
purpose of illustration and a basis for determining potential funding mechanisms. Mr. Stark
stated that the adoption of the resolution being considered would not commit the City to the
specific uses it references.
Commissioner Kilian suggested that different wording be used to clarify the basis in the
Planning Commissioner Letter which states that the general development plan is for an area not
specific uses.
Chairperson Bjorklund stated that there needs to be some different wording on #3, #6 and
7 in the basis to remove any reference to a specific plan.
M /Kilian, S /Bjorklund to adopt a resolution finding that the modification to the Richfield
Redevelopment Proiect Area Redevelopment Plan, the establishment of the Interchange West
and Lyndale Gateway Tax Increment Financing_ District, and the Interchange West and Lyndale
Gateway Tax Increment Financing Plan are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan with
the following changes to the basis of the adoption:
May 25, 1999
Page 3
3 The proposed uses of the Lyndale Gateway redevelopment project are consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
6 The approval of the TIF plan documents is consistent with the requirements of both of
the Contracts for Private Development.
47 The tax increment plan meets the requirements of state law and establish procedures
within Richfield.
Motion carried: 5 -0 (Ahlstrom abstained)
PC Letter # 20
ITEM #2 Finding of Consistency with the Comprehensive
Plan — Purchase and Sale of 6537 —14`
h Avenue
Planning and Zoning Administrator Julie Urban, reviewed the resolution being
considered which would find that the acquisition and sale of 6537 14th Avenue is consistent with
the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Urban stated that the home will be demolished and the
Hennepin Technical College will construct a new home for a moderate income family.
Commissioner Kilian asked what was the selling price of the existing home. Ms. Urban
stated that it was $65,000. Commissioner Kilian asked if the new house is going to be
constructed with materials that will mitigate low frequency noise. Ms. Urban stated that some
sound insulation for low frequency noise will be used.
M/Kilian, S /Bjorklund to adopt a resolution finding that the proposed
acquisition/disposition and use of the subiect property is in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Motion carried: 6 -0.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
LIAISON REPORTS
School Board: None
May 25, 1999
Page 4
Community Services Advisory Commission: Commissioner Alhstrom reported that the
Commission discussed plans to improve the ball fields at Holy Angles, the CIB and the Multi
Purpose Community Center Task Force.
HRA: Commissioner Gepner reported that the HRA discussed the Interchange West
project, they decided to go ahead with the project in separate residential and commercial phases
and they discussed having Ryan Companies as the master developer for the airport mitigation
area.
City Council: Mayor Kirsch reported that the Council approved the Comprehensive Plan
revisions and Exhaust Pros' application for a CUP. The Council also appointed a new Planning
Commissioner and approved the City Manager position profile.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:30 p.m.
Terry Ahlstrom
Planning Commission Secretary
J
Agenda Section:
Item #:
Letter #:
Planning Commission Letter
June 22, 1999
New Business
1
21
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type of Request: Lyndale Gateway project update by CSM Properties, Inc.
ANALYSIS
Background: On January 19, 1999 the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority
HRA) approved a contract with CSM Properties, Inc. for the redevelopment
of the Lyndale Gateway site. CSM has begun negotiating with property
owners for the acquisition of the site as well as refining the site plan for the
area.
Murray Kornberg, Vice President of CSM, will present the concept plan for
the development of the site.
Issues: • The Planning Commission will review the planned unit development plan
for the development and the final development plan/conditional use
permit for the senior housing /office portion of the development (on the
east side of Lyndale Avenue) in July.
A copy of the design guidelines from The Lyndale Gateway: A
Redevelopment Plan and Strategy, is attached.
A copy of CSM's concept plan is also attached.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
Recommendation: No action is being requested
In order to achieve the intent of the Concept Plan
and generate development that supports the guiding
principles the Planning Commission recommends the
following design guidelines. While development may
not exactly follow the patterns shown in the Concept
Plan, plans must be consistent with the design
I
guidelines. Guidelines have been developed for
public spaces, sites, buildings and land use.
Develop a consistent s&eetscape through the
redevelopment area to define its limits, to establish
a significawt sense of district; and to create a more
active street environment for pedestrians and can
Use pedestrian scale streetlights at a regular
interval at all streets within the redevelopment
area
Provide pedestrian amenities (benches and trash
receptacles) at logical locations along Lyndale Ave
Require ornamental fences and plantings to
screen parking areas from street views
Plant street trees at a regular interval on all
streets within the redevelopment area
Plant other plantings to create highlights at
pedestrian oriented spaces, building entries and
other focal areas
Establish a method of maintaining streetscape
improvements that is common for all properties
in the district
Mark the entries to the redevelopment area to
reinforce its identity as a district
Establish markers on both sides of Lyndale
Avenue at 76th Street and 74th Street
Establish markers on 76th Street at the southeast
comer of 76th Street and Aldrich Avenue, and at
The Lyndale Gateway r /u/y B, 1996
Design Guidelines
the northwest comer of 76th Street and Garfield
Avenue
Create spaces that are not buildings or parking
areas to create interest in the patterns of
derieJopment and to provide places for pedestrians
away hrvm busy streets
Create small "pocket plazas" between or beside
buildings that could be used for outdoor
restaurants, eating areas or gathering spaces, and
to create links between parking areas and the
street; develop these spaces to make them feel
like an extension of the street (similar paving,
lights, benches)
Encourage the development of a farmers market
that could use portions of larger parking areas at
off -peak parking times
Establish sidewalks continuously through the
district to provide for uninterrvpted pedestrian
chrulation
Provide sidewalks exclusively for pedestrian use
along Lyndale Avenue
Extend walks from Lyndale Avenue along 76th
Street and 74th Street to the limits of the district
Extend walks south of 77th Street to the main
entries of the Shops at Lyndale and the Hampton
Inn
Close Mh Street between Lyndale Avenue and
Aldrich Avenue to eliminate the potential for "short
cuts "through the neighborhood
Reroute the alley to reach Aldrich Avenue
Use the right -of -way to allow for more intense
development or to create additional parking
Page /9
i
I
r
ti
am
Make public &ansitan essentia /part oftthe solutron
Design and locate stops and shelters as integral
elements of the project
Create connections which make public transit
eminently useable by shoppers, employees, and
neighborhood residents
Etu
Configure and locate parking to insure that
buildings remain as the focus of the district
Discourage parking in front of buildings, except
where that parking might occur on the street
Place parking behind or beside buildings
Prohibit parking areas at street intersections
Make access to parking areas prominent and
visible from the street
Create a buffer between the redevelopment area
and adjacent homes to mitigate any negative
influences of commercial activities in the district
Provide a 40 foot wide bermed and landscaped
buffer strip with a five foot high fence (colored
chain link) at the area south of 76th Street and at
the northeast comer of 76th Street and Lyndale
Avenue
Require a 15 foot wide landscaped buffer strip
with a similar fence at all other areas
Establish a method of maintaining the integrity of
the buffer that is common for all properties in
the district
Create parking areas to accommodate expected
demand
Encourage the development of uses that
creatively share parking by time of day amongst
a variety of uses in order to reduce the total
amount of land dedicated to parking
Maximize density in the district by discouraging
the development of excess parking
Combine access points from Lyndale Avenue in
order to reduce potential conflicts
Allow a single access at Lyndale Avenue between
77th Street and 76th Street
Require 150 feet between access points at
Lyndale Avenue and all other redevelopment
parcels
Prevent access to parking areas from alleys;
restructure alley access to serve only residential
uses
Develop continuity hvm site to site which will allow
the buildings to be the focus of the district
Establish a common palette of materials for use
at all sites within the district (planting, lighting,
paving)
Establish standards for site development that
assure consistency through the district
Limit the use of free - standing signs and pylon
signs; encourage signs that are an integral part of
the buildings
Develop a uniled character for the built
environment to reinforce the sense of a complete
dist*4 emphasising the character of commercial
village rather than a shopping center
Establish compatibility between buildings through
similar massing, scale, bulk, and detail
Allow for individual expression from building to
building, to reflect the character of a district of
individual shops and businesses rather than a
strip center
Require developers to demonstrate how a
proposed building will be created that considers
neighboring buildings
Establish a character that is more about buildings
and the strret than parking area
Place buildings at the street frontage at all
locations within the district
Create buildings that address the street, with
front doors to the public space at the street as
well as access from parking areas
Use elements that are pedestrian in scale, as
opposed to those that are meant to relate to
automobiles and highways
The Lyndale Gateway Ar July 8, /996 Page 20
P4
Avoid "formula "arrhAwture in order to achieve a
design that better reflects the community
Prohibit corporate colors, franchise patterns and
buildings that are designed as signs; encourage
creative design that relies on "found" character
rather than introduced character
Require detail that is integral to the building, not
elements that are applied to a standard building
shell (such as clock, towers or "plastic" awnings)
Develop buildings that relate to the district and
people on all sides, not just the public sides,
eliminate a "back door" appearance of other
commercial areas
Avoid large, blank wall surfaces; encourage
windows, doors or other means of articulating
large facades
Make building entries the highlight of the
structure so it becomes obvious that the
development is related to pedestrians
Integrate mechanical systems into the design of
the building
Provide trash storage areas that are completely
enclosed and incorporated as a part of the
building
Require that signs be incorporated into the
building facade, windows or awnings; do not
allow signs that extend more than 12" beyond
the plane of the building facade or signs that
extend beyond the roof line
Develop taller buildings at some areas within the
district to emphasize its role as a gateway and to
provide focus at the center of the district
Allow two or three story buildings at the
intersection of 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue
and in areas south of 76th Street
The Lyndale Gateway w Jay B, 1996
Require the use of high quality building materials
and methods to create a stock of buildings that is
enduring
Utilize materials that are durable, easily
maintained and attractive at dose distances (from
the sidewalk, for example); and materials that
have an attractive pattern, texture and quality
detailing
Encourage the use of brick, stone or high quality
precast concrete; metals that are matte finish and
neutral in color, with visible comer trim when
used for exterior walls
Require the use of transparent glass at the
majority of street level windows; prohibit the use
of mirrored glass at street level
Encourage canvas awnings; prohibit awnings of
nylon or other synthetic materials, as well as
those awning structures meant to be illuminated
from within
Create compact mired use derelopment in the
vernacular of an urban ril /age
Allow higher intensity development which
integrates employment, shopping, living,
entertainment, transit, public spaces and facilities
Make all new development compatible with the
extant neighborhood
Page 2/
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
LOT 'A' - WEST DEVELOPMENT - RETAIL
TOTAL SITE AREA 276' x 525' 144,900 SF - 3.33 ACRES
PARKING SPACES: 232 ( 5.09/1000 SF)
BUILDING AREAS:
UNITS
NORTH BUILDING 30,461 SF
DENTIST OFFICE 15,637 SF
RETAIL STORES 14,824 SF
SOUTH BUILDING 15,120 5F
DRUGSTORE
LOT 'B' SENIOR APARTMENTS/ OFFICE
TOTAL SITE AREA 247' x 570 (ASSUMED) - 140,687 5F - 3,23 ACRES
SENIOR APARTMENT PARKING SPACES 115
41 ABOVE GRADE
74 BELOW GRADE
OFFICE BUILDING PARKING SPACES 142
79 ABOVE GROUND
63 BELOW GRADE
APARTMENT BUILDING AREA
UNITS
GARAGE
AREA
GARAGE N/A 29,884 SF
FIRST FLOOR 31 42,288 5F
2ND FLOOR 40 43,319 SF
3RD FLOOR 40 43,319 SF
4TH FLOOR 41 43,319 SF
TOTAL I BED UNITS 73
TOTAL 2 BED UNITS 79
TOTAL # OF UNITS 152 202,129 SF (GROSS AREA)
OFFICE BUILDING AREA
3) 8 UNIT TOWN HOMES
GARAGE 27,600 SF
FIRST FLOOR TCCH 5,876 SF
LEASABLE) TMI 6,335 SF
COMMON AREA 1,692 SF
ND FLOOR WEIS2(
LEASABLE)
12,1% SF
AREA OF GREEN SURFACE
3RD FLOOR WEIS 12,1% SF
LEASABLE)
LOT 'C' EAST DEVELOPMENT TOWNHOMES
TOTAL SITE AREA 134.5' x $25 70,613 5F - 1.62 ACRES
3) 8 UNIT TOWN HOMES
BUILDING AREA 14,942 5F PER UNIT
1) 6 UNIT TOWN HOMES--
BUILDING AREA 11,734 SF PER UNIT
ON SITE PARKING 9
STREET PARKING
AREA OF GREEN SURFACE 26,847 SF 313%
AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 43,766 SF 62%
ViOUNNIW'0131 -AHOW u. I . I €s r
ONISfIOH HOINaS
ILaaZIsSNIVJ
F I is 1! g
I '1'
I I I V
i Y.li `yi' :n.ii. ,
rr_ri_:: ' C_.rrii _ ilr Al
I M
nw
Wait
Full
AS SiN" "' v y' . Y'va v`iY.L'cA`"'FC''"6' -•
l ii
1.
i
Planning Commission Letter
June 22, 1999
Agenda Section: New Business
Item #: 2
Letter #: 22
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type of Request: Review proposed rezoning schedule. Provide feedback to staff
regarding schedule, proposed process and list of properties to be
rezoned.
ANALYSIS
History: State law requires that cities' Zoning Ordinances be made consistent with their
Comprehensive Plans. In 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed the City's
zoning classifications and identified those parcels with zoning that is
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Of those parcels, the Commission
determined that one category of parcels, that in which the land use is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan but the zoning is not, should be
rezoned.
Proposal: There are 32 parcels that staff propose be rezoned so that the zoning, land use
and Comprehensive Plan are consistent.
The properties would be divided into two groups and brought before the
Commission in July and September. Dividing the parcels into two groups
gives staff time to send out individualized letters and better respond to
questions and concerns that may arise.
Issues: 1. A handful of parcels were eliminated from the list to be rezoned for the
following reasons:
9 parcels are in the airport mitigation area
3 parcels are split or reconfigured in the Plan. In these cases, these lot
splits don't currently exist so it would be difficult to assign multiple
zoning classifications.
2 parcels are in the PASSS area
2. Letters explaining the reasoning behind the rezoning and the impact the
rezoning might have on the property will be mailed to property owners.
Notices will also be mailed to property owners and occupants within 350
feet of the parcels to be rezoned.
3. There are several properties west of 13'' Avenue but east of Bloomington
Avenue that would be rezoned under the proposed schedule. These
properties are not located within the direct mitigation area; however, the
Commission might consider not rezoning these properties due the
uncertainty in the area caused by the proposed runway.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
Recommendation: Provide feedback to staff.
Basis: 1. The Commission previously reviewed the parcels with zoning
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and determined that
those parcels where the land use was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan but the zoning is not should be rezoned.
2. The Commission previously determined that parcels located within
redevelopment areas should not be rezoned.
G/1
0
N
F
C
L
U
IL
W
D
Z
J
ZI
a
J
0.
IL
2
OI
U
O
Zt
C6
N
w
O
O
a
C\ C\ C\ C\ U 0\ O\ C\ C\ C, D\ Ch ON D\ CN C+ C,
ON C\ CN C\ O1 C\
rl r+ rl rl rl Q+ r+ r+ `i rl r+
r- C` r` 1 n r- {- (7\ C\ rn
rl rl rl r+ rl rl r+ r+ r+ N rl N N
F F F F F F V)
C C < w W Q ¢ ( ¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q R: C x
rl rl rl r+ rl rl N N rl
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
UO
cn
W W
v
S >
w ¢ ¢
Q En cn
0 0 0 0 0 o F H 3 w
F 3 3 w
u H x H H . H
U U U U U U Z a a
0 0 o n o N o rn ao
o m m o o r+ r+ o
n W) v v rl cv v v
N
O
Ob
CCICL.
c a
daa
ti
L%
10
U I w
o
O
Z
Z
O
N
W
Z
W
N
O
Z
J
QI
Jj
a
a
O
U
L
Z_
Z
O
N
N
N
W
Q
CT CT CT CT C1i Cl` C7, C, CT CT C% Cl\ CT O
z 5 O1 O1 5 Qz R z oz CT R CA R, CT
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Cl N C`1 N C11 C`1 N Cl (11 N N N N N
CT CT CT CT CT CT C, CN CT CT CT C7 CT C%
C4 x x x x a x x x x x x x rz
ri cn C6 cn ) x x x x r> x
C 0 CL C z z
N Cpl N N N N N N N N N N N N
U U u U U U U U U U U U U U
z
0
H
x x x x g x x x x x x x x x
F- - F- [-- F- H H F- i— [- H H F•
vl ^ M N M 00 CT r C`1 00 O1 o
K, M K, M cr M 7 M N O O M
In In In In In 1n In vi 7o ,o
to o o \0 \o o
N
O
N
d
CQ
CT01O
i
dt: 7
Gcr
MAN
Planning Commission Letter
June 22, 1999
Agenda Section: New Business
Item #: 3
Letter #: 23
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type of Request: Discuss land use issues relating to liquor licenses and provide feedback
to the City Council.
ANALYSIS
History: The City Council is reviewing the number of liquor licenses in the City. Staff
anticipates that the redevelopment projects that are in process will result in
requests for additional liquor licenses. Liquor licenses are established by
ordinance so an increase in the number of licenses requires an ordinance
amendment. The ordinance amendment process takes approximately three
months.
Proposal: After reviewing this information at their last study session, the City Council
asked that the Planning Commission review the zoning and land use issues
relating to restaurants that serve alcohol and provide information to the
Council.
Issues: • Staff suggested that the Council consider increasing the number of
licenses. An increase would result in licenses being available prior to the
completion of development projects, which would mean that developers
and potential tenants would know that licenses are available at the
beginning of their negotiations. An increase would also mean that staff
would not have to return to the Council several times to request an
increase in licenses.
Restaurants are conditional uses in commercial districts. The only
requirement specific to restaurants serving alcohol is that they be located
along a collector or arterial street.
Information on the number of existing City liquor licenses is as follows:
of City licenses # currently used State limit
intox. liquor 7 5 18
3.2 malt 15 12 none
wine 7 5 none
A map showing the location of existing liquor licenses will be displayed at
the meeting.
The City of Minneapolis limits liquor licenses to businesses located in
commercial areas that contain at least seven acres. A winelbeer license
can be ,issued to a restaurant in an area smaller than seven acres provided
that any patron ordering an alcoholic beverage also orders a meal.
Minneapolis also does not issue liquor or winelbeer licenses to any
premises located within 300 feet of schools and churches. Staff is in the
process of reviewing other City ordinances and may have additional
information available at the meeting.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
Recommendation: Provide feedback to staff regarding the adequacy or inadequacy of
existing land use regulations relating to restaurants that serve alcohol.
Basis: 1. The Council has requested feedback from the Planning
Commission and planning staff on this topic.
0 Planning Commission Letter
June 225 1999
Agenda Section: New Business
Item #: 4
Letter #: 24
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type of Request: Review information relating to check cashing (currency exchange)
businesses.
ANALYSIS
History: Staff has received some community feedback relating to check cashing
businesses. While significant concerns have not been raised, it is appropriate
to review any issues relating to these types of businesses with the
Commission.
Issues: • State law requires these businesses to obtain a State license. The City
Council has to approve the license.
These businesses are considered permitted uses in the C -2 (general
commercial) and I (industrial) districts. They are not allowed in the C -1
district (neighborhood commercial).
State law requires these businesses to be located % mile from each other.
It is unclear how the State monitors this requirement.
The City of St. Paul found that check cashing businesses generate a greater
number of police calls than banks do. Partly on this basis, St. Paul added a
100 foot buffer requirement between a check cashing business and any
residential use. Richfield police records show greater police calls at banks
than the two check cashing businesses; however, the difference in size
among the businesses makes a comparison difficult.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
Recommendation: Provide feedback to staff.
Basis: 1. Staff has received some community feedback relating to these types
of businesses.
2. It may be appropriate to consider incorporating a reference to the
State law that requires a '/z mile distance between check cashing
businesses into the City's ordinance.