The URL can be used to link to this page

03-23-1999PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA March 23, 1999 7:00 p.m. Roll Call Approval of Minutes Regular Planning Commission meeting of February 23, 1999 and Planning Commission study session of March 9, 1999. Special Meeting ITEM #1 PC Letter #10 Public Hearing k I =1 Ji l ITEM #3 PC Letter #13 ITEM #4 99 -CUP -1 New Business Old Business Liaison Reports Adjournment CIP \CIB — Joint meeting with Community Services TAP — 200 West 78th Street (continued discussion) Comprehensive Plan CUP Renewal — 6529 Penn Avenue School Board Community Services Advisory Commission HRA City Council Auxiliary aid for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Service's Director at 861-9702". Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting February 23, 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners: Terry Ahlstrom, Brenda Bjorklund, Pamela Dmytrenko, and Mitchell Hadley MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairperson Daniel Linnihan, Commissioners: Roger Gordon, William Kilian, Ken Meter, and David Gepner COUNCIL LIAISON: Martin Kirsch, Mayor STAFF PRESENT: John Stark, Community Development Manager Julie Urban, Zoning Administrator Mark Andrle, Community Development Technician The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice - Chairperson Bjorklund at 7:05 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Because the lack of a quorum the minutes could not be approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS Because of the lack of a quorum, Vice - Chairperson Bjorklund stated that the commission will not be taking testimony on Item 42, but will answer any questions the public may have. 99 -TAP -1 ITEM #1 200 W. 781h Street Minnesota Mini Storage Transitional Activity Permit to allow continued use of property as a self - storage facility Zoning Administrator Julie Urban reviewed the history of Minnesota Mini Storage and their application for a transitional activity permit which will allow continued use of property as a self - storage facility. February 23, 1999 Page 2 Ms. Urban stated that staff recommends that the commission recommend approval of the transitional activity permit. Vice - Chairperson Bjorklund asked why the applicant needs a TAP. Neal Blanchette of Larkin and Hoffman stated that the applicant is applying for a TAP to ensure the continued use of the property as a self - storage facility. M/Hadley, S /Dmytrenko to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 4 -0 M/Hadley, S/Bjorklund to continue the public hearing for a TAP at 200 W. 78`x' Street at the March regular meeting. Motion carried: 4 -0 PC Letter # 9 ITEM #2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Vice - Chairperson Bjorklund asked for people to address the commission with questions regarding the comprehensive plan update. Ms. Urban reviewed the annual review of the comprehensive plan and the proposed changes for the plan which came from the November study session. A member of the audience asked if Bridgeman's and the Post Office would be moved. Community Development Manager John Stark stated that currently there are no specific plans for either property, but the Richfield Lake Master Plan identifies the area as being a redevelopment area in the future. A member of the audience asked what are the plans for the Urban Village. Ms. Urban reviewed the specific developments that will be constructed in the Urban Village. Larry Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth Avenue, suggested that more copies of the proposed updates to the comprehensive plan be available to the public at the library and City Hall. Ms. Urban stated that staff will place more copies at the library and at the front desk at City Hall. Mr. Wozniczka stated that the comprehensive plan should address options for keeping residential areas protected from commercial developments. Steve Lindgren president of the Richfield Chamber of Commerce, suggested that the updates to the comprehensive plan be discussed at a regular meeting in stead of a study session. Mr. Lingren stated that the Chamber of Commerce has some concerns with the updates and would like to express their views to the commission. Ms. Urban suggested that Mr. Lingren and February 23, 1999 Page 3 the Chamber put their concerns in writing which can be distributed to all of the commission members since there were only four present. Mr. Lindgren agreed. Grace Lund 6721 Harriet Avenue, stated that 67`h Street in the Urban Village should remain open for better access for residents. NEW BUSINESS The commission agreed to discuss items #3 - #6 at a later meeting because of the lack of a quorum. They agreed to hold a special meeting at the study session on March 9 to hold the annual organizational meeting. PC Letter # 10 ITEM #7 CIP /CIB Schedule Ms. Urban suggested that the joint meeting with the Community Services Commission on March 23, 1999 at 6:30 p.m. The commissioners decided to keep the start time of the meeting at 7:00 p.m. LIAISON REPORTS School Board: Commissioner Dmytrenko reported that the school board will vote on new start times at their next meeting and that there is a hot topic session on March 25, 1999. Community Services Advisory Commission: none. HRA: none. City Council: Mayor Kirsch reported that the City Council had a second hearing for an ordinance amendment which was approved. The sale of bonds on the second sheet of ice is not to exceed $2.5 million. There was a public hearing regarding the area code change and it was agreed by the council to recommend that the current area code stay 612. February 23, 1999 Page 4 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:30 p.m. Mitchell Hadley Planning Commission Secretary gga Planning Commission Minutes Special Meeting March 9, 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Daniel Linnihan; Commissioners: Terry Ahlstrom, Brenda Bjorklund Pamela Dmytrenko, David Gepner, Roger Gordon, Mitchell Hadley, and Bill Kilian. MEMBERS ABSENT COUNCIL LIAISON Commissioner Ken Meter Martin Kirsch, Mayor STAFF PRESENT: Perry Thorvig, Community Development Specialist Julie Urban, Zoning Administrator Mark Andrle, Community Development Technician The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairperson Linnihan at 7:00 p.m. Organization Meeting PC Letter # 5 ITEM #1 Election of Planning Commission Chairperson, Vice- Chairperson and Secretary Chairperson Linnihan explained the election process and asked for nominations for Chairperson. Commissioner Dmytrenko nominated Commissioner Bjorklund. M /Hadley, S/Dmytrenko for a white ballot. The Commission elected Commissioner Bjorklund as Chairperson 8 -0. Chairperson Bjorklund asked for nominations for Vice - Chairperson. Commissioner Gepner nominated Commissioner Linnihan. M/Dmytrenko, S /Gepner for a white ballot. March 9, 1999 Page 2 The Commission elected Commissioner Linnihan as Vice - Chairperson 8 -0. Chairperson Bjorklund asked for nominations for Secretary. Commissioner Gepner nominated Commissioner Hadley as Secretary. Commissioner Hadley declined the nomination. Commissioner Hadley nominated Commissioner Ahlstrom for Secretary. M/Kilian, S/Dmytrenko for a white ballot. The Commission elected Commissioner Ahlstrom as Secretary 8 -0. PC Letter #6 ITEM #2 Appointment of Liaisons to the Community Services Advisory Commission, City Council, HRA and School Board Commissioner Dmytrenko was appointed to the School Board and Chairperson Bjorklund as the alternate. Mayor Kirsch was appointed to the City Council and Commissioner Linnihan as the alternate. Commissioner Gepner was appointed to the HRA and Commissioner Kilian as the alternate. Commissioner Ahlstrom was appointed to the Community Services Commission and Commissioner Meter as the alternate. PC Letter # 7 ITEM # 3 Annual Review of Planning Commission Bylaws M/Dmvtrenko, S /Linnihan to approve the current Planning Commission bylaws. Motion Carried 8 -0. March 9, 1999 Page 3 PC Letter #8. ITEM #4 Establish 1999 -2000 dates for Planning Commission Study Sessions The Commission discussed ideas for items for future study sessions. Suggestions included meeting with other Planning Commissions, a bus tour of Richfield, meetings with the Chamber of Commerce, a discussion with a Met Council representative, and airport noise mitigation issues. Zoning Administrator Julie Urban stated that she would come up with a schedule. M/Dmytrenko, S/Linnihan to close the Special Meeting Motion carried 8 -0. Study Session Items PC Letter #11 ITEM #5 Multi- purpose Community Center Task Force Updates Carmillo DeSantis of the Multi - Purpose Community Center Task Force gave the Commission an update on the progress of the Multi- purpose Community Center Task Force. Mr. DeSantis stated that the pool and Community Center needs repair and many Richfield residents are going to other cities to use the community centers. Mr. DeDantis stated that a survey showed that residents are in favor of a modest tax increase to pay for a new community center and the task force is still looking for more community input. The task force had found that there is a need for a pool, banquet rooms, and senior /teen programs. The task force is now getting input from city commissions and boards and they plan to bring their proposal to the City Council in the late spring. March 9, 1999 Page 4 The Commission then discussed the issues involved with a new community center such as cost, size, location and specific uses of a new community center. The Commission asked Mr. DeSantis to convey their opinion that a high quality facility be built. 771h Street Design Brainstorming ITEM #6 Community Development Specialist Perry Thorvig review the plans for the 77`h Street underpass and asked the Commission for their ideas regarding design standards that should be established for that area. The Commission suggested several standards such as underground utilities, building materials, underground parking or ramps, pedestrian friendly, more green areas, street lighting, and fencing that is consistent with the design of the sound wall. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:30 p.m. Terry Ahlstrom Planning Commission Secretary Planning Commission Letter March 23, 1999 Agenda Section: Joint Meeting with Community Services Commission Item #: 1 Letter #: 10 GENERAL INFORMATION Type of Request: Meet with Community Services Commission to review the proposed 2000 Capital Improvements Budget and 2001 -2005 Capital Improvements Program References: Richfield City Charter, Chapter 7. Minnesota Statute, Section 462.356, subd. 2 ANALYSIS Proposal: Steve Devich, Administrative Services Director, will make a presentation on the 2000 Capital Improvements Budget and 2001 -2005 Capital Improvements Program to the Planning Commission and Community Services Commission. The budget and program were sent to you in a separate mailing. One set of all project sheets, containing specific information on each proposed project, will be provided to the Chair. Any Commissioners interested in reviewing the project sheets should contact the Chair or staff. ACTION TO BE TAKEN Recommendation: No formal action is requested at this time. The Planning Commission annually reviews the CIB /CIP. The Commission will be asked to make a formal recommendation and a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan on April 27, 1999. J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 2001 -2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City Manager's First Draft Issued 3/12/1999 City Manager's Comment The following is the City Manager's first draft of the 2000 Capital Improvement Budget and 2001 -2005 Capital Improvement Program. The draft continues the front end funding. of a portion of the Second Ice Sheet with an inter -fund loan to be repaid through three years of Special. Revenue funding. Other projects included in the document reflect the input of City staff, Community Services Commission and Planning Commissions as reflected in project approvals from prior years. Total projects costs for projects that span more than one year are shown within the parenthesis after the project title. 2000 Capital Improvement Budget RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Ball Field Replacement ($4,000,000) Community Garden Relocation Ice Arena 2nd Sheet - Down Payment Monroe Park Building Replacement ($200,000) Park Maintenance ($500,000) Pool Renovation ($1,650,000) Playfeatures Replacement ($210,000) Rich Acres Replacement ($4,000,000) TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT Move Traffic Signal to 77th St & Penn Ave Replace Signal Equipment along Lyndale Ave Richfield Lake Area Storm Water. Retention Pond. 77th Street Underpass of TH 77 ($14,869,000) 70th S Russell Lyndale Avenue Bridge-over 1 -494 ($8,374,000) Reconstruction of 76th St - 35W to Penn Ave ($1,800,000) TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPR. PUBLIC FACILITIES Public Safety 800 MHz Radio System ($434,000) City Maintenance Facility ($6,400,000) Backwash Reclaim Basin Remodel Public Safety Detention Facility TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECT EXPENDITURE 2,000,000 S 48,000 O 100,000 R 10,000 R 100,000 R 550,000 B 120,000 R 200,000 O 3,128,000 1,500,000 M 128,000 F 32,000 M 725,000 S 611,400 M 1,834,200 S 9,782,400 FD 150,000 U 212,700 M 3,403,200 F 638,100 S 3,570,000 BL 700,000 M 23,287,000 127,000 R 6,400,000 O 130,000 U 50,000 R 6,707,000 TOTAL USES OF FUNDS $33,122,000 ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE B) Bonds 550,000 BL) Bloomington 3,570,000 F) Federal Grant 3,531,200 FD) Federal Demo 9,782,400 M) Municipal State Aid 3,056,100 0) Other 6,648,000 R) Special Revenue 507,000 S) State 5,197,300 U) User Fees 280,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE $33,122,000 3/15/93 2001 Capital Improvement Program RECREATION $.OPEN SPACE PROJECT EXPENDITURE Ice Arena Ceiling Beams 50,000 R Ice Arena 2nd Sheet - Down Payment ($575,000) 150,000 R Monroe Park Building Maintenance ($200,000) 190,000 R Multi- Purpose Community Center ($8,500,000) 4,900,000 B 1,100,000 O Park Maintenance ($500,000) 100,000 R Pool Renovation ($1,650,000) 1,100,000 O Playfeatures Replacement -Cycle 1 ($210,000) 65,000 R Rich Acres Replacement ($4,000,000) 2,000,000 B 1,800,000 S TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 11,455,000 KIUH I OF WAY IMNKUVtMtN I Extend Noise Wall 62nd - Penn to Xerxes Ave ($450,000). 225,000 M 225,000 S Extend Noise Wall 62nd - 35W to Penn Ave ($450,000) 225,000 M 225,000 S Lyndale Ave Reconstruction TH 62nd to 64th Street 1,500,000 M Reconstruction of 76th St - 35W to Penn Ave ($1,80x,000) 1,100,000 M 66th Street Interchange TH 77 ($11,500,000) 1,000,000 M 8,000,000 F 1,000,000 S 1,500,000 MC TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPR. 15,000,000 VUliLIU FAGILI I Its Overhead Walkway 100,000 U Parking Lot for Water Plant 75,000 U Public Safety 800 MHzRadio System ($434,000) 127,000 R TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 302,000 TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 26,757,000 t51 IMA I tU KtVLNUt t3Y 5UUKUh B) Bonds F) Federal Grant M) Municipal State Aid 0) Other MC) MAC Capital R) Soecial Revenue S) State Grant U) User Fees TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 6,900,000 8,000,000 4,050,000 2,200,000 1,500,000 682,000 3,250,000 175,000 26,757,000 3/15/99. 2002 Capital Improvement Program RECREATION & OPEN SPACE PROJECT EXPENDITURE Athletic Field Renovation ($875,000) 175,000 R Ice Arena Cooling Tower 30,000 R Ice Arena - 2nd Sheet Down Payment 325,000 R Multi- Purpose Community Center ($8,500,000). 2,500,000 O Park Maintenance ($500,000) 100,000 R Playfeatures Replacement ($210,000) 25,000 R TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 3,155,000 RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPR. 0 PUBLIC FACILITIES City Hall Back -Up Generator 250,000 R Public Safety 800 MHz Radio System ($434,000) 20,000 R TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 270,000 TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 3,425,000 ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE 0) Other (Bonds) $2,500,000 R) Special Revenue $925,000 U) User Fees $0 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE $3,425,000 3/15/99 2003 Capital Improvement Program RECREATION & OPEN SPACE PROJECT EXPENDITURE Athletic Field Renovation ($875,000) $200,000 R Park Maintenance $100,000 R Wood Lake Nature Center Office Renovation $52,000 R Wood Lake Classroom /Meetig Renovation $322,000 O TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 674,000 RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 76th Street Downsizing - East of 1 -35W ($2,200,000) 400,000 M 77th Street Ramps to TH 77($1,500,000) 37,500 M 900,000 F 225,000 S 37,500 MC Replace Penn Ave Bridge over 1 -494 ($5,000,000) 333,000 M 4,000,000 F 334,000 C 333,000 BL TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPR. 6,600,000 PUBLIC FACILITIES Public Safety 800 MHz Radio System ($434,000) TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES TOTAL USES OF FUNDS ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE BL) Bloomington C) Hennepin County F) Federal Grant M) Municipal State Aids MC) MAC 0) Other R) Special Revenue S) State Grant U) User Fees TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 20,000 R 20,000 7,294,000 333,000 334,000 4,900,000 770,500 37,500 322,000 372,000 225,000 0 7,294,000 3/15/99 2004 Capital Improvement Program RECREATION &.OPEN SPACE PROJECT EXPENDITURE Athletic Field Renovation ($875,000) Ice Arena/Pool Parking Lot Park Maintenance TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT Reconstruciton of 66th St & Portland Ave ($4,000,000) 76th Street Downsizing - East of 135W ($2,200,000) 77th Street Ramps to TH 77 ($1,500;000) TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPR. PUBLIC FACILITIES Augsburg /73rd & 1st Ave Stonn Sewer Improvement Public Safety 800 MHz Radio System ($311,000) TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES TOTAL USES OF FUNDS ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE C) Hennepin County F) Federal Grant M) Municipal State Aids 0) Other - Bonds R) Special Revenue TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 500,000 150,000 100,000 750,000 1,500,000 1,300,000 200,000 300;000 3,300,000 R R R M C M F 750,000 O 20,000 R 770,000 4,820,000 1,300,000 300,000 1,700,000 750,000 770,000 4,820,000 3/15/99 2005 Capital Improvement Program RECREATION & OPEN SPACE PROJECT EXPENDITURE Playfeatures Replacement ($2,000,000) 250,000 R Skyways for Urban Village Project 1,600,000. O TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 1,850,000 RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 76th Street Downsizing - East of 1 -35W ($2,200,000) 400,000 M Reconstruction of 66th,& Portland ($4,000,000) 1,200,000 C TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPR. 1,600,000 PUBLIC FACILITIES Public Safety 800 MHz Radio System 20,000 R TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 20,000 TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 3,470,000 ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE C) County M) Municipal State Aid 0) Other (Developer) R) Special Revenue TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 1,200,000 400,000 1,600,000 270,000 3,470,000 3/15/99 Capital Improvement Program- Beyond 2005 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE PROJECT EXPENDITURE Community Center Roof Playfeatures Replacement ($2,000,000) TOTAL REC. & OPEN' SPACE RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 76th Street East of 35W Downsizing ($2,200,000) TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ,IMPR. PUBLIC. FACILITIES Public Safety 800 MHz Radio System ($434,000) TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES TOTAL USES OF FUNDS ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE M) Municipal State Aid R) Special Revenue TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 35,000 R 1,750,000 R 1,785,000 1,200,000 M 1,200;000 100,000 R 100,000 3,085,000 1,200,000 1,885,000 3,085,000 3t45/99 o 0N U y, o m H m hOON c ON O V m OON NOON OClN F J Vf HO U O a I-. E3 pO OO 0 CD C CD 0 C2 O O oO 0 O O Oo O CL O o CD H co Q M C m m in m Y c O m LL! a v0i CD c U ao Olt N m o p y N M N m m C a m O W uJ o a co O E E E o m m m U) d U, 0 m m 0 0 v_ o 0 0 A O o m o O i c m o c m m 0 O o A 0 0 c a a oo c 0 m 0 0 m C o m q Ic9 O M° C N io N d C W 209c.i 0 0 C E 0 Y 0 c 1; a N O N z UfN OiD Ncl C G NN C Nm 4 7 C m C 7 r, N W x{p a VC_ m u r {'L r r m c m C m o o i m i0 CI u m u u J 1 o m JOrn N E E M N Vo tio co L o O o O m o O o o x m 0 cm Q 0 u u u p 2 a O a O O r O G p p w w w w Vw O mw O O p In h O H Q N w w A A A N N ar Q' O O O O O O O O O OO Op OO OO OO OO OO OO O O cm N N A O h A N M M w N N m N N N N 4 O 4 CI a O O O O CD CD 0 CD C2 O O O O O in O O O Uf 0 O C O O h Uf O Wf UY h Nen ON Or N N m N A N Pf M N N N a OC Q O1 0 0 m H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 o Uf O O In C h NONoO r r cr O m V 10i N N M r r N r r fp N r r r w N M N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O to O O O O O O O O O O N N O m O N A O m m N M UI C O O o 0 Cf O O O Uf N O w O N V O w m r r O1 fD Q w O O m l9 i0 tp ca O f Cp 4D N N r w fC Uf V r 0 w w N M N N pO OO C O c O OO oO O Oo C O o CD O co Q M C m Y c O m LL! a CD c U m o p y m m m m C a m O W uJ o E; co E E E o m m m U) d U, i m m v_ o A O o m o O i c m c m m 0 L A c a a oo c c7 m O N m C m m Ic9 O M° C N io N d W 209c.i C E G Y on c 1; a N O N z C C C G C m 4 7 C m C 7 r, N W x{p a VC_ m u r {'L u 7 m c m C m o o i m i0 CI u m u u J 1 o m JOrnmEEoVotioco L o o 3 m o o o x m 0 a Q u u u u 2 2 a a. a f- r w w w w V w U! w m w m o0 r 4 9 c o 0 U U m fnOON O ON NOON NOON U O0O b ON 2 () O O O O Yf e f r r N OOO O O G N c } C c ° w W C O? o m O h 0 1- u a n p r p C lyjr 1 a c p m r« c « c w 10 • fC ~ m fA 10 A N A N c p G Q C j o Cmc u . C .. 6 „° Q Q c Q mZm2coN m m m Q = U° aum t W x W c J~ a 0 m Nrr N N N 2 0 i N i bf O y LL N C R c O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 N ell N 0 O O O o O I O O O O O O O N n N 0 Uf O O N O O O O O Vf p N N N N O CD M O O O O O m O N N N N N O O en O O O O Uf Cl N m O m O O A m N O qr 01 N N p O N r N to r N N M M N O O O O O O O O O O O O r cn O 0 0 O O O O O O O Cl O r O O o ct O c O O O o O O J N of 47 Yn O o 0 0 0 0 O O Q Q N N N N O O O O O O 0 0 O O O N N N N N N O h O O O tff p O O O O 0 0 r h h m O r a h P m O v N O 1. Q O O U Uf O O 0% O N M M O Pl PI O rf N O N A O N h w N OOO O O G N c } C c ° w W C O? o m O h 0 1- u a n p r p C lyjr 1 a c p m r« c « c w 10 • fC ~ m fA 10 A N A N c p G Q C j o Cmc u . C .. 6 „° Q Q c Q mZm2coN m m m Q = U° aum t W x W c J~ a 0 m Nrr N N N 2 0 O y C R c O O O o Ct O O O O OO O O 0 0 0 0 N ell N 0 0 0 N N I O o 0 0 O Yl O N N N O O O N O C 0 Yf Vf O O C31 O N CD M O O M O m O O A R O O en O N O O Cl O m O m O O A m N O qr 01 N QO p O N r N to r N N M M N t0 N LL Q w r V CD 0 w R O O O O O O O O O OOOO O O O O O N e•f of O e•f Pf A m O 4" O r O r PI M N 1400 N I N NII N IM O y O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O p O o 0 0 O Yl O O N O O O O O O C 0 Yf Vf O O C A O N A M O v M O m Q O O A O O O en O N m of O m m O m m O A m N O qr 01 N C% O Pf N to h m at A Q N t0 1ff Q w r V O N 1400 N I N NII N IM 000 o N A cm M FW m m N m G H E r_ t q A D • c m h h N C A A N H 0 N I N OOO y W E W mO) O O O U U oo C O O EL y CD 0 O on W m CD H c 2 C E C A O 0 IL O O C m LL V U O vW J J O h Q H h m Q 1ff r w N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O h 0 0 Yf O O O O O 0 0 0 h h O O O A O h P m O v N O 1. Q O O Uf O O 0% O N M M O Pl PI O rf O N A O N h w N fq O Pf rs A 1 m Cm r N iD A N N r O NN 000 o N A cm M FW m m N m G H E r_ t q A D • c m h h N C A A N H 0 N I N OOO y W E W mO) O U U oo o o a EL y CDO on W m H c 2 C E C A CL, 0 IL O C m LL V U vW J J H NhN o o e 0 0 e0 e0 o0 00 0 000 0o 0o 0o m 00 c c p• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N 1ff O O N C in N a 0 0 O O mP o o mr0 o m m CO0 EOE cC r r r r r C A r r/ v v m m N N N N N N N N O O OO OO 0O 0O 0 0OO OO ClO OO OO OOOO O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O N O N O N 0 0 0 0 O N O V O O O p m m O N T H r r tv N N N N N N N N m CD O O O OO o0 O0 O O00 ClO O0 O0 O0 OO OO pp O O O O OO O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O Q p o O O O O O O O O O o O O O O A Orl A NA NA Or! Orf OA AA AO 0 N m N N N N a v m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O N Ifl O O O O N 0 0 O O Q O O a N N O4m aA M N A N m o0 N N N N m m r Nq r! a A N rf N N C w. N co A Q ti m N N N M N N N N m ZuVi OO 0 0 O O OO oO ClO O O O O oO 0O 0O V O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 Cl Cm N o 0 0 N 0 o vi r o ri c h vi vi VONNNNNQNl m N r! H H e7 C m N M M M M N M M N E E 0u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o e o 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O 0O 0O 0O ClO 0O 0O 0O 0 0OOQ' r O O O N O O A N O A O O N N O N O O O N A O O O O N O O OO Nm O N N A A N p O A N O Nr A Oen N OO O Nh /' OOf 0 0 N N tD N r elt ON N V m fp CO Q r N r1 NN N M N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O o O O O o O O O o O O O ON ON oO OO OO OO OHOOOO • O O O O O O O O O O O J N O O O N A N A in N O r• r/ Qrl OO ON Ar) NN QO NA N rANQOhNOAOmNAr) A tot0 O m NQm Nio rl m N r h m QI Q r m r U N r h N A N r) O r Oi N r N' m r Go Q Qd V M N N to M N N N OO E O mrQf E y C N C- I C p H m V O V m m W W O c O It o 7 m a v a O O a x m d V A a 4 Q m C1mCLQoc c 0 i Y 3 m VLL o V C E h C U C N m C ml Y a n a m A co J 0 Q c C7 a s Ix L mEmo i o w L7 U. O J 4 LL 0 Vywd f C C O C m m w m Q N O m m= dl rgm; m >. m Y a O C a t n H J Ui V p 4 0(j O a CL r C m d m m v 2 O er varcac co NNN h FV7 Agenda Section: Item #: Case #: Planning Commission Letter March 23, 1999 Public Hearing 2 99 -TAP -1 GENERAL INFORMATION Type of Request: Transitional Activity Permit to allow continued use of property as a self - storage facility Applicant /Owner: Two S Properties Location: 200 West 78th Street Zoning: Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Comp. Plan: References: Zoning Code C -2 (general commercial) Commercial /industrial Commercial /industrial Regional Commercial /Office see attached Citations section for excerpts) 526.38; 526.43, subd. 5 Public Notice: Notice of the Planning Commission's consideration and public hearing was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 350 feet of the subject property. City Council: :Planning Commission action would set City Council consideration for April 12, 1999. ANALYSIS Background: In August 1998, industrial properties located along I -494 were rezoned to zoning districts consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property at 200 West 78th Street is occupied by Minnesota Mini- Storage, a self - storage facility. This property was rezoned from I (industrial) to C -2 (general commercial). Storage facilities as principal uses are not permitted in the C -2 zoning district so the use became legally nonconforming with the rezoning. LOVA At the same time as the rezoning, the City Council adopted an ordinance to make it easier for nonconforming industrial properties to exist and possibly expand through a Transitional Activity Permit, The TAP recognizes that the long term goal for the 1 -494 freeway corridor is for non - industrial uses but that current uses may continue to exist for many years. Until a viable proposal for a new use exists, property owners shouldn't be discouraged from investing in their property. Proposal: Two S Properties is applying for a Transitional Activity Permit to continue its current use of the property as a storage facility. The TAP makes the storage facility a permitted transitional use of the property thereby removing the nonconforming status. ACTION TO BE TAKEN Decision Mode: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item on February 23. The public hearing was closed. The Commission may choose to reopen the public hearing or continue its discussion of the item. Recommendation: Recommend that the City Council approve the request for a transitional activity permit at 200 West 78th Street. Basis: 1. The property was zoned and used as industrial prior to October 3, 1998. 2. The transitional activity was permitted in the I district. 3. The transitional activity will maintain the vitality and economic success of the applicant's business during the transition period of the industrial property to commercial uses. 4. The transitional activity will not have an adverse impact upon development of land within the C -2 District in the manner intended for the district under the City's land use regulations or its Comprehensive Plan. The use has existed on this property for several years. 5. The transitional activity will not materially increase the potential public cost of development within the C -2 District because of significant increases in the land and building value. 6. The transitional activity will be compatible with surrounding uses, will have no adverse impact upon surrounding properties, and will be in full compliance with all performance standards and requirements contained in this code applicable to uses and structures in the I District. Alternative: Recommend that the City Council deny the request for a transitional activity permit at 200 West 78th Street with a finding of fact that the use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and future goals for the 1 -494 corridor. CITATIONS ZONING CODE: 526.38. Transitional activity permits. Subdivision I. Purpose. A goal of the City's Comprehensive Plan is to gradually phase out industrial zoning in the City. The Council recognizes that the transition from industrial to commercial uses will occur over time and may require an extended period of transition to be fully realized. The Council further recognizes that it may be appropriate and desirable to permit, subject to the conditions and limitations of this subsection, the owners of lands within the C -2 District, that were zoned and used industrially prior to October 3, 1998, to engage in certain interim activities with respect to the land, the structures or the uses during the transition period which will both permit existing industrial development within the C -2 District to remain viable but which will not have the effect of either delaying the transition or increasing the public costs connected with such transition. This subsection is intended to authorize the approval of certain transitional activities as interim uses in accordance with state law, to establish the circumstances under which certain transitional activities may take place, and to set forth the regulations, limitations and conditions applicable to such activities. Subd. 2. Transitional activities. The extension or expansion of nonconforming industrial uses in the C -2 district shall be referred to as transitional activities. Subd. 3. Permit re aired. It shall he unlawful for the owner or occupier of any land within the C -2 District to engage in any transitional activity without having first obtained a permit to do so. It shall be unlawful for the owner or occupier of such land to engage in any transitional activity in contradiction to the terms and conditions of any issued transitional activity permit. Subd. 4. Application. Application for a transitional activity permit shall be made to the Director on forms provided by the City and shall contain or be accompanied by the following: a) a site plan drawn to scale showing the dimensions of the parcel and the dimensions and locations of all structures; b) in instances where the site is to be utilized in connection with a use or structure located on a contiguous parcel, the site plan shall contain the same detail for the contiguous parcel; c) the proposed uses; d) the proposed modifications, alterations, renovations or improvements to be made in connection with the transitional activity, and the estimated cost of each; e) the time for completion of all modifications, alterations, renovations or improvements; t) evidence of ownership or interest in the property; g) the fee specified in Appendix D of the City Code; and h) estimated market value before and after, the change in taxes before and after, and change to potential cost of public development. Subd. 5. Public hearing. The provisions of subsection 526.43, Subd. 5 shall be applicable to public hearings concerning the issuance of transitional activity permits. Subd. 6. Criteria and standards. A transitional activity permit shall not be granted unless the Council makes the following findings: a) the transitional activity is in connection with a property that was zoned and used as industrial prior to October 3, 1998. b) the transitional activity is in connection with an industrial use that was either permitted or conditional in the I district; c) the transitional activity will maintain the vitality and economic success of the applicant's business during the transition period of the industrial property to commercial uses; d) the transitional activity will not have an adverse impact upon development of land within the C -2 District in the manner intended for the district under the City's land use regulations or its Comprehensive Plan; e) the transitional activity will not materially increase the potential public cost of development within the C -2 District because of significant increases in the land and building value; and t) the transitional activity will be compatible with surrounding uses, will have no adverse impact upon surrounding properties, and will be in full compliance with all performance standards and requirements contained in this code applicable to uses and structures in the I District. Subd. 7. Duration of permit. Any transitional activity permit granted by the Council shall state on its face the date or event that shall result in the expiration of such permit. Any transitional activity may be terminated by a change in zoning regulations. Subd. 8. Conditions. In approving a transitional activity permit the Council may place conditions and limitations upon the permit which, in the Council's discretion, will assure: a) that the transitional activity will be compatible with surrounding uses; b) that the activity is merely of a transitional nature and will not impede the orderly transition from industrial to commercial uses in the C -2 District; and c) that the public costs occasioned by the ultimate development of former industrially zoned property in the C -2 District will not be materially increased as a result of the transitional activity. Suhd. 9. Revocation. The City may revoke any transitional activity permit granted under this subsection upon violation of any condition of the permit, any law of the United States or the State of Minnesota, or any ordinance of the City. The procedure to be followed in considering such action shall be the same as the procedure described in Subsection 546.05, Subds. 12 -13 of this code. Subd. 10. Permit not assignable. The right to engage in transitional activities shall be the personal right of the person(s) named on the permit. Transitional activity permits may not be transferred or assigned to another even though such other person or entity may succeed to permittee's interest in the land. The permit shall terminate upon such transfer or assignment, and permittee's successor in interest in the land shall not engage in any transitional activity until such successor has obtained a new transitional activity permit. Added, Bill No. 1998 -16) 526.43 Subd. 5. Public hearing. Upon receipt of a completed application, a date shall be set for a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The hearing will be held no less than 10 days after mailed notice is sent to the owners of properties located wholly or partially within 350 feet of the site. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendations to the Council. Following appropriate review, the Council shall make a decision regarding the application. (Amended, Bill No. 1995 -19, Sec. 1) fit A j J, V, i m • HIM ON AVMH01H 31VIS83INI, xv/. bwm 13381S Lite L IS3M W7' -4 7- ii Ld a. w C) 0 crLL Ld a i j t cr LL, cr- z z w cr r j m CL CL ikq 3 Planning Commission Letterg March 23, 1999 Agenda Section: Public Hearing Item #: 3 Letter #: 9 GENERAL INFORMATION Type of Request: Conduct a public hearing relating to changes proposed for the Comprehensive Plan. Public Notice: Notice of the Planning Commission's consideration and public hearing was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 350 feet of property that would have a different designation under the Plan revisions. City Council: Once the Planning Commission has approved the proposed changes, the Council would be asked to give preliminary approval, subject to Met Council review. Once the Met Council has reviewed the Plan, the City Council has nine months to adopt it. Metropolitan Council: Following Planning Commission and City Council approval, the Plan revisions would be sent to the Metropolitan Council for review. ANALYSIS Background: At the November 1998 study session, the Planning Commission its first annual review of the Comprehensive Plan. Following its review, the Commission recommended that some changes be made to the Plan based on activity that has occurred since the Plan was written. A public hearing was scheduled on February 23, 1999. The Commission lacked a quorum, so the Commissioners limited the testimony to questions about the proposed changes and decided to continue the public hearing. Proposal: The proposed changes are as follows: The definitions for the different types of commercial designations are revised to provide better distinction among the three types (regional, community and neighborhood). A description of neighborhood commercial is added (it was inadvertently omitted in the original version). [THREE -3 -- THREE -4] The Plan Study reference is updated to reflect the removal of Plan Study designations in the Lyndale Gateway area. [THREE -5] The land use calculation table is updated to reflect the new designations. THREE -6] References to the Master Park Plan are updated to reflect the new Plan adopted by the City Council in January 1999. [THREE -7 — THREE -8] The HUB subarea description is updated to reference the Richfield Lake Area Master Plan. The Guide Plan is updated to reflect the Master Plan. Designation changes to specific properties are shown on the subarea map. [THREE -14 — THREE -17] The ILN subarea description is updated to reference the Lyndale Gateway study. The Guide Plan is updated to reflect the Master Plan. Designation changes to specific properties are shown on the subarea map. [THREE -24] East 66th Street Subarea: the designation for the Richfield Floral & Gardens block is changed from high density single family residential (R- SFH) to neighborhood commercial (C -1). Issues: The Chamber of Commerce has provided written feedback on the proposed changes. The Commission should review the five points listed in the letter from Steve Lindgren, Chamber of Commerce President, and provide direction to staff as to any revisions that should be made to the Comprehensive Plan changes The Plan is divided into five volumes. The attached pages are from volumes three and four in the Plan. The first volume, is an Executive Summary of the Plan. Following Planning Commission and City Council approval of the changes, the Executive Summary will be updated accordingly. ACTION TO BE TAKEN Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing on the proposed changes. Provide feedback to staff regarding the changes. Continue discussion and a decision on the proposed changes to April 27, 1999. Basis: 1. The Comprehensive Plan states that the Planning Commission will conduct an annual review of the Plan and make recommendations for any changes to the City Council. 2. Several activities have occurred since the Plan was adopted. The Plan should be updated accordingly. 3a Alternative: 1. Approve the Comprehensive Plan changes at this time. 2. :Decide not to amend the Comprehensive Plan at this time. 3. Schedule further discussion regarding the proposed changes at the study session on April 13, 1999. 3 -3 ichficid CHAMBER OF COMMERCE March 4, 1999 Ms. Julie Urban Zoning Administrator City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Dear Julie: Thank you for meeting with a number of the Richfield Chamber of Commerce Members regarding amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. I trust you found the meeting useful in hearing directly from individual businesses. As regtiested, please consider the following: Delete all references to Lyndale Garden Center, specifically on page THREE -15 Amend the language on THREE -24 to reflect the Executive Summary of the THE LYNDALE GATEWAY Study on Page 3, #10 which states: "For the area north of 76th Street, this document represents a concept rather than an implementation strategy." Perhaps it might even be more acceptable to rewrite the reference to read: "idea ". Clarify the language on Page 24 of the above referenced study under strategy to read consistent with the Executive Summary with respect to the "east side of the 7500 block." Identify the desire in Objective 4, page 24 to truly "Work closely with businesses..." Delete on THREE -24 "trailer park" and insert "manufactured home park ", or better yet delete all references to future uses of this property! Please provide the Chamber with the appropriate documentation with respect to the eastern portion nufactured home park changing the designation to city park in the comprehensive plan. y y urs, .. 7-&-'Gen O. Lit PRESIDENT SL:cs Serving Richfield for 44 Years" 1401 WEST 76TH STREET, SUITE 130 • RICHFIELD, MN 55423 • TELEPHONE: (612) 866 -5100 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements in abundance in order to support larger numbers of people. High- density, multiple- family residential use areas fall within and are described in four subarea plans in 6.2, including 1-494 East and West, Lyndale- HUB - Nicollet and Penn Avenue /West 66th Street. The existing Richfield Towers development in the 1 -494 East subarea near Chicago Avenue can be expanded to provide enough high- density housing in this area to support integrated neighborhood commercial services in the complex itself. The Washington Park site in the extreme southeast corner of the City provides a site for a mixed use, high- density development that could include commercial, office and recreational uses as well as residential. This could be a development similar to the Edinborough project in Edina, where the recreational and athletic facilities are operated by the City and are available on a membership basis to anyone in the City as well as residents of the complex. Two existing apartment complexes offer opportunities for high- density residential use in the 1 -494 West subarea as redevelopment occurs. The Fountainhead complex has great freeway visibility and will lend itself well to a mixed office/ commercial /residential development. The Century Court complex should be redeveloped to provide high- density, single - family homes (townhomes) along the streets that face existing single - family detached homes. The remaining part of the site could then accommodate high- density residential development. The Penn Avenue/West 66th Street subarea offers complete community scale Revised 19991 3 -y shopping and commercial services, as well as transit services, in order to support high- density, multiple - family residential development not currently available in that part of the City. The new developments would replace medium and low- density multiple structures that are nearing the end of their economic life. 1.2 Commercial Commercial land uses represent the only non - residential, economic enhancement opportunity for the City since there is little or no industrial development possible except on Metropolitan Airport Commission MAC) properties. Commercial developments are classified by size under three designations shown on Plan graphics as Regional (C -R), Community (C -C), and Neighborhood (C -N). A. Regional Commercial (C -R) sites are visible and accessible from major regional roads and highways or adjacent to regional centers like Southdale. A regional complex has more than 150,000 square feet of retail space and includes a variety of goods and services that attract customers from one sector of the metro area. The Lyndale- Hub- Nicollet Area (Richfield's downtown ) is an example of an existing Regional Commercial center in Richfield. The 1494 corridor presents the most potential for new regional commercial development in Richfield, but access to Trunk Highway 77 at East 66th Street offers a good opportunity for regional commercial, particularly if a new "West" terminal area is developed for the Metropolitan Airport. Specific descriptions are found in the 1-494 and Cedar Avenue subarea plan graphics included in Section 6.2.- THREE -3 3 ^5 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements B. Community Commercial (C -C) developments offer a variety of retail goods and services in districtssticustur-es of up to 150,000 square feet in floor area. These devaieprmrreati; iR the— City - -today Opportunities for new community level facilities would be limited due in large part to the dominance of the Hub Center, development of individual retail structures scattered along East 66th Street in the eastern part of the City, the proximity to the Southdale Regional complex in the west and the 1 -494 freeway exposure along the south boundary. However, tThe Plan shows two-locations for community commercial development (See near Cedar Avenue gr•aph+Gand East 66th Street gFap h's in -C}2), while a third may, develop—in- -the -PaR Sttudy areca alGRgg L-yadale- Avenue -perch of '6+- StFeet (See LN— gr-apNG 6.2) Gurrently artier a spesi#iE -plaR I- - gfa+ - The corner of 66th Street and 18th Avenue should become a suitable location for community scale retail in the eastern part of the City after 18th Street has been improved to be the collector street (replacing Cedar), and the TH77 /66th Street interchange has been upgraded. The scattered retail along 66th Street between Portland and Cedar Avenues should be consolidated at the 13th Avenue intersection into a community scale commercial development. This would provide for better and safer traffic flow on East 66th Street, permit better screening between the commercial and adjacent residential areas that is difficult to accomplish on an individual site basis, and better serve shoppers as well. Revised 1999) Both sides of Lyndale Avenue from 62nd Street to Lake Shore Drive are also designated Community Commercial. A third Community Commercial area may develop along Lyndale Avenue, north of 76th Street. C. Neighborhood Commercial (C -N) developments provide space .for goods and services that neighborhood residents need on a frequent basis. These include but are not limited to gasoline stations, grocery or convenience stores, drug stores, hardware stores, coffee and prepared food outlets, and dry cleaning and apparel repair. The stores are typically less than 10,000 square feet in size and are located in commercial districts that have not more than 25,000 square feet of store space. 1.3 Industrial Industrial uses such as manufacturing, processing, assembly and warehousing require large sites and tend to cluster with other similar uses in larger tracts. The only potential area for this kind of large site, large structure development is limited to the New Ford Town area and other land east of Cedar Avenue that is affected by future airport development as planned by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). Since the City has no direct planning authority over lands owned or controlled by the MAC, this area is shown on the Plan as industrial, but is not included in the land use calculations nor is it covered by the planning regulation or administration portions of this Plan. The City will continue to exercise planning influence as an advisory committee participant in the MAC site development, long -range planning process. THREE -4 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements Existing industrial uses and zoning are scattered, small and inconsistent with surrounding land uses. These individual sites and structures are proposed to be converted to uses that are compatible with the Plan proposals for the surrounding area through the use of incentives and specific redevelopment planning. Most will be converted to commercial uses. A one -block wide strip of land along the west side of TH77 (Cedar Avenue) is designated Office 0), but it is expected that the actual development will be largely "office - showroom" structures often found in industrial parks. These structures are usually single story (13 to 18 foot roof height) with 20 to 40 percent office and the balance warehouse space. Some may have two levels of office or showroom space in addition to the warehouse space. These structures require few employees but serve as effective barriers for the freeway noise as well as some attenuation for the ground level airport noise. 1.4 Office Office uses are proposed to be mixed with commercial over the entire length of the 1- 494 and Cedar Avenue corridors and to a limited extent in the Penn Avenue /West 66th Street and HUB areas. Except for the office - showroom development proposed along the Cedar Avenue corridor, the (0) designated areas represent a higher tax base potential for the City than commercial, industrial or high- density residential. 1.5 Public Public uses include all sites and facilities owned by any and all governments, except those specifically designated such as schools or parks. Specific sites include public works and utilities sites and City 3 -4 Hall, but do not include the municipal liquor stores, because they are retail businesses, or the MAC properties that will function as industrial uses. For planning purposes, it is more appropriate to classify and designate these uses rather than to identify the ownership. 1.6 Quasi - Public Quasi - Public uses (churches and clubs as well as private uses, libraries, schools, parks, recreation and other facilities that are not part of the public infrastructure) that are not operated as commercial businesses but instead serve large portions of the population are identified in the Plan and should be properly zoned during the implementation process. Many of these uses are conditional uses in the various districts; however, proper identification of this separate class of uses is important. Uniform requirements for development can be established for this separate class instead of having special permit requirements or conditions applied to individual sites. 1.7 Plan Study Plan Study is not a land use designation but identifies an area that is now, or should be within one to three years, under specific planning study as a basis for plan designations. It is a "holding area" intended to preserve existing uses and zonings while specific development plans are prepared and adopted. Plan Study areas should be reviewed annually. The designation recognizes those areas currently under some kind of specific planning or design study and also recommends areas that should be studied. There are currently no Plan Studv area designations in the Plan. Revised 1999) THREE -5 3 -7 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements 1.8 Summary The summary of land use areas and housing units as a result of adoption of the 1997 -2007 Plan is compared Beth to existing conditions and to the 1982 Plan pmpesal to illustrate the potential changes in land use proposed by the Plan. These figures do not include any part of the New Ford Town or Rich Acres areas presently under acquisition by the MAC. All figures are derived from repFeseRt° the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) rather than measured or surveyed areas. Some of the ski - Glasses we; e-RGt and seyeFal req .;Ford 6nmo in4ernrn }4inn in The significant changes are increases in single- family, high- density and mixed use commercial and office. This follows the goals and objectives established by the steering committee and Planning Commission. Because the grid system of streets results in above average suburban street area and because new development areas are a scarce, deliberate effort was made to vacate streets and utilize the area for development wherever possible. The Cedar Avenue corridor plan represents the largest vacated street area. See Summary of Land Use Comparisons. SUMMARY TABLE OF LAND USE COMPARISONS figures represent the percent of total land area in the City) Land Use Designation Current 1997 -2007 Plan Category Acres Acres Single- family Housing 2,193. 2120.2 47. 846.7 3.51869.5 47.641.2 Multi - Family Housing 175. 5212.7 3:94_7 146. 8366.4 3,28_1 Commercial 209 2245.6 45.4 292,3333.2 6 -47.3 Public & Quasi - Public 288- 8217.8 4.7- .8 205. 9225.9 4-55.0 Airport & Railroads 44 -55.8 0.31 44 ,60 0-.3 Parks & Recreation 466.4 37.8 49-29.7 4754 - 8467.9 441-410.3 Roads & Streets 1,286.9 28.4- 41,27-8- A1273.3 2-7-628.1 Water (non -park) 0.2 0.004 0.2 0.0004 Vacant 48 -09.1 0.62 4--80 0.0 TOTALS Revised 1999) 4,58936.1 100.0 4,587:936.1 100.0 THREE -6 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements PART TWO Parks & Open Space 2.1 Overview -- 19898 Parks Plan The 19898 Parks Plan outlineds and defineds a complete system of park components that will mature physically and programatically as cultural and community elements are added to a parks and open space system that has been well- developed over the past twenty years. The Comprehensive Plan proposals include all of the 19898 Parks Plan recommendations as updated including: A. Following the adopted "System Plan" as a guide to balancing recreation, culture, ornamentation and conservation elements in all park development and redevelopment projects beginning with a well- documented, current inventory of park sites and facilities classified under the system elements. B. Adopting policies and procedures that will encourage retention of private and quasi - public open space such as cemeteries, private schools, churches and civic organizations. C. Implement adopted development investment priorities for existing and proposed new park sites including acquisition of homes and land within the park boundaries as they become available and complete development and /or upgrading of all park sites in the following priority order: 1) Complete the acquisition of land and homes within the proposed park boundaries as they come up for sale: Adams Hill, Fremont, Garfield (trade), mil, Lincoln Field, Heredia, Monroe, Roosevelt, Taft, and Veterans parks. 2) Complete Veterans Memorial Park development as a City community park including the multi -use community center as planned. 3) Complete the redevelopment and upgrading of all remaining neighborhood parks beginning with those that are undersized or underdeveloped. 4) Replace the Rich Acres municipal golf course. 5) Continue joint use and development of school sites, particularly as replacement for facilities lost to airport expansion. 6) Plan and construct a city -wide bike /hike trail system that will include trails within the proposed freeway right of ways and an internal loop system that connects major parks, schools and other community activity centers with the freeway and MNS railroad trail corridors and neighboring cities. 7) Promote the private development of a portion of the Washington Park site as a mixed use, residential /commercial /fitness and recreation facility and replace lost open space and facilities by acquisition of homes required to expand the Wilson Pond site. 8) Sell New Ford Town and Rich Acres parks to the Metropolitan Airports Commission and use the funds to acquire and develop replacement facilities. Replacement facilities should be developed Revised 1999 ) THREE -7 3-9 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements in accordance with the adopted Ballfield Replacement Plan. 2.2 Open Space /Urban Shaping Policies Open space resource /urban shaping policies should provide for the retention of existing open space resources and encourage provision of additional amenities and specifically should: A. Require the Minnesota Department of Transportation to include bike /hike paths and landscape development within the upgraded freeway right of way (except 1- 494) so that these areas become open space assets for the City. B. Acquire or support the acquisition by others of the MNS railroad right of way for a bike /hike trail corridor and develop as a landscape asset. C. Require the provision of significant open space /cultural resources in all private or public redevelopment projects. D. Provide adequate landscape elements within the design of the off - street bike /hike corridor system. E. Add landscape improvements to all stormwater holding ponds to improve their function as open space assets. 2.3 Special Facilities Special facilities are well -used and must be maintained and improved to meet future needs, including: A. Add a multi -use recreational centersteUstufe to the Revised 1999) Arena /Pool complex and connect it to the Arena. B. Acquire the Fort Snelling golf course eFand add nine holes of regulation golf_ aad seer-ses C. Add historic and cultural interpretation of the Bartholomew home to the Wood Lake Nature Center program. D. lade — Continue development of Veterans Park as a community park. 2.4 Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and operations are well - directed and consistent but must be constantly improved to meet higher standards through the following practices: A. Provide adequate maintenance, storage and support facilities and efficient, effective maintenance equipment. B. Adopt and follow a plan for establishing, measuring and improving maintenance standards and operations. C. Continue to select, train and retain competent, experienced staff. 2.5 Funding Funding and other recommendations are intended to continue to provide a sound fiscal basis for parks, recreation and open space funding as follows: A. Provide some funding for parks and recreation facilities through the sale of New THREE -8 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements H. Continue the housing assistance programs through the Richfield HRA grants and loans program. I. Increase commercial development to provide jobs that are located near housing development areas. PART FIVE Economic /Fiscal 5.1 Recommendations Recommendations for planning must recognize the trend toward less state and federal funding, while at the same time the need for more public funds for capital and operating budgets in a maturing community. The Plan proposals include: A. Study and evaluate all fees and charges for public services to see that revenues cover the full costs of services and all supporting infrastructure maintenance and reserves and propose grant or subsidy policies to respond to the needs of special groups or populations B. Study and evaluate privatization options for public functions that are fully or partially funded with tax revenues. C. Enlarge and extend tax increment financing districts to encourage development and redevelopment that increases tax base. D. Adopt industrial revenue bonding procedures to finance private development that increases tax base. E. Continue to use revenue and general obligation bonds to finance public facility capital improvement programs. PART SIX Subarea Plans The subarea plans cover nine specific segments of the City that have particular planning needs that require more detail. These areas were defined and described in Volume Two, Part Seven. 6.1 Subarea Plan Descriptions A. LYNDALE- HUB - NICOLLET (LHN) The LHN sub -area has been the Richfield downtown" since it was developed over 39 40 years ago. The area has gone through two major improvement and redevelopment stages since its original construction, the most recent of which added high- density residential structures, mixed residential and commercial and an extensive "facelift" of the "HUB" commercial structure itself that has restored the commercial vitality that was fading in the 1970s. The Richfield Lake sestOF area (Crosstown to 68th Street and 1 -35W to Pleasant)aeFth of 66th StFeet between — Lyndale AveRue and 1-35W) has been shaped by the water and soil conditions of the lake area. Both Lyndale Avenue and West 66th Street deviated from their rigid gridiron pattern to skirt the lake and create a rare, non - perpendicular intersection of these two arterial streets. In 1997 and 1998, a planning process was undertaken for the area. The resulting master plan, The Lakes at Lyndale: the Richfield Lake Area Plan, is incorporated into Tthe Plan by reference. The objectives of the Master Plan are as follows: 1. Proactively work with MnDOT on its Interstate -35W improvement project, THREE -14 3,11 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements ensuring that Richfield does not suffer a net loss in housing, 2. Take advantage of opportunities to provide more and varied housing 3. Use redevelopment to provide new commercial investment and upgrade commercial /retail 4. Take advantage of the aesthetic and recreational opportunities provided by Richfield Lake. 5. Solve existing neighborhood cut - through traffic problems. Improve transit opportunities. 6. Improve the appearance of the community's _ ateways. 7. Involve the community in the planning process 8. Realize the kind of redevelopment success on this project that Richfield has experienced elsewhere in the community. aonsalidate the euFreRt !aad —USe patteFns -- woutd -b _- single fa high-density expanding the Wee ake-- Village Eoncept. To accomplish these objectives, Tthe commercial (C -C) area along the west and east sides of Lyndale Avenue to the west between West 63rd and 64th Streets would be expanded -t for additional develepm ,eel - --ARd parking bordered by medium density multi le housing. The existing Lyndale Garden Center site would be converted to high density housing (RMH). A—bike- hike-- tFai l s c- ould-- Foe, IO W eeway at West 64th StFeeet and go through the Richfield -L- development- Mixed use proiects incorporating housing and commercial uses would be encouraged throuqhout the Lakes on Lyndale area. The northeast corner of 66th and Lyndale would be developed as community commercial and office (C -C /0), including possibly a movie theatre. The regional commercial /office (C -R/0) development in the southwest corner of 66th and Lyndale would be expanded to include the Pleasant/Grand Avenue block. A mixed use, "urban village" concept has been proposed for the area. Neighborhood commercial (C -N) at the corner of 67th and Lyndale would provide a transition from the commercial to the single family neighborhood to the south. The five single- family residences on the west side of Harriet Avenue between West . 64th and West . 65th Street should be converted to commercial (C -C) to provide for additional development and parking for that developed area. The eight single - family dwellings between Harriet and Grand Avenues and the four along the west side of Garfield Avenue between West 63rd Street and 1 -35W should be converted to high- density (RSF -H) as a transitional use. Garfield Park is a strip of land nearly one block long and 75 feet wide that accommodates a tot play lot. However, all other park uses would intrude on the neighboring lots. The Plan shows the acquisition of five single - family lots in order to provide a site of about one acre in the shape of a square. The north half of the existing park could be added to the medium density, multiple residential development already in place to the west. THREE -15 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements A bike -hike trail should cross 1 -35W freeway at West 64th Street and go through the Richfield Lake Park and the commercial development. The Wood Lake sector (south of West 66th Street between Lyndale Avenue and I- 35W) includes a recommendation to convert the few remaining single - family residences along West 66th Street to townhomes and to acquire the two residences and one vacant lot along the north side of Lake Shore Drive to incorporate as open space, parking or accessory buildings for the existing high - density residential (RM -H) development. The large open spaces of St. Peters Church /School and the Academy of Holy Angels dominate the Holy Angels sector by providing relief to the intense commercial development north of West 66th Street. The Femainiag— si.9le -fay hame&- R4 and- -the —r G0MFnereiat/ as+GR do.".0 The Southeast sector (south of West 66th Street and east of Nicollet Avenue) proposes to convert the existing single - family housing to single - family, high- density RSF -H) as a transition use along Nicollet Avenue, West 66th Street and the commercial (C -C) area at the intersection. The Northeast sector (north of West 66th Street and east of Nicollet Avenue) 3--14 proposes an expansion of the commercial C -C) into the east half of the block between West 64th and West 65th Streets and conversion of existing single - family residences along the east side of First Avenue and the north side of West 66th Street. The HUB sector (north of West 66th Street between LYnd Pleasant and Nicollet Avenues) is the largest and most intensely developed sector of the entire subarea. Single- family residential housing along the east side of Blaisdell Avenue between 62nd and 63rd Streets and 64th and 65th Streets should be converted to high- density (RSF- H) and the lone remaining duplex at the corner of Nicollet Avenue and West 64th Street should be added to the commercial area (C -C) to the south. As they near the end of their useful life in the next few years, all of the medium density, multiple dwellings along the east side of the railroad should be converted to townhomes or patio homes that are more consistent with the neighborhood. The medium density, multiple along the north side of West 65th Street should be expanded by converting the five single - family residences in order to provide additional parking and landscaped area. THREE -16 3-13 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements B. EAST 66TH STREET (HUB TO CEDAR AVENUE) The Plan proposes to retain the existing commercial (C-C) on three of the four corners at West 66th Street and Portland Avenue. The northeast corner, however, is shown to be acquired as a site for a new Fire Station No. 1. Commercial (compatible with park activities) and high- density residential fill out existing private land to the north where the City should trade land with developers in order to provide more space around the arena. The desirable sites along the south side of West 66th Street across from Veterans Park should be converted to high - quality townhouses or patio homes as the existing multiple dwellings and commercial sites near the end of their useful lives. The 12th Avenue intersection should remain as a commercial corner, extending one full block to 13th Avenue on both sides of West 66th Street. The remaining three blocks to the east should be limited to office uses. Single - family, high- density (RSF -H) should serve as a transition use on all sides of the commercial and office areas. After the new fire station is occupied, the current City Hall and Public Safety Building should be redesigned to utilize the fire station space for community activities. The three existing homes along Portland Avenue should be added to the Heredia Park site to make up for the expanded City Hall parking area west of the building. C. PENN -66TH STREET ( PASSS) In 1989, the Richfield Department of Community Development prepared a Design Framework Manual and completed a redevelopment plan for the PASSS (Penn Avenue Sixty -Sixth Street) area and proposed a tax increment financing district. The Plan recommends enlargement of that planning area, coordination of land uses and an increase in the tax increment financing district as much as is possible under current legislation. The recommendations of the Design Manual are incorporated into the Plan. The Plan proposal detail includes the area between the Crosstown Freeway (MN62) on the north to West 70th Street on the south and from Xerxes Avenue on the west to 1 -35W to the east. The Plan proposals for the PASSS area are presented under three headings: (1) streets /access/ parking; 2) land uses; (3) public areas and uses. 1) Streets /Access /Parking should be consistently designed, signed and landscaped over the entire PASSS area. Both Penn Avenue and West 66th Street should be further improved in order to serve the transportation needs of through THREE -17 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Three: Plan Elements The Plan proposal shows all of the developed regional commercial areas as regional commercial (C -R) and expands that use designation to all the rest of the area except two sites -- the "Cloverleaf' site Fremont to Emerson Avenues) and the New Orleans Court apartment site Wentworth to Nicollet Avenues). Tax base and traffic distribution considerations require some non - commercial uses in this subarea and athe major office tower use on the Cloverleaf site is the most logical choice. The freeway site G#eFs the west -v-i -sib+ it " the o -metre aFea. Development 9R this site shoutd-be PAGIFe than simply well dGne, i - sheuid—be Waking and sheuid —fie ident+#ied a 'ef the City. The Plan eliminates the City garage site and replaces that inconsistent and inefficient use of valuable land with mid - density, multiple residential (R -MM) north of West 77th Street and regional commercial (C -R) to the south. The City facilities should be relocated to the former New Ford Town or other airport lands or other less valuable redevelopment locations within the City. When the "trailer park" is redeveloped, the east half would be an important addition to Lincoln Field, and the balance can be developed and upgrade what is already in place. The mixed GGmmeFGial and Fesidential -. dev Lyndale-Avenue is presently undeF -st by a- consultant- and- has been designated as Wan- Study" (PS) iR the PlaR. Plan Study a- eposed Innis use, buth} ratheF a 3-'f The Lyndale Gateway area, bounded by 74th Street on the north, 77th Street on the south, Garfield Avenue on the east and Aldrich Avenue on the west, was part of a planning study in 1995 and 1996. The plan that was developed proposes an integrated mixed use development in the area with shared parking and consisting of commercial, office and residential development while offering maximum protection for the adiacent neighborhoods. Regional- Commercial and Office development is likely south of 76th Street with Community Commercial and medium density housing (RMH) between 74th and 76th Streets. The Lyndale Gateway: A Redevelopment Plan and Strategy, July 8, 1996 is incorporated into the Plan by reference. J. 1 -494 CORRIDOR (WEST) The area between 1 -35W and Penn Avenue offers the same future commercial development potential as its counterpart to the east of 1 -35W. What it lacks is an upgraded street between the two freeway interchanges. The Plan proposal suggests a concept to approach that situation by improving Knox Avenue and West 77th Street as the commercial connection to support proposed Regional Commercial (C- R) sites on both sides of that upgraded street. The existing development can support or justify this and should be a THREE -24 3-15 RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Volume Four: Implementation established a confidence that should not be discarded. 2.2 Rezoning Consistent With Comprehensive Plan The City does not intend to rezone all currently inconsistent sites to conform to the Plan proposals. This rezoning would create a plethora of non - conforming use situations that compromise, at least, and seriously hurt, at worst, current owners and occupants without good purpose. Specific sites where the current land use is consistent with the Plan but the zoning is inconsistent will be rezoned during 1999. Other sites will be rezoned as a result of a participatory and logical redevelopment planning and process for each specific area as the opportunity presents itself. PART THREE Review 3.1 Historical Perspective The City has developed and practiced a formal development review process, as well as redevelopment project management, over a period of more than 30 years that allows for professional and citizen participation and has served the City well. There is no need to "invent" a new process since consideration of the consistency with or implications from provisions of the Comprehensive Plan is one of the subjects covered by the staff reports used to review a development proposal. 3.2 Plan Proposal Function The Plan provides extensive and clearly stated goals and objectives that can serve as criteria by which to evaluate requests for rezoning or redevelopment. They are not, however, substitutes for complete and effective site planning and structural design. PART FOUR Capital Budgeting 4.1 Current Practice The. City has annually updated, adopted and implemented a five -year Capital Improvement Budget/Capital Improvement Plan (CIB /CIP) for more than 20 years. The GuF%Rt-Flap (19969 2001) was adepted The Budget is divided into three major categories -- Recreation and Open Space, Right -of- Way Improvements, and Public Facilities. In addition to the program of capital expenditures that preserve and enhance City infrastructure and provide natural and recreational amenities, the Plan also recommends initiatives to assist the City in its strategic goal of creating economic development. 4.2 Plan Recommendations The current CIB /CIP is incorporated by reference into the Plan. Revised 1999) FOUR -3 Y) LLJ Z a 2 U Z D Z O Z a LI N Z a J LL 0 c G t`7 r G r C d O Q ma X w Q' H W v i ao 0 CQ m 1, IT o N o OR o m A O Q 14 4 I O N t7 Q 0 tT HH O O O O W O O D1 A P'1 O O O O G O tP/ O O CL O NtO O f` Vto Ol GD G C 1- O O O U J j tD Of O t0 O Of to O Of O U Z m O 9 O 9 7 9 V O to O U to O h 0 0 0C%4 O O Np tor- O QcliW Q0) N N K W crOi c0•) I rOi tin N 2 OLn Y w fV tD v N lA 1!7 O w Z tT O N O N N 2 pp7 to O N 7 I YX O fV m D 0 y 7 O1 N co O O Q u o c tri v F Y LC a to N q Zm CO n tR 0 CD O O W u v to o v, v opCL; O V A O to V O 2WUU Cl) W n CDN to N ton CCNZ Q 7 C) Y N U Q M M COD t(D t h w C Q' Q 0) In DtD t0 N LolA QVU. 1 Cl) O O K NF U. N N 2 N 1 O' CO CO I N I cl> CO i CJ to cD I .- r I O O I co 0 O to rncrU LL O N I I N O Y w a 1 cy O I m aD v Z U N O 0) C O U Zv I O iJK Q r°, U') a t°r4i C', N tri 0 D 0) LU ixQ LL I CO O I N co I 1 0 H LL lT, 0 ltf O' MINI N pplA I 0) D C 1 I w LtZU) Q p oNyOO H L h tD tp fC O C C O N a cutUUa0- w_00 t`7 r G r C d O Q ma X w Q' H W v 3-17 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Changes Richfield Lake Area MM 63rd B 0 Proposed Designations L`M`'MW--- Community Commerial /Office Neighborhood Commercial Change from Community Commercial Change from Regional Commercial /Office Change from High Density Single Family A 200 0 200 400 Feet March 9, 1999 3-11( Proposed Comprehensive Plan Changes Lyndale Gateway 77th St 1-494 N A 200 0 200 Feet March 9, 1999 H Agenda Section: Item #: Case #: Type of Request: Applicant /Owner: Location: Zoning: Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Comp. Plan: References: Zoning Code Planning Commission Letter March 23, 1999 Public Hearing 4 99 -CUP -1 GENERAL INFORMATION Renewal of Conditional Use Permit to allow use of property for auto sales Kevin Travers /Ray Tharp 6529 Penn Avenue I (industrial) Commercial Commercial Regional Commercial /Office see attached Citations section for excerpts) 546.05, Subds. 4 and 6 Public Notice: Notice of the Planning Commission's consideration and public hearing was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 350 feet of the subject property. City Council: Planning Commission action would set a City Council public hearing date of April 12, 1999. ANALYSIS Proposal: The property owner is requesting a renewed temporary conditional use permit for the property. Walser currently operates the car lot. History: In 1990, a conditional use permit (CUP) was approved to allow use of the property as a used car lot. A temporary CUP was issued for three years because a planning study had recently been completed for the area and the proposed car lot was inconsistent with that study. The CUP was renewed in 1993 and 1996. q_1 Issues: The property is not large enough to accommodate a significant number of cars; consequently, the CUP has limited the number of cars to 30. Recent counts found as many as 58 cars in the lot and an adjacent "alley." The alley" is not an approved location for car display or parking. A planning study is currently being conducted by Ryan Companies, the Planning Commission and a citizen/business advisory committee. That study should be completed later this year. Because of the study and the possibility of future changes in the area, the CUP should continue to be temporary. ACTION TO BE TAKEN Recommendation: Recommend that the City Council approve the request for a temporary conditional use permit at 6529 Penn Avenue for use as a car lot for a period of one year from the date of City Council approval with the following stipulations: 1. That a 22 -foot minimum drive aisle be maintained in the parking area. 2. That landscaping in the front of the property be maintained in compliance with the approved landscape plan and in compliance with PASSS design guidelines. 3. That a maximum of 30 cars be on the site at any one time. 4. That the alley located to the south of the property be maintained free of vehicles. Basis: 1. The additional one -year term will provide the City with further oversight given the expected redevelopment of the area. Alternative: Recommend that the City Council deny the request for a conditional use permit at 6529 Penn Avenue with a finding of fact that the proposed use would have an adverse impact on surrounding properties or the City as a whole. y-d CITATIONS ZONI:NC CODE: 546.05. Conditional use permits. Subdivision 1. Permit required. It shall be unlawful to engage in any use listed in this code as a conditional use without first obtaining a conditional use permit (CUP) from the City pursuant to this subsection. Subd. 2. Limitations. A conditional use permit may not be issued for the purpose of granting an adjustment or appeal, or for any use prohibited in the zoning district for which the permit is sought. Subd. 3. Application. Application for a conditional use permit shall be made to the Director on forms provided by the City. Subd. 4. Planning Commission review. After receipt of a completed application, a date shall be set for consideration before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may offer whatever public notice of its review it deems necessary. Following this consideration, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. Subd. 5. Public hearing. After receipt of the recommendation of the Planning Commission, a date shall be set for a public hearing. Not less than 10 days prior to the public hearing, notice shall be published once in the official newspaper and sent by mail to all the owners of properties located wholly or partially within 350 feet. The Council shall make the final determination on the application, and in doing so shall make findings regarding its review. The Council may impose conditions and require guarantees on the granting of the permit in order to ensure compliance with the conditions designated in connection therewith. The Council shall make a decision within 60 days of submission of a completed application unless written notice of an extension is Provided to the applicant. The notification must state the reasons for the extension and its anticipated length, which may not exceed 60 days unless approved by the applicant. If the Council fails to make a timely decision, the conditional use permit shall be deemed to have been approved. (Amended, Bill No. 199 -19, Sec. 4) Subd. 6. Conditions for issuance. The Council may not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds that all of the following conditions will be met: a) the proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan: b) the proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines; c) the proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 541 of this code; d) the proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements; C) the use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare; and f) there is a public need for such use at the proposed location; and g) the proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. H3 SECTION 546 -ZONING: ADMINISTRATION 546.05. Conditional use permits. Subdivision 1. Permit required. It shall be unlawful to engage in any use listed in this code as a conditional use without first obtaining a conditional use permit (CUP) from the City pursuant to this subsection. Subd. 4. Planning Commission review. After receipt of a completed application, a date shall be set for consideration before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may offer whatever public notice of its review it deems necessary. Following this consideration, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. Subd. 6. Conditions for issuance. The Council may not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds that all of the following conditions will be met: a) the proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan; b) the proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines; c) the proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section X41 of this code; d) the proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on govermnental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements; e) the use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare; and f) there is a public need for such use at the proposed location; and S) the proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. r,, v m A N tpW PROPERTY LINE o 'g X 0 54 I I PARKING s z I m v m Z I m c m h -iy PARKING I PARKING I z O x 2- vi 0 X31 V N 0 mm 4 i C mm z m z