Loading...
09-22-1992CITY Of RIOHFIELD nnminG commission A6EfIDA September 22, 1992 7:00 p.m. FuIOIlIl C au 1' gd Iwo f z1 r o u tI t• Regular Planning Commission meeting of August 25, 1992. I "ulali• t- I il•in ITEM #1 92- APUD -2 6500 Woodlake Drive Woodlake Point Condominiums Amend conditional use permit and final development plan to allow: 1) an entrance sign, and 2) a balcony enclosure for #1104. ITEM #2 Information Letter #11 300 West 78th Street (old Lampert Lumber site) Determine compliance of property with the comprehensive plan. IC1 i Ll lll('ti 1 / 1 •1 ti () Ill l l_l' I7iIN t ti 1 School Board Community Services Advisory Commission HRA City Council AdHoc 135/1494 Traffic Committee Add m =nmsimt PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson William Snyder; Commissioners: Robert Elliott, Timothy Erlander, Michael Gallagher, Daniel Linnihan, Morris Nilsen II, Thomas Scaglia, and David Sumnicht MEMBERS ABSENT: Nancy Edwardson COUNCIL LIAISON: None STAFF PRESENT: Byron Wallace, Community Development Director; .Shawn Drill, Zoning Administrator; and Diane Anastos, Associate Planner The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairperson Snyder at 7:03 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Erlander, S/Nilsen to approve the minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1992. Motion carried: 6 -0 PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 92- CUP -3, 6401 Lyndale Avenue South ITEM #1 Pizza Hut of America, Inc. Conditional use permit to allow a pizza carryout and delivery business with no dine -in service Commissioner Scaglia arrived. Zoning Administrator Drill reviewed the staff report, stating that request was to allow a pizza carryout and delivery business at Woodlake Plaza Shopping Center. He stated that though Planning Commission Minutes August 25, 1992 Page 2 the business would not provide dine -in service, a conditional use permit was required as it is for all other restaurants in the C -2, general commercial zoning district. Mr. Drill gave an analysis of the site plan, noting that Pizza Hut Delivery would be located in the small detached building on the northwest corner of the property. He also described the previous and current uses of the building. Mr. Drill noted that the major change consisted of interior remodeling and installation of kitchen equipment. New landscaping and exterior signage would also be installed. He added that Woodlake Plaza Center would be responsible for maintenance of all common area grounds. Mr. Drill reviewed the proposed business hours and on -site parking availability. He stated that Pizza Hut's request is not related to a current petition by Woodlake Plaza Shopping Center to rezone property and expand parking. Staff- recommended .approval of -the conditional. use :.permit .with .three stipulations as outlined in the staff report. Commissioner Sumnicht arrived. Bill Trussell, Pizza Hut Representative, concurred with the staff report. He stated that he was available to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Eileen Bentzen, 508 West 64th Street, stated concerns about traffic on 64th Street. She said that traffic was already very high and would increase with Pizza Hut. She stated that the delivery cars would be going in and out all night on this quiet and short street. Mrs. Bentzen also indicated that the neighbors were working on a plan to turn 64th Street into a one -way street or block it off completely from Lyndale Avenue. Mr. Trussell stated that Pizza Hut would not be opposed to the ideas suggested by the neighborhood to reduce traffic on 64th Street. Responding to Commissioner Linnihan's question, Mrs. Bentzen stated that she was basing her assumptions of increased traffic on the difficulties of making a left turn onto Lyndale Avenue during rush hour. She added that Lyndale Garden Center has had the most impact on traffic at the intersection, which requires police assistance on a seasonal basis. The north exit onto Lyndale Avenue from Woodlake Plaza allows a right turn only, and the south exit_ by Mister Donut allows a turn in either direction. Responding to Commissioner Elliott's question, Pizza Hut stated that they would expect 8 -10 drivers during the peak hours such as Friday evenings from 5 p.m to 8 p.m. They would employ 2 -4 drivers during the non -peak hours. Planning Commission Minutes August 25, 1992 Page 3 M/Scaglia, S /Sumnicht to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 8 -0 Responding to Chairperson Snyder's question, Community Development Director Wallace stated that there are certain requirements which must be met to warrant installation of a stoplight on major streets like Lyndale Avenue. He suggested that Mrs. Bentzen or someone from the neighborhood contact the City Engineer's office for more information if a stoplight is desired. Commissioner Sumnicht noted that Lyndale Garden Center appears to be the main source of traffic problems at the intersection on a seasonal basis, as noted by Mrs. Bentzen. Responding to Commissioner Nilsen's question, Mr. Drill reviewed access to the shopping center site from 64th Street and Lyndale Avenue. M/Erlander, S/Elliott to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. That a hose bib be provided for the dumpster area. 2. That the recycling room be enlarged if so determined by the Health Division at the time of plan review. 3. That landscape screening be provided in the area between the building and 64th Street that the landscape plan be reviewed by the City Planner; and that a cash escrow be submitted for the landscaping. Motion carried: 8 -0 NEW BUSINESS Information Letter #10 ITEM #2 First draft revisions of Zoning Code Sec. 505 -510) Zoning Administrator Drill reviewed the information letter, stating that revisions to the zoning code will clear up several discrepancies and bring it up to date. He said the attachment was a first draft of Sections 505 -510. General discussion about the revision process followed. Mr. Drill encouraged the Commissioners to review the draft and make any comments or suggestions. No formal action was requested. Planning Commission Minutes August 25, 1992 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS Responding to Commissioner Scaglia's question, Mr. Wallace said that a new single family home will be built at 6400 Vincent Ave. by Richard Ziemer. The City Council has extended a lot coverage variance to allow the floor plan. The Building Inspector is currently reviewing the building permit application. LIAISON REPORTS School Board: Commissioner Linnihan reported that the 8 -3 -92 meeting discussed the Major Building `Systems-and-Structural Renovation Proposal. Community Services Advisory Commission: None. BRA: Mr. Wallace reviewed the status of several projects including 77th Street acquisitions, former Lampert site, Hub West, Richfield Rediscovered Program, Fix up Street Demonstration Program, and the Best site at I494 and Nicollet. City Council: None. Ad Hoc Traffic Committee: Emerson Avenue Neighborhood (I -35W) meeting is tentatively set for Sept. 10, 1992. Commissioner Gallagher also gave an update on the buyout process for the New Ford Town and Rich Acres neighborhoods. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:20 p.m. Timoth rlander Planning Commission Secretary AM CITY Of R10HRELD PLRnninG oommission Action Requ ®it Item: 1/1 Agenda Section: Public Hearing Case: #92- APUD -2 Date: September 22, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Petitioner: Woodlake Point Management and Homeowners Association Location: 6500 Woodlake Drive Type of Request: Amendment to the conditional use permit and final development plan of a planned unit development (PUD) zoning district. Zoning: PMR (planned multi - family residential) Land Use: Condominium complex (12 stories) Comp. Plan: Central business district References: (see attached Citations section for excerpts) City Code: Section 416.07, Subd. 2 (e) regulates PUD signage. ZoninE Code: Sections 530.29 and 530.41 regulate the PUD amendment process. ACTION Proposed Change' 1) Installation of an identification sign on the premises; and 2) installation of a screening enclosure for the balcony of Unit # 1104. Staff Recommendation: Approve the amendment to the conditional use permit and final development plan for Woodlake Point Condominiums. HISTORY Public Notice: Notice of the Planning Commission's consideration and public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Hearing Examiner: Not applicable. City Council: Planning Commission action would set a City Council public hearing date of 0 October 12, 1992. ANALYSIS 9 ISSUES - relating to Identification Sign: The approved PUD plan for Woodlake Point does not indicate any signage, except for one temporary project sign which has already been removed. The sign ordinance requires that all new signage not shown on the PUD plan be approved before a sign permit can be issued. The purpose of the sign request is to aid people in locating the Woodlake Point entrance, which can be difficult to spot when factors such as traffic volume & speed, curvature of the road, and other distractive obstructions are considered. The proposed sign would be a monument style ground sign designed to compliment the existing development. The brick used for the sign base would match the building. The double face metal sign would have a dark green background with white lettering, and would not be illuminated. The proposed sign would be located in the southeast portion of the site, between Woodlake Drive and the front entrance. The sign location would not obstruct traffic visibility, because both curb cuts allow a "right -out only" turning movement. ISSUES - relating to Balcony Screening Enclosure for Unit 1104: Woodlake Point hopes to correct problems experienced by the owner of Unit #1104: The roof over the balcony does not extend far enough outward, which allows run-off to splash into the balcony area. The proposed screening enclosure with a four inch roof extension (framing) would eliminate problems associated with the run-off, such as ice built up. The enclosure would also eliminate a pigeon excrement problem, making use of the balcony more enjoyable for the owner. The application states that the enclosure would visually improve the appearance of the balcony by removing the need to hang deterrents (such as plastic owls) to scare the pigeons away. Such deterrents create a visually unpleasing, cluttered appearance. FAST FACTS: 1) The proposed screening enclosure would be constructed with a dark anodized aluminum frame which would match the existing window frames. 2) The screening material would be tightly knit to prevent as much snow sift as possible. 3) The enclosure would be mounted inside the balcony railing in order to maintain the rhythm of the exterior facade. 4) The screen would not be operable, however, would be removable with special tools. 5) The frame would be rigidly attached to the balcony floor, and would provide drain holes to dispose of trapped water. 6) Unit #1104 is the on the highest floor which provides balconies, and faces east. RECOMMENDATIONS i Recommended Action: Preferred: Recommend that the City. Council approve the amended conditional use permit and final development plan for Woodlake Point to allow the identification sign and screening of the balcony for Unit #1104. Basis' 1. The proposed sign will provide better identification for the property, which may also improve traffic flow through the area. 2. The proposed sign materials would compliment the building character. 3. The proposed screening enclosure would solve problems related to storm water run -off and pigeon excrement. 4. The proposed screening enclosure would be designed to compliment the building. S. Several other unit owners have indicated an interest in installing a screening enclosure. Approval for Unit #1104 would provide a model for future screening requests and consideration. Alternative: Recommend that the City Council deny one or both of the items requested by this application with a finding of fact that the proposal would have an adverse impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole. 65th Street W e point Condoms Nvood183& biding) 12 story ?; , ( L location of proposed identification sign 1 81 e 56th Street 1 sign location plan M6"140"46 N R CIHFIEL[ • ZONING I IA to 0 f 9 F'I I I IrAll I tjl l l It lll 63 1 1 4 LiW WWT VU 0 Ir=111111111,111C 117 CITY OF RICHFIELIA or"Zo rem CITATIONS CITY CODE: Section 416.07, Subd. 2 (e) Planned unit developments. Only the signs shown on the approved PUD plan shall be permitted. ZONING CODE: 530.29. Compliance with the PUD plan and final development plan. Subdivision 1. Changes. The development of the PUD district shall be in substantial compliance with the approved PUD plan, the approved final development plan and any conditions imposed by the council. Compliance shall not be considered substantial if there is: a) more than ten percent change in floor area in any one structure; b) more than a ten percent change in the original approved separation of buildings; c) any change in the original approved setbacks from property lines; d) more than five percent change in the ground area covered by the building; or . e) any change in the ratio of off - street parking and loading space to gross floor area in the building. Subd. 2. Building permits. A building permit may not be issued for a structure within the PUD district until the director certifies that the structure conforms to the provisions of the PUD plan, the final development plan and any other conditions imposed by the council. Upon approval by the director, the building permit application along with the appropriate information required for building permits shall be submitted to the building official who shall process the building permit in conformance with the building code. 530.41. Amendment of conditional use eprmit. Amendment to a conditional use permit issued for land within a PUD district shall be by two-thirds vote of the council. The council may hold such hearings on a proposal to amend a conditional use permit as it may consider necessary; but at least one public hearing shall be held. The council may consider all factors considered in connection with rezoning the PUD district and issuing conditional use permits therefor as well as any other factors relevant to the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or welfare and to the protection of property or improvements in the neighborhood. t 6 6 . •, •`'• v '•". 1: tat • — S 1 t: 3 gift K i, U, a` - ; r • "a -" . ` a J'' - A; -.• + ` t 1' 4• ' 1 Jr ol 04, nti 1z, ft Jr ol 04, nti i Item: #2 CITY Of R10HRELD PL RMMG commissio 1 Information Information Letter: # 11 Agenda Section: New Business Date: September 22, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Subject: The purchase of the former Lampert Lumber property at 300 West 78th Street by the City of Richfield. Type of Request: Consideration of a finding that the purchase of this property by the City is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Purpose: A site to which the entire garage operation can be relocated is not yet available. The 77th Street Project will dislocate some of the garage functions. A near -by relocation site would be most efficient and economical. Also, the* site would serve as a staging area for the 77th Street contractors. References: Chapter 462 of Minnesota Statutes requires that whenever the City acquires or sells property, the Planning Commission must review the transaction for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND Public Notice: Not applicable. City Council: On September 14, 1992, the City Council approved the purchase of the property subject to a finding by the Planning Commission. The purchase may not be closed until a fording is made. L -9 -22. DOT ANALYSIS Issues: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Figure 13 identifies this land as suitable for Freeway Strip" which is defined as Hotel/Motel, Dining/Entertainment, Retail/Wholesale, Offices, Light Industrial, Multi - Family, Offices. 2. The permitted uses allow a broad range of uses. 3. The proposed uses would be interim and would not be disruptive to the adjoining auto dealership, Soo Line railroad, or storage facility. 4. The site is available for a very reasonable cost. Purchase at this time would permit the marketing of the site at a later time for a suitable redevelopment project (the site is within the ILN redevelopment project). 5. On September 14, 1992, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission review this issue on September 22, 1992. RECOMMENDATION Recommended Action: Preferred: Adopt the attached resolution which makes a finding that acquisition of the property is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Alternative: Find that the purchase does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan. L -9 -22. DOT RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE RICHFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THAT THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the acquisition of 300 West 78th Street also known as the Lampert Lumber site (legal description attached, Exhibit A); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the acquisition of the property would serve a public purpose; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the acquisition for temporary use by the City for certain municipal garage functions which must be relocated because of the 77th Street •.improvement =project -and as ..a staging area for the street construction company would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds the acquisition of the property described above to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Passed this 22th day of September, 1992 by the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. ATTEST: Timothy Erlander, Secretary CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA William Snyder, Chairperson EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The property is legally described as follows: Parcel One: West 239 feet of the East 330 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 14 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 28, Range 24, according to the government survey thereof on file in the office of the County Recorder for Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel Two: That part of Lot 8, Block 2, Sunset Terrace, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence South along the East or rear line thereof to the Southeast corner of said Lot 8; thence. West along the South line a distance of 28 feet; •`thence in •a* =straight..line to point- of .beginning according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.