07-26-05 Worksession
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Special Worksession
July 26,2005
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kirsch at 5:30 p.m.
Members Present:
Martin Kirsch, Mayor; Bill Kilian; Susan Rosenberg; Fred Wroge; and Sue
Sandahl.
Staff Present:
Steven Devich, City Manager; Bruce Palmborg, Community Development
Director; Mike Eastling, Public Works Director; Dan Scott, Public Safety
Director; Betsy Osborn, Environmental Health Manager; Pam Dmytrenko,
Assistant to the City Manager; Bryan Shirley, City Attorney; and Cheryl
Krumholz, Recording Secretary.
Item # I
City Manager Devich stated the discussion regarding property maintenance and rental
housing inspections was requested by Council Member Wroge.
Council Member Wroge said he wanted a more pro-active approach to addressing property
maintenance and rental inspections. He added that 99% of the phone calls he receives are related to
property maintenance issues. People living outside Richfield are earning money off of our community
through rental property so there should be added fees for them to do business in the City.
Council Member Wroge stated Community Service Officers (CSOs) told him they would like
their positions to be full-time instead of part-time and that they care about the community. He added
the CSO positions used to be full-time.
Council Member Wroge said he would like 75% of the maintenance issues resolved by City
staff before a resident makes a phone call with a complaint rather than vice versa, as it currently is
handled. The response timeframe should be shortened.
Council Member Wroge stated he invited two long-time Richfield residents, Dave Ulmer and
John Bjostad, to attend tonight's Worksession and address the City Council regarding their concerns
on property maintenance. He added that he believes their concerns are common in the community.
Dave Ulmer, 7425 Bloomington Avenue, talked about incidents where there is lack of
enforcement by Police when vehicles are parked on City streets for months without moving, in
disrepair, or with for sale signs in windows; all of which are against City code.
Public Safety Director Scott apologized for the delay in correcting these violations and agreed
they should have been noticed. He added that citizens are relied upon to contact the police to report
Special Worksession Minutes
-2-
July 26, 2005
violations because the whole community needs to work together. Citizens know the problems in the
community much better than Police.
Public Safety Director Scott continued that when violations are located, they are addressed
and, if they're not, it is a different issue that he will handle with staff.
Council Member Wroge asked about Police only issuing tickets for speeding on the main
streets and not checking on the side streets.
Public Safety Director Scott explained that the police are patrolling side streets but because
there is more traffic on the main streets, they generate more complaints. The Police are responding
call-to-call.
Council Member Wroge asked Mr. Ulmer to discuss the differences between Minneapolis and
Richfield.
Mr. Ulmer said he bought his house in Richfield a long time ago because of the nice
neighborhood and community. He said you can tell which homes in Richfield have long-time
residents and which ones are rental property.
Public Safety Director Scott said when there are property maintenance violations, the City can
enforce compliance. He reviewed the number of complaints (1400) received in 2004 and the
response process. All violations were resolved except six, which went to court since the justice
system permits protesting such issues. He added that he believes the department is doing a good
job of handling violations.
Public Safety Director Scott reviewed the estimated increased cost of making the current three
CSOs full-time, which could result in a more pro-active approach to addressing property maintenance
violations.
John Bjostad, 7015 Harriet Avenue, talked about rental housing issues in his neighborhood,
related to the number of people living in one home, lack of property maintenance and several
vehicles. Situations like this don't help the neighborhood and could be a fire hazard if people are
living in the basement if it is not in compliance with the Fire code. He said the issue may be cultural
differences because they may not know how or want to do property maintenance. The owner of the
property depends upon the renter to take care of the property.
Mr. Bjostad added that Environmental Health was contacted in the spring regarding property
maintenance at one home and it was addressed in a couple days.
Mr. Bjostad also talked about a Section 8 home in his neighborhood that had property
maintenance problems.
Mr. Bjostad said he believes there is a general downgrading of property in the City and these
examples are representative of more areas in Richfield.
Mayor Kirsch agreed that violations were not fair to other neighbors.
Council Member Rosenberg agreed there may be cultural differences and some people may
not be familiar with the community standards. She added that Edwina Garcia, Richfield Community
Council Resource Coordinator, is doing some translating for Richfield block captains regarding
property maintenance. It is not fair to not tell residents of community standards but if they're told and
then don't comply, that becomes another issue. There are very strict guidelines for Section 8
housing.
Betsy Osborn, Environmental Health Manager, explained that City staff has the same
concerns as residents regarding multiple, unrelated people living together in one house and that it
appears to be an increasing problem. The current ordinance permits three unrelated individuals to
live together but if they're all related, there is technically no violation.
Ms. Osborn continued there is a Livable Communities Team, comprised of Public Safety and
Community Development Department staff, that addresses housing issues and will be discussing the
number of people residing in one home and property purchased by someone living outside Richfield.
Special Worksession Minutes
-3-
July 26, 2005
There has been preliminary discussion to develop a packet of information distributed by Assessing
staff and through the home inspection program to be given to the owner of rental property indicating
the community standards and expectations. .
Ms. Osborn said staff assumes honesty when residents provide information about the number
of people living in the home and how they're related.
Ms. Osborn added that the Fire code regarding living in the basement has changed and an
egress window is no longer required.
Public Safety Director Scott said a letter is sent to encourage the installation of an egress
window but it is not required.
Council Member Wroge said the CSOs need to be made full-time. Richfield is a fee oriented
City so a $100 rental license fee should be considered and dedicated to interpretive letters and .
paying for full-time CSOs so the City's approach on maintenance issue and inspections can be more
pro-active.
Council Member Kilian expressed support for Council Member Wroge's comments. He
requested the City Manager prepare a plan to be more pro-active instead of compliance being driven
by resident complaints. An additional ordinance may be necessary.
Council Member Sandahl reported that when the City Hall Advisory Task Force applicants
were interviewed and asked what they didn't like about Richfield, their response was the lack of
property maintenance. She said it is a quality of life issue. She suggested the budget be reviewed
for additional funding and fees be reassessed.
City Manager Devich clarified that CSOs have not been full-time previously but that they had
more hours than they do now. He said the proposed solution may not be a statement of the issues.
The CSOs are not qualified to conduct rental inspections. If the rental inspection fee is increased, a
service must be delivered. The City will need to hire more inspectors, which will cost more. The
State would not agree to charge a rental license fee unless a service was delivered.
Council Member Wroge disagreed that the City could not charge a non-homestead rental fee
because it is a right of the City, not the State.
Council Member Sandahl suggested a one-page sheet be created that lists the community
property maintenance standards and have it translated and placed on the doorstep.
Item # 2
City Manager Devich stated the Bereavement Leave Policy had been previously discussed by
the City Council and City staff at a Worksession. The Council direction was to conduct a focus group
with non-union City staff to obtain their feedback on eliminating the Bereavement Leave Policy and
replacing it with an increased Personal Leave accrual rate and modifying the language of a qualifying
event to be more inclusive.
Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant to the City Manager, reported that the employee focus group
unanimously indicated they did not want the Bereavement Leave Policy eliminated because it was a
greatly valued and appreciated option available to them during a very personal, difficult time.
City Manager Devich stated the original recommendation brought to the City Council by the
Human Rights Commission was to modify the language of an allowable event to include domestic
partner. He said staff preferred a language change, not a change in the hours.
Council Member Kilian said it appears staff considers bereavement leave as an insurance
policy not a guarantee. He said the language should be very open and not a check off list.
City Manager Devich said he preferred some general measurement of use.
Special Worksession Minutes
-4-
July 26, 2005
Council Member Wroge stated he takes issue with an outside group telling City administration
what the employees want; that is the City Manager's responsibility.
Council Member Rosenberg said the Human Rights Commission is not an outside group, they
are an advisory group making a recommendation to the City Council to make the policy more
inclusive.
Council Member Sandahl agreed that the Human Rights Commission is a citizen group
bringing ideas to the City Council. She said she had no problem with changing the language.
City Manager Devich said he wants to avoid the granting Bereavement Leave on a case-by-
case basis. He will return to the City Council with recommended language modifications for their
review.
Date Approved: August 9, 2005
c~~~
Recording Secretary