The URL can be used to link to this page

030811completeagendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2011 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE 7:00 P.M. AGENDA INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS Call to order Roll call Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who -wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. Notes: Pledge of Allegiance Approval of minutes of (1) Special City Council Worksession of February 22, 2011, and (2) Regular City Council Meeting of February 22, 2011 PRESENTATION 1. Presentation regarding Beyond the Yellow Ribbon program COUNCIL DISCUSSION 2. Council discussion • Hats Off to Hometown Hits Notes: AGENDA APPROVAL 3. Council approval of agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action is -necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended fpr approval. A. Consideration of approval of first reading of ordinance amending Richfield City Code Section 925 by adding new subsection related to vacant buildings and scheduling second reading for March 22, 2011 S.R. No. 51 B. Consideration of approval of resolution amending Appendix D of Richfield City Code related to fees for Domestic Partnership Registration S.R. No. 52 C. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing use of Sears c~`edit card by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of City S.R. No. 53 D. Consideration of approval of setting public hearing for April 12, 2011 regarding issuance of new on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses for Richfield Hotel Associates d/b/a Ramada, 7745 Lyndale Avenue S.R. No. 54 E. Consideration of approval of award of contract to Thelen Heating and Roofing for boiler and air handling unit replacement at 6444 Lyndale liquor store in amount of $158,000 S.R. No. 55 F. Consideration of approval of rejecting .all bids for Richfield Municipal Center audio- visual equipment and directing staff to re-bid this portion of the project S.R. No. 56 Notes: 5. Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar Notes: PUBLIC HEARING 6. Public hearing and second reading of transitory ordinance providing funding for certain capital improvements from Special Revenue Fund Staff Report No. 57 Notes: PROPOSED ORDINANCE 7. Consideration of second reading of ordinance amendment to City Administrative Code Chapter III, Subsection 310.33, Subd. 2 describing vacation leave accrual Staff Report No. 58 Notes: RESOLUTIONS 8. Consideration of resolution approving contract with International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 for contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012 Staff Report No. 59 Notes: 9. Consideration of resolution approving contract with Police Officers and Detectives Law Enforcement Labor Services 123 for contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 Staff Report No. 60 Notes: 10. Consideration of resolution approving contract with 9-1-1 Dispatchers Law Enforcement Labor Services Local 225 for contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 Staff Report No. 61 Notes: 11. Consideration of resolution approving contract with Police Supervisors Law Enforcement Labor Services Local 162 for contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 Staff Report No. 62 .- Notes: 12. Consideration of resolutions approving 2011 Management and General Services salary compensation plans, effective first full pay period of January 2011 Staff Report No. 63 Notes: CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 13. City Manager's report • May 24 City Council Meeting Notes: 14. Claims and payrolls Open foram (additional 15 minutes if more time needed after first Open Forum and by majority vote of the City Council) Each speaker is to keep their comment period fo three minutes to allow sufficient fime for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. indnriduais who wish to address the Counci! must have registered prior to fhe rtteefing. Notes: 15. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. richfield: March 2011 Page 1 of 1 City ® 'c field le a " - Calendars Net BVavigate: 2010 Jan Fite Mar ~ Mav Jun Jul Auy Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 March 2011 - I~Ionda ~'uesda ednesda '~'lfiursda J~ridaa 8 F~~ I I1~ar 3 6 PM Special Planning 7 PM Human Rights 7 PM Transportation 7 PM Arts Commission Commission Study Commission @ Commission @ Community Center Session Community Center 11:30a Richfield Tourism 7 PM Planning Promotion Board @ Commission Meeting 6601 Lyndale Ave, Suite 106 7 8 9 IO 11 6 PM Special 6 PM Richfield- 7 PM Bike Task Force 7-8:30 PM Public open Concurrent City Council Bloomington Watershed @ Maintenance Facility house at Mt. Calvary & Richfield School Board Management Meeting - Lunchroom school gym, 66th Meeting @ Richfield Richfield Council St./'6th Ave., to discuss High School-Board • Chambers preferred layout Room, 7001 Harriet Ave. alternative of north end 7 PM Regular City of Richfield Council Meeting Parkway/17th & " Bloomington Avenues 14 15 16 I7 18 5:30 PM Hearing 4:30 PM FOWL Board Examiner in Heredia Meeting @WLNC Room Friendship City " " 7 PM Community Commission Meeting Services Commission @ rescheduled to Feb. 24 Community Cehter 21 22 23 24 25 6 PM Advisory Board of 5:30 PM Special City 7 PM Friendship City SATURDAY, MAR. 26 Health Council Worksession Commission Meeting in 9:30-10:30 AM Heredia Conference Mayor's Hour @WLNC 5:45 PM Special 7 PM Regular City Room Concurrent HRA/City Council Meeiting CounciUPlanning Commisson " Worksession 7 PM Regular HRA _ Meeting 28 29 30 31 1 Air 7 PM Planning Commission Dispiay: Year Month Week ,D~+a Block List Condensed Abs Slide Calendars: Search Add Events: Daily Duration Periodic Administer: This Calendar All meetings held at City. Hall (6700 Portland Avenue) unless indicated otherwise Calendars Net free online interactive web calendars http://www.my.calendars.net/richfield 3!3/201.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ~" _ ~ Richfield, Minnesota Special Worksession February 22, 2011 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 6:15 p.m. ROLL CALL Council Members Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Pat Elliott; Fred Wroge; Sue Sandahl; and Tom Present: Fitzhenry. Staff Present:: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; John Stark, Community Development Director; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant to City Manager; Dave Conrads, Building Maintenance Supervisor; and Cheryl Krumholz, Recording Secretary. Item # 1 UPDATE REGARDING RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER (COUNCIL MEMO NO. 16) Mike Klass, WOLD Architects; Dale Sonnichsen, Stahl Construction; City Manager Devich, Assistant to the City Manager Dmytrenko and Building Maintenance Supervisor Conrads discussed the following regarding the municipal center: • Budget status - • Construction timeline • Abatement issues in current City Hall • Tennis court replacement • Parking issues • Use of Council Chambers during move transition The City Council requested staff coordinate a meeting with .the neighborhood around the tennis court to get their input on possibly reducing the tennis courts from two to one. The City Council requested staff contact Hennepin County regarding parking on Portland Avenue until the new parking lot is ready. Special Worksession Minutes -2- ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned. by unanimous consent at 6:50 p.m. Date Approved: March 8, 2011 Debbie Goettel Mayor Cheryl Krumholz Recording Secretary February 22, 2011 Steven L. Devich City Manager J CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Meeting February 22, 2011 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Sue Sandahl; Pat Elliott; Fred Wroge and Tom Fitzhenry. Staff Present.• Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mike Eastling, Public Works Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Corrine Heine, City Attorney; and Cheryl Krumholz, Recording Secretary. OPEN FORUM None. PRESENTATION OF COLORS AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Goettel led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Sandahl, S/Wroge to approve the minutes of (1) Special City Council Meeting of February 8, 2011; (2) Special Citv Council Worksession of February 8. 2011: and t'3) Regular City Council Meeting of February 8, 2011. Motion carried 5-0. Item #1 PRESENTATION. BY KEITH ELLISON, U.S. REPRESENTATIVE 5r" CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Council Meeting Minutes -2- February 22, 2011 Item #1A PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING, INC. Council Member Sandahl presented the certificate in recognition of Haeg Plumbing receiving the Minnesota Association of Plumbing =Heating -Cooling Contractors 2011 Plumbing Contractor of the Year. Item #2 COUNCIL DISCUSSION • HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS Council Member Sandahl announced there are advisory commission vacancies and encouraged residents to apply. Amy Dusek, Hennepin County Community Liasion, reported on the recent Teen Police Academy. Community Development Director Stark provided an update on the recent announcement related to the Richfield Borders store closing at the Shops at Lyndale and the intent of the leasing agent,. CSM, on occupancy of the space. -: Council Member Wroge discussed the concerns via email from residents regarding snow plowing efforts in the city. , City Manager Devich stated that throwing snow in the street is in violation of city ordinance. Item #3 COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA M/Wroge, S/Sandahl to approve the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. Item #4 CONSENT CALENDAR . A. Consideration of approval of first reading of ordinance amendment to City Administrative Code Chapter III, Subsection 310.33, Subdivision 2 describing vacation leave accrual and scheduling second reading for March 8, 2011 S.R. No. 41 B. Consideration of approval of resolution modifying Health Care Savings Plan for eligible General Services employees S.R. No. 42 RESOLUTION NO. 10480 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A POST EMPLOYMENT HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN FOR GENERAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES This resolution appears. as Resolution No. 10480. Council Meeting Minutes -3- February 22, 2011 C. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing Richfield Fire Department acceptance of five miscellaneous grant donations totaling $500 received from City residents and organizations during 2010 used to defray cost of fire and life safety educational programs S.R. No. 43 RESOLUTION NO. 10481 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF FIVE (5) MISCELLANEOUS DONATIONS RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO ADMINISTER THE FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AGREEMENTS AND TERMS PRESCRIBED BY THE DONORS This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10481. D. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing agreement with MN Department of Public Safety through Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for replacing present Intoxilyzer 5000 with new breath test instrument that will transmit directly to BCA S.R. No. 44 RESOLUTION NO. 10482 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION AND THE RICHFIELD PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT/POLICE FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE INTOXILYZER 5000 WITH A DATAMASTER DMT-G This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10482. M/Goettel, S/Wroge to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. Item #5 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR` None Item #6 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FUNDS FOR 2011 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (STAFF REPORT N0.45) Council Member Elliott presented Staff Report No. 45. Debbie Taylor, HOME representative, thanked the City Council for the funding. Nick Cichowicz, CAPSH representative, thanked the City Council for the funding. M/Wroge, S/Sandahl to close public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Council Meeting Minutes -4- February 22, 2011 M/Elliott, S/Wroge that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 10483 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FUNDS FOR THE 2011 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY REQUIRED THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10483. Item #7 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING RESOLUTION AMENDING RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATING 7 EAST 70T" STREET, 6941 NICOLLET AVENUE, 6944 NICOLLET AVENUE, 6945 NICOLLET AVENUE, 6949 NICOLLET AVENUE, 7001 NICOLLET AVENUE, 7005 NICOLLET AVENUE AND 6800 -PENN AVENUE AS COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND 6901 PENN AVENUE AS MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (STAFF REPORT N0.46) Council Member Sandahl presented Staff Report No. 46. Andrew Berg, 6901 Penn Avenue, spoke in support of the amendment. M/Wroge, S/Sandahl to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Council Member Wroge questioned the ability of the dental office parcel (7001 Nicollet Avenue) being converted back to single family and the amendment's impact on 7005 Nicollet Avenue, a single family residential parcel. Community Development Director Stark explained the permitted use in community commercial zoning. Dennis Dietzlec, owner of 7005 Nicollet Avenue, expressed support of the amendment. City Attorney Heine explained the permitted uses and non-conforming restrictions. M/Sandahl, S/Wroge that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made ap rt of these minutes: - RESOLUTION NO. 10484 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF 7 EAST 70TH STREET, 6941 NICOLLET AVENUE, 6944 NICOLLET AVENUE, 6945 NICOLLET AVENUE, 6949 NICOLLET AVENUE, 7001 NICOLLET AVENUE, 7005 NICOLLET AVENUE AND 6800 PENN AVENUE AS "COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL" AND 6901 PENN AVENUE AS "MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10484. Council Meeting Minutes -5- February 22, 2011 Item #8 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING RICHFIELD CITY CODE SECTION 1105 ADDING NEW SUBSECTION RELATED TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS ON CERTAIN LICENSE-APPLICANTS (STAFF REPORT N0.47) Council Member Fitzhenry presented Staff Report No. 47. M/Fitzhenry, S/Sandhal that this constitutes the second reading of Bill No. 2011-6 amending Richfield City Code Section 1105 adding new Subsection related to criminal background checks on certain license applicants. ' Motion carried 5-0. Item #9 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING RICHFIELD CITY CODE APPENDIX 1 CHANGING ZONING DESIGNATION OF 7410 AND 7420 CEDAR AVENUE FROM MR-1 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND MR-2 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) RESPECTIVELY, TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO BRING PROPERTIES INTO CONFORMANCE WITH RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (STAFF REPORT N0.48) Council Member Wroge presented Staff Report No. 48. Community Development Director Stark stated affected properly owners were notified but no discussions took place. M/Wroge, S/Goettel Commercial) to bring properties into conformance with Richfield Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried 5-0. Item #10 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING RICHFIELD CITY CODE SUBSECTION 544.13 RELATED TO MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS IV (TAKE-OUT ONLY) RESTAURANTS (STAFF REPORT N0.49) Mayor Goettel presented Staff Report No. 49. Community Development Director Stark explained the property owner polices and administers the Kensington Park parking requirements. M/Goettel, S/Elliott that this constitutes the second reading of Bill No. 2011-8 amending Richfield City Code Subsection 544.13 related to minimum parking requirements for Class IV (take- out only) restaurants. Motion carried 5-0. Council Meeting Minutes -6- February 22, 2011 Item #11 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 7610, 7630 AND 7644 LYNDALE AVENUE (KENSINGTON PARK) ALLOWING ADDITIONAL RESTAURANT SPACE FOR TAKE-OUT ONLY FACILITY (STAFF REPORT N0.50) Mayor Goettel presented Staff Report No. 50. Colleen Carey, Cornerstone Group, explained a recent parking survey conducted for Kensington Park and that they believe the parking can be managed to meet the needs of the proposed new user. M/Goettel, S/Wroge that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made ap rt of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 10485 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL RESTAURANT SPACE AT THE KENSINGTON PARK DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 7610, 7630 AND 7644 LYNDALE AVENUE Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10485. Item #12 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None. Mayor Goettel acknowledged O'Neal Hampton, resident and participant in the Biggest Loser Season 9, being in the audience. Colleen Carey, Cornerstone Group, announced they had a signed purchase agreement with Lyndale Garden Center. Item #13 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS M/V1/roge, S/Sandahl that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 2/22/2011 A/P Checks: 201369-201749 $ 2,683,104.03 Payroll: 73129-73456 41840-41841 $ 531,349.58 TOTAL $ 3,214,453.61 Motion carried 5-0. Council Meeting Minutes -7- February 22, 2011 OPEN FORUM None. ADJOURNMENT The City Council meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:30 p.m. Date Approved: March 8.2011 Debbie Goettel Mayor Cheryl Krumholz Recording Secretary Steven L. Devich City Manager AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4A REPORT # 51 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: CORRINE HEINE, CITY ATTORNEY NAME, TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: First reading of an ordinance amendment relating to vacant buildings. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: 1. Conduct a first reading of an ordinance amending Richfield City Code Section 925 by adding a new subsection related to vacant buildings. 2. Schedule second reading for March 22, 2011. II. BACKGROUND One of the effects of the economic recession has been an increase in the number of vacant buildings. Vacant buildings have adverse effects on the livability of the community, especially when they are not properly managed or maintained. The City has authority under State law to require vacant buildings to be properly secured. However, the law requires the City to adopt an ordinance if the City wants to provide for emergency securing of buildings. The proposed ordinance 0308 First Reading of Vacant Building Ordinance Amendment also regulates vacant buildings by requiring them to be registered and by requiring the persons responsible for the buildings to provide the City with a plan and timetable to return the building to occupancy and use and to correct code violations or nuisances, or demolish the building. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • Vacant buildings adversely impact the livability of the community, especially when they are not properly managed or maintained. • The City incurs costs in monitoring vacant buildings, whether the buildings are boarded or not. That cost should be borne by the persons responsible for the buildings rather than by taxpayers. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • Adoption of the ordinance will allow the City to implement a vacant building registration process. C. FINANCIAL • The registration fee is intended to offset City costs in monitoring vacant buildings. D. LEGAL • The City Attorney prepared the proposed ordinance. E. ENVIlZONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • Vacant buildings often become dumping grounds for junk, debris and other materials, some of which may be hazardous or detrimental to the environment. • Vacant buildings are a source of blight in the community. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • None. V. ATTACPIMENTS • Ordinance. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None 4-~-t CITY OF RICHFIELD STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO PUBLIC NUISANCES CAUSED BY VACANT OR ABANDONED BUILDINGS AND PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO REGISTER, MONITOR, ABATE, ASSESS, AND CLOSE VACANT OR ABANDONED BUILDINGS IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 925 of the Richfield City Code is amended by adding the following new subsection: 925.02. Registration and Regulation of Vacant Buildings. Subdivision 1. Policy. The purpose of this subsection is to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by establishing a program for the identification and regulation of vacant buildings within the City. Subsection 925.02 also determines the responsibilities of owners of vacant buildings and provides for administration, enforcement, and penalties associated with the same. Subd.2. Findings. (a) Vacant buildings have become a major cause of and source of blight in residential and non-residential neighborhoods, especially when the owner or responsible party of the building fails to actively maintain and manage the building to ensure they do not become a liability to neighborhoods and the community. (b) Vacant buildings may attract transients, homeless people, trespassers, and criminals, including drug abusers. Neglect of vacant buildings, as well as use of vacant buildings by transients and criminals, creates a risk of fire, explosion, or flooding for the vacant building and adjacent properties. (c) Vacant properties are often used as dumping grounds for junk and debris and are often overgrown with weeds and grass. (d) Vacant buildings that are boarded up to prevent entry by transients and other long-term vacancies discourage economic development and retard appreciation of property values. (e) There is a substantial cost to the City for monitoring vacant buildings regardless of whether those buildings are boarded or not. This cost should not be borne by the general taxpayers of the community but rather these costs should be borne by those who are responsible for vacant buildings. It is a responsibility of property ~~ -a ownership to prevent property from becoming a burden to the neighborhood and community and a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare. (f) Owners of multiple vacant properties within the city that allow code violations, criminal activity, or other activity or conditions that create a public nuisance upon their vacant properties to continue for extended periods contribute to blight and neighborhood decline in a much greater manner than a single property owner. Therefore, owners of multiple properties who fail to maintain their properties and correct violations, criminal activity ~ or public nuisances on their vacant properties shall be subject to imposition of higher administrative penalties in order to encourage these owners to correct violations in a prompt manner. Subd. 3. Adoption of State Law. Minnesota State Statute 463.251, in its entirety, and any future amendments to said statute are adopted by reference. Subd. 4. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this subsection: (a) Compliance Official -means the Public Safety Director, Fire Chief, Building Official, Public Health Official, Public Works Director and/or their designee. (b) Building - means a building or structure designed for business use or human use or occupancy. (c) Owner -means those shown to be the owner or owners on the records of the Hennepin County Department of Property Taxation; those identified as the owner or owners on a vacant building registration form, a holder of an unrecorded contract for deed, a mortgagee or vendee in possession, a mortgagor or vendor in possession, an assignee of rents, a receiver, an executor, a trustee, a lessee, other person, firm or corporation in control of the freehold of the premises or lesser estate therein. An owner also means any person, partnership, association, corporation, or fiduciary having a legal or equitable title or any interest in the property or building. This includes any partner, officer, or director of any partnership, corporation, association or other legally- constituted business entity. All owners shall have joint and several obligations for compliance with the provisions of this subsection. (d) Responsible party -means an owner, occupant, entity or person acting as an agent for the owner who has direct or indirect control or authority over the building or real property upon which the building is located. Any party having a legal or equitable interest in the property. Responsible party may include, but is not limited to, a realtor, service provider, mortgagor, leasing agent, management company or similar person or entity. (e) Vacant building - means a building or structure in which no person or persons actually and currently conducts a lawful business or lawfully resides or lives in 'Y~' ~'~ any part of the building on a permanent, non-transient basis in accordance with city code; or, is occupied by unauthorized persons for any amount of time. (f) Premises -means any real property and any appurtenant building or structure. (g) Dwelling -means the building or part of a building used by an individual as a place of residence on either afull-time or a part-time basis. A dwelling may be a part of amulti-dwelling or multi-purpose building, or a manufactured home as defined in this code or State Statutes. Subd. 5. Vacant Building Registration. (a) Application: The owner or responsible party must register a vacant building with the City no later than thirty (30) days after the building becomes vacant. The registration must be submitted on a form provided by the City and shall include the following information supplied by the owner: (1) The name, address, telephone number, and email address, if applicable, of each owner or the owner's representative; (2) The names, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses, if applicable, of all known lien holders and all other parties with any legal interest in the building; (3) The name, address, telephone number, and email address of a local agent, maintenance company, or person responsible for managing or maintaining the property; (4) The legal description, tax parcel identification number, and street address of the premises on which the building is situated; (5) A description of the premises, including the common address of the property; (6) The date the building became vacant, the period of time the building is expected to remain vacant, and a property plan and timetable for returning the building to appropriate occupancy or use and for correcting code violations and nuisances, or for demolition of the building; (7) The status of water, sewer, natural gas and electric utilities; (8) The owner must notify the compliance official of any changes in information supplied as part of the vacant building registration within fifteen (15) days of any change. ~6~~y (b) Property Plan: The property plan identified in subsection 925.02, subd. 5(a)(6) must meet the following requirements: (1) General provisions -The plan must comply with all applicable regulations and meet the approval of the compliance official. It must contain a timetable regarding use or demolition of the property. The plan must be completed within 30 days after the building is registered. (2) Maintenance of building -The plan must identify the means and timetable for addressing all maintenance and nuisance-related items identified in the application. Any repairs, improvements or alterations to the property must comply with the applicable building codes and City regulations. (3) Plan Changes - If the property plan or timetable for the vacant building is revised in any way, the revisions must meet the approval of the compliance official. (4) Demolition Required - If a building has remained vacant for a period of three hundred and sixty-five (365) consecutive days, and the compliance ofi'ICial has not approved an alternative schedule in the property plan, the owner must demolish the building and restore the grounds. If the owner does not demolish the building, the City may commence abatement and cost recovery proceedings for the abatement of the violation in accordance with City code and State Statutes. (c) Non-compliance and Notification: If the owner does not comply with the property plan or maintain or correct nuisance items, the City may commence abatement and recover its costs for correction of those items in accordance with City code and State Statutes. In the case of an absent owner and ongoing nuisance items, the City need not provide notice of each abatement act to the owner. A single notice by the City to the owner that it intends to provide ongoing abatement until the owner corrects the items will be sufficient notice. (d) Exemptions: (1) Fire Damage - A building that has suffered fire damage is exempt from the registration requirement for a period of ninety (90) days after-the date of the fire if the owner submits a request for exemption in writing to the compliance official. A request for exemption must be approved by the code official and include the following information supplied by the owner: (i) A description of the premises; ~~ -s (ii) The name and address of owner or owners; (iii) A statement of intent to repair and reoccupy the building in an expeditious manner and the time frame for completion; and, (iv) Actions the owner will take to ensure the property does not become a nuisance for the neighborhood. (2) Snow-birds -Those persons who leave their residential buildings on a temporary basis for vacation purposes or to reside elsewhere during the winter season in excess of thirty (30) sequential calendar days, and have the intent to return, are exempt from the registration requirement as follows. Exemption as a "snowbird" will be granted with proper verification and a local agent contact or a no fee vacant building registration form with applicable contact information provided to the City. (e) Fees: The owner must pay an annual registration fee. The registration fee will be in an amount adopted by resolution by the City Council. The amount of the registration fee shall be reasonably related to the administrative costs for registering and processing the registration form and for the costs of the City in monitoring the vacant building site. The fee must be paid in full prior to the issuance of any building permits or licenses, with the exception of a demolition permit. (f) Waiver of Fee: The registration fee may be waived if the owner or responsible party has. paid all past due registration fees and all other financial obligations and debts owed to the City that are associated with the vacant property and demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the compliance official: (1) that the property is re-occupied, with the exception of demolition, within a period of time deemed reasonable to the compliance official; and either (2) that he or she is in the process of demolition, rehabilitation, or other substantial repair of the vacant building; or (3) that he or she has a plan for the demolition, rehabilitation, or other substantial repair of the vacant building in a period of time that is deemed reasonable to the compliance official. (g) Assessment: If the registration fee or any portion is not paid within 60 days after billing, or within 60 days after any appeal becomes final, the City Council may certify the unpaid cost against the property in accordance with the process set forth in this code. y~-~ (h) Issuance of Permit: Upon completion of the registration process and payment of the fee, the City will issue a Vacant Building Permit to the owner. The owner must securely post the permit on the vacant building on a side or rear entrance door that is not generally visible from the public street. If no side or rear entrance door is available, the permit must be securely posted on another available entrance door. If the property is abandoned or the owner or responsible party fails to complete the registration process, the property will be administratively registered as a vacant property. Subd. 6. Change of Ownership. Anew owner(s) must register or re-register a vacant building within fifteen (15) days of any transfer of an ownership interest in a vacant building. The new owner(s) must comply with the approved property plan and timetable submitted by the previous owner. Any proposed changes in the property plan must be submitted and approved by the compliance official. Subd. 7. Inspections. The compliance official may inspect any vacant building in the City for the purpose of enforcing and assuring compliance with this chapter and other applicable regulations. Upon the request of the compliance official, an owner or responsible party must provide access to all interior portions of the building and the exterior of the property in order to complete an inspection. If the owner or responsible party is not available to provide access to the interior of the building, the City may use any legal means to gain entrance to the building for inspection purposes. Prior to any re-occupancy, a vacant building must be inspected by the City and found to be in compliance with the City Code and all other applicable regulations. All application and re-inspection fees must also be paid prior to any re-occupancy of the building. All such fees are set by Resolution of the City Council. Subd. 8. Maintenance of Vacant Buildings. The owner must comply with and address the following items in the properly plan: (a) Appearance: All vacant buildings must be so maintained and kept that they appear to be occupied. (b) Securing: All vacant buildings must be secured from outside entry by unauthorized persons or pests. Security must be by the normal building amenities such as windows and doors having adequate strength to resist intrusion. All doors and windows must remain locked. There shall be at least one operable door into every building and into each housing unit. Exterior walls and roofs must remain intact without holes. Vacant buildings shall be boarded when the building can no longer be secured against intrusion by the closing and locking of doors and windows in accordance with this chapter. (1) Architectural (Cosmetic) Structural Panels -Architectural structural panels may be used to secure windows, doors and other openings provided they are cut to fit the opening and match the characteristics of the building. Architectural panels may be of exterior grade-finished ~A -~ plywood or Medium Density Overlaid plywood (MDO) that is painted to match the building exterior or covered with a reflective material such as plexi-glass to simulate windows. (2) Temporary Securing -Untreated plywood or similar structural panels or temporary construction fencing may be used to secure windows, doors and other openings for a maximum period of 14 days. (3) Artistic board-up -With prior approval of the compliance official, artistic options may be utilized to secure a vacant building. (4) Emergency securing -The compliance official may take steps to immediately secure a vacant building at his or her discretion in emergency circumstances. (c) Fire Safety: (1) Fire protection systems -Owners of non-residential vacant buildings must maintain all fire protection systems, appliances and assemblies in operating condition and maintain underwriter laboratories (UL) monitoring of all systems. (2) Removal of hazardous and combustible materials -The owner of any vacant building, or vacant portion thereof, must remove all hazardous material and hazardous refuse that could constitute a fire hazard or contribute to the spread of fire. (d) Plumbing fixtures: Plumbing fixtures connected to an approved water system, an approved sewage system, or an approved natural gas utility system must be installed in accordance with applicable codes and be maintained in sound condition and good repair or removed and the service terminated in the manner prescribed by applicable codes. The building's water systems must be protected from freezing. (e) Electrical: Electrical service lines, wiring, outlets or fixtures not installed or maintained in accordance with applicable codes must be repaired, removed or the electrical services terminated to the building in accordance with applicable codes. (f) Lighting: All exterior lighting fixtures must be maintained in good repair, and illumination must be provided to the building and all walkways in the same manner as provided at the time the building was last occupied (unless electrical utilities have been terminated under subsection 5 or 8 of this section) or as otherwise provided in the approved vacant building plan. (g) Heating: Heating facilities or heating equipment in vacant buildings must be removed, rendered inoperable, or maintained in accordance with applicable codes. ~~C (h) Termination of utilities: The compliance official may require that water, sewer, electricity, or gas service to the vacant building be terminated or disconnected. Prior to the termination of any utility service, written notice must be given to the owner if possible, or posted directly at the property, unless an imminent hazard exists because of the utility. No utility may be restored until consent is given by the compliance official. Utilities may be discontinued at the request of the owner or responsible party as part of the approved vacant building property plan. The compliance official may authorize immediate termination of utilities at his or her discretion in emergency circumstances. (i) Signage: Obsolete or unused exterior signs and installation hardware must be removed. Holes and penetrations must be properly patched and painted to match the building. Surfaces beneath the signs that do not match the building must be repaired, resurfaced, painted or otherwise altered to be compatible with the building surfaces. All signs must be maintained in good condition and in compliance with this code. Auction signs or attention-getting devices may be placed on a property for no more than fourteen (14) consecutive days prior to the auction date and must be removed within three (3) days following the auction. Q) Exterior maintenance: The owner must comply with all applicable property maintenance regulations and City codes including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Public nuisances -The owner must eliminate any activity on the property that constitutes a public nuisance as defined by City code. (2) Grass and weeds -Any weeds or grass must be no greater than six (6) inches in height. (3) Exterior structure maintenance -The owner must maintain the vacant building in compliance with City code and building codes as determined to be necessary by the code official. (4) Abandoned or junk vehicles -The owner must remove abandoned and junk vehicles from the property. The City may impound such vehicles consistent with the requirements of the City code. (5) Storage and disposal of refuse -The storage and disposal of refuse must comply with the requirements of the City code. (6) Animals -The owner must ensure that all animals are removed from the property and handled in a humane manner. (7) Diseased, dead or hazardous trees -The owner must remove diseased, dead or hazardous trees or branches from the property in accordance with the City code. yA~ - 9 (8) Graffiti -The owner must remove all graffiti from the property in accordance with City code. (9) Abandoned pools -Swimming pools must be maintained, drained, emptied, and/or secured in accordance with City code. (k) Removal of garbage and refuse: The owner of any vacant building, or vacant portion thereof, must remove all garbage, refuse, rubbish, swill, filth, or other materials from the vacant building and the property upon which the building is located. (I) Police and Fire protections systems: The owner must properly maintain all alarm systems in any vacant building or portion thereof in operating condition; or, discontinue their service unless such service is required by code. (m) Loitering and/or criminal activities: Loitering or engaging in criminal activities is not allowed in the vacant building or on the real property upon which the vacant building is located. The owner or responsible party must not allow these activities and take immediate actions to eliminate these conditions once notified by the City. (n) Emergency Abatement: The compliance official may authorize immediate abatement of any public nuisance or maintenance item if, in the discretion of the compliance official, emergency circumstances exist that present an imminent threat to the public health and safety. (o) Other Codes. A plan for compliance with all applicable provisions of City code and other applicable regulations. Subd. 9. No Occupancy or Trespass. No person may trespass, occupy or reside in, on a temporary or permanent basis, any vacant building without the owner's consent. Subd. 10. Vandalism or Removal of Items Prohibited. No person may vandalize or remove items from a vacant building or the property upon which it is located, including, but not limited to, appliances, fixtures, electrical wiring, copper, or other similar items without the owner's consent. Subd. 11. Appeal. Any person or responsible party aggrieved by a decision under sections of this chapter may appeal to the City Council. The appeal must be in writing, must specify the grounds for the appeal, and must be submitted to the Public Safety Director within ten business days of the decision that is basis of the appeal. Subd. 12. Penalties. Any person or responsible party who violates any provision of this subsection is subject to a misdemeanor penalty and any administrative fees as provided under City code and this subsection. Imposition of such penalties, however, is not deemed to impair other remedies or civil penalties available to the City under this code or state law. ~{A - ~a Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective as provided in Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Adopted this day of , 2011. By: ATTEST: Debbie Goettel, Mayor Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 CONSENT ' 4B 52 REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIltECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: KATIE PORATH, DEPUTY CITY CLERK ~~ ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution amending Appendix D of the Richfield City Code related to fees for Domestic Partnership Registration. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the attached resolution amending Appendix D of the Richfield City Code related to fees for Domestic Partnership Registration. ~ II. BACKGROUND On February 8, 2011 Council approved Bill No. Partnership Registration. 2011-3 relating to Domestic According to Section 120.05, Subd. 2 of the approved ordinance Subd. 2 Application fee. The city clerk shall charge an application fee for the registration of domestic partners and shall charge a fee for providing certified copies of registrations, amendments, or notices of.termination. The fees required by this subsection shall be established from time to time by resolution of the City Council and set forth in Appendix D to this code. Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and- those adopted by ordinance. The following chart indicates the fees set by all other cities in Minnesota who have adopted a same or similar Domestic Partnership ordinance: 0308 Appendix D fees by Resolution Ci Re istration Fee St. Louis Park 50 Edina 25 Duluth 25 St. Paul 20 Golden Valle $40 Minnea olis $20 Ma lewood $20 Rochester $50 Based on comparable fees throughout the state and time needed for administration of the applications, staff wishes to designate the fee for registration at $30. A fee of $5 will be charge for each certified copy of the registration form, amendment form or notice of termination form as requested. This fee has been established and added, to Appendix D for all forms of certified documents including, but not limited to, resolutions, ordinances, minutes, etc. on file. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY ' • The City is required to establish fees that appropriately reflect the City's costs of administering the permit or application for which the fee is.charged. B. CRITICAL TIlVIING ISSUES • The fees for Domestic Partnership Registration should be established before the registry is opened to residents following its effective date of March 18, 2011. C. FINANCIAL • It is important that the fees charged are in line with the costs of the service provided. D. LEGAL • The ordinance, as currently worded, states that a fee will be established in Appendix D of the City Code. E. ENVIIZONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • NIA IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) • Change the amount of the fee or determine that no fee should be charged. If no fee is adopted the ordinance must be amended. ~- I V . ATTACHMENTS I n ~ VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING ~ ~~ - RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2011 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 10464 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: SECTION 1. ESTABLISHING FEES A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in the sections of this Resolution. B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this resolution. C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of the license. D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not been paid in a timely manner. SECTION 2. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED LICENSE FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) Heating and 400.07 1 Year $ 80.00 Ventilating Installer (2) Sign Installer 416.01- 1 Year $ 80.00 416.13 (3) Electrical 400.03- State License Required Installer 400.09 (4) Plumber 400.03- State License Required 400.09 (5) Well Driller 620 State License Required SECTION 3. PUBLIC WORKS FEES TYPE OF PERMIT OR LICENSE SECTION REQUIRING DESCRIPTION FEE (1) Benches 805.01- First Year $ 80.00 805.27. Renewal $ 30.00 (2) Boulevard 811.07 a) Application to place a privately owned $ 30.00 feature Permit feature in the boulevard b) If applied for after installation of feature has $ 60.00 begun BOLD represents added/amended fees SECTION 3. PUBLIC WORKS FEES (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (3) Excavation in 800.01- a) For each transverse excavation and each 100 $ 125.00 Public Right of 800.15 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation way and for each 100 feet of curb and gutter or portion thereof installed or driveway apron installed, except when survey and grade stakes are set by City b If a lied for after excavation has be un $ 250.00 (4) Forestry Permit 810 Applies only to trees on City property and public $ 25.00 ROW (5) Seasonal Load a) Per load $ 25.00 Limit Exemption b) If applied for after delivery $ 50.00 (6) Obstruction 802.17 (a) Short term, temporary lane closure of less No fee Permit than four hours (b) Lane closures longer than four hours duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial/Collector/Distributor Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 30.00 Week (per block or portion thereof) $ 125.00 Local/Residential Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 15.00 Week (per block or portion thereof) $ 50.00 Parking lane/sidewalk Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 7.50 Week (per block or portion thereof) $ 31.25 If applied for after obstruction closure has begun (c) Short term, temporary lane closure of less No fee than four hours (d) Lane closures longer than four hours duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial/Collector/Distributor $ 60.00 Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 250.00 Week (per block or portion thereof) Local/Residential $ 30.00 Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 100.00 Week (per block or portion thereof) Parking lane/sidewalk $ 15.00 Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 62.50 Week er block or ortion thereo (7) Noise Ordinance 930.35 (a) With conditions added as required $ 25.00 Exemption (b) If applied for after violation $ 50.00 (8) Certification 705.03- All delinquent accounts $ 50.00 Char a 705.21 (9) NSF Check $ 50.00 Char e BOLD represents added/amended fees G$-3 SECTION 4. FIRE SERVICES FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) Fire Prevention 400.21- For initial fee required under code Per $ 60.00 Code 400.29 For each additional fee required under year code $ 15.00 Penalty If not renewed within 2 months Per of notification ear $ 30.00 (2) Daycare/Adult Foster Care Facility $ 50.00 Ins ection (3) Reimbursement Fee for Per $ 250.00 Fire/Rescue Unit Hour (4) Sale of 1131 (a) License per location selling only Per $ 350.00 Consumer consumer fireworks Year Fireworks (b) License per location of each other $ 100.00 retail seller Per Year SECTION 5. AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION LICENSES AND PERMITS TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (t) Arcade 1105 1 Year $ 442.00 (2) Amusement 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device 1 Year $ 15.00 Device (Pinball) 1 Year $ 15.00 (b) Mechanical Music Box 1 Year $ 15.00 c Video Games (3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs (a} Lawful Gambling Permit (those exempt from State Licensure) 1 $ 100.00 (State Statute 349.213) Year (b) Lawful Gambling Investigative Fee $ 100.00 (State Statute 349.16) 1 STATE LICENSE REQUIRED Year (a) Itinerant Place of 1100.05- 1 day $ 237.00 Amusement 1100.11 (5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held - $3 1 $ 40.00 No fee for locations holding tavern month licenses. BOLD represents added/amended fees y~ -u SECTION 5. AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION LICENSES AND PERMITS (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (6) General 1100.03 (a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table 1 Year $ 15.00 Amusement (each) 1 Year $ 15.00 1. Coin operated 1 Year $ 40.00 (b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 Year $ 191.00 (c) Circus 1 Day $ 191.00 (d) Dance Hall (e) Golf 1 Year $ 45.00 1. Miniature 1 Year $ 45.00 2. Driving Tee 1 Day $ 182.00 (f) Mountback 1 Year $ 15.00 (g) Rides, mechanicaVanimal of any kind 1 Day $ 182.00 (ea) 1 Year $ 16.00 (h) Shows, any kind 1 Day $ 15.00 (i) Shuffleboard (each lane) ' Other ames (~) Musical Concert 1110.01 Per event $ 40.00 Is) Theatre Cinema 1120 1 Year $ 185.00 Plus a notice publication fee $ 6.50 (9) Roller Rink 1115 1 year or portion thereof $ 185.00 (to) Commercial 605 1 Year $2,205.00 Adult-Oriented Investigation fee 1 Year $2,205.00 Enter rises (t t) Masseur/Masseu 605 Certificate fee 1 Year $ 75.00 se Investi ation fee 1 Year $ 185.00 (t2) Public Baths 610 1 Year $2,553.00 Investi ation fee actual cost minimum $2,553.00 (t3) Fortune Teller 1130.05- 1 Day $ 148.00 and related trade 1130.07 1 $441.00 Week $ 880.00 1 $1,470.00 Month 1 Year (t 4) Adult 1196 Annual license 1 Year $2,204.00 Establishments Investi ation fee new license $2,204.00 BOLD represents added/amended fees ~B -5 SECTION 6. ANIMAL LICENSES AND PERMITS TYPE OF PERMIT OR LICENSE SECTION REQUIRING DESCRIPTION FEE (1) Animals 905.01- (a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered) with 1 Year $ 15.00 905.29 option to purchase amulti-year license 1 Year $ 25.00 (b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered $ 7.00 (c) Duplicate Animal License $ 10.00 (d) Late Penalty 1 Year $ 217.00 905.31- (e) Commercial Kennel 1 Year $ 164.00 905.33 (f) Residential Kennel $ 217.00 (g) Veterinary 1 Year $ 43.00 (h) Pigeons 905.37- (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary $ 30.00 905.39 Permit) $ 64.00 905.41 Q) Impounding (each animal) 1st time $ 127.00 905.01- 2nd Time $ 191.00 905.29 3rd time (each impound after) $ 500.00 (k) Dangerous dog registration fee (State Statute 347.51) SECTION 7. VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTATION LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) Aircraft 1340 1 Day $ 44.00 (2) Food Vehicle 615 (a) Bakery vehicle 1 Year $ 111.00 (b) Catering -for first food vehicle 1 Year $ 235.00 Second vehicle 1 Year $ 97.00 Each additional vehicle 1 Year $ 52.00 (c) Readily perishable (Same as (b) above (3) Garbage and 601.01- Commercial and Residential Refuse 601.33 First vehicle 1 Year $ 220.00 Collection Each additional vehicle 1 Year $ 47.00 (4) Motor Vehicle 1155 Per place of business 1 Year $ 330.00 Dealer Each additional place of business 1 Year $ 125.00 (5) Motor Bicycle 1160 Per place of business 1 Year $ 191.00 Business Per place of business to sell, rent or 1 Year $ 87.00 least (6) Sound Truck 1165 Per vehicle 1 Year $ 191.00 Per Vehicle 1 Day $ 29.00 BOLD represents added/amended fees 4~-~ SECTION 7 VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTATION LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (7) Taxicab 1170 First vehicle or auto livery 1 Year $ 476.00 Each additional vehicle or auto livery operated at any time within license 1 Year $ 59.00 eriod (8) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 Year $ 45.00 (9) Rental or Utility 1185 Each place of business 1 Year $ 87.00 Trailers and Trucks SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) Firearms Dealer 920.01- 1 Year $1 ,470.00 920.05 (2) Itinerant Food 615 Per $ 118.00 Establishment Event (3) Retail Candy 615 First facility 1 Year $ 118.00 Shop Each additional on same premises 1 Year $ 29.00 (4) Food 615 (a) Retail or Wholesale Food Sales 1 Year $ 311.00 Establishment (Grocery) (b) Restaurant (Prepackaged food only 1 Year $ 311.00 sold for consumption) (c) Restaurant (Prepared food sold for 1 Year $ 581.00 consumption) See fee (d) Plan Review Fees: schedule at end of Section 8 (e) Additional Food Facilities (Baked goods, meat, produce, Each microwave ovens) $ 40.00 (5) Vending 615 (a) Food vending machine requiring Machine coin or token (excepting those machines dispensing bottled or 1 Year $ 15.00 canned soft drinks) (b) Other food vending machines (excepting those dispensing bottled 1 Year $ 15.00 or canned soft drinks) 1 Year $ 15.00 c Ice vendin machine BOLD represents added/amended fees G~ - ~ SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (6) Automobile 1125 Per calendar year or fraction thereof $ 148.00 Washing Establishment (7) Scavenger 600.25 Each vehicle 1 Year $ 44.00 Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contents of each cesspool into $ 21.00 Cit sewer (8) Incinerator 600.01- 1 Year $ 44.00 600.23 (9) Tobacco 1146.01(MS Retail Sale and Distribution -License $ 368.00 461.12) issued on calendar year (cigarette vending machines prohibited) (Bill No. 1998-19 (10) Soft drink 1145.01 (a) Cans, bottles from shelf or cooler, $ 30.00 fountain service. (b) Vending machine dispensing bottles -0- or cans (c) Other vending machines Per year or fraction thereof $ 30.00 Per each additional machine $ 30.00 (11) Transit 1181.01- 1 Day $ 94.00 Merchant 1181.09 (12) Wagon 1181 1 Year $ 221..00 Peddler (13) State hawker 1181 6 month/per person covered $ 54.00 or Peddler license (14) Canvasser or 1181 6 month/per person covered $ 54.00 Solicitor (15) Christmas 1130.03 1 Year $ 119.00 Tree Sale (16) Motel 1190 First Unit $ 206.00 Per year each additional unit $ 14.00 (17) Outdoor 1135 Permit $ 93.00 Merchandising (18) Storage 1135 Per Enclosure $ 80.00 Enclosure BOLD represents added/amended fees ~3-S SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (19) Pawnbroker 1187 (a) Pawnbroker 1 Year $3,832.00 (b) Owner investigation fee 1 Year $2,203.00 (nonrefundable) 1 Year $ 797.00 (c) Manager investigation fee (nonrefundable) 1 Year $ 77.00 (d) Employee investigation fee (nonrefundable) $ 2.00 (e) Transaction fee -per transaction (20) Secondhand 1186 (a) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 Year $ 420.00 Goods Dealer (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs in excess of above with total not $1,762.00 exceeding Applicant shall deposit $1200.00 with Licensing Clerk along with application. Amount in excess of actual application costs shall be refunded. (21) Auto 1195.01 1 Year $ 328.00 Detailing Establishment (22) Tattoo, Body 630 (a) Tattoo, body piercing, body painting Piercing, Body or body branding 1 Year $ 734.00 Painting or Body (b) Initial investigation fee 1 Year $2,203.00 Branding (nonrefundable) (23) Temporary 630 Per booth $ 44.00 Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Branding and Body painting events (24) Massage 1188 Annual license 1 Year $ 733.00 Therapy Enterprise Investigation fee (new license) $ 733.00 License (Business license) Annual license 1 Year $ 75.00 Massage Therapist Investigation fee (new license) $ 75.00 License (Individual license) Per temporary location $ 147.00 Temporary Massage Thera ist License (25) Public 420.10 1st Pool $ 125.00 Swimming Pool Each Additional $ 67.00 License BOLD represents added/amended fees ~~ SECTION 8 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS (CONTINUED) PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR FOOD, THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AND LODGING PERCENTAGE OF FACILITY INVOLVED WILL BE DETERMINED BY STAFF Definitions: Class A -Large restaurant or large grocery store that employs more than four people per shift, and/or has multiple supplemental licenses (i.e., bar, bakery, deli, meat department, etc.) Class A (Fast Food) -Counter service only and/or drive through window and warehouses. Class B -Daycare, pet shops, retail candy, prepackaged food only. Class C Small grocery/restaurants with four or less employees per shift and health clubs. Environmental plan review -includes the physical remodeling, updating, equipment replacement, equipment additions and the general overall review of all plans/work. This also includes all new development projects. New Construction Extensive Minor Remodel Non-remodel and/or Major Remodel (25- (0-24% of approval Remodel (over 50% of facility) consultation 50% of facility facility) ($5,000 or involved less in costs Class A (large $2,343 $1,221 $659 $112 restaurant or roce Class A (fast food $1,614 $883 $490 $112 and warehouses Class C (food $883 $491 $293 $112 facilities with 4 or less employees per shift and health clubs Class B (daycares, $433 $169 $84 No fee grocery, pet shops, retail cand Class B New project or Minor remodel (prepackaged food change of owner - -permit but no onl $112 Ian check fee Therapeutic $112 $112 $112 $112 Massa e Lod in $1,952 $1,051 $548 $112 BOLD represents added/amended fees ~g-lo SECTION 9. LIQUOR AND RELATED LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) 3.2 Malt Liquor 1202.05 (d) On-Sale 1 Year $ 810.00 (e) Tavern (dance) 1 Year $ 662.00 (f) Wholesale 1 Year $ 40.00 (g) Off-Sale 1 Year $ 235.00 (h) Club (Bottle Club) 1 Year $ 535.00 (i) Temporary per event $ 59.00 (2) Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $13,358.00 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1 Year $ 200.00 (c) Wine 1 Year $1,178.00 (d) Veterans' Organization (Ex- 1 Year $ 766.00 Sunday) per event $ 121.00 (e) Temporary (3) Employee 1208.01 Effective 10/1/95 all licenses issued $ 33.00 License On-Sale shall be valid for a period of two years Liquor from the date of initial application Establishments (4) Investigation Fee 1202.01- (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' $ 732.00 and 1202.21 Organization each person shown on application actual costs in excess of above Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application $ 219.00 (b) Wine - Original Application initial $ 406.00 and 1202.11 Fee actual costs in excess of above with total fee not to exceed $3,096.00 Renewal Application Initial Fee $ 91.00 and actual costs in excess of above with total cost not to exceed $3,096.00 Additional Investigation under 1200.09 $ 180.00 and 1202.11 Subd.3 $3,096.00 not to exceed $ 91.00 Investigation of substitute manager BOLD represents added/amended fees io 4~ -1~ SECTION 10. HOUSING INSPECTION AND RENTAL LICENSE FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION OR LICENSE REQUIRING DESCRIPTION FEE (1) License for 405 (a) Apartment House 1 Year $ 140.00 Apartment Each unit $ 14.00 Houses and (b) Rental Home -single family dwelling 1 Year $ 140.00 Rental Homes (c) Duplexes/double bungalows First unit 1 Year $ 140.00 Each additional rental unit 1. Year $ 85.00 (d) Late Fee $ 100.00 $100 penalty for each month or per month portion thereof during which said fee remains unpaid. (e) License Transfer Fee $ 40.00 (f) Reinstatement of suspended license 50% of license fee (minimum $80) (g) Reinstatement of Revoked license 100% of license fee (h) Re-Inspection Fee 1. multi-family $ 80.00 ea. 2. single family & duplex $ 50.00 ea. (Inspection over standard 2 inspections) Reinspection fees shall be payable at the time of license renewal and no renewal license shall be issued unless all inspection fees are paid 1 Year (i) Provisional license for apartment $ 280.00 house Includes first unit $ 30.00 Each additional unit Provisional license for Rental Home- $ 280.00 single family dwelling Provisional license for duplex $ 280.00 First unit $ 170.00 Each additional unit $ 200.00 (j) Investigation fee for operating a rental property without a license (2) Certificate of 405.26 Single family home (includes one reinspection) $ 150.00 Housing 2-family home (includes one reinspection) $ 230.00 maintenance Compliance Reinspection Fee $ 50.00 Fee to rocess cash escrow a reement $ 50.00 (3) Permit Fee for 405.19 1 Year $ 170.00 Rooming House BOLD represents added/amended fees 11 ~g - ~. SECTION 11. MISCELLANEOUS FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six months $ 17.00 (2) Permit to Carry a Permit Issued By County Gun (3) False Alarms (a) in excess of 2 for calendar year $ 100.00 (billable) (b) in excess of 10 for calendar year $ 200.00 (c) in excess of 20 for calendar year $ 300.00 (4) Nuisance 925 Third call to a property for nuisance $ 250.00 Conduct Fee conduct within a 365-da eriod (5) Copying Flat rate (per page) $ .25 Services Special rate Provided (a) Black & White Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $ .25 8.5 x 14 (per side) $ .25 MN Statute 13.03C 11 x 17 (each) $ .50 24 x 36 (each) $ 2.50 X-large $ 2.50 Color Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $ 1.00 8.5 x 14 (per side) $ 2.00 11 x 17 (each) $ 4.00 24 x 36 (each} $ 18.00 X-large $ 3.OOsq./ft. (b) Labor hourly wage & 33% (c) Postage prevailing rate (d) Fax per page $ .50 (e) Audio tape of meeting (per tape) $ 5.00 (f) Video tape of meeting (per tape) $ 15.00 (g) Electronic copies (cd or disk) $ 5.00 (h) As builts (per image) $ .50 (6) Notary Fee Fee Set By State (7) Candidate Filing City Charter $ 25.00 Fee 4.04 (8) Photo Fee Includes 2 photos $ 16.00 includin tax BOLD represents added/amended fees 12 ~I 8 - ~ SECTION 11. MISCELLANEOUS FEES (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (9) Special Assessment Search $15.00 per Property Assessments Identification Number (PID) Levied or Pending Special $30.00 for each Assessment report Report Plus $.05 for each PID Number Creation of New or Special $25.00 minimum Report fee. Fees to be based on time and materials to create report Listing Information Printout of PID Listing $3.00 per PID Review of Comparable Property Number Records Residential Field Card Report $ .25 per copy for up to five comparable properties Commercial/Industrial/Apartment Field Card Report $2.00 per copy Certified Card Report $3.00 Copy of Certificate of Real Estate $ .25 Value (10) Domestic 120 Registration $30.00 Partnership (11) Certified copy of To certify documents i.e. resolutions, $5.00 per copy various documents ordinances, minutes, registration forms, etc. on file BOLD represents added/amended fees 13 ~Fj - W SECTION 12. ROOM AND PARK SHELTER RENTAL FEES LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATION FEE Richfield City Hall Council Chambers Non-Profit Weekend: $72.00/Hr Weekday: $49.00/Hr Resident Weekend: $72.00/Hr Private Weekday: $62.00/Hr Non-Resident Weekend: $82.00/Hr Private Weekda : $72.00/Hr Richfield Community Center Augsburg Room Non-Profit Saturday: $54.00/Hr Weekday: $27.00/Hr Resident Saturday: $54.00/Hr Private Weekday: $32.00/Hr Non-Resident Saturday: $59.00/Hr Private Weekda : $37.00/Hr Richfield Community Center Nicollet Room Non-Profit Saturday: $54.00/Hr Weekday: $27.00/Hr Resident Saturday: $54.00/Hr Private Weekday: $32.00/Hr Non-Resident Saturday: $59.00/Hr Private Weekda : $37.00/Hr Richfield Community Center Combined Non-Profit Saturday: $96.00/Hr Nicollet/Augsburg Weekday: $49.00/Hr Resident Saturday: $96.00/Hr Private Weekday: $62.00/Hr Non-Resident Saturday $106.00/Hr Private Weekda : $72.00/Hr Richfield Community Center Richfield Room Non-Profit Saturday: $72.00/Hr Weekday: $49.00/Hr Resident Saturday: $72.00/Hr Private Weekday: $62.00/Hr Non-Resident Saturday: $82.00/Hr Private Weekda : $72.00/Hr Richfield Community Center Ruth Johnson Room Non-Profit Saturday: $32.00/Hr Weekday: $27.00/Hr Resident $ 32.00/Hr Private Non-Resident $ 37.00/Hr Private 14 ~~-is SECTION 12 ROOM AND PARK SHELTER RENTAL FEES (CONTINUED) LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSFFICATION FEE Richfield Community Center Fireside Room Non-Profit $ 27.00/Hr Resident $ 32.00/Hr Private Non-Resident $ 37.00/Hr Private Wood Lake Nature Center Auditorium Non-Profit $31.00/Hr Resident $41.00/Hr Private Non-Resident $46.00/Hr Private Augsburg Park Park Buildings Resident $ 25.00/Hr Christian Park $ 21.00/Hr (3+ Donaldson Park-East Hrs) Jefferson Park Non-Resident Madison Park $ 30.00/Hr Taft Park-North $ 26.00/Hr (3+ Washin ton Park Hrs Fairwood Park Open Picnic Shelters Resident $ 20.00/Hr Monroe Park $ 17.00/Hr (3+ Augsburg Park Hrs) Non-Resident $ 25.00/Hr $ 22.00/Hr (3+ Hrs Sheridan Park Open Picnic Shelter Resident $ 23.00/Hr $ 20.00/Hr (3+ Hrs) Non-Resident $ 27.00/Hr $ 24.00/Hr (3+ Hrs) BOLD represents added/amended fees 15 y8 - I~ SECTION 12. ROOM AND PARK SHELTER RENTAL FEES (CONTINUED) LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATION FEE Veterans Park Open Picnic Shelter Resident 1 Section: $ 91.00 Day: 4 Hour Block 2 Sections: $ 165.00 3 Sections: $ Non-Resident 232.00 1 Section: $ 99.00 2 Sections: $ 178.00 3 Sections: $ 250.00 Veterans Park Open Picnic Shelter Resident 1 Section: $ 68.00 Evening: 3 Hour Block 2 Sections: $ 122.00 3 Sections: $ Non-Resident 171.00 1 Section: $ 73.00 2 Sections: $ 133.00 3 Sections: $ 190.00 Athletic Fields Baseball/Softball Fields Category A Renters Weekday: No fee Weekend: No Fee, only applicable staff costs Category B Renters 1- 2 hours Weekday: $ 32.50/Hr Weekend: $ 32.50/Hr + applicable staff Category B Renters costs 2 hours 4 hours 8 hours $ 32.50/Hr Add'I hours over 8 $ 65.00/Hr $ 80.00/Hr $ 32.50/Hr Tennis Courts Augsburg, Christian, Donaldson, Fairwood, $ 4.50/Hr Jefferson, Heredia, Madison, Nicollet, Roosevelt, and Washin ton Parks. BOLD represents added/amended fees 16 y$-~~ SECTION 12. ROOM AND PARK SHELTER RENTAL FEES (CONTINUED) LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATION FEE Athletic Facility Light Use Softball Fields $ 20.00/Hr Baseball Fields $ 25.00/Hr Football/Soccer $ 25.00/Hr Field $ 3.00/Hr Tennis Courts BOLD represents added/amended fees Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of March, 2011. Debbie Goettel Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs City Clerk 17 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4C REPORT # 53 ~I STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCII 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: FINANCE MANAGER NAME, 27TLE ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of resolution authorizing the use of a Sears's credit card by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of the City. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the use of Sears credit card by City employees otherwrise authorized to-make purchases on behalf of the City. III. BACKGROUND ~ • innesota tatutes ection 471.3 2, require the City of Richfield to authorize the use of credit cards by any City employee otherwise authorized to make a ppurchase on behalf of the City. • In today's business environment, most retail businesses, will no longer allow the City to purchase on account and will only accept a City check or a City credit card. - - • Consequently, the use of a City credit card provides efficiency and flexibility for employees to purchase goods and services on behalf of the City. In addition, in some instances, the use of a credit card provides a cost savin s for fihe City. • At the January 11, 2011 Cit~r Council meeting, the City Counci~initially authorized the use of credit cards by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of the City. . •- Accordingly, City staff is requesting authorization for-the use of one additional credit card. That new additional card would be a Sears's credit card. • The credit cards initially authorized for use by the City Council are the following: Five VISA credit-cards issued through the Richfield Bloomington Credit Union in the name of the City. The cardholders are the following: • City Manager • Public Safety Director • Public Works Director • Community Development Director - • Recreation Services Director • Four Roundy's credit cards issued to the City of Richfield Recreation Services Department and Public Safety Department. The Recreation Administration division, Wood Lake Nature Center, Ice Arena, and the Public Safety Adminisfirative Aide use the cards. 0308SearsCard Three Petco credit cards issued to the City of Richfield Public Safety Department. The credit cards will be maintained by the following: • Canine Officers (2) • SIU Investigator (1) • US Bank Purchasing Card Program. The following sixteen purchasing cards will be issued to the followm • Building Services Employees ~3)) -three cards. • Utility Department Employees (2) -two cards. • Information Technology Employees (4) -four cards. • Finance Manager.- one card. _ • Recreation Service Emplo ees (2) -two cards. • Public Safety Emplo ees ~) -two cards. • Assistant Fire Chief ~1) -one card. - • Communications Coordinator (1) -one card. II . BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION POLICY • n accor ance wit mnesota tatutes Section 471.382, the City of Richfield must authorize the use of credit cards by any City employee otherwise authorized to make a purchase on behalf of the City • Further, if a City employee makes or directs a purchase by.credit card that is not approved by the City Council, the employee could be personally liable for the amount of the purchase. • A purchase by credit card must otherwise comply with all statutes, rules, and Cit~r policies applicable to City purchases. • Finally,, the City's auditors recommend that the City authorize the use of credit cards by City employees on an annual basis. B. CRITICAL TIlVIING SSUES v FINANCIAL • - e o ers o ity cre it car s are responsible for reviewing and approving all purchhases entered into with the credit card. D. LEGAL • e ity is require y mnesota Statute 471.382, to authorize the use of credit cards b City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalfyof the City. E. NVIRONMENTAL ONSIDERATIONS 0 ,TERNATIVE KECOMMENDATION(S) ~ TT~e G``i~nci c`T o a ecae to not aut orize the use of the Sears credit card by City employees. However, most retail businesses in today's environment will no longer allow the City to purchase on account and will on.ly~accept a City, check or a City credit card. The use of City credit cards by employees provides efficiency and flexibility for employees to purchase goods and services on behalf of the City. TTACHMENTS eso ution aut onzing t e use o alit card by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of the City. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING ~ • one _ yc-i. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CREDIT CARDS BY CITY EMPLOYEES OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE PURCHASES ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAR 2011 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: That, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.382, the City Council of the City of Richfield may authorize the use of a credit card by City employees otherwise authorized to make a purchase on behalf of the City. The authorization is subject fio modification and revocation at any time by said City Council, of the City of Richfield, and subject to the following terms and conditions: If a City employee makes or directs a purchase by credit card that is not approved by the City Council, the employee can be personally liable for the amount of purchase. The purchases by credit card must comply with all statutes, rules and City of Richfield policies applicable to City purchases. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that designated City staff is hereby authorized to use the following City credit card to make purchases on behalf of the City of Richfield: • One Sears's credit card issued to the City of Richfield Legislative/Executive Department. The credit-card will be maintained by the following: • City Manager Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of March, 2011. ATTEST: Debbie Goettel, Mayor Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4D REPORT # 54 REPORT PREPARED BY: BETSY OSBORN, SUPPORT SERVICES " DIVISION MANAGER Nanrc•, TITLG DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the issuance of new on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses for Richfield Hotel Associates d/b/a Ramada, 7745 Lyndale Ave. S. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve a public hearing to be held April 12, 2011, for the consideration of new on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses for Richfield Hotel Associates d/b/a Ramada, 7745 Lvndale Avenue S. II. BACKGROUND Applications for new on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses for Richfield Hotel Associates d/b/a Ramada were received by the City on January 10, 2011. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • City ordinance provides that the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider all intoxicating liquor license applications and that a date be set for the public hearing prior to the hearing. • The hearing must be scheduled and held before a new license may be considered. • The new process has been initiated. 0308 Set PH Richfield Hotel Associates Ramada New Liquor Licenses Holding the public hearing on April 12, 2011 will provide ample time to complete the licensing process. B. CRrrICAL TnvmvG IssLTEs • N/A C. FINANCIAL • N/A D. LEGAL • N/A E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • Reject the applications for new on-sale intoxicating and Sunday liquor licenses for Richfield Hotel Associates dJb/a Ramada. • Schedule the hearing for another dafe. However, this ,may delay the licensing process. V. ATTACHMENTS • None VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • N/A AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4E REPORT # 55 ~' STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCx 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: WILLIAM F. FII,LMORE, LIQUOR OPERATIONS DIRECTOR NAME, TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of award contract for 6444 Lyndale Liquor Store boiler and AHU (air handling unit re lacement. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Award of contract to Thelen Heating and Roofing in the amount of $158,000 for boiler and air handling unit (AHU) replacement at 6444 Lvndale Liauor Store. II. BACKGROUND The boiler and equipment associated with air handling at the 6444 Lyndale Liquor Store are over 60 years old and in need of replacement due to the non-availability of parts. Specifications were prepared by Wold Architects & Engineers. III: BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • Thelen Heating and Roofing is the lowest and responsible bidder at $158,000. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • Approval at the March 8, 2011 City Council meeting will ensure all necessary equipment can be obtained. 03086444 Boiler Replacement for a timely installation. C. FINANCIAL • Boiler replacement was scheduled for 2012. Failure of the system necessitates immediate replacement. Funds will be from the liquor operations and are available. D. LEGAL • When the purchase of materials, merchandise, equipment or construction exceeds $25,000, authority to purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration. E. ENVIIZONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • None. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • Council may delay approval to a later meeting. Delayed approval, however, will result in delay of equipment and installation. V. ATTACHMENTS • Bid minutes. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None. I~j I CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Bid Opening February 15, 2011 2:00 p. m. 2011 Boiler and AHU Replacement -Richfield Liquor Store (Section 00 11 13) Bid No. 11-01 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for 2011 Boiler and AHU Replacement - Richfield Liquor Store (6400 Lyndale Avenue South), as advertised in the official newspaper on January 27, 2011. Present: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk Dave Conrads, Building Maintenance Supervisor Cheryl Krumholz, City. Manager Representative Mike Klass, WOLD The following bids were submitted and read aloud: Bidder's Name Bond Addendum #1 Addendum #2 TOTAL Thelen Heating & X X X $158,000 Roofing, Inc. Corval Constructors, X X X $185,700 Inc. Harris Mechanical X X X $189,000 Cool Air Mechanical, X X X $178,100 Inc. Construction Results X X X $182,979 Corporation Ryan Mechanical, Inc. X X $197,000 The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the March 8, 2011 Regular City Council Meeting. Nancy Gibbs City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4F REPORT ~ 56 ~~°~ STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL 1VIEETING n~cx 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: L. DEVICH, CITY MANAGER ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of rejecting all bids for Richfield Municipal Center audio/visual information display components and direct staff to re-bid this ortion of the project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Reject all bids and re-bid the Richfield Municipal Center audio/visual information display components of the project due to confusion in the bid documents regarding the calculation of sales taxes. II. BACKGROUND On February 17, 2011 the City staff advertised for bids for the audio/visual information display components for the new Richfield Municipal Center. Bids were collected and opened at 1 p.m. on March 2, 2011. The bid specifications provided for audio visual equipment for both the new City Council Chambers and the new training rooms. Unfortunately, the format of the bid documents left ambiguity with respect to the sales tax that the City would be required to pay for this type of equipment and ultimately, the bottom line costs of the submitted bid packages.. In addition, there was also some confusion with respect to the alternates allowed for certain pieces. of the requested equipment. It is staffs recommendation that because of this confusion and subsequent inaccurate bottom line totals that all bids be rejected and this portion of the project be re-advertised and re-bid. ' III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION 0308AV bfd reject A. POLICY • The City has the authority to reject all bids and re-bid the project due to errors in the bidding process. • In similar bid situations. in the past, the City has rejected all bids and started the bid process over. B. CRITICAL TIlVIING ISSUES • Due to the critical timing of this portion of the project, staff is recommending that the City Council reject all bids on March 8, 2011 so that the re-bidding process may start immediately. C. FINANCIAI, • There is minimal cost to re-bidding this portion of th.e project. D. LEGAL ' • From a legal perspective, it would be best to reject all bids and re-bid the portion of the project, since contractors could claim that they were confused by the bid documents and what was requested. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • None IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • None V. ATTACHMENTS • Bid tabulation VI. 'PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None ~~ - i F- W CZ_ G 0 W_ LL V LL 0 V 0 ~> UQ vi .~ ~ c ~ U U Q O ~U ~ Z ~ ~~ ..Q .a N N v~ N N ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ -Q O O L i-., ~ L ~ c 'coo . T ~~0 C 'cc°~E Q'a~ Q.NO' O~y O ~ .~ V ~ :a~~ m +~ c v N N oQc ~ ~ O ~o ~ ~ a~ '~ N ~N p ~ U ~~ ~ ~ ~ c~ o ~ ~ c Q O ~ N o O ~'C Z ~ a~ O O ~ O ~ 0 0~ c t ~~ ~o~ oNo a~ c Noa c ~" o U ~ aU io ~ .~ ~ . ~ _ .O ~ Q ' U .ON ~ O O O~Q ~ ~ o -a c ~ u~o ~ mo Z ~ ~~~° c ' U 'a ~c0 O C ~ ~m ~~C `o ~ N L > .~ O ++ Q- c C ~~ ~ O O N cV ~ ~ N~ c c ~ ~ .~U~ ~'c ca ~ ~,~g ~cE U~ oU ~~U m N U ~o N.a o.c .Q~C~ C7 U ° Y >, N - a~ c~ Z~~U aci N d O c~ a c m 0 ~° a~ t m~= o+~~ ~~~ ~ ~° a N ~~ O °o ~ ~ O ~ m M ~ o O o2S +~ M M ~- -c ~~ o O ~ N U o~~ M ti ~ m cC °~ + U ~ ~ Z ~ pjf=~~, ~ c V ~ V ~ O O M 1` M ~ ~ O _ 00 ~O~~ U a~ -~ to ~ U V N O r ff} Z EA ~ f }' M ~~ '~Op ~ ~'~~~V' p ~p ti N N C z a, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cfl a~ ~o•~~yv Q o ai o0 •OOQ~A N . ~~ ~ ~, . I-~ ~~o o m N ~ ~- 0 Z ~ ~ ~ m O O U f' Z ~ m c Q 0 a~ o c~ Z Q ~ ~ Z p N $ ~ a~Z U ~ N Vo ~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~C~ ~~ .°Q~aci >,O~ ~o .c C o_a coo N Q ~c~ ¢w C~C~C~ ~~ c 0 .~' U tv rn N O CV N C V c m f~ 7 .n a~ v 3 :a m c O c C O Y N U a~ .C H AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # r STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 PiJBLIC HEARINGS 6 57 REPORT PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Public hearing and second reading of transitory ordinance providing funding for certain capital im rovements from the S ecial Revenue Fund. ~~ I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: ~~ Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion:' Approve ' second reading of the transitory ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds from the Special Revenue Fund for certain caaital imarovements. II. BACKGROUND • At the December 14, 2010 City Council meeting, the City Council authorized $450,000 of Special Revenue Funds for improvements to City recreation capital improvements in 2011. • At the February 8, 2011 City Council meeting the Council approved the first reading providing for the expenditure of funds from the Special Revenue Fund for certain capital improvements. The planned expenditures are as follows: • Richfield Municipal Center (Dispatch Center) 100,000 • Purchase of Park Land Loan Payment 110,000 • Major Park Maintenance Projects 50,000 • Lincoln Field Internal Loan 45,000 • Taft Park Outdoor Lighting 105,000 • Veterans Park Monument Sign 25,000 • Community Center Air Conditioner 15,000 Finally, the 2011 Capital Improvement Budget provides for expenditure for all types of funds contained in the budget document including, municipal state aid, user fees, federal grants and state grants, however, authorization by ordinance is not required for expenditures other than Special Revenues. 0308 Transitory OrdSecondRead CHRIS REGIS, FINANCE MANAGER III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • City Charter Section 7.12, Subd. 2 requires that Special Revenue Funds for capital improvements must be authorized by ordinance. • ~ This process provides for public input through a public hearing. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • .Under Section 3.09 of the City Charter, a transitory ordinance becomes effective 30-days after publication of the second hearing notice. • It is prudent to complete the ordinance requirements early in the year so any capital projects planned can be initiated on a timely basis, completed and funds expended. C. FINANCIAL • While the total 2011 Capital Improvements Budget (CIB) includes total budgeted expenditures of $9,446,380 the portion of CIB concerning proposed funding from the Special Revenue fund is $450,000 as shown below: • Richfield Municipal Center (Dispatch Center) 100,000 • Purchase of Park Land Loan Payment 110,000 • Major Park Maintenance Projects 50,,000 • Lincoln Field Internal Loan 45,000 • Taft Park Outdoor~Lighting 105,000 • Veterans Park Monument Sign 25,000 • Community Center Air Conditioner 15,000 • A transitory ordinance is necessary to finalize these appropriations pursuant to City Charter. • The source of Special Revenue funds is municipal liquor profits. D. LEGAL • First reading of the ordinance was approved at the February 8, 2011 City . Council meeting and a notice of public hearing was published on February 24, 2011. E. ENVIRONMENTAL. CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • The-City Council could postpone the second reading of the transitory ordinance to a future City Council meeting. • The City Council could decide to authorize none or only a portion of the expenditures identified from the special revenue in the CIB. V. ATTACHMENTS • An ordinance providing for the expenditure of money from the Special Revenue Fund for certain capital improvements. VI. PRINCII'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING . None. ~-i r BILL NO. TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, for which the City would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures for such improvements which ire authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, Subdivision 2 of the City Charter, are as follows: • Richfield Municipal Center (Dispatch Center) 100,000 • Purchase of Park Land Loan Payment 110,000 • Major Park Maintenance Projects 50,000 • Lincoln Field Internal Loan 45,000 • Taft Park Outdoor Lighting 105,000 • Veterans Perk Monument Sign 25,000 • Community Center Air Conditioner 15,000 Section 3: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by Council action. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of March 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: J AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 PROPOSED ORDINANCE 7 58 REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: JESSE SWENSON, HR COORDINATOR ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Second reading consideration of amendment to the City Administrative Code Chapter III, Subsection 310.33 describing vacation leave. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the second. reading of the proposed ordinance amendment to the City Administrative Code Chapter III, Subsection 310.33. Subdivision 2, describing vacation leave accrual. II. BACKGROUND In an effort to remain competitive with other cifiy governments and the benefits that they offer and provide non-Union employees benefits already offered to Union members, a recommendation is being made to amend Section 310.33, Subdivision 2 as follows: Subd. 2, (f) from the beginning of the twenty-sixth year and through the twenty-ninth year of continuous employment each employee shall earn vacation at the rate of 7.08 hours per biweekly pay period (23 days per year). (g) from the beginning of.the thirtieth year of continuous employment, throughout the duration of employment, each employee shall eam vacation at the rate of 7.38 hours per biweekly pay period (24 days per year Nnr~ T/YZE 03080rd Chg-Vacation Leave 2nd Read This change would affect employees included in the General Services and Management Pay Plans who are not represented by a Union. The amendment is requested so that the City of Richfield's benefit package remains competitive with those of other Stanton V cities and to balance the benefits of the City's non-union employees with those represented by collective bargaining agreements. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • The proposed modification to Subsection 310.33, Vacation Leave, aids in balancing some of the benefits offered to non-union City employees. In practice, those benefits offered to Union employees should not exceed the benefits offered to employees not represented by unions. Of additional consideration is the fact that the majority of employees represented by collective bargaining agreements are males while non-union employees are primarily female. B. CRITICAL ISSUES • The addition of 8 hours of vacation leave for employees with more than 30 years of service recognizes the contributions of long-time staff members and is commensurate with similarly situated employees represented by collective bargaining agreements. C. FINANCIAL • Sy amending Section 310.33, Management and General Services employees with 30 or more years of continuous service would receive an additional day of vacation leave per year. • This benefit increase would affect nine Management and General Services employees. D. LEGAL • In order to provide the requested vacation leave accrual rate increase, the City Couricil must approve an amendment to the City's personnel ordinance. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • Do not amend the ordinance and take no further action. Defer discussion to another date. V. ATTACHMENTS • City Administrative Code change. VI. PRINCIPAL P-ARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING ~' BILL NO. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 310.33 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OFRICHFIELD THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Subsection 310.33, Subdivision 2 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Vacation leave" is hereby amended: Subd. 2, (f) from the, beginning of the twenty-sixth year and through the twenty-ninth year of continuous employment each employee shall eam vacation at the rate of 7.08 hours per biweekly pay period (23 days per year). (g) from the beginning of the thirtieth year of continuous employment, throughout the duration of employment, each employee shall earn vacation at the rate of 7.38 hours per biweeklL payperiod (24 days per year Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8~' day of March, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM # 8 REPORT # 59 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: JESSE SWENSON HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR NAME, TITLE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: SIGNATURE REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution approving the contract with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49 for the contract period January 1, 2011 throu h December 31, 2012. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the resolution approving the provisions of the 2011-2012 labor agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49 bargaining unit and authorize the City Manager to execute the a reement II. BACKGROUND City staff has completed labor negotiations with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49 (Union). The provisions of the 2011/2012 contract cover all of the employees in this Union, which consists of 38 City employees including Public Works Workers, Mechanics and Water Plant Operators. During the course of negotiations, City staff made the Union aware of the severe financial constraints the City is facing in 2011 and beyond, and sought a two percent wage increase for the entire 2011 contract year with a wage re-opener in 2012, to which the Union has agreed. 0308Local 49 2011/2012 contract The tentatively approved settlement includes the following significant changes: Wages A two percent wage increase for contract year 2011 and a re-opener for contract year 2012. Health Insurance A $60 increase to the Employer health insurance contribution which provides full coverage at the High Option plan for single Employee at $734.10 per month, $915 per month for Employee plus spouse or Employee plus child(ren) coverage and $965 per month for Employee plus family coverage. For Empioyees who select the single tier $2500 High Deductible Health Plan option, the Employer will contribute a maximum of $250 per month into the Employee's Health Savings Plan. A $1 increase to the Employer contribution for Employee single dental insurance coverage from $37 per month fio $38 per month. A contract re-opener would occur in 2012 for health insurance rates. Vacation Leave The annual vacation leave accrual was increased by 8 hours for employees with more than 30 years of continuous service with the City. Vacation Leave Sell Back Effective January 1, 2012, the maximum vacation leave sell back will be increased from 40 hours to 48 hours. Uniforms and Safety Boot Allowance An increase of $30 to the clothing allowance for auto mechanics off, from $120 to $150, which can be used towards the purchase of qualifying safety boots. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • The City has met and negotiated in good faith with the Union and its representatives and is bound under the Public Employer's Labor Relations Act to meet and bargain over the terms and conditions of employment. • The proposed settlement for the health and dental insurance provisions is identical to those provided to non=union City employees. The City has a long history of providing the same level of insurance benefits to all eligible City employees. • The two. percent wage increase represents the same two percent wage adjustment implemented for non-union City employees. This is one of four contract settlements before the Council on March 8, 2011. The Fire bargaining unit remains unsettled for 2011. • The two percent wage adjustment and health insurance increase is .comparable to other bargaining groups in similar metro cities. A survey of Stanton 5 cities indicates that those cities are providing anywhere from a 1 to 3 percent increase. The City has a long history of trying to remain as close to the mid-range as possible for Stanton 5 cities, in terms of wages and benefits. B. CRITICAL TIMING IssUEs • In order to allow the City's accounting personnel to modify payroll records in a timely manner for 2011 wages and benefits, it is recommended that the City Council act on March 8, 2011 to adopt the attached resolution providing for contract changes, effective January 1, 2011. C. FINANCIAL • Two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. • A maximum $60 increase in Employer monthly contribution towards health insurance coverage for 2011. • $1 per month increase in Employer monthly contribution towards employee single dental insurance in 2011. • There is no financial liability for the additional eight hours of annual leave sell back. These hours are already financially accounted for. • An additional 8 hours of vacation leave for employees with 30 years or more of service. With the current personnel in this, Union, three employees are currently eligible for this benefit. D. LEGAL • If the terms of this agreement are not approved, further negotiation and/or mediation will be necessary. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • NA IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • Do not approve the terms of this agreement and prepare for further negotiation and/or mediation. • Defer discussion to another date. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution VI. PRINCIl'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None ~-1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 49 BARGAINING UNIT FOR THE YEAR 2011 and 2012 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49 have reached an understanding concerning conditions of employment for years 2011 and 2012; and WHEREAS, it would be inappropriate to penalize Local 49 members who have negotiated in good faith; and WHEREAS, the City Ordinance requires that contracts between the City and the exclusive representative of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit shall be completed by Council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Labor Agreement between the City of Richfield and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49 Bargaining Unit, for years 2011 and 2012 under the provisions of the Labor Agreement to be implemented effective January 1, 2011 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of March 2011. Debbie Goettel Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9 REPORT # 60 ~y ~,, _ ~; STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: JESSE SWENSON, HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR Nance 777zE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution approving the contract with Police Officers and Detectives LELS. Local 123 for the contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the resolution approving the provisions of the 2011 labor agreement with the Police Officers and Detectives LELS 123 bargaining unit and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. II. BACKGROUND City staff has completed labor negotiations with the Police Officers and Detectives LELS 123 (Union). The provisions of the 2011 labor agreement cover all the employees in this Union. There are thirty-one employees represented in this bargaining unit. During the course of negotiations, City staff made the Union aware of the severe financial constraints the City is facing in 2011 and beyond, and agreed on a two percent wage increase for the entire 2011 contract year. 0308LELS 123 contract The tentatively approved settlement includes the following significant changes: Wages A two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. Effective the first full pay period of January, 2011, compensation for the special assignment of Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison Officer will increase from $250 per month to $255/month. There are currently three police officers in this special assignment. Health Insurance A $60 increase to the Employer health insurance contribution which provides full coverage at the High Option plan for single Employee at $734.10 per month, $915 per month for Employee plus spouse or Employee plus child(ren) coverage and $965 per month for Employee plus family coverage. For Employees who select the single tier $2500 High Deductible Health Plan option, the Employer will contribute a maximum of $250 per month into the Employee's Health Savings Plan. A $1 increase to the Employer contribution for Employee single dental insurance coverage, from $37 per month to $38 per month. Clothing Allowance An increase of $25 to the clothing allowance from $750 to $775 per year per officer. Vacation Leave The annual vacation leave accrual was increased by 8 hours to 192 hours per year for employees with more than 30 years of continuous service with the City. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • The City has met and negotiated in good faith with the Union and its representatives and is bound under the Public Employer's Labor Relations Act to meet and bargain over the terms and conditions of employment. • The proposed settlement for the health and dental provisions is identical to those provided to non-union City employees. The City has a long history of providing the same level of insurance benefits to all eligible City employees. • The two percent wage increase represents the same two percent wage adjustment implemented for non-union City employees. This is one of four contract settlements before the Council on March 8, 2011. The Fire bargaining unit remains unsettled for 2011. • The two percent wage adjustment and health insurance increase is comparable to other bargaining groups in similar metro cities. A survey of Stanton 5 cities indicates that those cities are providing anywhere from a 1 to 3 percent increase. The City has a long history of trying to remain as close to the mid-range as possible for Stanton 5 cities, in terms of wages and benefits. B. CRITICAL TnvmvG ISSUES • In order to allow the City's accounting personnel to modify payroll records in a timely manner for 2011 wages and benefits; it is recommended that the City Council act on March 8, 2011 to adopt the attached resolution providing for contract changes, effective January 1, 2011. C. Fn~rANCIAL • A maximum $60 increase in Employer monthly contribution towards health insurance coverage for 2011. • $1 per month increase in Employer monthly contribution towards employee single dental insurance in 2011. • An additional 8 hours of vacation leave for employees with 30 years or more of service. With the current personnel in this Union, it would be at least 3-4 years before anyone is eligible for this benefit. • A $5 per month increase in compensation for officers assigned as Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison officer. A portion of the salary and benefit pay for these officers is provided by the school districts in which they work (Richfield School District 280 and Intermediate District 287) through State grant funding. • Two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. D. LEGAL • If the terms of this agreement are not approved, further negotiation and/or mediation will be necessary. E. ENVIlZONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • NA IV. ALTERNATIVE IZECONIMENDATION(S) • Do not approve the terms of this agreement and prepare for further negotiation and/or mediation. • ~ Defer discussion to another date. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution VI. PRINCII'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None G-l RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (EELS), LOCAL 123 BARGAINING UNIT FOR THE YEAR 2011 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Richfield Police Officers and Detectives EELS Local 123 have reached an understanding concerning conditions of employment for year 2011; and WHEREAS, it would be inappropriate to penalize EELS Local 123 members who have negotiated in good faith; and - WHEREAS, the. City Ordinance requires that contracts between the City and the exclusive representative of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit shall be completed by Council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve - the Labor Agreement between the City of Richfield and EELS Local 123 Bargaining Unit for year 2011, .under the provisions of the Labor Agreement to be implemented, effective January 1, 2011 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of March 2011. Debbie Goettel Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # STAFF REPORT ~~,.,,; CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ ~` ~''~s ~r~ , ::, , . , . MARCH 8, 2011 RESOLUTIONS 10 61 REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: JESSE SWENSON, HUMAN RESOUCRES COORDINATOR ~j ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution approving the contract with the 911 Dispatchers LELS Local 225 for the contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the resolution approving the provisions of the 2011 labor agreement with the 911 Dispatchers LELS Local 225 bargaining unit and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. II. BACKGROUND City staff has completed labor negotiations with the 911 Dispatchers LELS Local 225 (Union). The provisions of the one year contract for calendar year 2011 cover all of the employees in this Union, which consists of 9 positions: 6 full-time employees and 3 part-time employees. During the course of negotiations, City staff made the Union aware of the severe financial constraints the City is facing in 2011 and beyond, and agreed on a two percent wage adjustment for the entire 2011 contract year. The tentatively approved settlement includes the following significant changes: Wages A two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. 0308dispatchers contract N~rE, T/TLE Health Insurance A $60 increase to the Employer health insurance contribution which provides full coverage~at the High Option plan for single Employee at $734.10 per month, $915 per month for Employee plus spouse or Employee plus child(ren) coverage and $965 per month for Employee plus family coverage. For Employees who select the single tier. $2500 High Deductible Health Plan option, the Employer will contribute a maximum of $250 per month into the Employee's Health Savings Plan. A $1 increase to the Employer contribution for Employee single dental insurance coverage, from $37 per month to $38 per month. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • The City has met and negotiated in good faith with the Union and its representatives and is bound under the Public Employer's Labor Relations Act to meet and bargain over the terms and conditions of employment. • The proposed settlement for the health and dental insurance provisions is identical to those provided to non-union City employees. The City has a long history of providing the same level of insurance benefits to all eligible City employees. These provisions are also identical to settlements reached with Police Officers, Police Supervisors and Local 49. • The two percent wage increase represents the same two percent wage adjustment implemented for non-union City employees. This is one of four contract settlements before the Council on March 8, 2011. The Fire bargaining unit remains unsettled for 2011. • The two percent wage adjustment and health insurance increase is comparable to other bargaining groups in similar metro cities. A survey of Stanton 5 cities indicates that those cities are providing anywhere from a 1 to 3 percent increase. The City has a long history of trying to remain as close to the mid-range as possible for Stanton 5 cities, in terms of wages and benefits. B. CRITICAL TIlVIING ISSUES • In order to allow the City's accounting personnel to modify payroll records in a timely manner for 2011 wages and benefits, it is recommended that the City Council act on March 8, 2011 to adopt the attached- resolution providing for contract changes, effective January 1, 2011. C. FINANCIAL • A maximum $60 increase in Employer monthly contribution towards health insurance coverage for 2011. • $1 per month increase in Employer monthly contribution towards employee single dental insurance in 2011. • Two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. D. LEGAL • If the terms of this agreement are not approved, further negotiation and/or mediation will be necessary.- E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • NA IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • Do not approve the terms of this agreement and prepare for further negotiation andlor mediation. • Defer discussion to another date. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution VI. PRiNCII'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None O ~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (EELS), LOCAL 225 BARGAINING UNIT FOR THE YEAR 2011 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the 911 Dispatchers EELS Local 225 have reached an understanding concerning conditions of employment for year 2011.; and WHEREAS, it would be inappropriate to penalize EELS Local 225 members who have negotiated in good faith; and WHEREAS, the City Ordinance requires that contracts between the City and the exclusive representative of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit shall be completed by Council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Labor Agreement between the City of Richfield and EELS Local 225 Bargaining Unit for year 2011, under the provisions of the Labor Agreement, to be implemented, effective January 1, 2011 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of March 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM # 11 REPORT # 62 ~' STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIlZECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: d p~" JESSE SWENSON, HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR N~ Tim ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution approving the contract with the Police Supervisors LELS Local 162 for the contract period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. I. RECOMI~~NDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the resolution approving the provisions of the 2011 labor agreement with the Police Supervisors LELS Local 162 bargaining unit and authorize the City Manager to execute the aareement. II. BACKGROUND City staff has completed labor negotiations with the Police Supervisors LELS Local 162 (Union). The provisions of the 2011 labor agreement cover all of the employees in this Union which consists of 11 positions: 8 Sergeants and 3 Lieutenants. During the course of negotiations, City staff made the Union aware of the severe financial constraints the City is facing in 2011 and beyond, and agreed on a two percent wage adjustment for the entire 2011 contract year. The tentatively approved one year contract settlement includes the following significant changes: 0308Police Supervisors 2011_ contract Wages A two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. Health Insurance A $60 increase to the Employer health insurance contribution which provides full coverage at the High Option plan for single Employee at $734.10 per month, $915 per month for Employee plus spouse or Employee plus child(ren) coverage and $965 per month for Employee plus family coverage. For Employees who select the single tier $2500 High Deductible Health Plan option, the Employer will contribute a maximum of $250 per month into the Employee's Health Savings Plan. A $1 increase to the Employer contribution for Employee single dental insurance coverage, from $37 per month to $38 per month. . Clothing Allowance A $25 increase to the annual clothing allowance from $820 to $845. III. BASIS OF RECOMI~~NDATION A. POLICY • The City has met and negotiated in good faith with the Union and its representatives and is bound under the Public Employer's Labor Relations Act to meet and bargain over the terms and conditions of employment. • The proposed settlement for the health and dental insurance provisions is identical to those provided to non-union City employees. The City has a long history of providing the same level of insurance benefits to all eligible City employees. These provisions are also identical to settlements reached with Police Officers, Dispatchers and Local 49. • The two percent wage increase represents the same two percent wage adjustment implemented for non-union City employees. This is one of four contract settlements before the Council on March 8, 2011. The Fire bargaining unit remains unsettled for 2011. • The two percent wage adjustment and health insurance increase is comparable to other bargaining groups in similar metro cities. A survey of Stanton 5 cities indicates that those cities are providing anywhere from a 1 to 3 percent increase. The City has a long history of trying to remain as close to the mid-range as possible for Stanton 5 cities, in terms of wages and benefits. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • In order to allow the City's accounting personnel to modify payroll records in a timely manner for 2011 wages and benefits, it is recommended that the City Council act on March 8, 2011 to adopt the attached resolution providing for contract changes, effective January 1, 2011. C. FINANCIAL . • A maximum $60 increase in Employer monthly contribution towards health insurance coverage for 2011. • $1 per month increase in Employer monthly contribution towards employee single dental insurance in 2011. • Two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. • A $25 increase to the clothing allowance for 2011. D. LEGAL • If the terms of this agreement are not approved, further negotiation and/or mediation will be necessary. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • NA IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • Do not approve the terms of this agreement and prepare for further negotiation and/or mediation. • Defer discussion to another date. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution VI. PRINCIl'AL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (EELS), LOCAL 162 BARGAINING UNIT FOR THE YEAR 2011 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Richfield Police Supervisors EELS Local 162 have reached an understanding concerning conditions of employment for year 2011; and WHEREAS, it would be inappropriate to penalize EELS Local 162 members who have negotiated in good faith; and WHEREAS, the City Ordinance requires that contracts between the City and the exclusive representative of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit shall be completed by Council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Labor Agreement between the City of Richfield and EELS Local 162 Bargaining Unit for year 2011, under the provisions of the Labor Agreement to be implemented, effective January 1, 2011 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8th day of March 2011 Debbie Goettel Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs City Clerk ~ ~: .~ AGENDA SECTION: RESOLUTIONS ~ AGENDA ITEM # 12 F REPORT # 63 --`~` STAFF REPORT A....~_~=- - - CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ ~~ `~'°~" MARCH 8, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: JESSE SWENSON HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR x~ ~r~ REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of resolutions approving the adoption of the 2011 Management and General Services salary compensation plans. I. RECONIMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the resolutions designating a 2% salary increase, effective the first full pay period of January, 2011, for the Management and General Services Salarv Compensation Plans. II. BACKGROUND Over the past two years City staff has received either a delayed wage increase or no increase at all. In 2009 a three percent increase was delayed to March 29t" and in 2010 all employee groups received a zero percent wage increase to their base wage. For 2011 management has to-date successfully negotiated with four labor unions for a finro percent wage increase. The two percent wage adjustment is comparable to other bargaining groups in similar metro cities. A survey of Stanton 5 cities indicates that those cities are providing anywhere from a 1 to 3 percent increase. The City has a long history of trying to remain as close to the mid-range as possible for Stanton 5 cities, in terms of wages and benefits. III. BASIS OF RECONIlVIENDATION 0308MG GS A. , POLICY • The City of Richfield has historically given employees that are represented by labor unions and those not represented by unions, such as General Services -and Management, the same salary adjustments each year. • Four labor unions have agreed to a two percent wage increase effective the first full pay period of January, 2011. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • In order to allow the City's accounting personnel to modify payroll records in a timely manner for 2011 wages and benefits, it is recommended that the City Council act on March 8, 2011 to adopt the attached resolution providing for contract changes, effective January 1, 2011. C. FINANCIAL • Two percent wage increase for contract year 2011. D. LEGAL • Salary adjustments for any City employee group must be done by an act of the City Council in the form of a resolution. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • None N. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S~ • The City Council could decide not to adopt these resolutions. V. ATTACHMENTS • .Resolutions VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None 0308MG GS is-~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 2011 GENERAL SERVICES SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides for the adoption of a pay plan for General Services employees from time-to-time, and WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 2011 pay plan for position classifications for General Services employees. The City Manager is authorized to add or reclassify positions as necessary. Examples of positions in each pay grade are attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does establish for the year 2011 the following pay plan, which is to be effective the first full pay period in January 2011 and subject to all applicable provisions of the City Code: Effective the first full pay period of January 2011 STEP 1 2 3 4 5 6 RANGE GS1 YR 31,345.60 33,196.80 35,027.20 36,920.00 39,124.80 40,289.60 MO 2,612.13 2,766.40 2,918.93 ~ 3,076.67 3,260.40 3,357.47 B W 1 ,205.60 1,276.80 1,347.20 1,420.00 1,504.80 1,549.60 H R 15.07 15.96 16.84 17.75 18.81 19.37 GS2 YR 34,486.40 36,254.40 38,022.40 39,956.80 42,016.00 44,096.00 MO 2,873.87 3,021.20 3,168.53 3,329.73 3.,501.33 3,674.67 B W 1 ,326.40 1,394.40 1,462.40 1,536.80 1 ,616.00 1,696.00 H R 16.58 17.43 18.28 19.21 20.20 21.20 GS3 YR 38,022.40 39,956.80 42,078.40 44,096.00 46,300.80 48,838.40 MO 3,168.53 3,329.73 3,506.53 3,674.67 3,858.40 4,069.87 B W 1 ,462.40 1,536.80 1,618.40 1 ,696.00 1 ,780.80 1 ,878.40 HR 18.28 19.21 20.23 21.20 22.26 23.48 GS3E YR 40,872.00 42,931.20 45,219.20 47,403.20 49,732.80 52,520.00 MO 3,406.00 3,577.60 3,768.27 3,950.27 4,144.40 4,376.67 B W 1,572.00 1,651.20 1 ,739.20 1 ,823.20 1 ,912.80 2,020.00 H R 19.65 20.64 21.74 22.79 23.91 25.25 GS4 YR 42,078.40 44,096,00 46,363.20 48,692.80 51,084.80 53,788.80 MO 3,506.53 3,674.67 3,863.60 4,057.73 4,257.07 4,482.40 B W 1,618.40 1,696.00 1,783.20 1 ,872.80 1,964.80 2,068.80 HR 20.23 21.20 22.29 23.41 24.56 25.86 GS4E YR 45,177.60 47,382.40 49,816.00 52,353.60 54,953.60 57,720.00 MO 3,764.80 3,948.53 4,151.33 4,362.80 4,579.47 4,810.00 B W 1,73.7.60 1,822.40 1 ,916.00 2,013.60 2,1 13.60 2,220.00 H R 21 .72 22.78 23.95 25.17 26.42 27.75 GS5 YR 46,363.20 48,692.80 51,084.80 53,788.80 56,472.00 59,300.80 MO 3,863.60 4,057.73 4,257.07 4,482.40 4,706.00 4,941.73 B W 1,783.20 1,872.80 1,964.80 2,068.80 2,172.00 2,280.80 H R 22.29 23.41 24.56 25.86 27.15 28.51 GSSE YR 49,816.00 52,353.60 54,912.00 57,720.00 60,632.00 64,001.60 MO 4,151.33 4,362.80 4,576.00 4,810.00 5,052.67 5,333.47 BW 1,916.00 2,013.60 2,112.00 2,220.00 2,332.00 2,461.60 H R 23.95 25.17 26.40 27.75 29.15 30.77 GS6 YR 51,084.80 53,788.80 56,472.00 59,300.80 62,337.60 68,744.00 MO 4,257.07 4,482.40 4,706.00 4,941.73 5,194.80 5,728.67 BW 1,964.80 2,068.80 2,172.00 2,280.80 2,397.60 2,644.00 H R 24.56 25.86 27.15. 28.51 29.97 33.05 GS6E YR 54,912.00 57,720.00 60,652.80 63,689.60 66,892.80 73,860.80 MO 4-,576.00 4,810.00 5,054.40 5,307.47 .5,574.40 6,155.07 BW 2,112.00 2,220.00 2,332.80 2,449.60 2,572.80 2,840.80 HR 26.40 27.75 29.16 30.62 32.16 35.51 0308MG GS is -a a. Step 1 -Start b. Step 2 -One year from anniversary date. c. Step 3 -One year since last increase. If an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee may not advance to Step 3 until performance is rated Satisfactory or higher. d. Step 4 -One year since last increase. If an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee may not advance to Step 4 until performance is rated Satisfactory or higher. e. Step 5 -One year since last increase. An employee must achieve a Satisfactory rating or better in all areas of responsibility before advancing to Step 5. f. Step 6 -One year since last increase. An employee must achieve a Satisfactory rating or better in all areas of responsibility before advancing to Step 6. Employees whose competency level and/or performance are rated Unsatisfactory may not advance to the next step until their performance improves. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 8~' day of March 2011. Debbie Goettel ~ Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs City Clerk (Revised 12-2010) 0308MG GS ~~'.~..' GENERAL SERVICES POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE GRADE POSITION TITLES CLASS Office Aide _ Non-Exempt Data Entry Operator Non-Exempt Switchboard-Receptionist Non-Exempt Community Development Technician Non-Exempt Community Service Officer Non-Exempt Custodian Non-Exempt Investigative Clerk Non-Exempt Lead Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt Licensing Clerk Non-Exempt Police Cadet Non-Exempt Senior Office Aide Non-Exempt Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt Community Development Assistant Non-Exempt Facilittyy Operations Assistant Non-Exempt Foresfry Inspector/Operations Assistant Non-Exempt Environmental Health Assistant Non-Exempt Lead Licensing Clerk Non-Exempt Leased Housing Assistant Non-Exempt Secretary Non-Exempt Utility Billing Clerk Non-Exempt 3E Assistant Liquor Store Manager Exempt 4 Assessment Clerk Non-Exempt Information Technologies Help Desk Non-Exempt Technician Operations Aide Non-Exempt 4SNE Administrative Aide Non-Exempt 5 Engineering Technician Non-Exempt Facility Maintenance Supervisor Non-Exempt Recreation Supervisor Part-time Non-Exempt Information Technologies Technician Non-Exempt 5E Code Compliance Specialist Exempt Crime Prevention Program Coordinator Exempt Community Development Accountant Exempt Community Development Coordinator Exempt Executive Coordinator Exempt Housing Specialist Exempt Human Resources Coordinator Exempt Human Services Planner/Coordinator Exempt Media Coordinator Exempt Naturalist Exempt Payroll Accountant Exempt Records Supervisor R Exempt E t ecreation Supervisor xemp Redevelopment Specialist Exempt 6 Civil Engineer Non-Exempt Network Administrator Non-Exempt Project Civil Engineer I T d /B ild t Non-Exempt Non-Exem t nspec or ra e u ing p Trade/Electrical Inspector Non-Exempt 6E Accountant Exempt Planner Exempt 0308MG GS -a-~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 2011 MANAGEMENT SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides for the adoption of a pay plan for Management employees from time-to-time; and WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 2011 pay plan for position classifications for Management employees. The City Manager is authorized to add or reclassify positions as necessary. Examples of positions in each pay grade are attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does establish for the year 2011 the following pay plan, which is to be effective the first full pay period in January 2011 and subject to all applicable provisions of the City. MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PAY PLAN MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PLAN PAY GRADE MINIMUM MID-RANGE MAXIMUM M-L YR 54,080.00 61,734.40 69,368.00 MO 4,506.67 5,144.53 5,780.67 BW 2,080.00 2,374.40 2,668.00 H R 26.00 29.68 33.35 M-1 YR 59,113.60 67,620.80 76,044.80 MO 4,926.13 5,635.07 6,337.07 BW 2,273.60 2,600.80 2,924.80 H R 28.42 32.51 36.56 M-2 YR 70,387.20 80,412.80 90,500.80 MO 5,865.60 6,701.07 7,541.73 BW 2,707.20 3,092.80 3,480.80 H R 33.84 38.66 43.51 M-3 YR 76,731.20 87,672.00 98,612.80 MO 6,394.27 7,306.00 8,217.73 BW 2,951.20 3,372.00 3,792.80 HR 36.89 42.15 47.41 M-4 YR 83,657.60 95,555.20 107,494.40 MO 6,971.47 7,962.93 8,957.87 BW 3,217.60 3,675.20 4,134.40 HR 40.22 45.94 51.68 M-5 YR 94,494.40 107,972.80 121,492.80 MO 7,874.53 8,997.73 10,124.40 BW 3,634.40 4,152.80 4,672.80 H R 45.43 51.91 58.41 ~a-s C a O R N C Q O ~+ c d m ~a c .C 0 t c N L a Z o a~ ~- ~ O U ~ p ~ "O N U ~ O O N O •~ c~ Z c ~ "-~ ~~~~ 0 a N ~, ~~~a~ o ~ U Q•N ~ ~ ~ O r O ~ ~ o~: s- LL O ~ .~ fOQ O ~ ~ ° O U d v- O ~' N C ~ ~ ~ ~ O fn ~ O _ \° ~ C O ~' ~ ~ ~ «t ~ ~ W N r ~ O c0 > +~ O O -~ ~ O ~ '''' p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Ri U _ ' ~ O~ C W ~_-~ N N ~ ~ C N N ~~ Z O ~ C QN O ~ ~ Z ~ M :c ~ OC ~ a~ ~ Z' V C~ ~ JD O -O ~0 0 >~c~va~i Q~ `° O N co~~Q- ~~ ~ E o 3 o o ° ~~ ~ ?O Z o~ c co ~ n E ~ ~ ~~~ N_ • o O to ~~~ ~ 0 0 0 ~+ y cn N• ~ ~-, O O O~ co C O Z ~ ~ Eo~~ D. u i `C E ~~c-~ ~ Q o ~ C Z S N O V U O O •~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ O C6 N ~ O ~ ~ f6 N N ~ ~ ~ `~ o U U ~ R3 O O ~ ~ LN... ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~~ ~ ~ •~ ~ o N ~ • W ~ ~ a i ~ t ~ o. 3 p o o .,...,.. O ~ ~ y-- o ^. ~ q +j O O c Z ~ ~ CO ''' Mc-~? 0 Z 0 Z N ~ E N ~ c ~ - W 0 o~ W c>,o o ~~~ Z' Z c ~ ~ ~ o ca ~Z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Q o . n-o~'-~ ~,~ ~ O u.~ ~N ~, C ~ ~ Q o U O O c~~~'~ ~ W ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ a. m a I-'o ~ ~ OQ(n Z ~ r O N L L O >+ c~ r c~ O O N c O U a~ t •U C U U N ~_ ..Q a~ N ca ~, N N O N a~ D N U U 1-- (~ U C ca Q Z 0 0 ~a-~ MANAGEMENT POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE RANGE POSITION TITLES CLASS M-L Liquor Store Manager Exempt M-1 City Clerk Exempt Facility/Program Manager Exempt Supervisor Exempt Health Administrator Exempt M-2 Assistant Utility Superintendent Chief Building Official Community Development Manager Information Technologies Manager Public Works Operations Manager (Streets/Forestry and Parks/Fleet) Transportation Engineer Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt M-3 Asst. Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Exempt Assistant City Manager/H.R. Manager Exempt City Engineer Exempt Housing & Redevelopment Manager/ Exempt Assistant Community Development Director Utilities Superintendent Exempt M-4 Deputy Public Safety Director Exempt Finance Manager Exempt Liquor Operations Director Exempt M-5 Department Director Exempt (Rev. 11-10)