05-10-2022 City Council AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MAY 10, 2022
7:00 PM
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
Call to order
Pledge of Allegiance
Open forum
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others.
Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council. Please refer to the City Council web page
for additional ways to submit comments. You may also call 612-861-9711 or email
kwynn@richfieldmn.gov with questions. Call into the open forum by dialing 1-415-655-0001 Use
webinar access code: 2450 346 9390 and password: 1234.
Approve the Minutes of the: (1) Joint City Council, Planning Commission and HRA Work Session of April 26, 2022;
and (2) Regular City Council Meeting of April 26, 2022.
PRESENTATIONS
1.Proclamation celebrating Asian and Pacific American Heritage Month
AGENDA APPROVAL
2.Approval of the Agenda
PROPOSED ORDINANCES
3. Consider the first reading of an ordinance amending City Code Section 721 to add new Subsection 721.24
related to facility requirements for bulk deicer storage and schedule a second reading for May 24, 2022.
Staff Report No. 75
4. Consider a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning from Mixed Use - Neighborhood to Planned
Mixed Use, Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family
development at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue South.
Staff Report No. 76
RESOLUTIONS
5. Consider a resolution providing for the sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A.
Staff Report No. 77
OTHER BUSINESS
6. Consider:
1.Approving the bid tabulation for the 65th Street Reconstruction Project;
2. Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to award and execute a contract for construction
between the City and Eureka Construction, Inc., for the 65th Street Reconstruction Project
in the amount of $10,169,400.00; and
3.Authorizing the City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City Council
consideration.
Staff Report No. 74
7.Consider the appointment of Cole Hooey to the Planning Commission with a term expiring January 31, 2023.
Staff Report No. 78
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
8.City Manager's Report
CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
9.Claims and Payroll
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
10.Hats Off to Hometown Hits
11.Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Joint City Council, Planning
Commission, and HRA Work
Session
April 26, 2022
CALL TO ORDER
The work session was called to order by Mayor Pro Tempore Supple at 6:00 p.m. in the
Bartholomew Room.
Council Members
Present:
Mary Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore; Simon Trautmann; Sean Hayford Oleary;
and Ben Whalen
Council Members
Absent:
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
Planning
Commission
Members Present:
James Rudolph, Chair; Brett Stursa; Brendan Kennealy; Eddie Holmvig-
Johnson; and Ben Surma
Planning
Commission
Members Absent:
Kathryn Quam
HRA Members
Present:
Mary Supple, Chair
HRA Members
Absent:
Maria Regan Gonzalez; Erin Vrieze Daniels; Lee Ohnesorge; and Gordon
Hanson
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Melissa Poehlman, Community Development
Director; Julie Urban, Assistant Community Development Director; Chris
Swanson, Management Analyst; and Kari Sinning, City Clerk
Others Present: Elwyn Tinklenberg, Project Management Consultant, American Legion Post
435; Diane Miller, Controller, American Legion Post 435; Nic Meyer, Project
Landscape Architect, Westwood Engineering; Dennis Pelowski, Counselor at
Law; Andy Keller, Vice Commander of American Legion Post 435
ITEM #1 INTRODUCTORY PRESENTATION OF REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR THE
AMERICAN LEGION SITE AT 6501 PORTLAND AVENUE
Joint City Council, Planning Commission, and HRA
Work Session Minutes -2-April 26, 2022
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple stated that Mayor Regan Gonzalez was not able to be present out
of an abundance of caution and turned over the meeting to staff. Community Development Director
Poehlman outlined some feedback guidelines for the discussion and introduced Elwyn Tinklenberg.
Elwyn Tinklenberg expressed gratitude for the opportunity to discuss these proposed plans with the
members present and shared the preliminary plans that included apartments, a restaurant, community
space (ballroom) with underground parking spaces. Tinklenberg stated that continuity is important
within this project so that it is connected with the park, the neighborhood, and with the history and
heritage of the Legion Post. The Legion wants to continue to serve the community and be a force
within the community.
Chair Rudolph asked about veteran’s preference for affordability apartments. Elwyn
Tinklenberg stated that it has been a part of the discussion and the goal is to provide housing,
especially to veterans, and possible short term stays for families that come to visit the VA hospital.
Counselor Dennis Pelowski stated that they have talked with the County Commissioner and US
Representatives who would be supportive of a veteran’s preference and it is possible that the units
could be subsidized.
Council Member Whalen expressed excitement for this project and appreciated many of the
concepts from the proposed plans that would benefit the community especially the variety of unit sizes
and asked if the affordability would be across the different unit sizes. Elwyn Tinklenberg stated that
the units would all be treated the same way regardless of size and would be dependent upon who
would reside in the unit. Council Member Whalen raised concerns about the abundance of parking;
there could be more units instead of more parking. Director Poehlman stated that the plans are
conceptual and the number of parking spaces could come down as the details change including
handicap parking stalls as the current plans do not show any.
Elwyn Tinklenberg stated that the transit opportunities of this site make this a unique project
and they want to incorporate those opportunities into the plan.
Council Member Hayford Oleary was glad to see this progress and raised a few concerns such
as a view from the legion of the memorial (the inward facing of the legion), the possibility of the legion
post closing, a main entrance to the building along Portland Ave that could possibly be moved to the
northwest corner of the building so all could access and not just residents, and full trail widths for the
sidewalks along Portland Ave to match the rest of the park. He also echoed the parking concerns from
Council Member Whalen. Elwyn Tinklenberg appreciated the concerns brought forth by Council
Member Hayford Oleary.
Commissioner Kennealy thanked them for the design and asked if the neighboring homes and
businesses would be affected by this plan like the other plans that were illustrated. Director Poehlman
stated that the other plans were created by a consultant and they are not a part of this plan.
Commissioner Surma asked for an explanation of public vs private pedestrian areas. Elwyn
Tinklenberg showed the public pedestrian right of ways in the proposed plan and explained that they
want to be a part of the park making it an amenity for the residents and public alike.
Council Member Trautmann echoed the comments and concerns that were previously stated
and noted the curated approach to the neighbors of the site. He also asked about the ADA
compliancy of the units. Elwyn Tinklenberg stated that there are currently four ADA compliant
apartments which may change over time.
Chair Rudolph shared that sometimes during events at the ice arena that parking lots will be
filled and to be mindful of that with the parking allotment at this site.
Joint City Council, Planning Commission, and HRA
Work Session Minutes -3-April 26, 2022
Commissioner Stursa echoed the excitement and comments regarding parking and asked
about a shade study being completed as to not affect the pool. Director Poehlman stated that it is a
requirement of code for a shade study to be completed. Diane Miller expressed appreciation for the
great comments and explained that in order to shadow cast upon the pool it would have to come from
the south. Elwyn Tinklenberg stated that regardless a shadow study will be conducted.
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple brought forth a message from a resident regarding more
accessible parking spots. Architect Nic Meyer stated that the proposed project operations would be
taken into consideration and the needs of the events that would be held there. Director Poehlman
stated that there are calculations that they would complete to make sure that there are enough
accessible parking spots. Elwyn Tinklenberg stated they are also making adjustments for EV charging
stations outdoors. Mayor Pro Tempore Supple expressed excitement for the project especially for
three bedroom apartments for families.
Council Member Whalen asked about the thoughts from legion members. Counselor Pelowski
stated that the history of the building is important to some members but there has been support from
members to offer more housing to veterans and the concept has brought members together. Vice
Commander Keller stated that the goal of the legion would be to be more of a veteran community
aspect versus just a bar. Counselor Pelowski also stated that the restaurant would be independently
run so the legion can focus on the community aspect to provide more services to veterans. Elwyn
Tinklenberg stated that when the project is completed the property would be owned by the legion, not
an investor.
Mayor Pro Tempore thanked the developers for the proposal and thanked the legion for all that
they have done for the community over the years. She asked staff if there was anything else that
needed to be addressed.
Director Poehlman asked if anyone had any questions or concerns regarding pedestrian
connectivity to the surrounding areas. Council Member Hayford Oleary stated that it would be nice to
have another exit from the ice arena to Portland Ave but it is not necessary as he saw no major
problems with the connectivity and liked the north-south pedestrian connection that extends to the
memorial. Counselor Pelowski stated that the proximity to the park, pool, and ice arena will make this
a very sought after location to live. Commissioner Kennealy stated that it looks great from a
pedestrian view. Council Member Trautmann appreciated that there is greenspace between the ice
arena and the site.
Chair Rudolph commented that as a veteran he is very proud of the effort to create a space for
veterans to share their time together.
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:52 p.m.
Date Approved: May 10, 2022
Mary Supple
Mayor Pro Tempore
Kari Sinning Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tempore Supple at 7:02 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
Council Members
Present:
Mary Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore; Simon Trautmann; Sean Hayford Oleary;
and Ben Whalen
Council Members
Absent:
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Chris Swanson,
Management Analyst; Jane Skov, IT Manager; Kelly Wynn, Administrative
Assistant; and Kari Sinning, City Clerk
Others Present: None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple led the Pledge of Allegiance.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple reviewed the options to participate:
Participate live by calling 1-415-655-0001 during the open forum portion
Call prior to meeting 612-861-9711
Email prior to meeting kwynn@richfieldmn.gov
City Manager Rodriguez read aloud an emailed comment from Larry Ernster, 6727 Elliot Ave,
that expressed disapproval of building more apartments for housing.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Whalen, S/Hayford Oleary to approve the minutes of the: (1) Special Closed Executive
Session of April 11, 2022; (2) Joint City Council, Planning Commission and HRA Work Session of
April 12, 2022; and (3) Regular City Council Meeting of April 12, 2022.
Motion carried 4-0.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Council Meeting
April 26, 2022
City Council Meeting Minutes -2-April 26, 2022
ITEM #1 PROCLAMATION TO RECOGNIZE ARBOR DAY 2022
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple read aloud the proclamation.
Council Member Whalen thanked everyone involved in park cleanups as there had been a few
events for the Adopt-a-Park program.
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple echoed the comments of Council Member Whalen and shared
that many residents have moved to Richfield because of the urban forest and appreciated everyone
that works to keep it that way.
ITEM #2 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
M/Trautmann, S/Whalen to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 4-0.
ITEM #3 CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar.
A.Consideration of the approval of the first reading of an ordinance rezoning property at 7700
Pillsbury Avenue South from Mixed Use - Neighborhood to Planned Mixed Use (PMU) and
schedule a second reading for May 10, 2022. (Staff Report No. 70)
B.Consideration of the use of Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds as established under
the American Rescue Plan Act by claiming the standard allowance for the replacement of
lost public sector revenue. (Staff Report No. 71)
RESOLUTION NO. 11972
RESOLUTION ELECTING THE STANDARD ALLOWANCE
AVAILABLE UNDER THE REVENUE LOSS PROVISION OF THE
CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND ESTABLISHED
UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT
M/Whalen, S/Trautmann to approve the consent calendar.
Council Member Hayford Oleary encouraged Council to watch the Planning Commission
meeting that was held last night of which item A was a topic of conversation and there were
amendments added.
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple appreciated that the federal government streamlined the process
for item B.
Motion carried 4-0.
City Council Meeting Minutes -3-April 26, 2022
ITEM #4 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT
CALENDAR
None.
ITEM #5
PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF TRANSITORY ORDINANCE
PROVIDING FUNDING FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE
LIQUOR CONTRIBUTION SPECIAL REVENUE FUND. (STAFF REPORT NO. 72)
Council Member Hayford Oleary presented Staff Report 72, read aloud the options to
participate in the public hearing, and opened the public hearing.
M/Hayford Oleary, S/Whalen to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 4-0.
Council Member Whalen stated that the Community Services Commission expressed
excitement for the updates and repairs for the parks and thanked everyone who contributed to these
funds by buying at municipal liquor stores and rounding up their purchases.
M/Hayford Oleary, S/Whalen to approve the attached transitory ordinance providing for the
expenditure of funds from the Liquor Contribution Special Revenue Fund for certain capital
improvements.
BILL NO. 2022-6
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19.24
ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY
FROM THE LIQUOR CONTRIBUTION SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Council Member Hayford Oleary promoted buying at the municipal liquor stores.
Motion carried 4-0.
ITEM #6
PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SUBSECTION 210.01 OF THE CITY CODE RELATED TO CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES FOR 2023 AND 2024. (STAFF REPORT NO. 73)
Council Member Trautmann read aloud the options to participate in the public hearing,
presented Staff Report 73, and opened the public hearing.
M/Trautmann, S/Hayford Oleary to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 4-0.
M/Trautmann, S/Hayford Oleary to approve the second reading of the ordinance amending
Subsection 210.01 of the City Code related to City Council salaries.
City Council Meeting Minutes -4-April 26, 2022
BILL NO. 2022-7
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 210
RICHFIELD CITY CODE PERTAINING TO CITY
COUNCIL SALARIES
Council Member Whalen appreciated that the salaries would continue to be appropriately
compensated for the work of being a council member as it is not a living wage.
Motion carried 4-0.
ITEM #7 CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Rodriguez gave a brief covid update, thanked staff for the work on setting up
hybrid meetings, and stated that there will be tablets available for Council soon.
ITEM #8 CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
M/Whalen, S/Trautmann that the following claims and payrolls be approved:
U.S. Bank 4/26/2022
A/P Checks: 305440 – 305822 $2,865,636.22
Payroll: 169566 – 169872, 53465 $ 708,822.30
TOTAL $3,574,458.52
Motion carried 4-0
ITEM #9 HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS
Council Member Whalen gave a shout out and thanked the Fire Department for their response
to recent fires in the City.
Council Member Hayford Oleary thanked the Fire and Police Departments for inviting Council
to the badging ceremonies as it was nice to see all the families behind the firefighters and officers . He
also promoted the Richfield Foundation fundraiser event “Toast to Richfield” on May 12.
Council Member Trautmann recognized Police Department for their badging ceremony and
was grateful for the opportunity to be able to show the oath process to his son. He especially
welcomed the new officers that were previous Community Service Officers. He also mentioned that
residents can apply for a stall at the Richfield Farmers Market to help launch their businesses.
Mayor Pro Tempore Supple mentioned a high school senior showcase that starts the second
week of May at the community center and that Gene and Mary Jacobson Outstanding Citizen award
nominations are being accepted thru April 29. She also gave a shout out to some remarkable leaders
in our community that have been recognized: 1) Monica Byron, a teacher at Centennial Elementary
School was elected as the new Vice President of Education Minnesota; and 2) Judy Moe, who has
been named as the ARC Minnesota’s 2021 Public Policy Leader of the Year. Mayor Pro Tempore
Supple also echoed the previous comments thanking the fire and police departments and stated that it
City Council Meeting Minutes -5-April 26, 2022
is important to keep in mind that they have families that are worried about them while they are on
duty.
ITEM #10 ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:33 p.m.
Date Approved: May 10, 2022
Mary Supple
Mayor Pro Tempore
Kari Sinning Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
Proclamation of the City of Richfield
WHEREAS, Asian and Pacific American Heritage Month, from May 1st through May 31th, pays
tribute to Asian and Pacific Americans, the fastest-growing ethnic minority group in the United
States of America, for their contributions to the United States of America and to celebrate the culture
and history of these groups; and
WHEREAS, May was designated as Asian and Pacific American Heritage Month because of the
first documented arrival of Japanese immigrants to the United States on May 7, 1843, and the
completion of the first transcontinental railroad on May 10, 1869, which was completed mostly by
Chinese immigrant laborers; and
WHEREAS, the first documented arrival of an Asian or Pacific Islander to Minnesota occurred in
Duluth, Minnesota in 1875; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota has provided asylum and relocation for many Asian refugees, from the
Vietnamese, Laotians, Cambodians and Hmong in the 1970’s and 1980’s, and Tibetans and Karen
peoples during the 1990’s, while other Asian and Pacific Islanders have immigrated to Minnesota in
their pursuit of opportunities and freedom; and
WHEREAS, at least 5.4% of the population in Richfield is of Asian or Pacific Islander origin,
according to 2021 estimates by the U.S. Census Bureau; and
WHEREAS, Asian and Pacific Americans have been subjected to discriminatory treatment
throughout their time in the United States, including the wrongful internment of Japanese-Americans
during World War II and recent irrational blame for COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, Asian and Pacific Americans have made the United States a better nation through their
hard work, initiative, creativity and sharing of their cultural heritage, and deserve to be recognized
for their achievements and participation in our civic life; and
WHEREAS, the Richfield Human Rights Commission supported this proclamation at its April 5,
2022, meeting and recommended the Richfield City Council do the same; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, MARIA REGAN GONZALEZ, Mayor of the City of Richfield, do
proclaim the month of May 2022 as Asian and Pacific American Heritage Month in the City of
Richfield and call on the people of Richfield to observe this month with appropriate programs,
activities, and ceremonies, and continue to honor the contributions of Asian and Pacific
Islander Americans throughout the year.
PROCLAIMED this 10th day of May, 2022.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED
ORDINANCES
AGENDA ITEM #3.
STAFF REPORT NO. 75
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
5/10/2022
REPORT PREPARED BY: Jordan Vennes, Water Resources Engineer
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
5/2/2022
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
5/3/2022
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider the first reading of an ordinance amending City Code Section 721 to add new Subsection
721.24 related to facility requirements for bulk deicer storage and schedule a second reading for May
24, 2022.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Background
The MPCA issued a new Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) General Permit on
November 16, 2020. The City of Richfield was issued coverage under this permit on October 1, 2021
and must be compliant with new permit requirements of this permit within 12 months of issuance (by
October 1, 2022).
Section 18.6 of the 2020 General Permit requires cities to develop, implement, and enforce a
regulatory mechanism which requires proper salt storage at commercial, institutional, and non-NPDES
permitted industrial facilities. At minimum, this regulatory mechanism must require the following:
(a.) designated salt storage areas must be covered or indoors;
(b.) designated salt storage areas must be located on an impervious surface; and
(c.) implementation of practices to reduce exposure when transferring material in designated salt
storage areas (e.g. sweeping, diversions, and/or containment).
The 2019 Statewide Chloride Management Plan states that winter maintenance activities are a primary
source of chloride discharges into lakes, streams, wetlands and groundwater.
Salt/deicers can enter the environment during storage, transport and application. It only takes one
teaspoon of salt to permanently pollute five gallons of water. Once contaminated with chloride, water
becomes prohibitively difficult and expensive to treat for chloride removal.
Ordinance
This ordinance amendment will apply to all commercial, institutional, and non-NPDES permitted
industrial facilities that temporarily or permanently maintain indoor or outdoor bulk deicer storage
facilities (greater than two tons in solid form or 400 gallons in liquid form).
Ordinance update would:
(a.) require indoor storage whenever possible;
(b.) require covered storage;
(c.) require storage on impervious surface;
(d.) require best practices during material transfer, including sweeping, diversions, and containment;
and
(e.) require solid and liquid deicer materials to be stored separately from one another.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Approve the first reading of an ordinance amending City Code Subsection 721 to add new
Section 721.24 related to facility requirements for bulk deicer storage and schedule a second reading
for May 24, 2022.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The City of Richfield has long prioritized proper storage of deicer materials as well as reducing its
salt/deicer application to protect our local and regional waterways while maintaining safe and
navigable streets.
This ordinance amendment is an additional step the City can take to further that goal of reducing
salt/deicer discharge into the stormwater system.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City Charter requires a first and second reading of ordinances.
A public hearing is not required unless a separate statute, charter provision or ordinance requires
it.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Approval of the first reading of this ordinance at this meeting will ensure that it is effective within the
timeframe required by the MS4 General Permit.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The intent of this ordinance amendment is to give staff a mechanism for enforcement of proper bulk
salt/deicer storage and is not intended to generate revenue.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed ordinance and will be available to answer questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Ordinance Ordinance
0 = 1 " " RC160\4\792245.v1 RC160\4\792245.v1 RC160\4\792245.v1
BILL NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER VII OF THE
RICHFIELD CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING
BULK DEICER STORAGE FACILITIES
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Chapter VII, Section 721 of the Richfield Code of Ordinances is
amended to add the following new sub-section 721.24:
721.24. – BULK DEICER STORAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Subdivision 1. Applicability. This sub-section applies to all commercial,
institutional, and non-NPDES permitted industrial facilities that maintain indoor and
outdoor bulk deicer storage facilities, whether temporary or permanent.
Subd. 2. Definitions.
a.“Bulk deicer storage” means the storage of any deicing material that is
measured at more than two tons in solid form or 400 gallons in liquid form ,
including but not limited to salt piles, sand piles, salt bag storage, and
other storage of deicing materials.
b.“Deicing material” means any solid or liquid material used for deicing
and/or traction during winter conditions, including but not limited to salt,
sand, and chloride-based deicers, such as sodium chloride (NaCl),
magnesium chloride (MgCl2), and calcium chloride (CaCl2).
Subd. 3. Requirements.
a.Indoor Storage. All bulk deicer storage facilities must provide indoor
storage for deicing materials wherever possible in order to protect such
materials against precipitation and surface water runoff.
b.Outdoor Storage.
(i)When not using indoor storage, bulk deicer storage facilities must
maintain any deicing materials in outdoor storage with a roof or
cover, including a permanent roof wherever possible.
(ii)When not using a permanent roof, bulk deicer storage facilities
must place a waterproof impermeable, flexible cover over all
deicing materials in order to protect against precipitation and
surface water runoff. The cover must be secured to prevent
removal by wind or other storm events. Any salt, sand, or other
deicing material piles must be formed in a conical shape and
covered in a manner to prevent leaching.
0 = 1 " " RC160\4\792245.v1 RC160\4\792245.v1 RC160\4\792245.v1
(iii)Bulk deicer storage facilities must temporarily repair any leaks,
tears, or other damage to roofs or covers immediately in order to
protect against precipitation and surface water runoff . Any
permanent repairs must be completed prior to the next winter
season.
c.Impervious Surface Storage. All bulk deicer storage must be located on an
impervious surface.
d.Transfer of Deicing Materials. Bulk deicer storage facilities must
implement best practices in order to reduce exposure to precipitation and
surface water runoff when transferring deicing material, including but not
limited to sweeping, diversions, and containment.
e.Separate Storage of Solid and Liquid Deicing Materials. Bulk deicer
storage facilities must store liquid deicing materials separately from any
solid deicing materials.
Section 2. This ordinance will be effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of
the City Charter.
Adopted by the City of Richfield this 24th day of May, 2022.
Mary Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Kari Sinning, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED
ORDINANCES
AGENDA ITEM #4.
STAFF REPORT NO. 76
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
5/10/2022
REPORT PREPARED BY: Ryan Krzos, Planner
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director
5/3/2022
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
5/3/2022
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning from Mixed Use - Neighborhood
to Planned Mixed Use, Planned Unit Development, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit
for a multi-family development at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue South.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
MWF Properties (Applicant) has submitted requests for land use approvals for a multi-family development at
7700 Pillsbury Avenue South. The proposal consists of 55 residential units within a four-story building. The
subject property is zoned Mixed Use - Neighborhood and is guided as Medium Density Residential by the
2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant is seeking approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment;
rezoning to Planned Mixed Use; and a Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Development Plan (FDP),
and Conditional Use Permit (CUP).
The Applicant is pursuing an amendment to Comprehensive Plan to re-guide the site as High Density
Residential. The High Density Residential future land use category is intended to allow for multi-family uses at
a density of 35 to 100 units per acre primarily located in areas convenient to transportation, shopping and
social services necessary to support higher concentrations of people. The proposed density (58 units per
acre) would fall within the specified High Density guidelines. Additionally, this site's location within an area
having high connectivity to transportation networks and amenities aligns with the characteristics envisioned for
High Density Residential areas.
The proposed building would be located with massing up along the 77th Street corridor, and a primary
entrance facing Pillsbury Avenue. The pedestrian environment along 77th Street is enhanced by street level
patios for first floor units along the sidewalk. The proposed architectural design provides visual interest by way
of use of varying materials, and breaks in massing through use of building articulation. The
general design language is consistent with that of recently approved projects in the City. Off-street parking
and an outdoor tot lot are provided to the south of the building. Additional vehicle and bicycle parking would be
provided in a basement level garage. As proposed, the Applicant would provide five level two Electric Vehicle
(EV) charging stations, and 20 level 2/3 capable stations.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request at their April 25, 2022 meeting. One member
of the public spoke and asked for more information on the project and expressed concerns over high density
development and tall buildings. The Planning Commission discussed impervious area, off-street parking
beyond the maximum, EV charging stations, and bicycle parking. The Planning Commission unanimously
approved a motion recommending approval of the project with conditions related to the aforementioned issues.
Those conditions are reflected in the attached resolution. Specifically the Planning Commission recommends
conditions be applied such that the four excess parking stalls beyond the maximum be provided as proof
of parking, that at least 50 percent of the required EV charging stations be provided (installed and as
EV capable), and that 50 percent of the enclosed bicycle parking racks be available generally to
tenants and not tied to leased vehicle parking stalls.
Proposed as a PUD, the Applicant is requesting flexibility with regard to standards contained in the zoning
ordinance. Flexibility is granted in exchange for efficient use of land and resources, to encourage innovation
in planning and building, and for a well-designed project successfully integrated into the neighborhood.
Additionally, the City's Inclusionary Housing Policy stipulates that projects can seek code flexibility allowed
through the PUD process to deliver affordable units. Staff finds that the project warrants application of the
PUD form of approval through use of quality architectural design that responds to the vision and direction of
the Comprehensive Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Policy. The development provides a reasonable
amount of amenities for residents for a site situated between the commercial areas to the east and south and
residential to the north across 77th Street. Furthermore, the Zoning Code provisions the Applicant is seeking
deviations from are relatively minor in nature, and staff finds that the overall design of the project meets the
intent of these individual zoning provisions. The most consequential deviations relate to exceeding the off-
street parking and impervious surface maximums. Staff found that the proposal reasonably balances the
tension between providing for off-street parking needs and impervious coverage and its associated benefits.
However, as noted the Planning Commission's recommendation include a condition requiring that the excess
stalls as proof of parking. All of the requested deviations are discussed in greater detail in the “Required
Findings” attachment to in this report.
Staff and the Planning Commission find that the proposed project meets the intent and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan and code requirements for Mixed Use development. Therefore, staff and
the Planning Commission recommend approval of the project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion:
1.Approve the attached resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject
property from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential.
2.Approve the ordinance rezoning the subject property from Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N) to
Planned Mixed Use (PMU); and
3.Approve the attached resolution granting a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit,
and Final Development Plan for a multi-family residential development at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue
South.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The subject property was originally the site of the City Garage/Public Works facility offices. After
garage operations were moved to the new Public Works facility at 66th Street and Trunk Highway
77, the property was transferred to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to be
marketed for redevelopment.
Since 2019, the Applicant has been working with the HRA to develop 55 units of work force
housing on the site.
The Applicant presented the conceptual plans for the proposal at a work session on October 18,
2021. The feedback related to land use aspects proposal were primarily in regard to ensuring that
the site provides sufficient quality of life amenities for residents. In response to this feedback the
plans were revised to include first story patios near the street level along 77th Street and balconies
for multiple units on the south of the building.
B.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
In reviewing amendments to the Comprehensive Plan the City is acting in a legislative capacity.
As such, a wider degree of discretion is afforded to the City to balance the various policy
considerations. In general, the action must be reasonably related to advancing the health, safety,
and general welfare of the community.
This site was guided as High Density Residential in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan update
reflective of a 2005 I-494 corridor study which envisioned the area as a complete community that
is compact, walkable, and transit-friendly. Later in the 2009 plan was amended to re-guide this site
within a Medium-High Density Residential guiding district. That amendment occurred in response
to a specific development proposal consisting of 15-unit townhome. The rationale at the time was
that this site was not large enough to accommodate a High Density Residential use. Since that
time no Medium Density development proposals have materialized for the site. The 2040
Comprehensive Plan carried forward that amended designation, albeit as the Medium Density
Residential designation since the residential designations were consolidated into the current three.
The Applicant is pursuing an amendment to re-guide the site as High Density Residential. The
High Density Residential future land use category is intended to allow for multi-family uses at a
density of 35 to 100 units per acre primarily located in areas convenient to transportation,
shopping and social services necessary to support higher concentrations of people. The
proposed 55-unit multi-family building on the .94 acre site (exclusive of right-of-way easements)
would fall within the specified High Density guidelines. Additionally, this site being within an area
having high connectivity to transportation networks and amenities aligns with the characteristics
envisioned for High Density Residential. The proposal is also consistent with goals and policies set
forth by the Comprehensive Plan particularly as it relates to housing as noted in the "Required
Findings" attachment.
Planned Unit Development
PUDs are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resources and to encourage
innovation in planning and building. In exchange for these efficiencies and superior design,
flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements is available. There are a number of sets of
review criteria that apply to this proposal. A full discussion of all requirements is included as an
attachment to this report. Generally, the criteria require that the Council find that the proposal
conforms to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code without having
undue adverse impacts on public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 542.03 Subd. 2 states that a site must be at least one acre to qualify as a PUD, which
may include right-of-way areas. The subject site is 1.31 acres in gross total, but is .94 acres when
excluding the 77th Street right-of-way easement.
The number of EV charging stations is not included in the list of requested deviations. Although
the proposed number is less than what is required by code, the requirement may be reduced by
staff to account for circumstances where they might not be utilized. In this case, upon the request
by the Applicant based on their experience with similar tenants in their properties, the reduced
amount was proposed and determined to be acceptable by staff. As noted in the executive
summary the Planning Commission's recommendation included a modified condition regarding
EV facilities.
Inclusionary Housing Policy
The City's Inclusionary Housing Policy states that housing development projects which include
affordable units are eligible to apply to the City for the following considerations regardless of
whether or not they receive public financial assistance:
Building permit fee reductions e.g.;
4d property tax reduction (rental projects);
Consideration of Code flexibility (e.g., smaller setbacks, excessive impervious surface, etc.)
in Planned Unit Developments;
A housing unit density bonus of 5-15%.
Neighborhood Meeting Policy
Per City policy for land use requests that involve Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezoning,
the Applicant held a neighborhood meeting on April 13th. Two adjoining property owners attended
the meeting and asked questions and expressed concern regarding compatibility with their
commercial property. The Applicant believes they will be able to address most of the concerns by
managing their activities during construction.
C.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
60-DAY RULE: The 60-day clock 'started' when the application was deemed on March 24, 2022. A
decision is required by May 23, 2022 or the City must notify the applicant that it is extending the
deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total) for issuing a decision.
D.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The required application fees have been paid.
E.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was mailed to properties within 500 feet of the
proposed development on April 12th and published in the Sun Current Newspaper on April 14th.
A first reading of the proposed ordinance rezoning to Planned Mixed Use occurred on April 26,
2022.
If approved at the May 10th meeting, Comprehensive Plan
amendments will be sent to the Metropolitan Council for review.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Approve the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and Planned Unit Development with
additional and/or modified conditions.
Deny the requests with findings that requirements are not met.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
Ryan Schwickert, MWF Properties LLC
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
PUD Ordinance - 7700 Pillsbury Ave Ordinance
PUD Resolution - 7700 Pillsbury Ave Resolution Letter
CPA Resolution - 7700 Pillsbury Ave Resolution Letter
Required Findings - 7700 Pillsbury Ave Backup Material
Project Narrative Backup Material
Proposed Rendering Backup Material
Proposed Civil and Landscape Plans Backup Material
Proposed Architectural Plans Backup Material
Proposed Lighting Plan Backup Material
Zoning Map Backup Material
2040 Comp Plan Designations Backup Material
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING;
AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY
CODE BY REZONING 7700 PILLSBURY AVENUE
SOUTH FROM MIXED USE - NEIGHBORHOOD
(MU-N) TO PLANNED MIXED USE (PMU)
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 8, Paragraph 1 of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code
(Mixed Use - Neighborhood) is repealed.
(1)M-16 (NE corner of 78th and Wentworth). Lot 4, Block 6, R.C.
Soen's Addition.
Sec. 2. Section 8, Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed
Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 11 to read as follows:
(11) M-16 (SE corner 77th and Pillsbury). Lot 4, Block 6, R.C. Soen’s
Addition.
Sec. 3. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the
Richfield City Charter.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of May,
2022.
Mary Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Kari Sinning, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AT 7700 PILLSBURY AVENUE SOUTH
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which
requests approval of a final development plan and conditional use permit for a planned
unit development to allow a four-story 55-unit multi-family residential building on the
parcel of land located at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue South (“subject property”), legally
described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 4, R.C. Soens Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public
hearing at its April 25, 2022 meeting, and recommended approval of the final
development plan and conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 500 feet
of the subject property on April 12, 2022 and published in the Sun Current newspaper
on April 14, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the final development plan and conditional use permit meet those
requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as specified in
Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staf f
Report No. ____; and
WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a
conditional use permit as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6
and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. ____; and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of a planned
unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1.The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth
above.
2.A planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit
are approved for a mixed-use development as described in City Council Report
No. ____, on the Subject Property legally described above.
3.The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional
use permit are subject to the following conditions:
Four vehicle parking stalls exceeding the maximum shall be shown on revised
plans and constructed as reserved stalls. The applicant may request approval
from the Community Development Directed with evidence that said stalls are
needed.
The applicant shall meet, at minimum, 50 percent of the Electric Vehicle
charging station requirements for both installed and EV capable.
At least 50 percent of the bicycle parking racks in the garage shall be
available generally to tenants and not tied for a vehicle parking stall lease s.
Final landscaping plans must be approved by the Community Development
Department prior to installation.
All parking spaces shall remain available year round.
All new utility service must be underground.
All utilities must be grouped away from public right-of-way and screened from
public view in accordance with Ordinance requirements in manner consistent
with the submitted landscaping plan.
The property owner is responsible for the ongoing maintenance and tending
of all landscaping in accordance with approved plans.
The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance
with all requirements detailed in the City’s Administrative Review Committee
Report dated March 24, 2022 and compliance with all other City and State
regulations.
Separate sign permits are required.
A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a
surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete.
Final stormwater management plan must be approved by the Public Works
Director. Infiltration not allowed in high-vulnerability wellhead protection area.
As-builts or $7,500 cash escrow must be submitted to the Public Works
Department prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy.
4.The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional
use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the
permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or
upon written request by the developer, the Council extends the expiration date
for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance,
Section 547.09, Subd. 9.
5.The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional
use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are
observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the
use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning
Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of
May 2022.
Mary Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Kari Sinning, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF 7700 PILLSBURY AVENUE SOUTH
TO “HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL”
WHEREAS, the City’s Comprehensive Plan provides a Guide Plan establishing
particular planning needs for specific segments of the City; and
WHEREAS, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates 7700 Pillsbury Avenue
South (“subject property”) as “Medium Density Residential”; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Guide Plan classification and determined
that it would be appropriate to designate the subject property as “High Density
Residential” as described in City Council Staff Report No. ____; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and
recommended approval of amending the Comprehensive Plan at its April 25, 2022
meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan on May 10, 2022; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota that the City’s Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to
designate 7700 Pillsbury Avenue South as “High Density Residential” contingent upon
the following:
1.The revision is submitted to and approved by the Metropolitan Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of
May, 2022.
Mary Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Kari Sinning, City Clerk
Required Findings
Part 1: Development proposals in the Mixed Use Districts shall be reviewed for
compliance with the following (537.01, Subd.3):
1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City’s development guides,
including the Comprehensive Plan and any redevelopment plans established for
the area. The City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Medium
Density Residential. This site was guided as High Density Residential in the 2009
Comprehensive Plan update reflective of a 2005 I-494 corridor study which
envisioned the area as a complete community that is compact, walkable, and
transit-friendly. Later in 2009, that plan was amended to re-guide this site within a
Medium-High Density residential guiding district. That amendment occu rred in
response to a specific development proposal consisting of 15-unit townhome.
The rationale at the time was that this site was not large enough to accommodate
a high density residential use. Since that time no medium density development
proposals have materialized for the site. The current 2040 Comprehensive Plan
carried forward that amended designation, albeit as the Medium Density
Residential designation since the residential designations were consolidated into
the current three.
The applicant is pursuing an amendment to re-guide the site as High Density
Residential. The High Density Residential future land use category is intended to
allow for multi-family uses at a density of 35 to 100 units per acre primarily
located in areas convenient to transportation, shopping and social services
necessary to support higher concentrations of people. The proposed 55-unit
multi-family building on the .94 acre site (exclusive of right-of-way easements)
would fall within the specified High Density guideline s. Additionally, this site
being within an area having high connectivity to transportation networks and
amenities aligns with the characteristics envisioned for High Density Residential .
The proposal is also consistent with the following goals and policies set forth by
the Comprehensive Plan.
Goal: Provide a full range of housing choices that meet residents’ needs at
every stage of their lives, and ensure a healthy balance of housing types that
meet the needs of a diverse population with diverse needs.
Policies:
Acknowledge and support the City’s allocation of the region’s need for
affordable housing.
Promote the development of a balanced housing stock that is available to
a range of income levels.
Give priority to projects that meeting the following criteria when
considering proposals for housing that include an affordable component:
o Located in proximity to public transportation, job centers, schools and
other amenities.
o Dispersed evenly throughout the City.
o Provides two and three-bedroom units (or larger).
Encourage development of areas where vehicle use is minimized.
2. Consistency with the regulations of the Mixed Use Districts as described by
Section 537 of the Code. The proposed development meets the intent of the
Mixed Use - Neighborhood District regulations. In keeping with the intent of the
Planned Unit Development regulations, deviations from the underlying MU-N
code requirements have been used to create a better overall development that
responds to the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal deviates from
MU-N regulations as follows:
75% Impervious Maximum. The proposed site improvements would consist of
84.1% impervious surfaces exceeding the Mixed Use - Neighborhood maximum
of 75%. For comparison, the impervious maximum of the other mixed use
subdistricts is 85%. The intent of this provision is ensuring there are sufficient
areas for drainage; and general appearances and enjoyment/recreation of green
spaces. Staff generally finds that the project sufficiently balances provision of
off-street parking (the primary driver of the excess beyond the maximum) and
impervious coverage. As noted in Part 3, #4 The Planning Commission
recommends that the development provide the excess stalls as proof of parking
which would marginally bring the site closer to conformance.
Five foot setback along 77th Street. The setback from the property line adjoining
77th Street ranges from about 3.1 to 7.4 feet; but exceeds five feet for all but
about 10% of the building on this side. This particular property line is considered
to be the side lot line. On corner lots the front is the shorter of the two street
abutting lot lines; meaning the front lot line is along Pillsbury Avenu e. The intent
of this setback is to provide adequate separation of buildings for light and air.
This being a street side, having a minimal portion that the building encroaching in
the setback staff finds that the intent is met.
Upper Story setbacks. A 20-foot upper story setback is required for buildings
above the third floor when across the street from residential property. The
building ranges from about 3.1 to 7.4 feet from the property line adjoining 77 th
Street, and does not step back on the fourth floor. The intent of this provision is
to prevent large monolithic wall faces opposite of residential property and along
transportation corridors. The proposed building elevations are well designed and
provide significant architectural detailing by way of changes in relief and variation
in materials such that staff finds the intent is met. Additionally, the development
provides street level patios for units on the first floor along 77th Street.
Departures from a number of provisions of the performance standards section of
the code are noted in Part 3 #4, below.
3. Creation of a design for structures and site features which promotes the
following:
i. An internal sense of order among the build ings and uses. The massing of the
proposed building is oriented towards 77th Street, generally away from the
commercial property to the south. The frontage along 77th Street is enhanced
by street level patios for first floor units; creating a pleasant pedestrian realm
in this corridor.
ii. The adequacy of vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways,
interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to
the public streets, width or interior drives and access points, g eneral interior
circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement
and amount of parking. The location of the building entrances, drive aisle and
parking lot, and walkways provide for orderly and safe accessibility to site that
will adequately serve residents arriving by all transportation modes.
iii. Energy conservation through the design of structures and the use of
landscape materials and site grading. The landscaping plan proposes
predominant use of native plantings generally requiring less water.
Additionally, the development is situated to take full advantage of the site’s
proximity to amenities and transit and bicycle networks which would reduce
reliance on automobiles.
iv. The minimization of adverse environmental effects on persons using the
development and adjacent properties. The applicant has indicated that impact
of the adjoining auto repair business to the west was investigated and
determined to be minimal in nature due to the distance of the exhaust
equipment. No other adverse impacts are anticipated.
Part 2: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application (542.09
Subd. 3):
1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. See above Part
1, #1
2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable
and unified environment within its own boundaries. See above – Part 1, #3.
3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the
guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified
by the design of the development. The development is in substantial compliance
with the intent of the guiding Mixed Use Neighborhood District. Departures from
MU-N district requirements are minimal as noted in Part 1, #2 above and the
proposal meets the intent of requirements.
4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets
or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the
development. The City’s Public Works, Engineering, and Recreation
Departments have reviewed the proposal and had no significant concerns except
as provided below.
The applicant has proposed that a significant portion of the site will drain to a low
point near the entrance to the underground parking garage; the stormwater will
be collected in an underground storage system and mechanically pumped out of
the site. Engineering staff opposed the original design submittal d ue to concerns
of system failure and potential flood damage. While the revised design does not
meet all City stormwater requirements, it does address many staff concerns, and
staff feels that the additional underground storage and design redundancies
planned by the developer will provide sufficient protection from flooding due to
system failure. Final design of the stormwater system is ongoing and must be
approved with building permit plans.
5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring
properties. The proposed improvements within the site and the conditions of the
resolution are designed to minimize any potential negative impacts on
neighboring properties. The massing of the building is positioned on the site
away from commercial property to the south. Parking in excess of the ordinance
specified maximum is indicative that off -street parking needs are addresses. The
City’s Public Works and Engineering staff is not concerned about traffic
circulation for vehicles entering or exiting the site. Accordingly, undue adverse
impacts are not anticipated.
6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are
sufficient to protect the public interest. The final development plan and
conditional use permit resolution establish conditions sufficient to protect the
public interest.
Part 3: All uses are conditional uses in the PMU District. The findings necessary to
issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (Subd. 547.09, Subd. 6):
1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the
City’s Comprehensive Plan. See above – Part 1, #1.
2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the
purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the
proposed use. The use is consistent with the intent of the Planned Mixed Use
District and the underlying Mixed Use Neighborhood District.
3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans
or urban design guidelines. See above – Part 1, #1
4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards
specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development is in substantial
compliance with performance standards. Deviation from Section 544 Code
requirements are requested as follows:
Maximum Parking. The zoning code establishes a parking maximum, which in
this instance is 110% of the minimum number of required stalls. Based on the
proposed 55 units, the minimum is 69 (1.25 per unit) and the maximum allowed
is 75. 83 total garage and surface parking stalls are proposed. Excluding the
ADA accessible stalls, the proposal would exceed the maximum by four. The
applicant has indicated that because the share of two and three-bedroom units a
1.5 per unit ratio is requested. The applicant based this request off of their
experience with similar properties that they operate. The code specifies that the
City should consider the amount of impervious coverage in evaluating whether to
grant excess beyond the maximum. Staff generally finds that the project
sufficiently balances parking and impervious coverage. The Planning
Commission recommendation included a condition that the development provide
the excess stalls as proof of parking.
Parking lot landscape islands. Five percent of the area encompassing the
parking lot is to consist of landscape islands, each being 10 feet by 10 feet and
180 square feet. Landscaping is provided around the perimeter of the parking
area instead of islands in order to maximize the number of off-street stalls. The
intent of this provision is to provide a well landscaped and attractive parking area.
The proposed landscaping plan generally provides an adequate amount of
plantings in the surrounding parking area.
Parking lot setback – The applicant has proposed a surface parking area with an
approximate two-foot setback to south property line; the Code requires a 5-ft.
setback. The intent of this provision is to provide adequate area to attractively
screen the parking lot and buffer adjacent properties from headlights and vehicle
noise. A significant portion of the surface stalls would be within area that would
be lower than the adjoin grade by way of retaining wall. This retaining wall would
provide the screening of highlights that the code is intended to provide.
Additionally, the commercial building to the south contains a significant blank wall
lessening the need for screening.
Fence height. An 8-foot fence is proposed along the west property line to screen
the adjoining rail corridor and commercial use. Ordinance specifies a 6-foot
maximum. Staff finds that the additional fence height is warranted to provi de the
additional screening it would provide.
5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental
facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. See above –
Part 2, #4.
6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or
welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health, safety
and welfare from undue adverse impacts.
7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. See above – Part 1,
#1.
8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code
for the granting of such conditional use permit . There are no specific conditions
set by the zoning code for multi-family uses in the underlying Mixed Use –
Neighborhood zoning district. As noted herein, the proposal would meet the
general conditions for granting of Conditional Use Permit approval. This
requirement is met.
Richfield Flats
Planning & Zoning Application Project Narrative
March 15, 2022
Legal Description of Site: Lot 6, Block 4, “R. C. Soens Addition”
Description of the Project:
The proposed project will be 55 units of affordable housing restricted to residents earning up to 60% of
the Area Median Income (AMI). Five (5) of the units will be restricted to residents earning up to 50% of
the AMI. Two (2) of the units will be restricted to 30% AMI. There will be a mix of 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom
units in four levels of apartments over one level of underground parking. Surface parking will also be
provided. All apartments will have in-unit laundry equipment. Community spaces include a Tot Lot,
Fitness Center, Mailroom, Package receiving room, Study, Community Room, and Exterior Patio. Trash
and recycling will be handled internally via chutes to an interior, garage level trash room. There will be a
staffed Leasing/ Management Office with on-site maintenance, and secure fob entry system.
We believe high density housing is an appropriate use for this site due to the location along a main
arterial roadway, 77th St, it being within walking distance of a bus route, and also the proximity to I494
and the surrounding commercial uses. In speaking with the HRA and City of Richfield, we found that it
was important to incorporate “family housing” components and other components to this project. It is a
tight site, but we were able to accommodate the following requests from the City and HRA:
*Added exterior patios to some of the north-facing units on the first floor to connect residents to the
outside.
*Added French balconies on a number of south-facing units to connect residents to the outside.
*Community Room now includes an exterior patio for additional use for residents.
*Added four “study/lounge” areas on 3 floors of the building for residents to utilize.
*Added 15 3-bedroom units to accommodate larger families.
*Increased green space/tot lot area as much as possible.
*More bike racks.
Anticipated Completion Date: December 2023
Impact on Adjacent Properties:
The site is bounded by roads on two sides, railroad on one side and a storage facility on the fourth side.
Accordingly, the proposed development will have no impact on the adjacent properties. However, we
do expect the residents to bring additional business to nearby shops and services, some of which are
only a few blocks away.
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/2248523JORDAN M. LOCKMANLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.4/11/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............RICHFIELD FLATSRICHFIELD, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422CONTACT: DAVID KNAEBLE763-234-7523SURVEYOR:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1L1.0CIVIL DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANC5.3CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRL1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILSARCHITECT:MILLER HANSON ARCHITECTS218 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 230MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401612-332-5420CIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422CONTACT: RORY SYNSTELIEN612-615-0060ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIESTHAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.MWF PROPERTIES7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTHMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423SITE LOCATIONC5.2CIVIL DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSP.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WOwner: Two S Properties IncExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkConcrete DrivewayChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad Track Address: 7700 Pillsbury Avenue SP.I.D. 3402824340073MINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.Bituminous Parking LotNO BUILDINGS[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
S00°09'23"W 210.22S89°53'12"W 273.62N00°08'04"E 210.24 N89°53'27"E 273.70[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner
S89°53'27"W 273.6812" RCP[9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCATCH BASINREMOVE EXISTINGCATCH BASINREMOVE EXISTINGSTORM SEWER LINESEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTTO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGEEXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALK TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.EXISTING STREETLIGHTS TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING SHED TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING POWER POLE ANDPOWER LINES TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEEXISTING ADJACENTBUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEREMOVE EXISTING UTILITY.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IF THISIS AN EXISTING WELL. IF IT IS AWELL, SEAL AND ABANDON PERMN WELL CODE.REMOVE EXISTINGBOLLARDSREMOVE ALL EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES(THAT ARE NOT TO BE REUSED) PER PRIVATEUTILITY COMPANY AND CITY STANDARDSCONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT &REMOVE PUBLIC PVMTS., CURBS, ANDWALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK,REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND, ANDTO CITY STANDARD AND APPROVALREMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.SAWCUT AND REMOVEEXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALKSAWCUT AND REMOVEEXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALKREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE DRIVEREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE DRIVEEXISTING SIGNS TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ORREMOVE AND REINSTALL, TYP.EXISTING OVERHEAD WIRESAND UTILITY POLES TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING SIGNS TOREMAIN PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING UTILITY BOX, TOREMAIN PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING GUY WIRE TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING CHAIN LINKFENCE TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEEXISTING CATCH BASIN TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGEEXISTING GAS METERTO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGEREMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.EXISTING TREE TOREMAINSAWCUT AND REMOVEEXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALKEXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BEREMOVED AND REINSTALLED ASNECESSARY FOR STORM SEWERINSTALLATIONREMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/2201" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:CITY OF RICHFIELD REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:DLTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'DRIPLINE WIDTHFURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ASSHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA.POSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS11.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSEDPAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCALREGULATIONS.7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITHPROPOSED PLANS.8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHINTHE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTIONSHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITYREQUIREMENTS. FOR ANY WORK ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THEADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK.11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMALWORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. ATNO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVALBY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORMTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS,AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED INA MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TOLGU.19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
T7xH7xBack Extension
R
3
.
0
'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'24.0'19.0'19.0'9.0'TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSB612 C&G, TYP.PVMT. MARKINGS, TYPNOPARKINGCONC. WALKREPLACE EXISTING CURB CUT WITH NEWCURB TO MATCH EXISTING ON EITHER SIDEOF EXISTING CURB CUT6.0'17.0'18.4'7.4'
7.5'CONC. WALK2.0'STNPNPUTILITY CONC. PAD -COORDINATE LAYOUT & DIM.W/UTILITY CO.INSURE PAD IS MIN. 4" ABOVEADJ. GRADECONC. UTILITYPAD19.0'TYP.RETAINING WALL ANDRAILING DESIGNED BYOTHERS, SEE ARCH.PLAN FOR DETAILS3 BIKE RACKS (6SPACES), SEE ARCHPLAN FOR DETAILS2213CONC. DRIVEWAY PERCITY STANDARDSCONSTRUCT PED RAMP PERMNDOT STANDARDSCAST IN PLACERETAINING WALL ANDRAILING DESIGNED BYOTHERS, SEE ARCH.PLAN FOR DETAILSACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSCONC. WALKCONC. WALK ,TIE INTOEXISTING WALKBENCH, SEE ARCHPLAN FOR DETAILSCONTRACTOR TOPROVIDE SHEETPILING ASNECESSARY TOPROTECT ADJACENTPROPERTIESCONC. STEPS ANDRAILING, COORD.W/ARCH.TOT LOT,SEE ARCH.FENCE AROUNDTOT LOT, SEEARCH.TRASH RECEPTACLE& BENCH, TYP. BOLTTO CONCRETE SLABRIBBON CURBRETAINING WALL AND RAILING DESIGNEDBY OTHERS, SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR DETAILSMONOLITHIC CONC.CURB5.0'
5.7'9.5'
5.9'9.1'3.1'NPTOTOREPLACE EXISTING CURB CUT WITH NEWCURB TO MATCH EXISTING ON EITHER SIDEOF EXISTING CURB CUTCONC. WALK, TIE INTOEXISTING WALKR48.0'
24.0'
R72.0'
R30.0'R3.0'PATIO,SEE ARCH.CANOPY,SEE ARCH.R15.0'R
1
5
.
0
'6.0'HEAVY DUTYBITUMINOUSLIGHT DUTYBITUMINOUSLIGHT DUTYBITUMINOUS9' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPER1.0'3.6'11.0'5.0'6.3'7.0'THICKENED EDGE CONCRETESTOOP, SEE GRADING30'X30' SIGHTTRIANGLES2.4'2.4'2.1'2.1'2.3'PROVIDESURMOUNTABLE CURBIN THIS LOCATION16.0'8.2'2.1'2.1'2.1'P.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WOwner: Two S Properties IncExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad TrackMINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner [9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY OF RICHFIELD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.ENGINEERING MUST BE PRESENT TO INSPECT ALL CONCRETE FORMS WITHIN ROWPRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR. MINIMUM 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED.2.TRAFFIC SIGNS AND DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED, DIRECTING TRAFFIC WITHIN THEAREA AND TRAFFIC ENTERING OR LEAVING THE AREA PER THE MMUTCD.3.ALL SQUARE HAND HOLE CASTINGS IN REPLACED SIDEWALK WILL NEED TO BEREPLACED WITH NEW ROUND HAND HOLE CASTINGS APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY4.STREET SIGNS IN THE PUBLIC ROW TO MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS, SIGNS LOCATEDIN CONCRETE SHALL BE IN 4" SLEEVES OR MOUNTED TO STREETLIGHTS.COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR APPROVED LOCATION OF SIGNS.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDEPARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO.SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OF-SITETRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN EXTERIOR TRASHAREA AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO.WEEKLY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONTDOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS).1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ARIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGAND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFFOOTING MATERIALS.6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETEFOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCEWITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TOTHE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BEWHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIORTO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENTSECTIONS.18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THEDRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHINPRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAIL
T7xH7xBack Extension CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOPARKING30'X30' SIGHTTRIANGLESP.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WOwner: Two S Properties IncExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad TrackMINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
S00°09'23"W 210.22S89°53'12"W 273.62N00°08'04"E 210.24 N89°53'27"E 273.70[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner
S89°53'27"W 273.68[9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSCITY OF RICHFIELD GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS, (FFE, LFE, GFE), PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BY CROSS CHECKING WITH ARCHITECTURAL,STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ELEVATIONS FOR EQUIVALENT "100" ELEVATIONS. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND INSTALLATION OF ANYFOOTING MATERIALS. VERIFICATION OF THIS COORDINATION SHALL BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING BY CIVIL, SURVEYOR, ARCHITECTURAL,STRUCTURAL AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.3.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION,EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BECOMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS ANDINSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.5.ANY ELEMENTS OF AN EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM AND RELATED EXCAVATIONS THAT FALL WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WILL REQUIRE A “RIGHTOF WAY EXCAVATION PERMIT”. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AQUIRING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF APPLICABLE6.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.7.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.8.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9.GRADES OF WALKS ARE DESIGNED AS SHOWN WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. CONTRACTOR TOENSURE GRADES FOLLOW THESE REQUIREMENTS IN THE FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION.10.PROPOSED SITE SLOPES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO NOT EXCEED 3:1. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE GRADES ON SITE FOLLOW THESE REQUIREMENTS INTHE FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION.11.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED ANDENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISHPROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.13.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREASELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.14.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED INEMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF ISTO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.15.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENTTRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTSWHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BEPROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFICOR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BERESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.16.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTIONOF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINEWHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTIONSYSTEMS.17. TOLERANCES17.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THEPRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.17.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOTBELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.17.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESSDIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.17.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.18.MAINTENANCE18.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.18.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THECONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDEDAND MULCHED.18.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTORSHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.
P.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WOwner: Two S Properties IncExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad TrackMINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner [9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"T7xH7xBack Extension CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOPARKING30'X30' SIGHTTRIANGLESPROPOSED GATEVALVE AND VALVE BOXMAKE WET TAPCONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" WATERMAIN, COORD. WITHCITYSTUB SANITARY TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=835.32COORD. W/MECH'LMAKE CONNECTION TOEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREX IE =834.75 (FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE (W)=834.92COORDINATE WITH CITY40 LF 8" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE@1.0%6" COMBINED DIPWATER SERVICE ANDVALVE, STUB TO WITHIN5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LCONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT &REMOVE PUBLIC PVMTS., CURBS, ANDWALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK,REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND, ANDTO CITY STANDARD AND APPROVALCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALLTHE UTILITY SERVICES WITH BOTH THECIVIL AND MECHANICAL PLANS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.SEE DEMO PLANFOR ALL EXISTINGUTILITY REMOVALINFORMATIONFIRE DEPARTMENTCONNECTION,COORD. W/MECH'LACCESS RISER,TYP.CB 1RIM=838.62IE=834.62MH 3RIM=847.95IE=844.04MH 4RIM=847.87IE=843.58PUMP STATION 160" DIA. BASE48" DIA. RISERRE=838.83IE (18"-E) =828.33FORCE MAIN IE=834.4260" DIA BOT (INSIDE)=825.3360" DIA TOP (LID)=836.92CONTRACTOR TO COORD.FINAL PUMP STATION DESIGNPEAK PUMP FLOW= 0.50 CFSMH 2RIM=848.45IE=845.0324" NYLOPLASTWITH 24" SOLIDGRATE4 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%46 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%99 LF 12" PVC SCH40STORM @ 1.00%21 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%30 LF 2-4" SCH 40 PVCFORCE MAINS,INSULATE. MAINTAIN 4'COVER OVER PIPE. 1PIPE FOR EACH PUMP.INSTALL 2-4" TIDEFLEXCHECKMATE CHECKVALVES AT PVCOUTLETSEX. CBEX. RIM=847.14(REC.)EX. IE(N)=843.44PROP. IE(S)=843.54CORE DRILL NEWCONNECTION TOEXISTING CB11 LF 12'' PVC SCH40STORM @ 2.00%12'' STORM SERVICE, STUBTO WITHIN 5' OF BUILDINGCOORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=843.80BLDG IE=843.90UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE 1A90'' PERFORATED CMP PIPEPROVIDED STORAGE=9492 CFREQ. STORAGE=9409 CF (100-YR FLOW VOL.FROM DRAINAGE AREA)12" SIDE & END STONE, 36" STONE SEPARATION,6" STONE COVER AND BASESTONE IE=828.00PIPE IE=828.50OUTLET IE W = 828.50INLET IE W = 834.20FOOTPRINT=78'x20'100-YR HWL=932.39TOP OF PIPE=936.00TOP OF ROCK=936.5017 LF 18" CMPSTORM @ 1.00%INLET IE = 834.20OUTLET IE = 828.50Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF RICHFIELD UTILITY NOTES:1.WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES INCLUDING HYDRANTS, CLEAN-OUTS, ANDSHUTOFF VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS.01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLE1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.4.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINEINSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6.ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEFINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEETPER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.16.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BESAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOSIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROADCLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALLOWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFICLOADING.22.2CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETIONOF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUSTBE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEEPLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.
P.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad TrackMINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
S00°09'23"W 210.22S89°53'12"W 273.62N00°08'04"E 210.24 N89°53'27"E 273.70[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner
S89°53'27"W 273.68[9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"T7xH7xBack Extension CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOPARKING30'X30' SIGHTTRIANGLES7 - PD215 - SB10 - EM8 - NK7 - HG23 - LK8 - HR13 - AT212 - ST9 - CA21 - EK4 - DL20' BUILDING TREE CLEARANCE SETBACK3 - QEEDGING W/ROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDEDGING W/ROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDSOD & TOPSOILSOD & TOPSOILSOD & TOPSOILROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDSOD & TOPSOILEDGING W/ROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDSOD & TOPSOIL2 - GIROCK MULCH PLANTING BEDEDGING - BACK OF CURB TO WALL10 - PN32.0'28.0'37.5'3 - DL24 - PN15 - CK9 - MD11 - SL7 - SL7 - SL7 - SL7 - SL7 - SL47 - CK11 - PN18 - PH19 - PH21 - PN28 - PH12 - PN7 - PSG2 - JM3 - BAJ23 - JM8 - EMTREESQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSPOLLINATOR FRIENDLYPSG7Princeton Sentry Gingko / Ginkgo biloba `Princeton Sentry`2.5" Cal. B&BNOT NATIVENGI2Skyline Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Skycole' TM3.5" CAL. B&BNATIVE CULTIVAREK1Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`2.5" Cal. B&BNATIVE CULTIVARYQE3Crimson Spire Oak / Quercus x 'Crimschmidt' TM2.5" CAL. B&BNOT NATIVESHRUBSQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSPOLLINATOR FRIENDLYCA29Arctic Fire Dogwood / Cornus sericea `Arctic Fire`#5 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARYDL7Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera#5 CONTNATIVEYHG27Gemo St. Johnswort / Hypericum kalmianum `Gemo`#2 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARYJM5Mint Julep Juniper / Juniperus chinensis `Mint Julep`#5 CONTNOT NATIVENBAJ23Blue Arrow Juniper / Juniperus Scopulorum `Blue Arrow`#5 CONTNOT NATIVENMD9Bee Balm / Monarda didyma---PD27Diabolo Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius `Diabolo`#5 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARYST12Birchleaf Spirea / Spiraea betulifolia `Tor`#5 CONTNOT NATIVEYGRASSESQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSPOLLINATOR FRIENDLYCK62Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`#1 CONTPH66Heavy Metal Switch Grass / Panicum virgatum `Heavy Metal`#1 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARPN79Northwind Switch Grass / Panicum virgatum `North Wind`#1 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARSL46Little Bluestem Grass / Schizachyrium scoparium#1 CONTNATIVESB15Blue Heaven Little Bluestem / Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven`#1 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARPERENNIALSQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSPOLLINATOR FRIENDLYAT213Summer Beauty Globe Lily / Allium tanguticum `Summer Beauty`#1 CONTNOT NATIVEYEM18Magnus Purple Coneflower / Echinacea purpurea `Magnus`#1 CONTNOT NATIVEYHR8Daylily / Hemerocallis x `Rosy Returns`#1 CONTNOT NATIVEYLK3Kobold Blazingstar / Liatris spicata `Kobold`#1 CONTNATIVE CULTIVARYNK8Kit Kat Nepeta / Nepeta x faassenii `Kit Kat`#1 CONTNOT NATIVEYPLANT SCHEDULEGROUND COVERSCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZEBlue Grass Based / SodCommercial grade,locally grown, "Big Roll"preferredSodGROUNDCOVER SCHEDULEREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248523JORDAN M. LOCKMANLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.4/11/22LANDSCAPE NOTES:PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIESAND PLANTING SIZESLEGENDMULCH SCHEDULEAREAMULCH TYPEEDGINGFABRICREMARKSTREE RINGS4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDARNONOSEE DETAIL SHT. L1.1PLANTING BEDS3" DEPTH, SCREENED 1-1/2" ROCK MULCHVARIES - SEELANDSCAPEPLANYESSEE DETAIL SHT. L1.1MAINT. STRIP AT BUILDING FOUNDATION3" DEPTH, SCREENED 1-1/2" ROCK MULCHVARIES - SEELANDSCAPEPLANYESSEE DETAIL SHT. L1.1NOTE: COORDINATE ALL MULCH AND PLANTING BED MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, PROVIDE SAMPLES AND SHOP DRAWINGS/PHOTOS/DATA SHEETS OF ALLMATERIALSEDGING - SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE, 4" DEPTH ALUMINUM,BLACK OR DARK GREEN IN COLOR, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS,STAKES, & ALL APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF.INSTRUC./SPECS.01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS)OF CRUSHED AND SCREENED 1-1/2" ROCK MULCH.3.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALLMULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROMDISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OFACCEPTANCE PERIOD.5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THEPLAN SHALL GOVERN.6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPEMATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THEDRAWINGS.8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTORSHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.12.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATEWATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PERWEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSP.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WOwner: Two S Properties IncExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkConcrete DrivewayChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad Track Address: 7700 Pillsbury Avenue SP.I.D. 3402824340073MINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.Bituminous Parking LotNO BUILDINGS[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
S00°09'23"W 210.22S89°53'12"W 273.62N00°08'04"E 210.24 N89°53'27"E 273.70[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner
S89°53'27"W 273.6812" RCP[9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS............01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF RICHFIELD EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOTREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITHNPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.
T7xH7xBack Extension CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOPARKING30'X30' SIGHTTRIANGLESP.I.D. 3402824340053Address: 200 78th St WOwner: Two S Properties IncExisting Public Storage BuildingExistingShed77TH ST W(A Public R/W)PILLSBURY AVE S
(A Public R/W)Concrete SidewalkChain Link Fence[B] Chain Link FenceCrosses Property Line[13] Railroad TrackMINNEAPOLIS, NORTHFIELD & SOUTHERN RY.[10] Drainage & Utility EasementPer Doc. No. 220683
S00°09'23"W 210.22S89°53'12"W 273.62N00°08'04"E 210.24 N89°53'27"E 273.70[11] Roadway & UtilityEasement Per Doc. No.2379396P.I.D. 3402824210004Address: 7100 Pleasant Ave SOwner: Soo Line Rr Co AccessMedianAccess
9" VSP 9" VSP8" PVC36" RCP36" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP
8" CIP[A] Found 1/2 Inch
Iron Pipe 0.7' N of Corner
[A] Found 1/2 InchIron Pipe 0.9' N of Corner
S89°53'27"W 273.68[9] Railroad Easement per Deed inBook 671, Page 219 as Doc. No. 549274as Shown on the Plat of "R.C. SOENS ADDITION"INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cRICHFIELD FLATS
7700 PILLSBURY AVE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423
7645 LYNDALE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423
MWF PROPERTIES
PROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:214844/11/22CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/15/22CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:DK, FJ, JLDK..............202248776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.4/11/22REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS............01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF RICHFIELD EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOTREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: MARCH 15, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership55 DWELLING UNITS:
·13 1BR Units
·27 2BR Units
·15 3BR Units
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: APRIL 11, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
T7x
H7x
Back Extension
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: MARCH 15, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: MARCH 15, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: MARCH 15, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: MARCH 15, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
7
7
0
0
R I C H F I E L D F L A T S
000-000-0000
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: APRIL 11, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTANAME: KENT SIMONDATE: APRIL 11, 2022 NO. 16390 2022 Miller Hanson Architects
COMM #1903
Richfield Flats,Limited Partnership
NO
PARKING
PRELIMINARY SET
INTERSTATE 494
77TH ST W
77TH S T W FRONTAGE RD
7 8 T H S T W PILLSBURY AVEWENTWORTH AVEPILLSBURY AVEWENTWORTH AVEGRAND AVE SPLEASANT AVENI CO LLET AVE TO W B I494
MR-2
MU-NMU-NMU-N
MU-R
PMR
PMU
R
500ftNotificationBuffer
±
Surrounding Zoning
0 200 400100ft
I:\GIS\Community Development\Case Maps\2022\7700 Pillsbury Ave - Zoning.mxd
Zoning Districts
R Single-Family
R-1 Low-DensitySingle-Family
MR-1 Two-Family
PMR Planned Multi-Family
MR-2 Multi-Family
MR-2/CAC Multi-Fam+ Cedar Overlay
MR-3 High-DensityMulti-Family
SO Service Office
C-1 CommunityCommercial
C-2 GeneralCommercial
PC-2 Planned GeneralCommercial
PMU Planned MixedUse
MU-C Mixed Use-Community
MU-C/CAC Mixed Use+ Cedar Overlay
MU-C/PAC Mixed Use+ Penn Overlay
MU-N Mixed Use-Neighborhood
MU-R Mixed Use-Regional
I Industrial
Case No: 22-CP-01, 22-PUD-01, 22-FDP-01, 22-RZN-01
7700 Pillsbury Avenue
INTERSTATE 494
77TH ST W
77TH S T W FRONTAGE RD
7 8 T H S T W PILLSBURY AVEWENTWORTH AVEPILLSBURY AVEWENTWORTH AVEGRAND AVE SPLEASANT AVENI CO LLET AVE TO W B I494
±
2040 Comprehensive Plan Designations
I:\GIS\Community Development\Case Maps\2022\7700 Pillsbury Ave - PLU.mxd
2040 Planned Land Use
Mixed Use
Regional Commercial
Community Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
High Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Park
Quasi-Public
Right-of-Way (ROW)
7700 Pillsbury Avenue
0 200 400100ft
Subject Site
Re-guide fromMDR to HDR
AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS
AGENDA ITEM #5.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 77
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
5/10/2022
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R
RE V IE W:
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector J odi B ursheim, Interim F inance
D irector
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez
5/3/2022
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider a resolution providing for the sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The Series 2022A bonds will accomplish the following:
Provide funding for the 65th Street reconstruction project with a $5,410,000 par bond. Debt service for this
portion of the bond issue will be provided by an estimated annual debt service tax levy of $398,000. The
estimated increase in taxes for a residential property valued at $300,000 is $29.38.
Provide funding for the 65th Street utility improvements with a $4,590,000 par bond. Debt service for this
portion of the bond issue, $312,000, will be provided by water revenues.
I n fall 2021, City Council approved the use of bonds in the amount of $11 million ($6.5 Street
Reconstruction/$4.5M Utility) to finance the project. I n order to keep the bond sale bank-qualified the debt
would need to occur in two sales over two years (2022 and 2023) or one issue at $11.4M that would not be
bank-qualified resulting in higher interest rates. W ith the current economic uncertainty and rising interest
rates, staff recommend using $1.1M in American Rescue Plan (A RPA) funding to reduce the bond issue to
the bank-qualified threshold of $10M. Our financial advisors, Ehlers, I nc, estimate that using $1.1M in A RPA
funds to reduce the bond size will result in the following savings:
Reduce total interest costs by $903,600.
Reduce the annual debt levy from $508,000 annually to $398,000.
Reduce the estimated tax impact on the average $300,000 home from a $36.39 increase to $29.38.
Council recently identified sustainable infrastructure as a strategic priority and sustainable funding as a
desired outcome in the draft strategic plan. We do not currently have a sustainable funding plan for all of our
operating and infrastructure needs for the next 5 years. Using a significant portion of A RPA to help address
current needs as opposed to funding additional projects is fiscally responsible.
We still have $2.3M in A RPA funds to designate as part of the 2023 budget process to make progress on
other strategic priorities.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Approve the attached resolution providing for the sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation
Bonds, Series 2022A.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Consistent with City Council direction, the Capital Improvement Plan (C IP), and the City's
Comprehensive Plan, staff has been working towards the construction of the 65th Street
Reconstruction Project over the past few years.
The 65th Street Reconstruction Project consists of a full road reconstruction to replace existing
deteriorating infrastructure along the 65th Street corridor between 66th Street/Rae Drive and Nicollet
Avenue. I n addition to this road reconstruct, other improvements along this corridor include pedestrian
improvements on Lyndale Avenue and the implementation of new trail along Richfield Lake on the North
side of 65th Street. New stormwater infrastructure will be installed to address historical flooding issues in
the area, and to accommodate any additional runoff that may occur from the redevelopment of the HUB
property. The existing 18-inch watermain that runs through the HUB property will be relocated to 65th
Street to allow for redevelopment of the HUB property.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The 65th Street Reconstruction Project is consistent with the following approved plans:
5 Year Street Reconstruction
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7 - Transportation)
Pedestrian Master Plan
Bicycle Master Plan
Street Reconstruction Guiding Principles
Complete Streets Policy
Arterial Roads Study
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
T he sale of the bonds at this time will allow the City to remain on schedule to award the contract
and begin construction.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
65th St Project
The estimated total cost of the 65th St Reconstruction project is $12.9M.
The engineer's estimate for the cost of construction at the time of bidding was $9 million.
The roughly $1.2 million difference between the lowest base bid and the engineer's estimate
is likely due to significant and rapid inflation, increased material costs, and reduced
material availability. I t is anticipated that costs will not decrease in the near future, and
would likely increase if the project were to be delayed.
$11 million in bonding was previously approved for the project. Staff recommend using $1.1M in
A RPA funds to reduce the bond to a bank-qualified $10M.
$1.8 million in Municipal State Aid (MS A) has been identified to cover the additional costs.
Total project funding:
Street Reconstruction Bonds: $5.4 million
Utility Bonds: $4.6 million
Municipal State Aid: $1.8 million
A RPA: $1.1 million
The debt service on the bonds will be provided from an average annual debt service tax levy
which is estimated to be $398,000.
T he estimated annual increase in taxes due to the issuance of these bonds for a residential
property valued at $300,000 will be approximately $29.38.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Legal Counsel has reviewed the Pre-Sale report and the attached resolution.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
The Council can choose not to use $1.1M in A RPA to reduce the size of the bond to a bank-qualified $10M.
The $11,150,000 bond would be an estimated annual debt service tax levy of $508,000. T he estimated
increase in taxes for a residential property valued at $300,000 would be $36.39.
T he alternate motion would be as follows and the alternate resolution is attached:
By Motion: Approve the attached resolution providing for the sale of $11,150,000 General Obligation
Bonds, Series 2022A.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Rebecca Kurtz, Ehlers, I nc.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
B Q and non-B Q C omparison C over Memo
P resale report for 2022A B ond C over Memo
Resolution for $10M B Q bond issue C over Memo
Resolution for $11.150M non-B Q bond issue C over Memo
City of Richfield, MN
Scenario Comparisons for Street Reconstruction and Utility Project
One Issue One Issue
BQ Non‐BQ
Sources of Funds Series 2022A Series 2022A
Par Amount of Bonds 10,000,000 11,150,000
MSA Funds 1,760,470 1,760,470
City Contribution / Cash / ARPA 1,102,000 ‐
TOTAL 12,862,470 12,910,470
Uses of Funds
Underwriter Discount 100,000 111,500
Cost of Issuance 95,000 100,500
Capitalized Interest Fund 105,110 135,387
Construction Fund 12,560,470 12,560,470
Rounding Amount 1,890 2,613
TOTAL 12,862,470 12,910,470
Term (Years)20 20
Interest Rate Assumption Current BQ Rates + 0.50% Current NBQ Rates + 0.50%
True Interest Cost 3.547% 3.768%
Interest Amount 4,202,242 5,105,839
Average Annual Debt Service 710,112 816,060
Est. Debt Levy 398,000 508,000
Tax Impact for $300,000 home 29.38 36.39
•
•
•
•
•
City of Richfield, Minnesota
$10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A
Issue Summary - City Cash Contribution
Assumes Current Market BQ "AA+" Rates plus 50bps
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 06/30/2022 | Delivered 06/30/2022
Street
Reconstruction Utility
Issue
Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $5,410,000.00 $4,590,000.00 $10,000,000.00
Planned Issuer Equity contribution 1,102,000.00 -1,102,000.00
MSA Funds 477,756.78 1,282,713.22 1,760,470.00
Total Sources $6,989,756.78 $5,872,713.22 $12,862,470.00
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%)54,100.00 45,900.00 100,000.00
Costs of Issuance 51,395.00 43,605.00 95,000.00
Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 105,110.24 -105,110.24
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 6,777,756.78 5,782,713.22 12,560,470.00
Rounding Amount 1,394.76 495.00 1,889.76
Total Uses $6,989,756.78 $5,872,713.22 $12,862,470.00
Series 2022A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 5/ 6/2022 | 7:54 AM
City of Richfield, Minnesota
$10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A
Issue Summary - City Cash Contribution
Assumes Current Market BQ "AA+" Rates plus 50bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
06/30/2022 -----
02/01/2023 --194,272.39 194,272.39 194,272.39
08/01/2023 --165,730.00 165,730.00 -
02/01/2024 370,000.00 2.650%165,730.00 535,730.00 701,460.00
08/01/2024 --160,827.50 160,827.50 -
02/01/2025 380,000.00 2.750%160,827.50 540,827.50 701,655.00
08/01/2025 --155,602.50 155,602.50 -
02/01/2026 390,000.00 2.850%155,602.50 545,602.50 701,205.00
08/01/2026 --150,045.00 150,045.00 -
02/01/2027 400,000.00 2.900%150,045.00 550,045.00 700,090.00
08/01/2027 --144,245.00 144,245.00 -
02/01/2028 415,000.00 3.000%144,245.00 559,245.00 703,490.00
08/01/2028 --138,020.00 138,020.00 -
02/01/2029 425,000.00 3.050%138,020.00 563,020.00 701,040.00
08/01/2029 --131,538.75 131,538.75 -
02/01/2030 435,000.00 3.100%131,538.75 566,538.75 698,077.50
08/01/2030 --124,796.25 124,796.25 -
02/01/2031 450,000.00 3.150%124,796.25 574,796.25 699,592.50
08/01/2031 --117,708.75 117,708.75 -
02/01/2032 465,000.00 3.200%117,708.75 582,708.75 700,417.50
08/01/2032 --110,268.75 110,268.75 -
02/01/2033 480,000.00 3.250%110,268.75 590,268.75 700,537.50
08/01/2033 --102,468.75 102,468.75 -
02/01/2034 495,000.00 3.300%102,468.75 597,468.75 699,937.50
08/01/2034 --94,301.25 94,301.25 -
02/01/2035 510,000.00 3.350%94,301.25 604,301.25 698,602.50
08/01/2035 --85,758.75 85,758.75 -
02/01/2036 525,000.00 3.400%85,758.75 610,758.75 696,517.50
08/01/2036 --76,833.75 76,833.75 -
02/01/2037 545,000.00 3.450%76,833.75 621,833.75 698,667.50
08/01/2037 --67,432.50 67,432.50 -
02/01/2038 565,000.00 3.500%67,432.50 632,432.50 699,865.00
08/01/2038 --57,545.00 57,545.00 -
02/01/2039 585,000.00 3.550%57,545.00 642,545.00 700,090.00
08/01/2039 --47,161.25 47,161.25 -
02/01/2040 605,000.00 3.600%47,161.25 652,161.25 699,322.50
08/01/2040 --36,271.25 36,271.25 -
02/01/2041 630,000.00 3.650%36,271.25 666,271.25 702,542.50
08/01/2041 --24,773.75 24,773.75 -
02/01/2042 655,000.00 3.700%24,773.75 679,773.75 704,547.50
08/01/2042 --12,656.25 12,656.25 -
02/01/2043 675,000.00 3.750%12,656.25 687,656.25 700,312.50
Total $10,000,000.00 -$4,202,242.39 $14,202,242.39 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $121,441.11
Average Life 12.144 Years
Average Coupon 3.4603129%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.5426573%
True Interest Cost (TIC)3.5471560%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.4414981%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)3.6489386%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 3.4603129%
Weighted Average Maturity 12.144 Years
Series 2022A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 5/ 6/2022 | 7:54 AM
City of Richfield, Minnesota
$10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A
Issue Summary - City Cash Contribution
Assumes Current Market BQ "AA+" Rates plus 50bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF Net New D/S 105% of Total Utilty Revenue Levy/ (Surplus)
02/01/2023 --194,272.39 194,272.39 (105,110.24)89,162.15 93,620.26 93,620.26 -
02/01/2024 370,000.00 2.650%331,460.00 701,460.00 -701,460.00 736,533.00 338,231.25 398,301.75
02/01/2025 380,000.00 2.750%321,655.00 701,655.00 -701,655.00 736,737.75 338,751.00 397,986.75
02/01/2026 390,000.00 2.850%311,205.00 701,205.00 -701,205.00 736,265.25 338,947.88 397,317.38
02/01/2027 400,000.00 2.900%300,090.00 700,090.00 -700,090.00 735,094.50 338,811.38 396,283.13
02/01/2028 415,000.00 3.000%288,490.00 703,490.00 -703,490.00 738,664.50 338,428.13 400,236.38
02/01/2029 425,000.00 3.050%276,040.00 701,040.00 -701,040.00 736,092.00 337,693.13 398,398.88
02/01/2030 435,000.00 3.100%263,077.50 698,077.50 -698,077.50 732,981.38 336,698.25 396,283.13
02/01/2031 450,000.00 3.150%249,592.50 699,592.50 -699,592.50 734,572.13 335,438.25 399,133.88
02/01/2032 465,000.00 3.200%235,417.50 700,417.50 -700,417.50 735,438.38 339,157.88 396,280.50
02/01/2033 480,000.00 3.250%220,537.50 700,537.50 -700,537.50 735,564.38 337,183.88 398,380.50
02/01/2034 495,000.00 3.300%204,937.50 699,937.50 -699,937.50 734,934.38 334,926.38 400,008.00
02/01/2035 510,000.00 3.350%188,602.50 698,602.50 -698,602.50 733,532.63 337,630.13 395,902.50
02/01/2036 525,000.00 3.400%171,517.50 696,517.50 -696,517.50 731,343.38 334,614.00 396,729.38
02/01/2037 545,000.00 3.450%153,667.50 698,667.50 -698,667.50 733,600.88 336,546.00 397,054.88
02/01/2038 565,000.00 3.500%134,865.00 699,865.00 -699,865.00 734,858.25 337,989.75 396,868.50
02/01/2039 585,000.00 3.550%115,090.00 700,090.00 -700,090.00 735,094.50 338,934.75 396,159.75
02/01/2040 605,000.00 3.600%94,322.50 699,322.50 -699,322.50 734,288.63 334,120.50 400,168.13
02/01/2041 630,000.00 3.650%72,542.50 702,542.50 -702,542.50 737,669.63 339,475.50 398,194.13
02/01/2042 655,000.00 3.700%49,547.50 704,547.50 -704,547.50 739,774.88 338,861.25 400,913.63
02/01/2043 675,000.00 3.750%25,312.50 700,312.50 -700,312.50 735,328.13 337,706.25 397,621.88
Total $10,000,000.00 -$4,202,242.39 $14,202,242.39 (105,110.24)$14,097,132.15 $14,801,988.76 $6,843,765.76 $7,958,223.00
Significant Dates
Dated 6/30/2022
First Coupon Date 2/01/2023
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $121,441.11
Average Life 12.144 Years
Average Coupon 3.4603129%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.5426573%
True Interest Cost (TIC)3.5471560%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.4414981%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)3.6489386%
Series 2022A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 5/ 6/2022 | 7:54 AM
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF
$10,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATIONS BONDS, SERIES 2022A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota has heretofore
determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $10,000,000
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A (the "Bonds"), to finance the 2022 and
2023 street reconstruction projects and utility improvement projects in the City; and
B.
C. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota
("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
D.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City
for the sale of the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on June 14,
2022, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the
Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City
are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of
an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City
upon its completion.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember .
and
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted against:
Councilmember was absent.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 10th day of
May, 2022.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Kari Sinning, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF
$11,150,000 GENERAL OBLIGATIONS BONDS, SERIES 2022A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota has heretofore
determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $11,150,000
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A (the "Bonds"), to finance the 2022 and
2023 street reconstruction projects and utility improvement projects in the City; and
B.
C. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota
("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
D.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City
for the sale of the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on June 14,
2022, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the
Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City
are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of
an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City
upon its completion.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember .
and
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted against:
Councilmember was absent.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 10th day of
May, 2022.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Kari Sinning, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #6.
STAFF REPORT NO. 74
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
5/10/2022
REPORT PREPARED BY: Olivia Wycklendt, Civil Engineer
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
5/3/2022
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
5/5/2022
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider:
1.Approving the bid tabulation for the 65th Street Reconstruction Project;
2.Authorizing the Mayor Pro Tempore and City Manager to award and execute a contract
for construction between the City and Eureka Construction, Inc., for the 65th Street
Reconstruction Project in the amount of $10,169,400.00; and
3.Authorizing the City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further
City Council consideration.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Background
Consistent with City Council direction, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and the City's Comprehensive
Plan, staff has been working towards the construction of the 65th Street Reconstruction Project over the past
few years.
The 65th Street Reconstruction Project consists of a full road reconstruction to replace existing deteriorating
infrastructure along the 65th Street corridor between 66th Street/Rae Drive and Nicollet Avenue. In addition to
this road reconstruct, other improvements along this corridor include pedestrian improvements on Lyndale
Avenue and the implementation of new trail along Richfield Lake on the North side of 65th Street. New
stormwater infrastructure will be installed to address historical flooding issues in the area, and to
accommodate any additional runoff that may occur from the redevelopment of the HUB property. The existing
18-inch watermain that runs through the HUB property will be relocated to 65th Street to allow for
redevelopment of the HUB property.
Advertisement for Bids
The advertisement for bid was published in the Richfield Sun-Current and on
the Questcdn.com website on March 10, 2022.
Bid opening was held on April 14th, 2022. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached.
Five bids were received ranging from a low bid of $10,169,400.00 to a high bid of $12,088,749.72.
The lowest responsive and responsible bidder was Eureka Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$10,169,400.00
Authorization to Award Contract
Following bid opening and tabulation of bids, it was determined that Eureka Construction, Inc., was the
lowest responsive and responsible bidder and would be awarded the project construction contract.
In order for the project to remain on schedule and to avoid delays to construction start (May 2022),
it has been advised that the Mayor Pro Tempore and City Manager be authorized to award and
execute the project construction contract.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By Motion:1.Approve the bid tabulation for the 65th Street Reconstruction Project;2.Authorize the Mayor Pro Tempore and City Manager to award and execute the contract for
construction between the City and Eureka Construction, Inc., for the 65th Street
Reconstruction Project in the amount of $10,169,400.00; and3.Authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City
Council consideration.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The pavement and underground infrastructure condition along 65th Street continues to deteriorate.
City staff have identified a need for complete reconstruction of the roadway and utilities in the 65th
Street corridor between 66th Street/Rae Drive and Nicollet Avenue.
Roadway improvements along Lyndale Avenue between 64th Street and 66th Street are
recommended due to recent and future redevelopment.
A long-term stormwater solution is needed in advance of the HUB redevelopment and is included
in the 65th Street reconstruction.
Relocation of the 18-inch watermain through the HUB property is required prior to redevelopment
of the HUB site.
B.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The 65th Street Reconstruction Project is consistent with the following approved plans:
5 Year Street Reconstruction
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7 - Transportation)
Pedestrian Master Plan
Bicycle Master Plan
Street Reconstruction Guiding Principles
Complete Streets Policy
Arterial Roads Study
C.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
In order for project construction to remain on schedule (May 2022), the contract should be awarded at
this time.
D.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The overall project uses/sources is attached.
The engineer's estimate for the cost of construction at the time of bidding was roughly $9 million.
The roughly $1.2 million difference between the lowest base bid and the engineer's estimate
is likely due to significant and rapid inflation, increased material costs, and reduced
material availability. It is anticipated that costs will not decrease in the near future, and
would likely increase if the project were to be delayed.
The total estimated project cost is $12.9 million.
$11 million in bonding was previously approved for the project. Staff recommend using $1.3M in
ARPA funds to reduce the bond to a bank-qualified $10M.
$1.8 million in Municipal State Aid (MSA) has been identified to cover the additional costs.
Recommended project financing is as follows:
Street Reconstruction Bonds: $5.4 million
Utility Bonds: $4.6 million
Municipal State Aid: $1.8 million
ARPA $1.1 million
E.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the contract and will be available to answer questions.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
None
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Bid Tabulation Backup Material
Final Layout 04-2022 Exhibit
Sources and Uses Summary Backup Material
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Bid Opening
April 14, 2022
10:00 a.m.
W 65th Street Reconstruction Project
Bid No. 22-04
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a there was a meeting of Administrative Staff and it was
stated that the purpose of the meeting was to receive; open and read aloud bids for the W 65th Street
Reconstruction Project, as advertised in the official newspaper on March 10, 2022.
Present: Kari Sinning, City Clerk
Joe Powers, City Engineer
Olivia Wycklendt, Civil Engineer
Chris Swanson, Management Analyst
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
Bidder’s Name Bond Non-
Collusion
Responsible
Contractor
Certificate
Total Base Bid
Geislinger and Sons Provided Provided Provided $10,929,069.50
Max Steininger, Inc. Provided Provided Provided $12,088,749.72
Eureka Construction, Inc. Provided Provided Provided $10,169,400.00
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.Provided Provided Provided $10,689,058.45
Meyer Construction Provided Provided Provided $11,620,662.59
The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the April 26, 2022 City
Council Meeting.
_______________________
Kari Sinning, City Clerk