The URL can be used to link to this page

04-27-2021 City Council MeetingR EG U LAR C IT Y C O U N C IL MEET IN G V IR T U AL ME E TIN G H E L D V IA W E B E X APR IL 27, 2021 7:00 P M IN TR O D U C TO RY P R O C E E D IN G S C all to order P ledge of A llegiance Open forum E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who wish to address the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting. A pproval of the Minutes of the (1) C ity C ouncil Work S ession of A pril 13, 2021; and (2) C ity C ouncil Meeting of A pril 13, 2021 AG E N D A APPR O VAL 1.A pproval of the A genda 2.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval. A .C onsider the approval of the A mendment to the S mall Wireless F acility C ollocation S upplemental A greement with New C ingular Wireless P C S , L L C , d/b/a AT&T Mobility, that set forth the terms and conditions of collocation on wireless support structures within C ity right-of-way. S taff Report No. 60 B .C onsider the approval of the first amendment to the Nine Mile C reek Regional Trail C ooperative A greement with Three Rivers P ark D istrict for trail extension construction as part of the 77th S treet Underpass project. S taff Report No. 61 C .C onsider the A pproval of the 77th S treet Underpass F inal D esign L ayout, P roject P lans and S pecifications and A uthorize P roject B idding. S taff Report No. 62 3.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar PR O P O S E D O R D IN AN C E S 4.S econd reading to consider a proposed ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations, and summary publication of said ordinance. S taff Report No. 63 5.C onsider approval of a second reading of an ordinance rezoning property at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th S treet to P lanned Mixed Use (P MU) and consider approval of a resolution for a variety of land use approvals for a mixed use P lanned Unit D evelopment. S taff Report No. 64 P U B LIC H E AR IN G S 6.C onduct a public hearing and consider: the second reading of a transitory ordinance vacating a portion of the Lyndale Avenue right-of-way and utility easements; a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance; and, a resolution approving a preliminary plat for property located at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th S treet. S taff Report No. 65 7.C onduct a public hearing and consider approval of a second reading of an ordinance repealing S ection 500 of the C ity C ode and adopting a new S ection 500 related to P lats and S ubdivision Regulations and a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance. S taff Report No. 66 R E S O L U T IO N S 8.C onsider the approval of a resolution of support for the C ommunity P roject F unding (C P F ) grant application in the amount of $50,000,000 for "P roject 1" of the I-494: US 169 to M S P A irport vision. S taff Report No. 59 9.C onsider the adoption of a resolution approving revisions to the Inclusionary A ffordable Housing P olicy. S taff Report No. 68 C IT Y MAN AG E R’S R E P O R T 10.C ity Manager's Report C LAIMS AN D PAYR O L LS 11.C laims and P ayroll C O U N C IL D ISC U SSIO N 12.Hats Off to Hometown Hits 13.A djournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota City Council Work Session April 13, 2021 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 5:45 p.m. virtually via WebEx. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Ben Whalen; Mary Supple; Simon Present: Trautmann; and Sean Hayford Oleary Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Jay Henthorne, Chief of Police; Martin Costello, City Prosecutor; Jane Skov, IT Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant. Item #1 REVIEW THE PRE-TRAIL DIVERSION, EXPUNGEMENTS, AND BAIL REFORM AS IT RELATES TO THE CI TY OF RICHFIELD PROSECUTIONS. Attorney Costello presented on a variety of items including: • Explanation of a municipal prosecutor; • Difference between a civil city attorney and county attorney; • Duties of a municipal prosecutor; • Prosecuting criminal and traffic offenses; • Prosecuting ordinance violations; and • Bail, diversion and expungement in a criminal prosecution. Council Member Hayford Oleary asked if fines are not a main part of punishment. Attorney Costello explained the fines are defined by legislators and has not kept up with inflation rate. Therefore, a judge has the opportunity to adjust time served and community service. Council Member Hayford Oleary stated concern with the various options available, seem to favor wealthy people. Attorney Costello stated that is a valid critique of the justice system which often describes privileged people. He spoke of the constant struggle to encompass all people and life situations. Council Member Whalen suggested going away from a cash bail system. He would also like to see systems put in place where individuals who have the opportunity to get their record expunged, be able to take advantage from start instead of having to jump through hoops later on in the process. Attorney Costello commented on various states doing away with cash bail but stated some concerns. Council Work Session Minutes -2- April 13, 2021 Council Member Trautmann thanked Attorney Costello for the presentation and frank assessment of the short comings of the justice system. He requested future discussions on tackling the challenges within the system. Attorney Costello supplied his personal background and stated some challenges he has faced in his career. He also stated he would take any comments or concerns and have future discussions to address the comments. Council Member Supple thanked Attorney Costello for the comprehensive report. Mayor Regan Gonzalez reiterated the changes to cash bail would need to be made at the state level. Attorney Costello commented that at the state level there are some adjustments but Minnesota constitutional law states all offenses are bailable. Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Attorney Costello for acknowledging the inequities and wondered how the council and public safety could work together to move change forward. Attorney Costello stated the city could develop ordinances to begin instituting some change. He also commented that policies and best practices should be developed to encompass all situations and the department (Public Safety Department) will begin to review next steps and let council decide on timeline. Chief Henthorne stated that they can look at best practices and next steps, discuss with City Manager Rodriguez and then she share with council. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:51 p.m. Date Approved: April 27, 2021 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 7:00 p.m. via WebEx. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Ben Whalen; Mary Supple; and Sean Hayford Present: Oleary Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager ; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; John Stark, Community Development Director; Julie Urban, Housing Manager; Jane Skov, IT Manager ; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance Moment of silence to recognize the police involved killing of Daunte Wright, for his family and community. OPEN FORUM Senior Office Assistant Wynn reviewed the options to participate:  Participate live by calling 612 -861-0651 during the open forum portion  Call prior to meeting 612 -861-9711  Email prior to meeting kwynn@richfielmn.gov Senior Office Assistant Wynn read a statement supplied : My name is Kathleen and I live at 6526 Stevens Ave So. I am here representing my neighborhood to ask for your assistance in amending and/or creating an ordinance that addresses noxious and/or toxic air emissions from small businesses, specifically noting laundromats. Senior Office Assistant Wynn stated there were no callers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Council Meeting Virtual Meeting held via WebEx April 13, 2021 Council Meeting Minutes -2 - April 13, 2021 M/Supple , S/Whalen to approve the minutes of the (1) Joint City Council/HRA/Planning Commission/Human Rights Commission Work Session of March 15, 2021; (2) City Council Work Session of March 23, 2021; and (3) City Council Meeting of March 23, 2021. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple : AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #1 PRESENTATION TO RECOGNIZE IMMIGRANT DAY Mayor Regan Gonzalez read the proclamation. Council Member Supple expressed gratitude to Unidos for bringing this forward as many families are in need of support and protection. Council Member Hayford Oleary spoke of how it is a national issue that affects Richfield residents and hopes to see real change. Council Member Trautmann echoed comments and will continue to support policies that make everyone welcome in the community. Council Member Whalen stated this was an issue rec ently brought up in a discussion with US Representative Omar. It is an item that is out of Richfield jurisdiction but greatly impacts the Richfield community. Mayor Regan Gonzalez spoke of a recent rally at Partnership Academy last weekend that attracted people from all over the state. Item #2 PRESENTATION TO RECOGNIZE EARTH DAY 2021 Mayor Regan Gonzalez presented the proclamation. Council Member Whalen highlighted the ongoing work and thanked staff involved with the sustainability efforts. Council Meeting Minutes -3 - April 13, 2021 Item #3 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA M/Whalen, S/Hayford Oleary to approve the agenda Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #4 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar. A. Consider the approval of a resolution authorizing the acceptance of grant funds in the amount of $30,000 on behalf of the Richfield -Bloomington Watershed Management Organization from the Board of Water and Soil Resources. Staff Report No. 50 RESOLUTION NO. 11837 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO ACCEPT GRANT FUNDS FROM THE BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF THE RICHFIELD-BLOOMINGTON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION (RBWMO) B. Consider First reading to consider a proposed ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations. Staff Report No. 51 C. Consider the approval of the resolutions to adjust the City’s Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) network. Staff Report No. 52 RESOLUTION NO. 11838 RESOLUTION REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID DESIGNATION FROM CERTAIN CITY STREETS RESOLUTION NO. 11839 RESOLUTION FOR MUNICIPAL STATE AID DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN CITY STREET S Council Meeting Minutes -4 - April 13, 2021 D. Consider the approval of the Small Wireless Facility Collocation Supplemental Agreements with Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, that set forth the terms and conditions of collocation on wireless support structures within City right -of-way. Staff Report No. 53 E. Consider approval of a first reading of an ordinance repealing Section 500 of the City Code and adopting a new Section 500 related to Plats and Subdivision Regulations and schedule a second reading for April 27, 2021. Staff Report No. 54 F. Consider ap proval of the first reading of an ordinance rezoning property on the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street as Planned Mixed Use (PMU) and consider approval of the first reading of a transitory ordinance vacating a portion of the Lyndale Avenue right-of-way and utility easements and schedule second readings for April 27, 2021. Staff Report No. 55 M/Supple , S/Whalen to approve the consent calendar . Council Member Hayford Oleary asked staff why item F includes vacating an easement. Director Stark stated he will look into and have an answer at the second reading. Council Member Supple expressed appreciation for the discussion from community regarding item B and was pleased to see a compromise and amendment. Council Member Whalen emphasized the proposal in item B is different from the original due to input and feedback from the community and encouraged residents to reach out and offer comments. Council Member Trautmann thanked Director Stark and the Community Development staff for continuo usly working with the community. Council Member Hayford Oleary thanked the community for seeing the current rules didn’t work and brought change to the table to better the community. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #5 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR None Council Meeting Minutes -5 - April 13, 2021 Item #6 CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MODIFYING A HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN FOR POLICE LIEUTENANTS, TEAMSTERS #320 BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES. STAFF REPORT NO. 56 Council Member Supple read staff report 56. Assistant City Manager Dmytrenko stated every employee group within the city has a post - employment savings plan and employees pay 100% into the plans. Staff received the request from the police department to increase the plan. M/ Supple, S/Whalen to adopt a resolution modifying a Health Care Savings Plan for eligible Police Lieutenants, Teamsters #320 bargaining unit employees. RESOLUTION NO. 11840 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN UPDATED AMENDED POST EMPLOYMENT HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN FOR POLICE LIEUTENANT EMPLOYEES (TEAMSTERS #320) Council Member Supple encouraged employees to set money aside for future healthcare needs whenever possible. Mayor Regan Gonzalez echoed comments and stated it is a great option to build a savings account for additional costs. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #7 CONSIDER A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY'S PARTI CIPATION IN THE JUST DEEDS COALITION, WHICH WORKS TO FACILITATE THE REMOVAL OF DISCRIMINATORY COVENANTS FROM PROPERTY DEEDS. STAFF REPORT NO. 57 Council Member Trautmann presented staff report 57. Director Stark stated the map recognizes the high number of covenants in the southeast portion of Richfield which is also a highly concentrated area of poverty. The covenants not only had an impact but continue to impact the community. Council Meeting Minutes -6 - April 13, 2021 Housing Manager Urban stated staff would like to take action as they became aware of disparity of BIPOC communities and owning a home. She appreciated the support to remove covenants as the government has been a part of the problem and would like to be part of the solution. Council Member Trautmann thanked staff for all the work and raising awareness of the situation. M/Trautmann, S/ Hayford Oleary to adopt a resolution condemning the use of discriminatory covenants, discharging discriminatory covenants on City -owned property, and approving participation in the Just Deeds Coalition. RESOLUTION NO. 11841 RESOLUTION CONDEMNING THE USE OF DISCRIMINATORY COVENANTS, DISCHARGING DISCRIMINATORY COVENANTS ON CITY -OWNED PROPERTY, AND APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE JUST DEEDS COALITION Council Member Supple stated is had been an honor being the liaison for the Human Rights Commission who recently voted unanimously to support this effort. Council Member Whalen thanked all the leaders in the coalition in assisting in moving this work forward. Council Member Hayford Oleary echoed comments and will continue to support such work. Council Member Trautmann described his personal background of moving into Richfield and how out of place their family was on their block. He spoke of his support for this work and bringing it to the forefront and recognizing the damage it has done to the community. He thanked sta ff for their continued work on this item. Mayor Regan Gonzalez commented and what a wonderful educational tool this is and how staff is supporting the community. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #8 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR A $1,000,000 GRANT APPLICATION FO R FEDERAL FUNDING THROUGH THE NEWLY CREATED COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING (CPF) PROGRAM FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE WOOD LAKE NATURE CENTER. STAFF REPORT NO. 58 Council Member Hayford Oleary read staff report 58. Council Meeting Minutes -7 - April 13, 2021 City Manager Rodriguez thanked staff for their hard work on this item and is hopeful for federal funding on the project. Council Member Hayford Oleary asked for clarification on the total estimated cost of $20million. City Manager Rodriguez stated that is correct and is hopeful to be included in funds for next year. M/ Hayford Oleary, S/ Whalen to approve the resolution of support for a federal CPF grant application for the new Wood Lake Nature Center project. RESOLUTION NO. 11842 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING (CPF) GRANT APPLICATION FOR WOOD LAKE NATURE CENTER Council Member Whalen asked about a preliminary design timeline and when council will be looking at the design. City Manager Rodriguez stated there will be a work session on May 11 dedicated to the Wood Lake Nature Center. Council Member Trautmann commented on how widely used the Wood Lake Nature is a nd how many programs are offered to residents utilizing the space. Mayor Regan Gonzalez stated Wood Lake Nature Center is another great example of how the community is leading to created spaces and parks within a community. Executive Analyst Martinez Ga vina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #9 CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Rodriguez supplied a brief update regarding Covid. She then recognized the recent tragic incident involving Daunte Wright and the grieving region. Item #10 CLAIMS AND PAYROLL M/Hayford Oleary, S/Trautmann that the following claims and payrolls be approved : Council Meeting Minutes -8 - April 13, 2021 U.S. Bank 04/13/2021 A/P Checks 295745 - 296203 $ 1,777,674.10 Payroll: 161011 – 161306 43394 687,387.47 TOTAL $ 2,465,061.57 Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Hayford Oleary: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #11 HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS Council Member Trautmann recognized the passing of a longtime friend, Bill Green, who was recently hired as the Richfield Equity and Inclusion Coordinator. Bill had dedicated his life to equity work and will leave a lifetime legacy of clear eyed vision. Council Member Hayford Oleary stated his condolences for the Green family. He then recognized the comments from the open forum and is hopeful to have some discussions regarding the air quality. He also stated his appreciation for the immediate work by staff to protect the community following the incident in Brooklyn Center. Council Member Supple expressed gratitude for the assistance from elected officials on a project at the middle school. Officials recorded greetings for the children as they were unable to meet in person. She also voiced heartfelt condolences to the family of Daunte Wright and continues to add her voice to the call for justice. Council Member Whalen echoed comments and ad ded a people made problem can be solved. He encouraged community members to reach out with ideas for safety. He also spoke of the upcoming meetings on Inclu sionary Housing draft language. City Manager Rodriguez explained she will be speaking with the Gr een family and will be recognizing him at the next meeting. Mayor Regan Gonzalez stated she is holding the Green family and everyone who knew Bill close to her heart. Item #11 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:12 p.m. Council Meeting Minutes -9 - April 13, 2021 Date Approved: April 27, 2021 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.A. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 60 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Olivia Wycklendt, C ivil E ngineer D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 4/16/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the approval of the Amendment to the Small W ireless Facility Collocation Supplemental Agreement with New Cingular W ireless P C S, L LC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, that set forth the terms and conditions of collocation on wireless support structures within City right-of-way. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: State legislation was passed in 2017 that established statewide requirements for cities to allow wireless companies to install small cell facility networks in the public right-of-way. The small cell facility networks are commonly known as "small cell wireless" equipment and distributed antenna systems. Although the legislation limited many actions the City can take to control the placement of the small cell facilities in the public right-of-way, it did allow for the City to enact a permitting process for the facilities. City Council approved amendments to the right-of-way ordinance (City Code Section 802) in 2017 to provide additional controls and management if small cell wireless companies choose Richfield as an installation site. The code amendment included the following requirement for a Small W ireless Facility Agreement: A smal l wi reless faci l i ty shal l onl y be coll ocated on a small wirel ess support structure owned or control l ed by the city, or any other ci ty asset i n the ri ght-of-way, after the appl icant has executed a standard small wirel ess faci li ty coll ocation agreement with the city. The supplemental agreement is required as stated in the Small W ireless Facility Collocation Agreement between the City and New Cingular W ireless P C S, L L C, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, which was signed August 13, 2019. This supplement dictates what space is leased by the City to New Cingular W ireless P C S, L L C, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, and the appropriate fees and rent for leasing this space. This supplemental agreement has been provided and signed by the AT&T representative. The amendment to the collocation supplemental agreement that is under consideration pertains to the collocated small cell application approximately located at 7444 Upton Avenue. This small cell facility will draw power from the City's street light power supply. The original collocation supplemental agreement for this location did not originally intend to draw from City power supply, which is why this amendment is required. The amendment up for consideration is necessary as it provides the terms and conditions that apply when a small cell application draws from City power. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By motion: Approve the amendment to the Small W ireless Facility Collocation Supplemental Agreement with New Cingular W ireless P C S, L LC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, that set forth the terms and conditions of collocation on wireless support structures within City right-of-way. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T W ireless and cellular service providers are looking for solutions to provide better and more reliable service to customers. One method of enhancing service is to install "small cell" antennas to fill in areas with poor existing coverage. State legislation was passed in 2017 that allows these antennas to be installed in the right-of-way. The City of Richfield adopted an ordinance on September 12, 2017 amending City Code Section 802 enacting an agreement and permitting process for small cell facilities within City right-of-way. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Section 802 of the Richfield City Code depicts the City's current practices of permitting the use within rights-of-way. Minnesota Statutes, Section 237.162, defines public right-of-way including management of standards and costs. Minnesota Statutes, Sections 237.16, 237.162, 237.163, 237.79, 237.81, and 238.086 (the "Act") and 2017 Session Laws, Chapter 94, amending the Act, are interpreted with consideration of small cell wireless technology. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: The attached amendment to the supplemental agreement must be in place before the small cell facility located at 7444 Upton Ave can be connected to City power. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The attached amendment defines the annual payment due to the City for use of City power. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: The City Attorney has reviewed the amendment and will be available to answer questions. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: None AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type A mendment to C ollocation S upplemental A greement C ontract/A greement C ollocation A greement B ackup Material C ollocation S upplemental A greement B ackup Material Market:CRANMNPSiteName:CRANRUMWSDALEOO7PACE:MRUMWO3O8I6FA:14826409USID:215058AMENDMENTTOCOLLOCATIONAGREEMENTSUPPLEMENTThisAmendmenttoCollocationAgreementSupplement(“AmendmenttoSupplement”),ismadethis_______dayofApril,2021betweentheCityofRichfield,aMinnesotalocalgovernmentunit,withitsprincipalofficeslocatedat6700PortlandAvenueinRichfield,Minnesota55423,(“Lessor”)andNewCingularWirelessPCS,LLC.aDelawareLimitedLiabilityCompany,d!b/aAT&TMobility,withitsprincipalofficeslocated1025LenoxParkBlvd.NE,3rdFloor,Atlanta,Georgia30319,(“Lessee”).WHEREAS,LessorandLesseeenteredintoaCollocationAgreementSupplement(“Supplement”)datedAugust13,2019issuedpursuanttothatcertainSmallWirelessFacilityCollocationAgreementdatedFebruaryIi,2019(“Agreement”);WHEREAS,LessorandLesseemutuallydesiretoamendtheSupplement.NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationofthefactscontainedintheRecitalsabove,andgoodandvaluableconsideration,thepartiesagree:1.TheCitywillinvoiceAT&Tforelectricalchargesinaccordancewithparagraph7oftheAgreement.2.Exceptasspecificallymodifiedherein,alltermsandconditionsoftheAgreementandSupplementremaininfullforceandeffect.3.Eachpartyrepresentsandwarrantsthatithastheright,power,legalcapacityandauthoritytoenterintoitsrespectiveobligationsunderthisThirdAmendment.INWITNESSWHEREOF,theParties,haveexecutedthisinstrumentonthedateabove.Lessor:CityofRichfieldBy:_______Name:_______Its:MayorDate:________By:_____Name:________Its:CityClerkDate: Lessee:NEWCINGULARWIRELESSPCS,LLC,aDelawareLimitedLiabilityCompanyBy:AT&bilityCorporation,ItsManagerName:KHSInKnutsonRealEstate&ConsbvonMqrTitle:________________________Dale:______________ AT&T MOBILITY PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT:CRAN 10120 SITE #:MNLO67DIF_R02 SITE FA#:14826409 PACE #:MRUMWO3O8I6/MRUMWO3O757 PTN #: USID #:215058 SCIP/CANDIDATE#:TA CONFIGURATION:- SrFE NAME:CRAfl_RUMWSDALE_007 SITE TYPE:STEEL LIGHPOLE SITE ADDRESS:7444 SOUTH UPTON AVENUE RICHFIELD,MN 55423 JURISDICTION:RICHFIELD,MN CITY POLE ASSET #:- 0 AT&T MOBILITY ROT S.MASQUE TOE ASENUE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 SCOPE OF WORK an ‘-fl-I NItEUNSI 540 NJ MA0’SY.S•-4TH ‘LOON C’RCACO.t 5444 ESQALOI CRAN 10/20 THE SCOPE OF WORK CONSISTS OF: UUSULJL 2’SQSS -INN’ALI.1’NEW 2N-C S ‘ANLESS SI.ASOS’0LE ‘0 RT’LAC(EASTHAC TACO_it laR.’AAOJORIR/Vt.490x757 •%50-AL NEW U C/SC ANCAC fl WS..C SJCAR.XACE_L ‘A •l.NOk_:1 NEW FOEO_NNCTLS 720tMOO PCS 22.C_SS1_L -%SOA..‘I NEW ONPV A•.’S’I•.A CC PC VD,.VVUD 0 POLE ERTEOR •44504...I2 SEA WRIR IN’S TO NC MO.JNTES 5 PO..E EXEPORSLIL_A005ES3L 7444 SOoT,UPTON ANEN1JE INSTALL (1)NEW AC/tC UNITS 15 NE MOEINTTD TO WOL0 ErSHO,N 0’’WLC,NW.NN422 NS’A...Si)NEW RAWCAP 5SCZ’*VEC ROCAC—4052—PI 220 .SAS’A NEW.Fa.c.’ONCQ&IL -C’•,TPt.REACOVS’5 ‘0.5 W._NC OCAIEOW THE SAVE ZE IC’tic 45C4’ONAt 500.’.o20r,44VWC.MS OSINCAICO P 5’:.OIRCN&,PC.C APP CANT 45641 W9ELESS P REPLACEMENT POLl 5 THE SAME HQCAO OR LOWE P PITH NOINCRE ANT FROM THE ONIONAL 9S1 S.MAROLIE TIE AVE.REPLACEMCNT POLE IS SAME MATTNIAL PRO APPEARANCE.SIAVEOER ETC.AS THE CRIONALMINNEAPOLIS.MN 5S4S2 REPLACE ANS INSTALL NEW SION ASS 45 NESTS 44.96741 RJ.2T 506 OROJTIS TIES kARL I 854.74 PRcPfl’(WAIFS CITY SE PIC4EIELO 8750 PORTLAND ASS. 4ICHFIELS.MN 5S47 ASCTCOU_S,X,.S..ACOWM..NC,’ICNS FACJ.’ APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS FULLERTON PNGINECRINO DESIGN IIE4EW000REUL2 ROAD.SUr0144 OCHMUMEIJRO.ILLIHSOS 60109 TOIL V47.VPEMKO R’,A,PIAI.R4,PIpINPW9.,,W SITE LOCATION MAP PROJECT CONSULTANTS AT&CORSaCTO. IPANACER:A,51W.N.RNS.NTPCN :505)025_SOONEMAIL.PRROSGATT.COM ALL WORK ANS MATOHIALS SHALL RE PORFORMES ANO INSTALLEC IN ACCOROANCE WON THE CURRENT EOI 11045 TE THE EOLLNNtSN S COSES AN PDOPTOO RE SHE LOCAL COSENNINEA..”ICRR’ES FC’ECP.rO SOlO NAT 5444.ELEC’N CAL COCE CNEN 021’ON) VS21SL SOIl M.RS’TC S’ANCANC ORECE CAT 215 10R S’_CON.RPL.SPPORIS FOR HI C’AA’SONS LLIES ANC OHA’EIC WORE (L—5) •FACILIIY IS UNMANN TO AND NTT FOR RIJMAN HARI TATION. •ASP ACCESS RENEIIWEMENTS ARE NOT HEOLLIRES. •THIS FACILITY TOTE NOT RCSUIRE POTARI E WATER 665 PILL NOT PROSSICE ANY NEAASE OPTS A j/IJ/IR 90%RESTER TJ 04/10,54 U%5.,ER I’I TITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX YMCA Q *780 SR AT&T PROJECT V AN ACER PHONE: EMAIL: PROECT MANATEE AS ORE ES I CON TACT: EMAIL. STE ACO 50005: AEOROESI CONCACi ENAL A ‘IC NEER/HI C ‘I It C ‘I CRESS CONNECT. PN05TI EMAIL CN N—T CENTRAL NOTES >1 TARIIAL SITE PLAN C—2 LC’’POLE C,1’AR4O0PS C—S SPEO’ITA’IO’.S CA CCflCAT.OSS MARIA A.RURMEINTER SENIOR CAT PROJECT MAlI HOER (552)220—RSRI MRSIRT@ACT.COM SAC WIRELESS 540 N.MASINON St ROAR ELOOR CPRICAOO,IL ASSET SHEENA CHRISTIAN ‘Ro€,,PH pitl:lR THRTR.E 181 SAC WRELOSS SAC t MOR 5 P.-F05 C’CACC._4CKS’ RON NA 450_P RHIlP.R.KMTO,SS.ES—. E.,M.,E4’CN ENCURCER MC ‘bC E 000HELC SC_So.bE SOC SC’A.A18.W’C..6C173 VON SARARRIR (A47)RS8—8415 p PIWRNOILIIWPI C—A L.C’I POE TE’ALS C—? SCM.E’&..S *7NRRRST I! r r S’ECA ‘0.5 I’3SSM’’Rfl81lRWVEsNCRE P4Eel?RM NE SR REEl HRNlERfla.IRS EONYRC AVE IS APR PNSRLOSSE NIP RELIEP ESMPLY 1111 I RMpRA1 misty ‘i.e MAt pit,.NyWIRORRS.Pt tRPmi prep.,,5 by WE Ii IAIAMP RIP d,rWce RS-,WLMIIPRdAVLI,.,. N 54Iy SJo,,ied PIOIRH.b,,I 5’EP”51.5.,—Ipp,p OH Ast SHE,IT MIIWGMH Ue.t,.RSflfl SE NANiE DRAN_RUMW_SDALE_OO?tAste CNIK 9 SI IRIERIRTAR C4INOI:O ONUTER FiRER SOT OOUIPMENT SF TAILS CONSOTHJCTSONI NRC WIRELESS AOOPESS:545 W.MADISON NT.9TH FLOOR CHICACO,IL START CONTACT:PATRICK JONES EMAIL:PINPISE.IOHINRREP.OSY’ DIRECTIONS I WIlD IS: 215058 PACE NSIR4RER: MRUMWO3O8I6IMRUMW0307S7 CITY POLE ASSET S Co’tm,Api’S’wc NO SCALE CANSISAW NURRER TA SCAN DR CODE FOR LINK TO SITE LOCATION MAP DRAWINGS SCALED TO I1’xI7’ T444 SOUTH UPTON AVE F$JE RICHFIELD.MN 55423 TITLE SHEET SHEET NALMRER i-I PROJECTS 2R19.5I4T -52N0 SSZOID.4.31t,3rosd*34111415341SJION1VN3O1143%133’?S£ZVSNWQi3IdHDI3IIN3ñYNOidflIW1OSfrflt553*0043116Vt:434114,4314010443:1310141105LM7fl80t0MkNflSIMIWO.9909LtLOO3VOSMrJndNVD3114431’SU239N—_xna9aw1IflS10111141sp,aa1&5I——frct,.p-c——na3l?I4.6.I1pat*4I410—941104L)W,AI4I535303144311040114dO5IN3N3014439304110111411t3310136011140NOtO1YNDINO394110149401431003141414341114II118*40143,4ION41NOISYo3concoco*3ooo3oo.40364110013,414SKI3677*4111444103414071440*938314y44314113141NIKIIY111444105*3145363144431301144140101403431341141133,404*IOIIyOUIION4098(014*1NIKI441431441(60III01IIWYNOANY01lNld93034,VDvIro3061fl019114719320S02439W0091*8340G’314INn-‘v%4.JDIi043143055540/cL/I]VNVIdr&IIst)I.11nI1.i3Vdt?I131)TWY6614*035334IV9430cmososeWuoy1SyJIGS01.3391y143_W0I1ow41*4&8315Y19902,141434140912410331414050034011011%74ONFNSIIIM3AHOVAIY3023411000W101NF1143NIOH9170401dli01030431*339N03*9*44314117*4192431640(StYInO839410SWAlfllBYDYAYNVOINHS3I9341*340S304431119fl590NO341043230118018440191101245304319314309433ZflJJ.fl01SNOlOYNIFOSGINSNVOINIO3I7*3013741114145440141431155140INCSN*%13038.0911014SNONIKIN0140403901311*14013*81400OW510(1*83400014141*ONITIVO101-4*311511SKI400015*001SKI10314*830045141304434374V61401280-fl(5)-V030*38364430304414113419SINYanvOs301012(81436‘14013410203347.940*5*4*7361V0333100*321A3’IIBI00..0314053(03tY4040-0r0409441041*7*05500438SN03N057*90063441C02INOflOL1IOOI3365,023531SKI0101(9010036111402140o34303AllY003434101031NO36143053150TN61B1*7VOW334Y6404254*5449.500*9SKI4.6*0101439CII04397144CTT7YISII50#081010IN69081*141531*8340114145<00,4)031*4051*834030113,403441415145Th141*NYld3SNOdS3ADN30dYl3‘3DNVN3INIVfr19JO11VYIS3**31671110466300841*8044240445101032341ISrIBWIS3OS80494394103’OSd414*3IVN011*4510434*11900341147oI1SF*IISI0S01040036414309,41414143,401.510110*5031.60*911343GIN1033131305338101414174130OWala,619108SKI40145(1(03011044045144*I*0IONY345(.YA3053058053411nv*114434ON6T8Y435017943W434144479421131140*414W671*14100d1626171*iv05941807194361363163t14384014314]741II14*19041000‘0(3694034Y1964*IOWOIS49SC367111541474153236V3608003190409GIWl01437115963140101I04I14*4316W1*4X0914141330395s.sM3J90300300*4140927791431319.05NI)434831084*38384ONII333403097W4053498384941131051.bd.94J0®83971*160136*44*01*S110l1-0I1110103153(00IOIIONIT01010408S9W,Y01800T1311*fl01111*NOdIONSI38*0ISI’SN103(075041*817090101-014*901034401338143677*10571118031*8914NI510111810104W0SO341403903341II(00*44109036514141*441VANY016409439I100144IStrytI40OWC_103915361494.434.04.44031lO14001104679*IS15iNY24914flV1G01814110314031030SIN03104110,4071Y00134*8343269136743460010(00371116134081638*41114V34*41746140100TN1103IDN361*90410OllNfl744836.10380100310(0410Y363971*16C3TNI38I1140800flY1151303401931406-01400704021106Thlv1093‘0OTOVInJG’A16.34367MG401346424343400013000‘0143NIIOIONIU34ONION539*70413474664901901*1434414amr3674346130444’S]1.52430107946.09440*WC8380640407vflIOY044404631*40400314341IV66N99470.037741SNfrsl.Tv133133ITh40433909418*NOYWN133094SKI304084*13010*8146034403990.003441IV1011V514(ION12111*410443190IV03I3938TN16A1y,Y436010914(0411014d110310714101*943410%ANYtflIIVl7vISNfrlSOd7110(137480540IV80*441443310843401.303400390413677406015t04448040467Y1V515744943140941143906544400*57741110301434,0151400113315*19.611004224101(33_ICN$70101*41101044038409431104011063.1014*13031000005409041372w404471301011000.1309114360..SITOJ.l914ONY830414*48048631314121110410183104100046*1634041*£240044015)414010452100104191*4900.1.LflIIfl4144314*090371*461010183111033441311550OW1N39410]AJ.1114454011016147494livONLISfi931*14414.133001439410166160,414flY403110,49011164V3(1131774161010y81I00l01I0lWIS100ONIINYISOW1104441037458110313341400,483001441014048438064IOIIYNN4IO01-N(3315101*00116IOIIVO14104fly448030411*101010*811-0039416401100180108414W413041(0434140344108424411*133677836014811*41119099.70]40270101066Vt40431041.1930141832110y7121913449153941.5SIN304404536SKI403677846094403TN4514409**5101031033049*tIN824367706i’&Iodt3GINSlvaYATN103311III36736657*8314441144*434OWYFOG3131SIN430316(82100144Y08N183105(442?1414*0N0VNI09410V417WN3671106SlYNOlyINS1040018WSN4SyH1111041143341.941*4£1011330109141405001104319600343608,146354901105081OW1*80444*415144094174NIYINO389010151481100744650840(4090GSIyOONI514OWII70IIYSIN035870401343131148340/300,44091*3131490314N041y180a4411791*300140404019031c1y7-143s’*‘1St3’9410]flm’40rnaIynW73144084(1416101093113002*73645(4647644399SW4300G3677915ICIYTT41S)*040141030IO3*74460091493W001OW110(05OIy.Is0NN4040311414.44*0WOVNI34304*0411446&L0’4N11102411303108434.01-011319059044451447417065V1-1184834Y3N1415310843417446SINNFIINN37144610104*1903SKIfl1513313N1131903NI9624113165*GIN19014809470411331341l*404N1TM51604319603441.05(35105,41045160*54030*83303344140130140439440091155138NIISY1.1(4440.a0111014014709*1631V4040174,-41*101lYNlWMi03’34175*0110181340000411455103451*4104liv11040414*404479448*14016543343677*4610I0fl3’00*S4.O051044033441fl216000533*4.3363634,40GMK10447115N1Ot3110ON81044130(14050323891410y104904414431140900VNI40041*09113671*96035W459130r00,41ZVH17144.N]N0a4l0OIlY00(01flY12156114AireSV40011071100397(0605148176*1583300601104440901531100104531341005816*81316-104014094TNl640101*1403SKI01363)VINA103084341OW8311*011830843141Al7400844401103901367(06GIN1-01110103INStNI53*04234431*1*00845041100N44yr6384540114030ION1*09141(6533*43601416869140TN40094313940ewz’ni7*705131401011.19003418040.101101813960044170r0101414.0*14*019414040(10)607y(0000150*8443013401011319.05‘SalON110100031679*1590133101440109500444*3666302.I1771101015*11300*4W04401403103.31940941(09495360132801315194314ay]404*44050*41Sj4.34011o74334*01060101*111.,0441(95*404659111*340440(67743941551171*46101344140051431434190O3ION314834105531N4WL34041030101*14004*04,4164939flIS0840383’0441*413*3132(644400403013*00104*190010443*1136930411*0ANY1771440*0411(111134140859490741aN004INN1030841450103110*0836INFO3511fl11431*411440SF1917401316*430II*51104841310301009479640311tfl394(5001104136510119604444.0A69.V48304WIN103044341191794774.640104311305flllofl.0’S79*10310444*94403W159314771064013*4(3003415311(814394190404021341IIOIdlyA#033GM7.419091079*33CC4*34304&Thaoa30151801034*4717948..%530971W504160494133144050110(466303403409II53.J0V.1053113144.24309.01.44*4314084760610131*110034161531101431441440141400’40478590034367141€10104414001441‘I1484014080(844341NI3411*4*0*301108401*066]N5r8394140*41*9*41*9(1(6)93040843NIIVOO144.flln0118441*00134171140174161010*41403304.545311111494184I0I1YNG9043861005839774161010*8100031161*01101815900011094£3YN41N103108434106403064011634094341‘41*441*4037944V3153141744.64030*80002413’51406041193416307014310051413‘I438Y0fl4441434flhYVN904747404435405St43401081*6001434311358084TNFO1010*91400401409118311130151010337466195(101410104*196034‘(3*012037909146034140111169900383033494350*0£141960NI544046OW140810313141064444044C04J40S0490401411540140*0090103,0775151133*6GIN10(104815100(04014584oNrw3o101104813400405011*34071*0914394TN40910N399104101714014032300840101Y0N341003801410146444*941440W01014NI5744401*14ONY110444015liv11413441741640(3*41400394190114*821030843414074408464401182404951413(0418466444435344190£11419011A3010401160443444458*9a10841144411010091170034113079033610677416sxra04*10(010349*441030*424140401110(1434103.190(0*53674065SOIVS04.4*5801060013434114196161(16*4430336SIN14003090714o413403413614140610134*00094‘083440*4674.01801645.10441193404*1435431110114410001483034341NI0301005148*00731411OW(4160)10114*1014140*44.11314OW1131451410111430003441405100.0(703843645118384017464liv8070410310311387431650088130941041400483410104811009(6001-N9633891316153048114(014041396011.1*41010101018(7’4040311040325801013604314140444NI40l.aiSF411049460fl5.00151*1100011*4V*141*7144OW34*947141640104*1460SF41V31lGV10*83360017911.9603140ff‘904190.40323103084l’tX33a’30341900511400145*03174410336716168404711467404140.03093419*0*0411439513fl409041111336304*414(801441241104(3*30SSTONOSN30344398141.191402338584103(08,348940403001854141109.60411641400101*63141314*30344141110413053540OW5401471838644717W0164407041043861005839INFO0010*414003411-13NVNl44,4III4334’l466480014.4113164(44IlcIdmI51114190414000413441I40V03071140001433011NIl1190ONIW3]81143NOflI3llfld411300—0043010014416LSNISIIV11VO*011913448t8.00,094,651047355110163013.10108*45.00ALflISOVdItt_ve HW’N__________I/C •1qI iiT11b1Ii letNWIP’0L)•I s.abIllH CRAN RF NOTICE SIGN AThT opsont...ntm,nn .tthio.tnuoto,.. NOTICE Othot.this pohat 51091,.anteni r.g endS.frnt.rcy F)4.Odne •oth.FoCG.ewaPcndnne. Eoposoi*08. I •0 tataty mildolioca for wokitin it.,I Keep I IE fleet..nomad —‘to 59,1401 AT&T.t sEo.ci-2023.opEn.3 and follow their In.trtirdo.m.prior to ptriprwlrg eny nl.Inl.n.ro.en reptiro those thin porn,. Thin is Alar Sir.OSlO _________ CRAN RF CAUTION SIGN -ACAU11ON& - AT&Topor.l,soW.nnaeatthlneuenlaro Mona thin point ye.am..tirlng .nwa *.t9 e.Sam In.a.eov iwJ5 r.la,e Ow FCC Deneenea Ocottoo& 0008. Font,.earety godson..or bookie9 ten: Roar 1’&e55 n,on 0t hnetn 04 CobolactAr&T.I .08-rn-mo 0W1 0,3 and roltoothelr Intl motion.prior to I pnttatnien toy tnoslte,too Or t.p&en I above his point Cad’tAo UOID__________ I I I I horohy 0.0557 that Al, —amad t ‘47 son or Ow yo,n- lkn.B 08111 :5o. ‘NO1-DC-16 lrX6n NOTICE DECAL’SIGN Writ.DECAL AITh ADHESSE BACKING. AVAILAntE FRDM EXCEL 5104 AND DECAL PH:510—601—D445 11 ‘Jo- DISCONNECT AC a cc POWER BOTh BEFORE WORXiNG ON Contact AT&t at 00035-2fl3, opt 9,3 and follow Otelr •thwvctomnprlortop.rloiinlng any malnt.SOItO Dr repair. 000re thin point STONEI-IQUSE RD899 RF NOTICE SIGN NOTICE (( a Oe.,Y .wln.s P4 Pa.anlolnea Inw000ed lee FCCN 0908e105 latin,nn.l.onet poptd.4n& aoen.tI...t,ilis..‘en rnn.nne. I c.eATar.irooetaeotaopar.0 01.03.n.e Oe.Ip Iryooo4.doaoeeeolthItlhel. CRAN_RUMW_SDALF_0O7 JEt D 215058 oACr MRUMWOSOSCE,MRUMWO3a7S7 CIT P POLE ASSEt CANDIDATE NUMBER: 7A SITE ADDRESS NOTICE DECAL SIGN 7444 SOUTH UPTON AVENUE RICHFIELD,MN 55423 S”EE ‘AVE SIGN DETAILS SHEEr NUM OLO C-6 ‘NO1-DC-16 ltX6’NOTICE DECAL’SIGN CRAN NODE RE SIGN PLACEMENT (e)F CIAWi-! ERNSt XC),ref A’E9VE BAOE*OC AVOULASLE 09t040 EXCEl.S9n AND DECAL PHI 510—808—0445 hIRN //eee.ew..dWeb.orn4rn&owWnpr.thacOId_931104aont.t135&pon...t NOTICE a AT&T MOBILITY 00’5.MAROUETTE AVON LIE VOW0CAAO_IS.US 554D2 or tIN.irro 540W MaCI VON ST.NTA FLOOR U Atfi’ FULLERTON E5OINEOIINO 010100 lIthE WODDF1EID ROAD,DUE I 100 SCI10UMOURO,ILLIIADS 0017) ta 047-0084100 R9W.EIAI.InoAFlrOr,eeInWoe NOTICE DECAL SIGN SCALE’N.T.0 (1 CRAN NODE RF SIGN PLACEMENT SCALEi N TE 2 CRAN RF NOTICE SIGN SCALEI N TT.3 CRAJA RF CAUTION SIGN SCALE n.7s.4 00 DonE 5050RIrt0n I DY A J/rJ/li 0075 tr’IEA I CRAN POLE POWER DISCONNECT SIGN CI dUO/N I F•it_lEO TA,tnln,oESE000eoCn nCOE 00 ANtOn CrSorInitnIoNonSEtnYnoLonerote SITE tAStE SCALE:N.T.S.CRAN POLE POWER DISCONNECT SIGr4CALFI ITS 6 RFNOTICE SIGN SEaL N.r S 7 NOT USED SCALE.11.1.0 (8 FRD.1:Tj ZOtDC’Dt DOSS {!!9IQ)cost—SOocI)IIllIllIItw555wcsiI5, - —,:-J.”Yt ---i:_..aI,— ;rr7t:.n _..,—,1.-S:F’zhoIas, -:-3 - 4piscepa Shurch.p -. --..-%...- S a-”:-i-t ‘E---—-- -st_fl ---....*-t J;‘th:;4.-‘i. —b Th 4 s—4r ‘—g’Penn Apjnrne-/;‘S •. :-‘ ‘— SbuIIEduCTh,onC.ertert ‘—--Sn S -—-—-—0 --h j.-”4 r—••F•.y.-.q;_4 .s ,-——— a‘a - .L=JL J—-_Zir4 J ---.Wj...—7!-,-ii ::-.-F-’--’—y A.>A’-ft .5 —_!,n: I:-1.-j •_-— -—-;.a ..- --.--)_.:t -I-—-F-’-..,S --:..--- 1 At-F -j_i--1 a —SIRhd -S . - -S —...%CathoIirhc --a--. 4r -2 ________ ai a_!—. FIBERROIJTE ——-—SCALE NTSI a t AT&T MOBILITY 90,5 MARGST AWNJC MROSTAPO_IS.MN 55M2 an CUL’ •IRELE$I 540 A.ASAEISON ST.0TH FLOORCHICAGO.IL 60651 FULLERTON •p1sI16(ERIWG DRSIBN I ICC F WOO 5.0 ROAD AZTE SEE 5CI6flLa LtO5 MO I” Ta fl4C A 3/Ti/IS 90%REeLS SJ 4/To/IS FINAL EM SO COOL SCAPE—SO OP CC 06 S6xI I%OO.EOE —NC INCE’5505.1 016 —-‘C—s—F SE’E NAME RANfiUMW.SOALE_007 TAO IS: 215058 PACE NUMBERI MRUMWO3O8IBIMRUMWO3O757 CITY POLE ASSES A: CAI€NCAEI..?AAEH’ 7A SI’E ACORESS 7444 SOUTH UPTON AVENUE RICHFIELD,MN 55423 SHEET NAME FIBER ROUTE SHE ES NUMBER C-8 qC.ECM St’S 0101.0205 / AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.B. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 61 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 4/20/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the approval of the first amendment to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park District for trail extension construction as part of the 77th Street Underpass project. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The eastern portion of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (NMC RT) currently serves both Richfield and Bloomington. The NMC RT's master plan recognized the potential for the trail to have two segments near the airport with the southern trail running from 12th Ave south of Hwy 494 along American Blvd. through Bloomington, and a northern trail running from 12th Ave north of Hwy 494 running east through the forthcoming 77th Street Underpass. T he 77th St Underpass project design includes a trail component that will be used to extend Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail under T H 77 as discussed in the NMCRT master plan. T he City has requested T hree Rivers funding support of $300,000 for development and construction of of the trail extension. Funding for this trail extension has been identified in T hree River ’s 2022 Capital Improvement Program. In order to access and use the funds for the purpose described above, both parties must agree to amend the existing NMCRT Cooperative Agreement. T his amendment was approved by the T RP D Board of Commissioners at it's April 15, 2021 regular meeting. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By Motion: Approve the first amendment to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park District for trail extension construction as part of the 77th Street Underpass project. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T As proposed, the First Amendment to the NMC RT Cooperative Agreement will provide $300,000 of funding in 2022 from Three Rivers to the City for the trail extension. Under the terms of the First Amendment, the City will be responsible for maintenance and management of the trail extension until such a time that the NMC RT master plan is amended to incorporate the extension into a larger plan for the trail to extend to Terminal 2 of MS P and to Fort Snelling State Park and trail network. The First Amendment does not commit TRP D to any further extension of the trail. Such a commitment would occur through a TRP D NMC RT Master Plan amendment process and would only be viable through a multi-agency partnership commitment to further development of the trail extension. T his trail extension will serve as a direct access route for non-motorized commuting to MS P—one of the largest employment nodes in the metro area. As such, T RP D sees it as an excellent example of the increasing demand in the regional trail network to play dual roles, as both a recreational network and as a transportation network. T hree Rivers believes support of this trail extension is helpful in developing the future partnerships needed to address the changing role of the regional trail network. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Construction of this trail extension is consistent with the Richfield comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7 - Transportation). C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: Construction of the 77th St. Underpass will begin this summer and having this agreement amendment in place will ensure Richfield's receipt of the funding from TRP D for trail extension construction. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and will be available to answer questions. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: None AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type TRP D NMC RT 1st A mendment C ontract/A greement E xhibit E xhibit First Amendment to TRAILWAY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL – 76TH STREET - 12TH AVE. TO CEDAR AVE. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF RICHFIELD Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Extension Construction from 76th Street to Longfellow Avenue via the Highway 77 Underpass Project This First Amendment, made and entered into this ____ day of ____________, 2021 by and between Three Rivers Park District, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as “Park District”) and the City of Richfield, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the “City”). Whereas, the Park District and City entered into a Trailway Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail on March 18th, 2010; and Whereas, the City is in the process of designing and constructing an extension of Richfield Parkway and 77th Street as a new underpass of Highway 77; and Whereas, the Park District desires to partner with the City to extend the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail from 76th Street south along Richfield Parkway and east on 77th Street through the underpass of Highway 77 to Longfellow Road to preserve the potential for future regional trail connections to the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport and to the trail network at Fort Snelling State Park. Now therefore, in consideration of mutual covenants herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and Park District agree to amend the Agreement as follows: Except as herein provided, the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement shall apply to and govern the provisions of this First Amendment. 1. Construction. The City will administer the trail construction contract and inspect the construction of all contract work. The Park District will have the right to enter the jobsite and make inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the City staff, but the Park District will have no responsibility for the supervision of the work. 2. Funding. The Park District agrees to fund a fixed amount of $300,000 for the development of the trail segment from 76th Street south along Richfield Parkway and east on 77th Street through the underpass of Highway 77 to Longfellow Road as depicted in Exhibit B. Park District funding will be available at the City’s request in January of 2022 or when construction begins, whichever is later. 3. Land Acquisition. The City will be responsible for securing any temporary and permanent easements necessary for trail construction and use of the trail. The trail extension shall remain the property and responsibility of the City until a Second Amendment conveying rights and responsibilities to the Park District is approved. A Second Amendment would occur if the Nine Mile Creek Master Plan is updated to include the trail extension as well as a further extension of the trail to Terminal 2 of MSP Airport onward to Fort Snelling State Park. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Park District and the City have entered into this First Amendment as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF RICHFIELD, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Date Its Mayor By: Date Its City Manager THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota By: Date John Gunyou, Board Chair By: Date Boe R. Carlson, Superintendent and Secretary to the Board John Gunyou 04/16/2021 Boe R. Carlson 04/16/2021 Exhibit B: Document Completion Certificate Document Reference : a4944a65-535d-4c96-a3b6-cc9f3fab1261 Document Title : 1st Amendment Nine Mile Creek RT with Richfield Document Region : Northern Virginia Sender Name : Linda Ziegler Sender Email : linda.ziegler@threeriversparks.org Total Document Pages : 3 Secondary Security : Not Required Participants John Gunyou (john@gunyou.com)1. Boe R. Carlson (boe.carlson@threeriversparks.org)2. CC Jonathan.Vlaming@threeriversparks.org1. Julie.Sommers@threeriversparks.org2. Document History Timestamp Description 04/16/2021 08:53AM CDT Document sent by Linda Ziegler (linda.ziegler@threeriversparks.org). 04/16/2021 08:53AM CDT Email sent to John Gunyou (john@gunyou.com). 04/16/2021 08:53AM CDT Email sent to Linda Ziegler (linda.ziegler@threeriversparks.org). 04/16/2021 10:15AM CDT Document viewed by John Gunyou (john@gunyou.com). 73.24.142.117 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 11_2_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36 04/16/2021 10:15AM CDT John Gunyou (john@gunyou.com) has agreed to terms of service and to do business electronically with Linda Ziegler (linda.ziegler@threeriversparks.org). 73.24.142.117 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 11_2_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36 04/16/2021 10:15AM CDT Signed by John Gunyou (john@gunyou.com). 73.24.142.117 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 11_2_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36 04/16/2021 10:15AM CDT Email sent to Boe R. Carlson (boe.carlson@threeriversparks.org). 04/16/2021 10:23AM CDT Document viewed by Boe R. Carlson (boe.carlson@threeriversparks.org). 68.46.8.81 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36 Edg/89.0.774.75 04/16/2021 10:24AM CDT Boe R. Carlson (boe.carlson@threeriversparks.org) has agreed to terms of service and to do business electronically with Linda Ziegler (linda.ziegler@threeriversparks.org). 68.46.8.81 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36 Edg/89.0.774.75 04/16/2021 10:24AM CDT Signed by Boe R. Carlson (boe.carlson@threeriversparks.org). 68.46.8.81 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36 Edg/89.0.774.75 04/16/2021 10:24AM CDT Document copy sent to John Gunyou (john@gunyou.com). 04/16/2021 10:24AM CDT Document copy sent to Boe R. Carlson (boe.carlson@threeriversparks.org). Reference 6C-1 Trail Extension north of Hwy 494 as depicted in the Master Plan AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.C. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 62 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 4/20/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the Approval of the 77th Street Underpass Final Design Layout, Project Plans and Specifications and Authorize Project Bidding. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Background Consistent with City Council direction, the Capital I mprovement Plan (C I P), and the City's Comprehensive Plan, staff is working towards the construction of the 77th Street Underpass I mprovements Project. The 77th Street underpass will connect 77th Street east and west of Trunk Highway (TH) 77 (Cedar Avenue) to eliminate a gap in the minor reliever network. The project will connect Bloomington and Longfellow Avenues and address regional traffic issues on the I -494 corridor through Richfield and Bloomington. W ith a project funding package identified and plans at 100% approval through MnD OT, staff are recommending moving forward to advertise in May 2021 with construction anticipated to begin in J uly 2021. Construction will be ongoing through October 2023. Final Layout, Plans and Specifications At the September 11, 2018 regular meeting, the City Council approved the final layout of the 77th Street Underpass. Since final layout approval in 2018, project staff and the engineering consultant have had to make small changes to the final layout, mostly related to the stormwater solutions for the project. T he biggest changes are the elimination of the stormwater holding ponds on the N E and S E quadrant of the underpass, with that infrastructure moving underground. T he updated final design layout dated December 2020 is attached for review and approval. Due to the size of the Project Manual and Construction Specifications (1,842 pages) and the fact that they are nonpublic until bidding has commenced, those documents are not attached to this staff report. However, if requested, staff can make them available for review by City Council prior to the meeting Bid Authorization Following authorization to move forward with soliciting competitive bids for project construction, staff will be working with the engineering consultant to let the project. At this time, staff is expecting to have City Council consider awarding the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder at the J une 22, 2021 City Council meeting. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By Motion: Approve the 77th Street Underpass Final Design Layout, Project Plans and Specifications and Authorize Project Bidding. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T The City Council passed Resolution No. 10847 on October 8, 2013 supporting the 77th Street Underpass Project. The City Council passed Bill No. 2013-24 on December 10, 2013 adopting the 77th Street Underpass Official Right-of-Way Map (City Ordinance 551). An open house was held March 10, 2016 gathering feedback on two layout options. A City Council work session was held on April 12, 2016 in which staff presented the layout options, the open house feedback, and received direction on the design moving forward. Council directed staff to explore another alternative layout that provided the future Richfield Parkway connection along the east side of Washington Park, eliminating the need for a bridge or intersection for old Cedar Ave. A City Council work session was held on May 10, 2016 in which staff presented the alternative Richfield Parkway connection layout brought up at the April 12 meeting. Council consensus was to direct staff to proceed with this layout. A City Council work session was held on J une 27, 2017 in which staff updated the Council on project design, schedule, and funding. A project open house was held J anuary 18, 2018 gathering feedback on the project layout including both the Richfield Parkway connection and separate improvements to Washington Park. Comments primarily focused on the sledding hill, parking, and other park impacts. A City Council work session was held on February 27, 2018 in which staff presented the open house feedback, and received direction on the design moving forward including informal approval of the Preliminary Design Layout. At the September 11, 2018 regular meeting, the City Council approved the final layout of the 77th Street Underpass. Since final layout approval in 2018, project staff and the engineering consultant have had to make small changes to the final layout, mostly related to the stormwater solutions for the project. The biggest changes are the elimination of the stormwater holding ponds on the NE and S E quadrant of the underpass, with that infrastructure moving underground. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): For City contracts or purchases estimated to exceed $175,000, sealed bids shall be solic ited by public notic e in the manner and subjec t to the law governing contracts or purchases by the City of Richfield. Construction of the 77th Street Underpass is consistent with the City 's Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7 - Transportation) and has been included in the Capital I mprovement Budget and Plan. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: W ith project funding identified and agreements between local agencies in draft form, the project team is ready to advertise for bids once MnD OT staff signs the final plans. Soliciting bids in May will allow the project to break ground as soon as J uly 2021. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: T he overall project uses/sources is attached. T he project construction is estimated to cost $21,000,000 and will be paid for primarily by the following sources: Federal: $7,000,000 State Bonding: $11,678,815 MnD OT: $4,000,000 Local funds: $150,000 for utility replacement and as needed E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: None ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: None AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type F inal L ayout 12-2020 E xhibit P roject Uses and S ources B ackup Material RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6700 PORTLAND AVE CITY OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6700 PORTLAND AVE CITY OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 7629 BLOOMINGTON AVE S MATTHEW AND SARAH KARNAS BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 307 MAPLE ISLAND RD 76 & BLOOMINGTON LLC RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6700 PORTLAND AVE CITY OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6700 PORTLAND AVE CITY OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD, MN 55423 1550 78TH ST E ADLER GRADUATE SCHOOL BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 8713 DUPONT AVE S 494 BUILDING PARTNERSHIP LLC RICHFIELD, MN 55423 1620 78TH ST E OLIN 2 LLC RICHFIELD, MN 55423 1620 78TH ST E C/O METRO SALES INC JERRY E MATHWIG RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6700 PORTLAND AVE CITY OF RICHFIELD 55437 BLOOMINGTON, MN 4801 WEST 98TH ST PHILO GEORGE GEORGE PUTHUKULAM 55431 BLOOMINGTON, MN 8024 THOMAS AVE S PROP LLC WILLIAM MILTON 55431 BLOOMINGTON, MN 8024 THOMAS AVE S PROP LLC WILLIAM MILTON CARROLLTON, TX 75007 4001 INTERNATIONAL PKWY G6 HOSPITALITY PROP LLC 55437 BLOOMINGTON, MN 4801 98TH ST W 7600 CEDAR AVE LLC MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 6040 28TH AVE S METRO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 6040 28TH AVE S METRO AIRPORT COMMISSION SPEED EX MPH SPEED DESIGN MPH 30 30 Frontage Road SPEED EX MPH SPEED DESIGN MPH 40 40 Ramp 1H BEGIN CONSTRUCTION STA 110+06.22 FRONTAGE ROAD END CONSTRUCTION BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION EXIST BRIDGE NO. 27070 EXIST BRIDGE NO. 27053 PROP BRIDGE NO.27R35 PROP BRIDGE NO.27R37 PROP BRIDGE NO.27R38 PROP BRIDGE NO.27R36 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 0 50 FT 100 FT 77TH Street Improvements 12'40'REX 15.5'LANE EX 18'LANE EX 19.5'25'R ON LOOP 1W EXISTING RAMP METERS 8' TRAIL 1:5WALL 2 26'1:4016.5'RAMP METERS EXISTING AND PROPOSED1:35 LANE TAPERWALL 1 CITY OF RICHFIELD COMMISSION METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS HENNEPIN COUNTY 494 INTERSTATE 175'R 29'22' 18' 3 0'R30'R EX 19.5'EX 19.5'EX 19.5'12'LANE6' SHLD12'LANE12'LANE8' SHLD6' SHLD6' SHLD12'LANE12'LANE11'SHLD10'TRAIL W/ 2' BLVD & 2' TREATMENT 31' 10' TRAIL 2' TREAMENTW/2' BLVD W/ 2' BLVD 1:10 1:10 1:10 1:15 SHLD1:15 SHLD16'1 :1 5 S HL D1:15 S H L D1:15 SHLD16'1:10 6'WALK 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:40 (CENTERPOINT ENERGY) PRESSURE GASMAIN EXISTING 20" HIGH (CENTERPOINT ENERGY) PRESSURE GASMAIN EXISTING 20" HIGH (CENTERPOINT ENERGY) PRESSURE GASMAIN EXISTING 20" HIGH REPLACEMENT CORRIDOR 20" OR 24" PROPOSED HIGH PRESSURE STEEL GASMAIN REPLACEMENT CORRIDOR 20" OR 24" PROPOSED HIGH PRESSURE STEEL GASMAIN REPLACEMENT CORRIDOR 20" OR 24" PROPOSED HIGH PRESSURE STEEL GASMAIN TH77 NB (MATCH EXIST ACROSS ROAD)EX 8'EX 15'EX 16'4 5'R50'R 7'BLVD1:50 SHLD TAPER40'R300'-12'LTL 10'TRAIL 13'THRU LANE 12'THRU LANE 11'THRU LANE 11'THRU LANE WALL 3 13'THRU LANE PROPOSED NOISE WALL 13'THRU LANE FINAL LAYOUT RICHFIELD PARKWAY 77TH ST WB 77TH STREET END S.P. 157-108-035 BEGIN S.P. 157-108-035 77TH STREET RAMP 1H FRONTAGE ROAD 77TH ST WB TH77 BEGIN S.P. 2758-82 END S.P. 2758-82 TH77 RAMP 1G TH77 NB (MATCH EXIST) RAMP 1H RAMP 1G 77TH ST 6' BLVD 10'TRAIL W/ 2' BUFFER AND 2' CLR ZONE24' ROADWAY (FACE TO FACE)1:15 S H L D DECEMBER 2020 PROPOSED NOISE WALL 12'THRU LANE 6'WALK W/ 2' BLVD 12'LANEWALL 5VAR.8'8'VAR.VAR.40'R 2 5'R1:30W/ 2' BLVD6'WALK 13'THRU LANE11'THRU LANE11'THRU LANE 10'TRAIL 300'-12'LTL 11'THRU LANE 13'THRU LANE 10' PARKING13'LANE10' TRAIL1:513'LANE6' WALK40'R7'BLVD 6'WALK 12'THRU LANE 13'THRU LANEEX 14'LANE EX 13'LANE EX 14'LANE EX 13'LANE 8'VAR.22'12'9'14' THRU LANE18' THRU LANEWALL 412'LANE10'SHLD12'LANE6'SHLD6'SHLD10'SHLD16'LANE16'LANEVAR. MEDIAN6'MEDIAN12'LANE12'LANE6' SHOULDER8'8'16'LANE VAR.VAR.1:25 SHLD TH 7 7 N B A D T 6 7 0 0 0 ( 2 0 1 5 )TH 77 SB ADT 67000 (2015)AIRPORTINTERNATIONALMPLS/ST. PAUL RAMP 1P ADT 4,900 (6,700)494 ADT 146000 (XXXX)RAMP 1G ADT 5,600 (6,600)SPEED POSTED MPH SPEED DESIGN MPH Trunk Highway 77 2020 AADT = 67,900 2040 AADT = 75,000 (3.0%) 2040 HCAADT = 2,7005570 SPEED POSTED MPH SPEED DESIGN MPH 77th Street 2020 AADT = 12,500 2040 AADT = 13,850 (3.6%) 2040 HCAADT = 5004040 BLOOMINGTON AVE S76TH ST FRONTAGE RD RAMP 1H RAMP 1YOLD CEDAR AVELONGFELLOW AVE18TH AVE S17TH AVE SMINNESOTA 77 LOOP W-S NE CIRCLE RAM P 1H L O O P 1W RA MP 1G R A MP 1 G RAMP 1 FRAMP 1YARAMP 1VRAMP 1HConcrete Curb & Gutter / Median Pond Turf Establishment Bituminous Roadway Concrete Roadway Permanent Easement Bridges and Walls Shoulders (Paved) Inplace ROW Prop ROW Trail Sidewalk Temporary Easement SPEED EX MPH SPEED DESIGN MPH 35 35 Ramp 1G Legend Noise Wall EXTENSION FUTURE PARKWAY { RICHFIELD PARKWAY CITY BOUNDARY 77th Underpass Funding Uses/Sources Richfield Project No. 41300 Updated 4/20/2021 Uses:Notes Design $2,300,000 Construction Costs $21,000,000 2021 estimate (includes 5% contingency) Utility Relocation $200,000 Right of Way (ROW)$7,000,000 Legal $100,000 Construction Adminstration $400,000 City Labor $375,000 City Staff Additional Contingency $1,050,000.0 5% above what's in the construction est. Total Uses $32,425,000 Sources: LRIP-Design $2,146,842 Design Federal $7,000,000 Construction, requires 20% match (MnDOT) 2017 State Bonding $10,000,000 ROW ($4.32M) & Construction ($5.68M) 2020 State Bonding $6,000,000 Construction Three Rivers Park $300,000 TRPD Trail - billed as actual cost Hennepin County $1,500,000 ROW MnDOT $4,000,000 MAC $300,000 MSA $500,000 As needed for ineligible items Total Sources $33,246,842 Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED ORDINANCES AGENDA ITEM #4. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 63 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Nellie J erome, A ssistant P lanner / Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector 4/20/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Second reading to consider a proposed ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations, and summary publication of said ordinance. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: T he identified purposes of the home occupation regulations of the Zoning Code are to allow for home occupations that are appropriate for residential settings; to protect those conducting a home occupation from self-induced harm; and to allow for home occupations that would not negatively impact others in a residential area. At the request of the City Council, staff has reviewed the current zoning regulations, the Comprehensive Plan, and recent complaints related to home occupations. Based on this review, staff is recommending the following revisions. Proposed revisions: Clarify that operators of a home occupation must reside on the premises full-time. Currently, home occupations must be operated entirely within an enclosed building. The proposed amendment adds an exception that will allow growing food or ornamental crops as an outside home occupation, so long as materials are maintained in a clean and orderly manner. Produce grown on-site may be sold or distributed off-site, or (based on the public hearing and discussion at the Planning Commission meeting), may be made available for on-site pick-up via a Community Supported Agriculture (C S A) distribution model. Clarify commercial vehicle allowances. Clarify prohibitions related to retail sales as a home occupation. Allow one non-resident employee in addition to resident employees, by right. The proposed regulations are intended to allow expanded opportunities for home oc cupations and local food production, while minimizing the more-disruptive aspec ts of commercial business that are often bothersome to neighbors. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By motion: 1. Approve the attached ordinance amending rules related to home occupations; and 2. Approve a resolution authoriz ing summary publication of the attached ordinance amending rules related to home occupations. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T T he ability to conduct a home occupation can provide affordability and flexibility for business owners and employees, particularly small entrepreneurs. Businesses that generate noise, include outdoor storage, generate traffic , or have similar noticeable effects tend to generate c omplaints from neighbors and have historic ally been prohibited as home occupations. Businesses that are c onducted within a fully enclosed building, with limited outside employees or customer traffic, are generally not notic eable to neighbors and have therefore been permitted as home occupations. At present, all residents in Ric hfield can grow food at home and share that food with friends and family. There are no limits as to the size or placement of either food or ornamental gardens on private residential property (with the exception of sight triangle regulations at corners). Backyard gardens, like the W orld W ar I I “victory gardens” which enc ouraged people in the U.S. to grow their own food, are c ommon throughout the metro area and can be a rewarding pastime and a way to grow extra produce during the warmer months. The Community Supported Agric ulture (C S A) model generally sells “shares” at the beginning of the growing season and a box of produc e is provided to the consumer weekly or bi-weekly throughout the season. Commercial businesses and religious institutions often serve as distribution locations for C S A shares. The P lanning Commission voted unanimously at the meeting on March 22, 2021, to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment, including an additional allowance for on-site C S A pick-up of produce grown on-site. The City Council approved a first reading of this ordinance on April 13, 2021. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The purpose of the Zoning Code is to protect public health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the city, by fostering harmonious and workable relationships between land uses. The purposes of the home occupation rules are to allow home occupations that are appropriate for residential settings, to protect those conducting a home occupation from self-induced harm, and to protect the property rights of neighbors. The Comprehensive Plan includes a goal to explore opportunities for policy change related to local food production and entrepreneurship. Staff has reviewed the home occupation regulations of nearby and peer communities in regard to market/production gardens and C S A distribution. Staff reviewed the ordinances of the cities of Bloomington, Eagan, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, and St. Louis Park. The following is a summary of policies in these peer communities: Horticultural activities are generally allowed as accessory uses in most cities, although not as home occupations. None of the cities allowed retail sales from residential properties. None of the suburban cities allow production/market gardening as a home occupation. The City of Minneapolis permits “the growing of food or ornamental crops, to be sold or donated off-site” as a home occupation. Minneapolis allows C S A box pickup as an accessory use in residential areas, unrelated to home occupations. Finding that there are benefits of on-site produce pick-up to both growers and nearby consumers, and based on the public hearing and discussion at the Planning Commission meeting, staff recommend allowing on-site pick-up of on-site-grown produce only through a C SA model of distribution. CS A models involve delivery or pick up of a weekly produce box for which customers pre-pay at the beginning of the growing season. T he CS A model does not involve active sales of produce, making it a more appropriate activity for home occupations while still increasing local access to fresh food. City staff recommends that the regulation not include a specified limit on the number of pick-ups per day or week because it would be very difficult to enforce. Further, limiting distribution to produce grown on an individual site will naturally limit then number of shares than can sold. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: Delay of the adoption of revised rules will likely impact the spring growing season. Current rules do not allow production/market gardening as a home occupation. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: Notice of the Planning Commission's public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper on March 11, 2021. The first reading of the ordinance by the City Council was held on April 13. Zoning ordinance amendments are effective upon publication in the Sun Current Newspaper, typically 10 days following adoption by the City Council. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Recommend approval of an ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations with an added provision allowing produce grown off-site to be distributed through a C S A model at residential properties. Recommend denial of an ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations, maintaining the status quo. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type P roposed Ordinance Ordinance Resolution - S ummary P ublication Resolution L etter BILL NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD ZONING CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATION RULES THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Section 509.21 of the Richfield Zoning Code, Home Occupations, is amended to read as follows: Subdivision 1. Home occupation defined. Home occupations are defined in subsection 507.07 of this Code. Subd. 2. Purposes. The purposes of this subsection are to allow for home occupations that are appropriate for residential settings; protect those conducting a home occupation from self-induced harm; and protect the property rights of neighbors. Subd. 3. Compliance required. A home occupation may be established and conducted only in accordance with this subsection. Subd. 4. Subordinate use. A home occupation shall be permitted as an accessory use to a residential dwelling unit. The home occupation use must be clearly subordinate to the residential use of the property, occupying no more than 25 percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling (excluding garages), and must be conducted by a person or persons who reside full-time in the dwelling . Subd. 5. Activities. A home occupation must be conducted in such a manner that activities connected with it are not noticeable from adjacent streets or residential lots, and except as permitted in Subd. 6 below, do not draw attention to the home occupation. All activities related to a home occupation must be conducted within a fully enclosed building,. The growing of food or ornamental crops, to be sold or donated off-site, shall be exempt from this provision provided that plants and related materials are maintained in a clean and orderly manner and that waste is disposed of appropriately. Food or ornamental crops may only be made available for on-site pick-up, provided that they are grown on-site, if they are distributed through a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) model. Subd. 6. Advertising. Signs are allowed in accordance with the provisions of Section 549 of the zoning code. Subd. 7. Outside storage. No outside storage of products or materials or equipment connected with the home occupation is permitted. This subdivision does not prohibit the outside parking of motor vehicles on the driveway of the premises in accordance with Subd. 8 below. Subd. 8. Outdoor parking of commercial vehicle. Outdoor parking of no more than one (1) commercial vehicle identified for business purposes is permitted, provided that the vehicle is registered to an occupant of the home, and that such vehicle parking is not otherwise prohibited by Section 1320 of the city code or any other applicable district regulations. Subd. 9. Parking, structural changes, lighting. Parking, structural alteration, lighting or similar facilities which indicate a use of the dwelling for purposes other than a residential structure are prohibited. Home occupations involving the need for more than three (3) outdoor parking spaces for operators and customers shall be prohibited. Parking facilities required to serve the home occupation shall be provided on the premises, but no such parking facilities shall be provided within any required front or side yard, except upon an established driveway. Subd. 10. Retail sales. Continuous Regular retail sales or distribution of products on the premises are prohibited. Occasional sales of products or other articles are permitted where the dwelling serves as an office for a person regularly engaged in retail sales outside the dwelling, or where such occasional sales are incidental to and not the primary purpose of the home occupation. Subd. 11. Specific activities prohibited. The following activities shall not be allowed as home occupations: a) The repair, whether for consideration or not, of motor vehicles which are not registered to a resident of the dwelling on the property where the repair is made, or to a son or daughter, sibling, parent, grandparent, or grandchild of a resident of the property; b) Adult business establishments regulated under Section 1196 of the city code; c) The practice of medical, dental, chiropractic, psychiatric, or other similar treatment or therapy, including acupuncture, where the person(s) providing such treatment or therapy is not licensed by the State of Minnesota to administer such treatment or therapy; or in the case of massage therapy, where the person(s) providing such treatment is not certified by the "National Certification Board for Therapy Massage and Bodywork" or by the "Massage and Bodywork Licensing Examination;" d) Businesses, educational programs, or similar gatherings which meet on a regular basis, having more than six (6) nonresident adults in attendance at one (1) time; e) Pet grooming or pet care facilities, except those legally existing on or before June 1, 1995; f) Gun or ammunition sales/repair, except those legally existing on or before June 1, 1995; g) Music instruction, unless conducted within a single-family (detached) dwelling; h) Tattoo businesses; and i) Sale of honey produced by hives located within the city regulated under section 906 of the city code. Subd. 12. Performance standards. A home occupation may not adversely impact the residential character of the dwelling or its neighborhood because of the emission of noise, odor, water, smoke, dust, gases, heat, glare, vibration, electrical interference, or parking or traffic resulting from the conduct of the home occupation. Subd. 13. Nonresident employee. One (1) person in addition to the person or persons who occupy the dwelling may be employed at the residence. if a conditional use permit is issued in accordance with Subsection 547.09 of this Code. Subd. 14. Hours of operation. The hours of operation for any home occupation shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Subd. 15. Use of equipment. No mechanical or electrical equipment requiring in excess of 240 volts single phase shall be permitted in the conduct of a home occupation, and no electric motor shall exceed three (3) horsepower. Section 2 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD ZONING CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATION RULES WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above-referenced amendment of the Richfield City Code; and WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense of publication of the complete text is not justified. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication: SUMMARY PUBLICATION BILL NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD ZONING CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATION RULES This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. This ordinance amends Zoning Code Section 509.21, Home Occupations. The approved ordinance includes amendments to clarify the intent of the home occupation rules, and to allow growing food or ornamental crops as an outside home occupation, so long as materials are maintained in a clean and orderly manner. The ordinance amendment requires that produce may either be sold or distributed off-site, or may be made available for on-site pick-up via a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) distribution model so long as it is grown on-site. The amendment also allows one non- resident employee, in addition to resident employees, by right. Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office during normal business hours or upon request by calling the Department of Community Development at (612) 861-9760. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED ORDINANCES AGENDA ITEM #5. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 64 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Ryan K rzos, P lanner D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector 4/21/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider approval of a second reading of an ordinance rezoning property at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street to Planned Mixed Use (P MU) and consider approval of a resolution for a variety of land use approvals for a mixed use Planned Unit Development. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: E S G Design and Architecture, on behalf of Enclave Companies (Developer), submitted land use applications for a Planned Unit Development (P UD) consisting of a mixed use building at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street. The proposed development, known as Lynk65, would consist of 159 residential units, residential amenities, and approximately 8,000 square feet of commercial space. The development would replace an existing strip mall and a single-family residence. The project area is currently zoned General Commercial (C-2). The site is located in what has been known as the Lakes at Lyndale area. Since the late 1990s, the City has identified this area for reinvestment and/or redevelopment. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Mixed Use; the intent of which is to create a vibrant, thriving city center that will serve as Richfield’s downtown. The city center is to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. The proposed development utilizes high-quality vertically mixed use urban design; adding households as well as new small-scale commercial space to the city center. The requested zoning change to Planned Mixed Use will allow for flexibility in administering specific requirements of the Zoning Code on an oddly-shaped site, in exchange for superior design and a project that meets the needs of the community. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the rezoning and proposed development on March 22, 2021. Minutes from that meeting are included as an attachment to this report. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property to P MU and to recommend approval of the development plans. Staff finds that the proposed project meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code requirements, and therefore recommends approval of the applications. T his proposal meets, and actually exceeds, the City's current Inclusionary Housing Policy (by providing the full "in-lieu" payment and including ten additional two-bedroom units affordable to households earning 60% of the area median income). RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By motion: 1. Approve an ordinance amending Appendix I of the Richfield City Code to change the zoning designation of property at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street from General Commercial (C-2) to Planned Mixed Use (P MU). 2. Approve a resolution approving the Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Final Development Plan for Lynk65. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T On September 24, 2019 representatives of Lynk65 presented conceptual plans for a mixed use development to the City Council, Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), and Planning Commission. Revised conceptual plans were presented to the City Council, HRA, and Planning Commission on J uly 20, 2020. I n the Fall of 2020 the City Council approved a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and Tax I ncrement Plan to facilitate the development and the inclusion of affordable rental units within the project. Per City Council policy a neighborhood meeting is required for Zoning Amendment (rezoning) requests. On Wednesday, March 3, representatives from Enclave Companies and E S G Architecture and Design hosted a neighborhood meeting regarding the development proposal. The project team presented the proposed plans and renderings to approximately a dozen individual attendees. Discussion and questions were on a range of topics including: residential density, parking, affordability, fencing and screening, traffic and other impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the rezoning and proposed development on March 22, 2021. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property to P MU and to recommend approval of the development plans. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The City’s Comprehensive Plan designates a large contiguous area including the subject property as a mixed use downtown. The intent of the mixed use category is to create a vibrant, thriving city center that will serve as Richfield’s downtown. The city center is to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. Residential densities are envisioned as being a range between 50 and 150 units per acre in the city center. At 77 units per acre, the proposed development falls in the middle of the range. The proposed Zoning District is Planned Mixed Use, with the underlying Mixed Use Community (MU-C) zoning district serving as a basis for code requirements. Planned Unit Developments are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resources and to encourage innovation in planning and building. I n exchange for these efficiencies and superior design, flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements is available. The proposal substantially complies with the Mixed Use-Community Districts requirements. Minor deviations with regard to sidewalks along rights-of-way, impervious area and building coverage, and upper story setbacks, are alternatively addressed through site and building design. There are a number of sets of review criteria that apply to this proposal. Generally, the criteria require that the Council find that the proposal conforms to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code without having undue adverse impacts on public health, safety, and welfare. The proposal includes 238 parking stalls for residents and commercial space users provided as surface and structured podium parking. Parking requirements can be reduced by 10% based on proximity to frequent public transit service, which would apply in this location. Residential parking requirements in the Mixed Use Districts are 1.25 per unit. W ith 159 proposed units a minimum of 179 stalls are required for the residential component of the project. Commercial parking requirements range from 3 to 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail/office/service. As no commercial tenants have been identified, that requirement is averaged to 3.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Coffee shops (4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet) and restaurants (10 spaces per 1,000 square feet) carry higher parking requirements. Calculating the commercial parking requirement for this project is dependent on whether a restaurant or coffee shop space is included. Please see the chart below for examples. Depending on the type of commercial user, between 22 and upwards of 50 spaces would be required for the commercial component of the project. As the proposal includes 53 surface stalls, staff is recommending a condition of the P UD limiting the amount of restaurant space to 4,500 square feet, which would likely result in an associated parking requirement of around 53. Commercial space allocation Requirement after 10% transit reduction 8,000 sq. ft. retail/office/service at 3.5 stalls per 1k sf (no restaurant space)25 spaces 6,800 sq. ft. retail/office/service + 1,200 sq. ft. coffee shop 21 spaces (retail) + 5 spaces (coffee shop) = 26 total 6,800 sq. ft. retail/office/service + 1,200 sq. ft. restaurant 21 spaces (retail) + 11 spaces (restaurant) = 32 total 3,500 sq. ft. retail/office/service + 4,500 sq. ft. restaurant 11 spaces (retail) + 41 spaces (restaurant) = 52 total A full discussion of all applicable review criteria is provided as an attachment to this report - see "Required Findings" below. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: A complete application was received and the "60-day clock" started on March 8, 2021. The Council must make a decision on the Zoning requests, or extend the deadline by an additional 60 days, by May 7, 2021. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The application processing fees have been paid. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: A public hearing on the rezoning and development plans was held before the Planning Commission on March 22, 2021. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current Newspaper and mailed to properties within 500 feet of the site. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property to P MU and to recommend approval of the development plans. The City Council approved a first reading of the ordinance rezoning the property on April 13, 2021. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Approve the requests with modified or additional stipulations. Deny the requested land use approvals with findings that requirements are not met. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: Representatives from Enclave Companies, E S G Architecture and Design, and Westwood Professional Services. AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Ordinance - Rezone from C -2 to P MU Ordinance P UD Resolution Resolution L etter P UD Requirements B ackup Material P roposed P lans E xhibit Zoning Map E xhibit P lanned L and Uses Map E xhibit March P lanning C ommission Minutes B ackup Material March P lanning C ommission P ublic C omments regarding Lynk65 B ackup Material ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 65TH STREET AS PLANNED MIXED USE THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 8 of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 10 to read as follows: (10) M-4 (NE Corner 65th and Lyndale): Lot 1, Block 1, Lyndale Oaks Second Addition. Sec. 2. Section 3, Paragraph 28 is repealed. (28) M-4 (E of Lyndale between 64th and 65th). Lots 3 through 5 and Lots 18 through 20, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks Addition except for the Northwesterly 25 feet of Lot 18; and Lot 2, Block 2, J.N. Hauser's Second Addition. (Amended, Bill No. 1992-11, 2011-22) Sec. 3. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AN FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 65TH STREET WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a final development plan and conditional use permit for a planned unit development to allow construction of a five-story mixed-use building on the parcel of land located at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street (“subject property”), legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Lyndale Oaks Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing at its March 22, 2021 meeting, and recommended approval of the amended final development plan and conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 500 feet of the subject property on March 9, 2021 and published in the Sun Current newspaper on March 11, 2021; and WHEREAS, the final development plan and conditional use permit meet those requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. ____; and WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. ____; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of a planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are approved for a mixed-use development as described in City Council Report No. ____, on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: • The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City’s Administrative Review Committee Reports dated February 26, 2021 and compliance with all other City and State regulations. • Permitted uses shall include those uses permitted in the Mixed-Use Community District. Additionally, Class I and II restaurants exceeding 4,500 square feet in gross area require review of an amendment to the PUD. • If a restaurant tenant is installed, odor control systems are required to mitigate cooking odors in accordance with City Code Subsection 544.27. • A boulevard feature permit from Richfield Public W orks is required before planting on public right-of-way. • Final landscaping plans must be approved by the Community Development Department prior to installation. Developer should consider native plantings that meet screening requirements previously identified. • Final trail sight line and clear zones must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. • All parking spaces shall remain available year round. • All new utility service must be underground. • All utilities must be grouped away from public right-of-way and screened from public view in accordance with Ordinance requirements. A screening plan is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. • The property owner is responsible for the ongoing maintenance and tending of all landscaping in accordance with approved plans. • This approval does not constitute approval of specific signs. Sign permits are required and must be applied for separately. • A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. • Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete. • Final stormwater management plans must be approved by the Public Works Director. • As-builts or $7,500 cash escrow must be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. 4. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or upon written request by the developer, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9. 5. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April 2021. Maria Regan-Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Required Findings Part 1: Development proposals in the Mixed Use Districts shall be reviewed for compliance with the following (537.01, Subd.3): 1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City’s development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan and any redevelopment plans established for the area. The City’s Comprehensive Plan designates a large contiguous area as a mixed use downtown encompassing the greater 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue area. The intent of the Mixed Use category is to create a vibrant, thriving city center that will serve as Richfield’s downtown. The city center is to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. The proposed development utilizes high-quality urban design and adds households as well as small-scale commercial opportunities to the city center. 2. Consistency with the regulations of the Mixed Use Districts as described by Section 537 of the Code. The proposed development meets the intent of the Mixed Use District regulations. The proposal deviates from regulations as follows: • Sidewalks are required along both sides of all public rights-of-way. As proposed, sidewalks are not provided along the portions of Harriet Avenue and 64 ½ Street abutting the north side of the site. These rights-of-way do not have sidewalks in this area. As a result, sidewalk on the north side of the site would not connect to a sidewalk system and thus would be dead ends at the property line. The proposal does include connections from 64 ½ Street to 65th Street along the east side of the building; providing connectivity from the adjoining neighborhood to the north to both the development and to the city center. • Proposed impervious area totals 95.3% of the development site exceeding the 80% maximum. The commercial properties proposed to be replaced by this project are extensively covered with impervious surfaces. The intent of this requirement is to provide areas for open space for recreation and storm water management opportunities. The proposed development plans include a third-floor amenity plaza, and two other above-grade outdoor community areas. The size of these amenities is suitable to serve the residents of this development. Additionally, below grade storm water management facilities are proposed to handle increased drainage associated with the added hard surfaces. • Building area covers 70.6 percent of the building site exceeding the 50 percent maximum. A significant portion of the proposed building coverage in excess of the 50 percent threshold contains the structure podium parking with the amenity plaza atop. Less this area, the building would be significantly closer to meeting the maximum. For reference, the ground floor building area equates to 54.3% of the total development site. Similar to the impervious area requirements, the building coverage maximum is intended to ensure the site has open area and for storm water treatment. • Mixed use developments are required to have a minimum 20-foot front Setback for upper Stories after the 3rd story. The intent behind this requirement is to create a pleasant pedestrian realm by addressing massing on higher parts of buildings so as to maintain a human scale. The proposed design includes activated building frontages along Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street utilizing commercial storefronts and townhome-style units lining the podium platform. Additionally, architectural treatments on the building, including material patterns and articulation break up the massing along all sides of the building. 3. Creation of a design for structures and site features which promotes the following: i. An internal sense of order among the buildings and uses. The location of the building, drive aisle and parking lot, and walkways provide for orderly and safe accessibility to site that will adequately serve residents and customers arriving by all transportation modes. Pedestrian connections are provided around and through the development. The frontages along Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street are activated by commercial storefronts and townhome-style units lining the podium parking; creating a pleasant pedestrian realm in these corridors; ii. The adequacy of vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width or interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. See (i) above iii. Energy conservation through the design of structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading. The landscaping plan proposes plantings at the perimeter of the building providing shade and wind screening effects. iv. The minimization of adverse environmental effects on persons using the development and adjacent properties. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Part 2: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application (542.09 Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. See above Part 1, #1 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. See above – Part 1, #3. 3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development. The development is in substantial compliance with the intent of the guiding Mixed-Use District. Departures from requirements are minimal and the proposal meets the intent of requirements. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the development. The City’s Public Works, Engineering, and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties. Undue adverse impacts are not anticipated. The proposed improvements within the site and the conditions of the resolution are designed to minimize any potential negative impacts on neighboring properties. The massing of the building is positioned on the site away from the lower density neighborhood to the north. Screening is provided via fencing and landscape plantings. Most traffic is expected to reach the development via Lyndale Avenue, rather than from the Harriet Avenue or 64 ½ Street. Entering or exiting the development through the neighborhood would be slower and less efficient than directly via Lyndale Avenue. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest. The final development plan and conditional use permit resolution establish conditions sufficient to protect the public interest. Part 3: All uses are conditional uses in the PMU District. The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (Subd. 547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. See above – Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The use is consistent with the intent of the Planned Mixed Use District and the underlying Mixed Use District. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. See above – Part 1, #1 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development is in substantial compliance with performance standards. Deviation from Code requirements is requested as follows: • Parking lot setback – The applicant has proposed a surface parking area with varying setback to north property line and a 10 ft. setback from the east property line; the Code requires a 15-ft. setback. The intent of this provision is to provide adequate area to attractively screen the parking lot and buffer adjacent properties from headlights and vehicle noise. A proposed buffer provides screening of the parking lot through a combination of fencing and landscaping. The proposed buffer areas are substantial enough to support the plants selected and provide an attractive barrier between the development and the adjacent property. • Required Trees – The Code requires that mixed-use site provide One (1) tree per 2,500 square feet of Developable Landscaping Area (the total area of a development site minus water features or protected wetlands). This equates to 36 required trees. The proposed landscaping plan includes 18 trees which maximize planting locations. Additional trees would likely result in overcrowding negatively impacting long-term viability of the landscaping. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City’s Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any adverse impacts. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health, safety and welfare from undue adverse impacts. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. See above – Part 1, #1. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:10:12 PMT1-1 TITLE SHEET 220549 NR NR Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 PROJECT TEAM PROJECT LOCATION 6445 Lyndale Avenue South Richfield, MN Project Site (Proposed PUD) Consists of Current Parcels: 6467 Lyndale Avenue South 6439 Lyndale Avenue South 415 64 1/2 Street West Vicinity Site Location BUILDING METRICS OWNER/DEVELOPER: Enclave Companies 1 2nd St. North Ste. 102 Fargo, ND 58102 ARCHITECT:ESG Architecture & Design 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-339-5508 Fx: 612-339-5382 CONTRACTOR:Enclave Companies 1 2nd St. North Ste. 102 Fargo, ND 58102 CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE: Westwood 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 ELECTRICAL:Vareberg Engineering 1331 32nd Ave. South Fargo, ND 58103 NORTHTRUEDRAWING INDEX DRAWING INDEX - LUA/PUD SHEET NUMBER NAME GENERAL INFORMATION T1-1 TITLE SHEET T1-2 ZONING & NARRATIVE CIVIL V1.0 LAND SURVEY CIVIL C2.0 PRELIMINARY CIVIL SITE PLAN C2.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C4.0 PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C5.1 PELIMINARY STORM VAULT DETAILS LANDSCAPE L1.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCPE PLAN L1.2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A0-1 3D RENDERINGS A0-2 EXISTING PHOTOS A0-3 EXISTING SITE PLAN A0-4 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A1-1 FIRST LEVEL PLAN A1-2 SECOND LEVEL PLAN A1-3 THIRD LEVEL PLAN A1-4 FOURTH LEVEL PLAN A1-5 FIFTH LEVEL PLAN A1-6 ROOF PLAN A3-1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3-2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3-3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4-1 SHADOW STUDIES ELECTRICAL E0.1 SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL E0.2 SITE PLAN - LIGHTING CALCULATIONS CITY OF RICHFIELD SITE PARKING TABLES No. Description Date New Project Addresses: 6445 Lyndale Ave South (Residential Apt. Bldg.) 6425 to 6443 Lyndale Ave S. (Commercial Spaces) Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:10:13 PMT1-2 ZONING & NARRATIVE 220549 NR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 No. Description Date PROJECT NARRATIVE APPLICATIONS & ZONING SUMMARY APPLICATIONS: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PLANNED MIXED USE) REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT (FINAL PLAT AT LATER DATE) UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION SITE PLAN APPROVAL ZONING: CURRENT ZONING: C-2 PROPOSED RE-ZONING: MU-C (MIXED-USE COMM.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: MIXED-USE PROPOSED BUILDING SUMMARY EXISTING SITE AREA 90,310 SF (2.07 ACRES) NEW SITE AREA (WITH OUT ROUNDABOUT AREA): 90,250 SF LEVEL 1 BLDG. FOOTPRINT 48,964 SF (54.2%) TOTAL BUILDING GSF 236,000 SF PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 4,264 SF (4.7%) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 86,046 SF (95.3%) FAR 1.85 DWELLING UNITS 159 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE 77 UNITS PER ACRE BEDROOMS 209 COMMERCIAL AREA ~8000 SF COMMERCIAL PARKING STALLS 23 COMMERCIAL STALLS PER 1000 SF 2.9 RESIDENTIAL PARKING STALLS 215.5 RESIDENTIAL PARKING PER UNIT 1.36 RESIDENTIAL PARKING PER BEDROOM 1.03 HEIGHT:59’-8” FRONTYARD SETBACK (LYNDALE):1’-9” FRONTYARD SETBACK (65TH):5’-5” REARYARD SETBACK (64TH ½ STREET):67’-9” SIDEYARD SETBACK (NORTHWEST):11’-3” SIDEYARD SETBACK (EAST):11’-11” SEE BUILDING METRICS AND PARKING SUMMARIES ON TITLE SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Overview The proposed redevelopment along Lyndale Avenue at West 65th Street will replace an existing strip mall and small residential property and its associated parking lot with a mixed-use development, including commercial space and residential apartment community. The project as proposed includes 159 rental dwelling units and approximately 8000 SF of commercial space. The site is currently zoned C2 (Commercial) and is at the northeastern quadrant of Lyndale Ave South and West 65th Street. Lyndale Avenue an active commercial and mixed-use corridor and the proposed project enhances the mixed use node by offering an urban infill design that incorporates a mix of uses with one building and transforming the property by adding 159 residential dwelling units. Streetscape and Public Realm The proposed redevelopment will dramatically improve the current site conditions, including the overall quality of the existing building. The associated site improvements will be a positive asset within the the neighborhood and other adjoining neighborhoods that are walk-able cycle-able to and from the site. Adding the combination of retail and residential uses at this location naturally creates a more inviting streetscape, as more people will be walking and biking to and from the site, which creates an energetic, safe and people-friendly hub, improving the site’s existing conditions drastically. The project will utilize just one curb cuts on Lyndale Avenue to access a drive that takes vechicles to a rear surface parking area and residential drop off location. On 64th ½ street an existing curb cuts will be repurposed to access the surface parking lot. Also accessed from this curb as well as the Lydale curb cut are the level 1 and level 2 parking access garage doors. This dual access strategy disperses traffic while keeping the majority of the residential parking enclosed within the building. The buildings strong frontage at the two public streets will improve sidewalk conditions, thus encouraging area residents to walk to and from the project. Additionally the building’s residential parking is lined with walk up units at it’s perimeter including at a new through way connection between 65th and 64th ½ that will provide access from the single family neighborhoods to the north and east with the commercial nodes at 65th / 66th and Lyndale. At all areas adjacent to the building, the streetscape is planned to be improved with trees, color pavement, planters, dynamic signage, seating, and art features (exact locations to be determined with staff and commission) Building Design The building design will be contemporary, constructed of precast concrete at the first two levels, and wood-frame on the upper three levels. Windows at the retail level and residential level will be expansive, allowing plenty of daylight into the commercial space and dwelling units. Exterior materials will consist primarily of brick, metal panel, fiber cement, precast and glass. White composite metal panels add a seek modern feel with other natural textures at the pedestrian and upper levels. The podium of the building is designed with heft and grounding The design incorporates vegetation on the ground near the building façade and on the outdoor shared amenities decks at level 3, as well as at several private unit terraces at level 3, adding park-like qualities to the site and building design. The residential lobby connects the front of the building’s main entry at Lyndale near the commercial entry to the rear secondary drop off / pick up residential entry. In addition to the unit terraces, the exterior facades will feature projecting and recessed balconies on upper levels that allow residents to take advantage of private outdoor space. On level 5, the building includes an indoor and outdoor gathering amenity area for residents to enjoy and adds a distinctive architectural element to the design on the east side of the project. WHHHHSTGSSWEST 64TH 1/2 STREETWEST 65TH STREETLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHB-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6B-8B-7B-9B-10B-11B-12B-13B-14B-15B-16XXXXXXXXXRAMP UP TTFF E T R A N S I T I O N SE E A R C H P L A N S HOUSINGFFE = 843.00COMMERCIAL/RETAILFFE = 842.00C9.00'18.00'24.00'24.00'25'24.00'18.00'2.98'24.00'25.15'18.00'5.41'16.00'16.00'25.00'6.00' 8. 0 0 '8.00'8'5' 2'14.68'12.48'5.00'B6AAACCD13E151111M(TYP.)13(TYP.)9AH1111588840HH(TYP.)H(TYP.)KKJJL1111S.1S.140NNNBUILDING OVERHANGDN21212119B19B19A19A2.35'1696985RAMP UPRAMP UP6.33'5.49'N9A99.00'(TYP.)(TYP.)1EXISTING FENCE ON PROPERTYLINE TO BE REPLACEDOO9A4.18'13.00'3.00'12.00'EX. RETAININGWALL0.90'EXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE5.00'1.04'Q(TYP.)PP3/8/2021 3:19 PM DMPPRELIMINARY PLANNEDUNIT DEVELOPMENTPLANS ANDPRELIMINARY PLATNo.DescriptionDateSSA0028894.00DateDescriptionNo.C2.0PRELIMINARY CIVILSITE PLAN01/18/21ENCLAVE - RICHFIELDPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION65th & LyndaleRichfield, MN 55234Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAS.1S.10REFERENCESTOP SIGN30" X 30"R1-1SIZEMnDOT DESIGNATION1 B612 CURB AND GUTTER2 FLUSH CURB AND GUTTER5 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK9 PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP9A PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP11 CROSS WALK STRIPING13 TRAFFIC ARROW14 SIGN INSTALLATION15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING18 BOLLARD19A PAVEMENT SECTION - STANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS19B PAVEMENT SECTION - HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS21 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE SECTION24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK36 SIGN POST WITH BOLLARD40 RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE (SEE DETAIL)48 CONCRETE STAIR AND RAILING DETAIL1EXISTING ZONING:C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIALPROPOSED ZONING:PUD·PARCEL DESCRIPTION:LOT 1 - BLOCK 1·PROPERTY AREA:90,310 SF (2.073 AC)·PERVIOUS SURFACE:4,264 SF (4.7%)·IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(RATIO):86,046 SF (95.3%)·BUILDING FOOTPRINT:48,964 SF·PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE:9' WIDE X 18' LONG, 24' AISLE·SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED:53 TOTAL STALLS (INCLUDES 5 ACCESSIBLE STALLS)17 COMMERCIAL STALLS (INCLUDES 3 ACCESSIBLE STALLS)36 COMMERCIAL STALLS (INCLUDES 3 ACCESSIBLE STALLS)REFER TO ARCHITECUTAL SITE PLAN FOR TOTAL SITE PARKING CALCULATIONSSIGN LEGENDSITE DETAILS (SI-0XX)SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONALSERVICES, MINNETONKA, MN, JANUARY 18th, 2021.2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THEENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS.4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OFEXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS.6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERSAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES.11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPAREDBY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.GENERAL SITE NOTESPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T 1891902/15/21DANIEL M. PARKSA FUTURE 65TH ST IMPROVEMENTS (BY OTHERS)B CONCRETE HEATED RAMP (SEE ARCH. AND PLUMBING PLANS)C MATCH EX. PAVEMENT W/ SAWCUTD BUILDING OVERHANGE CONCRETE COLUMNF REMOVE DRIVEWAY APRON AND CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTERG CONCRETE CURB TRANSITIONH CONCRETE STAIR & RAIL (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN)J ADA ACCESSIBLE ELEVATED SIDEWALKK PUBLIC SIDEWALKL COMMERCIAL TERRACE/CONCRETE SIDEWALKM TRANSFORMER PADN PLANTED AREAO BIKE RACKSP LIGHT POLEQ BOLLARD LIGHTSITE KEYNOTESA1 PROGRESS SET 01/18/210'2040601" = 20'2 LUA / PUD02/15/213 LUA / PUD REVISIONS 03/08/214 ..5 ..6 .. TTC33.5B-B60ROW64ROW45.3B-B83ROW37.2B-B 26 . 8 B- B 36.7B-B27.0B-B 8.2 EXCEPTION25.00WEST 64TH 1/2 STREETWEST 65TH STREETLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHLOT 3LOT 2LOT 4LOT 20LOT 5LOT 19LOT 18 BLOCK 2BLOCK 6PROPOSEDBUILDINGPROPOSEDBUILDINGLOT 1BLOCK 1PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYOF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHStorm Sewer Easement perDoc. No. 3668072,Easement to be vacatedEasement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacatedEasement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacatedEasement for Utility Installationand Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacated5. 0 0 5. 0 0 5.00Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacated5.00Vacated Alley and subject to perpetualeasements existing on alley to permitimprovements or maintenance ofexisting utilities per Doc. No. 5015916,Easement to be vacated14.00Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacatedL=25.64R=75.00Δ=19°35'13"28.40S51°48'29"EL=9.65R=51.54Δ=10°43'29"25.25169.655.00 Vacated Alley and subject to perpetualeasements existing on alley to permitimprovements or maintenance ofexisting utilities per Doc. No. 5015916,Easement to be vacated14.00(EXISTING STREETALIGNMENT)N46°32'02"E 132.00 N43°28'31"W 42.95N86°46'55"W 118.91L=93.97R=70.00Δ=76°54'54"N89°29'35"E 108.72N00°29'04"W 124.85(meas.) 125.00(plat)5.00N89°35'11"EN00°29'04"W 121.53(meas.) 121.94(plat)N89°32'19"E 194.89(meas.) 194(plat)L=20.20(meas.) 19.28(plat)R=20.00Δ=57°51'17"N43°36'53"W 180.31L=36.96R=409.27Δ=5°10'27"8.67N46°32'19"EN43°26'40"W 68.71L=11.52R=99.17Δ=6°39'26"L=41.66R=409.27Δ=5°49'57"63.52180.31L=37.27R=100.00Δ=21°21'13"PROPOSED RIGHT OFWAY VACATION OFLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH3/5/2021 2:11 PM DMPPRELIMINARY PLANNEDUNIT DEVELOPMENTPLANS ANDPRELIMINARY PLATNo.DescriptionDateBW0028894.00DateDescriptionNo.C2.1PRELIMINARY PLAT01/18/21ENCLAVE - RICHFIELDPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION65th & LyndaleRichfield, MN 55234Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.02/15/21.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE COMMITMENTNUMBER 56766PARCEL 1:LOT 2, BLOCK 2, "J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION".HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTATORRENS PROPERTYPARCEL 2:LOTS 4, 5, 19, 20 AND ALL OF LOT 18 EXCEPT THE NORTHWESTERLY 25 FEET THEREOF, BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS, ACCORDINGTO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PARTS OF THE VACATED ALLEYSIN SAID BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 19 IN SAID BLOCK 6; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THENORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 19 AND ITS EXTENSION TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK 6; THENCEEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 114.29 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCEWESTERLY PASSING THROUGH THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 6 TO THE CENTERLINE OF THEVACATED ALLEY ADJOINING THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 18 IN SAID BLOCK 6; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIDCENTERLINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THENORTHWESTERLY 25 FEET OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EXTENSION TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINEOF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT18; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 18;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTAABSTRACT PROPERTYPARCEL 3:LOT 3, BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA.ABSTRACT PROPERTYTOGETHER WITH:THAT PART OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AS DEDICATED ON J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THERECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, LYING SOUTHEASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF THEFOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:COMMENCING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SAID J.N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH43 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, ASSUMED BEARING ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF5.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO BE VACATED; THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 19SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 8.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 68.71FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF21 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 13 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.27 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINEOF LOT 2 AND SAID LINE THERE TERMINATING.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION1) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED USING CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE COMMITMENT NUMBER56766 HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 11, 2020 AT 07:00 AM2) SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS ZONE X WHEN SCALED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATEMAP COMMUNITY - PANEL NUMBER 27053C0368F DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2016.3) SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 91,127 SQ. FT. OR 2.092 ACRES.4) SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 89 TOTAL PARKING STALLS, INCLUDING 3 HANDICAPPED STALLS.5) THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION ANDEXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWNCOMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHERDOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATEDALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATIONAVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. (GOPHER STATEONE CALL TICKET NO. 203291663, NO. 203291690 AND NO. 2032916916) ADJOINING OWNERS SHOWN PER HENNEPIN COUNTY PARCEL WEBSITE.7) WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. WAS NOT PROVIDED ADJOINER DEEDS.8) THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATESYSTEM, N.A.D. 1983 (1986 ADJUSTMENT) US SURVEY FEET.GENERAL NOTESPOST INDICATOR VALVEGUY WIREFLARED END SECTIONSANITARY MANHOLEBEEHIVE CATCH BASINCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC TOWERSEWER CLEANOUTPOWER POLEELECTRIC BOXELECTRIC METERSIGNHANDICAPPED STALLCABLE TV BOXSTREET LIGHTMAIL BOXSTEEL/WOOD POSTBUSH/SHRUBCONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREEPOWER OVERHEADTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE OVERHEADPOWER UNDERGROUNDWATERMAINFIBER OPTICSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERGATE VALVEGAS LINECABLE TELEVISION LINECURB STOP BOXHYDRANTHAND HOLE/JUNCTION BOXSTORM MANHOLETELEPHONE BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONFENCE LINECURB & GUTTERAIR CONDITIONERFLAG POLETREE LINECTVGASPOHPUGSANSTOTOHTUGWATFOSCOSTCSEEETTTVACMAILHHTRAFFIC SIGNALCABLE TV MANHOLECATCH BASIN MANHOLESEPTIC COVERSEPTVXPRELIMINARY PLAT OF:LYNDALE OAKS 2ND ADDITIONZONINGSUBJECT PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIALPER THE CITY OF RICHFIELD ZONING MAP FOUND ON THEIR WEBSITEAREASUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS:LOT 1, BLOCK 1 AREA = 89,480 SQ. FT. OR 2.054 ACRESVACATED RIGHT OF WAY OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AREA = 817 SQ. FT. OR 0.019 ACRESRIGHT OF WAY OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AREA = 830 SQ. FT. OR 0.019 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 91,127 SQ. FT. OR 2.092 ACRESOWNER/SUBDIVIDERENCLAVE DEVELOPMENT1 2ND STREET NORTH, SUITE 102FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA, 58102SURVEYOR/ENGINEERWESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES12701 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300MINNETONKA, MN 55343952-937-51501 PROGRESS SET 01/18/212 LUA / PUD02/15/213 LUA / PUD REVISIONS 03/08/214 ..5 ..6 .. WHHHHSTSTSTSTGSSTSTSTSWATWATWATWATSTO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWEST 64TH 1/2 STREETWEST 65TH STREETLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANS AN S AN S AN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANB-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6B-8B-7B-9B-10B-11B-12B-13B-14B-15B-16STOSTOSTO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOS TO STOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOS TO S TO S TO STO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO WATWATWATWAT6" CIP6" CIP6" CIP8" CIP8" CIPWATWATXXXXXXXXXRAMP UP X,XXX SFCOMMERICAL SPACEXX STALLSX,XXX SFRESIDENTIAL LOBBYXX STALLSX,XXX SFRESIDENTIAL PARKINGXX STALLSTTFF E T R A N S I T I O N SE E A R C H P L A N S HOUSINGFFE = 843.00COMMERCIAL/RETAILFFE = 842.00FFE = 842.00FFE = 843.00C21-FPPCCCCCCCCDDDD25-RHA8-RSH20-PDS5-TAY38-FPP10-PDS25-RHA4-TAY8-RSH1-PFC1-CHB4-DBH5-TAY1-PFC2-MWG11-PDSC7-PDS6-RSH1-BOL5-MJJ8-ALC8-MJJ1-BOL4-ALC7-PDS1-BOL20-ASD18-ASD12-FPP12-RHA7-RSH12-FPP6-RHA13-FPP12-OSF17-RHA10-RHA3-TAY10-FPP14-FPP3-TAY3-NFS7-ASD4-NWM16-BES4-AJS2-CWR5-AJS2-GBB7-PWW11-BES3-CWR7-AJS5-NFS7-AJS14-ASD3-BNS6-AJS7-BES3-GBB6-AJS6-PBS5-ASD2-ASD3-CWR8-ASD6-PWW1-GBB5-PBS4-AJS3-NFS3-BES6-BES4-KFG4-CWR5-PWW5-AJS3-GBB18-ASD3-BNS3-GBB11-BES9-KFG1-CWR10-AJS3-BNS12-PWW6-NFS2-ASD3-ASD5-AJS3-ASD3-ASD3-AJS6-IMH2-CHB4-DBH4-TAY22-DAF10-DAF32-DAF16-DAF26-DAF10-DAF22-DAF22-DAF25-DAF35-DAF5-DAF19-DAF3/8/2021 12:57 PM DMPPRELIMINARY PLANNEDUNIT DEVELOPMENTPLANS ANDPRELIMINARY PLATNo.DescriptionDateJRW0028894.00DateDescriptionNo.01/18/21ENCLAVE - RICHFIELDPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION65th & LyndaleRichfield, MN 55234Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAL1.0PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN4401802/15/21JEFF WESTENDORF1 PROGRESS SET 01/18/21LANDSCAPE LEGENDSHRUBS / VINESOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREEORNAMENTAL TREEPERENNIALSEDGERA SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)B EDGER (TYP.)C SOD (TYP.)D EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN (TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION)ALANDSCAPE KEYNOTESB&B3.5" CAL.B&B4.5" CAL.4NWM3CHB3BOLB&B2PFC1.5" CAL.13MJJ24TAY12ALC8DBH29RSH16" O.C.54BES16" O.C.--MOC18" O.C.103ASD12" O.C.6IMHB&B3.5" CAL.13KFG24" O.C.30PWW18" O.C.55PDS18" O.C.12OSF18" O.C.62AJS18" O.C.11PBS18" O.C.B&B2.5" CAL.3'-0" O.C.120FPP12" O.C.95RHA12" O.C.17NFS3'-0" O.C.3'-0" O.C.13CWR3'-0" O.C.12GBB4'-0" O.C.3'-0" O.C.2MWG5'-0" O.C.5'-0" O.C.CONT.9BNS3'-0" O.C.244DAF12" O.C. BULBNORTHWOOD MAPLEIMPERIAL HONEYLOCUSTHACKBERRYBOULEVARD LINDENOVERSTORY TREEABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER SP. = SPREAD QTY .= QUANTITY CONT. = CONTAINERNOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.ORNAMENTAL TREECONIFEROUS SHRUBDECIDUOUS SHRUBPERENNIALSBULBSPRAIRIEFIRE CRABBIRD'S NEST SPRUCEMINT JULEP JUNIPERTAUNTON YEWNEON FLASH SPIREACAREFREE WONDER ROSE (PINK)GOLDEN BARBERRYALPINE CURRANTDWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEMINUET WEIGELAAPRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILYBLACK EYED SUSANPRAIRIE BLAZING STARPOW WOW WILDBERRY ECHINACEAMOONBEAM COEOPSISAUTUMN JOY SEDUMFLAME PINK PHLOXRHEINLAND ASTILBEOSTRICH FERNROYAL STANDARD HOSTAKARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASSDAFFODILPRAIRIE DROPSEED GRASSROOTSIZEBOTANICAL NAMEACER RUBRUM 'NORTHWOOD'GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS 'IMPCOLE'CELTIS OCCIDENTALISTILIA AMERICANA 'BOULEVARD'MALUS 'PRAIRIEFIRE'PICEA ABIES 'NIDIFORMIS'JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'MONLEP'TAXUS MEDII 'TAUNTON'SPIRAEA JAPONICA 'NEON FLASH'ROSA 'MEIPITAC'BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'AUREA'RIBES ALPINUMDIERVILLA LONICERAWEIGELA FLORIDA 'MINUET'HEMEROCALLIS 'APRICOT SPARKLES'RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 'GOLDSTURM'LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYAECHINACEA PURPUREA 'POW WOW WILDBERRY'COREOPSIS 'MOONBEAM'SEDUM X 'AUTUMN JOY'PHLOX PANICULATA PINK 'BARTWELVE'ASTILBE 'RHEINLAND'MATTEUCIA STRUTHIOPTERISHOSTA 'ROYAL STANDARD'CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER'NARCISSUS SP.SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPISAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN1 BULBS PER S.F.SPACINGSINGLESINGLESINGLE----SINGLE------SINGLE------------------------------REMARKSPLANT SCHEDULECOMMONCODE QTY1624664584244#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#5 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 CONT.#1 2 LUA / PUD02/15/213 LUA / PUD REVISIONS 03/08/214 ..5 ..6 ..DAFFODILS TO BE PLANTED BETWEEN PERENNIALS ALONG THE SIDEWALK EDGE WHERE SHOWN. 3/8/2021 12:57 PM DMPPRELIMINARY PLANNEDUNIT DEVELOPMENTPLANS ANDPRELIMINARY PLATNo.DescriptionDateJRW0028894.00DateDescriptionNo.01/18/21ENCLAVE - RICHFIELDPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION65th & LyndaleRichfield, MN 55234Phone(952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAL1.2LANDSCAPE DETAILS4401802/15/21JEFF WESTENDORF1PROGRESS SET01/18/21LAST REVISED:10/23/18SHRUB & PERENNIALCONTAINER PLANTINGLA27-CN.T.S.2XCONT.DIAMETERSET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ONUNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR MILDCOMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCHFINISH GRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.DEPTH PER CONTAINER SOIL DEPTHBACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIEDPLANTING SOIL OR AS APPROVEDEDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED,ADJACENT TO LAWN AREASMULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC,AS INDICATED)REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, ANDSET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASEMOUND, MATCHING SHRUBS NATURALGROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADELAST REVISED:10/19/18DECIDUOUS TREEPLANTINGLA28N.T.S.SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOILOR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHINGTREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHEDSITE GRADE.REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FORNURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE.ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEARFINISHED GROUNDLINE.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILLSOIL.FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN.PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVERPLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINEUPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED.PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES.PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER.GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FORONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS ANDCONIFEROUS TREES:TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.)OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OFSTAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND.STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINEDWOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATORPOSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANTAROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL.SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONGPOLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP.2XBALLDIAMETERSET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOILOR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHINGTREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITHFINISHED SITE GRADE.REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FORNURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE.ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEARFINISHED GROUNDLINE.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIEDBACKFILL SOIL.FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN.PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVERPLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES.PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER.GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FORONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS ANDCONIFEROUS TREES:TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.)OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OFSTAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND.STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINEDWOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATORPOSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANTAROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL.SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONGPOLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP.2XBALLDIAMETERLAST REVISED:10/19/18EVERGREEN TREEPLANTINGLA29N.T.S.1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OFALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THEIMMEDIATE AREA.4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BIDAND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THEDATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING.REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO,BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESSTHAN 5:3.7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION)REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY;TEMPORARY ONLY.10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED &BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR.WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLYABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS.12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OFEXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR.15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW)AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, ANDLARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12"DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12" TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE BEDS. ADD SOILAMENDMENTS FOR OPTIMUM PLANT GROWTH. ALL PARKING ISLAND GRADES SHALL HAVE A SIGNIFICANTCROWN.18. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDSSHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUNDALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RING,EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A RING TO THE DRIP LINE. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUSMATERIAL AND MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NOEXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCHEXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).19. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS, AROUND THE SITE, SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBSAND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE AND COMPLETED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. CONTRACTORTO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF-SITE PER PROJECTIMPROVEMENTS.20. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE,AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NOGREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUTDAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPEDDEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS(WHERE APPLICABLE).21. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITHSHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWNAND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS ANDENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOTSPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.22. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR. SEE PLAN FOR LIMITS OF IRRIGATION. LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION DASHED LINETO BE IRRIGATED FROM BUILDING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPEARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO WATER PLANTMATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND DURING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FORCONTRACTOR. VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEMSHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVEONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULINGCAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.23. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THESITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.24. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.25. VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITE WORK.26. ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS, ARE TO BE SODDED, UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS WEEDS. MATCH INTOEXISTING, AS APPLICABLE. ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED OR POTENTIAL EROSION AREAS, OR AS REQUIRED.27. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF PLAN ANDSCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERYSTOCK, LATEST VERSION. ADD FERTILIZER, HERBICIDE, AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH.PLANTING NOTES2LUA / PUD02/15/213LUA / PUD REVISIONS03/08/214..5..6.. Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:04 PMA0-1 3D RENDERINGS 220549 RS NR 01/12/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 FROM SOUTHWEST BIRD'S EYE FROM SOUTH VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST BIRD'S EYE FROM WEST FROM WEST VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST VIEW FROM FUTURE ROUNDABOUT FROM SOUTHWEST BIRD'S EYE FROM SOUTH VIEW FROM EAST BIRD'S EYE FROM NORTH No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:09 PMA0-2 EXISTING PHOTOS 220549 CR NR 01/12/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 No. Description Date 1 - FROM EAST SIDE LOOKING WEST2- FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER LOOKING NORTHWEST3- FROM WEST 65TH STREET LOOKING WEST 4 -FROM LYNDALE AVE S/WEST 65TH ST CORNER LOOKING WEST5- FROM LYNDALE AVE S/WEST 65TH ST CORNER LOOKING NORTHWEST6- FROM LYNDALE AVE SOUTH LOOKING NORTHEAST 7 - FROM NORTHWEST SIDE LOOKING SOUTHEAST8-FROM HARRIET AVE S/WEST 64 1/2 CORNER LOOKING SOUTHWEST9- FROM WEST 64 1/2 STREET LOOKING SOUTH WEST 65TH STREET LY N D A LE A V E S O U T H WEST 64 1/2 STREET GRAND AVE S6439 Lyndale Avenue South 6467 Lyndale Avenue South 415 64 1/2 Street West 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WEST 65TH STREET LY N D A LE A V E S WEST 64 1/2 STREET GRAND AVE SSignature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:10 PMA0-3 EXISTING SITE PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 12" = 1'-0"A0-3 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN 12" = 1'-0"A0-3 2 SITE LOCATION MAP No. Description Dat e NUMBERS CORRESPOND TO PHOTOS ON A0-2 ST ST ST ST ST ST C RAMP UP100'-0" 100'-0" 100'-0" 100'-0" 100'-0"100'-0" 101'-0"101'-0" RETAINING WALLS GENERATOR AND TRANSFORMER ON CONCRETE PADS RAMP TO SECOND LEVELBUILDING ABOVE BUILDING ABOVE LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE PROPERTY LINE C OMME RC I A L T E RRA C E WEST 65TH STREET L Y N D A L E A V E N U E S OU T H P A R A L L E L P A R KI N G R O U N D A B O U T R OA D WA Y WEST 64 1/2 STREET 100'-0" 100'-0" 101'-0" 100'-6" 100'-6" 101'-0"101'-0"101'-0"101'-0"101'-0"101'-0" 101'-0" 101'-0" 101'-0" 101'-0" 101'-0" 100'-0" 100'-0" TEMP. TRASH PICK UP ZONE/ COMPACT PARKING STALL BIKE RACKS 6 (12 BIKES) BIKE RACKS 8 (16 BIKES) 30 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL SURFACE STALLS 23 TOTAL COMMERCIAL SURFACE STALLS TYPICAL STANDARD STALL ROUNDABOUT CROSS WALK ROUNDABOUT CROSS WALK SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR LARGER SITE AREA SITE STATS EXISTING SITE AREA: 90,310 SF NEW SITE AREA: 90,250 SF RAMP UP TO TERRACE RAMP TO UP TO ENTRY 5' - 6"12' - 0" 6' - 10" 6' - 3" SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO 64TH 1/2 PROPERTY LINE PRIOR TO ROUNDABOUT BUILD ~3'-6" HIGH FENCE ON CONCRETE CURB / RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL GAS METERS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING SIDEWALK TO NORTHWEST TO ALIGN WITH REMAINDER OF 65TH & ROUNDABOUT BUILD246' - 5"132' - 0"169' - 4" 4 2 ' - 1 1" SIDEWALK & BLVD. LOCATION SHOWN MODIFIED FROM CITY STREET BUILD PLANS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING SIDEWALK TO NORTHWEST 68' - 1"FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT 101'-0" TYPICAL ELEVATION AT UNIT ACCESS TO PARKING GARAGE105' - 6"POTENTIAL FUTURE SIDEWALK CONNECTION, TBD BY CITY STAFF EXISTING FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE TO BE REPLACED AS AN IMPROVED BUFFER EXISTING FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE TO BE REPLACED AS AN IMPROVED BUFFER DESIGNATED PET RELIEF AREA ~6'-0" HIGH FENCE ON CONCRETE CURB / RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL ~6'-0" HIGH FENCE ON CONCRETE CURB / RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL ~3'-6" HIGH FENCE ON CONCRETE CURB / RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL WALK UP METAL BACLONIES, TYP. ENCROACHMENT, LESS THAN 12" AT SLOPED WALK ENCROACHMENT, LESS THAN 12" AT SLOPED WALK NEW PROPERTY PROPOSED LINE 10' - 9"AISLEDRIVE1 2' - 0"AISLEDRIVE1 3' - 0"COMMERCIAL9 STALLSCOMMERCIAL8 STALLS24' - 0"24' - 0"2 5 ' - 0 " GENERATOR AND TRANSFORMER SCREEN WALL WITH ACCESS DOORS COMMERCIAL6 STALLS25' - 0"24' - 1"RESIDENTIAL2 STALLSRESIDENTIAL3 STALLS24' - 0" 24' - 0" 6' - 0"24' - 0" 4' - 0" RESIDENTIAL 9 STALLS24' - 0"11 STALLS RESIDENTIAL TYP. 9' - 0"TYP.18' - 0"RESIDENTIAL 5 STALLS SIDEWALK 5' - 3"3' - 3"LEVEL 1 BLDG. FOOTPRINT: 48,964 SF PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 4,264 SF (4.7%) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 86,046 SF (95.3%) GREY HATCH DENOTES 10'-0" WIDE TRAIL FROM BACK OF CURB ORANGE DASHED LINE DENOTES 10 MPH SIGHT ZONE ADJACENT TO TRAIL DWELLING UNIT ON- GRADE STOOPS, 1'-0" ABOVE GRADE AT TRAIL/SIDEWALK 2' - 11"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"TRAIL / SIDEWALK (GRAY AREA) TRAIL / SIDEWALK (GRAY AREA) SIDEWALK HANDRAILS, BOTH SIDES, EACH STEP HEAVY BLACK LINE REPRESENTS BACK OF CURB - SEE CIVIL PLANS HEAVY BLACK LINE REPRESENTS BACK OF CURB - SEE CIVIL PLANS Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/21/2021 1:59:36 PMA0-4 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 220549 NR NR 01/12/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 4/21/21 1" = 20'-0"A0-4 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN No. Description Date STTT C RAMP UPUP DN DN DN UP DN UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q B.2 1 A3-2 2 A3-1 1 A3-1 2 A3-3 2 A3-2 1 A3-3 LOUVER -MECH EXHAUST LOUVER -MECH INTAKE GAS METERS MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN CLEAR IN HATCHED AREA FOR VAN ACCESS RAMP UP TO SECOND LEVEL10 STALLS3 STALLS10 STALLS13 STALLS 3 S T A L L S 6 STALLS 3 STALLS 2 S T A L L S 2 STALLS 3 STALLS3 A3-3 BICYCLE SERVICE LEASING SUITE WEST 64 1/2 STREET COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL BOH LOBBY ELEVATOR LOBBY MOVE-IN MECH. VESTIBULE MAIL ? WATER TRASH TERMINATION STAIR BCONF. ROOM VESTIBULE UNISEX JANITOR OFFICE #2 ? OFFICE #1 PET SPA BIKE ROOM MECH 165' - 7"172' - 11"163' - 1"122' - 5"2 0 0 ' - 8 " 24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0" 24' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0"TYPICAL STANDARD STALL C.2 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:26 PMA1-1 FIRST LEVEL PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-1 1 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN No. Description Dat e DN UP DN UP DN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q B.2 1 A3-2 2 A3-1 1 A3-1 2 A3-3 2 A3-2 1 A3-3 MECH EXHAUST /INTAKEMECH EXHAUST/INTAKEMECH EXHAUST/INTAKENEEDS STUDY 3 A3-3 9 STALLS13 STALLS 6 STALLS1 STALL (6 TANDEM ST. PER CITY ZONING CODE) 8 STALLS (4.5 TANDEM STALLS PER CITY ZONING CODE) 6 STALLS 8 S T A L L S 3 S T A L L S 9 S T A L L S2 STALLS4 STALLS1 5 S T A L L S 2 0 S T A L L S 1 7 S T A L L S 2 STALLS11 STALLS 1 STALL 9' - 0"18' - 0" TYPICAL STANDARD STALL 1 6 ' - 0 "9' - 0"TYPICAL COMPACT STALL PARKING GARAGE STAIR C TRASH STAIR B ELEV LOBBY MECH/ELEC STAIR A 10' - 4"5' - 5"12' - 0"2' - 8"1 1' - 4 "8"173' - 2"142' - 4" 2 2 6 ' - 1"147' - 8"3 3 6' - 8 " 165' - 7"24' - 5"24' - 0"26' - 5"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"RAMP DOWN24' - 0"7 1' - 9 " 2 7 4' - 0 "57' - 3"C.2 10' - 11"TYP.2' - 4"METAL HUNG BALCONY, BASE OF BALCONCY IS 15' OR MORE ABOVE GRADE BELOW Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:21:22 PMA1-2 SECOND LEVEL PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-2 1 SECOND LEVEL OVERALL PLAN No. Description Dat e DN UP UP DN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q B.2 1 A3-2 2 A3-1 1 A3-1 2 A3-3 2 A3-2 1 A3-3 3 A3-3 STAIR A MECH/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH STAIR B PUB & PARLOR MECH RR RR GROUP FITNESS SOUTH TERRACE FITNESS MECH/ELEC STAIR C NORTH TERRACE TURF LAWN BOCCE COURT RAISED GARDEN ZEN ZONE OUTDOOR MOVIE SCREEN HAMMOCKS NON OCCUPIED ROOF AREA U N I T T E RRA C E S UNIT TERRACESUNIT TERRACESUNIT TERRACESUNIT TERRACES23' - 9" 73' - 4"23' - 9" 16' - 5"12' - 0" 28' - 5"3' - 10"2' - 10"1 1' - 5 "28' - 10"174' - 4"3 3 6 ' - 3 "147' - 6"2 2 5 ' - 1 1" 142' - 4" 7 3' - 4 " 2 7 4 ' - 4 " 146' - 8" 73' - 4"36' - 0"100' - 4"C.2 11' - 0"Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:31 PMA1-3 THIRD LEVEL PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-3 1 THIRD LEVEL OVERALL PLAN No. Description Dat e DN UP DN UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 1 A3-2 2 A3-1 1 A3-1 2 A3-3 2 A3-2 1 A3-3 3 A3-3 STAIR C MECH/ELEC ELEV LOBBY MECH/ELEC STAIR A STAIR B TRASH 150' - 10" 3 1 3' - 0 "107' - 4"2 9 3' - 3 " 135' - 9"174' - 4"7 3' - 4 " 2 7 4 ' - 4 " 146' - 8" 73' - 4"36' - 0"C.2 11' - 0"Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:38 PMA1-4 FOURTH LEVEL PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-4 1 FOURTH LEVEL OVERALL PLAN No. Description Dat e DN DN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 1 A3-2 2 A3-1 1 A3-1 2 A3-3 2 A3-2 1 A3-3 3 A3-3 ELEV LOBBY TRASH THE OVERLOOK THE SOLARIUM 174' - 4"150' - 10" 3 1 3' - 0 "107' - 4"2 9 3' - 3 " 135' - 9" 7 3' - 4 " 2 7 4 ' - 4 " 146' - 8" 73' - 4"36' - 0"C.2 11' - 0"Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:43 PMA1-5 FIFTH LEVEL PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-5 1 FIFTH LEVEL OVERALL PLAN No. Description Dat e 1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 " 1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 "1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 " 1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 "1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 " 1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 "1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 " 1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 "1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 " 1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 "1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 " 1 / 4 " / 1'- 0 "1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0"1/4"/1'-0" 1/4"/1'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 C D E F G H J K L M N P Q 1 A3-2 2 A3-1 1 A3-1 2 A3-3 2 A3-2 1 A3-3 3 A3-3 ROOF ACCESS HATCH ELEVATOR OVERRUN -SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT TO PRIMARY ROOF BELOW WITH SPLASHBLOCKS TRASH CHUTE AND VENTING PROPOSED VENTING FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE ON LEVEL 1 ROOF CURB ROOF CURB PRIMARY ROOF DRAIN -TYP OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN -TYP REINFORCED WALKWAY ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTR O O F TO P M ECHANICAL EQ UIPM ENTROOF T OP ME C H A N I C A L E QU I P ME N T 150' - 10" 3 1 3' - 0 "100' - 4"2 9 3' - 3 " 135' - 9"174' - 4"C.2 11' - 0"EQUIPMENT NOT VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC RIGHT WAY, TYP. Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:07:47 PMA1-6 ROOF PLAN 220549 CR NR 01/12/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-6 1 LUA/PUD - BP-ROOF OVERALL No. Description Dat e LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" 1 LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" 234567891011 TO PARAPET 161' - 6" LEVEL 1 TH 101' - 0" LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 12A 8B 3A5D9B 6B 8B10B 5A 10A 8A8D 14 9A 3C 8A8F8A 5E 12B 10B 10E 8D 5F 6B 5B 15C 5E OPEN TO BEYOND 12' - 1"59' - 1"25' - 8"5E LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" 14151617181920 TO PARAPET 161' - 6" LEVEL 1 TH 101' - 0" 5A 8B5C 10B8A 12A 6B 9A 1A 1B 10B LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 8D 8D 9B9B 5D 8B12A 12C 3C3A5D6B PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 5E 15C 5E 8A 12B 10B 5D 12B 12B 6B6A10A 15B 10E 10E 6B 3C 6B26' - 7"61' - 6"9B 5B 6B 10B Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:08:21 PMA3-1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 220549 RS NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-1 1 LUA/PUD - NORTHEAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-1 2 LUA/PUD - NORTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES LUA/PUD 8E ALUMINUM DOOR 8F METAL DOOR 9A MECHANICAL GRILLE 9B MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A METAL FLASHING COLOR #1 10B METAL FLASHING COLOR #2 10D METAL FLASHING COLOR #4 10E METAL SILL TRIM, COLOR #2 12A METAL BALCONY & RAILING, COLOR #3 12B METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C METAL STOOP WITH RAILING SYSTEM 12D METAL RAILING, PAINTED 12E METAL BATTEN 14 BUILDING SIGNAGE 15B PRIVACY SCREEN WALL, COLOR #3 15C METAL CANOPY, COLOR #3 15D STEEL CANOPY, COLOR #2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES LUA/PUD 1A MASONRY, COLOR #1 1B MASONRY, COLOR #1, SOLDIER COURSE 1C MASONRY, WATERTABLE, COLOR #2 3A MASONRY INLAY PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL 3C PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN 5A METAL PANEL, VERTICAL, COLOR #1 5B METAL PANEL, HORIZONTAL, COLOR #1 5C METAL PANEL, VERTICAL, COLOR #2 5D METAL PANEL, COLOR #3 5E METAL CLADDING, COLOR #3 5F METAL CLADDING, COLOR #4 6A FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #4 8A ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 8B COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8D OVERHEAD DOOR No. Description Date LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" HJKLMNPQ TO PARAPET 161' - 6" LEVEL 1 TH 101' - 0" LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 12C 8E 1A 1B 6B 9A8B12A 8B 5A 5C 6C 5D 8A10A 10E6B 15B 6A 5B 10E5B 5F 10E 12B 6B 10D 5A 10E 8B 1A 10B12B 26' - 8"59' - 8"LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TO PARAPET 161' - 6" LEVEL 1 TH 101' - 0" LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 1A1B12C 8B 12A 9A 8B 5A5C6B10A 8B 8B 8A5D 6A5B 5B 6B 10E 6B 6B 12B 1A 5D 12E6B 10B 8B8B10E9A6C10B 6C 12E 6B 10D 8B8E 9B 12E 6C 6D 8A59' - 8"26' - 8"8E Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:09:08 PMA3-2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 220549 RS NR 01/13/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-2 1 LUA/PUD - EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-2 2 LUA/PUD - SOUTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES LUA/PUD 8E ALUMINUM DOOR 8F METAL DOOR 9A MECHANICAL GRILLE 9B MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A METAL FLASHING COLOR #1 10B METAL FLASHING COLOR #2 10D METAL FLASHING COLOR #4 10E METAL SILL TRIM, COLOR #2 12A METAL BALCONY & RAILING, COLOR #3 12B METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C METAL STOOP WITH RAILING SYSTEM 12D METAL RAILING, PAINTED 12E METAL BATTEN 14 BUILDING SIGNAGE 15B PRIVACY SCREEN WALL, COLOR #3 15C METAL CANOPY, COLOR #3 15D STEEL CANOPY, COLOR #2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES LUA/PUD 1A MASONRY, COLOR #1 1B MASONRY, COLOR #1, SOLDIER COURSE 1C MASONRY, WATERTABLE, COLOR #2 3A MASONRY INLAY PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL 3C PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN 5A METAL PANEL, VERTICAL, COLOR #1 5B METAL PANEL, HORIZONTAL, COLOR #1 5C METAL PANEL, VERTICAL, COLOR #2 5D METAL PANEL, COLOR #3 5E METAL CLADDING, COLOR #3 5F METAL CLADDING, COLOR #4 6A FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #4 8A ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 8B COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8D OVERHEAD DOOR No. Description Date LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" 1 LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TO PARAPET 161' - 6" LEVEL 1 TH 101' - 0" LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 5A6B 9A 8B 10A 6A 12A 10E6B 5B 5B 14 15D 1A8A12D 8A 14 15C 5D 5E 5E 8A 5E OPEN TO BEYOND 5D5E 12A 5F 8B 10E 6B 8B6B10E6C 10B 5F 5A 5C 9A 6B 8E 12C1B1C 8B 5C 5B 12' - 0"59' - 7"12D LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" A B C D E F G TO PARAPET 161' - 6" B.2 LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 8B 12A 9A 10A 6B5A 5C3C OPEN TO BEYOND 3A12B9B6B 5E 5E 5D 1C 5B 5E 5E 15C 5F 6D6A5B 6B 10B 10B 5F 5F 5A 15C 12A 5C 8B 6B 12A 59' - 8"12' - 0"26' - 8"C.2 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 115' - 0" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 136' - 4" LEVEL 5 147' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 157' - 8" 11 12 TO PARAPET 161' - 6" LEVEL 1 TH 101' - 0" LEVEL 2 TH 112' - 6" 8B 6B 6B 1A 12B 10D 5D 12E6B 10B 8B 10B 12E 12E 6B 6C 6C 8A 10E6D 8A 8E 10A 6A 8B 10E 6B 1B 1C 10E 6C 9B 10B 10B 59' - 8"8A Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:10:07 PMA3-3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 220549 RS NR 01/12/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-3 1 LUA/PUD - SOUTHWEST ELEVATION LEFT 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-3 2 LUA/PUD - NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A3-3 3 LUA/PUD - SOUTHWEST ELEVATION RIGHT EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES LUA/PUD 8E ALUMINUM DOOR 8F METAL DOOR 9A MECHANICAL GRILLE 9B MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A METAL FLASHING COLOR #1 10B METAL FLASHING COLOR #2 10D METAL FLASHING COLOR #4 10E METAL SILL TRIM, COLOR #2 12A METAL BALCONY & RAILING, COLOR #3 12B METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C METAL STOOP WITH RAILING SYSTEM 12D METAL RAILING, PAINTED 12E METAL BATTEN 14 BUILDING SIGNAGE 15B PRIVACY SCREEN WALL, COLOR #3 15C METAL CANOPY, COLOR #3 15D STEEL CANOPY, COLOR #2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES LUA/PUD 1A MASONRY, COLOR #1 1B MASONRY, COLOR #1, SOLDIER COURSE 1C MASONRY, WATERTABLE, COLOR #2 3A MASONRY INLAY PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL 3C PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN 5A METAL PANEL, VERTICAL, COLOR #1 5B METAL PANEL, HORIZONTAL, COLOR #1 5C METAL PANEL, VERTICAL, COLOR #2 5D METAL PANEL, COLOR #3 5E METAL CLADDING, COLOR #3 5F METAL CLADDING, COLOR #4 6A FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT PANEL, COLOR #4 8A ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 8B COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8D OVERHEAD DOOR No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/8/2021 10:10:12 PMA4-1 SHADOW STUDIES 220549 RS NR 2/15/21 Enclave - Richfield Enclave -Richfield 6445 Lyndale Ave. S Richfield, MN 55234 LUA / PUD Revisions 3/8/21 9 AM JUNE 21ST NOON 3 PM 6 PM 9 AM MARCH 21ST / SEPTEMBER 21ST NOON 3 PM 6 PM 9 AM DECEMBER 21ST NOON 3 PM 6 PM No. Description Date 65THSTW 64TH ST W PLEASANT AVEGRANDAVESHARRIET AVELYNDALE AVE S 64 1/2 ST W R R R R C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 MR-1MR-1 MR-2 MR-2 MR-2 MR-3 MR-3 PC-2 PMR PMR PMU PMU Subject Site 500ftNotificationBuffer ± Surrounding Zoning 0 200 400100 ft I:\GIS\Community Developme nt\Case Maps\2021\Lynk65 Zon ing.mxd Zoning Districts R Single-Family R-1 Low-Density Single-Family MR-1 Two-Family PMR Planned Multi- Family MR-2 Multi-Family MR-2/CAC Multi-Fam + Cedar Overlay MR-3 High-Density Multi-Family SO Service Office C-1 Community Commercial C-2 General Commercial PC-2 Planned General Commercial PMU Planned Mixed Use MU-C Mixed Use- Community MU-C/CAC Mixed Use + Cedar Overlay MU-C/PAC Mixed Use + Penn Overlay MU-N Mixed Use- Neighborhood MU-R Mixed Use- Regional I Industrial Case No: 21-RZN-02, 21-PUD-01, 21-FDP-01, & 21-CUP-01 Lynk65 Mixed Use Development 65THSTW 64TH ST W PLEASANT AVEGRAND AVE SHARRIET AVELYNDALE AVE S 64 1/2 ST W Subject Site ± 2040 Planned Land Uses I:\GIS\Community Developme nt\Case Maps\2021\Lynk65 PLU.mxd 2040 Planned Land Use Mixed Use Regional Commercial Community Commercial Neighborhood Commercial High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Park Quasi-Public Right-of-Way (ROW) Lynk65 Mixed Use Development 0 200 400100 ft Case No: 21-RZN-02, 21-PUD-01, 21-FDP-01, & 21-CUP-01 Planning Commission Minutes March 22, 2021 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Kathryn Quam, Commissioners Brendan Kennealy, Bryan Pynn, Susan Rosenberg, Peter Lavin, James Rudolph, and Brett Stursa MEMBERS ABSENT: none STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, Asst. Director of Community Development Ryan Krzos, Planner Nellie Jerome, Assistant Planner OTHERS PRESENT: For Item #1: Brian Bochman, Enclave Companies; Neil Reardon, ESG Architecture and Design. See attached list for additional public comments. Chairperson Quam called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Stursa, S/Rosenberg to approve the minutes of the February 22, 2021, meeting. Motion carried: 6-0 (Commissioner Rudolph was absent for the vote) OPEN FORUM No members of the public spoke, no comments received. APPROVAL OF AGENDA M/Quam, S/Lavin to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 7-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM #1 - Public hearing and consideration of a recommendation on variety of land use approvals to construct a mixed-use development at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street. City Planner Ryan Krzos presented the staff report. The applicants, Brian Bochman, of Enclave Companies, and Neil Reardon, of ESG Architecture and Design, gave a brief presentation. City Planner Krzos reviewed the proposal’s parking ratio, which met the minimum 1.25 stalls per dwelling unit, and noted that it was eligible for the 10% transit reduction. Public comments were received from callers regarding parking and traffic, best management practices for stormwater and greenspace, and impacts on neighbors. Additional written comments and a voicemail were received regarding similar issues. M/Rosenberg, S/Rudolph to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 7-0 Commissioners discussed impervious surface coverage and if the green roof makes up for the large building area. Parking was also discussed further, and it was confirmed that the proposal met the Zoning Code requirements as a Planned Unit Development. M/Stursa, S/Lavin to recommend approval of rezoning the subject property from General Commercial (C-2) to Planned Mixed Use (PMU) and approval of a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, and Final Development Plan for the proposed mixed-use development at the Northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street. Motion carried: 7-0 2 M/Quam, S/Rudolph to take a five minute recess before moving to the next item. Motion carried: 7-0 ITEM #2 - Public hearing to consider a proposed ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations. Assistant Planner Nellie Jerome presented the staff report and a summary of public comments received. Commissioners discussed traffic concerns and keeping agricultural home occupations to a reasonable distribution scale. Public comments received at the meeting focused on retail sales, allowing special circumstances for produce pickup through a CSA (community supported agriculture) model, and similar cities’ policies on this issue. M/Pynn, S/Quam to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 7-0 Staff clarified that the current home occupation rules wouldn’t allow gardening, but staff were this change was proposed in an effort to allow urban agriculture. Staff also noted that the proposed changes to the ordinance included edits that were not related to gardening, and that all retail sales are currently prohibited including the sale of honey from a residential lot. M/Stursa, S/Pynn to recommend approval of an ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations. M/Lavin, S/Stursa to amend the motion to include an allowance for CSA distribution at residential sites with the caveat that distribution is only allowed for produce that is grown on- site. Motion for amendment carried: 7-0 Motion as amended carried: 7-0 LIAISON REPORTS Community Services Advisory Commission: no report. City Council: no report. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA): A new appointment, Lee Ohnesorge, has jo ined the HRA. He has been involved with disability advocacy group in Richfield. Richfield School Board: no report Transportation Commission: multiple projects were discussed, new officers were appointed Chamber of Commerce: none. Sustainability Commission: Community trash collection policy is ongoing, and there is work on tree replacement and preservation plan. CITY PLANNER’S REPORT There is a work session focused on aligning planning districts with the comprehensive plan, and the Richfield City Council will meet with Bloomington City Council to discuss the CNU project at Portland and I-494. ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting will be Monday, April 27, 2021, at 7pm on the Webex online meeting platform. M/Stursa, S/Pynn to adjourn the meeting. 3 Motion carried: 7-0 The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:58 p.m. __________________________ Planning Commission Secretary City of Richfield Planning Commission Meeting, March 22, 2021 Public comments on Item #1: Public hearing and consideration of a recommendation on variety of land use approvals to construct a mixed use development at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street Public comments received at the meeting from the following callers: Alex Asmas, 6401 Harriet Ave Ava McKnight, 6935 11th Ave Debbie Eng, 6334 Grand Ave Dear Commissioners, I have seen a rendering of what, presumably, is being proposed for the 64th to 65th and Lyndale strip-mall site. While it is more than sad to see more small businesses depart, I understand that this is private property and can be sold at will. I hope that the city can put some restrictions on what type of development is constructed there. What I saw pictured is a 5-story building with commercial use on the first floor, and what appear to be residential units in the four floors above. My input is that I would like to see Richfield begin to restrict new developments to no higher than two stories. We have quite enough multi-story buildings that are blocking sun from many areas of our community now. This can make for dangerous walking in the winter. Richfield purports to be in favor of and wants to promote walking and biking; but unless there are safe ways to do this, it won't be done. Attempting to walk the shaded, ice-covered sidewalks in the winter is risky. Tall buildings are one of the factors that contribute to that danger. Multi-story residential buildings also bring about the questions of parking and traffic in the area. There are already several large multi-family residential buildings in this neighborhood, as well as many commercial/retail ventures. Richfield wants to promote itself as a "hometown"; and yet, at the same time, seems to erase any semblance of what has made us a community with the hometown feel. I would urge you to consider keeping any new developments smaller and more in line with our hometown feel - the thing which attracts many to want to live here. I think that we're more-than-full of high-end and "market rate" apartments and condominiums. Although the city can't prohibit private-property owners from selling their property, perhaps it can at least maintain some degree of common sense about what happens with the future development, so as to retain some of our small businesses and residents. Heidi Gaibor 6915 Wentworth Public comments on Item #2: Public hearing to consider a proposed ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations. Public comments received at the meeting from the following callers: Alex Asmas, 6401 Harriet Ave Jason Reese, 6400 Grand Ave Debbie Eng, 6334 Grand Ave Ava McKnight, 6935 11th Ave Hello Planning Commission members, I am writing on behalf of my family in opposition of the proposed amendments to section 509.21 subdivision 10 & 11-J and wish for both proposed changes to be stricken. I grew up in Richfield, and post-college came back to raise my family for which I’ve lived 8 years. “The Urban Hometown” is Richfield’s slogan and a name derived from the fertile farmland that once occupied the area. To quote a specific part of Richfield’s published description; “Although located in the middle of a large urban area, Richfield retains a small town atmosphere. The pace is easy, the streets are clean, City government is accessible, and community spirit runs high.” These are all reasons why I chose to raise my family here. What I implore each member of the committee to consider is how do the proposed changes align with these values, and if passed what it would tell the current and future residents of Richfield? A City that has so far done a good job leading in urban farming by considering the environmental, health and communal benefits it provides. I am the next-door neighbor of (the Reese Family) for whom this amendment is very obviously targeted towards. My family greatly enjoys having this wonderful garden and corresponding CSA in the neighborhood. The service this particular CSA provides has quite literally improved my family’s health and wellbeing. It has also served as a feature of the community, bringing us closer to many neighbors we otherwise may not have relationships with. These benefits are realized because we do not have to travel to an off-site pickup location and can stay within the immediate neighborhood. It is understandable to implement forward looking restrictions on certain use of personal property that could be of detriment or cause danger. What does not make sense is; what the city is trying to prevent, by not allowing very occasional pickup/distribution of vegetables? This seems like an unreasonable burden, not just to the distributors but also the people picking up (many of which do not travel by vehicle). Being the next-door neighbor to this CSA I can confidently say that traffic due to pick-up (one day per week, for a few hours) is virtually unnoticeable. In fact, there is significantly more traffic from other immediate homes, apartments and construction having vehicles come and go every single day, while also parking on the street. Considering this, any potential disturbance due to vegetable pick up is negligible. I fear that moving forward with these changes sets a poor precedent to any future urban farm and/or other cottage business in Richfield. It shows we are not governing with care and consideration but with blanket policy towards nuanced situations. It is especially important to consider ramifications, given the current economic challenges that face the community, resulting from the recent pandemic. Every decision such as this reverberates much louder than it may have in the past. My final concerns are: the use of the words “Continuous or regular” are very nebulous and provide no context. This would cause significant grey area in not just distribution of garden products but any products. Clarifying this further would be a significant task with much nuance needing to be added. Secondly, it’s disturbing to assume these changes are a result of what sounds like a single traffic complaint, but with no input from other stakeholders prior to the proposal of these new additions. Thank you for reading and considering this statement. Alex Asmus 6401 Harriet Ave 612-999-8989 I have resided in the same home in Richfield since 1947 and experienced the many changes since the days it was only a Village. It is my understanding, originally Richfield crops were trucked to Minneapolis for sale and distribution. Obviously, the population of the City has grown (no pun intended) over the years and become an inner suburb of maximum density. Recently, my R-1 property was within 500 feet of a home operating a part time motor vehicle repair facility in violation of Section 1, Subd. 11. a). The result was an increase in noise, equipment, on and off street parking, creating a considerable nuisance in the neighborhood. The part-time business was operated within the garage attached to the residence on the property. Despite complaints to City staff, the condition was not corrected until the tenants relocated. Sale of horticultural products as a Home Occupation might create problems similar to those I experienced near my property. As I interpret the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code, onsite sale of horticultural products will not be allowed. If my understanding is incorrect, I strongly recommend no such activity be permitted. Proponents of the sale of such goods admit they want to start a "cottage food business." I submit this is the very basis property is zoned commercial rather than residential. Such business will increase noise, automobile traffic and parking congestion, decrease property line setbacks and lawn area. Will the City allow such crops to be grown in the front yard? Understandably, all the other suburbs studied by the City staff forbid onsite sale of horticultural products. I cannot believe this industry could produce significant income from home crops. In order to become profitable, I can imagine operators might abuse the ordinance. Crops grown offsite might be trucked in for sale onsite. Regular vegetables could be purchased offsite at ordinary prices and resold onsite as organic. Businesses could be operated from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. seven days a week. Such a Home Occupation would be very difficult and expensive for the City to regulate. I do not object to homeowners growing a reasonable amount of horticultural products for use by their family, neighbors or friends. Likewise, donations to non-profits should be encouraged. Although, I do not know the requirements for participation, I suppose sales for profit could be performed at the farmers' market at Veterans Park on Saturday mornings. Gary Olso 612-869-0418 Dear Planning Commission and City Leaders, I am a long time Richfield resident, and first time Public Commenter. Thank you for considering these concerns and suggestions. More than 100 years ago, the industrial revolution paved the way for explosive population growth and the migration of human populations from rural agrarian settings to urban dwellings. Since then, city planners have had their hands full, creating rules and regulations that make city living safe and healthy for all residents. There has been a lot to think about in this monumental human shift. One of the themes that has helped guide urban planning is the concept of “zoning”; everything in its place, so that homeowners can enjoy safe, peaceful neighborhoods, separate from busy business districts, or the stink of a crowded turkey farm, etc. This framework is helpful, but when applied with a heavy hand and without nuance, it creates problems just as critical as those it was meant to solve. Urban areas have become “Food Deserts”, and people who live in urban zones are at higher risk for obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. At the same time, food insecurity is a common problem in urban areas, with the most vulnerable individuals being children and the elderly. At the same time, urban populations are losing basic understanding of where food comes from, and how our stewardship of the earth matters to each of us as individuals, and as a group. It is now common for children and even adults to lack basic understanding of how carrots, potatoes, peas, zucchinis, eggs, and meat grow and arrive on our plates. Our sterile neighborhoods have led to predictably sterile lives. We can go all year without meeting a neighbor if nothing in our yards calls us out to work and mingle. Our children have allergies and sensory issues, because they have no dirt to play in. And none of us like to eat vegetables, because the crummy cardboard produce at the store has travelled here from another hemisphere, with predictable results. As a result of these alarming trends, people in urban areas across our nation have started to push back against the clumsy zoning codes that have separated us from the food we eat. Historically, in what we might think of as “Urban Planning Version 1” , regulations favored very un-agricultural residential areas. There was a “slippery slope” fallacy underlying many of these regulations: “If we allow any chickens at all, pretty soon there will be a poultry farm in someone’s yard” “If we allow a tomato plant in a front yard, pretty soon there will be a field of wheat and a combine in another front yard” Richfield has, in recent years, done a good job of keeping up with the latest emerging wisdom, as we recognize that a more nuanced approach to governing can provide freedom, peaceful living and healthy choices to all residents. That growing and sharing food is fundamental to the human experience, and that a delicious meal starts with a fertile patch of ground. We are now allowed to keep a small number of chickens, who are delightful backyard companions, and we can plant garden crops on our property, while keeping things tidy and attractive. This forward-looking attitude, similar to other progressive urban attitudes in our country, is what attracted me to Richfield and is why I have recommended it to many of my friends who have subsequently moved here. I have spent the 12+ years that I have lived in Richfield believing it to be an “Urban Oasis” -- somewhere that I can enjoy the amenities of city life, while also having the freedom to enjoy my property to its fullest, growing food and sharing it with my neighbors, family and friends. I have a COMMUNITY of people who enjoy these things with me, and its value for our health, happiness, and well-being cannot be overstated. Specifically in question today is the “CSA” operation of one of our residents, and how an update or clarification to our city codes may affect them. It is my opinion Jason and Courtney’s yard, and the service they provide to our community, is one of the jewels of our city. I have not met them personally, but I think their vision and execution of an Urban CSA deserves to be front page news in any major media outlet. Their yard at the height of summer is jaw droppingly beautiful; I take time out of my way every time I visit Lakewinds to bike by and admire it, and I have sent other garden-loving friends their way to see it and be inspired! The service they provide to nearby neighbors of being able to access fresh produce at its peak is something that should be a basic human right, and yet has become so rare in our urban lives that we are here questioning it’s right to exist. The only reasons I have heard to change or limit their ability to provide this service are so fallacious that I cannot believe the discussion has lasted this long. First, there was the “traffic” complaint from a single disgruntled neighbor. In the case of this neighborhood CSA, the number of customers is somewhere around a dozen. And half of their customers are neighborhood residents who walk over to pick up their food. My own neighbors have a weekly bible study that attracts at least a dozen cars at one time (in non- covid times) (and for the record I am not complaining!). I hardly think we are going to outlaw this kind of gathering. If I’ve been quite busy shopping, sometimes the Amazon truck will visit my house several times a day! And yet for some reason, the handful of cars that might visit this resident’s house once a week, for a few months in the summer, is a problem. Please, let us take this off the table as a supposed concern. The only other concern I have heard is the “zoning” issue, with the “slippery slope” story in hot pursuit. “If we allow this tiny CSA, then what’s to stop another neighbor from opening a convenience store in their garage?”. And the clear answer is: Govern with wisdom and nuance! You can make a decision to specifically allow VEGETABLES, which grow in our dirt, which create beauty in our yards, which create community with our neighbors, and which nourish our bodies. And you may simultaneously continue to uphold other regulations that limit commercial and larger agricultural enterprises in our beautiful city. You did it with simplicity and aplomb by allowing 3 chickens in Richfield yards. What a triumph -- we can enjoy fresh eggs if we want, while running no risk of suffering a commercial poultry enterprise in our neighbor’s yard. You can use the same simple language and common sense to clarify our rules in a way that continues to allow residents to grow and share fresh produce with one another. Sincerely -- Stephanie King, Richfield Resident Members of the Richfield Planning Commission: My name is Debbie Eng and I am writing to you to provide community comment regarding the proposed ordinance amendment to modify rules related to home occupations, specifically Section 509.21, Subdivisions 10 and 11. I am a Richfield resident who lives 2 houses away from Jason Reese and Courtney Kupsch. It is Jason and Courtney’s yard garden that has triggered the proposed changes before you regarding gardening or horticultural activities. I have also been the recipient of a variety of wonderful fresh healthy vegetables from their garden. I am opposed to the proposed changes that would prohibit the sale or distribution of fresh healthy produce from a Richfield resident’s garden – • The city should be encouraging healthy eating and the sharing of fresh food. • Bee keeping and the sale of honey is allowed in Richfield. What is really the difference between these sales and product distribution? • Jason and Courtney’s garden is considered an asset in our great neighborhood and is well kept and enjoyed by many families. People stop to admire the garden while out walking. • Why would the city choose to deny this community asset? I have heard that “someone” has complained about traffic…the many neighbors that I have mentioned this to have been surprised and have stated that this has not been their experience. I also find this ironic given the July 2020 approval for a new 88-unit apartment building, on the corner of 64th street and Lyndale Ave S (2 short blocks and on the same street from Jason and Courtney’s garden) amid numerous traffic and parking concerns raised by myself and other neighbors. Commissioners, I strongly ask that you reconsider the proposed language in Section 509.21, Subdivisions 10 and 11. It is within your authority to revise the language proposed before you. We are a wonderful thriving neighborhood which exemplifies Richfield’s vision of an inclusive growing urban hometown. Jason and Courtney’s garden contributes to this vision. Thank you for your attention to my comments. Deborah A. Eng 6334 Grand Avenue South AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #6. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 65 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Ryan K rzos, P lanner D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector 4/21/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Conduct a public hearing and consider: the second reading of a transitory ordinance vacating a portion of the Lyndale Avenue right-of- way and utility easements; a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance; and, a resolution approving a preliminary plat for property located at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: I n conjunction with requested land use approvals for the redevelopment project known as Lynk65, the applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and vacation of a portion of the Lyndale Avenue right-of- way and utility easements. The proposed plat would combine the three parcels comprising the development site into one new lot. The vacations are necessary to accommodate the placement of the building in the proposed location. This portion of the Lyndale Avenue right-of-way is not needed in the design of the roundabout at the intersection with 65th Street, and the amount of area roughly equals the area that will be dedicated for the roundabout by the plat. W hile a public hearing is required by State Statute, the plat is a technical document dealing with the combination or division of land, and is not a reconsideration of land use approvals for the development. The proposed plat and vacation requests meet requirements and therefore staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance and resolution. I f the Council denied or delayed a decision on the land use items, consideration of the plat and vacations should also be denied or delayed. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: 1. Approve a second reading of the transitory ordinance vacating Lyndale Avenue right-of- way and utility easements over property located at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street; and 2. Approve a re solution authorizing summary publication of said transitory ordinance. 3. Approve the resolution granting approval of a preliminary plat of Lyndale Oaks Second Addition. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T None. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): All plats or subdivisions of land in the City must be approved by council resolution pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota State Statutes 462.357. The City Council may vacate public easements in accordance with MN Statutes 412.851. A first reading of the transitory ordinance to vacate right-of-way and utility easements was approved by the Council on April 13, 2021. At the first reading of the transitory ordinance, a question was asked as to why right-of-way would be vacated rather than granting an easement to the developer for encroachments. The Minnesota State Building Code prohibits doors to open into the public right-of-way and limits steps, including handrail extensions, from extending more than 12” into the public right-of-way. I t has been the City’s policy to require that all steps and railings be outside of the public right-of-way as a way to limit liability and provide space for machinery used to clear sidewalks. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: Per State Statute, the City has 120 days from the date of submittal of a complete application to issue a decision regarding a plat unless the applicant agrees to an extension. A complete plat application was received on March 8, 2021. The Council must render a decision by J uly 6, 2021. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The application processing fees have been paid. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: Notice of this public hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on April 15, 2021. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Approve a second reading of the transitory ordinance and/or resolution with modifications. Reject the proposed transitory ordinance and/or resolution. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: Representatives from Enclave Companies, E S G Architecture and Design, and Westwood Professional Services. AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Ordinance - Vacate Lyndale RO W and E asements Ordinance S ummary P ublication Resolution Resolution L etter Resolution - P reliminary P lat Resolution L etter P reliminary P lat E xhibit E asement Vacation E xhibit E xhibit ROW Vacation E xhibit E xhibit BILL NO. TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AND 65TH STREET THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1: The plat of J. N. Hauser’s Second Addition dedicates land lying west of the westerly line of Lot 2, Block 2 as public right of way for Lyndale Avenue South. Sec. 2. The owner of Lot 2, Block 2, J. N. Hauser’s Second Addition has petitioned for a partial vacation of that street easement described as follows: That part of Lyndale Avenue South as dedicated on J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly and northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most westerly corner of Lot 2, Block 2, said J.N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION; thence South 43 degrees 36 minutes 53 seconds East, assumed bearing along the westerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 5.38 feet to the point of beginning of the right of way to be vacated; thence South 46 degrees 32 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance of 8.67 feet; thence South 43 degrees 26 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 68.71 feet; thence Southeasterly, along a tangential curve, concave to the Northeast, having a central angle of 21 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds, a radius of 100.00 feet for an arc distance of 37.27 feet to said westerly line of Lot 2 and said line there terminating. Sec.. 3. The Council finds that there is no public need for a street easement over that part of the platted street that is the subject of the petition. Sec. 4. The following described lands are subject to the easements in favor of the City of Richfield as described in Exhibit A for utility purposes (“Utility Easements”): Sec. 5: The City has notified the service providers for gas, electric, telephone, and cable communications services of the proposed vacations; the following facilities are reported to be located in the Utility Easements: cable Sec. 6: The existing utility lines within the easement areas shall be removed and placed within new easements dedicated in the plat by the land owner. There is no need to reserve the Utility Easement as part of this proceeding. Sec. 7: The Council finds that there is not a public need for the Utility Easements. Sec. 8. The City of Richfield held the first reading on April 13, 2021 and second reading on April 27, 2021. Legal notice was published in the City’s official newspaper as required by ordinance. Sec. 9: The Street Easement and Utility Easement are vacated conditioned upon the following conditions: 1. Filing of the plat of Lyndale Oaks Second Addition; and 2. Dedication of additional right-of-way for Lyndale Avenue South in its new location on the final plat. Sec. 10: The vacation of the Street Easement is effective 30 days following publication of the ordinance. Sec. 11: The City Clerk is directed to prepare a certificate of completion of vacation proceedings and to record the vacation in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles or Hennepin County Recorder, as appropriate, following publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021 Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk EXHIBIT A UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS Easement 1. The easement for storm sewer purposes, in favor of the City of Richfield, as created in Agreement dated May 24, 1967, filed August 2, 1967, as Document No. 3668072, in Book 2596 of Deeds, Page 588, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying within: The southerly 5 feet of Lot 3, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Easement 2. The easement for utility installation and maintenance as created in Indenture dated September 10, 1946, filed September 11, 1946, as Document No. 2395014, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying within: The 5 feet to the rear of each Lot of Lots 3, 4, 5, 19, 20 and all of Lot 18 except the Northwesterly 25 feet thereof, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Easement 3. The portion of the easement for utilities purposes reserved by the City of Richfield in Transitory Ordinance 17.02 passed July 26, 1982, filed July 23, 1985, as Document No. 5015916, Hennepin County Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the most Northwesterly corner of Lot 19 in said Block 6; thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 19 and its extension to the Northerly line of Lot 5 in said Block 6; thence Easterly along said North line 114.29 feet, more or less, to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 5; thence Westerly passing through the Southwesterly corner of Lot 6 in said Block 6 to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining the Northeasterly line of Lot 18 in said Block 6; thence Northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Northeasterly extension of the Southeasterly line of the Northwesterly 25 feet of said Lot 18; thence Southwesterly along said extension to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 18; thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly line to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 18; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 18 to the Southerly corner of said Lot 18; thence Southeasterly to the point of beginning. RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 65TH STREET WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above referenced amendment of the Richfield City Code; and WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense of publication of the complete text is not justified. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication: SUMMARY PUBLICATION BILL NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 65TH STREET This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. This ordinance vacates a portion of the Lyndale Avenue right-of-way near the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street. Additionally, the ordinance vacates the utility easements within the property located at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street addressed as 6467 Lyndale Avenue, 6439 Lyndale Avenue, and 415 64 ½ Street West. Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office during normal business hours or upon request by calling the Department of Community Development at (612) 861-9760. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT FOR LYNDALE OAKS SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, ESG Design and Architecture on behalf of Enclave Companies has requested preliminary approval of a plat that combines several parcels of land and vacated right-of-way generally located at the northeast corner of Lyndale Avenue and 65th Street, on land that is legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is to be known as LYNDALE OAKS SECOND ADDITION; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed preliminary plat of LYNDALE OAKS SECOND ADDITION on Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at which all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, as follows: 1. The proposed preliminary plat of LYNDALE OAKS SECOND ADDITION satisfies the requirements of the City’s subdivision ordinances. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat of LYNDALE OAKS SECOND ADDITION is granted with the following conditions: a. The applicant must address to the City Attorney’s satisfaction all items listed in the plat opinion letter to be prepared by the City Attorney’s office. b. The applicant must address any/all comments by the City Engineering Department and Hennepin County. c. Compliance with any other applicable requirements of the Richfield City Code. d. The Applicant must obtain approval of a final plat prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any units within the platted area. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESRCRIPTION Parcel 1: Lot 2, Block 2, "J. N. Hauser's Second Addition". Hennepin County, Minnesota Torrens Property Parcel 2: Lots 4, 5, 19, 20 and all of Lot 18 except the Northwesterly 25 feet thereof, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; together with those parts of the vacated alleys in said Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, described as follows: Beginning at the most Northwesterly corner of Lot 19 in said Block 6; thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 19 and its extension to the Northerly line of Lot 5 in said Block 6; thence Easterly along said North line 114.29 feet, more or less, to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 5; thence Westerly passing through the Southwesterly corner of Lot 6 in said Block 6 to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining the Northeasterly line of Lot 18 in said Block 6; thence Northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Northeasterly extension of the Southeasterly line of the Northwesterly 25 feet of said Lot 18; thence Southwesterly along said extension to the Northeasterly line of said Lot 18; thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly line to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 18; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 18 to the Southerly corner of said Lot 18; thence Southeasterly to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Parcel 3: Lot 3, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property TOGETHER WITH: That part of Lyndale Avenue South as dedicated on J. N. Hauser's Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly and northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most westerly corner of Lot 2, Block 2, said J. N. Hauser's Second Addition; thence South 43 degrees 36 minutes 53 seconds East, assumed bearing along the westerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 5.38 feet to the point of beginning of the right of way to be vacated; thence South 46 degrees 32 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance of 8.67 feet; thence South 43 degrees 26 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 68.71 feet; thence Southeasterly, along a tangential curve, concave to the Northeast, having a central angle of 21 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds, a radius of 100.00 feet for an arc distance of 37.27 feet to said westerly line of Lot 2 and said line there terminating. TTC33.5B-B60ROW64ROW45.3B-B83ROW37.2B-B 2 6 . 8 B - B 36.7B-B27.0B-B 8.2 EXCEPTION25.00WEST 64TH 1/2 STREETWEST 65TH STREETLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHLOT 3LOT 2LOT 4LOT 20LOT 5LOT 19LOT 18 BLOCK 2BLOCK 6PROPOSEDBUILDINGPROPOSEDBUILDINGLOT 1BLOCK 1PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYOF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHStorm Sewer Easement perDoc. No. 3668072,Easement to be vacatedEasement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacatedEasement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacatedEasement for Utility Installationand Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacated5 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 5.00Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacated5.00Vacated Alley and subject to perpetualeasements existing on alley to permitimprovements or maintenance ofexisting utilities per Doc. No. 5015916,Easement to be vacated14.00Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014,Easement to be vacatedL=25.64R=75.00© 28.406 (L=9.65R=51.54© 25.25169.655.00 Vacated Alley and subject to perpetualeasements existing on alley to permitimprovements or maintenance ofexisting utilities per Doc. No. 5015916,Easement to be vacated14.00(EXISTING STREETALIGNMENT)N46°32'02"E 132.00 N43°28'31"W 42.95N86°46'55"W 118.91L=93.97R=70.00Δ=76°54'54"N89°29'35"E 108.72N00°29'04"W 124.85(meas.) 125.00(plat)5.00N89°35'11"EN00°29'04"W 121.53(meas.) 121.94(plat)N89°32'19"E 194.89(meas.) 194(plat)L=20.20(meas.) 19.28(plat)R=20.00Δ=57°51'17"N43°36'53"W 180.31L=36.96R=409.27Δ=5°10'27"8.67N46°32'19"EN43°26'40"W 68.71L=11.52R=99.17© L=41.66R=409.27© 63.52180.31L=37.27R=100.00Δ=21°21'13"PROPOSED RIGHT OFWAY VACATION OFLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH3/5/2021 2:11 PM DMPPRELIMINARY PLANNEDUNIT DEVELOPMENTPLANS ANDPRELIMINARY PLATNo.DescriptionDateBW0028894.00DateDescriptionNo.C2.1PRELIMINARY PLAT01/18/21ENCLAVE - RICHFIELDPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION65th & LyndaleRichfield, MN 55234Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.02/15/21.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE COMMITMENTNUMBER 56766PARCEL 1:LOT 2, BLOCK 2, "J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION".HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTATORRENS PROPERTYPARCEL 2:LOTS 4, 5, 19, 20 AND ALL OF LOT 18 EXCEPT THE NORTHWESTERLY 25 FEET THEREOF, BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS, ACCORDINGTO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PARTS OF THE VACATED ALLEYSIN SAID BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 19 IN SAID BLOCK 6; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THENORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 19 AND ITS EXTENSION TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK 6; THENCEEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 114.29 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCEWESTERLY PASSING THROUGH THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 6 TO THE CENTERLINE OF THEVACATED ALLEY ADJOINING THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 18 IN SAID BLOCK 6; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIDCENTERLINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THENORTHWESTERLY 25 FEET OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EXTENSION TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINEOF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT18; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 18;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTAABSTRACT PROPERTYPARCEL 3:LOT 3, BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA.ABSTRACT PROPERTYTOGETHER WITH:THAT PART OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AS DEDICATED ON J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THERECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, LYING SOUTHEASTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF THEFOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:COMMENCING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SAID J.N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH43 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, ASSUMED BEARING ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF5.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO BE VACATED; THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 19SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 8.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 68.71FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF21 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 13 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.27 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINEOF LOT 2 AND SAID LINE THERE TERMINATING.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION1) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED USING CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE COMMITMENT NUMBER56766 HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 11, 2020 AT 07:00 AM2) SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS ZONE X WHEN SCALED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATEMAP COMMUNITY - PANEL NUMBER 27053C0368F DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2016.3) SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 91,127 SQ. FT. OR 2.092 ACRES.4) SUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS 89 TOTAL PARKING STALLS, INCLUDING 3 HANDICAPPED STALLS.5) THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION ANDEXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWNCOMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHERDOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATEDALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATIONAVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. (GOPHER STATEONE CALL TICKET NO. 203291663, NO. 203291690 AND NO. 2032916916) ADJOINING OWNERS SHOWN PER HENNEPIN COUNTY PARCEL WEBSITE.7) WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. WAS NOT PROVIDED ADJOINER DEEDS.8) THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATESYSTEM, N.A.D. 1983 (1986 ADJUSTMENT) US SURVEY FEET.GENERAL NOTESPOST INDICATOR VALVEGUY WIREFLARED END SECTIONSANITARY MANHOLEBEEHIVE CATCH BASINCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC TOWERSEWER CLEANOUTPOWER POLEELECTRIC BOXELECTRIC METERSIGNHANDICAPPED STALLCABLE TV BOXSTREET LIGHTMAIL BOXSTEEL/WOOD POSTBUSH/SHRUBCONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREEPOWER OVERHEADTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE OVERHEADPOWER UNDERGROUNDWATERMAINFIBER OPTICSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERGATE VALVEGAS LINECABLE TELEVISION LINECURB STOP BOXHYDRANTHAND HOLE/JUNCTION BOXSTORM MANHOLETELEPHONE BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONFENCE LINECURB & GUTTERAIR CONDITIONERFLAG POLETREE LINECTVGASPOHPUGSANSTOTOHTUGWATFOSCOSTCSEEETTTVACMAILHHTRAFFIC SIGNALCABLE TV MANHOLECATCH BASIN MANHOLESEPTIC COVERSEPTVXPRELIMINARY PLAT OF:LYNDALE OAKS 2ND ADDITIONZONINGSUBJECT PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIALPER THE CITY OF RICHFIELD ZONING MAP FOUND ON THEIR WEBSITEAREASUBJECT PROPERTY CONTAINS:LOT 1, BLOCK 1 AREA = 89,480 SQ. FT. OR 2.054 ACRESVACATED RIGHT OF WAY OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AREA = 817 SQ. FT. OR 0.019 ACRESRIGHT OF WAY OF LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AREA = 830 SQ. FT. OR 0.019 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 91,127 SQ. FT. OR 2.092 ACRESOWNER/SUBDIVIDERENCLAVE DEVELOPMENT1 2ND STREET NORTH, SUITE 102FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA, 58102SURVEYOR/ENGINEERWESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES12701 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300MINNETONKA, MN 55343952-937-51501PROGRESS SET01/18/212LUA / PUD02/15/213LUA / PUD REVISIONS03/08/214..5..6.. L=93.97R=70.00Δ=76°54'54"N89°29'35"E 108.72N00°29'04"W 124.85(meas.) 125.00(plat)5.00N89°35'11"EN00°29'04"W 121.53(meas.) 121.94(plat)N89°32'19"E 194.89(meas.)194.00(plat)L=20.20(meas.)19.28(plat)L=77.53(platR=409.27Δ=11°00'29"N43°36'53"W 243.82132.00N46°32'02"E42.95N43°28'31"WN86°46'55"W 118.91L=78.63(meas.)Storm SewerEasement perDoc. No. 3668072Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014Easement for Utility Installationand Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014Vacated Alley and subject to perpetualeasements existing on alley to permitimprovements or maintenance ofexisting utilities per Doc. No. 5015916Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance perDoc. No. 2395014LOT 3LOT 2LOT 4LOT 20LOT 5LOT 19LOT 18BLOCK 2BLOCK 6WEST 64TH 1/2 STREETWEST 65TH STREETLYNDALE AVENUE SOUTHR=20.00Δ=57°51'17"5.005.005.00 5.005.00N:\0028894.00\DWG\SURVEY\0028894SKF01.DWG 04/02/2021Richfield, MinnesotaEnclave Richfield1 2nd Street North, Suite 102Fargo, North Dakota, 58102Easement Vacation Sketch21OF.NHCBTWEnclave DevelopmentDATE:PREPARED FOR:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:0'50'100':HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.comPROJECT NUMBER: 0028894.00- Denotes Easement Vacation for Easement for Utility Installation and Maintenance per Doc. No. 2395014 (see sheet 2 for utility easement vacationlegal description)- Denotes Easement Vacation for StormSewer Easement per Doc. No. 3668072 (see sheet 2 for storm sewer easementvacation legal description)- Denotes Easement Vacation of Vacated Alley and subject to perpetual Easements existing on Alley to permit improvements or maintenance of existing Utilities per Doc. No. 5015916 (see sheet 2 for alley easement vacationlegal description) N:\0028894.00\DWG\SURVEY\0028894SKF01.DWG 04/02/2021Richfield, MinnesotaEnclave Richfield1 2nd Street North, Suite 102Fargo, North Dakota, 58102Easement Vacation Sketch22OF.NHCBTWEnclave Development© 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.comPROJECT NUMBER: 0028894.00DATE:PREPARED FOR:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150SHEET NUMBER:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:PROPOSED STORM SEWER EASEMENT VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTIONAll of the Easement for storm sewer purposes, in favor of the City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipalcorporation, as created in Agreement dated May 24, 1967, filed August 2, 1967, as Document No. 3668072,in Book 2596 of Deeds, Page 588, Hennepin County, Minnesota.PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTIONAll of the Easement for Utility installation and maintenance as created in Indenture dated September 10,1946, filed September 11, 1946, as Document No. 2395014, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying in Lot 3, Lot 4,Lot 5, Lot 19, Lot 20 and Lot 18 except the Northwesterly 25 feet thereof, all in Block 6, LYNDALE OAKS,according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.PROPOSED ALLEY EASEMENT VACATION LEGAL DESCRIPTIONAll of the Easement for utilities purposes reserved by the City of Richfield in Transitory Ordinance 17.02passed July 26, 1982, filed July 23, 1985, as Document No. 5015916, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lyingover Block 6, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County, Minnesota;described as follows: Beginning at the most Northwesterly corner of Lot 19 in said Block 6; thence Northeasterly along theNorthwesterly line of said Lot 19 and its extension to the Northerly line of Lot 5 in said Block 6; thenceEasterly along said North line 114.29 feet, more or less, to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 5;thence Westerly passing through the Southwesterly corner of Lot 6 in said Block 6 to the centerline ofthe vacated alley adjoining the Northeasterly line of Lot 18 in said Block 6; thence Northwesterly alongsaid centerline to its intersection with the Northeasterly extension of the Southeasterly line of theNorthwesterly 25 feet of said Lot 18; thence Southwesterly along said extension to the Northeasterlyline of said Lot 18; thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly line to the most Easterly corner ofsaid Lot 18; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 18 to the Southerly corner of said Lot 18; thence Southeasterly to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota L YNDA L E A V ENU E SOU TH LOT 2 BLOCK 28.67S46°32'19"W S 4 3 ° 2 6 ' 4 0 " E 6 8 . 7 1 L = 3 7 . 2 7 R = 1 0 0 . 0 0 Δ = 2 1 ° 2 1 ' 1 3 " 5.38 S43°36'53"E Point of Commencement, Most Westerly Corner of Lot 2, Block 2, J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION Point of Beginning Point of Termination Westerly Line of Lot 2, Block 2, J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION R i g h t o f W a y t o b e v a c a t e d N:\0028894.00\DWG\SURVEY\0028894SKF02.DWG1 1 Richfield, Minnesota 03/05/2021 NHC BTW Richfield Apartments Right of Way Vacation Sketch SHEET NUMBER: DATE: OF DRAWN: CHECKED: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 :HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QF PROJECT NUMBER: 0028894SKF01 That part of Lyndale Avenue South as dedicated on J. N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly and northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most westerly corner of Lot 2, Block 2, said J.N. HAUSER'S SECOND ADDITION; thence South 43 degrees 36 minutes 53 seconds East, assumed bearing along the westerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 5.38 feet to the point of beginning of the right of way to be vacated; thence South 46 degrees 32 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance of 8.67 feet; thence South 43 degrees 26 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 68.71 feet; thence Southeasterly, along a tangential curve, concave to the Northeast, having a central angle of 21 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds, a radius of 100.00 feet for an arc distance of 37.27 feet to said westerly line of Lot 2 and said line there terminating. Right of Way Vacation Area = 817 square feet or 0.019 acres, more or less. AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #7. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 66 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Ryan K rzos, P lanner D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, E xecutive D irector 4/20/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Conduct a public hearing and consider approval of a second reading of an ordinance repealing Section 500 of the City Code and adopting a new Section 500 related to Plats and Subdivision Regulations and a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Section 500 of the City Code contains the City's platting and subdivision ordinance which regulates the subdivision of land. The current ordinance has not been revisited in some time, and as a result does not completely align with State Statute or the City's development review process. On February 23, 2021 a draft ordinance was presented at a work session of the City Council and Planning Commission. Staff took direction from discussion of the proposed provisions and incorporated revisions into the ordinance. Significant modifications based on direction from the work session include: Applications creating two new lots would be eligible for review under a minor subdivision review process. Staff revised this allowance down from four presented at the work session based on direction from policymakers. The revised ordinance includes a stipulation that when minor subdivision requests involve unusual elements or policy decisions affecting the community, staff may require the subdivision be reviewed under the platting process. Staff also added an appeals process for administrative decisions, including minor subdivision reviews, which would be heard by the City Council. Lastly, staff restored the subdivision waiver process for instances where a request would not be eligible for minor subdivision review, but where requiring preparation of a plat would create an unnecessary hardship. W aiver requests would be considered by the City Council, as they are currently. The ordinance provisions are organized in a manner similar to that of most communities across the state. The general sections include: General Provisions - establishes definitions of terms, penalties, and applicability of the provisions. Procedures - details how minor subdivision requests and plats are received and processed. Design standards - contains standards for how elements such as lots, streets, and utilities within subdivisions are laid out. Required improvements - describes obligations of the subdivider. Other Administrative Provisions - establishes a variance process to relieve or vary any standards of the subdivision ordinance; an appeals process for challenges to administrative decisions; and a waiver process for instances where the provisions create an undue hardship on the subdivider. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: 1. Approve a second reading of an ordinance repealing Section 500 of the City Code and adopting a new Section 500 related to Plats and Subdivision Regulations; and 2. Approve a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T See Executive Summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): City subdivision review authority is granted to cities by and subject to the Municipal Planning Act, which contains substantive and procedural requirements. The proposed ordinance was drafted to comply with these provisions which are outlined in State Statute Section 462.358. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: None. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: W hen drafting and adopting a subdivision ordinance, the City is said to be utilizing its legislative authority. W hen using its legislative authority, the action must be constitutional, rational, and in some way related to protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current, as required. A first reading of the Ordinance was conducted on April 13, 2021. The City Attorney contributed to and reviewed the ordinance. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Approve a second reading of the ordinance and/or resolution with modifications. Reject the proposed ordinance and/or resolution. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: None AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type P roposed S ubdivision Ordinance Ordinance Resolution - S ummary P ublication Resolution L etter BILL NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 500 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 500 RELATED TO PLATS AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Section 500 of the Richfield City Code is repealed in its entirety and replaced with a new Section 500 as follows: SECTION 500 - PLATS; SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 500.01. - Title Section 500 contains the subdivision regulations of the City of Richfield. 500.03. - Purpose. It is the intent and purpose of this Section to: (a) Protect and promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; (b) Provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land; (c) Assist in the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan; (d) Provide adequate public services and facilities; (e) Establish standards, requirements, and procedures for the review and approval or disapproval of subdivisions. 500.05. - Authority. The City Council shall be the platting authority. 500.07. - Definitions. Subdivision 1. For the purpose of this Section, the following words and terms shall have the meanings stated: Subd. 2. “Subdivision.” The separation of an area, parcel, or tract of land under single ownership into two (2) or more parcels, tracts, lots, or long-term leasehold interests where the creation of the leasehold interest necessitates the creation of streets, roads, or alleys, for residential, commercial, industrial, or other use or any combination thereof, except those separations: (a) where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots, or interests will be twenty (20) acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for residential uses and five (5) acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses; (b) creating cemetery lots; (c) resulting from court orders, or the adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary. (d) resulting from acquisition by governmental agencies for public improvements or uses. Subd. 3. “Administrative Review Committee.” Those persons from different City departments whose work on a day-to-day basis involves processing or review of development projects for compliance with applicable codes and standards and for the possible effects the request may have on City services or adjacent properties. Subd. 4. “Alley.” A public right-of-way other than a street to serve primarily as a means of secondary access to the side or rear of adjacent properties whose principal frontage is on a street. Subd. 5. “City.” The City of Richfield, Minnesota. Subd. 6. “City Standard Specifications.” Design requirements maintained by the City's Public Work Department related to construction of utilities, including sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main. Subd. 7. "Director." The Director of Community Development for the City of Richfield or the Director’s designee. Subd. 8. “Lot.” A tract of land which is all or part of a block and is identified on a plat. Subd. 9. “Outlot.” A tract of land identified by a capital letter and is land that is not part of a block. Subd. 10. “Plat.” The drawing or map of a subdivision prepared for filing of record pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 505 and containing all elements and requirements set forth in applicable local regulations adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358 and Chapter 505. Subd. 11. “Registered land survey.” The drawing or map of a subdivision prepared for filing of record pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 508. Subd. 12. “Right-of-way.” Land acquired by reservation or dedication intended for public use, and intended to be occupied or which is occupied by a street, trail, railroad, utility lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary sewer, storm sewer or other similar uses. Subd. 13. “Street.” A public right-of-way for vehicular traffic, whether designated as a highway, thoroughfare, arterial, parkway, collector, through way, road, avenue, boulevard, lane, place, drive, court or otherwise designated, which has been dedicated or deeded to the public for public use and which affords principal means of access to abutting property. Does not include an Alley. Subd. 14. “Subdivider.” Any person, firm, corporation, partnership, or association, having sufficient proprietary interest in land to subdivide and has submitted an application to effect the same under this Section. Subd. 15. “Through lot.” A lot other than a corner lot, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, abutting on two (2) or more streets. Subd. 16. “Zoning Ordinance.” Appendix B of the City Code. 500.09. - General Provisions. Subdivision 1. Scope. All subdivisions shall be subject to the regulations set forth in this Section and subject to the approval or disapproval of the City. When a conveyance, division, or subdivision to which the subdivision regulations of the municipality do not apply is presented to the City, the City clerk shall within ten (10) days certify that the subdivision regulations of the municipality do not apply to the particular division. Subd. 2. Conveyances prohibited. No conveyance of land that constitutes a subdivision under this Section may be filed or recorded, if the land is described in the conveyance by metes and bounds or by reference to an unapproved registered land survey made after April 21, 1961 or to an unapproved plat made after the effective date of this Section. The foregoing provision does not apply to the conveyance if the land described meets any of the criteria in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, subd. 4b(b). Subd. 3. Registered land surveys. Registered land surveys shall not be used to avoid the requirements of these subdivision regulations. All registered land surveys which constitute a subdivision as defined in this Section shall be subject to the provisions herein contained. All registered land surveys shall be prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 508. Subd. 4. - Common Interest Community Plats. Except as provided in Minnesota Statutes Section 515B.1-106, plats for common interest communities prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 505, 508, or 508A shall be reviewed pursuant to the provisions herein contained. Developments using plats for common interest communities prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 515B.2-1101(c) shall be subject to park dedication requirements and other similar development fees applicable to subdivisions platted under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 505 and a copy of such plat shall be delivered to the City no later than the date such plat is recorded. Subd. 5. Violations and Penalties. (a) Building permits. No building permit may be issued for the construction of any building on a parcel conveyed or subdivided in violation of this Section. (b) Injunction. In addition to imposing the penalty provisions of Section 115 of the City Code, the City may bring appropriate proceedings to enjoin any conveyance not complying with this Section. 500.11. - General Subdivision Procedures. Subdivision 1. Pre-Application conference. In order to provide for the orderly and expeditious processing of subdivision applications, subdividers are encouraged to confer with City staff before preparing a subdivision application to become familiar with all applicable ordinances, policies, regulations, and plans pertinent to the proposed subdivision. Subd. 2. Administrative Review Committee (ARC) Review. Subdivision applications shall not be considered complete until an Administrative Review Committee (ARC) meeting is held between the subdivider and the ARC, or the Director determines that such a meeting is not necessary. Applications must be submitted to the Community Development Department for the ARC meeting at least 28 days before the scheduled Planning Commission meeting to be considered for the agenda. Subd. 3. Application abutting a highway. Any subdivider proposing to subdivide land adjacent to a state or county highway, must submit or cause the City to submit the proposal to state and county highway departments prior to submitting a subdivision application to the City. The City will not consider an application complete until it receives a comment letter from the applicable highway department. 500.13. - Minor Subdivisions. Subdivision 1. Purpose. This subsection is established to provide for administrative approval of subdivisions or consolidations that meet specified criteria and for the waiver of standard platting requirements specified elsewhere in this Section. The minor subdivision process is intended largely to facilitate the further division of previously platted lots, the combination of previously platted lots into fewer lots, or for the adjustment of a lot line by relocation of a common boundary. Subd. 2. Criteria for Approval. A minor subdivision or consolidation must comply with the following: (a) A property line adjustment that does not increase or decrease the number of parcels. (b) Lot splits resulting in no more than two (2) parcels. (c) Lot combinations of previously platted lots. (d) The land involved has been previously subdivided by plat or Registered Land Survey and is on file and of record in the Hennepin County register of deeds or registrar of titles. (e) The lot or lots have frontage on an existing improved street, if required, and access to municipal services. (f) The application will not cause the parcel or any structure on the parcel to be in violation of this Section, the Zoning Ordinance, or the building code, unless prior or concurrent approval of a variance is granted. (g) The property has not been subject to a minor subdivision in the last five (5) years. (h) Subdivisions not meeting the criteria for a minor subdivision, or where the proposed minor subdivision involves unusual elements or policy decisions that the Director determines require detailed review, shall be subject to the platting requirements and procedures in this Section. Subd. 3. Application. (a) Applications for a minor subdivision or consolidation shall be made to the Community Development Department on forms provided by the City and shall include evidence of ownership interest. The application must be accompanied by the fee specified in Appendix D of the City Code. (b) Applications must include three (3) copies of a certificate of survey and one (1) electronic copy drawn to an engineer's scale with the new lots and new legal descriptions including: (a) Existing and proposed property lines (b) Dimensions of the existing and proposed parcels. (c) The area of the existing and proposed parcels. (d) All existing structures, including dimensions to existing and proposed property lines. (e) All visible encroachments. (f) All easements of record. (g) Distance between any existing driveways and existing and proposed property lines. (h) Trees that will be lost due to any proposed construction. Subd. 4. Review. The Director will review the application to determine compliance with this Section. The Director will approve or deny the application and will notify the subdivider of the decision in writing. If the application is denied, the Director will state the reasons for the denial. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Director may appeal to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals in the manner described in Section 500.29. Subd. 5. Filing. The subdivider must file a final minor subdivision or consolidation with the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. Evidence of proper filing must be submitted to the Director prior to issuance of any building permits. If a minor subdivision or consolidation is not recorded within one (1) year after the date of written approval, the Director may, upon ten (10) days written notice to the subdivider, revoke the approval in writing. 500.15. - Platting; Preliminary Plat Subdivision 1. Purpose. A preliminary plat ensures that sufficient information is provided by the subdivider to determine conformance with City Code requirements and to evaluate the impact of the proposed plat on surrounding property and public facilities and services. Subd. 2. Application. Application for preliminary plat approval shall be made with the Community Development Department on forms provided by the City and shall include evidence of ownership interest. The application must be accompanied by the fee specified in Appendix D of the City Code. The Director's recommendation, along with that of any other affected City department, shall accompany each application at the time of its presentation to the Planning Commission for recommendation and City Council for approval. Subd. 3. Preliminary Plat Content. The preliminary plat shall be drawn at a minimum scale of not less than one inch to 100 feet and shall contain, or have attached, the following information. The plat shall be prepared by a registered surveyor. (a) Identification and Description (1) Proposed name of subdivision (2) Legal description of the property according to the records in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder. (3) Name and contact information for the owner, owner's agent, subdivider, surveyor and designer of the plat. (4) Graphic scale, North point. (5) Date of preparation. (b) Existing Conditions (1) Boundary lines, boundary line dimensions, and total acreage of proposed plat. (2) Location, widths and names of existing or previously platted streets or other public ways, parks and other public lands, permanent buildings and structures, easements and section and corporate lines within the preliminary plat and to a distance 100 feet beyond the boundary line. (3) Boundary lines of adjoining land, within 100 feet, identifying by name and ownership. (4) Location and size of existing sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, telecommunications, electricity, natural gas facilities within the preliminary plat and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the boundary line. Data such as grades, rim and invert elevations, locations of catch basins and manholes, and fire hydrants shall also be provided. (5) Two (2) foot (minimum) contours showing existing and proposed ground elevations. (c) Design Features (1) Layout, numbers and preliminary dimensions of lots and blocks, building setback lines, and lot width at the front setback line. (2) Layout of all proposed streets, showing right-of-way widths, pavement widths, center line gradients, and typical cross sections. (3) Location of ingress and egress to the platted area, including existing and proposed driveway locations. (4) Location and width of existing or proposed alleys, pedestrian ways, and trails. (5) Location, dimensions, and purpose of all easements. (6) Location, type, size, grades, and rim and invert elevations of existing and proposed sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water mains, culverts, catch basins, manholes, hydrants, and other underground structures. (7) Schematic storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water layouts, illustrating invert and top rim elevations, proposed gradients, direction of flow, emergency overflow locations and elevations, hydrant locations, and drainage areas. (d) Other Information (1) Statement of the proposed use of lots, including residential building types and number of dwelling units and types of business or industrial use. (2) Proposed protective covenants, deed restrictions, or homeowners' association rules. Subd. 4. Publication; Notification; Public Hearing. Upon determination by the Director that a preliminary plat application is complete, the Director shall set a public hearing with the Planning Commission. Notice of the hearing shall be published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. Subd. 5. Planning Commission Review. The Planning Commission shall conduct the hearing and report upon findings and make recommendations to the City Council. The Planning Commission may recommend approval or denial for all or parts of the preliminary plat. The Planning Commission may recommend such changes or revisions to the plat or conditions of approval as necessary for the health, safety, general welfare, and convenience of the City. Subd. 6. City Council Review. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the preliminary plat within one- hundred twenty (120) days after the subdivider submits a complete application, as determined by the Director, unless the subdivider agrees to an extension. The City Council may approve or deny all or parts of the preliminary plat. The City Council may require such changes or revisions to the plat or conditions of approval as it deems necessary for the health, safety, general welfare, and convenience of the City. Approval of the preliminary plat shall not constitute final acceptance of the subdivision. If the preliminary plat is not approved, the reasons for such action shall be recorded in the proceedings of the City Council and transmitted to the subdivider. Subd. 7. Approval Standards. The Planning Commission, as a basis for their recommendation, and the City Council, as a basis for their approval, must make the following findings prior to approval of a preliminary plat: (a) The subdivision is in conformance with this Section and the applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance; (b) The subdivision does not conflict with any goals or policies of the Comprehensive Plan or other sub- area plan; the Capital Improvements Program; or any other City policy or regulation. (c) The subdivision can be economically served with public facilities and services. (d) The subdivision design mitigates potential substantial and irreversible negative impacts on the environment, including, but not limited to: topography; steep slopes; trees; vegetation; naturally occurring lakes, ponds, rivers and streams; susceptibility of the site to erosion, sedimentation or flooding; drainage; and storm water storage needs; (e) The subdivision will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. Subd. 8. Expiration. If the preliminary plat is approved by the City Council, the subdivider must file the final plat within one (1) year after said approval, or approval of the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a written request for a time extension is approved by the City Council. Once a final plat is approved, the preliminary plat expires at the time the corresponding final plat expires. For a preliminary plat involving a multiple phase subdivision, the preliminary plat approval for any remaining phases expires two (2) years after the most recent final plat approval for a prior phase is recorded. Subd. 9. Permits. Grading and/or footing foundation permits may be issued following preliminary plat approval. Approval of a grading or foundation permit does not obligate the City to approve a final plat. 500.17. - Platting; Final Plat Subdivision 1. Generally. A final plat must contain all the information required for recording purposes. Final plat approval may occur at the same meeting as preliminary plat approval, or at a later date, at the discretion of the City. Subd. 2. Application. Applications for final plat approval must be on the form provided by the City and must include evidence of ownership interest and the fee specified in Appendix D of the City Code. The Director's recommendation, along with that of any other affected City department, shall accompany each application at the time of its presentation to the City Council . Subd. 3. Final Plat Contents. The final plat must contain all modifications required during preliminary plat review. The contents of the final plat, including certifications and size of the final plat materials, shall conform to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes and the Hennepin County Plat Manual. The final plat shall contain signature lines for the City Manager and Mayor. Subd. 4. City Council review. The City Council shall either approve or disapprove the final plat application within sixty (60) days after the subdivider submits a complete application, as determined by the Director, unless the subdivider agrees to an extension. Subd. 5. Filing Document. Following final plat approval, the subdivider shall submit two (2) mylar copies of the final plat to the Community Development Department forCity official signature. Prior to release of the City official-signed plat, the following must occur: (a) The plat shall be executed by all required parties; (b) The public infrastructure contract shall be executed, if applicable; (c) The submittal of all required fees and appropriate financial guarantees to the City, if any, ensuring the subdivider’s performance of the terms of these regulations; (d) The submittal, in recordable form, of all required easements and deeds as required by the City in a form approved by the City Attorney. Subd. 6. Recording. A subdivider must file a final plat with the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within two (2) years of approval, unless a time extension has been granted. Evidence of proper filing must be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of any final occupancy permits. 500.19. - Construction and Maintenance Agreement In order to effectuate the provisions of this Section, the owner or subdivider must enter into a construction and maintenance agreement with the City providing for the installation and maintenance of the infrastructure and right-of-way improvements required by this Section. The contents of the agreement will provide for, among other things, security to the City in such amount as the City Engineer deems to be adequate to insure the satisfactory completion of the improvements. The construction and maintenance agreement shall be satisfactory in form and substance to the City Attorney. 500.21. - Design Standards The provisions in subdivisions one (1) through seven (7) of this subsection are the minimum design standards for subdivisions in the City. Subdivision 1. Lots. (a) Lot dimensions. Lot dimensions must comply with the minimum standards of the Zoning Ordinance, unless prior or concurrent approval of a variance is granted. A subdivision shall not result in the creation of a nonconforming structure unless prior or concurrent approval of a variance is granted nor shall a subdivision result in the creation of a nonconforming use. (b) Street Frontage. All lots shall abut and have direct access to an improved street except that lots in Planned Unit Developments may have frontage on a private street or other approved means of access. (c) Side lot lines. Side lot lines generally must be at right angles to or radial to street lines. (d) Through lots. Through lots shall be avoided, but may be allowed where lots back on a thoroughfare or other arterial street, or where topographic or other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable. (e) No Split Zoning. Lots must not be created which result in split zoning classifications. Subd. 2. Streets. (a) Arrangement. The arrangement of streets in new subdivisions or plats shall be so laid out as to provide a continuation of existing streets of adjoining areas, whether in the City or in adjoining municipalities or the projection of east-west or north-south streets of the City if there are no adjoining streets. Offset or irregular streets are prohibited unless the topography of the area concerned makes the construction of regular streets impossible or impractical. (b) Width. The width of street right-of-way shall be not less than the minimum street width established herein, unless existing conditions make a street of less width more suitable, as approved by the City Engineer. (1) Major streets. Major streets, which include Penn Avenue, Lyndale Avenue, Nicollet Avenue, Portland Avenue, Cedar Avenue, and 66th Street, shall be 100 feet in width. (2) Xerxes Avenue, Chicago Avenue and 12th Avenue shall be 66 feet in width. (3) Minor Streets. The minimum width for minor streets shall be 60 feet. (c) Cross Sections. The street section shall comply with design standards as set forth in the City standard specifications. All street designs are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. (d) Boulevards. Boulevard sodding shall be included as a part of the required street improvements. (e) Grades. Street grades must be approved by the City Engineer. No street shall exceed ten percent (10%) maximum grade. (f) Intersections. Streets must be laid out to intersect at right angles, whenever possible. Intersection angles must not be less than 60 degrees unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (g) Vertical curves. Different connecting street gradients shall be connected with vertical curves. Minimum length, in feet, of these curves shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Road Design Manual, latest revision. Subd. 3. Alleys. Alleys shall not be required for any block except when topographic conditions make them necessary. The minimum width of an alley in a residential block shall be fourteen (14) feet with a pavement width of twelve (12) feet. Alleys may be required in the rear of all business lots and, if required, shall be at least 20 feet wide. A five (5) foot cutoff shall be made to acute alley intersections. Subd. 4. Easements. A minimum five (5) foot Utility and Drainage easement is required along property lines and shall be dedicated by appropriate language, unless exempted by the City Engineer. A minimum ten (10) foot drainage and/or utility easement must be provided over public storm sewer, sanitary sewer or watermain. Subd. 5. Utilities. (a) Water and Sewer shall be designed per City Standard Specifications and per Chapter VII of the City Code. (b) Storm water facilities shall be designed per City Standard Specifications, per Chapter VII of the City Code, and in accordance with the City’s Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan. (c) Private Utilities. Unless waived by the City Engineer, all utility facilities, including, but not limited to, gas, electric power, and communication, shall be located underground and within utility easements, or street or alley right-of-way. Subd. 6. Sidewalks and Trails. Sidewalks and/or trails may be required and shall be designed per City Standard Specifications. Deviation from City Standard Specifications may be approved when warranted by conditions on an individual basis by the City Engineer. (a) Width: (1) A minimum six (6) foot sidewalk with a minimum six (6) foot boulevard is required, or; (2) A minimum ten (10) foot sidewalk directly behind the curb may be approved by the City Engineer when conditions constrain the arrangement described in (1). (b) Sidewalks must be concrete with saw cut joints and must provide at least a six (6) foot pathway free of obstructions. (c) Cross Slope. Sidewalks and trails must be designed with a maximum cross slope of one and one-half percent (1.5%). (d) Clear Zone. A minimum two (2) foot clear zone must be provided on the front (street) side of the sidewalk or trail and a minimum three (3) foot clear zone must be provided on the back side of the sidewalk or trail. Subd. 7. Street lighting. Street lights shall meet City Standard Specifications, including type, location, spacing and illuminance and shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 500.23. - Required Improvements Subdivision 1. Generally. Any required public improvements including water, sewer, stormwater drainage and storage areas, streets, alleys, sidewalks and trails, lighting, curbing, gutters, landscaping, open space, or similar utilities and improvements that the City Council deems reasonably necessary to support the proposed development, must be provided by the subdivider as a condition of the acceptance and approval of the subdivision. The design of any public infrastructure improvements must be approved by the City Engineer. Subd. 2. As-built drawings. Where improvements are not installed by the City, and prior to the City’s acceptance thereof, reproducible "as built" drawings shall be certified to be true and accurate by the registered engineer responsible for the installation of the improvement. Subd. 3. Park Dedication. In appropriate plats or subdivisions to be developed for residential uses, the Council may require that a reasonable portion of such land of sufficient size and character be set aside and dedicated to the public for public use as parks and playgrounds. The City has the option to require cash contribution in lieu of accepting dedication of land or the City may require a combination of land dedication and cash payment. Any cash contribution received by the City will be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition of land for parks and playgrounds or other lawful purposes. Subd. 4. Survey Monuments. The subdivider must install official permanent monuments as required by Minnesota Statutes, section 505.021. All monument markers shall be correctly in place upon final grading and installation of utilities. 500.25. - Waiver of Subdivision Approval Subdivision. 1. In any case in which compliance with this Section will create an unnecessary hardship and failure to comply does not interfere with the purpose of the subdivision regulations, the City Council may waive compliance by adopting a resolution to that effect and the subdivision may then be filed or recorded. 500.27. - Variances Subdivision. 1. Review. Subdivision variances must be reviewed and acted upon by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The City Council shall serve as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Subd. 2. Applicability. Variations from the literal provisions of this Section may be granted by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals in instances where an unusual hardship exists upon the land. Subd. 3. Applications. Application for a variance from this Section must be made in writing by the owner or subdivider at the time the preliminary plat application is submitted. Applications for approval of a subdivision variance shall be made to the Director on forms provided by the City. All subdivision variance requests must be accompanied by the fee specified in Appendix D of the City Code. The application must be accompanied by: a written description of the requested subdivision variance; a discussion of how the owner or subdivider believes the application meets the required findings in Subdivision 5; and any supporting information. Subd. 4. Public Hearing. Upon submission of a complete variance application as determined by the Director, the Director will set a public hearing with the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. The City will publish notice of the hearing in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Subd. 5. Findings. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals must make all of the following findings prior to approval of any subdivision variance: (a) An unusual hardship exists that justifies the subdivision variance; (b) The conditions upon which the request for a variance is based are unique to the property for which the variance is sought and are generally not applicable to other property; (c) The unusual hardship is not the result of actions of the subdivider; (d) The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to address the unusual hardship; (e) The variance will not conflict with the purpose and intent of this Section or the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and (f) The variance will not have a substantially detrimental impact on neighboring property owners or the public welfare. 500.29. - Appeals. Subdivision. 1. Appeals of decisions of the Director. Appeals of decisions of the Director must be reviewed and acted upon by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The City Council shall serve as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. An appeal from a decision of the Director must be in writing and state the specific grounds upon which the appeal is made. The appeal must be submitted to the Community Development Department within ten (10) days of the date of the Director’s written decision. Subd. 2. Hearing. Upon submission of a complete appeal application as determined by the Director, the Director will schedule a hearing with the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 3. Procedures. The Director shall prepare reports and other necessary information for the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The Board shall make a decision on the appeal by adopting written findings. A copy of the Board's decision shall be delivered by mail to the person appealing. Subd. 4. Final Decisions. A person aggrieved by a final decision of the City Council made under this Section 500 may seek judicial review by filing an action with the Hennepin County District Court within thirty (30) days after the date that the City provides written notice of the final decision to the subdivider. Section 2. This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 500 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 500 RELATED TO PLATS AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above-referenced amendment of the Richfield City Code; and WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense of publication of the complete text is not justified. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication: SUMMARY PUBLICATION BILL NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 500 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 500 RELATED TO PLATS AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. This ordinance repeals Section 500 of the Richfield City Code and adopts a new Section 500 related to plats and subdivision regulations. The ordinance updates the section of the City Code that establishes the procedures and requirements related to division of land. The approved ordinance would modify the subdivision plat review process to include review and recommendation by the City’s Planning Commission with final approval by the City Council. Certain subdivision applications that are simple in nature would be eligible for an administrative minor subdivision process. The approved ordinance is also intended to clarify and update provisions related review criteria, subdivision design standards, variances, and submittal requirements. Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office during normal business hours or upon request by calling the Department of Community Development at (612) 861-9760. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM #8. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 59 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the approval of a resolution of support for the Community Project Funding (C P F) grant application in the amount of $50,000,000 for "Project 1" of the I-494: U S 169 to MS P Airport vision. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Community Project Funding Background At the end of March, City staff were contacted by Minnesota Congressional District 5 Representative Ilhan Omar's office and were notified that the House Appropriations Committee will accept Representatives' requests for Community Project Funding (CP F) in appropriations bills for the upcoming fiscal year. T he newly approved CP F process is a reincarnation of Congressional "earmarks" which were disallowed by Federal legislation in 2011. Community Project Funding allows Congress members to directly fund projects that will positively impact their community with the logic being that members know the specific needs of their district most acutely. I-494: Airport to Highway 169 C PF Application With the I494 Vision adopted in early 2021, the MnD OT project team is now finalizing "Project 1", which entails improvements to the I494/35W interchange and access reconfiguration to the freeway ramps between Lyndale Avenue and Trunk Highway 77. I n an effort to help blunt the future cost-share burden, local communities adjacent to the project are collaboratively submitting C P F grant applications in the amount of $50,000,000 to close the projected funding gap. Resolutions of support like the one up for consideration are a key component Congress will consider when choosing which projects ultimately receive funding. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By Motion: Approve the resolution of support for the Community Project Funding (C P F) grant application in the amount of $50,000,000 for "Project 1" of the I-494: U S 169 to MS P Airport vision. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T Community Project Funding Background At the end of March, City staff were contacted by Minnesota Congressional District 5 Representative I lhan Omar's office and were notified that the House Appropriations Committee will accept Representatives' requests for Community Project Funding (C P F) in appropriations bills for the upcoming fiscal year. The newly approved C P F process is a reincarnation of Congressional "earmarks" which was disallowed by Federal legislation in 2011. Community Project Funding allows Congress members to directly fund projects that will positively impact their community with the logic being that members know the specific needs of their district most acutely. For the Federal fiscal year 2022 appropriations cycle, each member of Congress can submit up to 10 C P F requests with the understanding that only some or even none may be included in the final bill. Representative I lhan Omar's office encourages submission of and will be selecting projects that are well into the planning process—aka “shovel-ready projects”—and therefore would be most likely approved for funding. Additionally, projects that can clearly demonstrate community support and engagement will be prioritized. Members are required to provide evidence of community support that were compelling factors in their decision to select the requested projects per the rules of the C P F process adopted by Congress. I-494: Airport to Highway 169 C P F Application The I -494 Policy Advisory Committee (PA C) recently approved the I -494 Vision I mplementation Plan, which establishes a sequence of projects that will achieve the corridor vision. The MnD OT project team is now finalizing "Project 1", refining the corridor-wide stormwater management design, and carrying out public engagement processes for Project 1. Project 1 elements generally include a NB 35W to W B 494 flyover ramp, construction of MnPass lanes on 494 west of 35W , access reconfiguration of the freeway ramps between TH 77 and Lyndale Avenue, and construction of new bridges at Nicollet, Portland, and 12th Avenues, among other improvements. MnD OT has a construction cost-share policy that applies to any funded project identified for construction. The City's actual cost-share for the I -494 Vision would be established as any portion of the vision is funded for construction. At that time, a detailed design (including final right-of-way impacts) and Richfield's municipal consent are part of the project approval and permitting processes. I n an effort to help blunt the future cost-share burden, local communities adjacent to the project are collaboratively submitting C P F grant applications in the amount of $50,000,000 to close the anticipated funding gap. I f the C P F grant applications are successful and the $50,000,000 is awarded to the project, it has the potential to reduce or eliminate the local cost-share that cities—and therefore local taxpayers— would be required to ultimately contribute to the project. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): None C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: MnD OT in conjunction with local agency partners has been working towards roadway improvements along the I -494 Corridor from Trunk US Highway 169 to the MS P Airport. The C P F grant applications are currently being considered and prioritized by Representative I lhan Omar's office. Adoption of this resolution of support will further bolster the City's hope to have the I -494 Project 1 considered as one of Rep. Omar's 10 C P F requests. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: I t is believed that the receipt of a C P F grant for the project would serve to lessen Richfield's local cost-share burden that MnD OT will require as part of the I -494 Project 1. The exact amount of the grant funds available and the amount of Richfield's local cost-share for the I -494 Project 1 are not yet known. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: None ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: None AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type C P F Resolution of S upport Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING (CPF) GRANT APPLICATION FOR PROJECT 1 OF THE I494: AIRPORT TO HIGHWAY 169 VISION WHEREAS, MnDOT and local agency partners have been working towards roadway improvements along the I-494 Corridor from the Airport to US Highway 169; and WHEREAS, the elements of the first project (Project 1) to implement the I494: Airport to Highway 169 Vision were formally chosen by the I494 Policy Advisory Committee in early 2021; and WHEREAS, the funding solutions are largely in place to construct Proje ct 1, however, there remains a funding gap before full Project 1 funding is secured; and WHEREAS, CPF grants are specifically targeted to shovel-ready projects in Congressional members’ districts that demonstrate broad community engagement and support and will work to improve the lives of residents and business owners in the district; and WHEREAS, the identified Project 1 will greatly improve vehicular and pedestrian safety, reduce interstate congestion, improve the regional transit network, fix stormwater drainage issues to resolve localized flooding and reduce run-off into our waterways, and improve connectivity for pedestrians and bicyclists over Highway 494; and WHEREAS, the countless benefits listed above will be directly experienced by the diverse populations and businesses of Minnesota’s 2nd, 3rd, and 5th Congressional Districts as well as indirectly by constituents of every Congressional District in Minnesota as the I- 494 corridor is a major jobs hub and critical travel corridor for the state’s economy; and WHEREAS, project stakeholders have worked extensively through community outreach and engagement to ensure that equity considerations are front and center to each aspect of the I494: Airport to Highway 169 Vision; and WHEREAS, a large part of Project 1 will directly benefit one of Minnesota’s “ACP - 50” areas (Area of Concentrated Poverty w/ greater than 50% people of color as defined by the Metropolitan Council) by safely connecting them with jobs and other opportunities on either side of 494 through freeway ramp reconfiguration and improved pedestrian amenities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Richfield enthusiastically expresses its support for the CPF grant application for Project 1 of the I494: Airport to Highway 169 Vision. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM #9. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 68 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 4/27/2021 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Julie Urban, Housing & Redevelopment Manager D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector 4/20/2021 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 4/21/2021 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the adoption of a resolution approving revisions to the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Policy. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: I n 2018, the City Council adopted an I nclusionary Affordable Housing Policy (Policy) requiring that all new development receiving financial assistance from the City include affordable housing. Specifically, the Policy requires all housing developers receiving public subsidy to either: Make at least 20% of all housing units be affordable to either renters earning less than 60% of the Area Median I ncome (A MI ) or owners earning less than 115% of the A MI , or Pledge 15% of the net-present-value of the subsidy they receive to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund, and Keep units affordable for the length of the subsidy or for 10 years, whichever is longer, and Provide 90-day notice of sale, and Agree to not discriminate against renters receiving rental subsidies (including the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program). Policymakers reviewed the Policy in 2019 and again in September 2020 and February 2021. Staff was directed to prepare several revisions to encourage deeper affordability, add requirements for accessible housing, encourage larger units, and extend the length of the affordability term. The following revisions are proposed to the Policy: 1. A chart offering options for different levels of affordability would be added to the policy. To incentivize the creation of more deeply affordable units, developments could provide fewer units the deeper the affordability provided: Affordability Level % of Units RE NTA L 60% of Area Median I ncome (A MI )20% 50% of A MI 15% 30% of A MI 10% OW NE R-OC C UP I E D 115% of A MI 20% 100% of A MI 15% 80% of A MI 10% A mix of affordability would also be allowed. 2. Affordable units would need to be provided through a mix of bedroom sizes, similar to the mix provided by the development as a whole. To encourage larger units, the total number of units could be less if more two and three bedroom units are provided. 3. Developments would be required to provide fully-accessible or Type A (accessible-ready) units, and meet the following requirements/options: Provide either 5% Type A units or 3% fully-accessible units, at a mix of bedroom sizes. A combination of Type A and fully-accessible units may also be allowed. Provide roll-in showers in all Type A and fully-accessible units. Provide grab bars in Type A units or agree to pay to install grab bars at the request of a tenant. (Note: The Accessibility Code requires grab bars in fully-accessible units.) The affordability requirement would apply to the Policy-required units only (i.e., the Accessibility Code requires 2% of all units be Type A units and those 2% could be market-rate). 4. A developer could opt out of providing accessible units by making an up-front cash payment of $5,000 per unit to the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund. 5. The minimum length of the subsidy would increase from 10 years to 15 years. 6. Any redevelopment removing affordable housing would be required to replace the lost housing or pay a fee in lieu. T he current Policy only requires non-housing developments to replace any affordable housing being removed or pay a fee in lieu. 7. T he revision adds flexibility to the requirements for projects between 5 and 19 units. Projects of that size could be given an exception to the requirements by the Community Development Director, in recognition of the financial and administrative burden the Policy requirements might place on smaller developments. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By motion: Adopt a resolution approving revisions to the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Policy. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T The City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has been informally requiring projects receiving tax increment financing to include affordable housing or contribute to the HRA's Housing and Redevelopment Fund since 2001. The City, HRA, and Economic Development Authority (E D A) formally adopted a written I nclusionary Affordable Housing Policy in October of 2018. A revision related to the HRA's single family housing programs was adopted in April of 2019. W ork sessions on the proposed revisions were held in September 2020 and February 2021. Detailed information on the costs of the various requirements, as well as the positives and negatives of each was shared at the work sessions. The HRA and E D A approved the proposed revisions at their meetings on April 19, 2021. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): T he Policy furthers the Comprehensive Plan goal to provide a full range of housing choices that meet residents' needs at every stage of their lives, and ensure a healthy balance of housing types that meets the needs of a diverse population with diverse needs. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the need in the community for an additional 66 units of housing affordable at 30% of the A MI . The proposed Policy change encourages the development of these more deeply affordable units. The Policy is consistent with the City's Housing Visioning Statement that calls for a full range and balance of housing types and its I nclusionary Affordable Housing Policy Statement, which encourages developments to contain a mix of market-rate and affordable units, with a higher proportion of market-rate units. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: The Policy revisions would not apply to projects currently in process, although staff has been informally encouraging larger bedroom sizes and accessible units in the projects in process. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Providing affordable housing requires a subsidy, and the deeper the affordability and the larger the size of the unit, the greater the amount of the subsidy. To balance that greater cost, the proposed Policy revisions require a lesser percentage of units the greater the affordability and allows flexibility when a greater share of larger units is provided. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: The City has the authority to create an I nclusionary Affordable Housing Policy that applies to the use of its financial resources. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): The City may choose to: approve the revisions with changes; delay consideration to allow for additional public input; request an additional work session on the revisions, or not approve the revisions. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Resolution Resolution L etter Revised Inclusionary Housing P olicy RE D L INE D Ordinance Revised Inclusionary Housing P olicy clean copy Ordinance RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY WHEREAS, the City of Richfield (“City”) adopted an Inclusionary Housing Policy in 2018 that furthers the development of affordable housing within in the City; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to further support development of high quality housing in the community for households of various income levels, ages and sizes in order to help the City meet its goals of preserving and promoting economically diverse housing options in the City; and WHEREAS, the City wants to ensure that both the public and private sectors continue to create affordable housing opportunities in the City; and WHEREAS, the City believes that adoption of a policy setting criteria and incentives for developers to build new affordable units will assist the City in achieving its inclusionary housing goals; and WHEREAS, the City regularly reviews its policies and periodically makes changes to ensure consistency with current City policies and market conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Richfield, Minnesota, that: 1. The Inclusionary Affordable Housing Policy as revised is hereby approved and adopted. 2. City staff is authorized to carry out the policy effective immediately. Adopted by the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of April, 2021. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth Van Hoose, City Clerk City of Richfield Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority Richfield Economic Development Authority Inclusionary Affordable Housing Policy The City of Richfield, Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Richfield Economic Development Authority are committed to building a community that is welcoming and affordable to a diverse population of individuals and families at all stages of their lives. As such, we hereby establish the following policy for the inclusion of affordable housing in development proposals. Requirements 1. Housing Development Projects containing the construction of at least 5 new units which that receive Financial Assistance from the HRA, EDA or City: a. Must contain at least 20%a percentage of units that are affordable at one or more of the following levels over a period of fifteen years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer): units i. Affordability Level % of Units RENTAL 60% of Area Median Income (AMI) 20% 50% of AMI 15% 30% of AMI 10% OWNER‐OCCUPIED 115% of AMI 20% 100% of AMI 15% 80% of AMI 10% ii. A combination of affordability levels may be considered (e.g., 10% at 60% AMI and 5% at 30% AMI). iii. A mix of bedroom sizes similar to that of the overall building must be provided. A reduction in the overall number of affordable units may be considered if a greater number of 2 and/or 3 bedroom units are provided. i. At least 20% of rental housing units must be made affordable to tenant households earning no more than 60% of the Area Median Income over a period of ten years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer); ii. At least 20% of owner‐occupied housing units must be made affordable to, and initially sold to, households earning no more than 115% of the Area Median Income; iii. At least 20% of the grand total of housing units in a mixed rental/ownership development must be affordable at the affordability levels established in 1.a)i and 1.a)ii, and b. Must contain a minimum of 5% rental units that are Type A, per ANSI A117.1 Section 1003 of the 2020 Minnesota Accessibility Code, with a roll‐in shower or 3% of rental units that are Accessible, per ANSI A117.1 Section 1002 of the 2020 Minnesota Accessibility Code, with a roll‐in shower. Grab bars must also be installed in Type A units, or the developer and any future owner must agree to pay for installation upon request. A combination of Accessible and Type A units may also be considered. Units beyond those required by the Building Code must meet the affordability and mix of bedroom sizes as required in 1a. Or b.c. Must contribute to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund i. 15% of the “net present value” of Tax Increment generated by the project (or 15% of the net present value of other types of assistance) must be pledged to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund over a period of ten fifteen years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer), or ii. A pro‐rata combination of the above (i.e. 10% affordable units and a 7.5% contribution) may be considered, and iii. The accessibility component of 1b must still be met (the units may be market‐ rate) or an additional up‐front cash payment of $5,000 per required unit made to the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund. and c.d. Must agree to provide 90 days’ advance notice to the public body providing funding of any sale of the property, and; d.e. Must agree to not discriminate against households utilizing Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) or other forms of rental assistance. 2. Non‐Housing Development Projects that receive Financial Assistance from HRA, EDA or City and which result in the loss of affordable housing: a. Affordable housing units eliminated by the project must be replaced on‐site or at another location in Richfield by the developer at similar affordability levels, or; b. 5‐15% (depending on the magnitude of the loss of affordable housing) of the “net present value” of the Financial Assistance provided must be pledged to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund over a period of ten fifteen years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer). Incentives 3. Housing Development Projects which include affordable units (as outlined in 1a above) are eligible to apply to the City for the following considerations regardless of whether or not they receive Public Financial Assistance: i. Building Permit Fee Reductions (e.g., 10% reduction for rehabilitation and/or 5% reduction for new construction); ii. 4d Property Tax Reduction (rental projects); iii. Consideration of code flexibility (e.g., smaller setbacks, excessive impervious surface, etc.) in planned unit developments; iv. A housing unit density bonus of 5‐15% (e.g., a project in an area that allows 8‐24 units/acre could add an additional 1‐4 units/acre and remain in compliance). Exceptions 4. With regards to “scattered‐site single family housing development,” at least 20% of the units newly constructed or rehabilitated and converted to long‐term affordability in any three‐year period must meet the proscribed affordability requirements. 4.5. With regards to projects between 5 and 19 units, the Community Development Director may grant exceptions to the policy as circumstances warrant. 5.6. The City Council or Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Economic Development Authority may vary the application of this policy as circumstances warrant or as a developer identifies alternative means of addressing the spirit and intent of this policy, with the adoption of findings of the reasons for doing so. Adopted as revised: This ___ day of _____, 2021 by the Richfield City Council. ______________________ _______________________ Mayor City Manager This ___ day of _______, 2021 by the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority. ______________________ _______________________ Chair Secretary This ___ day of _________, 2021 by the Richfield Economic Development Authority. ______________________ _______________________ President Secretary City of Richfield Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority Richfield Economic Development Authority Inclusionary Affordable Housing Policy The City of Richfield, Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Richfield Economic Development Authority are committed to building a community that is welcoming and affordable to a diverse population of individuals and families at all stages of their lives. As such, we hereby establish the following policy for the inclusion of affordable housing in development proposals. Requirements 1. Housing Development Projects containing the construction of at least 5 new units that receive Financial Assistance from the HRA, EDA or City: a. Must contain a percentage of units that are affordable at one or more of the following levels over a period of fifteen years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer): i. Affordability Level % of Units RENTAL 60% of Area Median Income (AMI) 20% 50% of AMI 15% 30% of AMI 10% OWNER‐OCCUPIED 115% of AMI 20% 100% of AMI 15% 80% of AMI 10% ii. A combination of affordability levels may be considered (e.g., 10% at 60% AMI and 5% at 30% AMI). iii. A mix of bedroom sizes similar to that of the overall building must be provided. A reduction in the overall number of affordable units may be considered if a greater number of 2 and/or 3 bedroom units are provided. and b. Must contain a minimum of 5% rental units that are Type A, per ANSI A117.1 Section 1003 of the 2020 Minnesota Accessibility Code, with a roll‐in shower or 3% of rental units that are Accessible, per ANSI A117.1 Section 1002 of the 2020 Minnesota Accessibility Code, with a roll‐in shower. Grab bars must also be installed in Type A units, or the developer and any future owner must agree to pay for installation upon request. A combination of Accessible and Type A units may also be considered. Units beyond those required by the Building Code must meet the affordability and mix of bedroom sizes as required in 1a. Or c. Must contribute to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund i. 15% of the “net present value” of Tax Increment generated by the project (or 15% of the net present value of other types of assistance) must be pledged to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund over a period of fifteen years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer), or ii. A pro‐rata combination of the above (i.e. 10% affordable units and a 7.5% contribution) may be considered, and iii. The accessibility component of 1b must still be met (the units may be market‐ rate) or an additional up‐front cash payment of $5,000 per required unit made to the City’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund. and d. Must agree to provide 90 days’ advance notice to the public body providing funding of any sale of the property, and; e. Must agree to not discriminate against households utilizing Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) or other forms of rental assistance. 2. Development Projects that receive Financial Assistance from HRA, EDA or City and which result in the loss of affordable housing: a. Affordable housing units eliminated by the project must be replaced on‐site or at another location in Richfield by the developer at similar affordability levels, or; b. 5‐15% (depending on the magnitude of the loss of affordable housing) of the “net present value” of the Financial Assistance provided must be pledged to the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Fund over a period of fifteen years or the duration of the subsidy (whichever is longer). Incentives 3. Housing Development Projects which include affordable units (as outlined in 1a above) are eligible to apply to the City for the following considerations regardless of whether or not they receive Public Financial Assistance: i. Building Permit Fee Reductions e.g., ; ii. 4d Property Tax Reduction (rental projects); iii. Consideration of code flexibility (e.g., smaller setbacks, excessive impervious surface, etc.) in planned unit developments; iv. A housing unit density bonus of 5‐15% (e.g., a project in an area that allows 8‐24 units/acre could add an additional 1‐4 units/acre and remain in compliance). Exceptions 4. With regards to “scattered‐site single family housing development,” at least 20% of the units newly constructed or rehabilitated and converted to long‐term affordability in any three‐year period must meet the proscribed affordability requirements. 5. With regards to projects between 5 and 19 units, the Community Development Director may grant exceptions to the policy as circumstances warrant. 6. The City Council or Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Economic Development Authority may vary the application of this policy as circumstances warrant or as a developer identifies alternative means of addressing the spirit and intent of this policy, with the adoption of findings of the reasons for doing so. Adopted as revised: This ___ day of _____, 2021 by the Richfield City Council. ______________________ _______________________ Mayor City Manager This ___ day of _______, 2021 by the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority. ______________________ _______________________ Chair Secretary This ___ day of _________, 2021 by the Richfield Economic Development Authority. ______________________ _______________________ President Secretary