06-9738r
RESOLUTION NO. 9738
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF
MUNICIPAL EMINENT POMAIN AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Twin Cities metropolitan area has long been recognized as one
of the most livable metro areas in the nation because of its strong urban core, livable
neighborhoods and access to cultural activities; and
WHEREAS, the Kelo vs. New London, Connecticut Supreme Court decision has
been used to fuel anti-eminent domain activity nationally and in Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Kelo ruling had no effect on Minnesota eminent domain statutes
and did not in any way expand municipal eminent domain authority in Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has granted local decision making authority
to cities; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota cities have used eminent domain sparingly and
judiciously throughout the State; and
WHEREAS, metro area cities have used eminent domain for redevelopment and
revitalization efforts; and
WHEREAS, redevelopment and revitalization are critical to the livability and long-
term economic viability of the metro area and the protection and enhancement of private
investments in homes and businesses; and
WHEREAS, many municipal eminent domain actions are non-controversial and
initiated in order to arrive at an agreeable purchase price or to provide the seller with a
federal tax break; and
WHEREAS, the Johnson-Bakk eminent domain bill severely restricts the use of
eminent domain for redevelopment and revitalization efforts, threatens opportunities to
reinvest in our urban centers, and increases taxpayer costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Richfield opposes the Johnson-Bakk eminent domain bill as unduly restrictive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that eminent domain must continue to be a viable
option for public-private redevelopment and reinvestment projects in the Twin Cities
metro area.
Febru:r:.s~gg6~y the City Council of the City of Richfield, Mi~~.~~~t~. ~s 2l~) day of" ('~)
fl;7~r'i,J- ~/VJ
Martin J. IrscbyMayor .
ATTEST: