The URL can be used to link to this page

011111completeagendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE 7:00 P.M. AGENDA INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS Oath of office to Mayor Debbie Goettel Oath of office to City Council Member at Large Suzanne M Sandahl Call to order Roll call Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting: Notes: Pledge of Allegiance Approval of minutes of Regular City Council Meeting of December 14, 2010 PRESENTATION 1. Presentation of 2010 Zeta Award to Kelly Mertes, City of Richfield Recreation Supervisor (Council Memo No. 1) COUNCIL DISCUSSION 2. Council discussion Hats Off to Hometown Hits Notes: 3. Council approval of agenda AGENDA APPROVAL CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval. A. Consideration of approval of designating available Department Director or Assistant to the City Manager as Acting City Manager in 2011 in event City Manager is absent from City S.R. No. 1 B. Consideration of approval of resolution regarding City Council Member attendance at City Council meetings for 2011 S.R. No. 2 C. Consideration of approval of resolution designating Richfield Sun - Current as official newspaper for City of Richfield for 2011 S.R. No. 3 D. Consideration of approval of resolutions designating official depositories, including approval of collateral, for City of Richfield for 2011 S.R. No. 4 E. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing use of City credit.cards by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of City S.R. No. 5 F. Consideration of approval of resolution approving 2011 Social Service agency funding recommendations and authorizing City Manager to execute agreements for service with those agencies funded by the City S.R. No. 6 G. Consideration of approval of Richfield Municipal Center change order report for aggregate net effect of $94,161 in items included within project budget S.R. No. 7 H. Consideration of approval of request for a new taxi license for White Star Taxi & Limos, LLC, 3233 20th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN S.R. No. 8 Notes: 5. Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar -_ Notes: PROPOSED ORDINANCES 6. Consideration of second reading of an ordinance amending Richfield City Code Appendix D establishing change to fee schedule for Public Works, Section 3, subsection 10 Staff Report No. 9 Notes: 7. Consideration of a second reading of an ordinance rezoning a portion of the property located at 6528 Penn Avenue from the General Commercial and Mixed Use — Community with the Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay Districts to Planned Mixed Use and a resolution authorizing a final development plan and conditional use permit for a 12,900 square foot retail business with drive -thru service at 6528 Penn Avenue Notes: Staff Report No. 10 OTHER BUSINESS 8. Consideration of designating Council liaison appointments to various metropolitan agencies and city advisory commissions for 2011 Staff Report No. 11 Notes: 9. Consideration of designating Council Member(s) to attend March 2011 National League of Cities Congressional Conference; July 2011 N.O.I.S.E. Conference; and November 2011 National. League of Cities Congress of Cities Conference Staff Report No. 12 Notes: 10. Consideration of designating Mayor Pro Tempore for 2011 Staff Report No. 13 Notes: CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 11. City Manager's report Notes: 12. Claims and payrolls Open forum (additional 15 minutes if more time needed after first Open Forum and by majority vote of the City Council) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. Notes: 13. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612- 861 -9738. richfield: January 2011 Page 1 of 1 City of Richfield Calendar Calendars Net Navigate: 2210 Jan Feb Mar ,Aar May Jun Jul Auug Sao Oct Nov Dec 2012 January 2011 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 7 1 Dec 28 29 30 31 7 PM Planning 7 PM Regular City City Administrative Commission • Council Meeting Offices Closed - CANCELED CANCELED observance of New Years Day 3 4 5 6 7 PM Human Rights 7 PM Transportation 7 PM Arts Commission 8:30 AM Special City Commission Commission @ Community Center Council Worksessfon (rescheduled to Jan. 11) (annual goal setting)@ Richfield High School 7 PM Special Friendship Board Room, 7001 City Commission Harriet Avenue SATURDAY, JANUARY 8 8:30 AM Special City Council Meeting (commission interviews) 10 11 12 13 14 7 PM Regular City 7 PM Bike Task Force Council Meeting @ Mafntenace Facility Lunchroom 7 PM Human Rights Commission Meeting @ Community Center 17 18 19 20 21 City Administrative 5:30 PM Hearing 6:30 -8:00 PM Public 4:30 PM FOWL Board Offices Closed — Martin Examiner in Heredia meeting regarding Meeting @ WLNC Luther King, Jr. Day Room Richfield Parkway North Connection @ Mt. 7 PM Friendship City SATURDAY, JANUARY 7 PM Community Calvary School Commission 22 Services Commission @ Gymnasium, 66th St, & CANCELED 9 a.m.-3 p.m. Richfield Community Center 16th Ave. Remodeling Fair at Richfield High School 6 PM Advisory Board of Health 7 PM Regular HRA Meeting (rescheduled from Jan. 17) 4 25 26 27 28 7 PM Planning 5:30 PM Special City SATURDAY, JAN. 29 Commission Council Meeting 9:30 -10:30 AM (commission Interviews) Mayor's Hour @ WLNC In City Hall Executive Conference Room 6 PM Special City Council Worksession 7 PM Regular City Council Meeting 31 1 1 Feb 2 3 7 PM Human Rights 7 PM Transportation 7 PM Arts Commission Commission,@ Commission @ Community Center Community Center Display: Year Month Week Qgy Block List Condensed Abs Slims Calendars: Search Add Events: � Duration Periodic Administer: This Calendar All meetings held at City Hall (6700 Portland Avenue) unless Indicated otherwise Calendars Net free online interactive web calendars http : / /www.my.calendars.net/richfield 1/6/201.1 J CALL TO ORDER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Meeting December 14, 2010 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Goettel at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present., Debbie Goettel, Mayor; Sue Sandahl; Pat Elliott; and Tom Fitzhenry. Members Excused. Fred Wroge Staff Present. Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mike Eastling, Public Works Director; Chris Regis, Finance Manager; Barry Fritz, Public Safety Director /Chief; Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; and Cheryl Krumholz, Recording Secretary. M /Sandahl, S /Goettel to excuse Council Member Wroge from the December 14, 2010 Reaular City Council Meeting. Motion carried 4 -0. OPEN FORUM None. PRESENTATION OF COLORS AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Goettel led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Council Meeting Minutes -2- December 14, 2010 M /Sandahl, S /Elliott to approve the minutes of (1) Special City Council Worksession of November 23 2010' (2) Regular City Council Meetinq of November 23. 2010: and (3) Special City Council Meeting of November 29, 2010. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #1 RECOGNITION OF CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP TO BEST BUY This item was rescheduled to a future meeting. Item #2 RICHFIELD FOUNDATION AWARDING OF GRANTS The Richfield Foundation presented the grants totaling $10,300. Item #3 COUNCIL DISCUSSION • HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS The City Council acknowledged the efforts of Public Works staff during the recent significant snow fall event. Council Member Fitzhenry encouraged residents to remove the snow from around fire hydrants. Mayor Goettel added the snow should also be removed from storm drains. Item #4 COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Goettel moved Item #513 from the Consent Calendar to Item #6 for separate consideration. M /Fitzhenry, S /Sandahl to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #3 CONSENT CALENDAR A. Consideration of approval of first reading of ordinance amending Richfield City Code Appendix D establishing change to fee schedule for Public Works, Section 3, subsection 10 and setting second reading for January 11, 2011 S. R. No. 222 B. Moved to Item #6 C. Consideration of approval of resolution establishing 60 DNL as airport noise threshold for preventative and corrective land use measures in environs of Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport S.R. No. 224 Council Meeting Minutes -3- December 14, 2010 RESOLUTION NO. 10449 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 60 DNL AS THE AIRPORT NOISE THRESHOLD FOR PREVENTIVE AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES IN THE ENVIRONS OF THE MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10449. D. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing acceptance of all grants and donations received by Recreation Services Department in 2010 S.R. No. 225. RESOLUTION NO. 10450 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF ALL GRANTS AND DONATIONS RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO ADMINISTER THE FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GRANT AGREEMENTS AND TERMS PRESCRIBED BY DONORS This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10450. E. Consideration of approval of resolution authorizing conditional use permit to allow construction of 120 -foot replacement antenna tower at Richfield Municipal Center, 6700 Portland Avenue S.R. No. 226 RESOLUTION NO. 10451 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 120 -FOOT TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER . AT 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE (RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER) This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10451. F. Consideration of approval of Richfield Municipal Center change order report for aggregate net effect of $5,371 in items included within project budget S.R. No. 227 G. Consideration of approval of addendum to Hennepin County Residential Recycling Grant Agreement extending through 2011 S.R. No. 228 H. Consideration of approval of City Manager's reappointment of Connie Murray and Paul Wasko for two -year terms as Hearing Examiners S.R. No. 229 I. Consideration of approval of the following 2011 renewal of business licenses for 3.2 percent malt liquor sales and 2011 license renewals to operate businesses in Richfield: S.R. No. 230 License to Sell 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Aldi Foods — Off -Sale El Jalapeno — Off -Sale Kwik Way Foods — Off -Sale RBF Corporation of Wisconsin (Rainbow Foods) — Off -Sale Richfield U.S. — Off -Sale Sandy's Tavern — On -Sale SuperAmerica #4186 — Off -Sale SuperAmerica #4188 — Off -Sale SuperAmerica #4191 — Off -Sale SuperAmerica #4615 — Off -Sale Target Corporation — Off -Sale Vina Restaurant — On -Sale License to Operate in Richfield A New Star Limousine & Taxi Service — 8 vehicles Airport Taxi —11 vehicles Black & White Taxi — 5 vehicles Ecuadorian Express — 3 vehicles Gold Star Taxi — 27 vehicles Latino Americano — 8 vehicles Latino Express —10 vehicles Suburban Taxi Corporation — 5 vehicles Twin Cities Airport Taxi - 5 vehicles Paul's Rentals & Sales — Trailers and Trucks Rental Council Meeting Minutes -4- December 14, 2010 M /Sandahl, S /Goettel to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #6 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 313. Consideration of approval of first reading of ordinance amending Appendix 1 of Richfield City Code rezoning portion of 6528 Penn Avenue from General Commercial and Multiple Use — Community with Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay to Planned Mixed Use related to proposal for CVS Pharmacy S.R. No. 223 Council Member Sandahl requested an update on the proposed project. Community Development Director Stark discussed the project status, including the rezoning process and design guidelines compromises. M /Goettel, S /Sandahl to approve the first reading of the ordinance amending Appendix 1 of Richfield City Code rezoning portion of 6528 Penn Avenue from General Commercial and Multiple Use — Community with Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay to Planned Mixed Use related to proposal for CVS Pharmacy. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #7 PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING 2011 PAWNBROKER AND SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER LICENSE RENEWALS: • METRO PAWN & GUN, INC., 7529 LYNDALE AVENUE S.R. NO. 231 • UNIVERSITY CASH COMPANY, LLC D /B /A "I'S PAWN AND JEWELRY, 6414 NICOLLET AVENUE S.R. NO. 232 Council Member Fitzhenry presented Staff Report No. 231and 232. Mark Nichols, Metro Pawn representative, was available for questions. M /Sandahl, S /Elliott to close public hearing. Motion carried 4 -0. M /Fitzhenry, S /Sandahl to approve the renewal of the 2011 Pawnbroker and Secondhand Goods Dealer licenses for Metro Pawn & Gun, Inc., 7539 Lyndale Avenue, and University Cash Company, LLC d /b /a Avi's Pawn and Jewelry, 6414 Nicollet Avenue. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #8 PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING 2011 CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS: • FRED BABCOCK V.F.W. POST NO. 5555, INC., D /B /A FOUR NICKELS FOOD & DRINK; 6715 LAKE SHORE DRIVE S.R. NO. 233 • MINNEAPOLIS - RICHFIELD AMERICAN LEGION POST 435, 6501 PORTLAND AVENUE S.R. NO. 234 Council Meeting Minutes -5- December 14, 2010 Council Member Elliott presented Staff Report No. 233 and 234. M /Elliott, S /Sandahl to close public hearing. Craig Deneen, Minneapolis - Richfield American Legion Post 435 representative, was available for questions. Motion carried 4 -0. M /Elliott, S /Goettel to approve the renewal of 2011 Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555, Inc., d/b /a Four Nickels Food & Drink, 6715 Lake Shore Drive to approve the renewal of 2011 Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Minneapolis - Richfield American Legion Post 435, 6501 Portland Avenue. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #9 PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING 2011 ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS: • CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL OF COLORADO, LLC, 7644 LYNDALE AVENUE S.R. NO. 235 • THOMPSON'S FIRESIDE PIZZA, INC., D /B /A FIRESIDE PIZZA, I PENN AVENUE S.R. NO. 236 • KIANG'S RED PEPPER, INC., D /B /A RED PEPPER CHINESE RESTAURANT, 2902 WEST 66TH STREET S.R. NO. 237 • PATRICK'S FRENCH BAKERY, INC. D /B /A PATRICK'S BAKER & CAFE, 2928 WEST 66TH STREET S.R. NO. 238 • THE NOODLE SHOP - COLORADO, INC., D /B /A NOODLES AND COMPANY, 7630 LYNDALE AVENUE S.R. NO. 239 • JOHN E. POWERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. D /B /A LARIAT LANE 6320 PENN AVENUE S.R. NO. 240 • JOY'S PATTAYA THAI RESTAURANT, LLC, 7545 LYNDALE AVENUE S.R. NO. 241 Council Member Sandahl presented Staff Report No.'s 235 -241. M /Sandahl, S /Goettel to close public hearing. Motion carried 4 -0. M /Sandahl, SMroge to approve the renewal of 2011 On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses for Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, 7644 Lyndale Avenue: Thompson's Company, 7630 Lyndale Avenue; John E. Powers & Associates, Inc. d/b /a Lariat Lanes, 6320 Penn Avenue: Joy's Pattaya Thai Restaurant, LLC, 7545 Lyndale Avenue. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #10 PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING 2011 ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS: • THE FRENCHMAN'S, 1400 EAST 66TH STREET INCLUDES Council Meeting Minutes -6- December 14, 2010 • PAISAN INC., D /B /A KHAN'S MONGOLIAN BARBEQUE, 500 EAST 78TH STREET S.R. NO. 243 • WILTSHIRE RESTAURANTS, LLC, D /B /A HOULIHAN'S RESTAURANT & BAR, 6601 LYNDALE AVENUE (INCLUDES OUTSIDE SERVICE) S.R. NO.244 • DON PABLO'S OPERATING CORPORATION, LLC D /B /A DON PABLOS, 980 WEST 78TH STREET S.R. NO. 246 • CHAMPPS OPERATING CORPORATION D /B /A CHAMPP'S RESTAURANT, 790 WEST 66TH STREET S.R. NO. 246 • EL TEJABAN MEXICAN GRILL LLC D /B /A EL TEJABAN MEX. GRILL, 2 WEST 66TH STREET (INCLUDES OPTIONAL 2 A.M. CLOSING) S.R. NO. 247 Council Member Fitzhenry presented Staff Report No.'s 242 -247. Matt Giller, Houlihan's representative, was available for questions. Christine Blake, Frenchman's representative, thanked the City Council for acknowledging the reduction in police calls for her establishment this past year. M /Goettel, S /Fitzhenry to close public hearing. Motion carried 4 -0. M /Fitzhenry, S /Goettel Motion carried 4 -0. Item #11 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING 2011 ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL FOR HKD LO, INC. D /B /A JUN BO CHINESE RESTAURANT, 7717 NICOLLET AVENUE STAFF REPORT NO. 248 Mayor Goettel presented Staff Report No. 248. Boris Parker, Jun Bo attorney, discussed the number of public safety contacts, the pending proceedings for failure to pay sales /use taxes, allegations of minor consumption of the premises and the steps taken to address security and sales. Public Safety Director Fritz explained the need for extra patrol of the site, which is a big concern to the City. M /Goettel, S /Sandahl to close public hearing. Motion carried 4 -0. Council Meeting Minutes -7- December 14, 2010 Mayor Goettel stated she would not support renewal of the license. City Attorney Tietjen explained the legal options available to the Council. Council Member Fitzhenry stated he would not support renewal of the license. Council Member Elliott and Council Member Sandahl suggested not voting on the license tonight and waiting until the tax and under age consumption legal matters are concluded. City Manager Devich suggested the City Council wait until all five City Council members are present before taking action on this license. M /Goettel, S /Elliott to continue this license renewal matter to a City Council meeting following the conclusion of all legal matters and provide an interim liquor license with conditions. Motion carved 3 -1. Fitzhenry opposed. Item #12 CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ZONING DESIGNATION AND RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF 6901 PENN AVENUE (STAFF REPORT NO. 249) Council Member Elliott presented Staff Report No. 249. M /Elliott, S /Goettel to approve the first reading of the ordinance amending Richfield City Code Appendix 1 to change the zoning designation of 6901 Penn Avenue from MR -2 (Multi - Family Residential) to R (Single - Family Residential). Community Development Director Stark stated the Planning Commission recommended staff pursue a Comprehensive Plan amendment rather than rezoning the site. Staffs recommendation is related to the impacts of what would be allowed if the site suffered a loss and was to be rebuilt. Motion failed 0-4. M /Elliott, S /Sandahl to deny first reading of the ordinance and direct staff to pursue an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan so as to agree with the existing zoning designation. Motion carried 4 -0. Item #13 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IMPOSING CIVIL ENFORCEMENT ON ESTABLISHMENT IN RICHFIELD THAT UNDERWENT TOBACCO COMPLIANCE CHECK CONDUCTED BY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SAFETY AND FAILED BY SELLING TOBACCO TO UNDERAGE YOUTH (STAFF REPORT NO. 250) Council Member Elliott presented Staff Report No. 250. Short Stop Superette — 7034 Cedar Avenue — Short Stop Superette representatives admitted the violation occurred and stipulated to the suspension and penalty. Council Meeting Minutes -8- December 14, 2010 M /Elliott, S /Sandahl that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 10453 RESOLUTION SUSPENDING THE TOBACCO LICENSE FOR SHORT STOP SUPERETTE, 7034 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH, AND IMPOSING A CIVIL PENALTY FOR SECOND TIME TOBACCO COMPLIANCE FAILURE Motion carried 4 -0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10453. Item #14 RESOLUTION Consideration of resolution awarding sale of $6,455,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2010B (Staff Report No. 251) Mayor Goettel presented Staff Report No. 251. Rebecca Kurtz, Ehlers & Associates, recommended awarding the sale to United Bankers Bank of Bloomington, MN in the amount of $6,355,000 at a 2.98% interest rate. Ms. Kurtz reviewed the Standard & Poors reaffirming of the City's AA+ bond rating. M /Goettel, S /Elliott that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 10454 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2010B, IN THE ORIGINAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $6,355,000; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ESCROWING AND INVESTMENT OF THE PROCEEDS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF BONDS REFUNDED THEREBY Motion carried 4 -0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10454. Item #14 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING 2010 REVISED /2011 PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS (STAFF REPORT NO. 252) Council Member Sandahl presented Staff Report No. 252. City Manager Devich and Finance Manager Regis explained the debt service levy. M /Sandahl, S /Fitzhenry that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: Council Meeting Minutes -9- December 14, 2010 RESOLUTION NO. 10455 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2011 Motion carried 4 -0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 10455. Item #16 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT topics. None. Mayor Goettel reminded the City Council to provide the City Manager with goalsetting Mayor Goettel announced the cancelation of the December 25 Mayor's Hour. Item #9 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS M /Sandahl, S /Elliott that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 12114/2010 A/P Checks: 119547 - 200055 $ $1,684,376.87 Payroll: $ $1,048,694.03 TOTAL $ $2,733,070.90 Motion carried 4 -0. OPEN FORUM None.. ADJOURNMENT The City Council meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:17 p.m. Date Approved: Debbie Goettel Mayor Cheryl Krumholz Steven L. Devich Recording Secretary City Manager AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4A REPORT # 1 =J STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: CHE&YL KRUMHOLZ, EXEC. COORDINATOR REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a designation of an Acting City Manager for 2011. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Direct the City Manager to designate an available Department Director or the Assistant to the City Manager as Acting City Manager for 2011 in the event the City Manager is absent from the Citv. II. BACKGROUND It is necessary to designate a person to serve as the Acting City Manager for those times when the City Manager is absent from the City. In 2010, the City Manager designated various Department Directors or the Assistant to the City Manager as Acting City Manager. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • Past practice has been for the City Council to designate an Acting City Manager for times when the City Manager is absent from the City. • In 2010, the City Manager designated various Department Directors or the Assistant to the City Manager as Acting City Manager. 0111 actingcitymanager B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • It is necessary to designate a person to serve as the Acting City Manager to ensure continuation of City operations during an absence of the Manager. IV. ALTERNATIVE REcommENDATION(S) Defer this designation to another Council meeting V. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None. AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM.# 4B REPORT # 2 J STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: EXEC. COORDINATOR ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution regarding Council Member attendance at Council meetings. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the resolution regarding attendance by Council Members at Council meetings for 2011. III. BACKGROUND Subsection 205.15 of the Richfield City Code establishes an attendance policy for Council Members. The policy requires attendance to be taken at every regular and special meeting of the City Council and provides for the imposition of a monetary penalty for unexcused absence from a Council meeting. The policy may be annually invoked by resolution of the City Council. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • The Richfield City Code establishes attendance rules, which may be invoked for any calendar year by Council resolution. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) I V. ATTACHMENTS on this item to another Council meeting. • mebolullun. • City Code Subsection 205.15 VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None. 0111attendance q9-1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING ATTENDANCE BY COUNCIL MEMBERS AT COUNCIL MEETINGS WHEREAS, the attendance of Council Members at meetings is one of the most important duties imposed by law on members; and WHEREAS, member presence to participate in hearings, deliberations and decisions of the Council is essential to the proper discharge of the member's official duties; and WHEREAS, recognizing that it is not always possible for a member to be present at all meetings and that by reason of business demands, state of health, personal problems, vacations and other matters, occasional absences are excusable; and WHEREAS, Subsection 205.15 of the Richfield City Code establishes rules for attendance at City Council meetings that may be invoked by resolution of the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Richfield, Minnesota that the following rules apply to absences of Council Members from meetings during calendar year 2005: 1. This resolution applies to all regular meetings of the Council, as defined in Subsection 205.01 of the Richfield City Code. This resolution also applies to duly called special business meetings of the Council. The resolution does not apply to special informational or special ceremonial meetings. Special Council meetings are those called pursuant to Subsection 205.03 of the Richfield City Code. For purposes of this resolution, special meetings are further categorized as: a) Special business meetings. Special business meetings include: Special meetings called to conduct official business of the City where the Council considers action requiring a vote of the City Council; special work study meetings; and special meetings called for the purpose of conducting a public hearing. b) Special informational meetings. Special informational meetings are those called for the City Council to receive information or to participate in discussion but where no official action of the City Council is taken, except that the term does not include special work study meetings or meetings called for the purpose of conducting a public hearing. c) Special ceremonial meetings. Special ceremonial meetings are those called for ceremonial activities but where no official action of the City Council is taken, including ribbon cuttings, community celebrations and similar activities. 2. Any member of the Council desiring to be excused shall insofar as possible, give advance notice to the City Manager stating i) the meeting at which the member will be absent; ii) the member's reason for being absent; and iii) the member's location during the meeting. 3. At the beginning of each regular or special business meeting, the Clerk shall call the roll. If a member is absent, the City Manager shall report any communication from the absent Council Member regarding the reason for absence. The Mayor shall request the Council Members to determine whether the absence is excusable or inexcusable. 4. For each unexcused absence from a regular or special business meeting, the absent member shall be penalized by a fine of $25 and the Mayor, if absent, shall be penalized by a fine of $50. The fine shall be automatically deducted from the next Council Member payment unless otherwise directed by a majority of the City Council Members present. 5. This resolution remains in effect until December 31, 2011 unless revoked prior to that date by resolution of the City Council. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 10329. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk 1 S —A 45 -3 Richfield City Code 205.15 (Rev. 2000) 205.15. Attendance at council meetings. Attendance of council members at meetings is one of the most important duties imposed by law on members. Member presence to participate in the hearings, delib- erations and decisions of the council is essential to the proper discharge of the member's official duties. Recognizing that it is not always possible for a member to be present at all meetings, and that by reason of business demands, state of health, personal problems, vacations and other matters occasional absences are excusable, the following rules apply to absences of council members from .meetings when invoked by resolution of the council: (a) such rules shall remain in effect until the end of the calendar year during which the resolution is passed unless revoked prior to that time by resolution of the council; (b) unless excused by a majority of the city council, a member of the council may not be absent from any regular meeting or from such special meetings as the council may specify in the resolution; (c) for each unexcused absence from a regular or special meeting of the council each council member may be penalized by a fine of not to exceed $75, and the mayor may be penalized by a fine of an amount not to exceed $100, but the resolution may specify a lesser penalty for absence from a special meeting than a regular meeting; (d) any member of the council desiring to be excused shall insofar as possible give advance notice to the manager, stating (i) the meeting at which the member will be absent, (ii) the member's reason for being absent and, (iii) the member's location during the meeting. (Amended, Bill No. 2000 -3) STAFF REPORT =Oda REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4C REPORT # 3 E F CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 RFA KATIE PORATH, DEPUTY CITY CLERK - -- NAM ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of resolution designating an official newspaper for 2011. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the resolution designating the Richfield Sun - Current as the official newspaper for the City of Richfield for 2011. II. BACKGROUND The Richfield Sun - Current, published by Minnesota Sun Publications, has been the City's official newspaper for many years. Attached is a copy of a letter from Minnesota Sun Publications requesting that they be designated as the official newspaper for the City of Richfield for 2011. The 2011 advertising rate structure for legal notices is as follows: Sun Current 1 Column width (1.6 inches wide) $11.44 per inch for first insertion $ 5.72 per column inch for subsequent insertions There are 11 lines per inch. The 2011 rate has decreased from the 2010 rate of $14.30 per inch for first insertion and $7.15 per column inch for subsequent insertions. 0111newspaper For 2011, the Minneapolis Star Tribune Newspaper could be considered as the official newspaper. Attached is a letter regarding the 2011 advertising rate structure for legal notices in the Sunday and weekday, metro and statewide issues. The rate is $5.40 per line with 11 lines per inch. Their 2011 rate has increased from the 2010 rate of $3.40 per line; however, they have switched from a 10 column format to a wider 6 column format. Star Tribune 1 Column width (1.77 inches wide) $ 5.40 per line Based on the 2011 rates for 11 lines per inch, the total would be approximately $59.40 per inch in the Star Tribune compared to $11.44 for the first inch ($5.72 per subsequent inch) in the Sun - Current. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY The Charter of the City of Richfield requires in Section 13.01 thereof that the City Council annually designate an official newspaper for the City. The Sun - Current has expressed an interest in continuing to serve as the official newspaper of the City. The Sun - Current has served well as the official paper for many years. The Sun - Current is delivered to nearly all residences in the City. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The designation must be made at the first meeting of the new year. C. FINANCIAL The cost of the official publication is reasonable. D. LEGAL • A newspaper must be designated each year by the City for publication of all official and legal City business. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS None IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS) • Not make a designation and request the using another publication. V. ATTACHMENTS I • Kesoiution • Letter from Minnesota Sun Publications • Letter from Star Tribune VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None City Clerk's office to check into qC RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING AN OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2011 WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Richfield requires in Section 13.01 thereof that the City Council annually designate an official newspaper for the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Richfield Sun - Current is designated the official legal newspaper for the City of Richfield for 2011 for all publications required to be published therein. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk December 2010 City of Richfield City Council 5700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 -2599 Dear City Council Members: newspapers The Richfield Sun - Current would like to .be_conside,red for _designation as the legal newspaper for the City of Richfield for the upcoming year. All published legal notices are posted -on our website (www.minnlocai.com -)- at, no additional charge. This is an enhancement to the local news coverage already available on the.lnternet and will broaden the readership of your legal notices. One of the main benefits of publishing your legal notices with the- Sun- Current is our home - delivery, Sun Newspapers has become the primary source of community news in the suburbs. Your notices in our paper have the best chance of being seen and read. W- 6 would like- to-continue working with you, therefore, we will not.be making a rate change for the coming -year. - The rate structure for legals effective the first of the year will be: 1 cblumn width: $11.44 per inch for first insertion $5.72 per column inch for subsequent- insertions There are 11 lines per inch Two notarized affidavits on each of your publications -will be!provided with.no additional charge. . The Sun- Current.is published every Thursday. The deadline =for -regular length notices is 2:00 p.m. the Thursday prior to publidatibrL, E- rriailtng the legal notices is-an efficient And accurate way of get- ti rg the notices -to us. The email address for the iegals department is t®gals( acnpapers cote..... If you require. more information to make your decision ,''ple,ase contact me. or Jennifer McLemore, our Legals Representative, at °952- 392 -6829. Thank you for considering the Sun-Current-as the official newspaper for the City of Richfield for the upcoming year. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the needs of your. community. Sincerely, 3 C>4olr;ian °Piteetdent ��r�o=f�roup l✓'iil�lisher .'- 10917 VALLEY ViEw ROAD O RDBN PRAnm 0 MIl1insaa 55344 0 952. 829-0797 0 PA.- 952.941 -8588 4C. -3 425 Portland Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55488 -0002 StarTribune MINNEAPOLIS • ST. PAUL Deputy City Clerk, This letter is in response to your inquiry of our Legal / Public Notice rates for 2011. Beginning January 11, 2011 we are changing our classified column width. We are moving from a 10 column format to a 6 column format. Our rate per line will be $5.40 with 11 lines per inch in the wider 6 column format. If you have any further questions please feel free to call me. We would greatly appreciate your business. Sincerely., I.-- lc� LuAnna Fogarty I Star Tribune Media. Company Sales Manager, Classified Call Center & Obituaries 425 Portland Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55488 Direct 612.673.4869 luanna.fogarty @startribune.com AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4D REPORT # -4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: CHIji,,�REGIS, FINANCE MANAGER REviEwED By CITY MANAGER: i i Zx f A,,,. K#,J' I ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of resolutions designating official depositories for the City of Richfield for 2011, including the approval of collateral. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the attached resolutions designating official depositories, with the understanding that the City could not invest in any of the depositories beyond the level of insurance coverage or the aledaed collateral. II. BACKGROUND N/A III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION N/A A. POLICY • In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 118A.01 - 118A.06, the City of Richfield must designate financial institutions annually. The institutions must pledge the collateral over and above the amount of federal insurance, as public depositories. • U.S. Bank acts as the banking institution in the City's banking arrangement with the 4M Fund. Monies received, checks written by the City, flow through U.S. Bank, however, at the end of each business day, any proceeds remaining in City U.S. Bank accounts are swept to the 4M Fund to be invested. Therefore, at the end of the business day the City accounts are zero, which means the collateral 0111 Depositodes requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 118A.03 are not required. Accordingly, U.S. Bank has met all other statutory requirements and should be considered as a depository for the City's Deputy Registrar, payroll and vendor accounts and all savings deposits. • The City must also designate annually, certain savings and loan associations, banks, and credit unions as official depositories for deposit and investment of certain City funds. With approval of these official depositories, the City will be able to deposit and invest funds in these institutions, not exceeding the federal insurance of $250,000. • Finally, a designation must be made for certain financial institutions as depositories for the investment of City funds for 2011. These institutions, such as investment brokerage firms, offer goverment securities in the manner required by law. These financial institutions include U.S. Bank, RBC Dain Rauscher, Wells Fargo Institutional Brokerage & Sales, Morgan Keegan & Company, Northland Securities and the 4M Fund. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • N/A C. FINANCIAL • N/A Fri . LEGAL • The City is required by Minnesota Statute 118A.01 - 118A.06, to designate as a depository of funds, insured banks or thrift institutions. Any collateral so deposited is accompanied by an assignment pledged to the City in the amount specified in the attached resolutions. E. ENVIIZONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A N. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS) • The City Council could solicit other financial institutions for official depositories, but past relationships with the depositories recommended have proven satisfactory for the .City. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution designating US Bank a depository of funds of the City of Richfield for the year 2011. • Resolution designating certain savings and loan associations, banks, and credit unions as depositories for the investment of City funds in 2011. • Resolution designating certain financial institutions as depositories for the investment of City of Richfield funds in 2011. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None 4v -V RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING U.S. BANK A DEPOSITORY OF FUNDS OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAR 2011 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: That, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 118A.01- 118A.06, U.S. Bank be, and hereby is designated a depository of the funds of the City of Richfield, subject to modification and revocation at any time by said City, and subject to the following terms and conditions: The said depository shall not be required to give bonds or other securities for such deposits provided that the total sum thereof shall not at any time exceed in any depository the sums for which its deposits are insured under the Acts of Congress of the United States relating to insurance of bank deposits; but that in case such deposits in any such depository shall at any time exceed such insured sum, said depository shall immediately furnish bonds or other security for such excess according to law, approved by the City Council of said City. That said depository shall pay on demand all deposits therein; and shall pay all time deposits, at or after the end of the period for which the same shall be deposited, on demand. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be maintained a general account in which shall be deposited all monies from the water, sewer, storm sewer, liquor, swimming pool /ice arena, deputy register fees, City permits and other deposits not otherwise specifically provided for. The following officers or their facsimile signatures shall sign checks on this account; STEVEN L. DEVICH, CITY MANAGER CHRIS REGIS, FINANCE MANAGER BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all funds remaining in the account at the end of each business day will be transferred from U.S. Bank to the 4M Fund where funds deposited are invested and insured. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk SID -d- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN SAVING AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS, BANKS AND CREDIT UNIONS AS DEPOSITORIES FOR THE DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS IN 2011 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of City of Richfield, Minnesota WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 118A.01 — 118A.06, municipal funds may be deposited in any Savings and Loan Association, Bank or Credit Union which has its depos- s insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and WHEREAS, the amount of said deposits may not exceed the FDIC /NCUA insurance covering such deposits which insurance amount is presently $250,000, and WHEREAS, the deposit of City funds in Savings and Loan Associations and Banks would provide greater flexibility in the City's investment program and maximize interest income thereon, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that it is in the best interest of the proper management of City funds that various banks be designated as additional depositories for City funds for 2011. 2. It is further found and determined that the purpose of such depository designation is to facilitate the proper and advantageous deposit and investment of City funds and that such designation is not exclusive nor does it preclude the deposit of any City funds in other officially designated depositories of the City. 3. The Treasurer and Finance Manager are hereby authorized to deposit City funds in various depositories up to the amount of $250,000, or such other amount as may be subsequently permitted by law, such deposits to be in the form of demand accounts, payable to the City of Richfield on the signatures of the City Treasurer or Finance Manager. Such deposits may be made and withdrawn from time to time by the Treasurer or Finance Manager as his best judgment and the interests of the City dictates. 4. The investment of funds and the reporting thereof pursuant to this resolution shall be conducted in accordance with established policies of the City regarding the investment of City funds. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk 40 -3 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AS DEPOSITORIES FOR THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF RICHFIELD FUNDS IN 2011 WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has money which is available for investment, and WHEREAS, different financial institutions offer different rates of return on investments, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield shall purchase U. S. Treasury Bills, U. S. Treasury Notes.and other such government securities in the manner required by law from the institution offering the highest rate to the City of Richfield providing greater flexibility in the investment program and maximize interest income thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Richfield, Minnesota, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 118A.01 — 118A.06, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that it is in the best interest of the proper management of City of Richfield funds that certain financial institutions be designated as additional depositories for City of Richfield funds for 2011. 2. The following financial institutions designated as depositories for the City of Richfield funds: RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. Morgan Keegan & Company Wells Fargo Institutional Brokerage & Sales Cantor Fitzgerald 4M Fund Northland Securities, Inc. 3. The Treasurer and Finance Manager are hereby authorized to deposit the City of Richfield funds in any or all of the depositories herein designated. Such deposits may be made and withdrawn from time to time by the Treasurer or Finance Manager's judgment and as the interest of the City of Richfield dictates. 4. The investment of funds and the reporting thereof pursuant to this resolution shall be conducted in accordance with established policies regarding the investment of these funds. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11 t" day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk FP77 REPORT PREPARED BY: REvIEwED BY CITY MANAGER: AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4E REPORT # 5 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 CHRIS REGIS, FINANCE MANAGER Nam ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of resolution authorizing the use of credit cards by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of the City. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the use of City credit cards by City employees otherwise authorized to make aurchases on behalf of the City. II. BACKGROUND • Minnesota Statutes Section 471.382, require the City of Richfield to authorize the use of credit cards by any City employee otherwise authorized to make a purchase on behalf of the City. • In today's business environment, most retail businesses, will no longer allow the City to purchase on account and will only accept a City check or a City credit card. • Consequently, the use of a City credit card provides efficiency and flexibility for employees to purchase goods and services on behalf of the City. • In addition to the existing credit cards used, the City has entered the Purchasing Card program as offered through US Bank. The program is designed to make the purchasing /procurement process for low dollar valued items more efficient. The intent is to save time and paperwork by reducing the need for purchase orders, petty cash, check requests and employee reimbursements. • The City Purchasing card program began in 2010 on a limited basis and will be expanded during 2011. The program will allow controls to be put in place to limit monthly and single purchase amounts. Finally, a City Purchasing Card Policy has been established which is consistent with the City's Purchasing Policy and Minnesota Statutes. • The City currently uses the following credit cards: • Five VISA credit cards issued through the Richfield Bloomington Credit Union in the name of the City. The cardholders are the following: 0111Authorize Credit Card Use • City Manager • Public Safety Director • Public Works Director • Community Development Director • Recreation Services Director • Four Roundy's credit cards issued to the City of Richfield Recreation Services Department and Public Safety Department. The Recreation Administration division, Wood Lake Nature Center, Ice Arena, and the Public Safety Administrative Aide use the cards. • Three Petco credit cards issued to the City of Richfield Public Safety Department. The credit cards will be maintained by the following: • Canine Officers (2) • SIU Investigator (1) • US Bank Purchasing Card Program. The following sixteen purchasing cards will be issued to the following: • Building Services Employees (3) — three cards. • Utility Department Employees (2) — two cards. • Information Technology Employees (4) — four cards. • Finance Manager — one card. • Recreation Service Employees (2) — two cards. • Public Safety Employees (2) — two cards. • Assistant Fire Chief (1) — one card. • Communications Coordinator (1) — one card. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 471.382, the City of Richfield must authorize the use of credit cards by any City employee otherwise authorized to make a purchase on behalf of the City. • Further, if a City employee makes or directs a purchase by credit card that is not approved by the City Council, the employee could be personally liable for the amount of the purchase. • A purchase by credit card must otherwise comply with all statutes, rules, and City policies applicable to City purchases. • Finally, the City's auditors recommend that the City authorize the use of credit cards by City employees on an annual basis. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES N/A C. FINANCIAL • The holder's of City credit cards are responsible for reviewing and approving all purchases entered into with the credit card. D: LEGAL • The City is required by Minnesota Statute 471.382, to authorize the use of credit cards by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of the City. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS N/A N. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) • The City Council could decide to not authorize the use of credit cards by City employees. However, most retail businesses in today's environment will no longer allow the City to purchase on account and will only accept a City check or a City credit card. The use of City credit cards by employees provides efficiency and flexibility for employees to purchase goods and services on behalf of the City. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution authorizing the use of a credit card by City employees otherwise authorized to make purchases on behalf of the City. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None 4(F -t RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CREDIT CARDS BY CITY EMPLOYEES OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE PURCHASES ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAR 2011 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: That, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.382, the City Council of the City of Richfield may authorize the use of a credit card by City employees otherwise authorized to make a purchase on behalf of the City. The authorization is subject to modification and revocation at any time by said City Council, of the City of Richfield, and subject to the following terms and conditions: If a City employee makes or directs a purchase by credit card that is not approved by the City Council, the employee can be personally liable for the amount of purchase. The purchases by credit card must comply with all statutes, rules and City of Richfield policies applicable to City purchases. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that designated City staff is hereby authorized to use the following City credit cards to make purchases on behalf of the City of Richfield: • Five VISA credit cards issued through the Richfield Bloomington Credit Union in the name of the City. The cardholders are the following: • City Manager • Public Safety Director • Public Works Director • Community Development Director • Recreation Services Director • Four Roundy's credit cards issued to the City of Richfield Recreation Services Department and Public Safety Department. The credit cards to be maintained by the following: • Recreation Administration Division • Wood Lake Nature Center Division • Ice Arena Operation • Public Safety Administrative Aide • Three Petco credit cards issued to the City of Richfield Public Safety Department. The credit cards will be maintained by the following: • Canine Officers (2) — two cards. • SIU Investigator (1) — one card. • Sixteen US Bank Purchasing cards. The cardholders will be the following: • Building Services Employees (3) — three cards. • Utility Department Employees (2) — two cards. • Information Technology Employees (4) — four cards. • Finance Manager — one card. • Recreation Services Employees (2) — two cards. • Public Safety Employees (2) — two cards. • Assistant Fire Chief (1) — one card. • Communications Coordinator (1) — one card. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk FPWP7 REPORT PREPARED BY: AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER. CONSENT 417 6 KAREN BARTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT DmcTOR NAkM, DnE ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of a resolution approving the 2011 Social Service agency funding recommendations and authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements for service with those agencies funded by the City. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve a Resolution approving the 2011 Social Service Agency funding recommendations and authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements for service with those agencies funded by the City. II. BACKGROUND The City of Richfield allocates funds on an annual basis to social service agencies serving the Richfield community. The following priority areas for funding consideration, established by the Richfield Human Services* Planning Commission, were used to evaluate the applications received: 1) services for vulnerable senior residents; 2) services for individuals, families, teens and /or children at risk; 3) housing support services for low- income persons and persons at risk. An announcement was made soliciting funding proposals for service in the Sun Current. Notices were also sent directly to prospective agencies. A total of 13 applications were received from the following agencies: The Storefront Group, Modulo de Informacion, Recursos y Apolyo (MIRA), Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People (VEAP), Senior Community Services (SCS), Bridging, Inc., Cornerstone Advocacy Service, Loaves and Fishes, Church of New Life, Community Involvement Program, Family Stability Work Group, AccessAbility, The Family Partnership, and Richfield R.E.A.D.Y. AccessAbility's application was incomplete and Church of New Life's application did not meet submission criteria, and therefore have not been recommended for funding. The remaining 11 applications represent a wide variety of services offered to Richfield residents, as well as others outside of the city of Richfield. The total funding requested by the.eight eligible agencies exceeded the City's funding by $43,500, or approximately 50 %. Staff reviewed the proposals from the applicant agencies and is making the following recommendations for funding: Organization 2011 Funding Request 2011 Recommendation The Storefront Group $21,745 $14,100 MIRA $15,000 $9,500 VEAP $20,000 $14,000 Senior Community Services $12,000 $9,000 Bridging, Inc. $15,000 $5,000 Cornerstone Advocacy $16,550 $13,250 Loaves and Fishes $5,000 $4,000 Church of New Life $10,000 $0 Community Involvement Program $7,308 $5,000 Family Stability Work Group $1,000 $750 AccessAbili $750 $0 The Family Partnership $15,000 $11,000 Richfield R.E.A.D.Y. $3,000 $2,500 TOTAL $142,353 $88,100 The 2011 recommendations are based on the following criteria: • Demonstrated need of service for targeted population • Collaboration with other service providers • Participation in RCC, HSSC ,and its related activities • Efforts to serve cultural /ethnic and low- income populations • Demonstrated value to the community • Does not duplicate services to Richfield residents • Cost per Richfield Resident served The chart below provides a 5 -year history of the City of Richfield Social Service grant awards: Organization 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Proposed Senior Community Srvcs 9,070 9,070 11,500 $11,160 $8,760 $9,000 Cornerstone 13,500 15,000 15,000 $13,950 $16,460 $13,250 Storefront 30,000 28,000 28,000 $26,040 $21,745 $14,100 Family & Children's Services/ The Family Partnership 10,000 8,000 8,000 $7,440 $11,000 VEAP 15,000 15,000 15,000 $15,810 $14,600 $14,000 Richfield READY 2,500 2,500 2,500 $2,325 $2,500 MIRA 10,000 9,285 $9,737 $10,950 $9,500 Church of New Life $2,325 $5,395 Loaves & Fishes 3,000 3,000 $3,720 $3,650 $4,000 Bethany Covenant Church 7,285 CAPSH 5,000 Assumption Church 8,000 RCC Community Dialogue 500 Bridging, Inc. $10,950 $5,000 Community Involvement Program $5,000 Family Stability Work Grp $750 TOTAL 1 $93,570 1 $93,570 $96,570 $92,507 $92,510 $88,100 III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • All recommendations meet the priorities established for funding (see attached "Guidelines and Instructions for 2011 Funding Assistance" and "2011 Application for Funding Assistance "). • Agencies recommended for funding have met review criteria in the areas of service need and program management (see attached "Guidelines and Instructions for 2011 Funding Assistance" and "2011 Application for Funding Assistance "). • Agencies recommended for funding have stated service outcomes and have established methods for evaluating service results. B. CRITICAL TMENG ISSUES • Services are to be provided in calendar year 2011. C. FINANCIAL • Recommendations are based on the unallocated portion ($88,100 - Human Services - Programs), of the 2011 Other Agencies Division Budget, 10105. A City Council /Administration 2011 allocation of $24,500 of this budget is designated for the Hennepin South Services Collaborative for research, planning and coordination functions. • The total amount of funding for HSSC and the other social service agencies was reduced by 4.75% from previous years. This mirrored the types of reductions that were done to City department budgets the past two years. D. LEGAL • Agencies awarded funding will be required to sign a service agreement. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A N. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) • Approve recommendations with revised allocations. • Do not approve recommendations. V. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution Descriptions of Proposed Services Guidelines and Instructions for 2011 Funding Assistance 2011 Application for Funding Assistance VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • None RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2011 SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICE WITH THOSE AGENCIES FUNDED BY THE CITY WHEREAS, the City of Richfield desires to support social service agencies serving the city's residents; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has allocated funding for this purpose; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield solicited applications for said funding and has reviewed the applications against criteria established for the award of this funding; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the funds are allocated as follows: Organization Recommendation Cornerstone — Criminal Justice Intervention $13,250 The Family Partnership — School Success $11,000 Senior Community Services — Senior Outreach Program $9,000 The Storefront Group — Youth Counseling Program $14,100 Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People (VEAP) $14,000 Richfield R.E.A.D.Y. Scholarship Program $2,500 MIRA — Programs, Information & Referral Services $9,500 Loaves and Fishes $4,000 Bridging,,lnc. $5,000 Community Involvement Program $5,000 Family Stability WorkGroup $750 TOTAL $88,100 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager be authorized to execute contractual agreements with the above -named agencies summarizing services to be provided to Richfield residents. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD 2011 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OTHER AGENCY DIVISION SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING ASSISTANCE RICHFIELD COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL Agency-Program -of Services - - -- 2011 - -- -- Recommenda'ons The Storefront Group - Youth Community based counseling and support services to youth and families, including the $14,100 Counseling Program Property Offender Program for first time offenses, the Truancy Intervention Program for students who have been referred by schools or sent to court due to truancy. Other services include healthy relationship groups in the schools in Richfield. MIRA - Program Information & Information, referral and program services to the Latino community of Richfield. MIRA $9,500 Referral Services serves primarily low - income residents and offers various services for individuals and families to Improve. their well bein Volunteers Enlisted to Assist Provide basic needs services to low- income families and individuals through Food Programs, $14,000 People EAP) Social Service Programs, Transportation Programs and Seasonal Programs. Senior Community Services - Provides in -home c ounseling and service (or, care) coordination to frail elders and their families $9,000 Senior Outreach fro ram that assists older residents to remain independent as long as possible, Bridging, Inc. Provide low- income households with quality furniture and household items, free of charge, $5,000 by effectively utilizing community resources. Cornerstone Aalvocaey Service Provide crisis intervention and ongoing services that offer life- protecting safety and $13,250 support, including emergency shelter, transitional and permanent housing for victims of domestic violence, advocacy on behalf of victims in court, support groups for survivor and their families, as well as a Children, Youth, and Families Program that includes counseling, therapy, enrichment activities and school based violence prevention. Loaves & Fishes Provide nutritious meals to the hungry in an atmosphere of hospitality and develop joint $4,000 ventures /partnerships with like- minded organizations to assist guests with additional basic needs key to becoming self - sufficient. The Family Partnership - School Supports young people in Richfield and other West Metro communities who are in grades -- $11,000 Success 5 -9 and at -risk academically /behaviorally, by providing individualized goal planning and coaching as well as linkages to group, academic enrichment, and family enrichment activities. Through goal- setting, coaching, and connections, young people are able to _ develop skills and cornpqtencies that will romote spccess in- school and life. Richfield R. E.A.D.Y Richfield R,5.A.D.Y. provides bilingual summer youth programs„ youth scholarships, $2,500 attendance motivators, service provider events, and support of community and youth - - - - - -- -- events. Family Stability Work Group The Family Stability Work Group presents train- ing opportunities for Service Providers who $750 work with Richfield Residents. The trainings provide timely information relating to such --------- - - - - -_ ------ ___ —_— -fio_pics as affordable housinglegislative w ; ate$, reletingto ethnic_groups, etc. Z -f1 P 4 F- 3 QF -y CITY OF RICHFIELD GUIDELINES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR 2011 FUNDING ASSISTANCE The City of Richfield is offering Social Service grants to non - profit agencies serving the city of Richfield. Funding parameters and priority goals for the purpose of making the best use of funds are as follows: Fundina Parameters • Any non - profit organization is eligible to apply. • Projects must serve Richfield residents. • Because of limited funds, requests made should not cover all expenses of a proposed service. Priority Goals Projects must address at least one of the following priorities: • Services for vulnerable senior residents Services for individuals, families, teens and /or children at risk Housing support services for low- income persons and persons at risk Award Criteria Priority will be given to proposals that meet the following criteria: • Demonstrated need of the proposed service for the targeted population. • Collaboration with other service providers. • Participation in the Richfield Community Council and Hennepin South Services Collaborative and its related activities. • Efforts to serve low- income persons of all races /cultures /ethnicities. • Demonstrated value to the community. • Does not duplicate services to Richfield residents. Com leted applications must be submitted by November 15, 2010 4F -s Com leted applications must be submitted by November 15, 2010 APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS The attached Application for Funding Assistance must be used in your request for funds. All requests for funding must include the following information: • Typewritten responses to all questions on the 2011 Application. • Agency /program name and address, contact person name, title, phone #, fax #, and Email address as applicable. • Please do not include expensive binding, brochures, letters of support or materials not asked for in the application. • NOTE: You must use the updated 2011 Instructions and Application Questions. Submit 1 original (2 -sided printing) and 1 email copy of completed application by November 15, 2010 to: Karen Barton Community Development Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 kbartonCa)-cityofrichfield.org The City will review applications for social service funds. Applicants may be asked to respond in writing to additional questions. The City will determine 2011 funding recommendations in December, 2010. The Richfield City Council will award grant funds in January, 2011. Agencies awarded social services grants will be required to sign a service agreement for calendar year 2011 and submit semi - annual reports on service outcomes. Please contact Karen Barton at 612 -861 -9777 or kbarton(Mcityofrichfie/d.ora with any questions and for assistance in completing grant applications. Com leted applications must be submitted by November 15, 2010 4F -gyp CITY OF RICHFIELD 2011 APPLICATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING ASSISTANCE PROPOSAL HEADING 1. Agency name, address, contact person, and phone /fax/email 2. Amount of request 3. Brief description of service(s) provided 4. Identify priority area(s) you are addressing: a) Services for vulnerable senior residents b) Services for individuals, families, teens and /or children at risk c) Housing support services for low- income persons and persons at risk d) Other: Please Specify ADMINISTRATION 1. Provide a mission statement for your agency. 2. Provide verification of your organization's non - profit legal status. 3. Indicate your total agency budget for 2011. 4. Indicate your proposed project budget for 2011. Itemize proposed expenses and describe as applicable. Indicate both proposed City funds and other funds to support the project. PROGRAM 1. Describe service to be funded. Include: a) Brief statement detailing the service is and how it is provided b) Target population(s); estimated number of unduplicated individuals you plan to serve residing in the City of Richfield c) Eligibility criteria and process d) How clients are involved in the planning process for service e) Desired client outcomes and methods of evaluating and measuring client progress (use attached "Proposed Outcome /Evaluation Methods" form) 3. Demonstrate the need for the proposed service. 4. Describe efforts to outreach to target population, including immigrant and low - income individuals. 5. If city funds were reduced or not available after 2011, how you would continue to provide the service. COLLABORATION EFFORTS 1. Are you a partner in the Richfield Community Council, Hennepin South Services Collaborative or the Children's Mental Health Collaborative? If so, briefly describe your involvement. 2. Describe your efforts to collaborate with other agencies including your involvement in developing and participating in these collaborations. Please contact Karen Barton at 612- 861 -9777 or kbartonAcityofrichgeld.orA with any questions and for assistance in completing grant applications. Com leted applications must be submitted by November 15, 2010 City of Richfield Social Service Funding Programs - 2011 Proposed Outcomes/Evaluation Methods Name of Applicant Organization: Address: Contact Person: Phone: Email: Brief description of service for which funding is requested: Outcomes: State, 3 to 6 measurable Outcomes of propo -sod service — relate outcomes to client progress Outcomes indicate what result, benefit, or change would come from the service provided. Outcomes can be: 1) initial, such as increased knowledge, understanding, or skills; 2) intermediate, such as change in a specific behavior or attitude, or 3) long tvrm,,_ such as @ change in the condition or status of pe 'o [e. P Indicators: Describe -methods of evaluating proposed Outcomes — how you will measure-client Progress j ,x AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 CONSENT 4G 7 REPORT PREPARED BY: PAM;VAG�R. OASSISTANT TO H NAW RME REvIEwED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Accept the change order report for the Richfield Municipal Project for an aggregate net effect of $94,161 in items included in the project budget. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Accept the Richfield Municipal Center change order report for an aggregate net effect of $94,161 in items included within IL the project budget. II. BACKGROUND :1 - Resolution No. 10309 provides the City Manager the authority to approve change orders for all contracts awarded by the City Council for the construction of the new Richfield Municipal Center subject to the following limitations: • Up to an aggregate of $25,000 for non - budgeted items • Up to an aggregate of $100,000 for items within the project budget Following the approval of such change orders, the City Manager must report this information to the City Council. Attached is the list of the approved project change orders since the December 14, 2010 City Council meeting. Some change orders represent an increase to the originally awarded contract and some represent a decrease. The aggregate net effect of the change orders before the Council on January 11, 2011 is $94,161. The terrazzo flooring change order provides for the extension of the terrazzo flooring down the hallway to the public restrooms and into the restrooms in order to better accommodate this high - traffic area and maintenance concerns. A portion of 0111 CO's the electrical- related change orders are related to Sprint and Motorola requirements and are costs that will be reimbursed to the City. All of the change orders are budgeted items. Total net project change orders to- date is $149,624.13. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • In order to maintain the construction schedule of the Richfield Municipal Center project and respond to change order requests in a timely manner, the City Council has authorized (Resolution No. 10309) the City Manager to approve change orders up to an aggregate value of $100,000 for budgeted items and up to an aggregate value of $25,000 for non - budgeted items. B. CRITICAL TMUNG ISSUES • The City Manager must report approved change orders for the Richfield Municipal Center to the City Council at the next Council meeting. • These change orders have already been approved and, in most cases, implemented. C. FINANCIAL • Total net project change orders to -date is $149,624.13. • The change orders before the Council for review on January 11, 2011, represent a net effect of $94,161 for budgeted items. • $19,145 of the electrical related cost will be reimbursed to the City. • The costs for skylight related modifications which total $23,066, are connected to structural framing modifications and condensation prevention changes. D. LEGAL NA E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • NA IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS) None V. ATTACHMENTS Richfield Municipal Center Change Order Log VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None Change Order Log COR #I PR # Description I Amountl Subcontractor(s) 1073 32 Additional Casework Revisions in Gear Wash D134 (225.00) LSI, Egan, AN 1077 35 Finned Tube Radiation Room D101 283.00 Thelen, Vinco Pricing to be Revised 1079R 37 Walkway and Skylight Revisions 17,255.00 AIW, Gresser, AME, RTL 1090 41 Heating Pipe 1,748.00 Thelen 1093RR2 45 Substitution of Terrazzo in- lieu -of Tile and Carpet 15,604.00 Gresser, MCI, CD Tile, Advance Tile & Te 1098 1 49 Miscellaneous Electrical Revisions 12,547.00 Vinco 1099 50 Miscellaneous Revisions 6,345.00 Vinco 1112 - Temp. parking over porous pavers In SE lot over the winter 6,600.00 T.A. Schifsky & Sons 1115 56 Misc. Revisions 7,911.00 RTL, Div V, North Country Conc, OH Door, AIW, AME 1117 59 Stair W Beam Revision 4,939.00 County a e a s, onus, Arch Sales of MN, Stahl 1119 60 Storage Room #13204, New Doors #0232 6,867.00 Crossroad, Kendall, Thelen, Steinbrecher, , H &N, MCI 1125 63 Clock & On -Air Sin 4,167.00 Vinco 1127 66 Access Flooring Revisions (5,922.00) MCI 1128R 67 Add Insulation at S lights 5,811.00 RTL 1129 - Provide Conduit to Relocated Radio Tower 8,281.00 Vinco 1134 70 Secure Walls at Booking A121 1,950.00 Hollenback & Nelson 1135 - Add 6 Non -Rated Fire Extinguisher Cabinets - Crossroad, Hollenback Net Change Orders 94,161.00 rrazzo V _ -09da REPORT PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 4H REPORT # 8 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 119 2011 BETSY OSBORN, SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER NAME, PTLE ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: FFA eration of a request for a new taxi license for White Star Taxi & Limos, LLC, 3233 20th e Sout h, Minneapolis, MN. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the request for a new taxi license for White Star Taxi & Limos, LLC, 3233 20th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN. II BACKGROUND I On December 28, 2010 the City received an application for a request of a new taxi license for White Star Taxi & Limos, LLC, 3233 20th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN. The application is complete and all required fees have been paid. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: Ruben Mendoza Pacheco and Renato Lucas Eumana are the owners of the business. Neither of these individuals has any known criminal record. 0111 New License for White Star Taxi & Limos LLC Both owners have over six (6) years of experience in the transportation industry. The certificate of liability insurance has been submitted showing American Business Insurance Services, Inc. affording the coverage. At the present time, the number of vehicles that will be operating in Richfield will not exceed three. However, there is a possibility new vehicles could .be added. The applicant has supplied the information regarding the make, body style and year of all vehicles to be operated by`the applicant. The applicant also agrees to supply this information for any added vehicles in the future, as well as pay additional fees for additional vehicles making pick -ups within the City of Richfield. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY - • The applicant meets the standards that are contained in the City's ordinance. B. CRITICAL TImiNG ISSUES • Three vehicles are currently listed on the application to be licensed as taxicabs; therefore, no additional vehicles will be allowed to pick up patrons in the City without first obtaining the appropriate license. Future vehicles could be added to the license, providing that the proper paperwork has been completed, fees paid, and proof of current liability insurance submitted. C. FINANCIAL • N/A D. LEGAL N/A E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS NIA ALTERNATIVE KECOMMENDATION(S) • Deny the request for a new taxi company license for White Star Taxi & Limos, LLC. This would mean that the applicant could not pick up fares within the City of Richfield. However, the Public Safety Department has found no basis for a denial. I V. ATTACHMENTS I V1. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING I • KUDen racneco, uwner • Renato Eumana, Owner AGENDA SECTION: AGENDA ITEM # REPORT # =Oda STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11; 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: KAT ORATH, DEPUTY CITY CLERK NAME, TITLE REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: PROPOSED ORDINANCE 6 9 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consider an ordinance amendment to Richfield City Code Appendix D establishing a change to the fee for Public Works Section 3, Subsection 10 and to move the fees to the Appendix D resolution and set a second reading for January 11, 2011. amwd I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Conduct a second reading of an ordinance amending Appendix D of the Richfield City Code, establishing a fee schedule for certain permits and applications. II. BACKGROUND Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those adopted by ordinance. On an annual basis, as part of the budget process, departments are asked to review the schedule of fees that apply to their departments. The departments review their fees for services and compare the fees charged with the costs incurred in providing that service. If it is found that costs exceed the fee charged, the respective departments will adjust their fees accordingly. The proposed ordinance includes all fees that are required to be established by ordinance. Other fees, including rental licensing fees, are established via resolution (as opposed to ordinance). Revisions to these fees require only one hearing, which was conducted at the December 14, 2010 Regular City Council Meeting. It has been determined by the City Attorney that the portion of the ordinance referencing Public Works fees should be categorized under the resolution portion of Appendix D changes. Therefore it is recommended that this section be moved to 0111AppendixD the resolution and removed from the ordinance resulting in a need to amend the current ordinance. The increase in the Public Works fees for 2011 is reflected in Resolution No. 10464 amending Appendix D. First reading of the proposed ordinance amendment was held on December 14, 2010 and second reading is scheduled for January 11, 2011. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be established by ordinance. • The City attempts to establish fees that appropriately reflect the City's costs of administering the permit or application for which the fee is charged. B. CRITICAL ISSUES • N/A C. FINANCIAL • It is important for the City to annually review fees to ensure that the fees charged are in line with the costs of the service provided. • The ordinance will be effective February 18, 2011. D. LEGAL None. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) • Do not approve the recommended fee changes. However, if the recommended changes are not approved, City fees may be less than costs incurred to provide services. V. ATTACHMENTS • Ordinance VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None BILL NO. 2011- TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Background 1.01 Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those adopted by ordinance. , 1.02 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be adopted by ordinance. The City Council has previously established certain fees by Transitory Ordinance No. 1871. The City Council has established other fees by resolution, which resolution is also part of Appendix D. 1.03 The City Council has determined the need to update the schedule of fees under Transitory Ordinance No. 1871. Section 2. Fee Schedule Adopted 2.01 The fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A are hereby adopted by ordinance. 2.02 The fees adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance shall be amended only by ordinance. Any fees established by resolution, other than those adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance, may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Section 3. Effective date; codification. 3.01 This ordinance is effective in accordance with section 3.09 of the City Charter. 3.02 A copy of this ordinance shall be included in Appendix D to the Richfield City Code, immediately prior to the resolution establishing fees. 3.03 This ordinance supersedes Transitory Ordinance No. 1871. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11 day of January, 2011. ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk 1 Debbie Goettel, Mayor 6-( EXHIBIT A CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES A. Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit: Investigation. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set forth in Section 2. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. B. Permit fee refunds: The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permitted not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (a) Inspections outside of normal business hours $60.00 (minimum charge - two hours) per hour (b) Reinspection fees $60.00 (minimum charge $35.00) per hour (c) Inspections for which no fee is specifically $60.00 indicated minimum charge - one -half hour per hour (d) Additional plan review required by changes, $60.00 additions or revision to plans (minimum charge - per hour two hours e Fee to reissue building inspection record card $35.00 *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved. (1) Building Permits 400.03 - 400.09 $1 to $500 $35.00 (includes one inspection) Each additional inspection $35.00 $501 to $2,000 $25.00 for the first $500 plus $3.25 each additional $100, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 with a minimum fee of $35.00. $2,001 to $25,000 $73.50 for the first $2,000 plus $14.75 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000. $25,001 to $50,000 $415.75 for the first $25,000 plus $10.75 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000. BOLD represents addedlamended fees A -1 (0—S TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING $50,001 to $100,000 $682.50 for the first $50,000 plus $7.50 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000. $100,001 to $500,000 $1,053.50 for the first $100,000 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000. $500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,427.75 for the first $500,000 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000. 1,000,001 and up $5,945.25 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof. (2) Driveway, Parking 515.05 (no permit fee for sidewalks) $ 35.00 Area Permits (3) Swimming 420.00 Permanent or portable pools are based on building permit fees with a minimum of $ 35.00 (4) Plan Review Fee 400.03 - 400.09 35% of building permit fee for one and two family dwelling detached garages and basement remodels 65% of building permit fee for all other building permits, except no fee for the following: (a) Existing single family dwelling minor nonstructural alterations. (b) Single and two family dwelling repair and maintenance work. (c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance work not exceeding $1,000 or where plans are not required. Plan review fee for Maximum 25% of permit fee based on Minnesota State Building Code similar buildings 1300.0160 (5) Contractors License Charged once each time a contractor applies for $ 5.00 Verification Fee permit Cs) (6) Moving - 845 Moving Permit Fee $ 50.00 Buildings (7) Structure Demolition 400.00 - 400.09 (a) Commercial Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of $ 50.00 (b) Dwelling One or two story $ 50.00 Residential - Garage and lesser structure $ 35.00 BOLD represents addedtamended fees IM, V - q TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (8) Plumbing Permit 400.03 - 400.09 Residential Minimum Fee 2% of Total Job cost with a minimum of $ 35.00 (includes one inspection) Each additional inspection $ 35.00 (9) Plumbing Permit 400.03 - 400.09 Commercial/IndustdaVMulti- family Based on Total Job cost 2% of Estimated Job cost with a minimum of $ 45.00 (includes one inspection) Each additional inspection $ 35.00 Plan Review 10% of permit fee when the job cost exceeds $50,000 (10) Electrical Permit 400.03 - .400.09 Residential (a) Minimum Fee which includes one inspection $ 35.00 (b) Each additional Inspection $ 35.00 (c) Complete Wiring Fee: $ 150.00 Single Family Dwelling and each dwelling unit of a two family dwelling and includes not more than three inspections. (d) New Service - up to 200 amps $ 55.00 (e) Temporary Service - (for construction) $ 45.00 (f) Installation, addition alteration, or repair of each circuit or feeder $ 8.00 Swimming pool or exterior hot tub $ 55.00 (11) Electrical Permit 400.03 - 400.09 Commercial, Industrial and multiple dwellings Commercial (more than two units) and Technology systems: Minimum Fee which includes one inspection $ 45.00 Each additional inspection $ 35.00 (a) Based on total job cost - 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $ 45.00 - Over $50,000 - Fee/ $1,000.00 plus 1 1/2% of cost over $50,000.00 (b) Traffic Signals: Per Intersection $ 185.00 (c) Fire Alarm: Based on 3/4% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of $ 45.00 (d) Carnivals, festivals and similar events plus $35.00 for each service on generator $ 110.00 (12) Electrical Permit 400.03 - 400.09 Based on 2% of cost of electrical job to customer with a Signs minimum of $ 45.00 (separate electrical permit required for signs) (13) Residential 400.03 - 400.09 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs Heating, 1 1/2% estimated cost with a minimum of $ 35.00 Ventilating, Air (Includes one inspection) Conditioning and Each additional inspection $ 35.00 Refrigeration Commercial $ 45.00 Heating, Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs Ventilating, Air 1 1/2% estimated cost with a minimum of Conditioning and Refrigeration Plan Review of 10% of permit fee when the job cost exceeds $50,000. (14) Sign Installation 415.01 - 415.11 (a) Temporary sign permit $ 35.00 (b) Permanent sign (any size) $ 100.00 Building permit is required for sign support structures Fees based on building permit fee schedule BOLD represents added/amended fees ME] 6 -s ZONING. LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES BOLD represents added/amended fees TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (1) Planned Unit 542 (a) $500 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a Development maximum fee of $ 3,500.00 (b) PUD Plan Amendment fee - major $ 550.00 c PUD Plan Amendment fee - minor $ 350.00 (2) Site Plan Review 547 (a) $500 plus $.50 / $1,000 of project value to a maximum fee of $ 3,500.00 (b) Major amendment $ 500.00 (c) Minor amendment $ 350.00 (3) Variance 547 Residential $ 250.00 Non Residential $ 450.00 Extension $ 75.00 Variance Appeal Residential and Non Residential $ 150.00 (4) Conditional Use 547 (a) $500 + $.50/$1,000 of project value to a Permit maximum fee of $ 3,500.00 (b) Major amendment $ 500.00 (c) Minor amendment $ 350.00 5 Interim Use Permit 547 $ 500.00 (6) *Zoning District 547 $ 500.00 Change (7) *Subdivision Approval 500.01- 500.05 $ 500.00 Subdivision Waiver 500.05- Subd.2 $ 350.00 (8) Street Vacation 820 $ 350.00 (9) Appeal to Board of 547 $ 350.00 Adj. & Appeals (10) Special Request to $ 350.00 City Council (11) Zoning Compliance $ 50.00 Letter (12) Comprehensive Plan $ 600.00 Amend. (13) Plat: preliminary & $ 500.00 final *Any additional expense of notification necessitated by applicants request for continuance will be charged to the applicant. BOLD represents added/amended fees FIRE SERVICES FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (6) Fire Extinguishing 426 Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a $ 100.00 System Permit minimum of $ 50.00 Telecommunication Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except Senrice CWTS no fee for the following: a no charge for valuation of $1,000 or less (7) Fire Alarm Systems Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of $ 50.00 Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: a no charge for valuation of $1,000 or less (8) Flammable or Tanks (installation or modification $ 150.00 Combustible Liquid or Gas Storage Installation or alteration of piping Tanks Each unit or dispenser $ 50.00 and Piping Underground Tank Removal $ 100.00/Tank MISCELLANEOUS FEES TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION DESCRIPTION FEE OR LICENSE REQUIRING (3) Antenna 426 (a) CWTS antenna permit application fee $ 100.00 Commercial Wireless (b) Antenna permit fee for additional antennas added to $ 35.00 Telecommunication an existing antenna location Senrice CWTS BOLD represents added/amended fees A -5 AGENDA SECTION: PROPOSED ORDINANCE AGENDA ITEM # 7 REPORT # 10 =0990 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 119 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: MELISSA POEHLMAN, CITY PLANNER NAME THE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: SIGNA REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 1) Conduct a second reading of an ordinance rezoning a portion of the property located at 6528 Penn Avenue from the General Commercial and Mixed Use - Community with'the Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay Districts to Planned Mixed Use; and 2) Consider a final development plan and conditional use permit for a 12,900 square foot retail business with drive -thru service. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: 1. Approve an ordinance rezoning a portion of the property located at 6528 Penn Avenue as Planned Mixed Use; and 2. Approve a resolution authorizing a final development plan and conditional use permit for a 12,900 square foot retail building with drive -thru service at 6528 Penn Avenue. II. BACKGROUND Velmeir Companies has submitted an application for development of a CVS Pharmacy (CVS) at 6528 Penn Avenue. The proposal involves the demolition of the southern half of the existing shopping center, division of the property and construction of a new 12,900 square foot CVS with drive -thru service. The Arc's Value Village store will remain in the existing building and minor changes will be made related to the location of trash facilities. 011111 - 2nd Reading 6528 Penn - CVS Rezone & PUD Area Vision In October of 2008, the City Council adopted the Penn Avenue Master Plan and Design Guidelines to direct redevelopment and revitalization efforts along Penn Avenue between Highway 62 and 68th Street. Properties were subsequently rezoned to Mixed Use —Community (MU -C) and the Penn Avenue Corridor (PAC) Overlay was created to address items unique to this area. (Note — the small "panhandle" of 6528 Penn Avenue remained as (C -2) General Commercial.) The intent of these changes was to encourage improvements that would "create a traditional neighborhood center that is a vibrant, pedestrian- oriented district ... [accommodating] residential, shopping, recreational and business uses in a flexible arrangement..." (Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4 -23). III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • In 2008 and 2009 the City Council approved a Master Plan and zoning regulations that would encourage and direct the revitalization -of this area. Zoning Code Requirements: • Planned unit developments (PUDs) are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resources and to encourage innovation in planning and building. PUDs provide flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements, density and land uses if the proposed development is well designed and can be successfully integrated into the neighborhood. • The underlying Mixed Use — Community District is intended for shops and services that support the surrounding community. • While it is not mandatory that the development meet the requirements of the underlying MU -C and PAC Districts, it does meet many of them (parking, pedestrian access, architectural design, impervious surface, building orientation). • The development does not meet the following requirements: ■ Drive -up service windows must be 150 feet from parcels with residential use on the first floor. • The western -most edge of the drive -thru facility is located 50 feet from the adjacent residential parcel. A significant grade change and tree cover at this boundary will separate the uses and will effectively alleviate negative impacts: Maximum allowable front setback is 15 feet. • The western -most edge of the drive -thru facility is located 50 feet from the adjacent residential parcel. A significant grade change and tree cover at this boundary will separate the uses and will effectively alleviate negative impacts. Similarly, it is not required that the proposal meet all general zoning requirements, but the proposal does meet most of them (trash and recycling location, parking lot islands, landscaping, irrigation, bicycle parking, lighting). • The development does not meet the following requirements: • Parking lots are to be set back five (5) feet from adjacent commercial property. • Shared access, parking and circulation make this impractical and unnecessary. • Off -site signs are prohibited. • The proposed development includes a main ground sign at the intersection of 66th Street and Penn Avenue. This sign will include advertising for both CVS and Arc's Value Village, even though the proposed development will split the property into two parcels. Off -site signs ( "Outdoor Advertising Signs" by definition in the Code) are prohibited throughout the City in order to prevent additional billboards and visual clutter in the boulevards at corners. In this case, the sign will replace an existing multi- tenant sign and will advertise businesses that will operate with shared parking and drives. The proposal does not violate the intent of the sign regulations. • Approvals should also be conditioned upon: • An agreement with the City Public Works Department for maintenance of public improvements; • An easement for public use of the stairs; • Submittal and approval of a plat subdividing the two properties; and • Recording of a permanent cross - access agreement between the two properties (a copy to be provided to the City). Required Findings The following findings are necessary for the approval of a PUD application (542.09, Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans; The Comprehensive Plan and Penn Avenue Master Plan designate this property as part of a larger mixed use district stretching along Penn Avenue from Highway 62 to 68th Street. A commercial development intended to serve the surrounding community is consistent with these plans. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries; This requirement is met. 3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development; The MU -C District is intended to include shops and services that support the surrounding community and include commercial, office and higher density residential uses. The intent of the PAC District is to provide for a balanced mix of commercial, office and residential uses that together create a cohesive and pedestrian- friendly area. The development is in substantial conformance with the intent of guiding MU -C and PAC Districts. The development is in substantial compliance with the guiding MU -C and PAC District regulations as well. The proposed setbacks adequately protect adjacent uses and the proposed ground sign is justified by the shared parking and access between the two parcels. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that serve or are proposed to serve the development; Access to and from the development will remain the same and there is no change in the proposed class of use of the property (retail to retail). The developer will work with the Public Works Department to upgrade utilities where necessary and no issues are anticipated. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties, As above, no access changes are proposed and the property will continue to be used for retail purposes. The City has ordinances in place to restrict noise from the drive -thru service window and delivery vehicles, and to significantly limit lighting (1 footcandle) where adjacent to residential properties. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest, The final development plan, which establishes the terms and conditions of the development, meets this requirement. All uses are conditional uses in a Planned Unit Development. The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan, The Comprehensive Plan and Penn Avenue Master Plan designate this property as part of a larger mixed use district stretching along Penn Avenue from Highway 62 to 68th Street. A commercial development intended to serve the surrounding community is consistent with these plans. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intents to locate the proposed use, The proposed use will assist in the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Penn Avenue Mater Plan by providing an upgraded streetscape and pedestrian environment as well as a building with design details that are consistent with the intent of the Planned Mixed Use (PMU) District and the underlying Mixed Use — Community and Penn Avenue Corridor Districts. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines, The development is consistent with the Penn Avenue Corridor Master Plan and Design Guidelines. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of the Code, The proposed use will substantially comply with performance standards. Variations are supported by the specifics of the project as part of the approved final development plan. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; There are or will be adequate facilities, utilities, streets and services to support the development. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety or welfare, Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location; There is a need for enhanced and upgraded retail in the City. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by the Code for the granting of such conditional use permit, This requirement is met. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The City is required to issue a decision within 60 days of submission of a complete application unless a letter extending the deadline (up to an additional 60 days) is sent. The 60 -day deadline for a decision on this application was December 28, 2010. Because the second meeting in December was cancelled, a letter of extension was issued to allow consideration of this item on January 11, 2011. • The property owner and applicant have indicated that delay could impact the feasibility of the project. C. FINANCIAL • The required application fee has been paid. D. LEGAL • A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on November 22, 2010. The Planning Commission found that the proposed development and rezoning were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (7 -1, Schuller dissenting); and recommended approval of the final development plan and conditional use permit (6 -2, Schuller and Rublein dissenting). • A first reading of the rezoning of the property was held on December 14, 2010. • If approved, the rezoning will be effective 30 days following publication in the Sun Current Newspaper. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS • Impervious surface and landscaping requirements are met by the proposal. IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) • Deny the request for rezoning with findings that the criteria necessary for the creation of a PUD are not met. Approve the final development plan and conditional use permit with additional stipulations necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. V. ATTACHWNTS • Ordinance • Resolution • Site plans • Planning & zoning maps VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING • Jon Lennander, Velmeir Companies • Bill Wolfson, property owner 7 , � BILL NO. 2011- AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX 1 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD (CVS Planned Unit Development Plan and Rezoning) THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: A. The City's zoning ordinance establishes zoning classifications for individual property. The property located at 6528 Penn Avenue is zoned C -2 (General Commercial), MU -C (Mixed Use — Community) and is within the PAC (Penn Avenue Corridor) Overlay District. B. Velmeir Companies has submitted an application to the City for a planned unit development plan [the "PUD plan] for the south 220 feet of 6528 Penn Avenue [the "subject area "]. The PUD plan proposes to construct a 12,900 square foot retail building with drive -thru service and 58 parking stalls. C. The City has reviewed the zoning ordinance and determined that it would be appropriate to rezone the subject area as PMU (planned mixed use) and approve the PUD plan to establish the regulations governing the PMU district. D. The Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing concerning the PUD plan and amending the zoning ordinance in the subject area. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD plan and zoning ordinance amendment on November 22, 2010. The City Council held a first reading of the rezoning on December 14, 2010 and second reading and consideration of the PUD plan on January 11, 2011. E. The City's zoning ordinance provides criteria for approving a PUD plan and rezoning of property to a planned unit development. The City Council finds that the PUD plan and rezoning of property in the subject area meets the criteria in the following ways: 1) The proposed development conforms with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Development Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans: a) The PUD plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of this property as part of a larger mixed use district stretching along Penn Avenue from Highway 62 to 68th Street. b) The PUD plan is consistent with the described intent of this designation to "create a traditional neighborhood center that is a vibrant, pedestrian - oriented district ... [that] would accommodate residential, shopping, recreational and business uses in a flexible arrangement that captures the spirit and intent of the Penn Avenue Revitalization Master Plan." [4 -22] c) The PUD plan is consistent with the Penn Avenue Master Plan vision for this area as a continued home for the Arc's Value Village store, additional retail and surface parking. The PUD plan is consistent with the Penn Avenue Design Guidelines in that it I - a-- appropriately transitions between the public street and private development. d) The PUD plan and rezoning are also consistent with the expressed desire for "enhance[d] business opportunities ... either as part of upgrading existing retail areas, expanding new retail business opportunities and /or seeking new and /or redevelopment opportunities for offices, entertainment and service businesses." [4 -16] 2) The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries: The building is designed to accommodate customers for the proposed business, as well as continued shared access with the adjoining property. Drive -thru service is separated from the general parking area to prevent traffic congestion within the site. Enhanced crosswalk treatments on site will allow for safe pedestrian movement within the development and to /from the adjoining property and public street. 3) The development is in substantial conformity with the purpose and intent of the original MU -C and PAC zoning districts, and departures from the original district regulations are justified by the design of the development: Setbacks have been adjusted based on the particulars of the site — specifically, the significant grade change from the intersectiori to the northwest corner of the property and property's relationship to the adjacent residential buildings to the west. The proposed ground sign with that will contain advertising for the business on the northern half of the divided property is justified based on the shared parking and access for the two uses. 4) The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets, or other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the development: Access to and from the development will remain the same and there is no change in the proposed class of use of the property (retail to retail). The developer will work with the Public Works Department to upgrade utilities where necessary and no issues are anticipated. 5) The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties: No access changes are proposed and there is no change in the class of use of the parcel. The use is significantly separated and screened from the residential parcels to the west by a grade change and existing tree cover that will remain. 6) The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interests: A final development plan, which establishes the terms and conditions of the development, is required before construction can commence. Section 2. Appendix 1 of the zoning ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Richfield Zoning Code: Boundaries of Zoning Districts" is hereby amended: A. Section 3, Paragraph (6) is repealed. B. Section 16, Paragraph (6) is amended to read as follows: (6) M -9, 10 (W of Penn, 62 to 67th, except 66th & Penn corner) That area lying between the center lines of state highway 62 and 67th C. � -3 Street, and between the center lines of Penn Avenue and Queen Avenue extended north, except that part of Lot 16, "Richfield Gardens ". which lies southeriv of a line described as commencin, , Tickner's Subdivision of Lot 15, Richfield Gardens. (Amended, Bill No A new Section 8 titled Planned Mixed Use (PMU) is added as follows, and by now renumbering all following sections accordingly. Section 3. This amendment constitutes a rezoning of the south half of 6528 Penn Avenue. Section 4. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk '7-14 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CVS PHARMACY WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a final development plan and conditional use permit for a 12,900 square foot retail development on land located on the south half of 6528 Penn Avenue South, legally described as: That part of Lot 16, "Richfield Gardens ", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of a line described as commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 16; thence northerly, along the easterly line of said Lot 16, a distance of 219.69 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence westerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, to the west line of said Lot 16 and said line there terminating. Together with: Lot 3, Block 3, HARRY TICKNER'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15, RICHFIELD GARDENS, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request for a final development plan and conditional use permit on November 22, 2010 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun - Current and mailed to residents and property owners within 350 feet of the subject property on November 11th, 2010 and November 9, 2010, respectively; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the final development plan and conditional use permit on January 11, 2011; and WHEREAS, the proposed residential use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan: a) The PUD plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of this property as part of a larger mixed use district stretching along Penn Avenue from Highway 62 to 68th Street. b) The PUD plan is consistent with the described intent of this designation to "create a traditional neighborhood center that is a vibrant, pedestrian- oriented district ... [that] would accommodate residential, shopping, recreational and business uses in a flexible arrangement that captures the spirit and intent of the Penn Avenue Revitalization Master Plan." [4 -22] c) The PUD plan is consistent with the Penn Avenue Master Plan vision for this area as a continued home for the Arc's Value Village store, additional retail and surface parking. The PUD plan is consistent with the Penn Avenue Design Guidelines in that it appropriately transitions between the public street and private development. d) The PUD plan and rezoning are also consistent with the expressed desire for "enhance[d] business opportunities ... either as part of upgrading existing retail areas, expanding new retail business opportunities and /or seeking new and /or redevelopment opportunities for offices, entertainment and service businesses." [4 -16] WHEREAS, the retail use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning districts in which the project will be located. The proposed use complies with the purpose of the Zoning Code to assist in the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan by enhancing business opportunities through target redevelopment. This use is consistent with the intent of the Mixed Use — Community and Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay Districts; and WHEREAS, the retail use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. The Penn Avenue Master Plan was incorporated into and updated through the Comprehensive Plan update process. The proposed use is consistent with guidance for Mixed Use development in this area; and WHEREAS, the retail use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of the Zoning Code. The proposed use will substantially comply with performance standards. Variations are supported by the specifics of the project; and WHEREAS, the retail use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. There are or will be adequate facilities, utilities and services to support the development; and WHEREAS, the retail use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, there is a public need for such use at the proposed location. There is a need for enhanced and upgraded retail in the City; and WHEREAS, the commercial use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of a final development plan and conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of the final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A final development plan and conditional use permit are approved for a retail development as described in City Council Report No. , on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. The final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: • A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. • The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. • This approval authorizes submittal of a sign permit for an off -site sign at the corner of 66th Street and Penn Avenue. Sign permits are required for all signs and applications must be submitted to the Building Official. • That a final sediment and erosion control plan be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. • That a final stormwater management plan be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. • That a final plan for walkways and sidewalks, both public and private, be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director and Public Works Director. • That a maintenance agreement related to sidewalks, landscaping, retaining wall and stormwater requirements be executed. • That the property be platted. • That a permanent cross access agreement between the two proposed parcels be executed and a copy provided to the City. • That all new utilities be installed underground and not through new overhead wires. • That a final utility plan be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. • That appropriate permits and approvals related to stormwater, work within the right -of -way, sidewalk closures, detours and bus stop relocation be obtained by the developer. • Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, Velmeir Companies shall: • Receive approval and record final plat; • Submit a copy of Hennepin County's approval of the final plat; and • Submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any landscaping improvements not yet complete. 4. The final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 2011. Debbie Goettel, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Gibbs, City Clerk U 3 E CVS NWC PENN AVENUES & 66TH STREET WEST SHEET INDEX co -1 COVER SHEET Ct -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2 -1 SITE PLAN C3 -1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C4.1 UTILITY PLAN 1.14 LANDSCAPE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY A FIELD SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS FROM THE CITY OF RICHFIELD. 2. WE HAVE SHOWN BURIED STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ON AND/OR SERVING THE SITE TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS DO NOT CONSISTENTLY RESPOND TO LOCATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY PURPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE UTILITY OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM THEIR MAIN LINE TO THE CUSTOMER'S STRUCTURE OR FACILITY - THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE THEIR JURISDICTION. IF A PRIVATE SERVICE TO AN ADJOINER'S SITE CROSSES THIS SITE OR A SERVICE TO THIS SITE CROSSES AN ADJOINER, IT MAY NOT BE LOCATED SINCE MOST OPERATORS WILL NOT MARK SUCH ''PRIVATE" SERVICES. C. SNOW AND ICE CONDITIONS DURING WINTER MONTHS MAY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTILITY. D. MAPS PROVIDED BY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FIELD LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR INCONCLUSIVE. E. THE SURFACE FEATURES AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE LOCATED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES. F. ALL OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION AND LOCATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE PREPARED FROM RECORD DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM THE CLIENT AND THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RECORDS. G. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651/454 -0002. RICHFIELD, MN PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: SITE, GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, CURB & GUTTER, PAVING AND LANDSCAPE VICINITY MAP WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 - 454.0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 @ TOLL FREE: 1- 800- 252 -1166 Dr3fRlR CIVIL LEGEND PRRPnYD suurAw uarolwE 9taPL u.1NRIXE O aAT awx —"T 10 wrEVUVE N PoSr ixdcATm VNN_ a. Lwxr PaE tf PawEn PaE / scv w�TER uAxxaE r¢tyxarrt: wuaar vrslrr uurxotr �wnTEn gRV�cr� HAVdCN PNIX a �. a,ax ar —+�- lwo, cuvrdns � dxreT M,NxMa wal. u :°IerT uxr � DESIGN CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 7200 HEMLOCK LANE SUITE 300 MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55369 719 GRISWOLD STREET SUITE 1000 DETROIT, MI 48226 WARNING ALL CONSTRUCTION & POST -CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE ON -SITE. NO ON- STREET PARKING/ LOADING/ UNLOADING ALLOWED. VICKI VAN DELL TEL: 763 - 424 -5505 FAX: 763 - 424 -5822 SCOTT ROBACH TEL: 313- 324 -3136 FAX: 313- 324 -3111 Project acne: CVS/ phag is y LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CVS CS # 45851 CVS STORE # 02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Deve. n r Name: ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES PalnersNCevabpmenr Professions Services ASSOCIATES PlannlnR• Civil Errymw "•Laml S—y.IR Lamkrnpe Anixlxxrre . �:Wmun•mal )xW ihvducR lene -Snxe 3. n U Chr Minnewra 5.5 11:IePlrone: l)6n hx4 -; ;aT W Wx.Lwt'ksAssociafe+.,wn �.�rddrecr. CADD Qualification: wm �Muoanw,+xwmi� a i.yne Cnviun W�ue [m+b�t�yru.w Wro+ Su mina: 1;5/IO PVOSUI Wl 12600 Rm IdMDS 111 Professions Si nature: I IrtlY pxRY IM: INS pls�, spw:ilFiim w �epoR wa MN'na kmeauMx mYM1ma ngnNtbn wq Mw lam.aayt mw nag.;w�d Ere°,r.,,ma.wrw: ' oI uw sus m NWw:w, Md.I Van De11 -rL 41351 lo"1 1ID L�mnx• No Dn ualil Contr°I: WBS ..�.I:« VJV tea.. WBS 10/22/10 1 blst St W 3561 1'L>VFR wrt CI -1 EXISnVGUJNDirIPV'S PLAN 0.1 SITE P6%N C11 GRAOMGK. cc ±i UItnVPLV1 u -1 1N:nsU m. 62110 w6" st Si W 62M st W Fz 6jaf Sf W Vj W 6711d Sl 61 � al A9..•1'.o'i � fa•a v a d c w 63rd St W 63[h 5t s Q 4 A W 64th St 0 t o O uW 6S1h St ° W 65th 51 J PROPOSED SITE LOCATION 5? W 66th $t W#th St W 66th St 8 s3 53 � � a - W67th St IY 67th Si n F +d v - E A 1 fores[DF W � y < 4� W 681h St < a a c y x a W 69th St wo: -- 5 41 w 70th St C i 1 s W70 1j2 $I d < Z .-' 4 m.1»nrvt a2a1J L,l;res:'1 WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 - 454.0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 @ TOLL FREE: 1- 800- 252 -1166 Dr3fRlR CIVIL LEGEND PRRPnYD suurAw uarolwE 9taPL u.1NRIXE O aAT awx —"T 10 wrEVUVE N PoSr ixdcATm VNN_ a. Lwxr PaE tf PawEn PaE / scv w�TER uAxxaE r¢tyxarrt: wuaar vrslrr uurxotr �wnTEn gRV�cr� HAVdCN PNIX a �. a,ax ar —+�- lwo, cuvrdns � dxreT M,NxMa wal. u :°IerT uxr � DESIGN CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 7200 HEMLOCK LANE SUITE 300 MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55369 719 GRISWOLD STREET SUITE 1000 DETROIT, MI 48226 WARNING ALL CONSTRUCTION & POST -CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE ON -SITE. NO ON- STREET PARKING/ LOADING/ UNLOADING ALLOWED. VICKI VAN DELL TEL: 763 - 424 -5505 FAX: 763 - 424 -5822 SCOTT ROBACH TEL: 313- 324 -3136 FAX: 313- 324 -3111 Project acne: CVS/ phag is y LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CVS CS # 45851 CVS STORE # 02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Deve. n r Name: ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES PalnersNCevabpmenr Professions Services ASSOCIATES PlannlnR• Civil Errymw "•Laml S—y.IR Lamkrnpe Anixlxxrre . �:Wmun•mal )xW ihvducR lene -Snxe 3. n U Chr Minnewra 5.5 11:IePlrone: l)6n hx4 -; ;aT W Wx.Lwt'ksAssociafe+.,wn �.�rddrecr. CADD Qualification: wm �Muoanw,+xwmi� a i.yne Cnviun W�ue [m+b�t�yru.w Wro+ Su mina: 1;5/IO PVOSUI Wl 12600 Rm IdMDS 111 Professions Si nature: I IrtlY pxRY IM: INS pls�, spw:ilFiim w �epoR wa MN'na kmeauMx mYM1ma ngnNtbn wq Mw lam.aayt mw nag.;w�d Ere°,r.,,ma.wrw: ' oI uw sus m NWw:w, Md.I Van De11 -rL 41351 lo"1 1ID L�mnx• No Dn ualil Contr°I: WBS ..�.I:« VJV tea.. WBS 10/22/10 Sheet In e : 3561 1'L>VFR wrt CI -1 EXISnVGUJNDirIPV'S PLAN 0.1 SITE P6%N C11 GRAOMGK. cc ±i UItnVPLV1 u -1 1N:nsU m. Sheet Tit e: COVER SHEET Pro ect ND.: Loucks Project # 07420 Sheet No.: CO -1 la I z I _ I� I 0 3D I jL J 65 112 STREET W. 76 0.36W / 04 I I FD I 4 D42S I 0 46W 1 —� ---- --r --I ^ TC I I I I I- a o s° A / CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651 -454 -0002 igTOLL FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166 n Son MH V y OTC 85408 y, IB" RCP `IB'I RCP, 51 MH Si MH TC 853.81 1D, TC 853.80 n / I� 0 30 60 NORTH SCALE IN FEET Project Naw, CVS/ pphai acy LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC GENERAL NOTES PENN AVENUE S 1. THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY A FIELD SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES AND RECORD UTILITY DRAWINGS AND 66TH STREET W FROM THE CITY OF RICHFIELD. 2. WE HAVE SHOWN BURIED STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ON AND /OR SERVING THE SITE TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: A. UTILITY OPERATORS DO NOT CONSISTENTLY RESPOND TO CVS CS # 45851 CVS STORE It 02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Deve a r Name: LOCATE REQUESTS THROUGH THE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SERVICE FOR BOUNDARY PURPOSES SUCH AS THIS. B. THOSE UTILITY OPERATORS THAT DO RESPOND, OFTEN WILL NOT LOCATE SERVICES FROM THEIR MAIN LINE TO THE CUSTOMER'S STRUCTURE OR FACILITY - THEY CONSIDER THOSE SEGMENTS PRIVATE INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE OUTSIDE THEIR JURISDICTION. IF VELMEIR A PRIVATE SERVICE TO AN ADJOINER'S SITE CROSSES THIS SITE OR A COMPANIES SERVICE TO THIS SITE CROSSES AN ADJOINER, IT MAY NOT BE LOCATED SINCE MOST OPERATORS WILL NOT MARK SUCH "PRIVATE" Pumas N D— ba4-ent Plntessiona Services: SERVICES. C. SNOW AND ICE CONDITIONS DURING WINTER MONTHS MAY OBSCURE OTHERWISE VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF A BURIED STRUCTURE OR UTILITY. D. MAPS PROVIDED BY OPERATORS, EITHER ALONG WITH A FIELD /ASSOCIATES PMnMnB • Civil I nmennlL •LarvlAmeym6 LOCATION OR IN LIEU OF SUCH A LOCATION, ARE VERY OFTEN INACCURATE OR INCONCLUSIVE. I..mhCgx A" li-N. • H "sm,mmal E. THE SURFACE FEATURES AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE LOCATED BY LOUCKS ASSOCIATES. F. ALL OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION AND L "�a -sw MA.C,Muck 'O — 1elePlmne: IJfiS 1 �3aaiiaS 9 LOCATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE PREPARED FROM RECORD DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM THE CLIENT AND THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RECORDS. G. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION ©A sw Arf 1IKKT. TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651/454 -0002. WARNING • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH,.,,,,,,��v CADD ua iticatioll: ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. Su mina lasno MD 6"b W Inw10 Nerixd PUDSUMalal BENCHMARK — Floor level at southeast entrance to building No. 6528 Penn Ave. So, as shown on the ALTA/ACSM Survey dated 10/20/10. - - -- - ELEVATION= 865.79 feet (City of Richfield datum) - -- -- Pnnessiona Si naium: IMrapynMty 4iY Ins W� Arzbn are0alrac area w.l N.wre4 w re. a P.w mr :��".m I4m"aay LkwwaProkavaW fng,P.er "naruq We SURVEY LEGEND AS ASH CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER \'ICkI Van o.11 -P! AP APPLE STORM MANHOLE —r—SANRARY SEWER alas' uceroe no Dare BA BASSWOOD Q SANITARY MANHOLE — I — WATERMAIN BI BIRCH 0 WATER MANHOLE —P— SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ualh Com(o: VV8S WBS BO BOXELDER O HYDRANT —WATER SERVICE �.n.r:Lw VIV �^"• 10/22/10 BU BUCKEYE N GATE VALVE S 'CULVERT BS BUSH 0 POWER POLE —UNDERGROUND CABLE TV CA CATULPA O LIGHT POLE —as— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC he In ': CE CEDAR O YARD LIGHT —ro—UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC COI C15TING FT CO COTTONWOOD f- GUY WIRE —4a— UNDERGROUND GAS C I �1 IXDTINO CONDIII0H5 PLW 01 SITE N" DE DEAD TREE v SIGN —TU— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE C1a GRADINGPLAN EL ELM •' -' SPOT ELEVATION —— UNDERGROUND UTILITY CAml LTILRY PIA LIA LANDXAPEPLAN FR MISC FRUIT 0 A/C UNIT —a"— OVERHEAD UTIUTY FI FIR © CABLE 1V PEDESTAL —TF•c— UNDERGROUND TRAFFIC — HA HACKBERRY 0 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER — "*—DRAIN TILE — HI HICKORY a) TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —FORCE MAIN _ IR IRONWOOD © UTILITY PEDESTAL —CHAIN LINK FENCE — LO LOCUST m ELECTRIC MANHOLE —POST FENCE MA MAPLE © GAS VALVE --WOOD FENCE CA OAK m TELEPHONE MANHOLE a== = = = = -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL PA PALM a UTILITY MANHOLE CONCRETE CURB Sheet Title: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN PI PINE D ELECTRIC METER CONCRETE Po POPLAR u* GAS METER 511 CONTOUR SP SPRUCE a HAND HOLE —RAILROAD TRACKS 7111 Pro'e[t Nn.: Loucks Project # 07420 TR TREE (GEN) 0 MONITORING WELL CONIFEROUS TREE WA WALNUT 0 POST INDICATOR VALVE Sh-t No.: WI WILLOW 0 SOIL BORING DECIDUOUS TREE C1 -1 WARNING ^ r ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHOWN SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MMUTCD. WARNING ALL CONSTRUCTION & POST- CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE ON -SITE. NO ON- STREET / PARKING/ LOADING/ UNLOADING ALLOWED. WARNING — J ALL PUBLIC SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT BE — — — OBSTRUCTED. STORAGE Of MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. STREET LIGHTING AND INTERCONNECT CONDUIT MUST BE EXPOSED FOR CITY INSPECTION PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE OR BACKFILLING EXCAVATIONS IN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY. z INSTALL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MMUTCD. ALL PUBLIC SIGNAL /STREET LIGHTING WORK / F ALONG PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLOOMINGTON a ENGINEERING'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS / e FOR STREET LIGHTING AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST VERSIONS. / CONSTRUCT RAMPS WITH METAL DOME PA \ TRUNCATED DOME PANELS, PER RICHFIELD, / ADA AND MNDOT REQUIREMENTS. \ 8 y I I ti I i I I EXSTING 2.S' BLOCK RETAI C WALL AT THE EDGE ��PAVEMENT TO REMMl— li I S89 °45'12 "E 125.10 �L 2 g$ ti m NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OBSTRUCTIONS AND CONCRETE WORK WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY, PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION. 2. PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUND WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OR INSTALLATION OF SANITARY, WATER OR STORM WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -Of -WAY. CNE WAY \0 Sw,^ rta 0 CNE am.... WAY n 'RSti I i ry I Qr m EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING AREA TO REMAIN 19,650 SF 79 STALLS RE RED 113 STALLS PROVIDED PROPOSED AWNING DOUBLE DOOR PROPOSED PROPERTY UNE CROSSWALK PAVEMENT 4j MARKINGS (PER MMMUTCD) ON i RAISE D PAVEMENT. 0 PROPOSED CVs PHARMACY NORTHERN TYPE A- 12,900sf 96'10" x 137'611 52 STALLS REQUIRED 58 STALLS PROVIDED FFE =866.0 HANDICAP SIGNAGE PER MMD R7-8� R7 -BA & RI -BB (PER ' INSTALL ON of Y ,i D y' u 9, ppo. g }�-• 2 o SITE (TYP ICON FOR � FOR :30 7 a• wHITE� sTmPE l3. (TYP) D2 p, 8612 CURB 10 Q"iv • GLITTER CROiSM PAVEME A R20.0 MARKINi __ (PER MMMLrr( ON-W.. PAVEME ,? 7 1 -I - RAMP Rio 6 ^AND LIAR 19 I , i I - I - - f I I a I i a °i1, $ _4- p 1' NEW SIDEWALK WI _ LIGHT POLE 's (TYP) NEW SIDEWALK ONMENT IGN N89 °45'12 "W 421.35 CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 TOLL FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166 66TH STREET W CO RD 63 BRUEGER'S BAGELS , W woo ^2 pc V ON SIGN ICON SIGN RAGE FOR AILS P STAIRCASE CORNER SITE DATA ZONING CURRENT ZONING: MU -C MIXED USE COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT: PUD AREA TOTAL SITE AREA = 1.50 ACRES IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 0.92 ACRES BUILDING SURFACE AREA =0.30 ACRES PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 0.28 ACRES SETBACKS FRONT YARD: 0 -FT MIN & 15 -FT MAX INTERIOR SIDE YARD: 5 FT SURFACE PARKING TOTAL PROPOSED 58 STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED 3 STALLS D VAN) PROPOSED 3 STALLS (3 VAN) SITE PLAN NOTES 1. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYTHE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, 4. OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF RICHFIELD REQUIREMENTS. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROVIDE A 3 FOOT TAPER AT ALL CURB TERMINI. 7. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8 -1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. B. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT. AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 9. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. FLOWERAMA 10. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 11. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3 -1) 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. SEE SHEETS C3 -1 AND C4 -1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPING. 16. DISABLED PARKING SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA & MMUTCD. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR ® LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH NORTH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. 0 30 60 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE SCALE IN FEET CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. Project Name: CVSO LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CVS CS # 45851 CVS STORE #02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Deve n r Name: ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES ft.1- 00e,AP -1 Pro essiena Services: ASSOCIATES PIanlYng • cmi EryLinnnllx • lana A_i, L.mduaye nRUilnun° . k..mmreamwl 12. --k S16r 3011 Matte Cm«, W.— 55369 UWphm, 116314 33US vmw.l"uckNr¢�Meeswn O r1f11IK1: CADD ualilicatinn: w v,y� mWKl ne.e[N]D� Su lninal: IM5 /le PUD LAvrvval iwD10 Rcvi. iP1iD5"Ilbl Pnnessinnal Si naNre: �11ewy nwr aw uh or.1, soee+lren w howl n= I em n � LKa W Ne Sue vawW E tu0°�maE Ha Vi kit Van Deli - PE 41352 10111 - uT,nM no Der ualit Control: ,...L< WBS WBS I..,e, VIV 10/22/10 Sheet Ind- cDI ODI'ER"IT C1.1 66TNG CONDmONS PLAN L'b1 SR — Cl.l GRADinc WIN Q -I Urnuy K'N L 0-1 -1 IANI2AAPER1n Sheer Tille: - SITE PLAN Project No.: Loucks Project # 07420 Sheer Nn: C2 -1 yer Doc. No's 956063 & J156415- I STREET LIGHTING AND INTERCONNECT CONDUIT MUST BE EXPOSED FOR CITY INSPECTION PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE OR BACKFILLING EXCAVATIONS IN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY. z INSTALL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MMUTCD. ALL PUBLIC SIGNAL /STREET LIGHTING WORK / F ALONG PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BLOOMINGTON a ENGINEERING'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS / e FOR STREET LIGHTING AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST VERSIONS. / CONSTRUCT RAMPS WITH METAL DOME PA \ TRUNCATED DOME PANELS, PER RICHFIELD, / ADA AND MNDOT REQUIREMENTS. \ 8 y I I ti I i I I EXSTING 2.S' BLOCK RETAI C WALL AT THE EDGE ��PAVEMENT TO REMMl— li I S89 °45'12 "E 125.10 �L 2 g$ ti m NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OBSTRUCTIONS AND CONCRETE WORK WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY, PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION. 2. PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUND WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OR INSTALLATION OF SANITARY, WATER OR STORM WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -Of -WAY. CNE WAY \0 Sw,^ rta 0 CNE am.... WAY n 'RSti I i ry I Qr m EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING AREA TO REMAIN 19,650 SF 79 STALLS RE RED 113 STALLS PROVIDED PROPOSED AWNING DOUBLE DOOR PROPOSED PROPERTY UNE CROSSWALK PAVEMENT 4j MARKINGS (PER MMMUTCD) ON i RAISE D PAVEMENT. 0 PROPOSED CVs PHARMACY NORTHERN TYPE A- 12,900sf 96'10" x 137'611 52 STALLS REQUIRED 58 STALLS PROVIDED FFE =866.0 HANDICAP SIGNAGE PER MMD R7-8� R7 -BA & RI -BB (PER ' INSTALL ON of Y ,i D y' u 9, ppo. g }�-• 2 o SITE (TYP ICON FOR � FOR :30 7 a• wHITE� sTmPE l3. (TYP) D2 p, 8612 CURB 10 Q"iv • GLITTER CROiSM PAVEME A R20.0 MARKINi __ (PER MMMLrr( ON-W.. PAVEME ,? 7 1 -I - RAMP Rio 6 ^AND LIAR 19 I , i I - I - - f I I a I i a °i1, $ _4- p 1' NEW SIDEWALK WI _ LIGHT POLE 's (TYP) NEW SIDEWALK ONMENT IGN N89 °45'12 "W 421.35 CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651- 454 -0002 TOLL FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166 66TH STREET W CO RD 63 BRUEGER'S BAGELS , W woo ^2 pc V ON SIGN ICON SIGN RAGE FOR AILS P STAIRCASE CORNER SITE DATA ZONING CURRENT ZONING: MU -C MIXED USE COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT: PUD AREA TOTAL SITE AREA = 1.50 ACRES IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 0.92 ACRES BUILDING SURFACE AREA =0.30 ACRES PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = 0.28 ACRES SETBACKS FRONT YARD: 0 -FT MIN & 15 -FT MAX INTERIOR SIDE YARD: 5 FT SURFACE PARKING TOTAL PROPOSED 58 STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED 3 STALLS D VAN) PROPOSED 3 STALLS (3 VAN) SITE PLAN NOTES 1. MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIFICATION PER "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYTHE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM THE CITY AS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, 4. OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF RICHFIELD REQUIREMENTS. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROVIDE A 3 FOOT TAPER AT ALL CURB TERMINI. 7. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C8 -1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. SEE LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HARDSCAPE APPLICATIONS. B. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT. AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY (SIDEWALK, STREET OR DRIVEWAYS) 9. SEE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY REMOVAL DETAILS. FLOWERAMA 10. ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REMOVED WITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS PART OF THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 11. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. (SEE SHEET C3 -1) 12. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE DESCRIBED AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER DETAIL ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. 13. 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF ALL COMMON DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS. 14. SEE SHEETS C3 -1 AND C4 -1 FOR GRADING AND UTILITIES. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPING. 16. DISABLED PARKING SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA & MMUTCD. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR ® LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH NORTH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. 0 30 60 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE SCALE IN FEET CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. Project Name: CVSO LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CVS CS # 45851 CVS STORE #02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Deve n r Name: ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES ft.1- 00e,AP -1 Pro essiena Services: ASSOCIATES PIanlYng • cmi EryLinnnllx • lana A_i, L.mduaye nRUilnun° . k..mmreamwl 12. --k S16r 3011 Matte Cm«, W.— 55369 UWphm, 116314 33US vmw.l"uckNr¢�Meeswn O r1f11IK1: CADD ualilicatinn: w v,y� mWKl ne.e[N]D� Su lninal: IM5 /le PUD LAvrvval iwD10 Rcvi. iP1iD5"Ilbl Pnnessinnal Si naNre: �11ewy nwr aw uh or.1, soee+lren w howl n= I em n � LKa W Ne Sue vawW E tu0°�maE Ha Vi kit Van Deli - PE 41352 10111 - uT,nM no Der ualit Control: ,...L< WBS WBS I..,e, VIV 10/22/10 Sheet Ind- cDI ODI'ER"IT C1.1 66TNG CONDmONS PLAN L'b1 SR — Cl.l GRADinc WIN Q -I Urnuy K'N L 0-1 -1 IANI2AAPER1n Sheer Tille: - SITE PLAN Project No.: Loucks Project # 07420 Sheer Nn: C2 -1 1 III — _ — _ _ -J NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OBSTRUCTIONS AND CONCRETE WORK WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY. PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION. 2. PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUND WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OR INSTALLATION OF SANITARY, WATER OR STORM WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND /OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651 -454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 88TH STREET W CO RD 53 BRUEGER'S BAGELS tu W ft I 0 2� u 10 V >5 O IER RISER NOTE: CATCH BASINS RIMS ARE 2 INCHES LOWER THAN FLOW LINE ELEVATION. NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS AT CURB LINES INDICATE BASE OF CURB AND GUTTER LINE (I.E. FLOW LINE) ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF BUILDINGS, VESTIBULES, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, ENTRY LOCATIONS AND LOCATIONS Of DOWNSPOUTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. 5. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITE. SAID ROCK ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AND CITY REQUIREMENTS. 7. ALL ENTRANCES AND CONNECTIONS TO CITY STREETS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 8. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE OR GUTTER LINE ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FLOWERMA 9. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY PLAN DISCREPANCIES. 10. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AS -PER CITY AS -BUILT PLANS AND FIELD SHOTS. 0 30 60 NORTH SCALPS IN FEET CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY 6 /u TOLL F EE:A1- 800 - 252 - 166002 M 11. SEE SHEET C3 -2 FOR EROSION CONTROL INFORMATION LEGEND Vi,:kl 1. Van Ucll - PL mn vm EXISTING mo PROPOSED Control: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR x.-800 X 800.03 SPOT ELEVATION X 600.0 DRAINAGE SLOPE X.XX% Index: STORM SEWER 11 f.OVLR WFR STORM MANHOLE O R6MGG[) nONSKAN CATCH BASIN 0.1 SIit % SANITARY SEWER CYI GI GP WATERMAIN Cs' UII00'PlW BENCHMARK EMERGENCY OVERFLOW CONSTRUCTION LIMITS Project alne: cvs/ pQ1mmacy LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CV5 CS # 45851 CVS STORE # 02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Develo rName: ,•I VELMEIR COMPANIES PM-0 De,re!apr f Protessinna Services Planning • Gwl Lrynm.d, • Lalul S."' LaniRetpe Ani,iMynre • EnvlronirenLll IzUO Fien,luLk Lane. slid¢ 30 Alaple Grove, (7.112la R.5 muy,knnn: I�uu nzmsxls w,.w.tre,ekwx«:iaus.,:ao ©zaw Architect CADD ua i ¢anon: wa aro`e+Mraww pe4eaw w q.sn�,ewn eaayym ati,e CMpw a«�was+mm�run w� Suhminal: IMSna Rm Sulmilul 1:/1NIa RaWed PUOSnM:nel Nofenional Si nature: I Ilarew urtdY IAY IMV WN. tpeWkaona spun am oreparen w ^'. a, nna., mr a.m., awenaa'w, me uw I m. a nav Lk.reae wdmawns Rnp✓,mr nnMrun ma, of ue 9se of M'nlnda au;z Vi,:kl 1. Van Ucll - PL mn vm om� no mo ua it Control: ,.MK.Iw WBS VIV WBS 10122/10 Sheet Index: Cal f.OVLR WFR CI -t R6MGG[) nONSKAN 0.1 SIit % CYI GI GP Cs' UII00'PlW Sheet Title: GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN Project No.: Loucks Project # 07420 Sheet No.: C3 -1 F 7 3 STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE MANHOLE CASTING CBMH 201 NOTES R -2501A CBMH 202 48" DIA R -3067L 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE 48" DIA R -3067L CB 300 27" STOOL FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CBMH 301 48" DIA R -2501A CBMH 302 SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION R -3067L CBMH 303 48" DIA R -3067L OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA ICEAM), 1999 48" DIA R -3067L I EDITION. HDPE PIPE CONNECTIONS INTO ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES l SHALL BE MADE WITH WATERTIGHT MATERIALS, UTILIZING AN A -LOK OR WATERSTOP GASKET OR BOOT, CAST -IN -PLACE RUBBER BOOT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. WHERE THE ALIGNMENT PRECLUDES THE USE OF THE ABOVE APPROVED WATERTIGHT METHODS, CONSEAL 231 WATERSTOP SEALANT, OR APPROVED EQUAL WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. I I 2. SEE SHEET CS-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. / I 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS THE CITY. ALL I COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE - - - - - - - - - - - - CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES, S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY / EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. SREMAINYDRANT I 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN S TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND ERVICES D TO SANITARY REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND FFEE MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE, BE PROV DED WHERE 8.0 M / I 7. ALL STREET AND PERFORMED THE REQUIREMENTS OFST E CITY.CHINLLS TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE n I PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC / I CONTROL DEVICES IMUTCDI AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL / / ❑ SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL I PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY I OF THE CITY. / I 8. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE .4 MINIMUM OF 0.0 FEET OF COVER. 9. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE CBMH 2 RI =862.2 PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL INV =857.45 I REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO CONNECT 6" WATER PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC L H DPE O 1, IDI' 15" SERVICE TO EXISTING I SERVICE. LOADING. / HDP E 0 4 WATER CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY 10. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: - �-y CONDITION & DEPTH WATERMAIN 5 " DIP CLASS 55 flmiI MIN POLYWRAP REQUIRED. - OF EXISTING WATER OF E SANITARY SEWER 6- PVC SDR ZV SERVICE. / S' CBMH 300 CBMH 301 RIM =865.1 RIM -865.1 INV =862.1 PROPOSED INV =861.45 SERVICE. I STORM SEWER N12 HDPE -WT 12' -15 "DIAMETER STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 1S'DIAMETER, p ` 58' IS" HOPE O LDI C�C ROOFDRVNLEADS PVC SCHEOULE40 12'DIAMTER. 11. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3034. J \ PHARMACY INV -852.6 / I I 12' SEWER PIPE SHALL MEET OF EXCEED AASHTO M294 MINIMUM PIPE STIFFNESS PER ASTM D2412 6OPSI FOR 8-18 ". NORTHERN TYPE A- 12,90DSf 13. SANITARY & WATER LINES SHALL COMPLY WITH 96'10" X 137'6" I CONNECT 4" SANITARY A. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS" BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF.MINNESOTA (CEAM). 1999 EDITION AND TRANSFORMER 52 STALLS REQUIRED TO EXISTING t I REVISIONS. PAD 58 STALLS PROVIDED SANITARY SERVICE B. "RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR WASTEWATER FACILITIES" BY rl' FFE =866.0 88' INVERT BSDSERVICE AT I TO VERIFY THE GREAT LAKES UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BOARD OF STATE (i u 6" COMBINED WATER O 3.09 m o CONTRACTOR SIZE, CONDITION & DEPTH PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERS, 2004 EDITION SERVICE TO BE SPLIT WATER I INTO FIRE & DOMESTIC _ SERVICE. 14. BACDKF OW PPREVENTER MUST BE INSTALLED ON IRRIGATION LINE. CBMH 201 RIM 'il n INSIDE OF BLNLDING. m 15. ALL WATER LINES MUST BE WRAPPED IN 8 MIL MINIMUM POLVWRAP. = 860.31 1 ' _� 2 CBMH 304 2 FLOWERAMA NOTES r, IM -862.4 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION ' y \ NV(N)- 856.11 ` NV(SE) -851.2 FOR OBSTRUCTIONS AND CONCRETE WORK WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY. \ COMBINED WAVIER SERVICE PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION. IJ 33' 15" RCP O 1.5X, TIE INTO EXISTING 2. PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR UNDERGROUND WORK RIM -862.28 M CBMH AT INV- 850.69 WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OR CBMH 202 [ RIM -862.5 I INSTALLATION OF SANITARY, WATER OR STORM WORK WITHIN THE INV -858.0 180' 15" HDPE O 1.0% INV(SE) =851.0 PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. WARNING -•:._- EXISTING HYDRANT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR TO REMAIN LOCATIONS EXISTING COOPERATE WITH J 0' 15" RCP UTILITY COMPANIES IIN MAINTAINING THEIR AND /OR TIE INTO RELOCATION OF LINES. EXISTING CBMH AT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT EXISTING POWERPOLE O NV- 850.56 651- 454.0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS TOP OF EXISTING OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, RETAINING WALL WILL f� VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE NEED TO BE LOWERED. �� CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN CO RD 53 DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE MANHOLE CASTING CBMH 201 48" DIA R -2501A CBMH 202 48" DIA R -3067L CBMH 203 48" DIA R -3067L CB 300 27" STOOL R -2501A CBMH 301 48" DIA R -2501A CBMH 302 48" DIA R -3067L CBMH 303 48" DIA R -3067L CBMH 304 48" DIA R -3067L BRUEGER'S BAGELS CALL BEFORE YOU Dirt - 0 30 60 Gopher State One Cal I J TWIN CITY AREA: - 252 -1166 NORTH TOLL FREE: I -800- 252 -1106 SCALE IN FEET WARNING ALL PUBLIC SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. INSTALL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MMUTCD. WARNING PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY, DEVELOPER/ CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT ELECTRONIC UTILITY AS- BUILTS TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR MUST GATHER UTILITY AS -BUILT INFORMATION AT THE TIME THE NEW UTILITIES ARE EXPOSED, PRIOR TO B.ACKFILL. THIS INCLUDES THE ABANDONMENT AND CAPPING OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES & SERVICES. WARNING CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR ANY UTILITY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. WARNING ALL CONSTRUCTION & POST - CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE ON -SITE, NOON - STREET PARKING/ LOADING/ UNLOADING ALLOWED. miect ame- CVSO phoPffti acy LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CVS CSR 45851 CVS STORE 1I 02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Develn er Name: ,•, VELMEIR COMPANIES P,0_bD81ebP_t Professional Services: ASSOCIATES PWrvnR • Crva knK� _ m-I Anv , L.w,ka'ape Arvinlearwe • Urvirtxwxrual 7M k NMI MaRJe f�IU"'e,.Wnnesgn 5ilN9 ' lelrydwne'12631 M2 " -iilb vwrv.l=wksAaa.iawr.,xvn ID2rMw Architect: CADD uahffi 1iwc mimrse h'�mWU.x�'yore,vW U"�wv m Ny,u� CMO "+a '•"'e "geaa�- .b-n�"amrd um ,vl lmsnR Pu05xHlwul 1_�W70 Rcvi tlPUDSvhovual Pmlessional 5i nawre. I Mdy Al IIYa Pray "pclhwon a open rv- ww I NlcarwJP�neawl Erp�e"r xnae,tiv lsn" dww�a k. 11 -PF +use Lwen•.e No. D"M uaiil Cnn1m1: WBS WBS VIV " " 10/25/10 Sheen Index: col _111M Snlrr C1 -1 EXIST- C-01TIONS PLAN 0 -1 SR[PLAN Cim! u,fNNG PI \N C .4 UfkL PLAN _ II -I IANDSC APE P1 AN Sheet Tide: UTILITY PLAN M. 77 No.: Loucks Project #07420 Sheet No.: C4 -1 g� 3 y� _8 GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM TO'- 0" CLEARANCE). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB /GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAY'S ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD .ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA WHERE SOD /SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD I" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC -FED S N T ALL AREAS DISTURRED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE $W.ALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION Of NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED SHRUB HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROUT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ALL TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE STAKED WITH 3 STAKES SPACED EQUALLY .AROUND THE TREES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID .AND/OR QUOTATION. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION Of PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN .ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 0 -20 -20 OF 12 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 6 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN .ADDITIONAL .APPLICATION OF 10 -10 -10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS. ANNUALS, AND /OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND, ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12 -1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5.1. BLACK POLY EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP RIVER ROCK MULCH OF 3/4" SIZE AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. .ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND RIVER ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIEDANDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH .A WATERING/1-AWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 15 CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT. SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND(OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON -GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY' OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING. BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASEIPEST CONTROL CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. REPRODUCIBLE A5 -BUILT DRAWINGS) OF ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE I5. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY .ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15: DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER I AND FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15- PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY I. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. 1 I LANDSCAPE DETAILS: r `lll LANDSCAPE PLAN: ONE WAY I EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN —� EINIt • r7 -- I' - I 1 1 ' ONE • \\ WAY SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS x,41= ._—G_, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN .A PLUMB POSITION THRO GH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. THREE TAKES POSITIONED EQUALLY AROUND THE TREE ARE REQUIRED ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING 15 COMPLETE. CUT BACK WIRE 6 %SKET REMOVE .ALI. FL AGGING AND LABELING FROM TREE. WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8.12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER- DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. I Gx2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH SAFETY FLAGGING � ONE PER WIRE MULCH 4" DEEP - PER SPEC WOOD STAKES (3) EDGE VARIES SEE PLAN SC ARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE .ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS, 1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL L�_, SCALE: 112' =I'0' REFER TO PLAN 3" MIN. DEPTH la" RIVER ROCK —�� MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC. PROPOSED CVS PHARMACY NORTHERN TYPE A- 12,900sf 96'10" x 137'611 52 STALLS REQUIRED 58 STALLS PROVIDED FFE =866.0 4112 �w:+1f�r1wi�4A�F1►w4r�4� 2 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL "_1 5G4LC'3f4' =1'4Y — w F.M✓ER — — — LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUBS TO BE PLACED 50 THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE. ROCK MULCH - 3" DEEP - SEE SPEC. LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE SPEC. EDGING MATERIAL - SEE SPEC. EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN PLANTING SOIL -SEE SPEC. BUILDING WALL (TYP) J' Tr 7 I 0 20 40 NORTH SCALE IN FEET LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER 2,500 sq. ft. OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA. 1 SHRUB PER 1,000 sq. ft. OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA = 63,145 sq. R. TREES REQUIRED = 25 EXISTING TREES SAVED - 13 TREES PROVIDED = 15 TOTAL TREES ON SITE = 20 SHRUBS REQUIRED 63 SHRUBS PROVIDED =195 VARIES ROCKMULCH - SEESPECS. ALL T J 1 tilwkl r 115 -20 y SEE PLLA -N� 3" DEPTH Suyp„n Oplion= Emb,rlmenl 1 D.M1I, xrd P,. "nee erne :h I CONT I COMMENTS -'" DL,MOr, Inc. 4Rx. PA nr >�aM.� P. r,a, •a �I �,wL S, 'a min -ano ..... www.nninnr.nun 7 I 0 20 40 NORTH SCALE IN FEET LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER 2,500 sq. ft. OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA. 1 SHRUB PER 1,000 sq. ft. OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA = 63,145 sq. R. TREES REQUIRED = 25 EXISTING TREES SAVED - 13 TREES PROVIDED = 15 TOTAL TREES ON SITE = 20 SHRUBS REQUIRED 63 SHRUBS PROVIDED =195 VARIES ROCKMULCH - SEESPECS. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: y SEE PLLA -N� 3" DEPTH Fs—y—m"T QTV COMMON NAME I SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE I CONT I COMMENTS I I LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE SPEC k Buxus x'Green Mountain 32" HGT #7 POT PLANT T O.C. EDGER - SEESPECS. 'p< Junl r.Is hodzontalis'H has' 24" SPRD #5 POT PLANTS' O.C. VARIES -SEE PLAN BO 8 BICOLOR OAK Quemus bicolor 2.5" CAL B &B SINGLE STEM �EDGE SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gledhsis triacanthos Yee. Inerm)s'Sk cola 2.5" CAL B &B SNGLE S-IEM 12" DEPTH (MIN). LOAM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SD 80 STELLA D' ORO DAYLILY Hememcallis x'Stelle D' Om' 1 GAL 7 I 0 20 40 NORTH SCALE IN FEET LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1 TREE PER 2,500 sq. ft. OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA. 1 SHRUB PER 1,000 sq. ft. OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA = 63,145 sq. R. TREES REQUIRED = 25 EXISTING TREES SAVED - 13 TREES PROVIDED = 15 TOTAL TREES ON SITE = 20 SHRUBS REQUIRED 63 SHRUBS PROVIDED =195 VARIES ROCKMULCH - SEESPECS. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: y SEE PLLA -N� 3" DEPTH Fs—y—m"T QTV COMMON NAME I SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE I CONT I COMMENTS I I LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE SPEC GET 1 85 1 GREEN MOUNTAIN BOXWOOD Buxus x'Green Mountain 32" HGT #7 POT PLANT T O.C. EDGER - SEESPECS. DECIDUOUS TREES Junl r.Is hodzontalis'H has' 24" SPRD #5 POT PLANTS' O.C. VARIES -SEE PLAN BO 8 BICOLOR OAK Quemus bicolor 2.5" CAL B &B SINGLE STEM �EDGE SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gledhsis triacanthos Yee. Inerm)s'Sk cola 2.5" CAL B &B SNGLE S-IEM 12" DEPTH (MIN). LOAM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SD 80 STELLA D' ORO DAYLILY Hememcallis x'Stelle D' Om' 1 GAL POT PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPECS. CS 48 CRISP LEAF SPIREA S rea x bumalda'Cds a 24" HGT #2 POT PLANT 4' O.C. - --- -- -'- --- LOOSEN ROOTS OF DH 52 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE DieMlla lonicera 24' HGT #5 POT PLANT 3' O.C. PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING CONIFEROUS SHRUBS GET 1 85 1 GREEN MOUNTAIN BOXWOOD Buxus x'Green Mountain 32" HGT #7 POT PLANT T O.C. HJ 32 HUGHES JUNIPER Junl r.Is hodzontalis'H has' 24" SPRD #5 POT PLANTS' O.C. r3l PERENNIAL PLANTING PERENNIALS SD 80 STELLA D' ORO DAYLILY Hememcallis x'Stelle D' Om' 1 GAL POT PLANT 2' O.C. SCALE: 3/4'= I'P PS 43 PURPLE EMPEROR SEDUM Sedum 'Pu le Em mr 1 GAL POT PLANT2' O.C. Pro'ect Name: CVS/ phmm@cry LEFT HAND ENTRANCE NWC PENN AVENUE S AND 66TH STREET W CVS CS # 45851 CVS STORE # 02152 CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN D—loper Nam: MA VELMEIR COMPANIES ;YP' a In 0—op —, Professional Services: ASSOCIATES PLu,Mnq • G'vrl LPRrnern,� •Larcl4,rn•Yrry, Lanrkrape Mlnu tune •brvirwPrxnn.d -p G-111 -Fnk3m Aar enee...anrreHxa ssarnl relePlrwrc van nzna>us wr,w.LarcksAwn.unea.rpn An hitecr • rki CADD ualillwti. '"`w`awra.amw' =w., r•,n �, n.,. �w=or, ,�e.,a "rwvar.�ww ,mw low.B PDD SUIvrnal 11 10 Rev PUDSUIninel Professional Si nature: r M.erwiur va lnc d*+.� onarewn an �wrea er m. = U,a• ary eea : w<M.an .m rnn r a,an,w"",aa Lnmss,w am,aPnnwrm. •r., n. s.e d uMw.wa I,m IMP, A 48x3 — nn Dare ualit - ontrol: C VIV u P TIE a1 TIF Sheet IMP.: CM collrR $HEFT ci -I R1511NG CONDInGNS PLAN C3 -1 51TE PUN Cl .I FRADIAG PLW cdl UIIUTYPLW It -1 1, \NU)C'nPE %.nN Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE PLAN Poi ect No.: 07420 Sheet No.: L1 -1 Z = LUMINAIRE MOUNTING HEIGHT A.F.G W W.We Loaad- SunmMry I Z • Osrm 781 WMNe Labe X Y .... _ 1 4A2 609849 175 365 - 124 90 0 2 4A2 703.202 188.358 I .24 143.759 0 3 4A2 701.13 257.8322 24 - 180 - - 0 -- - 4 48 M3.545 - - -4C2 290.5341 24 356.959 -- '_- - -t0 I0 - -- 545.612 156754 24 90 8 - 4C2 702795 338.083 24 257787 0 7 4C2 660628 168.682 24 90 0 B 4D 489.921 174461 24 90.397 9 - -. MD4s 511 162 229.384 -I10 27 _.. W 0 MD4s 528.668 324.20 2626 0 0 '110 11 MD Ma 502776 332710 16.66 45 0 12 MD4a 522499 328.633 16.66 135 10 13 MD4s 509.032 74 MD4s 537.845 313.274 8.987 16.66 135 _101 24 0 D 24 �O 15 MD4s 649433 2001 �S= 16 MD4s 511496 18.945 28 90 0 17 MDBS 515.514 226.981 27 0 27 _ 0 0 I 0 1 18 - MOBS 523474 226.981 t9 moos 531.399 20 MOBS 515174 228.977 314.82 27 0 26 45 1 0 1 0- 21 - - MOBS 520.806 7 320.478 26 45 0 22 MOBS 498.562 328.518 16.66 45 0 23 - _- , MOBs 507047 336.988 16.66 45 0 24 MOBS 499157 323.088 16.66 135 0 25 - - MDBS 1 504.827 317.475 16.06 - '_135 -_ 0 _ 26 MDBS 512.579 336.513 16.86 135 - 0 - -- 27 MOS. 518252 0.834 - 135 10 28 MDBS 645.041 f324.409 0 �24 0 29 MOBS 583.645 6.981 0 0 30 MDBS :649.433 24 0 31 MOBS 637041 N292.091 89 24 0 J 0 32 Moos 1629.041 l 324.489 24 0 0 33 Moss 621,041 324489 24 0 0 324.489 24 0 0 4 MD8s 613.041 35 MOBS 605.041 324.489 1 24 0 -_ 38 MDBS 597.041 37 MOBS 589041 324.489 324489 1 -0_ 24 0 24 0 0 0 38 MOBS 581.041 324.409 124 0 110 89 ~ MDBS 573.041 - 324.489 24 0 0 0 40 MDBS 565.041 ~ 324.489 24 0 j - 41 MDBS 557.041 324459 24 0 0 MD8s 5.041 142 49 45 MDB. 541.041 M MDBS 533.041 324.489 324.489 324489 24 10 - -- 24 J 0 24 0 0 0 0 45 MDSS 649433 46 MOBS 649.433 300.091 • 308091 24 90 24 90 0 0 316.091 24 90 0 47 MD8s 60.433 48 MDas 575.645 i 226.981 24 0 0 49 MOBS 567845 228.987 24 0 50 MOSS 589.845 1228.981 24 0 0 51 MDBS ' 551.845 228.981 24 0 Il'0 52 MDBS 543.645 228.981 24 0 I --- 0 II1-5 -3 OB1x 502478 1- 327122 9.33 135 ---'rrr 0 --- 54 OBix 503.416 55 OBix 509.418 - 333122 1933 8201- 135 9.33 135 0 0 1 56 OBtx 589.418 320122 933 135 0 57 081x 515.416 .326122 9.33 135 0 SB OB1x 515.416 320122 1 9.33 135 0 0 59 DOI, 545.065 231284 24 0 1 60 OCx 648,924 1238159 24 0 0 61 OCx 638.439 22756 24 0 0 62 WPx 511.823 271 063 18 180 0 63 WPx 511.823 !301063 18 ISO -- - - - -- --, 0 _ - Y X 0,0 I + HUBBELL IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF LUMINAIRE MANUFACTURED BY OTHERS Luminalm Schedule Calculation Summary Symbol Label Qty Description Arrangement Lum. Watts LumenslLamp LLD LDD BF LLF Filename Label Description Units Avg Max Min i AvglMin Max/Min! 4D i CR1- P40 -H5 (Hubbell Ltg) SINGLE 453 31000 0,720 0 950 0.950 0.650 CR1- P40- H5.IES _! 5FT FROM FRONT ENTRANOBFC MINIMUM Fc - -_ 8.35 8.9 7.3 11.14 1.22 4C2 3 CITY CR1- P40•H4•HS (Hubbell Ltg) ROTATED OPTICS 453 31000 0720 0.950 0950 0.650 CR1- P40- H4- HS.IES 5FT FROM REAR ENTRANCBOFC MINIMUM Fc 2.43 2.7 2.1 1.18 1.29 4A2 3 QTY 2 CR1- P40-H4 (Hubbell Ltg) ROTATED OPTICS 453 31000 0.720 0.950 0.950 0.850 CRt- P40- H4.IES GIFT FROM SIDE ENTRANCE10FC MINIMUM Fc 1 6.47 0.5 8.4 1.01 1.02 -I 4B 1 CR1- P40 -113-HS (Hubbell Ltg) _ _ SINGLE 453 31000 0.720 0.950 0.950 0.850 CR1- P40•H3- HS.IES .' 5FT FROM SIDE ENTRANCEIDFC MINIMUM Fc 15.27 5.9 4.5 1.17 1.31 + MDBa 38 ,QT Y-,2---C 1 32 MVOLT OEB105 -GROUP N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. NA, 0.752 N A. 50 FT RADIUS 3.0 FC MINIMUMFc 1629 18.2 2.9 2.17 .6 .28 r MD4s C 132 MVOLT GEB10S SINGLE 32 3100 0.950 0.900 0.880 0.752 C_1_32 TUBLiss I CVS PARKING 1.5 FC MINIMUM Fe 0.75 18.2 1.0 3.55 9.58 e OB1x 8 LAH 70M IIRW ALE SINGLE 94 8000 0�74010.950 0950 0.888 LAH_7OM_11RW_ALE.ies OCx 3 AH 7OMHC BAR SINGLE 94 5700 0.720 1 0.950 0 950 0.650 AH_70MHC_BAR -Lies WPx 3 WFL2 70M FT SINGLE 95 : 6000 0.740 0.950. 0.950 0.668 WFL2_7OM_FT.ies POLE SPEC FOR CIMARRON: SINGLE FIXTURE SSS- XX- XX- X -A2 -XX TWIN FIXTURE 180 DEGREE APART SSS- XX- XX- X -C2 -XX 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0o 00 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 DO 00 0.0 Do 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 DO 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Be 00 01 0.1 01 01 01 01 01 01 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0o 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 02 03 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.1 01 01 01 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.1 ' 0.1 0.1 01 02 6.3 0.8 16 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 01 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.1 0.2 03 03 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 -- -- - -` -- - -_E_ _ -- -8989 "4747 °E -18790 - - -- - 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 DO 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 03 04 05 3.1 4.6 4.7 19 2.3 2.6 27 28 2&- 28 2.8 2.8 2.6 25 2,L__18 17 1.9_13. 1.4 19_- 12__06. 0'2 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.1 1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 3.0 57 6'.6 77 6.4 3.8 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.6 46 4!8 4.5 4.4 41 3.6 3.0 2.9 2.6 36 84 12.8 110 4.9 i.d 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 01 0.2 0.4 0.9 2.5 5.3 10.1 8.6 6.7 5.7 6:1 6.2 &3 63 63 62 6.1 5.8 5.1 3.9 4.6 3.7 4.7 9.2'! 15.8 18.5 1 1 3.0 09 0.3 01 0.0 DO 0.0 0.0 01 0.1 03 10.3 0.6 1.7 3.5 5.9 85 43 3.9 48 6.8 97 10.03 2.6 1.0 0.4 0.1 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.9 26 44 4.5 81 8.5 POA `P \ 0 5.4 4.7 5.0 4.8 6.3 5.11 1.9 1.0 04 0.2 01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 10.9 1.5 3.8 5.0 2.9 5.8 52 ; V � 5.6 5.0 5.0 3.8 88 4.0 j67 t1.6 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 00 0.0 00 01 0.2 0.4 09 1.2 .7 51 3.3 3.1 2.6 RMACY 4.8 4.5 4.1 33 3.5 3.6 1.41 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.7 00 0.0 0.0 0., 0.2 5 0.8 15 3.7j' 48 2.7 36 2.2 NORTHERN TYPE A- 12,900S� 42 46 4.7 48 5.3 4. 1,1 0.5 421.10, e.6 0.6 96'10" x 137'6" 0.0 0.0 O1 0.2 5, 0.5 10 2.7 3.9 2.2 31 2.8 52 STALLS REQUIRED 1 35 41 6.5 89 133 9.1 42 13 03 0 01 Do 00 0.0 0.0 0.1 01 03 !0.3 0.7 1.6 2.4 23 2.7, 1.7 58 STALLS PROVIDED i 22 42 as 11.6 1V, 123 55 15 0.3 OnrJ \\o.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 01 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.5 11 34 2.0 j 2.9 51 7.0 10.9 16.7 109 141,2 13 0.2 0.7/0.0 00 DO I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 01 0.3 04 0.5 12 1.9 2.9 2�- ��.___. - -- - A F 7.0 4.9 4.7 ED 143 31 ''6 0,8 0.2 0.1 9r,:118 //10.0 0.0 I -- _ - - ,9 0.81 0 .3 0��,8� 0.0 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 01 0.2 OA 05 08 1.3 1.9 27 39 -�13- �.4-- Sr-- '84-- 66- '66 - --62 55' L3 32 - 3..17 3.0' 70' 76 51 43 4.9 5.4 46 3.2 20 10 0.4 -/'7LLLLL (.00,, 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 '0.6 1.0 0.9 1.3 20 28 3.4 4.2 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.4 5.3 4;4.5 514 _¢.3 4.7 40 4.8 5.2 YO 7.8 6.0 3'.2 14 0.5 O!34- 01)0.0 00 1I 1.. F&��,, _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0:0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 Do 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.1 0.2' -0.7 1.2 1.3 1.9 3,6 3.3 3Y 42 5.4 52 4.9 52 5.2 4.5 5.0 6.8 6.8 6.9 6.1 51 5.1 5.6 6.3 71 97 13.2 14.0 517 1.8 0.7 0.1 0.0 Do 0.0 i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 09 1.5 3.2 71 5.9 3.1. 10 4.0 4.1 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.0 4.3 8.4 112 10.8 7.5 5.4 5.8 6.1-..7:0 91 42.3 16.1 15.6 71 2.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 01 0.3 0.6 0.9 1,3_'46 8.4 6.2 37- �.�7T -- 71:5-- "8T --5"9 .9- 3- t- Z:B -TI.Sl -ff7 -57 7.0 7.8 83 8.3 103 15.2 10.1 5.4 16 02,:01 00 Do 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 OW- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 06 09 1.3 4.3 8.7 89 35 3.2 61 106 12.0 9.2 4.8 2.8 3.8 9.0 12.6 11.8 7.7 5.5 9.0 12.6 12.2 8.5 61 63 4.9 24 0.6 0`1.'.- 0.0 Bo 0.0 0.0 Ea 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.2 06 0.9 14 28 6.4 to 24 82. 7.7 15.5 161 133 52. 22 21. .40. 6A S.8 3,9 4.8 .11.8 182- 17.2 98. 4.0 2.3 16 0.8 01 01 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 FOR PRICING CONTACT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 nil 0.0 0.0 0:0. 0.0..0.0 - -00 0.0 'O.D _0.0 ':0.2 & 11 11..1.3 .2.4 20 1.5_- 26_40 7.2 9.0 6.0 2.2 0.9 0,7 1.0. 1.41y5 =12 1.9 5.3_ 87 80 4.4 1G. 09 U5 0. U1 -Do U0 0.0 D9 0.0 a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Do 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 DO 00- 0.0 00 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.6 07 69 0.9 0.6 OB 1.0 09 0.8 0.8 02 0.1 DI 0.1 02 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 �A:� 0.1 0.0 0.0 o'& 40 00 0.0 00 Weidenbach -Brown Co., Inc. (OP� 5TRU -1 Vi 315 Norwood Park South 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o- so- sa -0�-- ee- -ee - ^a 9� 0.0- 4-0- o.z oa 0.5 Ds 04 0.4 0:6 oa od. oa -0.2 (/'1�//'�� p1� 1 0 - 1 of oa oz o.2 01 01 0:1 0.0o o.o 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0. Norwood, MA 02062 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 01 01 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 02 0.2 01 01 0.1 QQ0 I 0.050 0.0 (10 0.0 0.0 01 0.1 01 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 o.o Tel: 781- 769 -9868 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 0.1 01 0.1 01 0.1 01 01 0.1 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o Fax: 781- 769 -9832 0.0 0.0 0.0 0o 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 0.0 00 0.o 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ao 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 o.0 0.0 00 (10 0.0 o.o 0.o 0.0 00 0.0 E -Mail: CVSSUPPORT @WBLIGHT.COM NOT A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT - FOR DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY i1 THIS LI iH GDESIGNISB DONLIMREDINFORMATIONSUPPUEDBYOTHERSTOHUBBELLLIGHT SITE DETAILS PROVIDED HEREON ARE REPRODUCED ONLY ASA VISUALIZATION AID FIELDDEVIATIONS MAY SIGNIFICA1TYAFFECT PRftxCTED PERT -MANGE PRIORTOINSTAL T10N. CRMC& SITEMFORMATION (P01.ELOCATKK$,ORIEMATiO MOUNlWG IGW.UC18HOtILDBE000RDINATEDW HTHE RACTORANDIORS%CfflE RESPONSI&EFORTHEWR OT 2 UUM!NAIRE DATA IS TESTED TO INDLSTRY STANDARDS UNDER LABORATORY CONDIT -18 OPERATING VOLTAGE AND NORMAL MANUFACTUR44G TOLERANCES OF LAMP BALLAST AND LUMINAIRE MAY AFFECT FIEI.O RESULTS - 1 3 CONFORMANCE TO FACILITY CODE MIDOTHER LOCAL REOUREMENTS!S THE REBFIXA41BILTY OF THE OWNER AND -THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE SCE REVISED FROM DRAWR4G NUI48ER(s)PTLIE _ CAL HUBBELL g I1�N40 A1/9/2010 Graphic Scale 1052187 CVS #�TBD ADC 40 20 0 40 80 180' . PLAN - 0 - - -- Hubbell Lghe g, Inc DRAWINONO Q o -. -- --- - - - - -- - NORTH: RICHFIELD, MN 701 MILLENNIUM BLVD 1052389 28007NNLLE, SC 270' _ _._--- 1-- .- ___ -._ -_. 4 VS /Pharmacy Y 1 1 1fk T_ "mss SOUTH - 66TH STREET ELEVATION )q r �lw MUlun 1 �/rlll�� I -- NORTH - ELEVATION or-_1401; - i AIYf1W /YW.I F C y NORR r ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS _.._.._..__ -1 _-- ' _ i - _..- . -N_ -__ MATERIAL LEGEND STUCCO - SW- 6101- SANDS OF TIME- CORNICE czc STUCCO SW- 0036- BUCKRAM BINDING - PANELS/ DT, CANOPY G BRICK MODULAR 461 - 463 SMOOTH A- BELDEN BRICK BRICK - CVS RED - PINE HALL F ALUMINUM STOREFRONT -CLEAR ANODISED STONE - CANYON BUFF - ARRISCRAFT GROUND FLOOR W114DOWS REQUIREMENTS PENN STREET ELEVATION = 82.5' L.F. TRANSPARENT WINDOW REQUIRED -50% =41.25 LF TRANSPARENT WINDOW PROVIDED = 53 L.F. (64.2 %) I511UTTE R5 AREA INCLUDED) UNOBSTRUCTED GLASS AREA = 14.5 L.F. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS REQUIREMENTS 66TH STREET ELEVATION = 123.0 L.F. TRANSPARENT WINDOW REQUIRED -50 %= 246.00 LF TRANSPARENT WINDOW PROVIDED = 76.33 L.F. (31.0 %) (SHUTTERS AREA INCLUDED; AA VE"'LMEIR, COMPANIES Partners In Development w � LL �v CD t Q H oV V 1 0 9 2u I E F II I I 137 -6" I I I I5' -4" SPANDREL GLASS Cl u II bWPMEM A A.6 B i 1 I ttI I I I I a li� 9 it I 15 — (� I as PHARMACY I I I li � I g D II I I — — L I I 1 mq X I\ I I I \ PHOT 3 L / � REraL � � I � 3.1 I 1 0.5 0.5. o � AREA pp II - I 1 it C• m CHECKC� .H UCLNSE Eiz �I lm I 01— — o I I 4.2 4 — -UP- STAIR - T -11" \ P� r,JIj71 v� I O.H.DOOR EI RECEMNG y FIRE AREA jRISER _ _ _ ___------------------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- --19' -A" - (7' -0" 8/ CLR. GLAZNG) 27' -0' - (7' -0" B/ CLR GLAZING) 9' -6" 9' -6' (S C B/ (7' -0" B/ (3-Ae/ I 1 I I CLR GLAZING) CLR. GLAZING) I I I CLR GLAZING) 5 —* — L FACA" _______ ___ _ ___J 11° 11' -21" 4 B A OO C D E E 4 F F.2 z MEZZANINE PLAN i FLOOR PLAN F -1 SCALE 1/8" = V -0" F -1 SCALE' 1/8" = 1' -0" cvs pohgrrmuc -F NORTHERN TYPE A- 12900 -LEFT HAND CHAMFER DRIVE -THRU STORE NUMBER: w000 NWC 66th ST. & PENN AVE RICHFIELD, MN DEVELOPER M VELMEIR C0MPAN IES PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT 719 OtISwOW Street Suite 1000 Qatmit. MI 48226 YNMM•.MR.CORI CONSUI..TANT: SEAL THIS DRANING :HALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTIC,N PURPOSES UNTIL THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE RESPONSIBLE REGISTRANT APPEARS ON THE DRAWNG, AND PROPER PERMIT FORMS AND RELATED FEES ARE TRANSMITTED BY THE OWNER, OWNER'S AGENT OR CONTRACTOR TO THE AUTHORITY HAMNG JURISDICTION ISSUES: 10 -25 -2010 11 -09 -2010 NORR JOB f. JCDTIO.0234.00 CVS PROJECT MANAGER: R. BESUDEN DRAWING BY. S. ROBACH DATE: 10-25-2010 JOB NUMBER: CS00000 TITLE: OUTLINE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: 0L COMMENTS. NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION i i N 0 R R ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS 71 9 Griswold Street Suite 1000 Detroit, MI 48226 www.norrcom PROPOSED LU U® CD CD S I T E D 4=k OVA V) VLLMLIR COMPANIES Partners In Development v co E CL :.i 11.09.2010 6528 Penn Ave - PUD 11/10 Comprehensive Plan LDR LDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR LDR MIXED MIXED ,LD HDR HDR HDR HDR MIXED R Proposed Development MHD HDR HDR Parcel MIXED MIXED M MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED N 0 62.5 125 MHD 250 375 500 Feet MIXED LEGEND LDR - Low Density Residential MHD - Medium High Density Residential HDR - High Density Residential CCO - Community Commercial/Office MIXED - Mixed Use MIXED MIXED I W Z 66TH STREET Q z MIXED CCO CCO CCO CCO CCO MIXED a MIXED MIX MIXED MIXED - LDR LDR LDR FED MHD MIX N 0 62.5 125 MHD 250 375 500 Feet MIXED LEGEND LDR - Low Density Residential MHD - Medium High Density Residential HDR - High Density Residential CCO - Community Commercial/Office MIXED - Mixed Use R PMR R Y R R 6528 Penn Ave - PUD 11/10 Surrounding Zoning 1.9 R R R R R R R R R R R R MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC 0 MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC M MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC I/ MILOY_L MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC N 0 62.5 125 250 375 LEGEND R - Single Family Residential MR - Multi- Family Residential (discontinued) MR -2 - Multi - Family Residential PMR - Planned Multi - Family Residential C -2 - General Commercial 500 MU -C - Mixed Use - Community m Feet PAC - Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay MR -3 MU -C /PAC �4 -3 MU-C /PAC MU-C /PAC Proposed Development: R Parcel MR -3 MU -C /P New Zone - PMU U -C /PA MU -C /PAC l W M a 66TH STREET a z Z W C -2 C -2 C -2 C MU -C /PAC a -2 MU -C /PAC MU -C /PAC ZR MU -C /PAC R MR -2 MU -C /PAC MU -C/ MU -C /PAC MR -2 N 0 62.5 125 250 375 LEGEND R - Single Family Residential MR - Multi- Family Residential (discontinued) MR -2 - Multi - Family Residential PMR - Planned Multi - Family Residential C -2 - General Commercial 500 MU -C - Mixed Use - Community m Feet PAC - Penn Avenue Corridor Overlay AGENDA SECTION: OTHER BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 8 REPORT # 11 R J STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 11, 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: CiTA-)q, KRUMHOLZ, EXEC. COORDINATOR TITLE REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of designating representatives to serve as 2011 liaisons to various metropolitan agencies and City commissions. I. RECOMMENDED CTION: By Motion: Designate Council liaison appointments for 2011 to various metropolitan agencies and City commissions. III. BACKGROUND I Members of the City Council serve as the City's representatives on various metropolitan agencies and City commissions. Each year, the Council appoints these representatives. Staff will notify the agencies and commissions of the appointments. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • Each year, the City Council appoints representatives to serve as liaisons on various metropolitan agencies and City commissions. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • The City needs representation on metropolitan agencies and commissions. IIV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) I • ueter the ciesianatlon to a Tuture V. ATTACHMENTS Liaison appointment list. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None. 0111 liaisons AGENCY 2010 LIAISON 2011 LIAISON METRO CITIES DEBBIE GOETTEL, REP. COMM. SERVICES COMMISSION PAT ELLIOTT; FRED WROGE; TOM FITZHENRY; ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH SUE SANDAHL, ALTS. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES DEBBIE GOETTEL, REP. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION SUE SANDAHL, ALT. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TOM FITZHENRY, REP. FRIENDSHIP CITY COMMISSION PAM DMYTRENKO, ALT. NOISE TOM FITZHENRY, REP. ARTS COMMISSION DEBBIE GOETTEL, ALT. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SUE SANDAHL, LIA. PROPERTY EXCELLENCE TASK TOM FITZHENRY, ALT. 1 -35W SOLUTIONS ALLIANCE SUE SANDAHL, LIA. RICHFIELD COMMUNITY HUMAN PAT ELLIOTT, ALT. SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL MIKE EASLTING, STAFF LIA. 494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION SUE SANDHAL, LIA. PAT ELLIOTT, ALT. SOUTHWEST CABLE COMMISSION KRISTIN ASHER, STAFF LIA. MCWD /NMCWD DEBBIE GOETTEL PAT ELLIOTT PLANNING COMMISSION PAT ELLIOTT, LIA. DEBBIE GOETTEL, ALT. COMM. SERVICES COMMISSION FRED WROGE, LIA. PAT ELLIOTT, ALT. ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH DEBBIE GOETTEL, LIA. TOM FITZHENRY, ALT. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION PAT ELLIOTT, LIA. DEBBIE GOETTEL, ALT. FRIENDSHIP CITY COMMISSION PAT ELLIOTT, LIA. SUE SANDAHL, ALT. ARTS COMMISSION DEBBIE GOETTEL, LIA. SUE SANDAHL, ALT. PROPERTY EXCELLENCE TASK TOM FITZHENRY, LIA. FORCE FRED, WROGE, ALT. RICHFIELD COMMUNITY HUMAN DEBBIE GOETTEL, REP. SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL FOWL BOARD DEBBIE GOETTEL, REP. FRED WROGE, ALT. SOUTHWEST CABLE COMMISSION FRED WROGE, REP. STEVE DEVICH, REP. SUE SANDAHL, ALT. RICHFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY DEBBIE GOETTEL RICHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT PAT ELLIOTT, REP. FRED WROGE, ALT. wl 01/05/11 AGENDA SECTION: OTHER BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 9 REPORT # 12 STAFF REPORT MWWAA CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 119 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: CHER)U KRUMHOLZ, EXEC. COORDINATOR REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Discussion regarding Council attendance at 2011 National League of Cities Conferences and N.O.I.S.E. Conference. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Designate Council Member(s) to attend the March 12 -16, 2011 National League of Cities (NLC) Congressional Conference; July 2011 N.O.I.S.E. Conference; and the November 8 -12, 2011 NLC Congress of Cities Conference. II. BACKGROUND According to State Statute 471.66, the governing body of cities and school districts must adopt a policy that controls out -of -state travel for elected officials. That policy was adopted by the City Council in November 2005 and stipulates that the City Council must approve, in advance by a motion, attendance at out -of -state conferences. The general guidelines for evaluating out -of -state travel opportunities are listed in the policy. Information regarding the 2011 N.O.I.S.E. conference typically held in July and the November 2011 NLC Congress of Cities in Phoenix, AZ conference will be provided to the City Council when the agendas become available. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION 7�= 0111 conferences A. POLICY • The Council has determined that attendance at the NLC and N.O.I.S.E. Conferences is beneficial to the City's operations and long - range planning efforts. B. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES • While the City continues to face revenue reductions from the State, it is even more critical that the Council remains in the informational loop regarding congressional activities as it relates to airport/aviation activities, federal funds and homeland security issues. C. FINANCIAL Funds for one Council Member to attend the NLC Conference(s) are budgeted in the City's 2011 budget. The N.O.I.S.E. Conference is budgeted in the HRA 2011 budget. The estimated total cost of each conference, including registration, flight, lodging and per diem, is $2500 per Council Member. The City Council may wish to take into consideration the financial constraints facing the City for 2011. D. LEGAL • According to State Statute 471.66, the governing body of cities and school districts must adopt a policy that controls out -of -state travel for elected officials. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS N/A IV. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) • Address this issue prior to each conference. • Decline to send Council delegates to any or only designated conferences. V. ATTACHMENT (S) List of conferences. VI. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING None. q -( COUNCIL MEMBER ATTENDANCE AT NATIONAL CONFERENCES 2008-2011 CONFERENCE DATE LOCATION ATTENDEES COST 2008 NLC March 8 -12 Washington, DC Goettel $2520 Congressional city NOISE Jul 16 -18 Dulles, VA None None NLC Congress November 11 -15 Orlando, FL None None of Cities 2009 NLC March 14 -18 Washington, DC None None Congressional city NOISE TBD (typically TBD None None Jul NLC Congress November 10 -14 San Antonio, TX Sandahl $2380 of Cities 2010 NLC March 13 -17 Washington, DC Goettel None Congressional City NOISE TBD (typically TBD None None Jul NLC Congress Nov. 30 -Dec. 4 Denver, CO None None of Cities 2011 NLC March 12 -16 Washington, DC Congressional city NOISE TBD (typically TBD Jul NLC Congress Nov.8 -12 Phoenix. AZ of Cities 01/05/11 AGENDA SECTION: OTHER BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 10 REPORT # 13 STAFF REPORT =09da CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 119 2011 REPORT PREPARED BY: CHERYL KRUMHOLZ, EXEC. COORDINATOR REviEwED By CITY I 9��A'Vro � :7i�f� ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the designation of Mayor Pro Tempore for 2011. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Cky Council designation of Mayor Pro Tempore for 2011. III. BACKGROUND It is necessary to designate a City Council Member to serve as the Mayor Pro Tempore for those times when the Mayor is absent from the City. City Council Member Sue Sandahl served as Mayor Pro Tempore for 2010. III. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION A. POLICY • Each year the City Council designates a Council Member to serve as the Mayor Pro Tempore. B. CRITICAL ISSUES • It is necessary to designate a Mayor Pro Tempore to ensure continuation of City operations during an absence of the Mayor. IV. ALTERNATIVE KECOMMENDATION(S) • Defer the designation to a future Council meeting. V. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING ° 0111 MayorPro"rempore