2025-08-06 TC MinutesMINUTES
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING
BARTHOLOMEW ROOM, CITY HALL
Wednesday, August 6th, 2025, 7:00 PM
Commissioners in attendance: Jacob Olson, Stella Yang, Adam Knosalla, Brinnon Kubista,
Eli Straub, Jaz Warren, Louis Dzierzak, David Gepner
Commissioners absent: McKenzie Burke
City Staff: Matt Hardegger, Jake Whipple, Olivia Wycklendt, Joe Powers
Liaisons: Sean Hayford Oleary (City Council), Husniyah Bradley (Community Services
Commission), Ben Surma (Planning Commission), Jan Matheus (Bike/Walk Richfield)
1. Call meeting to order
Chair Dzierzak called meeting to order at 7:00 PM
2. Review & approve agenda
Commissioner Kubista moved to approve the agenda. Second by Commissioner
Knosalla. Motion approved.
3. Review & approve minutes for June 4th meeting
Commissioner Warren moved to approve the minutes from June 4th. Second by
Commissioner Yang. Motion approved.
4. Metro Transit Arterial BRT Study Update
Metro Transit Principal Planner Jake Knight provided an update on Metro Transit’s
ongoing study to identify the next three arterial bus rapid transit lines (aBRT. This
included an overview of the differences between regular route local bus service and
aBRT service, an overview of the existing aBRT network, a discussion of screening
criteria used, and a discussion of the remaining 10 routes. The remaining candidate
lines included four routes in Richfield – Route 4 (Penn Ave), Route 14 (Bloomington
Ave north of 66th Street), Route 18 (Nicollet Ave), and Route 515 (66th
Street/Bloomington Ave). Public engagement will be ongoing through August.
Commissioners Warren and Kubista discussed data collection timing and methods,
and inquired what the remainder of the process will look like. Knight responded that
ridership data was collected in fall 2024 with an online comment map available for
current feedback, and a third engagement period would occur when finalist routes are
selected.
Commissioner Gepner asked about the timing of the study, specifically why they
hadn’t been doing this type of study previously since they’d been operating a bus
system for years. Knight responded that Metro Transit is looking to create more
efficient transit lines and increase service and ridership on important lines.
Chair Dzierzak asked if Metro Transit was hoping to drive mode shift to transit by
increasing ridership and lowering vehicle traffic. Knight said the goal for arterial BRT
is to grow ridership, which can result in some mode shift to transit, but it is not a
direct consideration factor for route selection.
Councilmember Hayford Oleary stated that he thinks the 515 should not be upgraded,
since the existing route serves the city well and removing stops would make the route
less accessible for residents. Route 4 on Penn Avenue would serve the city well by
spreading out BRT lines. Route 18 is very close to Portland Ave (D Line) and would be
MINUTES
less geographically useful for Richfield, but if it were selected, it should extend further
south into Bloomington than has been shown to date.
Planning Commission Liaison Surma asked how Metro Transit determined which
branch of the 4 to use for BRT (Penn or Lyndale). Knight answered that this was
studied during Metro Transit’s pervious Network Next study.
Commissioner Straub supported the Route 4 upgrade to spread routes around
Richfield.
Commissioner Knosalla asked whether the Route 18 would remain with more frequent
stops if it were upgraded, and whether a Penn route would be coordinated with
ongoing design. Knight answered the future of Route 18 would be studied further if
the route is upgraded, local routes do occasionally remain in parallel. Metro Transit
has been actively coordinating with Hennepin County on the Penn Ave project.
Commissioner Kubista stated concerns with the current speed of the Bloomington Ave
route (14) and thought a BRT upgrade would benefit riders.
Commissioner Gepner stated that he’d like to see faster service across Richfield,
especially east-west on Route 515, and would like that route to be upgraded.
Transportation Engineer Hardegger summarized that the Commission preferred that
Route 4 and Route 14 be upgraded to BRT, was against any upgrade to Route 515,
and was neutral on Route 18. Summary was accepted by acclamation, Commissioner
Gepner dissenting on the Commission’s opposition to upgrading Route 515
specifically.
5. 2026 Sidewalk Projects Intro
Transportation Engineer Hardegger gave an overview of three sidewalk projects
planned for 2026: A Safe Routes to School (SRTS) project at Sheridan Hills
Elementary that received grant funding in 2024, and two Pedestrian Master Plan
sidewalk routes on 64th and 73rd Streets that received Met Council Regional
Solicitation funding in 2023. Engagement plans were presented for each project along
with expected challenges and expected timelines.
Chair Dzierzak asked about the construction timeline. The SRTS project would be
June to August while school is out, 64th and 73rd would be completed by
September/October 2026.
Councilmember Hayford Oleary asked what improvements at 64th and Nicollet would
be. Hardegger answered that it would require coordination with the County. Potential
options include a median and/or an RRFB, but it is unlikely that the County would
support an RRFB. Councilmember Hayford Oleary expressed support for an RRFB at
that spot.
Councilmember Hayford Oleary asked where the 73rd project would need to switch
sides of the road. Hardegger replied that the preferred scenario is a continuous north
side facility, but if that cannot be built within budget due to curb replacement costs,
the walk would be on the south only between Portland and 12th. Hardegger also
confirmed that all proposed walks would be 6 feet wide, with a potentially narrower
boulevard on 73rd in constrained areas. Councilmember Hayford Oleary expressed
desire to build any new trails 10 feet wide.
MINUTES
Commissioner Olson asked whether the Nicollet/64th Street intersection was part of
the upcoming reconstruction.
Councilmember Hayford Oleary mentioned that there was a poor quality sidewalk on
Nicollet between 64th and 62nd that needs to be upgraded, hopefully with county
support.
Hardegger said they will come back with these projects in November and encouraged
Commissioners who live near the projects to attend any neighborhood meetings.
6. Hennepin County CSAH 32 (Penn Avenue) Technical Analysis
HC Project Manager Matt Huggins presented about upcoming public engagement and
timeline for the Penn Avenue Reconstruction planned for 2028.
Traffic Engineer Graham Johnson presented a technical analysis of traffic in the
project area including historical crash data before and after the re-stripe. Traffic
counts were taken in May, with supplemental counts in the fall due to construction
effects in May. Speed data was collected at 3 locations. At all 3 locations, 60-70% of
the traffic was speeding with an 85th percentile 3-5 mph over the speed limit. Vehicle,
bike, and pedestrian volumes were taken at each intersection for warrant analysis.
Warrants were met for the existing signals at 64th, 66th, and 76th. Warrants were not
met for a new signal but were met to keep the signal at 69th Street. No warrants were
met at 75th Street. Johnson also discussed expected growth rates for population and
county VMT reduction goals, which led to a projected flat traffic level out to 2050.
Commissioner Yang asked if the crashes in the data are reported crashes. Johnson
answered yes, only reported crashes are included in the database.
Commissioner Warren asked how the crash data compares to similar corridors.
Johnson answered that the corridor is safe relative to the data, especially with no
fatal crashes in last 10 years.
Liaison Bradley asked why counts were taken for 14 hours and whether that covered
mornings or evenings. Johnson said those 14 hours typically cover 85-90% of daily
traffic, and they count 6am-8pm on a single day.
Liaison Matheus pointed out that the signal at 75th Street is the middle school and
should not be removed. PM Huggins mentioned that warrants are largely used for
state aid eligibility for costs, and that the County is aware of the high school density
at the intersection (three schools).
Olson asked whether improved pedestrian crossings are taken into account for
volume warrants, if better ped facilities increase demand.
Johnson and Huggins answered that warrants are based on existing counts, but the
county is aware of the safe routes to school issues that have been identified in the
area.
Lance Bernard from Transportation Collaborative (TC^2) presented on parking along
Penn Ave corridor. Parking counts were taken during peak periods on Tuesdays,
Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays of both off and on street parking usage within a
block of Penn Ave. Segments of the corridor did high street parking utilization,
especially immediately south of 66th. Some individual parking lots were also at
capacity during peak periods. Overall, there did not appear to be less parking
available than current demand..
MINUTES
Chair Dzierzak was interested to see what the engagement feedback shows with
respect to perceptions of parking for businesses on Penn.
Councilmember Hayford Oleary reiterated his desire to see on-street parking in the
business district, since a district-wide approach is unlikely. Other on-street parking
that the city has added recently (6600 and 7600 blocks of Lyndale) have high
utilization in areas that would have had low counts prior to the project.
Bernard mentioned that he had finished doorknocking at all the businesses along
Penn prior to the meeting. Commissioner Gepner asked if he had spoken to a
principal or manager at all of them, Bernard replied that they had talked to an owner
or manager, or gotten the contact information of the correct person if they were not
available.
Tom Kaiser, Zan Associates, presented on the public engagement process they plan
on implementing for this project. Open House 1 will be collecting experiences of
people on Penn today and providing background information. Kaiser noted that many
people will be familiar with previous outreach plans on Penn Ave and wants to
integrate those previous studies. The event will be on August 20 from 4:30-7pm at
St. Richards Church. Postcards were sent to 4400 addresses.
Commissioner Olson asked if the project team will be at PennFest. Kaiser confirmed
they would.
Huggins stated the project team would likely be back to the Commission
approximately every 3 months until a design is finalized.
7. Project Updates
a) City Staff
o Updates were provided on ongoing construction projects, including the
Hwy 62 sound wall, 70th Street SRTS, 73rd Street trail, Nicollet Ave, 494,
and cracksealing. Traffic concerns from construction traffic for 494 were
discussed, most have been passed to Public Safety. A speed sign was
placed west of Nicollet to attempt to calm traffic in advance of the
closure.
b) Liaisons
o City Council
i. Councilmember Hayford Oleary and Joe Powers updated the
commission about the 494 work session with MNDOT. Council
discussed the ramps at 35W and 76th street, bike and trail facilities
along 78th street, the 2nd Ave pedestrian bridge, and noisewalls west
of Penn on 78th Street. MnDOT will not revisit noisewall voting from
Phase 1, and will not be making any changes to the 2nd Ave ped
bridge. MnDOT is expecting to build a new pedestrian bridge at 73rd
Street over 35W in 2030. Wood Lake Nature Center had a
groundbreaking ceremony, construction is expected to finish in Fall
2026. Pool improvements will be coming in 2026 as well, mostly
maintenance. Approval was given to a development at 65th and
Penn. Legion Apartments proposal near Veterans Park was not well
received. 66th Street median concerns have been heard and council
is working with Public Works to improve. Richfield Lake issues with
overgrowth and geese are also being studied.
o Community Services Commission
MINUTES
i. Liaison Bradley updated on upcoming events that CSC will be tabling
at in advance of the new Community Center plans.
o Planning Commission
i. Liaison Surma updated the commission on new zoning code changes
that the Planning Commission sent to City Council for approval.
o Richfield Public Schools
i. Liaison Matheus offered an update for Liaison Brackett that Richfield
was recognized at a statewide SRTS conference for increases in
biking/walking percentages.
o Bike/Walk Richfield –
i. Liaison Matheus discussed Learn to Ride programs for kids and noted
that Richfield is a leader in youth bike education.
8. Other Business
a) Bike Tour start time and route – Currently planned for September regular
meeting.
o Engineer Hardegger previewed the route for the bike tour and reminded
commissioners that the meeting would start at 6pm.
9. Upcoming events/meeting(s)
a) Wed, August 20th, 4:30pm-7:00pm: Penn Avenue Open House #1, St.
Richard Catholic Church (7540 Penn Ave S)
b) Wed, September 3rd, 6:00pm: Transportation Commission Meeting (Bike
tour, meet at City Hall)
10. Adjournment
Commissioner Knosalla moved to adjourn the meeting. Second by Commissioner
Straub. Motion adopted. Meeting adjourned at 8:55pm.