The URL can be used to link to this page

2003-02-18.,MAN RICHFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NDA Tuesday, February 18, 2003 - 7 p.m. Richfield Community Center 7000 Nicollet Ave Commission Members i Robert Deb -,Gary Ness � Chad Sharkey . Glc:na Hamernick /Jana Pan ,Russ Susag —Rick Jabs � Rodney Schmidt ,Gordon Vizecky ,,Barb Kritzman � Linda Slocum 1. Call to Order ❑ Welcome New Members! • Gloma Hamernick • Jana Pan • Rodney Schmidt • Russ Susag 2. Approval of Minutes _ ❑ Regular Meeting of January 21, 2003 Regular Staff iJim Topitzhofer (Staff Liaison) -1John Evans (Secretary) Liaisons ohn Enger (Council) Mark Tolvstad (Planning Com) ZVt i4 A �� / a ivv�'l �'R lr Yh �),1.1 l ' S•ri��I iT � K O�/^�.-�f/A-\YKe++++q� �j�, 6I.-FC /1rtOf.F 3. Public Comment 0 ❑ Opportunity to discuss items not printed on the agenda 4. Action Items ❑ Appoint Chair, Vice Chair, Planning Commission Liaison, Community Human Services Planning Council Liaison, Transportation Committee Liaisons, FOWL Board Liaison, Ballfield Improvement Task Force Liaisons, and Veterans Park Master Plan Task Force Liaisons (Jabs) 5. Discussion Items ❑ Off -Leash Dog Park (Topitzhofer) ❑ 2004-2010 Capital Improvement Budget & Plan (Topitzhofer) 6. Committee Reports ❑ Ballfield Improvement Taskforce (Jabs and Kritzman) ❑ FOWL (Dietl) ❑ Planning Commission (Kritzman) ❑ Richfield Community Human Services Planning Council [RCHSPC] (Slocum) ❑ Community Center Remodeling (Topitzhofer) ❑ Veterans Park Master Plan Taskforce (Jabs) 7. Staff Reports ❑ Recreation Services • 2002 City Council Goals/Department Accomplishments 8. Other 9. Next Meeting [REGULAR MARCH 18 MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED] ❑ Annual Joint Planning Commission/Community Services Commission Meeting Monday, March 24 / 5:30 p.m. (potluck dinner) 6:00 p.m. (discussion of C/P) Richfield City Council Chambers 6700 Portland Ave 10. Adjournment 4A'�t- PC �s IC�1S Pc V �3�_Fout_ o s�10 is � �Sgr� p -fuf Off -Leash Pilot Program Summary Page I of 6 Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department Off -Leash Dog Area Pilot Program Summary February 5, 1999 BACKGROUND A citizens' group, Responsible Owners of Mannerly Pets (ROMP), made a presentation at the October 8, 1996, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission meeting requesting establishment of one or more designated off -leash dog areas within the park system. ROMP cited several successful off - leash programs throughout the United States. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation staff reviewed both local and national response to citizen requests for off -leash areas. On January 11, the Parks and Recreation Commission endorsed a staff proposal to establish two off -leash areas for a pilot program beginning June 27, 1997 and running through December 31, 1998. The off -leash areas were located at Rice Creek Regional Trail Corridor in Shoreview and the Lower Afton area of Battle Creek Regional Park in Maplewood. The areas were not associated with established recreation areas, one of the criteria in site selection. The Rice Creek site was approximately five acres; Battle Creek was approximately 4 acres. Mowed corridors (where pets are required to be leashed) provided transition areas from trails and parking lots. Mowed perimeter trails and signage defined the off -leash area boundaries. The creation of the sites was not part of the department's 1997 operating budget. In recognition of the cooperative effort between the department and the citizens' group, ROMP provided a donation of $3,000 for the signage and boundary markings. The department provided staff time and equipment to prepare the sites. PROGRAM SUMMARY Ramsey County's pilot off -leash dog area program concluded on December 31, 1998. The proposal to establish the pilot program indicated that an evaluation of the program would be conducted at its conclusion. This evaluation would determine the future direction of the program, which included discontinuing the program, continuing as is or expanding the program. In order to effectively evaluate the program and determine the future direction, seven evaluation criteria were established: 1. Number of users; 2. Public comments; 3. Natural resource impact; 4. Reduction of illegal activity in other park areas, 5. Expenses associated with the program; and, 6. Off -leash activity occurring in other agencies. Number of Users Two methods of monitoring were used to determine the number of users: staff counts and a file:HC:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local Settings\Temp\off leash_pilot_summary.html0/29/2002 Off -Leash Pilot Program Summary Page 2 of 6 ROMP sign -in book. However, since department staff is not typically in the park system continuously throughout the day, exact use numbers are not available. The following represents an estimation of use: a. Staff Counts Prior to opening the off -leash areas, some off -leash use was observed by staff, although usually not in designated sites. Throughout program: Use would depend on day and time visited. Use was most prevalent during the late afternoon/early evening on weekdays, and Saturday and Sunday throughout the day. Staff most frequently observed 5-10 human users. b. Romp Sign -In Book Examples (1998) for Battle Creek 11 Dates II Number of Users February 13 - February 19 95 I (April I 1 - April 17 211 June 11 - June 17 196 (August 11 - August 17 188 (October 11 - October 17 �l 196 (ROMP estimates number under -reported by approximately 30%.) Public Comments Public comments on the program were received in a variety of methods, including letters, e- mail, web site comments, and phone calls. In addition, the department held a community meeting on Tuesday, January 12, 1999, before the Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission to receive comments on the program. Eighty-one members of the community attended the meeting. a. In Support of the Program 14 e-mail comments . 31 telephone calls 7 letters . 127 comment cards b. Concerns About the Program . Three calls received regarding a perceived increase in illegal off -leash activity near sites. . One call reporting owner's dog being attacked by stray dog. . One call reporting injured dog. Owner originally thought injury was caused by a trap, but no traps were found. c. Community Meeting Members of the community who attended the meeting were asked to respond to four file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local Settings\Temp\off leash_pilot_summary.htm10/29/2002 Off -Leash Pilot Program Summary Page 3 of 6 questions. Comments were summarized as follows: Should Ramsey County provide off -leach dog areas? There was unanimous consent that Ramsey County should provide off -leash dog areas. Individuals cited several positive outcomes of the off -leash dog areas in support of their position, including: • Off -leash dog areas help build community by bringing together individuals of varying interests, abilities and ages. • Off -leash dog areas help keep dogs and people active by getting out of their homes and into the parks. • Dogs have an important role in families and the off -leash areas provide a positive focus for families. • Off -leash activity is a valid recreation use of parkland. How well did the pilot off -leash dog areas function? Individuals were generally satisfied with the pilot program sites. However, they frequently suggested changes that would enhance the sites. Comments included: The pilot program sites provided common meeting space for dogs and their owners. Dogs had the opportunity to socialize with people, other than their owners, meeting strangers and learning tolerance and manners. People followed the rules, cleaned up after their dogs, supervised and controlled their dogs and even extended themselves beyond baseline responsibility. What were the positive aspects of the off -leash dog areas in the pilot program and what changes would you recommend? Positive Aspects • Dogs could run free of the usual hindrances without breaking the law. • Increased health, longevity and well-being for people and dogs. • Off -leash recreation benefits the dogs, their owners and the general public. • Sites are used throughout all seasons of the year. Recommended Changes • Add more sites. • Increase the size of the sites to 10-20 acres. • Add more trash receptacles. • Install fencing. • Consider lighting for winter use. • Allow dogs off leash on entry paths. • Consider inner-city locations. • Provide 'clean" water for dog swimming and cooling -off. • Provide people facilities, including restrooms and drinking water. file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local Settings\Temp\off_leash_pilot_summary.htm10/29/2002 Off -Leash Pilot Program Summary Page 4 of 6 In your opinion, what are the desirable elements of an ideal off -leash dog area? • Clean water for dogs' use. • Drinking water for people. • Restroom facilities. • Variety of terrain. • Safe, convenient parking. • Fencing. • Safety from traffic. • Trash receptacles. • Sites with 10-20 acres. • Inner-city location. • Lighting for winter use. • Adequate signage to inform users and non -users of the areas and the associated rules. Additional comments: • Consider time-share areas such as waterfronts and trails. • Consider use fees to provide off -leash dog areas. Natural Resource Impact The department's Natural Resource Specialist conducted an evaluation of the impact off -leash dog areas have on the natural resources associated with the pilot program sites: • No apparent impact on vegetation or larger wildlife species. • Some impact on nesting birds is possible. • Would not recommend using wooded areas due to potential for increased erosion and greater impact on wildlife. Reduction of Illegal Activity in Other Park Areas The department attempted to determine the effect the off -leash dog areas had on reducing illegal off -leash activity in other park areas. Generally, enforcing illegal off -leash activity is a low priority for law enforcement. Therefore, data is difficult to obtain. The Ramsey County Sheriff Lakes and Trails Unit indicates no perceived difference. In addition, the City of Maplewood indicates that the areas have had little impact, either positive or negative, primarily due to lack of knowledge of the sites. Expenses Associated With the Program • Rule and Directional Signage: $550 per site • Boundary Markings: $425 per site • Temporary Fencing (Battle Creek only): $650 • Minimal operating costs. (Bi-weekly trash removal, occasional mowing, occasional snow compaction with groomer.) file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local Settings\Temp\off_leash_pilot_summary.html0/29/2002 Off -Leash Pilot Program Summary Page 5 of 6 • Materials provided by donation made on behalf of ROMP. • Department provided all labor. Off -Leash Activity Occurring in Other Metropolitan Agencies Anoka County Occasional requests from the public, primarily received by operations staff. Discussed concept internally and identified one possible site (Rum River Central) when park undergoes redevelopment in 2-4 years. Park users generally disregard current ordinance due to limited enforcement. City of Bloomington • Task force established to consider issue. • Preliminary findings indicate two one -acre sites in city parks. • Early summer implementation. Dakota County Department has received informal requests from the public. Discussed internally, but no current plans. Expect to consider issue in 1999. Hennepin Parks • Currently has three sites in operation, each approximately 30 acres in size located in the outer tier areas of the county. No planned modifications to current sites. • Special use permit ($25) required for use of any site. • Some discussion to add a site in one Southern Division park, but no site selected. City of Minneapolis • Citizens Advisory Committee established to study issue. • Recommended that the City and Park Board establish a minimum of six to ten initial sites throughout Minneapolis that will be operational within the next 12-18 months. • Suggested one site per park district, with additional sites placed in areas of identified need. City of St. Paul One small area (<1 acre) near Mears Park to accommodate condominium residents. Internal discussion, but no formal discussion at the Park Commission level. Mayor's Office has received complaints regarding leash laws, primarily after being cited for illegal off -leash activity. Washington County • No formal request from park users, except for ski jouring and dog sledding. • Have identified a potential area in Lake Elmo Park Reserve, but without expressed need, will file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local Settings\Temp\off leash_pilot_summary.htm10/29/2002 Off -Leash Pilot Program Summary Page 6 of 6 not move concept forward. FUTURE DIRECTION Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department has determined that the two off -leash pilot areas were successful. In order to implement the complete program, the department will develop an administrative policy on off -leash areas. The administrative policy will: . Identify the characteristics, amenities, and operation of Ramsey County's off -leash areas. . Define the number and general geographical location of the site(s) in the Ramsey County park system. . Establish a process for reviewing and evaluating sites. The pilot program sites will remain in operation as established in the pilot program until the administrative policy is developed and implemented. These sites will then be subject to review based on the criteria established in the administrative policy. file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local Settings\Temp\off leash_pilot_summary.htm10/29/2002 Page I of 12 Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department Off -Leash Dog Area Program Implementation March 14, 2000 Background A citizens' group, Responsible Owners of Mannerly Pets (ROMP), made a presentation at the October 8, 1996, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Commission meeting requesting establishment of one or more designated off -leash dog areas within the park system. ROMP cited several successful off - leash programs throughout the United States. Ramsey County Park Ordinance Chapter 3, Section T requires pets to be caged or on a leash not more than six (6) feet in length, except in a designated pet exercise or training area. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation staff reviewed both local and national response to citizen requests for off -leash areas. On January 11, 1997, the Parks and Recreation Commission endorsed a staff proposal to establish two off -leash areas for a pilot program beginning June 27, 1997 and running through December 31, 1998. The pilot program was evaluated based on six criteria: 1. Number of users; 2. Public comments; 3. Natural resource impact; 4. Reduction of illegal activity in other park areas; 5. Expenses associated with the program; and, 6. Off -leash activity occurring in other agencies. Results of the pilot program found that the provision of off -leash dog exercise areas is a legitimate recreational program that can be accommodated at carefully selected sites within the County park system. The Off -Leash Dog Area Administrative Policy was developed, which established criteria for the program, including. . The number and general geographical location of the site(s) in the Ramsey County park system; . The characteristics, amenities, and operation of Ramsey County's off -leash areas; . Accessibility goals, and, . A process for reviewing, evaluating, and selecting sites. Site Review Summary In August of 1999, a site review team was formed to examine possible changes to the pilot program sites, and considered additional sites for program expansion. The site review team members were off - leash users who resided in different geographic regions of the County, as well as a Parks and Recreation Commission liaison and department representatives: file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local S...\off leash_program implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 2 of 12 • Roseanne Carbone, St. Paul • Barb Heideman, Falcon Heights • Rose Quaday, Shoreview • Laura Jean Rathmann, St. Paul • Deb Schneider, White Bear Lake • Philip Jenni, St. Paul (Park and Recreation Commission Liaison) • Larry Holmberg, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department • Greg Mack, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department • Bill Schnieder, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department • Mark Themig, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department The review team examined six sites to determine how each site would meet the criteria established in the Administrative Policy. The following are the results of the review: Site Battle Creek Regional Park, Maplewood (Pilot Program Site) Woodview - Reservoir Woods Open Space, Roseville Bald Eagle -Otter Lakes Regional Park, White Bear Township Summary of Review Reviewed site for possible expansion to north to increase size and permit access to water. Reviewed both the Woodview Open Space (operated by Ramsey County) and the Reservoir Woods Open Space (operated by the City of Roseville) for possible location of additional off -leash area. Two sites were reviewed for possible creation of off -leash area: Bald Eagle segment and Otter Lake segment. Summary of Findings Existing site meets criteria and expansion will better serve increasing use. Expansion will also provide access to water for dog use. Expansion gf.vite to north is recommended. Reservoir Woods: Roseville's master plan for this site will not accommodate off -leash activity. Woodview: Site meets criteria and serves population in the center of the County. Potential for accessible area at site. Creation: of site at Woodview Open Space is recommended. Bald Eagle Segment: Site lacks close parking. Master plan indicates trail development, which may interfere with off - leash use. Otter Lake Segment: Site meets criteria, has existing parking, and a variety of terrain and vegetation. file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local S... \off leash_program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 3 of 12 Rice Creek Regional Trail Site was reviewed for possible Corridor, Shoreview dog access to Rice Creek. Vadnais-Snail Lakes Regional Park, Shoreview Island Lake County Park, Shoreview Proposed Action Two sites were reviewed for possible water access: north side of Snail Lake and south side of Snail Lake. Site was reviewed for possible water access to Island Lake. Creation of site at Otter Lake is reeonnnendeel Water access would be separate from existing facility, require extensive fencing, and provide limited access area. Providing access to water at Rice Creek is not recommended Minor expansion of existing site is recommended Sites do not meet criteria. North side has extensive vegetation along shoreline. South side has limited space and is adjacent to active recreation areas. Providing water access is not recommended at either site. Site does not meet criteria. Vegetation is extensive along shoreline and site size is limited. Providing water access is not recommended at this site. The following outlines proposed action. However, implementation of any of these steps depends on the availability of funding. 1. Expand the Battle Creek site north to provide water access.* 2. Create an additional off -leash site at Otter Lake.* 3. Realign parking lot and conduct minor expansion at Rice Creek.* 4. Create site at Woodview Open Space with additional accessible area.* 5. Continue to research and attempt to identify additional water access areas. (*Details on proposed action follow.) Funding Funds have not been allocated in the department's operating budget for this program. In order to file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local S...\off_leash—program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 4 of 12 implement the program, funding sources will need to be explored. As with other elements of the off - leash efforts, a partnership with the off -leash area users to explore funding will facilitate implementation of the program. Three possible funding opportunities have been identified: 1. Corporate Sponsorship and/or Grants Funding may be available from corporations such as pet food suppliers, veterinarian suppliers, granting agencies, etc. If these types of sources are identified, it might be more beneficial to have off -leash users apply for any funding, rather than the County. 2. User Donations Donations were received for the creation of the pilot program. Additional funds could be solicited from users to continue development. 3. User fees The concept of user fees could be explored. Although fees are charged for special use areas such as picnic shelters and pavilions, fees are not charged for general park use. In addition to developing fee policies and procedures, the issue of enforcement would need to be considered in greater detail. Battle Creek Regional Park Off -Leash Dog Area Summary • This pilot program site was evaluated for it's current use, as well as possible expansion. • Due to increased publicity and proximity to St. Paul, use at this site has grown considerably over the past three years. • User comments have indicated a desire for increased space, as well as access to water for dog use that is currently out of the site boundaries. • Many users have expressed concern regarding McKnight Road. Fencing should be installed along McKnight. Proposed Action • Extend off -leash border north to provide access to pond. • Relocate existing boundary markings to accurately reflect off -leash border. • Relocate trail away from small pond to reduce erosion. • Install crossing or bridge at deep culvert. • Re-route trail around second culvert. • Maintain existing circular trail. • Install fencing along McKnight from southern border of area to north of pond. • Install gate at McKnight entrance. file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\L.ocal 5... \off leash_program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 5 of 12 Potential Future Action • Create new access to the off -leash area from the new Upper Afton parking lot. . Install bulletin board at picnic table. • Improve turf in high use areas. Timeline Spring 2000, pending available funding Application of Administrative Policy Characteristic Policy Goal Size ( Sites should be approximately 10 acres. Buffer Zones 100' buffer zone should be established around perimeter to avoid conflict with other park users or adjacent land uses. Perimeter Carsonite markings with labels placed Markings every 100'. Estimated pricing per marking (with labels on front and back) is $17.25. Fencing Where 100' buffer zone is not feasible, fencing may be considered to buffer use areas. Estimated pricing on "hog wire" type fencing (installed) is $3.50/►inear ft. Double gates run approximately $400. Signage Rules signs will be posted at each entrance to the off -leash area. Directional signs may be posted where necessary. Estimated sign pricing is $250 for rules signs, $100 for directional signs. _ Water Access for Access to water for dog use will be a Dogs high priority. _ I A minimtun of 10 vehicular parking (Parking 1 spaces will be provided. Review Team Findings Expansion of the site to the north would create an additional 4.5 acres. creating a total off -leash area of 10.9 acres. Buffer zone could be established throughout the majority of the site. However, the perimeter may come close to a trail running along McKnight. Perimeter is approximately 4,000'. Approximately 30 markings exist. Additional 10 markings would be needed Fencing along McKnight should be considered. Pilot program users have expressed concern about the proximity of the site to McKnight. Approximately 1275 feet of fencing would be required. Two rule signs exist. A third rule sign and directional sign may be required if an official access is created to the north. Expansion of the site will provide water access to small pond on north end of site. Ample parking exists at the Lower Afton lot, Additional parking exists at Upper Afton. Estimated F-1015 Ct Fencing = $4,500 Double Gate = is i $400 $350 file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungersJ\i.ocal S... \off leash_program implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 6 of 12 Drinking Water Potable water will not be provided, I Drinking water available at picnic I unless in place, pavilion. Restroom Restroom facilities will be provided in Portable restroom currently being $55/month Facilities close proximity to the off -leash areas. provided at the Lower Afton parking lot. In most cases, these will be portable facilities. Two receptacles are in place. If access is Trash Trash receptacles and removal service Receptacles will be provided at each entrance created from the north (Upper Afton Lot), point. Additional receptacles will be an additional receptacle may be required, provided where necessary. Picnic A picnic table or bench will be One picnic table in use. No additional TablesBenclres provided for each off -leash area. tables proposed. Accessibility Priority will be given to sites that can , Developing an official trail link to Upper accommodate access for individuals Afton parking lot could provide with disabilities. At least one site in accessibility to site. However, making the system will include an accessible entire site accessible would be difficult trail from the parking lot to the due to terrain. interior of the site. Woodview Open Space Off -Leash Dog Area Summary • This possible expansion site was identified because it could serve the population in the center of the county. • It is a large open space site that is currently underutilized. The primary use area would be an area that was previously used as garden plots. However, this site may not be useable during wet period. • An additional 1.2 acre area could be made accessible but would need to be fenced. • Parking does not exist on the site. However, future plans include a parking lot and trail access to the Reservoir Woods area. Fencing may be needed along trail segment. • Larpenteur Avenue is a busy street and fencing may be necessary on the roadside perimeter. • There is no water access. Proposed Action • Create site with primary access off of Larpenteur Avenue. • Trail/path route would need to be determined and cleared. • Create additional accessible fenced site. Timeline file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungersAocal S... \off leash_program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 7 of 12 • Summer 2000, pending available funding. Application of Administrative Policy Characteristic II Policy Goal Size II Sites should be approximately 10 acres. Buffer Zones 100' buffer zone should be established around perimeter to avoid conflict with other park users or adjacent land uses. Perimeter Carsonite markings with labels Markings placed every 100'. Estimated pricing per marking (with labels on front and back) is $17.25. Fencing Where 100' buffer zone is not feasible, fencing may be considered to buffer use areas. Estimated pricing on "hog wire" type fencing (installed) is $3.5011inear ft. Double gates run approximately $400. Signage Rules signs will be posted at each entrance to the off -leash area. Directional signs may be posted where necessary. Estimated sign pricing is $250 for rules signs. $100 for directional signs. Water Access I for Dogs Parking Review Team Findings Initial boundaries indicate that the primary site would be 8 acres, with an additional 1.2 acre accessible area. No existing uses. However, future trail and parking lot would require fencing in some areas. is approximately 2,5001 . ately 25 markings would be needed. Fencing along Larpenteur should be considered (900'). Additional fencing along trail may be needed (770'). Entire accessible site would need fencing (900'). f Two rule signs would need to be installed. Access to water for dog use will be a No water access available. high priority. A minimum of 10 vehicular parking spaces will be provided. Construction of 20-car parking lot is planned for 2000 and fmtded by the City of Roseville. Estimated Costs • Fencing 1 along Larpenteur = $3,150 • Fencing along trail = $2,695 • Accessible area fencing = $3,150 • Double Gates (2) $500 file ://C:\Documents and Settings\yungersJ\Local S... \off leash_program implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 8 of 12 Drinking Water 'Potable water will not be provided, unless in place. Restroom Restroom facilities will be provided Facilities in close proximity to the off -leash areas. In most cases, these will be portable facilities. No drinking water. Portable restrooms would be provided. Trash Trash receptacles and removal Trash receptacles would be provided at Receptacles service will be provided at each each entrance. entrance point. Additional receptacles will be provided where necessary. Picnic A picnic table or bench will be One picnic table would be provided. Tables/Benches provided for each off -leash area. Accessibility Priority will be given to sites that can accommodate access for individuals with disabilities. At least one site in the system will include an accessible trail from the parking lot to the interior of the site. Potential for creation of smaller Cost of paved accessible area with paved trail access. trails (to be Due to proximity of parking lot and determined). trail, fencing would be needed. Bald Eagle/Otter Lakes Regional Park Off -Leash Dog Area Summary • This possible expansion site was identified because it could serve residents in the northeastern part of the County. The site is a large open space area that is not established for other types of recreational use. It is relatively flat, with both wooded and open areas. • Although much of the site is adjacent to Otter Lake, weeds would limit water access to only the boat launch area. It is thought that this would not conflict with boaters because the launch has relatively low use. • Existing parking is available. • Fencing along Otter Lake Road may need to be considered. Proposed Action • Create site with access from the parking lot south of the boat launch. • Boat launch area could provide water access. • Area along Otter Lake Road may need fencing. Timeline • Spring, 2000 file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local S... \off_leash_program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 9 of 12 Application of Administrative Policy Characteristic I Policy Goal Size Sites should be approximately 10 acres. Zones 100' buffer zone should be established around perimeter to avoid conflict with other park users or adjacent land uses. Perimeter I Carsoulte markings with labels placed Markings every 100'. Estimated pricing per marking (with labels on front and back) is $17.25. Fencing Where 100' buffer zone is not feasible, fencing may be considered to buffer use areas. Estimated pricing on "hog wire" type fencing (installed) is $3.50/linear ft. Double gates nm approximately $400. Signage Rules signs will be posted at each entrance to the off -leash area. Directional signs may be posted where necessary. Estimated sign pricing is $250 for rules signs, $100 for directional signs. Water Access for Access to water for dog use will be a I Dogs high priority. Parking Water Restrooni Facilities Trash Receptacles Picnic Tables/Benches A minimum of 10 vehicular parking spaces will be provided. Potable water will not be provided, unless in place. Restroom facilities will be provided in close proximity to the off -leash areas. In most cases, these will be portable facilities. Trash receptacles and removal service will be provided at each entrance point. Additional receptacles will be provided where necessary. A picnic table or bench will be provided for each off -leash area. Review Team Findings I Estimated Initial boundaries locations indicate that the site would be 12.3 acres. The only existing use is boat launch parking and unofficial walking trails. Throughout the majority of the site, a buffer zone could be established. However, additional signage may be needed in the boat launch area if water access is permitted. Perimeter is approximately 3.568'. Approximately 35 markings would be needed. Costs 75 Fencing along Otter Lake Road may need to $3,900 be considered. Approximately 1,111 feet of fencing would be required. One rule sign would need to be installed Water access is available at the boat launch. Weeds prohibit access at other points. The current parking lot can accommodate users. No drinking water. Portable restrooms would be provided. Trash receptacles would be provided at the entrance. One picnic table would be provided. 5250 $55/month file://CADocuments and Settings\yungers.j\Local S... \off leash_program_implementation.ht 10/2912002 Page 10 of 12 Accessibility Priority will be given to sites that can accommodate access for individuals with disabilities. At least one site in the system will include an accessible trail from the parking lot to the interior of the site. Rice Creek Trail Corridor Off -Leash Dog Area Summary Accessibility to site is possible, but gravel lot would make accessibility difficult. In addition, terrain limits accessibility in the site. This pilot program site was evaluated for it's current use, as well as possible access to Rice Creek on the east side of Lexington Avenue. However, the shoreline, vegetation, and distance from the existing parking lot do not make this option feasible. A small pond is used by some dogs, although the water level drops in late summer. Parking is available, but the popularity of the site has exceeded the lot's capacity. A realignment of the existing site is needed to create additional spaces. Expansion of the site to include the wooded area will provide better access and a variety of vegetation. Proposed Action . Expand the northern boundary to include the wooded area. . Relocate the access trail to reduce erosion around pond. . Realign the parking lot to increase the number of parking spaces. Future Action e Construction of new entrance road and paved parking lot. Timeline Spring, 2000 Application of Administrative Policy file://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local S... \off_leash_program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 11 of 12 Characteristic Size Policy Goal Review Team Findings Sites should be approximately 10 acres. Minor expansion of this site would result in approximately 14.8 acres. Buffer Zones I00' buffer zone should be established around perimeter to avoid conflict with other park users or adjacent land uses. Perimeter Carsonite markings with labels placed Markings every 100'. Estimated pricing per marking (with labels on front and back) is $17.25. Appropriate buffer zones currently exist, and could also be incorporated when relocating the buffer zone. Perimeter is approximately 3,253'. Approximately 20 markings exist. An additional 13 markings would be needed. Fencing Where 100' buffer zone is not feasible, Not required at this site. fencing may be considered to buffer use areas. Estimated pricing on "hog wire" type fencing (installed) is $3.50/linear ft. Double gates run approximately $400. Signage Water Access for Dogs Parking Drinking Water Rules signs will be posted at each entrance to the off -leash area. Directional signs may be posted where necessary. Estimated sign pricing is $250 for rules signs, $100 for directional signs. Access to water for dog use will be a high priority. A minimum of 10 vehicular parking spaces will be provided. Two rule signs exist. No additional sighs required. Water access is available at the pond. No other water access will be provided. 14 parking spaces exist, but it is not adequate capacity. Realignment of the existing lot would result in 24 total spaces. Master plan for the Regional Trail Corridor calls for removal of existing parking lot and creation of 30-carpaved lot with access road, funded through regional park funds. Potable water will not be provided, No drinking water. unless in place. Restroom Restroom facilities win be provided in Portable rstroom would be provided. Facilities close proximity to the off -leash areas. In most cases, these will be portable facilities. Trash Trash receptacles and removal service Trash receptacles are located at the parking Receptacles will be provided at each entrance point. lot. Additional receptacles will be provided where necessary. Picnic I A picnic table or bench will be provided One picnic table is provided. Tables/Benches for each off -leash area Accessibility Priority will be given to sites that can Long-term plans include installation of accommodate access for individuals with paved parking lot that could provide disabilities. At least one site in the accessibility in the future. system will include an accessible trail from the parking lot to the interior of the site. Estimated Costs $22425 L000 $55/month fileWCADocuments and Settings\yungers,j\Local S... \off leash_program implementation.ht 10/29/2002 Page 12 of 12 ftle://C:\Documents and Settings\yungers.j\Local S... \off leash_program_implementation.ht 10/29/2002 MINNEAPOLIS OFF LEASH RECREATION AREAS Exercise your dog off the leash in a safe environment Off —Leash Recreation Areas are open in some Minneapolis parks. These areas are fenced and signed. Only those dog owners who have purchased a permit for Off -Leash Recreation Areas (011W can exercise their dogs in these specially designated areas. If you plan to exercise your dog in an off -leash dog park, you will need to purchase a permit in addition to licensing your dog. This packet contains a 2002 OLRA Permit application and a Minneapolis Pet License application Eli Lake of the Isles 2845 I" Lake of the tries Parkway S/ Fe 0_o04 Y0!% ee Ov.IA. W. ]ehtt TWe� ratan W CIMw . Dog park is adjacent to soccer Ud between Lake of the Isles Parkway and Lake Se on the south end of lake of the Isles. (W. 28th St. becomes lake of the Isles Parkwo). One entrance no dog park on lake of the Isles Parkway. Stint parking only. Minnehaha Park $399 So. Mintu Naha, Park Drive 1� N Ole DOG* VA IA001o1 \ \ Franklin Terrace 925 Pranklin Terrace Ww� rla ah¢9. `q EAi.+ai -1 Dog park iw pardon of park east of 1.94 (adjacent co Riverside Pared. Enirances are on Franklin. Terrace and W. River Parkway. Street parlmw only_ St. Anthony Parkway 700 sit. Anthony Parkway CWveleta igelci� Columbla m Golf[ourse Dog park is on the south side of Sr Anthony Parkway, Dog Park is on south end of Minnehaha Park Enter a n the strmtfrom the Colombia Golf leaning Center_ park at 54dh St & Hiawatha Avenue..Enrrance ro Accez St, AnthonyParkxay from UnivemyAvenue NE dog park Is accessed by welling down a marked path. or Central Avenue. Park at the parking -lot located west of Puking lot at 54th Street - the Columbia Golf Learning Centex and neat de kiosk. i Yl JititlYi!iie•W6in•J•�WJi49a.{iaYa uei,Y /aY.oW3eid:GJJ55iauiaBPle 08 15.2002 10:55 FAI 612 370 1433 ANALIL CONTROL FACILITY 0 003 PAGE Z l.Sianeapolis Off Irish ReaeationAreas - .- How to obtain a permit for use of the -Off —Leash Recreation Areas 1. Your dog must first be licensed by the city where you lice before you can apply for an Off -Leash Recreation Area permit. A Minneapolis pet license application is on back page 2. Apply for a permit bnt y rernfng the attached permit application along with Proof of your pet license renewal. For additional animals in your house, please photocopy the permit application. If you have questions about the permit, contact the Minneapolis Animal Control, 506 11rh Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 or can 612-3484250. - 3. The permits are valid from the date purchased through January 31, 2003. 4. The cost for Minneapolis residents is $25 for the first dog and $15 for each additional dog. 5. The offleash permit is valid for all Minneapolis dog parks. Rules for Off — Leash Recreation Areas 1. Offdeash Recreation Areas are open during regular park hours 6 amt. -10 p.m. 2. All Handlers must possess an off leash permit for their dog(s). 3. Handlers must leash dogs except when they are inside an ofReash area 4. Handlers must have their dog(s) under control at all times. 5. Handlers may not let their dog(s) out of their sight 6. Handlers must have one leash per dog. 7. All dogs must display offdeish rags. 8. An attending adult must closely supervise all cbildren in an off -leash area. 9. Dogs declared dangerous animals under city code or dangerous orpotentially dangerous dogs under state statutes are not allowed in off-lea-1 areas. 10. Handlers must leash dogs) at the first sign of aggression or unruliness in off -leash areas. 11. Dogs in heat are not permitted in off -leash areas. ' 12. No more than three dogs per handler are peanitred at one time in off -leash areas. 13. Handlers must always clean up after their dog(s) in off -leash areas. 14. Handlers must observe all other ordinances, rules and regulations. Please Note Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Ordinance 2.19 requires dogs to be leashed at all times on park property outside the Off Leash Recreation Areas. The leash must not exceed B feet In len9th. How to report emergencies and criminal activity 1. Call 911 to report all emergencies and any criminal activity, including Property damage. Police, fire and animal control will provide appropriate responses to these calls- 2. failure to comply with reasonable requests for compliance by any enforcement agent may result in police action, including the arrest of suspected violators of Park Board and City of Minneapolis regulations. 3. All repors about dog bites and attacia will be reviewed m determine whether the aggressive dog will be declared dangerous under state statue or city ordinance. If such a declaration is made, the off -leash permit will be imme, diarely revoked. Call the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board at 612-673.5310 if you have any questions about the use and location of the dog recreation areas. Call 971 in case of emergency while using the dog parks � 0 15/2002 10:54 FAS 612 370 1433 .LYIHAL CO1,rROL FACILITY Minneapolis Off —Leash Recreation Areas: 2002 Permit Application Date of Applindom Lltrteat Minneapolis Dog license Proof of current rabies vacdaadon Coat $2.5 for fast dog I Cwta us for each additional dog To be completed by Minneapolis Animal Cctutrol Permit No: Proof of current rabies vaccaation Coln $50 for fuss dog Cost: $30 for each additional dog (A 002 PAGE 3 C Annual permits for 2D02 are valid from the time they are issued until January 31, 2003. Name of Ownert Name of Dog: Address: Breeds} --. _- - CirY - --- Set<- - ... Zip Codea Color. — -- - Phone: ( ) Minneapolis License No: Please complete a separate application for each dog. A pet license application is on the following page. Assumption of Risk and Release of Liability: Acceptance of the terms and conditions of this release and act herence to Off -Leash Area Roles are conditions of permit approval, retention and renewal. Permits may be revoked for noncompliance. I hereby admowledge that I voknatanly have applied m participate and uae, with my dog(sl Off Leash Recreation Areas MtAs) designated by the city of Minneapolis (City) and lAdmimpolis Park and Recreitim Board (MPM I understand that the acts of unleashing my d,9(SY or being physically present inside an OLRA necessarily involves risla of Injury, to me, other people, my dog(s) and other dogs, including but not limited to, asks resulting from aggressive or dangerous dopy, unpredictable behavior, lack of mroing, and lack eivaccination. I expressly as• sumo these risks and responsibility for the actions of my dog and myself I understand that no agent or employee of the City or the MPRB will supervise the OIRAs at any time. I further understand and agave that neither the City nor the MMB is liable for any loss, damage, or injury of any kind sustained by any human or dog while kissing an OLRA. I thereforeexpresslyassume all risks associated with using an OLRA, as well as arty ftatues or equipment located therein By signing this release of liability and using an OLRA, I hereby folly and forever release and discharge the City and the MPRB, their employees and agents from any and all c61m , demands, damages, or causes of action present or fume, whether the same be known or unknown, antici- pated or unanddpared, resulting from or arising out of my inxnded use of raid 01RA premises, fall 66, or equipment I have carefully read this release of Iiabiliry and understand, agree with and accept in tends and conditions. I also have receiv d a copy of the niles for use of OLRAs and agtec ro abide by [hest rules. Signawre Dace PJeage eompleec rids applianon, d return l[ with a cFcrk fo ,tire applicable amount, made out to the Minneapolis Fiaaoce , Departaen4 and a copy o£yoti -dog's currenc.rabies vacanicon ro: lvihmeipoiis AnimZControl r . 506 N4ihq ;kMue- n!? Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411.4322 ROBERT & DONNA VIDAS 7225 Girard Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Phone (612) 869-5713 Facsimile (612) 869-1134 January 17,2003 Mayor Martin Kirsch 6700 Portland Ave S Richfield, MN55423 Dear Marty, I want to acknowledge and thank you for your efforts in getting action on moving of the "spoil' from the dredging of Woodlake. The landscape contractor is, as you know, moving part of the pile over and putting it on top of the pile to the north. This is an improvement for us, but obviously we are still hopeful the "spoil' will be removed when the weather permits its use in landscaping. 1 spoke with Karen Schragg at the Nature Center after she learned of the movement and she was very pleased. Other neighbors also are pleased. Thanks again. I know you get gripes and you deserve thanks when you have been helpful. Very truly yours, - �Z J j "', /3-