Loading...
01-06-1992 Study SessionCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION January 6, 1992 MEMBERS PRESENT: Martin Kirsch, Mayor; Ivan Ludeman; Michael Sandahl; William Bullock; and Kristal Stokes. STAFF PRESENT: James Prosser, City Manager; Steven Devich, Administrative Services Director; Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk; Donald Fondrick; Community Services Director; -Bruce Palmborg, Housimg & Redevelopment Coordinator; Mike Eastling, City Engineer; Jack Erskine, Public Safety Director; and Tom Foley, Transportation Engineer. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kirsch at 6:00 p.m. Item #I DISCUSSION OF FURTHER OPTION FOR DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT 7300 FIRST AVENUE. S.S. NO. 1 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 1 regarding the following options for disposition of the property at 7300 First Avenue: 1) Scheduling the public hearing and second reading of the ordinance authorizing the sale and offering the property to the highest qualified bidder "as is". 2) Remove the structures from the site and maintain the site as a vacant City owned property. Council Member• Ludeman stated that the cost of a new storm sewer £or the intersection did not make it feasible, but that selling the house was not a solution. Council Member Bullock stated there is no solution to the problem but that the City should not own the property. Council Member Sandahl stated that the cheapest alternative is to sell the property "as is". Russell Susag, 7305 1st Avenue, stated that water from other areas like Nicollet Avenue contribute to the problem at this intersection. He said that the house was built on fill and this caused pressure on the foundation in heavy rains. Mr. Susag stated the property is not being maintained by the City to the neighborhood standards. He offered to organize the neighbors to provide maintenance for the lots. He advocated demolition of the houses at 7300 and 7304 First Avenue with the property becoming a park. Study Session Minutes -2- January 6, 1992 Council Member Sandahl stated that the offer by Mr. Susag to provide maintenance was appreciated but that this method could not be relied upon in the long term. He stated that it would be _ bad public policy to buy the second house and that the City cannot indemnify it's residents against natural disasters. Community Services Director Fondrick reviewed cost/benefit analysis and level of protection information related to this intersection. Council Member Bullock stated he supported dealing with this issue by selling the house. Council Member Ludeman asked about the feasibility, cost, and impact of the diversion of Nicollet Avenue stormwater. Community Services Director Fondrick indicated that this information would be provided to the council. Council Member Stokes stated concern about the precedent set and indicated that the City should attempt to sell the property. Mayor Kirsch directed that staff proceed to schedule council consideration of the "as is" sale of the property at 7300 First Avenue. Item #II DYSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AFFECTING THE I35W AND I494 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. S.S. NO. 2 The following individuals were present to discuss and answer questions regarding the draft Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for both the I35W and 1494 Reconstruction Projects: Craig Robinson, MNDOT Ron Rochelle, BRW (I494) Tony Heppelmann, BRW (1494) Adam Josephson, SRF (I35W) Charlene Zimmer, SRF (I35W) Connie Kozlak, Metropolitan Council staff Tony Heppelmann, BRW, reviewed the Executive Summary of the I494 Reconstruction Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Charlene Zimmer, SRF, reviewed the Executive Summary of the I35W Reconstruction Draft Environmental Impact Statement. It was indicated that both EIS processes may be completed by the end of 1992, with the first potential construction in 1997. The EIS public hearings are tentatively scheduled for April, 1992. Study Session Minutes -3- January 6, 1992 Item #III DISCUSSION OF AIRPORT COMMUNICATIONS PLAN. S.S. NO. 3 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 3 summarizing the implementation of the expanded airport communications plan consisting of the following elements: ~ Your City & Your Schools ~ Citizen Feedback * Richfield Sun Current * Council Meetings * Speakers Bureau * Cable TV * Board and Commission Communications Item #IV DISCUSSION OF 4-22 EXTENSION DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COMMENTS. S.S. NO. ~ City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 4 regarding identification of the following deficiencies in the 4- 22 Runway Extension Draft Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S): * Project description mayor objectives * Range of alternatives explored * Impact of safety issues * Mitigation of impact * Post Hoc Rationalization -- Discussion followed regarding Bloomington's role and interest in Richfield's response to the E.I.S. Don Priebe, ?225 Bloomington Avenue, stated agreement with the stated deficiencies and indicated other groups would also be submitting comments. He stated that the project must also be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council because the cost exceeds 10 million dollars. City Manager Prosser stated staff would continue preparing a written response to the Draft 4-22 E.I.S. Item #V DISCUSSION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR ACQUISITION OF NEW FORD TOWN AND RICH ACRES NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD. S.S. NO. 5 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 5 regarding the completion of the draft of the "Report on the Feasibility of Acquisition of the New Ford Town and Rich Acres Neighborhoods of the City of Richfield". He stated the City and MAC staff will meet on January 8, 1992 to make final changes to the feasibility report and to develop a schedule for presentation of the document to the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Richfield City Council. Study Session Minutes -4- January 6, 1992 Item #VI DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL NEED TO SPLIT ONE OR MORE CITY PRECINCTS FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER REDISTRICTING. S.S. NO. 6 Administrative Services Director Devich reviewed Study Session Letter No. 6 regarding the meeting of December 19, 1991 of Hennepin County Commissioner Randy Johnson with Mayor Kirsch and himself. He stated that Commissioner Johnson discussed the possibility of the redistricting of Hennepin County Commissioner Districts which may-split Richfield into more than one commissioner district and the possibility that the Richfield be asked to split some precincts to help aECOmmodate balancing population in the commissioner districts. Mr. Devich indicated that splitting precincts would involve a change in district designation for some residents, a possible new polling place and the costs associated with setting up a new voting precinct or precincts. The cost of a new precinct is approximately a $8,900 one-time cost and 52,800 in additional ongoing costs. City Clerk Ferber reviewed the statutory provisions of the redistricting process. He stated that the sequence requires that legislative boundaries be established first, the city precinct and ward boundaries be established second, and-then the county commissioner districts are determined. The county commissioner districts must follow the precinct boundaries established by the municipality. It was the consensus of the City Council to support the total City remaining in one county commissioner district if possible and to oppose splitting any Richfield precincts. Item #VII DISCUSSION RELATING TO COUNCIL SALARIES. S.S. N0. 7 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 7 regarding whether or not an ordinance amendment related to Council salaries should be prepared and scheduled for First Reading at a subsequent council meeting. Council Member Sandahl stated the council had adopted a policy to review council salaries on a regular basis to avoid. creating a disparity in salaries and adjustments. He suggested a proposed 4$ increase for consideration. Council Member Ludeman stated it was preferable to adjust council salaries regularly in small increments rather than in one large increment. He stated the last increase occurred in 1989 and that if a proposed increase was approved it would not be effective until 1993. It was the consensus of the cou3ieil that an ordinance amendment proposing a 4$ increase in council salaries be scheduled for consideration at a regular City Council meeting. Study Session Minutes -5- January 6, 1992 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous cons tat :15 p.m. Date Approved: 1/13/92 Martin irsch Mayor Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk J e D. Prosser Ci Manager ~`