Loading...
08-01-1988 Study SessionCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION August 1, 1988 MEMBERS PRESENT: Steven Quam, Mayor; Michael Sandahl; Martin Kirsch; and Edwina Garcia. ABSENT: Ivan Ludeman STAFF PRESENT: James Prosser, City Manager; Steven Devich, Administrative Services Director;. Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk; Donald Fondrick, Community Services Director; Byron Wallace, Community Development Director; John Erskine, Public Safety Director; William Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director; Jean Mitchell, Finance Manager; and Mike Eastling, City Engineer. COMM-UNITY SERVICES COMMISSION: Suzanne Sandahl, Emily Day. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Quam at 7:03 p.m. Item #I DISCUSSION OF STORM SEWER STUDY. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 11 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 11 regarding the storm sewer study conducted by Orr-Schelen-Mayer & Associates, Inc. and the stormwater improvements recommended by the Community Services Commission. Community Services Director Fondrick reviewed the role of the Community Services Commission in developing criteria to prioritize recommendations for stormwater management improvements. Peter Willenbring, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron 1fc Associates Inc., reviewed the criteria used by the Community Services Commission in prioritizing their recommendations as follows: - Benefit/cost ratio for the improvement project must be greater than 1, or - Flooding must take place for rainfall events having a greater than 29K chance of occurrence. - Improvements should be constructed on public property. - Improvements should be funded through the storm sewer utility. City should provide technical expertise and education to - residents in areas not meeting these criteria. _ City could reasonably support improvements with a total cost ranging from $500,000 to 1 million dollars. Study Session Minutes -2- August 1, 1988 Mr. Willenbring then reviewed the stormwater improvement recommendations of the Community Services Commission. City Manager Prosser stated that the improvements would increase the level of protection from flooding but there is no guarantee that properties will nat flood. Mr. Prosser stated that an approximate 20X increase in the storm sewer utility will be proposed excluding the financing of the proposed storm water improvements recommendations. Mr. Willenbring stated that an addendum to the original report had been prepared as a result of additional information provided by residents. Mayor Quam acknowledged the efforts of the Community Services Commission regarding this report. He directed that staff finalize the report for formal public and council presentation as soon as possible with reasonable public notification. Ites #II PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL REPORT. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 12. Cliff Hoffman and Mike Pung of the City's auditing firm of Deloitte, Haskins and Sells reviewed the City of Richfield Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987. They also reviewed their findings and recommendations concerning internal control and other matters resulting from the audit of the City's 1987 financial statements. The auditors stated that the City ws in a very solid financial condition and commented staff for the City's fiscal management. Item #III CONSIDERATION OF ADVANCE REFUNDING BONDS FOR OUTSTANDING CITY BOND ISSUES. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 13. 1 Administrative Services Director Devich reviewed the advantages of refunding outstanding bond issues when specific conditions exist. He stated that an analysis of advance refunding opportunities for the City reveals that there are three bond issues with potential savings to the City. It was the consensus of the council that city staff initiate actions to accomplish the advance refunding of these bonds. Study Session Minutes -3- August 1, 1988 Item #IV DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PARKING OF TRACTORS/TRAILERS ON CITY, SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 14.. City Manager Prosser reviewed the issues related to the parking of tractor trailers in public, school, and private parking lots throughout the community. Public Safety Director Erskine reviewed the following three options to address this issue: 1. Preparation of an ordinance amendment which would include private, City owned and school district owned parking lots in the definition of the current ordinance. 2. Preparation of an ordinance that gives Public Safety the authority to enforce laws on non-City owned property provided an agreement is signed between the owner of the property and the City. 3. Do nothing. It was the consensus of the council that city staff initiate Option ~~1. Ite^ #V DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PARKING OF UTILITY TRAILERS ON SIDEYARDS AND FRONTYARDS. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 15 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 15 regarding the issues related to the parking of utility trailers in front and side yards in the community. Public Safety Director Erskine reviewed the following options to address this issue: 1. Do nothing. 2. Revise 1320.03 to include a definition of utility trailers, which would prohibit them from parking anywhere for more than two hours. 3. Revise 1305.27 to include a definition of utility trailers, which would prohibit them from parking in front yards except in established driveways. 4. Revise ordinance 1325 dealing with recreational vehicles to include a definition of utility trailers. Mayor Quam stated that it would be most appropriate for staff to begin by presenting option ~~3 to the council for consideration. Study Session Minutes -4- August 1, 1988 Item #VI DISCUSSION REGARDING THE USE OF PROPERTY AT 6945 PENN AVENUE. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 16 City Manager Prosser reviewed the issues regarding modification of the proposed development at 6945 Penn Avenue from a use exclusively for dental offices to general office use. It was the consensus of the council that because the rezoning was not conditional upon the dental use, that it was not appropriate for council reconsideration. It was the consensus of the council that it was appropriate for the HRA t.o review this matter as part of the final development agreement consideration on August 15, 1988 and that mailed notices to the neighbors be provided for that meeting. Item #VII DISCUSSION REGARDING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR LEGAL SERVICES. STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 17 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 17 regarding a draft Request for Proposal for Legal Services. He stated an analysis of the use of an in-house attorney is also being undertaken. Mayor Quam related several suggestions for changes to the Request for Proposal. Discussion followed regarding alternative methods of reviewing the proposals. Item #VIII DISCUSSION OF NOMINATION PETITION ISSUE. STUDY SESSION LETTER N0. 18 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 18 regarding issues about provisions of the City Charter and State Statutes relating to the qualifications to sign nominating petitions. Mr. Prosser indicated that in reviewing this matter the City Attorney found that the Charter requires that candidates for office be registered voters. State Statute does not make this requirement. The City Attorney is concerned that the City Charter requirement may not be supported if challenged in court. Therefore, this matter will be referred to the Charter Commission. Study Session Minutes -5- August 1, 1988 ADJOURNMENT Council Member Sandahl reviewed the request of the NOISE organization for Richfield, and adjacent communities to host the 1989 NOISE Conference. He stated that NOISE would request some funding from the host cities for the conference. -TMe meeting ~+as at#~ou-r-ned-a~-8;-34-~-.-m. Date Approved : 8/22/88 ,~ ~~~-CZLaQ . Thomas P. Ferber City Cierk 1 ~~ w``~~'C D. Prosser Manager