Loading...
02-01-1988 Study SessionCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION February 1, 1988 DIEMBERS PRESENT: Steven Quam, Mayor; Ivan Ludeman; Michael Sandahl; Martin Kirsch; and Edwina Garcia. STAFF PRESENT: James Prosser, City Manager; Steven Devich, Administrative Services Director; Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk; Donald Fondrick; Community Services Director; Byron Wallace, Community Development Director; and John Erskine, Public Safety Director. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Quam at 7:01 p.m. Item #1 DISCUSSION REGARDING ORDINANCB RELATING TO TRANSIENT MERCHANTS. STUDY SESSION LETTBR NO. 1 City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 1 regarding options in regulating transient merchants in the city. Council Member Garcia stated support for prohibiting outdoor transient merchant operations for aesthetic and community standard reasons. Council Member Sandahl stated that he saw no reason to prohibit transient merchants or further regulate except to restrict them to commercial areas. Discussion followed regarding the restriction of door-to- door sales. It was the consensus of the council not to seek any changes regarding door-to-door sales. Council Member Kirsch stated that regulations regarding transient merchants needed to be tightened up but transient merchants should not be totally prohibited. Council Member Ludeman stated support for regulation of transient merchants regarding signs, banners, and location to eliminate traffic hazards. Public Safety Director Erskine reviewed the relationship of the transient merchant ordinance to the outdoor merchandising ordinance and his concerns regarding the administration of the proposed suspension and revocation procedures. He also reviewed existing transient merchant regulations in other communities. Study Session Minutes -2- February 1, 1988 Mayor Quam stated support for equivalent regulation of transient merchants to t~iose I.•egarding special event sales and banners for retailers. He stated that the regulation should be aimed at limiting duration and safety issues. He stated that administration of transient merchant ordinance should be by city staff with only appeals to be considered by the city council. City Manager Prosser stated that city staff would prepare a transient merchant ordinance amendment based on the direction provided by the city council discussion. Ites #2 DISCUSSION REGARDING LIGHT BAIL TRANSIT City Manager Prosser reviewed the roles of the various committees currently considering light rail transit iLRT) options. and corridors. Community Development Director Wallace reviewed the Nicollet Avenue, Sao Line, and I35W LRT corridor options. Mayor Quam stated his support for placing LRT in the I35W corridor because it would benefit the city the moat by moving more people through the city with less disruption to the city's transportation system and provide future expansion capacity in the corridor. He stated the Soo Line corridor would create safety and traffic problems for Richfield. Mayor Quam reviewed the political aspects of the LRT issue. City Manager Prosser reviewed the positive and negative impacts on the City of Richfield far each corridor. He stated the philosophy of the city is to minimize the impact of traffic flow through the city by maximizing the capacity of the I35W corridor. Lawrence Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth Avenue, stated his opposition to the Soo Line corridor becausa of the negative traffic and noise impacts it would create in Richfield. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:48 p.m. Date Approved: 2/8/88 Ste~tren J. ~'-' Mayor G~ ~ a - Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ame D. Prosser it Manager