Loading...
07-06-1987 Study SessionCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION July 6, 1987 MEMBERS PRESENT: John Hamilton, Mayor; Michael Sandahl; Martin Kirsch; and Edwina Garcia. STAFF PRESENT: James Prosser, City Manager; Steven Devich, Administrative Services Director; Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk; Donald Fondrick; Community Services Director; Byron Wallace, Community Development Director; Pat Coughlin, Assistant Fire Chief; Barry Fritz, Police Lieutenant; and Clayton LeFevere, City Attorney. OTHER PRESENT: David Braslau, Airport Noise Consultant, and Don Priebe, MSAC Representative. HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION: (Serving Seniors and Disabled) Dale Rusk, Myrna Hammer, Patricia Marble, Mark Erspamer, Betty Carr, Bette Flanders, and Donna Terras. Lil Hipp, Liason Member Community Center Manager. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hamilton at 7:05 p.m. Item #1 DISCIISSION WITH MEMBERS OF THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION (SERVING SENIORS AND DISABLED). STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 20. Commission Member Myrna Hammer reviewed the 1986 accomplishments of the Human Services Commission (Serving Seniors and Disabled), including the transfer of the "Access to Vote" project to the city, and the VFW, participation in the Community Center's ten year anniversary celebration, and support of the Fraser Independent Living Project. Commission Member Donna Terra reviewed the status of the Commission's 1987 goals of initiating a defensive walking education program and a smoke alarm safety program. Myrna Hammer reviewed the activities of the Task Force on Aging. City Manager Prosser reviewed the availability of Section 8 units in Richfield in response to a question from the audience. Study Session Minutes -2- July 6, 1987 Council Member Sandahl reviewed the reduced rate valet service provided at the airport in response to a concern expressed by the audience about the lack of handicap parking spaces at the airport. Mayor Hamilton thanked the Commission for it's dedication and service to the community. Item #2 DISCIISSION OF PART 150 STUDY REVIEW SUBMITTED TOM METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION. STIIDY SESSION LETTER NO. 21. City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 21 regarding the Part 150 Study Review submitted to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). David Braslau, consultant, reviewed the following comments regarding the Part 150 Study: 1. Distribution of Homes Impacted in Richfield -~ In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the measures in the future (when they will be implemented - not in 1985 or 1986), contours must be developed to enable such comparisons. A comparison of the contours WITH noise abatement measures with those for 1987 or 1992 actually show an INCREASE of homes impacted in Richfield. A detailed evaluation should be prepared for each runway and community impacted by aircraft noise and a methodology developed to ensure that the trade-offs of shifting or reducing noise are weighed with respect to impacts not only on the region, but upon each community. . 2. Flight Tracks off Runway 29R/L Three tracks demonstrate a wide dispersal pattern covering most of the City of Richfield. It is critical in the development of the contours that this dispersed data be accurately reflected in the program input, since otherwise the present impact on Richfield will be understated. 3. Wind Rose and Flictht Directions The examination of a wind rose of prevailing wind MSP clearly suggests that Runway 04 should receive present share of landings and takeoffs. The Part fails to address increased use of Runway 04. The increased Runway 04 operations on noise levels as capacity should be addressed. patterns from more than its 150 Submittal impact of well as the PRS Study Session Minutes -3- July 6, 198? 4. 40/60 Split Off Runway 22 This particular split as well as Qxact ground tracks will be difficult to enforce as assumed in the contour development. 5. Runway 4-22 Specific comments on Runway 4-22 must wait until the detailed analysis of runway operations and assumptions are available from the EIS. 6. Full Length Parallel Runway 4-22 The information on this alternative appears to be inconsistent and insufficient upon which to make an evaluation. 7. Community Land Use Plans Richfield is prepared to develop land use plans based upon the Part 150 contours. However, the City is also concerned that some assurance be provided that flight paths and their associated contours will not change so as to negate the objectives of land use plans and redevelopment. 8. Retrofit For communities where the most severe impact is on private residences rather than public buildings, residential rather than public buildings should receive funding priority. 9. Equitable Distribution of Noise It is recommended that some type of an objective community measure be developed so that flight operations could be selected to optimize the .measures for each community as well as the Metropolitan area as a whole. ld. Agreement with Bloomin ton The City of Richfield agrees with the comments made by the City of Bloomington in their letter to the MAC on May 19 and supporting memorandum. 11. Data and Assum tions Detailed assumptions as to the number of operations by type of aircraft and operation of each flight track should be made available to permit an accurate assessment of the impacts from Runway 22 Runway.29R/L on Richfield. i Study Session Minutes -4- July 6, 1987 12. Land Use Issues Richfield would like to see a higher priority assigned to land acquisition for compatible redevelopment and would like to have the opportunity to retrofit homes rather than public buildings if deemed more appropriate by the City. 13. Preferential Runway System Use and Capacity Since the PRS use can significantly affect noise levels in Richfield, the City would like to see a detailed explanation of the operating rules followed by the tower and how priorities have been assigned for takeoff and landing under the PRS. 14. PRS Brainstorming Task Force The City would appreciate further information on the newly established "brainstorming" task force on PRS use. If, in fact, decisions or recommendations on operations that could affect Richfield or other communities are to be made by this group, then Richfield, as well as all other affected communities, should be represented in this group. 15. Support of the Part 150 Concept and Willin ness to Cooperate The City would Like to express its willingness to cooperate in the evaluation of alternatives to minimize noise impacts in Richfield as well as the entire Metropolitan Area. Don Priebe, MSAC Representative, reviewed the efforts of the various ad hoc groups to come to a consensus in seeking the equitable distribution of airport noise. He stated that any decisions by Northwest Airlines regarding the location of their operations will be made by them based on business issues rather than noise issues. Discussion followed regarding soundproofing measures, acquisition of properties for buffering, and the distribution of operations on the various runways. City Manager Prosser stated it will be the strategy of the city to seek a reduction and moderation of overall noise in the community and the equitable distribution of noise for all communities adjacent to the airport. 1 Study Session Minutes -5- July 6, 1987 Item ~3 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ORDINANCE. STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 22. 1 n J City Manager Prosser reviewed Study Session Letter No. 22 regarding consideration of an ordinance limiting the location of driveways, parking areas, and parking vehicles on turnarounds located in front yards. Assistant Fire Chief Coughlin reviewed the definitions of sideyard and frontyard, current ordinance regulations, and presented slides showing examples of various driveway and parking areas located in front yards. He stated that there were 237 vehicle turnarounds and parking areas in frontyards in Richfield with about 40~ of those located on arterial streets. He reviewed the issues related. to the following five potential solutions: 1) Accept the present situation. 2) Allow on arterial streets and prohibit on non-arterial streets. 3) Allow with limits - no parking on turnarounds and prohibit locating on boulevard. 4) Allow on arterial only with limits - no parking on turnarounds and prohibit locating on boulevard. 5) Prohibit all front yard parking areas and turnarounds. Mayor Hamilton expressed concern that prohibiting these areas would cause hardship for those who would have to remove them. Council Member Sandahl expressed concern that the lack of offstreet parking would cause problems during snow emergencies. Assistant Fire Chief Coughlin stated that during snow emergencies vehicles are permitted to park in the front yard. Lawrence Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth Avenue, stated that the city should address parking the landscaping in commercial areas first. The city council requested that additional review and study of these issues occur prior to consideration of ordinance amendments. Study Session Minutes ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Date Approved: 7/13/87 ~l /~/' ~ Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk -6- July 6, 1987 n at 9i: Q2 p .~tt . ~---. ohn Ha n Mayor Ja s Pros er Ci Manager 1