072825 PC Meeting AgendaPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JULY 28, 2025
7:00 PM
Call to Order
Approval of the Minutes
Approval of the minutes of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of May 28, 2025.
Open Forum: Opportunity for the public to address the Commission on items not on the Agenda.
Agenda Approval
1. Approval of the Agenda
Public Hearings
2.Public hearing to consider various ordinance changes related to multifamily development regulations 11111111(MR-2 & MR-3 zoning district updates).
Staff Report No. 9
Other Business
3.Consideration of a resolution finding that the acquisition/disposition of single family and duplex residential
property in areas guided for Low Density Residential through the Richfield Rediscovered and New Home
Programs is consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Report No. 10
Liaison Reports
Community Services Advisory Commission
City Council
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
Richfield School Board
Transportation Commission
Chamber of Commerce
Sustainability Commission
City Planner's Reports
4.City Planner's Report
The short-term rental ordinance was passed on May 27th with a 5 day minimum. Beginning January 1,
2026, short-term rentals (anything less than one month) must be for a minimum of five days, unless the
owner lives on-site and is present during the rental. A business license (with inspection) will be
required instead of a rental license, and all short-term rentals must pay the existing 3% lodging tax.
On June 10th the City Council approved Penn Station, the 42-unit building at 6501 Penn Ave. The
developer working towards closing in September/October with demolition and construction expected to
start late fall.
Permits for site work at Loma Bonita were issued on June 30th. Once parking lot construction begins, it
will hopefully go quickly and a fall opening is a possibility.
The Office of Cannabis Management has been issuing pre-approvals and we’ve been receiving lots of
calls regarding potential cannabis locations.
Our Economic Development Manager is working with CivicBrand, a national consultant, to develop a
branding and placemaking strategy to highlight downtown Richfield in a way that supports local businesses,
attracts visitors, enhances the area’s vibrancy, and celebrates community pride. They will launch an online
survey in early August to get feedback that will help define downtown Richfield’s identity and inform the
branding. We’ll let you know once it’s launched and we encourage you to complete the survey. The
Economic Development Authority received a Business District Initiative Grant from Hennepin County for
this project.
5.Next Meeting Time and Location
Regular meeting Monday, August 25, 2025 at 7:00 in Council Chambers.
6.Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9739.
*Complete information on how to share comments or questions with the Planning Commission, see our
Agendas and Minutes page
https://www.richfieldmn.gov/city_government/planning_commission/agendas_and_minutes.php
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair Holmvig-Johnson at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
M/Taraldsen, S/Kennealy, to approve the minutes of the Regular Planning Commission
Meeting of February 24, 2025.
Motion carried: 6-0
M/Taraldsen, S/Hooey, to approve the minutes of the Joint Planning Commission and
City Council Work Session of February 24, 2025.
Motion carried: 6-0
ITEM #1
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
M/Taraldsen, S/Kennealy, to approve the agenda.
Motion carried: 6-0
OPEN FORUM
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
May 28, 2025
Planning Commissioners Present:
Eddie Holmvig-Johnson, Brendan Kennealy, Cole Hooey, Matt
Taraldsen, Benjamin Surma, and Stephanie Kowalkowski
Commissioners Excused:
Brett Stursa
Staff Present:
Sam Crosby, Planner II; and Ruby Villa, Planner I
Others Present: Johnny Opara, JO Companies; Erik Bjorum, POPE Design
See Item #2 for public hearing speakers
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Kowalkowski spoke about a recent tragedy in her family.
ITEM #2
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A
PRELIMINARY PLAT, A FINAL PLAT, AND A VARIANCE, FOR 42 UNITS OF
MULTIFAMILY HOUSING AT 6501 AND 6525 PENN AVENUE SOUTH.
Planner Villa presented Staff Report No. 7.
Johnny Opara, President of JO Companies, introduced himself to the commission and
provided some context for how the project has come together.
Chair Holmvig-Johnson opened the public hearing.
Michael Gormley, 6444 Newton Avenue South, expressed traffic and safety concerns
about the impact the project could have on 65th Street.
John Peterson, 6445 Oliver Avenue South, stated that he is not aware of any traffic studies
that have been conducted regarding the project, and is concerned about increased traffic and
safety.
Several Commissioners had multiple follow up questions for staff and the Applicant; the
group discussed parking, prior neighborhood meetings, pedestrian and bicycling improvements,
and the city’s Traffic Control Committee.
M/Hooey, S/Taraldsen, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried: 6-0.
M/Hooey, S/Surma, to approve the request for site plan approval, a preliminary plat, a
final plat, and a variance, for 42 units of multifamily housing at 6501 and 6525 Penn Avenue
South.
Motion carried: 5-1 (Commissioner Taraldsen dissenting).
ITEM #3
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE DISPOSITION OF
OUTLOT A, WEXLERS SECOND ADDITION BY THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE RICHFIELD
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
Planner Crosby presented Staff Report No. 8.
Planner Crosby discussed the current use of the remnant parcels and the low possibility
of them being developed for any other use.
M/Taraldsen, S/Kowalkowski, to approve a resolution finding that the disposition of
Outlot A, Wexlers Second Addition by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority is consistent
with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan.
Motion carried: 6-0
LIAISION REPORTS
• Community Services Commission: Commissioner Hooey stated that during the April
meeting it was discussed that the Splash Pad project is progressing, and the tentative
opening date is June 6th. Also, an RFP will soon be issued for the park portion of the
Vets Park Project and the groundbreaking for the new Wood Lake Nature Center was
earlier today.
• City Council: Chair Holmvig-Johnson had no report.
• Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA): Commissioner Stursa was absent.
• Richfield School Board: Commissioner Kennealy had no report.
• Transportation Commission: Commissioner Surma stated that during the last two
meetings, the following were discussed: Metro Transit’s proposed Network Now plan;
the Nicollet Avenue redesign and reconstruction; 494 Phase 2; Safe Routes to School;
and closure of the Portland Avenue bridge.
• Chamber of Commerce: Commissioner Kowalkowski had no report.
• Sustainability Commission: Commissioner Taraldsen stated that the city will be updating
the Climate Action Plan. Also, new solar panels are being put on public buildings and
Nine Mile Creek Watershed has identified Richfield as a priority area.
ITEM #4
CITY PLANNER’S REPORT
Planner Crosby presented the City Planner’s Report.
ITEM #5
NEXT MEETING TIME AND LOCATION
The next regular meeting is scheduled for June 23, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
ITEM #6
ADJOURNMENT
M/Kennealy, S/Taraldsen, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried: 6-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:44 p.m.
Submitted by:
Ruby Villa Matt Taraldsen
Planner I Planning Commission Secretary
AGENDA SECTION:Public Hearings
AGENDA ITEM #
CASE NO.:Staff Report No. 9
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
7/28/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY: Sam Crosby, City Planner & Lance Bernard, Director of Planning, TC2
DIRECTOR RE VIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director
7/24/2025
ITEM FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Public hearing to consider various ordinance changes related to multifamily development regulations
(MR-2 & MR-3 zoning district updates).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
During the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update, residents overwhelmingly identified housing needs and
affordability as a key concern. Recognizing that outdated zoning regulations are one barrier to affordable
housing, the City is updating the MR-2 (Multifamily) and MR-3 (High Density Multifamily) zoning districts to
better facilitate a variety of housing choices known as the “missing middle.” Missing middle housing refers to
moderately dense housing options such as triplexes, quadplexes, and small apartment buildings. These types
of homes can provide affordable and diverse living options, filling the gap between single-family homes and
large high-rise buildings.
It is important to note the update focuses on regulations for multifamily housing construction and
does not involve the rezoning of any properties. For details on affected areas, refer to the “Existing & Planned
Multifamily Parcels Map."
Since August 2024, City planning staff and consultant TC2 have collaborated on this effort (see “Historical
Context” below). The proposed changes were carefully crafted based on real-world examples, and tested by
designers on typical parcel sizes to ensure feasibility.
Following an eight-month update process and close collaboration with policymakers and stakeholders, staff
have prepared seven related ordinances. One of the ordinances, which affects Chapter 13, falls outside the
Zoning Code and does not require a public hearing, but is included for transparency and to show the full
scope of the changes.
In summary, the proposed amendments found in the seven ordinances:
facilitate infill development of small-sized multifamily housing;
accommodate the density ranges prescribed by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and
streamline the review and approval process.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Recommend approval of the seven ordinance
amendments regarding multifamily development regulations (MR-2 & MR-3 district updates).
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
2.
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities Act (LCA) Policy Development Grant was awarded in
June of 2024, and the contract was finalized in August of 2024.
The project began in late 2024/early 2025 with research into best practices, meetings with
developers, and analysis of local project examples.
The first Administrative Review Committee (ARC) meeting was held on January 9, 2025.
A joint Planning Commission and City Council work session on the Tier I standards was held on
February 24, 2025.
A second ARC meeting was held on March 13, 2025.
The project website was launched and public outreach was initiated in April of 2025:
Post cards were mailed to property owners zoned (MR-2 or MR-3) or guided for
multifamily (Medium or High Density).
The project website was promoted through social media, local newspapers, and the
Richfield Recap.
Stakeholder outreach included the following groups:
Developers
Minneapolis Association of Realtors
Richfield Chamber of Commerce
Regional Housing Policy Group
Richfield Apartment Managers Association
A joint Planning Commission and City Council work session on Tier II and Tier III standards was
held on May 13, 2025.
A third and final ARC meeting was held on June 12, 2025.
B.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Several changes have been made to modernize and facilitate infill development on MR-2 and MR-3
properties. Generally, changes include reduced minimum lot sizes, increased building and lot
coverages, reduced setbacks, minor height changes, and parking reductions in targeted transit and
pedestrian-friendly areas. Building and site design standards have been updated to ensure high-quality
design and general consistency with similar uses in other districts. The approval process has been
modified to allow some projects with administrative review only. Projects of up to 16 units in MR-2 and
32 units in MR-3 could be approved at a staff level, provided all requirements are met.
One new change has been added since the last work session: to apply Electric Vehicle charger
requirements to multifamily the same way we apply them to commercial sites - on a per stall basis, rather
than a per unit basis. The thresholds were also adjusted very slightly to be more equitable.
For a detailed summary of the changes proposed by the draft ordinances, see the Tier I, II & III
documents, attached.
Discretion
The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing a Zoning Code text amendment. The Zoning Code
is the main tool cities use to enact policies and development standards they decide are appropriate for
their community. However, the proposed amendment must be consistent with the goals, policies and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Plan
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan (adopted in 2018) is the foundation for this work. See the “Related Comp
Plan Goals & Policies” document for a list of goals and policies that support the code analysis and
reform.
C.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
Metropolitan Council grant funds need to be used by the end of June 30, 2026.
Staff hopes to complete the code updates by the end of September 2025, prior to the next
comprehensive plan update, for which system statements are released this fall.
D.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper on J uly 17, 2025.
First reading of the proposed ordinances is scheduled for Council consideration on August 26,
2025.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Recommend revisions to the ordinance amendment as proposed; or,
Recommend denial of the ordinance amendment regarding multifamily development
regulations (MR-2 & MR-3 district updates).
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Lance Bernard, Director of Planning, Transportation Collaborative & Consultants
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
E xisting & P lanned Multifamily P arcels Map E xhibit
F inal Tier I with Residential P arking Reduction A reas Map B ackup Material
F inal Tier II B ackup Material
F inal Tier III B ackup Material
Related C omp P lan Goals and P olicies B ackup Material
509 General P rovisions Ordinance D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
525 - M R-2 Ordinance D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
527 - M R-3 Ordinance D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
541.25 - V PA Overlay Ordinance D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
544 - General B ldg & P erf. S tandards Ord D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
547 - A dministration Ordinance D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
C hapter 1310 - P arking P ermits Ord. D raft 7-15-25 Ordinance
Existing & Planned Multifamily Parcels 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1
Miles
±
07/24/2025 I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Assistant Planner\Ruby\Bus Service & MDR Maps\Bus Service Maps.aprx/MR2 & MR3 Zoned & Guided | Scale: 1:30,500 | Revision Date: 7/24/2025 | Author: RVillaMR-3 High-Density Residential
MR-2 Multifamily Residential MDR Medium Density Residential
HDR High Density Residential
2040 GuidingZoning
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
1
Tier I, High Level - Recommended Standards
If a standard conflicts with an existing overlay district provision, the overlay district provision prevails.
1.Site Area
City Definition: Subd. 68."Lot area." The total horizontal area bounded by the front, side, and rear
lot lines. With respect to planned unit developments only, lot area may include, at the discretion of
the Director, areas of the right-of-way that are improved and integral to the design of the project.
(Amended, Bill No. 2014-4).
Purpose: A minimum lot size dictates how much land is required for different types of
development, ensuring appropriate density and promoting compatible land use.
Medium Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2: 15,000 sf (0.34 acres) min.
b)Proposed: 6,000 sf (0.13 acres) min.
High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-3: 60,000 sf (1.37 acres) min.
b)Proposed: 6,000 sf (0.13 acres) min.
Reasoning: The proposed standards are the same standard as the R zoning district. The goal is to
permit the smallest allowed use (3 units) on a standard-sized lot. This approach minimizes the
need for land assembly, which has been identified as a key obstacle for middle housing.
2.Lot Coverage
City Definition: Subd. 70. "Lot coverage." The total ground area covered by buildings on a lot,
excluding uncovered swimming pools, uncovered porches, or uncovered ground level landings.
Purpose: Lot Coverage limits help to control the ground cover of a project and the intensity of
development in a zoning district.
Medium Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2: 30% max.
b)Proposed: 45% max.
High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-3: 30% max.
b)Proposed: 55% max.
Reasoning: Lot coverage will naturally be limited by parking and impervious surface.
3.Impervious Surface
City Definition: Subd. 63. "Impervious surface." A surface that has been compacted or covered
with a layer of materials so that it is highly resistant to infiltration by water. It includes surfaces
such as compacted sand, limerock, or clay, as well as most conventionally surfaced streets, roofs,
sidewalks, parking lots, and other similar surfaces. Open uncovered decks or porches are not
included.
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
2
Propose: Limiting the amount of impervious surface helps regulate infiltration to reduce runoff
and flooding.
Medium Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2: N/A
b)Proposed: 70% max.
High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-3: N/A
b)Proposed: 75% max.
Reasoning: The proposed standards work with the minimum parking requirement. Mixed use
districts provide similar standards for impervious surface and open space requirements.
4.Site Width
City Definition: Subd. 76. “Lot line, front." On an interior lot, the lot line abutting a street; or, on a
corner lot, the shorter lot line abutting a street (or as otherwise designated by the Building
Official); or, on a through lot, the lot lines abutting the streets.
Purpose: A minimum lot width helps ensure that lots are wide enough to accommodate buildings,
driveways, and landscaping, promoting functional and accessible site design.
Medium Density Standard High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2: 75 feet min.a) Existing MR-3: 150 feet min.
b)Proposed: 50 feet min.b) Proposed: 50 feet min.
Reasoning: The proposed standards are based on the prevalence of existing lots; again, helping to
avoid land assembly, which has been identified as a key obstacle.
5. Building Height
City Definition: Subd. 59. "Height of building." The vertical distance to the highest point of the roof
for flat roofs; to the deck line for mansard roofs; and to the average height between the highest roof
ridge and its associated eaves for gable, hip and gambrel roofs, as measured from the average
elevation of the lot adjoining the front building line.
Purpose: Building height limitations help to prevent overshadowing and to ensure compatibility
with surrounding structures.
Medium Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2: 35 feet max.
b)Proposed: 3 stories, 36 feet max.
Reasoning: Twelve feet per story provides sufficient design flexibility to accommodate up to three
(3)story buildings.
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
3
High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-3: 50 feet max
b)Proposed: Minimum 3 stories; Maximum 5 stories, 60 feet
Additional building height standards include:
•Proximity to Transit Stations: Buildings within one (1) block east or west of a high frequency
transit line or within the expanded Lyndale/66th “Downtown” area (see map) may extend up
to six (6) stories (or 72 feet) to support transit-oriented development.
•When more than four (4) stories: Floors above the third floor shall be stepped back a
minimum of 15 feet when adjacent to public streets and public land. Step backs may be
adjusted depending on specific site conditions and building placements.
•Transition Zones: Where a high-density residential zone abuts the south side of a Low
Density Residential District (R or R-1), or a public park, the height of buildings within 50 feet
of the boundary shall not exceed three (3) stories (or 36 feet) to maintain a gradual
transition. (Simulates an MR-2 height building, for the width of the minimum lot width
requirement, when adjacent to single family, two family, or park.)
•Section 544.23 requires that no building shall be so tall that its shadow is cast across more
than 50% of land used guided for a single-family or two -family building between the hours
of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on any day of the year.
Reasoning: Provides adequate transition between R and MR zoning districts. Minimum height
requirement ensures the efficient use of land and promotes a pedestrian-friendly streetscape.
Maximum height is proportioned between the Medium Density Residential and the Mixed Use
Neighborhood zoning district (which is eight stories max).
6.Setbacks
City Definition: Subd. 116. "Setback." The minimum horizontal distance required between a
building, structure, parking lot or other site improvement and the related front, side or rear lot
lines.
Purpose: Setbacks provide a buffer from property lines, space to accommodate landscaping or
walkways, and to ensure adequate light, ventilation, and privacy for neighboring properties.
Medium Density Standard
Front Setback
a)Existing MR-2: 30 feet min.
b)Proposed: 15 feet min and allow 6 feet of encroachment for unenclosed front entry features,
(i.e., porches).
Side (Interior) Setback
a)Existing MR-2: 20 feet min. or building height
b)Proposed: 5 feet min, except if abutting a public park, then 15 feet.
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
4
Side (Corner) Setback
a) Existing MR-2: 30 feet min.
b) Proposed: 15 feet min.
Rear Setback
a) Existing MR-2: 25 feet min. or building height
b) Proposed: 20 feet min.
Reasoning:
• Front Setback: Encroachment “allowance” encourages front entry features which are “see
through” (i.e., decks, porches) but nine (9) feet still allows enough space for front yard
trees.
• Side (Interior) Setback: There are two (2) story SFR with five (5) foot side yard setbacks, one
(1) more story is not a significant difference. In many cities, three (3) stories are allowed for
SFR as well.
• Side (Corner) Setback: A reduced setback aligns with the proposed front yard setback
while still supporting the maintenance of sight triangle and planting areas within the side
yard.
• Rear Setback: A reduced setback provides greater flexibility with shallower multifamily lots
and aligns with some existing medium density development.
High Density Standard
Front Setback
a) Existing MR-3: 40 feet min.
b) Proposed: 15 feet min and allow 6 feet of encroachment for unenclosed front entry features,
(i.e., porches).
Side (Interior) Setback
a) Existing MR-3: 30 feet min or building height
c) Proposed: 8 feet min, except if abutting a public park, then 15 feet.
Side (Corner) Setback
a) Existing MR-3: 40 feet min.
b) Proposed: 15 feet min.
Rear Setback
a) Existing MR-3: 35 feet min.
b) Proposed: 20 feet min.
Important:
Retain the existing setbacks when adjacent to Vet’s Park (meaning move the current requirements
to the VPA overlay district.)
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
5
Reasoning:
•Front Setback: Encroachment “allowance” encourages front entry features which are “see
through” (i.e., decks, porches) but nine (9) feet still allows enough space for front yard
trees.
•Side (Interior) Setback: Building height adjacent to side lot lines limited based on context –
see height section.
•Side (Corner) Setback: A reduced setback aligns with the proposed front yard setback
while still supporting the maintenance of sight triangle and planting areas within the side
yard.
•Rear Setback: A reduced setback provides greater flexibility with shallower lots.
7.Parking Requirements
City Definition: Subd.93 “Parking lot (area).” An authorized area not within a building where motor
vehicles are stored for the purpose of temporary, daily, or overnight off-street parking.
Purpose: Parking minimums provide adequate space for parking vehicles relative to anticipated
demand.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2 and MR-3: 1.1 parking stalls per unit. (Based on 1.25 per unit with a 10% credit
for being within a 1/4-mile radius of a Frequently Operating Transit Line (FOTL), and a 5% credit
for extra bike parking.)
b)Proposed: Maintain existing standards and add the following:
•Reduce to 0.5 parking stalls per unit, only for buildings that are 40 units or less, for parcels
located 1 block* along either side of a High Frequency Transit Line. (HFTL).** A building of
41 units or more in size would need to meet existing parking requirements.
•Reduce to 0.5 parking stalls per unit for the first 40 units in a building, regardless of zoning
designation, if located within the expanded 66th/Lyndale “Downtown” area.*** The 41st
unit in a building, and above, would need to meet existing parking requirements.
•Reduce parking requirements for cluster developments in the MR-2 zoning district to 1.25
parking stalls per unit. (Missed during last year’s parking update.)
•If an alley is present, allow direct pull-in parking stalls off the alley.
•Allow on-street parking to count towards triplex and fourplex on-street parking
requirements only if:
o the roadway (back of curb to back of curb) is 36 feet wide or greater,
o sufficient driveway space exists such that the full parking requirement could be
parked on-site during a snow event (e.g., tandem stacked in driveway),
o the applicant agrees to provide notification to future residents through lease and/or
sale agreements, so that residents are aware of snow emergency requirements to
move cars off-street, prior to moving in, and
o The City adopts two (2) changes to the municipal code:
Add a clause that explicitly states that all on-street parking is public parking
and may be occupied by any vehicle regardless of vehicle ownership or
property ownership.
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
6
Section 1310 regarding residential parking permits, which has never been
used, is deleted.
*One (1) block meaning to the next street east/west, - or to where the next street would cross if the
street went through – see attached map.
** To be defined as stops with a 15-minute headway or less.
***To be described as being located on: either side of 66th Street, between Rae Drive to the west and
Stevens Avenue to the east; on either side of Lyndale Avenue, between Highway 62 to the north and
either 67th Street W (along east side) or Lake Shore Drive (along west side) to the south; and on either
side of Nicollet Avenue, between 64th Street to the north and 67th Street East/AHA Way to the south.
Reasoning: The proposed standards facilitate infill development, and support Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) and walkable/bikeable neighborhoods, while providing limited parking for
maintenance calls, deliveries, and shared car programs, etc.
The expanded 66th/Lyndale area is generally understood to be the downtown area, but since it has
not been formally defined, the term cannot yet be used. Once an official downtown area has been
adopted, the designated area can be adjusted accordingly. The off-street parking allowance
caveats are based on feedback from Engineering and Public Works.
8.Unit Sizes
City Definition: N/A
Purpose: A way of indirectly regulating housing density.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2 and MR-3:
Eff: 400 sf min.
1 bed: 550 sf min.
2 bed: 750 sf min.
3+: add 150 sf for each bedroom over 2 beds
b)Proposed: Eliminate.
Reasoning: The building code already sets requirements for bedroom sizes, so having additional
regulations would be redundant and confusing. The focus should be on regulating the overall
structure, not its interior layout.
9.Open Space
City Definition: Subd.90 “Outdoor Open Space.” Lawns and other natural areas and open
courtyards. Open space does not include driveways, parking areas or sidewalks.
Purpose: Requiring a minimum amount of open space ensures that residents have readily
accessible areas for passive enjoyment. The City also has a definition for “Usable Open Space”
which is meant to be for more active enjoyment and does not include required landscape setback
areas unless intentionally designed for such.
Medium & High Density Standard
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
7
a) Existing MR-2: Min. of 325 sf per unit / MR-3: Min. of 300 sf per unit
b) Proposed: Eliminate the “Outdoor Open Space” definition and instead use the “Usable Open
Space” definition, which is already used in the mixed-use districts. Require 10% of the lot for
MR-2 and 15% of the lot for MR-3, rather than a per unit calculation. Unit-specific open space,
such as balconies and porches, may not count for more than 50% of the overall open space
requirement. Impervious improvements, such as rooftop amenities and patios, may not be
more than 25% of the open space requirement. Shared rooftop amenities that are also a green
roof may be exempt from the 25% hard-surface limit, subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer and Sustainability Coordinator.
Reasoning: Both a single open space definition, and lot-based versus unit-based requirement, will
simplify and streamline the code. Richfield does not have a park dedication requirement, which is
typically 10% of a lot area and sometimes applies in addition to open space
requirements. Limiting the amount of open space dedicated to individual units helps preserve
shared open space that fosters a sense of community.
10. Number of Units by Bedrooms
City Definition: N/A
Purpose: Limits to the number of efficiency units was likely adopted (circa 1995) to ensure that a
variety of unit sizes were provided, to provide diversity in housing options. Smaller units tend to be
more affordable, while larger units tend to serve families. There is a benefit to having a variety of
unit sizes available, to serve a broad population, but at what proportion depends upon the
demographic of the rental community. Consequently, any one (1) unit size should not be severely
limited.
Medium & High Density Standard
a) Existing: Number of efficiencies limited to 20% of the units in MR-2, and 25% of the units in
MR-3.
b) Proposed: Eliminate.
Reasoning: Allow the market to determine the number of units. Similar to the rationale for unit size
standards, regulations should focus on the overall structure rather than its interior layout.
11. Approval Process
Purpose: To ensure proposals meet zoning rules and regulations consistently and in alignment
with the intent of the code.
Background: Currently, all commercial, industrial, multiple-family housing (3 or more units) and
institutional development applications are required to obtain full site plan approval. Full site plan
approval includes a public hearing, which takes at a minimum, two (2) months, and increases
project costs. The shift to an administrative site plan approval would not include a public hearing
process, can generally be processed in one (1) month, and the application fee is less expensive.
FINAL VERSION - JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
8
Historically, Richfield allowed multi-building developments called “group housing development”.
Currently, the code defines group housing as: “A development located on a single lot that consists
of two or more buildings, each of which contains 3 or more dwelling units”. This is probably a relic
from before the PUD code was adopted.
Medium Density Standard
a)Existing MR-2: Up to 8 units = site plan approval, 9 to 25 units = conditional use permit, over 25
units = not allowed no matter the lot size.
b)Proposed: By administrative site plan approval (no PC or CC) – Up to 16 units. Full site plan
approval (with PC & CC) for between 17 to 40 units. Conditional Use Permit for over 40 units.
Allow cluster homes as a permitted use with the same thresholds.
Reasoning: Will help shorten the application process and avoid the uncertainty of unknown
conditions for smaller projects, a stated obstacle.
High Density Standard
a)Existing MR-3: up to 20 units = site plan approval, more than 20 units = conditional use permit.
b)Proposed: By administrative site plan approval (no PC or CC) up to 32 units. Full site plan
approval (PC & CC) for between 33 to 100 units. Conditional Use Permit for over 100 units.
Change the name of the term “Group Housing Development” to “Multi-Building Development”
to avoid confusion and add “Multi-Building Development” as a permitted use in both MR-2 &
MR-3 districts, subject to the same thresholds.
For all projects administratively approved (both MR-2 & MR-3), require courtesy notice to
immediate neighbors prior to construction. Following draft language is for policy only, not for
ordinance:
At least 15 business days before demolition commences – or before construction commences
if the site is already vacant - the permit holder must provide written notification to all property
owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the site notifying them of the proposed
demolition and construction project. The notice must identify the nature of the project, the
permit holder, a contact name and phone number, and the site address. The notice must also
provide a city phone number to call with any questions, complaints or concerns. The notice
should be provided to city staff for review and approval prior to distribution.
Reasoning: For thresholds, same as for Medium Density. For multi-building development, this
would eliminate the need for a PUD if more than one (1) principal building is desired on one (1) lot.
(A PUD also triggers a rezoning and a conditional use permit.)
06/27/2025
Residential Parking Reduction Areas
*A HFTL is defined as having stops with a 15-min headway or less.
** One block meaning to the next street, or to where the next street would cross if it went through.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1
Miles
±I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Assistant Planner\Ruby\Bus Service & MDR Maps\Bus Service Maps.aprx/Parking Reductions | Scale: 1:21,500 | Revision Date: 6/27/2025 | Author: RVillaPMU Planned Mixed Use
PMR Planned Multi-
Family
Half a stall per unit for the
first 40 units. 1.25 stalls per
unit for the 41st unit &
above.
MU-R Mixed Use-
Regional
MU-N Mixed Use-
Neighborhood
MU-C Mixed Use-
Community
MR-3 High-Density
Multi-Family
MR-2 Multi-Family
R Low Density
Residential
High Frequency Transit
Line (HFTL)* Stop
All other highlighted parcels
shown; 1 block along either side
of a HFT line = 0.5 stalls/unit,
up to 40 units max.**
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
1
Tier II, Mid Level Recommended Standards
If a standard conflicts with an existing overlay district provision, the overlay district provision prevails.
1.Parking Location & Setbacks
Purpose: To locate parking predominantly behind the building to prioritize an active, pedestrian-
oriented street frontage.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing:
i.Setbacks (Section 544.13, Subd. 5): Parking lots must be setback eight (8) feet
from the right-of-way; five (5) feet from adjacent commercial, multifamily and mixed-
use property; and 15 feet from single and two-family property with appropriate
screening as required by Section 544.03, Subd. 5
ii.Location: None
iii.Screening: Section 544.03, Subd 5, generally requires that “Residential sites shall
be landscaped to improve the livability, beauty and value of housing; to screen and
mitigate views of large parking areas; to reduce the effect of traffic noise; to provide
shade; and to help protect water quality.”
b)Proposed:
i.Setbacks: Retain the existing requirement for an 8 foot setback when adjacent to
right-of-way on side or rear, otherwise Parking stalls must be setback a minimum of
five (5) feet from the side and rear property lines.
ii.Location:
Front yard and street side yards: not allowed
Rear yard or underground: allowed
Interior side yard: allowed, provided it is not more than the width of the
building, or 60 feet, whichever is less.
iii.Screening: Screening requirements only apply to parking lots. Parking lots adjacent
to Low-Density Residential, (R) and Single-Family Residential (R-1), Districts must
be screened along the side and rear property lines with a four (4) foot-tall privacy
fence, solid evergreen hedge, architecturally compatible opaque wall, or a
combination of these, unless:
1.An alley is present, or
2.The adjacent property owner provides a written waiver.
The perimeter planting requirements of 544.03, Subd. 6 shall apply to parking stalls
located in interior side yards, adjacent to all other zoning districts.
c)Reasoning: Reduced setbacks are mitigated by screening standards that minimize visual
impacts on neighboring properties. Locating parking at the rear or underground supports
the goal of maintaining active street frontages.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
2
2. Access
Purpose: To ensure orderly and efficient entry and exit for vehicles, to minimize curb cuts, and
enhance pedestrian safety.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: None.
b)Proposed:
i.If a parking lot is adjacent to an alley, access shall be off the alley.
ii.If a lot is not adjacent to an alley but is a corner lot or a through lot, then driveway
access shall be off the side street with the lower functional class as defined by the
comprehensive plan. If both roadways are the same functional class, access may
be off of either, subject to approval of the jurisdictional agency.
iii.If a lot is not adjacent to an alley nor a corner lot, driveway access can be from the
street.
iv.A driveway existing as of [insert date] that does not meet the above lot access
standards can continue in the same location until the property is redeveloped. Such
driveway may be expanded if it is in conformance with the City Code.
v.Shared access is highly encouraged but requires a recorded agreement with the
neighboring property owner.
c)Reasoning: The proposed changes are intended to reduce the number of access points
along the streets by encouraging access from the side or rear of the property when
possible. This approach supports the creation of uninterrupted sidewalks and reduces
potential conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles.
3.Building Mass
Purpose: To prevent long, continuous unbroken building facades, and to use design elements
to create a vertical rather than horizontal building expression.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: None
b)Proposed:
i.Every building wall length that exceeds the height of the building shall incorporate a
full height offsets spaced at intervals equal to of the building height. The offset shall
be a minimum of 1 foot in depth and width per story of building height. An offset can
be a projection or recess. All building walls under 36 feet in length are exempt from
this standard.
ii.No building wall shall exceed 200 feet in length.
c)Reasoning: The proposed standards are intended to divide a building’s mass into
increments that create an inviting, pedestrian-oriented streetscape.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
3
4.Minimum Window Requirements
Propose: To humanize the appearance of a building, allow access to light and air.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: Standards for window treatments are prescribed in Section 544.07, Subd 5 and
require that “Windows or simulated windows shall at a minimum be used on the ground
level of any wall parallel to or nearly parallel to a street. The use of bars, chains or similar
security devices that are visible from a public street or sidewalk shall be prohibited.”
b)Proposed: Retain existing, and add:
i.Each building wall that faces a public street, public sidewalk or public pathway, must
be comprised of no less than 30% windows on the first floor and no less than 20%
windows on each floor above the first floor.
ii.Each building wall that faces any other direction must be comprised of no less than
15% windows on each floor.
iii.Window requirements are not intended to require custom window sizes, or to
increase building setbacks to comply with building code. They are intended to apply
when the first floor is used for interior parking.
iv.False windows are prohibited.
c)Reasoning: To push for design standards that exceed the minimum building code, within
reason.
5.Blank Wall Limits
Purpose: Promotes visual interest and variety in the building expression, making the building
more appealing - an added element to ensure attractive design enhancing confidence in
project outcomes.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing Standards: There are no explicit requirements. However, window treatment
requirements under Section 544.07, Subd 5 (cited above) are typically applied.
b)Proposed:
i.Along a street frontage or side street, the bottom 25 feet of a building shall include
elements that relate to the human scale. These should include doors and windows,
projections, awnings and canopies, or decorative ornamentation. This requirement
may also be addressed through art installation or landscaping subject to approval
by the Director.
ii.A blank wall (to be defined as an uninterrupted wall that does not include entries,
windows, recesses, projections, or other architectural elements, and exceeds 25
feet in length) would be prohibited. Would be calculated per floor.
c)Reasoning: To ensure buildings are visually appealing, especially when the placement of
windows and balconies is limited by building code for various reasons. This regulation
would ensure building articulation in areas where other preferred elements are precluded.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
4
6.Principal/Front Entry Emphasis
Purpose: A well-designed entrance has long been a defining feature of architectural character.
It plays a vital role in wayfinding, creates a welcoming atmosphere, and provides shelter from
the elements.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: Architectural standards under Section 544.07, Subd. 1, require buildings to be
oriented so that at least one (1) principal entrance faces the public street.
b)Proposed:
a)Building entrances shall
face the front of the lot unless a corner lot where street classifications differ, then
the entrance shall face the street with the higher road classification;
be architecturally emphasized, and highly visible from the street; and,
utilize design features that protect pedestrians from the rain and sun, such as
awnings, canopies, or porticos.
c)Reasoning: Refer to the purpose statement above. These proposed requirements, which
are similar to the mixed-use district standards, are also appropriate for multifamily
residential
7.Other Contextual Considerations:
Section 547 – Administration
Purpose: To provide administration approval for minor deviations that would trigger a variance.
a)Existing: None
b)Proposed: Ten (10) percent administrative approval of deviations.
c)Reasoning: This would remove the variance process for situations that require very minor
flexibility. This provision is intended for unique situations where the full requirement cannot
feasibly be met, but the difference would not be noticeable without measurement. For
example, ten (10%) percent deviation from the five (5) foot side yard setback in MR-2 is six
(6)inches. Staff would have the ability to deny the deviation, and require the variance
process if staff finds the deviation warrants a greater review. As proposed, the provision
would apply to all site plan approvals and not just multi-family zoning districts.
Section 509.11. - Not Encroachments.
Purpose: To update provisions to clarify balcony encroachments.
a)Existing: In required front yards, principal building balconies that extend a distance of four
(4)feet or less, provided they are seven (7) feet or more above grade at the front building
line.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
5
b)Proposed: Retain existing and add in required side yards that are not adjacent to property
guided low density residential, principal building balconies that extend a distance of three
(3)feet or less, provided they are seven (7) feet or more above grade at the side building
line.
c)Reasoning: To facilitate balconies where appropriate. In the MR-2 district, the side setback
is five (5) feet, so a balcony could be two (2) feet from the property line. In the MR-3
district, the side setback is eight (8) feet, so a balcony could be five (5) feet from the
property line.
Section 509.13. - Central Air Conditioning Units.
Purpose: To update provisions regarding the location and screening of central air conditioning
units.
a)Existing: Central air conditioning units shall not be located forward of the front building line
and shall not be located closer to any side lot line than the minimum side setback
requirement for the principal building.
b)Proposed: Central air conditioning (AC) units shall be located in the rear yard whenever
feasible. Placement of AC units in a side yard is permitted only when rear yard placement is
determined to be infeasible by the City Building Official. In such cases, units may be
located in a side yard provided they are not placed closer to any side lot line than the
minimum side setback requirement for the principal building, minus three (3) feet. AC units
shall not be located in the front yard unless placement in the rear or side yard is not
feasible. In such cases, the unit must be screened from view by hardscape (e.g., fence or
wall) and approved by the Director.
c)Reasoning: The front yard location requirement was an issue in both the Rya and Penn
Place Townhome projects. Allowing a three (3) foot encroachment enables placement of
the A/C unit within the side yard without requiring the entire building to be set further back.
As proposed, this provision would apply to all projects and not just those in multifamily
residential zoning districts. This regulation has posed challenges, particularly when
retrofitting A/C units for existing homes. The change would primarily impact residential
properties and is unlikely to affect new construction or larger commercial projects, as their
units typically exceed three (3) feet in size.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
1
Tier III, Ground Level Recommended Standards
If a standard conflicts with an existing overlay district provision, the overlay district provision prevails.
1.Exterior Materials & Color
Purpose: To guide the durability and residential character of a structure, maintain a high quality
appearance over time, and to fit within Richfield’s urban and suburban context.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing:
i.Materials: Standards for exterior materials are prescribed in Section 544.07 Subd. 3
and require “the main exterior wall surface of all buildings shall be constructed of
wood, brick, stone, cementitious planks (e.g. Hardiplank ®), glass, architectural
concrete textured surface or other materials of high quality as approved by the
Director. Unadorned pre-stressed concrete panels, standard concrete block and
unfinished metal, except for naturally weathering metals such as copper, shall not be
permitted. All buildings shall be constructed so that each exterior wall and roof surface
is finished with materials of consistent quality as those of the front wall and front roof.”
ii.Color: None
b)Proposed:
i.Materials: Modify the existing standard by removing the ability to use architectural
concrete textured surfaces and limit finished metals to above the ground floor and not
more than 20% of the wall area with the caveat that they must be matte finished. This
would apply to multifamily residential only.
ii.Color: No building may display more than ten (10%) percent of any elevation surface in
bright, high intensity or pure tone primary or secondary colors. No fluorescent or neon
colors shall be used on any exterior elevation surface.
c)Reasoning: Finished metal is prone to denting and does not hold up well to the wear and tear
typically experienced at the ground level. Additionally, non-matte finishes can create reflective
glare from the setting sun, which can be a nuisance. Metal finishes and exposed concrete,
even when textured, are not traditionally used as exterior materials for housing and are
generally considered incompatible with residential settings. Similarly, building colors that are
overly bright, harsh, or otherwise out of character with the traditional neighborhood aesthetic
should be prohibited to maintain the area's cohesive appearance.
2.Exterior Lighting
Purpose: To promote environmentally sensitive lighting, to limit glare onto abutting parcels and
right-of-way, while allowing sufficient nighttime illumination at levels appropriate for a residential
are
Medium & High Density Standard
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
2
a)Existing: Standards for exterior lighting are prescribed in Section 544.09, Subd. 1 and require
“lighting to be designed and arranged to restrict direct illumination and glare onto abutting
parcels.” Section 544.09, Subd 2 – 13 provide additional lighting requirements. Standards to
note that pertain to this update include:
i.Direct off-site views of the light source are not permitted except for ornamental
style fixtures if it can be demonstrated that off-site view of the light source are
mitigated by the fixture design and/or location.
ii.Wall packs are not allowed.
iii.Lighting shall not exceed one (1) foot candle as measured from the centerline of a
public street or residential property line.
iv.Minimum parking lot illumination of 0.2 foot candles and a maximum of four (4) foot
candles.
v.Primary building entrances to multifamily residential at a minimum of five (5) foot
candles and no maximum.
b)Proposed: Modify the existing standard to include the following requirements for exterior
lighting:
i.Maximum illumination of eight (8) foot-candles at building entrances.
ii.Light color temperature (Kelvin) must not exceed 3,000 K.
iii.All fixtures must be dark sky compliant, downcast, except decorative fixtures per
544.09, Subd. 4, 8 & 11.
iv.Maximum pole or mounting height must not exceed 12 feet.
c)Reasoning: To incorporate industry standards that mitigate exterior lighting impacts to the
environment and adjacent uses.
Kelvin measures the color temperature of a light source, indicating whether it appears warm
(yellowish) or cool (bluish). 3,000 Kelvin is what the City uses for public street lighting, so it
would create a consistent tone. Bluer tones tend to disrupt wildlife and have also been shown
to have a negative impact on humans.
3.Sidewalks
Purpose: A dedicated pedestrian pathway, separating foot traffic from vehicular traffic and
promoting safe and accessible mobility for all.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: The subdivision regulations require a minimum six (6) foot wide concrete sidewalk
within the City right-of-way adjacent to the subject parcel, if the property is being platted.
Section 544 (General Building and Performance Standards) requires pedestrian paths at all
pedestrian arrival points to the property. Finally, the current ten (10%) percent parking credit
for being within one-fourth (1/4) mile of a frequently operating transit line requires that
pedestrian ways connect the parcel to the transit stop. This is an incentive for those who want
the credit to construct missing connections.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
3
b)Proposed: Require a six (6) foot wide sidewalk along all sides of the lot that abut a public
street, with any new construction. (will reference language in subdivision regulations)
c)Reasoning: Zoning regulations cannot impose requirements that extend beyond the
boundaries of a property unless there is a clear and direct nexus demonstrating how the off-
site requirement is necessary to address an impact caused by the development.
4.Screening for Refuse
Purpose: To screen the placement of refuse, recycling, and organic containers to minimize
adverse impacts on neighboring properties, including noise, odor, visual appearance, and litter.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: Standards for the screening of refuse collection are prescribed in Section 554.05. In
general, these requirements specify that all trash, garbage, waste materials, and recycling
containers must be designed to be stored within the interior space of the building.
b)Proposed: Up to eight (8) units are exempt from the internal storage requirements. Nine (9) to
twelve (12) units are also exempt from the internal storage requirements, but the exterior
storage must be screened by an enclosure. For 13 or more units, no change.
c)Reasoning: To minimize potential adverse impacts of larger buildings and facilitate smaller
buildings.
5.Screening for Utilitarian Items
Purpose: To screen the utilitarian items such as HVAC and utilities to minimize adverse impacts
on neighboring properties, including noise, odor, and visual appearance.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing: Standards for the screening of utilitarian items are prescribed in Section 554.05. In
general, these requirements specify that “all delivery and loading operations, HVAC
equipment, and other utility and service function shall be grouped and arranged away
from the public right-of-way and fully screened from ground level observation at any point
on the property, adjacent property, or from adjacent right-of-way.”
b)Proposed: No change.
c)Reasoning: Staff reviewed the existing standards and determined they are sufficient; no
revisions are necessary.
6.Landscaping
Purpose: Proper landscaping adds to the health, safety, aesthetic, ecological and economic
values of the community. The intent of these provisions is further listed in Section 544.03 -
Landscaping and screening requirements.
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
4
a)Existing: The landscaping and screening requirements under review apply to residential
uses as outlined in Section 544.03, Subd. 5. These standards are intended to improve the
livability, beauty and value of housing; to screen and mitigate views of large parking areas; to
reduce the effect of traffic noise; to provide shade; and to help protect water quality. The
requirements in the table below are in addition to any plantings in the public street right-of-way
whether installed by the land developer or the City.
Type Requirements
Overstory deciduous trees 3 to 6 units: 1 tree per dwelling unit
More than 6 units: 0.5 trees per dwelling unit
Coniferous trees May be substituted on a one-for-one basis for the
overstory deciduous trees
Ornamental deciduous trees Not required
Understory shrubs Foundation plantings are required in all areas
visible areas from the public right-of-way.
b)Proposed: Retain and edit understory shrubs as shown above.
c)Reasoning: Applies the same foundation planting language as required for single and two
family. Projects that are unable to accommodate tree plantings on-site may either plant trees in
designated public areas, such as parks or rights-of-way, or contribute to a fund that will be used
to plant trees in public spaces on their behalf.
7.Purpose Section
Purpose: To update the MR-2 (Section 525.01) and MR-3 (Section 527.01) purpose
statements to clearly align with the overall intent of the code and the proposed updates. The
purpose statements serve as guiding language when evaluating proposals such as variances
or PUDs, helping determine whether a proposal meets the code’s intent. Therefore, it is
important that the purpose statements explicitly describe the desired types of development and
intended characteristics.
Medium & High Density Standard
a)Existing:
MR-2: The purposes of the MR-2 District regulations are to reserve appropriately located
areas for multifamily dwellings; preserve as many as possible of the desirable
characteristics of the single-family residential district while permitting higher population
densities; provide opportunities for infill cluster housing development, thereby allowing
FINAL VERSION – JUNE 13 (However, adjustments may be made between drafting and adoption)
5
greater intensities and a wider variety of housing types; minimize traffic congestion and
avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings of excessive
size (or density) in relation to the surrounding land, buildings, or infrastructure; and to
provide multifamily residential areas that are safe and attractive.
MR-3: The purposes of the MR-3 District regulations are to reserve appropriately located
areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable range of population
densities; preserve as many as possible of the desirable characteristics of the single-family
district, while permitting higher population densities; provide space for semi-public facilities
needed to complement urban residential areas and space for institutions that require a
residential environment; minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by
preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the surrounding
infrastructure; and to provide multifamily residential areas that are safe and attractive.
b)Proposed:
MR-2: The purpose of the MR-2 zoning district is to promote multifamily development that is
diverse and attractive, and to facilitate context-sensitive infill and redevelopment, by
allowing a variety of buildings with multiple units. Characteristics of such buildings include
primary entrances and windows facing onto the street, with secondary windows facing to
the side and adjoining properties, human scaled architectural elements, and green space
that allows for tree canopy, water filtration, and relaxation. Examples of such building types
include stacked triplexes and fourplexes, townhomes, courtyard cottages, courtyard
apartments, rowhomes, small (low-rise) multifamily buildings and cluster developments.
The district is not intended to allow more than one (1) full-sized single-family detached unit
on a lot (a full-sized home meaning 1,200 square feet or bigger) or to allow slot homes.
MR-3: Similar to MR-2, except building types would include mid-rise apartments.
c)Reasoning: The existing purpose statements do not address the desirable aspects of the
district or the desired building form. The language precluding full size single family is to
ensure “multibuilding developments” are not misinterpreted. An example of slot homes is
RF64. Building types could be added to the definitions section if desired/needed.
Related Comp Plan Goals and Policies
CP Goals:
Provide a full range of housing choices that meet residents’ needs at every stage of their lives,
and ensure a healthy balance of housing types that meet the needs of a diverse population with
diverse needs.
Maintain and enhance Richfield’s commitment to housing … redevelopment, resulting in an
attractive, desirable and prosperous community.
CP Policies:
Strongly encourage pedestrian-friendly and transit-friendly building and site design through
measures such as higher density development and growth, which is located along major
transportation routes.
Regularly review land use and zoning ordinances to ensure maximum opportunities for
strengthening housing choices.
Promote the development of a balanced housing stock that is available to a range of income
levels.
Establish a land use pattern and supporting infrastructure that preserves and enhances the
ability of residents to make personal connections in their neighborhoods.
Provide a full range of housing choices that contribute to vital and desirable neighborhoods that
welcome diversity of age, race, and physical ability; while maintaining a comfortable small town
atmosphere.
Require site design and architectural characteristics that provide appropriate transitions
between lower and higher intensity uses.
Develop residential standards (scale, density, etc.) for redevelopment areas that create
neighborhood character.
Focus commercial and higher density residential development along major thoroughfares.
Ensure that redevelopment and infill projects maintain the integrity of existing neighborhoods.
Give priority to projects that meet the following criteria when considering proposals for market-
rate, multifamily housing:
» Located in transitional areas between single-family neighborhoods and commercial areas.
» Offers a complementary size and style to the community.
» Includes a mix of unit sizes and amenities.
» Includes amenities to build community and encourage active lifestyles.
» Offers a mix of residential and complementary commercial uses that embody and preserve the
feel of the “Urban Hometown” in their design.
» Offers flexibility in their design to accommodate market changes.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
ZONING CODE (APPENDIX B OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE)
TO MODIFY “GENERAL PROVISIONS” SECTION 509,
WITH CHANGES RELATED TO THE MR-2 & MR-3 ZONING CODE UPDPATES
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 507.07 “Definitions” is revised at the following subdivisions to read as
follows; all other subdivisions to remain unchanged, except for being renumbered
accordingly:
Subd. 54 “Expanded 66th & Lyndale Area.” All parcels located on either side of
66th Street, between Rae Drive to the west and Stevens Avenue to the east; on
either side of Lyndale Avenue, between Highway 62 to the north and either 67th
Street W (along east side) or Lake Shore Drive (along west side) to the south;
and on either side of Nicollet Avenue, between 64th Street to the north and 67th
Street East/AHA Way to the south (as depicted on the “Residential Parking
Reduction Areas” map on file with the Community Development Department).
(Added Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 61. "Group housing Multi-building development." A housing development
located on a single lot that consists of two (2) or more buildings, each of which
contains three (3) or more dwelling units. (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 95. "Open space, Outdoor." Lawns and other natural areas and open
courtyards. Open space does not include driveways, parking areas or sidewalks.
(Repealed Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 96. "Open space, Usable." Specifically designated open space that is
easily accessible and intended to serve residents and/or employees as well as
visitors. This encompasses various types of open space for passive enjoyment
as well as active use and includes accessible green areas and hard-surfaced
urban plazas, linear pedestrian-oriented greenways, major pedestrian areas,
courtyards, pocket parks and outdoor recreation areas. Usable open space does
not include driveways, parking areas or required landscape setback areas,
unless these are specifically designed for resident, public or customer access
and use. (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd.142 “Transit Line, Frequently Operating” A bus service route having:
i.Weekday frequency of two (2) runs per hour between 7:00 a.m. and 6:30
p.m.;
ii.Regularly scheduled service weekdays after 6:30 p.m.; and
iii.Some Saturday, Sunday, and holiday service. (Relocated Bill No. 2025-__)
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Subd.143 “Transit Line, High Frequency.” A north-south bus service route on an
arterial roadway, having stops with a 15-mintue headway or less. (Added Bill No.
2025-__)
Section 2 Subsection 509.07 “Lot provisions” is amended at to read as follows:
509.07. - Lot provisions.
Subdivision 1. One building and use. Except in the case of planned unit
developments, group housing multi-building developments, and developments in
the Mixed-Use Districts, only one (1) principal building and use may be located
on a lot. This subdivision is not intended to prohibit similar types of uses from
occupying a multi-tenant building if all other requirements of this Code are met.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 2 thru 5: unchanged.
Section 3 Subsection 509.11 “Not encroachments” is amended at to read as follows:
509.11. - Not encroachments.
The following shall not be considered as encroachments on setback
requirements in all zoning districts:
a)Principal building cornices, canopies, eaves, gutters, and other similar
features, provided they project not more than 30 inches into a required
yard. In no event shall such features be closer than 24 inches from any lot
line;
b)Principal building chimneys, flues, vents, and other similar features,
provided they project not more than 24 inches into a required yard and
are no more than five (5) feet in width. In no event shall such features be
closer than 30 inches from any lot line;
c)Principal building window wells and bay windows, provided they project
not more than 36 inches into a required yard. In no event shall they be
closer than 24 inches from any lot line; (Amended, Bill No. 2011-13)
d)In required front yards, principal building entry vestibules that extend a
distance of six (6) feet or less, provided such vestibule is not more than
eight (8) feet in width or more than one (1) story in height;
e)In required front yards, principal building balconies that extend a distance
of four (4) feet or less, provided they are seven (7) feet or more above
grade at the front building line;
Balconies attached to principal buildings may project up to four (4) feet
into required front yards and up to three (3) feet into required side and
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
rear yards, provided such side yards are not adjacent to properties guided
for low-density residential use. These projections are permitted only if the
balcony is located at least seven (7) feet above grade at the building line.
f)In front yards and street side yards, fire escapes attached to the principal
building that extend a distance of four (4) feet, six (6) inches or less;
g)In required front and rear yards, landings, steps, uncovered porches, and
other similar features attached to the principal building that extend a
distance of six (6) feet or less, provided such landing or uncovered porch
does not extend in elevation above the height of the ground floor level,
and in no case shall they be located more than 30 inches off the ground;
a railing enclosure no more than three (3) feet in height may be placed
around such landing or uncovered porch, unless prior approval for a
greater railing height is granted by the Director. In the MR-2 & MR-3
zoning districts, the feature may be covered.
h)In required side yards, uncovered porches attached to the principal
building that extend a distance of three (3) feet or less, provided they are
not more than 30 inches off the ground. In no event shall they be closer
than four (4) feet from any side lot line; and
i)In required side yards, principal building steps, stoops, handicap access
ramps, and other similar features that extend a distance of three (3) feet
or less. In no event shall they be closer than two (2) feet from a side lot
line.
Section 4 Subsection 509.13 “Central air conditioning units” is amended at to read as
follows:
509.13. - Central air conditioning units.
Central air conditioning units shall not be located forward of the front building
line, and shall not be located closer to any side lot line than the minimum side
setback requirement for the principal building.
Central air conditioning (AC) units shall be located in the rear yard
whenever feasible. Placement of AC units in a side yard is permitted only
when rear yard placement is determined to be infeasible by the City
Building Official. In such cases, units may be located in a side yard
provided they are not placed closer to any side lot line than the minimum
side setback requirement for the principal building, minus three (3) feet. AC
units shall not be located in the front yard unless placement in the rear or
side yard is not feasible. In such cases, the unit must be screened from
view by hardscape (e.g., fence or wall) and approved by the Director.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Section 5 Subsection 512.05 “Permitted, Conditional, Accessory and Prohibited uses in
Residential Districts” is amended at to read as follows:
Land Use R R-1 MR-2 MR-3
Residential
Single-family detached dwellings P P N N
Two-family dwellings P N P N P N
Multifamily dwellings and multi-building developments
(minimum 3 units)
N N P/C P/C
Cluster home developments C N P/C N
Section 6 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of September,
2025.
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
ZONING CODE (APPENDIX B OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE)
TO MODIFY THE “MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL (MR-2)”
ZONING DISTRICT, SECTION 525
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 525.01 “Purposes” is amended to read as follows:
525.01. – Purposes.
The purposes of the MR-2 District regulations are to reserve appropriately
located areas for multifamily dwellings; preserve as many as possible of the
desirable characteristics of the single-family residential district while permitting
higher population densities; provide opportunities for infill cluster housing
development, thereby allowing greater intensities and a wider variety of housing
types; minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by
preventing the construction of buildings of excessive size (or density) in relation
to the surrounding land, buildings, or infrastructure; and to provide multifamily
residential areas that are safe and attractive.
The purpose of the MR-2 District is to provide for multifamily development that is
diverse and attractive, and to facilitate context-sensitive infill and redevelopment,
by allowing a variety of buildings with multiple units. Characteristics of such
buildings include primary entrances and windows facing onto the street, with
secondary windows facing to the side and adjoining properties, human scaled
architectural elements, and green space that allows for tree canopy, water
filtration, and relaxation. Examples of such building types include stacked
triplexes and fourplexes, townhomes, courtyard cottages, courtyard apartments,
rowhomes, small (low-rise) multifamily buildings, multi-building and cluster home
developments. The district is not intended to allow more than one (1) full-sized
single-family detached unit on a lot (a full-sized home meaning 1,200 square feet
or bigger) or to allow slot homes. (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Section 2 Subsection 525.03 “Permitted Uses” is amended to read as follows:
525.03. - Permitted uses.
Subdivision 1. The uses listed in this subsection are permitted uses in the MR-2
District.
Subd. 2. Multifamily dwellings, multi-building developments and (excluding
cluster home developments) with eight (8) 16 or fewer units with administrative
site plan approval; and between 17 and 40 units with full site plan approval.
(Amended, Bill No. 1996-22 & Bill No 2025-__)
Subd. 3. State-licensed day care facility serving 14 or fewer children. Care
facilities located within the MR-2 District shall be subject to the same zoning
regulations as multifamily dwellings in the MR-2 District except that one
nonresident employee shall be permitted in accordance with State requirements.
(Amended, Bill No. 2016-3)
Subd. 4. State-licensed residential care facilities serving up to six (6) persons or
a housing with services establishment registered under M.S. 144D serving up to
six (6) persons. Care facilities located in the MR-2 District shall be subject to the
same zoning regulations as multifamily dwellings in the MR-2 District.
Section 3 Subsection 525.05 “Accessory building and use regulations” is amended to read
as follows:
Subdivision 1. The uses permitted in this subsection are allowable accessory
uses in the MR-2 District.
Subd.2: In addition to the general accessory building provisions of
Subsection 509.09, the following rules apply to accessory buildings in the MR-2
District.
a)The maximum height for accessory buildings shall be 15 feet;
b)For non-garage accessory structures, height is measured from the ground
level to the highest point of the roof. For garages, that measurement is taken
on the side of the building with the vehicle door; and
c)Accessory buildings, including garages:
i.shall not be located in the front or street side yard;
ii.must be set back 15 feet from the street side property line when in the
rear yard;
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
iii.must be set back a minimum of 10 five (5) feet from any rear or
interior side lot line, except that if a vehicle access door faces a rear
or interior side lot line, such rear or interior side setback requirement
shall be not less than 20 feet;
iv.shall adhere to the same access requirements as for parking lots
required by Subd.3.b, below.
Subd. 3. Open parking or garages as approved through Site Plan Review
a)Location of parking.
i.Parking is not permitted in the front and street side yards.
ii.Parking is permitted in interior side yards only if the width of the
parking and access drive together does not exceed the width of the
principal building or 60 feet, whichever is less.
iii.Parking is permitted in rear yards and underground locations.
iv.Individual stalls are permitted head-in off an alley.
b)Access to parking.
i.If the parcel is adjacent to an alley, access shall be off the alley.
ii.If the parcel is not adjacent to an alley but is a corner lot or a through
lot, then driveway access shall be off the side street with the lower
functional class as defined by the comprehensive plan. If both
roadways are the same functional class, access may be off of either,
subject to approval of the jurisdictional agency.
iii.If the parcel is not adjacent to an alley nor a corner lot, driveway
access may be from the street.
iv.A driveway existing as of September 9, 2025 that does not meet the
above lot access standards can continue in the same location until the
property is redeveloped. Such driveway may be expanded if it is in
conformance with the City Code.
v.Shared access is highly encouraged but requires a written recorded
agreement with the neighboring property owner.
c)Parking lot setbacks and screening.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
i.Parking lots must be set back 15 feet from the street side property line
and eight (8) feet from all other rights-of-way.
ii.Parking lots must be set back five (5) feet from the side and rear
property lines.
iii.The perimeter planting requirements of 544.03, Subd.7 shall apply to
parking stalls located in interior side yards.
iv.All parking lots adjacent to Low-Density Residential (R), and Single-
Family Residential (R-1), districts must be screened along the side
and rear property lines with a four (4) foot-tall privacy fence, solid
evergreen hedge, architecturally compatible opaque wall, or a
combination of these, unless an alley is present, or the adjacent
property owner provides a written waiver.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 4 Subsection 525.07 “Conditional Uses” is revised at the following subdivisions to
read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain unchanged, except for being
renumbered accordingly:
525.07. - Conditional uses.
Subd. 2. Multifamily dwellings, multi-building developments and cluster home
developments with 9 to 25 units more than 40 units (Amended Bill No. 2025-__).
Subd. 3. Cluster home developments provided that the following conditions are
met:
a)The design of the development shall be in harmony with the
surrounding neighborhood in terms of building materials, architectural
design, scale and mass of the structure, or other similar urban design
characteristics;
b)Two off-street parking spaces, at least one of which must be enclosed
in a garage, shall be provided for each dwelling unit; (Added, Bill No.
2002-11,
c)The number and location of driveways and curb cuts shall minimize
conflict with vehicular traffic and should not adversely impact adjacent
land uses;
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
d)The density of the development shall not exceed the density
recommended in the comprehensive plan. (Added, Bill No. 1996-22,
Repealed Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 5 Subsection 525.11 “Dimensional and parking regulations” is amended to read as
follows:
Subsection 525.11. - Dimensional and parking regulations for multifamily
structures (excluding cluster home developments). (Amended Bill No. 2025-__).
Subdivision 1. The standards set out in this subsection apply in the MR-2 District.
Minimum lot
size
15,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft.
Minimum lot
width
75 feet 50 feet
Minimum
floor area
a)Efficiency: 400 square feet per unit.
b)One bedroom: 550 square feet per unit.
c)Two bedroom: 750 square feet per unit.
d)More than two bedrooms: add 150 square feet per
bedroom to that required for a two bedroom dwelling unit.
Maximum
building
height
35 feet 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less
Maximum lot
coverage
(principal
structures)
30% 45%
Outdoor
Minimum
Useable
open space
requirements
1, 2
a)Two or fewer bedrooms: 325 square feet minimum per
dwelling unit.
b)Three or more bedrooms: 425 square feet minimum per
dwelling unit.
c)Balconies and porches with at least 70 square feet and
seven feet in width which are directly accessible by individual
dwelling units may be counted as contributing 175 square feet
to the outdoor open space requirements listed above.
10% of gross parcel area
Minimum
setbacks
a)Front: 30 feet. 15 feet
b)Side:
i)Interior: the height of building or 20 feet, whichever is
greater. 5 feet
ii)Street Side: 15 feet
ii)iii) Adjacent to Park: 15 feet
c)Rear: the height of building or 25 feet, whichever is greater
20 feet
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Maximum
impervious
surface
coverage
70%
1 Unit-specific open spaces, such as balconies and porches, may not count for
more than 50% of the overall usable open space requirement.
2 Impervious surface coverages, such as rooftop amenities and patios, may not
count for more than 25% of the usable open space requirement. Shared rooftop
amenities that are a green roof may be exempt from this limit, subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer and Sustainability Coordinator.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 2. Minimum Parking for multifamily structures (excluding cluster home
developments).
a)A minimum of 1.25 off-street parking spaces shall be provided for
each dwelling unit. The Council may reduce the parking requirement
for senior housing complexes, or other similarly low-driving
populations, including but not limited to, households earning below 60
percent AMI, people who are neuro-diverse, and/or people with
disabilities. (Amended Bill No. 2024-08)
b)A minimum of half (0.5) an off-street parking stall shall be provided
per unit for residential buildings that are 40 units or less and are
located within one block* along either side of a High Frequency
Transit Line.
* One (1) block refers to the distance to the next north-south street, or to
the point where the next street would intersect if it were extended
through (as depicted on the “Residential Parking Reduction Areas” map
on file with the Community Development Department).
(Added Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 6 Subsection 525.13 “Dimensional and parking regulations for cluster home
developments” is repealed in its entirety:
Subsection 525.13 - Dimensional and parking regulations for cluster home
developments. (Repealed Bill No. 2025-__)
Subdivision 1. The standards set out in this subsection apply to cluster home
developments in the MR-2 District
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Minimum lot area a)Three-unit structure in area not
designated as "High Density Single-
Family Residential" in the city's
comprehensive plan: 3,500 square
feet per unit.
b) Four-unit structure in area not
designated as "High Density Single-
Family Residential" in the city's
comprehensive plan: 3,000 square
feet per unit.
c) Three- or four-unit structure in area
designated as "High Density Single-
Family Residential" in the city's
comprehensive plan: 2,900 square
feet per unit.
d) Five or more unit structure: 2,500
square feet per unit. (Amended, Bill
No. 2002-11)
Minimum lot width 60 feet.
Minimum floor area a) One bedroom: 650 square feet per
unit.
b) Two bedroom: 850 square feet per
unit.
c)Three or more bedrooms: 1,000
square feet per unit.
Maximum building height 35 feet.
Maximum lot coverage 35 percent.
Outdoor open space requirements a) Two or fewer bedrooms: 325
square feet minimum per dwelling
unit.
b) Three or more bedrooms: 425
square feet minimum per dwelling
unit.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
c) Balconies, porches and decks with
at least 70 square feet in area and six
feet in width which are directly
accessible by individual dwelling units
may be counted as contributing 70
square feet to the outdoor open space
requirements listed above
Subd. 2. Setback requirements for cluster home developments (in feet).
Use Front Rear Interior Side Street Side
Cluster home
developments
in R-SFH
guided area
(but see
Subd. 3)
10 25 10 15
Cluster home
developments
in non-R-SFH
guided area.
(but see
Subd. 3)
30 25 20 30
Subd. 3. Setback reductions. the setback requirements for cluster home
developments may be reduced to 25 feet in the front, 5 feet for the side interior
and 12 feet in the rear if the following criteria are met:
a)The applicant can demonstrate that a superior design is achieved
through the reduced setback. Evidence of a superior design may include
but is not limited to the preservation of a natural feature, creation of an
amenity, creation of public open space, or incorporation of special
features to meet the needs of the target population;
b)The reduced setback does not adversely affect the surrounding
neighborhood in terms of a decrease in privacy, noise, overcrowding, or
other similar impacts;
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
c)The impact of the reduced setback is minimized through the presence
of features such as landscaping or other means of buffering, a limited
number of building openings in the portion of the structure that infringes
upon the setback, building orientation, minimized garage door
dominance, or other similar features.
Subd. 4. Minimum parking for cluster home developments. Two off-street parking
spaces, at least one of which shall be in a garage, shall be provided for each
dwelling unit. The Council, at its discretion, may reduce the minimum required
parking to not less than 1.5 parking spaces per unit after consideration of factors
including but not limited to the present or future availability of transit services,
shared parking, pedestrian orientation, and occupancy characteristics. In
addition, the Council may further reduce the parking requirement for projects
designed to serve seniors. (Amended, Bill No. 1996-22)
Section 7 Subsection 525.17 “Additional Regulations” is amended at to read as follows:
525.17. – Additional regulations.
Subdivision 1. [Generally.] Developments shall be constructed and maintained in
accordance with the standards set out in this subsection.
Subd. 2. Limit to number of efficiency units. No more than 20 percent of the
dwelling units in any one building shall be efficiency dwelling units. (Repealed Bill
No. 2025-__)
Subd. 3. Performance standards of Section 544. Developments shall be
constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable performance
standards set out in Section 544 of this Code, unless they conflict with the
standards in this section, then this section shall prevail.
Subd. 4. Design or overlay districts. All property located within a design district or
corridor overlay district shall be subject to such district's additional requirements
and/or modifications. When in conflict herewith, the overlay district shall prevail.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 8 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this _th day of September, 2025.
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
ZONING CODE (APPENDIX B OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE)
TO MODIFY THE “HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MR-3)”
ZONING DISTRICT, SECTION 527
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 527.01 “Purposes” is amended at to read as follows:
527.01. – Purposes.
The purposes of the MR-3 District regulations are to reserve appropriately
located areas for family living in a variety of types of dwellings at a reasonable
range of population densities; preserve as many as possible of the desirable
characteristics of the single-family district, while permitting higher population
densities; provide space for semi-public facilities needed to complement urban
residential areas and space for institutions that require a residential environment;
minimize traffic congestion and avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the
construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the surrounding
infrastructure; and to provide multifamily residential areas that are safe and
attractive.
The purpose of the MR-3 District is to provide for multifamily development that is
diverse and attractive, and to facilitate context-sensitive infill and redevelopment,
by allowing a variety of buildings with multiple units. Characteristics of such
buildings include primary entrances and windows facing onto the street, with
secondary windows facing to the side and adjoining properties, human scaled
architectural elements, and green space that allows for tree canopy, water
filtration, and relaxation. Examples of such building types include multiplexes,
townhomes, courtyard apartments, rowhomes, mid-rise apartments and multi-
building developments. The district is not intended to allow slot homes.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 2 Subsection 527.03 “Permitted Uses” is amended at to read as follows:
527.03. - Permitted uses.
Subdivision 1. The uses listed in this subsection are permitted uses in the MR-3
District.
Subd. 2. Multifamily dwellings and multi-building developments with 20 32 or
fewer units, with administrative site plan approval; and between 33 and 100 units
with full site plan approval. (Amended Bill No 2025-__)
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Subd. 3. State-licensed day care facility serving 14 or fewer children. Care
facilities located within the MR-3 District shall be subject to the same zoning
regulations as multifamily dwellings in the MR-3 District except that one
nonresident employee shall be permitted in accordance with State requirements.
(Amended, Bill No. 2016-3)
Subd. 4. State-licensed residential care facilities serving up to six (6) persons or
a housing with services establishment registered under M.S. 144D serving up to
six (6) persons. Care facilities located in the MR-3 District shall be subject to the
same zoning regulations as multifamily dwellings in the MR-3 District.
Section 3 Subsection 527.05 “Accessory building and use regulations” is amended to read
as follows:
Subdivision 1. The uses permitted in this subsection are allowable accessory
uses in the MR-3 District.
Subd.2: In addition to the general accessory building provisions of
Subsection 509.09, the following rules apply to accessory buildings in the MR-3
District:
a)The maximum height for accessory buildings shall be 15 feet;
b)For non-garage accessory structures, height is measured from the ground
level to the highest point of the roof. For garages, that measurement is taken
on the side of the building with the vehicle door; and
c)Accessory buildings, including garages:
i.shall not be located in the front or street side yard;
ii.must be set back 15 feet from the street side property line when in the
rear yard;
iii.must be set back a minimum of 10 five (5) feet from any rear or
interior side lot line, except that if a vehicle access door faces a rear
or interior side lot line, such rear or interior side setback requirement
shall be not less than 20 feet; and
iv.shall adhere to the same access requirements as for parking lots
required by Subd.3.b, below.
Subd. 3. Open parking or garages as approved through Site Plan Review
a)Location of parking.
i.Parking is not permitted in the front and street side yards.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
ii.Parking is permitted in interior side yards only if the width of the
parking and access drive together does not exceed the width of the
principal building or 60 feet, whichever is less.
iii.Parking is permitted in rear yards and underground locations.
iv.Individual stalls are permitted head-in off an alley.
b)Access to parking.
i.If the parcel is adjacent to an alley, access shall be off the alley.
ii.If the parcel is not adjacent to an alley, but is a corner lot or a through
lot, then driveway access shall be off the side street with the lower
functional class as defined by the comprehensive plan. If both
roadways are the same functional class, access may be off of either,
subject to approval of the jurisdictional agency.
iii.If the parcel is not adjacent to an alley nor a corner lot, driveway
access may be from the street.
iv.A driveway existing as of September 9, 2025 that does not meet the
above lot access standards can continue in the same location until the
property is redeveloped. Such driveway may be expanded if it is in
conformance with the City Code.
v.Shared access is highly encouraged but requires a written recorded
agreement with the neighboring property owner.
c)Parking lot setbacks and screening.
i.Parking lots must be set back 15 feet from the street side property line
and eight (8) feet from all other rights-of-way.
ii.Parking lots must be set back five (5) feet from the side and rear
property lines.
iii.The perimeter planting requirements of 544.03, Subd. 7 shall apply to
parking stalls located in interior side yards.
iv.All parking lots adjacent to Low-Density Residential, (R) and Single-
Family Residential (R-1), Districts must be screened along the side
and rear property lines with a four (4) foot-tall privacy fence, solid
evergreen hedge, architecturally compatible opaque wall, or a
combination of these, unless an alley is present, or the adjacent
property owner provides a written waiver.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 4 Subsection 527.07 “Conditional Uses” is amended at to read as follows:
527.07. - Conditional uses.
Subdivision 1. The uses listed in this subsection are conditional uses in the MR-3
District, and are subject to the conditional use permit provisions outlined in
Section 547.09 of this Code.
Subd. 2. Multifamily dwellings and multi-building developments with more than 20
100 units. (Amended Bill No 2025-__)
Subd. 3 thru 12: unchanged.
Section 5 Subsection 527.11 Dimensional and parking regulations” is revised at the
following subdivisions to read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain
unchanged, except for being renumbered accordingly:
527.11. - Dimensional and parking regulations for multiple-family structures.
(Amended Bill No 2025-__)
Subdivision 1. The standards set out in this subsection apply in the MR-3 District.
Minimum lot
size
60,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft.
Minimum lot
width
150 feet 50 feet
Minimum
floor area
a)Efficiency: 400 square feet per unit.
b)One bedroom: 550 square feet per unit.
c)Two bedroom: 750 square feet per unit.
d)More than two bedrooms: add 150 square feet per
bedroom to that required for a two bedroom dwelling unit.
Maximum
building
height
a)50 feet 5 stories, or 60 feet, whichever is less.
b)Proximity to Transit Stations: Buildings within one (1)
block of either side of a High Frequency Transit Line* or
within the Expanded Lyndale & 66th Area may extend
up to six (6) stories or 72 feet, whichever is less.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
c)When more than four (4) stories: Floors above the third
floor shall be stepped back a minimum of 15 feet when
adjacent to public streets and public land.
d)Transition Zones: Where a high-density residential zone
abuts the south side of a Low Density Residential
District (R or R-1), the height of buildings within 50 feet
of the boundary shall not exceed three (3) stories or 36
feet, whichever is less, in order to maintain a gradual
transition.
Maximum lot
coverage
(principal
structures)
30% 55%
Outdoor
Minimum
useable
open space
requirements
1, 2
a)Two or fewer bedrooms: 325 square feet minimum per
dwelling unit.
b)Three or more bedrooms: 425 square feet minimum per
dwelling unit.
c)Balconies and porches with at least 70 square feet and
seven feet in width which are directly accessible by individual
dwelling units may be counted as contributing 175 square feet
to the outdoor open space requirements listed above.
15% of gross parcel area
Minimum
setbacks
a)Front: 30 feet. 15 feet
b)Side:
i)Interior: the height of building or 20 feet, whichever is
greater. 8 feet
ii)Street Side: 15 feet.
ii)iii) Adjacent to a park: 15 feet.
c)Rear: the height of building or 25 feet, whichever is greater
20 feet
Maximum
impervious
surface
coverage
75%
* One (1) block refers to the distance to the next north -south street, or to the
point where the next street would intersect if it were extended through (as
depicted on the “Residential Parking Reduction Areas” map on file with the
Community Development Department).
1 Unit-specific open spaces, such as balconies and porches, may not count for
more than 50% of the overall usable open space requirement.
2 Impervious surface coverages, such as rooftop amenities and patios, may not
count for more than 25% of the usable open space requirement. Shared rooftop
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
amenities that are a green roof may be exempt from this limit, subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer and Sustainability Coordinator.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 2. Minimum parking.
a.A minimum of 1.25 off-street parking spaces shall be provided for each
dwelling unit. The Council may reduce the parking requirement for senior
housing complexes or other similarly low-driving populations, including
but not limited to, households earning below 60 percent AMI, people who
are neuro-diverse, and/or people with disabilities. (Amended, Bill No.
2011-19; & Bill No. 2024-08, & Bill No. 2024-12)
b.A minimum of half (0.5) an off-street parking stall shall be provided per
unit for residential buildings that are 40 units or less and are located
within one block* along either side of a High Frequency Transit Line.
* One (1) block refers to the distance to the next north-south street, or to
the point where the next street would intersect if it were extended
through (as depicted on the “Residential Parking Reduction Areas” map
on file with the Community Development Department).
(Added Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 6 Subsection 527.15 “Additional Regulations” is revised at the following
subdivisions to read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain unchanged,
except for being renumbered accordingly:
527.15. - Additional regulations.
Subdivision 1. [Generally.] Developments shall be constructed and maintained in
accordance with the standards set out in this subsection.
Subd. 2. Limit to number of efficiency units. No more than 25 percent of the
dwelling units in any one (1) building shall be efficiency dwelling units. (Repealed
Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 3. Performance standards of Section 544. Developments shall be
constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable performance
standards set out in Section 544 of this Code, unless they conflict with the
standards in this section, then this section shall prevail.
Subd. 4. Design or overlay districts. All property located within a design district or
corridor overlay district shall be subject to such district's additional requirements
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
and/or modifications. When in conflict herewith, the overlay district shall prevail.
(Amended Bill No 2025-__)
Section 7 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of September,
2025.
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
ZONING CODE (APPENDIX B OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE)
TO MODIFY SUBSECTION 541.25
“VETERANS PARK AREA (VPA) OVERLAY DISTRICT”
WITH CHANGES RELATED TO MR-2/MR-3 ZONING CODE UPDATES
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 541.25. - Veterans Park Area (VPA) Overlay District is amended at
the following subsections to read as follows:
Subdivision 1 thru 3: unchanged.
Subd. 4. Bulk and dimensional standards. All bulk and dimensional standards
applicable in the underlying districts, as found in Subsections 525.11 (MR-
2), 527.11 (MR-3), and 534.11 (C-2) of this Code, shall apply in the VPA Overlay
District with the following additions, qualifications, and/or exceptions:
a)MR-2 in the VPA Overlay District:
Front yard setback: The minimum front yard setback shall be 10
feet and the maximum shall be 25 feet along.
Parking shall be located in the rear and/or side yards of the
building.
b)MR-3 in the VPA Overlay District:
Building height: The principal building heights shall be a minimum
of 20 feet and up to a maximum of 55 feet or five (5) stories,
whichever is less.
Building heights shall be measured from the building
footprint's average ground level elevation.
Floors above the third floor shall be stepped back a
minimum of 15 feet when adjacent to public streets and
public land. Step backs may be adjusted depending on
specific site conditions and building placements, subject to
approval by the Council.
Maximum building coverage: 40 percent.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Setbacks:
Front: The minimum setback shall be 15 feet, and
the maximum shall be 25 feet.
Side 1: Interior: The minimum setback shall be the
height of the building or 30 feet, whichever is
greater.
Street: The minimum setback shall be 40
feet.
Rear 1: The minimum setback shall be the height of
the building or 35 feet, whichever is greater.
1.When adjacent to Veterans Memorial Park, the required rear and
side yard setbacks shall prioritize greenspace and landscaping as a
transition/buffer to the Park.
(Amended Bill No 2025-__)
c)C-2 in the VPA Overlay District:
Front yard setback: The minimum front yard setback shall be 15
feet and the maximum shall be 25 feet.
Rear and side yard setbacks: When adjacent to Veterans
Memorial Park, the required rear and side yard setbacks shall
prioritize greenspace and landscaping as a transition/buffer to the
Park.
Parking shall be located in the rear and/or side yards of the
building.
Subdivision 5 unchanged.
Section 2 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of September,
2025.
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
ZONING CODE - APPENDIX B OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
TO MODIFY “GENERAL BUILDING AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS”,
SECTION 544, WITH CHANGES RELATED TO THE MR-2/MR-3 CODE UPATES
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 544.03. “Landscaping and screening requirements” is amended to
read as follows:
544.03. - Landscaping and screening requirements.
Subdivision 1 thru 4: unchanged
Subd. 5. Residential sites. Residential sites shall be landscaped to improve the
livability, beauty and value of housing; to screen and mitigate views of large
parking areas; to reduce the effect of traffic noise; to provide shade; and to help
protect water quality.
a)Quantities. These requirements are in addition to any plantings in the public
street right-of-way whether installed by the land developer or the City.
Single- and Two-
Family Dwellings
Multiple-Family
Dwelling
Overstory deciduous
trees
1 per dwelling unit 3 to 6 units:
1 tree per dwelling
unit
More than 6 units:
0.5 trees per dwelling unit.
Coniferous trees May be substituted on a one-for-one basis for the overstory deciduous trees.
Ornamental
deciduous trees
1 per dwelling unit None required. May be substituted on a 1.5-
for-one basis for a max of 25%
of the overstories planted on
site.
Understory shrubs Foundation plantings
are required in all
areas visible from the
public street.
Foundation plantings
are required in all
areas visible areas
from the public right-
of -way.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
b)Commercial edges. The density and initial size of plantings shall be increased
along nonresidential edges and may be combined with berms, walls and
fences to achieve the objective of protecting the values, quietude and privacy
of the housing. Landscaping on the adjacent nonresidential property may not
be substituted for plantings on the residential property.
(Amended Bill No. 2023-1)
Subdivision 6: unchanged
Section 2 Subsection 544.05. “Screening of refuse collection and utilitarian items” is
revised at the following subsections to read as follows; all other subsections to
remain unchanged:
544.05. - Screening of refuse collection and utilitarian items.
Refuse collection, recycling and utilitarian elements shall be designed into the
interior space of buildings, except for residential structures up to eight (8) units.
Buildings of nine (9) to 12 units are also exempt from the internal storage
requirement, but exterior storage must be screened by an enclosure. (Amended
Bill No. 2025-__)
All delivery and loading operations, HVAC equipment, and other utility and
service function shall be grouped and arranged away from the public right-of-way
and fully screened from ground level observation at any point on the property,
adjacent property, or from adjacent right-of-way. Plans for screening enclosures
must be shown on construction plans.
a) Materials. Required screening may be achieved with fences, walls, earth
berms, hedges, two (2) staggered rows of coniferous trees, a dense
deciduous hedge, or other landscape materials. Earth berms shall not
exceed a slope of 3:1 unless specially treated and approved. All walls and
fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. The
use of wood, in whole or in part, as a screening material for roof-top
equipment shall not be considered as being architecturally compatible
unless the building is constructed with a wood exterior. In cases where
roof-top equipment may be visible from above, the Director will determine
if the equipment must be painted to match the roof.
b) Locations. All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot
occupied by the use, building, facility, or structure to be screened. No
screening shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight (8) feet
of the traveled portion of any street or highway.
c) Site improvements or redevelopment consisting of less than a 100 percent
increase in gross floor area where the above requirements are impossible
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
to meet based on site constraints as judged by the Director shall conform
to the following requirements:
i. All residential structures with more than three (3) eight (8) units and all
commercial, industrial, and institutional uses shall provide a screening
enclosure for required dumpsters. Such enclosures shall be high enough
to completely screen the dumpster from all property lines; (Amended,
Bill No. 2014-4 & Bill No 2025-__)
ii – v: no change.
Section 3 Subsection 544.07. “Architectural standards” is revised at the following
subdivisions to read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain unchanged,
except for being renumbered accordingly:
544.07. - Architectural standards.
Subdivision 1: unchanged
Subd. 2. Building orientation. Buildings shall be oriented so that at least one (1)
principal entrance faces the public street rather than the interior of the site. On
corner lots where the intersecting streets have different classifications, the
principal entrance shall face the street with the higher classification. Building
entrances shall:
a)Be architecturally emphasized and highly visible from the street; and
b)Utilize design features that protect pedestrians from the rain and sun,
such as awnings, canopies, or porticos;
See also Section 509.07, Subd.5 (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 3. Exterior Materials. The main exterior wall surfaces of all non-residential
structures shall be constructed of wood, brick, stone, cementitious planks (e.g.,
Hardiplank®), glass, architectural concrete textured surfaces or other materials of
high quality as approved by the Director.
The exterior wall surface for all residential structures shall be constructed of
wood, brick, stone, cementitious planks (e.g., Hardiplank®), glass or other
materials of high quality as approved by the Director. Finished metals shall be
used only above the ground floor and shall not exceed 20 percent of any exterior
wall surface and may not have a metallic finish.
For both residential and non-residential structures, uUnadorned pre-stressed
concrete panels, standard concrete block and unfinished metal, except naturally
weathering metals such as copper, shall not be permitted as exterior materials
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
for buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all
accessory buildings, including parking ramps, except those accessory buildings
not visible from any exterior lot line. (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subdivision 4: unchanged
Subd. 5. Window Treatment.
a)Windows or simulated windows for both residential and non-residential
structures shall at a minimum be used on the ground level of any wall parallel
to or nearly parallel to a street. The use of bars, chains or similar security
devices that are visible from a public street or sidewalk shall be prohibited.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
b)Window requirements for residential structures shall include:
i.Each building wall that faces a public street, public sidewalk or public
pathway, must be comprised of no less than 30 percent windows on the
first floor and no less than 20 percent windows on each floor above the
first floor.
ii.Each building wall that faces any other direction must be comprised of
no less than 15 percent windows on each floor.
iii.False windows are prohibited.
Residential window requirements are not intended to require custom window
sizes or to increase building setbacks to comply with building code. They are
intended to apply in cases when the first floor is used for interior parking.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subdivision 6 thru 8: unchanged
Subd. 9. Color. No residential structure may display more than ten (10) percent
of any elevation surface in bright, high intensity or pure tone primary or
secondary colors. No fluorescent or neon colors shall be used on any exterior
elevation surface. City-approved murals are exempt from this limitation. (Added
Bill No. 2025-__)
Subd. 10. Blank Walls. Residential building elevations shall consistently
incorporate elements that relate to the human scale. No wall shall be
uninterrupted for more than 25 feet in length as calculated per floor. Interruptions
may include doors and windows, projections, recessions, awnings and canopies,
decorative ornamentation or other architectural elements. This requirement may
also be addressed through art installation or living walls, subject to approval by
the Director. (Added Bill No. 2025-__)
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Subd. 11. Building Mass. No residential building wall shall exceed 200 feet in
length. Every residential building wall length that exceeds the height of the
building shall incorporate full height offsets spaced at intervals equal to or less
than the building height. The offset shall be a minimum of one (1) foot in depth
and width per story of building height. An offset can be a projection or recess.
Building walls under 36 feet in length are exempt from this standard. (Added Bill
No. 2025-__)
Section 4 Subsection 544.09. “Exterior lighting” is revised at the following subdivisions to
read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain unchanged:
Subdivision 1. L Except decorative fixtures per Subd. 4, 8 and 11, all lighting
shall be downcast. All lighting shall be designed and arranged to restrict direct
illumination and glare onto abutting parcels.
Subdivisions 2 thru 3: unchanged
Subd. 4. Direct off-site views of the light source shall not be permitted except for
globe and/or ornamental light fixtures. Globe and ornamental fixtures shall only
be used if the developer can demonstrate that off-site impacts stemming from
direct views of the bulb are mitigated by the fixture design and/or location.
Subd. 5 and 6: unchanged
Subd. 7. Poles in non-residential parking lots shall have a maximum height of 24
feet measured from finished grade. Poles in residential parking lots shall have a
maximum height of 12 feet measured from finished grade. (Amended Bill No.
2025-__)
Subd. 8. Lighting fixtures mounted directly on structures shall be permitted when
utilized to enhance specific architectural elements or to help establish scale or
provide visual interest, except as otherwise noted in Subdivisions 9 and 10.
(Amended, Bill 2009-1)
Subd. 9. "Wall paks" shall be permitted only in loading and service areas and
shall be down-lit. (Amended, Bill 2009-1)
Subd. 10. Shielded illuminators or fixtures shall be permitted to light building
mounted signage, building facades, or pedestrian arcades if they are integrated
into a building's architectural design.
Subd. 11. Lighting should highlight entrances, art, terraces and special
landscape features.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Subd. 12. If installed, exterior lighting shall meet the functional needs of the use,
without adversely affecting adjacent properties, neighborhoods or public uses, as
determined by the City. Specific requirements are listed below; however, the City
reserves the right to adjust these requirements based on concerns regarding
safety, security and/or impacts on surrounding properties. Illumination
measurements shall be taken by positioning the meter horizontally at ground
level. (Amended, Bill 2009-1)
Open-air parking lots (including the roof level of multi-level parking structures):
Minimum: 0.2 fc
Maximum: 4.0 fc
Minimum uniformity ratio: 20:1
Primary building entrances/exits:
Multifamily Residential:
Minimum: 5.0 fc within five (5) feet of the entrance/exit
Maximum: Eight (8) foot-candles within five (5) feet of the
entrance/exit. (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Commercial/Industrial:
Minimum: 10.0 fc within five (5) feet of the entrance/exit
Subd. 13. Site lighting should provide consistent levels of illumination, avoiding
pockets of very high or low levels of illumination.
Subd. 14. All residential fixtures:
a.Must be dark sky complaint, except decorative fixtures per Subd. 4, 8 and
11, above; and
b.Must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.
(Added Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 5 Subsection 544.13. “Vehicle parking and loading requirements” is revised at the
following subdivisions to read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain
unchanged:
Subsection 544.13. - Vehicle parking and loading requirements.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Subdivisions 1 thru 4: unchanged
Subd. 5. Parking Lot Setbacks. Unless otherwise noted elsewhere, parking lots
shall be set back in accordance with the following: (Amended, Bill No. 2011-19)
a) Parking lots must be set back eight (8) feet from the right-of-way,
b) Parking lots must be set back five (5) feet from adjacent commercial,
multifamily residential and mixed use property. (Amended, Bill No. 2011-
13; 2011-19)
c) Parking lots must be set back 15 feet from adjacent single-family and
two-family residential property with appropriate screening as required by
Subsection 544.03 Subd. 5 for residential sites or Subd. 6 for commercial.
(Amended, Bill No. 2011-19)
Subd. 6. Number of off-street spaces required. Off-street parking spaces shall be
provided according to the following minimum standards. Parking for land uses
not listed below shall be regulated according to the most similar use and/or
authoritative sources as determined by the City Planner.
No changes to the minimum number of off-street parking spaces required for
commercial uses.
1.On-street parking may be counted toward the parking requirements for triplex and
fourplex residential uses if the following conditions are met:
a)The roadway width, measured from back of curb to back of curb, is at
least 36 feet;
b)The site includes sufficient driveway space to accommodate the full
parking requirement on-site during snow events (e.g., tandem parking in
driveways); and,
RESIDENTIAL USES
Single and Two Family For R "Low Density Residential" zones,
see Section 514.15, Subd.4 For R-1
"Single Family Residential" zones, see
Section 518.15, Subd.3
Multifamily Dwelling 1 1.25 per unit.
Group home (state licensed residential
facility)
2 per 5 beds offered for residence
purposes.
Nursing or convalescent home 5 plus one (1) per 5 beds offered for
residence purposes.
Expanded 66th/Lyndale Area A minimum of 0.5 off-street parking stalls
shall be provided for the first 40 units in a
residential building.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
c)The applicant agrees to notify future residents, through lease or sale
agreements, of snow emergency requirements mandating off -street
vehicle relocation prior to occupancy.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
No changes to the minimum number of off-street parking spaces required for
Institutional/Public uses.
Subdivision 7 “Electric vehicle charger requirements” is revised as follows:
a) thru c) unchanged.
d)Minimum number of electric vehicle chargers required by land use are as
follows:
USE INSTALLED EV
CHARGING
STATIONS*
EV-READY
SPACES*
ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS
Residential
uses with up to
3 units six (6)
parking spaces
At least one (1)
space shall support
L1 charging.
Residential
uses with 4
seven (7) to 20
14 units parking
spaces
Ten (10) percent of
parking spaces
shall support L1
charging.
Two (2) spaces capable of
L2 or L3 charging. A
minimum of 50 percent of
remaining spaces capable
of L1 charging.
Residential
uses with 21 15
units or more
parking spaces
Ten (10) percent of
parking spaces
shall support L2
charging.
Twenty (20) percent of
spaces capable of L2 or
L3 charging. A minimum of
50 percent of remaining
spaces capable of L1
charging.
At least one ADA
parking space shall
have access to an
installed EV charger.
Non-residential
uses with up to
20 spaces
One (1) space
shall support L2 or
L3 charging
Ten (10) percent of
spaces capable of L2 or
L3 charging.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
USE INSTALLED EV
CHARGING
STATIONS*
EV-READY
SPACES*
ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS
Non-residential
uses with 21 or
more off-street
parking spaces
Five (5) percent of
parking spaces
shall support L2 or
L3 charging.
Twenty (20) percent of
spaces capable of L2
charging. At least one (1)
space capable of L3
charging.
At least one ADA
parking space shall
have access to an EV
charger.
*If calculation results in a fraction, the next higher whole number shall be used,traditional rounding
applies, unless the result is zero (0), then at least one (1) is required.
e)Thisese numbers may be reduced by the Director if proof can be provided
that such spaces will not be used.
(Added, Bill No. 2022-3; Amended, Bill No. 2022-14, (Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Subdivisions 8 thru 14: unchanged
Section 6 Subsection 544.23. “Solar access protection” is revised to read as follows:
No building shall be so tall that its shadow is cast across more than 50 percent of
land used guided for a single-family or two-family building between the hours of
9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on any day of the year. The Council may make
exceptions to this requirement if the applicant can prove to the Council's
satisfaction that measures have been taken to mitigate this solar access
requirement, which measures may include but are not limited to obtaining the
consent of the affected property owner(s).
Section 7 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of September,
2025.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
ZONING CODE (APPENDIX B OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE)
TO MODIFY “ADMINISTRATION”, SECTION 547,
TO ALLOW ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS ASSOCIATED
WITH CHANGES RELATED TO THE MR-2/MR-3 CODE UPATES
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 547.11 “Variances” is amended at to read as follows:
547.11. – Variances.
Subdivision 1. Limitations. The following limitations apply to variances:
a)A variance may be granted from the literal provisions of this Code only
when all of the following criteria are found to exist:
i.The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties
in complying with the official control. "Practical difficulties,"
as used in connection with the granting of a variance,
means that the property owner proposes to use the
property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an
official control. Economic considerations alone do not
constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include,
but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems;
ii.Unusual or unique circumstances apply to the property
which do not apply generally to other properties in the
same zone or vicinity, and such circumstances were not
created by any persons presently having an interest in the
property;
iii.The variance, if granted, would not alter the character of
the neighborhood. The completed project would not impair
an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
or substantially increase the congestion of public streets,
or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public
safety, or substantially diminish property values, or have a
detrimental or injurious impact on surrounding properties;
and
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
iv.The variance requested is the minimum variance that
would alleviate the practical difficulty.
v.The variance requested will not alter the essential
character of the locality.
vi.The variance requested is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the ordinance and consistent with
the comprehensive plan.
b)Variances may not be granted for uses that are not allowed in the
zoning district where the subject property is located.
c)Conditions may be imposed in the granting of variances. Such
conditions must be directly related to and must bear a rough
proportionality to the impact created by the variances.
d)The Director may administratively approve a deviation of up to ten
percent (10%) from any dimensional standard without requiring a
variance, provided that:
i.The deviation arises from a unique or practical difficulty that
prevents full compliance with the standard;
ii.The deviation does not compromise the intent or purpose of
the zoning regulation, and is found to be in harmony with the
criteria listed above.
(Amended Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 2 Subsection 547.13 “Site Plan Approval” is revised at the following subdivisions to
read as follows; all other subdivisions to remain unchanged:
547.13. – Site plan approval.
Subdivision 1: unchanged
Subd. 2. Approval required. It shall be unlawful to do any of the following without
first obtaining site plan approval:
a)Construct a building;
b)Move a building to any lot within the City;
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
c)Expand or change the use of a building or lot or modify a building, accessory
structure, or site or land feature (See Subd.11 for amendments to previously
approved plans); and (Amended, Bill No. 2011-17)
d)Take actions to prepare a lot for development, including grading or removing
or adding soils to a site, except in conformance with a permit or an approved plan
which complies with the City's comprehensive surface water management plan or
has received a variance from the appropriate water management organization as
necessary. (Amended, Bill No. 1998-2)
Subd. 3. Administrative site plan approval. Administrative approval of a site plan
may be granted by the Director for certain uses listed in this code, subject to the
following:
a)The application requirements (Subd. 4), general criteria and standards
(Subd. 8), and the terms of approval (Subd. 9) shall all apply. The
Director may impose conditions upon the approval to promote the intent
of the code, protect adjacent properties, or to bring nonconforming site
improvements into conformance according to Subsection 509.25 of the
code.
b)Notifications for Administratively Approved Residential Projects.
i.Timing of Notice. The building permit holder shall provide written
notice at least 15 business days prior to the start of demolition, or the
start of construction if the site is already vacant.
ii.Recipients of Notice. Notification must be mailed to all property
owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the project site.
iii.Content of Notice: The written notice shall include a brief description
of the proposed demolition and construction activities, the name and
contact information of the building permit holder, the project site
address, and a City contact number for questions.
iv.Review of Notice. The notice must be submitted to City staff for review
and approval prior to distribution.
(Repealed, Bill No. 2011-17, Replaced Bill No. 2025-__)
Section 3 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of September,
2025.
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Motion by: XX
Seconded by: XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 13
“TRAFFIC, MOTOR VEHICLES, AND OTHER VEHICLES”
TO REPEAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1 Subsection 1310 “Parking: Residential permits” is repealed in its entirety:
SECTION 1310. - PARKING: RESIDENTIAL PERMITS (Repealed Bill No. 2025-
__)
1310.01. - Findings: purposes.
The Council finds that streets in certain residential areas are congested because
of heavy residential and non-residential traffic and parking. It is the purpose of
this subsection to stem the flow of commuter traffic from institutional, commercial
and industrial districts into an adjoining residential neighborhood; to reduce air
pollution and other environmental effects of automobile commuting, and to
enhance the quality of life in the residential area by reducing noise, traffic
hazards and litter; to protect the residents from unreasonable burdens in gaining
access to their residences; to preserve the character of the residential district as
such; to promote efficiency in the maintenance of these streets in a clean and
safe condition; to preserve the value of property; to preserve the safety of
children and other pedestrians and traffic safety, and to promote the peace, good
order, comfort, convenience and welfare of the inhabitants of the City. The
provisions of this subsection, providing for parking by permit only, are deemed to
be in furtherance of such objectives.
1310.03. - Zone designation.
The Council shall from time to time by resolution designate certain streets as
"parking by permit only" parking zones, and cause them to be so posted.
Thereafter, no person in charge of any vehicle shall park or permit the vehicle to
be parked on posted streets unless the vehicle bears a permit as provided in this
subsection.
1310.05. - Permits.
Subdivision 1. Types. The City shall cause the following types of permits to be
available at the offices of the Director of Public Safety:
(a)resident permits for residents living on streets designated pursuant to
subsection 1310.03, one (1) for each car, owned or leased, currently
licensed and in operating condition and current use.
(b)visitor permits for each resident household: the number of visitor permits
which a resident household may obtain is determined from time to time by
resolution of the Council.
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
Subd. 2. Serial number. Both resident and visitor permits shall bear a serial
number for the resident obtaining the permit. A record of residents who have
permits shall be kept by the City.
Subd. 3. Display. Resident permits shall be displayed in the lower rear corner of
the left side window closest to the rear of the vehicle. Visitor permits shall be
placed on the dashboard or other conspicuous place where they may be easily
seen by law enforcement personnel through the windshield.
Subd. 4. Fee. To cover the costs of administering the permit system, a fee may
be charged for each permit. The amount of such fee is fixed from time to time by
the City Council.
1310.07. - Transfer.
No resident parking permit may be used by or sold or transferred to a person not
living at the address for which the permit was issued in the household of the
person to whom the permit was issued. No visitor permit may be given or sold for
any purpose other than to permit parking by a visitor while actually visiting a
resident.
1310.09. - Service exemption.
This section does not apply to individuals who perform, or vehicles used in the
performance of, commercial services, repairs, or emergency assistance for any
resident, provided that such persons are then performing, or the vehicles are in
fact being used, in such services or assistance. This exemption terminates
immediately upon completion of the service or assistance.
1310.11. - Enforcement.
Except as specifically provided otherwise in this subsection, the general parking
regulations of the City shall be applicable within the areas designated "Parking by
Permit Only".
Section 2 This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City
Charter.
VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of September,
2025.
____________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
City of Richfield Month XX, 2025
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
BILL NO. 2025-XX
ATTEST:
___________________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:Other Business
AGENDA ITEM #3.
CASE NO.:Staff Report No. 10
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
7/28/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY: Celeste McDermott & Hilary Lovelace, Housing Specialists
DIRECTOR RE VIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director
7/23/2025
ITEM FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Consideration of a resolution finding that the acquisition/disposition of single family and duplex
residential property in areas guided for Low Density Residential through the Richfield Rediscovered
and New Home Programs is consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Prior to 2009, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) was required to ask the Planning
Commission to make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan each time it acquired or sold an
individual property. In cases where the HRA was purchasing properties used as single family residential for
re-use as single family residential on property guided for Low Density Residential development, the Planning
Commission had limited discretion to make a finding other than one of consistency. This process was an
inefficient use of staff and Planning Commission time, and the delay in waiting for a finding of consistency
determination could result in the HRA missing out on opportunities to purchase property for its housing
programs.
To streamline this process, in 2009, the Planning Commission approved a resolution finding that any time the
HRA purchased a single-family property for reuse as a single-family dwelling in an area guided for Low
Density Residential, it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As a result, each individual acquisition or
sale did not need to come before the Planning Commission for review.
In January 2023, the City Council approved an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance allowing duplexes as
permitted uses in the Low Density Residential zoning district. This change brought the Zoning Ordinance into
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides Low Density Residential areas for a mix of single
family detached and attached housing types, including duplexes.
Because acquisition and disposition of property by the HRA still requires a finding of consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, and because duplexes are now permitted in Low Density Residential districts, staff is
recommending that the Planning Commission adopt a new resolution. This updated resolution would expand
the previous 2009 finding to include properties intended for reuse as either single family dwellings or
duplexes.
Staff proposes that the Planning Commission make a general finding of consistency for the acquisition and
disposition of property through the Richfield Rediscovered and New Home Programs under the following
updated conditions:
The property is currently zoned Low Density Residential.
The property is currently used as a single family dwelling or a duplex.
The property is guided as Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed use is as a single family dwelling or a duplex.
This updated finding would allow staff to continue administering housing programs efficiently while ensuring
alignment with the City’s long-term planning and land use policies.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve a resolution finding that the acquisition/disposition of single family and duplex
residential property through the Richfield Rediscovered and New Home Programs is consistent with
the 2040 Richfield Comprehensive Plan.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The HRA operates the Richfield Rediscovered and New Home Programs, through which the HRA
purchases substandard houses, demolishes the structures, and makes the lots available for the
construction of new affordable or market-rate homes.
In 2009, the Planning Commission approved a resolution finding that any time the HRA purchased
a single family property through the Richfield Rediscovered and New Home Programs for reuse
as a single family dwelling it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and each individual
sale/disposition did not need to come before the Planning Commission for review.
In January of 2023, the City Council approved an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance allowing
duplexes as permitted uses in the Low Density Residential zoning district to bring the Zoning
Ordinance into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
B.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
In the Comprehensive Plan, the Low Density Residential category allows for the mixture of single
family detached and attached units, such as duplexes and lower-density townhomes.
In January of 2023, the City Council approved an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance allowing
duplexes as permitted uses in the Low Density Residential zoning district to bring the Zoning
Ordinance into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The construction of new single family homes and duplexes in the Low Density Residential districts
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The HRA has demonstrated success through its Richfield Rediscovered and New Home
Programs in removing substandard, obsolete housing and facilitating the development of
contemporary, replacement housing for families.
Chapter 462 of Minnesota State Statutes requires that whenever any public agency buys or sells
property within the City, the Planning Commission must review the acquisition/disposition for
consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
In 2009, the Planning Commission approved a resolution finding that any time the HRA purchased
a single family property for reuse as a single family dwelling it was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, and each individual acquisition/disposition did not need to come before the
Planning Commission for review.
C.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
Opportunities to purchase deteriorated and substandard properties that are good candidates for
demolition are often time sensitive.
D.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The HRA has sufficient funding to purchase properties through these
programs.
E.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that whenever any public agency buys or
sells property within the City, the Planning Commission must review the proposed use of the site
for consistency with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Do not make a finding that the acquisition/disposition of single family and duplex property through the
Richfield Rediscovered and New Home Programs is not consistent with the Richfield Comprehensive
Plan.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
NA
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE RICHFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDING THAT THE ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION
OF PROPERTY FOR HOUSING PROGRAM PURPOSES
IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan regarding
the acquisition and disposition of properties through the Richfield Rediscovered and New Home
Programs;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the acquisition and disposition of
single family properties for single family residential purposes would be consistent with the
Richfield Comprehensive Plan in the following conditions:
•The property is zoned R (Low Density Residential).
•The property is used as a single-family dwelling or duplex.
•The property is guided as Low Density Residential.
•The proposed use is as a single-family dwelling or duplex.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that the
acquisition and disposition of single-family residential properties, for single-family or duplex
residential use, is in conformance with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted this 28th day of July 2025 by the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota.
Eddie Holmvig-Johnson,
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Matt Taraldsen,
Planning Commission Secretary
256