Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2025-08-12 WS City Council Agenda
Richfield City Council Agenda August 12, 2025 -- 5:15 PM Richfield Municipal Center Council Chambers 6700 Portland Avenue South 1. Call to Order 2. Item Discussion a. Preview the preliminary 2026 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update as summarized in the Key Financial Strategies (KFS) spreadsheet. Preview proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2026 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 3. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9739. Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City of Richfield website. Page 1 of 177 City Council Meeting 8/12/2025 Agenda Section: Item Discussion Agenda Item: 2.a. Report Prepared By: Steve McDaniel, Budget, Cash, and Debt Manager Department Director: Mary Bogie, Interim Finance Director Item for Consideration: Preview the preliminary 2026 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update as summarized in the Key Financial Strategies (KFS) spreadsheet. Preview proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2026 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff will present a high-level overview of the preliminary budget, utility rates and fee increases in order to seek council feedback in finalizing the proposed 2025 Revised and 2026 Proposed budgets, which will be presented in more detail on August 26. Staff is also seeking feedback on the proposed 2026 CIB and 2027-2030 CIP. Both the operating and capital budgets will determine the preliminary levy, which is scheduled to be considered by City Council on September 9, 2025. The City must certify its preliminary property tax levy for payable year 2026 to the County Auditor and set a date for its Truth in Taxation public meeting on or before September 30, 2025. Once the preliminary levy is approved, it may be further reduced at a later City Council meeting, but it legally cannot be increased over the preliminary approved amount. City Council is scheduled to conduct a Truth in Taxation hearing on November 25, 2025, and consider the adoption of the final budget and levy on December 9, 2025. HISTORICAL CONTEXT RECOMMENDED ACTION EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.) CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES The 2025 Revised and 2026 Proposed budgets are still being developed. City staff will Page 2 of 177 present the budgets in more detail on August 26, 2025. FINANCIAL IMPACT The 2025 Revised and 2026 Proposed budgets are the financial plan for the City for funding City services and programs. The Key Financial Strategies document is a financial forecast of future tax levies, general fund operations and future debt issuance. Proposed utility rates and City fees impact the financial operations of the utility funds, general fund and special revenue funds. The 2026 CIB and the 2027-2030 CIP is a plan of proposed future capital projects. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S) ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Preview Presentation 2. KFS and CIB-CIP for 08.12.25 3. DRAFT Appendix D 2026 LICENSE PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES (5) Page 3 of 177 Long-Term Financial Forecast Page 4 of 177 2026 Budget Preview Page 5 of 177 Timetable and Key Events •August 12, 2025:Tonight –2026 Budget Preview, KFS, Utility Rates & City Fees, 2026 CIB/2027-2030 CIP •August 26, 2025: Budget Work Session- departments present their budgets •September 9, 2025:Adopt preliminary tax levy •November 25, 2025:Truth in Taxation meeting •December 9, 2025:Certify final levy, adopt Budget & CIB/CIP Page 6 of 177 Budget Update •Labor force participation continues to remain below pre-pandemic levels. •Cost of living increase at 3%, average step increase at 2.75%, and average negotiated contract step increases 3%-5.5% •Personnel continues to be approximately 71% of the General Fund budget. •Debt issues planned for late 2025 funded with local sales tax. Debt issues planned for late 2026 funded with local sales tax, utilities, and property taxes. •Continued inflationary pressure expected to persist into 2026. Page 7 of 177 Budget Update •2026 Local Government Aid (LGA)remains almost flat, increasing by $37,764. •2026 Fiscal Disparity Aid increase almost 3%or a total of $134,500 over 2025. •Licenses and permits revenue for 2026 is projected to be similar to 2025 revised and 2024 actuals. •Rolling stock/building/tech levy at $1,682,308. This includes a 3.5% increase over 2025 as well as $100,000 related to buildings maintenance. •EDA levy at $645,160 which is a 3.5% increase. •Proposed levy increase is 5.97%. Page 8 of 177 2026 Proposed Preliminary Levy General Fund Levy Equipment Levy EDA Levy -Base Levy Total Debt Service Levy -Total 2026 Levy $25,420,333 $1,682,308 $645,160 $27,747,801 $3,946,030 $31,693,831 2026 Proposed Levy is $31,693,831 which is an increase of 5.97% over the 2025 Levy Page 9 of 177 Gross Tax Levy History 2026 $31,693,831 5.97% increase 2025 $29,907,569 5.45%increase 2024 $28,363,158 5.89%increase 2023 $26,784,954 6.60%increase 2022 $25,127,419 4.98%increase 2021 $23,934,632 5.50%increase 2020 $22,687,471 4.90%increase 2019 $21,626,692 4.87%increase Page 10 of 177 2026 Proposed Levy Impact on Average Home 2025 •$319,350 average home>City Tax $1,743 2026 •$326,900 average home>City Tax $1,821 •$78 annual increase or $6.50 per month Page 11 of 177 2026 Proposed General Fund Budget The 2026 proposed General Fund Budget of $35,079,115 is a: •7.18% increase from the 2025 adopted budget •8.18% increase from the 2025 revised budget Page 12 of 177 General Fund Revenues 2025A 2025R 2026P Taxes 23,419,852 23,419,852 25,168,647 Licenses and Permits 1,177,750 1,121,850 1,130,850 Intergovernmental 5,294,208 5,492,443 5,766,368 Charges for services 1,766,800 1,947,888 1,830,300 Fines and forfeitures 200,000 215,000 220,000 Miscellaneous 58,750 80,975 129,255 Transfers 812,600 508,490 833,695 32,729,960 32,786,498 35,079,115 Page 13 of 177 General Fund Expenditures 2025A 2025R 2026P Legislative/Executive 1,314,929 1,300,946 1,360,777 Administrative 1,304,174 1,351,500 1,427,977 Finance 678,020 495,832 701,628 Public Safety 12,824,640 12,586,184 13,642,788 Fire 6,188,977 6,333,130 6,641,729 Community Development 1,865,120 1,806,325 1,916,110 Public Works 5,303,150 5,301,140 5,894,340 Recreational Services 2,474,590 2,474,590 2,561,200 Transfer Out 352,250 352,250 372,250 0.44% Paid Family Medical Leave 0 0 115,000 40%Fund Balance Reserve 424,110 424,110 445,316 32,729,960 32,426,007 35,079,115 Page 14 of 177 General Fund Expenditure History Year Amount YOY Increase %Change 2020 25,730,463 -- 2021 26,530,517 800,054 3.11% 2022 27,443,767 913,250 3.44% 2023 28,978,191 1,534,424 5.59% 2024 31,057,599 2,079,408 7.18% 2025R 32,426,007 1,368,408 4.41% 2026P 35,079,115 2,653,108 8.18% Expenditure reported is based on actuals for 2020 to 2023, estimated actuals for 2024,revised budget for 2025 and proposed budget for 2026. Page 15 of 177 Staffing Update 2025R Proposed Position Additions •Finance-Senior Financial Analyst, Sept 2025 •Public Works-Asset Mgmt/GIS Analyst, Nov 2025 2025R Proposed Temporary Position Additions •Administrative Services/HR-PT Admin Support,current through year end •Administrative Services/Communications-PT Web Coordinator, Sep 2025-Sep 2026 Page 16 of 177 City Reserves City policy also requires the General Fund to have reserves not less than 40% of current year expenditures. The estimated balance for FYE 2024 is $12 million. This is a separate reserve from above. 2024 Estimated Balance $7,113,666 2025 Budgeted Transfers#($565,000) 2025 Projected Balance*$6,548,666 2026 Budgeted Transfers #($530,000) 2026 Projected Balance*$6,018,666 *Projections do not include any investment returns #Transfers to Ice Arena and Central Garage Long-term Capital Reserves Page 17 of 177 Forecast of City Reserves •Planned Capital Reserves transfers since 2021 to bring negative reserves in the Ice Arena and Pool into the black by 2028. •The Pool ended positive in 2024 at $209,957. •Reduced transfers to GF to zero in 2024 (LGA increase funded previous budget gap). •Budgeting surplus to fund General Fund 40% reserve requirement in 2025 and 2026 to stop future transfers from reserves. •Proposed 2026 Rolling Stock, Equipment and IT levy increase is 3.5% plus an additional $100,000 to Buildings. Page 18 of 177 2026 City Fee Update Page 19 of 177 Fee Increases –Community Development Reflect cost of doing business: •Driveway Permits ($65 -> $100), Sketch Plan Review ($350 -> $500), Rental License (increase by $40-80), Point of Sale Inspections ($140 ->$190) Escrows –increase initial fee by $25 and add annual administrative fee ($250/yr) to incentivize compliance New Fee: •Administrative Site Plan Review (in anticipation of MR- 2/MR-3 Zoning changes) $500 Page 20 of 177 Fee Increases –Public Safety/Support Services Reflect cost of doing business: •3% increase across most business license fees •Increased Beekeeping Registration and Inspection to $50 New Fee: •Fowl Registration and Inspection $50 Planning for increase of Wine fee to $2,000 to align with surrounding cities. Will require a public hearing Page 21 of 177 Fee Increases –Public Works New Fees: •$75 fee for onsite appointment "no-call, no-shows" if the City is not given reasonable notice (~1 hour) by the resident that they wish to cancel their appointment. o Residents pick the date and time for their appointments o <5% of appointments are no-shows and residents that are no-shows are usually habitual offenders o No-shows are typically for water meter repair or replacement o Each no-show appointment amounts to ½ hour of wasted working time for two PW staff. Page 22 of 177 Fee Increases –Public Works New Fees: •$50 Backflow Prevention Device Registration Fee applicable to all properties with backflow prevention devices, excluding SFH and Duplex properties. o Backflow device owners are annually required to have an RPZ licensed plumber inspect/certify their devices are functional. Fee upon inspection report submission allows the City to recover a portion of the expense it incurs to have a 3rd party administer this program. o No fee will be charged to SFH/Duplex residential properties at this time. Revised Fee Language: Revised various subsections of the Public Works obstruction permit fees to remove ambiguity and make permit administration simpler for staff and applicants alike. Page 23 of 177 Fee Increases –Recreation Services Fields: •5% increase •Increase Lincoln Fields to match Roosevelt •10% increase for Taft Softball Fields •Soccer Fields increased to match market •Maintenance fee increase Shelters: •5% increase •Adding weekend rate •Adding Damage Deposit •No rentals on 4th of July Wood Lake Nature Center: •Amphitheater Fee $75/4-hours Page 24 of 177 2026 Utility Update Page 25 of 177 Utilities (2025 Utility Bill) City Utility Fees Page 26 of 177 Utility Fund -Water 2026 Proposed Rates (5% increase) •$1,282,243 (May 2025) •$1.9M Target 60% of accounts 25% of accounts 15% of accounts Page 27 of 177 Water Fund Outlook 5% increase in 2026; future increases will be based on the 2025 rate study results Page 28 of 177 2025 Water Rates Comparison Page 29 of 177 Utility Fund -Wastewater 2026 Proposed Rate (2% increase) •2026 MCES Charges -$2,629,751 (1.89%) •$3,558,051 –Cash Balance (May 2025) •$1.9M Target Page 30 of 177 Wastewater Fund Outlook 2% increase in 2026; future increases will be based on the 2025 rate study results Page 31 of 177 2025 Wastewater Rates Page 32 of 177 Utility Fund -Stormwater 2026 Proposed Flat Rate (5% increase) •$1.20 increase per quarter / $4.80 annually •$6,212,929 –Cash Balance (May 2025) •$1.9M Target Page 33 of 177 Stormwater Debt Service vs. Annual Revenue OUTLOOK $2,440,285 (2026P Rate Revenues) Page 34 of 177 Stormwater Fund Outlook 5% increase in 2026; future increases will be based on the 2025 rate study results Page 35 of 177 2025 Stormwater Rates Comparison Page 36 of 177 Street Light User Fee •No proposed rate increase for 2026 •$7.21 (Quarter Residential) •$36.06/acre (Quarter Commercial) •Electricity and Maintenance Page 37 of 177 Utilities (2026 Utility Bill) 10.00 3.81 81.59 84.86 25.24 7.21 212.71 2026 Rates Page 38 of 177 Franchise Fees Xcel CenterPoint Total Franchise Fees Revenue of approximately $2,462,155 annually. No proposed rate increase for 2026 Page 39 of 177 Franchise Fees Use Page 40 of 177 Franchise Fees Outlook Page 41 of 177 2026 Capital Improvement Budget 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan Page 42 of 177 Capital Budgeting Process •Preliminary report is prepared by the City Manager and Finance Director and presented to the Planning Commission. •The Planning Commission reviews the projects based on the following consideration: -The proposed projects conformance to the Comprehensive Plan •CIB/CIP as recommended by the Planning Commission is returned to the City Manager and Finance Director and included in the annual budget. Page 43 of 177 2026 Capital Improvement Budget Recreation/Open Space, $6,725,000 , 29% Right of Way, $9,926,500 , 43% Public Facilities, $3,025,000 , 13% Buildings, Fleets & Technology, $3,624,636 , 15% CAPITAL PROJECT TOTALS Recreation/Open Space Right of Way Public Facilities Buildings, Fleets & Technology Total 2026 Capital Improvement Budget $23,301,136 Page 44 of 177 Total 2026 CIB Funding by Source (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 15%(BSR) Building Special Revenue 1% (BST) Bonds-Sales Tax 26% (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 17% (FF) Franchise Fees 7%(FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 7% (M) Municipal State Aid… (O) Other Funding 8% (S) State 3%(SR) Special Revenue 2% (U) User Fee 11% TOTAL BY SOURCE Total $23,301,136 Page 45 of 177 Total 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan Project Totals Recreation/Open Space, $61,700,000 , 46% Right of Way Improvements, $46,338,000 , 35% Utilities, $16,725,000 , 13% Buildings, Fleets & Technology, $7,997,610 , 6% Recreation/Open Space Right of Way Improvements Utilities Buildings, Fleets & Technology Total 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan $132,760,610 Page 46 of 177 Total 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 21% (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 0% (BST) Bonds-Sales Tax 38% (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 17% (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 6% (F) Federal Grant 2% (FF) Franchise Fees 3% (M) Municipal State Aid 5% (SR) Special Revenue 1%(U) User Fee 5% (S) State 1% (X) Xcel Energy 1% Total 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Plan $132,760,610 Page 47 of 177 Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (Henn. Co. & Richfield) •Estimated Project Cost –$25,400,000 •Estimated City Share –$11,100,000 •Construction 2026 –2027 Public Works: Capital Projects Page 48 of 177 Penn Ave Reconstruction (Henn. Co. & Richfield) •Estimated Project Cost – $32,600,000 •Estimated City Share – $12,800,000 •Construction 2028 –2029 Public Works: Capital Projects Page 49 of 177 Public Works: Capital Projects Grant-funded sidewalk & SRTS projects •64th Street Sidewalk –Lyndale to Portland •73rd Street Sidewalk –Portland to Old Cedar •Sheridan Hills Safe Routes To School (64th Street + Russell Ave) Estimated Cost •Total Cost: $3,214,675 •State Grant Funding: $2,444,200 •City Funding: $770,475 Page 50 of 177 Emergency Water Interconnect •Total Project Cost -$5,000,000 •Construction 2027 Public Works: Capital Projects •Connection to 48-inch Minneapolis water main •Alignment under west-side boulevard of 5th Ave •Tunneled under Hwy 62 •Connection to 18-inch Richfield water main Page 51 of 177 Public Works: Capital Projects Sanitary Sewer Lining •Total Project Cost: $900,000 •Construction: Annually Water Treatment Plant Elevator •Total Project Cost: $175,000 •Construction: 2026 Water Treatment Plant Generator •Total Project Cost: $2,500,000 •Construction: 2027 Page 52 of 177 Recreation Services: Capital Projects New Wood Lake Nature Center building •Project Budget: $26.4M •Construction start: September 2025 •Construction completion: Winter 2026 Page 53 of 177 Recreation Services: Capital Projects Veterans Memorial Park Complex •Project estimate: $9M •Pool: $4.25 M •Park Improvements: $2.6M •Ice Arena: $1.7M Page 54 of 177 Recreation Services: Capital Projects New Community Center building •Project estimate: $55M Page 55 of 177 Recreation Services: Capital Projects Parks Master Plan •Project estimate: $180,000 •Evaluate existing park system •Develop shared vision for park system •Develop prioritization strategy to guide decision- making and investments •Establish a detailed implementation program Page 56 of 177 Recreation Services: Capital Projects Donaldson Park building and playground •Project estimate: $1.8M building •Paused to reassess after Parks Master Plan Page 57 of 177 CITY OF RICHFIELD Global Assumption Layout : FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Fiscal disparities increase only 1%*, LGA by only 2% and then decreased by $370,000 for 3 years, starting in 2027, due to 2 TIFs decertifying. WITH COMMUNITY CENTER DEBT Net Tax Capacity increased in 2026 due to 2 TIF districts decertifying.Revised Assumptions / Updates: 2026 Budget - Fiscal disparities and LGA $$ are actuals and increase slightly compared to 2025. 428 Inflation Assumptions 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%130 3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50% GENERAL FUND 2024 Actual 2025 2025 Revised 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 REVENUE1GENERAL PROPERTY TAX 19,163,887 18,720,207 18,720,207 20,334,502 21,635,057 23,164,063 24,699,406 25,922,948 27,077,999 28,215,108 29,395,103 2 FISCAL DISPARITIES 3,047,406 4,699,645 4,699,645 4,834,145 4,882,486 4,931,311 4,980,624 5,030,431 5,080,735 5,131,542 5,182,858 3 LICENSES & PERMITS 1,130,661 1,177,750 1,121,850 1,130,850 1,164,776 1,199,719 1,235,710 1,272,782 1,310,965 1,350,294 1,390,803 4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID 3,392,552 3,410,633 3,410,633 3,448,397 3,147,365 2,840,312 2,527,118 2,577,661 2,629,214 2,681,798 2,735,434 5 OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,780,524 1,883,575 2,081,810 2,317,971 2,387,510 2,354,135 2,424,759 2,497,502 2,572,427 2,649,600 2,729,088 6 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,015,263 1,766,800 1,947,888 1,830,300 1,885,209 1,941,765 2,000,018 2,060,019 2,121,819 2,185,474 2,251,038 7 FINES & FORFEITS 221,719 200,000 215,000 220,000 226,600 233,398 240,400 247,612 255,040 262,692 270,572 8 MISC. REVENUE 282,935 58,750 80,975 129,255 133,133 137,127 141,240 145,478 149,842 154,337 158,967 9 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 622,290 812,600 508,490 833,695 845,228 771,929 635,553 487,725 449,335 462,815 476,699 10 TOTAL REVENUE 31,657,237 32,729,960 32,786,498 35,079,115 36,307,363 37,573,760 38,884,831 40,242,157 41,647,377 43,093,660 44,590,563 11 EXPENDITURES12LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE 1,138,263 1,314,929 1,300,946 1,360,777 1,408,404 1,457,698 1,508,718 1,561,523 1,616,176 1,672,742 1,731,288 13 ADMINISTRATIVE 1,250,238 1,304,174 1,351,500 1,427,977 1,477,956 1,529,685 1,583,224 1,638,636 1,695,989 1,755,348 1,816,786 14 FINANCE 1,361,005 678,020 495,832 701,628 726,185 751,601 777,908 805,134 833,314 862,480 892,667 15 PUBLIC SAFETY 11,910,055 12,824,640 12,586,184 13,642,788 14,120,286 14,614,496 15,126,003 15,655,413 16,203,352 16,770,470 17,357,436 16 FIRE 5,902,341 6,188,977 6,333,130 6,641,729 6,874,190 7,114,786 7,363,804 7,621,537 7,888,291 8,164,381 8,450,134 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,736,429 1,865,120 1,806,325 1,916,110 1,983,174 2,052,585 2,124,425 2,198,780 2,275,738 2,355,388 2,437,827 18 PUBLIC WORKS 5,104,979 5,303,150 5,301,140 5,894,340 6,100,642 6,314,164 6,535,160 6,763,891 7,000,627 7,245,649 7,499,247 19 RECREATION SERVICES 2,324,289 2,474,590 2,474,590 2,561,200 2,650,842 2,743,621 2,839,648 2,939,036 3,041,902 3,148,369 3,258,562 20 0.44% related to PFML 115,000 119,025 123,191 127,503 131,965 136,584 141,364 146,312 21 40% GF Reserve - 424,110 424,110 445,316 467,581 490,960 515,508 541,284 568,348 588,240 608,829 22 TRANSFER OUT 330,000 352,250 352,250 372,250 379,079 380,972 382,931 384,958 387,057 389,229 391,477 23 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 31,057,599 32,729,960 32,426,007 35,079,115 36,307,363 37,573,760 38,884,831 40,242,157 41,647,377 43,093,660 44,590,563 24 REVENUE OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 599,638 - - - - - - - - - LEVY CALCULATION25General Fund Tax Levy 22,211,293 23,419,852 23,419,852 25,168,647 26,517,543 28,095,374 29,680,031 30,953,379 32,158,734 33,346,650 34,577,961 26 Reserve for Uncollectable 222,113 234,199 234,199 251,686 265,175 280,954 296,800 309,534 321,587 333,467 345,780 27 Total General Fund Tax Levy 22,433,406 23,654,051 23,654,051 25,420,333 26,782,718 28,376,328 29,976,831 31,262,913 32,480,322 33,680,117 34,923,741 26 Existing Debt 4,113,543 4,101,375 4,101,375 3,946,030 3,955,605 4,004,291 2,940,303 3,735,716 5,066,313 5,054,183 4,934,21327New Debt - - - - 576,571 - 1,422,209 1,045,51627aCash available in debt service funds to smooth debt levy (576,571) 28 EDA 556,823 623,343 623,343 645,160 667,741 691,112 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,066 820,824 29 Rolling Stock, Building, and IT Levy 835,000 1,528,800 1,528,800 1,682,308 1,741,189 1,802,130 1,865,205 1,930,487 1,998,054 2,067,986 2,140,366 30 TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVY 28,363,158 29,907,569 29,907,569 31,693,830 33,147,253 34,873,861 36,919,848 38,714,968 40,310,937 41,595,352 42,819,14331Levy % Increase 5.84%5.45%5.45%5.97%4.59%5.21%5.87%4.86%4.12%3.19%2.94% 32 TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVY 28,363,158 29,907,569 29,907,569 31,693,830 33,147,253 34,873,861 36,919,848 38,714,968 40,310,937 41,595,352 42,819,143 33 LESS FISCAL DISPARITIES (3,724,282)(4,699,645)(4,699,645)(4,834,145)(4,882,486)(4,931,311)(4,980,624)(5,030,431)(5,080,735)(5,131,542)(5,182,858)34 NET LOCAL LEVY TO TAXPAYERS 24,638,876 25,207,924 25,207,924 26,859,685 28,264,766 29,942,550 31,939,224 33,684,537 35,230,202 36,463,810 37,636,285 35 NET TAX CAPACITY 47,262,389 46,190,766 46,190,766 48,223,119 49,391,381 50,873,122 52,399,316 53,971,296 55,590,434 57,258,147 58,975,892 36 TAX RATE ON TAX CAPACITY 52.132%54.574%54.574%55.699%57.226%58.857%60.954%62.412%63.375%63.683%63.816%37 TAX RATE % CHANGE -0.47%4.45%4.45%2.06%2.74%2.85%3.56%2.39%1.54%0.49%0.21% 38 City Taxes on Avg Household 1,657 1,743 1,743 1,821 1,927 2,041 2,177 2,296 2,402 2,486 2,56639Percentage tax increase in average home 2.72%5.16%5.16%4.47%5.82%5.94%6.67%5.46%4.59%3.50%3.22% 40 Average Home Market Value Increase (Decrease)3.20%0.60%0.60%2.36%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%41 Total Net Tax Capacity Increase (Decrease)3.50%-2.30%-2.30%4.40%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%42 Estimated Average Home Market Value 317,856 319,350 319,350 326,900 336,707 346,808 357,212 367,929 378,967 390,336 402,046 Page 58 of 177 CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PLAN 2026 – 2030 Page 59 of 177 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The Richfield Capital Improvement Budget and Plan is a comprehensive list of major improvements necessary to meet the needs of the community over a five-year period. This list is prepared through compiling the project needs requested by the various city departments. The Capital Plan sets forth the proposed scheduling and details of specific projects by year, estimated cost, and a justification or description to those responsible for making policy decisions regarding expenditures for new facilities. In addition, the Plan provides information so that individual project requests can be better evaluated against community needs and the community’s ability to pay for and maintain these facilities in the succeeding years. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GOALS The specific goals of the Capital Improvement Plan are: • To develop a realistic list of capital improvement needs which relates proposed projects to the City’s capacity to finance such projects. • To minimize the impact of projects on the residents’ ability to pay. • To schedule various projects and improvements in a way which allows adequate time to detailed design and engineering of the projects, preparing environmental statements or grant applications or exploring alternative methods of financing. • To provide coordination between City departments, various units of special and general local government, and public utilities. • To implement the community’s Comprehensive Plan in an orderly fashion. • To keep the public involved and informed about needed public improvements and to better enable the public to schedule private improvements. OVERVIEW Richfield’s Capital Improvement Plan is a process for identifying annual project needs and priorities for project coordination as well as for financial planning. In addition, the Capital Improvement process provides for public discussion of short range City improvements. The Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)/Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are identified through discussions of the various City commissions and the City departments. From these discussions City staff compiles estimated costs, scope and potential funding sources for the projects. A preliminary report is then generated by the Finance Director based on these discussions and presented to a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission then reviews the projects and scheduling based on the following consideration: • The proposed project’s conformance to the Comprehensive Plan. The CIB/CIP, as recommended by the Planning Commission, is then returned to the Finance Director, and submitted to the City Council as part of the annual budget process. The Council may delete projects from the Plan or may change the scheduling and priority of the allocation of funds. In accordance with state statutes, the City Council should refer any new project they may add to the Capital Improvement Plan to the Planning Commission for review. Accordingly, the 2025 Revised/2026 Proposed Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) reflects funding for several improvement projects throughout the City. Included are costs for the Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction, multi-year Pavement Management, multi-year ADA Page 60 of 177 Improvements, multi-year Bicycle Improvements and multi-year Pedestrian Improvement projects. The capital spending plan also includes funds for park and recreation and water and wastewater projects. The funding for the right of way projects is expected to come from sources such as Federal and State grants, Municipal State Aid (MSA), street reconstruction bonds, and utility franchise fees. Funding for other projects included in the CIB will come from intergovernmental revenues, special revenues, and user fees. The City’s main operating budgets should not be materially affected by the planned projects as all funding is outside those budgets. The only possible effect would be on the maintenance of the newly constructed projects. In some cases the maintenance costs may increase, but in others, it is expected to decrease. The Capital Improvement Plan, which represents the next four-year period, also contains a number of significant proposed projects including, several park projects, major street improvement and reconstruction projects throughout the city, replacement of rolling stock and technology equipment, and several projects to improve public facilities throughout the City. 2026 Capital Improvement Budget Projects Recreation Open Space Community Center - $20,000 Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. Parks Major Maintenance - $275,000 Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects include tennis/basketball court resurfacing, trail resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partial replacement of existing park capital items. Specific improvement projects and their priorities will be identified through the Parks Master Plan process. Parks Master Plan - $180,000 Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks Master Plan, a document within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall philosophy around park management and development, as well as specific park development plans, and serves as a guiding document for future capital improvement planning and other operations. The plan was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a consultant to help coordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement process. Veterans Park Complex - $5,000,000 Veterans Park is home to several recreation amenities: the Outdoor Pool, the Ice Arena, the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility, and the park itself (including trails, green space, marsh, etc). Improvements to the Veterans Park Complex would include a new pool liner and pool concessions area, improvements to the arena roof, HVAC, lobby area, doors, and the addition of an elevator, improvements to the gutters and irrigation system of the band shell, a new roof, lighting, and surfacing for the pavilion, new roof and fascia for the mini-golf building, and improvements to the park trails, vegetation, signage, and the addition of a wildlife viewing area. Page 61 of 177 Wood Lake Nature Center Building - $1,000,000 Wood Lake Nature Center needs a complete re-build as its current building is 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community and region that are placed on the center. Grants have been secured for the project: $3m from a Federal grant and $12m from a State of Minnesota bonding grant. The largest remaining segment of funding, $11m, from local sales tax ($10m in 2025 and an additional $1m in 2026). Wood Lake Trail Updates - $250,000 Major overall update work to Wood Lake’s trails, including raising trail beds, resurfacing trails with additional aggregate, and performing other repairs as needed. A state grant would be pursued and funds would be utilized from the Friends of Wood Lake operating fund. Right of Way Improvements 64th Street Sidewalk - $165,000 This project will construct a new sidewalk along W 64th St from just east of MSAS 363 (Lyndale Ave) to CSAH 35 (Portland Ave). The new sidewalk will be separated from the roadway by a boulevard, and new ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. A new ADA-compliant at-grade railroad crossing will be constructed across the Progressive Rail line located along Pleasant Ave. Minor right of way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Sidewalk will be constructed on one side of the street, which will be determined through the city’s public engagement process. Project was awarded Active Transportation funding through the 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal) - $200,000 This project will construct a new sidewalk along E 73rd Street and Diagonal Blvd to MSAS 369 (Cedar Ave S). Sidewalk location will be determined by the city’s public engagement process. New ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. Minor right of way acquisitions and temporary construction easements will be required. Project was awarded Active Transportation funding through the Met Council’s 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. Multi-Year ADA Improvements - $200,000 The City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan must be updated to comply with State and Federal requirements. The updated plan will be used to identify missing or non-compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way. This may include sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure. The plan will be used to program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements - $40,000 As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities will be installed. Each route will go through a public engagement process prior to implementation. Improvements may be identified as signage, pavement markings, or other items identified in each plan. Multi-Year Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction - $7,500,000 Page 62 of 177 Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 76th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant will lead a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s Public Engagement Process to guide the roadway design. Staff will pursue additional funding sources to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27). Multi-Year Pavement Management Program - $737,000 The City’s Accelerated 6-Year Mill and Overlay Project was completed in 2020. In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements. Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements - $40,000 Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction – $300,000 This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement. Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement - $50,000 Public Works will be replacing a significant portion of the street name signs throughout the City. This is needed because many of the existing street name signs do not meet current standards for font design and retro-reflectivity, both of which impact the public’s ability to clearly read and understand the signs. Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk - $694,500 This project will construct approximately 0.25 miles of new sidewalk near Sheridan Hills Elementary School, including traffic calming and pedestrian safety features at the intersections of 64th/Thomas, 64th/Sheridan, and 64th/Russell. Project was identified during the 2024 SRTS Design Assistance study and was awarded Safe Routes to School funding through the 2024 Infrastructure Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. Public Facilities HUB Redevelopment Participation - $1,450,000 In conjunction with redevelopment of the HUB shopping center property, the City will work with the developer to construct stormwater infrastructure that will address regional flooding of public right-of-way near the HUB property. The infrastructure will be designed to handle runoff from public right-of-way, as well as anticipated developed conditions on the HUB property. The costs for this infrastructure will be shared between the City and the developer. The City will also likely share cost to complete sidewalk installation along 65th St that was not constructed with the 65th St Reconstruction Project. Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System - $200,000 Page 63 of 177 The storm sewer collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced concrete pipe. A cleaning and inspection program is conducted annually to determine the condition of the sewer mains and structures. Sewer mains and structures, that are identified as being in poor condition, will be replaced or rehabilitated with the means and methods that are in-line with industry standards. The rehabilitation will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years. Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining - $900,000 The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe). As staff does ongoing maintenance and television inspections, they encounter areas with tree root intrusion and/or pipes that have cracks. In order to preserve the level of service to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, these pipes should be lined. Lining consists of installation of a liner in the existing clay pipe; which expands and heats the liner, causing adherence to the pipe. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, the appropriate standard. This technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the pipe. It’s anticipated this program will be ongoing until completed based upon funding availability. Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements - $100,000 The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room (floor) inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor. Water Plant Elevator Replacement - $175,000 The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it’s getting to be very difficult to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily for the transport of equipment, chemicals, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It’s also that which satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with modern technology. Water Plant Program Space Renovation - $150,000 The program spaces of the water treatment plant including the education center and bathrooms, men’s and women’s bathrooms on the operating floor, and lunch/break room need reconstruction. Both in the forms of cosmetic improvements (e.g. carpet and paint) to a full re-construction of the space to meet current building codes and modern-day design. This project is for the design, construction, and oversight of construction of these spaces to bring each into a modern-day space for the benefit of the plant employees and general public that visit the plant. Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement - $50,000 The last of three sludge pumps require replacement. The frequent effort of maintenance and repair is no longer adding value for plant operations. This project will be for the procurement and installation of one new sludge pump at the water treatment plant. Page 64 of 177 Buildings, Fleet and Technology Carpet Replacement - $120,000 The carpet in the Police department is worn and due for replacement. The carpet is at the end of its life cycle. Fiber Infrastructure Projects - $45,000 This is related to two fiber infrastructure projects. The first is to create redundancy fiber to Woodlake Nature Center at an estimated cost of $30,000. The additional $15,000 is the estimated annual amount of fiber infrastructure projects. Fire SCBA Purchase - $450,000 The self-contained breathing apparatuses (SCBA) purchased in 2014 are reaching end-of-life in 2026. This request is to replace all SCBAs and related bottles and equipment. Laptop Purchases - $34,260 Per laptop replacement schedule and additional laptops requested by city departments. Multi-Year Fleet Purchases - $1,664,726 The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to provide City Services. This project is ongoing in which the Division makes vehicle purchases every year. Network Infrastructure Replacement - $10,650 Per network infrastructure replacement schedule this request is to replace access points and switches at the ice arena. Public Works Storage Facility - $1,300,000 The City built its current maintenance facility with an understanding that ongoing storage needs could be accommodated off-site. Historically, the City had relied on the MnDOT Cedar Ave Station to provide the salt needed for the winter season via an ongoing agreement and did not need to store salt on site. This agreement was modified in 2021 and MnDOT has chosen to no longer provide salt to the city. In addition, the site the City is currently using for temporary storage for tree debris, sweepings, water main break debris etc., is a short-term solution, requiring the City to identify a new location to be used for its storage needs. In 2025 MnDOT will be conveying a parcel of land along the west side of TH 77 and north of Diagonal Blvd to the City which will become the future storage site. Page 65 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Community Center Building Repair 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Community Center Building Repair TOTAL PROJECT COST $20,000/yr (until new building) DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 $20,000 2029 2027 $20,000 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB $20,000 2030 CIP 2023-2025 $20,000/yr 2027 CIP $20,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $40,000 ($20k/yr x 2 yrs) OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $20,000/yr x 2 yrs 8. Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 66 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Parks Major Maintenance 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Parks Major Maintenance TOTAL PROJECT COST Varies DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 $275,000 2029 $335,000 2027 $335,000 2030 $455,000 2028 $335,000 >2030 $335,000/yr SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB $275,000 2030 CIP $455,000 2000-2025 $50,000-100,000/yr 2027 CIP $335,000 Beyond 2030 $335,000/yr 2028 CIP $335,000 2029 CIP $335,000 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $275,000-$455,000/yr OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $275,000-$455,000/yr 8. Brief summary of project: Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects include tennis/basketball court resurfacing, trail resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partial replacement of existing park capital items. Specific improvement projects and their priorities will be identified through the Parks Master Plan process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 67 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Parks Master Plan 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Parks Master Plan TOTAL PROJECT COST $180,000 DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 $100,000 2029 2027 $80,000 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB $180,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $180,000 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $180,000 8. Brief summary of project: Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks Master Plan, a document within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall philosophy around park management and development, as well as specific park development plans, and serves as a guiding document for future capital improvement planning and other operations. The plan was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a consultant to help coordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 68 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Veterans Park Complex Improvements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Veterans Park Complex TOTAL PROJECT COST $9 million DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 $5,00,000 2029 $ 2027 $4,800,000 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $9,800,000 Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $9,800,000 8. Brief summary of project: Veterans Park is home to several recreation amenities: the Outdoor Pool, the Ice Arena, the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility, and the park itself (including trails, green space, marsh, etc). Improvements to the Veterans Park Complex would include a new pool liner and pool concessions area, improvements to the arena roof, HVAC, lobby area, doors, and the addition of an elevator, improvements to the gutters and irrigation system of the band shell, a new roof, lighting, and surfacing for the pavilion, new roof and fascia for the mini-golf building, and improvements to the park trails, vegetation, signage, and the addition of a wildlife viewing area. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No x 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 69 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Wood Lake Nature Center Building 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Wood Lake Nature Center Building TOTAL PROJECT COST $26,225,000 DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2022-2026 $26,225,000 2029 2027 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB - 2030 CIP - 2022 $100,000 2027 CIP - Beyond 2030 - 2023 $125,000 2028 CIP - 2029 CIP - TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $225,000 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $11,000,000 Other Funding (O) $200,000 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $12,000,000 Federal Grant (F) $3,000,000 Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $26,425,000 8. Brief summary of project: Wood Lake Nature Center needs a complete re-build as its current building is 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community and region that are placed on the center. Grants have been secured for the project: $3m from a Federal grant and $12m from a State of Minnesota bonding grant. The largest remaining segment of funding, $11m, would come from local sales tax, if approved in November 2024 by referendum. The final funding component is from liquor store revenue ($225,000). 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 70 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Wood Lake Trail Updates 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Wood Lake Trail Updates TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 $250,000 2029 2027 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $0 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $50,000 G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $200,000 Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 8. Brief summary of project: Major overall update work to Wood Lake’s trails, including raising trail beds, resurfacing trails with additional aggregate, and performing other repairs as needed. A state grant would be pursued and funds would be utilized from the Friends of Wood Lake operating fund. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 71 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement TOTAL PROJECT COST $120,000 DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 2029 2027 $120,000 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $120,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $120,000 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $120,000 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Adams Hill Park in accordance with the Play Equipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 72 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement TOTAL PROJECT COST $120,000 DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 2029 2027 2030 2028 $120,000 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $120,000 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $120,000 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $120,000 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Heredia Park in accordance with the Play Equipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 73 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Ice Arena Repair 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Ice Arena Repair TOTAL PROJECT COST $20,000/yr DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 2029 $20,000 2027 2030 $20,000 2028 $20,000 >2030 $20,000/yr SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP $20,000 2023-2025 $20,000/yr 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $20,000/yr 2028 CIP $20,000 2029 CIP $20,000 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $20,000/yr OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $20,000/yr 8. Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Ice Arena building, rink equipment, and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include repair or replacement of HVAC equipment, roof, windows, flooring, ice rink equipment, bleachers, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. The funds will not be necessary during renovation work to the Arena in 2026 and 2027. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 74 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Community Center Building Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Community Center Building TOTAL PROJECT COST $55 million DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 2029 $30,000,000 2027 2030 $20,000,000 2028 $5,000,0000 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amou nt G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $10,000,000 Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $45,000,000 Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $55,000,000 8. Brief summary of project: The Community Center needs a complete rebuild the current building is more than 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community, including gym space, a walking track and community spaces. $45 m would come from a local sales tax and $10 m would come from bonds. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No x 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 75 of 177 Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Little Bob’s Park Play Equipment Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PROJECT Little Bob’s Park Play Equipment Replacement TOTAL PROJECT COST $120,000 DEPARTMENT Recreation Services PROJECT SPENDING PLAN (work performed with actual expenditures) 2026 2029 $120,000 2027 2030 2028 >2030 SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (current & future years) SPECIAL REVENUE ALLOCATIONS (past years) 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP $120,000 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $120,000 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ Municipal State Aid (M) $ G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ Other Funding (O) $ G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ Hennepin County (C) $ State (S) $ Federal Grant (F) $ Tax Levy (TL) $ Franchise Fee (FF) $ User Fee (U) $ Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ Xcel Energy (X) $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $120,000 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Little Bob’s Park in accordance with the Play Equipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 76 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 64th Street Sidewalk 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 64th Street Sidewalk 2. Total project cost: $1,310,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $165,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $1,145,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2026: $165,000 Municipal State Aid 2027: $291,000 Municipal State Aid, $854,000 State Grant 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $854,000 65.2% Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $456,000 34.8% TOTAL $1,310,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along W 64th St from just east of MSAS 363 (Lyndale Ave) to CSAH 35 (Portland Ave). The new sidewalk will be separated from the roadway by a boulevard, and new ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. A new ADA-compliant at-grade railroad crossing will be constructed across the Progressive Rail line located along Pleasant Ave. Minor right of way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Sidewalk will be constructed on one side of the street, which will be determined through the city’s public engagement process. Project was awarded Active Transportation funding through the 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 77 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap 2. Total project cost: $1,570,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $200,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $1,370,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2026: $200,000 MSA 2027: $323,960 MSA, $1,046,040 State Grant 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $1,046,040 66.6% Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $523,960 33.4% TOTAL $1,570,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along E 73rd Street and Diagonal Blvd to MSAS 369 (Cedar Ave S). Sidewalk location will be determined by the city’s public engagement process. New ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. Minor right of way acquisitions and temporary construction easements will be required. Project was awarded Active Transportation funding through the Met Council’s 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 78 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year ADA Improvements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: ADA Improvements 2. Total project cost: $1,100,000 3. Years to complete: 6 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2024 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $200,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $1,100,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,100,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan must be updated to comply with State and Federal requirements. The updated plan will be used to identify missing or non-compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way. This may include sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure. The plan will be used to program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 79 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 2. Total project cost: $200,000 through five years 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Annual If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $40,000 2030 CIP $40,000 2027 CIP $40,000 Beyond 2030 $40,000* 2028 CIP $40,000 2029 CIP $40,000 *Annually 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $200,00 0 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities will be installed. Each route will go through a public engagement process prior to implementation. Improvements may be identified as signage, pavement markings, or other items identified in each plan. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 80 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: City share $11,500,000 County asset with total project $25,000,000 3. Years to complete: 4 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2024 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $6,400,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $2,550,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2026: $3,500,000 Property Tax Bond, $4,000,000 Utility Bonds 2027: $4,000,000 Property Tax Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $7,500,000 65.22% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $4,000,000 34.78% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $11,500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 77th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant led a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s Public Engagement Process to guide the roadway design in 2023 and 2024. Staff are pursuing state bond funding to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27). 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Previous years’ expenditures cash flowed prior to bonding: 2024 $500,000 2025 $1,550,000 Page 81 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Pavement Management Program 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Pavement Management Program 2. Total project cost: $3,780,000 through five years 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Annual Maintenance If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $737,000 2030 CIP $827,000 2027 CIP $737,000 Beyond 2030 $700,000 2028 CIP $777,000 2029 CIP $702,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $3,780,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $3,780,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City’s Accelerated 6-Year Mill and Overlay Project was completed in 2020. In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 82 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 2. Total project cost: $200,000 through five years 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Annual If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $40,000 2030 CIP $40,000 2027 CIP $40,000 Beyond 2030 $40,000* 2028 CIP $40,000 2029 CIP $40,000 *Annually 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $200,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 83 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: City share $12,800,000 County asset with total project $32,600,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2025 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $300,000 2030 CIP $ 2027 CIP $300,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $6,000,000 2029 CIP $6,000,000 2025: $200,000 MSA 2026: $300,000 MSA 2027: $300,000 MSA 2028: $5,500,000 Property Tax Bond, $4,500,000 Utility Bond 2029: $2,000,000 Utility Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $5,500,000 42.97% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $6,500,000 50.78% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $800,000 6.25% TOTAL $12,800,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 84 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Street Name Sign Replacement 2. Total project cost: $150,000 3. Years to complete: 3 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2025 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $50,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $50,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $150,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $150,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Public Works will be replacing a significant portion of the street name signs throughout the City. This is needed because many of the existing street name signs do not meet current standards for font design and retro-reflectivity, both of which impact the public’s ability to clearly read and understand the signs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 85 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 2. Total project cost: $694,500 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $694,500 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $544,500 78.4% Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $150,000 21.6% TOTAL $694,500 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct approximately 0.25 miles of new sidewalk near Sheridan Hills Elementary School, including traffic calming and pedestrian safety features at the intersections of 64th/Thomas, 64th/Sheridan, and 64th/Russell. Project was identified during the 2024 SRTS Design Assistance study and was awarded Safe Routes to School funding through the 2024 Infrastructure Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 86 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 2. Total project cost: $1,200,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $1,200,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,200,000 100% TOTAL $1,200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The concrete pavement panels and pavement joints on 77th Street are beginning to fail in certain areas and will need major maintenance in the near future to avoid full reconstruction. This work will address the worst areas of pavement failure, primarily east of Portland Ave. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 87 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 78th Street Lighting 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 78th Street Lighting 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 3 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $100,000 2029 CIP $200,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $500,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: MnDOT will be adding pedestrian level lighting (paid for by the City) to several trail segments constructed in Phase 1 of the I-494 project. Due to issues with the way the contract was written, there are several gaps in the trail network that will not have lighting constructed, and the city will need to backfill with pedestrian and street lighting. These areas are 78th Street west of Penn, 78th Street from Pleasant Ave to Nicollet Ave, and 78th Street from Nicollet Ave to Portland Ave. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 88 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – I-494 Phase 2 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: I-494 Phase 2 2. Total project cost: $1,000,000 3. Years to complete: 3 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $1,000,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,000,000 100% TOTAL $1,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: MnDOT will be expanding I-494 to add E-ZPass lanes from Hwy 169 to Hwy 77 to complete the I-494 corridor vision layout. The overall project includes the expanded lanes, a new railroad bridge at Pleasant Ave, a reconstructed 82nd Street interchange, new bridges on Hwy 77 over I-494, and pavement rehabilitation work on I-35W from 82nd to 76th and on I-494 east of I-35W to 24th Ave. The local work includes frontage road work in Richfield at Lyndale Ave, Pleasant Ave, and east of 12th Ave. The project is currently identified as $220,000,000 in the 2025-28 STIP, with the local cost share not yet identified ($1,000,000 has been used as a placeholder). The total state project cost is likely to increase. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 89 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Traffic Signal Replacements 2. Total project cost: $2,580,000 3. Years to complete: 4 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP $640,000 2027 CIP $670,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $655,000 2029 CIP $615,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $2,580,000 100% TOTAL $2,580,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the ends of their expected life-cycles between 2025 and 2035. The signals will need to be replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total cost of signal replacements is $2.6M, with the first signal components being replaced no earlier than 2027 due to the ongoing 494 project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 90 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 69th Street Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 69th Street Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $7,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $7,000,000 2029 CIP 2029: $3,000,000 Property Tax Bond, $4,000,000 Utility Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,000,000 42.9% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $4,000,000 57.1% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $7,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The project includes reconstruction of 69th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including narrowing of the roadway to add sidewalk to one side, reconstruction of retaining walls, lining or replacement of sanitary sewer, and replacement of storm sewer. The final roadway section will be determined following the City’s public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 91 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th and Knox Improvements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th and Knox Improvements 2. Total project cost: $4,980,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $650,000 2029 CIP $4,330,000 2030: $1,642,960 Property Tax Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $1,642,960 33.0% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $2,687,040 54.0% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $650,000 13.0% TOTAL 4,980,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project consists of the conversion of the existing signalized intersection at W 76th St (MSAS 361) and Knox Ave S in the City of Richfield to a roundabout, including improvements to active transportation facilities that use the intersection. Ultimate design of the intersection will be determined through the city’s public engagement process. Permanent right of way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Project was selected for Regional Solicitation in the 2024 cycle, with a FY 2029 construction date. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 92 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th Street West Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th Street West Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $6,250,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP $6,250,000 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2030: $3,750,000 Property Tax Bond, $1,500,000 Utility Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,750,000 60.0% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $1,500,000 24.0% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $1,000,000 16.0% Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $6,250,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of 76th Street between Sheridan Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including intersection control at Upton Avenue, replacement of City utilities, undergrounding of overhead utilities, retaining wall and sidewalk replacement. The exact design of the roadway will be determined through a public engagement process. The City will continue pursuing grant funding, however the project will need to be completed due to deteriorating stormwater utilities, regardless of if grant funding is obtained. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 93 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 63rd Street Greenway 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 63rd Street Greenway 2. Total project cost: $3,850,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $3,850,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $2,675,000 69.5% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,175,000 30.5% TOTAL $3,850,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This concept was originally proposed in the early 2010s, to create a trail connection on 63rd Street between Taft Park and Veterans Park. Project would include removing thru access on 63rd Street from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave, creating a linear park while maintaining driveway access for all residents whose driveways connect to 63rd Street. Ultimate design of the linear park would be based on a public outreach and engagement process. This project would only be implemented if grant funding can be secured. Project may be advanced if selected for Regional Solicitation or Active Transportation funding through the Met Council. The federal grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs and all of the design/engineering costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 94 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 70th Street Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 70th Street Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $4,600,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $4,600,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2031: $3,300,000 Utility Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $3,300,000 71.7% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,300,000 28.3% TOTAL $4,600,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd Avenue to 5th Avenue, also including sidewalk, curb, and gutter as well as undergrounding of parallel utilities. Additionally, the reconstruction will comprise replacement of City utilities, including an 84” storm sewer pipe that will connect to the storm system installed with the Portland Avenue project. The existing pipe is being monitored for condition, and rate of deterioration may impact the year of reconstruction. Per current conditions, this has been identified as high risk through the Stormwater Risk Assessment. Design of the roadway will include a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 95 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 73rd St Bridge and Bikeways 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 73rd St Bridge and Bikeways 2. Total project cost: $10,500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $10,500,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2031: $5,000,000 Property Tax Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $5,000,000 47.6% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $5,500,000 52.4% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $10,500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Replacement of 73rd St pedestrian bridge over I-35W, sidewalk and trail additions along 73rd St from the new bridge to Lyndale Avenue and along Donaldson Park to the regional trail. The existing bridge is not ADA accessible, narrow, and disconnected from the existing pedestrian and bike network. The City will continue to pursue grant funding to construct the project. If awarded funding, the project will be moved forward in the CIP and staff will pursue additional funding sources 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 96 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th Street and I-35W Intersections 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th Street & I-35W Intersections 2. Total project cost: $750,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $750,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $750,000 100% TOTAL $750,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail currently passes through the on and off ramps to I- 35W at 76th Street, creating a safety risk for pedestrians and bicyclists using the trail. This project would modify the interchange ramp terminal designs to create a safer intersection for pedestrians and bicyclists using the trail. Ultimate design would be done in coordination with MnDOT and via the city’s public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: TBD Cost effectiveness: X Page 97 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 2. Total project cost: $3,600,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $3,600,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2032: $3,600,000 Property Tax Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,600,000 100% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $3,600,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Currently, the intersection of 76th Street and 77th Street—two of the highest volume local roads in Richfield—is an unsignalized “T” intersection that carries approximately 16,000 vehicles per day. The exact design of the intersection and the intersection control method will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 98 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 77th Street Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: International Boulevard Phase 1 2. Total project cost: $17,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $17,000,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $13,600,000 80% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $3,400,000 20% TOTAL $17,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of approximately 0.8 miles of 77th Street between Portland Ave and Richfield Parkway. Project goals would address pedestrian/bicycle access in the corridor, intersection safety at 12th Ave, Chicago Ave, Bloomington Ave, and 14th Ave, and right-sizing of the roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the roadway would be determined through the city’s public engagement process. Project vision is a boulevard design acting as a gateway to the city from MSP Terminal 2 and the Mall of America through the 77th Street Underpass. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: TBD Cost effectiveness: X Page 99 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Bloomington Ave & Diagonal Blvd 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Bloomington Ave & Diagonal Blvd 2. Total project cost: $1,800,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $1,800,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,800,000 100% TOTAL $1,800,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash rate. Multiple intersections nearby have sharp angles and difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Permanent intervention requires realignment of three intersections (Bloomington/72nd, Diagonal/72nd, Bloomington/Diagonal). A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 100 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Bloomington Ave & Richfield Parkway 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Bloomington Ave & Richfield Parkway 2. Total project cost: $1,800,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $1,800,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,800,000 100% TOTAL $1,800,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Bloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash rate. Multiple intersections nearby can have difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Metro Transit Route 14 also runs through the intersection area. Permanent intervention requires realignment of two intersections (Bloomington Ave/63rd St, Bloomington Ave/Richfield Pkwy). A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 101 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $11,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $11,000,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2032: $3,500,000 Property Tax Bond, $2,000,000 Utility Bond 2033: $3,500,000 Property Tax Bond, $2,000,000 Utility Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $7,000,000 64% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $4,000,000 36% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $11,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of Humboldt Avenue and Lake Shore Drive between 69th Street and 75th Street. A public engagement process will take place to identify the future road section and continuity. The reconstruction will include replacement of City utilities. The project is programmed to coincide with the adjacent 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge Replacement project; the extents and scope of this project will likely be adjusted to fit available funding. Staff intend to pursue alternative funding sources for this project if the 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge Replacement project receives funding. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 102 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $4,900,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $4,900,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $4,900,000 100% TOTAL $4,900,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project includes reconstruction of Lyndale Ave between 65th St and Hwy 62. The project would “right-size” the roadway and modernize the corridor to match the Lyndale Ave corridor south of 66th St. The project would include a full public engagement process to determine the final design. The Lyndale Ave Reconstruction project is not planned to occur until the existing pavement and surface infrastructure reach end-of-life. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 103 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – TH62 Noise Barrier East 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: TH62 Noise Barrier East 2. Total project cost: City share $550,000 (5% of total project) Minneapolis share $550,000 (5% of project total) State asset with total project $11,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $550,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) - MPLS $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $550,000 100% $ % TOTAL $550,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Richfield is interested in installing a noise wall on the south side of TH 62 from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave. This installation requires collaboration with MnDOT and City of Minneapolis. Installation will only be pursued if the City is successful in obtaining funding from MnDOT’s Standalone Noise Barrier Program. Currently, this project does not have identified funding from City of Minneapolis, but does have Minneapolis’ continued interest. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 104 of 177 Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – HUB Redevelopment Participation 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: HUB Redevelopment Participation 2. Total project cost: $1,450,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $1,450,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) - Developer $650,000 44.8% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $150,000 10.3% User Fee (U) $650,000 44.8% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,450,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: In conjunction with redevelopment of the HUB shopping center property, the City will work with the developer to construct stormwater infrastructure that will address regional flooding of public right-of-way near the HUB property. The infrastructure will be designed to handle runoff from public right-of-way, as well as anticipated developed conditions on the HUB property. The costs for this infrastructure will be shared between the City and the developer. The City will also likely share cost to complete sidewalk installation along 65th St that was not constructed with the 65th St Reconstruction Project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 105 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System 2. Total project cost: $2,000,000 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2020 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $200,000 2030 CIP $200,000 2027 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2030 $200,000 2028 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $2,000,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $2,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The storm sewer collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced concrete pipe. A cleaning and inspection program is conducted annually to determine the condition of the sewer mains and structures. Sewer mains and structures, that are identified as being in poor condition, will be replaced or rehabilitated with the means and methods that are in-line with industry standards. The rehabilitation will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 106 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 2. Total project cost: $22,000,000 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2017 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $900,000 2030 CIP $900,000 2027 CIP $900,000 Beyond 2029 2028 CIP $900,000 2029 CIP $900,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $22,000,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $22,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe). As staff does ongoing maintenance and television inspections, they encounter areas with tree root intrusion and/or pipes that have cracks. In order to preserve the level of service to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, these pipes should be lined. Lining consists of installation of a liner in the existing clay pipe; which expands and heats the liner, causing adherence to the pipe. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, the appropriate standard. This technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the line. It’s anticipated this program will be ongoing until completed based upon funding availability. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 107 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 2. Total project cost: $225,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2025 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $100,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $225,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $225,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room (floor) inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 108 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Elevator Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Elevator Replacement 2. Total project cost: $175,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $175,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $175,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $175,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it’s getting to be very difficult to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily for the transport of equipment, chemicals, visitors, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It’s also that which satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with modern technology. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 109 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Program Space Renovation 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Program Space Renovation 2. Total project cost: $150,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $150,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $150,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $150,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The program spaces of the water treatment plant including the education center and bathrooms, men’s and women’s bathrooms on the operating floor, and lunch/break room need reconstruction. Both in the forms of cosmetic improvements (e.g. carpet and paint) to a full re-construction of the space to meet current building codes and modern-day design. This project is for the design, construction, and oversight of construction of these spaces to bring each into a modern-day space for the benefit of the plant employees and general public that visit the plant. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 110 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 2. Total project cost: $50,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $50,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $50,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $50,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The last of three sludge pumps require replacement. The frequent effort of maintenance and repair is no longer adding value for plant operations. This project will be for the procurement and installation of one new sludge pump at the water treatment plant. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 111 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Sanitary Lift Station 6 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Lift Station 6 2. Total project cost: $300,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Utilities 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $300,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $300,000 100 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $300,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station 6, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Project also will improve concrete slab around wet well to solve drainage issues. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 112 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Generator 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Generator 2. Total project cost: $2,500,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $100,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $2,400,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2027: $2,500,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $2,500,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $2,500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at the water treatment plant has reached the point where maintenance and problem solving are too frequent. In addition, the integral fuel tank and housing are badly corroded. Repairing the current unit is not advantageous due to the age, the cost to implement the needed repairs, and the minimal return on such an investment. There has also been a shift in the industry and technology for more efficient ways of providing a generator backup system for a building of this type and power demand. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. A study was commission in 2024 to ascertain the design needs and future costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 113 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Recirculation System 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Recirculation System 2. Total project cost: $125,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $125,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $125,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $125,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 revealed certain health and safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water plant has the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA compliant. Public works staff retained a consultant to formulate a design that mitigates these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 114 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water System Interconnect 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water System Interconnect 2. Total project cost: $5,000,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $100,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $4,900,000 Beyond 2029 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2027: $5,000,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $5,000,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $5,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The water treatment plant was built in 1963 and to date has been a standalone system. If it were to have a catastrophic failure and unable to produce water, the city is not equipped with a long-term emergency backup water source. Connecting to another city’s water system would create the needed level of service redundancy. As part of the DNR’s water supply plan, they encourage all cities to have an emergency backup water source. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 115 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Well 3 Water Service 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Well 3 Water Service 2. Total project cost: $50,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $50,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $50,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $50,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: A ¾ inch water service extends out to the Well House 3 building at the water plant. The water service was constructed in a manner that exposes a length of copper to the outside elements as it traverses from within the plant to the well house. This length of pipe has burst on several occasions due to the cold weather rendering the well useless. This project will include the design, construction, and oversight of construction of a water service extension that is frost protected. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 116 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP $100,000 Beyond 2029 2028 CIP $400,000 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Wilson Pond subwatershed is located in the southeast quadrant of the city. This subwatershed is subject to flooding during heavy rain events. The low-lying nature of the subwatershed has proven to be a challenge with managing stormwater within the regional pond (Wilson Pond) system. Public works staff is in the process of updating the stormwater model to ascertain current flood risk conditions. The results of the model will be used to explore engineering alternatives to reduce the flood risk to the immediate neighborhoods. A design will be selected from the alternatives analysis that yields the most benefit. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 117 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2029 2028 CIP $500,000 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ % $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The filter media at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Industry standards state that filter media of this type has a lifespan of roughly 20-years. The current media was replaced in 2006. This project will include a full exchange of the current sand media, or an engineered media, in the event of the water chemistry changing and driving this need. This effort will also include a coatings improvement effort to the walls of the filter bays and new actuating valves. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 118 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Sanitary Lift Station 4 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Lift Station 4 2. Total project cost: $350,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Utilities 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP $350,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $350,000 100 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $350,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. To update dry well pit to current safety standards. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 119 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Watermain Rehabilitation 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Watermain Rehabilitation – Transmission Mains 2. Total project cost: $137,000,000 3. Years to complete: 50-75 years 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP $3,000,000 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $2,000,000* 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2030: $2,300,000 Utility Bonds 2031: $700,000 Utility Bonds * Utility Bond/5 Year – average of $2,000,000 each year 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $137,000,000 % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $137,000,000 % $ % 8. Brief summary of project: The water distribution system is nearing the end of its functional life. Industry standards for cast iron pipe – which is the primary pipe material within the distribution system – is 75 years. This watermain rehabilitation program has been structured to either replace or rehabilitate (in-situ) the distribution system within the next 50-75 years. A recent study revealed that the present worth for replacement/rehabilitation is whole is $137 Million. As years pass we expect this cost to increase, which is why this is programmed for years beyond 50-years. This will be ongoing replacement and may be accelerated using bonding as needed and/or to avoid inflation. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 120 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Logan Tower Coating 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Logan Tower Coating 2. Total project cost: $2,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $2,000,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2035: $2,000,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $2,000,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $2,000,000 100% $ 8. Brief summary of project: The 1-million-gallon water tower was originally constructed in 1962. The tower provides water pressure and storage to the residents of Richfield. The interior and exterior were last reconditioned in 2011. This tower still has the old city logo. The typical life span of these types of coatings is 15-20 years. This project is programmed for 2035. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 121 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Penn Tower Coating 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Penn Tower Coating 2. Total project cost: $2,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $2,000,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2037: $2,000,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $2,000,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $2,000,000 100% $ 8. Brief summary of project: A re-application of the interior and exterior protective coating will be required at Penn Tower. The 1.5-million-gallon water tower was originally constructed in 1963. The interior was last reconditioned in 2007, and the exterior of the tank was repainted in 2017. Recent inspections revealed that the integrity of the coating is intact and the need is very low for corrective actions. This project is scheduled for 2037. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Page 122 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Sanitary Lift Station 1 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Lift Station 1 2. Total project cost: $350,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Utilities 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $350,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $350,000 100 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $350,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Update building with new HVAC and new roof. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 123 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Sanitary Lift Station 2 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Lift Station 2 2. Total project cost: $350,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Utilities 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $350,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $350,000 100 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $350,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Update Building with new HVAC and new roof. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 124 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Sanitary Lift Station 3 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Lift Station 3 2. Total project cost: $350,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Utilities 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $350,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $350,000 100 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $350,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 125 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $500,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: An evaluation was completed in 2023 to review the integrity of the coatings on the pipes within the water treatment plant pipe gallery. The evaluation revealed a loss of the protective coatings on the pipes along with observations of corrosion of the pipe, pipe-joints and hardware and supporting beams in certain locations. The coatings effort will need to be completed within the next ten-year cycle. This project will fund the work and oversight of this effort. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 126 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Well 2 Generator 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Well 2 Generator 2. Total project cost: $1,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $1,000,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2035: $1,000,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $1,000,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at Well 2 is nearing its life-cycle and will require replacement. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 127 of 177 Utilities Project Summary Form – Well 5 Generator 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Well 5 Generator 2. Total project cost: $1,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $1,000,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 2045: $1,000,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $1,000,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at Well 5 is nearing its life-cycle and will require replacement. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Page 128 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Carpet Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Carpet Replacement/Police 2. Total project cost: $120,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Government Buildings 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP $120,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $120,000 100% TOTAL $120,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the Police department is worn and due for replacement, we are at the end of life cycle. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 129 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form –Fiber Infrastructure Projects 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Redundancy Fiber at Woodlake Nature Center 2. Total project cost: $45,000 3. Years to complete: 2026 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: IT and Park & Recreation 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP $45,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (LTCR) $45,000 100% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Internal Service Revenue (ISR) $ % TOTAL $45,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Create redundancy fiber to Woodlake Nature Center at an estimated cost of $30,000. The additional $15,000 is the estimated annual amount of fiber infrastructure projects. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 130 of 177 Fire Project Summary Form – SCBA Purchase 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: SCBA Purchase 2. Total project cost: $450,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Fire 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIB $450,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (LTCR) $450,000 100% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Internal Service Revenue (ISR) $ % TOTAL $450,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Our current SCBAs purchased in 2014 are reaching end-of-life in 2026. This request is to replace all SCBAs and related bottles and equipment. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 131 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form –Laptop Purchases 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Laptop Purchases 2. Total project cost: $34,260 3. Years to complete: 2026 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Replacement Schedule If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Administrative Services / IT 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP $34,260 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Internal Service Revenue (ISR) $34,260 100% TOTAL $34,260 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Per Laptop Replacement Schedule and additional laptops for Departments. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 132 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Fleet Purchases 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Fleet Vehicle Purchases 2. Total project cost: $9,417,336 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP $1,664,726 2030 CIP $2,125,400 2027 CIP $1,785,000 Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $1,874,250 2029 CIP $1,967,960 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $9,417,336 100% Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $9,417,336 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to provide City Services. This project is ongoing in which the Division makes vehicle purchases every year. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 133 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form –Network Infrastructure Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Network Infrastructure Replacement 2. Total project cost: $10,650 3. Years to complete: 2026 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Replacement Schedule If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: IT 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP $10,650 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Internal Service Revenue (ISR) $10,650 100% TOTAL $10,650 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Per Replacement Schedule to replace access points and switches at the ice arena. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 134 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Public Works Storage Facility 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Public Works Storage Facility 2. Total project cost: $1,300,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP $1,300,000 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2029 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (LTCR) $650,000 50% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $325,000 25% User Fee (U) $325,000 25% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,300,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City built its current maintenance facility with an understanding that ongoing storage needs could be accommodated off-site. Historically, the City had relied on the MnDOT Cedar Ave Station to provide the salt needed for the winter season via an ongoing agreement and did not need to store salt on site. This agreement was modified in 2021 and MnDOT has chosen to no longer provide salt to the city. In addition, the site the City is currently using for temporary storage for tree debris, sweepings, water main break debris etc., is a short-term solution, requiring the City to identify a new location to be used for its storage needs. In 2025 MnDOT will be conveying a parcel of land along the west side of TH 77 and north of Diagonal Blvd to the City which will become the future storage site. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: X Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Page 135 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Carpet Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Carpet Replacement 2. Total project cost: $190,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Government Buildings 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP $190,000 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $190,000 100% TOTAL $190,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the main area’s of City Hall are worn and need of replacement. We have past the life expectancy. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 136 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Carpet Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Carpet Replacement/Fire 2. Total project cost: $55,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Government Buildings 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP 2030 CIP $55,000 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % Buildings Special Revenue (BSR) $55,000 100% TOTAL $55,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the fire department is worn and past it’s life expectancy. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 137 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Boiler Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Boiler Replacement 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Government Buildings 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $500,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The boiler will be at the end of it’s life cycle and needs replacement. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 138 of 177 Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Chiller Replacement 2026 Capital Budget (CIB) 2027-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Chiller Replacement 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Government Buildings 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2026 CIP 2030 CIP 2027 CIP Beyond 2030 $500,000 2028 CIP 2029 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The chiller will be at the end of it’s life cycle and needs replacement. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Page 139 of 177 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2027-2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page 140 of 177 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Community Center Building Repair 20,000$ SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 275,000 SRParks Master Plan 180,000 SRVeterans Park Complex (projects to be built 2026-27)5,000,000 BST Wood Lake Nature Center (project to be built 2025-26)1,000,000 BSTWood Lake Trail Updates 50,000 O Wood Lake Trail Updates 200,000 STOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 6,725,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 64th Street Sidewalk 165,000$ M 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)200,000 MMulti-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FFMulti-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)3,500,000 BMulti-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)4,000,000 BUMulti-Year Pavement Management Plan 737,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)300,000 MMulti-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 150,000 MSheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 544,500 STOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 9,926,500$ UTILITIES HUB Redevelopment Participation 150,000$ FF HUB Redevelopment Participation 650,000 O HUB Redevelopment Participation 650,000 UMulti-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 UWater Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 100,000 UWater Plant Elevator Replacement 175,000 U Water Plant Program Space Renovation 150,000 UWater Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 50,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 3,025,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Carpet Replacement - Police 120,000$ BSR Fiber Infrastructure Projects - Information Techologies 45,000 OFire SCBA Purchase 450,000 O Laptop Purchases - Information Technologies 34,260 ISRMulti-Year Fleet Purchases 1,664,726 FSRNetwork Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 10,650 ISR Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 FFPublic Works Storage Facility 650,000 OPublic Works Storage Facility 325,000 U TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 3,624,636$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 23,301,136$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 3,500,000$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 120,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 6,000,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 4,000,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 1,542,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,664,726 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 44,910 (LTCR) Long Term Capital Reserve - (M) Municipal State Aid 815,000 (O) Other Funding 1,845,000 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 744,500 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 2,550,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 23,301,136$ PROJECT EXPENDITURE 2026 Capital Improvement Budget Page 141 of 177 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000$ SR Community Center Building Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 335,000 SR Veterans Park Complex (projects to be built 2026-27)4,800,000 BST TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 5,275,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 64th Street Sidewalk 291,000$ M 64th Street Sidewalk 854,000 S 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)323,960 M 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)1,046,040 S 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 1,200,000 M 78th Street Lighting 200,000 FF 494 Phase 2 1,000,000 M Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)4,000,000 B Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 737,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)300,000 M Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 670,000 MTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 10,952,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Sanitary Lift Station 6 300,000 U Water Plant Generator 2,500,000 BU Water Plant Recirculation System 125,000 U Water System Interconnect 5,000,000 BU Well 3 Water Service 50,000 U Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 100,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 9,175,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Fleet Purchases 1,785,000$ FSR TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 1,785,000$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 27,187,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 4,000,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 4,800,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 7,500,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 1,267,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,785,000 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 3,784,960 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 1,900,040 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 1,675,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 27,187,000$ 2027 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 142 of 177 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000$ SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 335,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 475,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 76th & Knox Improvements 650,000$ M 78th Street Lighting 100,000 FF Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 777,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)5,500,000 B Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)4,500,000 BU Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 655,000 M TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 12,462,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 500,000 U Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 400,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 2,000,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Carpet Replacement - City Hall 190,000$ BSR Fleet Purchases 1,874,250 FSR TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 2,064,250$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 17,001,250$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 5,500,000$ (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 190,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 4,500,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 1,157,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,874,250 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 1,305,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 2,000,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 17,001,250$ 2028 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 143 of 177 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000$ SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 335,000 SR Community Center Project 10,000,000 B Community Center Project 25,000,000 BST TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 35,475,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 69th Street Reconstruction 3,000,000$ B 69th Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 BU 76th & Knox Improvements 2,687,040 F78th Street Lighting 200,000 FF Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 702,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)2,000,000 BUMulti-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 615,000 M TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 13,484,040$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Sanitary Lift Station 4 350,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 1,450,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Fleet Purchases 1,967,960$ FSR TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 1,967,960$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 52,377,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 13,000,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 25,000,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 6,000,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 2,687,040 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,182,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,967,960 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 615,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 1,450,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 52,377,000$ 2029 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 144 of 177 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000$ SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 455,000 SR Community Center Project 20,000,000 BST TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 20,475,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 76th & Knox Improvements 1,642,960$ B 76th Street West Reconstruction 3,750,000 B 76th Street West Reconstruction 1,500,000 BU76th Street West Reconstruction 1,000,000 X Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 827,000 FFMulti-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 640,000 M TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 9,439,960$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 3,000,000 BU TOTAL UTILITIES 4,100,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Carpet Replacement - Fire 55,000$ BSR Fleet Purchases 2,125,400 FSR TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 2,180,400$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 36,195,360$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 5,392,960$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 55,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 20,000,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 4,500,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 907,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 2,125,400 (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 640,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 1,100,000 (X) Xcel Energy 1,000,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 36,195,360$ 2030 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 145 of 177 RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000$ SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 335,000 SRTOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 355,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 63rd Street Greenway 2,675,000$ F 63rd Street Greenway 1,175,000 M 70th Street Reconstruction 3,300,000 BU 70th Street Reconstruction 1,300,000 M 73rd St Bridge & Bikeways 5,000,000 B 73rd St Bridge & Bikeways 5,500,000 F 76th Street & I35W Intersections 750,000 M 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 3,600,000 B 77th Street Reconstruction 13,600,000 F77th Street Reconstruction 3,400,000 MBloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd 1,800,000 MBloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy 1,800,000 MHumboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 7,000,000 BHumboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 4,000,000 BU Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 700,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 4,900,000 M TH62 Noise Barrier East 550,000 MTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 61,130,000$ Utilities Logan Tower Coating 2,000,000$ BU Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 UMulti-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 2,000,000 BUPenn Tower Coating 2,000,000 BUSanitary Lift Station 1 350,000 USanitary Lift Station 2 350,000 USanitary Lift Station 3 350,000 U Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 500,000 U Well 2 Generator 1,000,000 BU Well 5 Generator 1,000,000 BUTOTAL UTILITIES 10,650,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Boiler Replacement 500,000$ UChiller Replacement 500,000$ U TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 1,000,000$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 73,135,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 15,600,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 15,300,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 21,775,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 780,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - (ISR) Internal Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 15,675,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 355,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 3,650,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 73,135,000$ Capital Improvement Plan - Beyond 2030 PROJECT EXPENDITURE Page 146 of 177 CIB TOTAL* 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CIP COST Beyond 2030 RECREATION OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT 26-Community Center Building Repair 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 26-Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 275,000 SR 335,000 SR 335,000 SR 335,000 SR 455,000 SR 1,460,000 335,000 SR 26-Parks Master Plan 180,000 SR - 26-Veterans Park Complex 5,000,000 BST 4,800,000 BST 4,800,000 26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 1,000,000 BST 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates 50,000 O - 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates 200,000 S - 27-Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 28-Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 28-Multi-Year Ice Arena 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 60,000 20,000 SR 29-Community Center Project 10,000,000 B 10,000,000 29-Community Center Project 25,000,000 BST 20,000,000 BST 45,000,000 29-Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 TOTAL RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 6,725,000 5,275,000 475,000 35,475,000 20,475,000 61,700,000 355,000 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax - - - 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 - (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 6,000,000 4,800,000 - 25,000,000 20,000,000 49,800,000 - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 1,900,000 355,000 (S) State 200,000 - - - - - - (O) Other Funding 50,000 - - - - - - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 6,725,000 5,275,000 475,000 35,475,000 20,475,000 61,700,000 355,000 PROJECTS TOTAL* RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CIP COST Beyond 2030 26-64th Street Sidewalk 165,000 M 291,000 M 291,000 26-64th Street Sidewalk 854,000 S 854,000 26-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)200,000 M 323,960 M 323,960 26-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)1,046,040 S 1,046,040 26-Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 600,000 26-Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 160,000 40,000 FF 26-Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction 3,500,000 B 4,000,000 B 4,000,000 26-Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction 4,000,000 BU - 26-Multi-Year Pavement Management Program 737,000 FF 737,000 FF 777,000 FF 702,000 FF 827,000 FF 3,043,000 700,000 FF 26-Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 160,000 40,000 FF 26-Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 300,000 M 300,000 M 300,000 26-Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 5,500,000 B 5,500,000 26-Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 4,500,000 BU 2,000,000 BU 6,500,000 26-Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF 50,000 FF 50,000 26-Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 150,000 M - 26-Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk 544,500 S - 27-77th Street Pavement Maintenance 1,200,000 M 1,200,000 27-78th Street Lighting 200,000 FF 100,000 FF 200,000 FF 500,000 27-494 Phase 2 1,000,000 M 1,000,000 27-Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 670,000 M 655,000 M 615,000 M 640,000 M 2,580,000 28-69th Street Reconstruction 3,000,000 B 3,000,000 28-69th Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 BU 4,000,000 29-76th & Knox Improvements 650,000 M 650,000 29-76th & Knox Improvements 2,687,040 F 2,687,040 29-76th & Knox Improvements 1,642,960 B 1,642,960 30-76th Street West Reconstruction 3,750,000 B 3,750,000 30-76th Street West Reconstruction 1,500,000 BU 1,500,000 30-76th Street West Reconstruction 1,000,000 X 1,000,000 >30-63rd Street Greenway - 2,675,000 F >30-63rd Street Greenway - 1,175,000 M >30-70th Street Reconstruction - 3,300,000 BU >30-70th Street Reconstruction - 1,300,000 M >30-73rd St Bridge & Bikeways - 5,000,000 B >30-73rd St Bridge & Bikeways - 5,500,000 F >30-76th Street & I35W Intersections - 750,000 M >30-76th/77th Street Intersection Control - 3,600,000 B >30-77th Street Reconstruction - 13,600,000 F >30-77th Street Reconstruction - 3,400,000 M >30-Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd - 1,800,000 M >30-Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway - 1,800,000 M >30-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction - 7,000,000 B >30-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction - 4,000,000 BU >30-North Lyndale Reconstruction - 4,900,000 M >30-TH62 Noise Barrier East - 550,000 M TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS 9,926,500 10,952,000 12,462,000 13,484,040 9,439,960 46,338,000 61,130,000 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 3,500,000 4,000,000 5,500,000 3,000,000 5,392,960 17,892,960 15,600,000 (BU) Govt Bond Utility 4,000,000 - 4,500,000 6,000,000 1,500,000 12,000,000 7,300,000 (F) Federal Grant - - - 2,687,040 - 2,687,040 21,775,000 (FF) Franchise Fee 1,067,000 1,267,000 1,157,000 1,182,000 907,000 4,513,000 780,000 (S) State 544,500 1,900,040 - - - 1,900,040 - (M) Municipal State Aid 815,000 3,784,960 1,305,000 615,000 640,000 6,344,960 15,675,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 9,926,500 10,952,000 12,462,000 13,484,040 9,439,960 46,338,000 61,130,000 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2027 - 2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Page 147 of 177 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2027 - 2030 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA PROJECTS TOTAL* UTILITIES 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CIP COST Beyond 2030 26-HUB Redevelopment Participation 150,000 FF - 26-HUB Redevelopment Participation 650,000 O - 26-HUB Redevelopment Participation 650,000 U - 26-Multi-Year Rehab of Stormwater Collect. Mains 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 800,000 200,000 U 26-Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 3,600,000 900,000 U 26-Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 100,000 U - 26-Water Plant Elevator Replacement 175,000 U - 26-Water Plant Program Space Renovation 150,000 U - 26-Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 50,000 U - 27-Sanitary Lift Station 6 300,000 U 300,000 27-Water Plant Generator 2,500,000 BU 2,500,000 27-Water Plant Recirculation System 125,000 U 125,000 27-Water System Interconnect 5,000,000 BU 5,000,000 27-Well 3 Water Service 50,000 U 50,000 27-Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 100,000 U 400,000 U 500,000 28-Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replace & Rehab 500,000 U 500,000 29-Sanitary Lift Station 4 350,000 U 350,000 30-Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 3,000,000 BU 3,000,000 2,000,000 BU >30-Logan Tower Coating - 2,000,000 BU >30-Penn Tower Coating 2,000,000 BU >30-Sanitary Lift Station 1 - 350,000 U >30-Sanitary Lift Station 2 - 350,000 U >30-Sanitary Lift Station 3 - 350,000 U >30-Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings - 500,000 U >30-Well 2 Generator - 1,000,000 BU >30-Well 5 Generator - 1,000,000 BU TOTAL UTILITIES 3,025,000 9,175,000 2,000,000 1,450,000 4,100,000 16,725,000 10,650,000 (BU) Govt Bond Utility - 7,500,000 - - 3,000,000 10,500,000 8,000,000 (F) Federal Grant - - - - - - - (FF) Franchise Fee 150,000 - - - - - - (O) Other Funding 650,000 - - - - - - (U) User Fee 2,225,000 1,675,000 2,000,000 1,450,000 1,100,000 6,225,000 2,650,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 3,025,000 9,175,000 2,000,000 1,450,000 4,100,000 16,725,000 10,650,000 PROJECTS TOTAL* BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CIP COST Beyond 2030 26-Carpet Replacement 120,000 BSR - 26-Fiber Infrastructure Projects - Information Technologies 45,000 O 26-Fire SCBA Purchase 450,000 O - 26-Laptop Purchases - Information Technologies 34,260 ISR 26-Multi-Year Fleet Purchases 1,664,726 FSR 1,785,000 FSR 1,874,250 FSR 1,967,960 FSR 2,125,400 FSR 7,752,610 26-Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies 10,650 ISR 26-Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 FF - 26-Public Works Storage Facility 650,000 O - 26-Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 U - 28-Carpet Replacement - City Hall 190,000 BSR 190,000 30-Carpet Replacement - Fire 55,000 BSR 55,000 >30-Boiler Replacement - 500,000 U >30-Chiller Replacement - 500,000 U TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECH 3,624,636 1,785,000 2,064,250 1,967,960 2,180,400 7,997,610 1,000,000 (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 120,000 - 190,000 - 55,000 245,000 - (FF) Franchise Fee 325,000 - - - - - - (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,664,726 1,785,000 1,874,250 1,967,960 2,125,400 7,752,610 - (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 44,910 - - - - - - (O) Other Funding 1,145,000 - - - - - - (U) User Fee 325,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 3,624,636 1,785,000 2,064,250 1,967,960 2,180,400 7,997,610 1,000,000 SUMMARY PROJECTS Recreation/Open Space Development 6,725,000 5,275,000 475,000 35,475,000 20,475,000 61,700,000 355,000 Right of Way Improvements 9,926,500 10,952,000 12,462,000 13,484,040 9,439,960 46,338,000 61,130,000 Utilities 3,025,000 9,175,000 2,000,000 1,450,000 4,100,000 16,725,000 10,650,000 Buildings, Fleet and Technology 3,624,636 1,785,000 2,064,250 1,967,960 2,180,400 7,997,610 1,000,000 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 23,301,136 27,187,000 17,001,250 52,377,000 36,195,360 132,760,610 73,135,000 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 3,500,000 4,000,000 5,500,000 13,000,000 5,392,960 27,892,960 15,600,000 (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue 120,000 - 190,000 - 55,000 245,000 - (BST) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax 6,000,000 4,800,000 - 25,000,000 20,000,000 49,800,000 - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 4,000,000 7,500,000 4,500,000 6,000,000 4,500,000 22,500,000 15,300,000 (C) Hennepin County - - - - - - - (F) Federal Grant - - - 2,687,040 - 2,687,040 21,775,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,542,000 1,267,000 1,157,000 1,182,000 907,000 4,513,000 780,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,664,726 1,785,000 1,874,250 1,967,960 2,125,400 7,752,610 - (ISR) Internal Special Revenue 44,910 - - - - - - (M) Municipal State Aid 815,000 3,784,960 1,305,000 615,000 640,000 6,344,960 15,675,000 (O) Other Funding 1,845,000 - - - - - - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - - - - - - - (S) State 744,500 1,900,040 - - - 1,900,040 - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 1,900,000 355,000 (U) User Fees 2,550,000 1,675,000 2,000,000 1,450,000 1,100,000 6,225,000 3,650,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 23,301,136 27,187,000 17,001,250 52,377,000 36,195,360 132,760,610 73,135,000 * Total CIP costs do not include any project costs reflected in the 2026 CIB. Page 148 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 1 of 29 Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. Bill No. 2025-XX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Background 1.01 Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those adopted by Ordinance. 1.02 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be adopted by Ordinance. The City Council has previously established certain fees by Transitory Ordinance No. XX-XX. The City Council has established other fees by resolution, which resolution is also part of Appendix D. 1.03 The City Council has determined the need to update the schedule of fees under Transitory Ordinance No. XX-XX. Section 2. Fee Schedule Adopted 2.01 The fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A are hereby adopted by Ordinance. 2.02 The fees adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance shall be amended only by Ordinance. Any fees established by resolution, other than those adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance, may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Section 3. Effective date; codification. 3.01 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. 3.02 This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2026. 3.03 A copy of this Ordinance shall be included in Appendix D to the Richfield City Code, immediately prior to the resolution establishing fees. 3.04 This Ordinance supersedes Transitory Ordinance No. XX-XX. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9th day of September 2025. Mary B. Supple, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk Page 149 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 2 of 29 EXHIBIT A. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES A. Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit: Investigation. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set forth in Section 2. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. B. Permit fee refunds: The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permitted not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Building Permits 400.03 — 400.09 Fee Schedule to follow MN Statute 326B.153 + State Surcharge 326B.148 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/326B.153 Except values of $1-$2,000, the fee is $65.00 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/326B.148 (2) Driveway, Parking Area Permits 515.05 (no permit fee for sidewalks) $65.00 100 (3) Swimming 420.00 Permanent or portable pools are based on building permit fees with a minimum of $65.00 (4) Plan Review Fee 400.03 — 400.09 25% for decks/porches, gazebos, bathroom remodels, etc. 35% of building permit fee for one and two family dwelling basement remodels Plan review fee for similar buildings 65% of building permit fee for all other building permits, except no fee for the following: Page 150 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 3 of 29 (a) Existing single family dwelling minor nonstructural alterations. (b) Single and two family dwelling repair and maintenance work. (c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance work not exceeding $1,000.00 or where plans are not required. Plan Review fee for similar buildings Maximum 25% of permit fee based on Minnesota State Building Code 1300.0160 (5) Contractor License Verification Fee contractor applies for permit(s) $5.00 (6) Moving- Buildings 845 Moving Permit Fee $65.00 (7) Structure Demolition 400.00 — 400.09 (a) Commercial Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of $65.00 (b) Residential Demolition $65.00 (8) Plumbing Permit 400.03 — 400.09400.03 — 400.09 Residential Minimum Fee 2% of Total Job cost with a minimum of (includes one inspection) $65.00 Each additional inspection $65.00 (9) Plumbing Permit 400.03 — 400.09400.03 — 400.09 Commercial/Industrial/Multi- family Based on Total Job cost 2% of Estimated Job cost with a minimum of (includes one inspection) $65.00 Each additional inspection $65.00 (13) Solar Photovoltaic Based on 2% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of (separate Page 151 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 4 of 29 System Rating* electrical permit required for signs) 400.03 — 400.09 0—5,000 watts $65.00 5,001—10,000 watts $150.00 10,001—20,000 watts $200.00 20,001—30,000 watts $250.00 30,001—40,000 watts $300.00 (14) Residential Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Commercial Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration 400.03 — 400.09 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of (Includes one inspection) $65.00 Each additional inspection $65.00 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of $65.00 (15) Sign Installation 415.01 — 415.11 549.07- 549.11 (a) Temporary sign permit (b) Permanent sign (any size) Building permit is required for sign support structures fees based on building permit fee schedule $65.00 $125.00 (16) Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 400 A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued before completion of the entire work covered by the permit, provided the Chief Building Official deems that the building is safe to occupy $200.00 Plus a letter of credit or cash escrow equal to 125% of the remaining City Code requirements Page 152 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 5 of 29 ZONING, LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Planned Unit Development 542 (a) $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $5,000.00 (b) Major PUD Plan Amendment—$1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $5,000.00 (c) Minor PUD Plan Amendment $400.00 (2) Site Plan Review 547 (a) Standard Review: $500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (b) Administrative Review $500 (bc) Major amendment—$500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (cd) Minor amendment $350.00 (3) Variance 547 Residential $350.00 Non Residential $500.00 Variance Appeal Residential and Non Residential $350.00 (4) Conditional Use Permit 547 (a) $500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (b) Major amendment—$500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 © Minor amendment $350.00 (5) Interim Use Permit 547 $1,000 plus $100/year monitoring fee up to a maximum fee of $1,500.00 (6)* Zoning District or Code Text Change 547 $2,000.00 (7)* Subdivision Approval 500.01— 500.05500.13 $500.00 Subdivision Waiver 500.05-Subd. 2 500.25 $350.00 (8) Street/Easement Vacation 820/State Statute $1,000.00 (9) Appeal to Board of Adj. & Appeals 547 $350.00 Page 153 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 6 of 29 (10) Special Request to City Council $350.00 (11) Zoning Compliance Letter $75.00 (12) Comprehensive Plan Amend. $1,000.00 (13) Plats* 500 Preliminary/Final Plat $775.00 $500 / $275 (14) Sketch Plan Review $350.00 500 (15) Extension Extension of a Land Use Approval (rezoning, site plan approval, conditional use permit, variance, etc.) beyond its original approval period $250.00 (16) Escrow Administration Fee $100.00 125 + $250/year after stipulated completion date if not complete. (To be accrued/charged on the day following expiration and annually on this anniversary date until complete.) (17) Special Exception Review for Fences or Walls 509.15 Subd.13 A special fence exception may be issued per the restrictions of Section 509.15 for corner lots or through lots. $250.00 (18) Public Tree Planting Fund 544.03 Subd.8 For the planting of trees in public parks or public boulevards. $160.00 per caliper inch. *Any additional expenses incurred by the City in the course of processing a request will be charged to the applicant. FIRE SERVICES FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (6) Fire Extinguishing System Permit Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: (a) Nno plan review charge fee for valuations of $1,000 or less; minimum fee applies as listed. (b) A plan submittal is required for all fire sprinkler systems with 10 or more sprinkler heads. $50.00 (7) Fire Alarm Systems Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% $50.00 Page 154 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 7 of 29 of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: (a) No plan review charge fee for valuations of $1,000 or less; minimum fee applies as listed. (b) Plan submittal is required for all fire alarm system installations or modifications. (8) Flammable or Combustible Liquid or Gas Storage Tanks and Piping Tanks (installation or modification) $150.00 Installation or alteration of piping Each unit or dispenser $50.00 Underground Tank Removal $100.00/Tank MISCELLANEOUS FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (3) Antenna Commercial Wireless Telecommunication Service (CWTS) 425 & 544 (a) CWTS antenna permit application fee $100.00 (b) Antenna permit fee for additional antennas added to an existing antenna location or replacement of existing antennas at a location $35.00 (Bill No. 2020-12, §§ 1—3; Bill No. 2022-12, § 3; Bill No. 2023-1; Bill No. 2023-9; Bill No. 2024-09; Bill No. 2025-XX) RESOLUTION NO. Res. No. 2025-XXXXX RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2025 2026 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 12127 12243 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: Section 1. Establishing Fees. A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in the sections of this resolution. B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this resolution. Page 155 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 8 of 29 C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of the license. D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not been paid in a timely manner. Section 2. Construction and Related License Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Heating and Ventilating Installer 400.07 1 Year $80.00 (2) Sign Installer 416.01—416.13 1 Year $80.00 (3) Electrical Installer 400.03—400.09 State License Required (4) Plumber 400.03—400.09 State License Required (5) Well Driller 620 State License Required Section 3. Public Works Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Benches 805.01— 805.27 First Year $80.00 Renewal $30.00 (2) Boulevard feature Permit 811.07 a) Application to place a privately owned feature in the boulevard $30.00 b) If applied for after installation of feature has begun $60.00 (3) Excavation in Public Right-of-way 800.01— 800.15 a) For each transverse excavation and each 500 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation and for each 500 feet of curb and gutter or portion thereof installed or driveway apron installed, except when survey and grade stakes are set by City $200.00 $0.20 per foot > 500' b) If applied for after excavation has begun $400.00 c) For each pothole $20.00 (4) Pole Attachment /Small Cell Facilities Permit 802 a) Application to attach or collocate pole attachment on City facilities in the City Right- of-way $500.00 /≤ 5 units $100.00/unit thereafter b) Application to construct/install new small cell pole w/ attachment in the City Right- of- way $1,000/unit c) Annual rental fee per attachment to collocate on the city structure, per agreement Up to $150/unit d) Annual maintenance fee associated with the collocation, per agreement Up to $25/unit Page 156 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 9 of 29 Monthly Electrical Fees a) Radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts b) Radio node over 100 maximum watts c) The actual cost of electricity $73.00/node $182.00/node (5) Forestry Permit 810 Applies only to trees on City property and public ROW $100.00 (6) Seasonal Load Limit Exemption a) Per load $25.00 b) If applied for after delivery $50.00 (7) Obstruction Permit 802.17 (a) Short term, temporary single lane closure of less than four hours No fee (b) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $60.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $300.00 Collector Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $30.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $75.00 Local/Residential Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $15.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $45.00 Sidewalk/Bike Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $30.00 Parking Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $7.50 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) 31.25 (c) If applied for after obstruction closure has begun, regardless of duration of closure (c) Short term, temporary single lane closure less than four hours No fee (d) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $120.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $300.00 Collector Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $60.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $150.00 Page 157 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 10 of 29 Local/Residential Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $30.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $90.00 Sidewalk/Bike Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $60.00 Parking Lane Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion thereof) $15.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $62.50 If the closures are not removed by the permitted completion date, then additional Days will be charged at double the rate (8) Noise Ordinance Exemption 930.35 (a) With conditions added as required $50.00 (b) If applied for after violation $100.00 (9) Certification Charge 705.03— 705.21 All delinquent accounts $50.00 (10) NSF Check Charge $30.00 (11) Utility Services Sanitary Sewer 700.05 All land uses New Service $125.00 Repair $125.00 Disconnect $125.00 Replacement $125.00 Sewer Service Line Televising $100.00 Appointment Fee, No-Call, No-Show For failure to appear/be available at scheduled appointment time without reasonable advance notice to the City. Reasonable advance notice to the City is considered at least 1 hour before the scheduled appointment time. $75.00 Water Service 715.01 All land uses $125.00 New Service $125.00 Repair $125.00 Disconnect $125.00 Replacement Turn on/off $75.00 Meter Installation $75.00 Private Hydrant $75.00 Hydrant Meter Fee $75.00 Page 158 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 11 of 29 Appointment Fee, No-Call, No-Show For failure to appear/be available at scheduled appointment time without reasonable notice to the City. $75.00 Backflow Device Registration Fee 710.23 All properties, excluding SFH and Duplex residential properties $50.00 SFH and Duplex residential properties No fee Storm Sewer 720 All land uses New Service $125.00 Repair $125.00 Disconnect $125.00 Replacement $125.00 (12) Street Light Banners 855.05 First time applicant to hang street light banners within a district of for an event. $50.00 Per street light banner installation (no existing hardware) $20.00 Per street light banner installation if supporting hardware exists on the light pole. $10.00 Per street light banner removal $10.00 Permit Renewal: Annually for both decorative and event banners, unless banner design has changed, then full application fee is charged. If annual renewal is not completed, the permittee risks removal of all banners at the permittee's expense. $10.00 (13) Utilities Special Charges 715.03 Transaction fee for utility accounts paying by credit card (excludes ACH withdrawals, checks, or debit card payments) 2.95% of utility bill or $1.95, whichever is greater Section 4. Fire Services Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Fire Prevention Code (Fire Safety) 400.21— 400.29 For initial fee required under code Per Year Year Covers activities or materials requiring fire department approval per fire code, including tents, hazardous materials, open flames, and other regulated uses. $100.00 Page 159 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 12 of 29 For each additional fee required under code: Applies to each additional regulated item under the same permit (e.g., multiple tents at one location). [GRAPHIC]$20.00 25.00 Penalty iIf not renewed within 2 months of notification: Per Year Applies to permits not renewed within 2 months of official notice (e.g., fire safety permit for hazardous materials). $75.00 (2) Daycare/Adult Foster Care Facility Inspection $100.00 (3) Reimbursement Fee for Fire/Rescue Unit Per Hour $400.00 (4) Sale of Consumer Fireworks 1131 (a) (a) License per location selling only consumer fireworks Per Year Per Year (b) Fireworks sales under temporary membrane structures (e.g., tents) require a fire safety permit $350.00 (b) License per location of each other retail seller (Each physical store) Per Year $100.00 (5) Display of Commercial Fireworks 5608 Licensed per display by qualified vendor $350.00 Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Arcade 1105 1 Year $687.00 $708.00 (2) Amusement Device 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball) 1 Year $16.00 $17.00 (b) Mechanical Music Box 1 Year $16.00 $17.00 (c) Video Games 1 Year $16.00 $17.00 (3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs State Fee Investigation Fee $250.00 (4) Itinerant Place of Amusement 1100.05— 1100.11 1 Day $370.00 $381.00 Page 160 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 13 of 29 (5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held: 1 month: $5.00 $6.00 $54.00 $56.00 No fee for locations holding tavern licenses. (6) General Amusement 1100.03 (a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 Year $16.00 $17.00 1. Coin operated 1 Year $16.00 $17.00 (b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 Year $54.00 $56.00 (c) Circus 1 Year $208.00 $214.00 (d) Dance Hall 1 Day $208.00 $214.00 (e) Golf 1. Miniature 1 Year $48.00 $49.00 2. Driving Tee 1 Year $48.00 $49.00 (f) Mountback 1 Day $199.00 $205.00 (g) Rides, mechanical/animal of any kind (ea) 1 Year $16.00 $17.00 (h) Shows, any kind 1 Day $199.00 $205.00 (i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 Year $17.00 $18.00 (j) Other games 1 Day $16.00 $17.00 (7) Musical Concert 1110.01 Per event $60.00 $62.00 (8) Theatre Cinema 1120 1 Year $288.00 $297.00 Plus a notice publication fee $8.00 $9.00 (9) Roller Rink 1115 1 Year or portion thereof $288.00 $297.00 (10) Commercial Adult- Oriented Enterprises 605 1 Year $3,434.0 0 $3537.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $3,434.0 0 Page 161 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 14 of 29 $3537.00 (11) Masseur/Masseuse 605 Certificate fee 1 Year $112.00 $115.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $280.00 $288.00 (12) Public Baths 610 1 Year $3,977.0 0 $4096.00 Investigation fee (actual cost minimum) $3,977.0 0 $4096.00 (13) Fortune Teller and related trade 1130.05— 1130.07 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month 1 Year $230.00 237.00 $685.00 $705.00 $1,369.0 0 $1410.00 $2,291.0 0 $2360.00 (14) Adult Establishments 1196 Annual license 1 Year $3,434.0 0 $3537.00 Investigation fee (new license) $3,434.0 0 $3537.00 Section 6. Animal Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Animals 905.01— 905.29 (a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered) with option to purchase a multi- year license 1 Year $15.00 (b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered) 1 Year $25.00 (c) Duplicate Animal License $7.00 (d) Late Penalty $10.00 905.31— 905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel 1 Year $249.0 0 $256.00 (f) Residential Kennel 1 Year $118.0 0 $122.00 (g) Veterinary $249.0 0 $256.00 Page 162 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 15 of 29 905.37— 905.39 (h) Pigeons 1 Year $44.00 $45.00 905.41 (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary Permit) $31.00 $32.00 905.01— 905.29 (j) Impounding (each animal) 1st time $77.00 $79.00 2nd Time $138.00 $142.00 3rd time (each impound after) $207.00 $213.00 (k) Dangerous dog registration fee State Statute 347.51) $500.00 $500.00 906.13 905.37 (I) Beekeeping Registration + Inspection fee Fowl Registration +Inspection Fee $31.00 $50.00 $50.00 Section 7. Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Aircraft 1340 1 Day $60.00 $62.00 (2) Garbage and Refuse Collection 601.01— 601.33 Commercial and Residential First vehicle 1 Year $343.0 0 $353.00 Each additional vehicle 1 Year $73.00 $75.00 (3) Motor Vehicle Dealer 1155 Per place of business 1 Year $513.0 0 $528.00 Each additional place of business 1 Year $194.0 0 $200.00 (4) Motor Bicycle Business 1160 Per place of business 1 Year $298.0 0 $307.00 Per place of business to sell, rent or lease 1 Year $137.0 0 $141.00 (5) Sound Truck 1165 Per vehicle 1 Year $298.0 0 Page 163 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 16 of 29 $307.00 Per vehicle 1 Day $44.00 45.00 (6) Taxicab 1170 First vehicle or auto livery 1 Year $743.0 0 $765.00 Each additional vehicle or auto livery operated at any time within license period 1 Year $91.00 $94.00 (7) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 Year $70.00 $72.00 (8) Rental or Utility Trailers and Trucks 1185 Each place of business 1 Year $137.0 0 $141.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Firearms Dealer 920.01— 920.05 1 Year $2,291.0 0 $2360.00 (2) Food Establishments 617 (A) Type I Establishment, a large 1 year high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day (1) Food service establishment $1,028.00 $1059.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $755.00 $778.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $755.00 $778.00 (B) Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day (1) Food service establishment $883.00 $909.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $588.00 $606.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $588.00 $606.00 (C) Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared Page 164 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 17 of 29 elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment (1) Food service establishment $755.00 $778.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $375.00 $386.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $375.00 $386.00 (D) Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended or mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat on-site, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere (1) Food service establishment $492.00 $507.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $228.00 $235.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $228.00 $235.00 (E) Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging (1) Food service establishment $303.00 $312.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $188.00 $194.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $188.00 $194.00 (F) Supplemental Facility (1) High Supplemental Facility (like Type I or II) $188.00 $194.00 (2) Medium Supplemental Facility (like Type III) $150.00 $155.00 (3) Catering Supplemental Facility (for Food Catering Vehicle(s) and equipment) $228.00 $235.00 (4) Low Supplemental Facility (like Type IV or V) $112.00 $115.00 (G) Temporary Food Establishment (1) Complex Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type I or II) $188.00 $194.00 Page 165 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 18 of 29 (2) Complex Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type I or II) $341.00 $351.00 (3) Simple Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type III, IV or V) $78.00 $80.00 (4) Simple Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type III, IV or V) $182.00 $187.00 (5) Temporary Food Multi-Vendor $955.00 $984.00 (H) Farmer's Market Stand (stands not exempted from licensing in Minnesota Statue Chapter 28A) $228.00 $235.00 (3) Automobile Washing Establishment 1125 Per calendar Year or fraction thereof $228.00 $235.00 (4) Cesspools 925.03 Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contents of each cesspool into City sewer $35.00 $36.00 (5) Incinerator 601.29— 601.31 1 Year $68.00 $70.00 (6) Tobacco No licenses being issued 1146.01(M S 461.12) Retail Sale and Distribution - License issued on calendar Year (cigarette vending machines prohibited) (Bill No. 1998-19) $574.00 $591.00 (7) Transient Merchant 1181.01— 1181.09 1 Day $146.00 $150.00 (8) Wagon Peddler 1181 1 Year $344.00 $354.00 (9) State hawker or Peddler license 1181 6 month/per person covered $84.00 $87.00 (10) Canvasser or Solicitor 1181 6 month/per person covered $84.00 $87.00 (11) Christmas Tree Sale 1130.03 1 Year $186.00 $192.00 (12) Lodging Establishments 618 (A) Hotel/Motel $317.00 $327.00 (1) Each Guestroom $26.00 $27.00 (13) Outdoor Merchandising 1135 Permit $145.00 $149.00 (14) Storage Enclosure 1135 Per Enclosure $124.00 $128.00 (15) Pawnbroker 1187 (a) Pawnbroker 1 Year $5,5,969.0 0 $6148.00 (b) Owner investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $3,431.0 0 $3534.00 Page 166 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 19 of 29 (c) Manager investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $1,241.0 0 $1278.00 (d) Employee investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $118.00 $122.00 (e) Transaction fee - per transaction $2.00 $2.00 (16) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1186 (a) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 Year $654.00 $674.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs in excess of above with total not exceeding $2,511.0 0 $2586.00 Applicant shall deposit $1,200.00 with Licensing Clerk along with application. Amount in excess of actual application costs shall be refunded. (17) Auto Detailing Establishment 1195.01 1 Year $510.00 $525.00 (18) Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Painting or Body Branding 630 (a) Tattoo, body piercing, body painting or body branding 1 Year $1,142.0 0 $1176.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) $1,077.0 0 $1109.00 1 Year (19) Temporary Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Branding and Body painting events 630 Per booth $68.00 $70.00 (20) Massage Therapy Enterprise License (Business license) 1188 Annual license 1 Year $1,109.0 0 $1142.00 Investigation fee (new license) $1,109.0 0 $1142.00 Massage Therapist (Individual License) Annual license 1 Year $109.00 $112.00 Investigation fee (new license) $112.00 $115.00 Temporary Massage Therapist License Per temporary location $229.00 $236.00 (21) Public Swimming Pools 619 (A) Indoor (1) First pool $303.00 $312.00 Page 167 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 20 of 29 (2) Each additional pool $150.00 $155.00 (B) Outdoor (1) First pool $303.00 $312.00 (2) Each additional pool $150.00 $155.00 (C) School, K through grade 12, pools (1) First pool $196.00 $202.00 (2) Each additional pool $109.00 $112.00 (D) Pool opening reinspection fee, operator makes an appointment for an inspection, but the pool is not ready to open $103.00 $106.00 (22) Motion pictures and commercial photography permit 1197 Per event Photography Motion picture (based on application) $52.00 $54.00 $ $206.00 $212.00 (23) Adult-Use Cannabis TBD 1198 Cannabis Retailer Cannabis Renewal (The initial registration fee shall include the fee for initial registration and the first annual renewal. Any renewal fee imposed by the local unit of government shall be charged at the time of the second renewal and each subsequent annual renewal thereafter.) $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1000.00 Low-Potency Hemp Edible TBD 1198 Lower Potency Hemp Retailer Registration Annual Renewal $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR FOOD, THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AND LODGING PERCENTAGE OF FACILITY INVOLVED WILL BE DETERMINED BY STAFF Descriptions: Type I Establishment, a large high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day. Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day. Page 168 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 21 of 29 Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment. Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat onsite, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere. Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging. Environmental plan review—includes the physical remodeling, updating, equipment replacement, equipment additions and the general overall review of all plans/work. This also includes all new development projects. New Construction and/or Major Remodel (over 50% of facility involved) Extensive Remodel (25— 50% of facility) Minor Remodel 0— 24% of facility) Non-remodel approval consultation ($5,000 or less in costs) Type I $3,648.00 $3757.00 $1,902.0 0 $1959.00 $1,027.00 $1058.00 $175.00 $180.00 Type II $2,513.00 $2588.00 $1,377.0 0 $1418.00 $758.00 $780.00 $175.00 $180.00 Type III $1,378.00 $1419.00 $766.00 $789.00 $457.00 $471.00 $175.00 $180.00 Type IV $675.00 $695.00 $263.00 $271.00 $133.00 $137.00 No fee Type V New project or change of owner - $175.00 $160.00 $180.00 Minor remodel - permit but no plan check fee Therapeutic Massage $170.00 $180.00 $175.00 $180.00 $175.00 $180.00 $175.00 $180.00 Section 9. Liquor and Related License and Permit Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) 3.2 Malt Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $912.00 (b) Tavern (dance) 1 Year $745.00 (c) Wholesale 1 Year $44.00 (d) Growler (Micro Brewery Off-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $175.00 (e) Off-Sale 1 Year $264.00 (f) Club (Bottle Club) 1 Year $603.00 (g) Temporary per event $191.00 (2) Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $12,029.00 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1 Year $200.00 Page 169 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 22 of 29 (c) Wine 1 Year $1,325.00 (d) Taproom (Micro Brew On-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $700.00 (e) Cocktail Room (Micro Distillery On Sale) 1 Year $800.00 (f) Micro Distillery Off Sale 1 Year $600.00 (g) Veterans' Organization (Ex-Sunday) 1 Year $863.00 (h) Temporary per event $191.00 (3) Employee License On-Sale Liquor Establishments 1208.01 Effective 10/1/95 all licenses issued shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of initial application $37.00 (4) Investigation Fee 1202.01— 1202.21 (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization $824.00 and Each person shown on application $247.00 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application (excluding Veteran's Organizations) $247.00 1202.11 (b) Wine, Taproom, Brewpub, Distillery, and $824.00 Each person shown on application $247.00 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application $247.00 1202.11 Investigation of substitute manager $103.00 Section 10. Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) License for Apartment Houses and Rental Homes (includes up to two inspections) 407 (a) Apartment House, 1 Year $150.00190 Each unit $15.00 (b) Rental Home - single family dwelling, 1 Year $150.00 190 (c) Duplexes/double bungalows/townhouses First unit, 1 Year $150.00 190 Each additional rental unit, 1 Year $85.00 125 (d) Late Fee—Charged each month the license is late $100 or 25% of the annual license fee, whichever is Page 170 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 23 of 29 greater, up to a maximum monthly fee of $500.00 (e) License Transfer Fee $50.00 (f) Reinstatement of suspended license 100% of license fee (minimum $80.00) (g) Reinstatement of Revoked license 200% of license fee (h) Re-Inspection Fee (for inspections over the first two) 1. multi-family 3rd inspection: $100.00 4th inspection: $200.00 5th inspection: $400.00 6th inspection and more: $800.00 Up to $3,000, maximum 2. single family & duplex 3rd inspection: $50.00 4th inspection: $100.00 5th inspection: $200.00 6th inspection and more: $400.00 Up to $1,500, maximum Re-inspection fees shall be payable at the time of license renewal and no renewal license shall be issued unless all inspection fees are paid (i) Provisional license for apartment house Includes first unit $300.00 380 Each additional unit $30.00 Provisional license for Rental Home— single family dwelling 1 Year $300.00 380 Provisional license for duplex First unit $300.00 380 Each additional unit $170.00 250 (j) Investigation fee for operating a rental property without a license $500.00 (2) Certificate of Housing maintenance Compliance (includes up to two inspections) 408 Single family home $150.00 190 2-family home $230.00 270 Condominium $100.00 140 Page 171 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 24 of 29 Re-inspection Fee 3rd inspection $50.00 4th inspection $100.00 5th inspection $200.00 6th inspection and more $400.00 Up to $1,500, maximum Fee to process cash escrow agreement $100.00 125 Fee to process Agreement to Comply $100.00 125 (3) Richfield Apartment Managers' Association Fee 407 Fee to support RAMA services $1.50/unit (4) Permit Fee for Rooming House 406 1 Year $170.00 210 Section 11. Miscellaneous Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six Months $17.00 (2) Permit to Carry a Gun Permit Issued By County (3) False Alarms (billable) (a) in excess of 2 for calendar Year $100.00 (b) in excess of 10 for calendar Year $200.00 (c) in excess of 20 for calendar Year $300.00 (4) Nuisance Conduct Fee 925 Third call to a property for nuisance conduct within a 365-day period $400.00 (5) Copying Services Provided Flat rate (per page) $.25 Special rate (a) Black & White Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $.25 8.5 x 14 (per side) $.25 MN Statute 13.03C 11 x 17 (each) $.50 24 x 36 (each) $2.50 X-large $2.50 Color Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $1.00 8.5 x 14 (per side) $2.00 Page 172 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 25 of 29 11 x 17 (each) $4.00 24 x 36 (each) $18.00 X-large $3.00/sq. ft. (b) Labor hourly wage & 33% (c) Postage prevailing rate (d) Fax per page $.50 (e) CD of meeting (per CD) $5.00 (f) DVD of meeting (per DVD) $15.00 (g) Electronic copies (CD or disk) $5.00 (h) As builts (per image) $.50 (6) Notary Fee Fee Set By State (7) Candidate Filing Fee City Charter 4.04 $25.00 (8) Photo Fee Includes 2 photos $16.00 including tax (9) Assessingment Search Fees Special Special Assessment Search Fees - One free property identification number (PID) search per Day - if more than one search per Day (per search) $3.00 Special Assessment Search Report - per PID $15.00 $25.00 Creation of New or Special Report - Fees to be based on time and materials to create report - Minimum Fee $25.00 Review of Comparable Property Records Residential Field Card Report $.25 - for up to five comparable properties (per copy) Commercial/Industrial/Apartment Field (10) Domestic Partnership 120 Registration $30.00 (11) Certified copy of various documents To certify documents i.e. resolutions, ordinances, minutes, registration forms, etc. on file (per copy) $5.00 (12) Vacant Building Registration Fee 925 Single Family Home or Duplex—Vacant one to two years $600.00 Single Family Home or Duplex—Vacant three to four years $800.00 Single Family Home or Duplex—Vacant five or more years $1,000.00 Page 173 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 26 of 29 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $618.00 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one Year or longer $1,133.0 0 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $1,390.0 0 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one year or longer $2,678.0 0 (13) Violation of Conversion Therapy Ban 635 Providing conversion therapy to a minor or vulnerable adult $1,000.00 per instance Section 12. Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees. Location or Type Description Fee Classification Fee Richfield Municipal Center Bartholomew Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $75.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $100.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $500.00/4-hour block Heredia Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $69.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $82.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $400.00/4-hour block Fred Babcock Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $69.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $82.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Richfield Community Center Augsburg, Fireside, Nicollet, or Ruth Johnson Rooms Non-Profit Private $42.00/Hr $60.00/Hr Combined Nicollet/Augsburg or Richfield Rooms Non-Profit Private $69.00/Hr $95.00/Hr Kitchen All Renters $80.00/4-hour block, $15.00/additional hour Page 174 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 27 of 29 Free with combined Nicollet/Augsburg room rental Wood Lake Nature Center Auditorium Non-Profit Private $45.00/Hr $65.00/Hr Wood Lake Amphitheater $75/4-hour block Park Shelters Wood Lake Nature Center - Emily Day Pavilion Monday - Thursday $82.0085/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $95/4-hour block $50 Damage/Compliance Deposit Fairwood, Monroe, Augsburg Park Shelters Monday-Thursday $44.0046/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $56/4-hour block $50 Damage/Compliance Deposit Sheridan Park Shelter Monday-Thursday $62.0065/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $75/4-hour block $50 Damage/Compliance Deposit Veterans Park Shelter Monday-ThursdayFriday $115120 per section/3-hr block Saturday &Friday- Sunday $135 141 per section/3-hr block $75/section Damage/Compliance Deposit Enclosed Park Buildings Jefferson Park, Washington Park, Madison Park Monday-Thursday $65/4-hour block Friday-Sunday $75/4-hour block $100 Damage/Compliance Deposit Athletic Fields Donaldson Premier Baseball Fields (Donaldson) Resident Non-Resident $5754.00/hr $284270.00/day (first 8 hrs) $6966.00/hr Page 175 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 28 of 29 $357340.00/day (first 8 hrs) Premier Roosevelt Youth Baseball/Softball Fields (Roosevelt & Lincoln) Resident Non-Resident $4644.00/hr $273260.00/day (first 8 hrs) $5956.00/hr $336320.00/day (first 8 hrs) Lincoln and Taft Premium Softball Fields (Taft) Resident Non-Resident $3330.00/hr $126120.00/day (first 8 hrs) $4440.00/hr $183175.00/day (first 8 hrs) General Baseball/Softball Fields Resident Non-Resident $2625.00/hr $115109.00/day (first 8 hrs) $3735.00/hr $209199.00/day (first 8 hrs) Taft and Washington Premier Soccer/Football Fields (Taft & Washington) Resident Non-Resident $7059.00/hr $79.00100/hr Christian and Donaldson General Soccer/Football Fields (Christian & Donaldson) Resident Non-Resident $52.0055/hr $8177.00/hr Monroe Neighborhood Soccer Field (Monroe) Resident Non-Resident $40.0042/hr $6360.00/hr Broomball/Hocke y Rink Donaldson and ChristianAll outdoor rinks Resident Non-Resident $29.0030/hr $4139.00/hr Tennis Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $15.0016/court/hr $25.0026/court/hr Volleyball Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $18.0019/hr $26.0027/hr Basketball Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $18.0019/hr $2726.00/hr Page 176 of 177 Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES Richfield, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-04-18 11:47:09 [EST] (Supp. No. 40) Page 29 of 29 Open Space All parks Resident Non-Resident $18.0019/hr $26.0027/hr Athletic Facility Light Use Softball, Baseball, Soccer, Football, Hockey, Tennis All renters $30.0031/hr Additional Field Usage Fees All parks All renters $75/hr maintenance fee $30 administrative fee (permit changes/cancellation) $500 Damage/Compliance deposit Richfield Band Shell Stage and Equipment All renters Stage $150.00165/hr Equipment $7075/booking Page 177 of 177