2025-06-24 City Council AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JUNE 24, 2025
7:00 PM
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
Call to order
Pledge of Allegiance
PRESENTATIONS
1.2025 Gene and Mary Jacobsen Citizen of the Year Presentation
2.Hennepin County Update -- Commissioner Goettel
Open forum
Participants can share their comments in person, by voicemail, or email, and may also request
to participate virtually. For more information on submitting comments, refer to the Council
Agenda and Minutes page on richfieldmn.gov/citycouncil
Approval of the Minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session from June 10, 2025, and (2) City Council
Regular Meeting from June 10, 2025.
AGENDA APPROVAL
3.Approval of the Agenda
4.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended
actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any
Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the
regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are
recommended for approval.
A.Consider adoption of a resolution authorizing the City to affirm the monetary limits on statutory municipal tort
liability.
Staff Report No. 78
B.Consider the approval of setting a public hearing to be held on July 22, 2025, to consider the issuance of
new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for SK Food, LLC dba K-ChiMac, located at
6420 Nicollet Avenue South.
Staff Report No. 79
C.Consider the approval of an agreement for Prosecution Services with the City of Richfield and H/J Law.
Staff Report No. 80
D.Consider accepting the bid tabulation and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to take all necessary
steps to award and execute a contract with the responsible low bidder for the 73rd Street Safe Routes to
School project (SP 157-593-003) upon authorization from MnDOT and authorize the City Manager to
approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City Council consideration. Accepting the bid
tabulation is only a formal acknowledgement of the City’s receipt of bids for the project. It does not include
an award of the contract.
Staff Report No. 81
E.Consider a resolution accepting a Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant in the amount of
$10,000 for the purchase of skate aids, hockey equipment, rental skates, and rink dividers at the Richfield
Ice Arena, and authorize staff to execute a grant agreement.
Staff Report No. 82
F.Consider a resolution accepting two State of Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Program Grants for
$67,064 and $68,785 to purchase and install solar energy equipment on the roofs of the Richfield Ice Arena
and the Richfield Public Works building.
Staff Report No. 83
5.Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the revocation of a tobacco license issued to Richfield Tobacco &
Vape Outlet, dba Smoke & Pure Vape, located at 6535 Nicollet Avenue South, for egregious flavored product and
cannabis sales violations.
Staff Report No. 84
OTHER BUSINESS
7.Consider an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority to
operate up to five additional housing units under the Family Affordable Housing Program.
Staff Report No. 85
8.Consider appointment to fill a vacancy on the Transportation Commission.
Staff Report No. 86
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
9.City Manager's Report
CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
10.Claims and Payroll
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
11.Hats Off to Hometown Hits
12.Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9739.
AGENDA SECTION:PRESENTATIONS
AGENDA ITEM #1.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Brittany Bartlett, Equity Coordinator
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/18/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
2025 Gene and Mary Jacobsen Citizen of the Year Presentation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Richfield Human Rights Commission has selected a Citizen of the Year award recipient since 1971. The
award is given to a family, group, organization, business or individual who lives or works in Richfield and whose
actions demonstrate an awareness and commitment to the attitudes and practices that foster human
understanding, tolerance and the spirit of human relations.
The Human Rights Commission has awarded the 2025 Gene and Mary Jacobsen Outstanding Citizen award to
Tynika Smith.
Tynika started Ms. T's Helping Hand Inc in 2020 to collect donations and help support those experiencing
housing instability. She spends major holidays serving meals and handing out donations to those in need. Not
only does she bring things she'll think people will need, but she takes them time to learn people's names and
bring them what they ask for help with. Her dedication to residents in need is committed, selfless, and incredibly
caring.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
See Executive Summary
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
Kim Jacobsen Tynika Smith
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
City Council Work Session
June 10, 2025
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Supple called the work session to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Bartholomew Room.
Council Present:
Mary Supple, Mayor; Sharon Christensen; Walter Burk, Sean Hayford
Oleary, Rori A. Coleman-Woods
Staff Present:
Guests:
Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Melissa Poehlman, Community Developer
Director; Julie Urban, Assistant Community Development Director; Jan
Youngquist, Economic Development Manager; Sam Crosby, Planner II;
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk; Administrative Assistant Mark McKinley.
Planning Commission; Housing Redevelopment Authority; Aaron Diederich,
VP of Construction at Lupe Development; Greta Norris, Project Architect at
Pope Design Group; Eli Zmira, Pope Design Group; and Joseph Kimbrell,
Pope Design Group.
ITEM #1
COUNCIL TRAINING AND REVIEW OF THE NEW AGENDA MANAGEMENT
PLATFORM AND BOARD PORTAL OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO COUNCIL.
City Clerk Friedrich, along with Administrative Assistant Mark McKinley, provided training to the
Council on the new agenda management platform. They covered key components, including logging
in, reviewing agendas and agenda packets, and the Council action available within the platform.
ITEM #2
PRESENTATION BY LUPE DEVELOPMENT ON A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED FOR THE AMERICAN LEGION SITE, 6501 PORTLAND AVENUE.
Community Development Director Poehlman provided historical background information regarding
the project site. Community Development Director Poehlman noted items in the packet for Council,
HRA, and the Planning Commission to focus on during the presentation.
Aaron Diederich, VP of Construction at Lupe Development, provided details on Lupe
Development's work. Mr. Diederich shared Lupe Development previously presented this project to
staff, and it was not received well. Mr. Diederich noted the feedback received was incorporated into
the current presentation. Mr. Diederich provided a project overview, and noted phase one is the
family building on the east, with corridors of the building extending toward the park; with phase two
including the left-oriented building with pedestrian street frontage.
City Council Work Session Minutes
-2- June 10, 2025
Greta Norris, Project Architect at Pope Design Group, provided details on the surrounding sites and
amenities, the orientation of the buildings, and designs for the layout and landscaping around the
buildings. Ms. Norris described the sustainable design features. Mr. Diederich noted use of high-
efficiency furnaces, LED light fixtures, and recycled materials.
Council members, City staff, HRA, Planning Commission, and representatives from Lupe
Development, and Pope Design Group discussed key aspects of the development project.
Discussion included review of a proposed one-year interim period between the completion of
Phase 1 and the start of Phase 2, the parking space ratio, and the limited number of units with
access to Portland Avenue within the current site plan concept.
The group also noted the building height and compliance with City Code, the absence of retail
components in the current plan, and the affordability of the housing units. Council, HRA, and
Planning Commission raised concerns about pedestrian accessibility and the need for clearly
defined building entrances. Pope Design Group noted that pedestrian engagement was considered
in the building design and is reflected in the current concept. Additionally, the Council emphasized
the importance of accounting for city services and infrastructure within the current site plan
concept.
Community Development Director Poehlman provided a summary of the discussion and stated the
main concerns discussed.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Supple adjourned the work session at 6:58 pm.
Date Approved: June 24, 2025
Mary B. Supple
Mayor
Michelle Friedrich Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Supple at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Council Present:
Mary Supple, Mayor; Sharon Christensen; Walter Burk; Sean
Hayford Oleary; and Rori A. Coleman-Woods.
Staff Present:
Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney;
Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director, Kristin
Asher, Public Works Director; and Michelle Friedrich, City
Clerk. Mike Dobesh, Fire Chief; Janell Brooks, Assistant Fire
Chief; Joe Powers, City Engineer.
Others Present: Carole Kelly, Human Rights Commissioner
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Supple led the Pledge of Allegiance.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Supple reviewed the participation options for residents at the Council meeting including in-
person comments, comments by voicemail or email, and an option to request to participate virtually
with advance notice. Mayor Supple noted more information on submitting comments can be
reviewed at www.richfieldmn.gov/citycouncil. No residents participated in the Open Forum public
comment opportunity.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: made by Councilmember Hayford Oleary, seconded by Councilmember Burk to approve
the Minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session Meeting from May 27, 2025, and (2) City Council
Regular Meeting from May 27, 2025.
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #1
PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING JUNETEENTH
]
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Council Meeting
June 10, 2025
City Council Meeting Minutes -2- June 10, 2025
Mayor Supple formally presented a proclamation and invited Human Rights Commissioner (HRC)
Karole Kelly to accept the proclamation. Commissioner Kelly commented on the importance of
preserving the rights of everyone and thanked the Council. Council thanked the HRC for its work in
preserving history.
ITEM #2
RECOGNITION OF RETIRING FIRE CHIEF MIKE DOBESH
City Manager Rodriguez recognized the accomplishments of Fire Chief Dobesh in his years with the
City. Mayor Supple presented Fire Chief Dobesh with his retirement badge. City Manager Rodriguez
congratulated Fire Chief Dobesh on his retirement. Fire Chief Dobesh thanked the Council for the
honor of representing the City.
ITEM #3
SWEARING-IN CEREMONY FOR FIRE CHIEF JENELL BROOKS
City Manager Rodriguez highlighted Jenell Brooks’ accomplishments during her years with the City.
She stated that Ms. Brooks has a strong vision for the Fire Department and has ample experience.
City Clerk Friedrich read the Oath of Office for Fire Chief Jenell Brooks. Fire Chief Brooks thanked
the City for the opportunity to become Fire Chief in the City where she has worked for 15 years.
ITEM #4
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: made by Councilmember Hayford Oleary, seconded by Councilmember Christensen to
approve Agenda as presented.
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #5
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar.
A. Consider approval of Adams Hill Pond Maintenance Project change orders in the net amount
of $167,137.77 for various project elements related to water quality improvements and
landscape and riparian restoration.
(Staff Report No. 74)
B. Consider the approval of the first amendment of the Response Sustainability agreement with
the City of Bloomington.
(Staff Report No.75)
MOTION: made by Councilmember Coleman-Woods, seconded by Councilmember Christensen to
approve the consent calendar.
Motion carried: 5-0
City Council Meeting Minutes -3- June 10, 2025
ITEM #6
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT
CALENDAR
None.
ITEM #7
CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A PRELIMINARY PLAT,
A FINAL PLAT, AND A VARIANCE, FOR 42 UNITS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
AT 6501 AND 6525 PENN AVENUE SOUTH. (STAFF REPORT NO. 76)
Council Member Burk presented Staff Report 76.
Director Poehlman provided a follow-up on the public comments regarding traffic, noting staff had
discussed that a traffic study would not be helpful on the site since traffic will still likely be well under
1,000 trips per day.
MOTION: made by Councilmember Burk, seconded by Councilmember Hayford Oleary, to approve
a site plan, a preliminary plat, a final plat, and a variance, for 42 units of multifamily housing at 6501
and 6525 Penn Avenue South.
RESOLUTION NO. 12324
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR PENN STATION AT 6501
AND 6525 PENN AVENUE SOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 12325
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR PENN
STATION
Council expressed excitement regarding the project and requested clarification regarding the
sidewalks on the site.
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #8
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Rodriguez shared information regarding the comments made at the last meeting to
reduce the short-term rental minimums. She stated that they held an in-depth discussion at the
meeting and decided to reduce the minimums.
ITEM #9
CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
MOTION: made by Councilmember Hayford Oleary, seconded by Councilmember Christensen, to
approve the following claims and payrolls:
U.S. BANK 06/05/2024
City Council Meeting Minutes -4- June 10, 2025
A/P Checks: 336496-336806, Manual
check 5302025 $1,372,969.31
Payroll: 197111-197469; Manual checks
44144-44145 $1,064,554.85
TOTAL $2,437,524.16
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #10
DISCUSS FUNDING CONTINGENCY PLAN AND FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-FUNDED 73RD STREET SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
(SRTS) TRAIL PROJECT. (STAFF REPORT NO. 77)
Mayor Supple presented Staff Report 77.
City Engineer Powers presented an overview and background of the project, and explained how
federal aid road projects work. City Engineer Powers noted the City received $635,000 in federal
funding for construction only. City Engineer Powers stated the risks of the project, noting there is a
very low risk of federal funding being taken back, but the City has a funding contingency plan if
federal funding is lost.
Council and staff discussed the North Lyndale restripe project and completion of the project. Staff
noted the North Lyndale restripe project was planned for 2025, but may need to be pushed to 2026.
ITEM #11
HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS
Councilmember Coleman-Woods noted she has nothing to share.
Councilmember Christensen shared the State of the Community will be held at City Hall on June 11.
Councilmember Hayford Oleary shared his grandmother passed away, noting the community had
been so important to her.
Councilmember Burk express appreciation to City Planner Ruby Villa for her help with a resident's
understanding of ordinances.
Mayor Supple echoed Councilmember Christensen's comments regarding the State of the
Community and urged residents to join the event scheduled from 4:30-7:00 p.m.
ITEM #12
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: made by Councilmember Coleman-Woods, seconded by Councilmember Burk to adjourn
the meeting at 7:51 p.m.
Motion carried: 5-0
City Council Meeting Minutes -5- June 10, 2025
Date Approved: June 24, 2025
Mary Supple
Mayor
Michelle Friedrich Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.A.
STAFF REPORT NO. 78
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Kate Niederer, Human Resources Manager
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/17/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider adoption of a resolution authorizing the City to affirm the monetary limits on statutory
municipal tort liability.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City purchases its liability insurance coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
(LMCIT). Each year, the City must decide to either affirm or waive its statutory limits of liability by July 1. After
reviewing cost considerations measured against potential risk, the City has, historically, affirmed the liability
limits which are $500,000 for an individual claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence.
Staff is recommending the same course of action for the upcoming insurance renewal as waiving the liability
limits would increase costs due to the need to purchase excess liability insurance.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Council to affirm the monetary limits on municipal
tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
A requirement of insurance coverage through the LMCIT is an annual affirmation or waiver of statutory limits of
liability.
The current statutory limits of liability for Minnesota cities are $500,000 for an individual claimant and $1,500,000
per occurrence. Cities can waive these limits to allow an individual claimant to recover more than $500,000, up to
the $1,500,000 per occurrence limit, if excess liability insurance is purchased. Because waiving the statutory
limits increases the exposure, the premium is higher for coverage under the waiver option. The cost of the excess
liability insurance continues to be very expensive.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
State Statute establishes liability limits for cities and the current level is $1,500,000, which appears to be a
reasonable limit. Historically, the majority of municipalities in Minnesota do not waive the monetary limits on
municipality tort liability as established by Statutes 466.04.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
The City's insurance policy with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust will renew on July 1, 2025. This
action must be completed on, or before, that time.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The City has historically not purchased excess liability coverage because of the cost of such coverage.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The tort liability limits established by Minnesota Statutes have historically protected cities and no Minnesota
court has ever established a monetary award in excess of the statutory limits against a municipality. Each city
must annually decide whether the city would voluntarily waive the statute for both the single
claims and each occurrence limit.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
If the Council determines that any single claimant should receive more than the $500,000 limit, the Council could
elect to waive the statutory monetary limits.
If the Council determines that the $1,500,000 per occurrence limit is not adequate, the City could purchase excess
liability coverage at a significant additional cost.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution Affirming Municipal Tort Liability Limits Resolution Letter
2025-07-1 Richfield LMC Liability Coverage Form Contract/Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. XXXXX
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY
MINNESOTA STATUTES 466.04
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 466.04 provides for Municipal tort liability limits
for Minnesota cities; and
WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has asked that each
city review the tort liability limits and determine if the respective city would choose to
waive its limits; and
WHEREAS, such decision to affirm or waive the tort liability limits must be filed
with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust at the insurance renewal date.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager is directed to
report to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust that the Richfield City Council
does not waive the monetary limits on the municipal tort liability established by
Minnesota statutes 466.04.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of June,
2025.
Mary Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
League of Minnesota Cities 3/2/2023 Liability Coverage Waiver Form Page 1
LIABILITY COVERAGE WAIVER FORM
Members who obtain liability coverage from LMCIT must decide whether to waive the statutory tort liability limits to
the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not waive the statutory tort limits must be made annually by the member’s governing body, in consultation with its attorney if necessary. The decision has the following effects:
•If the member does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant could recover no more than $500,000 on
any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total all claimants could recover for a single occurrence towhich the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would applyregardless of whether the member purchases the optional LMCIT excess liability coverage.
•If the member waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant couldrecover up to $2,000,000 for a single occurrence (under the waive option, the tort cap liability limits are only waived
to the extent of the member’s liability coverage limits, and the LMCIT per occurrence limit is $2,000,000). The totalall claimants could recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to$2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants.
•If the member waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could
potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total all claimants could recover for asingle occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased,regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
LMCIT Member Name: __________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Check one:
☐The member DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. §
466.04.
☐The member WAIVES the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04, to the
extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of member’s governing body meeting:___________________________________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Position: _______________________________________________________________________________________
Members who obtain liability coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) must complete and return this form to LMCIT before their effective date of coverage. Email completed form to your city’s underwriter, to pstech@lmc.org, or fax to 651.281.1298.
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.B.
STAFF REPORT NO. 79
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Manager
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Jay Henthorne, Director of Public Safety/Chief of Police
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/17/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider the approval of setting a public hearing to be held on July 22, 2025, to consider the
issuance of new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for SK Food, LLC dba K-ChiMac,
located at 6420 Nicollet Avenue South.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On May 29, 2025, the City received the application materials for new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt
Liquor licenses for SK Food, LLC dba K-ChiMac, located at 6420 Nicollet Avenue South.
All required information and documents have been received. All licensing fees have been paid.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve the setting of a public hearing to be held on July 22, 2025, to consider the
issuance of new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for SK Food, LLC dba K-ChiMac,
located at 6420 Nicollet Avenue South.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
This is a notice to set the public hearing. Staff will provide a more detailed historical context in the report
submitted for the public hearing on July 22, 2025.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
City ordinance requires the City Council to conduct a public hearing to consider all On-Sale Wine and 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor license applications and set a date for the public hearing.
The hearing must be scheduled and held before a new license may be considered.
The new process has been initiated.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
Holding the public hearing on July 22, 2025 will provide ample time to complete the licensing process.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
All licensing fees have been received.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
There are no legal considerations.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Reject the applications for new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for SK Food, LLC dba
K-ChiMac.
Schedule the public hearing for another date; however, this will delay the licensing process.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
There are no parties expected at this meeting.
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.C.
STAFF REPORT NO. 80
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Jay Henthorne, Director of Public Safety/Chief of Police
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Jay Henthorne, Director of Public Safety/Chief of Police
6/10/2025
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/17/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider the approval of an agreement for Prosecution Services with the City of Richfield and H/J
Law.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Richfield Department of Public Safety is required to have a attorney licensed to practice law in
Minnesota, to advise and represent the City in municipal prosecutions relating to criminal and civil statutes and
ordinances.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve the contract agreement for Prosecution Services with H/J Law for the City of
Richfield Department of Public Safety.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
H/J Law has represented the City of Richfield Department of Public Safety for municipal prosecution
since July 1, 2022.
Previous to that Martin Costello served as prosecuting attorney for 33 years.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
The City of Richfield Department of Public Safety is required by law to have a municipal prosecutor to handle
state statute, and local ordinance violations; along with expungements, and diversions.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
The City of Richfield Department of Public Safety is required to have a prosecuting attorney. The current contract
with H/J Law expires on June 30, 2025.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There are no financial changes from the previous contract. For all prosecution services, the City of Richfield shall
pay a monthly retainer fee of $15,500.00, with an annual limit of $186,000.00, plus out of pocket expenses.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The contract agreement for a municipal prosecutor is to process those violations that are within the scope of city
ordinance and non felony level under state statute. The prosecutor also guides and educates city staff on
appropriate action and helps the city manage risk in those situations which are legal in nature.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
The City Council could decide to not approve the agreement, however the Department of Public Safety would then
need to find another law firm to handle the department's municipal prosecutions.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Contract Contract/Agreement
AGREEMENT FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES
BETWEEN
CITY OF RICHFIELD
AND
HJ LAW, LLC
This Agreement for Prosecution Services (Agreement) is effective as of July 1, 2025, by and
between the City of Richfield, 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423 (City),
and HJ Law, LLC, 900 American Boulevard East, Suite 145, Bloomington, MN. 55420
(Prosecutor).
WHEREAS, the City requires attorneys licensed to practice law in Minnesota to advise
and represent the City in municipal prosecutions; and
WHEREAS, the attorneys working with the Prosecutor are licensed to practice law in
Minnesota and are experienced in and familiar with all phases of municipal prosecution and
desire to provide the prosecution services required by the City; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto want to enter into a written agreement to set forth the
terms, conditions, compensation, duties, responsibilities and other matters relating to the
Prosecutor providing said services to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the City and the Prosecutor that the
City does hereby retain and designate the Prosecutor as the Richfield City Prosecutor, effective
July 1, 2025, and the Prosecutor does hereby accept the position of Richfield City Prosecutor and
agrees to perform the requirements of that position, all on the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth.
A. Services.
1. The Prosecutor hereby agrees to perform and furnish these legal services to the
City:
a. Appearing at all required court hearings, including arraignments, pretrial and
omnibus hearings, court trials, jury trials, sentencing hearings, probation
violation hearings, and other appearances for non-felony cases;
b. Assembling all required case files and providing timely discovery to criminal
defense attorneys and/or defendants;
c. Charging non-felony cases;
d. Prosecuting forfeitures related to non-felony cases;
e. Prosecuting all City ordinance violations;
- 2 -
f. Working collaboratively with the City’s domestic abuse victim advocates;
g. Advising the City Council and staff on ordinance drafting, code enforcement,
and related matters;
h. Providing police training on a mutually-agreed upon basis with the
Department of Public Safety, but at least annually;
i. Consulting with and advising the Department of Public Safety command staff,
investigators, patrol officers, and administrative staff on all matters relating to
non-felony prosecutions. This includes being available by telephone to
consult with officers after business hours and on the weekends, as needed;
j. Attending all necessary meetings with City and Department of Public Safety
staff;
k. Making reports, as requested, to the City Council regarding non-felony
prosecutions;
l. Speaking at City-related functions on criminal law-related topics;
m. Maintaining an office presence at the Police Department, to include at least 3
half-days per week at the Department of Public Safety; and
n. Completing any other duties and responsibilities necessary to effectively
prosecute the City’s criminal, traffic, and ordinance violations.
B. Fees and Costs.
1. For all prosecution services, the City shall pay the Prosecutor a monthly retainer
fee of $15,500.00, with an annual limit of $186,000.00, plus out-of-pocket
expenses.
2. Monthly bills will be for the above monthly retainer fee, plus identify and itemize
any and all out-of-pocket expenses, e.g., certified documents or witness subpoena
fees.
3. Additional costs of $250 per hour when representing the City in appeals arising
from non-felony prosecutions;
C. Conflicts of Interest.
1. The Prosecutor will not represent any clients in legal actions involving Richfield
or with interests adverse to those of Richfield, including any units of government
having jurisdiction within or contiguous to Richfield. The Prosecutor shall use
best efforts to meet all professional obligations to avoid conflicts of interest and
appearances of impropriety.
- 3 -
2. In the event that a conflict of interest arises in any cases, the Prosecutor, with the
consent of the City, agrees to refer those matters to outside counsel for
prosecution at the City’s expense.
D. Insurance.
1. The Prosecutor will maintain malpractice insurance coverage for all attorneys
providing prosecution services to the City.
E. Term of Contract - Termination.
1. The term of this Agreement shall be one year unless amended in writing by the
mutual agreement of the parties hereto or terminated in accordance with the
conditions hereinafter contained. The last day of the one-year term is June 30,
2026.
2. This Agreement may be terminated by the City at any time or by the Prosecutor
upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to the City. In either event, on the termination
of this Agreement, all finished and unfinished documents and work papers
prepared by the Prosecutor pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property
of the City and the Prosecutor will be paid for services satisfactorily performed up
to the date of termination.
F. Miscellaneous.
1. All services provided by the Prosecutor pursuant to this Agreement are provided
by the Prosecutor as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City
for any purpose, including but not limited to: income tax withholding, workers’
compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts and
eligibility for employee benefits.
2. Except as provided in Section C(2) of this Agreement relating to conflicts of
interest, the rights and obligations created by this Agreement may not be assigned
by either party.
3. Data provided to the Prosecutor under this Agreement shall be administered in
accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 13.
4. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the City from retaining legal counsel
other than the Prosecutor in any legal matters including, but not limited to,
litigation and other specialized areas of law.
5. The Prosecutor agrees not to discriminate in providing services under this
Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age,
sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, or religion.
- 4 -
6. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of
this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all
parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts,
whether based on convenience or otherwise.
7. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise
unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect.
8. This Agreement, including any addenda or amendments subsequently signed by
both parties, shall constitute the entire agreement between the City and the
Prosecutor, and supersedes any other written or oral agreements between the City
and the Prosecutor. This Agreement can only be modified in writing signed by
both the City and the Prosecutor.
Executed this _____ day of June, 2025.
H|J LAW CITY OF RICHFIELD
Gregory P. Holly Mary Supple
Attorney at Law Mayor
Katrina E. Joseph Katie Rodriguez
Attorney at Law City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.D.
STAFF REPORT NO. 81
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Jake Whipple, Civil Engineer
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
6/16/2025
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/18/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider accepting the bid tabulation and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to take all
necessary steps to award and execute a contract with the responsible low bidder for the 73rd Street
Safe Routes to School project (SP 157-593-003) upon authorization from MnDOT and authorize the
City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City Council consideration.
Accepting the bid tabulation is only a formal acknowledgement of the City’s receipt of bids for the
project. It does not include an award of the contract.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City has received funding through the Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation program to construct
approximately 1300' of multi-use trail along the south side of 73rd Street between Bloomington and Cedar
Avenue within City right-of-way.
Bids were opened on June 12th, 2025, but the city cannot formally award the project until authorization has
been provided by MnDOT, per the terms of the DCP Agency Agreement between the two parties. Since the
next regular City Council meeting is not scheduled until July 22, authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to
approve the bid tabulation and execute the contract would allow the project to move forward without delay once
authorization to proceed is received from MnDOT.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion:
Accept the bid tabulation;
Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to take all necessary steps to award to and execute a
contract with the responsible low bidder for the 73rd Street Safe Routes to School project (SP
157-593-003) upon authorization from MnDOT; and
Authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City
Council consideration.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
In 2022, Richfield applied for and was awarded a federal grant through the Metropolitan Council's Regional
Solicitation for construction of a trail on 73rd Street between Bloomington Ave and Cedar Ave adjacent to
Centennial Elementary School. The award was for fiscal year 2026 (since accelerated to 2025). The project
scope included a shared use path on one side of the road, with an associated curb relocation to narrow the
roadway to 28 feet from curb to curb.
In early 2023, Richfield and MnDOT executed a Delegated Contract Process (DCP) Agency agreement. This
agreement is a standard agreement between the agencies to allow MnDOT to accept and distribute federal
funds on behalf of a local agency. This has been a standard practice in Minnesota for decades, simplifying the
process for local agencies and ensuring that the local agencies are able to meet the requirements set forth in
federal law.
In 2023, the Centennial Elementary location was the recipient of an Active Transportation grant for a
demonstration project through MnDOT. This demonstration project has been in place since August 2023, and is
currently still in place.
Through 2024 and early 2025, the project design was completed with participation from the public, Richfield
Public Schools, and the Transportation Commission. Open Houses were held at Centennial Elementary school
in the fall of 2024. This process led to several changes to the proposed grant scope. The trail was moved from
the north side of 73rd to the south side of 73rd for better connectivity with the school, curb extensions were added
to shorten crossing distances and provide sightlines at several intersections, and raised crosswalks were added
at 3 locations.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Equity: The Safe Routes to School program as a whole advances equity by creating improved non-motorized
routes to school that help promote active transportation and provide alternative forms of transportation for
students to get to school on time and ready to learn. Narrowing the roadway reduces the speed of drivers making
it safer for non-motorized persons to cross the streets.
Strategic Plan: This project will drive progress towards sustainable infrastructure financing and climate
resilience by leveraging availability of federally-funded grant programs to improve active transportation
infrastructure within the city.
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
Contracts estimated to have a value over $175,000 must be made by sealed bids, solicited by public
notice, and awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
This project is identified in the City's Pedestrian Master Plan and Richfield Public Schools' Safe Routes
to School Plan.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting is July 22, 2025.
Authorizing the City Manager and Mayor at the June 24, 2025 City Council meeting to award and execute
a contract will allow the project to begin construction as soon as possible, increasing the probability that
construction is complete prior to the start of the 2025-26 school year at Centennial Elementary.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
8 bids were opened and read aloud at the bid opening on June 12, 2025, ranging from $930,173.80 to
$1,294,703.50.
The engineer's estimate for the Project was $970,000.00.
Funding for the Safe Routes to School project will come primarily from the Regional Solicitation grant.
The original amount of the grant award was $635,000. The remaining amount will be paid by the City
using Municipal State Aid Funding.
Design and engineering are not eligible uses of the Safe Routes to School grant funding. These portions
of the project are being paid by the City using Municipal State Aid Funding.
Sources and Uses for the project are attached.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The bid opening was held on June 12, 2025 was in accordance with legal requirements.
The ad for bid was published on May 22, 2025 in Finance and Commerce and on June 5, 2025 in the
Sun Current and Quest CDN.
The City Attorney will review the final construction contract prior to execution by the Mayor and City
Manager.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
None
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Bid Tabulation Backup Material
73rd Street Sources & Uses Exhibit
Project Layout Exhibit
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Bid Opening
June 12, 2025
2:00 p.m.
PROJECT: 73rd Street Trail Safe Routes to School Bid Letting (#9694923)
Bid No.: 2025-02
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015 and the City Code, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was
called by City Clerk Friedrich who announced the purpose of the meeting was to receive; open and read aloud
bids for the 73rd Street Trail Safe Routes to School Bid Letting, as advertised in the official newspaper on June
5, 2025.
Present: Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Jake Whipple, Civil Engineer
Matt Hardegger, Transportation Engineer
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
Bidder’s Name Bond Non-
Collusion
Intent to
Comply
Responsible
Contractor
Certificate
Total Base Bid
Thomas and Sons
Construction Provided Provided Provided Provided $930,173.80
Pember Companies, Inc. Provided Provided Provided Provided $951,970.45
Park Construction Company Provided Provided Provided Provided $975,583.70
Valley Paving, Inc. Provided Provided Provided Provided $982,733.25
New Look Contracting, Inc. Provided Provided Provided Provided $1,018,768.90
Shoreline Landscaping &
Contracting Provided Provided Provided Provided $1,043,560.45
Meyer Contracting Inc. Provided Provided Provided Provided $1,048,279.52
Urban Companies Provided Provided Provided Provided $1,294,703.50
City Clerk Friedrich noted the bids would be tabulated and considered at the June 24, 2025 City
Council Meeting.
_______________________
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
73rd Street Trail - Safe Routes to School (#9694923)
Owner: Richfield, MN City of
06/12/2025 02:00 PM CDT
Engineer Estimate Thomas and Sons Construction Pember Companies, Inc.Park Construction Company Valley Paving, Inc New Look Contracting, Inc.Shoreline Landscaping & Contracting Meyer Contracting Inc.Urban Companies
Section TitleLine Item Item Code Item Description UofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension
BASE BID SECTION - REQUIRED COMPLETION $0.00 $930,173.80 $951,970.45 $975,583.70 $982,733.25 $1,018,768.90 $1,043,560.45 $1,048,279.52 $1,294,703.50
1 2011.601 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LUMP SUM 1 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $11,897.60 $11,897.60 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $12,955.00 $12,955.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $21,865.56 $21,865.56 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
2 2011.601 AS BUILT LUMP SUM 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $2,641.60 $2,641.60 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $2,875.00 $2,875.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,854.77 $4,854.77 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
3 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $83,000.00 $83,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $268,022.47 $268,022.47 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 $50,775.00 $50,775.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $90,000.00 $90,000.00
5 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH 4 $350.00 $1,400.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 $286.00 $1,144.00 $375.00 $1,500.00 $340.00 $1,360.00 $1,820.00 $7,280.00 $275.00 $1,100.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00
6 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 $215.00 $645.00 $480.56 $1,441.68 $1,325.00 $3,975.00 $1,097.00 $3,291.00 $1,850.00 $5,550.00 $614.59 $1,843.77 $1,100.00 $3,300.00
7 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 25 $650.00 $16,250.00 $655.00 $16,375.00 $633.42 $15,835.50 $650.00 $16,250.00 $1,032.00 $25,800.00 $2,150.00 $53,750.00 $645.68 $16,142.00 $1,000.00 $25,000.00
8 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN EACH 12 $30.00 $360.00 $42.50 $510.00 $41.60 $499.20 $43.00 $516.00 $45.00 $540.00 $80.00 $960.00 $40.00 $480.00 $50.00 $600.00
9 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN PANEL TYPE SPECIAL EACH 4 $30.00 $120.00 $42.50 $170.00 $41.60 $166.40 $43.00 $172.00 $68.00 $272.00 $100.00 $400.00 $40.00 $160.00 $70.00 $280.00
10 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 73 $6.00 $438.00 $6.25 $456.25 $5.72 $417.56 $4.00 $292.00 $15.00 $1,095.00 $8.00 $584.00 $5.50 $401.50 $10.00 $730.00
11 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 1743 $0.10 $174.30 $2.25 $3,921.75 $1.92 $3,346.56 $2.00 $3,486.00 $3.00 $5,229.00 $2.50 $4,357.50 $1.85 $3,224.55 $7.00 $12,201.00
12 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 44 $25.00 $1,100.00 $29.30 $1,289.20 $26.90 $1,183.60 $40.00 $1,760.00 $49.50 $2,178.00 $121.00 $5,324.00 $64.08 $2,819.52 $50.00 $2,200.00
13 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT 434 $18.00 $7,812.00 $18.00 $7,812.00 $24.37 $10,576.58 $27.00 $11,718.00 $26.00 $11,284.00 $43.00 $18,662.00 $27.56 $11,961.04 $25.00 $10,850.00
14 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 1685 $6.00 $10,110.00 $5.25 $8,846.25 $7.89 $13,294.65 $11.00 $18,535.00 $5.25 $8,846.25 $12.00 $20,220.00 $5.47 $9,216.95 $15.00 $25,275.00
15 2104.503 REMOVE FENCE LIN FT 189 $25.00 $4,725.00 $13.50 $2,551.50 $20.80 $3,931.20 $13.00 $2,457.00 $11.50 $2,173.50 $10.00 $1,890.00 $8.88 $1,678.32 $12.00 $2,268.00
16 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 39 $20.00 $780.00 $13.00 $507.00 $23.70 $924.30 $41.00 $1,599.00 $25.00 $975.00 $15.00 $585.00 $30.22 $1,178.58 $27.00 $1,053.00
17 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 2812 $9.00 $25,308.00 $6.50 $18,278.00 $5.07 $14,256.84 $7.00 $19,684.00 $5.50 $15,466.00 $8.00 $22,496.00 $6.55 $18,418.60 $15.00 $42,180.00
18 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 229 $1.00 $229.00 $1.00 $229.00 $1.78 $407.62 $2.00 $458.00 $1.50 $343.50 $5.00 $1,145.00 $1.52 $348.08 $2.00 $458.00
19 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 4257 $1.50 $6,385.50 $1.50 $6,385.50 $1.37 $5,832.09 $2.00 $8,514.00 $1.00 $4,257.00 $6.00 $25,542.00 $1.06 $4,512.42 $3.00 $12,771.00
20 2104.618 SALVAGE BRICK PAVERS SQ FT 136 $10.00 $1,360.00 $20.00 $2,720.00 $3.13 $425.68 $7.00 $952.00 $3.00 $408.00 $12.00 $1,632.00 $15.86 $2,156.96 $15.00 $2,040.00
21 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CU YD 590 $35.00 $20,650.00 $57.00 $33,630.00 $38.02 $22,431.80 $38.00 $22,420.00 $60.00 $35,400.00 $38.00 $22,420.00 $66.88 $39,459.20 $100.00 $59,000.00
22 2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD 130 $10.00 $1,300.00 $59.25 $7,702.50 $20.23 $2,629.90 $42.00 $5,460.00 $60.00 $7,800.00 $70.00 $9,100.00 $22.62 $2,940.60 $60.00 $7,800.00
23 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 40 $200.00 $8,000.00 $175.00 $7,000.00 $192.40 $7,696.00 $200.00 $8,000.00 $1.00 $40.00 $80.00 $3,200.00 $185.00 $7,400.00 $200.00 $8,000.00
24 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 CU YD 1390 $39.00 $54,210.00 $50.00 $69,500.00 $0.01 $13.90 $61.00 $84,790.00 $45.00 $62,550.00 $38.00 $52,820.00 $82.35 $114,466.50 $60.00 $83,400.00
25 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD 2545 $4.00 $10,180.00 $4.00 $10,180.00 $4.30 $10,943.50 $4.25 $10,816.25 $3.25 $8,271.25 $4.00 $10,180.00 $3.75 $9,543.75 $5.00 $12,725.00
26 2301.502 DOWEL BAR EACH 144 $20.00 $2,880.00 $11.00 $1,584.00 $15.84 $2,280.96 $19.00 $2,736.00 $19.25 $2,772.00 $18.00 $2,592.00 $15.00 $2,160.00 $21.00 $3,024.00
27 2301.504 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 8.0"SQ YD 322 $138.00 $44,436.00 $120.00 $38,640.00 $95.98 $30,905.56 $138.00 $44,436.00 $143.75 $46,287.50 $127.00 $40,894.00 $90.90 $29,269.80 $150.00 $48,300.00
28 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C)TON 585 $135.00 $78,975.00 $155.60 $91,026.00 $148.60 $86,931.00 $130.00 $76,050.00 $168.75 $98,718.75 $125.00 $73,125.00 $120.00 $70,200.00 $155.00 $90,675.00
29 2503.503 8" DUCTILE IRON PIPE SEWER CL 52 LIN FT 44 $150.00 $6,600.00 $155.20 $6,828.80 $125.05 $5,502.20 $136.00 $5,984.00 $113.00 $4,972.00 $253.00 $11,132.00 $172.55 $7,592.20 $110.00 $4,840.00
30 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 LIN FT 704 $96.00 $67,584.00 $104.50 $73,568.00 $69.01 $48,583.04 $85.00 $59,840.00 $120.00 $84,480.00 $89.00 $62,656.00 $105.31 $74,138.24 $115.00 $80,960.00
31 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $1,443.81 $2,887.62 $900.00 $1,800.00 $2,465.00 $4,930.00 $1,580.00 $3,160.00 $2,443.69 $4,887.38 $2,400.00 $4,800.00
32 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 $1,900.53 $11,403.18 $1,320.00 $7,920.00 $2,720.00 $16,320.00 $2,130.00 $12,780.00 $2,290.22 $13,741.32 $2,600.00 $15,600.00
33 2504.602 8" SLEEVE EACH 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $2,820.00 $8,460.00 $1,869.17 $5,607.51 $1,450.00 $4,350.00 $1,985.00 $5,955.00 $1,390.00 $4,170.00 $2,652.34 $7,957.02 $2,000.00 $6,000.00
34 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 3 $5,500.00 $16,500.00 $4,800.00 $14,400.00 $4,925.88 $14,777.64 $7,600.00 $22,800.00 $6,395.00 $19,185.00 $9,860.00 $29,580.00 $5,312.56 $15,937.68 $6,000.00 $18,000.00
35 2504.602 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 2 $400.00 $800.00 $110.00 $220.00 $457.03 $914.06 $755.00 $1,510.00 $550.00 $1,100.00 $810.00 $1,620.00 $133.81 $267.62 $525.00 $1,050.00
36 2504.604 2" INSULATION SQ YD 50 $50.00 $2,500.00 $53.50 $2,675.00 $23.32 $1,166.00 $63.00 $3,150.00 $15.00 $750.00 $50.00 $2,500.00 $42.72 $2,136.00 $70.00 $3,500.00
37 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 9 $1,050.00 $9,450.00 $1,120.00 $10,080.00 $1,380.63 $12,425.67 $1,350.00 $12,150.00 $2,175.00 $19,575.00 $1,320.00 $11,880.00 $1,551.18 $13,960.62 $2,150.00 $19,350.00
38 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 7 $700.00 $4,900.00 $800.00 $5,600.00 $1,135.07 $7,945.49 $1,400.00 $9,800.00 $1,162.00 $8,134.00 $1,120.00 $7,840.00 $872.96 $6,110.72 $1,100.00 $7,700.00
39 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 LIN FT 36 $850.00 $30,600.00 $785.00 $28,260.00 $769.96 $27,718.56 $800.00 $28,800.00 $1,410.00 $50,760.00 $998.00 $35,928.00 $992.41 $35,726.76 $1,400.00 $50,400.00
40 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 72-4020 LIN FT 6.3 $1,900.00 $11,970.00 $1,070.00 $6,741.00 $1,272.97 $8,019.71 $1,600.00 $10,080.00 $1,753.00 $11,043.90 $1,919.00 $12,089.70 $1,613.05 $10,162.22 $1,700.00 $10,710.00
41 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL EACH 13 $3,750.00 $48,750.00 $2,815.00 $36,595.00 $3,657.65 $47,549.45 $3,800.00 $49,400.00 $5,267.00 $68,471.00 $4,130.00 $53,690.00 $4,632.49 $60,222.37 $5,100.00 $66,300.00
42 2506.602 UTILITY VERIFICATION HOLE EACH 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,430.00 $2,860.00 $2,283.66 $4,567.32 $660.00 $1,320.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $1,030.48 $2,060.96 $3,000.00 $6,000.00
43 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3347 $16.00 $53,552.00 $13.05 $43,678.35 $13.70 $45,853.90 $17.00 $56,899.00 $17.00 $56,899.00 $13.00 $43,511.00 $12.75 $42,674.25 $20.00 $66,940.00
44 2521.518 3" BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 11215 $3.00 $33,645.00 $3.40 $38,131.00 $2.57 $28,822.55 $3.00 $33,645.00 $3.15 $35,327.25 $4.00 $44,860.00 $2.50 $28,037.50 $3.50 $39,252.50
45 2521.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH 90 $15.00 $1,350.00 $7.70 $693.00 $21.12 $1,900.80 $21.00 $1,890.00 $21.50 $1,935.00 $18.00 $1,620.00 $20.00 $1,800.00 $24.00 $2,160.00
46 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B412 TIP OUT LIN FT 207 $38.00 $7,866.00 $42.80 $8,859.60 $28.94 $5,990.58 $40.00 $8,280.00 $41.75 $8,642.25 $58.00 $12,006.00 $36.44 $7,543.08 $45.00 $9,315.00
47 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 1383 $38.00 $52,554.00 $31.00 $42,873.00 $27.62 $38,198.46 $34.00 $47,022.00 $35.00 $48,405.00 $48.00 $66,384.00 $35.19 $48,667.77 $40.00 $55,320.00
48 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 37 $120.00 $4,440.00 $104.60 $3,870.20 $102.01 $3,774.37 $127.00 $4,699.00 $135.00 $4,995.00 $109.00 $4,033.00 $94.50 $3,496.50 $135.00 $4,995.00
49 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 47 $129.00 $6,063.00 $129.00 $6,063.00 $111.46 $5,238.62 $138.00 $6,486.00 $145.00 $6,815.00 $127.00 $5,969.00 $103.50 $4,864.50 $147.00 $6,909.00
50 2531.604 8" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SQ YD 83 $150.00 $12,450.00 $129.00 $10,707.00 $144.72 $12,011.76 $146.00 $12,118.00 $155.00 $12,865.00 $125.00 $10,375.00 $135.00 $11,205.00 $155.00 $12,865.00
51 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 260 $70.00 $18,200.00 $78.00 $20,280.00 $63.35 $16,471.00 $66.00 $17,160.00 $69.00 $17,940.00 $60.00 $15,600.00 $60.00 $15,600.00 $70.00 $18,200.00
52 2545.501 LIGHTING SYSTEM LUMP SUM 1 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $39,715.00 $39,715.00 $42,137.93 $42,137.93 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $56,480.00 $56,480.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $42,000.00 $42,000.00
53 2557.602 FENCE POST SPECIAL EACH 1 $3,900.00 $3,900.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,080.00 $2,080.00 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $850.00 $850.00 $1,510.00 $1,510.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
54 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $13,520.00 $13,520.00 $17,200.00 $17,200.00 $23,750.00 $23,750.00 $14,800.00 $14,800.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00
55 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN PANEL TYPE SPECIAL EACH 4 $250.00 $1,000.00 $210.00 $840.00 $208.00 $832.00 $214.00 $856.00 $198.00 $792.00 $180.00 $720.00 $200.00 $800.00 $200.00 $800.00
56 2564.618 SIGN SQ FT 82 $90.00 $7,380.00 $160.00 $13,120.00 $156.00 $12,792.00 $161.00 $13,202.00 $104.00 $8,528.00 $102.00 $8,364.00 $150.00 $12,300.00 $100.00 $8,200.00
57 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 $500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.01 $0.01 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
58 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 34 $200.00 $6,800.00 $200.00 $6,800.00 $124.80 $4,243.20 $205.00 $6,970.00 $150.00 $5,100.00 $180.00 $6,120.00 $165.46 $5,625.64 $400.00 $13,600.00
59 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 1405 $5.00 $7,025.00 $4.90 $6,884.50 $4.16 $5,844.80 $5.00 $7,025.00 $5.00 $7,025.00 $2.85 $4,004.25 $5.82 $8,177.10 $8.00 $11,240.00
60 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 260 $90.00 $23,400.00 $100.00 $26,000.00 $0.01 $2.60 $75.00 $19,500.00 $32.00 $8,320.00 $32.00 $8,320.00 $96.93 $25,201.80 $60.00 $15,600.00
61 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 110 $2.40 $264.00 $2.10 $231.00 $1.04 $114.40 $3.00 $330.00 $1.50 $165.00 $3.00 $330.00 $1.00 $110.00 $3.00 $330.00
62 2575.505 SEEDING ACRE 0.32 $3,500.00 $1,120.00 $3,180.00 $1,017.60 $832.00 $266.24 $3,300.00 $1,056.00 $4,200.00 $1,344.00 $5,000.00 $1,600.00 $800.00 $256.00 $25,000.00 $8,000.00
63 2575.508 HYDRAULIC MULCH MATRIX POUND 791 $24.00 $18,984.00 $23.35 $18,469.85 $3.12 $2,467.92 $24.00 $18,984.00 $2.25 $1,779.75 $7.00 $5,537.00 $3.00 $2,373.00 $2.00 $1,582.00
64 2575.608 SEED SOUTHERN BOULEVARD POUND 51 $36.00 $1,836.00 $35.10 $1,790.10 $5.88 $299.88 $36.00 $1,836.00 $12.00 $612.00 $38.00 $1,938.00 $5.65 $288.15 $10.00 $510.00
65 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PREF THERMO GR IN CONT SQ FT 72 $33.00 $2,376.00 $48.75 $3,510.00 $47.79 $3,440.88 $50.00 $3,600.00 $40.00 $2,880.00 $40.00 $2,880.00 $45.95 $3,308.40 $35.00 $2,520.00
66 2582.518 CROSSWALK PREF THERMO GR IN SQ FT 635 $13.20 $8,382.00 $16.30 $10,350.50 $15.96 $10,134.60 $17.00 $10,795.00 $16.00 $10,160.00 $39.00 $24,765.00 $15.35 $9,747.25 $15.00 $9,525.00
Base Bid Total:$0.00 $930,173.80 $951,970.45 $975,583.70 $982,733.25 $1,018,768.90 $1,043,560.45 $1,048,279.52 $1,294,703.50
Solicitor: Richfield, MN City of
73rd Street SRTS Project
Richfield Project No.
SAP Nos. 157-591-003
Sources and Uses Tracking
Council Action
Grant Application Engineers Estimate Contract Award*
April 2022 April 2025 TBD 2025
Estimated Uses:
Design $125,000 $125,000 $125,000
Construction*$810,000 $970,000 $930,174
Change Orders $0 $0 $0
Right of Way $1,000 $500 $500
Legal $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
Construction Admin/Engineering/Staff $40,000 $50,000 $50,000
Contingency $97,700 $19,400 $18,603
10% Contingency 2% Contingency 2% Contingency
Total Uses $1,074,700 $1,165,900 $1,125,277
Sources:
2022 Regional Soliciation Funds - Federal STBG $635,000 $635,000 $635,000
Municipal State Aid $440,000 $531,000 $491,000
Total Sources $1,075,000 $1,166,000 $1,126,000
Difference $300 $100 $723
Notes
*Contract Award has not occurred and will be Low Risk
completed upon authorization from MnDOT.Medium Risk
Costs for construction shown are based on the High Risk
lowest bid received and do not constitute award
of the project.
73 rd S treet t rail r econ S t ruction P roject
Proyecto de reconStrucción del camino de la calle 73
73RD TRAIL SOUTH ALTERNATIVE
Roadway Calzada
Driveway Entrada de vehículo
Concrete Roadway and Sidewalk Calzada y acera de concreto
Trail Camino/Sendero
Boulevard Paseo arbolado
Tree Removal Remociòn de àrboles
Legend — LeyendaBloomington Ave16th Ave S73rd St17th Ave S18th Ave SCedar Ave SRaised CrossingRaised Crossing
Lugar de entrega de la escuela
Raised Crossing
Paso de peatones elevadoPaso de peatones elevado
School Drop Off
Paso de peatones elevado
Bump Out
Extensiones de las aceras
Bump Out
Extensiones de las aceras
Bump Out
Extensiones de las aceras
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.E.
STAFF REPORT NO. 82
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:John Evans, Analyst
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Karl Huemiller, Recreation Services Director
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/17/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider a resolution accepting a Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant in the amount of
$10,000 for the purchase of skate aids, hockey equipment, rental skates, and rink dividers at the
Richfield Ice Arena, and authorize staff to execute a grant agreement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Richfield has been awarded a Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant in the amount of
$10,000 for the purchase of skate aids, hockey equipment, rental skates, and rink dividers for the Richfield Ice
Arena.
This grant, which focuses on equipment for youth athletics and recreation, would provide staff with the funds to
upgrade and replace broken equipment for the Ice Arena's in-demand youth programs.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve a resolution accepting a Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant in the
amount of $10,000 for the purchase of skate aids, hockey equipment, rental skates, and rink dividers at
the Richfield Ice Arena, and authorize staff to execute a grant agreement.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
One of the primary missions of the Richfield Ice Arena is to help teach youth how to ice skate, through the Learn
to Skate program, school visits, and open skating sessions. Additionally, promotion of the sport of hockey is
another fundamental mission through the Little Spartans program.
These efforts have continued to see strong participation in recent years, which means that some of the
equipment used for these programs has been heavily used and is in need of replacement. Skate aids, which
skaters hold in front of them for balance, are dwindling in numbers at the Arena as they can break from heavy use.
Also, these programs depend on a full supply of properly-fitting skates for visitors, hockey equipment, and
dividers that allow different skill levels to work in separate parts of the ice.
The Richfield Recreation Services Department has received a number of youth sports grants from Hennepin
County in the past including Lincoln Athletic Complex, School District #287 soccer field and running track,
Academy of Holy Angels Synthetic Turf Field, archery equipment and soccer goals.
This grant enables Ice Arena staff to continue their ongoing mission to introduce kids to ice skating and hockey in
a safe and effective way.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Impact:
This grant will allow the City to continue providing programming through the Learn to Skate and Little Spartans
programs, as well as through school visits and open skating sessions. These programs are open to visitors of all
social and economic backgrounds. The success of these programs promotes the growth of skating and hockey,
especially for people within groups traditionally excluded from skating and hockey.
People:
The Recreation Services Department has an ongoing commitment to provide programs and facilities that are
accessible and inviting to all people, regardless of ethnicity, gender identification, or economic status. The
Richfield Ice Arena is no exception, always seeking ways to introduce people to ice skating.
Consequences:
The Recreation Services Department has been proactive about creating a welcoming environment for all people
and we have seen diverse participation. Staff realizes that these facilities are made possible by all of Richfield
residents and strives to take steps to ensure that our participants reflect that diversity and individuality.
Strategic Outcome Considerations:
This grant helps to meet the strategic priority of equity and inclusion by reducing barriers for traditionally excluded
groups.
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
The Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant agreement requires Council acceptance by resolution.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
Staff will need to process the agreement in a timely fashion to secure the funds and begin purchase of the
equipment in time for the 2025-2026 school year and skating/hockey season.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The grant enables staff to make these equipment upgrades without straining the operating budget of the Richfield
Ice Arena.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
There are no legal considerations for this project.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Reject the resolution and require staff to find other funding sources for this important equipment.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution accepting Hennepin Equipment Grant Resolution Letter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A HENNEPIN COUNTY YOUTH SPORTS EQUIPMENT GRANT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000, FOR THE PURCHASE OF ICE SKATING EQUIPMENT FOR THE RICHFIELD ICE ARENA. WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has secured a Hennepin County Youth Sports
Equipment Grant in the amount of $10,000 to purchase ice skating equipment for the
Richfield Ice Arena; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires the acceptance of grants by
resolution of the City Council, adopted by two-thirds majority of its members, expressing
such terms in full; and WHEREAS, the grant will enable staff to purchase equipment that is crucial to providing access to ice skating for new skaters, including skate aids, rental skates, rink
dividers, and hockey equipment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, that Richfield Recreation Services staff is authorized to accept the
Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant for the purchase of ice skating equipment for the
Richfield Ice Arena. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of June, 2025.
Mary Supple, Mayor ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.F.
STAFF REPORT NO. 83
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:John Evans, Analyst
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Karl Huemiller, Recreation Services Director
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/18/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider a resolution accepting two State of Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Program Grants for $67,064 and $68,785 to purchase and install solar energy
equipment on the roofs of the Richfield Ice Arena and the Richfield Public Works building.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Richfield has been awarded two State of Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Program Grants to purchase solar energy equipment on the roofs of the Richfield Ice
Arena ($67,084) and the Richfield Public Works building ($68,785).
The grants will enable staff to proceed with the projects and enable the capturing of solar power for use and sellback.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve a resolution accepting two State of Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Program Grants for $67,064 and $68,785 to purchase and install solar
energy equipment on the roofs of the Richfield Ice Arena and the Richfield Public Works building, and authorize staff to proceed with grant agreements and execution
of the projects.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
A primary mission of the Sustainability program in Richfield is to explore and implement the use of solar energy capture wherever feasible.
These grants from the State of Minnesota will enable staff to proceed with the purchase and installation of equipment on two City buildings.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Impact:
These grants help to lessen the environmental impact of heavy use of electricity from less-sustainable sources.
People:
The improvements will be an environmental benefit to all people and, with time, a cost-saving benefit to the residents of Richfield.
Strategic Outcome Considerations:
The projected arrays will decrease electricity costs and greenhouse gas emissions, benefiting the community monetarily and by decreasing the amount of fossil fuels burned to source
electricity. These projects will also be used as an opportunity to connect residents, business owners, and other community members with information and resources on installing
residential and commercial solar on their properties.
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
These grants, and related grant agreements, require Council acceptance by resolution.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
Staff will need to process the agreement in a timely fashion to proceed with the purchase and installation of the equipment in the near future.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The grant provides an affordable way to add solar to two of the City's building to reduce operating costs.
Ice Arena
Solar on public buildings grant $67,064
Federal Solar Subsidy (30%)$33,532
City's Cost $11,178
Total Cost:$111,774
Public Works Building
Solar on public buildings grant $68,785
Federal Solar Subsidy (30%)$34,392
City's Cost $11,465
Total Cost:$114,642
The public works project requires the addition of an electrical meter, which has added cost as compared to the Ice Arena project.
The solar arrays are expected to provide approximately $10,000 in utility savings per building per year with an expected life span of 30 years.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
There are no legal considerations for this project.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
Reject the resolution and require staff to find other funding sources for this important equipment.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution accepting state solar grants Resolution Letter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TWO MINNESOTA SOLAR ON PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROGRAM GRANTS, FOR $67,064 AND $68,785, FOR THE PURCHASE OF SOLAR ENERGY EQUIPMENT FOR THE RICHFIELD ICE ARENA AND THE RICHFIELD PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has secured two Minnesota Solar on Public
Buildings Program Grants from the State of Minnesota: one for the installation of solar equipment on the Richfield Ice Arena for $67,064, and the other for the installation of solar equipment on the Richfield Public Works building for $68,785; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires the acceptance of grants by
resolution of the City Council, adopted by two-thirds majority of its members, expressing such terms in full; and WHEREAS, the grant will enable staff to purchase and install the equipment to
harness solar energy with panels on two City buildings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, that Richfield Recreation Services staff is authorized to accept the
two Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Program Grants from the State of Minnesota and to administer the corresponding grant agreements and proceed with the projects.. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of June, 2025.
Mary Supple, Mayor ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #6.
STAFF REPORT NO. 84
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Manager
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Jay Henthorne, Director of Public Safety/Chief of Police
6/13/2025
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/17/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the revocation of a tobacco license issued to Richfield
Tobacco & Vape Outlet, dba Smoke & Pure Vape, located at 6535 Nicollet Avenue South, for egregious
flavored product and cannabis sales violations.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
With the implementation of the flavored product prohibition on January 1, 2024, the City has seen a steady
increase in tips and complaints for not only the illegal sales of flavored products, but also illegal cannabis sales
by licensed tobacco retailers. Due to the tip the city received and the successful search of the premises
revealing a significant inventory of illegal product, this has led staff to recommend revocation of the tobacco
license.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion:
Approve a resolution authorizing the revocation of a tobacco license issued to Richfield Tobacco &
Vape, dba Smoke & Pure Vape Outlet located at 6535 Nicollet Avenue South, Richfield, MN.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The attached resolution outlines the actions and events involving Richfield Tobacco & Vape Outlet, dba Smoke &
Pure Vape over the past 8 months.
Due to the volume of flavored product and illegal cannabis seized, confirmed testing of illegal high dose cannabis
products, the involvement of two State agencies, and two previous violations for a flavored sale and underage
sale both occurring two weeks apart in October 2024, staff recommend the revocation of the tobacco license.
Staff feel the recommended revocation is appropriate based on the circumstances and sends a message that
this type of disregard for city policy and the protections put in place to keep all residents and visitors from the
harms of tobacco and cannabis use will not be tolerated in Richfield. The City will continue to enforce, investigate
and hold accountable all tobacco retailers who violate local and state laws.
The City conducts age and product compliance checks to ensure licensees are following the city ordinance and
enforces fines when there is a failure. The tobacco compliance history of this retailer includes failures on October
7, 2024 and October 24, 2024.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
Chapter 11, section 1146 of the Richfield City Ordinances addresses tobacco licensing and sales in the city. The
flavored products prohibition went into effect on January 1, 2024. All retailers were given five months in late 2023
to reduce their flavored product inventory in anticipation of the new flavor ban which took effect January 1, 2024.
Additionally, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 342 and Richfield city Code Subsection 1198.07, cannabis
dealers are required to be licensed by the State and registered by the City to legally make retail sales to
customers or patients.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
No critical timing issues
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact to the City of Richfield.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved of the contents of the staff report.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
The City Council could decide not to approve the resolution authorizing revocation of the tobacco license and direct
staff on how to proceed.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
Said Mustafa, Owner
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Resolution for Revocation Resolution Letter
2
DOCSOPEN\RC160\3\1031310.v3-6/9/25
RESOLUTION NO. ______
FINDINGS AND DECISION RELATED TO THE REVOCATION OF THE TOBACCO LICENSE OF
RICHFIELD TOBACCO &VAPE OUTLET (D/B/A “SMOKE & PURE VAPE”) LOCATED AT 6535
NICOLLET AVENUE SOUTH, RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS
WHEREAS, Richfield Tobacco & Vape dba Smoke & Pure Vape (“Licensee”), a Minnesota
company, operates a retail establishment located at 6535 Nicollet Avenue S., Richfield, Minnesota
(“Licensed Premises”) and sells tobacco products pursuant to a tobacco license issued by the City of
Richfield (“City”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Richfield City Code Subsection 1146.05, tobacco retailers are required to be
licensed by the City to legally operate; and
WHEREAS, the City takes pride in the ongoing efforts to keep tobacco, cannabis, and flavored
products out of the hands of underage individuals; and
WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council supports strict enforcement of its tobacco ordinance to
accomplish its goal of curbing sales to underage individuals while respecting the due process rights of license
holders; and
WHEREAS, also pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 342 and Richfield City Code Subsection
1198.07, cannabis retailers are required to be licensed by the State and registered by the City to legally make
retail sales to customers or patients; and
WHEREAS, City staff are recommending a revocation of Licensee’s tobacco license based on the
egregious nature of certain violations by Licensee and blatant disregard for requirements in the City’s
tobacco and cannabis ordinances and State law; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing and discussing the pertinent files and information from staff and the
public safety department, the City Council makes the following findings with respect to Licensee’s tobacco
license:
A. Richfield City Code Subsection 1146.09, subd. 1 prohibits licensees from selling tobacco
products to any person under the age of 21; and
B. Richfield City Code Subsection 1146.09, subd. 6 prohibits the sale of flavored products by
licensed establishments; and
C. Richfield City Code Subsection 1146.03, subd. 20 defines “flavored product” as “[a]ny licensed
product that contains a taste or smell, other than the taste or smell of tobacco, that is
distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of the
product, including, but not limited to, any taste or smell relating to chocolate, cocoa, menthol,
mint, wintergreen, vanilla, honey, fruit, or any candy, dessert, alcoholic beverage, herb, or
spice. A public statement or claim, whether express or implied, made or disseminated by the
manufacturer of a licensed product, or by any person authorized or permitted by the
manufacturer to make or disseminate public statements concerning such products, that a product
3
DOCSOPEN\RC160\3\1031310.v3-6/9/25
has or produces a taste or smell other than a taste or smell of tobacco will constitute
presumptive evidence that the product is a flavored product.”
D. Minnesota Statutes Section 342.09, subd. 4 prohibits any person from selling cannabis flower,
cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products without a
license issued under Chapter 342 that authorizes such sale.
E. Richfield City Code Subsection 1198.07 prohibits retail sales by cannabis retailers and lower-
potency hemp retailers without an active registration by the City.
F. In August 2023, City staff personally visited all licensed tobacco retailers, including the
Licensed Premises, to provide educational materials related to the flavor prohibition and
answered retailer questions about the new ordinance. The Association for Non-Smokers-
Minnesota also sent a postcard size graphic of what was legal and illegal to sell. The new
ordinance gave retailers five months to sell their flavored products before going into effect on
January 1, 2024.
G. In October 2024, Richfield Police conducted two routine undercover compliance checks. The
Licensee failed both compliance checks. On October 7, 2024, the Licensee sold a flavored
product to the purchaser. On October 24, 2024, the Licensee sold product to an underage
person.
H. In May 2025, Richfield staff received a tip forwarded from the Minnesota Department of
Revenue (“DOR”) that alleged the Licensee was selling flavored tobacco products along with
cannabis that the owner was transporting in from Michigan, Illinois, and Colorado, mixing it
with synthetic cannabis and selling it to customers. Additional allegations included locations of
hidden spaces throughout the store where illegal product was being kept.
I. On May 13, 2025, the Richfield Police Department obtained a search warrant to search the
Licensed Premises. Richfield Officers, along with staff from the Minnesota DOR and Office of
Cannabis Management (OCM) executed the warrant. Richfield Officers found roughly 6448
items containing flavored products that were seized from the store. The following items were
taken as inventory of the search warrant:
a. 344 flavored items from the back room.
b. 4510 flavored tobacco items from the humidor.
c. 370 flavored items behind the front counter.
d. 175 flavored items concealed in a bench behind the humidor.
e. 969 flavored items were found behind the counter.
f. 67 THC products located in the ceiling space and in the bench behind the humidor.
g. 13 flavored items found on the north wall.
J. The overwhelming majority of these items were out in the open for anyone to purchase. Some
tobacco and cannabis items were concealed in a hidden bench/chest behind the humidor and
several cannabis items were stored in a storage tub in the ceiling.
K. The Licensee does not have a properly issued license for the retail sale of cannabis flower and
cannabis products. Licensee is registered with the State to sell lower-potency hemp products,
however, according to the OCM, the THC products found on the Licensed Premises tested at
levels significantly higher than the allowed limit for THC in these types of products.
4
DOCSOPEN\RC160\3\1031310.v3-6/9/25
WHEREAS, Richfield City Code Subsection 1146.05, subd. 5(a) states that a license may be denied,
suspended or revoked by the council, after an investigation and public hearing where the licensee is
granted the opportunity to be heard, for one or more of the following reasons:
(1) The operation of the business is in conflict with any provision of this code.
(2) The operation of the business is in conflict with any health, fire, building, building
maintenance, zoning, or any other applicable codes or laws.
(3) The applicant or licensee has failed to comply with one (1) or more provisions of this section
or any statute, rule or ordinance pertaining to the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-
related devices, electronic delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products.
WHEREAS, Richfield City Code Subsection 1146.23, subd. 1(d) provides that after a fourth
violation, if within 36 months of the third violation, the penalty is a $1,000.00 fine and the license will be
revoked.
WHEREAS, Richfield City Code Subsection 1198.25, subd. 3 further states that any violation of
the City Code Section regulating cannabis and hemp businesses shall be grounds for enforcement against
any business license issued by the City.
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2025, the City sent a notice to the Licensee stating the staff’s intent to
recommend to the City Council that Licensee’s tobacco license be revoked based on the city code
violations and executed search warrant and investigation performed by the Richfield Police
Department on May 13, 2025, and informing Licensee of its right to a hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The recitals outlined above are hereby adopted by the Council as factual findings and are
fully incorporated herein.
2. All documentation from the Police Department’s case file is fully incorporated herein.
3. The findings of the Richfield Police Department upon the execution of a valid search warrant
of the Licensed Premises substantiate the Licensee’s violations of the following subsections
of City Code and state law:
• 1146.09, subd. 1 (prohibition of the sale of tobacco products to persons under the
age of 21);
• 1146.09, subd. 6 (prohibition of the sale of flavored products by licensed
establishments);
• 1198.07 (prohibition of the retail sale of cannabis without an active registration);
• Minnesota Statutes Section 342.09, subd. 4 (prohibition of sale of cannabis
products without a license issued under Chapter 342); and
• Minnesota Statutes Section 151.72, subd. 5a (sale of THC products at THC levels
exceeding what is allowed by state law).
5
DOCSOPEN\RC160\3\1031310.v3-6/9/25
4. The Licensee has had four or more violations within the last 36 months, including two failed
compliance checks in October 2024, illegal sales of cannabis without a state license or an
active City registration, and sale of THC products exceeding THC limits allowed under law
discovered in May 2025.
5. The failure of the Licensee to comply with the provisions of the Richfield City Code
pertaining to the sale of tobacco and flavored products, and cannabis products, as cited above
is grounds for the revocation of a license by the City Council as authorized under City Code
Subsections 1146.05, subd. 5(a) and 1146.23, subd. 1(d).
6. The tobacco license for Richfield Tobacco & Vape Outlet, d/b/a “Smoke & Pure Vape”,
which business was most currently located at 6535 Nicollet Avenue South, Richfield,
Minnesota, 55423, is hereby revoked and Licensee is ordered to pay the $1,000 fine.
7. The City Council finds that the egregious circumstances and violations involved in this matter
warrant revocation of the tobacco license.
Adopted this _____ day of _____________, 2025.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #7.
STAFF REPORT NO. 85
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Julie Urban, Asst. Community Development Director
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director
6/18/2025
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/18/2025
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider an amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with Metro Housing and Redevelopment
Authority to operate up to five additional housing units under the Family Affordable Housing Program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In 2003, the City approved a Cooperative Agreement (Agreement) with the Metropolitan Council's Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (Metro HRA) that allows them to own and operate 10 scattered site units of affordable
housing in the community. Under the terms of the Agreement, the properties are exempt from property taxes but
pay a fee in lieu of taxes in an amount equal to 10% of the rent paid for the unit.
Metro HRA owns and operates 150 units of affordable housing throughout Anoka, Hennepin, and Ramsey
Counties as part of the Family Affordable Housing Program. Metro HRA recently sold five of these homes and
are in the process of purchasing replacement homes in various communities. They have purchased two homes
within Richfield and are seeking to bring the operation of the homes under the Agreement through a second
Agreement. They would also like the second Agreement to provide the option of purchasing three additional
homes in Richfield at some time in the future.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve Cooperative Agreement No. 2 between the City and the Metropolitan Council
Housing and Redevelopment Authority to own and operate an additional five homes in the community
through the Family Affordable Housing Program.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
As part of a 1995 class action lawsuit settlement, the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority (PHA) was
required to demolish 770 units of public housing and replace those units in areas throughout the
metropolitan area (aka The Hollman Decree). In partnership with Minneapolis PHA, Metro HRA agreed
to purchase and operate 150 units of scattered site replacement units. The Richfield City Council
approved a Cooperative Agreement with Metro HRA in 2003 to own and operate ten units in Richfield,
exempting the properties from property taxes and accepting a payment in lieu equal to 10% of the rent
paid.
The properties are licensed under the City's rental licensing program and are inspected biennially like all
other rental housing in the community.
Typically, Metro HRA's service area does not include communities like Richfield that locally administer the
federal Housing Choice Voucher Program. Through the Family Affordable Housing Program, however,
Metro HRA expands its service area to provide affordable housing options in a broader area.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Consistent with the Strategic Plan goal to maintain Richfield as an affordable place to live, the Family
Affordable Housing Program provides affordable rental housing for households who earn less than 80%
of the Area Median Income. Families living in the homes pay 30% of their income on rent. It has become
increasingly difficult for Section 8 voucher holders to find affordable units and property owners willing to
accept federal rent assistance. The Program's scattered-site, project-based units provide guaranteed
housing choices for families with children.
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
The current Cooperative Agreement with Metro HRA allows them to own and operate ten homes in
Richfield under the Program.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
Metro HRA recently purchased two homes in Richfield and are seeking to operate them under the
Cooperative Agreement with the City.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Metro HRA owns, operates and maintains the units. The units are subsidized through the federal Project-
Based Voucher Program. The vouchers used are part of Metro HRA's allocation and do not count against
the Richfield HRA's allocation of vouchers.
The Cooperative Agreement exempts the properties from property taxes, instead collecting a payment in
lieu equal to the amount of rent charged. The average payment in lieu is $620 per unit.
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
The proposed Agreement was reviewed by the City Attorney. The final form of the Agreement will also be
approved by the City Attorney.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. Decide not to approve the Cooperative Agreement No. 2.
2. Decide to approve the Cooperative Agreement No. 2 to allow only two additional homes.
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING:
Terri Smith, Metro HRA Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Cooperative Agreement No. 2 Contract/Agreement
Cooperative Agreement 2003 Backup Material
Affordable Family Housing Program Presentation Backup Material
Pagelof4
COOPERATION AGREEMENT No. 2
Metropolitan Council Family Affordable Housing Program
THIS COOPERATION AGREEMENT NO. 2 (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between
the Metropolitan Council (the “Council”) and the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the “City”).
WHEREAS, the Council is a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota
and is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 473.195. to exercise the functions, rights, duties,
privileges. immunities and limitations as are provided for housing and redevelopment authorities
created for municipalities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 473.195, the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047, and other laws relating to housing and redevelopment
authorities apply to the Council when the Council exercises the functions of an authority; and
WHEREAS, in I999 the Council established its Family Affordable Housing Program (FAHP) to
help implement a federal consent decree in the Hollman housing discrimination litigation and
create affordable housing opportunities in suburban locations for low-income families; and
WHEREAS, in March 2003 the City and the Council entered into a Cooperation Agreement under
which the Council acquired ten residential properties (FAHP Units) in the City as part of the
Council's Family Affordable Housing Program; and
WHEREAS, at its April 13, 2022, meeting, the governing body of the Council approved the
Council's acquisition of additional FAHP Units and authorized its Community Development
Division Director to execute all agreements required to complete the sale of properties and purchase
of replacement units; and
WHEREAS, residential properties in the City acquired and operated by the Council under this
Agreement will be used for subsidized affordable housing and therefore will be public property
used for essential public and governmental purposes under Minnesota Statutes. section 469.040,
subdivision I; and
WHEREAS, the Council's Section 8 housing assistance programs, including its Section 8 project-
based voucher program. are funded by and subject to Annual Contributions Contracts (and a
Consolidated Annual Contributions Contract) with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above-recitals and in consideration of the mutual
covenants in this Agreement, the City and the Council agree as follows:
I. Whenever used in this Agreement:
Page 2 of 4
(a) The term “FAHP Units" means up to five additional residential housing units acquired by
the Council in connection with its Family Affordable Housing Program located on a
scattered- site basis within the corporate limits of the City. The FAHP units are in addition
to the existing ten FAHP Units covered by the March 2003 Cooperation Agreement between
the City and the Council.
(b) The term “Taxing Body” or “Taxing Bodies” means the State of Minnesota and any city,
county, or any political subdivision of the State which would have authority to assess or
levy real or personal property taxes or to certify such taxes to a taxing body or public
officer to be levied for its use and benefit with respect to the FAHP Units if the units were
not exempt from taxation. The term “taxes" does not include charges for special
assessments or for utilities and special services, such as heat, water, electricity, gas, sewage
disposal, or garbage removal. The term “special services” means those physical services
provided to a FAHP Unit for which the City's actual cost of providing the services can be
calculated.
(c) The term “Shelter Rent" means the total rentals of a FAHP Unit charged to tenants during
the preceding calendar year, excluding any charges for utilities and special services such
as heat, water, electricity. gas. sewage disposal or garbage removal and excluding all other
income of the FAHP Unit.
2. Should the Council seek to acquire additional FAHP Units. it will notify the City of those
potential additional acquisitions.
3. The Council and the City agree:
(a) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 469.040 each FAHP Unit is exempt from all real
and personal property taxes levied or imposed by any Taxing Body for so long as the
FAHP Unit is owned by the Council or another public body and is leased to eligible low-
income individuals or families for residential use (the Exemption Period).
(b) During the Exemption Period, the City will not levy or impose any real or personal
property taxes upon a FAHP Unit or upon the Council with respect to the FAHP Unit.
(c) During the Exemption Period, the Council will make, or cause to be made, payments in
lieu of taxes (“Payments in Lieu of Taxes'') in payment for the public services and facilities
furnished from time to time without other cost or charge for or with respect to each FAHP
Unit. Each Payment in Lieu of Taxes will be made at the time when real property taxes on
a FAHP Unit would be paid if the FAHP Unit were subject to taxation and will be in an
amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the Shelter Rent charged with respect to the FAHP
Unit during the preceding calendar year. A Payment in Lieu of Taxes for a FAHP Unit may
not exceed the amount which would be payable in taxes if the FAHP Unit were not exempt
from real or personal property taxes.
Page3of4
(d) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 469.040, subdivision 3, the county within which
a FAHP Unit is located will distribute the Payments in Lieu of Taxes among the Taxing Bodies
in the proportion which the real property taxes which would have been paid to each Taxing
Body for such year if the FAHP Unit were not exempt from taxation bears to the total real
property taxes which would have been paid to all of the Taxing Bodies for such year if the
FAHP Unit were not exempt from taxation; provided, however, that no payment for any year
will be made to any Taxing Body in excess of the amount of the real property taxes which
would have been paid to such Taxing Body for such year if the FAHP Unit were not
exempt from taxation.
4. During the Exemption Period, the City, or other appropriate Taxing Body, without cost or
charge to the Council or the tenants of a FAHP Unit (other than the Payments in Lieu of Taxes)
will:
(a) Furnish or cause to be furnished to the Council and the tenants of the FAHP Unit public
services and facilities of the same character and to the same extent as are furnished from
time to time without cost or charge to other dwellings and inhabitants in the City.
(b) Reasonably cooperate with the Council by such other lawful action or ways as the City or
other Taxing Body and the Council may find necessary in connection with the
development and administration of the FAHP Unit.
5. If by reason of the City’s or other Taxing Body's failure or refusal to furnish or cause to
be furnished any public services or facilities which it has agreed to furnish or cause to be
furnished to the Council or to the tenants of any FAHP Unit, the Council incurs any
expense to obtain such services or facilities, then the Council after reasonable notice may
deduct the amount of such expense from any Payments in Lieu of Taxes due or to become
due to the City or other Taxing Body in respect to any FAHP Unit or any other housing
units owned or operated by the Council.
6. No Cooperation Agreement previously entered into between the City and the Council will be
construed to apply to any FAHP Units covered by this Agreement.
7. No member of the governing body or any other public official of the City or other Taxing
Body who exercises any responsibilities or functions with respect to any FAHP Unit
during her or his tenure or for one year thereafter may have any interest, direct or indirect,
in any FAHP Unit or any contracts in connection with any FAHP Unit. If any such
governing body member or such other public official of a Taxing Body involuntarily
acquires or had acquired prior to the beginning of her or his tenure any such interest, she
or he must immediately disclose such interest to the Council.
8. The privileges and obligations of the City and other Taxing Bodies will remain in full force
and effect with respect to the FAHP Units so long as the beneficial title to the FAHP Units
is held by the Council or by any other public body or governmental agency authorized by
law to operate the FAHP Units as subsidized housing for eligible low-income families under
the federal Section 8 project-based voucher program. If at any time the beneficial title to, or
possession of, a FAHP Unit is held by such other public body or governmental agency the
Page4of4
provisions of this Agreement will inure to the benefit of and may be enforced by such
other public body or governmental agency.
9. The obligation of the Parties under this Agreement apply to each FAHP Unit covered
by this Agreement.
10. Minnesota Statutes section 13.462 will govern data on individuals receiving FAHP assistance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the authorized representatives of the City and the Council have
respectively signed this Agreement. This Agreement is effective on the date when both Parties’
authorized representatives have signed this Agreement.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By: ____________________________ By: _____________________________
Lisa Barajas, Director
Community Development
Date: __________________________ Date: ____________________________
Family Affordable Housing Program
May 2025
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lFamily Affordable Housing Program
History
Met Council purchases 150 homes
•1992 class action lawsuit
•Alleging historical patterns of racial segregation
•1995 Settlement
•Required Minneapolis Public Housing Authority
to demolish 770 units of public housing; and
•Create replacement units in non-impacted areas
•Replacement units developed by regional partners
•Metropolitan Council purchased 150 units
between 2001 and 2004
•10 unit is Richfield
1
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lMetropolitan Council Partnership
Council Purchases
150 housing units
•Located in Anoka,
Hennepin and Ramsey
Counties
•11 communities
•Single Family Homes
and Townhomes
•2-5 bedrooms
2
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lFAHP Program Operation
Successful Operation since 2001
•Day-to-day management services provided by
Kingwood Management
•Contract since 2005
•Units operated under the federal Project Based
Voucher program
•Tenants pay 30% of income towards rent
•Federal subsidy makes up the difference
•Capital Improvement plan ensures units remain
assets in community
3
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lEdina Affordable Housing Partnership
4 Units Added in 2021-2022
$2 million loan from the
City of Edina
0%
interest
25-year
forgivable
4
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lEdina Affordable Housing Partnership
5
Single Family
Home
•Three Bedrooms
•One Bathroom
•Move-in Ready
•Occupancy March 2022
Single Family
Home
•Converted from a Three
Bedroom to a Five
Bedroom
•Two Bathrooms
•Finished Basement
•Installed water mitigation
system
•Occupancy October 2022
Duplex
•(2) Three Bedrooms
•One Bathroom
•Substantial Renovation
•Replaced windows and
siding
•Finished basements
•Outdoor concrete and
patios
•Occupancy March 2023
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lFAHP Portfolio Rebalancing
Sold 5 Units
in 2024
Purchasing 5
Replacement
Units 2025
Selling
additional 11
units 2025-
2026
Purchase 11
Replacement
Units 2025-
2026
6
•Move away from townhome associations
•Increase portfolio of single-family homes
•Self-Sufficiency initiative
•More green space
•Safe neighborhoods
•Proximity to transit, groceries, services
M e t r o p o l i t a n C o u n c i lFAHP Replacement Units
Cooperation Agreement
(Amendment)
•Authorizes Met Council to purchase an addition
(2-4) units in Richfield
•Units exempt from property taxes
•Council shall make a Payment in Lieu of
Taxes for each unit
•10% of rent charged
•County shall distribute the PILOT
•Average PILOT = $620 per unit
7
Terri Smith
Director, Metropolitan Council Housing and
Redevelopment Authority
Terri.smith@metc.state.mn.us
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #8.
STAFF REPORT NO. 86
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6/24/2025
REPORT PREPARED BY:Mark McKinley, Administrative Assistant
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW:Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
6/17/2025
OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW:
CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
Consider appointment to fill a vacancy on the Transportation Commission.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Terms of several City advisory board and commission members expire on January 31, 2025. Terms for
advisory board and commissions are for three years.
The City Council directs the City Manager’s office to conduct an annual recruitment seeking applicants to fill
the vacancies. This recruitment includes a press release and information on the City’s website and social
media platforms. Applicants were interviewed at a work session held on November 16, 2024.
The Transportation Commission had an unexpected resignation after all positions were filled. During the
recruitment process, Council designated alternate candidates as there were not enough open positions for all
applicants. The recommended alternate's application was submitted to Council for their review.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion: Approve the appointment of Jacob Olsen as Transportation Commissioner commencing on
June 24, 2025 and expiring January 31, 2026.
BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:
A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT
This information is contained in the executive summary.
B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Maintaining a full commission roster allows for a diverse range of perspectives to be shared during each
commission meeting. Maintaining a full roster allows for more flexibility in instances where a quorum is needed to
conduct official business.
C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc):
City advisory board and commissions were established by City ordinance or resolution.
D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES:
It is advisable to appoint a replacement to ensure quorum at meetings.
E.FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION:
None
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S):
None
PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: