Loading...
2025-04-22 WS City Council Agenda W ORK SESSION RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, BARTHOLOMEW ROOM APRIL 22, 2025 5:45 PM Call to order 1.Discuss ban on short-term rentals. 2.Introduction and preliminary discussion of future plans for Minnesota Independence College and Community. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9739. AGENDA SECTION:Work Session Items AGENDA ITEM #1. STAFF REPORT NO. 13 WORK SESSION 4/22/2025 REPORT PREPARED BY: Sam Crosby, Planner II DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director 4/15/2025 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 4/16/2025 ITEM FOR WORK SESSION: Discuss ban on short-term rentals. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Through the policy proposal process in 2024, the City Council identified the restriction of Short-Term Rentals (STRs) as a priority. The main concern expressed was the removal of the units from the housing market for long-term residents. Other issues, such as maintenance and noise/nuisances were also raised. Potential solutions to the concern would be to either ban or limit the number of STRs. There seemed to be consensus to carve out an exception for units where the owners live on-site. On January 28, the City Council held a work session to discuss imposing limits on STRs. The Council asked for additional information, including data on police and fire calls, and public feedback on the topic. Staff has found that, due to the format of their record keeping system, it was impossible to draw any conclusions from the data that the police department provided. A summary of the survey outreach and results is provided in the historical section below. Additional research since the last work session has led to a deeper understanding of the issue. As outlined in the policy section below, STRs where the owner lives elsewhere are essentially a one-unit lodging establishment that is skirting many of the regulations that apply to similar larger lodging establishments. Staff has concluded that the flexibility that STRs provide does not outweigh the loss of housing, or the staff time that would be needed to ensure they’re operating on par with other lodging establishments, and therefore finds that a one-month limitation is the best approach. Because properties where the owner or licensee lives on site will be exempt, it preserves the ability for some STRs to remain in the community. DIRECTION NEEDED: Review survey results and additional information outlined in the policy section and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT Survey Outreach Staff crafted an 11-question public opinion survey, which was widely distributed: February 13: Segment in the Richfield Recap & posted at front information desk. February 14: Sent to rental property owners through RAMA Reporter (association bulletin). February 19: Posted to Facebook. February 20: Published in the Sun Current. February 20: Provided information and survey link at Visit Richfield board meeting. March 4: Provided information and survey link at Chamber of Commerce board meeting. March 6: Reminder in Richfield Recap. March 7: Survey closed. The survey was formatted to allow only one response per device. Survey Results People who are more interested in the topic are more likely to take the survey. Consequently, the results are not necessarily representative of the whole population, but are likely to skew to extremes. 541 responses were received. 81% of respondents are full time residents. Only 3 were short-term rental owners that live on site. 17 were short-term rental owners that live elsewhere. Of those who responded, 40% have had direct experience with STRs and 60% had no direct experience. Overall, respondents were evenly split on their general opinion of STRs with 33% viewing them as very or somewhat negative, 33% considering their impact neutral, and 34% viewing them as very or somewhat positive. Overall, 36% generally oppose limitations, while 54% generally support limitations (10% neutral). Of those with direct experience, 49% indicated that they either somewhat or strongly supported limitations of some kind (44% oppose, 7% neutral); yet in the next question, 49% responded that they do not think that STRs should be limited at all (4% 1 week, 5% 2 weeks, 23% 1 month, 19% other), showing again, an even split in opinions on the issue. Note that the majority of those indicating "other" preferred a longer minimum time frame, as long as 6 months to a year. Respondents may have been confused by one of the two questions. Some did not seem to understand that a limit of more than 30 days is essentially a ban. Some perhaps preferred other mechanisms such as caps, limiting the number of days per year, or increased code enforcement. Some respondents conflated STR ownership and corporate ownership. Of those with no direct experience, 20% strongly oppose limitations, and 42% strongly support limitations, but 40% responded that they do not think that STRs should be limited. Not surprisingly, of those that own STRs, 100% oppose limitations. Of those that own long term rentals, 53% generally oppose limitations, and 67% answered that they should not be limited. 66% of all respondents agreed that changes should not apply to properties where owners live on site (19% unsure and 15% disagree). Staff also received four calls – all from owners or potential owners of STRs. Staff can provide a link to study results upon request. In short, while results were mixed, a deeper dive into the comments revealed that for those respondents who favored limiting rentals, the majority preferred limiting rentals to no less than 30 days. B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS One of the purposes of a ban on STRs is to remove roadblocks to residents finding affordable housing options. C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc): Continued discussions among departments have led to further understanding of the complexity of the issue: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) classifies STRs as a hotel or motel, and requires a lodging license, which requires inspection by the Fire Marshall. But the State Fire Marshall does not inspect these types of properties. Therefore, the MDH has been accepting housing rental licenses. Hotels and motels are also required to be ADA accessible, and to have minimum life safety standards, such as exit signs and emergency lighting. State Statues requires a 3% lodging tax on all rentals of less than 30 days. The tax is paid on a monthly basis, and after collection the City sends the tax to the local tourism promotion board (Visit Richfield). Staff have struggled to determine an effective method to enforce and collect this tax. Staff turnover at the City has lowered this on the list of priorities. Hotels and motels are only permitted in commercial and mixed use districts, and bed and breakfasts, while conditionally permitted in residential, require an on-site operator. Hotels and motels also require a business license from the City. Finally, both hotels/motels and traditional bed and breakfasts are required to obtain a conditional use permit from the City. In summary, an STR where the owner lives elsewhere is essentially a one-unit extended stay that circumvents regulations, whether they be federal, state, or local. STRs are akin to ride share apps operating without the expensive licensing that traditional taxis are required to carry. The benefits to the community that STRs provide, such as flexibility in lodging options for visitors, do not outweigh the ambiguity of looking the other way, particularly in regards to accessibility and safety. Therefore, the options become either to require that STRs comply with all the regulations listed above, or require that they rent for no less than one month, as to not be classified as a lodging establishment, hotel or motel. Staff finds that a one-month limitation is the best approach, as it is the simplest solution. Because properties where the owner lives on site will be exempt, it provides a balance that facilitates responsible hosting while preserving the ability for some STRs to remain in the community. In light of this, staff further recommends removing the conditional use permit for a traditional bed and breakfast. There are two differences between an STR where the owner lives on site and a traditional bed and breakfast: the food service (which is licensed by the health department), and a limit of not more than two rooms. Given the close similarity, staff recommends removing the conditional use permit requirement for bed and breakfasts, rather than requiring a conditional use permit for every remaining short-term rental. D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: Legally – none. This can be enacted at any time. However, staff would like to draft an ordinance amending Chapter 4 “Building Housing and Construction Regulations” of the municipal code for consideration at the May 13 City Council meeting, with a second reading on May 27 – providing a seven-month grace period between adoption and implementation. A more complete draft of the potential ordinance amendment is attached. E.FINANCIAL IMPACT: While a ban on rentals of less than one month duration may cause some STRs to go out of business, some may adjust to the new requirement and stay in business as long-term rentals. F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION: None. ALTERNATIVE(S): Do not make any changes at this time. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: None ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Draft Ordinance Amendment Backup Material BILL NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD BUILDING, HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS (CHAPTER IV OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE) TO LIMIT RENTALS TO NO LESS THAN ONE MONTH THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Subsection 407.05 of the Richfield Municipal Code “Inspection and Licensing of Apartment Houses and Rental Homes” Code is amended to read as follows: 407.05. - License required. It is unlawful for any person who is an owner of an apartment house or an owner of a rental home to operate such apartment house or rental home without first having obtained a license under the provisions of this Section. No apartment house, rental home, or accessory dwelling unit (as described in subsection 518.05) shall be rented or leased for a term of less than one month unless the licensee lives on site. There are two (2) types of licenses: regular and provisional. Provisional licenses are defined in Subsection 407.13. All references to licenses in this Section are references to regular licenses, unless otherwise stated. No license shall be required under this Section for Rental Homes which have currently valid licenses from either Hennepin County, or the Minnesota Department of Health permitting such occupancy. Section 2 This ordinance is effective on January 1, 2026. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __th day of May, 2025. ____________________ Mary B. Supple, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk DRAFT AGENDA SECTION: Work Session Items AGENDA ITEM # 2. STAFF REPORT NO. 14 WORK SESSION 4/22/2025 REPORT PREPARED BY: Sam Crosby, Planner II DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director 4/14/2025 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 4/16/2025 ITEM FOR WORK SESSION: Introduction and preliminary discussion of future plans for Minnesota Independence College and Community. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Minnesota Independence College and Community (MICC) is a nonprofit vocational and life skills training program for autistic and neurodivergent adults. MICC currently operates out of a converted single family residence at 2000 - 76th Street West, and the Colony Apartments at 35W and 76th Street West. MICC offers a variety of programs including a three-year college program that focuses on teaching students the skills necessary to live independently. The MICC program also offers graduates support and connections beyond graduation. These support services drive many graduates to search for housing in the immediate area of the campus. In the past, MICC had hopes of consolidating and expanding their program space in one building with complimentary housing above. For many reasons, one of which was that the housing needs to be owned by a separate entity other than MICC, that project was not financially viable. Last year, MICC began exploring the possibility of a phased project where the school and housing were in two separate buildings, to be constructed at different times. The two phases would share access, parking, and storm water. At a work session last June, the City Council and Planning Commission provided feedback on a concept plan, including: Shifting the stormwater pond to the north could act as a buffer for the adjacent single family residential. The access from the south side should not just be a door, but should be a significant main entrance, so that the building “faces” south. The transparency on the first floor should be maximized as much as possible. Design to integrate the public and private space in the southwest corner of the site. The MICC team has revised the plans and, at this work session, will share the updated concepts for the phased redevelopment of the four properties on the north side of 76th Street West between Morgan Avenue and Newton Avenue. DIRECTION NEEDED: Staff and presenters are seeking feedback on the updated concepts. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT MICC has operated out of the nearby Colony Apartments since its inception in 1996. In 2016, the City Council approved an Interim Use Permit for MICC to use the property at 2000 - 76th Street West for social, meeting, and office space. The Interim Use Permit was extended in 2022 and will expire July 12, 2027. Preliminary concepts for redevelopment of the properties at 2000, 2006, and 2018 - 76th Street West were presented at a work session in the summer of 2022. A preliminary development agreement was filed with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to construct a new mixed use facility on these lots, with classroom and office space, and 67 units of affordable housing. As explained in the narrative, that project was not financially viable. MICC presented a similar concept at a work session in June of 2024. B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS People with disabilities are a historically excluded group. The expansion of, and improvements to, their educational facility and social gathering space will greatly enhance their quality of life, and help increase their sense of inclusion and belonging. C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc): The properties are part of a multi-block area that has been guided “Medium Density Residential” by the Comprehensive Plan since 2008. The properties are currently zoned R (Low Density Residential) and are non-compliant with the Comprehensive Plan. This is in accordance with the City's practice of delaying the rezoning until an area is prioritized for redevelopment via action of the Council or until a development is contemplated. MR-2 (Medium Density Housing) is the zoning district that corresponds to the Medium Density designation. Public or private elementary and high schools, and other similar learning institutions are conditional uses in the MR-2 zoning district. Multifamily dwellings with eight or fewer units require site plan approval. In the previous concept, the housing part of the project could not stand alone, as it was too dense. The amount of housing has been reduced. The medium density designation allows a range of 8 to 34 units per acre. At approximately 0.38 acres in size (~16,800 square feet), the housing parcel could support 3 to 13 units and 8 units are envisioned at this time. Row houses are the unit type being conceptualized at this time. This is a product that Richfield does not have a lot of, and would help diversify our housing stock. Business or trade school parking requirements, which are 1 per employee plus 1 per 3 students based on rated design capacity, would apply to the MICC building. The housing would need 1.25 per unit. Both uses are subject to slight reductions for extra bike parking and transit proximity. MICC will need to submit a parking study to support their anticipated deviation from code. Cross access, cross parking and cross drainage easements will all be established with the first phase of the project. The land use request is anticipated to be: Plat, Rezone, a Conditional Use Permit for the school, and at least two (building setback) variances. D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: None at this time. When the project moves forward, MICC plans to request a two year approval to provide sufficient time in which to secure project funding. MICC hopes to complete the entitlement process yet this year. E.FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION: None at this time. ALTERNATIVE(S): N/A PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Amy Gudmestad, CEO of MICC; Mark Forsberg, Associate Principal RSP Architects; Scott Aspenson, Principal RSP Architects ATTACHMENTS: Description Type 25-04-22 MICC Work Session Narrative Backup Material 25-04-22 MICC Work Session Plans Backup Material 7501 Logan Avenue South / Suite 2A / Richfield, MN 55423 www.micc.org MICC Learning Center Project Narrative April 4, 2025 Introduction Minnesota Independence College and Community (MICC) seeks to rezone and replat land owned by MICC in Richfleld to build a facility for serving autistic and neurodivergent adults. MICC is unique nationally, offering a specialized vocational and life skills training program to foster independence within a supportive community. The City of Richfleld has been an integral part of that community. MICC’s Mission and Impact At MICC, we know the best way to teach life skills is through flrsthand experience in a supportive and vibrant community. Our person-centered curriculum allows autistic and neurodivergent adults to deflne their own paths to success. Our location in Richfleld provides numerous community engagement and employment opportunities, essential for our students’ growth. Need for Expansion The demand for our programs has outgrown our current facilities. With a 138% increase in autism diagnoses in Minnesota from 2009 to 2020, the need for postsecondary education and employment support for autistic individuals is critical. The existing rented spaces in Richfleld (at Colony Apartments and Woodlake Church) are inadequate and not designed for the experiential learning essential for our students. Administration functions are split between Colony Apartments and one of the homes owned by MICC on 76th Street. These disjointed, outdated and inaccessible spaces hinder program collaboration and resource sharing. Currently, MICC serves approximately 55 students each year but the need is growing. To continue the delivery of high-quality programming, we urgently need a purpose-built facility. In addition to the anticipated growth in educational programs, the building will serve over 100+ autistic and neurodivergent adults (all MICC graduates) living independently within a 10-block area and utilizing MICC for wrap-around services to ensure they can sustain their independence, have access to opportunities for social activities, and contribute positively to the community. These individuals are an important part of MICC’s community, but also Richfleld, their home. 7501 Logan Avenue South / Suite 2A / Richfield, MN 55423 www.micc.org New Campus Plan We propose rezoning, replating and re-developing 4 single-family properties at 2000, 2008 & 2018 W 76th Street and 7532 Morgan Ave S to build a new 27,000 square foot, two story building that will serve as MICC’s Learning Center and organizational headquarters. The new campus will include: •Appropriate teaching and socializing areas to allow students to engage authentically with peers. •Flexible classrooms designed for small and large group engagement, integrated technology and multi-purpose furniture, as well as space for physical fltness, yoga and meditation areas. •Student support spaces for advisory services on continued education and employment, •Staff offices promoting cross-department collaboration and fiexibility for our expanding team. •Reserved land for future expansion or potential housing development. Rezoning the property to MR-2 aligns with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. MICC seeks to have the combined property divided into two parcels with one property for MICC’s new building and the other for future expansion or housing. We will be requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the education use. MICC will continue to contract with Colony Apartments for our students’ housing needs and some social spaces. Parking Demand MICC has a fiexible work environment with employees often working from home. We conducted a parking study for employees to identify peak and low parking times. The study found that MICC’s busiest times were Tuesday – Thursday between noon and 4:00 pm, with 40 spots needed if everyone was on site at the same time. On average, we believe we would regularly use 30 spots during peak time and 15 spots off hours including evenings and weekends. 88% of MICC students use public transportation. Students reside at Colony Apartments where adequate parking is available for those that drive. We will be requesting a variance for parking. Conclusion We look forward to the City’s input and moving forward with the formal land use application for the new facility. MICC – LEARNING CENTER |04.04.2025© 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MINNESOTA INDEPENDENCE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 2 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLANPENN AVEMORGAN AVE. SNEWTON AVE. SN 200’100’0’ COLONY APARTMENTS SITE PLAN 1” = 100’ © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 10:10:12 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 10:10:12 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN BEST BUY HEADQUARTERS W. 76TH ST W. 75TH ST WOODLAKE LUTHERAN CHURCH MICC PROPOSEDSITE 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolis, MN55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolis, MN55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/20/2025 2:23:24 PM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN - CONTEXT M 4- - MICC 1" = 100'-0"1M 4 - SITE PLAN MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 3 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 2/12/2025 8:34:09 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7STUDENT CENTER - MICC PROPERTY LINE MORGAN AVE. SNEWTON AVE. SW. 76 TH ST PARKING(39 STALLS) EXISTING STRUCTURES N 50’25’0’ SITE PLAN 1’-0” = 1/32” BUILDING FOOTPRINT PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC PROSPECTIVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PROSPECTIVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PROSPECTIVE FUTURE PARKING SWALE AND RETENTION R R R R R 4 PARCELS 79,436 SF1.82 ACRES EXISTING ZONING R LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 4 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 2/12/2025 8:34:09 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7STUDENT CENTER - MICC PROPERTY LINE MORGAN AVE. SNEWTON AVE. SW. 76 TH ST PARKING(39 STALLS) EXISTING STRUCTURES N 50’25’0’ SITE PLAN 1’-0” = 1/32” BUILDING FOOTPRINT PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC PROSPECTIVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PROSPECTIVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PROSPECTIVE FUTURE PARKING SWALE AND RETENTION R MR-2 MR-2 R PARCEL 164,436 SF1.48 ACRES PARCEL 215,000SF(225.10’ X 66.64’).34 ACRES MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 5 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD © Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 2/12/2025 8:34:09 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7STUDENT CENTER - MICC PROPERTY LINE MORGAN AVE. SNEWTON AVE. SW. 76TH ST PARKING(39 STALLS) EXISTING STRUCTURES N 50’25’0’ SITE PLAN 1’-0” = 1/32” BUILDING FOOTPRINT PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC 8' - 0" 30' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0" 30' - 0" 15' - 0" 35' - 0"15' - 0"35' - 0"8' - 0"30' - 0"© Copyright RSP Architects 2024. All rights reserved. RSP Project No. RSP Architects 612.677.7100 rsparch.com 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413-1036 Date: 1/9/2025 9:02:01 AM 06/06/2024 SITE PLAN P7- - MICC PROSPECTIVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PROSPECTIVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PROSPECTIVE FUTURE PARKING SWALE AND RETENTION MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 6 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD 1 WELCOME 1 RECEPTION 2 WAITING 3 CONFERENCE 4 SOCIAL TEAM 5 WELCOME STORAGE 6 MAIL STORAGE 7 PARTICIPANT MAIL 8 MEDICATION ENGAGEMENT 9 ACTIVE LOUNGE 10 QUIET LOUNGE 11 TEACHING KITCHEN 12 ART CLASSROOM LEARNING 13A HEALTH CLASSROOM 13B HEALTH CLASSROOM 14 GENERAL CLASSROOM 15 TECH CLASSROOM SUPPORT 16 ELEVATOR 17 ELEV MACHINE ROOM 18 STORAGE 19 MECHANICAL ROOM 20 RESTROOMS 21 TRASH/RECYCLE 22 FACILITY WORKSHOP 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A 13 B 14 15 16 17 18 18 18 19 20 21 FIRST FLO O R PL A N STAIR STAIR 20 N 25’12’0’ 1’-0” = 1/16” MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 7 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD SECOND FLO O R PL A N OFFICE 16 ELEVATOR 20 RESTROOMS 25 LEADERSHIP OFFICE 26 PRIVATE OFFICE 27 CONFERENCE 28 HUDDLE 29 SENSORY 30 WORKSTATIONS 31 FINANCE 32 HUMAN RESOURCES 33 TECH ROOM 34 ADVISORY HUDDLE 35 MOTHER’S ROOM 36 STAFF BREAK LOUNGE 37 MECHANICAL ROOM 16 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26272727 28 28 28 28 28 29 30 30 30 31 32 333434 34 34 34 34 35 36 37 STAIR STAIR 20 N 25’12’0’ 1’-0” = 1/16” MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 8 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 9 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 10 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 11 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 12 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 13 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 14 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 15 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 16 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD RENDER - EXTERIOR SOUTH WEST | SOUTH EAST MICC – LEARNING CENTER | 17 04.04.2025 © 2025 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD RENDER - EXTERIOR NORTH EAST | NORTH WEST