Loading...
05-15-1972 SpecialCITY OF RICHFIELD SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES AREA No. 1 May 15, 1972 The Council of the City of Richfield met in special session at Centennial Schoo1,~73rd and Bloomington Avenue, on Monday, May 15, 1972, at 7:00 p.m., for a hearing to consider permanent street construction and ornamental street lighting program ..for Area No. 1 (that area lying east of 12th Avenue, south of Diagonal Boulevard, west of .5th Avenue and north of 77th Street). Meeting was called to order by Mayor Law. Present: Anderson, Jacobsen, Kenealey, Luettinger and Law Absent: None Wayne Burggraaff, City Manager, gave a s],ide presentation on permanent street construction and ornamental street lighting,. and provided background information on these two proposed projects. - SamHuston - consulting engineer from Orr-Schelen-Mayerson and Associates, reviewed the planning proposed for this area and explained basic information re- garding the preliminary engineer's report for the permanent street construction project. The following appeared in interest and asked questions: Ray Scott, 7544 13th Avenue Russell L. Matson, Jr., 7401 13th Avenue Hugh A. Weber, 7620 16th Avenue Maurice Collison, 7426 14th Avenue Howard C, Halloff, 7305 14th Avenue Dick Lewis, 7545 12th Avenue Morey Devitt, 7600 13th Avenue The following spoke in favor: Mrs. Lloyd C. Johnson, 7609 12th Avenue - Permanent B. W. Carlson, 7320 14th Avenue - Permanent thoro~ B, R. Hoverson, 7408 13th Avenue - Permanent Leo E. Poe~rling, 7445 14th Avenue - Permanent Jim Nestande, 7445 12th Avenue - Permanent Sidney Zochert, 7444 14th Avenue - Permanent streets and street lighting streets for arterial a.ghfares only streets streets streets streets 1 - 2 - May 15, 1972 `The following spoke in opposition: Mrs. Jerome E. Leeson, 7621 12th Avenue - Permanent streets Verilyn L. Ness, 7338 14th Avenue - Permanent streets and street lighting Mayor Law indicated that the council would like to bring this hearing to a 1 close and that the council had been previously advised to make their decision on 7."hursday, May 18th, which is the last day of the four scheduled meetings; however, he asked each councilman to respond at this time and to indicate their feelings about the proposed improvements: Councilman Kenealey: Still wanted to think more on these issues before committing his feelings. Councilman Luettinger; Favors permanent street program and favors installing conduits under driveways if we don°t do lighting program. Councilman Jacobsen: Favors permanent street program and favors mid-block lights. Councilman Anderson: Had not made up his mind, either pro or con, on permanent streets. He did, however, agree on conduit under driveways for lighting if project is approved. Mayor Law: In favor of permanent street program as there is a need to upgrade the streets, Said he was, generally, also in favor of ornamental lights. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. 1~ate Approved ; 'Thomas J. M n City Clerk Ma or o °' Manager y'