The URL can be used to link to this page

08-14-2024 WS City Council Agenda W ORK SESSION RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, BARTHOLOMEW ROOM AUGUST 14, 2024 5:00 PM Call to order 1.Preview the preliminary 2025 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update as summarized in the Key Financial Strategies (KFS) spreadsheet. Preview proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2025 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9739. AGENDA SECTION:Work Session Items AGENDA ITEM #1. STAFF REPORT NO. 21 WORK SESSION 8/14/2024 REPORT PREPARED BY: Courtney Miller, Senior Analyst DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: Kumud Verma, Finance Director CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/9/2024 ITEM FOR WORK SESSION: Preview the preliminary 2025 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update as summarized in the Key Financial Strategies (KFS) spreadsheet. Preview proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2025 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff will present a high level overview of the preliminary budget, utility rates and fee increases in order to seek council feedback in finalizing the proposed 2024 Revised and 2025 Proposed budgets which will be presented in more detail on August 20. Staff is also seeking feedback on the proposed 2025 CIB and 2026-2029 CIP. Both the operating and capital budgets will determine the preliminary levy which is scheduled to be considered by City Council on September 10. The City must certify its preliminary property tax levy for payable year 2025 to the County Auditor and set a date for its Truth in Taxation public meeting on or before September 30, 2024. Once the preliminary levy is approved, it may be further reduced at a later City Council meeting, but it legally cannot be increased over the preliminary approved amount. City Council is scheduled to conduct a Truth in Taxation hearing on November 26, 2024 and consider the adoption of the final budget and levy on December 10, 2024. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A.HISTORICAL CONTEXT B.EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS C.POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, exc): D.CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: The 2025 budget is still being developed. City staff will present the budget in more detail on August 20, 2024 E.FINANCIAL IMPACT: The 2025 budget is the financial plan for the City for funding City services and programs. The Key Financial Strategies document is a financial forecast of future tax levies, general fund operations and future debt issuance. Proposed utility rates and City fees impact the financial operations of the utility funds, general fund and special revenue funds. The 2025 CIB and the 2026-2029 CIP is a plan of proposed future capital projects. F.LEGAL CONSIDERATION: ALTERNATIVE(S): N/A PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type Appendix D Non Building Fees Cover Memo Appendix D Building Fees Cover Memo Key Financial Strategies 10 year plan Backup Material 2025 CIB 2026-2029 CIP Cover Memo RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2024 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 12127 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: Section 1. Establishing Fees. A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in the sections of this resolution. B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this resolution. C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of the license. D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not been paid in a timely manner. Section 2. Construction and Related License Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Heating and Ventilating Installer 400.07 1 Year $80.00 (2) Sign Installer 416.01—416.13 1 Year $80.00 (3) Electrical Installer 400.03—400.09 State License Required (4) Plumber 400.03—400.09 State License Required (5) Well Driller 620 State License Required Section 3. Public Works Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Benches 805.01— 805.27 First Year $80.00 Renewal $30.00 (2) Boulevard feature Permit 811.07 a) Application to place a privately owned feature in the boulevard $30.00 b) If applied for after installation of feature has begun $60.00 (3) Excavation in Public Right of way 800.01— 800.15 a) For each transverse excavation and each 500 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation and for each 500 feet of curb and gutter or portion thereof installed or driveway apron installed, $200.00 $0.20 per foot except when survey and grade stakes are set by City > 500' b) If applied for after excavation has begun $400.00 c) For each pothole $20.00 (4) Pole Attachment /Small Cell Facilities Permit 802 a) Application to attach or collocate pole attachment on City facilities in the City Right-of- way $500.00 /≤ 5 units $100.00/unit thereafter b) Application to construct/install new small cell pole w/ attachment in the City Right- of-way $1,000/unit c) Annual rental fee per attachment to collocate on the city structure, per agreement Up to $150/unit d) Annual maintenance fee associated with the collocation, per agreement Up to $25/unit Monthly Electrical Fees a) Radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts b) Radio node over 100 maximum watts c) The actual cost of electricity $73.00/node $182.00/node (5) Forestry Permit 810 Applies only to trees on City property and public ROW $50100.00 (6) Seasonal Load Limit Exemption a) Per load $25.00 b) If applied for after delivery $50.00 (7) Obstruction Permit 802.17 (a) Short term, temporary single lane closure of less than four hours No fee (b) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Day (per block or portion thereof) $60.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $300.00 Collector Day (per block or portion thereof) $30.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $75.00 Local/Residential Day (per block or portion thereof) $15.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $45.00 Sidewalk/Bike Lanes Day $30.00 If applied for after obstruction closure has begun (c) Short term, temporary single lane closure less than four hours No fee (d) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Day (per block or portion thereof) $120.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $300.00 Collector Day (per block or portion thereof) $60.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $150.00 Local/Residential Day (per block or portion thereof) $30.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $90.00 Sidewalk Day $60.00 If the closures are not removed by the permitted completion date, then additional Days will be charged at double the rate (8) Noise Ordinance Exemption 930.35 (a) With conditions added as required $50.00 (b) If applied for after violation $100.00 (9) Certification Charge 705.03— 705.21 All delinquent accounts $50.00 (10) NSF Check Charge $4030.00 (11) Utility Services Sanitary Sewer 700.05 All land uses New Service $125.00 Repair $125.00 Disconnect $125.00 Replacement $125.00 Sewer Service Line Televising $100.00 Water Service 715.01 All land uses $125.00 New Service $125.00 Repair $125.00 Disconnect $125.00 Replacement Turn on/off $5075.00 Meter Installation $75.00 Private Hydrant $75.00 Hydrant Meter Fee $5075.00 Storm Sewer 720 All land uses New Service $125.00 Repair $125.00 Disconnect $125.00 Replacement $125.00 (12) Street Light Banners 855.05 First time applicant to hang street light banners within a district of for an event. $50.00 Per street light banner installation (no existing hardware) $20.00 Per street light banner installation if supporting hardware exists on the light pole. $10.00 Per street light banner removal $10.00 Permit Renewal: Annually for both decorative and event banners, unless banner design has changed, then full application fee is charged. If annual renewal is not completed, the permittee risks removal of all banners at the permittee's expense. $10.00 (13) Utilities Special Charges 715.03 Transaction fee for utility accounts paying by credit card (excludes ACH withdrawals, checks, or debit card payments) 2.95% of utility bill or $1.95, whichever is greater Section 4. Fire Services Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Fire Prevention Code 400.21— 400.29 For initial fee required under code Per Year $80100.00 For each additional fee required under code $20.2500 Penalty If not renewed within 2 months of notification Per Year $75.00 (2) Daycare/Adult Foster Care Facility Inspection $80100.00 (3) Reimbursement Fee for Fire/Rescue Unit Per Hour $375400.00 (4) Sale of Consumer Fireworks 1131 (a) License per location selling only consumer fireworks Per Year $350.00 (b) License per location of each other retail seller Per Year $100.00 (5) Display of Commercial Fireworks 5608 Licensed per display by qualified vendor $350.00 Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Arcade 1105 1 Year $667687.00 (2) Amusement Device 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball) 1 Year $1516.00 (b) Mechanical Music Box 1 Year $1516.00 (c) Video Games 1 Year $1516.00 (3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs State Fee Investigation Fee $250.00 (4) Itinerant Place of Amusement 1100.05— 1100.11 1 Day $359370.00 (5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held: 1 month: $45.00 $5254.00 No fee for locations holding tavern licenses. (6) General Amusement 1100.03 (a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 Year $1516.00 1. Coin operated 1 Year $1516.00 (b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 Year $5254.00 (c) Circus 1 Year $202208.00 (d) Dance Hall 1 Day $202208.00 (e) Golf 1. Miniature 1 Year $4748.00 2. Driving Tee 1 Year $4748.00 (f) Mountback 1 Day $193199.00 (g) Rides, mechanical/animal of any kind (ea) 1 Year $1516.00 (h) Shows, any kind 1 Day $193199.00 (i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 Year $1617.00 (j) Other games 1 Day $1516.00 (7) Musical Concert 1110.01 Per event $5860.00 (8) Theatre Cinema 1120 1 Year $288280.00 Plus a notice publication fee $78.00 (9) Roller Rink 1115 1 Year or portion thereof $280288.00 (10) Commercial Adult-Oriented Enterprises 605 1 Year $3,3343,434.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $3,3343,434.00 (11) Masseur/Masseuse 605 Certificate fee 1 Year $109112.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $272280.00 (12) Public Baths 610 1 Year $3,8613,977.00 Investigation fee (actual cost minimum) $3,8613,977.00 (13) Fortune Teller and related trade 1130.05— 1130.07 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month 1 Year $223230.00 $665685.00 $1,3291,369.00 $2,2242,291.00 (14) Adult Establishments 1196 Annual license 1 Year $3,3343,434.00 Investigation fee (new license) $3,3343,434.00 Section 6. Animal Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Animals 905.01— 905.29 (a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered) with option to purchase a multi-year license 1 Year $15.00 (b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered) 1 Year $25.00 (c) Duplicate Animal License $7.00 (d) Late Penalty $10.00 905.31— 905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel 1 Year $242249.00 (f) Residential Kennel 1 Year $115118.00 (g) Veterinary $242249.00 905.37— 905.39 (h) Pigeons 1 Year $4344.00 905.41 (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary Permit) $3031.00 905.01— 905.29 (j) Impounding (each animal) 1st time $77.00 2nd Time $138.00 3rd time (each impound after) $207.00 (k) Dangerous dog registration fee State Statute 347.51) $500.00 906.13 (I) Beekeeping Registration fee $3031.00 Section 7. Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Aircraft 1340 1 Day $5860.00 (2) Garbage and Refuse Collection 601.01— 601.33 Commercial and Residential First vehicle 1 Year $333343.00 Each additional vehicle 1 Year $7173.00 (3) Motor Vehicle Dealer 1155 Per place of business 1 Year $498513.00 Each additional place of business 1 Year $188194.00 (4) Motor Bicycle Business 1160 Per place of business 1 Year $289298.00 Per place of business to sell, rent or lease 1 Year $133137.00 (5) Sound Truck 1165 Per vehicle 1 Year $289298.00 Per vehicle 1 Day $4344.00 (6) Taxicab 1170 First vehicle or auto livery 1 Year $721743.00 Each additional vehicle or auto livery operated at any time within license period 1 Year $8891.00 (7) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 Year $6870.00 (8) Rental or Utility Trailers and Trucks 1185 Each place of business 1 Year $133137.00 Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Firearms Dealer 920.01— 920.05 1 Year $2,2242,291.00 (2) Food Establishments 617 (A) Type I Establishment, a large 1 year high- risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day (1) Food service establishment $9981,028.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $733755.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $733755.00 (B) Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day (1) Food service establishment $857883.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $571588.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $571588.00 (C) Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment (1) Food service establishment $733755.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $364375.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $364375.00 (D) Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended or mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat on-site, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere (1) Food service establishment $478492.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $221228.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $221228.00 (E) Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging (1) Food service establishment $294303.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $183188.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $183188.00 (F) Supplemental Facility (1) High Supplemental Facility (like Type I or II) $183188.00 (2) Medium Supplemental Facility (like Type III) $146150.00 (3) Catering Supplemental Facility (for Food Catering Vehicle(s) and equipment) $221228.00 (4) Low Supplemental Facility (like Type IV or V) $109112.00 (G) Temporary Food Establishment (1) Complex Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type I or II) $183188.00 (2) Complex Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type I or II) $331341.00 (3) Simple Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type III, IV or V) $7678.00 (4) Simple Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type III, IV or V) $177182.00 (5) Temporary Food Multi-Vendor $927955.00 (H) Farmer's Market Stand (stands not exempted from licensing in Minnesota Statue Chapter 28A) $221228.00 (3) Automobile Washing Establishment 1125 Per calendar Year or fraction thereof $221228.00 (4) Cesspools 925.03 Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contents of each cesspool into City sewer $3435.00 (5) Incinerator 601.29— 601.31 1 Year $6668.00 (6) Tobacco 1146.01(MS 461.12) Retail Sale and Distribution - License issued on calendar Year (cigarette vending machines prohibited) (Bill No. 1998-19) $557574.00 (7) Transient Merchant 1181.01— 1181.09 1 Day $142146.00 (8) Wagon Peddler 1181 1 Year $334344.00 (9) State hawker or Peddler license 1181 6 month/per person covered $8284.00 (10) Canvasser or Solicitor 1181 6 month/per person covered $8284.00 (11) Christmas Tree Sale 1130.03 1 Year $181186.00 (12) Lodging Establishments 618 (A) Hotel/Motel $308317.00 (1) Each Guestroom $2526.00 (13) Outdoor Merchandising 1135 Permit $141145.00 (14) Storage Enclosure 1135 Per Enclosure $120124.00 (15) Pawnbroker 1187 (a) Pawnbroker 1 Year $5,7955,969.00 (b) Owner investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $3,3313,431.00 (c) Manager investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $1,2051,241.00 (d) Employee investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $115118.00 (e) Transaction fee - per transaction $2.00 (16) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1186 (a) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 Year $635654.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs in excess of above with total not exceeding $2,4382,511.00 Applicant shall deposit $1,200.00 with Licensing Clerk along with application. Amount in excess of actual application costs shall be refunded. (17) Auto Detailing Establishment 1195.01 1 Year $495510.00 (18) Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Painting or Body Branding 630 (a) Tattoo, body piercing, body painting or body branding 1 Year $1,1091,142.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) $1,0461,077.00 1 Year (19) Temporary Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Branding and Body painting events 630 Per booth $6668.00 (20) Massage Therapy Enterprise License (Business license) 1188 Annual license 1 Year $1,0771,109.00 Investigation fee (new license) $1,0771,109.00 Massage Therapist (Individual License) Annual license 1 Year $106109.00 Investigation fee (new license) $109112.00 Temporary Massage Therapist License Per temporary location $222229.00 (21) Public Swimming Pools 619 (A) Indoor (1) First pool $294303.00 (2) Each additional pool $146150.00 (B) Outdoor (1) First pool $294303.00 (2) Each additional pool $146150.00 (C) School, K through grade 12, pools (1) First pool $190196.00 (2) Each additional pool $106109.00 (D) Pool opening reinspection fee, operator makes an appointment for an inspection, but the pool is not ready to open $100103.00 (22) Motion pictures and commercial photography permit 1197 Per event Photography Motion picture (based on application) $5052.00 $200206.00 (23) Adult-Use Cannabis TBD Cannabis Retailer Cannabis Renewal (The initial registration fee shall include the fee for initial registration and the first annual renewal. Any renewal fee imposed by the local unit of government shall be charged at the time of the second renewal and each subsequent annual renewal thereafter.) $500.00 $1,000.00 Low-Potency Hemp Edible TBD Lower Potency Hemp Retailer Registration Annual Renewal $125.00 $125.00 PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR FOOD, THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AND LODGING PERCENTAGE OF FACILITY INVOLVED WILL BE DETERMINED BY STAFF Descriptions: Type I Establishment, a large high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day. Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day. Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment. Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat onsite, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere. Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging. Environmental plan review—includes the physical remodeling, updating, equipment replacement, equipment additions and the general overall review of all plans/work. This also includes all new development projects. New Construction and/or Major Remodel (over 50% of facility involved) Extensive Remodel (25— 50% of facility) Minor Remodel 0— 24% of facility) Non-remodel approval consultation ($5,000 or less in costs) Type I $35423,648.00 $18471,902.00 $9971,027.00 $170175.00 Type II $24402,513.00 $13371,377.00 $743758.00 $170175.00 Type III $13381,378.00 $744766.00 $444457.00 $170175.00 Type IV $655675.00 $255263.00 $129133.00 No fee Type V New project or change of owner - $155175.00 Minor remodel - permit but no plan check fee Therapeutic Massage $170.00 $170175.00 $170175.00 $170175.00 Section 9. Liquor and Related License and Permit Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) 3.2 Malt Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $912.00 (b) Tavern (dance) 1 Year $745.00 (c) Wholesale 1 Year $44.00 (d) Growler (Micro Brewery Off-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $175.00 (e) Off-Sale 1 Year $264.00 (f) Club (Bottle Club) 1 Year $603.00 (g) Temporary per event $115191.00 (2) Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $12,029.00 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1 Year $200.00 (c) Wine 1 Year $1,325.00 (d) Taproom (Micro Brew On-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $700.00 (e) Cocktail Room (Micro Distillery On Sale) 1 Year $800.00 (f) Micro Distillery Off Sale 1 Year $600.00 (g) Veterans' Organization (Ex-Sunday) 1 Year $863.00 (h) Temporary per event $185191.00 (3) Employee License On-Sale Liquor Establishments 1208.01 Effective 10/1/95 all licenses issued shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of initial application $37.00 (4) Investigation Fee 1202.01— 1202.21 (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization $824.00 and Each person shown on application $247.00 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application (excluding Veteran's Organizations) $247.00 1202.11 (b) Wine, Taproom, Brewpub, Distillery, and $824.00 Each person shown on application $247.00 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application $247.00 1202.11 Investigation of substitute manager $103.00 Section 10. Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) License for Apartment 407 (a) Apartment House, 1 Year $150.00 Houses and Rental Homes (includes up to two inspections) Each unit $15.00 (b) Rental Home - single family dwelling, 1 Year $150.00 (c) Duplexes/double bungalows/townhouses First unit, 1 Year $150.00 Each additional rental unit, 1 Year $85.00 (d) Late Fee—To be cCharged each month the license is late $100 or 25% of the annual license fee, whichever is greater with a minimum monthly fee of $50.00, up to and a maximum monthly fee of $500.00, charged each month the fee is late (e) License Transfer Fee $50.00 (f) Reinstatement of suspended license 100% of license fee (minimum $80.00) (g) Reinstatement of Revoked license 200% of license fee (h) Re-Inspection Fee (for inspections over the first two) 1. multi-family 3rd inspection: $100.00 4th inspection: $200.00 5th inspection: $400.00 6th inspection and more: $800.00 Up to $3,000, maximum 2. single family & duplex 3rd inspection: $50.00 4th inspection: $100.00 5th inspection: $200.00 6th inspection and more: $400.00 Up to $1,500, maximum Re-inspection fees shall be payable at the time of license renewal and no renewal license shall be issued unless all inspection fees are paid (i) Provisional license for apartment house Includes first unit $300.00 Each additional unit $30.00 Provisional license for Rental Home— single family dwelling 1 Year $300.00 Provisional license for duplex First unit $300.00 Each additional unit $170.00 (j) Investigation fee for operating a rental property without a license $500.00 (2) Certificate of Housing maintenance Compliance (includes up to two inspections) 408 Single family home $150.00 2-family home $230.00 Condominium $100.00 Re-inspection Fee 3rd inspection $50.00 4th inspection $100.00 5th inspection $200.00 6th inspection and more $400.00 Up to $1,500, maximum Fee to process cash escrow agreement $100.00 Fee to process Agreement to Comply $50100.00 (3) Richfield Apartment Managers' Association Fee 407 Fee to support RAMA services $1.50/unit (4) Permit Fee for Rooming House 406 1 Year $170.00 Section 11. Miscellaneous Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six Months $17.00 (2) Permit to Carry a Gun Permit Issued By County (3) False Alarms (billable) (a) in excess of 2 for calendar Year $100.00 (b) in excess of 10 for calendar Year $200.00 (c) in excess of 20 for calendar Year $300.00 (4) Nuisance Conduct Fee 925 Third call to a property for nuisance conduct within a 365-day period $400.00 (5) Copying Services Provided Flat rate (per page) $.25 Special rate (a) Black & White Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $.25 8.5 x 14 (per side) $.25 MN Statute 13.03C 11 x 17 (each) $.50 24 x 36 (each) $2.50 X-large $2.50 Color Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $1.00 8.5 x 14 (per side) $2.00 11 x 17 (each) $4.00 24 x 36 (each) $18.00 X-large $3.00/sq. ft. (b) Labor hourly wage & 33% (c) Postage prevailing rate (d) Fax per page $.50 (e) CD of meeting (per CD) $5.00 (f) DVD of meeting (per DVD) $15.00 (g) Electronic copies (CD or disk) $5.00 (h) As builts (per image) $.50 (6) Notary Fee Fee Set By State (7) Candidate Filing Fee City Charter 4.04 $25.00 (8) Photo Fee Includes 2 photos $16.00 including tax (9) Assessing Fees Special Special Assessment Searches - One free property identification number (PID) search per Day - if more than one search per Day (per search) $3.00 Special Assessment Search Report - per PID $15.00 Creation of New or Special Report - Fees to be based on time and materials to create report - Minimum Fee $25.00 Review of Comparable Property Records Residential Field Card Report $.25 - for up to five comparable properties (per copy) Commercial/Industrial/Apartment Field (10) Domestic Partnership 120 Registration $30.00 (11) Certified copy of various documents To certify documents i.e. resolutions, ordinances, minutes, registration forms, etc. on file (per copy) $5.00 (12) Vacant Building Registration Fee 925 Single Family Home or Duplex - Vacant less than one Year $500525.00 Single Family Home or Duplex - Vacant one Year or longer $550575.00 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $600618.00 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one Year or longer $1,1001,133.00 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $1,3501,390.00 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one year or longer $2,6002,678.00 (13) Violation of Conversion Therapy Ban 635 Providing conversion therapy to a minor or vulnerable adult $1,000.00 per instance Section 12. Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees. Location or Type Description Fee Classification Fee Richfield Municipal Center Bartholomew Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $75.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $100.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $500.00/4-hour block Heredia Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $69.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $82.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $400.00/4-hour block Fred Babcock Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $69.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $82.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Richfield Community Center Augsburg, Fireside, Nicollet, or Ruth Johnson Rooms Non-Profit Private $42.00/Hr $60.00/Hr Combined Nicollet/Augsburg or Richfield Rooms Non-Profit Private $69.00/Hr $95.00/Hr Kitchen All Renters $38.00/booking $80.00/4-hour block, $15.00/additional hour Free with combined Nicollet/Augsburg room rental Wood Lake Nature Center Auditorium Non-Profit Private $45.00/Hr $65.00/Hr Park Shelters Wood Lake Nature Center - Emily Day Pavilion $82.00/4-hour block Fairwood, Monroe, Augsburg Park Shelters $44.00/4-hour block Sheridan Park Shelter $62.00/4-hour block Veterans Park Shelter Monday-Friday $115 per section/3-hr block Saturday & Sunday $135 per section/3-hr block Athletic Fields Donaldson Baseball Fields Resident Non-Resident $54.00/hr $270.00/day (first 8 hrs) $66.00/hr $340.00/day (first 8 hrs) Roosevelt Baseball Fields Resident Non-Resident $44.00/hr $260.00/day (first 8 hrs) $56.00/hr $320.00/day (first 8 hrs) Lincoln and Taft Premium Softball Fields Resident Non-Resident $30.00/hr $120.00/day (first 8 hrs) $40.00/hr $175.00/day (first 8 hrs) General Baseball/Softball Fields Resident Non-Resident $25.00/hr $109.00/day (first 8 hrs) $35.00/hr $199.00/day (first 8 hrs) Taft and Washington Premier Soccer/Football Fields Resident Non-Resident $59.00/hr $79.00/hr Christian and Donaldson Soccer/Football Fields Resident Non-Resident $52.00/hr $77.00/hr Monroe Neighborhood Soccer Field Resident Non-Resident $40.00/hr $60.00/hr Broomball/Hockey Rink Taft, Donaldson, and Christian Resident Non-Resident $29.00/hr $39.00/hr Tennis Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $15.00/court/hr $25.00/court/hr Volleyball Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $18.00/hr $26.00/hr Basketball Courts All parks Resident Non-Resident $18.00/hr $26.00/hr Open Space All parks Resident Non-Resident $18.00/hr $26.00/hr Athletic Facility Light Use Softball, Baseball, Soccer, Football, Hockey, Tennis All renters $30.00/hr Richfield Band Shell Stage and Equipment All renters Stage $150.00/hr Equipment $70/booking Appendix D LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Background 1.01 Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those adopted by Ordinance. 1.02 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be adopted by Ordinance. The City Council has previously established certain fees by Transitory Ordinance No. 19.31. The City Council has established other fees by resolution, which resolution is also part of Appendix D. 1.03 The City Council has determined the need to update the schedule of fees under Transitory Ordinance No. 19.31. Section 2. Fee Schedule Adopted 2.01 The fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A are hereby adopted by Ordinance. 2.02 The fees adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance shall be amended only by Ordinance. Any fees established by resolution, other than those adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance, may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Section 3. Effective date; codification. 3.01 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. 3.02 This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2025. 3.03 A copy of this Ordinance shall be included in Appendix D to the Richfield City Code, immediately prior to the resolution establishing fees. 3.04 This Ordinance supersedes Transitory Ordinance No. 19.31. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this __ day of ______ 2024. Mary B. Supple, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk EXHIBIT A. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES A. Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit: Investigation. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set forth in Section 2. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. B. Permit fee refunds: The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permitted not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Building Permits 400.03— 400.09 Fee Schedule to follow MN Statute 326B.153 + State Surcharge 326B.148 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/326B. 153 Except values of $1-$2,000, the fee is $65.00 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/326B. 148 (2) Driveway, Parking Area Permits 515.05 (no permit fee for sidewalks) $4065.00 (3) Swimming 420.00 Permanent or portable pools are based on building permit fees with a minimum of $5565.00 (4) Plan Review Fee 400.03— 400.09 25% for decks/porches, gazebos, bathroom remodels, etc. 35% of building permit fee for one and two family dwelling basement remodels Plan review fee for similar buildings 65% of building permit fee for all other building permits, except no fee for the following: (a) Existing single family dwelling minor nonstructural alterations. (b) Single and two family dwelling repair and maintenance work. (c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance work not exceeding $1,000.00 or where plans are not required. Plan Review fee for similar buildings Maximum 25% of permit fee based on Minnesota State Building Code 1300.0160 (5) Contractor License Verification Fee contractor applies for permit(s) $5.00 (6) Moving- Buildings 845 Moving Permit Fee $65.00 (7) Structure Demolition 400.00— 400.09 (a) Commercial Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of $65.00 (b) Residential Demolition Dwelling One or two story Residential—Garage and lesser structure $65.00 $40.00 (8) Plumbing Permit 400.03— 400.09 Residential Minimum Fee 2% of Total $5565.00 400.03— 400.09 Job cost with a minimum of (includes one inspection) Each additional inspection $5565.00 (9) Plumbing Permit 400.03— 400.09 400.03— 400.09 Commercial/Industrial/Mul ti-family Based on Total Job cost 2% of Estimated Job cost with a minimum of(includes one inspection) $65.00 Each additional inspection $65.00 (10) Electrical Permit 400.03— 400.09 400.03— 400.09 Residential (a) Minimum Fee which includes one inspection $55.00 (b) Each additional Inspection $55.00 (c) Complete Wiring Fee: Single-family Dwelling and each dwelling unit of a two family dwelling and includes not more than three inspections. $175.00 (d) New Service—up to 200 amps $100.00 (e) Temporary Service— (for construction) $55.00 (f) Sub Panel $55.00 (g) Installation, addition alteration, or repair of each circuit or feeder $10.00 (h) Swimming pool or exterior hot tub $55.00 (11) Electrical Permit Commercial (12) Electrical Permit Signs 400.03— 400.09 400.03— 400.09 Commercial, Industrial and multiple dwellings(more than two units) and Technology systems: Minimum Fee which includes one inspection $55.00 Each additional inspection $55.00 (a) Based on total job cost - 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of - Over $50,000 ? Fee/$1,000.00 $55.00 plus 1% of cost over $50,000.00 (b) Traffic Signals: Per Intersection $185.00 (c) Fire Alarm: Based on ¾% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of $55.00 (d) Carnivals, festivals and similar events plus $35.00 for each service on generator $110.00 (13) Solar Photovoltaic System Rating* Based on 2% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of (separate electrical permit required for signs) 400.03— 400.09 0—5,000 watts $65.00 5,001—10,000 watts $150.00 10,001—20,000 watts $200.00 20,001—30,000 watts $250.00 30,001—40,000 watts $300.00 (14) Residential Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeratio n Commercial Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeratio n 400.03— 400.09 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of (Includes one inspection) $5565.00 Each additional inspection Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of $5565.00 $65.00 (15) Sign Installation 415.01— 415.11 (a) Temporary sign permit (b) Permanent sign (any size) Building permit is required for sign support structures fees based on building permit fee schedule $5565.00 $125.00 (16) Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 400 A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued before completion of the entire work covered by the permit, provided the Chief Building Official deems that the building is safe to occupy $200.00 Plus a letter of credit or cash escrow equal to 125% of the remaining City Code requirements ZONING, LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Planned Unit Development 542 (a) $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $5,000.00 (b) Major PUD Plan Amendment— $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $5,000.00 (c) Minor PUD Plan Amendment $400.00 (2) Site Plan Review 547 (a) $500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (b) Major amendment—$500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (c) Minor amendment $350.00 (3) Variance 547 Residential $350.00 Non Residential $500.00 Variance Appeal Residential and Non Residential $350.00 (4) Conditional Use Permit 547 (a) $500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (b) Major amendment—$500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (c) Minor amendment $350.00 (5) Interim Use Permit 547 $500 1,000 plus $100/year monitoring fee up to a maximum fee of $1,0001,500.00 (6) *Zoning District or Code Text Change 547 $1,0002,000.00 (7) *Subdivision Approval 500.01— 500.05 $500.00 Subdivision Waiver 500.05- Subd. 2 $350.00 (8) Street/Easement Vacation 820/State Statute $5001,000.00 (9) Appeal to Board of Adj. & Appeals 547 $350.00 (10) Special Request to City Council $350.00 (11) Zoning Compliance Letter $65.7500 (12) Comprehensive Plan Amend. $1,000.00 (13) Plats* 500 Preliminary/Final Plat $775.00 (14) Sketch Plan Review $350.00 (15) Extension Extension of a Land Use Approval (rezoning, site plan approval, conditional use permit, variance, etc.) beyond its original approval period $250.00 (16) Escrow Administration Fee $50100.00 (17) Special Exception Review for Fences or Walls 509.15 Subd.13 A special fence exception may be issued per the restrictions of Section 509.15 for corner lots or through lots. $250.00 (18) Public Tree Planting Fund 544.03 Subd.8 For the planting of trees in public parks or public boulevards. $160.00 per caliper inch. *Any additional expenses incurred by the City in the course of processing a request will be charged to the applicant. FIRE SERVICES FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (6) Fire Extinguishing System Permit Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the $50.00 following: (a) no charge for valuation of $1,000 or less (7) Fire Alarm Systems Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: (a) No charge for valuation of $1,000 or less $50.00 (8) Flammable or Combustible Liquid or Gas Storage Tanks and Piping Tanks (installation or modification) $150.00 Installation or alteration of piping Each unit or dispenser $50.00 Underground Tank Removal $100.00/Tank MISCELLANEOUS FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (3) Antenna Commercial Wireless Telecommunication Service (CWTS) 425 & 544 (a) CWTS antenna permit application fee $100.00 (b) Antenna permit fee for additional antennas added to an existing antenna location or replacement of existing antennas at a location $35.00 CITY OF RICHFIELD Global Assumption Layout : FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Fiscal disparities increase only 1%*, LGA by only 2% and then decreased by $370,000 for 3 years, starting in 2026, due to 3 TIFs decertifying. WITH COMMUNITY CENTER DEBT Added $2,590,000 to Net Tax Capacity in 2026 due to TIFs deceritfying, CD budget increased by $200k in 2026 to reflect loss of TIF admin fees.Revised Assumptions / Updates: 2525 Budget - Fiscal disparities and LGA $$ are actuals and increase by 26% and 0.5% respectively compared to 2024. 428 Inflation Assumptions 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%130 4.00%4.50%4.50%4.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%GENERAL FUND 2023 Actual 2024 2024 Revised 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 REVENUE 1 GENERAL PROPERTY TAX 18,035,728 18,495,769 18,495,769 18,695,206 20,166,641 21,458,755 23,363,488 24,004,963 25,044,759 26,124,294 27,234,985 2 FISCAL DISPARITIES 3,004,338 3,724,282 3,724,282 4,699,645 4,746,641 4,794,108 4,842,049 4,890,469 4,939,374 4,988,768 5,038,656 3 LICENSES & PERMITS 981,777 1,140,000 1,005,550 1,177,750 1,213,083 1,249,475 1,286,959 1,325,568 1,365,335 1,406,295 1,448,484 4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID 2,038,711 3,392,552 3,392,552 3,410,633 3,108,846 2,801,023 2,487,043 2,536,784 2,587,520 2,639,270 2,692,055 5 OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,612,149 1,492,737 2,074,972 1,883,575 1,940,082 1,998,285 1,953,233 2,011,830 2,072,185 2,134,351 2,198,381 6 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,919,962 2,016,720 1,652,240 1,766,800 1,819,804 1,874,398 1,930,630 1,988,549 2,048,205 2,109,652 2,172,941 7 FINES & FORFEITS 180,391 200,000 200,000 200,000 206,000 212,180 218,545 225,102 231,855 238,810 245,975 8 MISC. REVENUE 714,207 77,060 135,750 58,750 60,513 62,328 64,198 66,124 68,107 70,151 72,255 9 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 987,525 360,090 506,090 838,490 831,820 852,823 409,215 421,492 434,137 447,161 460,575 10 TOTAL REVENUE 29,474,789 30,899,210 31,187,205 32,730,849 34,093,429 35,303,374 36,555,361 37,470,880 38,791,477 40,158,751 41,564,308 11 EXPENDITURES12LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE 1,034,837 1,265,380 1,224,207 1,314,929 1,360,952 1,408,585 1,457,885 1,508,911 1,561,723 1,616,383 1,672,957 13 ADMINISTRATIVE 959,262 1,263,950 1,298,424 1,304,174 1,349,820 1,397,064 1,445,961 1,496,570 1,548,950 1,603,163 1,659,274 14 FINANCE 1,046,114 912,618 1,398,838 678,020 701,751 726,312 751,733 778,044 805,275 833,460 862,631 15 PUBLIC SAFETY 11,133,159 11,817,265 11,743,663 12,799,639 13,247,626 13,711,293 14,191,189 14,687,880 15,201,956 15,734,024 16,284,715 16 FIRE 5,618,697 5,552,889 5,744,315 6,188,977 6,405,591 6,629,787 6,861,829 7,101,993 7,350,563 7,607,833 7,874,107 17 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,652,012 1,849,550 1,810,320 1,865,120 2,130,399 2,204,963 2,282,137 2,362,012 2,444,682 2,530,246 2,618,805 18 PUBLIC WORKS 5,064,179 5,182,120 5,219,890 5,253,150 5,437,010 5,627,306 5,824,261 6,028,110 6,239,094 6,457,463 6,683,474 19 RECREATION SERVICES 2,209,931 2,326,037 2,325,548 2,474,590 2,561,201 2,650,843 2,743,622 2,839,649 2,939,037 3,041,903 3,148,370 20 COMP STUDY EST / BUDGET SURPLUS - 399,401 92,000 500,000 525,000 551,250 578,813 607,753 638,141 670,048 693,499 21 TRANSFER OUT 260,000 330,000 330,000 352,250 374,079 395,972 417,931 59,958 62,057 64,229 66,477 22 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,978,191 30,899,210 31,187,205 32,730,849 34,093,429 35,303,374 36,555,361 37,470,880 38,791,477 40,158,751 41,564,308 23 REVENUE OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 496,598 - - - - - - - - - - LEVY CALCULATION 24 General Fund Tax Levy 21,040,066 22,220,051 22,220,051 23,394,851 24,913,282 26,252,863 28,205,537 28,895,432 29,984,134 31,113,062 32,273,641 25 Reserve for Uncollectable 210,401 222,201 222,201 233,949 249,133 262,529 282,055 288,954 299,841 311,131 322,736 26 Total General Fund Tax Levy 21,250,467 22,442,251 22,442,251 23,628,800 25,162,415 26,515,391 28,487,592 29,184,386 30,283,975 31,424,193 32,596,377 26 Existing Debt 3,672,620 4,113,543 4,113,543 4,101,375 4,110,046 4,121,139 4,006,754 2,874,661 4,186,662 4,986,901 4,974,47627New Debt 427,980 0 - - 0 401,213 0 1,030,556 802,426 28 EDA 579,096 599,364 599,364 623,343 645,160 667,741 691,112 715,300 740,336 766,248 793,066 29 Rolling Stock, Equipment, and IT Levy 868,400 1,208,000 1,208,000 1,528,800 1,582,308 1,637,689 1,695,008 1,754,333 1,815,735 1,879,286 1,945,061 30 TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVY 26,798,563 28,363,158 28,363,158 29,882,318 31,499,929 33,343,173 34,880,465 35,559,237 37,829,134 39,056,627 40,308,980 31 Levy % Increase 5.87%5.84%5.84%5.36%5.41%5.85%4.61%1.95%6.38%3.24%3.21% 32 TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVY 26,798,563 28,363,158 28,363,158 29,882,318 31,499,929 33,343,173 34,880,465 35,559,237 37,829,134 39,056,627 40,308,98033LESS FISCAL DISPARITIES (3,004,338)(3,724,282)(3,724,282)(4,699,645)(4,746,641)(4,794,108)(4,842,049)(4,890,469)(4,939,374)(4,988,768)(5,038,656)34 NET LOCAL LEVY TO TAXPAYERS 23,794,225 24,638,876 24,638,876 25,182,673 26,753,287 28,549,065 30,038,416 30,668,768 32,889,760 34,067,859 35,270,324 35 NET TAX CAPACITY 45,429,412 47,262,389 47,158,126 45,270,581 48,992,346 50,462,116 51,975,979 53,535,259 55,141,317 56,795,556 58,499,423 36 TAX RATE ON TAX CAPACITY 52.376%52.132%52.247%55.627%54.607%56.575%57.793%57.287%59.646%59.983%60.292%37 TAX RATE % CHANGE -5.55%-0.47%-0.25%6.47%-1.83%3.60%2.15%-0.88%4.12%0.57%0.51% 38 City Taxes on Avg Household 1,613 1,657 1,657 1,776 1,787 1,907 2,007 2,049 2,197 2,276 2,35739Percentage tax increase in average home 9.36%2.72%2.73%7.19%0.62%6.71%5.22%2.10%7.24%3.58%3.53% 40 Existing Tax Base Inflation Estimate (residential)/ M 15.94%3.20%5.00%0.60%2.50%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 41 Total Net Tax Capacity Increase (Decrease)13.90%5.50%5.00%-2.30%2.50%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 42 Estimated Average Home Market Value 308,000 317,856 317,200 319,350 327,334 337,154 347,268 357,686 368,417 379,470 390,854 CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PLAN 2025 – 2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The Richfield Capital Improvement Budget and Plan is a comprehensive list of major improvements necessary to meet the needs of the community over a five-year period. This list is prepared through compiling the project needs requested by the various city departments. The Capital Plan sets forth the proposed scheduling and details of specific projects by year, estimated cost, and a justification or description to those responsible for making policy decisions regarding expenditures for new facilities. In addition, the Plan provides information so that individual project requests can be better evaluated against community needs and the community’s ability to pay for and maintain these facilities in the succeeding years. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GOALS The specific goals of the Capital Improvement Plan are: • To develop a realistic list of capital improvement needs which relates proposed projects to the City’s capacity to finance such projects. • To minimize the impact of projects on the residents’ ability to pay. • To schedule various projects and improvements in a way which allows adequate time to detailed design and engineering of the projects, preparing environmental statements or grant applications or exploring alternative methods of financing. • To provide coordination between City departments, various units of special and general local government, and public utilities. • To implement the community’s Comprehensive Plan in an orderly fashion. • To keep the public involved and informed about needed public improvements and to better enable the public to schedule private improvements. OVERVIEW Richfield’s Capital Improvement Plan is a process for identifying annual project needs and priorities for project coordination as well as for financial planning. In addition, the Capital Improvement process provides for public discussion of short range City improvements. The Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)/Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are identified through discussions of the various City commissions and the City departments. From these discussions City staff compiles estimated costs, scope and potential funding sources for the projects. A preliminary report is then generated by the Finance Director based on these discussions and presented to a meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission then reviews the projects and scheduling based on the following consideration: • The proposed project’s conformance to the Comprehensive Plan. The CIB/CIP, as recommended by the Planning Commission, is then returned to the Finance Director, and submitted to the City Council as part of the annual budget process. The Council may delete projects from the Plan or may change the scheduling and priority of the allocation of funds. In accordance with state statutes, the City Council should refer any new project they may add to the Capital Improvement Plan to the Planning Commission for review. Accordingly, the 2024 Revised/2025 Proposed Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) reflects funding for several improvement projects throughout the City. Included are costs for the 77th Street Railroad Crossing Replacement, Pavement Management, RRFB installations and multi-year Pedestrian Improvement projects. Capital spending plan also include funds for park and recreation and water and wastewater projects. The funding for the right of way projects is expected to come from sources such as Federal and State grants, Municipal State Aid (MSA), street reconstruction bonds, and utility franchise fees. Funding for other projects included in the CIB will come from intergovernmental revenues, special revenues, and user fees. The City’s main operating budgets should not be materially affected by the planned projects as all funding is outside those budgets. The only possible effect would be on the maintenance of the newly constructed projects. In some cases the maintenance costs may increase, but in others, it is expected to decrease. The Capital Improvement Plan, which represents the next four-year period, also contains a number of significant proposed projects including, several park projects, major street improvement and reconstruction projects throughout the city, replacement of rolling stock and technology equipment, and several projects to improve public facilities throughout the City. 2025 Capital Improvement Budget Projects Recreation Open Space Donaldson Park Building Rebuild - $450,000 The old, outdated concrete structure at Donaldson Park needs to be refurbished or replaced. $335,000 has been allocated from liquor revenue in the 2024 capital improvement plan, $450,000 is proposed for the 2025 capital improvement budget and will come from liquor revenue in 2025. Ice Arena Repairs - $15,000 Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Ice Arena building, rink equipment, and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include repair or replacement of HVAC equipment, roof, windows, flooring, ice rink equipment, bleachers, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. Community Center - $10,000 Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. Veterans Park Complex - $4,200,000 Veterans Park is home to several recreation amenities: the Outdoor Pool, the Ice Arena, the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility, and the park itself (including trails, green space, marsh, etc). Improvements to the Veterans Park Complex would include a new pool liner and pool concessions area, improvements to the arena roof, HVAC, lobby area, doors, and the addition of an elevator, improvements to the gutters and irrigation system of the band shell, a new roof, lighting, and surfacing for the pavilion, new roof and fascia for the mini-golf building, and improvements to the park trails, vegetation, signage, and the addition of a wildlife viewing area. The funding source would be local sales tax, if approved in November 2024 by referendum. Wood Lake Nature Center Building - $15,737,000 Wood Lake Nature Center needs a complete re-build as its current building is 50 years old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community and region that are placed on the center. Grants have been secured for the project: $3m from a Federal grant and $12m from a State of Minnesota bonding grant. The largest remaining segment of funding, $11m, would come from local sales tax, if approved in November 2024 by referendum. Right of Way Improvements ADA Improvements - $200,000 The City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan must be updated to comply with State and Federal requirements. The updated plan will be used to identify missing or non-compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way. This may include sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure. The plan will be used to program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements - $40,000 As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities will be installed. Each route will go through a public engagement process prior to implementation. Improvements may be identified as signage, pavement markings, or other items identified in each plan. Pavement Management Program- $617,000 The City’s Accelerated 6-Year Mill and Overlay Project was completed in 2020. In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements. Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements - $40,000 Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. 70th Street SRTS Improvements – $675,000 Two intersections along 70th Street outside of the STEM/RDLS campus are slated for a demonstration project in the spring/summer of 2024. This project would make the improvements at the intersections of 70th Street with Elliot Avenue and 12th Avenue permanent, based on the results of the demonstration project. Staff will be pursuing state grant funding to cover construction costs for this project. 73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial) – $925,000 Installation of a new trail on 73rd St between Bloomington Ave and Cedar Ave. Trail includes new pedestrian ramps, improved crossings at Bloomington Ave and 16th Ave, and a new connection/crossing at Cedar Ave to the Nokomis-Minnesota River Regional Trail. The City installed a demonstration version of this project in 2023 and has received Metropolitan Council regional solicitation funding to construct the project in 2025. Traffic Signal Replacements - $340,000 The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the ends of their expected life-cycles between 2025 and 2035. The signals will need to be replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total cost of signal replacements is $3.1M, with the first signal components being replaced no earlier than 2025. TH62 Noise Barrier West - $697,500 Richfield was selected to receive a 20 ft. concrete precast noise barrier that would be constructed from approximately Xerxes Avenue to Russell Avenue as part of the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Standalone Noise Barrier Program. The total cost of the project is estimated at $5.9M of which Richfield’s share is about 10%. North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction - $200,000 This project includes reconstruction of Lyndale Ave between 65th St and Hwy 62. The project would “right-size” the roadway and modernize the corridor to match the Lyndale Ave corridor south of 66th St. The project would include a full public engagement process to determine the final design. Lyndale Ave between 63rd St and 65th St was restriped and partially repaved as part of the 65th Street Reconstruction project in 2023. Funds planned for 2025 are to extend the restriping under Hwy 62 into Minneapolis. The Lyndale Ave Reconstruction project is not planned to occur until the existing pavement and surface infrastructure reach end-of-life. Street Name Sign Replacement - $50,000 All street name signs need to be replaced. Newer standards of lettering size and retroreflective set by the Federal Highway Administration’s Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices are not met with the existing signs. The signs will be purchased by a vendor and installed by City Staff. Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction - $1,550,000 Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 76th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant will lead a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s Public Engagement Process to guide the roadway design. Staff will pursue additional funding sources to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27). Penn Avenue Reconstruction – $200,000 This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement. Pillsbury Plaza - $270,000 The Public Works Department is looking to create a community space in remnant right-of-way as part of the 65th Street Reconstruction Project. The work includes a pathway, plaza area, benches, landscaping, ADA swing, water fountain, and is adjacent to a multi-use trail that connects Richfield Lake to Nicollet Avenue and the schools along 65th Street. Public Facilities City-wide Water meter Upgrade - $100,000 The outgoing city-wide system of 11,000 water meters was installed in 2007 and requires employees to drive by each property to obtain meter readings. The system is failing, and it is becoming time consuming to maintain. The installation of a new system will have a signal read radio device which will eliminate the need to drive by each property. With the pandemic and supply shortages the project has been delayed multiple years. Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains and Manhole - $400,000 The stormwater collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). A cleaning and inspection program is underway to determine the condition of the stormwater collection mains. Mains that are observed to be in poor condition, and not in need of upsizing for capacity related reasons, will be rehabilitated using an engineered method that is designed to restore hydraulic efficiency and structural integrity. The rehabilitation effort will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years. Sanitary Sewer Main Lining - $900,000 The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe). As staff does ongoing maintenance and television inspections, they encounter areas with tree root intrusion and/or pipes that have cracks. In order to preserve the level of service to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, these pipes should be lined. Lining consists of installation of a liner in the existing clay pipe; which expands and heats the liner, causing adherence to the pipe. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, the appropriate standard. This technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the pipe. It’s anticipated this program will be ongoing until completed based upon funding availability. Adams Hill Life Station Control Panel Upgrade - $90,000 The lift station is in Adams Hill Park at 7313 Xerxes Ave S. The control panel and electrical components were last upgraded in 2008. Upgrading the control would bring the electrical and controls up to modern day standards. The upgrade will more importantly separate the high voltage power supply from the low voltage power supply making it safe for operators to access the panel and perform routine maintenance. This would also standardize the lift station controls with SCADA for continuous monitoring. Legion Lake Lift Station - $180,000 The Legion Lake infiltration system is a residential grade irrigation/infiltration system that was constructed in 2015. The pumping system is not conducive to the application, nor is it of the proper means to minimize health and safety for Public Works staff. This project will replace the irrigation cabinet and meter setup with a traditional storm sewer lift station and monitoring system. This will alleviate the need to reinstall the pump intake and transducer annually, it will better protect the instrumentation used to operate the pump and eliminate health hazards working near and within the water body. Lift 7 (Ice Arena) Richfield - $300,000 Lift Station 7 is in front of the Ice Arena at 636 E 66th St. The lift station was built in 1971. The lift station structure and ancillary components have been found to be in poor condition as well as under size with the addition of rink 2. The recommendation is to decommission the existing lift station and design and construct a new lift station of modern technology. The new lift station design will be one that meets the needs the service needs of the ice arena. Sanitary Sewer Hot Spot Improvements - $250,000 The City has roughly 20 locations within the sanitary sewer system that impedes or partially restricts the flow of sewage. This project would be programmed to design and develop engineering solutions that either eliminate these issues or improve system performance. Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements - $125,000 The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room (floor) inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor. Water Plant Elevator Replacement - $150,000 The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it’s getting to be very difficult to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily for the transport of equipment, chemicals, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It’s also that which satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with modern technology. Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade - $25,000 The need for enhanced cyber security along with the State of Minnesota’s executive order to complete, certify, and deliver a cyber security assessment has created the need to plan for, and fund, certain upgrades and replacement of water treatment plants instruments and controls system. This project will help fund replacement of programable logic controllers, SCADA controllers and equipment, and enhance protective measures from cyber threats. Water Plant Recirculation System - $100,000 The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 revealed certain health and safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water plant has the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA compliant. Public works staff retained a consultant to formulate a design that mitigates these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards. Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement - $50,000 Two of the three sludge pumps require replacement. The frequent effort of maintenance and repair is no longer adding value for plant operations. This project will be for the procurement and installation of two new sludge pumps at the water treatment plant. Buildings, Fleet and Technology Garage Floor Sealing - $150,000 The Public Works Facility Garage floor is in need of repairs. This sealing project will address issues after an oil separator replacement project and other various defects in the garage floor. Fleet Purchases - $1,609,514 The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to provide City Services. Public Works Storage Facility - $1,300,000 The City built its current maintenance facility with an understanding that on-going storage needs could be accommodated off-site. Historically, the City had relied on the MnDOT Cedar Ave Station to provide the salt needed for the winter season via an ongoing agreement and did not need to store salt on site. This agreement was modified in 2021 and MnDOT has chosen to no longer provide salt to the city. In addition, the site the City is currently using for temporary storage for tree debris, sweepings, etc., is a short-term solution, requiring the City to identify a new location to be used for its storage needs. The goal is to find a location where all of our storage needs can be met. A feasibility study looking at the remnant site at 7636 Cedar Avenue will be conducted this year. Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Community Center Building Repair 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Community Center Building Repair 2. Total project cost:$10,000 2025 and then $20,000/yr 3. Years to complete:Annual: ongoing major maintenance items 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2019 5. Responsible department:Recreation Services 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $10,000 2029 CIP $20,000 2026 CIP $20,000 Beyond 2029 $20,000/yr 2027 CIP $20,000 2028 CIP $20,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $20,000/yr 100% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $20,000/yr 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building andsurrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items mayinclude HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capitalitems. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Ice Arena Repair 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Ice Arena Repair 2.Total project cost:$15,000 2025 and then 20,000/yr 3. Years to complete:Annual: ongoing major maintenance items 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2023 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $15,000 2029 CIP $20,000 2026 CIP $20,000 Beyond 2029 $20,000/yr 2027 CIP $20,000 2028 CIP $20,000 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $20,000/yr 100% Hennepin County (C) % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $20,000/yr 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Ice Arena building, rink equipment,and surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items mayinclude repair or replacement of HVAC equipment, roof, windows, flooring, ice rink equipment, bleachers, and otherrepair and replacement of existing capital items. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Veterans Park Complex 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Veterans Park Complex 2.Total project cost:$9 million 3. Years to complete:3 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $4,200,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $2,800,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $2,000,000 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $9,000,000 100% Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $9,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Veterans Park is home to several recreation amenities: the Outdoor Pool, the Ice Arena, the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility, and the park itself (including trails, green space, marsh, etc). Improvements to theVeterans Park Complex would include a new pool liner and pool concessions area, improvements to the arena roof, HVAC, lobbyarea, doors, and the addition of an elevator, improvements to the gutters and irrigation system of the band shell, a new roof, lighting,and surfacing for the pavilion, new roof and fascia for the mini-golf building, and improvements to the park trails, vegetation, signage,and the addition of a wildlife viewing area. The funding source would be local sales tax revenue, if approved in November 2024 byreferendum.9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following:Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Wood Lake Nature Center Building 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Wood Lake Nature Center Building 2.Total project cost:$26,000,000 3. Years to complete:3+ 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: (NOTE: $225,000 was allocated in the 2022 and 2023 CIB. $1.276m spent in 2024) 2025 CIP $15,737,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $ 8,987,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding:Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $11,000,000 42% Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $12,000,000 46% Federal Grant (F) $3,000,000 12% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $26,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Wood Lake Nature Center needs a complete re-build as its current building is 50 years old and isfalling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs fromacross the community and region that are placed on the center. Grants have been secured for the project: $3m from a Federal grant and$12m from a State of Minnesota bonding grant. The largest remaining segment of funding, $11m, would come from local sales tax, ifapproved in November 2024 by referendum. The final funding component is from liquor store revenue ($225,000). 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Donaldson Park Building Rebuild 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Donaldson Park Building Rebuild 2.Total project cost:$1.475m 3. Years to complete:2 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2024: $335,000 2025: $450,000 Reserves: $190,000 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: (NOTE: $525,000 was allocated in the 2024 CIB and from CIB major maintenance reserves) 2025 CIP $ 450,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $1,025,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $200,000 14% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $975,000 66% Hennepin County (C) $300,000 20% State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,475,000 100% 8.Brief summary of project: The old, outdated concrete structure at Donaldson Park needs to be refurbished or replaced. $335,000has been allocated from liquor revenue in the 2024 capital improvement plan, $450,000 is proposed for the 2025 capital improvementbudget, $300,000 is anticipated from a Hennepin County Facility Grant. $190,000 will be sourced from unspent past-year capital improvement major maintenance items and $200,000 will be sourced through donations. 9.Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10.Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following:Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Parks Major Maintenance 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Parks Major Maintenance 2.Total project cost:Varies 3. Years to complete:Annual: ongoing major maintenance items 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2000 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP $320,000 2026 CIP $210,000 Beyond 2029 Varies/yr 2027 CIP $320,000 2028 CIP $320,000 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $210,000/ $320,000 100% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $210,000/yr $320,000/yr 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified andprioritized each year by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects include tennis/basketball courtresurfacing, trail resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partialreplacement of existing park capital items. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Wood Lake Building and Fence Repair 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Wood Lake Building and Fence Repair 2.Total project cost:$20,000/yr after 2025 3. Years to complete:Annual: ongoing major maintenance items 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2019 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP $20,000 2026 CIP $20,000 Beyond 2029 $20,000/yr 2027 CIP $20,000 2028 CIP $20,000 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $20,000/yr 100% Hennepin County (C) % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $20,000/yr 100% 8.Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Wood Lake Nature Center buildingsand fencing (wood and chain link) that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Itemsmay include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capitalitems. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Parks Master Plan 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Parks Master Plan 2.Total project cost:2026 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $180,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $180,000 100% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $180,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks MasterPlan, a document within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall philosophy around park management and development, as well as specific park development plans, and serves as a guiding document for futurecapital improvement planning and other operations. The plan was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a consultant to helpcoordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following:Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand X B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Wood Lake Trail Updates 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Wood Lake Trail Updates 2.Total project cost:2026 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $250,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $50,000 20% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $200,000 80% Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $250,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Major overall update work to Wood Lake’s trails, including raising trail beds, resurfacingtrails with additional aggregate, and performing other repairs as needed. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 2.Total project cost:$120,000 3. Years to complete:1 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $120,000 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $120,000 100% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $120,000/yr 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Adams Hill Park in accordance with the PlayEquipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 2.Total project cost:$120,000 3.Years to complete:1 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP $120,000 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $120,000 100% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $120,000/yr 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Heredia Park in accordance with the PlayEquipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Recreation & Open Space Project Summary Form – Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement 2.Total project cost:$120,000 3. Years to complete:1 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Recreation Services 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP $120,000 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $120,000 100% Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $120,000/yr 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Little Bob’s Park in accordance with the PlayEquipment Replacement Schedule. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 70th Street SRTS Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 70th Street SRTS Improvements 2. Total project cost: $675,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $675,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $586,225 86.85% Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $88,775 13.15% TOTAL $675,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Two intersections along 70th Street outside of the STEM/RDLS campus are slated for a demonstration project in the spring/summer of 2024. This project would make the improvements at the intersections of 70th Street with Elliot Avenue and 12th Avenue permanent, based on the results of the demonstration project. Staff will be pursuing state grant funding to cover construction costs for this project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial) 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial) 2. Total project cost: $925,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $800,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 2024 Design $125,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $635,000 68.65% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $290,000 31.35% TOTAL $925,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Installation of a new trail on 73rd St between Bloomington Ave and Cedar Ave. Trail includes new pedestrian ramps, improved crossings at Bloomington Ave and 16th Ave, and a new connection/crossing at Cedar Ave to the Nokomis-Minnesota River Regional Trail. The City installed a demonstration version of this project in 2023 and has received Metropolitan Council regional solicitation funding to construct the project in 2025. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – ADA Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: ADA Improvements 2. Total project cost: $1,100,000 3. Years to complete: 6 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2024 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 2026 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $200,000 2028 CIP $200,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $1,100,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,100,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan must be updated to comply with State and Federal requirements. The updated plan will be used to identify missing or non-compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way. This may include sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure. The plan will be used to program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 2. Total project cost: $200,000 through five years 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2018 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $40,000 2029 CIP $40,000 2026 CIP $40,000 Beyond 2029 $40,000* 2027 CIP $40,000 2028 CIP $40,000 *Annually 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $200,00 0 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities will be installed. Each route will go through a public engagement process prior to implementation. Improvements may be identified as signage, pavement markings, or other items identified in each plan. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Pavement Management Program 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Pavement Management Program 2. Total project cost: $3,570,000 through five years 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2021 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $617,000 2029 CIP $702,000 2026 CIP $737,000 Beyond 2029 $700,000* 2027 CIP $737,000 2028 CIP $777,000 *Estimate of annual average 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $3,570,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $3,570,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City’s Accelerated 6-Year Mill and Overlay Project was completed in 2020. In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 2. Total project cost: $200,000 through five years 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2018 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $40,000 2029 CIP $40,000 2026 CIP $40,000 Beyond 2029 $40,000* 2027 CIP $40,000 2028 CIP $40,000 *Annually 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $200,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Street Name Sign Replacement 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Street Name Sign Replacement 2.Total project cost:$150,000 3. Years to complete:3 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Public Works 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $50,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $50,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $50,000 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $150,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ 100% 8. Brief summary of project: All street name signs need to be replaced. Newer standards of lettering size and retrorflectivity set by the Federal Highway Administration’s Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices are not met withthe existing signs. The signs will be purchased by a vendor and installed by City Staff. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Traffic Signal Replacements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Traffic Signal Replacements 2. Total project cost: $3,100,000 3. Years to complete: 12 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $340,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $350,000 Beyond 2029 $2,000,000* 2027 CIP 2028 CIP $230,000 *Work will be done over several years in varying amounts. 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $3,100,000 100% TOTAL $3,100,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the ends of their expected life-cycles between 2025 and 2035. The signals will need to be replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total cost of signal replacements is $3.1M, with the first signal components being replaced no earlier than 2025. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: North Lyndale Avenue Restriping 2. Total project cost: $200,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $ 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $200,000 100% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Lyndale Ave between 63rd St and 65th St was restriped and partially repaved as part of the 65th Street Reconstruction project in 2023. This project will extend the restriping under Hwy 62 into Minneapolis. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Pillsbury Plaza 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Pillsbury Plaza 2. Total project cost: $270,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $270,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $270,000 % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Public Works Department is looking to create a community space in remnant right-of-way as part of the 65th Street Reconstruction Project. The work includes a pathway, plaza area, benches, landscaping, ADA swing, water fountain, and is adjacent to a multi-use trail that connects Richfield Lake to Nicollet Avenue and the schools along 65th Street. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: X Community support: Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – TH62 Noise Barrier West 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: TH62 Noise Barrier West 2. Total project cost: City share $697,500 (10% of total project) State asset with total project $6,975,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $697,500 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $697,500 100% TOTAL $697,500 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Richfield was selected to receive a 20 ft. concrete precast noise barrier that would be constructed from approximately Xerxes Avenue to Russell Avenue as part of the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Standalone Noise Barrier Program. The total cost of the project is estimated at $5.9M of which Richfield’s share is 10%. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: City share $10,000,000 County asset with total project $21,000,000 3. Years to complete: 4 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2024 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $1,550,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $6,400,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $1,550,000 2028 CIP 2024: $250,000 Property Tax Bond, $250,000 Utility Bonds 2025: $775,000 Property Tax Bond, $775,000 Utility Bonds 2026: $3,200,000 Property Tax Bond, $3,200,000 Utility Bonds 2027: $775,000 Property Tax Bond, $775,000 Utility Bonds 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $5,000,000 50.00% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $5,000,000 50.00% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $10,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 76th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant will lead a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s Public Engagement Process to guide the roadway design. Staff will pursue additional funding sources to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27). 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 2. Total project cost: $810,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $810,000 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $810,000 100% TOTAL $810,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The concrete pavement panels and pavement joints on 77th Street are beginning to fail in certain areas and will need major maintenance in the near future to avoid full reconstruction. This work will address the worst areas of pavement failure, primarily east of Portland Ave. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 69th Street Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 69th Street Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $6,500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP $6,500,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $2,700,000 41.54% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $3,800,000 58.46% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $6,500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The project includes reconstruction of 69th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including narrowing of the roadway to add sidewalk to one side, reconstruction of retaining walls, lining or replacement of sanitary sewer, and replacement of storm sewer. The final roadway section will be determined following the City’s public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th Street West Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th Street West Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $5,750,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP $5,750,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,500,000 60.87% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $1,250,000 22.44% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $1,000,000 17.39% Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $5,750,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of 76th Street between Sheridan Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including intersection control at Upton Avenue, replacement of City utilities, undergrounding of overhead utilities, retaining wall and sidewalk replacement. The exact design of the roadway will be determined through a public engagement process. The City will continue pursuing grant funding, however the project will need to be completed due to deteriorating stormwater utilities, regardless of if grant funding is obtained. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: City share $10,600,000 County asset with total project $31,300,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP $4,600,000 2026 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2029 $500,000 2027 CIP $500,000 2028 CIP $4,600,000 2025: $200,000 MSA 2026: $200,000 MSA 2027: $200,000 MSA, $150,000 Property Tax Bond, $150,000 Utility Bond 2028: $250,000 Property Tax Bond, $250,000 Utility Bond 2029: $2,300,000 Property Tax Bond, $2,300,000 Utility Bond 2030: $2,300,000 Property Tax Bond, $2,300,000 Utility Bond 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $5,000,000 47.17% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $5,000,000 47.17% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $600,000 5.66% TOTAL $10,600,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 64th Street Sidewalk 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 64th Street Sidewalk 2. Total project cost: $1,310,000 3. Years to complete: 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 1,145,000 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP $165,000 2028: $165,000 Franchise Fees 2029: $291,000 Franchise Fees, $854,000 Federal Grant 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ 34.8% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $854,000 65.2% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $456,000 % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,310,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along W 64th St from just east of MSAS 363 (Lyndale Ave) to CSAH 35 (Portland Ave). The new sidewalk will be separated from the roadway by a boulevard, and new ADA-compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. A new ADA-compliant at-grade railroad crossing will be constructed across the Progressive Rail line located along Pleasant Ave. Minor right of way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Sidewalk will be constructed on one side of the street, which will be determined through the city’s public engagement process. Project may be advanced if selected for Regional Solicitation or Active Transportation funding through the Met Council. The federal grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs and all of the design/engineering costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap 2. Total project cost: $1,570,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP $1,370,000 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP $200,000 2028: $200,000 MSA 2029: $323,960 MSA, $1,046,040 Federal Grant 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $1,046,040 66.6% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $523,960 33.4% TOTAL $1,570,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along E 73rd Street and Diagonal Blvd to MSAS 369 (Cedar Ave S). Sidewalk location will be determined by the city’s public engagement process new ADA- compliant curb ramps will be added throughout the corridor. Minor right of way acquisitions and temporary construction easements will be required. Project may be advanced if selected for Regional Solicitation or Active Transportation funding through the Met Council. The federal grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs and all of the design/engineering costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th and Knox Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th and Knox Improvements 2. Total project cost: $4,330,000 3. Years to complete: 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 4,330,000 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $1,642,960 37.9% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $2,687,040 62.1% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL 4,330,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project consists of the conversion of the existing signalized intersection at W 76th St (MSAS 361) and Knox Ave S in the City of Richfield to a roundabout, including improvements to active transportation facilities that use the intersection. Ultimate design of the intersection will be determined through the city’s public engagement process. Permanent right of way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Project may be advanced if selected for Regional Solicitation or Active Transportation funding through the Met Council. The federal grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs and all of the design/engineering costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $4,500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $4,500,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $4,500,000 100% TOTAL $4,500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This project includes reconstruction of Lyndale Ave between 65th St and Hwy 62. The project would “right-size” the roadway and modernize the corridor to match the Lyndale Ave corridor south of 66th St. The project would include a full public engagement process to determine the final design. The Lyndale Ave Reconstruction project is not planned to occur until the existing pavement and surface infrastructure reach end-of-life. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 63rd Street Greenway 2024 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 63rd Street Greenway 2. Total project cost: $3,500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $3,500,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $2,500,000 71.43% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $1,000,000 28.57% User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $3,500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This concept was originally proposed in the early 2010s, to create a trail connection on 63rd Street between Taft Park and Veterans Park. Project would include removing thru access on 63rd Street from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave, creating a linear park while maintaining driveway access for all residents whose driveways connect to 63rd Street. Ultimate design of the linear park would be based on a public outreach and engagement process. This project would only be implemented if grant funding can be secured. Project may be advanced if selected for Regional Solicitation or Active Transportation funding through the Met Council. The federal grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs and all of the design/engineering costs. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 70th Street Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 70th Street Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $4,200,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $4,200,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $3,000,000 71.43% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,200,000 28.57% TOTAL $4,200,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd Avenue to 5th Avenue, also including sidewalk, curb, and gutter as well as undergrounding of parallel utilities. Additionally, the reconstruction will comprise replacement of City utilities, including an 84” storm sewer pipe that will connect to the storm system installed with the Portland Avenue project. The existing pipe is being monitored for condition, and rate of deterioration may impact the year of reconstruction. Per current conditions, this has been identified as high risk through the Stormwater Risk Assessment. Design of the roadway will include a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 73rd St Bridge and Bikeways 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 73rd St Bridge and Bikeways 2. Total project cost: $9,750,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $9,750,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $4,250,000 43.59% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $5,500,000 56.41% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $9,750,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Replacement of 73rd St pedestrian bridge over I-35W, sidewalk and trail additions along 73rd St from the new bridge to Lyndale Avenue and along Donaldson Park to the regional trail. The existing bridge is not ADA accessible, narrow, and disconnected from the existing pedestrian and bike network. The City will continue to pursue grant funding to construct the project. If awarded funding, the project will be moved forward in the CIP and staff will pursue additional funding sources 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 2. Total project cost: $3,300,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $3,300,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $3,300,000 100% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $3,300,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Currently, the intersection of 76th Street and 77th Street—two of the highest volume local roads in Richfield—is an unsignalized “T” intersection that carries approximately 16,000 vehicles per day. The exact design of the intersection and the intersection control method will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Bloomington Ave & Diagonal Blvd 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Bloomington Ave & Diagonal Blvd 2. Total project cost: $1,650,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $1,650,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,650,000 100% TOTAL $1,650,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash. Multiple intersections nearby have sharp angles and difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Permanent intervention requires realignment of three intersections (Bloomington/72nd, Diagonal/72nd, Bloomington/Diagonal). The above cost estimate reflects a similar project in the metro area. A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Bloomington Ave & Richfield Parkway 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Bloomington Ave & Richfield Parkway 2. Total project cost: $1,650,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $1,650,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $1,650,000 100% TOTAL $1,650,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Bloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash. Multiple intersections nearby can have difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Metro Transit Route 14 also runs through the intersection area. Permanent intervention requires realignment of two intersections (Bloomington Ave/63rd St, Bloomington Ave/Richfield Pkwy). The above cost estimate reflects a similar project in the metro area. A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 2. Total project cost: $10,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $10,00,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $6,500,000 65% Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $3,500,000 35% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $10,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Reconstruction of Humboldt Avenue and Lake Shore Drive between 69th Street and 75th Street. A public engagement process will take place to identify the future road section and continuity. The reconstruction will include replacement of City utilities. The project is programmed to coincide with the adjacent 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge Replacement project; the extents and scope of this project will likely be adjusted to fit available funding. Staff intend to pursue alternative funding sources for this project if the 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge Replacement project receives funding. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Right of Way Improvements Project Summary Form – TH62 Noise Barrier East 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: TH62 Noise Barrier East 2. Total project cost: City share $500,000 (5% of total project) Minneapolis share $500,000 (5% of project total) State asset with total project $10,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 $500,000 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) - MPLS $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $500,000 100% $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Richfield is interested in installing a noise wall on the south side of TH 62 from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave. This installation requires collaboration with MnDOT and City of Minneapolis. Installation will only be pursued if the City is successful in obtaining funding from MnDOT’s Standalone Noise Barrier Program. Currently, this project does not have identified funding from City of Minneapolis, but does have Minneapolis’ continued interest. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form –Adams Hill Lift Station Control Panel Upgrade 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Adams Hill Lift Station Control Panel Upgrade 2. Total project cost: $90,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $90,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $90,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $90,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The lift station is in Adams Hill Park at 7313Xerxes Ave S. The control panel and electrical components were last upgraded in 2008. Upgrading the control would bring the electrical and controls up to modern day standards. The upgrade will more importantly separate the high voltage power supply from the low voltage power supply making it safe for operators to access the panel and perform routine maintenance. This would also standardize the lift station controls with SCADA for continuous monitoring. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Citywide Water Meter Upgrade 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Citywide Water Meter Upgrade 2. Total project cost: $4,100,000 3. Years to complete: 7 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2018 5. Responsible department: 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 100,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $4,100,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $4,100,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The outgoing city-wide system of 11,000 water meters was installed in 2007 and requires employees to drive by each property to obtain meter readings. The system is failing, and it is becoming time consuming to maintain. The installation of a new system will have a signal read radio device which will eliminate the need to drive by each property. With the pandemic and supply shortages the project has been delayed multiple years 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Legion Lake Lift Station 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Legion Lake Lift Station 2. Total project cost: $180,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $180,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $180,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $180,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Legion Lake infiltration system is a residential grade irrigation/infiltration system that was constructed in 2015. The pumping system is not conducive to the application, nor is it of the proper means to minimize health and safety for Public Works staff. This project will replace the irrigation cabinet and meter setup with a traditional storm sewer lift station and monitoring system. This will alleviate the need to reinstall the pump intake and transducer annually, it will better protect the instrumentation used to operate the pump and eliminate health hazards working near and within the water body. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: X Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Lift 7 (Ice Arena) Rebuild 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Lift 7 (Ice Arena) Rebuild 2. Total project cost: $300,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $300,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $300,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $300,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Lift Station 7 is in front of the Ice Arena at 636 E 66th St. The lift station was built in 1971. The lift station structure and ancillary components have been found to be in poor condition as well as under size with the addition of rink 2. The recommendation is to decommission the existing lift station and design and construct a new lift station of modern technology. The new lift station design will be one that meets the needs the service needs of the ice arena. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 2. Total project cost: $2,000,000 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2020 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 2026 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2029 $200,000* 2027 CIP $200,000 2028 CIP $200,000 *Estimate of annual average 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $2,000,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $2,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The stormwater collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). A cleaning and inspection program is underway to determine the condition of the stormwater collection mains. Mains that are observed to be in poor condition, and not in need of upsizing for capacity related reasons, will be rehabilitated using an engineered method that is designed to restore hydraulic efficiency and structural integrity. The rehabilitation effort will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Manhole Structures 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Manhole Structures 2. Total project cost: $2,000,000 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2019 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $200,000 2029 CIP $200,000 2026 CIP $200,000 Beyond 2029 $200,000 2027 CIP $200,000 2028 CIP $200,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $2,000,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $2,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The stormwater collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s. Most of the storm manholes are constructed of brick or block; most of which are failing. Rehabilitation consists of lining the interior of the structure with an engineered product to reinforce the brick walls as well as prevent seepage. This technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of digging and replacing the entire structure. Once lined, the approximate life expectancy will be extended by 30 years. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form –Sanitary Sewer Hot Spot Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Sewer Hot Spot Improvements 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $250,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $250,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City has roughly 20 locations within the sanitary sewer system that impedes or partially restricts the flow of sewage. This project would be programmed to design and develop engineering solutions that either eliminate these issues or improve system performance. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 2. Total project cost: $22,000,000 3. Years to complete: Ongoing 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? Yes If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 2017 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $900,000 2029 CIP $900,000 2026 CIP $900,000 Beyond 2029 $900,000* 2027 CIP $900,000 2028 CIP $900,000 *Annually 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $22,000,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $22,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe). As staff does ongoing maintenance and television inspections, they encounter areas with tree root intrusion and/or pipes that have cracks. In order to preserve the level of service to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, these pipes should be lined. Lining consists of installation of a liner in the existing clay pipe; which expands and heats the liner, causing adherence to the pipe. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, the appropriate standard. This technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the pipe. It’s anticipated this program will be ongoing until completed based upon funding availability. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade 2. Total project cost: $100,000 3. Years to complete: 4 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $25,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $25,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $25,000 2028 CIP $25,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $100,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $100,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The need for enhanced cyber security along with the State of Minnesota’s executive order to complete, certify, and deliver a cyber security assessment has created the need to plan for, and fund, certain upgrades and replacement of water treatment plants instruments and controls system. This project will help fund replacement of programable logic controllers, SCADA controllers and equipment, and enhance protective measures from cyber threats. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 2. Total project cost: $125,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $125,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $125,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ % $ 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room (floor) inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Elevator Replacement 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Elevator Replacement 2. Total project cost: $150,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $150,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $150,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $150,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it’s getting to be very difficult to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily for the transport of equipment, chemicals, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It’s also that which satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with modern technology. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Recirculation System 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Recirculation System 2. Total project cost: $100,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $100,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $100,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ % $100,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 revealed certain health and safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water plant has the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA compliant. Public works staff retained a consultant to formulate a design that mitigates these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 2. Total project cost: $50,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $50,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $50,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $50,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Two of the three sludge pumps require replacement. The frequent effort of maintenance and repair is no longer adding value for plant operations. This project will be for the procurement and installation of two new sludge pumps at the water treatment plant. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – HUB Redevelopment Participation 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:HUB Redevelopment Participation 2.Total project cost:$1,325,000 3. Years to complete:1 4.Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Public Works 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $1,325,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) - Developer $600,000 45.3% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $125,000 9.4% User Fee (U) $600,000 45.3% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,325,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: In conjunction with redevelopment of the HUB shopping center property, the City willwork with the developer to construct stormwater infrastructure that will address regional flooding of public right-of-way near the HUB property. The infrastructure will be designed to handle runoff from public right-of-way, as well asanticipated developed conditions on the HUB property. The costs for this infrastructure will be shared between the Cityand the developer. The City will also likely share cost to complete sidewalk installation along 65th St that was not constructed with the 65th St Reconstruction Project. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand X B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: X Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Generator 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Generator 2. Total project cost: $1,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $1,000,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $1,000,000 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The generator at the water treatment plant has reached the point where maintenance and problem solving are too frequent. In addition, the integral fuel tank and housing are badly corroded. Repairing the current unit is not advantageous due to the age, the cost to implement the needed repairs, and the minimal return on such an investment. There has also been a shift in the industry and technology for more efficient ways of providing a generator backup system for a building of this type and power demand. This project will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Water System Interconnect 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water System Interconnect 2. Total project cost: $4,000,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $4,000,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $3,900,000 97.5% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $100,000 2.5% Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $4,000,000 100% 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The water treatment plant was built in 1963 and to date has been a standalone system. If it were to have a catastrophic failure and unable to produce water, the city is not equipped with a long-term emergency backup water source. Connecting to another City’s water system would create the needed level of service redundancy. As part of the DNR’s water supply plan, they encourage all cities to have an emergency backup water source. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – DSG Storm Lift Station Upgrade 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: DSG Storm Lift Station Upgrade 2. Total project cost: $90,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $90,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $90,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $90,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: This lift station is located behind the Fountain Head Apt. alongside 35W. The lift station was built in 1997 to maintain a safe water level in the pond. The pump base and rails are becoming unusable, making it very difficult to do maintenance on the lift station. The control panel for the pumps is showing signs of rust, and the electrical components need to be updated to current electrical code. This would standardize the controls on the storm lift stations throughout the City. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $500,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ 100% Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: An evaluation was completed in 2023 to review the integrity of the coatings on the pipes within the water treatment plant pipe gallery. The evaluation revealed a significant loss of the protective coatings on the pipes along with observations of corrosion of the pipe, pipe-joints and hardware and supporting beams in certain locations. The recommendation provided by the consultant was for full removal and replacement of all pipe and support system coatings within the next five years. This project will fund the work and oversight of this effort. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Utilities Project Summary Form – Watermain Rehabilitation – Transmission Mains 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Watermain Rehabilitation – Transmission Mains 2. Total project cost: $12,000,000 3. Years to complete: 20 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP $500,000 2026 CIP $500,000 Beyond 2029 $500,000* 2027 CIP $500,000 2028 CIP $500,000 *Estimate of annual average 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $12,000,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL % $12,000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The water distribution transmission system consists of concrete, cast iron, and ductile iron pipe that ranges in diameter of 16 to 24 inches. These are considered the City’s transmission mains and are the most critical water mains for the distribution of drinking water and water for fire suppression. The rehabilitation effort is for the purpose of maintaining the integrity and resiliency of these assets. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: X Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Well 3 Water Service 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Well 3 Water Service 2. Total project cost: $50,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $50,000 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $50,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL 100% $50,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: A ¾ inch water service extends out to the Well House 3 building at the water plant. The water service was constructed in a manner that exposes a length of copper to the outside elements as it traverses from within the plant to the well house. This length of pipe has burst on several occasions due to the cold weather rendering the well useless. This project will include the design, construction, and oversight of construction of a water service extension that is frost protected. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form –Nicollet Park Water Main Improvements 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Nicollet Park Watermain Improvements 2. Total project cost: $250,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $250,000 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $250,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $250,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Prior to the design and construction of the water treatment plant, the Nicollet Park well- field supplied water to the City’s water distribution system. The infrastructure that allowed for this is no longer needed nor is it maintained. These unused and non-maintained segments of the system present a risk of failure. A failure could lead to water loss and customers being out of service. This project would remove the watermain, valves, and fittings that are no longer in use. The proper lengths of pipe and fittings would be installed to fully decommission, or take off-line, the old water main infrastructure. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $500,000 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ % $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The filter media at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Industry standards state that filter media of this type has a lifespan of roughly 20-years. The current media was replaced in 2006. This project will include a full exchange of the current sand media with new product as well as a coatings improvement effort to the walls of the filter bays. The rehabilitation effort will also include the supply of new actuating valves. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: Utilities Project Summary Form – Water Plant Program Space Renovation 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Water Plant Program Space Renovation 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $500,000 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL % $500,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The program spaces of the water treatment plant including the education center and bathrooms, men’s and women’s bathrooms on the operating floor, and lunch/break room need reconstruction. Both in the forms of cosmetic improvements (e.g. carpet and paint) to a full re-construction of the space to meet current building codes and modern day design. This project is for the design, construction, and oversight of construction of these spaces to bring each into a modern-day space for the benefit of the plant employees and general public work visit the plant. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage X Replace/Improve X Expand B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Utilities Project Summary Form – Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 2. Total project cost: $500,000 3. Years to complete: 2 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Public Works 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP $100,000 2028 CIP $400,000 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $500,000 100% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Wilson Pond subwatershed is located in the southeast quadrant of the city. This subwatershed is subject to flooding during heavy rain events. The low-lying nature of the subwatershed has proven to be a challenge with managing stormwater within the regional pond (Wilson Pond) system. Public works staff is in the process of updating the stormwater model to ascertain current flood risk conditions. The results of the model will be used to explore engineering alternatives to reduce the flood risk to the immediate neighborhoods. A design will be selected from the alternatives analysis that yields the most benefit. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: X Cost effectiveness: X Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Fiber Redundancy to the Water Plant 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project: Fiber Redundancy-Water Treatment 6221 Portland Ave to City Hall - Project #329227 2. Total project cost: $63,500 3. Years to complete: 1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project? No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5. Responsible department: Admin Services/Information Technologies 6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP 2029 CIP 2026 CIP $63,500 Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7. Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $63,500 100% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $63,500 100% 8. Brief summary of project: Create a redundant fiber path for the Water Plant building. This would create an alternate path for the water plant to stay connected to the internet and our network. If one fiber path were to go down the water plant would still be connected to the internet and network, creating no downtime. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A. Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand X B. Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Fleet Purchases 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Fleet Vehicle Purchases 2.Total project cost:$1,609,514 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Public Works 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $1,609,514 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $1,609,514 % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ 100% 8.Brief summary of project: The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments toprovide City Services. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Garage Floor Sealing 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Garage Floor Sealing 2.Total project cost:$150,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Public Works 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $150,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (O) $ % G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $ % User Fee (U) $ % Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $150,000 100% Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $ 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The Public Works Facility Garage floor is in need of repair. This sealing project will address issues after an oil separator replacement project and other various defects in the garage floor. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve X Manage Replace/Improve Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: Community support: Cost effectiveness: X Buildings, IT and Fleet Project Summary Form – Public Works Storage Facility 2025 Capital Budget (CIB) 2026-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1. Project:Public Works Storage Facility 2.Total project cost:$1,300,000 3. Years to complete:1 4. Is this a continuation of a current project?No If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP? 5.Responsible department:Public Works 6.Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project: 2025 CIP $1,300,000 2029 CIP 2026 CIP Beyond 2029 2027 CIP 2028 CIP 7.Please indicate the sources of funding: Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total Funding Source Amount ($$) % of Total G.O. Bonds- Property Tax (B) $ % Other Funding (LTRC) $650,000 50% G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax (BST) $ % Other Recreation Funding (OR) $ % G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU) $ % Special Revenue (SR) $ % Hennepin County (C) $ % State (S) $ % Federal Grant (F) $ % Tax Levy (TL) $ % Franchise Fee (FF) $325,000 25% User Fee (U) $325,000 25% Fleet Special Revenue (FSR) $ % Xcel Energy (X) $ % Municipal State Aid (M) $ % TOTAL $1,3000,000 100% 8. Brief summary of project: The City built its current maintenance facility with an understanding that on-going storage needs could be accommodated off-site. Historically, the City had relied on the MnDOT Cedar Ave Station toprovide the salt needed for the winter season via an ongoing agreement and did not need to store salt on site. Thisagreement was modified in 2021 and MnDOT has chosen to no longer provide salt to the city. In addition, the site the City is currently using for temporary storage for tree debris, sweepings, etc., is a short-term solution, requiring the City toidentify a new location to be used for its storage needs. The goal is to find a location where all of our storage needs can bemet. A feasibility study looking at the remnant site at 7636 Cedar Avenue will be conducted this year. 9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X 10. Priority ranking system A.Check one of the following: Preserve Manage Replace/Improve X Expand B.Indicate points for the following: Protect existing resources: X Health/safety: X Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan: Land use compatibility: X Community support: Cost effectiveness: X 2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2026-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Multi-Year Community Center Building Repair 10,000$ SR Multi-Year Donaldson Park Building Rebuild (project to be built in 2026)450,000 SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 15,000 SR Multi-Year Veterans Park Complex (projects to be built 2025-27)4,200,000 BST Multi-Year Wood Lake Nature Center (project to be built 2025-26)2,013,000 BST Multi-Year Wood Lake Nature Center (project to be built 2025-26)12,000,000 SMulti-Year Wood Lake Nature Center (project to be built 2025-26)1,724,000 FTOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 20,412,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 70th Street SRTS Improvements 586,225$ S 70th Street SRTS Improvements 88,775 M 73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial)635,000 F 73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial)290,000 MMulti-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicylce Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)775,000 B Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)775,000 BU Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 617,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2029-30)200,000 M Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF Multi-YearTraffic Signal Replacements 340,000 M North Lyndale Avenue Restriping 200,000 FF Pillsbury Plaza 270,000 FF TH62 Noise Barrier West 697,500 M TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 5,804,500$ UTILITIES Adams Hill Lift Station Control Panel Upgrade 90,000$ UCitywide Water Meter Upgrade 100,000 U Legion Lake Lift Station 180,000 U Lift 7 (Ice Arena) Rebuild 300,000 U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Manhole 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Hot Spot Improvements 250,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade 25,000 U Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements 125,000 U Water Plant Elevator Replacement 150,000 U Water Plant Recirculation System 100,000 U Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 50,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 2,670,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Fleet Purchases 1,609,514$ FSR Garage Floor Sealing 150,000 FSR Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 FF Public Works Storage Facility 650,000 O Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 UTOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 3,059,514$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 31,946,014$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 775,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 6,213,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 775,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 2,359,000 PROJECT EXPENDITURE 2025 Capital Improvement Budget (FF) Franchise Fees 1,742,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,759,514 (M) Municipal State Aid 1,616,275 (O) Other Funding 650,000 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 12,586,225 (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 2,995,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 31,946,014$ RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Multi-Year Community Center Building Repair 20,000$ SR Multi-Year Donaldson Park Building Rebuild (project to be built in 2026) 300,000 C Multi-Year Donaldson Park Building Rebuild (project to be built in 2026) 200,000 O Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 210,000 SR Multi-Year Veterans Park Complex (projects to be built 2025-27) 2,800,000 BST Multi-Year Wood Lake Building & Fence Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Wood Lake Nature Center (project to be built 2025-26) 8,987,000 BST Parks Master Plan 180,000 SR Wood Lake Trail Updates 50,000 SR Wood Lake Trail Updates 200,000 S TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 12,987,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000$ FF Multi-Year Bicylce Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27) 3,200,000 B Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27) 3,200,000 BU Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 737,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29) 200,000 M Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 350,000 M TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 8,017,000$ UTILITIES DSG Storm Lift Station Upgrade 90,000$ U HUB Redevelopment Participation 600,000 U HUB Redevelopment Participation 125,000 FF HUB Redevelopment Participation 600,000 O Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000 U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater System Manhole Structures 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Hot Spot Improvements 250,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade 25,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 500,000 U Water Plant Generator 1,000,000 BU Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 500,000 U Water System Interconnect 3,900,000 BU Water System Interconnect 100,000 F Well 3 Water Service 50,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 9,040,000$ BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY Fiber Redundancy to the Water Plant 63,500$ O TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY 63,500$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 30,107,500$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 3,200,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 11,787,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 8,100,000 (C) Hennepin County 300,000 (F) Federal Grant 100,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,192,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 550,000 (O) Other Funding 863,500 (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State 200,000 (SR) Special Revenue 500,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 3,315,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 30,107,500$ PROJECT EXPENDITURE 2026 Capital Improvement Plan RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000$ SR Multi-Year Community Center Building Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SRMulti-Year Parks Major Maintenance 320,000 SR Multi-Year Veterans Park Complex (projects to be built 2025-27)2,000,000 BSTMulti-Year Wood Lake Building & Fence Repair 20,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 2,500,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 77th Street Pavement Maintenance 810,000$ M Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicylce Improvements 40,000 FFMulti-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)775,000 B Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)775,000 BU Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 737,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)200,000 M Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)150,000 BMulti-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)150,000 BU Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FFTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 3,927,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater System Manhole Structures 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade 25,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 500,000 U Nicollet Park Water Main 250,000 U Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement & Rehalbilitation 500,000 U Water Plant Program Space Renovation 500,000 U Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 100,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 3,175,000$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 9,602,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 925,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 2,000,000 (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 925,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 1,067,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 1,010,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 500,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 3,175,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 9,602,000$ 2027 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000$ SR Multi-Year Community Center Building Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 320,000 SR Multi-Year Wood Lake Building & Fence Repair 20,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 500,000$ RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT 64th Street Sidewalk 165,000$ FF 69th Street Reconstruction 2,700,000 B 69th Street Reconstruction 3,800,000 BU 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)200,000 M 76th Street West Resconstruction 3,500,000 B 76th Street West Resconstruction 1,250,000 BU 76th Street West Resconstruction 1,000,000 X Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicylce Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 777,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)2,300,000 B Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)2,300,000 BU Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 230,000 M TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 18,502,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater System Manhole Structures 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Water Plant Instruments and Controls Upgrade 25,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 500,000 U Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 400,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 2,225,000$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 21,227,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 8,500,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 7,350,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant - (FF) Franchise Fees 1,222,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 430,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 500,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 2,225,000 (X) Xcel Energy 1,000,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 21,227,000$ 2028 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000$ SR Multi-Year Community Center Building Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 320,000 SR Multi-Year Wood Lake Building & Fence Repair 20,000 SR TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 500,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 64th Street Sidewalk 291,000$ FF 64th Street Sidewalk 854,000 F 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)323,960 M 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)1,046,040 F 76th & Knox Improvements 1,642,960 B 76th & Knox Improvements 2,687,040 F Multi-Year ADA Improvements 200,000 FF Multi-Year Bicylce Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 702,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)2,300,000 B Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)2,300,000 BU TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 12,427,000$ UTILITIES Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater System Manhole Structures 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 500,000 U TOTAL UTILITIES 1,800,000$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 14,727,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 3,942,960$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 2,300,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 4,587,080 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,273,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 323,960 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 500,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 1,800,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 14,727,000$ 2029 Capital Improvement Plan PROJECT EXPENDITURE RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Multi-Year Community Center Building Repair 20,000$ SR Multi-Year Ice Arena Repair 20,000 SR Multi-Year Wood Lake Building & Fence Repair 20,000 SRTOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE 60,000$ RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 63rd Street Greenway 1,000,000$ FF 63rd Street Greenway 2,500,000 F 70th Street Reconstruction 1,200,000 M 70th Street Reconstruction 3,000,000 BU 73rd St Bridge & Bikeways 4,250,000 B 73rd St Bridge & Bikeways 5,500,000 F 76th/77th Street Intersection Control 3,300,000 B Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd 1,650,000 M Bloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy 1,650,000 M Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 6,500,000 BHumboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction 3,500,000 BU Multi-Year Bicylce Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan 700,000 FF Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)250,000 B Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction (project to be built in 2028-29)250,000 BU Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 2,000,000 M North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 4,500,000 M TH62 Noise Barrier East 500,000 MTOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT 42,330,000$ Utilities Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains 200,000$ U Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater System Manhole Structures 200,000 U Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 500,000 UTOTAL UTILITIES 1,800,000$ TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 44,190,000$ ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 14,300,000$ (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 6,750,000 (C) Hennepin County - (F) Federal Grant 8,000,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,780,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue - (M) Municipal State Aid 11,500,000 (O) Other Funding - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - (S) State - (SR) Special Revenue 60,000 (TL) Tax Levy - (U) User Fees 1,800,000 (X) Xcel Energy - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 44,190,000$ Capital Improvement Plan - Beyond 2029 PROJECT EXPENDITURE CIB TOTAL* 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 CIP COST Beyond 2029 RECREATION OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT 25-Community Center Building Repair 10,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 80,000 20,000 SR 25-Multi-Year Donaldson Building Rebuild 450,000 SR - 25-Multi-Year Donaldson Building Rebuild 300,000 C 300,000 25-Multi-Year Donaldson Building Rebuild 200,000 O 200,000 25-Multi-Year Ice Arena 15,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 80,000 20,000 SR 25-Veterans Park Complex 4,200,000 BST 2,800,000 BST 2,000,000 BST 4,800,000 25-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 2,013,000 BST 8,987,000 BST 8,987,000 25-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 12,000,000 S - 25-Wood Lake Nature Center Building 1,724,000 F - 26-Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance 210,000 SR 320,000 SR 320,000 SR 320,000 SR 1,170,000 26-Parks Master Plan 180,000 SR 180,000 26-Wood Lake Building & Fence Repair 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 20,000 SR 80,000 20,000 SR 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates 50,000 SR 50,000 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates 200,000 S 200,000 27-Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 28-Heredia Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 29-Little Bob's Park Play Equipment Replacement 120,000 SR 120,000 TOTAL RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 20,412,000 12,987,000 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 16,487,000 60,000 (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax 6,213,000 11,787,000 2,000,000 - - 13,787,000 (C) County - 300,000 - - - 300,000 (F) Federal Grant 1,724,000 - - - - - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000 (S) State 12,000,000 200,000 - - - 200,000 60,000 (O) Other Funding - 200,000 - 200,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 20,412,000 12,987,000 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 16,487,000 60,000 PROJECTS CIB TOTAL* RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 CIP COST Beyond 2029 25-70th Street SRTS Improvements 586,225 S 25-70th Street SRTS Improvements 88,775 M 25-73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial)635,000 F 25-73rd Street SRTS Improvements (Centennial)290,000 M 25-ADA Improvements 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 200,000 FF 800,000 25-Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 160,000 40,000 FF 25-Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction 775,000 B 3,200,000 B 775,000 B 3,975,000 25-Multi-Year Nicollet Reconstruction 775,000 BU 3,200,000 BU 775,000 BU 3,975,000 25-Multi-Year Pavement Management Program 617,000 FF 737,000 FF 737,000 FF 777,000 FF 702,000 FF 2,953,000 700,000 FF 25-Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 FF 40,000 BU 40,000 M 160,000 40,000 FF 25-Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 200,000 M 200,000 M 200,000 M 400,000 25-Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 150,000 B 2,300,000 B 2,300,000 B 4,750,000 250,000 B 25-Multi-Year Penn Avenue Reconstruction 150,000 BU 2,300,000 BU 2,300,000 BU 4,750,000 250,000 BU 25-Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement 50,000 FF 50,000 FF 50,000 FF 100,000 25-Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements 340,000 M 350,000 M 230,000 M 580,000 2,000,000 M 25-North Lyndale Avenue Restriping 200,000 M 25-Pillsbury Plaza 270,000 FF 25-TH62 Noise Barrier West 697,500 M 27-77th Street Pavement Maintenance 810,000 M 810,000 28-64th Street Sidewalk 165,000 FF 291,000 FF 456,000 28-64th Street Sidewalk 854,000 F 854,000 28-69th Street Reconstruction 2,700,000 B 2,700,000 28-69th Street Reconstruction 3,800,000 BU 3,800,000 28-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)200,000 M 323,960 M 523,960 28-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)1,046,040 F 1,046,040 28-76th Street West Resconstruction 3,500,000 B 3,500,000 28-76th Street West Resconstruction 1,250,000 BU 1,250,000 28-76th Street West Resconstruction 1,000,000 X 1,000,000 29-76th & Knox Improvements 1,642,960 B 1,642,960 29-76th & Knox Improvements 2,687,040 F 2,687,040 >29-63rd Street Greenway - 1,000,000 FF >29-63rd Street Greenway - 2,500,000 F >29-70th Street Reconstruction - 1,200,000 M >29-70th Street Reconstruction - 3,000,000 BU >29-73rd St Bridge & Bikeways - 4,250,000 B >29-73rd St Bridge & Bikeways - 5,500,000 F >29-76th/77th Street Intersection Control - 3,300,000 B >29-Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd 1,650,000 M >29-Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway - 1,650,000 M >29-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction - 6,500,000 B >29-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction - 3,500,000 BU >29-North Lyndale Reconstruction 4,500,000 M >29-TH62 Noise Barrier East - 500,000 M TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS 5,804,500 8,017,000 3,927,000 18,502,000 12,427,000 42,873,000 42,330,000 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 775,000 3,200,000 925,000 8,500,000 3,942,960 16,567,960 14,300,000 (BU) Govt Bond Utilitiy 775,000 3,200,000 925,000 7,390,000 2,300,000 13,815,000 6,750,000 (F) Federal Grant 635,000 - - - 4,587,080 4,587,080 8,000,000 (FF) Franchise Fee 1,217,000 1,067,000 1,067,000 1,182,000 1,233,000 4,549,000 1,780,000 (S) State 586,225 - - - - - - (M) Municipal State Aid 1,816,275 550,000 1,010,000 430,000 363,960 2,353,960 11,500,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 5,804,500 8,017,000 3,927,000 18,502,000 12,427,000 42,873,000 42,330,000 PROJECTS CIB TOTAL* UTILITIES 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 CIP COST Beyond 2029 25-Adams Hill Lift Station Control Panel Upgrade 90,000 U - 25-Citywide Water Meter Upgrade 100,000 U - 2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2026 - 2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2026 - 2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 25-Legion Lake Lift Station 180,000 U - 25-Lift 7 (Ice Arena) Rebuild 300,000 U - 25-Multi-Year Rehab of Stormwater Collect. Mains 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 800,000 200,000 U 25-Multi-Year Rehab of Stormwater Collect. Manholes 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 200,000 U 800,000 200,000 U 25-Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Hot Spot Improvements 250,000 U 250,000 U 250,000 25-Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 900,000 U 3,600,000 900,000 U 25-Multi-Year Water Plant Instruments & Controls Upgrade 25,000 U 25,000 U 25,000 U 25,000 U 75,000 25-Water Plant Chlorine Storage Improvements 125,000 U - 25-Water Plant Elevator Replacement 150,000 U - 25-Water Plant Recirculation System 100,000 U - 25-Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement 50,000 U - 26-DSG Storm Lift Station Upgrade 90,000 U 90,000 26-HUB Redevelopment Participation 600,000 U 600,000 26-HUB Redevelopment Participation 125,000 FF 125,000 26-HUB Redevelopment Participation 600,000 O 600,000 26-Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains 500,000 U 500,000 U 500,000 U 500,000 U 2,000,000 500,000 U 26-Water Plant Generator 1,000,000 BU 1,000,000 26-Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings 500,000 U 500,000 26-Water System Interconnect 3,900,000 BU 3,900,000 26-Water System Interconnect 100,000 F 100,000 26-Well 3 Water Service 50,000 U 50,000 27-Nicollet Park Water Main 250,000 U 250,000 27-Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replac & Rehab 500,000 U 500,000 27-Water Plant Program Space Renovation 500,000 U 500,000 27-Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation 100,000 U 400,000 U 500,000 27-Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation - TOTAL UTILITIES 2,670,000 9,040,000 3,175,000 2,225,000 1,800,000 16,240,000 1,800,000 (BU) Govt Bond Utilitiy - 4,900,000 - - - 4,900,000 - (F) Federal Grant - 100,000 - - - 100,000 - (FF) Franchise Fee - 125,000 - - - 125,000 - (O) Other Funding - 600,000 - - - 600,000 - (U) User Fee 2,670,000 3,315,000 3,175,000 2,225,000 1,800,000 10,515,000 1,800,000 TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 2,670,000 9,040,000 3,175,000 2,225,000 1,800,000 16,240,000 1,800,000 PROJECTS CIB TOTAL* BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 CIP COST Beyond 2029 25-Fleet Purchases 1,609,514 FSR 25-Garage Floor Sealing 150,000 FSR 25-Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 FF 25-Public Works Storage Facility 650,000 O 25-Public Works Storage Facility 325,000 U 26-Fiber Redundancy to the Water Plant 63,500 O TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECH 3,059,514 63,500 (FF) Franchise Fee 325,000 - (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,759,514 - (O) Other Funding 650,000 63,500 (U) User Fee 325,000 - TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE 3,059,514 63,500 - - - - - SUMMARY PROJECTS Recreation/Open Space Development 20,412,000 12,987,000 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 16,487,000 60,000 Right of Way Improvements 5,804,500 8,017,000 3,927,000 18,502,000 12,427,000 42,873,000 42,330,000 Utilities 2,670,000 9,040,000 3,175,000 2,225,000 1,800,000 16,240,000 1,800,000 Buildings, Fleet and Technology 3,059,514 63,500 - - - 63,500 - TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 31,946,014 30,107,500 9,602,000 21,227,000 14,727,000 75,663,500 44,190,000 (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax 775,000 3,200,000 925,000 8,500,000 3,942,960 16,567,960 14,300,000 (BST) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax 6,213,000 11,787,000 2,000,000 - - 13,787,000 - (BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 775,000 8,100,000 925,000 7,390,000 2,300,000 18,715,000 6,750,000 (C) Hennepin County - 300,000 - - - 300,000 - (F) Federal Grant 2,359,000 100,000 - - 4,587,080 4,687,080 8,000,000 (FF) Franchise Fees 1,542,000 1,192,000 1,067,000 1,182,000 1,233,000 4,674,000 1,780,000 (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue 1,759,514 - - - - - - (M) Municipal State Aid 1,816,275 550,000 1,010,000 430,000 363,960 2,353,960 11,500,000 (O) Other Funding 650,000 863,500 - - - 863,500 - (OR) Other Recreation Funding - - - - - - - (S) State 12,586,225 200,000 - - - 200,000 - (SR) Special Revenue 475,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000 60,000 (U) User Fees 2,995,000 3,315,000 3,175,000 2,225,000 1,800,000 10,515,000 1,800,000 (X) Xcel Energy - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 31,946,014 30,107,500 9,602,000 21,227,000 14,727,000 75,663,500 44,190,000 * Total CIP costs do not include any project costs reflected in the 2025 CIB.