1954-497ryg ~n t, ~-~ r=h t '~ ~ '.. '~~ ~Ti6~+K ~ r ~.~ R~'~ ,~ r r w ~' ~ r ~ti >r ~ ~ }
t. e,I~ x t t ~ -Ni" W
k :a
t"
r:pry ., R~~..lfi' ION: N0.`,~,„,~' ..r ~ ,.
~Y,~ '
' - RESOLOT 10N ORDER 1 NG PREP/~R9T I ON :OE =R~ORT ON STREET .. s,.
,t ~ ~ a,.
GRADING TO BE KNOIdN`A~ VILLAGE PROJECT NO 30~ .
~.
WHEREAS, "IT 1$ PROPOSED TO iMP ;Vf THE FO~.LOWING STREET:
~,
V- .P.~N,o, LCC_, AT I ON f RCM TO
~;' ~ ~:;
~ 343 20TH AVENUE 6$TH STREET 69TM~STREET
~. '±~ w
r S0. 68TH STREET CENTER LINE OF
2 X66 FT. EAST & WEST' ,0~'.
4" 20TH AVENUE CENTER LINE OF 20rH:AVE•
F
1 ~
NO•~ 69'I`'H STREET CENTER LINE OF 165.8 FEET WEST "OF ': x
I 20"1'H AVENUE CEN'1`ER_ LINE~OF. BOTH AVE•,
,_`
~/ 4
DY GRADING OF ROADWAY AND C10ULEVARDS AND TO ASSESS ALL ADUT7It~G F~RQPERTY FOR ALI, ~ >,~>'~~'
OR A PORTION OF THE GO$T OF THE IMPROVEMENT PURSUANT TO M• S« A. SECTION 4298011. ~'~``"
'w: „
To 429.111 (L,AWS 1953, CH. 398) - ~ ~_
;,
~ NOW THERERCRE,"ICE IT RESOLVED'BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF `;~~`?
~ RICHFIELD MINNESQTA: r"-,- ~'
a+
~. _ _. _ ,. '`fir
1• THAT THE~PROPOSED IMPf20VEMENt DE REFERRED t0 THE VILLAGE ENGINEER, FOR
~•`' STUDY,ANU THAT HE DE IN5TRUCTPsD TO REPORt TO TWE COUNCIL WITH ALL CONVENI~NT'"~ ,< Fk.
~ SPEEDt ApVISING THE COUNCIL IN A PRELIMINARY WAY AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSE ~ ~~ y`
1 MPROVENIENT 1 S FEA$ ILiLE AND AS T0. WHETHER lT SHOULD BEST C3E MADE AS PROpOSEDf•
OR IN .CONNECTION 'WITH-SOME OTHER IMPROVEMENT AND THE ESTIMATED:COST 'OF TH6 i ~'r'~
~. _ _ , >
LMPR{~ViMENT AS RECOMMENDED. _ `;_ =
~~: 2• THAT l'HE STREET GRADING"L15TE0 IN THIS RESOLUTION~._SHALL HEREAFTER
~ - RE'KNOWN AS VILLAGE PROJECT NO. 303. ~,:
~"
ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1954s '
ATTEST: