1986-23BILL N0. 1986-23
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III,
PART IV, SECTION 3.34A
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.34A of the Ordinance Code
entitled: "Planned Unit Development Zoning District" is hereby
amended in the following respects:
I. By amending subdivision 1 thereof to read as follows:
Subdivision 1. Purpose.
.. ,
r
s r
It is the purpose of this section to provide for the
establishment at the discretion of the cit council of
planned unit development PUD zoning districts on tracts
of land which are suitable in location, area and character
for the use and for the structures proposed. It is the
objective of the city to provide for flexibility in
planning mixed land uses, economic and efficient land
uses, a high level of amenities, creative and superior
design, greater intensity and increased community economic
benefit, improved public safety and preservation of
natural scenic and recreational qualities of open spaces
far a better living, working and sho ping environment. To
accomplish those objectives, the suitability of a tact of
land for the development proposed must be determined
primarily by reference to the city's comprehensive plan
and any redevelopment plan for the area which has been
adopted by the city. Consideration shall be given to
existing and surrounding development when establishing a
planned unit development district. Standards and criteria
relating to such matters as design, building size, height
and location, lot coverage and_parkinq requirements
contained elsewhere in the city's zonin_ regulations
should be considered as merely guidelines in considering
any PUD proposal and may be departed from in the approval
of any PUD proposal if the city determines that the PUD
proposal is consistent with the purposes and objectives
above described.
II. By amending subdivision 9 thereof to read as follows:
Subd. 9. Criteria and Standards. In considering any PUD
proposal, the city shall be guided primarily by the
purposes and objectives described in subdivision 1 of this
section. In considering any PUD proposal in any
redevelopment project area, the city also shall be guided
by the goals and objectives contained in the plan for such
redevelo ment ro'ect area and the uidelines contained
in paragraphs 1 through 3 of this subdivision, and
subdivisions 10 and 11 shall not apply to such PUDs.
Except as to applications for PUDs in officiall adopted
redevelo ment ro'ect areas the cit shall ao 1 the
standards contained in paraaraohs 1 throuoh 3 of this
subdivision and subdivisions 10 and 11.
(1) Land Use Intensity (LUI). The maximum land use
intensity rating permitted in a PUD district shall be
determined by the gross land area of the tract of land,
the proposed type of planned unit development district,
and the uses assigned to the PUD district.
(2) The land use intensity rating for those parcels
of the PUD district designated for residential uses, or a
combination of residential and nonresidential uses, shall
be as follows:
GROSS LAND AREA PR & PC-1 PMR, PC-2 &
SQUARE FEET ACRES DUI RATING PI LUI RATING
43,560- 87,120 1-2 40 48
87,120-130,680 2-3 43 50
130,680-174,240 3-4 45 52
174,240-217,800 4-5 48 54
217,800-261,360 5-6 50 56
over 261,360 6+ 55 58
(3) The land use intensity rating for those parcels
of the PUD district designated s olely for commercial and
industrial uses sha ll be as foll ows:
GROSS LAND AREA
SQUARE FEET
43,560- 87,120
87,120-130,680
130,680-174,240
174,240-217,800
217,800-261,360
over 261,360
~,
0
PR & PC-1
ACRES LUI RATING
1-2 30
2-3 33
3-4 35
4-5 38
5-6 40
6+ 45
PMR, PC-2 &
PI LUI RATING
38
42
44
48
50
52
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
J
l1
Minnesota Suburban Newspapers, Inc.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
TATE OF MINNESOTA)
SS.
OUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
Dona 1 d K . Mo r t e n s o n ,being duly sworn on an oath says that he/she
is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as
Richfield Sun-Current
are stated below.
and has full knowledge of the facts which
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified
newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended.
(B) The
Bill No.1986-23
which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper; and was printed and published once each
week, for ono successive weeks; it was first published on Wedne sda,y~ ,the ~ ~ day
f November
nd including
19 8 6 and was thereafter printed and published on every
t0
the day of , 19; and printed below is
a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size
and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice:
ahcdE•(ghijklmnnpyrctu~wv gg ,,r.
BY: ~ ~ ~-
TITLE: Qpexa,tions 1`ia,ndgex
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this
'2 0 day of ~°v 1~ 8 6
- ~ 1 ' y,,
Not~r_y Pudic `~..
)
~-
,r, _ _.
RATE INFORMATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users $ 2.10 per line
for comparable space (Line, word, or inch rate)
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter $ 36.5¢ per line
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(3) Rate actually charged for the above matter $ 35¢ per line
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(Official Yubhcetlon)
BILL N0. 1986-23
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER iii,
PART IV, SECTION 3.34A
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.34A of the Ordinance Code entitled:
"Planned Unit Development Zoning District" is hereby amended in the
following respects:
I. By amending subdivision 1 thereof to read as follows:
Subdivision 1. Purpose. Itris-the-puspose e~thissectianie psowde-
fer the aetabliehrrtent; aE-the diacretitut oF1he-city-coerncifrof plaxnad
tutu devebpt+!retN.{1xNDfzon4ng-dietric4e or-tractrof~nn~ uthieh ass
suitable-in -lecertier+, areirexd ehe*aeter-forthe~ uee~ri~ fee the
sErueNtres proposed. All stte4t P>•l•Azenitr6.tfistrtclaare tab~pp}iaatttlned
aatl~ettcloped easuxafied busies SitiMbiiKywf the.traeisatiraud.for
the d+:vabP~t~P~P~~h~ bvdefetvwitied~rimerifyby.refer-
eatee~ te.theciby's eerwpreltonsaye~ewbpt¢tewi plan trd ~ny..re-
develepwertLplatt ferthearaa wkici-haa.boeri opted--b5't~+e'ett'y~ 1+
is inlended-that ills-pFOwsierts-et R1+isbec,~+en-anbany addibtenul
rstlturetaaenls eelaAliskefiby~4hecity eebneii ifr•ealabttsb+n8-e~FI3A
drstrect wilireceomPlieit the pusp0ees ot-aonirtgits se64orMr i~6eetwn
3!G7- Sttbdiwsien i. ii te~ the +nttittltots •wE 4ire aMy M }rowd~~fec
(~exitieiity-in.planwing mixed•land uaos, oaonernw.and-effieit+wt laud
ttsesT a-kiiglr hwef•-of t+wiewities- it'rrprtwed-public safety, creotire
design rond..preservetioa..of;tatti*nl semittand~eereatianalitaalities-
at open spaces far abetter-frvixg~ warkirtg awd sbeppi+tg ~nv+cou-
trteM.
ll is the purpose of this section to provide for the establishment, at
the discretion of the city council, of planned unit development (PUD)
zoning districts on tracts o[ land which are suitable in location, area
and character for the use and for the structures proposed. It is the
objective of the city to provide for flexibility in planning mixed land
.uses, economic and efficient land uses, a high level of amenities,
creative and superior design, greater intensity and increased com-
munity economic benefit, improved public sa,(ety and preservation of
natural scenic and recreational qualities of open spaces for a better
living, working and shopping environment. To accomplish those
objectives, the suitability of a tract of land for the development
propos must be determined primarily by referenceto the city's
compr~ensive plan and any retlevelupment plan for the area which
has been adopted by the city. Consideration shall be given to existing
and surrounding development whc^. establishing a planned unit
development district. Standards and criteria relalinq to such matters
as design, building size, height and location, lot coverage and parking
requirements contained elsewhere in the cily'szoning regulations
should'be considered as merely guidelines in considering any PL'D
proposal and may be departed from in the approval oI any PUD
proposal if the city determines that the PUD proposal is consistent
with the purposes and objectives_aboee described.
II. By amending subdivision 9 thereot to read as follows:
Subd. 9. Criteria and Standards. In considering any PUD proposal,
the city shall be guided primarily by the purposes and objectives
described in subdivision 1 of this section. In considering any PUD
proposal in any redevelopment project area, the city also shall he
guided by the goals and objectives contained in the plan for such
redevelopment project area, and the guidelines contained in para-
graphs (1) through (3) of this subdivision, and subdivisions 10 and 11
shall not apply to such PUDs. Except as to application for PUDs in
- officially adopted redevelopment project areas, the city shall apply
the standards contained to paragraphs (1) through (3) of this
subdivision and subdivisions ]0 and I t.
(1) Land Use Intensity (LUU. The maximum lend use intensity
rating permitted in a PUD district stall be determined by the gross
land area of the tract of land, the proposed type of planned unit
development district, and the uses assigned to the PU D dtstrict.
(2) The lend use intensity rating [or those Parcels of the Pi;D
district designated for residential uses. or a combination of residen-
tial and nonresidential uses, shall be as follows:
GROSS LAND AREA 3'R & PC-1 PMR, PG2 &
SQUARE FEET ACRES L"JI RATING P1 LUi RATING
43,560- 87,120 1-2 40 - 48
87,120-130,680 2-3 43 50
130,680-174,240 3-4 45 52
174,240-217,A00; 4-& 48 54
217,800-261,360 5-6 50 56
over 261,360 6+ 55 58
(3) The land use intensity rating for those parcels o[ the PUD
district designated solely for commercial and industrial uses shall he
as follows:
GROSS LAND AREA PR & PC-1 PMR, PC-2 &
SQUARE FEET - ACRES LU1 RATING PI LUI RATING
43,560- 87,120 1-2 30 38
87,120-130,680 2-3 33 42
130.680-174,240 3-4 35 44
174,240-217,800 4-5 38 48
217,800-261,360 5-6 40 50
over 261,360 6+ 45 52
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield. Minnesota this 10th day
of November, 1986.
JOHN ti. HAMILTON. Mayor
ATTESTT:
THOMAS FERBER, Oity Clerk ~ ,
INov. 19. 1985)-RICH