Loading...
1982-36rLEGAL NOTICE Bi11 1982-3b AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES•ORDAIN: Chapter III of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield entitled "Building, Health, Zoning and Land Use Regulations is hereby amended in the following respects: A. By amending Subdivision 1 of Section 3.29 to read as follows: "Subdivision 1. Conformar_ce Required. Except as hereinafter specified, no land, building, structure or premises shall hereafter be used and no building or part thereof or other structure shall be located, erected, reconstructed, extended, enlarged, or altered except in conformity with the regulations specified for the district in which it is located. No building permit shall be issued to permit any such erection, reconstruc- tion, extension, enlargement or alteration until the review described in Section 3.06A has been completed." B. By adding after Section 3.06, the following new sec- tion: 3.06A. BUILDING P.ND CONSTRUCTION PERiti1ITS: CONFORMITY ~dITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REDEVELOPMENT PLANS AND URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES. Subdivision 1. Permit Acplication. The building permit application shall contain the necessary infor- mation so that it can be determined whether the proposed construction will be in conformity with the comprehensive plan and any redevelopment. glans on urban design guide- lines applicable to the district in which the proposed construction will be located. Subdivision 2. Review 3v Building Official. If the proposed construction lies outside of any redevel- opment district, is nct subject to urban design guidelines, and is, in the opinion of the building official, in conformity with the comprehensive plan of the city, the requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied. Subdivision 3. Review By City ~~araaer. All appli- cations involving construction in redevelopment districts or districts subject to urban design guidelines and all applications as to which the building official does not _ make a finding of conformity with the comprehensive plan shall be processed as follows: timely received appeal hearing request. The council may review the report and recommendations of the Community Development Department, the building permit application, and the findings of the city manager. The applicant shall be given an opportunity to appear and offer evidence to the council. Within 30 days of the close of the hearing, the council shall make its findings. Such findings may take one of the following formsa . (1) Sustaining the city manager's determination. (2) Rescinding the city manager`s determination. (3) Sustaining the city manager's decision but placing certain conditions or stipulations upon the construction or upon the use designed to re- move adverse impacts upon the orderly planning and redevelopment of the district. The council`s findings shall be reported to the build- ing official by the city manager. If the finding is as described in paragraph (2) of this subdivision, the requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied. If the finding is as described in paragraph (1), no building permit shall be issued. If the finding is as described in paragraph (3) of this subdivision, the requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied only if the conditions are met within the time period set by the council. Otherwise, no permit shall be issued. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of November 1982. i "~ ,% ,/ /,; f, 1 f~..~ w--F ~. Bohn Hams.%l ton', A~ayor ATTEST° ~ . i ,, . - - Sy a ergh, City lark' SUN NEwSP~iPERS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RICHFIELD SUN 8940 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota State of Minnesota County of Hennepin D. K. MORTENSON, being duly sworn, on oath says he is and during all times here stated has been the vice president and general manager of the newspaper know as The Richfield Sun and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (1) Said newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in column and sheet form equivalent in printed space to at least 900 square inches. (2) Said newspaper is a weekly and is distributed at least once every week. (3) Said newspaper has 50% of its news columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate matter and advertisement. (4) Said newspaper is' circulated in and near the municipalities which it purports to serve, has at least 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers, has an average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid or no more than three months in arrears and has entry as second- class matter in its local post-office (5) Said newspaper purports to serve the City of Richfield in the County of Hennepin, and it has its known office of issue in the City of Bloomington in said county, established and open during its regular business hours for the gathering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of subscriptions and maintained by the managing officer of said newspaper or persons in its employ and subject to his direction and control during all such regular business hours and devoted exclusively during such regular business hours and at which said newspaper is printed. (6) Said newspaper files a copy of each issue immediately with the State Historical Society. (7) Said newspaper is made available at single or subscription prices to any person, corporation, partnership or other unincorporated association requesting the newspaper and making the applicable payment. (8) Said newspaper has complied with all foregoing conditions for at least one year preceding the day or dates of publication mentioned below. (9) Said newspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota prior to January 1, 1966 and each January 1 thereafter and affidavit in the form prescribed by the Secretary of State and signed by the managing officer of said newspaper and sworn to before a notary public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper. He further states on oath that the printed B 111 198 2 - 3 6 hereto attached as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published therein in the English language, once each week, for successive weeks that it was first so published on Wed the ~', day of NOVember 19 $2 and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including the day of 19 and that the following is a printed copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit: (Official Publication) BILL 1982-38 AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III OF THE ORDINANCECODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter III of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield entitled "Building, Health, Zoning and Land Use Regulations is hereby amended in the following respects: A. By amen~ing,Subdivision 1 of Section 3.29 to read as follows: °Subdivisioo-.I':'Conformance Required. Except as hereinafter specified, no land, building, s6iu+cture or premises shall hereafter be used and no building or part thereof or other structure shall be located, erected, reconstructed, extended, enlarged, or altered except in conformity with the regulations specified for the district in which it is located. No building permit shall be issued to permit any such erection, reconstruction, extension, enlargement or alteration until tbG review described in Section 3.OBA has been completed." B. Adding after Section 3.06, the following new section; 3.OBA. BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION PERMITS: CONFORMITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REDEVELOPMENT PLANS AND UR- BAN DESIGN GUIDELINES. Subdivision~l. Permit Application. The building permit application shall contain the necessary information so that it can be determined whether the proposed construction will be in conformity with the comprehensive plan and any redevelopment plans on urban design guidelines applicable to the district in which the proposed construction will be located. Subdivision 2. Review By Building Official. If the proposed construction lies outside of any redevelopment district, is not subject to urban design guidelines, and is, in the opinion df the building official, in conformity with the comprehensive. plan of the city, the requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied. Subdivision 3. Review By City Manager. All applications involving con- truction in redevelopment districts or districts subject to urban design guidelines and all applications as to which the building official does not make a finding of conformity with the comprehensive. plan shall be processed as follows: (I) The application shall be referred to [he Community Development Department For its review. The review shall be based upon the material submitted in the application together with any other information which the department believes will assist in the review. (2) Upon the completion of its review, the Community Development Department shall make a written report of its review to the city manager. The. report may contain, and shall contain, if requested by the manager, a recommended finding. (3) Upon receipt o~the written report and not later than 30 daysfollowing the date the matter was referred to the Community Development Depart- ment the city managger shall make his findings concerning the proposed construction. The findings shall contain one of the following conclusions: (a) .The proposed construction is in conformity with the com- prehensive plan and any applicable redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. (b) The proposed construction is not in conformity with the comprehensive plan or any applicable redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. (c) The proposed construction is not in conformity with the comprehensive plan or any applicable redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines but such non-conformity will not be likely to jeopardize or adversely affect the orderly planning and development process for the district in which the construction would be located. (4) If the city manager makes the finding described in paragraphs (3) (a) or (c) of this section, 'he shall report that fact to the building official and the requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied. If the city manager makes the finding described in paragraph (3)(b) of this section, he shall notify the applicant of such determination. The notification shall also inform the applicant of applicant's right to appeal the city manager's decision to the city council and that the applicant has 10 days from the date of notification to deliver a written request for an appeal hearing to the city clerk. If no appeal hearing request is ttiade within the time period, the manager's determination shall be final. The building official shall be notified and no building permit shall be issued. Subdivision 4. Appeal to Council. The appeal shall be heard at the first regular council meeting which is at least 14 days following the date of a timely received appeal hearing request. The council may review the report and recommendations bt the Community Development Department, the building permit application, and the findings of the city manager. The applicant shall be given an opportunity to appear and offer evidence to [he council. Within 30 days of the close ofglhe hearing, the council shall make its findings. Such findings may take gne of the following.forms: (1) Sustaining'the city manager's determination. (2) Rescinding the city manager'sdetermination. (3) Sustaining the city manager's decision but placing certain conditions or stipulations upon the construction or upon the use designed to remove adverse impacts upon the orderly planning and The council's findings shall be reported to the building official by the city manager. If the finding is as described in paragraph (2) of this subdivision, the requirementsq~ ~qt&ysection shall be deemed sa~isfied. I.'the finding is as described in p~~gfafSti~U2, no building permit shall be issued. If the findin is as described in par,A&#aph (3) of this subdivision, the requirements of th section shall be de tisfied only if the conditions are met within t time period set by t. _ cll. Otherwise, no permit shall be issued. i aased by the City.> x it of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th of November,1982. ~ - ;N JOHN HAMI ATTEST: SYLVIA K. BERGH City Clerk (Nov. 17, 1982)-RICH abedefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz ,~., ~,,......___ C~" ~„ and sworn to before me this ~-7 day of November, 19~- * ~ ~ . ~ t~Pv'! c t :, SOT~4 PAy commission ~ a~+lY 2, t:~86