81-6551R~~~ ~,
' ~'
1- 78
u~
s
S 14
~ ~r~ +.
y~
J ~,"
~ RESOLUTION NO. b551
,.,: ,
RESOLUTION EXTENDING TRANSITORY
~ '-`` ORDINANCE 16.61 FOR ADDITIONAL
-;• TWELVE MONTH PERIOD
~ ~-
,F. ~"=
s
`
~,ar
~ 4
on November 24, 1980, the City Council adopted
WHEREAS
~ ?~ ,
Transitory Ordinance 16.61 placing a moratorium upon development
wx~
;' of the area of land located .within .the City of Richfield bounded
i
~
~~.-: by 65th Street on the north,-,66th Street on the south, Lyndale on
~~t the east and Graham Avenue on the. west; and
~
~ ~
~
~~tT
~ WHEREAS, the purpose 'of said moratorium was recited in the
r
,
5 ~'
,,
~~ >> ~ ~~ ordinance to be as follows c
;
,
.,,~„~ Fes-
..~_~ " [I] t is necessary and.. expedient. for the
a ~~ ~ "' purpose of protecting the planning process.
'~~ and preserving the health and safety, general
1~¢
.a _ ~,.~ v welfare, convenience, and prosperity of the
'~~"~ citizens that during such study period and
' ~~` ' ~ - -`• pending the adoption of official controls ,
s ~~t no development or redevelopment within the
"- ' ~~ - block occur, and no request for rezoning,
A;'' ~,~ ~;<' -; special use permit, variance, platting, build-
`
~,~~
~ - ing permit or sign .permit be considered. "
~
, ~
~
~,~ _
~~.
- -~
~`;'~
~,r
r
r-t'
F„''4 - ,
~~~
;, j,
';f~ 5.. r.. ~.
,..r .,J.
~°9.~
~ ~.~~ -
WHEREAS, during the period of the moratorium the city staff
and the staff of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have con-
ducted reviews of the existing zoning and land use patterns in
the area which is subject to the moratorium and have studied the
potential for development of the area as an integrated project; and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1981, the Planning Commission, upon
review of.recommendations by the City Planning staff and following
public hearing, recommended. that the Richfield Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Element - Central Business District Policy be amended
to designated areas such as the subject block for integrated
development; and
.WHEREAS, on June 22, 1981, The Comprehensive Plan containing
the amendments recommended by the Planning Commission was
forwarded- to the Metropolitan Council for its review and comment
as is required prior to-its formal consideration by the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City has been notified that the Comprehensive
Plan submittal was approved by the Metropolitan Council on
December 3, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to conduct public hearings
on the Comprehensive Plan and to receive the information gathered:
by the staff during the past. year; and
~:
# -
.
is ~
Y ".~`: WHEREAS, should the Council adopt the Comprehensive Plan,.
~ ~4~~,~~ including the Land Use Element, it will also be necessary to.
,_<;,~~'~ consider the adoption of official controls implementing the
,yyr, ~ , ,,'- Comprehensive Plan; and
L •~l~T~
~~'~~'- WHEREAS, the purpose quoted above for which the moratorium
,r=~.._ was originally enacted remains valid until all of the actions
-,,;:; outlined herein can be considered;. and
tq~ ~
Y ~`
WHEREAS, Ordinance 16,.61 provides that the Council may
~ '~ 5--~ extend it for an additional 12 months.
<~,. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
'~~` City of Richfield, riinneso.ta, that Ordinance 16.61 is hereby
;;
~~ '~~`~ renewed and extended for an additional 12 month period to and-
: rNi~ ~i until January 10, 1983.
~„=Uu
~ ~ _. ~BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the'City Council .requests the
'``~`' ~ City Planning Commission to consider and make recommendations on
~ ;~~ ~K
+FK the appropriate zoning classification for the subject block, .taking
-.into consideration the Comprehensive Plan of the City as finally
~.~~
~` adopted.
,~..
rr~ ,.
`~~'~ ~ Passed by the City Council of the. City of Richfield. this 28th
~~~ Y ~~:~; ~ t: day of December, 1981.
,pry
_ ~" , -~ -
~ ~~ ~
,,,a ` 3 1
,~~ , na d J . Pr i e AZ~Y ~r
yY
`~Yr=~ .;'.`: ATTEST:
~.~"K~'
~'
~ ~ ~ .rf~~a .,; .
Y ~ S v K. Bergh ty Clerk