10-13-2020 Complete AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
VIRTUAL MEETING HELD VIA WEBEX
OCTOBER 13, 2020
7:00 PM
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
Call to order
Pledge of Allegiance
Open forum
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments
are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to
address the Council may call 612-861-0651 during the Open Forum portion or must have
registered prior to the meeting by calling 612-861-9711 or emailing kwynn@richfieldmn.gov.
Approval of the Minutes of the (1) Joint City Council and HRA Work Session of September 21, 2020; (2) City
Council Work Session of September 22, 2020; and (3) City Council Meeting of September 22, 2020.
AGENDA APPROVAL1.Approval of the Agenda
2.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended
actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any
Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the
regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are
recommended for approval.
A.Motion to pass a resolution regarding Hennepin County SCORE 2021 Contract Amendment.
Staff Report No. 117
B.Consider the approval of Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) lease agreement No. 27710
Amendment #6 for continued use of excess land along I-494 next to the Best Buy Campus for a Metro
Transit Park and Ride parking lot and transit station.
Staff Report No. 118
C.Consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) funds for an
extension on an original four-year grant to fully fund an officer dedicated for DWI enforcement in Richfield.
Staff Report No. 119
D.Consider the approval of Amendment #1 to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement with
Chamberlain Apartments, LLC that modifies indemnification provisions in the agreement for the
apartments constructed at 6630, 6700, and 6701 Richfield Parkway.
Staff Report No. 120
E.Consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing Amendment #2 to the partnership agreement between the
City of Richfield and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for the purchase/storage of salt
through June 30, 2022.
Staff Report No. 121
F.Consider a resolution approving a License Agreement with Spohn's Automotive Inc. for the parking lot at
Cedar Avenue and Diagonal Boulevard and authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute any
renewals to the License Agreement after October 13, 2020.
Staff Report No. 122
3.Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4.Public hearing and consider a resolution adopting the annual Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (LHN) Maintenance District
assessment.
Staff Report No. 125
5.Public hearing and consider resolutions adopting the annual Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Project Area
assessment and proposed work for 2021.
Staff Report No. 124
6.Public hearing and consider a resolution adopting the assessment for removal of diseased trees from private
property for work ordered from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019.
Staff Report No. 123
7.Public hearing regarding the special assessment roll for weed elimination from private property and removal or
elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property.
Staff Report No. 127
8.Public Hearing regarding the special assessment roll for unpaid false alarm user fees against private property.
Staff Report No. 128
9.Public hearing regarding the special assessment roll for unpaid vacant property registration fees against private
property.
Staff Report No. 129
10.Public hearing regarding the assessment of delinquent utility bills to be certified to property taxes.
Staff Report No. 130
11.Conduct a public hearing to consider the platting and vacation of right-of-way and utility easements at 6228 Penn
Avenue South and 6200 Queen Avenue South (Lunds & Byerlys).
Staff Report No. 126
RESOLUTIONS
12.Consider an amendment to approve final development plans for a mixed use development at 101 66th Street
East (66th Street and 1st Avenue). The proposed amendment reduces commercial space and increases the
number of apartments in the project.
Staff Report No. 131
OTHER BUSINESS
13.Consider approval of the Climate Action Plan.
Staff Report No. 132
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
14.City Manager's Report
CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
15.Claims and Payroll
16. Hats Off to Hometown Hits
17. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Concurrent City Council and Housing and
Redevelopment Authority Work Session
September 21, 2020
CALL TO ORDER
The work session was called to order by HRA Chair Supple at 5:47 p.m. via Webex.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Simon Trautmann; Ben
Present Whalen; and Edwina Garcia
Council Members
Absent: None
HRA Members Mary Supple, Chair; Maria Regan Gonzalez; Sue Sandahl;
Present: Erin Vrieze Daniels; and Pat Elliott
HRA Members
Absent: None
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; John Stark, HRA Executive
Director/Community Development Director; Julie Urban, Housing Manager;
and LaTonia DuBois, Administrative Assistant.
Others Present: None
Item #1
REVIEW THE INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY
Executive Director Stark provided a brief history and overview of the Inclusionary Affordable
Housing Policy (Policy). Housing Manager Urban presented a Power Point that went over the current
housing data, the current Policy, possible revisions, and ways to gain deeper affordability and gain
community feedback.
Chair Supple inquired about 30% Area Median Income (AMI) units and possible conflicts
with Tax Increment Financing (TIF).
Housing Manager Urban explained challenges with obtaining 30% AMI and the need to find
ways to obtain flexibility with legislature.
Council Member Whalen had a follow up question regarding TIF rules at the state level, if it
would cause conflicts or if it would be unlikely to get developers to provide 30% units until TIF rules
change at the state level.
Housing Manager explained Council Member Whalen’s concern would be a likely outcome.
Concurrent Council and HRA Work Session -2- September 21, 2020
Commissioner Vrieze Daniels inquired about applying the Policy to public land sales and
how it would have applied to the Emerson Lane land sales.
Housing Manager Urban explained the Emerson Lane land sales fell under the scattered
site single family housing program and that program requires for 20% to be affordable over a period of
3 years; therefore, the Policy would not have applied to that development.
Council Member Whalen inquired about smaller parcels and if exceptions and flexibility
could apply to specific lots when being sold at subsidy.
Housing Manger explained the impacts of the Policy being made into an Ordinance.
Executive Director Stark pointed out the two new developments in the city that did not
require subsidy, the Novo and Lunds and explained that Lunds owned the land. The Novo was really
the only development that happened without subsidy and in the past developments happening without
subsidy was a sign of good infrastructure.
Council Member Trautmann spoke to Type A (Adaptable) and fully accessible units creating
a greater capacity.
Executive Director Stark mentioned another tool, other than TIF, that could offer more
affordability would be to put a second mortgage on the property, generally with a 15-18 year term.
Council Member Whalen spoke of current Policy terms, ability to vary current Policy and an
open-ended statement in the Policy. Inquired about how St. Louis Park manages compliance with
their affordable housing policy.
Housing Manager Urban explained that St. Louis Park hired a consultant and some
practicalities for the City of Richfield to manage compliance.
Housing Manager Urban offered some concepts to gain community feedback and asked
Council Members and Commissioners to offer further suggestions.
Chair Supple spoke of posting information in public spaces.
Council Member Trautmann mentioned community feedback he received regarding
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and the interest in exploring detached ADU’s as a possibility.
Council Member Whalen spoke of the possibility of VEAP providing assistance with
distributing information.
Housing Manager Urban spoke of other housing partners she will reach out to as well.
Executive Director Stark expressed appreciation for any help available.
Council Member Whalen mentioned the possibility of working with the housing team to do
phone banking and/or door knocking.
Chair Supple mentioned feedback regarding the Governor’s Moratorium and requirements
of notice.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez expressed appreciation for the outreach plan and mentioned plain
language information could be shared with to community groups to gain feedback, and inquired about
staff’s response for detached ADU’s.
Concurrent Council and HRA Work Session -3- September 21, 2020
Housing Manager Urban explained steps being made to allow detached ADU’s.
Executive Director Stark spoke of a possible pilot program.
Council Member Whalen spoke of the importance to hear voices of renters. Council Member
Trautmann supported Council Member Whalen’s views.
Housing Manager Urban mentioned attached and detached ADU’s would both be
considered for a pilot program.
Chair Supple and Council Member Trautmann thanked staff for all their hard work.
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:57 p.m.
Date Approved: October 13, 2020
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
LaTonia DuBois Katie Rodriguez
Administrative Assistant City Manager
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
City Council Work Session
September 22, 2020
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 5:46 p.m. virtually via WebEx.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Ben Whalen; Mary Supple; and Simon
Present: Trautmann
Council Members Edwina Garcia
Absent:
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Rachel Lindholm, Sustainability Specialist; Amy
Markle, Recreation Services Director; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive
Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant.
Item #1
PRESENTATION AND REVIEW OF THE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
City Manager Rodriguez reviewed how staff and Council make goals and objectives to which
included a Climate Action Plan (CAP).
Director Markle expressed excitement to bring this presentation to Council and all the hard
work Sustainability Specialist Lindholm has put in around this plan. She then gave an introduction to
the plan and the importance of climate action planning and sustainability efforts so far.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm explained how the Richfield CAP is unique including a five
year plan, focused short-term actions and annual revision of the plan.
Director Markle spoke of the CAP creation process including a review of 13 other CAPs, focus
areas specific to Richfield and staff review. She then reviewed what is in the Richfield CAP:
• 6 focus areas;
• 18 objectives;
• 80 actions;
• Narrative about previously accomplished efforts; and
• Connections to GreenStep Cities
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm reviewed goal one to develop and promote energy efficiency
efforts which includes energy and transportation initiatives. She then moved to goal 2 to promote
renewable energy installation and purchasing which includes increase purchasing through Xcel, solar
installation/incentives education, research on renewables for municipal sites and solar park lighting.
Goal three is to encourage sustainable design and building practices which contains sustainability
guide for developers/builders, ARC review opportunities, affordable housing permit fee review, review
and revise existing standards and green certification.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm then spoke of goal four to strengthen and expand natural
resource management that includes landscaping and storm water. Goal five touches on reduction of
Council Work Session Minutes -2- September 22, 2020
waste generated and promote responsible disposal that contains partnership programs/education,
expand collection access and municipal waste reduction. Goal six is to improve access to local and
healthy food which contains community gardens and edible landscaping, animal husbandry ordinance
review, support mobile food-sharing efforts, healthy food education and food deserts and access in
Richfield.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm discussed plans for the next five years including start and/or
implement action every year, coordinating with other city staff, flexible planning and actions already in
progress.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez expressed her excitement for discussion on this topic.
Council Member Whalen asked for follow up on the schedule of the implementation part of the
plan.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm explained how the plan is still being formed and is open to
change. The update schedule is also open and dates have not been set but the annual Sustainability
Commission update to Council is an option.
City Manager Rodriguez hopes this good work will flow into strategic planning and gives staff a
good start in that area.
Council Member Supple has heard from residents they want more trees and is looking forward
to exploring the information collected around food deserts and edible landscaping.
Council Member Trautmann thanked staff for their efforts and the holistic approach and
making so many considerations.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez wondered what the equity impact component looks like and how it will
be included throughout the plan. She also spoke of what a wonderful story this has been as it has
been community driven and she would like to leverage the drive for knowledge around this topic.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm expressed her profound excitement about all the ideas
Mayor Regan Gonzalez and all Council spoke about. She is also excited to work with staff on
including equity in all of the steps throughout the plan.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez spoke of a food assessment in Richfield and the surrounding cities
containing affordability and accessibility.
Council Member Whalen echoed equity comments and agrees that it impacts everyone
differently and it does matter. He then asked about work for businesses and the possibility for carbon
taxes and incentives along with existing regulations around pollution control.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm explained there aren’t any included in this plan as it is
difficult to regulate and would be a state pollution control task.
Council Member Supple thanked Sustainability Specialist Lindholm for her efforts of pulling all
departments together in the plan and equity work.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez wondered about an annual celebration to keep this work at the
forefront to showcase all the work happening. She also spoke of how to support interest groups and
have year round clean ups and utilize the partnerships with schools. She also wondered about more
information around the tiny homes concept and the possibility of reducing lot sizes to accommodate
those along with rezoning and being able to promote healthy living situations and healthy housing.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez also had ideas regarding home owners and renters having availability to
Council Work Session Minutes -3- September 22, 2020
quality living housing, being able to partner with larger institutions and creating a check list for
residents to support quality living and the CAP.
Sustainability Specialist Lindholm spoke of options to share all the wonderful information and
the possibility of putting together a newsletter for distribution.
Council Member Whalen explained how gradual steps will need to be taken to become more
and more green city-wide. He then offered the idea to create friendly competitions to create more
sustainable households.
Director Markle confirmed they will add more language around equity within the plan.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked staff again for all their efforts and making this a city-wide
initiative.
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:46pm
Date Approved: September 22, 2020
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez
Senior Office Assistant City Manager
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 7:00 p.m. via WebEx.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Ben Whalen; Edwina Garcia; and
Present: Simon Trautmann
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; John Stark,
Community Development Director; Chris Regis, Finance Director; Skov, IT
Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior
Office Assistant
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance
OPEN FORUM
Ruane Onesirosan, 2421 West 65th Street, expressed concern over a project near her home
and the possibility of construction workers not donning masks. She believes the project should be shut
down. She also had questions about an item from the September 8th agenda regarding prevailing wage.
Senior Office Assistant Wynn reviewed the options to participate:
• Participate live by calling 612-861-0651 during the open forum portion
• Call prior to meeting 612-861-9711
• Email prior to meeting kwynn@richfielmn.gov
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Council Meeting
Virtual Meeting held via WebEx
September 22, 2020
Council Meeting Minutes -2- September 22, 2020
M/Trautmann, S/Whalen to approve the minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session of
September 08, 2020; and (2) City Council Meeting of September 08, 2020.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Mayor Regan Gonzalez made an announcement regarding the retirement celebration for
Council Member Garcia taking place on Thursday, October 8th from 4:00-6:00pm in the City Hall
courtyard. She asked attendees to please RSVP to Senior Office Assistant Kelly Wynn at
kwynn@richfieldmn.gov or 612-861-9711 by October 2nd.
Council Member Garcia thanked everyone for the kind words and commented how hard it will
be leave everyone and she will be sad to go.
City Manager Rodriguez reviewed the invite and to please RSVP so we are able to plan for
social distancing.
Item #1
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the agenda
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #2
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar.
A. Consider approval of the 2020-2021 Emergency Preparedness agreement with the City of
Bloomington, using public health emergency preparedness grant funds distributed by a
Council Meeting Minutes -3- September 22, 2020
federal grant from the Centers for Disease Control, to provide services in the area of public
health emergency preparedness/bio-terrorism and the development of a response system.
(Staff Report No. 110)
B. Consider a Grant Compliance Agreement with Penn Investments, LLC regarding a Livable
Communities Demonstration Account Pre-Development Grant for 6501 Penn Avenue South.
(Staff Report No. 111)
C. Adoption of a resolution authorizing the refunding of the $2,120,000 G.O. Street
Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A, dated September 6, 2012 and the $2,770,000 G.O.
Storm Sewer Bonds, Series 2013B, dated March 21, 2013 with the $3,255,000 G.O.
Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B. (Staff Report No. 112)
RESOLUTION NO. 11793
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF
$3,255,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2020B
D. Consider the adoption of a resolution to accept the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security (CARES) Act grant of $2,745,098. (Staff Report No. 113)
RESOLUTION NO. 11794
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF THE CORONAVIRUS AID,
RELIEF, AND ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT GRANT
M/Garcia, S/Supple to approve the consent calendar.
Council Member Supple thanked staff for finding the savings and refinancing the bonds.
Council Member Whalen also thanked staff for the incredible amount of work processing the
expenditures for the CARES money.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #3
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT
CALENDAR
Council Meeting Minutes -4- September 22, 2020
None
Item #4
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO
THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE APPENDIX D (FEE SCHEDULE) AND A
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF SAID
ORDINANCE. THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WOULD REVISE FEES RELATED
TO THE PREPARATION OF ZONING VERIFICATION LETTERS AND THE
PROCESSING OF PLAT APPLICATIONS. (STAFF REPORT NO. 114)
Council Member Trautmann presented staff report 114 and opened the public hearing.
Director Stark explained there were minor changes to the language.
Senior Office Assistant Wynn confirmed there were no callers for the public hearing and
reviewed how residents can call 612-861-0651 to participate live during public hearings.
M/Trautmann, S/Whalen to close the public hearing.
Council Member Trautmann thanked staff for reviewing the policies and comparing them to
surrounding communities.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
M/Supple, S/Whalen to (1) approve a second reading of an ordinance amendment to Richfield
City Code Appendix D (Fee Schedule) related to planning and zoning fees; and (2) adopt a resolution
authorizing summary publication of an ordinance amending Richfield City Code Appendix D (Fee
Schedule) related to planning and zoning fees.
RESOLUTION NO. 11769
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR
CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Council Meeting Minutes -5- September 22, 2020
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #5
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING
A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND APPROVING A TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE 2020-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCE
DISTRICT (HENLEY II). (STAFF REPORT 115)
Council Member Garcia presented staff report 115 and opened the public hearing.
Director Stark explained how TIF is one of the most misunderstood items the city is involved in.
He then clarified what will happen with the funds and how the city and developers are to be paid.
Rebecca Kurtz with Ehlers spoke of how this will be a ‘pay as you go’ note and it is hopeful to
have it paid off in 12 to 12.5 years versus the usual 26 year loan.
Ruane Onesirosan, 2421 West 65th Street, expressed her confusion regarding the language of
this item and asked if the city pays developers to build within Richfield
Director Stark explained the city uses taxes paid by a developer to reimburse them for project
costs. He gave examples of how redevelopment is expensive and costs more than building in an open
urban setting.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Director Stark for helping to explain the situation along with
other city budgets and finances.
M/Garcia, S/Whalen to close the public hearing.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
M/Garcia, S/Supple to approve a resolution approving a modification to the Redevelopment
Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment project; and approving a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the
2020-1 Tax Increment Finance District (Henley II).
RESOLUTION NO. 11770
Council Meeting Minutes -6- September 22, 2020
RESOLUTION APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; AND APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLAN FOR THE 2020-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT: HENLEY II
Council Member Whalen asked for clarification on the affordable units and if they would only be
deemed affordable housing for 12 years instead of 26 years.
Director Stark confirmed.
Council Member Whalen asked for explanation of roles for City Council and HRA on these
matters.
Director Stark spoke of how the HRA approved this item in July contingent on this motion. This
item is one of very few that needs to be approved by both bodies.
Rebecca Kurtz with Ehlers confirmed Minnesota TIF law requires the City Council to hold the
public hearing.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #6
CONSIDER THE 2020 REVISED/2021 PROPOSED BUDGET RESOLUTIONS
ADOPTING THE 2021 PRELIMINARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY, SETTING TRUTH
IN TAXATION HEARING DATE, AUTHORIZING BUDGET REVISIONS,
AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 2020 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS,
AND APPROVING CITY FEES FOR 2021 (STAFF REPORT NO. 116)
Council Member Supple read staff report 116. She also thanked staff for all the time spent on
the budget and everyone who supplied input and participated in discussions around the budget.
M/Supple, S/Whalen to adopt the attached resolutions establishing the 2021 preliminary
property tax levy and proposed date for the Truth in Taxation hearing, authorizing budget revisions,
authorizing revision of 2020 budget of various departments, and approving City fees for 2021.
RESOLUTION NO.11765
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY
FOR THE YEAR 2021
Council Meeting Minutes -7- September 22, 2020
RESOLUTION NO. 11766
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET REVISIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 11767
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 2020 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. 11768
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2021 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 11694
Council Member Whalen highlighted how staff and Council have had many meetings around the
budget and believes it is a success in a time when surrounding communities are cutting programs and
Richfield has been able to continue on with many of the same services. Richfield is also moving forward
with hiring an Equity Coordinator, embedded social worker and body cameras with the Police
Department.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez echoed thanks to staff in the difficult times and how they have been
making extremely difficult decisions, shift staff and resources, delaying projects and handling COVID
mitigations. She expressed tremendous appreciation for all the additional communication staff has
provided to council. She spoke of how the city is in a more fortunate position compared to some
neighboring communities and is glad we are building infrastructure for the future.
Council Member Supple emphasized that because of the careful documentation for COVID
mitigations, the city was able to receive the $2.7 million to make the budget whole.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
M/Trautmann, S/Garcia to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter
into a three-year agreement with Madison National Life/ Ochs Company for long-term disability
insurance benefits.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Council Meeting Minutes -8- September 22, 2020
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #7
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Rodriguez thanked staff and Council for assisting in making the tough decisions
around the budget. She then spoke of how staff has moved to recording all board and commission
meetings. The meetings will be posted online to make them more available to residents. She also
reminded residents to fill out their Census as it is set to close September 30.
Item #8
CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
M/Garcia, S/Trautmann that the following claims and payrolls be approved:
U.S. Bank 09/22/2020
A/P Checks 290754 - 291132 $ 1,679,878.31
Payroll: 156872 – 157166 43194 - 43267 704,675.51
TOTAL $ 2,384,553.82
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #9
HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS
Council Member Garcia encouraged everyone to fill out their Census and expressed her
appreciation to Analyst Martinez Gavina for all her work around the matter. It is important to be counted
for both residents and the city. She then spoke of how critical it is for the community to get out and vote
in the upcoming election. Residents can vote by absentee ballot at city hall or by mail.
Council Meeting Minutes -9- September 22, 2020
Council Member Whalen also emphasized how important it is to vote and thanked RDAP and
League of Minnesota Voters for hosting events regarding the local elections. He then spoke of the huge
success the playground build at Washington Park was and thanked the Parks and Recreation
Department for putting it together.
Council Member Trautmann mentioned the Farmer’s Market and how they offer curbside
pickup. Residents can order ahead via the Richfield website. He then asked about one happening
during the winter months.
City Manager Rodriguez stated staff is actively engaging in the possibility to make a Farmer’s
Market happen this winter.
Council Member Supple spoke of the Free Bikes for Kids program that took place in Taft Park.
Over 100 bikes and helmets were given out to kids. She thanked everyone involved that made the
program possible.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez echoed comments on how important voting is and also encouraged
friends and family to fill out their Census. She then reiterated the retirement celebration for Council
Member Garcia taking place October 8th and to RSVP to Kelly Wynn at kwynn@richfieldmn.gov or 612-
861-9711.
Item #10
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:09 p.m.
Date Approved: October 13, 2020
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez
Senior Office Assistant City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.A.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 117
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Rachel L indholm, S ustainability S pecialist
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector
10/7/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W:
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/7/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Motion to pass a resolution regarding Hennepin County S C O R E 2021 Contract Amendment.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Hennepin County has written an amendment to the existing S C ORE policy, which would be in place for 2021,
before a new policy is drafted. The S C ORE policy details how funds for recycling and organics participation
and education are distributed to cities in the county as well as some guidelines and restrictions for how the
funding can be used.
Staff is requesting passage of the attached resolution which will indicate approval of the amendment proposed
by Hennepin County.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Pass the resolution to accept the amendment to the S C O R E contract.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The City of Richfield annually receives Select C ommittee on Recycling and the Environment
(S C ORE) funding from Hennepin County to apply towards recycling education, administrative
costs, and credits to residents.
The annual award is determined by both rec yc ling and organics efforts cities report. I n the past
few y ears, organics efforts have comprised a higher percentage of the funding amount, therefore
decreasing the recy cling portion. This has c ut Richfield's overall S C ORE funds, which has meant
that residents receive less of a refund every year.
Previously, there has been a stipulation on the funding that required c ities without organized
recycling to pass back 90% of its S C ORE funds back to residents.
Not being allowed to retain the funds has made it financially harder for the City to invest in
recycling education, dedicated staff, and related projects.
The 2021 amendment removes this requirement, allowing the City of Richfield to retain the entirety
of its S C ORE funding, while staff work with the county to improve recycling education and efforts
across the city.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The proposed resolution and the original Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy have
been included.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The County would like to have the approval process completed before the end of the year. Prompt
approval will also help staff coordinate any necessary actions on the City's end.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The City will be allowed to retain a portion of the S C ORE funding which has been previously required to
be dispersed among residents. This year, a credit of $1.29 was applied to each water bill, resulting in an
annual credit of $5.16 per household.The City will be able to use this funding to help fund the
Sustainability Specialist staff position.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
None
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not pass the resolution and forfeit retaining the S C ORE funds.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
S C O RE F unding P olicy 2017-2020 B ackup Material
Resolution - 2021 S C ORE A mendment Resolution L etter
Hennepin County Residential
Recycling Funding Policy
January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2020
Board Adopted: November 29, 2016
1
I. Policy Description
A. Background
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has determined that curbside collection of
recyclables and organics from Hennepin County residents is an effective strategy to reduce
reliance on landfills, prevent pollution, conserve natural resources and energy, improve public
health, support the economy, and reduce greenhouse gases. Therefore, the county adopted the
goals established in State Statute and by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in its
Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan and developed a Residential Recycling
Funding Policy to help reach a 75% recycling rate by 2030.
The county will distribute all Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) funds
received from the state to cities for curbside collection of residential recyclables and organics. If
cities form a joint powers organization responsible for managing a comprehensive recycling and
waste education system for the residents of those cities, the county will distribute recycling and
organics grants to that organization. Cities are expected to fulfill the conditions of the policy.
B. Term of the Policy
Hennepin County is committed to implement this policy and continue distributing all SCORE
funds received from the state for the purpose of funding curbside residential recycling and
organics programs from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2020. The county may revise this
policy if it determines changes are needed to assure compliance with state law and MPCA goals
established for metropolitan counties. In the event that SCORE funds are eliminated from the
state budget or significantly reduced, the county will consult with municipalities at that time and
develop a subsequent recommendation to the board on continuation of this policy and future
funding of curbside recycling and organics programs.
C. Grant Agreements
Each municipality seeking funding under the terms of the Residential Recycling Funding Policy
must enter into a recycling grant agreement with the county for a term concurrent with the
expiration of this policy, December 31, 2020. The grant agreement must be accompanied by a
resolution authorizing the city to enter into such an agreement.
D. Fund Distribution
The county will distribute to Hennepin County municipalities 100% of SCORE funds that the
county receives from the state. SCORE funds will be dedicated to two different purposes: 1)
2
curbside recycling and 2) curbside organics recycling. SCORE funds are based on revenue
received by the State of Minnesota from the solid waste management (SWM) tax on garbage
services. SCORE funds are subject to change based on the SWM tax revenue received by the
state and funds allocated by the legislature. Funds distributed to municipalities for the current
calendar year will be based on SCORE funds received by the county in the state’s corresponding
fiscal year.
II. Recycling
A. Allocation of Funds
The following formula will be utilized to determine a city’s recycling SCORE grant each year.
Percent of SCORE funds allocated to curbside recycling:
2017 80%
2018 70%
2019 60%
2020 50%
City recycling grant calculation:
Number of households with
curbside recycling in city
-------------------------------
Total number of households
with curbside recycling in
county
x
Total SCORE
Funds available
for recycling
=
Recycling grant
amount available
to the city
Eligible residential households are defined as single family through eight-plex residential
buildings or other residential buildings where each housing unit sets out its own recycling
container for curbside collection. The number of eligible households will be determined by
counting the number of eligible households on January 1 of each funding year. The city will
report the number in its application for funding.
B. Application for Funding
Each municipality must complete an annual grant application by February 15 to receive funding
for that year. The application consists of a web-based report and a planning document provided
by the county. The web-based report asks for contract, program, tonnage, and financial
3
information. The participation rate for the curbside recycling program must also be included in
the web-based report. The municipality must calculate its participation rate during the month of
October. The methodology for measuring participation must be provided to the county upon
request. The planning document asks for a description of activities the city will implement to
increase recycling and make progress toward county objectives.
C. Use of Funds
The following requirements apply to the use of recycling funds:
1. All grant funds accepted from the county must be used for waste reduction and recycling
capital and operating expenses in the year granted. The county will not reimburse any
funds in excess of actual expenses.
2. A municipality or joint powers organization may not charge its residents through
property tax, utility fees, or any other method for the portion of its recycling program
costs that are funded by county grant funds.
3. Municipalities must establish a separate accounting mechanism, such as a project
number, activity number, or fund that will separate recycling revenues and expenditures
from other municipal activities, including solid waste and yard waste activities.
4. Recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues, and expenditures are subject to audit.
5. Municipalities that do not contract for curbside recycling services will receive grant funds
provided that at least 90% of the grant funds are credited back to residents and the city
meets all minimum program requirements. The additional 10% may be used for
municipal administrative and promotional expenses.
D. City Requirements
1. Materials Accepted
At a minimum, the following materials must be collected curbside:
• Metal food and beverage cans;
• Glass food and beverage containers;
• Cardboard boxes;
• Newspaper and inserts;
• Mail, office and school papers;
4
• Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes;
• Boxes from toothpaste, medications and other toiletries;
• Magazines and catalogs;
• Aseptic and gable-topped containers; and
• Plastic bottles and containers, #1 – Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET, PETE), #2 High
Density Polyethylene (HDPE), #4 – Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and #5 –
Polypropylene (PP) plastic bottles, except those that previously contained hazardous
materials or motor oil.
The county may add materials to this list and require municipalities to begin collection within
one year of receiving notification from the county. Municipalities will notify the county if
materials not found on this list will be collected.
2. Education and Outreach
The partnership between the county and municipalities has been highly effective in
educating residents and motivating behavior change. In order to continue this partnership
and increase these efforts, program activities of municipalities must be coordinated with
county and regional efforts. Municipalities must adhere to the following requirements:
a. Use county terminology when describing recycling guidelines, including the
description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation guidelines, and
promotional materials;
b. Use images provided by the county or the Solid Waste Management Coordinating
Board (SWMCB) if using images of recyclables;
c. Provide recycling information on the city’s website, including materials accepted and
not accepted, a recycling calendar, and links to county resources;
d. Mail a recycling guide to residents each year using a template developed jointly with
the county. The county will design and print the guide. If a municipality does not use
the template produced by the county, the municipality may develop its own guide at
the municipality’s expense, but it must be approved by the county. If the municipality
relies on the hauler to provide the recycling guide, this guide requires approval by
the county.
e. Complete two educational activities from a menu of options developed by the
county.
5
Any print material that communicates residential recycling guidelines that were not provided
by the county template will require county approval. This does not apply to waste reduction
and reuse, articles on recycling that do not include guidelines, or social media posts. The
county will respond within five business days to any communication piece submitted.
3. Recycling Performance
On an annual basis, municipal recycling programs must demonstrate that a reasonable effort
has been made to maintain and increase the pounds of recyclables per household collected
from their residential recycling programs.
If a municipality does not demonstrate measureable progress, a recycling improvement plan
must be submitted by the municipality within 90 days of being notified by the county. The
recycling improvement plan must be negotiated with the county and specify the efforts that
will be undertaken by the municipality to improve its recycling program to yield the results
necessary to achieve county objectives.
In cooperation with the county, the municipality may be required to participate in waste and
recycling sorts to identify recovery levels of various recyclables in its community. Based on
the results of the study, the county and municipality will collaborate to increase the recovery
of select recyclable materials being discarded in significant quantities.
E. Grant Payments
The county will make two equal payments to the municipality. One payment will be made after
the county receives the application, which consists of the web-based report and the planning
document. A second payment will be made after basic program requirements, education and
outreach requirements, and recycling performance have been confirmed and approved. If the
municipality meets the county requirements, both payments will be made during the same
calendar year. Funding will be withheld until the municipality meets the requirements of this
policy.
III. Organics Recycling
A. Allocation of Funds
The following formula will be utilized to determine a city’s organics recycling SCORE grant each
year:
6
Percent of SCORE funds allocated to curbside organics recycling:
2017 20%
2018 30%
2019 40%
2020 50%
City organics recycling grant calculation:
Number of households with
curbside organics in city
---------------------------------
Total number of households
with curbside organics in
county
x
Total SCORE
funds available for
organics
=
Organics grant
amount available
to the city
If the formula above results in cities receiving grants where the dollar amount per participating
household is greater than $25 per year, then a cap will apply. The funding cap per participating
household is $25 per year. The most the county will grant a city is $25 per participating
household per year. If funds are left over because of the cap, those funds will carry over into the
following year’s SCORE funds.
Eligible residential households are defined as single family through eight-plex residential
buildings or other residential buildings where the household is signed up for organics service
and the household sets out its own container with organics for curbside collection. The number
of eligible households will be determined by counting the number of eligible households on
September 1 of each funding year. The city will report the number in the application for funding.
B. Application for Funds
Each municipality must complete an annual application provided by the county by September 1
to receive funding. As a part of the application, a city must submit the number of households
signed up for and receiving curbside organics service.
C. Use of Funds
The grant funds may be used for program expenses, including the following:
• Discount to new customers
• Discount to existing customers
• Referral incentives
• City contract costs
7
• Education and outreach
• Compostable bags
• Kitchen containers
• Carts
Program administration is not an eligible expense. Yard waste expenses are not eligible. If
organics are co-collected with other waste, the organics expenses must be tracked separately. If
a city passes funds through to a hauler, 100% of those funds must be credited to residents’ bills.
In addition, the following requirements apply:
• All grant funds must be used during the term of the agreement. Funds not spent must be
returned to the county.
• Funds must be expended on eligible activities per Minnesota State Statute 115A.557.
• A municipality or joint powers organization may not charge its residents through
property tax, utility fees, or any other method for the portion of its organics program
costs that are funded by county grant funds.
• Municipalities must account for organics expenditures separately upon request by the
county. Expenditures are subject to audit.
D. Education and Outreach Requirements
The partnership between the county and municipalities has been highly effective in educating
residents and motivating behavior change. In order to continue this partnership and increase
these efforts, program activities of municipalities must be coordinated with county and regional
efforts. The following requirements apply:
1. Use county terminology when describing organics recycling guidelines, including the
description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation guidelines, and
promotional materials;
2. Use images provided by the county or the SWMCB if using images of organic materials;
3. Provide organics recycling information on the city’s website, including material accepted
and not accepted, service options, and links to county resources;
4. Work with the county to develop promotional resources to increase participation.
8
E. Reporting
A report on the city’s organics program must be submitted electronically to the county by
February 15 following each year. The report must include, but is not limited to, the following:
Basic Program Information
• Hauler(s)
• Collection method
• Where organics were delivered to and processed
• Is service opt-in or opt-out
• Cost of service to residents; contract cost for city
• How the service was billed
• Items included in service, such as curbside collection, cart, compostable bags, etc.
Results
• Tons
• Number of households signed up
• Average pounds per household per year
• Participation (set-out rate on pickup day)
• Program costs
• How funds were used
F. Grant Payment
The county will make one organics grant payment to a municipality each year. The payment will
be made after the county receives the application and confirms that the municipality meets the
requirements of this policy.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2021 AMENDMENT TO THE SCORE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield recognizes the environmental and economic
importance of improving responsible waste disposal and has undertaken several related
initiatives over the past few years, including establishing an organics drop-off program
and implementing a recycling system throughout Richfield’s parks;
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield annually receives Select Committee on
Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) funding from Hennepin County to apply
towards recycling education, administrative costs, and credits to residents;
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield desires to enter into an agreement with
Hennepin County to amend the existing SCORE policy and adopt the 2021 amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, that it approves the 2021 amendment to the SCORE policy and
directs the Mayor and City Manager to sign and execute the related amendment.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th Day of
October, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.B.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 118
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider the approval of Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnD O T) lease agreement No.
27710 Amendment #6 for continued use of excess land along I-494 next to the Best Buy Campus for a
Metro Transit Park and Ride parking lot and transit station.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The parcel of land along I -494 in front of the Best Buy Campus is currently leased to the City at no cost to be
used as a Park and Ride for Metro Transit. The existing two-year lease agreement expired at the end of
August. The amendment to the lease agreement permits the continued use of the MnD OT property for the
same uses as before for a period of two (2) years. The new agreement will become effective retroactively on
August 31, 2020.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve Minnesota Department of Transportation lease agreement No. 27710 Amendment
#6 for continued use of excess land along I-494 next to the Best Buy Campus for a Metro Transit Park
and Ride parking lot and transit station.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
On J anuary 13, 2004, City Council approved the original Commercial Lease Agreement No.
27710 for surplus land along I -494 adjacent to the Best Buy Campus.
The Lease Agreement has been renewed several times since 2004, typically in 2 year increments.
T his land amounting to almost 62,000 square feet combined with land purchased from the
Best Buy Company has been used as a parking lot by Best Buy, and a Park and Ride lot
and transit station by Metro Transit.
T he excess I-494 right-of-way covered by the agreement will only be used for surface
parking and a transit station until the land is needed for highway
reconstruction/expansion.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The lease agreement as amended continues to support Richfield's transit goals in the City
Comprehensive Plan by working with transit providers to enhance mass transit systems in the City.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The existing lease expired on August 31, 2020.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
Approval of the lease will have no impact on City finances.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the lease agreement and will be available for questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
MnD O T L ease 6 C over L etter C over Memo
L ease #6 C ontract/A greement
L ease A greement Graphic E xhibit
1500 W. County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
Commercial Lease Cover Letter Page 1 of 1 LS1004 9/2/2020
September 2, 2020
City of Richfield
Attn: Jack Broz, Transportation Engineer
Richfield City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Parcel: 2732 (5=111) 902 0017 Lease No.: 27710
County: Hennepin Property Use: Parking
Property
Address:
Near TH 494 and Penn
Ave., Richfield MN
Rent: $.00
Term: Two (2) Years
Dear Mr. Broz:
Enclosed is a copy of the Commercial Amendment #6 of Lease No. 27710 by and between the
State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) and City of Richfield for the above
referenced location.
Please be aware that there may be a construction project on TH 494 that looks to affect the
leased area in 2022.
After your review of the enclosed, please have the appropriate person(s), sign this lease, and
return a copy in a timely manner via email to me for final processing. In addition to forwarding the
Tenant-executed Lease, please forward a copy of the required Certificate of Insurance, as
required in Sections 10 and 11 of the Lease.
The lease from the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation is a legal document; if you
have any questions or request modifications to the lease, please contact me at 651-234-7550 or
email at katherine.roen@state.mn.us
Upon receipt of the above-mentioned items, a fully executed copy of the lease will be sent to you
for your records.
Sincerely,
Katherine Roen
Real Estate Aide
C: Acting R/W Supervisor– Becky Parzyck
Office of Finance – Jane Olson
Lease file
Commercial Amendment Page 1 of 3 LS1022 9/2/2020
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metro District
1500 W. County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
651-234-7550
PARCEL: 2732 (5=111) 902 0017 LEASE NO. 27710
AMENDMENT OF COMMERCIAL LEASE
No. 6
THIS AGREEMENT, is made by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of
Transportation ("Landlord") and City of Richfield ("Tenant"), and shall be an amendment and
addition to Lease No. 27710 (also known as Lease No. H-06048).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into Lease No. 27710, as amended ("Lease")
involving the rental of a commercial property;
WHEREAS, the parties deem certain amendments and additional terms and conditions
mutually beneficial for the effective continuation of said Lease; and
NOW THEREFOR, Landlord and Tenant agree to substitution and/or addition of the following
terms and conditions which shall become a part of the Lease No. 27710, effective as of the
date set forth hereinafter.
1. Effective on August 31, 2020, this Lease No. 27710 shall be renewed for a period of two
(2) years commencing on September 1, 2020 and continuing through August 31, 2022,
with the right of termination in both Landlord and Tenant as set forth in the Lease.
2. Effective on August 31, 2020, the following paragraph is added to Section 3 of the Lease:
Tenant at its sole cost and expense, agrees to comply with, and provide and maintain
the Premises in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances and regulations
issued by any federal, state or local political subdivision having jurisdiction and authority
in connection with the Premises including the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). If
the Premises are not in compliance with the ADA or other applicable laws Landlord may
enter the Premises and perform such obligation without liability to Tenant for any loss or
damage to Tenant thereby incurred, and Tenant shall pay Landlord for the cost thereof,
plus 10% of such cost for overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of
Landlord’s invoice.
Commercial Amendment Page 2 of 3 LS1022 9/2/2020
3. Effective on August 31, 2020, the following paragraph is added as a second paragraph
to Section 7 of the Lease:
Tenant hereby voluntarily releases and waives any and all claims and causes of action
for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation arising from or related to
any cancellation or termination of this Lease by Landlord, including any cancellation or
termination for highway purposes (as determined solely by the Landlord). Tenant
agrees that it will not make or assert any claims for damages, costs, expenses, losses,
fees and compensation based upon the existence, cancellation or termination of the
Lease. Tenant agrees not to sue or institute any legal action against Landlord based
upon any of the claims released in this paragraph.
4. Effective on August 31, 2020, Section 14 of the Lease is deleted in its entirety and the
following Section 14 is substituted therefor:
14. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. The Tenant for itself, successors in interest, and assigns, as
a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that in the event
improvements are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Premises
described in this Lease for a purpose for which a Landlord activity, facility, or program
is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or
benefits, the Tenant will maintain and operate such improvements in compliance with
all requirements imposed by the Acts and Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in
federally-assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), (as may be amended) such that no person on the
grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income-level, or Limited
English Proficiency (LEP) will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of,
or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said improvements.
5. The terms of the original Lease and its amendment(s) are expressly reaffirmed and
remain in full force and effect. By this reference the original Lease and its amendment(s)
are attached and incorporated into this agreement.
Commercial Amendment Page 3 of 3 LS1022 9/2/2020
TENANT
City of Richfield
Signature
Print Name
Title Date
LANDLORD, STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By
Lynn P. Clarkowski, P.E.
Metro Program Delivery Engineer
Date
Approved as to form and execution
OFFICE OF CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
By
Title
Date
1111 i
1 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF RICHFIELD LEASE EXHIBIT
1 INCH 120 FEET
I
I I I
N j
77TH ST W 1
v r I
IH y 1
I I j
c
1 M o I
Z 1 1
IV
I Itz140i
L i i
N
l
V1p
I c
O
2 1 I I I3AiN w ItO
T 1 I z I o 1R3
1 36 1
ji4
2
718
49
i B 1 O I FUTURE RACE Mn DOT R W CD I O
o g 45 24 59 11 Ino
m H220 26 96 a r
7 Il6894104Eyinom1251018090
v
0 o
y Z
O I 90
I
VU
7
189 94 I o
S89 41 04 E
V
585 28 S3 E 7fi T 04W
74 44 s X888 29 251E 588 9 2 E
r
o
P1 t J 4 6 16 I3 R 2322 83 1 2S s5 m
N N7 01 39 T i 9 15 V
rn
60 1 b
7T 19 i 3j0 S3
L N J N89 15 19 E i I NOV 19 19 E tar
N89 21 4011 li c l6 OF II N SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT Cam 140 4vFaee0TLGpEFGIQI1PPmeSDzert pwqsfsr01p
O
I a 78 K
1 l
T 4 o No Q SOUTH LINE OF m iiz LP
1 mO
S Q
911 N 2 I I NO R L 18321
moo TRE 2T cg f
y i 50 00 1 OJTLOT B
A
Oin
155 20 r w
t
u I cc V I ti gi 84 S23 4015
1
t014 588 26 20 W132Ba14
7Jjp59SM
5t4
I 1 a 4 s1 POZ4oIi1N
1 N 2
CITY OF R I
s UDC Y O
OF
R
RICHFIELD
C
F I E L
R N L1A l I j 1 C n1 c vwr Ct A N m n T m mT C m V
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
r901735895925W
I
i
WAS SHOWN ON BEST BUY CAMPUS PLAT
EXHIBIT
AREA SHOWN IN RED CR055 HATCHING REPRESENTS MNODT PERMANENT RIR AREA LEASED TO CITY FOR PAHK84G PURPOSES
A
REFER TO BEST BUY CAMPUS PLAT BY SLIME LAND SURVEYING LLC 1shaaf 3 of 41 FOR DIMENSIONS
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.C.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 119
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice
10/8/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/8/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety (O T S) funds
for an extension on an original four-year grant to fully fund an officer dedicated for D W I enforcement in
Richfield.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTS A) is providing federal funding to the OTS to
implement a program to support one full time officer solely for D W I enforcement. Eight counties, including
Hennepin, were chosen to receive grant funding. The grant is administered through the OTS. The grant
was guaranteed for four years, but will be written for an additional federal fiscal year at a time. The City of
Richfield has received an additional extension and has been awarded $96,852.49 for 2021.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt a resolution allowing the Richfield Department of Public Safety to accept a grant
from the Office of Traffic Safety (O T S) for an extension on an original four-year grant to fully fund an
officer dedicated for D W I enforcement in Richfield.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The average number of D W I arrests per year in Richfield is 176. The goal is to increase that
to 200 D W I arrests per year.
I n 2016, Richfield had 26 alcohol related crashes.
I n 2017, Richfield had 30 alcohol related crashes.
I n 2018, Richfield had 21 alcohol related crashes.
From October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018, there were 20 D W I crashes, which is the fiscal
year for State of Minnesota agencies.
Minnesota Motor Vehicle Crash Facts data show that the hours between 5:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m.
as having the highest concentration of alcohol related crashes. The D W I officer's work shift will be
from 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. with a minimum of two Fridays and two Saturdays per month to be a
required part of the D W I officer's schedule. Statistics will be checked daily, including but not
limited to: speed tickets, seat belt tickets, texting tickets, "Not a Drop" tickets and warnings
associated with these statistics. Proactive criminal interdiction patrol would also be implemented.
The City of Richfield has been approved to receive $96,852.49 from the D W I Officer grant for
2021.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Public Safety does not accept financial support unless it is designated for a specific program that
will affect the department as a whole.
The grant money will be used by Public Safety to pay for one full-time police officer salary;
including overtime and/or training.
Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires that every acceptance of a grant or devise of real or
personal property on terms prescribed by the donor be made by resolution of more than
two-thirds majority of the City Council.
The Administrative Services Department issued a memo on November 9, 2004, requiring
that all grants and restricted donations to departments be received by resolution and by a
two-thirds majority of the City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statute 465.03.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The total length of the grant was for four years, however, grants will be written for one federal fiscal year
at a time and the City of Richfield has received an extension on an original four-year grant to fully fund
an officer.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
Federal guidelines require this money be spent on projects designed to reduce D W I incidents.
Both the officer and majority of the equipment funded by the grant can only be used for the
enforcement of laws prohibiting driving while impaired. I f the D W I officer responds to, or is called
to an incident for something other than an alcohol-related driving offense, the time spent on non-
D W I related enforcement exceeding 15 successive minutes must be paid for by the agency. The
vehicle will be assigned to and driven solely by the D W I officer.
The Richfield Department of Public Safety has developed a work plan and budget that have been
approved by the OTS.
The grant will cover one full-time sworn officer, and fringe benefits are covered by the grant. The
Richfield Department of Public Safety has funds budgeted for items not covered by the grant.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
There are no legal considerations.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Council could disapprove the acceptance of the grant but the Richfield Department of Public Safety would
then not be able to dedicate an officer to D W I enforcement.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
A greement C ontract/A greement
Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/POLICE TO
ACCEPT GRANT MONIES FROM THE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$76,919.89 OR A LESSER AMOUNT, AS AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY, TO FUND A POLICE OFFICER DEDICATED TO DWI ENFORCEMENT.
WHEREAS, Richfield Police Department has been approved by the Office of Traffic
Safety (OTS) to receive funds made available to eight Counties in the State of Minnesota
through federal funding provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA); and
WHEREAS, Richfield is scheduled to be awarded $96,852.49 or a lesser amount as
awarded by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety to be used as designated by the grant
agreement which mandates that the funds be used to support one full time officer dedicated to
DWI enforcement for an extension of the original term of four years; and,
WHEREAS, Richfield has agreed that the Minnesota Department of Public Safety will
serve as the fiscal agent; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the agreement, squad operating costs per mile,
maintenance, uniforms, weapons and time spent in excess of 15 minutes on non-DWI related
calls will be covered by the Richfield Police Department; and,
WHEREAS, Richfield Police has established an approved budget with the OTS for
$96,852.49 or a lessor amount for the DWI enforcement program; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield, Public Safety
Department enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, for
traffic safety enforcement projects during the period from October 1, 2020 to September 30,
2021.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of October,
2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.D.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 120
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider the approval of Amendment #1 to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement with
Chamberlain Apartments, L LC that modifies indemnification provisions in the agreement for the
apartments constructed at 6630, 6700, and 6701 Richfield Parkway.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Amendment #1:
The Developer is working on closing their U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) loan
on The Chamberlain Apartments. After a HUD review of the Maintenance Agreement between the City of
Richfield and the Chamberlain Apartments, HUD will require an amendment regarding the indemnification
provisions in section 7 of the original agreement.
Currently the agreement contains indemnification provisions that HUD needs to see limited to surplus cash of
the borrower and to have HUD carved out of any liability should HUD become a successor in interest to the
borrower.
Original Maintenance Agree me nt:
The properties at 6630, 6700, and 6701 Richfield Parkway were redeveloped to construct three multi-unit
apartment buildings. The construction includes site improvements on both public and private property.
I n J anuary 2020 the City worked with the Developer to draft a Construction and Maintenance
Agreement that defines ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the site and boulevard
improvements constructed during the redevelopment project. T hese improvements and
responsibilities include:
Sidewalk and Sidewalk Snow Removal
Landscaping and I rrigation
Boulevard Trees
Street and Sidewalk Lighting
Storm water Control Devices
I nfiltration Basins
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Approve Amendment #1 to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement with Chamberlain
Apartments, LL C that modifies indemnification provisions in the agreement for the apartments
constructed at 6630, 6700, and 6701 Richfield Parkway.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
See executive summary.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City requires a Construction and Maintenance Agreement for redevelopment projects containing
boulevard improvements and/or storm water treatment structures.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
I n order for the Developer to move forward with closing their HUD loan both parties to the agreement
must agree to the indemnification provision changes as requested by HUD.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
None.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the amendment to the agreement.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Maintenance A greement A mendment #1 C ontract/A greement
Original Maintenance A greement C ontract/A greement
1
[Space Above this Line for Recording Office Use Only]
FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made as of the _____ day of ___________, 2020, by and
between Chamberlain Apartments, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”) and
the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”).
RECITALS
A. Developer and the City are parties to that certain Maintenance Agreement dated
January 15, 2020 and recorded February 27, 2020 as Document No. T05688777 in the office of
the Registrar of Titles and as Document No. A10760163 in the office of the County Recorder in
and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Maintenance Agreement”).
B. Developer is the owner of the real property subject to the terms of the Maintenance
Agreement, legally described on attached Exhibit A (the “Property”).
C. Developer and the City desire to modify the Maintenance Agreement, as more fully
described below.
PROVISIONS
1. The parties hereby amend the Maintenance Agreement by adding the following
language to Section 7 of the Maintenance Agreement:
n. HUD Requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") is ever deemed
the "Owner" of all or part of the property described on Exhibit “A”, HUD
shall not be subject to the indemnification provisions contained in Section
7(b) of the Maintenance Agreement, dated January 15, 2020, between
Chamberlain Apartments, LLC and the City of Richfield, Minnesota.
HUD prohibits and does not authorize any expenditure which would
violate 31 USC 1341 (the "Anti-Deficiency Act"). Any provision of this
2
Agreement which violate(s)(d) the Anti-Deficiency Act, in the past,
present or future, will not be enforced against HUD. Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Agreement, HUD whether in the capacity of
subsidy provider, loan insurer, lender, owner, lessee or mortgagee in
possession, shall have no obligation of reimbursement, indemnity, or
holding harmless, of any nature whatsoever, to any governmental entity,
private entity, person or party, either now or in the future. Additionally,
any indemnification obligation of “Owner” shall be limited to available
liability insurance proceeds, Surplus Cash and/or non-Project Assets, as
each such term is defined in the Regulatory Agreement for Multifamily
Projects by and between Owner and HUD.
The City acknowledges that the Developer or “Owner” has previously
pledged Surplus Cash to a Developer Surplus Cash Note, dated June 18,
2018 in the amount of $682,850, provided by the Developer in exchange
for a loan of $682,850 from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota. 75% of Developer’s Surplus
Cash is pledged to the payment of the Developer Surplus Cash Note,
commencing August 1, 2025 and payable each February 1 and August 1
thereafter until paid in full.
2. No Further Amendment. Except as specifically amended herein, the Maintenance
Agreement and all of the terms and provisions thereof shall remain unchanged and in full force and
effect.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
3
IN WITNESS, the undersigned have caused this First Amendment to Maintenance
Agreement to be executed as of the day and year set forth above.
CHAMBERLAIN APARTMENTS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company
By Kraus-Anderson, Incorporated, its Managing
Member
By:
Name: Peter J. Diessner
Its: President
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of
, 2020, by Peter J. Diessner, the President of Kraus-Anderson, Incorporated, the
Managing Member of Chamberlain Apartments, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on
behalf of the limited liability company.
Notary Public
4
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
By
Name:
Its: Mayor
By
Name:
Its: City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2020, by
, and , the Mayor
and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
This instrument was drafted by:
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. (MSR/LML)
200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
71026034 v1
5
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Property
All of Wexlers Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in
the Office of the County Recorder as Document No. 10568097, filed on July 3, 2018, and of
record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles as Document No. 5541858, filed on July 3, 2018,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.E.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 121
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
10/6/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing Amendment #2 to the partnership agreement
between the City of Richfield and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnD O T) for the
purchase/storage of salt through June 30, 2022.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Original Agreement Background:
The City of Richfield currently does not own/operate a salt storage facility and the most recent salt purchasing
agreement with MnD OT was authorized at the J uly 24th, 2018 regular C ity Council meeting. Entering into
these types of partnerships has allowed the City to:
build a Public Works Maintenance Facility without a large salt storage area;
show consideration for the public interest by looking for more effic ient, c ost effec tive, and
environmentally conscious ways of providing services; and
reduce potential for unnecessary pollution problems by avoiding redundant facilities.
The original contract requires a formal amendment to the agreement be adopted by the C ity Council if a 3%
increase in the per-ton cost of salt is expected in any given year of the contract.
Amendment #1 Background:
The City of Ric hfield adopted amendment #1 to the original agreement in September 2019 that provided for
the following increases in per-ton salt prices:
26.23% increase in F Y 2020;
3% increase in F Y 2021; and
3% increase in F Y 2022.
Amendment #2:
Rate Changes: Amendment #2 as proposed modifies the per-ton salt rate schedule adopted in Amendment
#1 in the following manner:
26.23% increase in F Y 2020 (unchanged from Amendment #1);
(8.69%) decrease in F Y 2021;
3% increase in F Y 2022.
Since the MnD OT contract is based off a 1,500-ton purc hase of salt(*), the new per-ton salt rate would result
in a net savings of $34,137 to the C ity of Ric hfield over the term of the contract when compared to the rates
adopted in Amendment #1.
(*) Public W orks usually purchases around 1,000-ton of salt on average, but this i s highl y vari able
given our Mi nnesota winters, therefore actual savings are impossibl e to predi ct.
Loading Changes: Amendment #2 also clarifies salt loading and storage expectations for the City of
Richfield: "Salt picked up at Cedar Avenue Truck Station will not be returned or refund requested. City will
fill their salt shed with salt picked up from Cedar Avenue Truck Station at beginning of season and only
request more salt when necessary to refill city salt shed. City will avoid numerous pickups of small
amounts of salt."
Public Works has the capacity to store around 200 tons of of salt on site at the Maintenance Facility. W hile
these new loading and storage requirements are not ideal from the City's perspective, they are manageable
and will have no impact to service delivery.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt the resolution authorizing Amendment #2 to the partnership agreement between the
City of Richfield and MnD O T for the purchase/storage of salt through June 30, 2022.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The City of Richfield does not have an adequate salt storage facility for yearly ice control
operations and can only keep 200 tons on site, therefore, we rely on salt storage services from
MnD OT's Cedar Ave Truck Station.
MnDOT 's proximity to the Maintenance Facility is ideal for City of Richfield ice control
operations.
Sharing salt storage facilities as much as possible reduces the potential for unnecessary chloride
pollution problems resulting from duplicate facilities.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City participates in a joint purchasing agreement with the State of Minnesota and MnD OT.
T he State of Minnesota solicits bids for all the participants in the joint purchase
agreement.
T he original contract #1030429 requires a formal amendment be approved by the City
Council if yearly salt costs are expected to rise more than the estimated 3%.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The City of Richfield does not have adequate salt storage at the Public W orks Maintenance Facility for
an entire season worth of salt and requires this amendment to the original agreement to acquire salt for
ice control operations.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
Salt costs include the price of salt plus material handling fees and MnD OT administrative charges.
The cost of salt for 2021 including the material handling fee and administrative costs is expected to
decrease by (8.69%) from $143,879.62 in 2020 to $131,379.68 in 2021, with a 3% expected
increase for 2022 thereafter; and
The above dollar amounts are assuming the total of 1500-ton is applied/purchased during a snow
season.
Salt application/purchases do fluctuate each season, sometimes dramatically depending on the
number of snow and ice events.
Funding for salt is included in the annual Street Division operating budget.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
T he City Attorney has reviewed this agreement.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
A mendment #2 Resolution Resolution L etter
A mendment #1 to C ontract 1030429 C ontract/A greement
MnD O T S alt A mendment #2 C ontract/A greement
Original A greement #1030429 E xhibit
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO ENTER INTO
AMENDMENT #2 TO MNDOT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NO. 1030429 WITH THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
PURCHASE/STORAGE OF SALT UNTIL JUNE 30, 2022
WHEREAS, the Public Works Maintenance Facility has limited space for salt
storage; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Cedar Avenue Truck
Station is conveniently located next to the City of Richfield Maintenance Facility and has
adequate storage space for both agencies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield authorized MnDOT
Partnership Agreement No. 1030429 at the July 24, 2018 regular City Council meeting;
and
WHEREAS, the original contract provides that if the actual cost of the salt,
including material handling fee and administrative costs, exceeds the estimated 3%
annual increase, an amendment must be done; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield authorized Amendment #1 to
MnDOT Partnership Agreement No. 1030429 at the September 10, 2019 regular City
Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, the original contract provides that any amendment to the agreement
must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by
the same parties, or their successors in office, who executed the original agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the cost of salt for 2021 including the material handling fee and
administrative costs is expected to decrease by (8.69%) from $143,879.62 in 2020 to
$131,379.68 in 2021, with a 3% expected increase for 2022 thereafter; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment requires the City to store as much salt as
possible on site in an effort to minimize salt pick-up or drop-off at the Cedar Avenue
Truck Station.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Richfield hereby authorizes the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into Amendment
#2 to Partnership Agreement No. 1030429 between the City of Richfield and the
Minnesota Department of Transportation for purchase/storage of salt until June 30,
2022.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of
October, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
MnDOT Contract #: 1030429
Amendment Form 1
Updated 06/28/2018
AMENDMENT # 01 TO MnDOT Partnership Agreement #: 1030429
Contract Start Date: 09/14/2018 Original Contract Amount: $476,845.36
Orig. Contract Exp. Date: 06/30/2022 Prev. Amendment(s) Total: $0.00
Amended Exp. Date : 06/30/2022 Current Amendment Amount: $81,851.09
Current Contract Total: $558,696.45
Project Identification: Supply Road Salt for Winter Season of 2019-2022
State Project (SP): NA Trunk Highway #: NA
Federal Project # : NA
This amendment is by and between the State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation (“State”) and
City of Richfield (City of Richfield).
Recitals
1. The State has a contract with the City of Richfield identified as MnDOT Contract No. 1030429 (“Original Contract”) to
provide road salt to the City of Richfield for the winter seasons of 2019 through 2022.
2. The State and the City of Richfield are willing to amend the Original Contract as stated below.
Contract Amendment
In this Amendment deleted contract terms will be struck out and the added contract terms will be underlined.
REVISION 1. Sub-article 1.3. “Exhibits” is amended as follows:
1.3 Exhibits. Exhibit A A-1 is attached and incorporated into this agreement.
REVISION 2. Sub-article 3.2. “Terms of Payment”, is deleted and replaced in its entirety.
3.2 The estimated total cost of road salt, including Material Handling fee and administrative costs, for FY
2019-2022 is shown in the table below and itemized in attached Exhibit A-1.
Estimated Cost FY 2019 Increase % Increase $ $113,978.94
FY 2020 plus 26.233% $29,900.08 $143,879.62
FY 2021 plus 3.0% $4,316.37 $148,196.01
FY 2022 plus 3.0% $4,445.86 $152,641.89
Total Estimated Cost of Contract $558,696.45
The terms of the Original Contract are expressly reaffirmed and are incorporated by reference. Except as amended
herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Contract and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect.
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK]
MnDOT Contract #: 1029439
2
CITY OF RICHFIELD
The City of Richfield certifies that the appropriate
person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the
City of Richfield as required by applicable articles,
bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Title:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
Date:
MnDOT Contract #: 1030429
Amendment Form 1
Updated 06/28/2018
AMENDMENT # 02 TO MnDOT Partnership Agreement #: 1030429
Contract Start Date: 09/14/2018 Original Contract Amount: $476,845.36
Orig. Contract Exp. Date: 06/30/2022 Prev. Amendment(s) Total: $81,851.09
Amended Exp. Date : 06/30/2022 Current Amendment Amount: ($34,137.14)
Current Contract Total: $524,559.31
Project Identification: City of Richfield - Supply Road Salt for Winter Season of 2019-2022
This amendment is by and between the State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation (“State”) and
City of Richfield (City of Richfield).
Recitals
1. The State has a contract with the City of Richfield identified as MnDOT Contract No. 1030429 (“Original Contract”) to
provide road salt to the City of Richfield for the winter seasons of 2019 through 2022.
2. The State and the City of Richfield are willing to amend the Original Contract as stated below.
Contract Amendment
In this Amendment deleted contract terms will be struck out and the added contract terms will be underlined.
REVISION 1. Sub-article 1.3. “Exhibits” is amended as follows:
1.3 Exhibits. Exhibit A-1 A-2 is attached and incorporated into this agreement.
REVISION 2. Sub-article 3.2. “Terms of Payment”, is deleted and replaced in its entirety as follows:
3.2 The estimated total cost of road salt, including Material Handling fee and administrative costs, for FY
2019-2022 is shown in the table below and itemized in attached Exhibit A-2.
Estimated Cost FY 2019 Increase % Increase $ $113,978.94
FY 2020 plus 26.233% $29,900.08 $143,879.62
FY 2021 plus -8.69% $4,316.37 $131,379.68
FY 2022 plus 3.0% $4,445.86 $135,321.07
Total Estimated Cost of Contract $524,559.31
REVISION 3. Articles 2.2.5 and 2.2.6 are added to the contract as follows:
2.2.5 Salt picked up at Cedar Avenue Truck Station will not be returned or refund requested.
2.2.6 City will fill their salt shed with salt picked up from Cedar Avenue Truck Station at beginning of season
and only request more salt when necessary to refill city salt shed. City will avoid numerous pickups of
small amounts of salt.
The terms of the Original Contract are expressly reaffirmed and are incorporated by reference. Except as amended
herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Contract and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect.
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK]
MnDOT Contract #: 1029439
2
CITY OF RICHFIELD
The City of Richfield certifies that the appropriate
person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the
City of Richfield as required by applicable articles,
bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Title:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
Date:
Exhibit A-2
Estimated Cost for 2019/2022 Snow Seasons
MnDOT Contract: 1030429
Article 2 Partnership Proposal Reference
FY19 Materials and Supplies (Inventory) Unit Rate Total
Materials/
Supplies
Total Cost
Salt 1500 $67.68 $101,520.00 12.18%12,365.14$ $ 113,885.14
$0.00 -$ -$
Total Materials and Supplies $0.00 113,885.14$
FY20 Materials and Supplies (Inventory) Unit Rate Total
Materials/
Supplies
Total Cost
Salt 1500 $80.68 $121,020.00 18.79%22,739.66$ $ 143,759.66
$0.00 -$ -$
Total Materials and Supplies $0.00 143,759.66$
FY21 Materials and Supplies (Inventory) Unit Rate Total
Materials/
Supplies
Total Cost
Salt 1500 $71.41 $107,115.00 22.54%24,143.72$ $ 131,258.72
$0.00 -$ -$
Total Materials and Supplies $0.00 131,258.72$
Costs of Salaries
FY19 Employee -Job Class Per Hour *1Rate *2 Basic Fringe Rate
**Labor Additive
Percent Labor Additive $
Total
Rate $Hours
Total Cost of
Salaries
Salaries
Total Cost
1 Office & Adminstrative Specialist 20.62 $10.33 25.01%7.74$ 38.69$ 2.00 $77.38 21.22%$16.42 $93.80
1 Overtime $0.00 $0.00
1 Overtime X2 - Sundays and Holidays $0.00 $0.00
1 Total Cost of Salaries $77.38 $16.42 $93.80
FY20 Employee -Job Class Per Hour *1Rate *2 Basic Fringe Rate
**Labor Additive
Percent Labor Additive $
Total
Rate $Hours
Total Cost of
Salaries
Salaries
Total Cost
1 Office & Adminstrative Specialist 21.08 $10.33 25.64%8.05$ 39.46$ 2.50 $98.66 21.59%$21.30 $119.96
1 Overtime $0.00 $0.00
1 Overtime X2 - Sundays and Holidays $0.00 $0.00
Total Cost of Salaries $98.66 $21.30 $119.96
FY21 Employee -Job Class Per Hour *1Rate *2 Basic Fringe Rate
**Labor Additive
Percent Labor Additive $
Total
Rate $Hours
Total Cost of
Salaries
Salaries
Total Cost
1 Office & Adminstrative Specialist 21.61 $10.33 22.93%7.32$ 39.26$ 2.50 $98.16 23.23%$22.80 $120.96
1 Overtime $0.00 $0.00
1 Overtime X2 - Sundays and Holidays $0.00 $0.00
Total Cost of Salaries $98.16 $22.80 $120.96
Fringe and Labor Additive are not charged against overtime hours
Fringe and Labor Additive are not charged against overtime hours
****Maintenance/
Billing Overhead
Percent Cost
***Material Handling Fee
Percent Cost
****Maintenance/
Billing Overhead
Fringe and Labor Additive are not charged against overtime hours
M/BO not charged to
inventory.
***Material Handling Fee
Percent Cost
****Maintenance/
Billing Overhead
Percent Cost
M/BO not charged to
inventory.
***Material Handling Fee
Percent Cost
****Maintenance/
Billing Overhead
Percent Cost
M/BO not charged to
inventory.
Page 1 of 2
CM Rev.09/18/2017
Exhibit A-2
Estimated Cost for 2019/2022 Snow Seasons
MnDOT Contract: 1030429
Total Contract $131,379.68
Four year agreement with est. 3% annual increase see Table below.
Boxes in Total Estimated agreement $524,559.31
Boxes in are notes.Cost per FY
Total Cost of Contract FY 2019 Increase %Increase $$113,978.94
FY 2020 plus 26.234%$29,900.68 $143,879.62
FY 2021 plus 3.0%$4,316.39 $148,196.01
FY 2022 plus 3.0%$4,445.88 $152,641.89
Total Cost of Contract $558,696.45
Cost per FY
Total Cost of Contract FY 2019 Increase %Increase $$113,978.94
FY 2020 plus 26.234%$29,900.68 $143,879.62
FY 2021 plus -8.7%-$12,499.94 $131,379.68
FY 2022 plus 3.0%$3,941.39 $135,321.07
Total Cost of Contract $524,559.31
****Maintenance/Billing Overhead is composed of indirect costs related to conducting maintenance operations. It is applied to labor, labor additive,
are input boxes.
Rates/Addititives are established each year by the Office of
Financial Management. Find the current rates by going to the
Managerial Accounting page of the Financial Management
*1 Hourly Rate = the hourly rate of the employee plus fringe. Fringe = the cost of group insurance, social security and retirement. Each employee's fringe
** Labor Additive is applied to cover benefits that are not directly distributed to labor hours such as sick leave, vacation, holiday pay and worker and
***Material Handling is applied to cover the costs associated with handling inventoried items. It is applied to all items issued from MnDOT inventory
Page 2 of 2
CM Rev.09/18/2017
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
MnDOT Contract #1030429
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATON
AND
CITY OF RICHFIELD
FOR
SUPPLY ROAD SALT FOR WINTER SEASON OF FY 2019-2022
This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota Acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State")
and the City of Richfield ("City of Richfield") located at: 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423
Recitals
1. Under Minnesota Statutes Section 174.02, subdivision 6, the Commissioner of Transportation may enter
into agreements with governmental or nongovernmental entities for research and experimentation, for
sharing facilities, equipment, staff, or other means of providing transportation-related services; or for
other cooperative programs that promote efficiencies in providing governmental services or that further
the development of innovation in transportation for the benefit of the citizens of Minnesota; and
2. The parties wish to cooperatively provide road salt; and,
3. Both parties are willing to enter this Agreement to set forth their respective rights and duties.
Agreement
1. Term of Agreement; Exhibits
1.1 Effective date. This Agreement will be effective upon execution and approval by the appropriate
State and City of Richfield officials pursuant to Minnesota law.
1.2 Expiration date. This Agreement will expire on June 30, 2022, unless terminated earlier
pursuant to Article 10.
1.3 Exhibits. Exhibit A is attached and incorporated into this agreement.
2. Scope of Work and Responsibilities of Each Party.
The State will provide to the City of Richfield up to 1,500 tons of road salt (sodium chloride) per Fiscal
Year (July 1-June 30) from FY 2019-2022. The City of Richfield will be charged the per-ton price plus
shipping costs, a MnDOT Material Handling, and an administrative cost. The Material Handling Rates
change each fiscal year. The Material Handling Rate for Fiscal Year 2019 is 12.18%. The administrative
cost is .25 hours (plus normal and customary additives/rates) added each time the picked up salt is
logged in MnDOT's inventory system. In Exhibit A this cost is estimated to be $93.80 for FY 2019 and is
subject to change each fiscal year.
2.1.State responsibilities. State will:
2.1.1 Provide up to 1,500 tons of road salt. Load salt.
2.1.2 Maintain and log records of salt picked up by City of Richfield in MnDOT's inventory
system.
a) Records will be validated by both the City of Richfield and the State at pickup.
b) Logging the inventory items will include an administrative cost for inputting the
inventory charges of approximately .25 hours per pickup.
2.1.3 Invoice the City of Richfield for salt on the first working day of the month following
pickup.
1
Partnership Agreement Rev. 08/24/2017
MnDOT Contract # 1030429
2.2 The City of Richfield responsibilities. City of Richfield will:
2.2.1 Pick up salt at Cedar Avenue truck stations.
2.2.2 Arrange for hauling of road salt from the Cedar Avenue truck station.
2.2.3 Maintain records of salt picked up.
2.2.4 Promptly pay the State the invoiced amount.
3. Terms of Payment
3.1 State will invoice the City of Richfield on a monthly basis for the actual cost of salt picked up,
Material Hand!ingfee, and administrative costfortheterm ofthis contract.
3.2 The estimated total cost of road salt, including Material Handling fee and administrative costs,
for FY 2019-2022 is shown in the table below and itemized in attached Exhibit A.
Estimated Cost FY 2019 Increase % Increase $ $113,978.94
FY 2020 plus 3.0% $3,419.37 $117,398.31
FY 2021 plus 3.0% $3,521.95 $120,920.25
FY 2022 plus 3.0% $3,627.61 $124,547.86
Total Estimated Cost of Contract $476,845.36
3.3 If the actual cost of the salt, including Material Handling fee and administrative costs, exceeds
the estimated 3% annual increase, as itemized in Exhibit A, an amendment will be done.
3.4 The City of Richfield will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of Transportation.
IMPORTANT NOTE: PAYMENT MUST REFERENCE THE "MNDOT CONTRACT NUMBER" SHOWN
BELOW AND AT THE TOP OF THIS CONTRACT. Remit payment to the address below:
MnDOT
Attn: Cash Accounting
RE: MnDOT Contract Number 1030429
Mail Stop 215
395 John Ireland Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
4. Authorized Representatives
4.1 Each party's Authorized Representative is responsible for administering this Agreement and is
authorized to give and receive any notice required or permitted under this Agreement.
4.2 State's Authorized Representative is
Name:Jay Emerson or successor
Title:South Region TOS 4
MnDOT -Metro District--Maintenance
Street Address:1500 County Road B2, MS 050
City State Zip:Roseville, MN 55113
Telephone:651-234-7907
Email:Jay.emerson@state.mn.us
4.3 City of Richfield 's Authorized Representative is:
Name:Chris Link, or successor
Title:Operations Superintendent
Local Gov't:City of Richfield
Billing Address:6700 Portland Avenue South
City State Zip:Richfield, MN 55423
2
Partnership Agreement Rev.08/24/2017
MnDOT Contract # 1030429
Street Address:6700 Portland Avenue South
City State Zip Richfield, MN 55423
Telephone:612-861-9174
Email:clink@cityofrichfield.org
5. Liability
4.4 Each party is solely responsible for its own acts or omissions associated with the tasks and
deliverables covered by this Agreement. The liability of the State is governed by Minn. Stat.
§3.736 and other applicable law. The liability of the City of Richfield is governed by Minn. Stat.
Chapter 466 and other applicable law.
5. Audit: Under Minnesota Statutes §16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents and accounting
procedures and practices of the City of Richfield relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination
by State and the Legislative Auditor for a minimum of six years.
6. Jurisdiction and Venue: Minnesota Law governs the validity, interpretation and enforcement of this
Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this agreement, or its breach, must be in
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
7. Government Data Practices:
The parties must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it
applies to all data provided by under this agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected,
received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the parties under this agreement. The civil
remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either of the
parties.
8. Assignment and Amendments
8.1 Assignment. Neither party may assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this
Agreement without the prior consent of the other party and a fully executed Assignment
Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this
Agreement, or their successors in office.
8.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective
until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed this original
Agreement, or their successors in office.
9. Waiver; Contract Complete
9.1 Waiver. If a partyfailsto enforce any provision of this contractthatfailure does notwaivethe
provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it.
9.2 Contract Complete. This contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the parties.
No other understanding regarding this contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind
either party.
10. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party, with or without cause, upon 30 days
written notice to the other party. The City of Richfield will pay the State for any costs incurred under the
Agreement prior to the date of termination.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.]
3
Partnership Agreement Rev.08/24/20 17
MnDOT Contract # 1030429
CITY OF RICHFIELD
The City of Richfield certifies that the
appropriate person(s) have executed the
contract on behalf of the City of Richfield as
required by applicable articles, bylaws,
resolutions or ordinances.
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Title:
Date
By:
Title:
Date
By:
Title:
Date
By:
Date
AssItant c)1missioner or
Assistant Division Director
COMMISSIONER OFISTRATION
4
Partnership Agreement Rev.08/24/2017
Exhibit A
Estimated Cost fbr 2019/2022 Snow
MssDOT Contract 1030429
Article 3 Partnership Agreement Reference
Total
$101,520.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2. Material Handling Rate
Percent Cost
12.10% $12,365.14
$
3. Marnlenmsce/
Billing Overhead
Percent Cost
Materints/
Supplies
Total Cost
$113,005.14
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Materials and Supplies (Inventory)
Salt
Unit/Toss 1. Rate
500 567.68
M/oOnct ctrrstrd 0 iovrsrcry.
$0.00 $113,085.14 Total Materials and Supplies
Costs of Salanes
6. Basic Fringe Rate
$10.33
7. Labor
Additive Total Total Cost of
Percent Labor Additive $Rate $Honrs Salaries Percent
25.01% $7.74 $30,69 2.00 $77.30 21.22%
Fringe and Labor Additive urn not chargod against ovnlimrtsoars
Employee -Job Claus
1 4. Office & Adrninstrative Specialist
I Overtime
I Overtime X2 - Sundays and Holidays
Total Cost of Salaries
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$77.30
$77.30
Salaries
Cost Total Cost
$16.42 $93.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$16.42 $93.00
$16.42 893.00
5.Hourtv Rate
$20.62
Total Contract $113,978.94
Boxes in are input boxes.
Boxes in are notes.
Four year agreement with est. 3% annual increase see Table below.
Estimated Cost FY 2019
FY 2020 plus
FY 2021 plus
FY 2022 plus
Total Estimated Cost of Contract
Increase %Increase $
'3.0%$3,419.37
3.0%$3,521.95
3.0%$3,627.61
$113,970.94
$117,390.31
$120,920.25
$124,547.86
$476,845.36
Rates/Addititives are established each year by the Office of
Financial Management. Find the current rates by going to the
Managerial Accounting page of the Financial Management
Office. Cut and paste tIre URL below:
http://ibub.dot.stale.mn.us/finaneialmanagemenl/financial-
ops/manageeialaccoantisg.hlml
I. Rate is the Unit Rate . For instance the rate can be per gallon. ton, hour, ss'eek, mile. This rate is an estimate. Actual cost will change as the cost to
MODOT changes.
2. Material Handling is applied to cover the costs associated with handling inventoried items. It is applied to all items issued from MnDOT inventory
centers.
3. Maintenance/Billing Overhead is composed of indirect costs related to condusting rnuiutenance operations, It is applied to labor, labor additive.
equipment, personal expenses and tub testing. Maintenance/Billing Overhead is not applied to inventory items, but is applied to Office & Administrative
Specialist (Employee - Job Clans) Hours when inventory items arc charged.
4. Office & Administrative Specialist (Empinyee'Jab Class) Hours. Inventory items are charged using the MnDOT RCA timesheet system. The
system requires that .23 hours of administrative time must be charged when inventory items am entered or the charge will be rejected. This is an estimate
based on entering inventory items 8 times during a year with .25 hours used per time equaling 2 hours over a year.
5. Hnurly Rote = the hourly rate of the employee.
6. Basic Fringe = the cost of group insurance, social security and retiremeul. Each employee's fringe rote is different. A basic fiingc rate of $10.33 for FY
7. Labnr Additive is applied to cover benefits that are cot diseclly distributed to labor hours such as sick Irave, vacation, holiday pay and worker and
anemptoyment compensation.
Page I of I
CM Rev.09/18/2017
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTYOFHENNEPIN )ss
)
CITY OF RICHFIELD )
I, Elizabeth VanHoose, being the duly qualified city clerk of the City of
Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true
and exact copy of Resolution No. 11524
And that the same is on file and on record in my office.
Given under my hand and seal
This 25th day of July, 2018
Elizabeth VanHoose
City Clerk
City of Richfield
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 11524
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO ENTER INTO MNDOT
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NO. 1030429 WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PURCHASEISTORAGE OF SALT UNTIL JUNE
30, 2022
WHEREAS, the Public Works Maintenance Facility has limited space for salt
storage; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Cedar Avenue Truck
Station is conveniently located next to the City of Richfield Maintenance Facility and has
adequate storage space for both agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Richfield hereby authorizes the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into Partnership
Agreement No. 1030429 between the City of Richfield and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation for purchase/storage of salt until June 30, 2022.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of
July, 2018.
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.F.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 122
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Myrt L ink, C ommunity D evelopment A ccountant
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
10/6/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W:
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider a resolution approving a License Agreement with Spohn's Automotive Inc. for the parking lot
at Cedar Avenue and Diagonal Boulevard and authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute any
renewals to the License Agreement after October 13, 2020.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
I n 2001, the City of Richfield (City) worked with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnD OT) to
secure a commercial lease for the construction of a parking lot on excess MnD OT right-of-way. I n return, the
City leased the parking lot to the Transmission Shop, I nc. located at 6958 Cedar Avenue.
I n September of 2020, the Transmission Shop, I nc. sold their business to Spohn's Automotive, I nc. Spohn's
intends on continuing to use the property in the same manner as the previous business. Per our attorney, the
License Agreement (Agreement) was not transferable; the Council must approve a new Agreement with
Spohn's Automotive, I nc.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve a resolution approving the License Agreement between the City of Richfield and
Spohn's Automotive, Inc. for the parking lot at Cedar Avenue and Diagonal Boulevard and authorize
the City Manager and Mayor to execute any renewals to the License Agreement after October 13, 2020.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
I n August 2001 the City approved a Commercial Lease between the City and MnD OT for the
construction of a parking lot on excess right-of-way land at approximately Cedar Avenue and
Diagonal Boulevard.
At the same time the City also approved a License Agreement with the Transmission Shop, I nc.
for the use of the parking lot. The parking lot was constructed by the Transmission Shop, I nc. and
they have paid the property taxes since 2001.
On J une 6, 2018 the City Council gave approval to the City Manager and Mayor to execute any
renewals to the Amendment of Commercial Lease with MnD OT and Amendment to License
Agreement.
I n September 2020 the Transmission Shop, I nc. sold their business to Spohn's Automotive, I nc.
which requires a new License Agreement to be executed.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Amendments to the Lease with MnD OT are set for another two years. They are set to expire on
J une 30, 2022.
This License Agreement could terminate if MnD OT needs the land for highway purposes.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The sale between the Transmission Shop I nc. and Spohn's Automotive, I nc. has already taken place.
There needs to be a signed License Agreement between Spohn's Automotive, I nc. and the City.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
There is no financial impact to the City.
Since this is essentially a "pass through" license agreement of a property we do not own, staff
does not believe that the City could charge rent for use of this site.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Kennedy and Graven prepared the attached resolution and License Agreement.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not approve the License Agreement with Spohn's Automotive, I nc.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
L icense A greement C ontract/A greement
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. _______
RESOLUTION APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SPOHN’S AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the “City”) holds an interest in certain property
located in the City (the “Property”) pursuant to a lease agreement between the City, as tenant, and the State of
Minnesota, department of Transportation, as landlord; and
WHEREAS, Spohn’s Automotive, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Grantee”), has proposed to
license a tract of land within the Property located at 6945 Cedar Avenue (the “Licensed Premises”) for the
purpose of the temporary parking of passenger motor vehicles for continuous periods of not more than one
week; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented before the City Council of the City a form of License
Agreement (the “License Agreement”) between the City and the Grantee, pursuant to which the City will
agree to license the Licensed Premises to the Grantee under the terms set forth therein; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
as follows:
1. The License Agreement is hereby in all respects authorized, approved, and confirmed, and
the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the License Agreement for
and on behalf of the City in substantially the form now on file with the City Council but with such
modifications as shall be deemed necessary, desirable, or appropriate, the execution thereof to constitute
conclusive evidence of their approval of any and all modifications therein.
2. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver to the
Grantee any and all documents deemed necessary to carry out the intentions of this resolution and the License
Agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of October, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of this _____ day of ___________, 2020,
by and between THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), and the SPOHN’S AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a
Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee").
WITNESSETH:
BACKGROUND.
Grantor currently holds an interest in the property that is the subject of this license
agreement by virtue of a lease agreement between it, as tenant and the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation, as Landlord. A copy of the lease agreement is attached hereto as
Exhibit A (hereafter referred to as the "Lease"). Grantee acknowledges that until such time as
Grantor acquires title to the property, all of Grantor's rights to and in the property that is subject
to this Agreement derive from the Lease, and are subject to the provisions and terms of the
Lease.
ARTICLE I - GRANT, TERM.
1.1 LICENSED PREMISES. In consideration of the fees, covenants and agreements
herein reserved and contained on the part of Grantee to be performed, Grantor does hereby
license to Grantee the tract of land located at 6945 Cedar Avenue, Richfield, Minnesota and
located on land legally described in the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the
"Licensed Premises").
1.2 TERM AND EXTENSIONS. The term of this License shall commence on the
Commencement Date, and, unless extended as hereinafter provided, will terminate on June 30,
2022 or such earlier date as may be determined in accordance with the provisions of this
Agreement. At the expiration of the term the Grantee agrees to vacate the Licensed Premises
and deliver the same to the Grantor. Grantee acknowledges that as long as the Lease or its
extension is in place, Grantor's ability to extend this Agreement is dependent upon whether the
Grantor's Lease is extended. Grantor agrees that so long as Grantee requests an extension, and is
not in default of its obligations hereunder, and further assuming that the use of the Licensed
Premises remains appropriate, that it will utilize its best efforts to obtain an extension of the
Lease, and if successful, will extend this Agreement as well. Upon the acquisition of the
property, Grantor shall be entitled to terminate this License at any time following the giving of
180 days written notice of such termination. Grantor may also terminate the License based on a
good faith determination by the Grantor that the property owned by Grantee located at 6958
Cedar Avenue is needed for redevelopment or other public purposes.
ARTICLE II - USE OF LICENSED PREMISES
2.1 GRANTEE'S USE. During the term of this License, the Licensed Premises may
be used only for the purpose of the temporary parking of passenger motor vehicles for
continuous periods of not more that one week. At Grantor's written direction, the Grantee shall
immediately remove from the lot any vehicle, equipment or item that does not in Grantor's
reasonable judgment comply with that purpose.
2.2 IMPROVEMENTS TO LICENSED PREMISES. With ten days’ notice and
consent from the Grantor, the Grantee may cut, trim, or remove from the Licensed Premises such
trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the Grantee’s judgment unreasonably interfere with the
Grantee’s use of or the function of Licensed Premises.
ARTICLE III - LICENSE FEE
3.1 LICENSE FEE. No license fee is required.
ARTICLE IV - TAXES
4.1 TAXES. The Grantee shall be responsible for all real estate taxes and
installments on special assessments which are due and payable in any year following the
Commencement Date and continuing until the termination of this Agreement or any extensions
thereof.
ARTICLE V - UTILITIES
5.1 CHARGES. Grantee shall pay for all utility services furnished the Grantee for
use on the Licensed Premises.
ARTICLE VI - MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS
6.1 ACCEPTANCE OF LICENSED PREMISES. The Grantee accepts the Licensed
Premises AS IS, and WHERE IS with all faults and defects. Grantee shall be responsible, at its
cost and expense to maintain and repair the Licensed Premises to the required standards of the
City of Richfield, during the term of this Agreement. Grantee acknowledges that the Grantor
shall have no obligation of any nature to maintain, preserve or repair the Licensed Premises.
ARTICLE VII - ALTERATIONS
7.1 NOTICE TO GRANTOR. Prior to the initiation of any alterations costing more
than $5,000, Grantee shall give Grantor written notice thereof and specify the work to be
performed in reasonable detail and include the names of the contractors and materialmen to be
utilized. After receipt of said notice, Grantor shall have a reasonable period of time during
which it shall make a determination, in its sole discretion, whether or not to permit the work.
Grantee shall provide Grantor upon request with any further information reasonably necessary
for such determination by Grantor and Grantee shall not commence work or accept materials
prior to receiving written notice of Grantor's determination.
ARTICLE VIII - DESTRUCTION AND RESTORATION
8.1 DAMAGED. If a significant portion of the Licensed Premises shall be damaged
by any casualty whether insured or uninsured, the Grantor shall have no obligation to repair or
rebuild the Licensed Premises. Grantee shall have the option to rebuild or repair or to terminate
this License by exercise of notice to Grantor.
ARTICLE IX - PUBLIC LIABILITY, INDEMNITY
9.1 GRANTEE'S LIABILITY INSURANCE. Grantee shall, during the entire term
hereof, keep in full force and effect a policy of liability and property damage insurance with
respect to the Licensed Premises, and the business operated by Grantee, in which the limits of
liability shall be $1,000,000.
9.2 INDEMNIFICATION. Except for claims arising out of the willful or negligent
act of the other party or its representatives, each party shall indemnify and defend the other party
against all claims, expenses and liabilities incurred, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in
connection with loss of life, personal injury, or property damage arising out of any occurrence in,
upon or at the Licensed Premises, or the occupancy or use thereof by said party, or occasioned
wholly or in part by any act or omission of said party, its agents, employees, contractors. This
provision shall not be deemed as a waiver of any statutory liability limits available to Grantor.
ARTICLE X - ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLICENSING
10.1 NO ASSIGNMENT BY GRANTEE. Grantee may not assign this License to a
third party, including, without limitation, a purchaser of Grantee’s business at 6958 Cedar
Avenue, without prior written consent of the Grantor.
ARTICLE XI - GRANTEE'S DEFAULT
11.1 EVENTS OF DEFAULT. The following events shall be deemed to be events of
default by Grantee under this License:
(a) Grantee shall fail to pay when due any payments or other charges provided
herein, or any portion thereof and the same shall remain unpaid for a period of ten
(10) days after the same has become due; or
(b) Grantee shall do or permit to be done anything which creates a lien of
record upon the Licensed Premises; and does not cause said lien to be released
within ten (10) days after written notice from Grantor; or
(c) Grantee has failed to comply with any other provision of this License and
has not cured any failure within thirty (30) days (or five (5) days in the case of
non-compliance with Section 2.1), or such longer period of time as may be
reasonably required to cure such default, after Grantor, by written notice, has
informed Grantee of such noncompliance.
11.2 GRANTOR'S REMEDIES. Upon the occurrence of any of the above events of
default, Grantor may without providing a notice of termination, or without affording Grantee an
opportunity to cure (except as to matters for which the right to cure is specifically given in this
Agreement), immediately notify Grantee of such default and may, with such notice, retake
possession of the Licensed Premises.
11.3 COSTS, EXPENSES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES. If one party is required to seek
legal counsel for collection or to commence or defend litigation in order to enforce or enjoy the
covenants and agreements in this License, the party prevailing in such collection, litigation shall
have the right to reimbursement from the other party of all reasonable costs, expenses and
attorneys' fees.
ARTICLE XII -- GRANTOR DEFAULT
12.1 DEFAULT NOTICE TO GRANTOR. Should Grantor default in the
performance of any of the covenants on the part of the Grantor to be kept or performed and such
default shall continue for ten (10) days after written notice to Grantor from Grantee specifying
such default, Grantee shall have the same remedy as is available to the Grantor in section 10.2
above.
ARTICLE XIII - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
13.1 COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT. Grantee, subject to the terms and
provisions of this License, on payment of the license fee and observing, keeping and performing
all of the terms and provisions of this License on its part to be observed, kept and performed,
shall lawfully, peaceably and quietly and exclusively have, hold occupy and enjoy the Licensed
Premises during the term hereof without hindrance or objection by any persons lawfully claiming
under Grantor.
13.2 ACCESS TO LICENSED PREMISES. Grantee shall allow Grantor and its
officers, agents, assigns, contractors and employees access to the Licensed Premises during
regular business hours, on 48 hours' prior notice for purposes of inspecting, surveying, testing
and any other pre-demolition activities which are deemed necessary to the Grantor for purposes
of reuse of the Licensed Premises. The Grantor will use reasonable efforts not to interrupt or
disturb Grantee's business in the course of conducting said activities, and shall indemnify
Grantee for any damage to inventory, stock, moveable trade fixtures and like items occasioned
by such activities.
13.3 SURRENDER OF LICENSED PREMISES. At the expiration or termination of
this License, Grantee shall surrender the Licensed Premises in an "as is" condition, but may
remove therefrom all advertising signs and devices and all other property placed on the Licensed
Premises by Grantee. All such items not removed shall forfeit to and be deemed the exclusive
property of Grantor.
13.4 LIENS. Grantee agrees not to suffer or allow any liens to be placed against the
Licensed Premises as a result of Grantee's activities during the term of this Agreement;
including, without limitation any liens for labor or materials provided for any repair,
maintenance, modification, alteration or construction of the Licensed Premises.
13.5 NO DAMAGES, NO RELOCATION BENEFITS. Grantee understands and
acknowledges that Grantor is willing to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations
hereunder only because Grantee has agreed that it will make no claim for damages upon
termination of this Agreement. Specifically, and without limitation of the foregoing, Grantee
understands that upon the expiration or other termination of this Agreement, Grantor has no
obligation to provide it with other parking, to compensate it for the value of lost parking, to
compensate it for the impact of the lost parking on the value of the business, or on the income or
profitability of the business, to acquire the business or any part thereof, to pay or offer relocation
benefits or relocation assistance.
13.6 NO PROPERTY INTEREST. This instrument is not a lease, creates no landlord-
Tenant relationship, and nothing in this Agreement will be deemed to create any property interest
other than as expressed in this Agreement.
13.7 GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of Minnesota will govern the validity
and interpretation of this Agreement.
13.8 NOTICES. Any notice which is required under this License shall be deemed
"given" upon hand delivery or three (3) days after prepaid posting in the U. S. Mail whichever
shall first occur.
13.9. APPROVAL OF EXTENSIONS. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City of
Richfield may approve future extension of this Agreement without further action from the City
Council.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their signatures the day and
year first above written.
GRANTOR:
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
By:________________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Its: Mayor
By:_________________________________
Katie Rodriquez
Its: City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of __________, 2020,
by Maria Regan Gonzalez, the Mayor of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a public body
corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Grantor.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of __________, 2020,
by Katie Rodriquez, the City Manager of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a public body
corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Grantor.
Notary Public
GRANTEE:
SPOHN’S AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
By:________________________________
Its:_________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of __________, 2020,
by _____________________________, the _______________________ of Spohn’s
Automotive, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the Grantee.
Notary Public
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #4.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 125
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector/C ity E ngineer
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing and consider a resolution adopting the annual Lyndale/H U B/Nicollet (LH N) Maintenance
District assessment.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (L HN) maintenance assessment was established to recover special maintenance
expenses in the L HN area in 1981. The current services include:
Maintenance and operation of irrigation
Weed control
Mowing
Trash and litter removal
Maintenance of street lighting system
Fence maintenance
The LHN Redevelopment Area is approximately bounded by 64th Street, 1st Avenue, 67th Street, and
Emerson Avenue (map attached).
I n late 2019 City Council directed staff to discontinue maintenance district assessments for the L HN
Redevelopment Area. This is because with the recent redevelopment and corresponding maintenance
agreements there has been a shift in responsibility towards the property owner related to items like
irrigation and boulevard maintenance. In addition, there are road elements that were once
considered a "special feature" going in city-wide, no longer making them "special", like planted
medians. T herefore, this will be the final assessment to these properties and the owners have been
notified.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion adopt a re solution adopting the asse ssme nt
on the Ly ndale /HUB/Nicollet (L H N) district for costs incurred to maintain the are a for 2019.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
City staff has determined actual costs of current services to be assessed for the 2019
maintenance of this area to be $27,269.66.
Fluctuations in expenditures for maintenance of LHN are caused by a number of factors:
Changes in water use and irrigation costs;
Concrete repair variations; and
Demand of aging infrastructure updates.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Section 825 of the City Code indicates “current services” mean one or more of the following:
(a) snow, ice, or rubbish removal from sidewalks;
(b) weed elimination from streets or private property;
(c) removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding
any structure included under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.15 to
463.26;
(d) installation or repair of water service lines;
(e) street sprinkling, sweeping, or other dust treatment of streets;
(f) the trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees from any street;
(g) the treatment and removal of insect-infested or diseased trees on private property;
(h) the repair of sidewalks and alleys;
(i) the operation of a street lighting system;
(j) the maintenance of landscaped areas, decorative parks and other public amenities on or
adjacent to street right-of-way; and,
(k) snow removal and other maintenance of streets in commercial redevelopment areas.
Council ordered the work and the work was done for 2019.
Commercial property owners will be assessed on a per-square-foot basis.
The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk.
Notice of assessment and the public hearing was mailed to all property owners on the assessment
roll on September 15, 2020.
Notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Each year the City shall list the total unpaid charges for current services against each separate lot
or parcel to which they are attributable under Section 825 of the City Code. This list is available at
the offices of the City Clerk, Assessing, and Public W orks.
The list is submitted to the County Auditor and due to Hennepin County by the end of November
annually.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
All costs to the City will be recovered through this assessment.
Estimated and actual costs for the LHN maintenance services from 2003-2019 are:
Year Estimated Actual
2003 $50,000 $37,785.67
2004 $50,000 $44,031.39
2005 $50,000 $45,385.31
2006 $50,000 $45,648.56
2007 $50,000 $51,605.29
2008 $50,000 $49,999.99
2009 $50,000 $49,747.02
2010 $50,000 $32,459.40
2011 $50,000 $39,090.87
2012 $50,000 $32,244.51
2013 $50,000 $25,522.16
2014 $50,000 $29,415.52
2015 $50,000 $27,321.07
2016 $50,000 $26,025.24
2017 $50,000 $24,107.92
2018 $50,000 $84,041.38
2019 $50,000 $27,269.66
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney will be available to answer questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Property owners on the assessment roll.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 L HN A ssessment Roll E xhibit
2019 L HN A ssessment Resolution Resolution L etter
L HN A ssessment Map E xhibit
2020 Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Assessment for 2019 Work
Property ID Street Amount
27-028-24-23-0084 Lyndale Ave S $80.22
27-028-24-23-0085 Lyndale Ave S $60.18
27-028-24-23-0086 Lyndale Ave S $119.87
27-028-24-23-0087 Lyndale Ave S $215.80
27-028-24-23-0088 Lyndale Ave S $228.94
27-028-24-23-0090 Lyndale Ave S $270.49
27-028-24-13-0001 Nicollet Ave S $396.32
27-028-24-13-0052 Nicollet Ave S $134.24
27-028-24-13-0053 Nicollet Ave S $291.59
27-028-24-13-0115 66th St E $33.45
27-028-24-23-0010 Lyndale Ave S $304.91
27-028-24-23-0074 Lyndale Ave S $494.04
27-028-24-23-0115 ADDRESS PENDING $189.11
27-028-24-24-0057 Nicollet Ave S $146.42
27-028-24-24-0063 66th St W $254.66
27-028-24-32-0132 Lyndale Ave $91.89
27-028-24-32-0133 Grand Ave $254.87
27-028-24-32-0134 ADDRESS PENDING $186.06
27-028-24-32-0137 Lyndale Ave S $1,478.68
27-028-24-42-0078 Nicollet Ave S $723.54
28-028-24-14-0010 66th St W $514.25
28-028-24-14-0011 65th St W $259.60
28-028-24-14-0370 ADDRESS PENDING $269.94
27-028-24-32-0126 Lyndale Ave S $145.77
28-028-24-41-0039 66th St W $282.74
27-028-24-13-0116 Nicollet Ave S $1,398.05
27-028-24-23-0082 66th St W $1,225.97
27-028-24-23-0111 Lyndale Ave S $1,388.91
27-028-24-23-0112 Lyndale Ave S $655.08
27-028-24-23-0113 Lyndale Ave S $523.97
27-028-24-23-0114 Lyndale Ave S $843.99
27-028-24-23-0116 ADDRESS PENDING $1,904.61
27-028-24-24-0040 Nicollet Ave S $101.28
27-028-24-24-0060 Nicollet Ave S $772.59
27-028-24-24-0061 65th St W $5,665.17
27-028-24-24-0064 66th St W $1,464.69
27-028-24-24-0065 Nicollet Ave S $267.00
27-028-24-32-0127 Lyndale Ave S $498.52
27-028-24-32-0138 66th St W $181.59
27-028-24-32-0139 Lake Shore Dr $739.61
27-028-24-32-0452 Lyndale Ave S $1,737.46
28-028-24-14-0372 ADDRESS PENDING $473.59
Total: $27,269.66
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE
LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET (LHN) MAINTENANCE FOR
THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2019 TO DECEMBER 31, 2019
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current
services related to maintenance of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment
Area, which is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street, and
Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the total amount of $27,269.66 is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by
the proposed current services in the amount of assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable before or during 2021 and shall bear interest at
the rate of five percent (5%) from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City’s Finance Division,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid before
November 12, 2020. A property owner may, at any time prior to November 15 pay to
the City’s Finance Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid,
with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which payment is made.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to
the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County and such
assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 13th day of
October, 2020.
________________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
6 6 TH S T WLYNDALEAVESGRAND AVE SEAST PLEASANT AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SNICOLLET AVE SNICOLLET AVE S1ST AVE SM ILDRED DR
63RD ST W
RAE DR
EMERSON AVE SLYNDALE AVE SALDRICH AVE SBRYANT AVE SCOLFAX AVE SDUPONT AVE SWoodl
ake Dr
Lake Shore Dr
Wood LakeLn
LYNWOOD BLVDWEST PLEASANT AVE S64 1/2 ST W
BOB PL
67TH ST W
66TH
ST W
6 5 TH S T WHARRIET AVE SGARFIELD AVE64TH ST W
65TH ST W
(CO RD NO 52)Ri chfield Lake
ACADEMY OFHOLY ANGELS
BLESSED TRINITYCATHOLICSCHOOL
WOOD LAKENATURE CENTER
THE HUB
LITTLEBOB'SPARK
NICOLLETPARKGARFIELDPARK
6348
6242
8 10 12
652765256521
65096507650565036501
7
1
0
7
0
4
7
1
6
6547 64636467645967166812
6732
6726
6720
6714
6708
6700
6644
6638
6632
6626
6620
6614
6608
6636
6632
6628
6624
6620
6616
6612
6608
1107-09
67356725
6733
6729
6715
6709
6705
6707
6701
6645
6639
6633
6621
6625
6609
6601
905912926
911
901
6615
6615
826
6604
6721
6657
6633
6629
6625
6621
6617
6615
6611
6607
6605
927925923 917
6701
6704
6308
1610121016101810081014 905901903 6500
920
924
1106
920 910
900
825
800
91592110016445
6540
6536
6532
6528
6524
6520
6516
6512
6508
65046500
6533
6529
6539
1124
6525
6436
643064266424
6420
6416
6412
6408
6404
6400
6312
65496444
6300
6304
6315
102010166420
63016305
100810006304
6300 6301
6305
9201050
9149109069006320
6308
6300 6301630563096311
6321
63256327
6308
63046300 63016305
6313 6300
6239
6245 6244
6238
6244
6238 6239
6245 6244
6238
6232
6239
6245
6234
6233 6232
906
6328
6324
6320
6314 6317
6321
6325
6330
6320
4
812
6641
66246629
6625
66386635
6633 6632
10-12 6644
6601
6721
6727
6733 6732
6726
6701
6705
6711
6715
6718
6714
6708
6704
6700
6705
6709
6713
6719
6525
407
6601
6711
6600
4006645
6701
6717
6600
6734
6732670067016705
6709
6713
6717
6721
6725
6729
6733
6724
6720
67126708
67006701
6709
6713
6717
6721
6725
6729
6733 6732
6728
6724
6720
6716
6712
6708
67046700
672567306709
6725
6733
6737 6736
6732
6724
6720
6716
6710
6700
6640
67306729
6732
6726 6725
6729
6735 6734
6728
6724
633863366334
6551
6600
100
220
199 66th St W
6500
6440
6401
6409
6415
6421
6429
6420
6410
64006401
6409
6415
6421
6429 6428
6420
6414
6408
64006401
6409
6415
6421
6429 6428
6420
6414
6408
6400
6401
6413
6421
6429 6428
6420
6414
6408
6400
6437
212 200
6430
7
1
8
7
2
26501 6401
6500
6444644064386436
300
6501
65216439800
840
6430
6400
6408
6414
6420
4154094016401
6409
6415
6421 6420
6414
6408
6400 6401
6411
6417
6423
6431
6439 6438
6426
6420
6414
6408
301
400 312 300
6345 6086106006025205225145085004184204104124004023163183083006233
6237 6236
6226 6229
6237 6236
6228 6229
6237 6236
6228 6229
6237 6236
6228
6301
6305
6311
6317
6323
6329
6335 6334
6328
6322
6316
6310
6304
63006301
6305
6311
6317
6323
6329
6335 6334
6328
6322
6316
6310
6304
6300
6334
6328
6322
6316
6310
6229
6555
6304
6300
6244
6240 62416245 6244
6240 6241
6245 300
6240
6301
6301
6245
6241
6244
62406245
6337
6345 6342
6338
6332 6331
6337
6345 6344
6336
6332 6331
6337
6343 6342
6336
6330 6331
6337
6343 63426344
63366338
63306332
6301
6305
6309
6319
6325 6324
6318
6312
6306
6301
6305
6309
6319
6325 6324
6312
6308
6304
63006301
6305
6313
6319
6325 6324
6312
6308
6304
63006301
6313
6321
6329 6324
6318
6312
6306
6300
6234 6235 6244 6235 6234 6235 6234
6228
6237
6224
62206227 6225
6229 6228
6224
6220 6225
6227
6231 6228
6224
6220
6225
6229 6228
6224
141618206231
5
164 65356533
6519
6515
6400
6408
6414
6420
6426
6425
6401
6444
64326445
6511
6625
6531
6320
6326
6332
6338
63446343
6337
6331
6325
6319
6300
226535 26283034 333638
64
66
76
96 94
202
140
6315
6325
6335
7
1/232361/2
80
204
6545
6300
6308
6321
6327
6333
6339
6354
6517644164436445644764516457646164654084064046332
820
7
2
07
2
4
790
924928
1025
1112
1115
11186515 11256505
1120
110010301020
1005110510351015
1020
62366238 1&2
62446246
6307
6402
6221 Nicollet Ave S
921
6710 L.S. DR
6715L.S. DR
Lyndale-Hub-Nicollet (LHN)Assessment DistrictRichfield, Minnesota
The City of Richfield makes no representation or warranties, expressor implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided herewith,regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is noguarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency,suitability, or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user acceptsthe data “as is”, and assumes all risks associated with its use.
Assessment Districts
2019 Assessed Parcels
#I:\GIS\Public Works\Streets\AssessmentDistricts\Projects\LHNAssessment_2020.mxd1 inch = 500 Feet
0 500 1,000250 Feet
B l o o m i n g t o nE d i n aM i n n e a p o l i s
M S PGVWX35GVWX31
GVWX53
GVWX32
GVWX53 GVWX53 GVWX53
GVWX32 GVWX52
GVWX52 GVWX35
GVWX35
§¨¦35W §¨¦35W
§¨¦494
§¨¦35W
§¨¦494
?A@62
?A@77
?A@62 ?A@62
?A@77
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #5.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 124
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector/C ity E ngineer
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing and consider resolutions adopting the annual Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (IL N) Project
Area assessment and proposed work for 2021.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The I LN Project Area assessment was established to recover special maintenance expenses in the 77th
Street area in 1988. The current services include:
Maintenance and operation of irrigation systems
Weed control
Mowing
Fertilization
Trash and litter removal
Re-plantings
These current services are provided on both sides of the 77th Street wall. The maintenance functions are
funded through a maintenance assessment on 77th Street commercial properties.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion:
1. Adopt a resolution adopting the assessment on the IL N Project Area for costs incurred to
maintain the area for 2019.
2. Adopt a resolution ordering the undertaking of the current service project within the IL N Project
Area for 2021.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
City staff has determined the actual assessment costs of current services for 2019 for this area to
be $54,621.75.
The estimate for 2021 maintenance is $80,000.
Fluctuations in expenditures for maintenance of the 77th Street Project Area are caused by a
number of factors:
Changes in water use and irrigation costs;
Concrete repair variations;
Demand for aging infrastructure updates; and
Need for re-plantings.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Section 825 of the City Code indicates “current services” mean one or more of the following:
(a) snow, ice, or rubbish removal from sidewalks;
(b) weed elimination from streets or private property;
(c) removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding
any structure included under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.15 to
463.26;
(d) installation or repair of water service lines;
(e) street sprinkling, sweeping, or other dust treatment of streets;
(f) the trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees from any street;
(g) the treatment and removal of insect-infested or diseased trees on private property;
(h) the repair of sidewalks and alleys;
(i) the operation of a street lighting system;
(j) the maintenance of landscaped areas, decorative parks and other public amenities on or
adjacent to street right-of-way; and,
(k) snow removal and other maintenance of streets in commercial redevelopment areas.
Council ordered the work and the work was completed for 2019.
Resolution No. 7405, adopted in 1988, established a policy for assessing the costs.
Commercial property owners will be assessed on a per-square-foot basis; however, all single
family and multi-family residential properties, plus the two churches in the area, would be exempt
from the special assessment levy.
The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk.
Notice of the public hearing was mailed to all owners described on the assessment roll on
September 15, 2020.
The public hearing notice was published in the official newspaper on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Each year the City shall list the total unpaid charges for current services against each separate lot
or parcel to which they are attributable under Section 825 of the City Code. This list is available at
the offices of the City Clerk, Assessing, and Public W orks.
The assessment roll is submitted to the County Auditor and is due to Hennepin County by the end
of November annually.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
All costs to the City will be recovered through this assessment.
Estimated and actual costs for the I LN Project Area maintenance services from 2003-2019 are:
Year Estimate Ac tual
2003 $80,000 $59,831.07
2004 $80,000 $63,842.79
2005 $80,000 $64,841.54
2006 $80,000 $69,606.52
2007 $80,000 $77,441.46
2008 $80,000 $77,000.01
2009 $80,000 $62,894.55
2010 $80,000 $64,124.81
2011 $80,000 $72,427.48
2012 $80,000 $78,286.46
2013 $80,000 $59,779.82
2014 $80,000 $71,499.01
2015 $80,000 $59,557.56
2016 $80,000 $71,489.33
2017 $80,000 $77,790.83
2018 $80,000 $71,528.09
2019 $80,000 $54,621.75
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney will be available to answer questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Property owners on the assessment roll.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 IL N A ssessment Roll E xhibit
2019 Resolution Resolution L etter
2021 Resolution Resolution L etter
IL N A ssessment Map E xhibit
2020 Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Assessment for 2019 Services
Property ID Street Amount
33-028-24-43-0019 76th St W $1,482.03
33-028-24-43-0049 Meridian Crossings $2,537.33
33-028-24-43-0050 Meridian Crossings $2,781.83
33-028-24-43-0051 77th St W $146.35
33-028-24-44-0112 Lyndale Ave S $1,191.67
33-028-24-44-0114 Lyndale Ave S $13.93
33-028-24-44-0128 Aldrich Ave S $9.60
33-028-24-44-0129 Lyndale Ave S $0.88
34-028-24-33-0081 Lyndale Ave S $933.01
34-028-24-33-0082 Lyndale Ave S $85.14
34-028-24-33-0150 Lyndale Ave S $323.84
34-028-24-33-0151 Lyndale Ave S $323.84
34-028-24-33-0152 Lyndale Ave S $323.84
34-028-24-33-0153 Lyndale Ave S $323.84
34-028-24-33-0154 Lyndale Ave S $323.84 34-028-24-33-0155 Lyndale Ave S $323.84
34-028-24-34-0001 78th St W $184.04
34-028-24-34-0053 78th St W $1,199.49
34-028-24-34-0054 Wentworth Ave $258.91
34-028-24-34-0056 78th St W $297.61
34-028-24-34-0057 Pillsbury Ave $432.25
34-028-24-34-0058 Pillsbury Ave $68.93
34-028-24-34-0059 Pillsbury Ave $60.32
34-028-24-44-0006 Portland Ave $187.26
34-028-24-44-0007 Portland Ave $295.82 34-028-24-44-0023 78th St E $374.66
34-028-24-44-0024 5th Ave S $131.40
34-028-24-44-0025 5th Ave S $130.97
34-028-24-44-0027 5th Ave S $172.97
34-028-24-44-0028 77th St E $132.06
34-028-24-44-0029 4th Ave S $267.18
34-028-24-44-0030 4th Ave S $204.87
34-028-24-34-0061 Pillsbury Ave $129.47
34-028-24-34-0065 Nicollet Ave S $239.51
34-028-24-34-0066 Nicollet Ave S $226.27
34-028-24-44-0032 77th St E $471.33
34-028-24-44-0036 77th St E $4,397.97
35-028-24-33-0006 Portland Ave $287.98
35-028-24-33-0008 Portland Ave $353.91
35-028-24-44-0004 Cedar Ave S $700.71 35-028-24-44-0006 78th St E $422.17
35-028-24-34-0002 78th St E $319.44
35-028-24-43-0008 78th St E $600.36
33-028-24-44-0110 Lyndale Ave S $1,191.67
33-028-24-44-0113 Lyndale Ave S $158.11
33-028-24-44-0115 Lyndale Ave S $125.57
33-028-24-44-0231 78th St W $4,814.34
33-028-24-44-0232 78th St W $4,216.20
33-028-24-44-0233 Lyndale Ave S $302.41
33-028-24-44-0234 78th St W $217.97
33-028-24-44-0235 78th St W $153.45
33-028-24-44-0236 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $300.50
34-028-24-33-0087 77th St W $627.19
34-028-24-33-0088 77th St W $1,343.03
34-028-24-33-0156 77th St W $3,843.61
34-028-24-34-0055 Wentworth Ave $258.49
34-028-24-34-0060 Pillsbury Ave $129.45
34-028-24-34-0073 Pillsbury Ave $525.11
34-028-24-43-0005 2nd Ave S $517.35
34-028-24-43-0077 2nd Ave S $298.74
34-028-24-43-0078 Nicollet Ave S $5,245.89
34-028-24-44-0031 5th Ave S $393.62
34-028-24-44-0037 78th St E $414.80 35-028-24-33-0009 78th St E $322.31
35-028-24-43-0077 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $2,102.55 35-028-24-44-0010 77th St E $1,792.68
35-028-24-44-0033 78th St E $1,201.35 35-028-24-44-0034 78th St E $452.69 Total: $54,621.75
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON
INTERSTATE-LYNDALE-NICOLLET (ILN) PROJECT AREA MAINTENANCE FOR
THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2019 TO DECEMBER 31, 2019
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council
has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current
services related to maintenance of the ILN Project Area, which is approximately
bounded by I-35W, 77th Street, I-494 and Cedar Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Such proposed assessment roll in the total amount of $54,621.75 is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by
the proposed current services in the amount of assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable before or during 2021 and shall bear interest at
the rate of five percent (5%) from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City’s Finance Division,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by
November 12, 2020. A property owner may, at any time prior to November 15, pay
to the City’s Finance Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which payment is made.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to
the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County and such
assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner in other municipal
taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of October,
2020.
_______________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ORDERING THE UNDERTAKING OF
CURRENT SERVICE PROJECT WITHIN THE
INTERSTATE-LYNDALE-NICOLLET (ILN) PROJECT
AREA FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2021 TO
DECEMBER 31, 2021
WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance, the City Council of the City of Richfield did
establish a special assessment district and did propose that certain current services be
undertaken by the City in the ILN Project Area, approximately bounded by I-35W, 77th
Street, I-494 and Cedar Avenue and that the cost of such services be specially
assessed against benefited property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield did also by such resolution
set the date of the public hearing on the undertaking of such current service project and
the levying of special assessment to bear the cost thereof; and
WHEREAS, following due notice, such public hearing was held on October 13,
2020, at which time all interested parties desiring to be heard were given an opportunity
to be heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the following examples of current services of the City shall be undertaken by
the City within the ILN Project Area, which area constitutes the special assessment
district with the exception of residential properties, plus the two churches in the area,
with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against the benefited
property within the district:
a. Snow, ice or rubbish removal;
b. Weed elimination;
c. Elimination or removal of public health or safety hazards from private
property, excluding any structure included under the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes Section 463.15 to 463.26;
d. Installation and repair of water service lines;
e. Street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets;
f. The treatment and removal of insect-infested or diseased trees on private
property;
g. Trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees;
h. Repair of sidewalks, crosswalks and other pedestrian walkways;
i. Operation of the street lighting system;
j. Maintenance of landscaped areas and other public amenities on or adjacent
to street right-of-way; and
k. Snow removal and other maintenance of streets.
2. The work to be performed may be by day labor, by City force, by contract, or by any
combination thereof.
3. The designated period of the project shall be from January 1, 2021, through
December 31, 2021. Costs of the project shall be in the manner provided in the
Richfield Ordinance Code.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of October,
2020.
____________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
245
7614
7727
7701
7709
77177715
7721 100
7720
7700
200
7601
7609
7615
7621
7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
7600 7601
7609
7615
7621
7627
7633
7639
84
7645 7645
7625
7615
7601
7601
351
301
7701
7745
401
7638
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
7600 7601
7609
7615
7621
7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
7600
7639 7638
7633 7632
7627 7626
7621 7620
7615 7614
7609 7608
7601 7600
501
7545 7544
7538 7539
7545 7544
7538 7539
7545 7544
7538 7539
7545 300 7
7538 7537
7545
7539
7545 7544
75387537
7545 7544
7538
7645
7700
7638
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
7600
7638
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
7600 7601
7621
7627
7633
7639
7644
7630
7600
7639
7633
7627
7621
7615
76011017
7609
7615
7621
7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
1001
7639
7633
7627
7621
7615
7609
7601
7612
7608
7604
100
200
7601 Girard Ave S
42 AD
7625
7632
7626
7620
7614
7608
7619
76237625
76297631
76357637
76417643 76101000 78th St W
980
710 78th St W
7600
1401
7621
7617
7609
7601
75377541
7545 7544
754075367537
7541
7545
7537 7536 753775417545 7544
75377541
7545 7544
754075367541
7545 7544
7540753675377541
7545 7544
75407536
700
704
90
97 93 89
99 95 91 87 83 79EAST PLEASANT AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SM eridianCrossings78TH ST W
76TH ST W 76TH ST
77TH ST WGRAND AVE SHARRIET AVE SGARFIELD AVE S7 8 T H S T W
77TH ST W
SHOPS AT LYNDALEUS BANCORP
Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet (ILN)Assessment DistrictRichfield, Minnesota
The City of Richfield makes no representation or warranties, expressor implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided herewith,regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is noguarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency,suitability, or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user acceptsthe data “as is”, and assumes all risks associated with its use.
Assessment Districts
2019 Assessed Parcels
#I:\GIS\Public Works\Streets\AssessmentDistricts\Projects\ILNAssessment_2020.mxd1 inch = 500 Feet
0 500 1,000250 Feet
7717
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
76267621
7625 7632
7628 7625
7629
7635 7634
7628
7624
7635
7629
7625
6167733
7727
7701 631
620
710
701
315 345
7744
7715
7731
415 7701
7714
7708
500
7639
7633
7627
7720
7701
7730
7700
7745
76437645
7627
7633
7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7701
7740
7636
7626
7735
7720
7700
7727 30
457700
7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7626
7620
84
308
305
7730
7740
40508090
70
60
97 93 89 85 81 77 4953576165
99 95 91 87 83 79 67 63 59 55 51 47
7627
607
626 632 638
711 717 729 735
716 728 734
77TH ST E
7 8 TH ST E
78TH ST E 4TH AVE S77TH ST W
INTERSTATE HWY NO 494
I N T E R S T AT E H W Y N O 4 9 4
MENARDS
ROOSEVELTPARK
152477th St E
160077th St E 152477th St E
76337629
1525
1600
1620 1640
7636
7625
1401
7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
76267627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626
1200
1300
7700
7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626 7627
7633
7639 7638
7632
7626
901 1001
7700
7744 13 - 2021 - 3233 - 40 1 - 127640
900 1000
1306
1312
1318
1324 7764 774077167635
7627
77TH ST E
78TH ST E
INTERSTATE HWY NO 494
WASHINGTONPARK
B l o o m i n g t o nE d i n aM i n n e a p o l i s
M S PGVWX35GVWX31
GVWX53
GVWX32
GVWX53 GVWX53 GVWX53
GVWX32 GVWX52
GVWX52 GVWX35
GVWX35
§¨¦35W §¨¦35W
§¨¦494
§¨¦35W
§¨¦494
?A@62
?A@77
?A@62 ?A@62
?A@77
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #6.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 123
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector/C ity E ngineer
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing and consider a resolution adopting the assessment for removal of diseased trees from
private property for work ordered from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The health of trees within municipal limits is threatened by shade tree diseases and it is the City’s
responsibility to control and prevent the spread of these diseases.
I f the City deems it necessary to remove a diseased tree on private property, the property owners have three
options available:
1. Remove the tree themselves;
2. Hire and pay for their own contractor; or
3. Hire their own contractor and request the cost of the tree removal be assessed against their property
tax.
I n the period from J anuary 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, eleven (11) property owners chose the third
option. The total amount to be assessed is $21,429.75.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Approve the resolution adopting the assessment
for removal of diseased trees from private property for work ordered from January 1, 2019, through
December 31, 2019.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
I n the early 1970’s, the City of Richfield began a shade tree disease program to assist homeowners in
the removal of diseased trees on private property. The following process is how the City ensures
property owners are aware of their diseased tree(s).
Notification to Property Owners
At time of marking for removal, paperwork is left at the property which includes:
Removal deadline;
Reason the tree was marked for removal;
Assessment information;
I nformation regarding private contractors;
A card postmarked to the City informing the City of owner's removal plans; and
City staff contacts for more information.
I f the tree becomes hazardous or is past the removal deadline the City sends an additional deadline letter
to the property owner. T he letter is sent to the last known owner as obtained from Hennepin
County Property Records and verified by our utility billing records.
Occupied Properties
On confirmed occupied properties, property owners with diseased private trees have three options
available for tree removal:
1. Remove the tree themselves;
2. Hire and pay their own contractor; or
3. Hire their own contractor and request the cost of the tree removal be assessed against
their property tax.
Vacant Properties
I n cases where the property is vacant and no owner can be found, removals must be ordered when trees
have passed the removal deadline or become hazardous. A contractor then performs the removal and the
cost is assessed to the property. I n 2019, no vacant properties had trees removed in this manner.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The work has been completed with prior approval from the affected residents; except in cases of
vacant properties.
Minnesota State Statute requires the County be notified of all special assessments.
The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk.
Notices of the assessment hearing were mailed to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll on September 15, 2020.
The public hearing notice was published in the official newspaper on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The unpaid charges for the removal of the diseased trees must be special assessed for
certification to the County Auditor along with current taxes as stated in City Code 910.23.
The assessment role is submitted to the County Auditor and must be reported to Hennepin County
by the end of November annually.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The costs to be assessed for the removal of diseased trees on private property for work ordered
during the period J anuary 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, have been determined to be
$21,429.75.
The property owner may pay the original principal amount without interest within 30 days from the
date the Council adopts the assessment. The unpaid balance will be spread over five (5) years
with a five percent (5%) interest rate.
The original source of funding to have the work done is through the City’s Permanent
I mprovement Revolving Fund.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the resolution and will be available to answer any questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Property owners on the assessment roll.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Tree A ssessment Roll E xhibit
A ssessment Resolution Resolution L etter
2020 Tree Assessment for 2019 Work
Property ID Street Assessment Amount
26-028-24-33-0094 Park Ave $2,499.95
26-028-24-33-0102 Park Ave $2,499.96
27-028-24-33-0035 Grand Ave $1,290.30
29-028-24-11-0018 Thomas Ave $1,720.40
29-028-24-43-0002 Thomas Ave $2,258.03
32-028-24-14-0058 Sheridan Ave $1,881.69
33-028-24-22-0126 Penn Ave $1,935.45
35-028-24-22-0058 Oakland Ave $1,967.71
35-028-24-32-0009 Portland Ave $1,612.88
35-028-24-41-0040 16th Ave $591.39
35-028-24-43-0031 13th Ave $3,171.99
Total: $21,429.75
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED
TREES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR WORK ORDERED DURING JANUARY 1,
2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2019
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the removal of diseased trees from
private properties in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred for such work
ordered during the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 amount to
$21,429.75.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council
has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current
services related to the removal of diseased trees from private properties in the City of
Richfield and the expenses incurred for such work ordered during the period of January
1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. The costs to the properties are as follows:
Address
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the amount of $21,429.75, is hereby accepted
and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and
each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
current services in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in no more than one annual installment and shall
bear interest at the rate of five (5%) percent from the date of adoption of this
assessment resolution.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City’s Assessing
Division, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by
November 12, 2020. A property owner may, at any time prior to November 15, pay
to the City’s Assessing Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to
the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of October,
2020.
______________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #7.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 127
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A .
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing regarding the special assessment roll for weed elimination from private property and
removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Minnesota State Statutes provide that the City may levy a special one year assessment for the elimination of
public health or safety hazards or the elimination of weeds from private properties.
The special assessments are based on costs incurred by the City in connection with the abatement of weeds
or public health or safety hazards on certain properties in the City which are not properly maintained.
The owners of the subject properties are notified by the City to take corrective action with regard to the issue
with the property. I f the specific property issues were not abated within the proper time limit the City would
take the corrective action necessary and bill the property owner.
I n all cases, property owners have been notified that any unpaid charges or fees may be assessed against
the property.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Approve the attached resolution adopting the
assessment for weed elimination from private property and removal or elimination of public health or
safety hazards from private property.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
N/A.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The nuisance properties were not maintained by the owners and the City incurred costs to abate the
nuisance.
Minnesota State Statutes provide that the City may levy a special one-year assessment for these costs.
Notice of the certification was published in the Sun Current on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
N/A.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The proposed special assessment for the elimination of public health or safety hazards from private
property is $4,960.65 with an additional 5% interest penalty.
The proposed special assessment for weed elimination from private property is $1,375.00 with an
additional 5% interest penalty.
Costs incurred for city staff time in the cleanup of the properties or to remove the weeds are included in
the special assessment amount.
A $25.00 administrative fee is charged to all properties.
The affected property owner may prepay the original principal amount without interest within 30 days
from the date the Council adopts the assessment. I f the original principal amount is not paid, the
assessment will be charged 5% interest.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
No legal issues are apparent at this time. The City Attorney will be in attendance at the Council meeting
should a legal question arise.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not approve the attached resolution and have the costs absorbed by the City.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 Nuisance S pecial A ssessment Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR
WEED ELIMINATION FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY AND REMOVAL OR
ELIMINATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY HAZARDS FROM PRIVATE
PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City
Council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current
services related to weed elimination from private property and removal or elimination of
public health or safety hazards from private property in the City of Richfield:
Public
Health or
Weed Safety
Property Address Property ID Number Elimination Hazards
2401 65th St W 29-028-24-14-0044 250.00 -
6220 James Ave S 28-028-24-21-0043 125.00 -
6239 Logan Ave S 28-028-24-21-0055 - 331.06
6305 Dupont Ave S 28-028-24-11-0086 - 250.00
6430 Portland Ave 27-028-24-14-0005 125.00 -
7004 Penn Ave S 32-028-24-11-0007 125.00 -
7100 Oliver Ave S 33-028-24-22-0113 - 4.129.59
7144 12th Ave S 35-028-24-21-0012 125.00 -
7144 Lake Shore Dr. 33-028-24-21-0072 250.00 -
7320 4th Ave S 34-028-24-14-0065 250.00 -
7532 Garfield Ave S 34-028-24-32-0051 125.00 -
7545 3rd Ave S 35-028-24-32-0062 - 250.00
Total $1,375.00 $4,960.65
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the amount of $6,335.65, is hereby accepted and
shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each
tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current
services in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in no more than one annual installment and shall
bear interest at the rate of five (5%) percent from the date of adoption of this
assessment resolution.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor and within 30 days of the date the City Council
adopts the assessment, pay the whole assessment on such property to the City’s
Assessing Division without interest. Payments received after the expiration of the 30
day prepayment period, but received prior to November 15, 2020 will be charged
interest through the date of payment. Payments will not be accepted between
November 15, 2020 and January 1, 2021.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to
the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of October, 2020.
______________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #8.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 128
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A .
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public Hearing regarding the special assessment roll for unpaid false alarm user fees against private
property.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Richfield City Code and City Charter allow the City to specially assess delinquent false alarm user fees
against the respective properties. State Statutes provide that the City may levy a special one year assessment
for these costs.
Unpaid alarm user fees must be paid to the City within 30 days from the date of written notice by the City to
the alarm user. Fees not paid within the time specified will be subject to a 10% penalty charge.
The special assessment for unpaid false alarm user fees assessed to private properties provides a means for
the City to recover costs incurred with the response by public safety to an alarm call on certain properties in
the City that turns out to be false.
I n all cases, property owners have been notified that any unpaid charges or fees may be assessed against
the property.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Approve the attached resolution adopting the
assessment for unpaid false alarm user fees against private property.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
N/A.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Richfield City Code section 915.07 Subd. 3 and chapter 8.02 of the City Charter allows the City to
specially assess delinquent false alarm user fees against the respective properties.
An alarm user charged with an alarm user fee may make a written appeal of the false alarm charge to
the Director of public safety within 15 days’ notice of the charge.
Minnesota State Statutes provide that the City may levy a special one-year assessment for these costs.
Notice of the certification was published in the Sun Current on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
N/A.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
A 10% penalty charge is applied to all properties which have not paid within the time specified.
The proposed special assessment for unpaid false alarm user fees from private property is $1,100.00
with an additional 5% interest charge on the assessment.
The affected property owner may prepay the original principal amount without interest within 30 days
from the date the Council adopts the assessment. I f the original principal amount is not paid, the
assessment will be charged 5% interest.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
No legal issues are apparent at this time. The City Attorney will be in attendance at the Council meeting
should a legal question arise.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not approve the attached resolutions and have the costs absorbed by the City.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 F alse A larm A ssessment Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR
UNPAID FALSE ALARM FEES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City
Council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for unpaid
false alarm fees from private property in the City of Richfield:
Unpaid
False
Property Address Property ID Number Alarm Fee
200 78th Street W 34-028-24-34-0053 550.00
32 66th Street W 27-028-24-24-0061 110.00
34 66th Street W 27-028-24-40-0061 110.00
34 66th Street W 27-028-24-40-0061 110.00
6501 Portland Ave S 26-028-24-23-0001 110.00
6532 2nd Ave S 27-028-24-13-0093 110.00
Total $1,100.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota:
1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the amount of $1,100.00, is hereby accepted and
shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract
of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current
services in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in no more than one annual installment and shall
bear interest at the rate of five (5%) percent from the date of adoption of this
assessment resolution.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor and within 30 days of the date the City Council
adopts the assessment, pay the whole assessment on such property to the City’s
Assessing Division without interest. Payments received after the expiration of the 30
day prepayment period, but received prior to November 15, 2020 will be charged
interest through the date of payment. Payments will not be accepted between
November 15, 2020 and January 1, 2021.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the
County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of October, 2020.
______________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #9.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 129
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A .
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing regarding the special assessment roll for unpaid vacant property registration fees
against private property.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Minnesota State Statutes and the Richfield City Code provide that the City may levy a special one year
assessment for the unpaid registration of vacant property.
The special assessments are based on the fee required by a property owner to register vacant property.
The owners of the subject properties are notified by the City of the unpaid registration fee. I f the fee remains
unpaid the property owners are notified that any unpaid charges or fees may be assessed against the
property.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Approve the attached resolution adopting the
assessment for unpaid vacant property registration fees against private property.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
N/A.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Richfield City Code section 925.02 Subd. 5 allows the City to specially assess delinquent vacant
property registration fees.
Minnesota State Statutes provide that the City may levy a special one-year assessment for these costs.
Notice of the certification was published in the Sun Current on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
N/A.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The proposed special assessment for the unpaid vacant property registration fee is $1,225.00 with an
additional 5% interest penalty.
A $25.00 administrative fee is charged to all properties.
The affected property owner may prepay the original principal amount without interest within 30 days
from the date the Council adopts the assessment. I f the original principal amount is not paid, the
assessment will be charged 5% interest.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
No legal issues are apparent at this time. The City Attorney will be in attendance at the Council meeting
should a legal question arise.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not approve the attached resolution and have the costs absorbed by the City.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 Vacant P roperty S pecial A ssessment Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR
UNPAID VACANT PROPERTY REGISTRATION FEES AGAINST PRIVATE
PROPERTY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City
Council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current
services related to weed elimination from private property and removal or elimination of
public health or safety hazards from private property in the City of Richfield:
Unpaid
Vacant
Property
Property Address Property ID Number Registration
6604 Irving Ave S 28-028-24-31-0018 125.00
6319 Humboldt Ave S 28-028-24-12-0055 275.00
6929 10th Ave S 26-028-24-34-0043 275.00
6935 14th Ave S 26-028-24-43-0011 275.00
7144 Lakeshore Dr 33-028-24-21-0072 275.00
Total $1,225.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the amount of $1,225.00, is hereby accepted and
shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each
tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current
services in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in no more than one annual installment and shall
bear interest at the rate of five (5%) percent from the date of adoption of this
assessment resolution.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor and within 30 days of the date the City Council
adopts the assessment, pay the whole assessment on such property to the City’s
Assessing Division without interest. Payments received after the expiration of the 30
day prepayment period, but received prior to November 15, 2020 will be charged
interest through the date of payment. Payments will not be accepted between
November 15, 2020 and January 1, 2021.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to
the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of October, 2020.
______________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #10.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 130
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A .
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing regarding the assessment of delinquent utility bills to be certified to property taxes.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Minnesota State Statutes 444.075 and 429.101 and Chapter V I I of the Richfield Code of Ordinances provide
that unpaid water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and street light charges may be certified to the county auditor
to be included in a property owner ’s annual property tax bill.
The City Code also authorizes a certification fee to be charged against each delinquent account. By
certifying the delinquent charges to the property taxes, the City is assured of collection of the charges. The
pending delinquent 2020 utility charges total $484,060.36 for 832 accounts. This amount does not include the
$50.00 certification fee that will be added to each account.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Approve the attached authorizing certification of
unpaid water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and street light charges to the county auditor to be
collected with other taxes on said properties.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Below is a history of certified amounts since 2016:
2016 – Certification totaled $282,839.33 for 541 properties.
2017 – Certification totaled $352,654.03 for 565 properties.
2018 – Certification totaled $352,609.14 for 573 properties.
2019 – Certification totaled $374.640.56 for 538 properties.
2020 – Certification totaled $484,060.36 for 832 properties.
Staff expects that, as in years past, many of the now delinquent accounts will be paid before
final certification to the County.
Throughout the year, the Utilities division bills and collects charges for water, sanitary sewer,
storm water, and street light charges from within the City. Accounts are billed quarterly.
The delinquent accounts must be certified to the County Auditor in order for the City to
collect the charges through the property tax payment process.
A $50 certification fee is added to each certified account.
The certified amount is spread over a period of one year at the rate of 5% per annum.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Minnesota State Statutes 444.075 and 429.101 and Chapter V I I of the Richfield Code of Ordinances
provide that unpaid water, sanitary sewer, storm water, street light charges may be certified to the
county auditor to be included in a property owner ’s annual property tax bill.
A First Notice of Certification to Property Taxes was mailed on August 12, 2020 to Richfield property
owners with delinquent accounts.
A final second notice was mailed on September 18, 2020.
Notice of certification was published in the Sun Current on September 24, 2020.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
To prepay the delinquent amount and avoid certification, the entire past due amount must be paid by
November 15, 2020.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The pending delinquent 2020 charges are $484,060.36, compared to $472,771.98 at the same time
last year.
The $50.00 certification fee per account would add an additional $40,400.00 to the certified balance.
I n 2019 the City ultimately certified $374,640.56, due to some property owners paying their delinquent
bill prior to the November 7, 2019 deadline.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
There are no legal issues apparent at this time. The City Attorney will be available to answer
questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 Utility C ertification Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO. _______
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTIFICATION OF UNPAID WATER, SANITARY
SEWER, STORM WATER, AND STREET LIGHT CHARGES TO THE COUNTY
AUDITOR TO BE COLLECTED WITH OTHER TAXES ON SAID PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 705 establishes rules, rates, and charges for
sanitary sewer service in the City of Richfield and provides that all delinquent accounts
for sewer and water services may be certified against the properties served, including
an added certification charge; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 715 establishes rules, rates, and charges for water
service in the City of Richfield and provides that all delinquent accounts for water
services may be certified against the properties served; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 720 establishes rules, rates, and charges for storm
water service in the City of Richfield; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 444.075 provides that unpaid charges
for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water services may be certified to the county
auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes are collected;
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 429.101 provides that unpaid charges
for the operation of street lights may be assessed against the property and collected in
the same manner as other taxes; and
WHEREAS, the certification list has been prepared specifying the amount that
shall be certified against each particular property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. The total unpaid amount for water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and street light
charges is $484,060.36.
2. A $50 certification charge shall be levied against each delinquent account, such
charges totaling $40,400.00.
3. The above-described certification list will be spread over a period of one year at
the rate of 5% per annum.
4. The total unpaid amount will be certified to the County Auditor for collection with
other taxes on said properties.
5. A copy of the resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin County Auditor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 13th day of
October, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #11.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 126
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
10/7/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/7/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Conduct a public hearing to consider the platting and vacation of right-of-way and utility easements at
6228 Penn Avenue South and 6200 Queen Avenue South (Lunds & Byerlys).
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
On October 28, 2019, the Council approved plans for a multi-family development in the existing parking lot of
the Lunds and Byerlys grocery store at 6200 and 6228 Penn Avenue South. As a condition of this approval,
the applicant must plat the property in order to re-subdivide the land in accordance with the approved plans.
The applicant must also officially request the vacation of abandoned right-of-way in the middle of the site and
utility easements. New utility easements have been dedicated in the plat and the easements are no longer
necessary.
Platting is a technical process that establishes property lines, right-of-way, and utility easements; it is not a
reconsideration of land use approvals already granted for the development. T he City Attorney's office,
Hennepin County, MnD OT, and public utility companies have reviewed the proposed plat and
vacations. All comments have been addressed or included as stipulations in the resolution.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion:
1. Approve the attached transitory ordinance vacating road and utility easements over property
located at 6200 and 6228 Penn Avenue South; and
2. Approve the attached resolution granting approval of a final plat of Lunds of Richfield.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
See Executive Summary.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
All plats or subdivisions of land in the City must be approved by council resolution pursuant to the
provisions of Minnesota State Statutes 462.357.
A first reading of the transitory ordinance to vacate right-of-way was approved by the Council on
J une 23, 2020.
The City Council may vacate public easements in accordance with MN Statutes 412.851.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Per State Statute, the City has 120 days from the date of submittal of a complete application to
issue a decision regarding a plat unless the applicant agrees to an extension.
A complete plat application was received on April 29, 2020. The Council must render a decision
by August 27, 2020.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
None
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Notice of this public hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on October 1, 2020 and mailed
to properties within 350 feet of the project location.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Transitory Ordinance - easement vacations Ordinance
Resolution - P lat Resolution L etter
P lat E xhibit
BILL NO.
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
OVER 6200 QUEEN AVENUE AND 6228 PENN AVENUE
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1: The following described lands are subject to the easements as
described below for public street right-of-way purposes (“Street Easement”):
The West 30 feet of the South 150 feet of the North 350 feet of the east 330 feet
of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 28, Range
24, as described in Quit Claim Deed Document Number T661295.
Sec. 2: The City of Richfield transferred ownership of the described lands, via
Quit Claim Deed Document Number T661295 dated December 28, 1967, to Lunds R E
Holdings LLC and the property was developed as a grocery store and parking lot.
Sec. 3. The Street Easement is not required for access to the abutting properties.
Sec. 4. The following described lands are subject to the easements in favor of
the City of Richfield as described below for drainage and utility purposes (“Utility
Easement”):
That part of the drainage and utility easement reserved in favor of the City of
Richfield as Bill No. 1995-15 Transitory Ordinance No. 17.63, dated September 11,
1995 the same as on file and record as Document Number T2767742, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying within:
The East 30 feet of the North 1/2 of the East 3/8 of the East 1/2 of the North 1/2
of the Northeast 1/4, EXCEPT THE North 175 feet thereof and EXCEPT the East 330
feet thereof, all in Section 29, Township 28, Range 24.
Sec. 5: The City has notified the service providers for gas, electric, telephone,
and cable communications services of the proposed vacations; the following facilities
are reported to be located in the Street and Utility Easements: cable
Sec. 6: The existing utility lines within the easement areas shall be removed and
placed within new easements dedicated in the plat by the land owner. There is no need
to reserve the Utility Easement as part of this proceeding.
Sec. 7: The Council finds that there is not a public need for the Street Easement.
Sec. 8. The City of Richfield held the first reading on June 23, 2020 and second
reading on October 13, 2020. Legal notice was published in the City’s official
newspaper as required by ordinance.
Sec. 9: The Utility Easement is vacated conditioned upon: filing of the plat of
Lunds of Richfield.
Sec. 10: The vacation of the Street Easement is effective 30 days following
publication of the ordinance.
Sec. 11: The City Clerk is directed to prepare a certificate of completion of
vacation proceedings and to record the vacation in the office of the Hennepin County
Registrar of Titles or Hennepin County Recorder, as appropriate, following publication.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of
October, 2020
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL
OF A FINAL PLAT FOR
LUNDS OF RICHFIELD
WHEREAS, Lund Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Applicant”) has requested
approval of a final plat that combines two parcels of land currently addressed as 6200
Queen Avenue South and 6228 Penn Avenue South and legally described as:
Parcel 1: The East 158 feet of the South 160 feet of the North ½ of the East 3/8
of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 28, Range
24.
Parcel 2: The East 330 feet of the North ½ of the North ½ of the Northeast
Quarter, Except the North 175 feet thereof,
Except the South 25 feet of the North 200 feet of the East 300 feet of said
Northeast Quarter and except the East 158 feet of the South 160 feet of the North ½ of
the East 3/8 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; all in Section 29,
Township 28, Range 24.
Certificate of Title, Certificate Number 845282
Being Torrens Land
And, the North ½ of the East 3/8 of the East ½ of the North ½ of Northeast
Quarter; Except the North 175 feet thereof, and Except the East 330 feet thereof,
Section 29, Township 28, Range 24.
Certificate of Title, Certificate Number 848433
Being Torrens Land
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is to be known as LUNDS OF RICHFIELD;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed plat of LUNDS OF
RICHFIELD on Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at which all interested persons were given
the opportunity to be heard; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, as follows:
1. The proposed plat of LUNDS OF RICHFIELD satisfies the requirements of the
City’s subdivision ordinances.
2. Final approval of the plat of LUNDS OF RICHFIELD is granted with the
following conditions:
a. The Applicant must address to the City Attorney’s satisfaction all items
listed in the plat opinion letter prepared by the City Attorney’s office.
b. The Applicant must address to the City Public Works Director’s
satisfaction all items identified by the City Engineer.
c. The Applicant is authorized to make minor adjustments to the plat to
accommodate a required turn lane on Penn Avenue.
d. The Applicant must submit two mylar copies of the plat for signature by
the City.
e. The Applicant must file the final plat with the Hennepin County
Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days of the approval of this
resolution.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of
October, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
PENN AVE. SOUTH WEST 62ND ST.HWY 62 OFF-RAMPN0°14'23"W 482.90
N0°14'17"W 457.55 S89°35'24"E 300.02S0°14'18"E25.00S89°35'23"E 194.01LOT 2LOT 1BLOCK 1S89°37'50"E 494.02LEGEND 6228 PENN AVE SRICHFIELD, MN 55423AND6200 QUEEN AVE S.RICHFIELD, MN 55423PRESENT ADDRESSESTract A:Par 1: The East 158 feet of the South 160 feet of the North 1/2 of the East 3/8 of the Northeast Quarter of theNortheast Quarter of Section 29, Township 28, Range 24.Par 2: The East 330 feet of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter,Except the North 175 feet thereof,Except the South 25 feet of the North 200 feet of the East 300 feet of said Northeast Quarter and except the East158 feet of the South 160 feet of the North 1/2 of the East 3/8 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter;all in Section 29, Township 28, Range 24.Certificate of Title, Certificate Number: 845282Being Torrens LandTract B:The North 1/2 of the East 3/8 of the East 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Northeast Quarter;Except the North 175 feet thereof, and Except the East 330 feet thereof, Section 29, Township 28, Range 24.Certificate of Title, Certificate Number: 848433Being Torrens LandLEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE PLATTEDTOTAL AREA TO BE PLATTED INCLUDING RIGHT-OF-WAY = 230,961 S.F. OR 5.302 ACRESAREASLOT AREAS TO BE PLATTED:LOT 1, BLOCK 1 = 124877 S.F. OR 2.867 ACRESLOT 2, BLOCK 1 = 87,544 S.F. OR 2.010 ACRESPENN AVENUE SOUTH TO BE DEDICATED = 18,531 S.F. OR 0.425 ACRESWENCK ASSOCIATES,1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTER,MAPLE PLAINE, MNGARY BJORKLUND, MN.LICENSE NUMBER 46563LAND SURVEYOROCTOBER 14, 2019DATE OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL TAXPAYER / PROPERTY OWNER / ADDRESSLUND REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, A MINNESOTA LTD. LIABILITY CO, WHOSE ADDRESS IS:4100 50TH STREET WEST #2100, EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424LUNDS OF RICHFIELD PRELIMINARY PLAT OFAPRIL 6, 2020 REVISIONAPRIL 28, 2020 REVISIONAUGUST 11, 2020 REVISIONOCTOBER 7, 2020 REVISION
R.T. DOC. NO.
LUNDS OF RICHFIELD
WENCK
ASSOCIATES
PENN AVE. SOUTH
N0°14'29"W 482.90
N0°14'17"W 457.55 S89°35'24"E 300.02S0°14'17"E25.00S89°35'23"E 194.02LOT 2LOT 1BLOCK 1S89°37'50"E 494.01R.T. DOC. NO.LEGEND LUNDS OF RICHFIELD DETAIL OF BOUNDARY THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TWP. 28, RGE 24WENCKASSOCIATES
AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS
AGENDA ITEM #12.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 131
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
10/5/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W:
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider an amendment to approve final development plans for a mixed use development at 101 66th
Street East (66th Street and 1st Avenue). The proposed amendment reduces commercial space and
increases the number of apartments in the project.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
I n J une 2018, the City Council approved development plans for a mixed use building with 6,000 square feet of
commercial space and 31 apartments at 66th Street and 1st Avenue, now known as The Emi. After a series of
delays, P LH & Associates (Developer) approached the City Council and Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) earlier this year to discuss the possibility of amending those plans to reduce ground floor
commercial space and provide affordable housing units instead. The Council and HRA were generally
supportive and the Developer is now proposing a development that includes 1,770 square feet of commercial
and 42 apartments.
The proposed development continues to provide a building that is responsive to the street, albeit this is
primarily via walk-up apartments instead of commercial uses. Exterior elevations have changed to
accommodate the apartments; however, these changes are modest and continue to provide an
attractive frontage on all sides of the building.
The change from commercial space to residential significantly lowers parking requirements. W ithout a transit
reduction and assuming a fairly intense commercial use such a coffee shop, the development requires 61
spaces. W ith the permitted transit reduction, the required parking falls to 55 spaces. The maximum allowable
parking per Code is 67 spaces.
The Developer had not originally proposed a reduction in parking and plans continued to include 72 spaces.
Staff recommended to the Planning Commission that the rear row of 12 spaces (closest to the adjacent home
at 6616 Stevens) be removed in favor of additional landscaping and serve as a proof-of-parking area;
however, after hearing public testimony related to parking and traffic concerns, the Planning Commission
opted to recommend approval with a reduction to 67 stalls (the maximum permitted by Code). The Developer
has submitted the attached proposal to remove the five stalls closest to the home at 6616 Stevens Avenue.
The proposed development remains in keeping with the framework, goals, and polic ies of the Comprehensive
Plan. Some of those policies and goals include:
Commit to equitable opportunities for all.
Emphasize sustainability.
Maintain an appropriate mix of housing types in each neighborhood based on available amenities,
transportation resources, and adjacent land uses.
Promote development that broadens the tax base.
Encourage development of areas where vehicle use is minimized.
Staff finds that the proposed amendment continues to meet the policies and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan and Code requirements for mixed use development and recommends
approval.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the attached resolution approving an amendment to the conditional use permit
and final development plans for 101 66th Street East.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Southview Baptist Church vacated the property and began marketing it for sale in 2013.
T he Developer purchased the property in 2016.
T he Planning Commission and City Council were first made aware of a possible
development on this site in August 2016; joint Council/Planning Commission work
sessions were held on August 23, 2016 and November 20, 2017.
T he Developer held open house meetings to discuss the proposal with the neighborhood
on April 19 and May 14, 2018.
In June 2018, the City Council approved final development plans for the project. Due to
delays in securing financing and identifying a general contractor, construction was
delayed, and in June 2019 the Council granted a one-year extension to get the project
underway. While they had hoped to be under construction this spring, the current
pandemic led to a second six-month extension in May 2020.
On June 15, 2020, the Developer presented updated concepts to the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and City Council. T he Developer proposed to reduce
ground floor retail space in order to provide additional, affordable apartment units.
July 14, 2020, the City Council approved a resolution supporting an application to the
Metropolitan Council for Livable Communities Demonstration Act (LCDA) grant funds for
the project.
July 20, 2020, the HRA approved a preliminary development agreement with the
Developer agreeing to explore the option of tax increment financing to support the
development.
September 17, 2020, City staff and the Developer presented the project to the L C D A
Review Committee. T he Committee was supportive of the development and its location,
but noted that parking was excessive. Grant awards will be announced in November.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Planne d Unit De ve lopment
Planned Unit Developments (P U Ds) are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and
resources and to encourage innovation in planning and building. In exchange for these
efficiencies and superior design, flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements is
available. There are a number of sets of review criteria that apply to this proposal. A full discussion of all
requirements is included as an attachment to this report. Generally, the criteria require that the Council
find that the proposal conforms to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
without having undue adverse impacts on public health, safety, and welfare.
T he proposed development meets the intent of the Mixed Use District regulations and the
proposed plans are consistent with all but two Zoning Code requirements. T hese items are not
proposed to change and were part of the the originally approved PUD.
1. On the west half of the site, the proposed buffer between the parking lot and the adjacent
residential property line is 4 feet 10 inches feet narrower than required (10.17 feet vs. 15
feet). The intent of this provision is to provide adequate area to attractively screen the parking lot
and buffer adjacent properties from headlights and vehicle noise. The proposed buffer provides
100% screening of the parking lot through a combination of fencing and landscaping. The buffer
area is large enough to support the plants selected and will provide an attractive barrier between
the development and the adjacent property to south (6613 1st Avenue).
2. As a corner lot and a through lot (extending through a block), the building could be interpreted to
have three “front” sides facing 66th Street, 1st Avenue, and Stevens Avenue. The building exceeds
the maximum front/side setback of 15 feet along both 1st Avenue (19.4 feet) and Stevens Avenue
(52.6 feet); however, the proposed design nicely balances the need for a customer entrance and
patio space adjacent to the commercial uses on the west side of the building, while providing a
larger setback to the residential areas to the south and east along Stevens Avenue.
Parking Calcuations:
Required residential - 42 x 1.25 stalls/unit = 53 spaces
Required commercial (estimated 4.5/1,000sf) - 1,770/1,000 x 4.5 = 8 spaces
Total required parking 61 - 10% (transit) = 55 spaces
Allowable maximum - 61 x 110% = 67 spaces
Virtual Open House
City requirements do not require the Developer to hold a neighborhood open house for an amendment to
a Planned Unit Development; however, the Developer opted to publicize and solicit for feedback via a
virtual neighborhood open house. Comments generally reflected displeasure with the building as a whole
and concerns regarding spillover parking and traffic. All written comments submitted to the Developer's
website and to City staff directly are included as an attachment to this report.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
60-DAY R U LE: A complete application was received and the 60-day clock started on
September 21, 2020. A decision is required by November 16, 2020 or the Council must notify
the applicant that it is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120
days total) for issuing a decision.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority will separately consider a request for Tax I ncrement
Financing to aid the project.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on September 28, 2020. Several
members of the public spoke and draft minutes are attached to this report.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal with the stipulation discussed in
the Executive Summary (6-1, Rudolph dissenting).
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Approve the amended development plans with additional and/or modified conditions.
Deny the amended development plans with findings that it does not meet requirements (existing
approvals for a development with 6,000 square feet of commercial space and 31 dwelling units would
remain in place.)
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Paul Lynch, P L H & Associates
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
E xpanded Requirements D iscussion E xhibit
P roposed P lans - Revised E xhibit
2018 A pproved P lans B ackup Material
D eveloper Virtual Open House C omments E xhibit
D raft P lanning C ommission Minutes E xhibit
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AT 101 66TH STREET EAST
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which
requests approval of an amended final development plan and conditional use permit for
a planned unit development to allow construction of a three-story mixed-use building on
the parcel of land located at 101 66th Street East (“subject property”), legally described
as:
Lots 7 and 8 except the south 50 feet of the west half of Lot 8, Goodspeed’s First
Plat, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public
hearing at its September 28, 2020 meeting, and recommended approval of the
amended final development plan and conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet
of the subject property on September 15, 2020 and published in the Sun Current
newspaper on September 17, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the amended final development plan and conditional use permit
meet those requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as
specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City
Council Staff Report No. ____; and
WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a
conditional use permit as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6
and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. ____; and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of an amended
planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 11513
approved by the City Council on June 26, 2018; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth
above.
2. A planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit
are approved for a mixed-use development as described in City Council Report
No. ____, on the Subject Property legally described above.
3. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional
use permit are subject to the following conditions:
• The Developer shall continue to work with Community Development staff to
finalize the following items:
o Continue to discuss transformer screening and/or artistic wrap treatment.
Continue to discuss landscape and hardscape in this area. The fenced
area shall not be larger than necessary to screen the transformer and
materials shall be complimentary to building materials.
o If space allows without reducing parking, residential trash storage shall be
accommodated in the underground level or designed within the building.
• No more than 67 parking stalls are permitted.
• The walkway on the south side of the building shall be connected to the
Stevens Avenue sidewalk, whether at grade or with stairs through the
retaining wall.
• Plans must include signage and a curb extension to physically prohibit right
turns from the development onto southbound Stevens Avenue.
• Raised berm and landscaping shall fully screen parking lot views from the
south. Screening opacity requirements shall be as follows: 100% opacity to 3-
4 feet height and 50% opacity to 6 feet height. Developer shall work with the
property owner at 6616 Stevens Avenue to devise a mutually acceptable
screening solution along the shared property line, in accordance with the
above opacity requirement.
• With the consent and cooperation of the property owner at 6615 Stevens
Avenue, the developer shall install plantings on the property or boulevard
area to mitigate headlight impacts. A boulevard feature permit from Richfield
Public Works is required before planting on public right-of-way.
• Final landscaping plans must be approved by the Community Development
Department prior to installation. Developer should consider native plantings
that meet screening requirements previously identified.
• The existing wood fence abutting the property at 6613 1st Avenue shall be
replaced with new fence pickets/panels. Existing fence posts may be reused.
• Permitted uses shall include those uses permitted in the Mixed-Use
Neighborhood District, except convenience stores. Additionally, the following
uses from the Mixed-Use Community District are permitted: offices/clinics,
health/athletic clubs, spas, yoga studios and class III restaurants without
drive-thru/drive-in service.
• If a restaurant tenant is installed, odor control systems are required to
mitigate cooking odors in accordance with City Code Subsection 544.27.
• Commercial doors facing 66th Street and 1st Avenue shall not be locked
during business hours.
• Direct access to/from 66th sidewalk from individual ground floor units on north
side of building shall be provided.
• Signage on the south and east building facades shall not be lit between the
hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., except any signage related to
underground parking or resident entry. Large-scale wall or projecting signage
shall not be used on the south or east elevation.
• Bicycle parking is required for commercial uses, with a minimum capacity of
six (6) bicycles. An artistic or unique design/color is recommended. Enclosed
or underground bicycle parking is required for the residential uses.
• All parking spaces shall remain available year round.
• All new utility service must be underground.
• All utilities must be grouped away from public right-of-way and screened from
public view in accordance with Ordinance requirements. A screening plan is
required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
• The property owner is responsible for the ongoing maintenance and tending
of all landscaping in accordance with approved plans.
• The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance
with all requirements detailed in the City’s Administrative Review Committee
Reports dated April 5, 2018 and September 14, 2020 and compliance with all
other City and State regulations. Separate sign permits are required.
• A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
• Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a
surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete.
• Final stormwater management plan must be approved by the Public Works
Director. Infiltration not allowed in high-vulnerability wellhead protection area.
• As-builts or $7,500 cash escrow must be submitted to the Public Works
Department prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy.
• The Public Works Department will monitor traffic counts and patterns
following completion of the development.
4. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional
use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the
permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or
upon written request by the developer, the Council extends the expiration date
for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance,
Section 547.09, Subd. 9.
5. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional
use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are
observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the
use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning
Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of
October 2020.
Maria Regan-Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
Required Findings
Part 1: Development proposals in the Mixed Use Districts shall be reviewed for
compliance with the following (537.01, Subd.2):
1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City’s development guides,
including the Comprehensive Plan and any redevelopment plans established for
the area. As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, a small area plan for
the 66th Street and Nicollet Avenue area (including this site) was prepared. The
study confirmed the strength of the Richfield housing market; indicating that there
was an opportunity to build additional higher income multi-family units in this
area. A small amount of additional office space was also indicated as a possibility
for the area, specifically as a complement to the introduction of new residential
buildings in a mixed-use development pattern.
Policies in the Comprehensive Plan that support this proposal include the
following:
• Commit to equitable opportunities for all.
• Emphasize sustainability.
• Maintain an appropriate mix of housing types in each neighborhood based
on available amenities, transportation resources, and adjacent land uses.
• Promote development that broadens the tax base.
• Encourage development of areas where vehicle use is minimized.
2. Consistency with the regulations of the Mixed Use Districts as described by
Section 537 of the Code. The proposed development meets the intent of the
Mixed Use District regulations. The proposal only deviates from regulations as
follows:
• As a corner lot and a through lot (extending through a block), the building
could be interpreted to have three “front” sides facing 66th Street, 1st Avenue,
and Stevens Avenue. The building exceeds the maximum front/side setback
of 15’ along both 1st Avenue (19.4’) and Stevens Avenue (52.6’); however,
the proposed design balances the need for customer entrance and patio
space adjacent to the commercial uses on the west side of the building, while
providing a larger setback to the residential areas to the south and east along
Stevens Avenue.
3. Creation of a design for structures and site features which promotes the
following:
i. An internal sense of order among the buildings and uses. The location of the
building, drive aisle and parking lot, amenities and walkways provide a safe
and accessible site that will adequately serve residents and customers
arriving by all transportation modes. Pedestrian connections to 66th Street
are strong and active uses & building frontages are included on all sides, with
the exception of the ground floor facing Stevens Avenue.
ii. The adequacy of vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways,
interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to
the public streets, width or interior drives and access points, general interior
circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement
and amount of parking. See above
iii. Energy conservation through the design of structures and the use of
landscape materials and site grading. The approved plans include a proof-of-
parking area that will be landscaped unless found necessary to alleviate an
unusual parking demand.
iv. The minimization of adverse environmental effects on persons using the
development and adjacent properties. The proposal includes buffering and
landscaping along property boundaries and exceeds the minimum amount of
pervious surfaces required.
Part 2: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application (542.09
Subd. 3):
1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. See above Part
1, #1
2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable
and unified environment within its own boundaries. See above – Part 1, #3.
3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the
guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified
by the design of the development. The development is in substantial compliance
with the intent of the guiding Mixed-Use District. Departures from requirements
are minimal and the proposal meets the intent of requirements.
4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets
or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the
development. The City’s Public Works, Engineering, and Recreation
Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues.
5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring
properties. Undue adverse impacts are not anticipated. The site and the
conditions of the resolution are designed to minimize any potential negative
impacts on neighboring properties. Most traffic is expected to reach the
development via 66th Street, rather than from the south via 1st or Stevens
Avenue. Entering or exiting the development through the neighborhood would be
slower than directly via 66th Street. Furthermore, 1st and Stevens Avenues do
not continue south of 68th Street (the street grid is interrupted) making
neighborhood traffic increases unlikely. The plan includes signage and curb
modifications to prohibit right turns from the development onto southbound
Stevens Avenue.
6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are
sufficient to protect the public interest. The final development plan and
conditional use permit resolution establish conditions sufficient to protect the
public interest.
Part 3: All uses are conditional uses in the PMU District. The findings necessary to
issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (Subd. 547.09, Subd. 6):
1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the
City’s Comprehensive Plan. See above – Part 1, #1.
2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the
purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the
proposed use. The use is consistent with the intent of the Planned Mixed Use
District and the underlying Mixed Use District.
3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans
or urban design guidelines. See above – Part 1, #1
4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards
specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development is in
substantial compliance with performance standards. Deviation from Code
requirements is requested as follows:
Parking lot setback – The applicant has proposed a 10.17 ft. setback from the
south property line; the Code requires a 15-ft. setback. The intent of this
provision is to provide adequate area to attractively screen the parking lot and
buffer adjacent properties from headlights and vehicle noise. The proposed
buffer provides 100% screening of the parking lot through a combination of
fencing and landscaping. The buffer area is large enough to support the plants
selected and will provide an attractive barrier between the development and the
adjacent property to south (6613 1st Avenue).
5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental
facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City’s
Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do
not anticipate any adverse impacts.
6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or
welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health,
safety and welfare from undue adverse impacts.
7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. See above – Part
1, #1.
8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code
for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met.
01/2"1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
PROJECT INDEX:
OWNER:PROJECT ADDRESS:
ISG PROJECT #
MANAGING OFFICE:
9/21/2020 8:23:53 AM
G1 -10
TITLE SHEET,
SHEET INDEX,
PROJECT
GENERAL NOTES
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
20746 ARCH R18.RVT
DRL
JPW
05/22/2019
JPW
200 20746 G1-10
17-20746
PLH MIXED USE BLDG
101 66th STREET EAST
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PROJECT MANAGER: JOE WAGNER
EMAIL: joe.wagner@is-grp.com
PLH & ASSOCIATES, LLC.
PAUL LYNCH
PO BOX 390157
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55439
608.206.7596
PLH MIXED USE BUILDING
17 -20746RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE,
BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE
PROJECT MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY
CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL
ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT /
ENGINEER.
2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL
EXTENT AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND CORRELATING QUANTITIES AND
DIMENSIONS.
3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING
INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT /
ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION
OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE
OF DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE
SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS,
DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT /
ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED,
INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO
MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN
MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY
ARCHITECT / ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
7. LARGE-SCALE, MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER
SMALLER-SCALE, LESS SPECIFIC DETAILS AND INFORMATION. MORE STRINGENT
REQUIREMENTS FOR CODE, PRODUCTS AND INSTALLATION TAKE PRECEDENCE
OVER LESS STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
8. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS SEALANT AROUND ALL MATERIALS AT EXTERIOR WALL
PENETRATIONS. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROPRIATE SEALANT.
9. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER
TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION.
10. SEAL ALL OPENINGS IN WALLS, FLOORS, CEILINGS, AND ROOFS, AROUND DUCTS,
PIPES, VENTS, TRAPS, CONDUIT AND ALL OTHER PENETRATIONS WITH
FIRESTOPPING AS SPECIFIED AND REQUIRED BY CODES.
11. PROVIDE TEMPORARY WALLS, ENCLOSURES, DUST SHIELDS AND WALK-OFF MATS
AS REQUIRED TO SEPARATE DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION FROM EXISTING
BUILDING.
12. PROVIDE BRACING AND SHORING AS REQUIRED TO PROTECT EXISTING
STRUCTURE TO REMAIN. PROVIDE SECURE AND WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE OF
TEMPORARY OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS. PROTECT ALL BUILDING
COMPONENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION.
13. RESTORE ALL EXISTING AREAS AFFECTED BY DEMOLITION AND RELATED NEW
CONSTRUCTION TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WALLS, FLOORS, AND CEILINGS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FINISHES.
14. PROVIDE SOLID WALL BACKING WITH METAL OR FIRE-RETARDANT WOOD
BLOCKING BEHIND DOOR HARDWARE SUCH AS WALL STOPS, BUMPERS, HOLD
OPENS, ETC.
SHEET INDEX
SHEET # SHEET TITLE
S1-00 STRUCTURAL NOTES
S1-01 STRUCTURAL SCHEDULES
S1-11 OVERALL FOUNDATION PLAN
S1-12A FOUNDATION PLAN - AREA A
S1-12B FOUNDATION PLAN - AREA B
S1-13 LOWER LEVEL CONCRETE SLAB PLAN
S2-11 FOUNDATION DETAILS
S2-12 FOUNDATION DETAILS
S2-13 FOUNDATION DETAILS
S2-14 FOUNDATION DETAILS
S2-21 FOUNDATION WALL ELEVATIONS
S3-01 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
S3-02 PRECAST LOADING PLAN
S3-11 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
S3-21 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
S3-31 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
S3-32 ENLARGED FRAMING PLANS
S4-11 FIRST / SECOND FLOOR SHEAR WALL PLANS
S4-12 THIRD FLOOR SHEAR WALL PLAN
S4-14 SHEAR WALL DETAILS
S6-21 FRAMING DETAILS
S6-22 FRAMING DETAILS
ELECTRICAL
E2-10 LOWER LEVEL POWER AND SYSTEMS PLAN
E2-11 FIRST FLOOR POWER AND SYSTEMS PLAN
E2-12 SECOND FLOOR POWER AND SYSTEMS PLAN
E2-13 THIRD FLOOR POWER AND SYSTEMS PLAN
E2-14 ROOF POWER PLAN
E2-20 LOWER LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN
E2-21 FIRST FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN
E2-22 SECOND FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN
E2-23 THIRD FLOOR LIGHTING
E3-11 TYPICAL UNIT ELECTRICAL PLANS
E3-31 ELEVATOR ELECTRICAL PLANS
E4-11 POWER RISERS, DETAILS
E5-11 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES
E5-12 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES
SHEET INDEX
SHEET # SHEET TITLE
GENERAL
G1-10 TITLE SHEET, SHEET INDEX, PROJECT GENERAL NOTES
G1-11 MOUNTING HEIGHTS AND STANDARDS, ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
G1-21 LOWER LEVEL AND FIRST FLOOR CODE DATA AND CODE DATA PLAN
G1-22 SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR CODE DATA AND CODE DATA PLAN
CIVIL
C0-10 SITE DATA
C0-20 SITE DETAILS
C0-21 SITE DETAILS
C0-22 SITE DETAILS
C0-23 SITE DETAILS
C0-24 SITE DETAILS
C0-25 STORMWATER CHAMBER DETAILS
C1-10 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) EXISTING CONDITIONS
C1-20 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PROPOSED CONDITIONS
C1-30 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES
C1-31 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES
C1-32 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES
C1-33 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILS
C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLAN
C3-10 SITE PLAN
C3-20 SITE UTILITY PLAN
C4-10 SITE GRADING PLAN
C5-10 SITE RESTORATION PLAN
C5-20 PLANTING PLAN
C5-21 PLANT SCHEDULE, NOTES & DETAILS
C6-10 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL
A1-01 INTERIOR PARTITION WALL TYPES, PARTITION NOTES
A1-02 INTERIOR PARTITION WALL TYPES, PARTITION NOTES
A1-21 LOWER LEVEL AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A1-22 SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN
A1-23 TYPICAL UNIT PLANS
A1-31 LOWER LEVEL AND FIRST FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
A1-32 SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
A1-41 LOWER LEVEL AND FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLANS
A1-42 SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR FINISH PLANS
A1-43 TYPICAL UNIT FINISH PLANS
A1-59 FINISH LEGENDS
A1-71 ROOF PLAN
A1-72 ROOF DETAILS
A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2-12 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A3-11 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3-21 WALL SECTIONS
A3-22 WALL SECTIONS
A3-23 WALL SECTIONS
A3-24 WALL SECTIONS
A3-31 ENLARGED DETAILS
A3-32 ENLARGED DETAILS
A3-33 ENLARGED DETAILS
A4-11 DOOR, FRAME AND WINDOW SCHEDULES AND TYPES
A6-11 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A6-12 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A7-11 ENLARGED VERTICAL CIRCULATION PLANS
A7-12 ENLARGED VERTICAL CIRCULATION PLANS
A7-13 ENLARGED VERTICAL CIRCULATION PLANS
STRUCTURAL
7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
INTERNATIONAL PLAZA
SUITE 550
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425
PHONE: 952.426.0699
MINNEAPOLIS /
ST. PAUL OFFICE
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
06/05/19 ADDENDUM #1 DRL
06/14/19 ADDENDUM #2 MDS
17-20746C0-10ARTARTATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C0 - DETAILSREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE DATAPLH MIXED USEBUILDINGI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON05/14/1955938B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. NSWELOCATION MAP0SCALE IN FEET500'1000'SITE SUMMARYPROPOSED ZONING:PMU, PLANNED MIXED USESITE AREA:0.98 AC.IMPERVIOUS AREAPROPOSED:0.72 AC. / 73%GREENSPACEPROPOSED:0.26 AC. / 27%BUILDING COVERAGEPROPOSED:0.30 AC. / 31%RETAIL SF:6,122 SFRESIDENTIAL SF:33,250 SFUNDERGROUND SF:13,333 SFBUILDING SF:52,705 SFRESIDENTIAL UNITS:31 UNITSPARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE)TYPEUNIT / AREASTALLS REQUIREDSTALLS PROVIDED19' x 9'1.5 / UNIT473319' X 9'3.5 / 1000 SF2238HANDICAP STALL22TOTAL:6971SETBACKSPARKINGBUILDINGFRONT YARD3'0'SIDE YARD3'0'REAR YARD3'0'RESIDENTIAL3'15' LEGEND EXISTINGCITY LIMITSACCESS CONTROLSECTION LINEQUARTER SECTION LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEPROPERTY / LOTLINEEASEMENT LINECULVERTWATER EDGEWETLAND BOUNDARYWETLAND / MARSHWATERFENCE LINESTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERSANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINCONTOUR (MAJOR)UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEOVERHEAD ELECTRICUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TVGASUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICCONTOUR (MINOR)DECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREETREE LINEMANHOLE/STRUCTURECATCH BASINHYDRANTCURB STOPVALVEUTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINETPOWER POLE990989PROPOSEDCULVERTSTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TVGASCONTOURSTORM MANHOLECATCH BASINHYDRANTVALVEEASEMENTRIGHT OF WAYSTORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH)1015LOT LINEOVERHEAD UTILITYUNDERGROUND UTILITY CITY OFRICHFIELD, MNPROJECT LOCATIONMN 121
PROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION:6600 STEVENS AVENUE SOUTHRICHFIELD, MN 55423S27, T28, R24RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN, MINNESOTASANITARY CLEAN OUTCURB STOPPORTLAND AVENUE
SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCEALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF RICHFIELD REQUIREMENTS ANDMNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2016 EDITION, AND THESTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN ASPROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, UNLESS DIRECTEDOTHERWISE.PROJECT GENERAL NOTES1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUTARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS),DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONSISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.2.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT ANDCOMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK.3.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.4.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.5.DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OFDETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR INCHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGNINTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK.6.ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED,INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TOMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEENMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.7.ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TOAVOID GALVANIC CORROSION.8.THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FORGENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THEKNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACEUTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.9.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, MINIMUM 3 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION (811OR 1-800-252-1166).TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYTHIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN JUNE 2017 BYISG.PROJECT DATUMHORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATESYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET.US 35 W
990989LIGHT POLESFLOOD ZONETHE FLOOD ZONE CLASSIFICATION/LIMITS DEPICTED HEREON, IF ANY, ARE SUBJECT TO MAPSCALE UNCERTAINTY. THE SURVEYED PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT IN AHAZARDOUS FLOOD AREA, ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITYPANEL NO. 27053C0369F. PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,EFFECTIVE DATE NOVEMBER 4, 2016. FLOOD AREAS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY.66TH STREETMN 62NICOLLET AVENUE
CIVIL SHEET INDEXC0-10SITE DATAC0-20SITE DETAILSC0-21SITE DETAILSC0-22SITE DETAILSC0-23SITE DETAILSC0-24SITE DETAILSC0-25STORMWATER CHAMBER DETAILSC1-10STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) EXISTING CONDITIONSC1-20STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PROPOSED CONDITIONSC1-30STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTESC1-31STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTESC1-32STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTESC1-33STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILSC2-10EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLANC3-10SITE PLANC3-20SITE UTILITY PLANC4-10SITE GRADING PLANC5-10SITE RESTORATION PLANC5-20PLANTING PLANC5-21PLANT SCHEDULE, NOTES, & DETAILSC6-10PHOTOMETRICS PLAN
66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTHAC 135.63135.62Temporary EasementTemporary EasementSTORM MHR = 839.38I = 832.63STORM CB-ROUNDR = 840.54I = 834.34STORM MHR = 838.06I = 833.25STORMCB-ROUNDR = 837.46I = 833.46STORMCB-ROUNDR = 837.86I = 834.56SANITARY MHR = 839.20I(W) = 832.86I(S) = 829.86I(E) = 836.86I(S) = 833.86BENCHMARK14841.1717-20746C2-10MNAMNAATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C2 - EXISTINGREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,EXISTING SITE &REMOVALS PLANREMOVAL LEGENDSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONREMOVE BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTREMOVE CONCRETEPAVEMENTREMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALKREMOVE GRAVEL SURFACEDEMOLISH BUILDINGREMOVE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE DECIDUOUS TREE(CLEAR & GRUB)CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONAND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.PAVEMENT REMOVALS SHALL INCLUDE FULL DEPTHSAWCUT & SECTION REMOVAL.LEGENDEXISTINGSTORM DRAINSANITARY SEWERSANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINWATER MAINGASOVERHEAD ELECTRICUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND TVOVERHEAD UTILITYUNDERGROUND UTILITYFIBER OPTICFENCE LINEPROPERTY / LOT LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENT LINECONTOURS (MAJOR)CONTOURS (MINOR)NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES.1001010SCALE IN FEET1020REMOVE BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT (TYP)REMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP)DEMOLISH EXISTINGBUILDINGCLEAR & GRUBEXISTING TREE (TYP)REMOVE GRAVELSURFACEDEMOLISH EXISTINGBUILDINGREMOVE RETAINING WALLREMOVE SIGNREMOVE RETAINING WALLDEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDINGREMOVE CONCRETEPAVEMENT (TYP)REMOVE GUARDPOSTS, TYP OF (2)REMOVE GUARD POSTS,TYP OF (3)REMOVE CURB &GUTTER (TYP)DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDINGDEMOLISH EXISTINGBUILDINGI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON05/14/1955938B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. REMOVE OVERHEAD ELECTRICALLINES AND POLES (COORDINATEWITH UTILITY COMPANY)NOTE: EXISTING REMOVALS SHOWN ARE FORREFERENCE ONLY.PLH MIXED USEBUILDINGREMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP)
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDING1ST FLOOR FFE=845.42'PARKING GARAGE FFE=834.42'66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH 135.63135.62Temporary EasementTemporary Easement84
0
8
4
1
8
4
2
8
4
3
8
4
4845
835
836
837
838
839839844845
EXISTING TREETO REMAINEXISTING TREETO REMAINEDGEREDGEREDGEREDGER8458458428428438438438448448
4
4EXISTING ROW OF ARBORVITAE (TO REMAIN)SYMBOLDESCRIPTIONQTYEDGER155 lfSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONQTYSOD10,845 sfWOOD MULCH1,776 sf1REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE17-20746C5-10--------RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C5 - LANDSCAPEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE RESTORATIONPLAN0SCALE IN FEET1020TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & STABILIZATION NOTETEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES, INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL FENCE, INLETPROTECTION, ETC. MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL SEEDING AND STABILIZATIONMEASURES ARE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. REFER TOSWPPP SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON05/14/1955938B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. 06/05/19ADDENDUM 1ARTPLH MIXED USEBUILDING
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH Temporary EasementTemporary Easement84
0
8
4
1
8
4
2
8
4
3
8
4
4845
835
836
837
838
839839845(6) GOLDMOUND SPIREA(3) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(4) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(1) RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK)(1) RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK)(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(9) GOLDMOUND SPIREA(3) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) HACKBERRY(1) DWARF WINGED EUONYMUSBUR OAK (1)(3) BLACK HILLS SPRUCEEASTERN RED CEDAR (5)BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (6)EASTERN RED CEDAR (6)DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS (8)EXISTING TREETO REMAINEXISTING TREETO REMAINEDGEREDGEREDGEREDGERSEA GREEN JUNIPER (3)CRANBERRY COTONEASTER (4)SEA GREEN JUNIPER (3)845845842842843843843844844844SEA GREEN JUNIPER (3)RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK) (1)GOLDMOUND SPIREA (16)(5) DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS(4) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(7) GOLDMOUND SPIREAEXISTING ROW OF ARBORVITAE (TO REMAIN)(2) SEA GREEN JUNIPER17-20746C5-20--------RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C5 - LANDSCAPEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,PLANTING PLAN0SCALE IN FEET1020UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIESON-SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.TOTAL SITE = 42,699 SF30 TREES SHOWN2 EXISTING TREES (TO BE SAVED)28 PROPOSED TREES83 SHRUBS SHOWN17 TREES REQUIREDCODE: 1 TREE PER 2500 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPE AREA(42,699 / 2500 = 17.1 OR 17 TREES)43 SHRUBS REQUIREDCODE: 1 SHRUB PER 1000 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPE AREA(42,699 / 1000 = 42.7 OR 43 SHRUBS)LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON05/14/1955938B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. 5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALARTPLH MIXED USEBUILDING
CON.TREESQTYCOMMON NAMESIZEROOTNOTE9Black Hills SprucePicea glauca densata6` HtB & B11Eastern Red CedarJuniperus virginiana6` HtB & BOVERSTORYQTYCOMMON NAMESIZEROOTNOTE3Autumn Gold GinkgoGinkgo biloba `Autumn Gold`2-1/2" CalB & Bmale plant only1Bur OakQuercus macrocarpa2-1/2" CalB & B1HackberryCeltis occidentalis2-1/2" CalB & B3River Birch (Multi-Trunk)Betula nigra6` HtB & BMulti-trunkCON.SHRUBSQTYCOMMON NAMESIZEROOTNOTE34Sea Green JuniperJuniperus chinensis `Sea Green`24" Ht.ContDEC.SHRUBSQTYCOMMON NAMESIZEROOTNOTE4Cranberry CotoneasterCotoneaster apiculatus16" HtCont15Dwarf Winged EuonymusEuonymus alatus `Compactus`4` Ht.Cont43Goldmound SpireaSpiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`24" Ht.ContPLANT SCHEDULE17-20746C5-21--------RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C5 - LANDSCAPEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,PLANT SCHEDULE,NOTES, & DETAILS1.COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS,SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPEELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTORSHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVEPRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK.2.SAVE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED.3.REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TOPLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLINGWITH PLANTING MIX.4.LAWN AREAS SHALL HAVE 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALLBE COMPACTED TO 85% MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURECONTENT.5.REFER TO PLANTING DETAILS PLAN FOR AMENDED SOIL DEPTH INPLANTING BEDS AND SURROUNDING TREES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONSFOR MIX TYPE.6.FIELD STAKE PLANTINGS ACCORDING TO PLAN. OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE ALL PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TOINSTALLATION. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE PLANTINGLAYOUT AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.7.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRUE TO THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAME ANDSIZE AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE.8.IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ONTHE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THEPLANTING PLAN SHALL GOVERN.9.OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE QUANTITIES TO SUIT BUDGETLIMITATIONS. CONTRACTOR'S UNIT BID PRICES SHALL PREVAIL FOR ANYCHANGES IN QUANTITIES.10.ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITHPLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT,FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTENAPPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND OWNER.11.ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FORNURSERY STOCK (A.N.S.I.), LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICANASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANTMATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCKCONFORMS TO A.N.S.I.12.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN A LIVE ANDHEALTHY GROWING CONDITION FOR ONE FULL GROWING SEASON (ONEYEAR) AFTER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE OR SHALL BE REPLACED FREEOF CHARGE WITH THE SAME GRADE AND SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL HAVEA STRONG CENTRAL LEADER.13.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS.ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINALCONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.14.PLANTING BED EDGING - USE 3/4" x 6" PROFESSIONAL GRADE METALEDGING IN ALL AREAS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS LAWN AREAS ORWHERE INDICATED. USE 12" METAL SPIKES AS INSTRUCTED BYMANUFACTURER.15.PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, NATURAL COLOR,SURROUNDING ALL PROPOSED TREES TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH ASSHOWN IN TREE PLANTING DETAIL. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT SUCHAS PLASTIC SHEET OR LANDSCAPE FABRIC. IF LOCATED WITHIN A PLANTBED, SUBSTITUTE THIS MULCH WITH THE MULCH CALLED FOR WITHIN THATPLANT BED. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TOMULCHING.16.ALL AREAS NOT WITHIN PLANT BEDS OR PAVEMENT SHALL BE SODDED.TURF AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SODDED. SODSECTIONS SHALL BE NO SMALLER THAN 24" X 36" STAKED IN PLACE WITHBIODEGRADABLE SOD STAKES WHEN SLOPE IS STEEPER THAN 5:1 ORWHEN CONDITIONS REQUIRE.17.IRRIGATION REQUIRED - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ASA 'DESIGN BUILD' PROJECT AND SERVICE ALL GREEN SPACE INCLUDINGLAWN AND PLANTING BEDS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT DRAWING FORAPPROVAL BY ENGINEER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.18.FOR PLANT, SHRUB, AND TREE LOCATIONS: CONTRACTOR IS PERMITTEDTO USE DISCRETION AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DRIVEWAYS, UTILITIES, OROTHER CONFLICTS. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS, INCLUDING SHRUBSAND TREES SHALL MEET CITY CODE.21.INDICATED QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATES AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BYTHE CONTRACTOR/BIDDER.22.IRRIGATION WATER METER TO BE INSTALLED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR.GENERAL PLANTING NOTESGUY ASSEMBLY: 16" POLYPROPYLENE ORPOLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRIP- (TYP.)DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKESOR SIGN POSTS @ 120 DEG. O.C. (SEE STAKINGDIAGRAM).CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREES ONLY IF THETREE(S) BEGIN TO LEAN WITHIN THE GUARANTEEPERIOD.COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORMORIENTATION OF GUY LINES AND STAKES.120 DEG.120 DEG.120 DEG.1.PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE SITE, THE CONTRACTORSHALL LOCATE THE BUTTRESS ROOTS OR TRUNKFLARE OF EACH TREE. IF FLARE IS LOCATED MORETHAN 2" DOWN FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THETREE IS REJECTED AND SHALL NOT BE DELIVERED TOTHE SITE.2.ONCE THE PROPERLY GROWN TREE IS DELIVERED TOTHE SITE, MEASURE DISTANCE BETWEEN TOP OF THEBUTTRESS ROOTS AND THE BOTTOM OF THEROOTBALL. SUBTRACT 2" TO DETERMINE DEPTH OFPLANTING PIT.3.DIG PIT TO DEPTH DETERMINED ABOVE. PIT SHALL BEDISHED WITH SIDEWALLS AS SHOWN BELOW. SCARIFYWALLS AND BOTTOM OF PIT.4.SET TREE IN PIT SO THAT THE FLARE IS ONE-TWOINCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. IN ALL AREASWITH HEAVY CLAY OR POORLY DRAINED SOILS(MOTTLING), CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TREEMAY BE RELOCATED OR THE ROOTBALL FURTHERELEVATED.5.REMOVE ANY SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL TOEXPOSE TOP OF FLARE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTWILL NOT ACCEPT ANY TREE UNLESS THE FLARE ISVISIBLE.6.BACKFILL PLANTING PIT TO WITHIN 12" OF GRADE ANDTHOROUGHLY WATER.7.REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE, AND ALL ROPE FROM THE TOP12" OF THE ROOTBALL8.BACKFILL TO THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL9.DO NOT CREATE WATERING RING10.CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO INSPECTPLANTING PRIOR TO PLACING ANY MULCH OVER THEROOT BALL.1.LOCATE BUTTRESS ROOTS (SEE NOTES ABOVE).2.REMOVE EXCESS SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL TO EXPOSETRUNK FLARE. MEASURE DEPTH OF ROOTBALL TODETERMINE DEPTH OF PLANTING PIT.3.TO ELIMINATE ENCIRCLING ROOTS, MAKE SEVERAL VERTICALSLITS AROUND PERIMETER OF ROOT MASS FROM TOP TOBOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL. DEPTH OF SLITS INTO THEROOTBALL SHALL BE AT LEAST 2".TREES WILL BE REJECTEDFOR THE FOLLOWINGREASONS:-POOR FORM-DAMAGED TRUNK-BURIED ROOT FLARES-ENCIRCLING TRANSPORT ROOTS-UNCONSOLIDATED ROOTBALL SOIL (DUETO EXCESSIVE HANDLING)TREE PLANTING NOTESCONTAINER GROWN TREESSTAKINGREMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIREBASKETS, BURLAP, TWINE - REMOVE THESE AND ALLNON-BIODEGRADIBLE MATURIALS FROM THEPLANTING PIT. AVOID CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS.ANY ROOTS THAT ARE SCARED OR BROKEN DURINGPLANTING SHOULD BE CUT CLEAN AT 90 DEGREESBACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER TREE PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVESOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDEDTOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL.DO NOT TAMP SOIL, BUT SATURATE WITH WATERTHROUGHOUT BACKFILL PROCESS.EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TOTHE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" AND AMINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHMOUNDED AT EDGE TO FORM A SHALLOW SAUCER -DO NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 3" OF TRUCK. WHEN INPLANT BED, SUBSTITUTE WITH PLANT BED MULCH.ROOTBALL DIA2X ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLNEVER CUT PRIMARY LEADERPRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED, OR RUBBING LIMBSAND BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING -ALL PRUNING CUTS CLEAN AT 90 DEGREESTREES 8'+TREES 6'-8'SET ROOT FLAIR ABOVE GRADE 3"WHEN STAKED, ATTACH 1/2" WIDE NYLONSTRAPPING SNUGLY AROUND TRUCK AND, WITHSOME LOOSENESS, TO STAKES AS SHOWNNOTE: * AVOID STAKING UNLESSNECESSARY. * NO STAKINGTREES UNDER 6'.STAKINGDIAGRAMMUST MAINTAIN TRUNK IN VERTICAL ORIENTATIONMULCH - PER PLANS & NOTESPLANTING BED - SOIL PREPARATION PER PLANS& NOTESLAWN OR GROUND COVERFINISH GRADELANDSCAPE EDGING AND STAKING - PER PLANS& NOTESSUBGRADE - PER PLANS & NOTESMULCH, PER PLANS & NOTESBACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER SHRUB PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVESOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDEDTOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOILEXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THEDEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL / CONTAINER MINUS 3" ANDA MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL/ CONTAINER - TILL ALL PLANTING BEDS TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF 6" THROUGHTPLACE ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL ANDENSURE PLANT IS PLUMBALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE TOP OFTHE CROWN OF THE PLANT IS SLIGHTLY ABOVEFINISH GRADE 3"ROOTBALL DIA2 TIMES ROOTBALL DIADEPTH OFROOTBALLCUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OFWIRE BASKETS, BURLAP AND/OR TWINE, OR ENTIRECONTAINER, AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT,SCARIFY ROOTS FOR ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS 5GALLONS OR SMALLERCONTAINER DIA2 TIMES CONTAINER DIASHRUB PLANTING DETAILNO SCALELANDSCAPE EDGING DETAILNO SCALETREE PLANTING DETAILNO SCALEUNDISTURBED SOILIRRIGATION REQUIREMENTSIRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A 'DESIGN BUILD' PROJECT ANDSERVICE ALL LANDSCAPED AREA, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED OTHERWISE, INCLUDING LAWNAND PLANTING BEDS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL BY THEOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.STAKING DIAGRAMORANGE SAFETY FENCE ATTACHEDTO STAKESTREE PROTECTION DETAILNO SCALESECTIONPLANSTAKES - SET MAXIMUM 5' APART2" x 2" WOOD OR STEELEXISTING TREE TRUNKFENCE DISTANCE FROM TRUNK:- FOLLOW PLAN LOCATIONS IFSHOWN- OTHERWISE, PLACE FENCE 1' FOREACH 1" OF TRUNK DIAMETER (AT4' HEIGHT).EXAMPLE: 6" TRUNK DIA MEANS 6'FROM TRUNKSTAKES - 2" x 2" WOOD OR STEELSET A MIN. 24" DEEP INUNDISTURBED GROUNDORANGE SAFETY FENCEATTACHED TO STAKESEXISTING GRADE4' HT.EXISTING TREEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON05/14/1955938B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. 5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALARTPLH MIXED USEBUILDING
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH BENCHMARK14841.17Luminaire ScheduleTYPESYMBOLQTYDESCRIPTIONMODELLUMENSZ12LITHONIA D-SERIES SIZE 1-530-T2MDSXW1 LED 10C 530 40K T2M MVOLT2101Z125LITHONIA D-SERIES SIZE 1-350-T2MDSXW1 LED 10C 350 40K T2M MVOLT1448Z141LITHONIA D-SERIE SIZE 1 - T4MDSXW1 LED 10C 350 40K T4M MVOLT1458Z2F3LITHONIA D-SERIES SIZE 2 - TFTMDSXW2 LED 20C 1000 40K TFTM MVOLT7593Z12Z12Z12Z12Z12Z14Z2FZ2FZ2FZ1Z10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.30.40.50.50.60.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.40.50.60.80.91.01.00.90.90.90.91.01.00.90.70.60.40.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.20.20.30.30.30.40.60.70.91.01.31.41.51.41.41.41.51.61.41.21.00.80.60.50.30.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.30.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.50.60.80.91.11.31.51.82.01.92.02.02.12.11.81.61.31.10.90.60.50.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.60.60.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.50.50.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.70.81.01.21.41.51.82.12.42.52.62.62.72.62.21.91.71.41.10.90.70.50.40.30.30.30.30.30.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.20.30.40.50.70.80.80.80.80.80.80.90.90.80.70.70.70.80.90.90.90.80.80.81.01.11.21.41.61.82.12.52.83.13.13.33.33.12.82.32.11.81.41.10.90.80.60.60.50.50.50.50.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.20.40.50.70.91.11.21.21.11.11.21.21.21.11.00.90.91.01.11.31.21.21.11.21.31.41.41.51.72.02.32.73.13.74.14.24.03.63.32.92.52.11.71.41.31.21.11.00.90.90.90.80.60.40.30.20.10.10.00.20.40.70.91.21.51.61.71.61.61.71.81.71.41.21.11.11.31.51.71.81.61.61.71.81.81.61.71.81.92.32.93.74.85.55.85.14.54.13.53.12.52.01.81.71.71.71.51.41.41.51.30.90.60.30.20.10.10.00.30.50.81.21.62.02.12.42.42.32.42.42.11.81.51.31.31.51.82.12.42.42.32.42.42.21.91.81.81.82.02.73.64.66.06.05.14.94.64.43.83.02.42.22.22.42.62.42.22.22.31.91.30.80.40.20.10.00.00.30.50.81.32.02.52.53.03.13.13.12.92.52.11.61.31.31.72.22.63.03.13.13.12.92.52.11.61.10.80.91.42.62.62.83.14.14.44.24.43.93.12.52.42.73.23.83.73.53.63.42.61.81.00.50.20.10.00.00.30.50.91.42.12.83.03.74.54.64.53.63.02.31.61.21.21.72.53.03.74.54.64.43.62.92.31.50.90.60.60.81.01.52.02.32.83.84.55.14.53.62.72.53.24.14.85.35.15.14.43.52.21.00.40.20.10.00.00.30.60.91.52.22.83.04.35.66.25.34.12.92.11.51.21.21.62.33.14.35.66.25.34.12.92.11.40.90.60.50.71.31.71.82.33.13.84.24.84.33.52.62.43.14.65.98.08.37.65.43.82.10.90.40.20.10.00.00.30.61.01.52.22.82.43.24.24.54.03.12.31.91.41.11.11.52.02.43.24.34.64.13.12.31.91.30.80.50.50.70.91.11.21.62.32.93.53.93.42.72.22.33.04.15.49.011.28.24.83.42.00.90.40.10.10.00.00.30.60.80.91.01.10.02.31.30.60.20.10.00.00.00.40.71.01.21.31.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.81.21.51.61.60.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.91.41.81.91.90.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.91.41.82.02.00.90.90.80.60.40.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.50.91.31.61.92.11.41.11.00.70.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.81.21.41.71.92.21.41.20.70.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.81.21.51.82.01.91.41.10.70.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.91.31.71.92.01.21.01.00.70.40.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.50.91.41.82.02.00.80.80.70.50.40.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.40.81.31.71.81.80.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.71.11.41.51.60.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.60.91.01.11.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.71.01.21.51.70.91.11.11.11.01.01.01.11.21.21.11.00.90.90.91.11.21.21.11.00.90.90.91.01.11.21.21.10.90.90.91.01.01.11.00.90.60.50.40.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.71.01.21.51.51.01.21.31.31.21.21.31.41.51.51.41.21.21.21.21.31.41.41.31.21.11.21.11.21.31.41.41.21.11.21.11.21.21.21.10.90.70.60.50.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.70.91.01.21.31.01.21.31.21.01.01.11.31.41.51.31.11.01.01.01.21.41.41.31.11.00.91.01.11.31.41.31.21.00.90.91.01.21.21.10.90.60.50.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.60.70.81.01.10.91.01.11.00.90.80.91.11.21.31.11.00.80.80.91.01.21.21.10.90.80.70.81.01.11.21.21.00.90.70.80.91.01.10.90.70.60.40.40.30.30.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.50.60.70.80.80.60.70.70.70.70.70.70.80.90.90.80.70.70.70.70.80.80.80.80.70.60.60.70.70.80.80.80.70.70.60.60.60.70.70.60.50.40.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.40.50.50.50.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.50.50.50.50.50.40.40.40.50.50.50.50.40.40.40.40.40.50.50.50.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc17-20746C6-10ARTARTATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C6 - PHOTOREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,PHOTOMETRICSPLAN0SCALE IN FEET1020I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON05/14/1955938B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. PLH MIXED USEBUILDING
REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DN
DN
UP
DN
UPDWREF.REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWUP
UP
A2 -122
A2-12
A2-11
1
1
115
FUTURE
COMMERCIAL
103
STAIR
200' - 0"
2
A3-11
_____________________
11 88
AA
DD
1
A3-11
_____________________66' - 8"BB
CC
22 33 44 55 66 77
108
MECHANICAL
109
UNIT TYPE 2110
UNIT TYPE 2
112
UNIT TYPE 2
113
ADA
UNIT TYPE 7
107
UNIT TYPE 5
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 1"28' - 7"30' - 0"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"0"3 1/2"41' - 5"17' - 1"8' - 2"106
CIRCULATION
104
VESTIBULE
105
VESTIBULE /
MAIL
120
TRASH
ENCLOSURE
101
COMMON
AREA
121
EXIT
CORRIDOR
102
STAIR
1 3/4"1 3/4"29' - 11 5/8"16' - 11 3/4"31' - 5 1/8"25' - 10 1/4"36' - 5 1/4"18' - 4"3' - 4"
1' - 2"
8' - 6"
6 1/2"1' - 6"
5' - 6 1/2"13' - 7"6' - 10"
2' - 0"
3' - 4"3' - 4"10' - 0"5' - 4"
3 1/2"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"13' - 6 1/4"14' - 9 3/4"28' - 1"58' - 7"24' - 0"
4 3/4"
9' - 10"10' - 8"8' - 1"11' - 5"6' - 0"14' - 11"5' - 1"6' - 0"13' - 7"6' - 5"6' - 0"13' - 7"6' - 5"6' - 0"5' - 7"8' - 0"6' - 0"5"12' - 6"6' - 0"
4' - 0 1/2"
7' - 0"
6 1/2"
8' - 9"5' - 2"5' - 8"6' - 4"
3 1/2"
111
COMMUNITY
ROOM
120A 120B
105A
104A
104B
105B
115B
119
FITNESS
114
TOILET
A7-11
6
A7-11
2
9' - 9 7/8"21' - 8 1/2"6' - 7 1/2"13' - 6 1/4"5' - 8 1/2"9' - 1 1/4"16' - 9 1/4"11' - 3 3/4"8' - 6"20' - 1"4' - 0 1/2"15' - 2 1/4"10' - 3 1/8"5' - 8"29' - 11 7/8"115A
23' - 0"7 3/8"3
A3-21
_____________________
2
A3-21
_____________________21' - 4"2
4
A3-21
_____________________
24' - 0"
4.44.41.81.8 2.22.2 3.83.8
W1 W2
A1-23
5 20' - 4"15' - 10"10' - 2"20' - 4"2
A3-23
_____________________
4
A3-23
_____________________3 1/2"30' - 5 3/4"5' - 8 1/2"6' - 5 3/4"9' - 6"5' - 10"26' - 0"20' - 4"52' - 2"200' - 0"24' - 0"
108
ELEVATOR
102B
3
A3-23
_____________________
8 8
3AL1
21' - 4"A1-23
9 1' - 3 1/4"1' - 3 1/4"
7
A3-21
_____________________
D10
D10
1' - 0"13' - 6"5' - 10"26' - 0"22' - 6 1/2"7' - 0"
122
STORAGE122
25
102A
7 7
W1
J6
J6
G6
F2
F2
J6
J6
J6
J6
W1W1
B.3B.3
B.6B.6
G6
E4
F4
1"
29
M8
M8M4
M8
5
A3-23
_____________________
5
A3-23
Sim
_____________________
8
A1-01
8
A1-01
7
A1-02
8
A1-01
8
A1-01
7
A1-02
8
A1-01
34
345' - 10"6' - 0"1.31.3
A1-02
8
TYP
G6
114G6
J6
J6
J6
117
UNIT TYPE 2116
UNIT TYPE 2 110A1' - 6"
118
UNIT TYPE 2
123
UNIT TYPE 2
124
UNIT TYPE 2
W1 W1 W1
124A123A118A30' - 3"5' - 8"30' - 3"7
J6
GATE GATE GATE GATE
GATEGATEGATE
GATE
WALL LEGEND
FUTURE CONSTRUCTION
NEW CONSTRUCTION
A2-122
A2 -12
A2 -11
A2 -11
1
2
166' - 8"200' - 0"
33 STALLS
UTILITIES
2
A3-11
_____________________64' - 8"36' - 3 3/8"10' - 8"93' - 8 5/8"59' - 4"
11 88
AA
DD
1
A3-11
_____________________
BB
CC
22
19' - 0"9' - 4"6' - 10"21' - 6"21' - 6"6' - 10"13' - 6 1/4"14' - 9 3/4"28' - 1"28' - 7"30' - 0"
33 44 55 66 77
19
2 10
20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"9' - 8"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"7' - 3 3/8"9' - 0 5/8"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 8"24' - 0"
9' - 8"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"
1' - 4"
9' - 0"9' - 0"11' - 4"45' - 8"TYP21' - 0"003
STAIR
002
STAIR 001B003A
1' - 0"13' - 6"10' - 10"16' - 0"25' - 4"35' - 8"10' - 3 3/8"93' - 8 5/8"
A7-11
1
A7-11
5
1 1
1 1
2
2
A3-21
_____________________
TYP
TYP
4
A3-21
_____________________
4.44.41.81.8 2.22.2 3.83.8
005
2
A3-23
_____________________
4
A3-23
_____________________
ELEVATOR
006
ELEVATOR
EQUIP
2
001
UNDERGROUND
PARKING
3
A3-23
_____________________
22
22
7
A3-21
_____________________
22
22
22
22
006
005
LOBBY
002
27
27
1' - 8"3' - 0"5' - 6"21' - 0"B.3B.3
B.6B.6
5
A3-23
_____________________
3' - 0"5' - 2"20' - 0"4
4
1.31.3
20' - 8"
N
01/2"1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
9/18/2020 2:49:23 PM
A1 -21
LOWER LEVEL
AND FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
20746 ARCH R18.RVT
DRL
JPW
05/22/19
JPW
400 20746 A1-21
17-20746
1/8" = 1'-0"2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGEND
1 COLUMN, TYPICAL. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
2 BOLLARD, TYPICAL. REFER TO BOLLARD DETAIL
3 EQUIPMENT BY OWNER, COORDINATE LOCATION AND
POWER REQUIREMENTS WITH ELECTRICAL
4 WALL MOUNTED BICYCLE HANGER, (1) TYP AT EACH
PARKING STALL
8 CONCRETE PATIO, REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
22 FULL HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATE WITH LATCH,
OWNER TO PROVIDE LOCK
24 SECONDARY ROOF DRAIN LEADER, REFER TO PLUMBING
DOCUMENTS
25 FLOOR TO SLOPE TO OH DOOR
27 3'-0" x 7'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE GATE
29 2 YARD DUMPSTERS BY OTHERS
34 STEEL GRATING, REFER TO STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS
UNIT LEGEND
TOTAL FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGES
LOWER LEVEL: 13,333 PARKING = 13,333 SF TOTAL
FIRST FLOOR: 12,313 RESIDENTIAL + 1,170 RETAIL = 13,483 SF TOTAL
SECOND FLOOR: 13,384 RESIDENTIAL = 13,384 SF TOTAL
THIRD FLOOR: 13,384 RESIDENTIAL = 13,384 SF TOTAL
53,584 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
STUDIO -18 UNITS
1ST FLOOR -0
2ND FLOOR -10
3RD FLOOR -10
1 BEDROOM -20 UNITS
1ST FLOOR -10
2ND FLOOR -5
3RD FLOOR -5
2 BEDROOM -4 UNITS
1ST FLOOR -0
2ND FLOOR -2
3RD FLOOR -2
42 TOTAL UNITS
1/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE J6,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. SEE ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR UNIT WALL DIMENSIONS
AND TYPES, DOOR NUMBERS AND ELEVATION
REFERENCES.
3. TYPICAL DOOR LAYOUT IS FOR THE HINGE SIDE OF THE
DOOR PANEL TO BE 6" FROM FACE OF ADJACENT WALL,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. DIMENSIONS ARE TO GRIDS AND CENTERLINE OF
INTERIOR WALLS.
5. UNIT TYPES MAY BE MIRRORED. COORDINATE ENLARGED
UNIT TYPE PLANS WITH FLOOR PLANS.
6. REFER TO CODE PLANS FOR RATED EXTERIOR WALLS,
REFER TO ASSEMBLY TYPES ON SHEET A1-01 FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
7. GYP BD AT PARTY WALLS AND CEILINGS TO CONTINUE
PAST INTERIOR WALLS AND THROUGH CHASES TO
MAINTAIN SYSTEM INTEGRITY. PRE -ROCK ALL PARTY
WALLS AND CEILINGS. SEE A1-01 FOR ASSEMBLY TYPES.
8. VERIFY ALL FRAMING DIMENSIONS W/ TUB ROUGH
OPENING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PANELIZING WALL
SYSTEM.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
REF.DWREF.DWREF.DW REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DW
DN
UP
DN
UPREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DW
DN
DN REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWA2-12
A2 -11
A2-11
1
2
1
208
UNIT TYPE 3
207
UNIT TYPE 2
219
UNIT TYPE 2 218
UNIT TYPE 2
2
A3-11
_____________________
209
UNIT TYPE 2
216
UNIT TYPE 8
217
UNIT TYPE 2
215
STORAGE
11 88
AA
DD 66' - 8"200' - 0"
1
A3-11
_____________________
19' - 0"9' - 4"6' - 10"21' - 6"21' - 6"6' - 10"13' - 6 1/4"14' - 9 3/4"28' - 1"28' - 7"30' - 0"
BB
CC
22 33 44 55 66 77
206
UNIT TYPE 1 210
UNIT TYPE 1
211
UNIT TYPE 3
20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"249
CORRIDOR
201
CIRCULATION
203
STAIR
202
STAIR
215
203
A7-11
3
A7-11
7
3
A3-21
_____________________
A1
4
A3-21
_____________________
4.44.41.81.8 2.22.2 3.83.8
W2 W1 W1 W1 W1 W2
2
A3-23
_____________________
4
A3-23
_____________________
1 1/4"
13' - 8"10' - 0"1' - 6"19' - 5"12' - 10"5' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 7"11' - 11"8' - 6"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 8"5' - 11"5' - 11"8' - 8"5' - 0"5' - 0"13' - 11"12' - 8"8' - 8"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 10"6' - 4"
1 1/4"
ELEVATOR
202
17' - 2"19' - 5"19' - 5"26' - 0"36' - 0"26' - 0"19' - 5"36' - 7"
36' - 5 3/4"5' - 1 1/2"5' - 5"24' - 7 3/4"26' - 0"26' - 0"17' - 1 1/4"6' - 6 1/4"2' - 7 3/4"13' - 5 1/2"36' - 7 1/4"30' - 6"5' - 8"30' - 6"3
A3-23
_____________________
1414
14 14 14 14
36' - 2 1/4"30' - 5 3/4"6' - 2 3/4"14' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 8"10' - 0"14' - 0"1 1/4"47' - 0 1/2"10' - 0"14' - 7 1/2"
1' - 3"
5' - 2"4' - 10"8' - 10"5' - 11"5' - 11"8' - 5 7/8"5' - 2 1/8"4' - 9 7/8"
1' - 7 1/8"
26' - 5 1/2"11' - 0 1/2"38' - 10"14' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 8"10' - 0"14' - 0"1 1/4"200' - 0"
G4A1
J6
D10
D10
D10D10
D10D10
D10
D10
D10 3' - 8"A1A1
26 26
W1 W1
2
A3-24
_____________________
1
A3-24
_____________________
J6 J6 J6 J6
W1W1
B.3B.3
B.6B.6
5
A3-23
_____________________
7 7
7777
J6
F4
F6
J6
J6
J6
J6
5
A1-02
6
A1-02
6
A1-02
5
A1-02
5
A1-02
6
A1-02
6
A1-02
5
A1-02
1.31.3
8' - 8"
212
UNIT TYPE 1
W2
D10
D10
16' - 6 1/4"19' - 3"
19' - 2"17' - 1"
D10
222
UNIT TYPE 1
220
UNIT TYPE 1221
UNIT TYPE 8
213
UNIT TYPE 8
223
UNIT TYPE 8
1' - 3"11' - 5"6' - 10"10' - 6"
W2
W2
4' - 9 1/2"13' - 8"5' - 5 3/4"
W1 W2 W2W2 W3W3W2W1W1 W1A2-122
A2-12
A2 -11
A2-11
1
2
1
2
A3-11
_____________________
314
UNIT TYPE 8
11 88
AA
DD
1
A3-11
_____________________
BB
CC
22 33 44 55 66 77
306
UNIT TYPE 1
307
UNIT TYPE 2
308
UNIT TYPE 3 309
UNIT TYPE 2
310
UNIT TYPE 1
311
UNIT TYPE 3
315
UNIT TYPE 2
316
UNIT TYPE 2
317
UNIT TYPE 2
200' - 0"
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"13' - 6 1/4"14' - 9 3/4"28' - 1"28' - 7"30' - 0"66' - 8"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"303
STAIR
302
STAIR
313
STORAGE
252
CORRIDOR
301
CIRCULATION
313
303
A7-11
4
A7-11
8
3
A3-21
_____________________
A1
A1
J6
4
A3-21
_____________________
4.44.41.81.8 2.22.2 3.83.8
W2 W1 W1 W1 W1 W2
302A
2
A3-23
_____________________
4
A3-23
_____________________
ELEVATOR
D10D10D10
D10
D10
302302A
ROOF
ACCESS
16' - 10"19' - 7 3/4"5' - 1 1/2"5' - 4 7/8"24' - 5 7/8"26' - 0"26' - 0"17' - 3 1/4"6' - 6 3/8"
2' - 7 1/8"
13' - 4"1 1/4"14' - 0"10' - 0"6' - 6"5' - 8"6' - 6"10' - 0"14' - 0"1 1/4"17' - 2"19' - 5"19' - 5"26' - 0"36' - 2"26' - 0"19' - 5"36' - 5"30' - 5 3/4"36' - 2 1/4"3
A3-23
_____________________
14141414
14 14 30' - 6"5' - 8"30' - 6"30' - 6"5' - 8"30' - 6"1 1/4"
13' - 8"10' - 0"12' - 11"8' - 0"11' - 5"
1' - 5"
5' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 7"6' - 0"5' - 11"8' - 6"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 8"6' - 1"5' - 9"8' - 8"5' - 0"5' - 0"13' - 11"7' - 1"5' - 7"8' - 8"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 10"6' - 4"
1 1/4"
1 1/4"47' - 0 1/2"10' - 0"14' - 5 1/2"
1' - 5"
5' - 1 1/2"4' - 10 1/2"8' - 9 1/2"5' - 9 1/2"6' - 0 1/2"8' - 6 3/8"10' - 0"
1' - 5 1/8"
26' - 8"11' - 0"38' - 10"1 1/4"
200' - 0"1 1/4"14' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 8"10' - 0"14' - 0"1 1/4"66' - 8"26262
A3-24
_____________________
1
A3-24
_____________________
W1W1
W1 W1
B.3B.3
B.6B.6
F6
F4J6
A1A1A1
7 7
7777
J6
J6 J6J6
J6
F2
J6
D10
D10D10
G4
F4
J6
F2
6
A1-02
6
A1-02
5
A1-02
5
A1-02
6
A1-02
6
A1-02
5
A1-02
5
A1-02
1.31.3
19' - 3 1/2"17' - 3"
304
UNIT TYPE 1
305
UNIT TYPE 8
D10
312
UNIT TYPE 1
318
UNIT TYPE 8
W2 W2 W2
W2W2
D10
D10
319
UNIT TYPE 1
320
UNIT TYPE 8
W2 W2
A1-23
7
W1W1W1 W3W3N
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
9/18/2020 2:49:34 PM
A1 -22
SECOND AND
THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
20746 ARCH R18.RVT
DRL
JPW
05/22/19
JPW
400 20746 A1-22
17-20746
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGEND
14 BALCONY, REFER TO SECTION 5/A3-21
23 ROOF DRAIN LEADER, REFER TO PLUMBING DOCUMENTS
24 SECONDARY ROOF DRAIN LEADER, REFER TO PLUMBING
DOCUMENTS
26 24" x 24" ACCESS PANEL, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH
MECHANICAL DOCUMENTS
1/8" = 1'-0"2 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE J6,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. SEE ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR UNIT WALL DIMENSIONS
AND TYPES, DOOR NUMBERS AND ELEVATION
REFERENCES.
3. TYPICAL DOOR LAYOUT IS FOR THE HINGE SIDE OF THE
DOOR PANEL TO BE 6" FROM FACE OF ADJACENT WALL,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. DIMENSIONS ARE TO GRIDS AND CENTERLINE OF
INTERIOR WALLS.
5. UNIT TYPES MAY BE MIRRORED. COORDINATE ENLARGED
UNIT TYPE PLANS WITH FLOOR PLANS.
6. REFER TO CODE PLANS FOR RATED EXTERIOR WALLS,
REFER TO ASSEMBLY TYPES ON SHEET A1 -01 FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
7. GYP BD AT PARTY WALLS AND CEILINGS TO CONTINUE
PAST INTERIOR WALLS AND THROUGH CHASES TO
MAINTAIN SYSTEM INTEGRITY. PRE -ROCK ALL PARTY
WALLS AND CEILINGS. SEE A1 -01 FOR ASSEMBLY TYPES.
8. VERIFY ALL FRAMING DIMENSIONS W/ TUB ROUGH
OPENING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PANELIZING WALL
SYSTEM.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
REF.DWREF.DWREF.
DW
REF.DWDWREF.DWREF.REF.DWAA
206
UNIT TYPE 1
17' - 0 3/8" AT 1A
15' - 4"3' - 2 3/4"
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
18' - 6 3/4"30' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"3' - 4"12' - 3 7/8"6' - 2 7/8"12' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"9' - 3 1/8"3' - 8 1/8"6' - 5 3/4"5
438
1 96' - 1 7/8"
3' - 0"
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
20' - 2 3/4" AT 1A
E4
E4 E4
E6
E4
E4E4
E4
E4
F4
A6 -113 4
A6-11 1
2
16
16
16
17
17
5' - 7"2' - 2"6' - 2"4' - 8 3/4"J6
D10
D10
A6 -11
5
A6-11
5 Sim
20
1948"30"
30"48"36"49"
48"30"48"30"48"30"48"30"
A6-1215
AA
207
UNIT TYPE 2
5
7
2 4361
10' - 6"3' - 6 5/8"11' - 1 1/8"30' - 6"19' - 2 3/8"5' - 11 1/2"0"4' - 6"5' - 10 1/2"12' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"12' - 11 1/4"3' - 8 1/8"E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E6
F4
E4
E44' - 0"8' - 0"
5
A3-21
_____________________
A6-116
7
8
A6 -11
9
A6 -1110
16
16
17
17
5' - 7 5/8"3' - 1"6' - 1"6' - 1"J6
D10
D10
A6 -11
11
A6 -11 1 Sim2 Sim
19
20
49"36"30"48"
30"48"48"30"48"30"
30"48"48"30"30"48"AA
44
208
UNIT TYPE 3
DEMISE FACE TO FACE
35' - 1 3/4"30' - 6"13' - 3 5/8"6' - 5"10' - 9 3/8"2' - 3"2' - 11 3/8"1' - 3"
6' - 5 3/8"
10' - 11 1/8"3' - 6 5/8"10' - 3 3/8"10' - 4 5/8"2' - 1 1/8"13' - 11 1/2"3' - 8 1/8"17' - 0"17' - 0"13' - 6"7' - 1 3/8"22' - 0"6' - 0 3/8"0"5
10
4
1061
3
7
1' - 0"
CLEAR
5' - 0"CLEAR3' - 0"E4
E6
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4 4' - 0"8' - 0"
5
A3-21
TYP
_____________________
A6 -11
12
13
A6 -11 18
19
16
16
16
17
17
17
6' - 1"5' - 5 1/2"3' - 1"6' - 1"A6 -11
8 Sim
A6-11 9 SimA6-1111SimA6-11
10Sim
420
19 30"48"
48"36"30"48"48"30"48"48"30"30"48"48"30"A6 -1218
17
88
AA
GRID TO DEMISING FACE
26' - 1 7/8"
4' - 4 3/8"9' - 8 1/4"12' - 1 1/4"GRID TO DEMISING FACE30' - 2 3/8"26' - 6 3/8"3' - 8 1/8"19' - 9 7/8"6' - 4"
107
UNIT TYPE 5
8' - 0"4' - 5 3/4"5' - 1 1/8"12' - 11 1/4"4' - 4 1/4"
5' - 2 3/4"0"5
1 642
37
E4E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E6
E4
16
16
17
17
F4
F4
F4J66' - 1"5' - 7"3' - 1"
A6-116Sim
7 Sim
8 SimA6 -11
9 Sim
A6 -11
11Sim
A6-1110Sim
A6 -11 1 Sim2 Sim
F4
20
19
AA
BB
113
ADA
UNIT TYPE 7
1
9
3
4
5
85' - 5"2' - 2"6' - 0"
J6
E4
E4
E4
J6
D10
E4
F4
E6
E4
E4
A6 -11 2527
A6 -11
28
A6 -11 26
A6 -1129
30
A6-11
28Sim
20
20
19
35
19
35
3630"48"
48"36"30"48"48"30"48"48"30"48"30"48"30"114J6
G6
G6
N12A6' - 6 1/2"9' - 10 1/4"
A6-12
9
10
11
12
SD
GB1
GB2
TPD
SN MIR
AA
BB
22 2.22.2
111
COMMUNITY
ROOM
30' - 5 3/4"J6
8
A1-01
DD
CC
22
5
A3-22
_____________________
119
FITNESS
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
88
DD
CC
8' - 0 1/4"3' - 3"19' - 2 3/4"3' - 4 3/4"6' - 4"9 1/4"5' - 4 1/4"1' - 8"3' - 8"14' - 10"8' - 10 1/2"3' - 1 1/2"13' - 7 1/4"3' - 10 3/4"01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
9/18/2020 2:49:43 PM
A1 -23
TYPICAL UNIT
PLANS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
20746 ARCH R18.RVT
DRL
JPW
05/22/19
JPW
400 20746 A1-23
17-20746
1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 1 - STUDIO TYPE B (1 - 580 SF - 10 INSTANCES )
1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT TYPE 2 - 1 BEDROOM TYPE B (780 SF - 18 INSTANCES )
1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 3 - 2 BEDROOM TYPE B (1080 SF - 4 INSTANCES )
1/4" = 1'-0"6 UNIT TYPE 5 - 1 BEDROOM TYPE B (780 SF - 1 INSTANCE)
KEYNOTE LEGEND
3 EQUIPMENT BY OWNER, COORDINATE LOCATION AND POWER REQUIREMENTS WITH ELECTRICAL
6 MECHANICAL UNIT, REFER TO MECHANICAL DOCUMENTS
16 FURNITURE BY OWNER
17 WIRE CLOSET SHELVING UNIT, COORDINATE WITH OWNER
19 SINK BASE IS REMOVABLE, COUNTER IS AT 34" AFF
20 PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION OF GRAB BARS IN THIS BATHROOM
35 ALL FIXTURES THIS ROOM TO COMPLY WITH ADA MOUNTING HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS - SEE SHEET G1-01
36 BASE CABINET IS REMOVABLE
SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE J6,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. SEE ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR UNIT WALL DIMENSIONS
AND TYPES, DOOR NUMBERS AND ELEVATION
REFERENCES.
3. TYPICAL DOOR LAYOUT IS FOR THE HINGE SIDE OF THE
DOOR PANEL TO BE 6" FROM FACE OF ADJACENT WALL,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. DIMENSIONS ARE TO GRIDS AND CENTERLINE OF
INTERIOR WALLS.
5. UNIT TYPES MAY BE MIRRORED. COORDINATE ENLARGED
UNIT TYPE PLANS WITH FLOOR PLANS.
6. REFER TO CODE PLANS FOR RATED EXTERIOR WALLS,
REFER TO ASSEMBLY TYPES ON SHEET A1 -01 FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
7. GYP BD AT PARTY WALLS AND CEILINGS TO CONTINUE
PAST INTERIOR WALLS AND THROUGH CHASES TO
MAINTAIN SYSTEM INTEGRITY. PRE -ROCK ALL PARTY
WALLS AND CEILINGS. SEE A1 -01 FOR ASSEMBLY TYPES.
8. VERIFY ALL FRAMING DIMENSIONS W/ TUB ROUGH
OPENING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PANELIZING WALL
SYSTEM.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
06/05/19 ADDENDUM #1 DRL
JASON E. HOEHN
05/22/2019 40422
JEREMY WIESEN
05/22/2019 49451
1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT TYPE 7 - STUDIO - TYPE A (670 SF - 1 INSTANCE)
1/4" = 1'-0"5 FIRST FLOOR TOILET 114
1/4" = 1'-0"8 ENLARGED COMMUNITY ROOM PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"9 ENLARGED FITNESS ROOM PLAN
RESTROOM ACCESSORY SCHEDULE
MARK DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
GB1 GRAB BAR - HORIZONTAL 36" LONG CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
GB2 GRAB BAR - HORIZONTAL 42" LONG CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
MIR 24"X36" FRAMELESS GLASS MIRROR CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER - SHEET CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
SD SOAP DISPENSER CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
SN SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
TPD TOILET PAPER DISPENSER CONTRACTOR PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED
1/4" = 1'-0"7 UNIT TYPE 8 - STUDIO (510 SF - 8 INSTANCES)
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' -0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' -1 7/8"
ROOF
137' -5"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1188223344556677
LOW PARAPET
140' -2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' -2"
EF-1
EF-3EF-3
EF-1
EF-3 EF-3 EF-3
?
?EF-5 EF-5
EF-4EF-4EF-4???
???EF-1EF-1?
EF-3
EF-2
EF-5 EF-5
EF-5EF-5
EF-5
EF-2EF-2 EF-2
EF-5EF-5
EF-2
EF-5
1
A7-13
_____________________
3
A3-21
_____________________
4.44.4 1.81.82.22.23.83.8
4
A3-23
_____________________
5
A3-21
TYP
_____________________
A2-11
4
1
A3-24
_____________________
5
A3-23
_____________________
1.31.3
A2-11
5
SIGNAGE BY OWNER
EF-7
EF-7
EF-7
EF-8
EF-1
11
A3-33
_____________________
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' -0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' -1 7/8"
ROOF
137' -5"
AA DD
1
A3-11
_____________________
BB CC
LOW PARAPET
140' -2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' -2"
EF-2
EF-3 EF-2
EF-1
EF-4
EF-5
EF-1EF-1
EF-4
S5
EF-5
EF-5
EF-3
EF-5
A2-11
3
7
A3-21
_____________________
FUTURE LOUVER
B.3B.3 B.6B.6
EF-7
AA
22' - 0"2' - 9"
SIGNAGE BY OWNER
5
A3-21
_____________________
RAILINGS, TYP AT
BALCONIES AND PATIO
TIE BACK AT BALCONIES
2"EQ2"EQ2"3 1/2"1"2' - 7"1"3 1/2"2"3' - 6"3/4"
3 3/8"
3/4"
TREX FASCIA BOARD
SIGNAGE BY OWNER
3' - 0"12' - 0"01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
9/18/2020 2:49:54 PM
A2 -11
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
20746 ARCH R18.RVT
DRL
JPW
05/22/19
JPW
400 20746 A2-11
17-20746
EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL SCHEDULE AND TAKEOFF
MARK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL / COLOR COMMENTS
EF-1 STONE PANEL LEDGESTONE / OWNER TO
SELECT COLOR
PROVIDE MATCHING SILL, FLASHING TO MATCH
STONE
EF-2 6" LAP SIDING OWNER TO SELECT COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-3 18" x 120" FIBER CEMENT SIDING CEDAR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-3A METAL PANEL CN1653, COLOR MANSARD
BROWN
INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-4 BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING WHITE INSTALL VERTICALLY
EF-5 18" x 72" FIBER CEMENT PANELS GREY INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-7 CAP FLASHING TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH
EF-8 PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH
NOTE:
OWNER TO APPROVE OF ALL FINISHES AND
COLORS PRIOR TO PLACING FINAL ORDER
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION
SIGNAGE
MARK WIDTH HEIGHT
TEXT
HEIGHT COUNT
S3 8' - 6" 2' - 0" 1' - 0" 1
S5 12' - 0" 3' - 0" 1' - 6" 2
1/4" = 1'-0"3 ENLARGED SIGN DETAIL
1/2" = 1'-0"4 TYPICAL RAILING ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"5 ENLARGED SIGN DETAIL
ALTERNATE:
PROVIDE COST TO REPLACE UP TO 50% OF
THE EF -3 WITH EF-3A
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' -0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' -1 7/8"
ROOF
137' -5"
2
A3-11
_____________________
11 88223344556677
LOW PARAPET
140' -2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' -2"
EF-1 EF-1 EF-1
?EF-4
?
EF-5 ?
EF-2
?
EF-4
?
?
EF-1
EF-2
EF-1
EF-1
EF-3 EF-3 EF-3
EF-2 EF-3 EF-2
EF-3
EF-5EF-5
EF-3
EF-5EF-5
1
A7-13
_____________________
2
A3-21
_____________________
4.44.4
1
A3-24
_____________________
EF-7
11
A3-33
_____________________
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' -0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' -1 7/8"
ROOF
137' -5"
AADD
1
A3-11
_____________________
BBCC
LOW PARAPET
140' -2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' -2"
EF-1
EF-2
EF-1
EF-3
EF-5
EF-5
EF-2EF-3
EF-5
4
A3-21
_____________________
2
A3-23
_____________________3
A3-23
_____________________8' - 0"EF-8
EF-7
14
S2-14
_____________________
15
S2-14
_____________________01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
9/18/2020 2:50:03 PM
A2 -12
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
20746 ARCH R18.RVT
DRL
JPW
05/22/19
JPW
400 20746 A2-12
17-20746
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION
EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL SCHEDULE AND TAKEOFF
MARK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL / COLOR COMMENTS
EF-1 STONE PANEL LEDGESTONE / OWNER TO
SELECT COLOR
PROVIDE MATCHING SILL, FLASHING TO MATCH
STONE
EF-2 6" LAP SIDING OWNER TO SELECT COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-3 18" x 120" FIBER CEMENT SIDING CEDAR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-3A METAL PANEL CN1653, COLOR MANSARD
BROWN
INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-4 BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING WHITE INSTALL VERTICALLY
EF-5 18" x 72" FIBER CEMENT PANELS GREY INSTALL HORIZONTALLY
EF-7 CAP FLASHING TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH
EF-8 PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH
SIGNAGE
MARK WIDTH HEIGHT
TEXT
HEIGHT COUNT
S3 8' - 6" 2' - 0" 1' - 0" 1
S5 12' - 0" 3' - 0" 1' - 6" 2
NOTE:
OWNER TO APPROVE OF ALL FINISHES AND
COLORS PRIOR TO PLACING FINAL ORDER
ALTERNATE:
PROVIDE COST TO REPLACE UP TO 50% OF
THE EF -3 WITH EF-3A
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
EXTERIOR CONCEPTUAL RENDERING
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com PLH MIXED USE
Richfield, Minnesota
April 16, 2018
ISG Project No. 17-20746
June 2018 Rendering
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'261266TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH
17-20746C3-10MNAMNAATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C3 - SITEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE PLANPLH MIXED USEBUILDING0SCALE IN FEET10 20
18'CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION(DARK SHADE) (SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEWALK (SEE DETAIL)22'CONSTRUCT TURN-DOWNWALK (SEE DETAIL)(ALONG BUILDING FRONT)PROPOSED COLORED CONCRETEWALK BY COUNTYPROPOSED CONCRETEWALK BY COUNTY24'PARKING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACK6'F&I: HANDICAP SIGN W/ BOLLARD,TYP. OF 2 (SEE DETAIL)F&I: WHITE PARKINGLOT STRIPING (TYP)6'6'R15'REPAIR OR REPLACEBITUMINOUS PAVING ASNECESSARY (MATCH EXISTING)REPAIR OR REPLACEBITUMINOUS PAVING ASNECESSARY (MATCH EXISTING)CONSTRUCT B618CURB & GUTTER(TYP) (SEE DETAIL)10.17'11.37'SECOND FLOOR BALCONY,TYP. (SEE ARCH)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEWALK (SEE DETAIL)R5'R15'R5'R3'R15'R3'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. CONSTRUCT STANDARDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION(SHADE) (SEE DETAIL)PAVEMENT LEGENDSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKRETAINING WALL (SEE ARCH)RETAINING WALL (SEE ARCH)F&I: SCREEN FENCE(SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT STANDARDDRIVEWAY APRON, TYP. OF 3(SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMP,TYP. OF 6 (SEE DETAIL)RETAINING WALL (SEE DETAIL)8'8'8'9'11'F&I: BIKE RACK (SEE DETAIL)F&I: "NO RIGHT TURNS"SIGN AND STOP SIGN3.1'19.3'13.2'52.6'31.2'106.1'57.9'19.4'19'R8'R8'5/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTALARTSNOW STORAGE AREACONSTRUCT D318 CONCRETECURB AND GUTTERCONSTRUCT B618 CONCRETECURB & GUTTERCONSTRUCT B618 CONCRETECURB & GUTTERF&I: STOP SIGNAs Approved - June 2018
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH Temporary EasementTemporary Easement84
0
8
4
1
8
4
2
8
4
3
8
4
4845
835
836
837
838
839839 845845844843842
841844845(6) GOLDMOUND SPIREA(3) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(8) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(1) RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK)(1) RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK)(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(9) GOLDMOUND SPIREA(3) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) HACKBERRY(1) DWARF WINGED EUONYMUSBUR OAK (1)(3) BLACK HILLS SPRUCEEASTERN RED CEDAR (5)BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (6)EASTERN RED CEDAR (6)DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS (8)EXISTING TREETO REMAINEXISTING TREETO REMAINEDGEREDGEREDGEREDGERSEA GREEN JUNIPER (3)CRANBERRY COTONEASTER (1)SEA GREEN JUNIPER (5)8458458428428438438
4
3
844844844SEA GREEN JUNIPER (4)CRANBERRY COTONEASTER (3)RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK) (1)GOLDMOUND SPIREA (16)(6) DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS(8) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(12) GOLDMOUND SPIREAEXISTING ROW OF ARBORVITAE (TO REMAIN)17-20746C5-20--------RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C5 - LANDSCAPEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,PLANTING PLANPLH MIXED USEBUILDING0SCALE IN FEET10 20UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIESON-SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.TOTAL SITE = 42,699 SF30 TREES SHOWN2 EXISTING TREES (TO BE SAVED)28 PROPOSED TREES96 SHRUBS SHOWN17 TREES REQUIREDCODE: 1 TREE PER 2500 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPE AREA(42,699 / 2500 = 17.1 OR 17 TREES)43 SHRUBS REQUIREDCODE: 1 SHRUB PER 1000 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPE AREA(42,699 / 1000 = 42.7 OR 43 SHRUBS)LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. 5/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTALARTAs Approved - June 2018
A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
166' - 8"200' - 0"
33 STALLS
MECHANICAL
SPACE
MECHANICAL
SPACE
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
LOBBY
001
2
A3-11
_____________________64' - 8"36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"14' - 1"8' - 3"1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B
C
2
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"
3 4 5 6 7
19
2 10 2
20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"MOTORCYCLE
PARKING
10' - 0"9' - 4"
9' - 8"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"7' - 8"9' - 4"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"11' - 4"
9' - 8"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"11' - 4"TYP21' - 0"24' - 8"TYP21' - 0"22' - 4"22' - 4"PARKING
000
ELEVATORSTAIR
003
STAIR
002
WALL MOUNTED BICYCLE
HANGER, (1) TYP AT EACH
PARKING STALL
000B
001003A
002A
002B
003B
25' - 4"16' - 0"25' - 4"FDFD FD FD FD FD
N
01/2"1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:23:50 AM
A1-20
LOWER LEVEL
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-20
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGENDPLAN SHEET NOTES
1.ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DDN
DWREF.A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
1485 SF
COMMERCIAL 1
115
STAIR
103
ELEVATOR
200' - 0"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________66' - 8"B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
1507 SF
COMMERCIAL 3
117
1436 SF
COMMERCIAL 4
118
STORAGE
108
UNIT TYPE 2
109
UNIT TYPE 1A
110
UNIT TYPE 2
112
UNIT TYPE 1
113 UNIT TYPE 5
107
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"44' - 4"6' - 6"1' - 10"12' - 0"2' - 0"1' - 10"12' - 6"CIRCULATION
106
VESTIBULE
104
VESTIBULE / MAIL
105
TRASH ENCLOSURE
120
1506 SF
COMMERCIAL 2
116
COMMON AREA
101
EXIT CORRIDOR
001
STAIR
102
MAILBOXES
14' - 1"6' - 0"11' - 11"3' - 4"12' - 1"4' - 9"11' - 1"6' - 0"16' - 9"6' - 0"18' - 5"6' - 0"44' - 9"8' - 6"30' - 4"
36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"
4' - 0"12' - 0"6' - 0"12' - 0"6' - 0"12' - 0"8' - 0"12' - 0"8' - 0"12' - 0"8' - 0"12' - 0"51' - 9"9' - 0"27' - 3"
COMMUNITY ROOM
111
120A 120B
103 105A116C
104A
102
104B
116B 116A 117A 118A 111B
119B118B117B115C
105B
115B
114
FITNESS
119
111A
119A
TOILET
114
N
01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:23:55 AM
A1-21
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-21
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PLAN SHEET NOTES
1.ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
UNIT LEGEND
TOTAL FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGES
LOWER LEVEL: 13,333 PARKING = 13,333 SF TOTAL
FIRST FLOOR: 7,016 RESIDENTIAL + 6,124 RETAIL = 13,138 SF TOTAL
SECOND FLOOR: 13,117 RESIDENTIAL = 13,117 SF TOTAL
THIRD FLOOR: 13,117 RESIDENTIAL = 13,117 SF TOTAL
52,705 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
STUDIO - 1 BED TYPES - 10 UNITS
1ST FLOOR - 2
2ND FLOOR - 4
3RD FLOOR - 4
1 BEDROOM TYPE - 10 UNITS
1ST FLOOR - 2
2ND FLOOR - 4
3RD FLOOR - 4
2 BEDROOM TYPES - 11 UNITS
1ST FLOOR - 1
2ND FLOOR - 5
3RD FLOOR - 5
TOTAL UNIT MIX
10 - STUDIO - 32%
10 - 1 BEDROOM - 32%
11 - 2 BEDROOM - 35%
31 TOTAL UNITS
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/DREF.W/DDWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/D
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/D
A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
UNIT TYPE 4
205 UNIT TYPE 3
208
UNIT TYPE 2
207
UNIT TYPE 3
204 UNIT TYPE 4
212
UNIT TYPE 1A
219
UNIT TYPE 2
218
ELEVATOR
2
A3-11
_____________________
UNIT TYPE 2
209
UNIT TYPE 1A
216
UNIT TYPE 2
217
STORAGE
215
1 8
A
D 66' - 8"200' - 0"
1
A3-11
_____________________
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"
B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
UNIT TYPE 1
206
UNIT TYPE 1
210
UNIT TYPE 3
211
20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"CORRIDOR
249
CIRCULATION
201
STAIR
203
STAIR
202
36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"
202
215
203
N
01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:00 AM
A1-22
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-22
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGENDPLAN SHEET NOTES
1.ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/DREF.W/DDWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/D
REF.DW
W/D
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DA2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
2
A3-11
_____________________
UNIT TYPE 1A
314
1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
UNIT TYPE 4
305
UNIT TYPE 1
306
UNIT TYPE 2
307
UNIT TYPE 3
308
UNIT TYPE 2
309
UNIT TYPE 1
310
UNIT TYPE 3
311
UNIT TYPE 6
312
UNIT TYPE 2
315
UNIT TYPE 2
316
UNIT TYPE 1A
317
UNIT TYPE 3
304
200' - 0"
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"66' - 8"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"ELEVATORSTAIR
303
STAIR
302
STORAGE
313
CORRIDOR
252
CIRCULATION
301
36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"
302
313
303
N
01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:06 AM
A1-23
THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
09/12/17
400 20746 A1-23
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGENDPLAN SHEET NOTES
1.ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW
REF.DWW/D
REF.
DW
W/D
REF.DWW/DA
B
3
UNIT TYPE 1
206
17' - 0 3/8" AT 1A
15' - 4 3/8"3' - 2 3/8"
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
18' - 6 3/4"30' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"3' - 4"7' - 2 7/8" AT 1A
5' - 6 7/8"5' - 7"2' - 5"4' - 11 7/8"1' - 6"12' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"8' - 8 3/4"4' - 2 1/2"CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"6' - 5 3/4"5
434
1 46' - 1 7/8"
3' - 0"
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
20' - 2 3/4" AT 1A
A
B
3
UNIT TYPE 2
207
5
7
2 4361
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
25' - 1 3/4"
10' - 7 7/8"3' - 4 3/4"11' - 1 1/8"30' - 6"9' - 3 7/8"5' - 7"5' - 0"5' - 2 7/8"1' - 6"4' - 6"6' - 4 7/8"12' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"12' - 11 1/4"4' - 2 1/2"CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"
A
B
4 5
UNIT TYPE 3
208
DEMISE FACE TO FACE
35' - 1 3/4"30' - 6"13' - 3 5/8"6' - 5"10' - 9 3/8"2' - 0"3' - 8 3/8"1' - 3"
6' - 11 3/8"
10' - 11 1/8"3' - 4 3/4"10' - 5 1/4"10' - 4 5/8"2' - 1 1/8"13' - 5"4' - 2 1/2"17' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"13' - 6"5' - 11 3/8"5' - 0"5' - 5"12' - 9"6' - 0 3/8"1' - 6"5
2
4
261
3
7
3CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"
CLEAR
5' - 0"CLEAR3' - 0"1
A
B
2
52 33
46
12
47GRID TO DEMISING FACE
36' - 1 7/8"GRID TO DEMISING FACE35' - 7 3/8"10' - 11 3/8"3' - 4 3/4"10' - 6 1/4"10' - 9"18' - 5"5' - 0 1/2"12' - 8 3/8"3' - 10 1/4"6' - 1"4' - 2 1/2"
15' - 11"3' - 9 1/2"5' - 11 1/2"10' - 5 7/8"1' - 6"13' - 9 3/4"4' - 10 1/4"3' - 4 1/2"6' - 11 1/2"12' - 11 3/4"5' - 8 1/4"4' - 10 1/2"6' - 6 1/8"
CLEAR
4' - 0"CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
3' - 0"CLEAR5' - 0"UNIT TYPE 4
205
8
D
C
7
14' - 3"5' - 6"4' - 4 1/2"15' - 4"1' - 6"24' - 4"6' - 2"11' - 2 5/8"10' - 0"3' - 4 3/4"11' - 0"9' - 9"4' - 6"10' - 2 3/4"4' - 6"626423' - 6"15' - 4"
UNIT TYPE 6
312
20' - 3 7/8"3' - 6"15' - 4"
4' - 9 1/4"61
4
43' - 7 3/4"CLEAR
4' - 0"6' - 5"3' - 8"CLEAR5' - 0"8
A
B
GRID TO DEMISING FACE
26' - 1 7/8"
4' - 4 3/8"9' - 8 1/4"12' - 1 1/4"GRID TO DEMISING FACE30' - 2 3/8"25' - 11 7/8"4' - 2 1/2"9' - 3 7/8"5' - 7"5' - 0"6' - 3"
UNIT TYPE 5
107
8' - 0"4' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"12' - 11 1/4"3' - 9 3/4"
4' - 8 1/4"1' - 6"5
1 642
37
CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:13 AM
A1-24
TYPICAL UNIT
PLANS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
10/17/17
400 20746 A1-24
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 1 & 1A - STUDIO (1 - 580 SF - 5 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT TYPE 2 - 1 BEDROOM (783 SF - 10 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 3 - 2 BEDROOM (1086 SF - 6 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT TYPE 4 - 2 BEDROOM (1194 SF - 3 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"5 UNIT TYPE 6 - 2 BEDROOM (1290 SF - 1 INSTANCE)
(1A - 633 SF - 5 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"6 UNIT TYPE 5 - 1 BEDROOM (798 SF - 1 INSTANCE)
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
37' - 5"112' - 9"10' - 10 3/4"38' - 11 1/4"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"66' - 8"66' - 8"200' - 0"
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"
8 3/16"12' - 0 13/16"186' - 6 13/16"8 3/16"66' - 8"20' - 8"1' - 10"12' - 6"N
01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:18 AM
A1-71
ROOF PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-71
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
2
A3-11
_____________________
18234567
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-1
EF-3EF-3
EF-1
EF-3 EF-3 EF-3
EF-4
EF-5 EF-5 EF-5
EF-4EF-4EF-4EF-4EF-4EF-4
EF-1EF-1EF-1EF-1EF-1EF-1
EF-3
EF-2
EF-5
S5 S5 S5 S5 S5
EF-5
EF-6EF-6
EF-5
EF-2EF-2 EF-2
EF-5EF-5
EF-2
EF-6
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
A D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B C
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-2
EF-3 EF-2
EF-1
EF-4
EF-5
EF-1EF-1
EF-4
S5
EF-5
EF-6
EF-3
EF-5
01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:30 AM
A2-11
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A2-11
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONEXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL SCHEDULE AND TAKEOFF
MARK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL / COLOR COMMENTS
APROX
AREA
EF-1 STONE VENEER 4442 SF
EF-2 LAP SIDING LP SMARTSIDE LITE COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY 2155 SF
EF-3 18" x 120" FIBER CEMENT SIDING NICIHA VINTAGE WOOD LITE CEDAR COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY 7547 SF
EF-4 BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING LP SMARTSIDE WHITE COLOR INSTALL VERTICALLY 926 SF
EF-5 18" x 72" FIBER CEMENT PANELS NICHIHA GREY COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY 1876 SF
EF-6 PAINT BLACK 949 SF
NOTE:
ALL QUANTITIES IN "AREA" ARE APPROXIMITE
AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THESE
NUMBERS ARE NOT GUARANTEED AND NOT
INTENDED TO BE REPLACEMENTS FOR SHOP
DRAWINGS OR PHYSICAL DRAWING
EVALUATIONS AND TAKEOFFS.
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
SIGNAGE
MARK WIDTH HEIGHT
TEXT
HEIGHT COUNT
S1 4' - 9"2' - 0"0' - 9"1
S2 6' - 0"2' - 0"0' - 9"4
S3 8' - 6"2' - 0"1' - 0"1
S5 12' - 0" 3' - 0"1' - 6"6
As Approved - June 2018
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8234567
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-1
EF-1 EF-1
EF-4 EF-4
EF-1
EF-5 EF-5
EF-2
EF-1
EF-4
EF-1
EF-4
EF-1
EF-2
EF-1
EF-1
S2 S1 S2 S2 S2
S3
EF-3
EF-2 EF-3 EF-3
EF-2 EF-3 EF-2
EF-3
EF-6
EF-5EF-5
EF-3
EF-5EF-5EF-5
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
AD
1
A3-11
_____________________
BC
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-1
EF-2
EF-1
EF-3
EF-5
EF-6
EF-2EF-3
EF-5
01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:42 AM
A2-12
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A2-12
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
As Approved - June 2018
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
TOP OF FOOTING
88' - 6"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
A D
1
A3-11
_____________________
A3-11
3
B C
SECOND FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
112' - 10 1/4"
THIRD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
124' - 0 1/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
135' - 2"
UNIT TYPE 3
208
UNIT TYPE 2
217
UNIT TYPE 3
308
UNIT TYPE 2
315
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
COMMUNITY ROOM
111
CIRCULATION
106
CORRIDOR
249
CORRIDOR
252
PARKING
000
FITNESS
119
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
TOP OF FOOTING
88' - 6"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8234567
SECOND FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
112' - 10 1/4"
THIRD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
124' - 0 1/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
135' - 2"
UNIT TYPE 4
205
UNIT TYPE 3
208
UNIT TYPE 2
207
UNIT TYPE 4
212
COMMERCIAL 1
115
UNIT TYPE 2
209
UNIT TYPE 1
206
UNIT TYPE 1
210
UNIT TYPE 3
211
UNIT TYPE 4
305
UNIT TYPE 1
306
UNIT TYPE 2
307
UNIT TYPE 3
308
UNIT TYPE 2
309
UNIT TYPE 1
310
UNIT TYPE 3
311
UNIT TYPE 6
312
COMMERCIAL 2
116
COMMERCIAL 3
117
COMMERCIAL 4
118
UNIT TYPE 2
109
UNIT TYPE 2
112
UNIT TYPE 1
113
UNIT TYPE 5
107
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
COMMUNITY ROOM
111
CIRCULATION
106
TRASH ENCLOSURE
120
PARKING
000
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
TOP OF FOOTING
88' - 6"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
A
12" INSULATED PRECAST WALL (3" CONC,
3" INSUL, 6" CONC)
6" CONCRETE SLAB
FOOTING
8" HOLLOW CORE PLANK WITH 2" TOPPING
EXTERIOR FINISH
1 1/2" ZIP WALL SHEATINGSYSTEM (SHEATHING,
CONTINUOUS CI R-6.6 AND WEATHER BARRIER)
2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ R-20 BATT INSULATION,
6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER
5/8" GYP BD
GYPCRETE
T&G SHEATHING
24" DEEP TRUSSES
RESILIENT CHANNEL
5/8" GYP BD
SECOND FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
112' - 10 1/4"
THIRD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
124' - 0 1/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
135' - 2"
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
GYPCRETE
T&G SHEATHING
24" DEEP TRUSSES
RESILIENT CHANNEL
5/8" GYP BD
EXTERIOR FINISH
1 1/2" ZIP WALL SHEATINGSYSTEM (SHEATHING,
CONTINUOUS CI R-6.6 AND WEATHER BARRIER)
2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ R-20 BATT INSULATION,
6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER
5/8" GYP BD
R30 INSULATION BASE W/ EPDM ROOF
MEMBRANE
T&G SHEATHING
24" DEEP TRUSSES
RESILIENT CHANNEL
5/8" GYP BD
8' - 11"10' - 2"12' - 9 1/8"8' - 11"01/2" 1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:52 AM
A3-11
BUILDING
SECTIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A3-11
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION
1/4" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL WALL SECTION
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
As Approved - June 2018
The Emi – Virtual Open House Comments (as of 9/24/20)
1. I am still very much against this monstrosity going into our neighborhood, but
guess it has become useless to beat a dead horse. Perhaps if the building had
some architectural value, it would be more palatable. It reminds me of a big box
warehouse. And too close to the street on the north side. I am also very
concerned about who will be willing to rent these tiny studio apartments and the
extra traffic it will bring going north on Stevens. Sorry for the negativity, but you
already have been told by almost every neighbor in the area that we feel this was
pushed down our throats. It just doesn't fit.
2. Still sounds like too much traffic, parking on ours streets, etc. I was so hoping two
homes would be built there.
3. While the news of the reduced retail space is welcome, I'm concerned about the
increased number of units (31 to 42) with the same number of parking stalls (33)
planned. How can you say the parking ratios are better with more units and the
same number of stalls?? In addition, I see that the exit/entrance to the parking lot
on Stevens is restricted to avoid southbound traffic onto Stevens, but no such
restriction on 1st. We get enough traffic now with drivers cutting through to avoid
backups at the 66th/Nicollet roundabout and open access on 1st will lead to even
MORE traffic coming down 1st Ave.
4. There is not enough parking for the complex. I don't want the over flow parking
on the streets. Further reducing the flow of traffic. And when comes to street
cleaning and snow removal the city will not tag parking parking offenders. Further
creating traffic flow issues on 1st ave. and Stevens. When the snow is not
cleaned up from cars not being moved.
5. Hello - Thank-you for sending out postcards informing neighbors about updates
made to the EMI. 1. My fellow neighbors and I (all sharing the block with the EMI)
are environmentally conscious. I personally have a pollinator-friendly yard and
have committed to organic lawn care. As a token of good faith, will you commit to
caring for your green space (turf) organically? Will you consider landscaping with
plants that are native (i.e. more drought tolerant) and pollinator-friendly? Not only
will this help get neighbors on board with your project, but it will be a great
marketing tool for your building. Your green space will be safe for adults,
children, pets, and our local water supply. If using native plants, as well, you will
need to use less water once established - saving you money! If you need names
of some great local companies that provide organic lawn care services and help
with restorative landscaping, please let me know. 2. I also would like assurance
that you will commit to using a non-salt alternative for winter sidewalk de-icing
such as "SafePaw". Again - another great way to market your building as
environmentally conscious. And it won't negatively affect your green space come
spring - saving you money for the cost of turf replacement. 3. Do you have
updated drawings with removal of 5,000sf of commercial space on the first floor
of the EMI? I look forward to hearing from you, XXX
6. EMI was suppose to 'work with' the neighbors for this new design and to my
knowledge, not one resident was contacted for input until now and we are only 7
days away from the Planning Commission meeting. I don't believe that there are
enough parking spots for the added apts. EMI is assuming that the reduced retail
space would be sufficient. Retail parking is short term and residential parking is
long term. This floor plan does not provide enough long term parking. In addition,
apts on ground level facing 66th St are subject to high levels of road dust and air
pollution. In addition, this new exterior design is not shown in its entirety, only an
elongated view that is incomplete. This new design is quite 'unattractive' and is
not a visible asset to the neighborhood.
7. I'm a local resident who, truthfully, is open to more density but is not super keen
on how modern and mismatched the style of this development is to our local
community. NOTHING looks like this and it's not a classic look that will age well.
However, I know that's the current vibe. I do however have some concerns with
the changes to the plan. When this was approved to be changed from residential
only to mixed use, it was done so with the promise that there would be local
businesses to benefit the existing residents nearby. This is being greatly
reduced. So now we will have a bit of an eye sore, and very few benefits to those
of us within a walking distance. Richfield needs more small local businesses,
especially with front facing property on main roads for visibility. I'd be happy to
share our street parking with visitors to a coffee shop or yoga studio. It's short
sighted to make these changes - COVID will not be here in 3 years, this building
will be. Keep the commercial spaces available for local businesses that need
them. That's a bigger need than a few more windowless studio apartments.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 28, 2020
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Kathryn Quam, Commissioners Bryan Pynn, Sean Hayford Oleary, Peter
Lavin, and James Rudolph, Susan Rosenberg, Brett Stursa
MEMBERS ABSENT: none
STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, Asst. Director of Community Development
Nellie Jerome, Assistant Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Christine and Renato Kirsnik for Public Hearing Item #1; Paul Lynch, PLH &
Associates, and Charlie Bird, for Public Hearing Item #2
Chairperson Quam called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Rudolph, S/Lavin to approve the minutes of the July 27, 2020, meeting.
Motion carried: 7-0
OPEN FORUM
No members of the public spoke, no comments received.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M/Lavin, S/Pynn to approve the agenda.
Motion carried: 7-0
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM #1
Public hearing to consider a request for variance for a driveway wider than the allowed
maximum at 2015 Forest Drive. Assistant Planner Nellie Jerome read the staff report for this
variance application. Commissioners discussed hardships of bringing the driveway into
compliance, and the requirements for granting a variance.
M/ Rudolph, S/ Pynn to close the public hearing.
Motion carried: 7-0
M/Rudolph, S/Lavin to approve the variance for a driveway wider than the allowed maximum at
2015 Forest Drive, finding that the required conditions for variance approval are met.
Commissioner Lavin discussed practical difficulties of removing the excess pavement.
Motion failed: 4-3 (nay votes from Quam, Rosenberg, Stursa, and Hayford-Oleary
M/Stursa, S/Rosenberg to approve the resolution denying a variance for a driveway wider than
the allowed maximum at 2015 Forest Drive.
Commissioners discussed the
Motion carried: 4-3 (nay votes from Rudolph, Lavin, and Pynn)
July 27, 2020
2
ITEM #2
Consideration of an amendment to approve final development plans for a mixed use
development at 101 66th Street East (66th Street and 1st Avenue). The proposed
amendment reduces commercial space and increases the number of apartments in the
project. Assistant Community Development Director Melissa Poehlman presented the staff
report for the project known as the Emi. The developer is requesting to reduce ground floor
commercial space and provide affordable housing units instead.
Commissioners discussed parking ratio minimums and maximums, and staff explained that the
current proposal is above the parking maximums for both residential and commercial spaces.
Staff clarified that they were recommending that the developer remove a row of twelve spaces
and keep it as pervious landscaping, with the option to add parking if needed in the future. The
developer was present to answer questions. The developer proposed bringing the parking ratio
under the maximum by removing 5 parking stalls instead of 12.
Written comments that were received before the meeting were given to Commissioners.
During the meeting, callers brought up concerns with unpleasant construction disturbance with
projects like this, the size of the building, neighborhood traffic and parking, trash around the
project site, and a want for more inclusion of community members in the planning process. An
adjacent neighbor noted that he preferred that the additional 12 parking stalls on the south side
be kept as landscaping.
Assistant Community Development Director Melissa Poehlman addressed the written
comments and concerns from callers, noting that the façade is of high-quality materials and
that the proposal being considered tonight will reduce traffic and parking with the reduction of
commercial space. She added that the choice of environmental friendly landscape
maintenance will be up to the developer. Commissioners requested that this project be
completed soon.
M/ Pynn, S/ Quam to close the public hearing.
Motion carried: 7-0
Commissioners discussed design changes in approved projects and what threshold of
changes would require a return to the Planning Commission for re-approval. Assistant
Community Development Director Poehlman explained that she can bring the concern up at
the City Council meeting.
M/ Pynn, S/ Hayford Oleary to approve recommended action with the condition that the
number of parking stalls is limited to 67 total.
Motion carried: 6-1 (nay vote from Rudolph)
LIAISON REPORTS
Community Services Advisory Commission: playgrounds are going in at Washington, Taft, and
Madison, and the dog park is nearly ready.
City Council: no report
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA): no report
Richfield School Board: no report
Transportation Commission: Nothing to report.
Chamber of Commerce: (vacant)
July 27, 2020
3
CITY PLANNER’S REPORT
Nothing to report
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting will be Monday, October 26, 2020, at 7pm on Webex online meeting
platform.
M/Pynn, S/Hayford Oleary to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried: 7-0
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:25 p.m.
__________________________
Planning Commission Secretary
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #13.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 132
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
10/13/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Rachel L indholm, S ustainability S pecialist
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector
10/4/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W:
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
10/6/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider approval of the Climate Action Plan.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Over the past several years, Richfield has undertaken numerous sustainability-related initiatives,
complementing existing city services that already follow environmental best practices. Recently, after resident
inquiries and with increased sustainability efforts, the City Council asked staff to create a climate action plan
for Richfield. This report will help guide many of the environmental initiatives the city will undertake over the
next 5 years.
After getting feedback on the C A P at the previous work session and subsequently revising it, staff are now
requesting formal approval of the Climate Action Plan. This action will help increase and advance the
sustainability work and education happening throughout the City.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the Climate Action Plan.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Sustainability/environmental efforts have a long history in Richfield, including establishing W ood
Lake Nature Center in 1971, which has provided environmental education for almost 50 years.
I n 2012, Richfield joined GreenStep Cities to track sustainability progress and work to achieve
more environmental initiatives. Currently, the City is looking to reach Step 4 designation.
The City hosted a GreenCorps member from October 2018 - August 2019; the member's projects
focused on waste reduction and disposal. I n 2019, the Sustainability Specialist staff position was
created to continue and expand sustainability efforts.
I n 2019, the Sustainability Commission was established after the Organics Taskforce was
disbanded and residents wanted an ongoing commission dedicated to sustainability.
The C A P creation process started in March 2020. A draft was brought to the Sustainability
Commission for feedback at the August 27th meeting. An edited version was brought to the City
Council at the September 22nd work session were staff received more feedback for further
revisions.
Some actions in the C A P are already underway, like participating in Partners in Energy.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies several City goals that are connected to goals in the Climate
Action Plan as well (detailed in Appendix 2 of the C A P).
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Formal approval will accelerate media promotion of the plan. Since work on actions included in the plan
has already started and will continue, there are no climate actions that are waiting for immediate approval
of the plan first.
Adopting the C A P will help align goals with staff work and prioritize efforts, steering sustainability goals
with a measured time frame (5 years). Effects of climate change are already experienced locally and
globally so continuing and increasing sustainability efforts is essential.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
Some projects and actions will require additional funding, but the majority will be accomplished with
existing staff time and budget. Any projects that require additional funding will go through the proper
presentation and approval process in the future.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
This is not a legally binding document. I ndividual actions and projects could include specific legal
considerations and will be brought up at that time.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not vote to approve the Climate Action Plan or request further changes to the content before approval.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
C limate A ction P lan B ackup Material
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
City of Richfield
Table of Contents
Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................................page 2
Overarching Climate Action Goals........................................................................................................................page 4
Goal 1: Develop and Promote Energy Efficiency Efforts....................................................................................page 5
Goal 2: Promote Renewable Energy Installation and Purchasing.................................................................page 8
Goal 3: Encourage Sustainable Design and Building Practices.....................................................................page 9
Goal 4: Strengthen and Expand Natural Resource Management.................................................................page 10
Goal 5: Reduce Waste Generated..........................................................................................................................page 12
Goal 6: Improve Access to Local and Healthy Food........................................................................................page 14
Appendix 1: Implementation Tables.......................................................................................................................page 16
Appendix 2: Related 2040 Comprehensive Plan Policies.............................................................................page 20
Appendix 3: Resources.............................................................................................................................................page 21
Page 1
Lifelong learning at Wood Lake Nature Center is an essential part of sustainability and
environmental education and action!
Page 2
Introduction
In Richfield’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, one of the overarching goals was “emphasizing sustainability
as a measure to ensure the future economic, environmental and social health of the community”. Sus-
tainability efforts are also inherently connected to the rest of the City’s goals. This includes increasing
equity, committing to a balanced multi-modal transportation system, providing the best core services,
engaging residents with community outreach, and more.
Our climate is changing rapidly, with more precipitation (both rain and snow) and warmer temperatures,
especially during the winter and overnight (Minnesota Environment and Energy Report Card, 2019). In
2016, transportation surpassed electricity as the largest source of CO2 emissions in MN (Minnesota En-
vironment and Energy Report Card, 2019). All of these statistics and more highlight a need for society to
change its business-as-usual behaviors and look towards more environmentally friendly ways of life.
The predominant lenses through which the climate actions in this plan have been proposed and evalu-
ated are mitigation, education, and equity. It is well-known that climate change has and will continue to
affect everyone, disproportionately affecting marginalized populations. This includes our elderly, peo-
ple of color, disabled, non-English speaking, low-income, and immunocompromised friends, family, and
neighbors.
It’s important to learn
how climate change
affects people differ-
ently based on so-
cio-economic factors.
As such a diverse
community, Richfield
knows the importance
of ensuring equity in all
services and projects.
The Climate Action
Plan is no exception,
with staff and elected
officials ensuring that
equity is highlighted in
every goal. There are
some general aspects
in the plan that work
to increase equity, like
widespread translation
of existing and new
resources and docu-
ments, and working
to provide in-person
translation as well. Spe-
cific actions look at eq-
uity on a deeper scale,
working to increase
tree canopy, healthy food access, complete transportation systems, and decrease financial barriers. Ex-
panding access to services helps create a more connected community.
Figure 1: Land Surface temperature. Richfield is indicated by the black outline. (Source: Metropolitan
Council Local Planning Assistance)
Page 3
Climate change will continue to bring many environmental, social, and resource-based stresses to cities
like Richfield. These problems could include heat and disease killing the urban tree canopy. Fewer ma-
ture trees and more development increases the urban heat island effect, which has already shown that
the average temperature in the cities and first-ring suburbs is several degrees warmer than surrounding
rural areas (Smoliak et al, 2015). Figure 1 shows the prevalence of warmer temperatures in Richfield, es-
pecially compared to surrounding areas.
These warming temperatures lead to a decline in air and water quality as well as a significant increase
in health emergencies related to conditions like asthma, COPD, and cardiac arrest. Stresses on bodies
of water increase flooding and decrease water quality. Stresses on public health like food supply chain
disruptions threaten the well-being of urban populations. Stresses on low income residents and/or those
who live in high-risk areas or aging infrastructure affect already marginalized populations, and increase
the severity of health-related consequences.
Richfield has shown its commitment to more sustainable actions, especially over the past few years. The
City joined GreenStep Cities, a continuous improvement program with hundreds of action steps housed
under 29 best practice categories, and is currently working to achieve Level 4 status within the program.
More information on Richfield’s GreenStep Cities progress can be found by visiting: https://greenstep.
pca.state.mn.us/city-detail/12392.
Efforts like these adds to the many common municipal practices that have long been the best environ-
mental option. However, Richfield needs a plan going forward that prioritizes a larger scale climate ac-
tion effort. It is necessary to prepare our community to handle both existing and new conditions that may
hinder future daily living, so we can best adapt to these unknown situations.
This climate action work plan de-
tails actions to help achieve both
short- and long-term goals for the
City of Richfield’s sustainability
efforts. These actions have been
influenced by policies outlined in
the most recent Comprehensive
Plan as well as staff and resident
suggestions. There are many
actions to undertake and Rich-
field will only realize the success
of its full potential when everyone
works together. Together we can
prepare Richfield for the future
and see the benefits of our efforts
now.
This plan will be re-evaluated
every year by city staff and the
Sustainability Commission to en-
sure that the goals and actions included are meeting the city’s needs. This annual review will also look at
the progress being made and next steps including additional resources that might be needed to further
achieve these actions.
In 2019, Richfield bought two Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) to
be used in the Engineering and Recreation Departments. Engineering staff
only filled up the gas tank 3 times in the first year of driving!
Page 4
Overarching Climate Action Goals
The City of Richfield has identified the following goals as overarching objectives that encompass nu-
merous possible actions. Some of these efforts will strengthen resources found in Richfield, like greens-
pace and local food systems, while others focus on resources generated outside of Richfield, including
electricity and renewable energy. In addition to responsible consumption and awareness, these climate
actions will help reduce the environmental effects and greenhouse gas emissions resulting from current
behaviors.
1. Develop and Promote Energy Efficiency Efforts – Understand Richfield’s energy usage and
how to reduce it, saving money and helping the environment.
a. Energy Initiatives
b. Transportation Initiatives
2. Promote Renewable Energy Installation and Purchasing – Reduce reliance on fossil fuel de-
rived energy and educate residents and businesses on installation incentives.
3. Encourage Sustainable Design and Building Practices – Ensure design and construction plans
integrate environmental best practices and amenities, making the building’s life-cycle more envi-
ronmentally efficient.
4. Strengthen and Expand Natural Resource Management – Inventory various natural resources
and include the public in restoration and maintenance of trees, parks, and bodies of water.
a. Landscaping and Urban Canopy
b. Water Quality and Conservation
5. Reduce Waste Generated & Promote Responsible Disposal – Understand how to responsibly
dispose of many different goods and materials while promoting a circular, low waste economy.
6. Improve Access to Local and Healthy Food – Increase convenient purchasing opportunities
and create more gardening and food production opportunities.
Page 5
Goal 1: Develop and Promote Energy Efficiency Efforts
Energy Initiatives
Emissions from energy generation and usage account for the second highest sector of emissions glob-
ally, only behind transportation. When compared to other inner ring suburbs, Richfield falls below the av-
erage of tons of CO2 emitted from energy consumption (Figure 2). This also correlates with lower energy
consumption compared to other inner ring suburbs.
However, because of Richfield’s specific land use, the lower than average energy usage is drastically
driven by residential energy consumption, not by commercial consumption. This is reflected in the resi-
dential energy costs shown in Figure 3, which shows that Richfield residents pay a fairly average amount
per household has paid per day for energy, despite using less energy than average.
These costs add up and based on the condition of one’s home, it can add up quickly. “‘Energy Burden’ is
the percentage of household income spent on home energy bills. The nation’s average energy burden
is roughly 3.5%, but some Minnesotans spend 20-30% of their income on energy” (CERTs, 2020). This
is determined in part by the age or maintenance of HVAC systems and other appliances, the amount
of heat loss or retention, and general resource usage. These factors tend to disproportionately affect
low-income and marginalized groups without funds for large equipment upgrades or the agency as rent-
ers to make these changes.
Figure 2: The 2017 Energy Emissions of the Inner Ring Suburbs. (Source: Regional Indicators Initiative)
Figure 3: 2016 Energy Costs (dollars per household per day) of the Inner Ring Suburbs. (Source: Regional Indicators Initiative)
Page 6
It is clear that energy efficiency and reduction efforts would benefit both sectors, saving money and con-
serving resources. Richfield has already undertaken several energy efficiency efforts, especially when it
comes to the energy usage of municipal buildings. Both the Public Works building and the Water Plant
are outfitted entirely with LED lighting fixtures. The Water Plant has also taken part in an Xcel Energy
rebate program to upgrade equipment like high service water pumps and other motor upgrades. Other
citywide energy actions include converting all stoplights in the city to LED fixtures as well as participating
in Xcel and Center for Energy and Environment’s Home Energy Squad program since 2013.
Objective 1: Share opportunities to decrease energy costs and lower energy usage with residents and
business owners
1.1 Community stakeholders will write and execute an Energy Action Plan through participating in
Partners in Energy. Among other goals, include a focus on residential energy use and efficiency
efforts with marginalized populations in the city.
1.2 Develop a City webpage that provides information to help residents incorporate energy efficien-
cy practices and technology into their lives. Communicate these strategies through social media,
newsletters, and e-notifications.
1.3 Encourage commercial and large residential building owners to reduce energy use and increase
energy efficiency by retrofitting existing buildings and introducing behavior changes.
1.4 Discuss including energy efficiency tips and improvements as part of point of sale inspections or
new homeowner materials. Promote utility rebates for energy efficient product upgrades.
Objective 2: Increase the energy efficiency of all municipal buildings and operations
2.1 Track municipal energy, natural gas, and water consumption on B3, an energy benchmarking
program.
2.2 Conduct municipal building audits to find efficiency opportunities (behavior change and technol-
ogy implementation). Create building-specific improvement plans, optimizing city operations to
best conserve energy and save money.
2.3 Replace existing Xcel metered high-pressure sodium (HPS) streetlights with LED streetlights.
2.4 Develop a program to replace existing Xcel flat rate HPS streetlights with LED streetlights.
2.5 Create and maintain a written inventory of LED and HPS light fixtures in municipal facility and
park parking lots. Use this information as a guideline for replacing HPS fixtures with LEDs.
Transportation Initiatives
In Minnesota, transportation generates the most greenhouse gas emissions. Although freight transpor-
tation contributes to this, individual travel makes up a far greater percentage of Richfield’s transportation
emissions (Met Council
Greenhouse Gas Invento-
ry, 2018). While there has
been progress in promoting
and planning for alternative
modes of transportation
(public transit, biking, walk-
ing, rolling, riding scooters
or skateboards, etc), the car
continues to be the primary
mode of transport for many.
Additionally, most of those
trips have a single occupant,
especially commutes.
Figure 4: 2018 Vehicle Miles Traveled for the Inner Ring Suburbs. (Source: Regional
Indicators Initiative)
Page 7
Richfield is above average for inner ring suburbs when it comes to vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As
shown in Figure 4, the
city’s statistics do fall in line
with many other suburbs.
However, when the data is
changed to show VMT per
household per day, Rich-
field rises to the top, driv-
ing nearly 80 miles every
day. According to the 2017
National Household Travel
Survey, 35.2% of all vehicle
trips were 2 miles and less
and 5% of all trips were
under ½ of a mile! This is an
area where carpooling and
increased transit use would
be greatly beneficial.
Richfield’s Complete Streets Plan has overseen many transportation infrastructure improvement projects
aiming to increase the safety of all people traveling in Richfield. Several pedestrian bridges and under-
passes have been constructed to enhance the city’s transportation infrastructure. Re-striping and round-
abouts have also helped increase overall safety. One exemplary project was the reconstruction of 76th
Street. Reduced from four lanes of concrete to two lanes of asphalt, the right of way was used to add
bike lanes, sidewalks, multi-purpose trail, and green boulevards with trees on both sides of the roadway.
These projects and more all help reduce transportation emissions and other effects on the environment
while also promoting positive public health habits.
Objective 3: Reduce city-wide transportation-related emissions and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
3.1 Share education with residents regarding electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (EV/PHEV)
incentives, financing, charging infrastructure (public and private), benefits, etc.
3.2 Continue evaluating the full municipal fleet for vehicle replacement opportunities
3.3 Install charging stations at municipal facilities after integrating more EVs/PHEVs into the fleet.
3.4 Encourage fewer individual in-city staff trips and more carpools. Prioritize using EVs/PHEVs for
these shorter trips.
3.5 Review and amend city policies to encourage employees to
adopt a telework/in-office split schedule.
3.6 Continue to encourage inclusion of roundabouts into plan-
ning and educate the public on the benefits of reducing
idling and lowered emissions.
Objective 4: Encourage alternate forms of transportation, promoting
a healthier mobility network
4.1 Work with partners like Move Minnesota and Commuter Ser-
vices to promote and incentivize alternative transportation for
staff and residents.
4.2 Share information about the MPCA’s electric bus initiative
with local schools.
4.3 Develop more opportunities to educate the public on equity
in transportation planning.
Figure 5: 2018 Vehicle Miles Traveled per household per day for the Inner Ring Suburbs.
(Source: Regional Indicators Initiative)
Page 8
Goal 2: Promote Renewable Energy Installation and Purchasing
As detailed in the previous goal, energy efficiency and related emissions are a large component of
the greenhouse gas emissions reduction challenge. Increasing the amount and production capacity of
renewable energy infrastructure helps lower reliance on fossil fuels and reduce emissions from energy
production.
Richfield is serviced by Xcel Energy, which has set sev-
eral goals to increase the percentage of carbon-free
energy provided to customers. In 2019, Xcel Energy
reached 54% carbon-free energy production in the Up-
per Midwest. In 2019, wind power alone supplied 15%
of the energy Xcel provided (Figure 6).
Implementing different models, like buildings produc-
ing their own electricity through solar or geothermal
infrastructure, helps build a stronger energy system.
Renewable energy generation at individual sites con-
tinues to become more financially accessible, strength-
ening energy production at varying scales.
Many households in Richfield have installed solar pan-
els on their homes or garages. Local businesses like
Jaguar Land Rover Richfield generate electricity from
rooftop solar arrays as well. Additionally, the City has
solar panels on five buildings (the Pool, Ice Arena, Public Works, and two liquor stores). A less expensive
way to participate in the generation and consumption of renewable energy is to purchase it through
Xcel’s Renewable Energy programs, like Windsource and community solar gardens. Over 1,000 house-
holds in Richfield currently participate in energy programs like these!
Objective 1: Increase city-wide renewable energy purchase and generation
1.1 Promote options for purchasing renewable energy to residents and businesses. Identify afford-
able opportunities to increase equity throughout Richfield, working with low income communities
and with people of color.
1.2 Conduct solar feasibility study; identify buildings in the city with the most potential and do target-
ed outreach. Share grant programs to increase affordability, especially for non-residential sites.
1.3 Develop and distribute an educational brochure outlining current financing incentives and the
benefits of installing solar.
Objective 2: Increase municipal renewable energy purchasing and infrastructure installation
2.1 Continue to research renewable energy infrastructure options for municipal facilities.
• Identify any other municipal buildings with good solar payback potential.
• Investigate feasibility of solar thermal hot water systems.
• Investigate adding renewable infrastructure in all new construction.
2.2 Investigate viability of making all park trail lighting solar powered.
2.3 After reduction efforts, offset energy use with renewable energy purchasing through Xcel Ener-
gy’s renewable portfolio options.
Figure 6: 2019 Breakdown of Energy Production in Xcel’s
Upper Midwest Service Area. (Source: Xcel Energy Power
Generation).
Page 9
Goal 3: Encourage Sustainable Design and Building Practices
Construction and demolition (C&D) waste includes
materials from the renovation, demolition, or construc-
tion of buildings and transportation infrastructure. In
2019, Minnesota generated an estimated 10.2 million
tons of C&D waste, with around 1.4 million tons of
that recorded as landfilled (MPCA). This waste stream
presents a great opportunity to divert materials for
reuse and extend their lifecycle.
With limited space for new construction in Richfield,
sustainable design, which looks at the lifespan of
a building and plans for emerging technologies is
essential. It also takes into account existing natural
resources like natural lighting and passive heating to
lower a building’s energy footprint after construction.
All of these practices result in financial and environ-
mental savings over time.
Richfield residents are implementing sustainable design features into their own home improvement or
construction projects. Many residents have installed solar panels, natural landscaping, passive solar
design, additional dwelling units, and more. Richfield’s Community Development department has several
environmentally-oriented grant programs, including the Richfield Rediscovered Lot Sale Program, which
includes five sustainable construction categories that builders should include in their design plans.
Objective 1: Develop and streamline municipal permit process
1.1 Evaluate projects for sustainable opportunities during Administrative Review Committee (ARC)
meetings. For projects with city financial support or regulatory approval, develop an amenity point
evaluation system.
1.2 Create a guide of financial and planning resources for constructing efficient and sustainable
buildings. Share this with builders/developers at ARC meetings.
1.3 Encourage builders/developers to seek Energy Star, MN GreenStar, Xcel’s Energy Efficient Build-
ings programs, SB 2030 Energy Standard, or other certifications.
1.4 Review the effectiveness of the City’s affordable housing permit fee reduction program. Investi-
gate how to improve the program and revise as needed.
Objective 2: Adopt and promote green design strategies
2.1 Encourage deconstruction instead of demolition of properties by sharing information about Hen-
nepin County’s deconstruction grant program.
2.2 Review design and construction standards to help ensure projects reduce stormwater runoff
rates, volumes, and nutrient loads, and enhance water quality.
2.3 Set lawn design standards to require restoration of soil permeability after construction and in-
clude native plants and compost.
2.4 Review and reduce parking maximums to better promote alternative modes of transportation.
Require bike parking for all multi-unit housing and commercial developments.
2.5 Request that a developer submit plans during the design review process on how their develop-
ment could achieve “solar-ready” and “EV-ready” status.
2.6 Require that new municipal buildings be built using the SB 2030 energy standard and/or a green
building framework that includes an equity lens.
Richfield’s partnership with Habitat for Humanity constructs
affordable housing units in the city. All of their houses are built
to meet Energy Star 3.1 standards.
Page 10
Goal 4: Strengthen and Expand Natural Resource Management
Landscaping and Urban Canopy Initiatives
Natural resource and greenspace management is very important to maintaining a healthy ecosystem.
This is especially true in urban areas where there are many other factors, like a denser population, that
could directly or indirectly harm the environment. For example, having a healthy, mature tree canopy
fosters good air quality, mitigates the urban heat island effect, reduces energy use through shading,
and helps improve water quality.
Richfield’s Public Works Department employs several environmentally beneficial maintenance prac-
tices. Select areas in almost all of the city’s parks feature native grasses and wildflowers and are not
regularly mowed. This contributes to improving soil health, erosion control, and reducing emissions
from mowing. Chemical use in parks has gradually been reduced over the past 10 years, with staff
focused on establishing better turf which requires fewer chemicals. Richfield’s parks and streetscape
projects have boasted recent efforts to plant and care for increased vegetation, including more trees,
bee-friendly medians, designated pollinator garden areas, and newly planted flower beds around sev-
eral park signs.
Objective 1: Establish land management standards and practices that lower inputs and maximize resilience
1.1 Identify areas in parks and commercial spaces that could be restored to natural habitat or non-
turf vegetation. Develop a conversion plan.
1.2 Increase amount of native species planted to provide pollinators and other wildlife a habitat.
1.3 Use compost in landscaping to boost soil health, resilience, and increase water retention.
1.4 Increase invasive species removal in public and private areas.
1.5 Require more greenspace in streetscape design and construction projects.
1.6 Create and implement natural resource management plans for large greenspaces throughout
the parks system.
Objective 2: Strengthen Richfield’s urban forest
2.1 Update the citywide boulevard tree inventory, identifying vulnerable urban tree canopy.
2.2 Continue to protect mature legacy trees through regular maintenance, disease prevention, and
tree-friendly urban planning and construction. Review tree/landscaping policies for single-family
and multi-unit developments; amend as needed to maximize replacement opportunities.
2.3 Increase tree canopy percentage; concentrate efforts in low-income and high urban heat areas.
2.4 Continue to increase tree species diversity and communicate efforts to the public, especially as
pertaining to residential tree selection and climate adaptive forestry.
2.5 Maintain Tree City USA status and annual tree planting events including Earth Day celebrations.
Objective 3: Provide education and outreach on protecting natural resources
3.1 Educate residents and businesses on planting trees adaptable to climate change.
3.2 Revise city code to remove barriers to using native vegetation in landscaping.
3.3 Encourage and educate residents and businesses to convert landscapes to diverse, indige-
nous, and drought tolerant flora, including pollinator gardens. Explain why rain gardens aren’t
advised in Richfield.
3.4 Increase community education on invasive species identification and removal.
Page 11
Water Quality and Conservation Initiatives
Less than 1% of the planet’s water is accessible to be used for household use, agriculture, and other
human-related uses (USGS). In fact, most of the fresh surface
water people use comes from rivers, but they only make up
about 1/10,000th of 1% of Earth’s total water supply (USGS)! It’s
clear that understanding and improving water quality and con-
servation is essential in using the limited supply that we have.
Richfield’s Public Works Department manages water quality
and conservation measures. This includes seasonal street
sweeping to limit pollutant loading in the City’s surface waters.
Additionally, the Taft/Legion Lakes treatment system provides
regional pollutant load removal and stormwater capacity. All
new developments in the City must follow stormwater stan-
dards to ensure that extra volume and pollutant loading are
both addressed in the planning stage and will not adversely
affect the water resources in the area’s watershed.
City code restricts when residents are allowed to irrigate their
lawns and gardens (not allowed May 1 to September 30 from 11 am to 4 pm) to prevent excess wa-
ter from being used at times when it is more likely to evaporate than infiltrate into the ground. Public
Works has also tracked annual winter salt use to reduce excess chlorides from reaching surface waters.
Aside from damage to infrastructure (curbs, streets, pipes, and vehicles), excessive road salt applica-
tion can be very harmful to aquatic life and have long term impacts to bodies of water.
Objective 4: Promote water conservation
4.1 Create ranked list education campaign of easy behavior changes that would reduce water use.
4.2 Develop in person, print, and online water conservation education for residents and business-
es. Make education as accessible as possible with translations.
4.3 Provide information to residents on natural landscaping techniques, including low water plants.
4.4 Encourage high efficiency systems (with soil moisture sensors or programmable watering areas)
in new installations or system replacements.
Objective 5: Improve stormwater management, preserving and enhancing wetlands, streams, lakes,
and floodplain areas
5.1 Ensure the City’s shoreline management ordinance is
consistent with state requirements.
5.2 Educate residents who want to help restore and reveg-
etate shoreline.
5.3 Explore conducting an inventory of pond status and
creating improvement plans.
5.4 Develop a salt reduction education program for resi-
dents, businesses, and other organizations.
5.5 Promote citywide Adopt-A-Drain efforts with the goal
of having all catch basins adopted.
5.6 Audit and re-design stormwater drainage systems to
improve litter capture in all parks. Budget for profes-
sionally cleaning ponds and removing litter.
Public Works Workers Kurt Siebert and Nick Kleve
finish some natural landscaping and pollinator
garden installation in Monroe Park.
Natural landscaping can help prevent shoreline
erosion. (Source: MPCA)
Page 12
Goal 5: Reduce Waste Generated
We use numerous different products in our daily lives, almost all of which come in some sort of non-reu-
seable packaging. Once it’s in the trash or recycling, it’s usually not thought of again. However, we incin-
erate or landfill our trash and it quickly adds up. Richfield households produce more waste per day than
the inner ring suburb average (Figure 6); in 2018, Richfield generated an estimated 41,692 tons of waste
total (Regional Indicators Initiative).
Besides the large amount of resources used to create these products and production-related emissions,
there are significant emissions associated with disposing of waste. This includes household pick-up and
the subsequent transportation as well as the greenhouse gases released from landfilling or incineration.
Since Richfield generates more waste than average, it follows that the city has a higher than average
emission tonnage as well (Figure 7).
There are many ways to reduce the amount of waste one produces. A lot of this has to do with more
conscious consumption, but proper disposal is also a factor. Figure 8 shows how different waste man-
agement methods in Hennepin County have fluctuated over the years, almost all of them far from their
related 2030 goal.
Richfield has implemented several initiatives to reduce the amount of waste thrown away in the City.
Over 800 households have signed up for the residential organics drop-off program, which has diverted
several dozen tons of compostable material from incinerators and landfills.
Figure 6: Tons of waste generated per household per day in the Inner Ring Suburbs in
2018. (Source: Regional Indicators Initiative)Initiative)
Figure 7: Waste emissions (tons of CO2) associated with waste generated in the Inner Ring
Suburbs in 2018. (Source: Regional Indicators Initiative)
Page 13
The city’s waste reduction efforts currently focus on
municipal building systems and staff education, low
waste community events like the Farmers Market, and
household behaviors. Several city buildings have started
organics collection, with more to be rolled out, including
areas at the Ice Arena and Pool. Additional citywide re-
cycling education and events are always being planned
and implemented!
Objective 1: Create and share education on how to
reduce waste
1.1 Share education and incentives to motivate resi-
dents and businesses to reduce waste, recycle,
and compost. Promote Hennepin County Mas-
ter Recycler and Composter program and Zero
Waste Challenge.
1.2 Communicate with residents about events and
businesses that promote waste reduction and re-
use, such as Fix-it Clinics.
1.3 Develop educational materials that illustrate the
impacts of waste generation and reduction be-
haviors and share smarter purchasing tips.
1.4 Host a citywide drop-off event to collect materials
that cannot be recycled curbside (electronics, household hazardous waste, etc).
1.5 Continue to build a robust education and resource page on the city’s website.
Objective 2: Emphasize and expand recycling and organics collection efforts
2.1 Enforce the state recycling statute and undertake an educational campaign to strengthen recy-
cling in multi-unit housing and businesses.
2.2 Organize curbside solid waste, recycling, and organics collection by 2022 to increase accessibil-
ity and equity and achieve environmental benefits.
2.3 Require that all events held at city facilities (including park shelters) are low or zero waste, follow-
ing published city guidelines.
Objective 3: Reduce waste generated by municipal staff and operations
3.1 Update the Sustainable Purchasing Policy and annually educate relevant staff on best practices
3.2 Develop a list of environmentally preferred local vendors and environmentally preferable state
cooperative purchasing contracts for city purchases.
3.3 Create city operations goals for sustainable material use in projects, solid waste reduction, re-
cycling, and organics recycling. Work with the municipal Green Team to create a friendly depart-
ment or building competition.
3.4 Develop and implement low waste guidelines for all internal staff events to follow.
3.5 Improve all waste disposal systems in municipal buildings and with the municipal Green Team,
coordinate related education for all staff.
Figure 8: Historic breakdown of waste disposal methods
compared to county goals. (Source: 2019 Hennepin County
Recycling Progress Report)
Page 14
Goal 6: Improve Access to Local and Healthy Food
When it comes to food transportation, the physical distance between farm and table can be pretty long.
Additionally, local produce and other food products are usually more expensive than what can be pur-
chased at the bigger retail stores, making local, healthy food not as cost-efficient or accessible for many
people. With climate challenges affecting food production around the world, it will be essential to pro-
duce more of our own food closer to home. This also promotes responsible land management behaviors
which will benefit the environment.
When people are more involved with growing their own food and are more aware of how much labor
and resources go into food production, they are less likely to waste it or throw it away (Nova, 2020).
This reduces greenhouse gas emissions and also helps build other environmentally conscious habits by
developing relationships and connection to the land. For
example, if you know how much your plants rely on clean
water for growth, you might start thinking about the health
of your local water sources and how to reduce contam-
inants in them. This systems thinking approach is very
important when it comes to climate action!
Historically, there have been a variety of organizations
working to increase access to local and healthy food in
Richfield. The Richfield Farmers Market has operated from
May-October for 30 years, with the Winter Market spotlight-
ing more local food vendors. There are several affordable
grocery stores in town, and organizations and initiatives
like VEAP and Fare For All further increase food access
for residents across the city. Residents are allowed to keep bees and chickens per City Code, and there
have been a number of community gardens in the City over the years as well.
Objective 1: Increase the amount of healthy food grown by Richfield residents, shortening supply chain
length and strengthening the community’s resilience
1.1 Support the creation and maintenance of pocket community gardens in parks and other areas
identified across the city.
• Educate participants on soil testing
for contaminants to ensure health and
safety.
• Establish gardens at schools and con-
nect into curricula.
• Collaborate on equipment-lending
libraries and seed/seedling programs.
1.2 Encourage edible landscapes and garden-
ing on various types of properties (homes,
businesses, schools, etc). Review and amend
code as needed.
1.3 Revise ordinances related to the keeping of
bees, chickens, and other animals to better
support animal health and husbandry best
practices.
1.4 Encourage the creation of community gar-
dens to fulfill the green space requirement for
new developments.
Page 15
Objective 2: Ensure all residents have nearby access to purchasing and consuming healthy food
2.1 Continue to support innovative practices such as mobile food mar-
kets and pantries to bring food closer to under-resourced consum-
ers. Develop a multi-lingual comprehensive list of local resources for
staff to share with residents.
2.2 Explore partnership opportunities to provide education and skill
development for families around healthy food selection and prepara-
tion.
2.3 Promote Community Supported Agriculture programs through exist-
ing programs and partnerships
2.4 Measure proximity of grocery stores to residential areas, specifi-
cally pedestrian access within a half-mile radius of grocery stores.
Use this information in program development to focus on increasing
equity.
Page 16
Appendix 1: Implementation Tables
Goal 1: Develop and Promote Energy Efficiency Efforts
Energy Initiatives
Action
Item
Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
1.1 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Short-term
(2 years)
2020 2.1
1.2 Municipal Ongoing 2021 2.1
1.3 Commercial Short-term 2021 2.4
1.4 Municipal, Residential Short-term 2022 -
2.1 Municipal Short-term; ongoing 2020 1.1, 1.6, 20.1
2.2 Municipal Short-term 2022 1.2, 1.3
2.3 Municipal Short-term 2022 4.2, 4.3, 4.5
2.4 Municipal Short-term 2022 4.2, 4.3, 4.5
2.5 Municipal Short-term 2022 4.2, 4.3, 4.5
Transportation Initiatives
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
3.1 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2022 -
3.2 Municipal Ongoing 2021 13.2, 13.3, 13.6
3.3 Municipal Long-term; ongoing 2023 23.5
3.4 Municipal Short-term launch;
ongoing
2022 13.1
3.5 Municipal Short-term launch;
ongoing
2021 12.5
3.6 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2020 11.6
4.1 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2021 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 12.6
4.2 Municipal, Education Short-term 2020 -
4.3 Municipal Short-term; ongoing 2021 -
Goal 2: Promote Renewable Energy Installation and Purchasing
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
1.1 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Short-term launch;
ongoing
2021 26.2a
1.2 Municipal Short-term 2023 26.2b
1.3 Municipal Short-term 2023 26.2
2.1 Municipal Long-term 2023 1.7
2.2 Municipal Ongoing 2022 4.5
2.3 Municipal Long-term 2025 15.2
Page 17
Goal 3: Encourage Sustainable Design and Building Practices
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
1.1 Municipal, Commercial Short-term 2021 3.3
1.2 Municipal, Commercial Short-term launch;
ongoing
2022 2.2
1.3 Municipal, Commercial Ongoing 2021 -
1.4 Municipal Ongoing 2022 2.6
2.1 Municipal, Commercial Short-term; ongoing 2020 22.8
2.2 Municipal, Commercial Ongoing 2021 17.5
2.3 Municipal, Commercial Ongoing 2022 16.2
2.4 Municipal, Commercial Short-term 2021 12.1, 14.1
2.5 Municipal, Commercial Short-term; ongoing 2021 2.2
2.6 Municipal Short-term 2021 3.1
Goal 4: Strengthen and Expand Natural Resource Management
Landscaping and Urban Canopy Initiatives
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
1.1 Municipal Ongoing 2022 18.5a
1.2 Municipal Ongoing 2022 18.5a
1.3 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Short-term; ongoing 2022 15.5, 16.2, 18.5b
1.4 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2022 18.8
1.5 Municipal Ongoing 2021 -
1.6 Municipal Long-term; ongoing 2024 10.1
2.1 Municipal Ongoing 2021 -
2.2 Municipal, Commercial Ongoing 2021 16.2, 16.5
2.3 Municipal Long-term; ongoing 2022 16.3
2.4 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2021 16.6
2.5 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2021 16.1
3.1 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Ongoing 2021 -
3.2 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Short-term; ongoing 2021 16.5, 17.5
3.3 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2022 -
3.4 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2022 18.8
Page 18
Water Quality and Conservation Initiatives:
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
4.1 Municipal, Residential Short-term 2021 2.5
4.2 Municipal, Residential Short-term; ongoing 2021 2.5, 20.6
4.3 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2021 -
4.4 Municipal Ongoing 2021 2.5
5.1 Municipal Short-term 2022 19.4
5.2 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2022 19.5
5.3 Municipal Long-term 2024 19.5
5.4 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial, Others
Ongoing 2021 17.6
5.5 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial, Others
Ongoing 2021 17.3
5.6 Municipal Ongoing 2023 -
Goal 5: Reduce Waste Generated
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
1.1 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Ongoing 2021 22.2
1.2 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2021 22.2, 22.4
1.3 Municipal, Residential Short-term 2021 22.2
1.4 Municipal Short-term 2023 -
1.5 Municipal Ongoing 2020 22.2
2.1 Municipal, Commercial,
Multi-Unit Housing
Long-term 2022 22.6
2.2 Municipal, Residential Short-term 2020 22.3, 22.5, 22.7
2.3 Municipal Ongoing 2021 15.7
3.1 Municipal Short-term launch;
ongoing
2021 15.1, 15.4, 15.8
3.2 Municipal Short-term 2021 15.3
3.3 Municipal Long-term 2022 15.5, 22.1
3.4 Municipal Short-term 2021 15.7
3.5 Municipal Short-term launch;
ongoing
2021 22.1
Page 19
Goal 6: Improve Access to Local and Healthy Food
Action Item Sector(s) Involved Project Timeframe Potential Start Year GreenStep City
Related Action(s)
1.1 Municipal, Residential,
Schools
Long-term; ongoing 2022 27.2, 27.3c
1.2 Municipal, Residential,
Commercial
Ongoing 2021 -
1.3 Municipal, Residential Short-term 2021 27.2
1.4 Municipal, Multi-Unit Housing Ongoing 2023 27.2
2.1 Municipal Ongoing 2021 27.3
2.2 Municipal, Residential,
Community Education
Ongoing 2021 -
2.3 Municipal, Residential Ongoing 2021 27.3b
2.4 Municipal Short-term 2021 27.4
Page 20
Appendix 2: Related 2040 Comprehensive Plan Policies
Adopted in 2018, Richfield’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan helps the city set goals and policies that improve
land use, transportation, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, parks, utilities, and public facilities. Many of
these policies tie into the objectives that this climate action work plan highlights as well. The two docu-
ments are inherently connected as they both work to improve the municipal services Richfield currently
offers while ensuring the overall sustainability of the future of the City.
General Policies
• “Encourage the use of alternative energy sources and sustainable building practices.”
• “Encourage protection of the environment in the day-to-day conduct of City business.”
• “Explore opportunities for policy change related to pollinator habitat protection, local food pro-
duction and entrepreneurship, the promotion of healthy food retail, and waste reduction.”
Goal 1 (Develop and Promote Energy Efficiency Efforts) Policies
• “Reduce pollutants through public transit, car-pooling, traffic control, use of berms and trees, and
stronger enforcement of pollution policies”
• “Incorporate landscaping and aesthetics in all transportation improvements.”
• “Make fuel efficiency and alternative fuels a high priority when purchasing vehicles for use by the
city.”
Goal 2 (Promote Renewable Energy Installation and Purchasing) Policy
• “Install solar panels or similar energy sources on public buildings and encourage owners of busi-
nesses and private property owners to do the same”
Goal 3 (Encourage Sustainable Design and Building Practices) Policy
• “Encourage sustainable building practices”
Page 21
Appendix 3: Resources Used
Anderson, M. and S. McMinn. (2019, September 03). As Rising Heat Bakes U.S. Cities, The Poor Often
Feel It Most. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/03/754044732/as-rising-heat-bakes-u-s-cities-the-poor-often-
feel-it-most
Burnsville Sustainability Guide Plan. (2009). Burnsville, MN. http://www.ci.burnsville.mn.us/DocumentCen-
ter/View/1287/Sustainability-Guide-Plan?bidId=
Carbon Reduction Plan: Xcel Energy. (n.d.). https://www.xcelenergy.com/environment/carbon_reduction_
plan
Chapter 3: Environment. (February 25, 2019) Red Wing, MN. https://www.red-wing.org/846/Red-Wing-
2040-Community-Plan
Chapter 7: Resilience and Sustainability. (2018). Golden Valley, MN. http://www.goldenvalleymn.gov/plan-
ning/comprehensiveplanupdate/index.php
Chapter 9: Sustainability. (September 9th, 2019). Maplewood, MN. https://www.maplewoodmn.gov
/1718/2040-Comprehensive-Plan
City of Eden Prairie Climate Action Plan. (March 2020). Eden Prairie, MN. https://www.edenprairie.org/
home/showdocument?id=15547
Climate & Resilience Action Plan. (December 2019). St. Paul, MN https://www.stpaul.gov/sites/default/files/
Media%20Root/Mayor%27s%20Office/Saint%20Paul%20Climate%20Action%20%26%20Resilience%20
Plan.pdf
Dunbar, E. (March 7th, 2019). Minnesota’s many routes to carbon-free energy by 2050. https://www.
mprnews.org/story/2019/03/07/minnesota-pledges-100-percent-carbon-free-energy-is-it-possible
Federal Highway Administration. 2017 National Household Travel Survey, U.S. Department of Transporta-
tion, Washington, DC. https://nhts.ornl.gov.
Hennepin County Environment and Energy. “2019 Recycling Progress Report”. (June 2020). Minneapolis,
MN.
Klausing, Kyle and Sophie Bishop. (July 2016). Morris Model – Community Resilience Plan. https://www.
morrismodel.org/morris-goals
Minneapolis Climate Action Plan. (June 28, 2013). Minneapolis, MN. http://vote.minneapolismn.gov/www/
groups/public/@citycoordinator/documents/webcontent/wcms1p-113598.pdf
Minnesota, Environmental Quality Board. (2019). Minnesota Environment and Energy Report Card.
Nova, Paulo, et al. “Urban Organic Community Gardening to Promote Environmental Sustainability Prac-
tices and Increase Fruit, Vegetables and Organic Food Consumption.” Gaceta Sanitaria, vol. 34, no. 1,
2020, pp. 4–9., doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.001.
Page 22
Power Generation. (n.d.). https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfolio/electricity/power_generation
Regional Indicators Initiative. (2013-2018). https://www.regionalindicatorsmn.com/
Smoliak, B. V., P. K. Snyder, T. E. Twine, P. M. Mykleby, and W. F. Hertel, 2015: Dense Network Observa-
tions of the Twin Cities Canopy-Layer Urban Heat Island. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54, 1899–1917, https://
doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0239.1.
St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan. (February 2018). St. Louis Park, MN. https://www.stlouispark.org/home/
showdocument?id=8214
USGS. (n.d.). How Much Water is There on Earth? https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-sci-
ence-school/science/how-much-water-there-earth?qt-science_center_objects=0