The URL can be used to link to this page

09-22-2020 Complete AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIRTUAL MEETING HELD VIA WEBEX SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 7:00 PM INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS Call to order Pledge of Allegiance Open forum Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council may call 612-861-0651 during the Open Forum portion or must have registered prior to the meeting by calling 612-861-9711 or emailing kwynn@richfieldmn.gov. Approval of the Minutes of the (1) City Council Meeting of September 08, 2020; and (2) City Council Work Session of September 10, 2020. AGENDA APPROVAL1.Approval of the Agenda 2.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval. A.Consider approval of the 2020-2021 Emergency Preparedness agreement with the City of Bloomington, using public health emergency preparedness grant funds distributed by a federal grant from the Centers for Disease Control, to provide services in the area of public health emergency preparedness/bio-terrorism and the development of a response system. Staff Report No. 110 B.Consider a Grant Compliance Agreement with Penn Investments, LLC regarding a Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre-Development Grant for 6501 Penn Avenue South. Staff Report No. 111 C.Adoption of a resolution authorizing the refunding of the $2,120,000 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A, dated September 6, 2012 and the $2,770,000 G.O. Storm Sewer Bonds, Series 2013B, dated March 21, 2013 with the $3,255,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B. Staff Report No. 112 D.Consider the adoption of a resolution to accept the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act grant of $2,745,098. Staff Report No. 113 3.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar P U B LIC H E AR IN G S 4.P ublic hearing and consider the approval of an ordinance to the Richfield C ity C ode A ppendix D (F ee S chedule) and a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance. The proposed ordinance would revise fees related to the preparation of zoning verification letters and the processing of plat applications. S taff Report No. 114 5.C onduct a public hearing and consider a resolution approving a modification to the Redevelopment Plan and approving a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax Increment Finance District (Henley II). S taff Report No. 115 R E S O L U T IO N S 6.C onsider the 2020 Revised/2021 P roposed B udget resolutions adopting the 2021 preliminary property tax levy, setting truth in taxation hearing date, authorizing budget revisions, authorizing revision of 2020 budget of various departments, and approving C ity fees for 2021. S taff Report No. 116 C IT Y MAN AG E R’S R E P O R T 7.C ity Manager's Report C LAIMS AN D PAYR O L LS 8.C laims and P ayroll C O U N C IL D ISC U SSIO N 9.Hats Off to Hometown Hits 10.A djournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 7:00 p.m. via WebEx. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Ben Whalen; Edwina Garcia; and Present: Simon Trautmann Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Amy Markle, Recreation Services Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Jennifer Anderson, Health Administrator; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; Chris Regis, Finance Director; Skov, IT Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance OPEN FORUM Senior Office Assistant Wynn reviewed the options to participate: • Participate live by calling 612-861-0651 during the open forum portion • Call prior to meeting 612-861-9711 • Email prior to meeting kwynn@richfielmn.gov Senior Office Assistant Wynn confirmed there were no callers for the open forum. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Council Meeting Virtual Meeting held via WebEx September 8, 2020 Council Meeting Minutes -2- September 08, 2020 APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Garcia, S/Supple to approve the minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session of August 10, 2020; (2) City Council Meeting of August 10, 2020; and (3) Special City Council Meeting of August 14, 2020. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #1 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA M/Supple, S/Whalen to approve the agenda Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #2 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar. A. Approval by motion an agreement to grant an easement as part of a Site Lease Agreement at 1901 East 66th Street between the City of Richfield and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless. (Staff Report No. 98) B. Consider the approval of the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) Dementia Grant Contract, acting through the Minnesota Board on Aging (MBA). The contract is effective from July 20, 2020 - June 30, 2021. (Staff Report No. 99) Council Meeting Minutes -3- September 08, 2020 C. Consider the approval of the continuation of an agreement with the City of Bloomington for the provision of food, pools, lodging, therapeutic massage and body art establishment inspection services for the City of Richfield for 2021. (Staff Report No. 100) D. Consider the approval of an agreement between the Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department and the City of Richfield Police Department to participate in the Joint Community Police Partnership (JCPP) program from March 16, 2020 through December 31, 2023. (Staff Report No. 101) E. Consider the adoption of the City of Richfield Water Supply Plan. (Staff Report No. 102) F. Consider the approval of the first reading of an ordinance amendment to the Richfield City Code Appendix D (Fee Schedule) related to planning and zoning fees and schedule a public hearing and second reading for September 22, 2020. (Staff Report No. 103) G. Consider acceptance of the bid tabulation and award the Water Treatment Plant Solids Holding Tank Mixing System project contract to Magney Construction, Inc., in the amount of $63,150.00 and authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City Council consideration, as authorized by the City Charter. (Staff Report No. 104) Council Member Garcia asked if the employee hired from Item D is currently working out of City Hall. City Manager Rodriguez confirmed they are but only part time right now. Chief Henthorne stated the new hire will be full time September 14, 2020. M/Garcia, S/Trautmann to approve the consent calendar. Council Member Trautmann spoke of how glad he is to have a new liaison on board. He also inquired about an introduction during a future council meeting. Council Member Whalen stated he is excited to see the city becoming more dementia friendly and is eager to see what this will be able to do for the community. Council Member Supple also expressed her excitement and spoke of how many people in Richfield currently have dementia. Council Member Garcia praised Jennifer Anderson and the work she has done surrounding this issue. Mayor Regan Gonzalez echoed her gratitude to staff and community members who helped make it possible to participate. Council Member Whalen then complimented the Public Works Department as well as the water plant staff regarding all of their hard work. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Council Meeting Minutes -4- September 08, 2020 Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #3 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR None Item #4 CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF THE SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE THAT INCLUDES REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL PERSONS USING DESIGNATED OFF-LEASH DOG AREA(S) IN CITY OF RICHFIELD PARKS THAT INCLUDES A SLIGHT MODIFICATION TO RULE ONE (STAFF REPORT NO. 105) Council Member Supple presented staff report 105. Director Markle stated there had been a modification to rule one in an effort to be more inclusive. She also expressed her excitement and is hopeful to have the park open in October. M/Supple, S/Whalen to approve second reading of the ordinance that includes requirements for all persons using designated off-leash dog area(s) in City of Richfield Parks with the included modification to rule one of the ordinance. Mayor Regan Gonzalez spoke of her excitement to have this park open and how hard the Community Services commission worked to help shepherd this through. She encouraged residents to become commission members as well. Council Member Trautmann thanked Director Markle and the Community Services commission for everything they have done to make this possible. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Council Meeting Minutes -5- September 08, 2020 Item #5 SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PREVAILING WAGE POLICY FOR CITY FUNDED CAPITAL PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED COSTS OF $300,000 OR MORE (STAFF REPORT NO. 106) Council Member Whalen read staff report 106 and spoke of the numerous letters from local unions and contractors in support of this ordinance. He thanked staff for putting the research and terminology together to get this item passed. City Manager Rodriguez thanked Analyst Martinez Gavina, Director Stark and Director Asher for assisting with gathering information on this topic. M/Whalen, S/Trautmann to approve the second reading of an ordinance establishing a prevailing wage policy for city funded projects with estimated costs of $300,000 or more. Council Member Garcia spoke of her work with labor unions for 12 years and how grateful she is for labor protection standards and promoting economic labor development. She also spoke of how unions have helped families and created a middle class. Council Member Supple stated how the timing is wonderful with yesterday being Labor Day. She agreed with Council Member Garcia comments as well and thanked unions and contractors who continue to fight for fair wages. Council Member Trautmann explained how this is a great opportunity for all working people and how unions have advocated for prevailing wage. This is also to assist to combat wage theft and labor trafficking and creates a powerful set of tools for the city. It will help put working individuals in secure working environment. Mayor Regan Gonzalez echoed all the council member comments. She expressed her appreciation for Analyst Martinez Gavina for her leadership on this item. She stated how excited she is for all the items on the agenda as it is all strongly supporting the community and its needs. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #6 CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS HEALTH, DENTAL, TERM LIFE, AND DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUMS FOR 2021 FOR GENERAL SERVICES, Council Meeting Minutes -6- September 08, 2020 MANAGEMENT, FIRE AND ALL POLICE BARGAINING UNITS. IN ADDITION, ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY M ANAGER TO ENTER INTO A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH MADISON NATIONAL LIFE/ OCHS COMPANY FOR LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS (STAFF REPORT NO. 107) Council Member Trautmann read staff report 107. M/Trautmann, S/Supple to adopt a resolution designating the City's contribution toward health, dental, term life, and long term disability insurance premiums for 2021 for General Services, Management, and all Fire and Police bargaining units. Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Assistant City Manager Dmytrenko for her leadership in negotiations to provide coverage for employees. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 M/Trautmann, S/Garcia to adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a three-year agreement with Madison National Life/ Ochs Company for long-term disability insurance benefits. RESOLUTION NO. 11792 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARD HEALTH, DENTAL, TERM LIFE, AND DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR GENERAL SERVICES, MANAGEMENT, AND FIRE AND POLICE BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES Council Member Trautmann spoke of how critical insurance is in creating security for families and what an impact it makes on people’s lives. He also thanked Assistant City Manager Dmytrenko for her assistance in giving employees and their family’s peace of mind. Assistant City Manager Dmytrenko stated how important it is for employees to have quality coverage and how the city was so lucky to have such a minimal increase from 2020 to 2021. She also stated how the long term disability coverage rate will be a 14% decrease. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Council Meeting Minutes -7- September 08, 2020 Motion carried 5-0 Item #7 CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AND PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AND THE CITY OF RICHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR AN EMBEDDED SENIOR SOCIAL WORKER (STAFF REPORT NO. 108) Council Member Garcia presented staff report 108. Chief Henthorne spoke of how excited the department is for this program and that Donna Nelson started orientation last week. He stated how this model swanned out of JCPP program a few years ago. It is a very unique program and will create a second to none service to the residents that really need it and will also cut down on repeat calls to the same residence. M/Garcia, S/supple to approve an agreement between the Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department and the City of Richfield Police Department for implementing the Police Mental Health Program. Council Member Whalen stated how thrilled he is about the program. He thanked staff for all their efforts to make this program happen. He also suggested for the future to look into having someone fulltime rather than a shared service with Edina. Council Member Supple spoke of how appreciative she was of staff to work with multiple agencies. Council Member Garcia agreed with council members comments and truly believes this program needs to happen and is hopeful the community will appreciate it. Council Member Trautmann thanked Chief Henthorne for his comments and leadership to make this happen along with all the goals laid out in the staff report. The goals are aspirational to keep the community safe and well and he is glad to support this item. Mayor Regan Gonzalez echoed the gratitude to Chief Henthorne. She reiterated how important this program was to council and Chief Henthorne made it a priority. She spoke of how staff leveraged partnerships overnight and excited to see it come to life. She recapped a ride-along she experienced that involved a mental health situation and emphasized how important it is to have a structure to assist police with these situations. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Council Meeting Minutes -8- September 08, 2020 Item #8 CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Rodriguez commented on the voting situation that is quickly approaching. She encouraged residents to check the website for up to date information. She stated that on September 18 residents can begin to do in-person absentee voting; 7 days before the election is direct balloting where residents would feed their absentee ballot into a counting machine; and November 3 is Election Day when residents would need to go to their designated voting locations. Council Member Garcia emphasized how important it is to vote. She explained how safe and secure it is to vote at city hall ahead of time. Council Member Whalen reminded residents to check their in-person voting locations due to school construction. He encouraged residents to vote by mail if COVID is a concern and spoke of the tracking available for mail in ballots. Council Member Trautmann spoke of how effective and well established the absentee ballot process is at the city. It is a long established tradition in Minnesota. Item #9 CLAIMS AND PAYROLL M/Garcia, S/Trautmann that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 08/25/2020 A/P Checks 289982 - 290419 $ 1,516,044.82 Payroll: 156280 - 156577 689,579.82 TOTAL $ 2,205,624.64 U.S. Bank 09/08/2020 A/P Checks 290420 - 290753 $ 2,231,355.15 Payroll: 156578 - 156871 653,344.25 TOTAL $ 2,884,699.40 Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Trautmann: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 5-0 Item #10 THE CITY COUNCIL PASSED A RESOLUTION ENACTED PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 12.29 EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF A Council Meeting Minutes -9- September 08, 2020 MAYOR-DECLARED LOCAL EMERGENCY AT THEIR MEETING ON MARCH 18, 2020. AT THE SAME MEETING CITY COUNCIL PASSED A MOTION TO REVISIT THE EMERGENCY DECLARATION AT A COUNCIL MEETING IN 6 MONTHS TIME (STAFF REPORT NO. 109) Mayor Regan Gonzalez read staff report 109 and reviewed that this item is for discussion and no voting will take place. City Manager Rodriguez stated that if no action is to taken, the emergency declaration will stay in place. A council member may make a motion to revisit the item in a future meeting. Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Council Member Trautmann for making the motion in March to bring this item back for council discussion. She spoke of how important it is to have checks and balances and using good governance. Council Member Trautmann thanked staff along with Mayor Regan Gonzalez for the leadership provided during the pandemic and appreciated the discussion opportunity for this item. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked for clarification on what staff needed from council. City Manager Rodriguez reviewed the options for moving forward. Council Member Whalen stated that given the nature of the pandemic and no clear end, he would like to revisit this again in six months. He believes it is absolutely necessary to keep in place for the safety of the community. Council Member Garcia exited the meeting at 8:08 p.m. Council Member Supple agreed with Council Member Whalen’s suggestion to revisit in six months. Council Member Trautmann spoke of how the emergency plan creates good government practices and would like to keep the declaration in place. He expressed concern of the availability and private data within the emergency in place and would like to give the Mayor access to the plans. City Manager Rodriguez stated she would speak with City Attorney Tietjen and report back. Mayor Regan Gonzalez agreed with council member comments on revisiting this item again in six months. She expressed appreciation for the communication efforts from staff regarding this item. Item #11 HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS Council Member Trautmann praised Director Markle and the Parks and Recreation Department for the programs they have been able to offer for children with socially distancing. He encouraged residents to look into the programs. Council Meeting Minutes -10- September 08, 2020 Council Member Whalen thanked everyone involved in the first day of school, especially teachers as they navigate a school year with open ended questions and uncertainties. He also commended parents as they have had to make very tough decisions this year around distance learning and how assisting with schooling has become another full time job for families. He then spoke of how the Sustainability Commission was able to look at the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and how excited he is to discuss it with council at the upcoming work session. He thanked Director Markle and Sustainability Specialist Lindholm for their work around the plan. Council Member Whalen reminded residents the council will be having a work session on Thursday regarding the 2021 budget and will have a preliminary vote at the next council meeting. Council Member Supple commented on a great first day back in school and how excited she was to meet new students and families. She also spoke of the new Sports to Go program put on by the Parks and Recreation Department. She encouraged families to take a look at the equipment available to rent. Council Member Supple then expressed her excitement to see the Ice Arena up and running. The updates were needed and will be utilized by the skaters and visitors. She also congratulated the sidewalk poetry contestants who had their work selected. The poems have been placed along 66th Street between Portland and 35W and encouraged residents to take a walk to see the new additions. Mayor Regan Gonzalez reminded residents to fill out their Census forms. She also encouraged residents to volunteer in assisting to aid others. Analyst Martinez Gavina reviewed the volunteer needs and residents should contact her for more information at 612-861-9701 or bmgavina@richfieldmn.gov. Item #12 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:20 p.m. Date Approved: September 22, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota City Council Work Session September 10, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 4:30 p.m. virtually via WebEx. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Mary Supple; Simon Present: Trautmann; and Ben Whalen. Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Chris Regis, Finance Director; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director; Mike Dobesh, Acting Fire Chief; Amy Markle, Recreation Services Director; Bill Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director; Jay Henthorne, Chief of Police/Public Safety Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; Neil Ruhland, Communication and Engagement Manager; and Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst. Item #1 PRESENTATION OF THE 2020 REVISED/2021 PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY. Mayor Regan Gonzalez introduced City Manager Rodriguez who stated that the Council will be asked to approve the 2020 Revised and 2021 Proposed Budget and Preliminary Tax Levy at the September 10 Council Meeting and tonight is to ask any questions. City Manager Rodriguez then introduced Finance Director Chris Regis. Finance Director Regis gave an overview of the 2020 Revised and 2021 Proposed Budget and Preliminary Tax Levy. Each department gave a presentation on their proposed budgets and highlights. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:29 p.m. Date Approved: September 22, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.A. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 110 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/22/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jennifer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice 9/15/2020 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 9/16/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider approval of the 2020-2021 Emergency Preparedness agreement with the City of Bloomington, using public health emergency preparedness grant funds distributed by a federal grant from the Centers for Disease Control, to provide services in the area of public health emergency preparedness/bio-terrorism and the development of a response system. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The City of Richfield has had a public health emergency preparedness contract with the City of Bloomington to provide public health emergency preparedness services on Richfield's behalf for over seventeen years. This is Richfield's 2020-2021 contractual agreement with Bloomington. The City will receive $50,405 for the grant cycle that runs from J uly 1, 2020, to J une 30, 2021. The contract with the City of Bloomington for this same period of time for public health emergency preparedness is in the amount of $46,405, of which $12,000 is being passed through directly to Bloomington to meet the Cities Readiness I nitiative (C RI ), which is intended to be used metro wide to regionally fund public health emergency preparedness planning, exercise, training and activities. A remaining amount of $4,000 is retained by Richfield for our staff time, training, planning and exercise in public health emergency preparedness activities. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By motion: Approve the 2020-2021 contract with the City of Bloomington, using public health emergency preparedness grant funds distributed by a federal grant from the Centers for Disease Control, to provide services in the area of public health emergency preparedness/bio-terrorism and the development of a response system. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T The State of Minnesota has received funds from the federal government (C D C) to be used in developing agencies' public health emergency preparedness/response to bio-terrorism or a large public health disease outbreak. This is part of a nationwide effort to respond to serious public health emergencies. There are specific requirements in the grant in the areas of coordination, assessment, planning and exercise, response surveillance, Health Alert Network, risk communications training and providing services and activities to improve the mass dispensing of medicines and medical supplies through the Cities Readiness I nitiative. Richfield continues to pool these federal grant dollars with Bloomington and Edina with a portion used to support a Public Health Emergency Response Coordinator for the three cities. Nick Kelley, Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, is representing the Tri-City area (Boomington, Edina and Richfield) and has been regularly meeting with Richfield and Edina staff to plan and develop the requirements of the grant. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The City of Richfield became a Local Public Health Agency in 1977, which makes the City eligible to receive these grant funds to use for the development of a public health emergency response system specific to Richfield and its needs. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: These funds are part of a nationwide effort by the federal government to respond to serious public health emergencies, including threats of bio-terrorism. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Funds being used are those given to Richfield as a Local Public Health agency, from the federal government, to develop a system for responding to public health emergency preparedness and bio- terrorism threats. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: The City Attorney has reviewed the contract and has approved of its contents. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): The City Council could decide not to approve the contract with the City of Bloomington for the services of a Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator in developing a public health emergency preparedness/bio-terrorism plan. This would mean the City would have to hire a staff person to assume some of the grant responsibilities which cannot be met with current staffing levels and would result in a significant budget increase. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type 2020-2021 E P A greement C over Memo Agreement ID: 2020-331 PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND RICHFIELD THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, acting through its Public Health Division, located at 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431-3027 (“Bloomington”), and the CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at (“Richfield”). Bloomington and Richfield are herein referred to collectively as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements. B. Bloomington's Division of Public Health provides Public Health Emergency Preparedness Services to respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, and other threats to public health including, but not limited to coordination, assessment, planning and exercise, response, surveillance, notification, and training (“PH Emergency Preparedness Services”). Bloomington also provides services and activities to improve the mass dispensing of medicines and medical supplies through the Cities Readiness Initiative (“CRI Duties”). C. Richfield wishes to promote, support, and maintain the health of its residents by providing PH Emergency Preparedness Services and Cities Readiness Initiative (“CRI”) planning activities to its residents, and desires to contract with Bloomington to provide such PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties, funding these duties via Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) grant dollars and subject to the grant compliance timelines provided by MDH. D. Bloomington is willing to provide such PH Emergency Preparedness Services and perform such CRI Duties to residents of Richfield on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this Agreement, Richfield and Bloomington agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Services to be Provided. Bloomington agrees to provide the residents of Richfield with PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties as described in the Scope of Services attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A or any supplemental letter agreements, or both, entered into between Richfield and Bloomington (the “Services”). The Services referenced in the attached Exhibit A or any supplemental letter agreements shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All Services shall be provided in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by contractors currently providing similar services. 2 2. Time for Completion. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from July 1, 2020 and continuing until June 30, 2021, unless terminated by either party or amended pursuant to the Agreement. 3. Consideration. The consideration, which Richfield shall pay to Bloomington, shall not exceed $46,405.00, as set forth in Exhibit B and incorporated into this Agreement. 4. Approvals. Bloomington will secure Richfield’s written approval before making any expenditures, purchases, or commitments on Richfield’s behalf beyond those listed in the Services. Richfield’s approval may be provided via electronic mail. 5. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the contrary, either party may terminate for any reason upon giving thirty (30) days’ written notice to the other party. In the event of termination: a. The quarterly payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period ended on the date of termination, and Richfield shall pay such reduced quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of Bloomington’s invoice. b. The Parties may take whatever action at law or in equity that may appear necessary or desirable to collect damages arising from a default or violation or to enforce performance of this Agreement. c. The provisions of this section will continue and survive termination of the Agreement. 6. Amendments. No amendments may be made to this Agreement except in writing signed by both parties. 7. Records/Inspection. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, the Parties agree that the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices, that are relevant to the contract or transaction, are subject to examination by the other party and the state auditor or legislative auditor for a minimum of six years. The Parties shall maintain such records for a minimum of six years after final payment. 8. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, each party, and its successors or assigns, agree to protect, defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the other party, its officers, officials, agents, volunteers, and employees from any and all claims; lawsuits; causes of actions of any kind, nature, or character; damages; losses; or the costs, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, professional services, and other technical, administrative or professional assistance resulting from or arising out of the indemnifying party’s (or its subcontractors, agents, volunteers, members, invitees, representatives, or employees) performance of the duties required by or arising from this 3 Agreement, or caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct, or arising out of the failure to obtain or maintain the insurance required by this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability to which the Parties are entitled. The Parties agree that these indemnification obligations will survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. 9. Insurance. To the extent allowed by law, the Parties agree to maintain the following insurance coverages, in an amount equal to, or greater than, the minimum limits described below, and upon request, to provide the other with a certificate of insurance evidencing such coverages: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance in the amount of at least $1,500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury or death arising out of each occurrence, as well as $1,500,000 per occurrence for property damage. In the alternative, each party may maintain a general aggregate of at least $2,000,000. Each party agrees to name the other party as an additional insured on its Commercial General Liability and to provide an endorsement of such status. In addition, each party agrees to notify the other party thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or a change in any of the aforementioned insurance policies. All insurance must be provided at the respective party’s expense and at no additional cost to the other party. b. Bloomington agrees to maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.181, subd. 2. 10. Subcontracting. Neither Bloomington nor Richfield shall assign, sublet, or transfer any rights under or interest (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) in the Agreement without the written consent of the other except to the extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Bloomington from employing such independent consultants, associates, and subcontractors, as it may deem appropriate to assist it in the performance of services required by this Agreement. Any instrument in violation of this provision is null and void. 11. Assignment. Neither Bloomington nor Richfield shall assign this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement, in whole or in part, without the other party’s prior written consent. Any assignment in violation of this provision is null and void. 12. Independent Contractor. Bloomington shall be deemed an independent contractor. Bloomington’s duties will be performed with the understanding that Bloomington has special expertise as to the services which Bloomington is to perform and is customarily engaged in the independent performance of the same or similar services for others. All required equipment and personnel shall be provided or contracted for by Bloomington. The manner in which the services are performed shall be controlled by Bloomington; however, the nature of the services and the results to be achieved shall be specified by Richfield. The Parties agree that this is not a joint venture and the Parties are not co-partners. Bloomington is not to be deemed an employee or agent of Richfield and has no authority to make any binding commitments or obligations on behalf of Richfield except to the extent expressly provided in this Agreement. 4 All services provided by Bloomington pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by Bloomington as an independent contractor and not as an employee of Richfield for any purpose, including but not limited to: income tax withholding, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts and eligibility for employee benefits. 13. Compliance with Laws. The Parties shall exercise due care to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, ordinances and regulations in effect as of the date Bloomington agrees to provide the Services. 14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, any attached exhibits and any addenda or amendments signed by the Parties shall constitute the entire agreement between Bloomington and Richfield, and supersedes any other written or oral agreements between Bloomington and Richfield. This Agreement can only be modified in writing signed by Bloomington and Richfield. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. 15. Third Party Rights. The Parties to this Agreement do not intend to confer on any third party any rights under this Agreement. 16. Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise. 17. Conflict of Interest. Bloomington shall use reasonable care to avoid conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety in representation of Richfield. In the event of a conflict of interest, Bloomington shall advise Richfield and either secure a waiver of the conflict or advise Richfield that it will be unable to provide the requested services. 18. Work Products and Ownership of Documents. All records, information, materials and other work products, including, but not limited to the completed reports, drawings, plans, and specifications prepared and developed in connection with the provision of services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of Richfield, but reproductions of such records, information, materials and other work products in whole or in part may be retained by Bloomington. Regardless of when such information was provided, Bloomington agrees that it will not disclose for any purpose any information Bloomington has obtained arising out of or related to this Agreement, except as authorized by Richfield or as required by law. These obligations survive the termination of this Agreement. 19. Agreement Not Exclusive. Bloomington retains the right to perform other PH Emergency Services and CRI Duties for other entities, in Bloomington’s sole discretion. 20. Data Practices Act Compliance. Any and all data provided to Bloomington, received from Bloomington, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by 5 Bloomington pursuant to this Agreement shall be administered in accordance with, and is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. The Parties agree to notify the other party within three (3) business days if it receives a data request from a third party. This paragraph does not create a duty on the part of Bloomington to provide access to public data to the public if the public data are available from Richfield, except as required by the terms of this Agreement. These obligations survive the termination of this Agreement. 21. No Discrimination. The Parties agree not to discriminate in providing products and services under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, or religion. Violation of any part of this provision may lead to immediate termination of this Agreement. The Parties agree to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended (“ADA”), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A. Each party agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the other party from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorneys’ fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought alleging a violation of these laws by the acting party or its guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives and subcontractors. Upon request, the Parties shall provide accommodation to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all services under this Agreement. The parties agree to utilize their own auxiliary aid or service in order to comply with ADA requirements for effective communication with people with disabilities. 22. Authorized Agents. Richfield’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is Jennifer Anderson, the Health Administrator/Support Services Manager of Richfield, or designee. Bloomington’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is Nicholas Kelley, Assistant Public Health Administrator, who shall perform or supervise the performance of all Services. 23. Notices. Any notices permitted or required by this Agreement shall be deemed given when personally delivered or upon deposit in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to: Bloomington: City of Bloomington, 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, MN 55431, Attn: Nicholas Kelley; nkelley@bloomingtonmn.gov; 952-563-4962; Richfield: City of Richfield, 6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield, MN 55423, Attn: Jennifer Anderson; jenniferanderson@richfieldmn.gov; 612-861-9881; or such other contact information as either party may provide to the other by notice given in accordance with this provision. 24. Waiver. No waiver of any provision or of any breach of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions or any other or further breach, and no such waiver shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the party to be charged with such a waiver. 6 25. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit or affect the scope and intent of this Agreement. 26. Mediation. The Parties agree to submit all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement to mediation at the Conflict Resolution Center, 2101 Hennepin Avenue, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405. In the event mediation is unsuccessful, either party may exercise its legal or equitable rights. 27. Publicity. Bloomington and Richfield shall develop language to use when discussing the Services. Bloomington and Richfield agree that any publicity regarding the Services or the subject matter of this Agreement must not be released unless it complies with the approved language. Bloomington must not use Richfield’s logo or state that Richfield endorses its services without Richfield’s advanced written approval. Publicity approvals may be provided electronically. 28. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 29. Signatory. Each person executing this Agreement (“Signatory”) represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized. 30. Counterparts and Electronic Communication. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted by electronic mail in portable document format (“pdf”) and signatures appearing on electronic mail instruments shall be treated as original signatures. 31. Recitals. Bloomington and Richfield agree that the Recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated into this Agreement. [The balance of this page left blank intentionally.] 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Services Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Diann Kirby Its: Community Services Director Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. __________________________________ Melissa J. Manderschied CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor DATED:___________________________ BY:________________________________ Its: City Manager 8 EXHIBIT A TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND RICHFIELD SCOPE OF SERVICES CDC Budget Period BP2 (07/01/2020 – 06/30/2021) CHB and Tribal Health Duties All CHBs and THDs complete these Recurring Duties: □ Complete a work plan with specific planned activities; review work plan with Public Health Preparedness Consultant no later than August 17, 2020. □ Submit a three-year training and exercise plan (MYTEP) (January 2021 – June 2024) Dec 31, 2020. □ Mid-Year Report, due December 31, 2020 □ End of Year Report, due July 9, 2021 □ Update and maintain accounts/information in: o Inventory Management and Tracking System (IMATS) o MN Responds o MN.TRAIN o PartnerLink Maintain three-deep 24/7 contact information o MNTrac □ Health Alert Network (HAN) messages from MDH: o Respond timely to HAN messages: alerts (1 hour) and advisories (24 hours) o Maintain a two-deep HAN contact list for each hospital and primary clinic within the jurisdiction o Forward all HAN messages sent by MDH to the appropriate health care partners as directed in the HAN message; an exemption to this duty may be granted for an individual HAN message after consultation with MDH staff □ Communicate with volunteers at least twice a year. Call-down drills do not qualify as communication in the context of this grant duty. 9 □ Test volunteer notification by conducting a call down drill. Submit a MN Responds After Action Report and update volunteer database based on drill results. COVID-19 response activities can be used to meet this grant duty. o A template for the MN Responds After Action Report can be found on SharePoint: https://mn365.sharepoint.com/sites/MDH/epr/phep/aarip/Forms/AllItems.aspx. □ Staff maintain appropriate NIMS training based on their role(s), using PHEP Capability 3 (page 36) as a guide. □ Maintain Health Care Coalition (HCC) signed membership. Ensure CHB representation on Health Care Coalition steering/advisory committees, and report back to CHB/LHD/THD Directors and Emergency Preparedness Coordinators on actions, information, and other important items. □ After Action Reports, Improvement Plans, and Corrective Actions: o Write AAR-IPs for exercises and significant incidents/events. Submit within 90 days of the exercise/incident/event. o AAR-IP templates can be found on MDH’s SharePoint site: https://mn365.sharepoint.com/sites/MDH/epr/phep/aarip/Forms/AllItems.aspx o Document status or completion of corrective actions and track progress on improvement plans o Retain AAR-IP documents for planning purposes according to your agency’s retention policies o Submit a COVID-19 AAR within 90 days of demobilization of ICS structure □ Attend MDH-sponsored preparedness trainings when offered and appropriate to CHB/THD Work Plan □ Address the access and functional needs of at-risk individuals in your plans, exercises and responses. For exercises, include a minimum of one inject or objective that addresses the access or functional needs of at-risk individuals that may be disproportionally impacted by the incident or event, based on the scenario. 10 Base Duties These duties support a statewide level of preparedness Domain Community Resilience Capability 1: Community Preparedness Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 1.1 B. Based on funding level, each CHB/THD will engage with community partners that serve a population with access or functional needs to build mutual understanding of roles and functions during an emergency response. Minimum number of community partners to engage with: Base level funding: 1 partner X and Y level funding: 2 partners Z level funding: 3 partners Increased understanding of the roles and functions of community partners will increase the ability of CHB/THD’s to ensure the needs of populations with access and functional needs are met during an emergency response. Current work with community partners as part of the COVID-19 response can be used to meet this grant duty. May have regional components (such as material development), but must have individual CHB/THD partner engagement and reporting. 1.2 B. Each CHB will participate in or conduct a JRA, ensuring that the public health, health care, and mental/behavioral health impacts are taken into account. The JRA must identify the top 3 threats to the CHB as a whole. In multi-county CHBs, all members of the CHB must participate. CHBs completing their JRA during this budget period will report the top 3 threats identified and the role of public health in responding to each. Knowledge of current risks provides good information for prioritizing work. Participating in joint JRAs provides opportunities for joint identification of public health roles. JRA needs to be completed at least once during the 5- year project period, per federal guidance. MDH recommends that partners representing people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs be engaged as part of the risk assessment process. MDH recommends including climate projection data in the JRA. MDH can provide climate projection data specific to the jurisdiction. To request data, contact Rachel Schulman (rachel.schulman@state.mn.us). May be conducted regionally if it engages partners from each CHB/THD. 11 Domain Incident Management Capability 3: Emergency Operations Coordination Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 3.1 B. By September 30, 2020, conduct a hotwash of COVID-19 response activities to date and submit a summary of strengths, identified gaps and improvement items to health.phep@state.mn.us. The intent of this grant duty is for CHBs/THDs to collect information on the COVID-19 response to-date. With an extended response, there is value in capturing strengths and gaps before demobilization. Additionally, there may be improvement items that can be implemented and tested during the response. The hotwash required to meet this grant duty can be informal. This grant duty does not require an AAR-IP, however information gathered from this hotwash can inform a future AAR-IP. Provide a summary to MDH in a format that is useful to the CHB/THD. In document submitted to MDH, include bullet points of strengths, identified gaps and improvement items. May be conducted regionally if response activities were conducted regionally. Domain Countermeasures and Mitigation Capability 8: Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 8.1 B In collaboration with regional partners, CHBs/THDs will participate in planning, distribution, and implementation of a COVID-19 vaccination campaign, based on vaccine availability and response objectives. This duty is intended to encourage CHBs/THDs to work with partners to ensure vaccine distribution and administration as appropriate for the response. If a COVID-19 vaccine is not available during BP2, this grant duty will not be required. CHB/THD activities will vary depending on response objectives, vaccine availability, and health care capacity to administer vaccine. CHBs/THDs should work with local response partners to meet this grant duty. Include documents of vaccination campaign planning and/or implementation in the COVID-19 response AAR-IP. CHBs/THDs may take a regional approach to this duty. 12 X, Y, Z Elective Duties Domain and Capability Based Each level needs to choose: X = 1 Y = 3 Z = 5 Choose Elective Duties based on jurisdictional priorities and threats Domain Community Resilience Capability 1: Community Preparedness Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 1.1 E. Conduct a jurisdictional risk assessment that incorporates climate projection data or update an existing jurisdictional risk assessment to incorporate climate projection data AND complete one of the following activities: • Develop a new emergency plan annex to address a threat that is projected to increase in frequency and/or severity in your jurisdiction. • Conduct a communication and/or educational campaign around a threat that is projected to increase in frequency and/or severity. • Conduct an exercise (tabletop or higher) of the public health response role to a scenario based on climate projection data. The intent of this duty is to facilitate the incorporation of climate projection data into risk assessments, plans, and exercises. Climate projection data is available specific to regional jurisdictions on the following website: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/ environment/climate/data.html MDH has tools and templates available for assessing heat vulnerability to develop extreme heat plans.. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/e nvironment/climate/extremeheat.html JRA may be conducted regionally if it engages partners from each CHB. Plan development/updates must be done at the CHB level. Communication/educational campaigns and exercises may be conducted regionally if they engage partners from each CHB. 13 Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 1.2 E. CHB will meet with at least one community partner that serve a population with access or functional needs across CHB jurisdictional boundaries. CHB will facilitate meetings with community partners and representatives from affected jurisdictions to build understanding of roles and functions during an emergency response and discuss how to coordinate response functions during a multi-jurisdictional incident. Update plans, as needed, based on meeting outcomes. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. CHBs and community partners will have a better understanding of how to share resources during a multi-jurisdictional incident or response. The community partners selected for this grant duty cannot be the same as the community partners selected for grant duty 1.1 B. May not be completed regionally. Although this work will occur across jurisdictional boundaries and therefor have regional implications, only the CHB that is leading the work may choose this as an elective duty. Capability 2: Community Recovery Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 2.1 E. CHBs will develop or revise continuity of operations plans (COOP), either as a stand-alone public health plan or as a component of another plan, based on an MDH-provided COOP Preparedness Elements Worksheet. Completed worksheet(s) must be submitted to MDH. It is important that agencies have a COOP plan identifying resources, actions, procedures, and information that is developed, tested, and held in readiness for use in the event of a major disruption of operations. COOP planning helps prepare CHB/LHD to maintain mission critical operations after any emergency or disaster. If this duty was selected in in BP1 (2019-2020), it may not be repeated in the current grant year. If this duty was selected prior to BP1 and procedural or policy level changes need to be made to the plan, it may be repeated in the current grant year. May not be completed regionally. 2.2 E. Where COOP plans already exist, CHBs can exercise the plan at the tabletop, functional, or full-scale level. Exercises test the plan to identify strengths and gaps and develop a plan for improvement. If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year, based on documented gaps as part of After Action Report- Improvement Plan and/or in a COVID-19 response May not be completed regionally. 14 Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. hotwash. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. Domain Incident Management Capability 3: Emergency Operations Coordination Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 3.1 E. CHBs create an Incident Action Plan (IAP) as part of an exercise (workshop or higher) based on identified public health risks and using procedures in jurisdictional plans for creating IAPs. Note: Consider developing Incident Action Plans (IAPs) that extend beyond one operational period. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. CHBs will become familiar with the development and use of an IAP. Transitioning between operational periods is a critical skill to assure work is completed. Developing an IAP has been identified as a gap. If this duty was selected in previous years, it may be repeated in the current grant year if it is a functional or higher. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. The same exercise design may be used by multiple CHBs and may be ‘played’ on the same day. However, play has to occur at each CHB and each CHB needs to complete an AAR-IP. 3.2 E. CHBs will select a gap previously identified in an AAR-IP, identify how the gap has or is being addressed, and test or retest through an exercise (TTX or higher). Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. To allow CHBs to work on priorities they have identified and test/retest that gaps have been corrected. If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year if based on gaps identified in an AAR-IP. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. May not be completed regionally 15 Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 3.3 E. CHBs will exercise (functional or full-scale) the physical activation of the public health department operations center (PH DOC) at least once during the grant year. Activation will include, at a minimum, the set-up of the operations center room(s), assignment of incident command staff, connection and testing of communications equipment, and staff briefings to provide role clarity and operational procedures. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. CHBs will become familiar with the use of ICS in a response and physical set-up of emergency operations. If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year, based on documented gaps as part of After Action Report- Improvement Plan. As this requires actual physical set-up and movement of people and ‘things’, that makes it a functional or full-scale. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. Each CHB needs to complete its own exercise and AAR-IP. The same exercise design may be used by multiple CHBs and may be ‘played’ on the same day. However, play has to occur at each CHB and each CHB needs to complete an AAR-IP. Domain Information Management Capability 4: Emergency Public Information and Warning Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 4.1 E. CHBs will identify and exercise (TTX or higher) communication strategies for populations with limited English proficiency AND communication strategies for populations that are deaf, hard of hearing, or vision impaired. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. Testing communication strategies using identifying lists of access and functional needs populations are critical for public messaging. CHBs must exercise their plans for communicating to (a) at least one population with limited English proficiency group AND (b) at least one population that is deaf or hard of hearing or vision impaired. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. Each CHB needs to complete its own exercise and AAR-IP. The same exercise design may be used by multiple CHBs and may be ‘played’ on the same day. However, play has to occur at each CHB and each CHB needs to complete an AAR-IP. 16 Domain Countermeasures and Mitigation Capability 8: Medical Countermeasures Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 8.1 E. CHBs will identify at least one new CPOD partner and develop a CPOD agreement and plan with that partner. CPOD partners with agreements and completed plans must be entered into IMATS in accordance with the MDH IMATS Local User Guide. This duty is to encourage CHBs to pursue new CPOD agreements with partners in their jurisdictions. This duty is appropriate for CHBs pursuing new CPOD agreements with partners in their jurisdictions. Completion of this duty requires a written agreement with a new CPOD partner. Additionally, it requires that the CPOD partner has a written plan that has been reviewed by the CHB. Regional work is unlikely, but there may be some instances where regional CPOD plans are appropriate. 8.2 E. CHBs will conduct or coordinate COVID-19 testing for at least 50 people and identify lessons learned to improve their mass dispensing and/or mass vaccination plans. This duty is to encourage CHBs to use current response efforts to use, evaluate, and update their emergency response plans. Completion of this duty requires a hotwash and completion of an after action report identifying at least one area for improvement in mass dispensing plans. CHBs may take a regional approach to testing but must write their own after action report and identify areas for improvement specific to their jurisdictional plans. Capability 11: Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 11.1 E. CHB’s will exercise their Essential Services plan and tracking process, as part of their Isolation and Quarantine plan, in coordination with partners, at the tabletop, functional, or full-scale level. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. Minnesota’s isolation and quarantine law (Minnesota Statutes section 144.419),Subdivision 2(g) states: The needs of persons isolated and quarantined shall be addressed in a systematic and competent fashion, including, but not limited to, providing adequate food, clothing, shelter, means of communication between those in isolation or quarantine and those outside these settings, medication, and competent medical care. The Essential Service checklist and tracking form example is available on the MDH Isolation and Quarantine SharePoint site. Also on SharePoint are materials from a webinar MDH hosted in 2018 featuring presentations from Dakota and Hennepin CHBs and their approach to essential services planning. Partners identified in your Essential Services plan must participate in the exercise. Inclusion of every partner identified in your plan is not required, however CHBs should include as many partners as May have regional components (such as material development), but must have individual CHB documentation specific to the provision of essential services within the CHB. 17 Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach possible, based on partner availability and exercise scenario. Capability 14: Responder Safety and Health Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 14.1 E. CHBs will develop or update Responder Safety and Health Plans, either as a stand-alone public health plan or as a component of a jurisdictional plan. At minimum plans must include: • A list of relevant partners and organizations that support responder safety and health (e.g. vaccination clinics, employee health clinics, locations for respirator fit testing, Worker’s Compensation) • Safety Officer (or equivalent) job action sheet detailing safety officer required qualifications and responsibilities during activation, response, and demobilization phases. • Required and recommended training for public health emergency responders (including any relevant just-in-time training). • Process for identifying staff involved in an incident response including staff members’ location, hours of deployment, and protocol for reporting possible physical or mental health exposures and incidents. CHBs should have a clear understanding of their role in jurisdictional management of responder safety and health. Document operational responder safety and health plans that reflect the role(s), expectations, and responsibilities for CHBs. CHBs may have developed similar processes for Capability 15: Volunteer Management. Responder Safety and Health Plans should designate plans and processes specific to CHB staff but may include components that are similar to volunteer management plans. For the required training component, capture what your jurisdiction requires your staff to have completed in order to achieve responder readiness. This will vary by jurisdiction but may include: required ICS training, personal preparedness training, PPE and bloodborne pathogen training etc. May not be completed regionally. 18 Domain Surge Management Capability 5: Fatality Management Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 5.1 E. CHBs will coordinate with partners to develop or revise family assistance center (FAC) plans either as a stand- alone public health plan or as a component of a jurisdictional plan. Plans must include plan elements identified on the MDH-provided Family Assistance Center Preparedness Elements Worksheet. Completed worksheet(s) must be submitted to MDH. CHBs should have a clear understanding of their role in jurisdictional fatality management response. Document operational FAC plans that reflect the role(s), expectations, and responsibilities for CHBs. If this duty was selected in in BP1 (2019-2020), it may not be repeated in the current grant year. If this duty was selected prior to BP1 and procedural or policy level changes need to be made to the plan, it may be repeated in the current grant year. May not be completed regionally; plan templates may be created regionally and shared. 5.2 E. Where family assistance center (FAC) plans already exist, CHBs will exercise the FAC plan, in coordination with partners, at the tabletop, functional, or full-scale level. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. To allow CHBs to test/retest their FAC Plans. It is important to regularly exercise and update agency or jurisdictional FAC plans in collaboration with partners that support or provide the mass care in an emergency response. If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year, based on documented gaps as part of After Action Report- Improvement Plan. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. Each CHB needs to complete its own exercise and AAR-IP. The same exercise design may be used by multiple CHBs and may be ‘played’ on the same day. However, play has to occur at each CHB and each CHB needs to complete an AAR-IP. Capability 7: Mass Care Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 7.1 E. CHBs will coordinate with partners to develop or revise mass care plans, either as a stand-alone public health plan or as a component of a jurisdictional plan. Plans must include elements on the MDH-provided Mass Care Preparedness Elements Worksheet. Completed worksheet(s) must be submitted to MDH. CHBs should have a clear understanding of their role in jurisdictional mass care response. Operational mass care plans will include the role(s), expectations, and responsibilities for CHBs. If this duty was selected in in BP1 (2019-2020), it may not be repeated in the current grant year. If this duty was selected prior to BP1 and procedural or policy level changes need to be made to the plan, it may be repeated in the current grant year. May not be completed regionally; plan templates may be created regionally and shared. 19 Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 7.2 E. Where mass care plans already exist, CHBs will exercise the plan, in coordination with partners, at the tabletop, functional, or full-scale level. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. To allow CHBs to test/retest their Mass Care Plans. It is important to regularly exercise and update agency or jurisdictional Mass Care plans in collaboration with partners that support or provide the mass care in an emergency response. If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year, based on documented gaps as part of After Action Report- Improvement Plan. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. Each CHB needs to complete its own exercise and AAR-IP. The same exercise design may be used by multiple CHBs and may be ‘played’ on the same day. However, play has to occur at each CHB and each CHB needs to complete an AAR-IP. Capability 10: Medical Surge Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 10.1 E. CHBs will coordinate with partners to develop or update family reunification plans in support of medical surge operations, either as a stand-alone public health plan or as a component of a jurisdictional plan. Plans must include elements on the MDH-provided Family Reunification Preparedness Elements Worksheet. Completed worksheet(s) must be submitted to MDH. CHBs should have a clear understanding of their role in jurisdictional family reunification plans. Operational family reunification plans that reflect the role(s), expectations, and responsibilities for CHBs should be documented. If this duty was selected in in BP1 (2019-2020), it may not be repeated in the current grant year. If this duty was selected prior to BP1 and procedural or policy level changes need to be made to the plan, it may be repeated in the current grant year. May not be completed regionally; plan templates may be created regionally and shared. 10.2 E. Based on jurisdictional priorities, where family reunification plans already exist, CHBs will exercise the plan, in coordination with partners, at the tabletop, functional, or full- scale level Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. To allow CHBs to test/retest their family reunification plans If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year, based on documented gaps as part of After Action Report- Improvement Plan. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. Each CHB needs to complete its own exercise and AAR-IP. The same exercise design may be used by multiple CHBs and may be ‘played’ on the same day. However, play has to occur at each CHB and each CHB needs to complete an AAR-IP. 20 Capability 15: Volunteer Management Grant Duty Intent Scope Regional Approach 15.1 E. CHBs will conduct an emergency preparedness exercise to notify and assemble volunteers (requiring volunteers to physically report to a location after being activated/notified). This grant duty may be met through an exercise or real event requiring activation of response plans. Volunteer assembly must include a registration/sign-in procedure and a volunteer safety message based on exercise/incident characteristics. Note: Real world incidents and planned events may fulfill this grant duty if the items listed are part of the response activities. Test and evaluate volunteer intake process and safety and health monitoring. If this duty was selected in a previous grant year, it may be repeated in the current grant year. Volunteers must be asked to physically report. The number of volunteers and timeframe is at local discretion. Identify key objectives – 3 to 5 objectives is optimal. One exercise may be used to satisfy two duties as long as the exercise meets all of the requirements of each duty. This duty may be conducted regionally; to complete this duty regionally, the following must be met: • Volunteers from every CHB participating in the exercise must physically report; • Each participating CHB must contribute to the AAR-IP and identify corrective actions. Center for Emergency Preparedness and Response Minnesota Department of Health 625 Robert St. N. health.epr@state.mn.us https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/ep/index.html 06/16/2020 21 CDC Budget Period BP2 1901 (07/01/2020 – 06/30/2021) Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI) Duties: CRI 1. CRI Jurisdictions that did not have an ORR in BP1: Participate in Operational Readiness Review (ORR) site visits and submit documentation, as directed by MDH. CRI 2. Based on gaps identified in your most recent ORR, develop a new ORR Action Plan, participate in quarterly technical assistance calls, and submit documentation of completed activities (uploaded to SharePoint). CRI 3. Update and submit the following three forms in DCIPHER by June 15, 2021: • Jurisdictional Data Sheet • Point of Dispensing Planning Form • Training and Exercise Planning Form (must be updated with data from the 2021-2024 MYTEP) CRI 4. CDC-Required Drills: Conduct three different MCM planning drills each grant year and provide reports to CDC. By May 1, 2021: • Complete the following three drills for a pandemic influenza scenario: o Staff notification and assembly o Facility set-up o Site activation • Upload drill data to DCIPHER CRI 4. MDH-Required Drills and Training: Tactical Communications Maintenance • Once per grant year, conduct a training on how to operate communications equipment (e.g. radios) with all core POD staff and test radio functionality (no travel required). Report completion date in REDCap by the end of the grant year. • Once per grant year, conduct a POD site activation call-down drill for all open PODs and CPODs and update site contact information based on results. Report completion date in REDCap by the end of the grant year. Complete an AAR using the POD Activation AAR- IP Template and upload to REDCap CRI form. • Once per quarter (Q1 drill is waived), conduct a notification drill of all core staff needed to manage all open PODs. Report completion date for each drill in REDCap by the end of each quarter. For each drill, complete an AAR using the Staff Notification AAR-IP template and upload to REDCap CRI form. • Every six months, conduct a volunteer notification drill and update volunteer database based on results. Report completion date for each drill in REDCap by the end of the quarter. For each drill, complete an AAR using the MN Responds-MRC AAR-IP template and upload to REDCap CRI form. CRI 5. Other duties as required by CDC or MDH. 22 EXHIBIT B TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND RICHFIELD TERMS OF PAYMENT A. Richfield shall pay Bloomington the total not-to-exceed amount of $46,405.00 during the term of this Agreement for services outlined below: 1. $34,405.00 for PH Emergency Preparedness Services; and 2. $12,000.00 for CRI Duties. B. The amounts above will be paid according to the following terms: 1. Bloomington shall invoice Richfield for the Services identified on Exhibit A, as follows: Invoice Date Amount Upon Contract Execution $11,601.25 December 1, 2020 $11,601.25 March 1, 2021 $11,601.25 June 1, 2021 $11,601.25 2. Payment shall be made within 15 days of receipt by Richfield of Bloomington’s invoice. AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.B. S TAFF REPORT NO. 111 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/22/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Julie Urban, Housing and Redevelopment Manager D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector 9/15/2020 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 9/16/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider a Grant Compliance Agreement with Penn Investments, L LC regarding a Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre-Development Grant for 6501 Penn Avenue South. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On J une 24, 2020, the City was awarded a Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LC D A) Pre- Development Grant (Grant) in the amount of $50,000 to undertake activities relating to the redevelopment of 6501 Penn Avenue South. The activities include site plan development, feasibility and market studies, storm water management planning, soil testing, and other eligible activities. I n J anuary, 2020, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement with Penn I nvestments, L L C (Developer) for the redevelopment of 6501 Penn Avenue South. The Developer will undertake the activities and be reimbursed with the Grant proceeds. The Grant Compliance Agreement lays out the terms and conditions for reimbursing the Developer for those activities. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By motion: Approve a Grant Compliance Agreement with Penn Investments, L LC regarding a Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre-Development Grant for 6501 Penn Avenue South. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T On J une 24, 2020, the City was awarded an LC D A Grant from the Metropolitan Council for pre- development activities to further the redevelopment of 6501 Penn Avenue South. On J anuary 21, 2020, the HRA entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement with Penn I nvestments, LLC for the redevelopment of 6501 Penn Avenue South. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The City and the Metropolitan Council have executed a Grant Agreement that lays out the terms of the Grant. The Grant Compliance Agreement conveys those terms to Penn I nvestments, LLC. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: The Grant expires J une 20, 2022. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The City was awarded $50,000 in Grant funds. The City intends to provide the proceeds of the Grant to the Developer. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: The HRA Attorney prepared the Agreement. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): 1. Decide not to approve the Agreement. 2. Approve the Agreement with changes. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: NA AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Grant C ompliance A greement C ontract/A greement 1 GRANT COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT This GRANT COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ______________, 2020, between the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “City”), and Penn Investments LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the “Authority”) and the Developer entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement, dated January 21, 2020 (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Developer proposed to acquire certain property (the “Redevelopment Property”) from the Authority, demolish the blighted buildings on the Redevelopment Property, and construct a building with approximately 80 to100 housing units with at least twenty percent (20%) of the units available for persons earning sixty percent (60%) or less of the area median income and up to 12,000 square feet of commercial (the “Project”), and the Authority agreed to reimburse the Developer for a portion of the costs of the redevelopment with tax increment; and WHEREAS, to assist the Developer in obtaining additional financing for the Project, the City submitted an application to the Metropolitan Council for funds available under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre-Development Grant Program and the Authority submitted an application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for funds available under the Community Homeownership Impact Fund; and WHEREAS, the City was awarded and accepted a Livable Communities Demonstration Account Grant (Pre-Development Grant Program) in the maximum amount of $50,000 from Metropolitan Council (the “LCDA Grant”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Grant Agreement (Pre- Development Grant Program) Agreement (the “LCDA Grant Agreement”), proceeds of the LCDA Grant may be used for site plan development, feasibility and market studies, stormwater management, soil testing, and other purposes and activities as more fully described in the LCDA Grant Agreement (the “Eligible Costs”); and WHEREAS, a copy of the LCDA Grant Agreement has been provided to the Developer; and WHEREAS, the City intends to provide the proceeds of the LCDA Grant Authority to the Developer to pay for Eligible Costs; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the Authority, the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The LCDA Grant Agreement is incorporated herein by reference. 2. The Developer has read the LCDA Grant Agreement and agrees to comply with all terms, conditions, and obligations of the City under the LCDA Grant Agreement, including but not limited to providing evidence of expenditures for Eligible Costs, establishing and maintaining records, consenting to audits, and providing project progress reports. 2 3. The Developer agrees to fully indemnity the City for any liability incurred by the City with respect to the LCDA Grant Agreement. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) S-1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Grant Compliance Agreement effective the date and year first written above. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA By Its Mayor By Its City Manager CPII DEVELOPMENT LLC By Name Its RC125-366 (JAE) 668280v1 AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.C. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 112 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/22/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector 9/15/2020 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 9/16/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Adoption of a resolution authorizing the refunding of the $2,120,000 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A, dated September 6, 2012 and the $2,770,000 G.O. Storm Sewer Bonds, Series 2013B, dated March 21, 2013 with the $3,255,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: I n 2012 the City issued the $2,120,000 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A and in 2013 the City issued the $2,770,000 G.O. Storm Sewer Bonds Series 2013B. The 2012A bonds were issued to fund the 76th Street East Reconstruction Project. The 2013B bonds were issued to fund costs related to the Richfield Parkway Project. I n the current economic market, interest rates continue to be at low levels, and the City’s fiscal consultant, Ehlers & Associates, I nc. periodically reviews the City’s outstanding bond issues to determine which issues, if any are feasible for refunding. Upon the latest review of the bond issues, Ehlers & Associates, I nc. recommends undertaking a bond refunding of the Series 2012A and 2013B to take advantage of the low interest rates and realize interest savings. For this refunding the savings is estimated to be $245,428. The type of refunding being presented is a current refunding. I n a current refunding transaction, the bonds being refunded will either all mature or be redeemed within 90 days or less from the date of issuance of the refunding issue. The City would then begin to make payments on the newly issued “refunding bonds.” Accordingly, the Series 2020B bonds are being issued to provide funds sufficient for a current refunding on February 1, 2021. The par amount of the Series 2012A and Series 2013B to be called on the call date is $1,385,000 and $1,775,000 respectively. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By Motion: Approve the attached resolution providing for the sale of the $3,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T N/A. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): N/A. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: The sale of the refunding bonds at this time will allow the City to take advantage of the low interest rates and realize interest savings. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: On the basis of Ehlers & Associates, I nc. review, it appears that the current interest rate climate makes it feasible to refund the two bond issues. The current outstanding principal balance of the 2012A and 2013B bonds is $1,385,000 and $1,775,000 respectively. The City will continue to make the principal and interest payments up to and on the refunding date. The $3,255,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B are being issued to provide funds for a current refunding on February 1, 2021, on all of the City’s callable G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A and callable G.O. Storm Sewer Bonds, Series 2013B. I t is estimated that this refinancing under current rates would reduce the combined interest costs of paying these two debt issues by approximately $245,428. The savings expressed in net present value terms is estimated to be 7.373% of the refunded principal or $233,001. The bonds are being issued for a 13 year term; this does not extend the terms of the original issues. The maturity date of the new refunding issue will be the same as the two current outstanding issues. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: Legal Counsel has reviewed the Pre-Sale report and the attached resolution. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Disregard the current refunding option, continue to retire the bonded debt as presently scheduled, and forego the projected savings. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: Rebecca Kurtz, Ehlers & Associates, I nc. AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type 2020B Refunding P rovide for the S ale Resolution Resolution L etter P re-S ale Report S eries 2020B E xhibit Resolution No. __________ Resolution Providing for the Sale of $3,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $3,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B (the "Bonds"), to finance a current refunding of the Series 2012A and 2013B Bonds in the City for interest savings; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 PM on October 27, 2020, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September, 2020. ___________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk • • • • • • • City of Richfield, Minnesota $3,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Issue Summary Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 11/19/2020 | Delivered 11/19/2020 Cur Ref 2012A Str Recon Cur Ref 2013B Storm Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $1,430,000.00 $1,825,000.00 $3,255,000.00 Total Sources $1,430,000.00 $1,825,000.00 $3,255,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%)17,160.00 21,900.00 39,060.00 Costs of Issuance 23,284.18 29,715.82 53,000.00 Deposit to Current Refunding Fund 1,385,000.00 1,775,000.00 3,160,000.00 Rounding Amount 4,555.82 (1,615.82)2,940.00 Total Uses $1,430,000.00 $1,825,000.00 $3,255,000.00 Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Issue Summary | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM City of Richfield, Minnesota $3,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Issue Summary Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/17/2020 ----- 08/01/2021 --16,197.79 16,197.79 - 02/01/2022 255,000.00 0.350%11,478.75 266,478.75 282,676.54 08/01/2022 --11,032.50 11,032.50 - 02/01/2023 265,000.00 0.350%11,032.50 276,032.50 287,065.00 08/01/2023 --10,568.75 10,568.75 - 02/01/2024 260,000.00 0.400%10,568.75 270,568.75 281,137.50 08/01/2024 --10,048.75 10,048.75 - 02/01/2025 270,000.00 0.400%10,048.75 280,048.75 290,097.50 08/01/2025 --9,508.75 9,508.75 - 02/01/2026 265,000.00 0.500%9,508.75 274,508.75 284,017.50 08/01/2026 --8,846.25 8,846.25 - 02/01/2027 270,000.00 0.600%8,846.25 278,846.25 287,692.50 08/01/2027 --8,036.25 8,036.25 - 02/01/2028 275,000.00 0.700%8,036.25 283,036.25 291,072.50 08/01/2028 --7,073.75 7,073.75 - 02/01/2029 270,000.00 0.750%7,073.75 277,073.75 284,147.50 08/01/2029 --6,061.25 6,061.25 - 02/01/2030 275,000.00 0.850%6,061.25 281,061.25 287,122.50 08/01/2030 --4,892.50 4,892.50 - 02/01/2031 280,000.00 0.950%4,892.50 284,892.50 289,785.00 08/01/2031 --3,562.50 3,562.50 - 02/01/2032 285,000.00 1.200%3,562.50 288,562.50 292,125.00 08/01/2032 --1,852.50 1,852.50 - 02/01/2033 285,000.00 1.300%1,852.50 286,852.50 288,705.00 Total $3,255,000.00 -$190,644.04 $3,445,644.04 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $22,174.08 Average Life 6.812 Years Average Coupon 0.8597606% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.0359122% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.0397213% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 0.8559840% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.2939108% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.8597606% Weighted Average Maturity 6.812 Years Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Issue Summary | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM City of Richfield, Minnesota $3,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Issue Summary Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2021 -(2,940.00)-2,940.00 02/01/2022 282,676.54 282,676.54 303,565.00 20,888.46 02/01/2023 287,065.00 287,065.00 308,965.00 21,900.00 02/01/2024 281,137.50 281,137.50 304,165.00 23,027.50 02/01/2025 290,097.50 290,097.50 309,365.00 19,267.50 02/01/2026 284,017.50 284,017.50 304,365.00 20,347.50 02/01/2027 287,692.50 287,692.50 308,935.00 21,242.50 02/01/2028 291,072.50 291,072.50 308,287.50 17,215.00 02/01/2029 284,147.50 284,147.50 307,002.50 22,855.00 02/01/2030 287,122.50 287,122.50 305,597.50 18,475.00 02/01/2031 289,785.00 289,785.00 308,525.00 18,740.00 02/01/2032 292,125.00 292,125.00 311,195.00 19,070.00 02/01/2033 288,705.00 288,705.00 308,165.00 19,460.00 Total $3,445,644.04 $3,442,704.04 $3,688,132.50 $245,428.46 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................230,061.31 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 0.856%(Bond Yield).....230,061.31 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................2,940.00 Net Present Value Benefit $233,001.31 Net PV Benefit / $3,485,226.69 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.685% Net PV Benefit / $3,160,000 Refunded Principal...7.373% Net PV Benefit / $3,255,000 Refunding Principal..7.158% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/19/2020 Refunding Delivery Date 11/19/2020 Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Issue Summary | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM City of Richfield, Minnesota $1,430,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Cur Ref 2012A Str Recon Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/17/2020 ----- 08/01/2021 --7,122.58 7,122.58 - 02/01/2022 110,000.00 0.350%5,047.50 115,047.50 122,170.08 08/01/2022 --4,855.00 4,855.00 - 02/01/2023 115,000.00 0.350%4,855.00 119,855.00 124,710.00 08/01/2023 --4,653.75 4,653.75 - 02/01/2024 115,000.00 0.400%4,653.75 119,653.75 124,307.50 08/01/2024 --4,423.75 4,423.75 - 02/01/2025 120,000.00 0.400%4,423.75 124,423.75 128,847.50 08/01/2025 --4,183.75 4,183.75 - 02/01/2026 115,000.00 0.500%4,183.75 119,183.75 123,367.50 08/01/2026 --3,896.25 3,896.25 - 02/01/2027 120,000.00 0.600%3,896.25 123,896.25 127,792.50 08/01/2027 --3,536.25 3,536.25 - 02/01/2028 120,000.00 0.700%3,536.25 123,536.25 127,072.50 08/01/2028 --3,116.25 3,116.25 - 02/01/2029 120,000.00 0.750%3,116.25 123,116.25 126,232.50 08/01/2029 --2,666.25 2,666.25 - 02/01/2030 120,000.00 0.850%2,666.25 122,666.25 125,332.50 08/01/2030 --2,156.25 2,156.25 - 02/01/2031 125,000.00 0.950%2,156.25 127,156.25 129,312.50 08/01/2031 --1,562.50 1,562.50 - 02/01/2032 125,000.00 1.200%1,562.50 126,562.50 128,125.00 08/01/2032 --812.50 812.50 - 02/01/2033 125,000.00 1.300%812.50 125,812.50 126,625.00 Total $1,430,000.00 -$83,895.08 $1,513,895.08 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $9,758.94 Average Life 6.824 Years Average Coupon 0.8596737% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.0355124% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.0393200% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 0.8559840% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.2930520% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.8596737% Weighted Average Maturity 6.824 Years Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Cur Ref 2012A Str Recon | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM City of Richfield, Minnesota $1,430,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Cur Ref 2012A Str Recon Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2021 -(4,555.82)-4,555.82 02/01/2022 122,170.08 122,170.08 132,510.00 10,339.92 02/01/2023 124,710.00 124,710.00 135,510.00 10,800.00 02/01/2024 124,307.50 124,307.50 133,410.00 9,102.50 02/01/2025 128,847.50 128,847.50 136,310.00 7,462.50 02/01/2026 123,367.50 123,367.50 134,110.00 10,742.50 02/01/2027 127,792.50 127,792.50 136,690.00 8,897.50 02/01/2028 127,072.50 127,072.50 134,160.00 7,087.50 02/01/2029 126,232.50 126,232.50 136,400.00 10,167.50 02/01/2030 125,332.50 125,332.50 133,520.00 8,187.50 02/01/2031 129,312.50 129,312.50 135,400.00 6,087.50 02/01/2032 128,125.00 128,125.00 137,150.00 9,025.00 02/01/2033 126,625.00 126,625.00 133,575.00 6,950.00 Total $1,513,895.08 $1,509,339.26 $1,618,745.00 $109,405.74 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................99,659.28 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 0.856%(Bond Yield).....99,659.28 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................4,555.82 Net Present Value Benefit $104,215.10 Net PV Benefit / $1,529,724.70 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.813% Net PV Benefit / $1,385,000 Refunded Principal...7.525% Net PV Benefit / $1,430,000 Refunding Principal..7.288% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/19/2020 Refunding Delivery Date 11/19/2020 Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Cur Ref 2012A Str Recon | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM City of Richfield, Minnesota $1,825,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Cur Ref 2013B Storm Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/17/2020 ----- 08/01/2021 --9,075.21 9,075.21 - 02/01/2022 145,000.00 0.350%6,431.25 151,431.25 160,506.46 08/01/2022 --6,177.50 6,177.50 - 02/01/2023 150,000.00 0.350%6,177.50 156,177.50 162,355.00 08/01/2023 --5,915.00 5,915.00 - 02/01/2024 145,000.00 0.400%5,915.00 150,915.00 156,830.00 08/01/2024 --5,625.00 5,625.00 - 02/01/2025 150,000.00 0.400%5,625.00 155,625.00 161,250.00 08/01/2025 --5,325.00 5,325.00 - 02/01/2026 150,000.00 0.500%5,325.00 155,325.00 160,650.00 08/01/2026 --4,950.00 4,950.00 - 02/01/2027 150,000.00 0.600%4,950.00 154,950.00 159,900.00 08/01/2027 --4,500.00 4,500.00 - 02/01/2028 155,000.00 0.700%4,500.00 159,500.00 164,000.00 08/01/2028 --3,957.50 3,957.50 - 02/01/2029 150,000.00 0.750%3,957.50 153,957.50 157,915.00 08/01/2029 --3,395.00 3,395.00 - 02/01/2030 155,000.00 0.850%3,395.00 158,395.00 161,790.00 08/01/2030 --2,736.25 2,736.25 - 02/01/2031 155,000.00 0.950%2,736.25 157,736.25 160,472.50 08/01/2031 --2,000.00 2,000.00 - 02/01/2032 160,000.00 1.200%2,000.00 162,000.00 164,000.00 08/01/2032 --1,040.00 1,040.00 - 02/01/2033 160,000.00 1.300%1,040.00 161,040.00 162,080.00 Total $1,825,000.00 -$106,748.96 $1,931,748.96 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $12,415.14 Average Life 6.803 Years Average Coupon 0.8598290% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.0362265% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.0400367% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 0.8559840% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.2945858% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.8598290% Weighted Average Maturity 6.803 Years Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Cur Ref 2013B Storm | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM City of Richfield, Minnesota $1,825,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B Cur Ref 2013B Storm Assuming Current GO BQ "AA+" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2021 ---- 02/01/2022 160,506.46 160,506.46 171,055.00 10,548.54 02/01/2023 162,355.00 162,355.00 173,455.00 11,100.00 02/01/2024 156,830.00 156,830.00 170,755.00 13,925.00 02/01/2025 161,250.00 161,250.00 173,055.00 11,805.00 02/01/2026 160,650.00 160,650.00 170,255.00 9,605.00 02/01/2027 159,900.00 159,900.00 172,245.00 12,345.00 02/01/2028 164,000.00 164,000.00 174,127.50 10,127.50 02/01/2029 157,915.00 157,915.00 170,602.50 12,687.50 02/01/2030 161,790.00 161,790.00 172,077.50 10,287.50 02/01/2031 160,472.50 160,472.50 173,125.00 12,652.50 02/01/2032 164,000.00 164,000.00 174,045.00 10,045.00 02/01/2033 162,080.00 162,080.00 174,590.00 12,510.00 Total $1,931,748.96 $1,931,748.96 $2,069,387.50 $137,638.54 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................126,900.87 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.295%(AIC)............126,900.87 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................(1,615.82) Net Present Value Benefit $125,285.05 Net PV Benefit / $1,955,501.99 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.407% Net PV Benefit / $1,775,000 Refunded Principal...7.058% Net PV Benefit / $1,825,000 Refunding Principal..6.865% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/19/2020 Refunding Delivery Date 11/19/2020 Series 2020B GO Ref Bds C | Cur Ref 2013B Storm | 8/28/2020 | 9:05 AM AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.D. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 113 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/22/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector 9/15/2020 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 9/16/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the adoption of a resolution to accept the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (C AR E S) Act grant of $2,745,098. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The C A RE S Act grant provided federal funds to the State of Minnesota and the legislature and Governor then distributed these funds to local governments throughout Minnesota to deal with the financial impacts of Covid- 19. The City of Richfield received $2,745,098 of C A RE S grant funding and is in the process of compiling eligible costs incurred due to Covid-19 mitigation within the City. I t is expected that all grant funds will be utilized. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By Motion: Adopt a resolution accepting the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act grant of $2,745,098. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T N/A. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires that every acceptance of a grant or devise of real or personal property on terms prescribed by the donor be made by resolution and adopted by two-thirds majority of the City Council. The Administrative Services Department issued a memo on November 9, 2004, requiring that all grants and donations to departments be received by resolution and passed by more than two-thirds majority of the City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statute 465.03. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: None. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The amount of C A RE S grant funding received is $2,745,098. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: None. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): None. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: N/A. AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type C A RE S Grant Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF THE CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF, AND ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT GRANT WHEREAS, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act grant provided federal funds to the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota and the legislature and Governor distributed these funds to local governments throughout Minnesota to deal with the financial impacts of Covid-19; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield received $2,745,098 of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act grant funds NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: That the City Council of the City of Richfield hereby accepts the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act grant funds received by the City, and authorizes the City to administer the funds in accordance with the requirements of the grant. Approved by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September, 2020. ________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST ___________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM # 4. STAFF REPORT NO. 114 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9/22/2020 REPORT PREPARED BY: Melissa Poehlman, Asst. Community Development Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: John Stark, Community Development Director 9/16/2020 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 9/16/2020 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Public hearing and consider the approval of an ordinance to the Richfield City Code Appendix D (Fee Schedule) and a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance. The proposed ordinance would revise fees related to the preparation of zoning verification letters and the processing of plat applications. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City staff conducts an annual review to determine whether its fees for permits and services are appropriate. Among other criteria, the intent of the review is to determine whether the costs of issuance for fees and permits reflect the staff time and costs related to performing the services associated with those fees. At the same time, staff tries to ensure that costs for City services are in line with our peer communities and are not excessive or onerous. Fees related to building permits, zoning, and other land use permits are established by Appendix D of the City's Code. Staff is recommending the following changes to the fees and permits included in this section. Zoning Letter: Current: $50 Proposed: $65 Revised to account for approximately two hours of staff time. Plat: Current: Preliminary Plat $500, Final Plat $250 Proposed: Combined Preliminary/Final Plat $775 Revised to reflec t actual legal and staff time costs associated with review of plat documents. RECO MMENDE D AC TION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: 1. Approve a second reading of an ordinance amendment to Richfield City Code Appendix D (Fee Schedule) related to planning and zoning fees; and 2. Adopt a resolution authorizing summary publication of an ordinance amending Richfield City Code Appendix D (Fee Schedule) related to planning and zoning fees. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T None B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): State Statutes require municipal fees and permits to be determined in accordance with actual staff time and costs that are incurred in providing related services. City staff has determined that the fees in question should be modified in order to better reflect actual time and costs incurred. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: I f approved, the proposed fee changes will be effective J anuary 1, 2021. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: City staff has determined that current fees for some applications are insufficient to cover the costs related to processing those applications. Staff also reviews similar fees in our peer communities to ensure that Richfield's fees are not onerous or excessive. W ith the proposed changes, Richfield's fees remain in line with these peer communities. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current, as required. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Approve the attached ordinance with changes. Reject the proposed ordinance and/or resolution. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Ordinance Ordinance Resolution - S ummary P ublication Resolution L etter BILL NO. TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Background 1.01 Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those adopted by Ordinance. 1.02 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be adopted by Ordinance. The City Council has previously established certain fees by Transitory Ordinance No. 19.11. The City Council has established other fees by resolution, which resolution is also part of Appendix D. 1.03 The City Council has determined the need to update the schedule of fees under Transitory Ordinance No. 19.11. Section 2. Fee Schedule Adopted 2.01 The fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A are hereby adopted by Ordinance. 2.02 The fees adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance shall be amended only by Ordinance. Any fees established by resolution, other than those adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance, may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Section 3. Effective date; codification. 3.01 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. 3.02 This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2021. 3.03 A copy of this Ordinance shall be included in Appendix D to the Richfield City Code, immediately prior to the resolution establishing fees. 3.04 This Ordinance supersedes Transitory Ordinance No. 19.11. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES A. Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit: Investigation. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set forth in Section 2. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. B. Permit fee refunds: The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permitted not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (a) Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum charge - two hours) $60.00 per hour (b) Reinspection fees (minimum charge $35.00) $60.00per hour (c) Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated (minimum charge - one- half hour) $60.00 per hour (d) Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revision to plans (minimum charge - two hours) $60.00 per hour (e) Fee to reissue building inspection record card $35.00 *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employee involved. (1) Building Permits 400.03— 400.09 $1 to $500 (includes one inspection) $40.00 Each additional inspection $40.00 $501 to $2,000 $26.25 for the first $500 plus $3.50 each additional $100, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 with a minimum fee of $40.00. $2,001 to $25,000 $77.25 for the first $2,000 plus $15.50 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000. $25,001 to $50,000 $436.50 for the first $25,000 plus $11.25 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000. $50,001 to $100,000 $716.75 for the first $50,000 plus $7.75 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000. $100,001 to $500,000 $1,106.25 for the first $100,000 plus $6.25 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000. $500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,599.25 for the first $500,000 plus $5.25 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000. 1,000,001 and up $6,242.50 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.25 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof. (2) Driveway, Parking Area Permits 515.05 (no permit fee for sidewalks) $40.00 (3) Swimming 420.00 Permanent or portable pools are based on building permit fees with a minimum of $40.00 (4) Plan Review Fee 400.03— 400.09 35% of building permit fee for one and two family dwelling basement remodels 65% of building permit fee for all other building permits, except no fee for the following: (a) Existing single family dwelling minor nonstructural alterations. (b) Single and two family dwelling repair and maintenance work. (c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance work not exceeding $1,000 or where plans are not required. Plan review fee for similar buildings Maximum 25% of permit fee based on Minnesota State Building Code 1300.0160 (5) Contractors License Verification Fee Charged once each time a contractor applies for permit(s) $5.00 (6) Moving- Buildings 845 Moving Permit Fee $50.00 (7) Structure Demolition 400.00— 400.09 (a) Commercial Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of $50.00 (b) Dwelling One or two story Residential - Garage and lesser structure $50.00 $40.00 (8) Plumbing Permit 400.03— 400.09 Residential Minimum Fee 2% of Total Job cost with a minimum of (includes one inspection) $40.00 Each additional inspection $40.00 (9) Plumbing Permit 400.03— 400.09 Commercial/Industrial/Multi-family Based on Total Job cost 2% of Estimated Job cost with a minimum of(includes one inspection) $45.00 Each additional inspection $40.00 (10) Electrical Permit 400.03— 400.09 Residential (a) Minimum Fee which includes one inspection $40.00 (b) Each additional Inspection $40.00 (c) Complete Wiring Fee: Single Family Dwelling and each dwelling unit of a two family dwelling and includes not more than three inspections. $165.00 (d) New Service - up to 200 amps $100.00 (e) Temporary Service - (for construction) $45.00 (f) Sub Panel $55.00 (g) Installation, addition alteration, or repair of each circuit or feeder $8.00 (h) Swimming pool or exterior hot tub $55.00 (11) Electrical Permit Commercial 400.03— 400.09 Commercial, Industrial and multiple dwellings(more than two units) and Technology systems: Minimum Fee which includes one inspection $45.00 Each additional inspection $40.00 (a) Based on total job cost - 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of - Over $50,000 - Fee/ $1,000.00 plus 1% of cost over $50,000.00 $45.00 (b) Traffic Signals: Per Intersection $185.00 (c) Fire Alarm: Based on ¾% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of $45.00 (d) Carnivals, festivals and similar events plus $35.00 for each service on generator $110.00 (12) Electrical Permit Signs 400.03— 400.09 Based on 2% of cost of electrical job to customer with a minimum of (separate electrical permit required for signs) $45.00 (13) Solar Photovoltaic System Rating* 0—5,000 watts $60.00 5,001—10,000 watts $100.00 10,001—20,000 watts $150.00 20,001—30,000 watts $200.00 30,001—40,000 watts $250.00 40,001 and over $250.00 and $10.00 for each additional watts over 40,000 watts (14) Residential Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration 400.03— 400.09 Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs 1½% estimated cost with a minimum of (Includes one inspection) $40.00 Each additional inspection $40.00 Commercial Heating, Central Systems and Additions, Alterations and Repairs1½% estimated cost with a $45.00 Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration minimum of (15) Sign Installation 415.01— 415.11 (a) Temporary sign permit (b) Permanent sign (any size) Building permit is required for sign support structures fees based on building permit fee schedule $40.00 $100.00 (16) Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 400 A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued before completion of the entire work covered by the permit, provided the Chief Building Official deems that the building is safe to occupy $200.00 Plus a letter of credit or cash escrow equal to 125% of the remaining City Code requirements ZONING, LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Planned Unit Development 542 (a) $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $5,000.00 (b) Major PUD Plan Amendment - $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $5,000.00 (c) Minor PUD Plan Amendment $400.00 (2) Site Plan Review 547 (a) $500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (b) Major amendment - $500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (c) Minor amendment $350.00 (3) Variance 547 Residential $350.00 Non Residential $500.00 Variance Appeal Residential and Non Residential $350.00 (4) Conditional Use Permit 547 (a) $500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (b) Major amendment - $500 + $5/$1,000 of project value (construction cost) up to a maximum fee of $3,500.00 (c) Minor amendment $350.00 (5) Interim Use Permit 547 $500 plus $100/year monitoring fee up to a maximum fee of $1,000.00 (6) *Zoning District or Code Text Change 547 $1,000.00 (7) *Subdivision Approval 500.01— 500.05 $500.00 Subdivision Waiver 500.05- Subd. 2 $350.00 (8) Street/Easement Vacation 820/State Statute $500.00 (9) Appeal to Board of Adj. & Appeals 547 $350.00 (10) Special Request to City Council $350.00 (11) Zoning Compliance Letter $50.00 $65.00 (12) Comprehensive Plan Amend. $1,000.00 (13) Plats* 500 Preliminary/Final Plat $500.00 $775.00 Final Plat $250.00 (14) Sketch Plan Review $350.00 (15) Extension Extension of a Land Use Approval (rezoning, site plan approval, conditional use permit, variance, etc.) beyond its original approval period $250.00 (16) Escrow Administration Fee $50.00 *Any additional expenses incurred by the City in the course of processing a request will be charged to the applicant. FIRE SERVICES FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (6) Fire Extinguishing System Permit Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: (a) no charge for valuation of $1,000 or less $50.00 (7) Fire Alarm Systems Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of: Plan review fee: 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following: (a) No charge for valuation of $1,000 or less $50.00 (8) Flammable or Combustible Liquid or Gas Storage Tanks and Piping Tanks (installation or modification) $150.00 Installation or alteration of piping Each unit or dispenser $50.00 Underground Tank Removal $100.00/Tank MISCELLANEOUS FEES Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (3) Antenna Commercial Wireless Telecommunication Service (CWTS) 425 & 544 (a) CWTS antenna permit application fee $100.00 (b) Antenna permit fee for additional antennas added to an existing antenna location or replacement of existing antennas at a location $35.00 (Bill No. 2018-17) RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above referenced amendment of the Richfield City Code; and WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense of publication of the complete text is not justified. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication: SUMMARY PUBLICATION BILL NO. ________ APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. This ordinance revises fees for certain land use services and applications. The fee for the preparation of a zoning verification letter has been raised from $50 to $65 and fees related to the processing of preliminary and final plat applications have been combined and raised from a total of $750 to $775. New fees will be effective January 1, 2021. Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office during normal business hours or upon request by calling the Department of Community Development at (612) 861-9760. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #5. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 115 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/22/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector 9/15/2020 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 9/16/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Conduct a public hearing and conside r a resolution approving a modification to the Redev elopme nt Plan and approv ing a Tax Incre me nt Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax Increment Finance District (Henle y I I). E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The City of Richfield and the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) have been in discussions with Northbay Companies (Developer) since 2019 related to their redevelopment proposal at 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue. T hat proposal, as it stands now, includes the rehabilitation of the existing 22-unit apartment building at 6345 Lyndale Avenue South and the construction of 82 new multifamily units. T he project would include at least 20% of the units being made available to households earning 50% or less than the Area Median Income; with at least 5 of those units being in the newly constructed portion of the development. A summary of the actions that the City and/or HRA have taken includes the following: A joint work session of the Richfield HRA, City Council and Planning Commission on November 26, 2019 at which the concept was generally supported; An HRA approval of a Preliminary Development Agreement on J anuary 21, 2020 that included a commitment by the HRA to examine the appropriateness and potential amount of available Tax I ncrement Financing (TI F); A City Council approval of various land-use applications (including a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Rezoning) of the site on J uly 14, 2020, and; An HRA approval of a final Contract for Private Development (Contract) on J uly 20, 2020 which, in part, approved the issuance of TI F and included the provision, "the Authority [HRA] shall issue and deliver... [a] TI F Note in the principal amount of $2,025,987" if certain conditions set forth in the Contract are met. I n accordance with the Contract for Private Development, and the HRA's consideration of the TI F Plan, the City is now being asked to consider a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and Approving a Tax I ncrement Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax I ncrement Finance District (Henley I I ). That Modification and Plan are contained in an attached document which includes the following: The Modification to the existing Richfield Redevelopment Plan including a map update identifying the 2020-1 (Henley I I ) TI F District and a short text passage citing the new District; A summary of the HRA and City's Authority to create such a District, A description of its classification as a Housing District (requiring 20% affordable at 50% of the A MI ); An identification of the Original Net Tax Capacity that the "base" taxes will be calculated on - those taxes will be distributed to all the local taxing jurisdictions (Hennepin County, Richfield Public Schools and the City of Richfield) as was the case prior to the establishment of the TI F District; $9,650,610 as the maximum TI F and related interest that could theoretically be collected in the District over it's maximum lifespan of 26 years; The types of uses eligible for expenditure (including acquisition, affordable housing and other qualifying improvements such as structured parking); The "But-For" analysis concluding that the resulting housing development "would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment." W hile the TI F Plan identifies the maximum amount of Tax I ncrement that could be generated and the maximum expenditure on certain eligible uses, it does not commit the use of those funds. That commitment is contained in the approved Contract for Private Redevelopment which sets forth the following uses of TI F funds: Up to 90% of the TI F collected in an amount not to exceed $2,025,987 to the Developer as a TI F Pay- As-You-Go Note to assist them in funding TI F qualifying expenses, and ; Up to 10% of the TI F collected to be retained by the Richfield HRA for reimbursement of expenses (including staff costs) in administering this District. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion approve a resolution approving a modification to the Re de ve lopment Plan for the Richfield Redev elopme nt project; and approving a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax Incre me nt Finance District (He nley I I). B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T The City and HRA have been engaged in discussions with this Developer in regards to the proposed project for nearly a year and have already granted several approvals related to the project. The City and HRA have established similar Housing TI F Districts in the past to advance the construction of new housing inclusive of at least 20% affordable housing. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The proposed Redevelopment Area Modification and TI F Plan describes the statutory Authority by which the City and HRA can create a TI F District; C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: A notice was placed in the local newspaper (the Richfield Sun-Current) forecasting that the City Council would be considering this item on September 22. The Developer is hoping to begin their project in 2020 and would only be able to do so upon approval of these items. The Richfield HRA is considering this item on September 21, 2020. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: T he T IF Plan identifies the Original Net Tax Capacity that the "base" taxes will be calculated on - those taxes will be distributed to all the local taxing jurisdictions (Hennepin County, Richfield Public Schools and the City of Richfield) as was the case prior to the establishment of the T IF District; According to the TI F Plan, the HRA would be eligible to retain 10% of the TI F collected in the District to reimbuse its costs incurred in administering the District. The Contract for Private Development identifies up to $2,025,987 to the developer as a TI F Pay- As-You-Go Note; this "Pay-Go" Note obligates the HRA to make payment to the Developer only in the event that the Developer has paid adequate taxes to provide the funding for such payment. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: HRA legal counsel (J ulie Eddington of Kennedy & Graven), has reviewed the documents under consideration and drafted the resolutions that the HRA and City Council are considering. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): Defer consideration of the approval of a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and Approving a Tax I ncrement Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax I ncrement Finance District (Henley I I ) to a future meeting in order to obtain further information. Do not approve a a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and Approving a Tax I ncrement Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax I ncrement Finance District (Henley I I ) to a future meeting in order to obtain further information with findings as recommended by the City Attorney. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: Representatives of Northbay Companies AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type Resolution A pproving TIF P lan Resolution L etter TIF P lan and Redev A rea Mod B ackup Material CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. _______ RESOLUTION APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; AND APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE 2020-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT: HENLEY II WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the “City”) and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the “Authority”) have established, and the Authority administers, the Richfield Redevelopment Project (the “Redevelopment Project”) located within the City and have created a Redevelopment Plan (the “Redevelopment Plan”) therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, as amended (the “HRA Act”); and WHEREAS, within the Redevelopment Project the City and the Authority have created certain tax increment financing districts pursuant to the HRA Act and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended (the “TIF Act”); and WHEREAS, the City and the Authority have determined to modify the Redevelopment Plan and approve a tax increment financing plan (the “TIF Plan”) relating to the creation of a new tax increment financing district within the Redevelopment Project designated as the 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II (the “TIF District”), a housing district, all as described in a plan document presented to the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) on the date hereof; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.175, subdivision 2a of the TIF Act, notice of the proposed TIF District was provided to the county commissioner who represents the area included in the TIF District on or about August 10, 2020; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.175, subdivision 2 of the TIF Act, the proposed TIF Plan and the estimates of the fiscal and economic implications of the TIF Plan were presented to the Clerk of the Board of Education of Richfield Public Schools and to the Taxpayer Services Division Manager, as the County Auditor, of Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “County”) on or about August 21, 2020; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2020, the Board of Commissioners of the Authority (the “Board”) approved the modified Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan for the TIF District and referred such plans to the City Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing relating to the approval of the modified Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan for the TIF District, and the views of all interested parties were heard at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the contents of the modified Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: Section 1. Findings; Redevelopment Project. The City Council hereby finds that (a) the land in the Redevelopment Project would not be made available for development or redevelopment without the 2 use of tax increment financing; and (b) the modified Redevelopment Plan is intended to and, in the judgment of the City Council, the effect of such actions will be to (i) afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Redevelopment Project by private enterprise; and (ii) conform to the general plan for development of the City as a whole. Section 2. Findings; TIF District. 2.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly development of the Redevelopment Project, and for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City and its residents, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the City to provide public financial assistance to the TIF District and the Redevelopment Project. 2.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that the development proposed in the TIF Plan could not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. 2.03. The proposed development to be financed in part through tax increment financing will provide the City with affordable housing. 2.04. The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development of the City as a whole. 2.05. The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the TIF District and the Redevelopment Project by private enterprise. 2.06. The TIF District is a housing district under Section 469.174, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act. 2.07. The reasons and facts supporting all the above findings are set forth in the TIF Plan and are incorporated herein by reference. The City Council has also relied upon the reports and recommendations of its staff and consultants, as well as the personal knowledge of members of the City Council, in reaching its conclusions regarding the TIF Plan. Section 3. Public Purpose. The adoption of the TIF Plan conforms in all respects to the requirements of the TIF Act. The TIF Plan will help facilitate affordable housing within the City. The City expressly finds that the tax increment assistance is provided solely to make the development financially feasible and thus produce the public benefits described. Therefore, the City finds that the public benefits of the TIF Plan exceed any private benefits. Section 4. Approvals; Further Proceedings 4.01. The modified Redevelopment Plan is hereby approved. 4.02. The TIF Plan for the TIF District is hereby approved and adopted in substantially the form on file at City Hall. 4.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized and directed to file a request for certification of the TIF District with the Taxpayer Services Division Manager, as the County Auditor, of the County and to file a copy of the modified Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue and the State Auditor as required by the TIF Act. 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RC125-376 (JAE) 674345v3 MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Richfield Redevelopment Project Area - AND - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN Establishment of 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II (a housing district) Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota Public Hearing: September 22, 2020 Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 2 Table of Contents Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area ............. 3 Foreword ................................................................................................................................ 3 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II ......... 4 Foreword ................................................................................................................................ 4 Statutory Authority .................................................................................................................. 4 Statement of Objectives ......................................................................................................... 4 Redevelopment Plan Overview .............................................................................................. 4 Description of Property in the District and Property to be Acquired......................................... 5 Classification of the District .................................................................................................... 5 Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District ......................................................... 5 Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ..................................................................... 6 Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued ............................................................................... 7 Uses of Funds ........................................................................................................................ 8 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ..................................................................... 8 Supporting Documentation ....................................................................................................10 Administration of the District ..................................................................................................11 Appendix A: Map of the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District .............12 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District .................................................................13 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications .........................................................14 Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 3 Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area Foreword The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. Generally, the substantive changes include the establishment of the 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, is recommended. It is available from the Community Development Director at the City of Richfield. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 4 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II Foreword The Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Richfield (the “City”), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of the 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II (the "District"), a housing tax increment financing district, located in the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. Statutory Authority Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 - 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. Statement of Objectives The District currently consists of five parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. The District is being created to facilitate the development of 104 units of housing including the construction of 82 units and the rehabilitation of 22 existing units in the City. Sixteen studio units in the rehabilitated property at 6345 Lyndale and five studio units in the new construction portion of the project will be reserved for persons with incomes at or below 50% of the median area income. The HRA anticipates entering into an agreement with NorthBay as the developer. Development is anticipated to begin the Fall 2020. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area and the District. Redevelopment Plan Overview Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the HRA is authorized to undertake the following activities in the District: 1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by the HRA and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 5 pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The HRA may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. Description of Property in the District and Property to be Acquired The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed below. Please also see the map in Appendix A for further information on the location of the District. Classification of the District The HRA, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended, inclusive, finds that the District, to be established, is a housing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11 and M.S., Section 469.1761. ▪ The District consists of five parcels ▪ The development will consist of 104 units of multi-family rental housing ▪ 20% of the units will be occupied by person with incomes less than 50% of median income ▪ No more that 20 percent of the square footage of the building that is receiving assistance from tax increment consists of commercial, retail or other non-residential uses. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA (a total of 26 years of tax increment). The HRA elects to receive the first Parcel number Address Owner 2702824220083 608 64th St. W.64th St LLC 2702824220082 602 64th St. W.64th St LLC 2702824220081 520 64th St. W.Rauth 2702824220080 514 64th St. W.Huntington 2702824220084 6345 Lyndale S.6345 Lyndale LLC Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 6 tax increment in 2022, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2047, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2020 for taxes payable 2021. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2022) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA. The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2021, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2021). The ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the projects within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA requests 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2022. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed. Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 7 Note: Tax capacity includes a 2.5% inflation factor for the duration of the District. The tax capacity included in this chart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 25. The tax capacity of the District in year one is estimated to be $58,094. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City has review the area to be included in the District and determined no building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the City. Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by pay-as- you-go notes and interfund loans. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification. This provision does not obligate the HRA to incur debt. The HRA will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The HRA may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $6,641,954. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund Project estimated Tax Capacity upon completion $420,303 Original estimated Net Tax Capacity $34,988 Fiscal Disparities $0 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity $385,315 Original Local Tax Rate 136.6880%Pay 2020 Estimated Annual Tax Increment $526,680 Percent Retainted by the City 100% Project Tax Capacity SOURCES Tax Increment 9,650,610$ Interest 965,061 TOTAL 10,615,671$ Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 8 loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. Uses of Funds Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate the development of 104 units of housing including the construction of 82 units and the rehabilitation of 22 existing units. The HRA has determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section. Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. The HRA may expend funds for qualified housing activities outside of the District boundaries. Fiscal Disparities Election Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the HRA may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities. The HRA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b (inside). Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated USES Land/Building Acquisition 3,000,000$ Site Improvements/Preparation - Affordable Housing 1,000,000 Utilities - Other Qualifying Improvements 1,715,952 Administrative Costs (up to 10%)926,002 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL 6,641,954$ Interest 3,973,717 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL 10,615,671$ Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 9 by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the Pay 2019 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Pay 2019 figures. The District will be certified under the Pay 2021 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the District is $9,650,610; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. An impact of the District on police protection is expected. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic, and additional overall demands to the call load. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The probable impact of the District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically, new buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will Entity 2019/Pay 2020 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) upon completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 2,112,707,400 385,315 0.0182% City of Richfield 42,574,771 385,315 0.9050% ISD No. 280 57,397,386 385,315 0.6713% Impact on Tax Base Entity Pay 2020 Extension Rate Percent of Total CTC Potential Taxes Hennepin County 41.0840%30.06% 385,315 $ 158,303 City of Richfield 54.7270%40.04% 385,315 210,871 ISD No. 280 32.6580%23.89% 385,315 125,836 Other 8.2190%6.01% 385,315 31,669 136.6880%100.00% $ 526,680 Impact on Tax Rates Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 10 necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements in the area. The current infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The probable impact of any District general obligation tax increment bonds on the ability to issue debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. It is not anticipated that there will be any general obligation debt issued in relation to this project, therefore there will be no impact on the City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's debt limit. (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $2,305,759; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $2,900,662; (5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. No requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received. Supporting Documentation Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. (i) In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon (1) written representation made by the developer to such effects, (2) review of the developer’s proforma; and (3) City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site within the District, which is further outlined in the City Council resolution approving the establishment of the TIF District and Appendix C. (ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market value both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix B and indicates that the increase in estimated Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 11 market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. Administration of the District Administration of the District will be handled by the Community Development Director. Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 12 Appendix A: Map of the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District 71st 1/2 70th 1/2 LOGAN75th VINCENTUPTONTHOMASWASHBURNXERXESI - 494 78th 77th 76th OLIVERNEWTONMORGANSHERIDANRUSSELLQUEENPENN74th 72nd 73th 71st 69th 70th DUPONTKNOXJAMESIRVINGHUMBOLDTGIRARDFREMONTEMERSONCOLFAXBRYANTALDRICHGARFIELDGRANDHARRIETLYNDALE62nd 67th 68th 66th 65th 64th 63rd SHERIDAN1700240031002300WASHBURNXERXESVINCENTUPTONTHOMASRUSSELLQUEENPENNOLIVERNEWTONMORGANLOGANDUPONTHUMBOLDTKNOXJAMESIRVINGGIRARDEMERSONFREMONTLYNDALECOLFAXBRYANTALDRICHGARFIELDHARRIETGRAND69th 71st 72nd 73th 74th 75th 78th 70th 76th 77th COLUMBUS2nd1stSTEVENSPLEASANTPILLSBURYBLAISDELLWENTWORTHNICOLLET3rdCLINTON4th5thPORTLANDOAKLANDPARK10th11th12th13th14thELLIOTCHICAGO15th16th17th18thCEDARBLOOMINGTON62nd 63rd 64th 65th 67th 68th 66thCOLUMBUSPLEASANTPILLSBURYWENTWORTHBLAISDELLSTEVENSNICOLLET1st2nd5thCLINTON3rd4thOAKLANDPARKPORTLAND15th11thCHICAGOELLIOT10th13th12th14thBLOOMINGTON16th17thCEDAR18th 1900800900100011001200130018006005004003002005010012420030032440050062070072080090010001100130014001500160017001800100152419006001200000700140029002800270026002500220021002000300015001600City of Richfield 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ¯ Community Development Department2013 Legend TIF DistrictNo. 2020-1;Henley II Parcels City Limits 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II located within the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 13 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District 8/20/2020 Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 Henley II - 2.5% Inflation City of Richfield, MN 82- unit New Multi-Family Development and 22-unit Multi-Family Rehab ASSUMPTIONS AND RATES DistrictType:Housing District Name/Number: County District #:Exempt Class Rate (Exempt)0.00% First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2020 Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.) Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining First $150,000 1.50% Inflation Rate - Every Year:2.50%Over $150,000 2.00% Interest Rate:4.25%Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I)2.00% Present Value Date:1-Aug-21 Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental)1.25% First Period Ending 1-Feb-22 Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2021 First $162,000 0.75% Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development:2022 Over $162,000 0.25% Years of Tax Increment 26 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res. 1 Unit) Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2047 First $500,000 1.00% Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Over $500,000 1.25% Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Incremental Homestead Residential Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 35.1664%Pay 2020 First $500,000 1.00% Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 142.4540%Pay 2020 Over $500,000 1.25% Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 136.688%Pay 2020 Agricultural Non-Homestead 1.00% Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.)136.688%Pay 2020 State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes)38.8460%Pay 2020 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)0.14849%Pay 2020 Building Total Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class After Land Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Map ID PID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap. 1 2702824220083 64th St LLC 608 64th St. W.114,000 130,000 244,000 100%244,000 Pay 2021 Non-H Res. 1 Unit 2,440 Rental 3,050 1 2 2702824220082 64th St LLC 602 64th St. W.127,000 141,000 268,000 100%268,000 Pay 2021 Hmstd. Res.2,680 Rental 3,350 1 3 2702824220081 Rauth 520 64th St. W.127,000 140,000 267,000 100%267,000 Pay 2021 Hmstd. Res.2,670 Rental 3,338 1 4 2702824220080 Huntington 514 64th St. W.85,000 106,000 191,000 100%191,000 Pay 2021 Hmstd. Res.1,910 Rental 2,388 1 5 2702824220084 6345 Lyndale LLC 6345 Lyndale S.264,000 1,565,000 1,829,000 100%1,829,000 Pay 2021 Rental 22,863 Rental 22,863 1 717,000 2,082,000 2,799,000 2,799,000 32,563 34,988 Note: 1. Base values are for pay 2020 based upon review of County website on 8-13-20. 2. Located in SD #280 and WS #0 Tax Rates BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) Area/ Phase Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\Richfield\Housing-ED-Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\2020-1 TIF - Henley II\TIF Run - TIF PLAN 8/20/2020 Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Henley II - 2.5% Inflation City of Richfield, MN 82- unit New Multi-Family Development and 22-unit Multi-Family Rehab Estimated Taxable Total Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Year Market Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxes Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft./Unit Per Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./Units Value Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit 2020 2021 2022 2023 Payable 1 Apartments 192,500 192,500 82 15,785,000 Rental 197,313 2,406 25%100%100%100%2023 1 Apartments 127,500 127,500 22 2,805,000 Rental 35,063 1,594 25%100%100%100%2023 TOTAL 18,590,000 232,375 Subtotal Residential 104 18,590,000 232,375 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.0 0 0 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates from County assessor 3-2-2020. Total Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide Market Tax Disparities Tax Property Disparities Property Value Total Taxes Per New Use Capacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. Ft./Unit Apartments 197,313 0 197,313 269,703 0 0 23,439 293,142 3,574.90 Apartments 35,063 0 35,063 47,926 0 0 4,165 52,091 2,367.79 TOTAL 232,375 0 232,375 317,629 0 0 27,604 345,233 Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary significantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. Total Property Taxes 345,233 less State-wide Taxes 0 less Fiscal Disp. Adj.0 less Market Value Taxes (27,604) less Base Value Taxes (47,824) Annual Gross TIF 269,805 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF? TAX CALCULATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity) Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\Richfield\Housing-ED-Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\2020-1 TIF - Henley II\TIF Run - TIF PLAN 8/20/2020 Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 3 Henley II - 2.5% Inflation City of Richfield, MN 82- unit New Multi-Family Development and 22-unit Multi-Family Rehab TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Project Original Fiscal Captured Local Annual Semi-Annual State Admin.Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD % of Tax Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross Tax Auditor at Net Tax Present ENDING Tax Payment OTC Capacity Capacity Incremental Capacity Rate Increment Increment 0.36%10%Increment Value Yrs.Year Date - - - - 02/01/22 100%58,094 (34,988) - 23,106 136.688%31,583 15,792 (57) (1,573) 14,161 13,578 0.5 2022 08/01/22 100%58,094 (34,988) - 23,106 136.688%31,583 15,792 (57) (1,573) 14,161 26,874 1 2022 02/01/23 100%232,375 (34,988) - 197,388 136.688%269,805 134,903 (486) (13,442) 120,975 138,090 1.5 2023 08/01/23 100%232,375 (34,988) - 197,388 136.688%269,805 134,903 (486) (13,442) 120,975 246,992 2 2023 02/01/24 100%238,184 (34,988) - 203,197 136.688%277,746 138,873 (500) (13,837) 124,536 356,766 2.5 2024 08/01/24 100%238,184 (34,988) - 203,197 136.688%277,746 138,873 (500) (13,837) 124,536 464,257 3 2024 02/01/25 100%244,139 (34,988) - 209,151 136.688%285,885 142,942 (515) (14,243) 128,185 572,595 3.5 2025 08/01/25 100%244,139 (34,988) - 209,151 136.688%285,885 142,942 (515) (14,243) 128,185 678,679 4 2025 02/01/26 100%250,242 (34,988) - 215,255 136.688%294,228 147,114 (530) (14,658) 131,926 785,586 4.5 2026 08/01/26 100%250,242 (34,988) - 215,255 136.688%294,228 147,114 (530) (14,658) 131,926 890,270 5 2026 02/01/27 100%256,499 (34,988) - 221,511 136.688%302,779 151,389 (545) (15,084) 135,760 995,754 5.5 2027 08/01/27 100%256,499 (34,988) - 221,511 136.688%302,779 151,389 (545) (15,084) 135,760 1,099,043 6 2027 02/01/28 100%262,911 (34,988) - 227,923 136.688%311,544 155,772 (561) (15,521) 139,690 1,203,111 6.5 2028 08/01/28 100%262,911 (34,988) - 227,923 136.688%311,544 155,772 (561) (15,521) 139,690 1,305,013 7 2028 02/01/29 100%269,484 (34,988) - 234,496 136.688%320,528 160,264 (577) (15,969) 143,718 1,407,673 7.5 2029 08/01/29 100%269,484 (34,988) - 234,496 136.688%320,528 160,264 (577) (15,969) 143,718 1,508,196 8 2029 02/01/30 100%276,221 (34,988) - 241,233 136.688%329,737 164,869 (594) (16,427) 147,847 1,609,456 8.5 2030 08/01/30 100%276,221 (34,988) - 241,233 136.688%329,737 164,869 (594) (16,427) 147,847 1,708,609 9 2030 02/01/31 100%283,126 (34,988) - 248,139 136.688%339,176 169,588 (611) (16,898) 152,080 1,808,478 9.5 2031 08/01/31 100%283,126 (34,988) - 248,139 136.688%339,176 169,588 (611) (16,898) 152,080 1,906,268 10 2031 02/01/32 100%290,205 (34,988) - 255,217 136.688%348,851 174,426 (628) (17,380) 156,418 2,004,756 10.5 2032 08/01/32 100%290,205 (34,988) - 255,217 136.688%348,851 174,426 (628) (17,380) 156,418 2,101,194 11 2032 02/01/33 100%297,460 (34,988) - 262,472 136.688%358,768 179,384 (646) (17,874) 160,864 2,198,310 11.5 2033 08/01/33 100%297,460 (34,988) - 262,472 136.688%358,768 179,384 (646) (17,874) 160,864 2,293,405 12 2033 02/01/34 100%304,896 (34,988) - 269,909 136.688%368,933 184,466 (664) (18,380) 165,422 2,389,159 12.5 2034 08/01/34 100%304,896 (34,988) - 269,909 136.688%368,933 184,466 (664) (18,380) 165,422 2,482,922 13 2034 02/01/35 100%312,519 (34,988) - 277,531 136.688%379,352 189,676 (683) (18,899) 170,094 2,577,325 13.5 2035 08/01/35 100%312,519 (34,988) - 277,531 136.688%379,352 189,676 (683) (18,899) 170,094 2,669,765 14 2035 02/01/36 100%320,332 (34,988) - 285,344 136.688%390,031 195,016 (702) (19,431) 174,882 2,762,829 14.5 2036 08/01/36 100%320,332 (34,988) - 285,344 136.688%390,031 195,016 (702) (19,431) 174,882 2,853,957 15 2036 02/01/37 100%328,340 (34,988) - 293,352 136.688%400,977 200,489 (722) (19,977) 179,790 2,945,693 15.5 2037 08/01/37 100%328,340 (34,988) - 293,352 136.688%400,977 200,489 (722) (19,977) 179,790 3,035,521 16 2037 02/01/38 100%336,548 (34,988) - 301,561 136.688%412,197 206,099 (742) (20,536) 184,821 3,125,940 16.5 2038 08/01/38 100%336,548 (34,988) - 301,561 136.688%412,197 206,099 (742) (20,536) 184,821 3,214,478 17 2038 02/01/39 100%344,962 (34,988) - 309,974 136.688%423,698 211,849 (763) (21,109) 189,978 3,303,592 17.5 2039 08/01/39 100%344,962 (34,988) - 309,974 136.688%423,698 211,849 (763) (21,109) 189,978 3,390,852 18 2039 02/01/40 100%353,586 (34,988) - 318,599 136.688%435,486 217,743 (784) (21,696) 195,263 3,478,674 18.5 2040 08/01/40 100%353,586 (34,988) - 318,599 136.688%435,486 217,743 (784) (21,696) 195,263 3,564,668 19 2040 02/01/41 100%362,426 (34,988) - 327,438 136.688%447,569 223,784 (806) (22,298) 200,681 3,651,210 19.5 2041 08/01/41 100%362,426 (34,988) - 327,438 136.688%447,569 223,784 (806) (22,298) 200,681 3,735,950 20 2041 02/01/42 100%371,486 (34,988) - 336,499 136.688%459,954 229,977 (828) (22,915) 206,234 3,821,223 20.5 2042 08/01/42 100%371,486 (34,988) - 336,499 136.688%459,954 229,977 (828) (22,915) 206,234 3,904,722 21 2042 02/01/43 100%380,773 (34,988) - 345,786 136.688%472,648 236,324 (851) (23,547) 211,926 3,988,740 21.5 2043 08/01/43 100%380,773 (34,988) - 345,786 136.688%472,648 236,324 (851) (23,547) 211,926 4,071,010 22 2043 02/01/44 100%390,293 (34,988) - 355,305 136.688%485,660 242,830 (874) (24,196) 217,760 4,153,786 22.5 2044 08/01/44 100%390,293 (34,988) - 355,305 136.688%485,660 242,830 (874) (24,196) 217,760 4,234,840 23 2044 02/01/45 100%400,050 (34,988) - 365,063 136.688%498,997 249,498 (898) (24,860) 223,740 4,316,386 23.5 2045 08/01/45 100%400,050 (34,988) - 365,063 136.688%498,997 249,498 (898) (24,860) 223,740 4,396,235 24 2045 02/01/46 100%410,051 (34,988) - 375,064 136.688%512,667 256,334 (923) (25,541) 229,870 4,476,566 24.5 2046 08/01/46 100%410,051 (34,988) - 375,064 136.688%512,667 256,334 (923) (25,541) 229,870 4,555,224 25 2046 02/01/47 100%420,303 (34,988) - 385,315 136.688%526,680 263,340 (948) (26,239) 236,153 4,634,351 25.5 2047 08/01/47 100%420,303 (34,988) - 385,315 136.688%526,680 263,340 (948) (26,239) 236,153 4,711,832 26 2047 02/01/48 Total 9,685,478 (34,868) (965,061) 8,685,549 Present Value From 08/01/2021 Present Value Rate 4.25%5,254,284 (18,915) (523,537) 4,711,832 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\Richfield\Housing-ED-Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\2020-1 TIF - Henley II\TIF Run - TIF PLAN Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 14 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II is a housing district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11. The 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II consists of five parcels. The development will consist of the development of 104 units of housing, including the construction of 82 units and the rehabilitation of 22 existing units, all or a portion of which will receive tax increment assistance and will meet income restrictions described in M.S. 469.1761. At least 20 percent of the units – 16 studio units in the rehabilitated property at 6345 Lyndale and five studio units in the new construction portion -- receiving assistance will have incomes at or below 50 percent of area median income. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is a housing district that meets the City's objectives for development and redevelopment. The cost of land acquisition, site and public improvements and developing affordable housing makes this housing development infeasible without City assistance. Due to decreased rental income from affordable units, there is insufficient cash flow to provide a sufficient rate of return, pay operating expenses, and service the debt. This leaves a gap in the funding for the project and makes this housing development feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer was asked for and provided a letter and a proforma as justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the cost of land acquisition, site and public improvements and construction of affordable housing add to the total development cost. Historically, the costs of site and public improvements as well as reduced rents required for affordable workforce housing in the City have made development infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other development of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II 15 The City Council reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for 2020-1 Tax Increment Financing District: Henley II will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Richfield Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for residential development, which is desirable or necessary for increased population and an increased need for life-cycle housing within the City. AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM #6. STAFF RE P ORT NO. 116 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/22/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irecor D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector 9/15/2020 O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A . C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 9/16/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N: Consider the 2020 Revised/2021 Proposed Budget resolutions adopting the 2021 preliminary property tax levy, setting truth in taxation hearing date, authorizing budget revisions, authorizing revision of 2020 budget of various departments, and approving City fees for 2021. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On September 10, 2020, a special City Council meeting was held for the purpose of presenting and discussing the 2020 Revised/2021 Proposed Budget and 2021 preliminary property tax levy. At this meeting staff presented to the City Council a preliminary gross tax levy of $23,934,632 which includes a levy for general fund operations of $19,001,439, a debt service levy of $3,508,545, a tax abatement levy of $54,043, an equipment and technology levy of $830,000, and an Economic Development Agency levy of $540,605. Accordingly, the 2021 preliminary gross levy represents a 5.50% increase from the 2020 gross levy. As Council is aware, once the preliminary levy is approved, it may be further reduced at a later City Council meeting, but it legally cannot be increased over the preliminary approved amount. I n addition, the City must certify its proposed property tax levy for payable year 2021 to the County Auditor and set a date for its Truth in Taxation public meeting on or before September 30, 2020. The Truth in Taxation public meeting must be held between November 25 and December 28, 2020 and must occur at 6:00 p.m. or later. The City’s Truth in Taxation public meeting is scheduled for Monday November 30, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. via virtual W ebEx meeting. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: By Motion: Adopt the attached resolutions establishing the 2021 preliminary property tax levy and proposed date for the Truth in Taxation hearing, authorizing budget revisions, authorizing revision of 2020 budget of various departments, and approving City fees for 2021. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T N/A. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The City Charter establishes that at a special budget meeting of the Council on or before September 15, the City Manager must submit to the Council a proposed budget and a budget message in the form and containing the information specified in Section 7.06. Consequently, as required by the Truth in Taxation legislation (MS 275.065) each “taxing authority” must certify its proposed property tax levy for payable year 2020 to the County Auditor on or before September 30, 2020. “Taxing authority” includes all counties, all school districts, all cities regardless of population, all towns, special taxing districts. No local units of government are exempted from this requirement. I n addition, each “taxing authority” with a population of 500 or more, must certify to their County Auditor the date that has been selected for the Truth in Taxation public meeting by September 30, 2020. This Truth in Taxation public meeting must be held between November 25 and December 28, 2020 and must occur at 6:00 p.m. or later. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S: Along with the 2020 Revised/2021 Proposed budget and preliminary property tax levy, City staff is also recommending a date for this year ’s Truth in Taxation public meeting. I t is recommended that this year ’s meeting be set for 6:00 p.m. Monday November 30, 2020 via virtual W ebEx meeting. All official action concerning the preliminary tax levy and setting dates for the Truth in Taxation hearings must be concluded before September 30, 2020. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The preliminary gross levy for taxes payable 2021 as presented is $23,934,632. The City’s tax capacity rate is anticipated to increase from 53.291% to 54.011%. I ncluded in the 2021 preliminary gross levy is a levy to fund the purchase of rolling stock and technology equipment of $830,000 and the levy to fund the Economic Development Authority of $540,605. A final resolution for consideration authorizes the revision of the 2020 budget to conform to the most recent 2020 revenue and expenditure projections. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION: N/A. ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S): The City Council could adopt a lesser 2021 preliminary property tax levy or 2020 Revised/2021 Proposed budget or select other allowable Truth in Taxation hearing dates. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G: None. AT TAC H ME N T S: D escription Type 2021 P roposed B udget and Tax L evy Resolution Resolution L etter 2020 A uthorizing B udget Revisions Resolution L etter A uthorizing Revision of 2020 B udget of Various D epartments Resolution L etter 2021 A ppendix D F ees Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2021 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Truth in Taxation law provides for a proposed tax levy to be certified to the County Auditor by September 30, 2020 and then recertified before December 28, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The budget for the City of Richfield for the year 2021 is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for each of the departments to be as follows: General Fund Legislative/Executive $ 1,044,630 Administrative Services 908,360 Finance 743,050 Public Safety 10,466,760 Fire Services 4,995,480 Community Development 1,697,080 Public Works 4,590,640 Recreation Services 2,078,350 Transfers Out 230,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $26,754,350 2. The estimated gross revenue of the City of Richfield from all sources, including general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year 2021 which are more fully detailed in the City Manager’s official copy of the 2021 budget, are hereby found and determined to be as follows: TOTAL GENERAL FUND $26,754,350 3. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2020, payable in 2021 for the following purposes and in the following amounts: PURPOSE AMOUNT General Fund1 $19,001,4392 Equipment 830,000 Economic Development Authority 540,605 Debt Service 3,508,545 Cedar Point Tax Abatement 54,043 1 Provision has been made in the General Fund for the payment of the City’s contributory share to Public Employees’ Retirement Association. 2 General Fund Levy includes all fiscal disparities distribution amounts. 4. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A, will be reduced from $139,135.50 to $106,756 due to the use surplus bond proceeds from the issue. 5. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2013A, will be reduced from $160,203.75 to $150,203.75 due to the use of bond fund cash. 6. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2015A will be reduced from $634,705.32 to $262,495.94 due to the utilization of gas and electric franchise fees. 7. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B, will be reduced from $269,850 to $259,850 and $250,761.92 to $240,761.92 due to the use of bond fund cash. 8. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2016C, will be reduced from $724,473.75 to $704,473.75 due to the use of bond fund cash. 9. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2017A, will be reduced from $620,681.25 to $600,681.25 due to the use of bond fund cash. 10. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B, will be reduced from $350,700 to $340,700 due to the use of bond fund cash. 11. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2018A will be reduced from $701,163.75 to $273,762.50 due to the utilization of gas and electric franchise fees. 12. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Bonds, Series 2019A will be reduced from $381,570 to $371,570 due to the use of bond fund cash. 13. The budget for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield for the year 2021 is hereby ratified and approved. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2020, payable in 2021 for the following purposes: PURPOSE AMOUNT Housing and Redevelopment Authority $631,030 14. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the County Auditor. 15. The Truth in Taxation public meeting shall be set for 6:00 p.m. November 30, 2020 via virtual WebEx meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET REVISIONS WHEREAS, the City Charter and Minnesota Statutes provide for a process for adopting an annual budget and tax levy; and WHEREAS, the City Charter provides certain authority for the City Manager and/or City Council to revise the annual budget; and WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to restate such authority with the adoption of the budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Manager may increase the budget by City Council action provided that unbudgeted receipts will be available to equal or exceed the increased expenditures. 2. The City Manager may authorize transfers between divisions within a department providing the transfers do not increase or decrease the department or total budget. 3. The City Manager may transfer budgeted amounts between departments only with the approval of the City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 2020 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS WHEREAS, Resolution No. 11685 appropriated funds for personal services, other expenses and capital outlays for each department of the City for the year of 2020; and WHEREAS, The City Charter, Chapter 7, Section 7.09, gives the Council authority to transfer unencumbered appropriation balances from one department to another within the same fund at the request of the City Manager; and WHEREAS, The City Manager has requested a revision of the 2020 budget appropriations in accordance with Charter provisions and as detailed in the Proposed 2021 budget document. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the 2020 appropriations for each department of the General Fund be amended to establish the following totals: General Fund Legislative/Executive $ 934,680 Administrative Services 902,610 Finance 686,140 Public Safety 9,949,000 Fire Services 4,852,170 Community Development 1,650,000 Public Works 4,352,180 Recreation Services 1,729,630 Transfer Out 1,483,810 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $26,540,220 INCREASE $ 1,079,500 2. Estimated 2020 gross revenue of the City of Richfield from all sources, as the same are more fully detailed in the City Manager’s official copy of the proposed 2021 budget, are hereby revised as follows: INCREASE $1,079,500 3. That the City Manager and the Finance Director bring into effect the provisions of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 22nd day of September 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Resolution No. Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2021 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 11694 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: Section 1. - Establishing Fees. A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in the sections of this resolution. B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this resolution. C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of the license. D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not been paid in a timely manner. Section 2. - Construction and Related License Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Heating and Ventilating Installer 400.07 1 Year $ 80.00 (2) Sign Installer 416.01—416.13 1 Year $ 80.00 (3) Electrical Installer 400.03—400.09 State License Required (4) Plumber 400.03—400.09 State License Required (5) Well Driller 620 State License Required Section 3. - Public Works Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Benches 805.01— 805.27 First Year $ 80.00 Resolution No. Page 2 Renewal $ 30.00 (2) Boulevard feature Permit 811.07 a) Application to place a privately owned feature in the boulevard $ 30.00 b) If applied for after installation of feature has begun $ 60.00 (3) Excavation in Public Right of way 800.01— 800.15 a) For each transverse excavation and each 100 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation and for each 100 feet of curb and gutter or portion thereof installed or driveway apron installed, except when survey and grade stakes are set by City $ 125.00 b) If applied for after excavation has begun $ 250.00 c) For each pothole $ 20.00 (4) Pole Attachment /Small Cell Facilities Permit 802 a) Application to attach or collocate pole attachment on City facilities in the City Right-of-way $500/≤ 5 units & $100/unit thereafter b) Application to construct/install new small cell pole w/ attachment in the City Right- of-way $1,000/unit c) Annual rental fee per attachment to collocate on the city structure, per agreement Up to $150/unit d) Annual maintenance fee associated with the collocation, per agreement Up to $25/unit Monthly Electrical Fees a) Radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts b) Radio node over 100 maximum watts c) The actual cost of electricity $73.00/node $182.00/node Resolution No. Page 3 (5) Forestry Permit 810 Applies only to trees on City property and public ROW $ 50.00 (6) Seasonal Load Limit Exemption a) Per load $ 25.00 b) If applied for after delivery $ 50.00 (7) Obstruction Permit 802.17 (a) Short term, temporary single lane closure of less than four hours No fee (b) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 60.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $ 300.00 Collector Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 30.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $ 75.00 Local/Residential Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 15.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $ 45.00 Sidewalk/Bike Lanes Day $ 30.00 If applied for after obstruction closure has Resolution No. Page 4 begun (c) Short term, temporary single lane closure less than four hours No fee (d) Lane closures longer than four hours' duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.) Arterial Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 120.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $ 300.00 Collector Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 60.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $ 150.00 Local/Residential Day (per block or portion thereof) $ 30.00 Full Closure (per block or portion thereof) $ 90.00 Sidewalk Day $ 60.00 If the closures are not removed by the permitted completion date, then additional Days will be charged at double the rate (8) Noise Ordinance Exemption 930.35 (a) With conditions added as required $ 50.00 Resolution No. Page 5 (b) If applied for after violation $ 100.00 (9) Certification Charge 705.03— 705.21 All delinquent accounts $ 50.00 (10) NSF Check Charge $ 30.00 (11) Utility Services Sanitary Sewer 700.05 All land uses New Service $ 125.00 Repair $ 125.00 Disconnect $ 125.00 Replacement $ 125.00 Sewer Service Line Televising $ 75.00 Water Service 715.01 All land uses $ 125.00 New Service $ 125.00 Repair $ 125.00 Disconnect $ 125.00 Replacement Turn on/off $ 50.00 Meter Installation $ 50.00 Private Hydrant $ 50.00 Hydrant Meter Fee $ 50.00 Resolution No. Page 6 Storm Sewer 720 All land uses New Service $ 125.00 Repair $ 125.00 Disconnect $ 125.00 Replacement $ 125.00 (12) Street Light Banners 855.05 First time applicant to hang street light banners within a district of for an event. $ 50.00 Per street light banner installation (no existing hardware) $ 20.00 Per street light banner installation if supporting hardware exists on the light pole. $ 10.00 Per street light banner removal $ 10.00 Permit Renewal: Annually for both decorative and event banners, unless banner design has changed, then full application fee is charged. If annual renewal is not completed, the permittee risks removal of all banners at the permittee's expense. $ 10.00 Section 4. - Fire Services Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Fire Prevention Code 400.21— 400.29 For initial fee required under code Per Year $ 80.00 For each additional fee required under code $ 20.00 Resolution No. Page 7 Penalty If not renewed within 2 months of notification Per Year $ 75.00 (2) Daycare/Adult Foster Care Facility Inspection $ 80.00 (3) Reimbursement Fee for Fire/Rescue Unit Per Hour $ 375.00 (4) Sale of Consumer Fireworks 1131 (a) License per location selling only consumer fireworks Per Year $ 350.00 (b) License per location of each other retail seller Per Year $ 100.00 Section 5. - Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Arcade 1105 1 Year $ 611.00 (2) Amusement Device 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball) 1 Year $ 15.00 (b) Mechanical Music Box 1 Year $ 15.00 (c) Video Games 1 Year $ 15.00 (3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs State Fee Resolution No. Page 8 Investigation Fee $ 250.00 (4) Itinerant Place of Amusement 1100.05— 1100.11 1 Day $ 329.00 (5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held: 1 month: $ 4.00 $ 52.00 No fee for locations holding tavern licenses. (6) General Amusement 1100.03 (a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 Year $ 15.00 1. Coin operated 1 Year $ 15.00 (b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 Year $ 49.00 (c) Circus 1 Year $ 202.00 (d) Dance Hall 1 Day $ 202.00 (e) Golf 1. Miniature 1 Year $ 47.00 2. Driving Tee 1 Year $ 47.00 (f) Mountback 1 Day $ 193.00 (g) Rides, mechanical/animal of any kind (ea) 1 Year $ 15.00 (h) Shows, any kind 1 Day $ 193.00 (i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 Year $ 16.00 (j) Other games 1 Day $ 15.00 Resolution No. Page 9 (7) Musical Concert 1110.01 Per event $ 52.00 (8) Theatre Cinema 1120 1 Year $ 256.00 Plus a notice publication fee $ 7.00 (9) Roller Rink 1115 1 Year or portion thereof $ 256.00 (10) Commercial Adult- Oriented Enterprises 605 1 Year $ 3,051.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $ 3,051.00 (11) Masseur/Masseuse 605 Certificate fee 1 Year $ 100.00 Investigation fee 1 Year $ 249.00 (12) Public Baths 610 1 Year $ 3,534.00 Investigation fee (actual cost minimum) $ 3,534.00 (13) Fortune Teller and related trade 1130.05— 1130.07 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month 1 Year $ 205.00 $ 609.00 $ 1,216.00 $ 2,035.00 (14) Adult Establishments 1196 Annual license 1 Year $ 3,051.00 Investigation fee (new license) $ 3,051.00 Section 6. - Animal Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Animals 905.01— 905.29 (a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered) with option to purchase a multi-year license 1 Year $ 15.00 Resolution No. Page 10 (b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered) 1 Year $ 25.00 (c) Duplicate Animal License $ 7.00 (d) Late Penalty $ 10.00 905.31— 905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel 1 Year $ 217.00 (f) Residential Kennel 1 Year $ 100.00 (g) Veterinary $ 217.00 905.37— 905.39 (h) Pigeons 1 Year $ 43.00 905.41 (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary Permit) $ 30.00 905.01— 905.29 (j) Impounding (each animal) 1st time $ 64.00 2nd Time $ 127.00 3rd time (each impound after) $ 191.00 (k) Dangerous dog registration fee State Statute 347.51) $ 500.00 906.13 (I) Beekeeping Registration fee $ 30.00 Section 7. - Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Aircraft 1340 1 Day $ 58.00 (2) Garbage and Refuse Collection 601.01— 601.33 Commercial and Residential Resolution No. Page 11 First vehicle 1 Year $ 305.00 Each additional vehicle 1 Year $ 65.00 (3) Motor Vehicle Dealer 1155 Per place of business 1 Year $ 456.00 Each additional place of business 1 Year $ 173.00 (4) Motor Bicycle Business 1160 Per place of business 1 Year $ 265.00 Per place of business to sell, rent or lease 1 Year $ 121.00 (5) Sound Truck 1165 Per vehicle 1 Year $ 265.00 Per vehicle 1 Day $ 40.00 (6) Taxicab 1170 First vehicle or auto livery 1 Year $ 660.00 Each additional vehicle or auto livery operated at any time within license period 1 Year $ 81.00 (7) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 Year $ 62.00 (8) Rental or Utility Trailers and Trucks 1185 Each place of business 1 Year $ 121.00 Section 8. - Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Firearms Dealer 920.01— 920.05 1 Year $ 2,035.00 Resolution No. Page 12 (2) Food Establishments 617 (A) Type I Establishment, a large 1 year high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day (1) Food service establishment $ 914.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $ 671.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $ 671.00 (B) Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day (1) Food service establishment $ 784.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $ 522.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $ 522.00 (C) Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment (1) Food service establishment $ 671.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $ 333.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $ 333.00 (D) Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended or mixed drinks, packaged foods customers Resolution No. Page 13 heat onsite, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere (1) Food service establishment $ 437.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $ 203.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $ 203.00 (E) Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging (1) Food service establishment $ 269.00 (2) School, kindergarten through grade 12 $ 168.00 (3) Daycare Center or Preschool $ 168.00 (F) Supplemental Facility (1) High Supplemental Facility (like Type I and II) $ 168.00 (2) Medium Supplemental Facility (like Type III and IV) $ 134.00 (3) Catering Supplemental Facility (for Food Catering Vehicle(s) and equipment) $ 203.00 (4) Low Supplemental Facility (like Type V) $ 100.00 (G) Temporary Food Establishment (1) Complex Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type I and II) $ 168.00 (2) Complex Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type I and II) $ 303.00 (3) Simple Temporary 1 to 3 days (like Type III, IV and V) $ 70.00 Resolution No. Page 14 (4) Simple Temporary 4 to 21 days (like Type III, IV and V) $ 162.00 (5) Temporary Food Multi-Vendor $ 849.00 (H) Farmer's Market Stand (stands not exempted from licensing in Minnesota Statue Chapter 28A) $ 203.00 (3) Automobile Washing Establishment 1125 Per calendar Year or fraction thereof $ 203.00 (4) Scavenger 601.17 Each vehicle 1 Year $ 60.00 Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contents of each cesspool into City sewer $ 31.00 (5) Incinerator 601.29— 601.31 1 Year $ 60.00 (6) Tobacco 1146.01(MS 461.12) Retail Sale and Distribution - License issued on calendar Year (cigarette vending machines prohibited) (Bill No. 1998-19) $ 510.00 (7) Transient Merchant 1181.01— 1181.09 1 Day $ 130.00 (8) Wagon Peddler 1181 1 Year $ 306.00 (9) State hawker or Peddler license 1181 6 month/per person covered $ 76.00 (10) Canvasser or Solicitor 1181 6 month/per person covered $ 76.00 (11) Christmas Tree Sale 1130.03 1 Year $ 166.00 (12) Lodging Establishments 618 (A) Hotel/Motel $ 282.00 Resolution No. Page 15 (1) Each Guestroom $ 22.00 (13) Outdoor Merchandising 1135 Permit $ 129.00 (14) Storage Enclosure 1135 Per Enclosure $ 111.00 (15) Pawnbroker 1187 (a) Pawnbroker 1 Year $ 5,303.00 (b) Owner investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $ 3,049.00 (c) Manager investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $ 1,103.00 (d) Employee investigation fee 1 Year (nonrefundable) $ 106.00 (e) Transaction fee - per transaction $ 2.00 (16) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1186 (a) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 Year $ 582.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs in excess of above with total not exceeding $ 2,438.00 Applicant shall deposit $1,200.00 with Licensing Clerk along with application. Amount in excess of actual application costs shall be refunded. (17) Auto Detailing Establishment 1195.01 1 Year $ 453.00 (18) Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Painting or Body Branding 630 (a) Tattoo, body piercing, body painting or body branding 1 Year $ 1,016.00 (b) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) $ 3,049.00 Resolution No. Page 16 1 Year (19) Temporary Tattoo, Body Piercing, Body Branding and Body painting events 630 Per booth $ 60.00 (20) Massage Therapy Enterprise License (Business license) 1188 Annual license 1 Year $ 986.00 Investigation fee (new license) $ 986.00 Massage Therapist (Individual License) Annual license 1 Year $ 97.00 Investigation fee (new license) $ 100.00 Temporary Massage Therapist License Per temporary location $ 204.00 (21) Public Swimming Pools 619 (A) Indoor (1) First pool $ 269.00 (2) Each additional pool $ 134.00 (B) Outdoor (1) First pool $ 269.00 (2) Each additional pool $ 134.00 (C) School, K through grade 12, pools (1) First pool $ 175.00 Resolution No. Page 17 (2) Each additional pool $ 100.00 (22) Motion pictures and commercial photography permit 1197 Per event Photography Motion picture (based on application) $ 50.00 $ 200.00 PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR FOOD, THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AND LODGING PERCENTAGE OF FACILITY INVOLVED WILL BE DETERMINED BY STAFF Descriptions: Type I Establishment, a large high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day. Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day. Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat treatment. Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot dogs, blended mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat onsite, continental breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods made elsewhere. Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging. Environmental plan review—includes the physical remodeling, updating, equipment replacement, equipment additions and the general overall review of all plans/work. This also includes all new development projects. New Construction and/or Major Remodel (over 50% of facility involved) Extensive Remodel (25—50% of facility) Minor Remodel 0—24% of facility) Non-remodel approval consultation $5,000 or less in costs) Type I $3,242.00 $1,690.00 $913.00 $155.00 Type II $2,233.00 $1,224.00 $680.00 $155.00 Resolution No. Page 18 Type III $1,224.00 $681.00 $406.00 $155.00 Type IV $599.00 $234.00 $117.00 No fee Type V New project or change of owner - $ 142.00 Minor remodel - permit but no plan check fee Therapeutic Massage $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $155.00 $155.00 Section 9. - Liquor and Related License and Permit Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) 3.2 Malt Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $ 912.00 (b) Tavern (dance) 1 Year $ 745.00 (c) Wholesale 1 Year $ 44.00 (d) Growler (Micro Brewery Off-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $ 175.00 (e) Off-Sale 1 Year $ 264.00 (f) Club (Bottle Club) 1 Year $ 603.00 (g) Temporary per event $ 67.00 (2) Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $ 15,036.00 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1 Year $ 200.00 (c) Wine 1 Year $ 1,325.00 (d) Taproom (Micro Brew On-Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year $ 700.00 Resolution No. Page 19 (e) Cocktail Room (Micro Distillery On Sale) 1 Year $ 800.00 (f) Micro Distillery Off Sale 1 Year $ 600.00 (g) Veterans' Organization (Ex-Sunday) 1 Year $ 863.00 (h) Temporary per event $ 137.00 (3) Employee License On-Sale Liquor Establishments 1208.01 Effective 10/1/95 all licenses issued shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of initial application $ 37.00 (4) Investigation Fee 1202.01— 1202.21 (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization $ 824.00 Each person shown on application $ 247.00 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application (excluding Veteran’s Organizations) $ 247.00 1202.11 (b) Wine, Taproom, Brewpub, Distillery, and $ 824.00 Each person shown on application $ 247.00 Each additional investigation for each person not listed on original or renewal application $ 247.00 1202.11 Investigation of substitute manager $ 103.00 Resolution No. Page 20 Section 10. - Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) License for Apartment Houses and Rental Homes 405 (a) Apartment House 1 Year $ 150.00 Each unit $ 15.00 (b) Rental Home - single family dwelling 1 Year $ 150.00 (c) Duplexes/double bungalows/townhouses First unit 1 Year $ 150.00 Each additional rental unit 1 Year $ 85.00 (d) Late Fee—To be charged each month the license is late 10% of the annual license fee, with a minimum monthly fee of $50.00 and a maximum monthly fee of $500.00, charged each month the fee is late (e) License Transfer Fee $ 50.00 (f) Reinstatement of suspended license 100% of license fee (minimum $80.00) (g) Reinstatement of Revoked license 200% of license fee (h) Re-Inspection Fee 1. multi-family $80.00 for each building with 4 to 11 units $100.00 for each building with 12 or Resolution No. Page 21 more units 2. single family & duplex $50.00 ea. (Inspection over standard 2 inspections) Reinspection fees shall be payable at the time of license renewal and no renewal license shall be issued unless all inspection fees are paid (i) Provisional license for apartment house Includes first unit $ 300.00 Each additional unit $ 30.00 Provisional license for Rental Home—single family dwelling 1 Year $ 300.00 Provisional license for duplex First unit $ 300.00 Each additional unit $ 170.00 (j) Investigation fee for operating a rental property without a license $ 500.00 (2) Certificate of Housing maintenance Compliance 405.26 Single family home (includes one reinspection) $ 150.00 2-family home (includes one reinspection) $ 230.00 Condominium (includes one reinspection) $ 100.00 Reinspection Fee $ 50.00 Resolution No. Page 22 Fee to process cash escrow agreement $ 50.00 Fee to process Agreement to Comply $ 50.00 (3) Permit Fee for Rooming House 405.15-16 1 Year $ 170.00 Section 11. - Miscellaneous Fees. Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee (1) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six Months $ 17.00 (2) Permit to Carry a Gun Permit Issued By County (3) False Alarms (billable) (a) in excess of 2 for calendar Year $ 100.00 (b) in excess of 10 for calendar Year $ 200.00 (c) in excess of 20 for calendar Year $ 300.00 (4) Nuisance Conduct Fee 925 Third call to a property for nuisance conduct within a 365-day period $ 350.00 (5) Copying Services Provided Flat rate (per page) $ .25 Special rate (a) Black & White Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $ .25 8.5 x 14 (per side) $ .25 MN Statute 13.03C Resolution No. Page 23 11 x 17 (each) $ .50 24 x 36 (each) $ 2.50 X-large $ 2.50 Color Photocopy rate 8.5 x 11 (per side) $ 1.00 8.5 x 14 (per side) $ 2.00 11 x 17 (each) $ 4.00 24 x 36 (each) $ 18.00 X-large $ 3.00/ sq. ft. (b) Labor hourly wage & 33% (c) Postage prevailing rate (d) Fax per page $ .50 (e) CD of meeting (per CD) $ 5.00 (f) DVD of meeting (per DVD) $ 15.00 (g) Electronic copies (CD or disk) $ 5.00 (h) As builts (per image) $ .50 (6) Notary Fee Fee Set By State (7) Candidate Filing Fee City Charter 4.04 $ 25.00 Resolution No. Page 24 (8) Photo Fee Includes 2 photos $ 16.00 including tax (9) Assessing Fees Special Special Assessment Searches - One free property identification number (PID) search per Day - if more than one search per Day (per search) $ 3.00 Special Assessment Search Report - per PID $ 15.00 Creation of New or Special Report - Fees to be based on time and materials to create report - Minimum Fee $ 25.00 Review of Comparable Property Records Residential Field Card Report $ .25 - for up to five comparable properties (per copy) Commercial/Industrial/Apartment Field (10) Domestic Partnership 120 Registration $ 30.00 (11) Certified copy of various documents To certify documents i.e. resolutions, ordinances, minutes, registration forms, etc. on file (per copy) $ 5.00 (12) Vacant Building Registration Fee 925 Single Family Home or Duplex - Vacant less than one Year $ 300.00 Resolution No. Page 25 Single Family Home or Duplex - Vacant one Year or longer $ 350.00 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $ 550.00 Any other type of property of less than 20,000 square feet in building size AND less than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one Year or longer $ 1,050.00 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant less than one Year $ 1,300.00 Any other type of property larger than 20,000 square feet in building size OR more than 1 acres of lot size - Vacant one year or longer $ 2,550.00 Section 12. - Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees. Location Description Fee Classification Fee Richfield Municipal Center Bartholomew Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $ 75.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $ 100.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Non-Resident and other groups $500.00/4-hour block Richfield Municipal Center Heredia Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $ 65.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $ 80.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resolution No. Page 26 Non-Resident and other groups $400.00/4-hour block Richfield Municipal Center Fred Babcock Room Civic and non-profit groups and governmental agencies $ 65.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Resident groups $ 80.00/Hr (2-hour minimum) Richfield Augsburg Room Non-Profit $ 38.00/Hr Community Center Fireside Room Nicollet Room Ruth Johnson Room Resident Private Non-Resident: Private $ 48.00/Hr $ 55.00/Hr Combined Nicollet/Augsburg or Richfield Room Non-Profit Resident: Private Non-Resident: Private $ 67.00/Hr $ 82.00/Hr $ 93.00/Hr Kitchen All Renters $ 36.00/booking Free with combined Nicollet/Augsburg room rental Wood Lake Nature Center Auditorium Non-Profit Resident: Private Non-Resident: Private $ 38.00/Hr $ 48.00/Hr $ 56.00/Hr Park Buildings (depending on availability) Augsburg, Christian, Donaldson (East), Jefferson, Madison, Taft, Washington Park Buildings All Renters $ 27.90/Hr (2hr min) Wood Lake Nature Center - Emily Day Pavilion $ 74.40/4-hour block Resolution No. Page 27 Park Shelters Fairwood, Monroe, Augsburg Park Shelters $ 37.20/4-hour block Sheridan Park Shelter $ 74.40/4-hour block Veterans Park Shelter Monday – Thursday Day: 4-Hour Block 1 Section: $120.90 2 Sections: $190.65 3 Sections: $260.40 1 Section: $93.00 Evening: 3-Hour Block 2 Sections: $148.80 3 Sections: $195.30 Veterans Park Shelter Weekend Day: 4-Hour Block Evening: 3-Hour Block 1 Section: $125.55 2 Sections: $195.30 3 Sections: $260.40 1 Section: $97.65 2 Sections: $153.45 3 Sections: $199.95 Athletic Fields Premium Baseball Fields Donaldson, Roosevelt Resident Non-Resident $ 44.00/hr $ 260.00/day (first 8 hrs) $ 56.00/hr $ 320.00/day (first 8 hrs) Premium Softball Fields Lincoln, Taft Resident Non-Resident $ 25.00/hr $ 120.00/day (first 8 hrs) $ 35.00/hr $ 175.00/day (first 8 hrs) Resolution No. Page 28 General Baseball/Softball Fields All other Resident Non-Resident $ 18.50/hr $ 91.00/day (first 8 hrs) $ 35.00/hr $ 175.00/day (first 8 hrs) Soccer/Football Fields Christian, Donaldson, Taft, Washington Resident Non-Resident $ 52.00/hr $ 77.00/hr Broomball/Hoc key Rink All broomball/ hockey rinks Resident Non-Resident $ 18.00/hr $ 26.00/hr Tennis Courts All parks Resident $ 5.00/court/hr Non-Resident $ 6.00/court/hr Open Space All parks Resident Non-Resident $ 18.00/hr $ 26.00/hr Athletic Facility Light Use Softball, Baseball, Soccer, Football, Hockey, Tennis All renters $ 28.00/hr Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this _____ day of _____, 2020. _______________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk