The URL can be used to link to this page

07-14-2020 Complete AgendaR EG U LAR C IT Y C O U N C IL ME E TIN G V IR T U AL ME E TIN G H EL D V IA W E B E X JU LY 14, 2020 7:00 P M IN TR O D U C TO RY P R O C E E D IN G S C all to order P ledge of A llegiance Open forum E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who w ish to address the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting. A pproval of the Minutes of the (1) C ity C ouncil and HRA Work S ession of June 15, 2020; (2) C ity C ouncil Work S ession of June 23, 2020; and (3) C ity C ouncil Meeti ng of J une 23, 2020. AG E N D A AP P R O VAL 1.A pproval of the A genda 2.Consent C alendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City C ouncil in one motion. Once the C onsent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for C ouncil discussion and action. All items listed on the C onsent C alendar are recommended for approval. A .C onsi der an ordinance amending regulati ons pertaining to the installation of small wireless facilities and wireless support structures in the right-of-way. S taff Report No. 73 B .C onsi der a resolution granting a conditional use permit to allow a small wi reless facility in the right-of-way near 7108 Lyndale Avenue S outh. S taff Report No. 74 C .A pprove a resolution authorizing a summary publication of a lengthy zoni ng code amendment previously approved on J anuary 28, 2020. S taff Report No. 75 D .C onsi der the adoption of a resolution granti ng a subdivision waiver for a mi nor boundary adjustment at 7020 Oak Grove B oulevard and 7000 Lyndale Avenue. S taff Report No. 76 E .C onsi der the adoption of a resolution supporting L ivable C ommuniti es D emonstration A ct grant appli cations to the Metropolitan C ounci l to support redevelopment of the northeast corner of 65th and Lyndale Avenue and of 101 66th S treet E ast. S taff Report No. 77 F.C onsi der the adoption of a resolution appointing election judges for the P rimary E lection of A ugust 11, 2020, and General E lection of November 3, 2020. S taff Report No. 78 G.C onti nue the public hearing to consi der the platting and vacation of easements at 6228 P enn Avenue S outh and 6200 Queen Avenue S outh (L unds & B yerlys) to J uly 28, 2020. S taff Report No. 79 H.A pprove a third amendment to the S i te L ease A greement at 7401 L ogan Avenue S outh between the C i ty of Richfield and T-Mobile C entral L L C ( successor in interest to A P T Mi nneapolis, Inc.) with regard to the extension of lease renewal terms. S taff Report No. 80 I.C onsi der the adoption of a resolution: designating Lyndale Avenue from 62nd S t to 77th S t an “urban distri ct” pursuant to Minnesota S tatutes, section 169.14; and setting the speed limit of the corridor at 30 miles per hour and directing P ublic Works to erect si gnage accordingly. S taff Report No. 81 3.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar R E S O L U T IO N S 4.C onsider a vari ety of land use approvals for a proposal to construct an 82-uni t apartment building on 64th S treet, east of Lyndale Avenue (future address: 600 64th S treet West). S taff Report No. 82 P U B LIC H EAR IN G S 5.P ublic heari ng and consider a resolution approvi ng a final plat of the RF 64 A ddi ti on. S taff Report No. 83 6.C onduct a publi c hearing and consider approval of resolutions vacating utility easements and approving the preliminary and final plats of the Henley 2 A ddition. S taff Report No. 84 PR O P O S E D O R D IN AN C ES 7.C onsider the approval of the first reading of an ordinance amending S ubsection 210.01 of the C ity C ode related to C ity C ounci l salaries. S taff Report No. 85 C IT Y MAN AG E R ’S R E P O R T 8.C ity Manager's Report C L AIMS AN D PAYR O LL S 9.C laims and P ayroll C O U N C IL D IS C U S S IO N 10.Hats Off to Hometown Hits 11.A djournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. R equests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the C ity Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Concurrent City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority Work Session June 15, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The work session was called to order by HRA Chair Supple at 5:45 p.m. via Webex. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Simon Trautmann, and Ben Present Whalen. Council Members Edwina Garcia. Absent: HRA Members Mary Supple, Chair; Maria Regan Gonzalez; Sue Sandahl; Present: Erin Vrieze Daniels; and Pat Elliott HRA Members Absent: None Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; John Stark, HRA Executive Director/Community Development Director; Julie Urban, Housing Manager; Melissa Poehlman, Assistant Community Development and LaTonia DuBois, Administrative Assistant. Others Present: Lori Boisclair, Boisclair Corporation (RF64/6501 Penn); Charlie Bird, PLH Associates (Emi project); Mike Barnett, MB Realty (RF64/6501 Penn); Paul Lynch, PLH Associates (Emi project) and Adam Seraphine, NHH Properties (RF64/6501 Penn). Item #1 REDEVELOPMENT UPDATES- THE EMI HRA Chair Supple inquired about speakers for the open forum. Administrative Assistant DuBois explained there were no comments for open forum and provided instructions for submitting open forum comments prior to meetings. HRA Executive Director Stark presented development projects that would be addressed at this work session and introduced Assistant Community Director Poehlman to speak about the Emi project. Assistant Community Director Poehlman provided information on the project location, project delays, and conversations about adding some affordability and making modifications to the project, and asked policy makers to provide general feedback, she then invited Paul Lynch (PLH Associates) to explain his proposal. Concurrent Council and HRA Work Session -2- June 15, 2020 Paul Lynch introduced Charlie Bird (PLH Associates) who he brought on to help with the project due to having several years of experience with affordable housing and apartment complexes. Charlie Bird explained his history with the Emi project and how the original plan was not feasible due to increased construction costs and that they have had conversations regarding the potential of Tax Increment Funding and the addition of affordable units. They have come up with a couple different versions of the project that would add some affordable units and reduce commercial space. Commissioner Sandahl requested clarification on project location. Charlie Bird provided project location information, and Assistant Community Director Poehlman provided lot area. Council member Whalen inquired about the different options for affordability. Charlie Bird explained the options of reducing commercial space and adding some affordability or eliminating commercial space all together and offered affordability rates. Assistant Community Director Poehlman provided feedback received from Ehlers. The two preliminary options meet HRA requirements, but would reduce commercial space. HRA Chair Supple inquired about what the concerns were from the public regarding the original proposal. HRA Executive Director Stark explained some of the concerns heard from the neighborhood regarding the original proposal. Council member Whalen stated his support of the affordability factor and inquired about commercial space in the general area, including the HUB shopping mall and asked staff to provide an update on the previous conversations regarding the HUB area. Assistant Community Director Poehlman provided feedback regarding the HUB area and expressed thoughts of the potential value of commercial space at the Emi project. Commissioner Vrieze Daniels stated she is in support of adding additional affordability inquired about the commercial space being reduced or not and still adding six units and about sizes of the units. Charlie Bird explained the size of the units with reduced commercial space versus no reduced commercial space and stated the affordable units would all be one bedroom, but would be larger than one bedroom units in Minneapolis. Commissioner Sandahl inquired about how many levels, if there were elevators and parking. Stated that she is in support of affordable housing but she is more concerned with getting a development that works. Mayor Regan Gonzalez expressed support of the full development being housing and would like to see some two bedrooms included in the affordability aspect. HRA Chair Supple expressed her support of affordable housing and funding form the HRA to include affordability. Council member Trautmann offered support for affordability and expressed thoughts for potential value of small commercial space in the area. Concurrent Council and HRA Work Session -3- June 15, 2020 Commissioner Sandahl expressed support for commercial space in the area and the benefits of having community gathering spaces. REDEVELOPMENT UPDATES – 6501 PENN AVENUE SOUTH HRA Executive Director Stark provided the history of the development site gave a recap of a prior work session and offered staff suggestions for the site. Housing Manager Urban added that there are still a lot of details that need to be worked out, phasing and timing that deeper affordability requires, discussed struggles to get input from the community due to Covid-19 and the inability to have community meetings and requested feedback from policy makers. HRA Executive Director Stark explained that due to higher costs, the Locus development team would not be able to be involved in the project if it was decided that deeper affordability was involved. Commissioner Vrieze Daniels expressed her support for 100% deeper affordability. Commissioner Elliott expressed the importance of community feedback. Commissioner Sandahl expressed support for 20% affordability and concerns regarding 100% affordability. HRA Executive Director Stark explained previous responses from the community to 100% affordability and the struggle to gain support from the community. Council member Whalen offered support for 100% affordability and suggested a range of income restrictions. Council member Trautmann offered support for a mixture of affordability throughout the development and expressed discouragement that the Locus architect team would not be a part of the development. HRA Executive Director Stark informed policy makers that staff would pursue which ever direction policy makers decide upon. Mayor Regan Gonzalez agreed with deeper affordability, the importance of community feedback and discussed language used regarding affordable housing. Commissioner Vrieze Daniels seconded Mayor Regan Gonzalez’s thoughts regarding language used to explain affordable housing. Commissioner Elliott spoke of affordability versus income restricted and thoughts he has heard from community members. Commissioner Elliott suggested getting more community feedback before moving forward. Commissioner Sandahl expressed concerns with building developments that are only for low income. HRA Chair Supple spoke in favor of a mixed income development that would include 30% – 80% income averaging and the benefits of the amount of additional time required to get the development funded. Concurrent Council and HRA Work Session -4- June 15, 2020 Lori Boisclair (Boisclair Corporation) explained challenges and steps required to obtain funding for affordable housing. REDEVELOPMENT UPDATES – RF64 Housing Manager Urban provided an update on the RF64 project. Adam Seraphine (NHH Properties) discussed setbacks due to Covid-19 and the acquisition process, provided construction updates and the next phases in the project. Mike Barnett (MB Realty) provided a re-cap on sales of the townhomes and impacts of Covid-19 on sales. Informed policy makers that 64 townhomes are projected and the possibility of increasing that number Council member Whalen inquired about changes in unit sizes. Adam Seraphine provided estimated unit sizes for apartments and townhomes and explained that they are waiting for final designs from architect. HRA Chair Supple inquired about accessibility and affordability. Adam Seraphine explained the affordability is in the townhomes and informed policy makers that he would get the numbers for accessibility to John and Julie soon. Council member Whalen spoke of the benefits of more accessible and the need for larger units. Lori Boisclair spoke to the number of three bedroom units and the costs for accessible units. HRA Executive Director Stark provided status updates on the Enclave and mentioned an upcoming work session on that item. Provided updates on the Henley II, the Novo, Lunds apartments and instructed anyone with questions to email him directly. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:57 p.m. Date Approved: July 23, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor LaTonia DuBois Katie Rodriguez Administrative Assistant City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota City Council Work Session Virtual meeting held via WebEx June 23, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 5:47 p.m. held via WebEx Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Mary Supple; and Ben Present: Whalen Council Members Simon Trautmann Absent: Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant Others Present: Ann Lenczewski, State Government Relations Item #1 DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL SALARIES City Manager Rodriguez provided a brief background on the discussion and council will be setting the pay rate for city council for 2021 and 2022. Council Member Supple recommended council take no increase in pay due to the pandemic to help conserve costs for the city. Council Member Garcia agreed with Council Member Supple and would support no increase in salary. Council Member Whalen stated he wouldn’t be opposed to an increase. He believes council should be compensated for the time it takes for the position. He also spoke of the efforts it takes on top of a full time job. Council Member Garcia spoke of how the pandemic has affected everyone in so many ways and she would feel uncomfortable taking an increase at this time. She also touched on how people do the job for the community and not for the money. Mayor Regan Gonzalez read the following points submitted by Council Member Trautmann: • This job is not done for the pay • Would not be in support of any big increase • May deter future residents from applying knowing how little the pay is for the position Mayor Regan Gonzalez supported no increase as a symbolic gesture during these times involving the pandemic. CIty Council Work Session Minutes -2- June 23, 2020 Council Member Whalen clarified council will be setting the pay rate for the next two years and asked if the item could be revisited in a year if pandemic is beginning to pass. City Manager Rodriguez confirmed they could revisit the item if desired. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked if staff could bring back two options for council to vote on since Council Member Trautmann is not present. City Manager Rodriguez asked council to weigh in the option of zero percent increase for 2021 and to revisit the item in regards to the 2022 rate. Council Member Supple showed support of a zero percent increase for the next two years with the uncertainty of the affects the pandemic will have on the city long term. Council Member Garcia supported Council Member Supple’s statement. Mayor Regan Gonzalez recommended assessing the situation on a yearly basis until the effects of the pandemic are manageable. City Manager Rodriguez confirmed the goal of the review is to have council set the rate for the next two years, until the next election. She said she would gather some financial indicators to help better support a decision. Item #2 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE FROM ANN LENCZEWSKI City Manager Rodriguez introduced Ann Lenczewski and what she will be reviewing in her update. Ann Lenczewski gave a brief background of her work and how busy the session has been with so many decisions being made regarding COVID-19 along with the unfortunate incident involving George Floyd. She spoke on the bipartisan approach that has been taken to get items through for Richfield. She also touched on: • Wood Lake Nature Center project • 77 Underpass • Worker’s compensation for First Responders • Splitting of federal money and how it may be spent Council Member Supple wondered if money spent through the HRA and EDA for financial assistance could be replaced with federal money. Ann Lenczewski said those guidelines are unclear at this time. The League of MN Cities is attempting to set up rules. Council Member Whalen would like to also use the money for rental and eviction assistance if possible. Ann Lenczewski stated the Governor may extend the eviction moratorium as well so it is necessary to keep that in mind. Council Member Garcia spoke of this being the first time a lobbyist has come to report to council and she would rather communicate directly with legislators. CIty Council Work Session Minutes -3- June 23, 2020 City Manager Rodriguez commented on being able to have legislators also come to report in the future. She then spoke on how the city has been tracking expenses related to COVID-19 in the hopes of being reimbursed in the future. Council Member Whalen questioned if the city is still short on laptops and if the federal money would cover technology needs. City Manager Rodriguez stated they are exploring all avenues on how the money will be eligible for spending but the guidelines are extremely broad right now and the city is waiting for more direction. Mayor Regan Gonzalez commented on the excellent work legislators are doing to support Richfield. She also asked for more information on how police reform and other changes may be adopted. Ann Lenczewski believes many have been misunderstanding what people of color have been saying in which is there can be no compromise on justice. She also briefly spoke on the following: • Potential residency requirements for law enforcement • Arbitration issue • 77 Underpass not included in last bonding bill Council Member Garcia would like to see a non-partisan approach and her dislike of multiple parties. She believes everyone should be able to work together. Ann Lenczewski agreed people need to work together. Council Member Supple thanked everyone for all their hard work. Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Ann Lenczewski for attending and reporting. She expressed her hope to utilize this chance to implement a lot of change. Council Member Garcia thanked Ann Lenczewski for all the daily updates she has been supplying the council and staff. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:33 p.m. Date Approved: July 14, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 7:01 p.m. via WebEx. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Ben Whalen; and Edwina Garcia Present: Council Members Simon Trautmann Absent: Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Jennifer Anderson, Health Administrator; John Stark, Community Development Director; Melissa Poehlman, Assistant Community Development Director; Amy Markle, Recreation Director; Jane Skov, IT Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant Others Present: Dr. Marc Jenkins; and Ron Johnson, Firefighters for Healing PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance OPEN FORUM No speakers. Senior Office Assistant Wynn stated no submissions had been received and reviewed the options to participate. APPROVAL OF MINUTES City Attorney Tietjen reviewed and directed changes to the language in minutes of a from the City Council Special session from June 17, 2020. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Council Meeting Virtual Meeting held via WebEx June 23, 2020 Council Meeting Minutes -2- June 23, 2020 M/Supple, S/Whalen to approve the minutes of the (1) Special City Council and Staff Work Retreat of May 20, 2020; (2) Special City Council and Staff Work Retreat of June 10, 2020; (3) City Council Meeting of June 9, 2020; and (4) Special City Council closed session of June 17, 2020 with amended changes from City Attorney Tietjen. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 4-0 Item #1 PRESENTATION OF DR. MARC JENKINS PROCLAMATION Mayor Regan Gonzalez presented the proclamation. Senior Office Assistant Wynn presented the Key to the City of Richfield. Dr. Marc Jenkins thanked Council for the recognition. He spoke of how proud and thrilled he is to be a Richfield resident. Council Member Garcia commented on how Dr. Jenkins is a ‘modern day hero.’ His work and contributions to COVID-19 are wonderful and expressed her gratitude. Council Member Supple congratulated Dr. Jenkins. She also expressed her gratitude of his work with community youth and in being a fantastic role model. Council Member Whalen echoed the many congratulations. He thanked Dr. Jenkins for all his work, especially with COVID-19 and in the community. Mayor Regan Gonzalez commented on all of Dr. Jenkins’ achievements and is so grateful to have him as a Richfield resident. She spoke of how he has inspired many youth to become scientists and looks forward to what he is able to achieve in the future. Item #2 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA M/Whalen, S/Garcia to approve the agenda Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Council Meeting Minutes -3- June 23, 2020 Supple: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 4-0 Item #3 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar. A. Consider the approval of the City of Richfield's Xcel Energy Partners in Energy Application submission (Staff Report No. 69) RESOLUTION NO. 11743 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION RECEIVED BY THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO ADMINISTER THE FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UPDATED CENSUS B. Continue the public hearing to consider the platting and vacation of easements at 6228 Penn Avenue South and 6200 Queen Avenue South (Lunds & Byerlys) to July 14, 2020 (Staff Report No. 70) C. Consider the approval of first reading of a transitory ordinance vacating a right-of-way easement on property at 6228 Penn Avenue South (Lunds) and schedule a public hearing and second reading for July 14, 2020 (Staff Report No. 71) M/Garcia, S/Supple to approve the consent calendar. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 4-0 Item #4 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR None Council Meeting Minutes -4- June 23, 2020 Item #5 CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT BY FIREFIGHTERS FOR HEALING TO CONDUCT LAWFUL GAMBLING AT SANDY’S TAVERN, 6612 PENN AVENUE SOUTH (STAFF REPORT NO. 72) Council Member Supple presented staff report 72. Health Administrator Anderson stated she is available for questions. Council Member Garcia asked about a new building. Ron Johnson confirmed they are building new units next to Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis. Council Member Garcia asked about the benefits for Sandy’s Tavern by allowing gambling on their premises. Ron Johnson explained they share the proceeds from the gambling. He then gave an explanation of what Firefighters for Healing does for firefighters, their families and relatives. Council Member Garcia asked for clarification on the four different gambling components . Ron Johnson explained they would like to focus on bingo and electronic pull tabs with the option to add a paddlewheel and/or tip board in the future. Council Member Garcia brought up potential concerns with existing policies and a fear of more non-profits coming to the area to request gambling permits. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked Heath Administrator Anderson to clarify the process and who controls the permits. Health Administrator Anderson explained gambling permits are granted to on-sale liquor establishment, which Richfield currently has ten. Gambling does not necessarily fit many establishments’ atmospheres so she is not concerned with multiple places applying. She also said this is the first permit requested in three years. Council Member Garcia expressed concern with setting the wrong precedence. She believes in the organization but worries about bringing more gambling into the area. Health Administrator Anderson asked about the possibility of setting a cap on the number of permits granted. City Attorney Tietjen said she can look into the matter but does not believe the city can set a cap on the permits. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked other council members to supply comments and provided a summary of the items in question. Council Member Whalen agreed with Council Member Garcia in that Firefighters for Healing is a great organization but is not terribly concerned with a flood of requests. He would like to know if putting a limit on the requests would be possible. Council Meeting Minutes -5- June 23, 2020 Council Member Supple has no issue with the current proposal but would like staff to look into a cap on proposals in the future. Mayor Regan Gonzalez expressed support for the current proposal. She then asked staff to complete more research on permits going forward. Ron Johnson thanked council for their great questions and spoke of his connections to Richfield and what a wonderful community it is. M/Supple, S/Whalen to adopt the resolution approving the lawful gambling premises permit application by Firefighters For Healing, to conduct lawful gambling at Sandy's Tavern, 6612 Penn Avenue South. RESOLUTION NO. 11744 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LAWFUL GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR FIREFIGHTERS FOR HEALING TO CONDUCT LAWFUL GAMBLING AT SANDY’S TAVERN AT 6612 PENN AVENUE SOUTH Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Garcia: AYE Whalen: AYE Motion carried 4-0 Item #6 CITY MANAGER’S REPORT City Manager Rodriguez reminded residents there will multiple public hearings along with the open form for the upcoming meeting on July 14, 2020. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina spoke of the single phone line that will be used for all public comments. Senior Office Assistant Wynn explained there will be a phone line available for the open forum and public hearings for live comments and asked residents to be patient during the process. Below are options for participation: • Email prior to meeting kwynn@richfieldmn.gov • Call prior to meeting (612) 861-9711 • Participate during live meeting (612) 861-0651 o Be prepared to state full name, address and your comment City Manager Rodriguez briefly spoke on the following items: • A slight decline in COVID-19 cases in Richfield • Update on mitigation regarding sports competitive play Council Meeting Minutes -6- June 23, 2020 • Policymaker advisory meeting regarding the 35W corridor, Project A Council Member Supple thanked everyone for representing Richfield. Mayor Regan Gonzalez spoke of how it was a united front and was glad thing s were brought to the forefront. Item #7 CLAIMS AND PAYROLL M/Garcia, S/Whalen that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 06/23/2020 A/P Checks 288324 - 288716 $ 2,768,999.49 Payroll: 154594 - 154865 721,011.36 TOTAL $ 3,490,010.85 Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote: Regan Gonzalez: AYE Supple: AYE Whalen: AYE Garcia: AYE Motion carried 4-0 Item #8 HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS Council Member Whalen encouraged residents to review the summary from the June 10, 2020 Council-Staff planning retreat online. He also spoke of how resident commissions are back in action after taking a few meetings off due to COVID-19. He also reminded community members of the ongoing recreation programs happening virtually. Council Member Garcia excused herself from the remainder of the meeting at 7:52 p.m. Council Member Supple thanked Health Administrator Anderson for all the reminders and wonderful communication she has been supplying during the pandemic. She then reminded residents to register for the Urban Wildlife Race. The Wood Lake Nature Center is making the event happen virtually and taking place July 25 through August 1. Mayor Regan Gonzalez encouraged small businesses in need to apply for the state’s small business relief program. Applications are currently open. She also congratulated all Richfield 2020 graduates and how the community has come together to celebrate them in these unprecedented times. She then commented on how change starts with individual commitments. There are many ways to get involved in the community such as the League of Women Voters and Richfield Foundation. Council Meeting Minutes -7- June 23, 2020 Item #9 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:57 p.m. Date Approved: July 14, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.A. STAFF REPORT NO. 73 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/6/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: J oe P owers, A sst. C ity E ngineer C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider an ordinance amending regulations pertaining to the installation of small wireless facilities and wireless support structures in the right-of-way. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: I n 2017, the Minnesota Legislature amended S tate law to expressly allow the installation of "small wireless facilities" and "wireless support structures" in the right-of-way. This right is subjec t to loc al governmental authority to manage right-of-way permitting, but the City's authority to deny permits in the right-of-way is very limited. Cities are permitted to make such facilities or structures a conditional use in right of way located in areas zoned for single-family residential use and given that cities were not permitted to adopt a moratorium in 2017 to study other potential regulations, the City Attorney recommended that the Council do this. Sinc e the adoption of the regulation two years ago, staff has c ontinued to study potential aesthetic and spacing guidelines for all small wireless facilities. At a May 26 work session, staff presented a set of regulations to the City C ounc il. Based on feedback at this work session, the minimum separation between facilities has been increased from 150 feet to 350 feet and language limiting the size of safety signs has been eliminated. These regulations would apply to installations in right-of-way adjacent to all zoning districts. Staff also recommended to the Council on May 26 that the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit (C U P) in the single-family residential districts be removed. T he CUP process invites the public to participate in the consideration of an application that, in this case, the City has little to no authority to deny. Participants have frequently expressed health concerns related to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF EMF); however, the established guidelines for human exposure to RF EMF are set by the Federal Communications Commission and the City has no authority to deny a request that meets those requirements. With the adoption of aesthetic and spacing requirements that will apply to all installations, the CUP process becomes one that invites public comment, but offers no legitimate opportunity for influence. T his type of process can, erode public trust and is frustrating and inefficient for all involved. T he Council was supportive of this recommendation. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on June 22 to consider the proposed amendment to remove the CUP requirement from the Zoning Code. After a lengthy debate related to the usefulness of the C U P in this process, the Commission recommended approval. Access to a reliable telecommunications network is important for the residents of Richfield. T he proposed regulations are intended to reasonably regulate the aesthetic impacts that this improved connectivity and availability will create. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the first reading of an or dinance related to the installation of small wireless facilities and wireless support structures in the right-of-way. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT See Exec utive S ummary B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The purpose of both the City's right-of-way management and zoning regulations is to appropriately protec t the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of Ric hfield. I f, in a partic ular case, a requirement of this ordinance was to shown infeasible, the Statutory language would require the City to waive that partic ular requirement. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: W hile C OV I D-19 appears to be impacting the short-term outlook for applic ations and possibly c onstruction of new fac ilities, AT&T and Verizon have both indic ated that they will expect to apply for additional facilities this year. These regulations will only apply to applications submitted after the adoption and public ation of this ordinance. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney's office has reviewed the proposed ordinance revisions. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on J une 22, 2020. No members of the public spoke or submitted comments. The Planning Commission voted (3-2) to rec ommend approval of the proposed ordinance. Commissioners Quam and Rudolph dissented. A sec ond reading of the proposed ordinanc e is sc heduled for J uly 28, 2020. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Approve a first reading with modifications. Reject the proposed ordinance and maintain status quo. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Ordinance Ordinance BILL NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Subsection 514.05, Subd. 11 of the Richfield City Code related to permitted uses in the Single-Family (R) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 11. Minor public utilities, excludingincluding “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.” in compliance with regulations detailed in Subsection 802.21 of the City Code. Section 2 Subsection 514.07, Subd. 12 of the Richfield City Code related to conditional uses in the Single-Family (R) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 12. Major public utilities, and “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.”. Section 3 Subsection 518.05, Subd. 11 of the Richfield City Code related to permitted uses in the Low-Density Single-Family (R-1) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 11. Minor public utilities, excludingincluding “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.” in compliance with regulations detailed in Subsection 802.21 of the City Code. Section 4 Subsection 518.07, Subd. 4 of the Richfield City Code related to conditional uses in the Low-Density Single-Family (R-1) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 4. Major public utilities, and “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.”. Section 5 Subsection 802.21 of the Richfield City Code related to the issuance of permits to install small wireless facilities in City right-of-way is amended to read as follows: . 802.21. Issuance of Permits; Conditions. Subdivision 1. Permit Issuance. If the Applicant has satisfied the requirements of this Section, the City shall issue a permit within a reasonable period of time of receiving a completed application. Subd. 2. Conditions. The City may impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of the permit and the performance of the applicant thereunder to protect the health, safety and welfare or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use. In addition, a permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state and federal laws, including but not limited to Minnesota Statutes §§ 216D.01—.09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System) and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560. Subd. 3. Screening. The Permittee shall screen all above-ground facilities as required by the Director. Screening methods shall include the use of shrubs, trees and/or landscape rock or installation using camouflaged forms of the facility. Subd. 4. Small Wireless Facility Conditions . In addition to subdivisions 2 and 3, the erection or installation of a wireless support structure, the collocation of a small wireless facility, or other installation of a small wireless facility in the right-of-way, shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) Each small wireless facility antenna (“antenna”) shall be located entirely within a shroud or canister type enclosure. The diameter of the antenna enclosure at its widest point should not be wider than two times the diameter of the top of the wireless support structure. (b) A small wireless facility and enclosure shall only be collocated on the particular wireless support structure, under those attachment specifications, and at the height indicated in the applicable permit application. (c) All colors shall match the background of any wireless support structure that the facilities are located upon. In the case of existing wood poles, finishes of conduit shall be zinc, aluminum, stainless steel, or colored to match those metal finishes. (d) All cables, wires, and connectors related to the small wireless facility must be fully concealed on the wireless support structure and shall match the color of the wireless support structure. (e) No new wireless support structure installed within the right-of- way shall exceed 50 feet in height without the city's written authorization, provided that the city may impose a lower height limit in the applicable permit to protect the public health, safety and welfare or to protect the right-of-way and its current use, and further provided that a registrant may replace an existing wireless support structure exceeding 50 feet in height with a structure of the same height subject to such conditions or requirements as may be imposed in the applicable permit. (f) All antenna enclosures shall either be mounted to the top of the wireless structure pole aligned with the centerline of the wireless support structure, or mounted to the side of the wireless support structure such that the vertical centerline of the antenna enclosure shall be parallel with the wireless support structure No wireless facility may extend more than ten (10) feet above its wireless support structure. (g) Where an applicant proposes to install a new wireless support structure in the right-of-way, the city may impose separation requirements between such structure and any existing wireless support structure or other facilities in and around the right-of-way. Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall be located no closer than 300 feet away, radially, from another small wireless facility and wireless support structure. (h) To the greatest extent possible, new wireless support structures shall not be located directly in front of any existing residential, commercial, or industrial structure and shall be located in line with existing lot lines. (i) Where an applicant proposes collocation on a decorative wireless support structure, sign or other structure not intended to support small wireless facilities, the city may impose reasonable requirements to accommodate the particular design, appearance or intended purpose of such structure. (j) Where an applicant proposes to replace a wireless support structure, the city may impose reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements on the replacement of such structure. (k) Tree “topping” or the improper pruning of trees is prohibited. Any proposed pruning or removal of trees, shrubs, or other landscaping already existing in the right-of-way must be noted in the application and must be approved by the City. (l) Ground mounted equipment cabinets shall be the color of brushed aluminum and additionally screened through the use of shrubs, trees, and/or landscape rock or installation using camouflaged forms of the facility. (m) New small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall not be illuminated, except in accordance with state or federal regulations, or unless illumination is integral to the camouflaging strategy such as design intended to look like a street light pole. (n) The small wireless facility operator/permittee shall remove or paint over unnecessary equipment manufacturer decals. Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures shall not include advertisements and may only display information required by a federal, state, or local agency. (o) In residential areas, the small wireless facility operator/permittee shall use a passive cooling system. In the event that a fan is needed, the small wireless facility operator/permittee shall use a cooling fan with a low noise profile. (p) The applicant shall provide photo simulations from at least two reasonable line-of-site locations near the proposed project site. The photo simulations must be taken from the viewpoints of the greatest pedestrian traffic. Subd. 5. Small Wireless Facility Agreement. A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on a small wireless support structure owned or controlled by the city, or any other city asset in the right-of-way, after the applicant has executed a standard small wireless facility collocation agreement with the city. The standard collocation agreement may require payment of the following: (a) Up to $150.00 per year for rent to collocate on the city structure. (b) $25.00 per year for maintenance associated with the collocation; (c) A monthly fee for electrical service as follows: 1. $73.00 per radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts; 2. $182.00 per radio node over 100 maximum watts; or 3. The actual costs of electricity, if the actual cost exceed the foregoing. The standard collocation agreement shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required small wireless facility permit, provided, however, that the applicant shall not be additionally required to obtain a license or franchise in order to collocate. Issuance of a small wireless facility permit does not supersede, alter or affect any then-existing agreement between the city and applicant. Section 5 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.B. STAFF REPORT NO. 74 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/6/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider a resolution granting a conditional use permit to allow a small wireless facility in the right-of- way near 7108 Lyndale Avenue South. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: S A C W ireless, on behalf of AT&T (Applic ant), is requesting approval of a c onditional use permit (C UP) to allow the installation of a small wireless fac ility in a residential area. The Applicant is proposing to attach small wireless equipment to a City -owned light pole adjac ent to 7108 Lyndale Avenue South. The site was identified by AT&T’s radiofrequency engineers as an area where c ellular coverage is lacking and where light poles, utility poles, or other struc tures that c ould feasibly hold a small wireless facility are present. The proposed small wireless facility is able to fill a "poc ket" of poor c ellular c overage that signals from a traditional tower cannot reach. I n order to approve a C UP, the C ounc il must find that the request is c onsistent with the purpose and goals of the City 's Comprehensive P lan and Zoning Code; c omplies with applicable performance standards; and will not c ause "undue adverse impacts" on governmental facilities, utilities, or servic es; or on the public health, safety, or welfare. Finding that the proposal meets requirements, staff rec ommends approval of the C UP for a small wireless fac ility at 7108 Ly ndale Avenue South. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution granting a conditional use permit to allow a small wireless facility in the right-of-way near 7108 Lyndale Avenue South. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT State law gives "telecommunications right of way users" the right to install fac ilities in the right of way. This right is subject to local governmental authority to manage right of way permitting. I n 2017, the Minnesota Legislature amended the definition of a "telecommunications right of way user" to include persons deploying fac ilities to provide "wireless servic e." W ireless providers may deploy a "small wireless fac ility" or a "wireless support struc ture" in the right-of-way. W hile the C ity's authority to deny permits in the right-of-way is limited, cities may make such facilities or struc tures a c onditional use in right of way located in "a distric t or area zoned for single-family residential use or within a historic district." The City Council held a work session to disc uss this issue on J uly 25, 2017 and directed City staff to move forward with an amendment to make these facilities a conditional use in single-family residential areas. I n August 2019, the City Council approved applic ations for small wireless facilities at 6 other sites throughout the C ity, as well as one additional location in November 2019. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Small wireless facilities are a conditionally permitted use in the Single-Family Residential (R) and Low D ensity Single-Family Residential (R-1) Distric ts. A full discussion of general C UP requirements and required findings c an be found as an attachment to this report. The Federal Communications Commission (FC C ) has established guidelines for human exposure to Radio Frequency Elec tromagnetic Fields. Separate evaluations of each individual site are inc luded as attachments to this report. All sites will comply with established FC C guidelines. The C ity Attorney's Office has advised that in order to rejec t an applic ation based on health impac ts, the C ity would have to show (with evidence) that the Federal Government's ruling on the allowable exposure limits is wrong. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: 60-D AY RUL E: The 60-day c lock started when a complete application was received on May 11, 2020. Because this item will go to the City Counc il on J uly 14, bey ond the 60-day deadline, C ity staff notified the applic ant that the C ity has extended the deadline for issuing a decision (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total). D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. I nstallation and maintenance will be the responsibility of the Applic ant. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on J une 22, 2020. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the site on J une 11, 2020. No members of the public spoke or submitted c orrespondence on this item. The Planning Commission recommended approval (5-0). ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: S A C W ireless representative(s), on behalf of AT&T AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter C U P Requi rements B ackup Materi al S mall cell locati ons map B ackup Materi al P lans B ackup Materi al RF S tudy - 7108 Lyndale Avenue B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 7108 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co-located on a city-owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 7108 Lyndale Avenue South, legally described as: That part of Lyndale Avenue South adjacent to Lot 3 and the North ½ of Lot 4, Block 2, “Woodlake Shores”, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its June 22, 2020 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on June 11, 2020; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on right-of-way adjacent to the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City’s Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, and for compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. _______________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Code Requirements / Required Findings Part 1 – Conditional Use Permit: The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. This requirement is met. The location of the facility is designated as “Low Density Residential”. The Utilities section of the Comprehensive Plan states that the provision of public and private utilities is essential to a thriving, healthy community. This proposal to upgrade privately owned wireless equipment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. This requirement is met. The purpose of the Zoning Code is to protect and promote the public health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. The proposed use is not inconsistent with these intentions. The property is in the Single-Family Residential (R) District. The purpose of the R District is to provide residential locations that are safe, attractive and quiet. The proposed use of attaching a small wireless facility to an existing pole in the right-of-way does not pose threat to this and is conditionally permitted in this district. Given that there is not currently an excessive concentration of small wireless facilities at this location, this requirement is met. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. There are no specific redevelopment plans that apply. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. Section 544 of the code does not apply to small wireless facilities in the Single-Family Residential Districts. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. Small wireless facilities located in the right-of-way require a permit from Public Works and are required to meet certain conditions. The facility will be co-located with existing utilities. The City’s Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. No adverse impacts are anticipated. The supplied frequency study indicates that radiofrequency emissions will be within the acceptable limits for the general public set by the Federal Communications Commission. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. Maintaining and providing up-to-date wireless facilities at multiple locations is necessary to maintain a thriving community. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. #*AUGSBERG AVE S72ND ST WUPTON AVE S71 1/2 ST W JAMES AVE S(CO RD NO 52)XERXES AVE SPENN AVE S74TH ST W NEWTON A VE SMORGAN A VE SLOGAN A VE S73RD ST W 73RD ST W 72ND ST W 70TH ST W 68TH ST W 67TH ST W 66TH ST WXERXES AVE S65TH ST W NEWTON A VE SMORGAN A VE SLOGAN A VE SPENN AVE SOLIVER A VE SRUSSEL AVE SQUEEN AVE SSHERIDAN AVE STHOMAS AVE SUPTON AVE SVINCENT AVE SWASHBURN AVE S71ST ST W 66TH ST W 65TH ST W 67TH ST W O LI V E R A V ES68TH ST W 73RD ST W 73RD ST WWASHBURN AVE S71ST ST WNEWTONAVES LYNDALE AVE SHARRIET AVE SGRAND AVE SGARFIELD AVE S70TH ST WHARRIET AVE SGRAND AVE SGARFIELDAVES66TH ST WLYNDALEAVESEAST PLEASANT AVE S69TH ST W WEST PLEASANT AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SNICOLLET AVE S72ND ST W EAST PLEASANT AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SNICOLLET AVE SSTEVENS AVE S2ND AVE S3RD AVE SCLINTON AVE S4TH AVE S5TH AVE SPORTLAND AVE S72ND ST E 73RD ST E 74TH ST E 75TH ST E 76TH ST E 77TH ST E 70TH ST E 69TH ST E 68TH ST E 71ST ST E 67TH ST E 66TH ST E 65TH ST E 1ST AVE SSTEVENS AVE S3RD AVE SCLINTON AVE S4TH AVE S5TH AVE SPORTLAND AVE SPORTLAND AVE S70TH ST W XERXES AVE S70 1/2 ST W 71ST ST W 69TH ST W AVE SQUEEN65 1/2 ST W LYNDALEAVESL A K E VIE W AV E HUMBOLDT AVE SIRVING AVE SJAMES AVE SKNOX AVE SOAKLANDAVEMO RGANA VEFOREST DR RAE DR EMERSON AVE S69TH ST E KNOX A VE SWoodl ake Dr Lake Shore Dr E M E R S O N L A N E Wood LakeLn M e rid ia n CrossingsLAKE SHORE DRLYNWOOD BLVD69TH ST W WEST PLEASANT AVE SEAST PLEASANT AVE SWEST PLEASANT AVE SBOB PL 67TH ST W 68TH ST W 66TH ST W 65TH ST W 65TH ST W APPLELN (CO RD NO 32)AVE S(CO RD NO 52)INTERSTATE HWY NO 35W(CO RD NO 53) 75TH ST W 1ST AVE S76TH ST W 76TH ST 77TH ST WGRAND AVE SHARRIET AVE SGARFIELD AVE S74TH ST W PILLSBURY LN HUMBOLDT AVE SALDRICH AVE SBRYANT AVE SCOLFAX AVE SDUPONT AVE S74TH ST W 75TH ST W 77TH ST WEMERSON AVE SFREMONT AVE SGIRARD AVE SKNOX AVE SOLIVER A VE S75TH ST W 76TH ST W JAMES73RD ST W 75TH ST W SHERIDAN AVE STHOMAS AVE SUPTON AVE SVINCENT AVE S76TH ST W PENN AVE SRUSSEL AVE SQUEEN AVE SWASHBURN AVE SCIR77TH ST W PLEASANT LN72 1/2 ST W LAKESHOR E DRO A K G R O VEBLVD(CO RD NO 32)INTERSTATE HWY NO 35W7108 LYNDALE AVE S WOOD LAKE NATURE CENTER DONALDSON AUGSBURG ADAMS HILL MONROE ROOSEVELT RICHFIELD LAKESHERIDAN LYNDALE FIELD LINCOLN FIELD JEFFERSON HEREDIA FAIRW OOD FREMONT APPLE BLOSSOM LITTLE BOB'S 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125 Miles ¯ Small Wireless Installation Locations - June 2020 Legend #*Proposed Location (7108 Lyndale) Previously Approved Locations (7) Parks City Limits I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\Small W ireless Locations 6-2020.mxd site development, architecture & engineering, construction 540 W. Madison, 9th Floor, Chicago, IL 60661 T 847.944.1600 F 847.991.5707 www.sacw.com April 30, 2020 City of Richfield Planning & Zoning 6700 Portland Ave. Richfield, MN 55423 PROJECT NARRATIVE 217099 / MRUMW030157 / GALCT_007 / 7108 Lyndale Ave. S. Twenty years ago, cell phones were considered a luxury. Today, businesses and individuals alike rely on these devises to an increasing degree. As we move toward the future, starting with 5G connectivity, this trend will undeniably continue. To realize the potential of a wholly connected world, communities of all sizes must adapt their infrastructure to accommodate increased cellular traffic. At the same time, a neighborhood’s character is important and should not be sacrificed for a wireless network. Small Wireless Facilities (“SWF”) solve this problem. They sit inconspicuously atop light and utility poles that already line the streets, and offer the increased bandwidth that users desire, and will likely demand in just a matter of years. (a) Basic Description of the Proposed Project The proposed project consists of removing the City of Richfield-owned light pole located at approximately 7108 Lyndale Ave. S.; replacing the pole with a newly manufactured pole of the same style at no cost to the City and attaching a SWF to the replacement pole. The SWF will consist of a cylindrical antenna measuring 24 in. x 15 in. mounted to the top portion of the pole, and two small rectangular radios mounted slightly below it. (see enclosed construction drawings for details). (b) Anticipated Completion Date Construction is tentatively forecasted to begin on November 6, 2020. It is forecasted to be complete six weeks thereafter, on December 18, 2020. Although these dates are subject to change, SWFs rarely require longer than six weeks to install. (c) Effect or Impact on Adjacent Properties and Mitigation Efforts The effect and/or impact of the proposed project on adjacent properties will be minimal. The subject light pole’s aesthetics will be altered slightly, and a SWF will sit atop the replacement pole. In exchange for this minor modification, AT&T customers in the area will receive significantly increased cellular reception, data transfer speeds, and network capacity. SIGNED: DATED: Joe Goldshlack SAC Wireless | 540 W. Madison, 9th Floor Chicago, IL 60661 (517) 648-0023 – Direct Joe.goldshlack@sacw.com This document contains confidential or proprietary information of Ramaker & Associates, Inc. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Ramaker and Associates, Inc.Copyright - Ramaker & Associates, Inc. - All Rights ReservedDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:CI:\44900\44985\CAD\44985_MRUMW030157 (14826480)_08.06.2019.dwg Printed by: jopseth on Oct 17, 2019 - 1:26pmSHEETNUMBER PROJECTNUMBER REV. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE:20197900 XERXES AVENUE S., 3RD FLOOR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 SCALE: NONE 0 10/17/19 PERMIT DRAWINGS CRAN 1C/2C/3C MRUMW030157 CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 217099 44985 INITIALS GM 540 W. MADISON ST. 9TH FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60661 www.sacw.com 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 PROJECT INFORMATION: T-1 TITLE SHEETGM JMO AT&T MOBILITY PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT: FA #: PACE #: PTN #: USID #: SCIP/CANDIDATE #: CONFIGURATION: SITE NAME: SITE TYPE: SITE ADDRESS: JURISDICTION: STRUCTURE OWNER: PROJECT CONSULTANTS CRAN 1C/2C/3C 217099 14826480 3511A0K128,3511A0K0ZR,3511A0K0YW MRUMW030157,MRUMW030223,MRUMW030273 STEEL LIGHT POLE CITY OF RICHFIELD 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 DRAWING INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET A-1 GENERAL NOTES A-2 OVERALL SITE PLAN A-3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-4 A-5 PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ELEVATIONS EQUIPMENT DETAILS MOUNTING DETAILS E-1 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM E-2 UTILITY DETAILS E-3 GROUNDING DETAILS RF-1 RF PLUMBING DIAGRAM (REFERENCE ONLY) REF POLE MANUFACTURER DESIGN (BY OTHERS) REF FOUNDATION DESIGN (BY OTHERS) THIS IS NOT AN ALL INCLUSIVE LIST. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT PART OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL NEEDED EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE A FUNCTIONAL SITE. THE PROJECT GENERALLY CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING: - INSTALL NEW LIGHT POLE PER PLAN - INSTALL NEW FIBER SERVICE RUN FROM EXISTING SOURCE TO NEW LIGHT POLE LOCATION (BY FIBER PROVIDER) - INSTALL EQUIPMENT PER PLAN - INSTALL (1) NEW OMNI ANTENNA - INSTALL (1) NEW DUAL BAND B25/66 RRH & (1) NEW B46 RRH - INSTALL (1) NEW AC DISCONNECT & (1) NEW PSU CODE COMPLIANCE SPECIAL NOTES x ALL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH CURRENT AT&T CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION GUIDE. x EXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE CHANGED & VERIFIED IN FIELD. IF SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS OR DETERIORATION ARE ENCOUNTERED AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, A REPAIR PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED & CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. x THESE DRAWINGS ARE FULL SIZE & SCALEABLE ON 11"X17" SHEET SIZE x STATEMENT THAT COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENERGY CODE IS NOT REQUIRED. x SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT INVOLVE MODIFICATIONS TO EXTERIOR ENVELOPE OF BUILDING, HVAC SYSTEMS OR ELECTRICAL LIGHTING. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. LOCATION MAP NORTH CALL MINNESOTA ONE CALL (800) 252-1166 CALL 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG! UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PROJECT: USID ID: PACE #: SCIP/CANDIDATE #: CITY POLE ASSET #: SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: JURISDICTION: APPLICANT: CONSTRUCTION: SAC WIRELESS 540 W. MADISON ST. 9TH FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60661 SAC PROJECT MANAGER: A/E FIRM: RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES 855 COMMUNITY DRIVE SAUK CITY, WI 53583 (608) 643-4100 JOSH OPSETH - PROJECT MANAGER CRAN 1C/2C/3C 217099 MRUMW030157 ---- HENNEPIN CITY OF RICHFIELD 7A LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: 44° 52' 22.22" (44.8728389) 93° 17' 18.79" (-93.2885528) GROUND ELEV. (A.M.S.L.): PROPERTY OWNER: PROPOSED USE: 847' AT&T MOBILITY 7900 XERXES AVENUE S., 3RD FLOOR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 PICO 7A CITY OF RICHFIELD 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 CITY OF RICHFIELD 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE RICHFIELD, MN 55423 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY SITE ACQUISITION: SCOPE OF WORK SHEENA CHRISTIAN sheena.christian@sacw.com AUSTEN BRUNKEN ab923w@att.com MARIA BURMEISTER mb018v@att.com ANDREW MCHUGH andrew.mchugh@sacw.com GN-1 x 2015 MN BUILDING CODE / 2012 IBC x 2015 MN MECHANICAL & FUEL GAS CODE / 2012 IMC x MN ELECTRICAL CODE / 2017 NEC 42202JAMES R. SKOWRONSKI I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: Date: Typed or Printed Name: Registration Number: 10/17/2019 JAMJAMJAMJAMJAMJAMJAMJAMJJAMJJJJAMJJAMJAMJAMJAMJAMJJJAMJAMJJJAMJMMMMMMMMMMMMMMES R. SKOWRONSKI SignSSSSSSSSSSSSigSSaturtutututtututttuttutuue: Typed or Printed Name:Re EXISTING CONCRETE WALKWAY (TYP) EXISTING GRASSY AREA (TYP) APPARENT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREA W 72ND STLYNDALE AVE SR/W R/W R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W R/W R/W R/W EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREA PROPOSED STEEL LIGHT POLE IN NEW CONCRETE FOUNDATION - (1) PROPOSED FIBER HANDHOLE W/ UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TO PROPOSED POLE - (1) PROPOSED ANTENNA - (2) PROPOSED RRHs - (1) PROPOSED AC DISCONNECT - (1) PROPOSED PSU SEE SHEETS A-2 & A-3 This document contains confidential or proprietary information of Ramaker & Associates, Inc. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Ramaker and Associates, Inc.Copyright - Ramaker & Associates, Inc. - All Rights ReservedDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:CI:\44900\44985\CAD\44985_MRUMW030157 (14826480)_08.06.2019.dwg Printed by: jopseth on Oct 17, 2019 - 1:26pmSHEETNUMBER PROJECTNUMBER REV. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE:20197900 XERXES AVENUE S., 3RD FLOOR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 60'0 120'30' 11" x 17"22" x 34"- 1" = 60'- 1" = 30' 0 10/17/19 PERMIT DRAWINGS CRAN 1C/2C/3C MRUMW030157 CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 217099 44985 INITIALS GM 540 W. MADISON ST. 9TH FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60661 www.sacw.com 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 PROJECT INFORMATION: A-1 OVERALL SITE PLANGM JMO SCALE: 1" = 60' OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 NORTH LYNDALE AVE SFOEE11'-11" 1'-6"WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WRPROPOSED FIBER HANDHOLE BACK OF CURB EDGE OF SIDEWALK PROPOSED FIBER CONDUIT POWER SOURCE TBD PROPOSED STEEL LIGHT POLE IN NEW CONCRETE FOUNDATION - (1) PROPOSED FIBER HANDHOLE W/ UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TO PROPOSED POLE - (1) PROPOSED ANTENNA - (2) PROPOSED RRHs - (1) PROPOSED AC DISCONNECT - (1) PROPOSED PSU SEE SHEETS A-2 & A-3 A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLANGM JMOThis document contains confidential or proprietary information of Ramaker & Associates, Inc. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Ramaker and Associates, Inc.Copyright - Ramaker & Associates, Inc. - All Rights ReservedDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:CI:\44900\44985\CAD\44985_MRUMW030157 (14826480)_08.06.2019.dwg Printed by: jopseth on Oct 17, 2019 - 1:26pmSHEETNUMBER PROJECTNUMBER REV. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE:20197900 XERXES AVENUE S., 3RD FLOOR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 0 10'2.5' 5' 11" x 17"22" x 34"- 1" = 5'- 1" = 2.5' 0 10/17/19 PERMIT DRAWINGS CRAN 1C/2C/3C MRUMW030157 CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 217099 44985 INITIALS GM 540 W. MADISON ST. 9TH FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60661 www.sacw.com 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 PROJECT INFORMATION: NORTH SCALE: 1" = 5' ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO(1) PROPOSED ACE ANTENNA SEE ANTENNA DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 SEE MOUNTING DETAIL ON SHEET A-5 (2) PROPOSED NOKIA RADIOS SEE RADIO DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 SEE MOUNTING DETAIL ON SHEET A-5 PROPOSED STEEL LIGHT POLE TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED POWER FEED (BY CONTRACTOR) ROUTED INSIDE LIGHT POLE PROPOSED FIBER FEED (BY CONTRACTOR) ROUTED INSIDE LIGHT POLE PROPOSED STREET LIGHT POWER FEED (BY OTHERS) ROUTED INSIDE LIGHT POLE 2" PVC CONDUIT W/ CONDUCTORS FROM METER TO POLE - REFER TO ONE-LINE DIAGRAM FOR CONDUIT FILL 1/2" PVC CONDUIT FOR GROUND CONDUCTOR (HOMERUN) 2" PVC CONDUIT FOR STREET LIGHT POWER FEED 2" PVC CONDUIT FROM FIBER HANDHOLE TO POLE FIBER HANDHOLE (1) PROPOSED LUMINARE SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A-4 EEEEEFOFOFO(1) PROPOSED CCI PSU SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 (1) PROPOSED RAYCAP AC DISCONNECT SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 CL OF PROPOSED PSU ELEV. 18'-6" CL OF PROPOSED RAYCAP ELEV. 17'-0" CL OF PROPOSED 2" COUPLER ELEV. 16'-0" CL OF PROPOSED 2" COUPLER ELEV. 19'-6" CL OF PROPOSED NOKIA RADIO ELEV. 23'-0" CL OF PROPOSED NOKIA RADIO ELEV. 21'-0" FOUNDATION (REF) ELEV. 0'-0" TOP OF PROPOSED ANTENNA ELEV. 29'-10" CL OF PROPOSED ANTENNA ELEV. 28'-10" TOP OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ELEV. 30'-0"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPROPOSED STEEL LIGHT POLE (1) PROPOSED ACE ANTENNA SEE ANTENNA DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 SEE MOUNTING DETAIL ON SHEET A-5 (2) PROPOSED NOKIA RADIOS SEE RADIO DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 SEE MOUNTING DETAIL ON SHEET A-5 PROPOSED POWER FEED (BY CONTRACTOR) ROUTED INSIDE LIGHT POLE PROPOSED FIBER FEED (BY CONTRACTOR) ROUTED INSIDE LIGHT POLE PROPOSED STREET LIGHT POWER FEED (BY OTHERS) ROUTED INSIDE LIGHT POLE PROPOSED CONDUITS, SEE DETAIL 2 (1) PROPOSED LUMINARE SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A-4 (1) PROPOSED CCI PSU SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 (1) PROPOSED RAYCAP AC DISCONNECT SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 TOP OF PROPOSED ANTENNA ELEV. 29'-10" CL OF PROPOSED ANTENNA ELEV. 28'-10" TOP OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ELEV. 30'-0" CL OF PROPOSED PSU ELEV. 18'-6" CL OF PROPOSED RAYCAP ELEV. 17'-0" CL OF PROPOSED 2" COUPLER ELEV. 16'-0" CL OF PROPOSED 2" COUPLER ELEV. 19'-6" CL OF PROPOSED NOKIA RADIO ELEV. 23'-0" CL OF PROPOSED NOKIA RADIO ELEV. 21'-0" FOUNDATION (REF) ELEV. 0'-0" A-3 PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ELEVATIONSGM JMOThis document contains confidential or proprietary information of Ramaker & Associates, Inc. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Ramaker and Associates, Inc.Copyright - Ramaker & Associates, Inc. - All Rights ReservedDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:CI:\44900\44985\CAD\44985_MRUMW030157 (14826480)_08.06.2019.dwg Printed by: jopseth on Oct 17, 2019 - 1:26pmSHEETNUMBER PROJECTNUMBER REV. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE:20197900 XERXES AVENUE S., 3RD FLOOR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 SCALE: AS NOTED 0 10/17/19 PERMIT DRAWINGS CRAN 1C/2C/3C MRUMW030157 CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 217099 44985 INITIALS GM 540 W. MADISON ST. 9TH FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60661 www.sacw.com 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 PROJECT INFORMATION: SCALE: 1" = 3.75' PROPOSED LIGHT POLE BACK ELEVATION 2SCALE: 1" = 3.75' PROPOSED LIGHT POLE SIDE ELEVATION 1 NOTE: FINAL DESIGN PENDING STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROPOSED ANTENNA TOP OF POLE PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTING FLANGE SUPPLIED WITH POLE PROPOSED LIGHT POLE PROPOSED ACE ACOM-MK-TOP ANTENNA MOUNT PROPOSED COMMSCOPE SCSM1 SIDE ARM ANTENNA MOUNT BAND TO POLE W/ 1/2" STAINLESS STEEL BANDING USING BRACKET BANDING SLOTS (TYP. OF 2) RRH MOUNTING BRACKET (HUBBELL# PSC208-0505) -4" OFFSET FROM POLE -FINISH: HOT DIP GALVANIZED -ACCEPTS ERICSSON RAIL RRHs MOUNT TO BRACKET W/ MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED HARDWARE A-5 MOUNTING DETAILSGM JMOThis document contains confidential or proprietary information of Ramaker & Associates, Inc. Neither this document nor the information herein is to be reproduced, distributed, used or disclosed either in whole or in part except as authorized by Ramaker and Associates, Inc.Copyright - Ramaker & Associates, Inc. - All Rights ReservedDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:CI:\44900\44985\CAD\44985_MRUMW030157 (14826480)_08.06.2019.dwg Printed by: jopseth on Oct 17, 2019 - 1:27pmSHEETNUMBER PROJECTNUMBER REV. DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE: PROJECT TITLE:20197900 XERXES AVENUE S., 3RD FLOOR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 SCALE: NONE 0 10/17/19 PERMIT DRAWINGS CRAN 1C/2C/3C MRUMW030157 CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 217099 44985 INITIALS GM 540 W. MADISON ST. 9TH FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60661 www.sacw.com 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 PROJECT INFORMATION: SCALE: NTS ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL 1 SCALE: NTS EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DETAIL 2 EXAMPLE CRAN RF CAUTION SIGN SCALE: NTS SITE SIGNAGE DETAIL 3 EXAMPLE CRAN RF NOTICE SIGN EXAMPLE CRAN POLE POWER DISCONNECT SIGN EXAMPLE STONEHOUSE RD899 RF NOTICE SIGN LE ROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE C7.61 LIGHTING PLANS DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C705.dwg 3/1/2019 1:30:29 PMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. REVISION DATENO. R 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comBRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 2/19/19 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION ZAP KME BTN T16114541 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 1 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 2 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 1 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 2 LEOTEK LUMINAIRE: AR18-30M-MV-NW-3-BK-530-PCR7-SC-RPA HAPCO POLE: RTA30C7BF-BA CYCLONE LUMINAIRE: CNM56P1-GAL-3-100W-4K-120-GCN15-DIM-CP4052-RAL9005TX CYCLONE POLE: PM43-16-SA-BM11-T40-CP4341-RAL9005TX CYCLONE BRACKET: M230-C1-S40-CP3731-RAL9005TX-7 PIN PC RECEPTACLE-SHORTING CAP AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1100 ● 703.276.1169 fax info@sitesafe.com ● www.sitesafe.com 7108 LYNDALE AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 Latitude: N44-52-22.22 Longitude: W93-17-18.79 Structure Type: Utility Pole Report generated date: October 25, 2019 Report by: Sophie Thein Customer Contact: Meg Lanigan AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA – 14826480 USID – 217099 Site Name – CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 (MRUMW030157) AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 REPORT SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY .......................................................................... 3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE ............................................................................................... 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY ............................................................................................ 7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS ......................................................................................... 8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE ................................................................................................ 11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT ................................................................................. 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE ............................................................................. 11 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION .................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A – STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS .............................................. 13 APPENDIX B – REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................... 14 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS .......................................................................................... 14 OSHA STATEMENT ............................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C – SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES ........................................................ 16 APPENDIX D – RF EMISSIONS ....................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX E – ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................ 18 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................... 18 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS ............................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX F – DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX G – REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 1 General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level at antenna level 4,438.4% General Public Limit in front of AT&T Mobility, LLC’s Alpha Sector Antenna 1 Vertical Safety Distance 3’ Horizontal Safety Distance 13’ Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1% General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC’s Policy? No The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 217099_CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007_MRUMW030157_RFDS 10-18-19 CD’s: 217099_CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007_MRUMW030157_ CDs REV 0 10-18-19 RF Powers Used: Provided by Customer 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Anchor & Parapet Info Parapet Available (Y/N) Parapet Height (inches) Fall Arrest Anchor Available (Y/N) Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre-Site Visit AT&T Signage (Existing Signage) AT&T Signage Locations Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Signage AT&T Signage Locations Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha 2 Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included:  Site Scale Map  RF Exposure Diagram  RF Exposure Diagram – Elevation View BUILDING 1 = 22' AGL BUILDING 2 = 10' AGL GROUND LEVEL 1 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 10/25/2019 9:29:10 AM 0 9.5 19.1 (Feet) Carrier Identification AT&T MOBILITY LLC VERIZON WIRELESS T-MOBILE SPRINT UNKNOWN CARRIER Sign Legend Caution 1 Caution 2 Notice 2 Notice 1 Warning Warning 2 i Info 1 i Info 2 RSP RF Safety Plan Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 7 3 Antenna Inventory The following antenna inventory was obtained by the customer and was utilized to create the site model diagrams: Ant ID Operator Antenna Make & Model Type TX Freq (MHz) Technology Az (Deg) Hor BW (Deg) Ant Len (ft) Power Power Type Power Unit Misc Loss TX Count Total ERP (Watts) Ant Gain (dBd) Z (AGL) MDT EDT 1 AT&T MOBILITY LLC (Proposed) Ace Technology ACOM-2F15D-12P Omni 1900 LTE 0 360 2 160 TPO Watt 0 1 794.5 6.96 27' 0° 0° 1 AT&T MOBILITY LLC (Proposed) Ace Technology ACOM-2F15D-12P Omni 2100 AWS 0 360 2 160 TPO Watt 0 1 832 7.16 27' 0° 0° 1 AT&T MOBILITY LLC (Proposed) Ace Technology ACOM-2F15D-12P Omni 5700 LTE 0 360 2 20 TPO Watt 0 1 34.4 2.36 27' 0° 0° Note: The Z reference indicates the bottom of the antenna height above the main site level unless otherwise indicated. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) is provided by the operator or based on Sitesafe experience. The values used in the modeling may be greater than are currently deployed. For other operators at this site the use of “Generic” as an antenna model or “Unknown” for a wireless operator means the information with regard to operator, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not available nor could it be secured while on site. Other operator’s equipment, antenna models and powers used for modeling are based on obtained information or Sitesafe experience. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below.  GROUND LEVEL = 0’  BUILDING 1 = 24’  BUILDING 2 = 25’ The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. BUILDING 1 = 22' AGL BUILDING 2 = 10' AGL GROUND LEVEL 1 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 Composite View % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 10/25/2019 9:27:24 AM Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged 0 10 20 (Feet) % of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification AT&T MOBILITY LLC VERIZON WIRELESS T-MOBILE SPRINT UNKNOWN CARRIER Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs N Person 6' GROUND LEVEL UTILITY POLE = 30' AGL VERIZON ANTENNA = 28' AGL 1 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 Elevation View % of FCC Public Exposure Limit www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_007 10/25/2019 9:24:25 AM Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level (0) 0 8.6 17.2 (Feet) % of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification AT&T MOBILITY LLC VERIZON WIRELESS T-MOBILE SPRINT UNKNOWN CARRIER Sign Legend Caution 1 Caution 2 Notice 2 Notice 1 Warning Warning 2 i Info 1 i Info 2 RSP RF Safety Plan Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC’s proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non-compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: AT&T Mobility, LLC Proposed Alpha Sector Location 2 (10.25” x 10.25”) Yellow Caution 2 signs required opposite from each other on the pole structure at the bottom of radome. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Sophie Thein. October 25, 2019 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 Appendix A – Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe’s recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 Appendix B – Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 (“OET Bulletin 65”), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or “Controlled environment” and General Public or “Uncontrolled environment”. The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane-wave Equivalent Power Density 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 0 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz)Power Density (mW/cm2)Occupational General Public AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 15 Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (V/m) Magnetic Field Strength (H) (A/m) Power Density (S) (mW/cm2) Averaging Time |E|2, |H|2 or S (minutes) 0.3‐3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0‐30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f 2)* 6 30‐300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300‐1500 ‐‐ ‐‐ f/300 6 1500‐ 100,000 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5 6 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (V/m) Magnetic Field Strength (H) (A/m) Power Density (S) (mW/cm2) Averaging Time |E|2, |H|2 or S (minutes) 0.3‐1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34‐30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f 2)* 30 30‐300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300‐1500 ‐‐ ‐‐ f/1500 30 1500‐ 100,000 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.0 30 f = frequency in MHz *Plane‐wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer – (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 Appendix C – Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker’s understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows:  Locked door or gate  Alarmed door  Locked ladder access  Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst-case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 Appendix D – RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows:  Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone.  Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone.  Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers.  Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels.  Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 Appendix E – Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC’s OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / far field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the far field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of “Generic” as an antenna model, or “Unknown” for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer’s published data regarding the antenna’s physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna’s range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 Appendix F – Definitions 5% Rule – The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance – The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) – A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle – The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) – The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) – The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half-wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) – The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment – Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna – For the purposes of this report, the use of “Generic” as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst-case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna – An antenna that is completely non-directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement – This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) – The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane-wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 Occupational/Controlled Environment – Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 – Technical guideline developed by the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) – Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.gov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields – Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement – A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) – The radio frequency output power of a transmitter’s final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 Appendix G – References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://www.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) http://www.ncrponline.org Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.org American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.org Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) http://www.epa.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation/ International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://www.icnirp.org World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones American Cancer Society (ACS) http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_1_3X_Cellular_Phone_Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurvey/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non-Ionizing Radiation http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7147.pdf AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.C. STAFF REPORT NO. 75 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/6/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Approve a resolution authoriz ing a summary publication of a lengthy zoning code amendment previously approved on January 28, 2020. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On J anuary 28, 2020 the City C ounc il approved the rezoning of the Market P laza/Village Shores property at 66th Street and Ly ndale Avenue South from Planned Multiple Residential (P MR) to Planned Mixed Use (P MU). This change was made in c onjunction with a request, and subsequent approval, of plans for a new Chase Bank in the southeast corner of the development's parking lot. The rezoning was conditioned upon the rec ording of a new Registered Land Survey with Hennepin C ounty and this step has now been c ompleted. I n order to effectuate the rezoning, the City must publish the attac hed ordinance; however, given the extensive text of the previous legal description, publication would cost over $400. Staff is recommending that the Council approve a resolution authorizing a summary publication to reduce this cost. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: Approve the attached resolution authorizing summary publication of an ordinance rez oning land at 6501 W oodlake D rive as Planned Mixed Use. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT None B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Summary publication of adopted ordinanc es is permitted when the verbatim text of the amendment is c umbersome, and the expense of publication of the c omplete text is not justified. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: None D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The c ost to the entire text of the approved ordinance would be over $400. The c ost to publish a summary of the approved ordinance is expec ted to be less than $100. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : None ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Reject the proposal and publish the approved ordinance in its entirety. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution E xhibit E xhibit - Newspaper A d P roof E xhibit RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 66TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AS PLANNED MIXED USE WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above referenced amendment of the Richfield City Code; and WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense of publication of the complete text is not justified. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication: SUMMARY PUBLICATION BILL NO. 2020-2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 66TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AS PLANNED MIXED USE This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. On January 28, 2020, the Richfield City Council adopted an ordinance designated as Bill No. 2020-2, the title of which is stated above. The ordinance changed the zoning of property commonly known at Market Plaza and Village Shores at 6501 Woodlake Drive from Planned Multiple Residential (PMR) to Planned Mixed Use (PMU). Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office during normal business hours or upon request by calling the Department of Community Development at (612) 861-9760. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk -Public Notice Ad Proof- Ad ID: 1019325 Copy LIne: Ordinance NO. 2020-2 PO Number: Start: 02/06/20 Stop: 02/06/2020 Total Cost: $404.60 # of Lines: 303 Total Depth: 33.667 # of Inserts: 1 Ad Class: 145 Phone # (763) 691-6000 Email: publicnotice@ecm-inc.com Rep No: SE700 Date: 01/30/20 Account #: 412507 Customer: CITY OF RICHFIELD / DEPUTY CITY CLERK Address: 6700 PORTLAND AVE S RICHFIELD Telephone: (612) 861-9731 Fax: (612) 861-9749 This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Please proof read carefully if changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at Cambridge (763) 691-6000 or email at publicnotice@ecm-inc.com Ad Proof Enlarged Publications: SC Bloomington Richfield Contract-Gross CITY OF RICHFIELDORDINANCE NO. 2020-2AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 66TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AS PLANNED MIXED USE THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 8 of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 9 to read as follows: (9) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale): Registered Land Survey Nos. 1635 and 1864. Sec. 2. Section 9, Paragraph 3 (Planned Multiple Residential) is amended to read as follows: (3) M-3 (Woodlake Point Con- dominiums): CONDOMINIUM NO. 0533 WOODLAKE POINT (3) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale). Tract 1: All that part of the fol- lowing described premises lying easterly of the center line of Gra- ham Avenue as deeded to Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2052 of Deeds, page 639; that part of Gov- ernment Lot 2 described as begin- ning at the intersection of the center line of 66th Street with the westerly line of Government Lot 2, which is the old Military Reservation line; thence northwesterly 114.6 feet along the said Military Reservation line to Judicial Landmark No. 11 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547; thence north along a line extended to Judicial Landmark No. 9 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547 to the intersection of said line with the southerly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of premises conveyed to the Village of Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2053 of Deeds, page 131; thence northeasterly along the souther- ly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of the premises con- veyed to the Village of Richfield in said deed to the east line of Gov- ernment Lot 2; thence south along the east line of Government Lot 2 to the center line of 66th Street; thence westerly along the center line of 66th Street to the place of beginning; all in Section 28, Town- ship 29, Range 24, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (See Reference #2 of attached Boundary Conflicts). Tract 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along the south line of said Govern- ment Lot 1 a distance of 64.8 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hen- nepin; thence southwesterly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to the west line of said gov- ernment Lot 1; thence south along said west line to the point of be- ginning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 3: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the south line of said Government Lot 2 distant 64.8 feet east from the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along said south line a distance of 88 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence south- westerly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to its intersec- tion with a line drawn north, parallel with the west line of said Govern- ment Lot 1 and its extension north, from the point of beginning; thence south along the last described par- allel line to the point of beginning. That the east boundary line of said tract has been judicially determine and Judicial Landmarks set pur- suant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 4, Parcel 1: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, com- mencing at a point, which point is marked by Judicial Landmark, and is located 256.6 feet east and 33 feet north of the southwest corner of Government Lot 1; thence north parallel with west line of said line of said Lot 90.7 feet to a point marked by Judicial Landmark; thence at right angles East 229.2 feet to the point of intersection with the west- erly line of Lyndale Avenue, which point is marked by Judicial Land- mark; thence southwesterly along said line of Lyndale Avenue 95.5 feet to the point of intersection with the north line of 66th Street, which point is marked by Judicial Land- mark; thence west along said line 195.7 feet to the point of beginning. Tract 4, Parcel 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot; dis- tant of 152.80 feet east of the southwest corner of said Govern- ment Lot 1; thence easterly along the south line of said Government Lot 1 a distance of 103.80 feet; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 229.60 feet; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes a dis- tance of 104.07 feet to the south- erly line of R.L.S. No. 1318; files of Registrar of Titles; County of Hen- nepin; thence westerly along last said southerly line to an intersec- tion with a line drawn northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with the west line of said Govern- ment Lot 1; thence southerly along last said parallel line to the point of beginning. That the east line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Nos. 10017 and 17641 and west line of said tract has been judicially de- termined and Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Cast No. 17641, according to the Govern- ment Survey thereof. Tract 4, Parcel 3: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing on a line parallel to and 256.6 feet east of the west line of said Section 27 at a point therein which is 123.7 feet north along said line from the south line of said Government Lot 1, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark; thence north along said parallel line a distance of 105.9 feet; thence east a distance of 306.5 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the westerly line* of Lyndale Avenue, which point of intersection is determined by re- turning to the point of beginning of said line and continuing north along said parallel line a distance of 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to the west line of Lyndale Ave- nue; thence southerly along said latter line, 115 feet to said point of termination of the north line of the land now being described; thence southwesterly along the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue a distance of 113.4 feet, more or less, to a Ju- dicial Landmark located in said line at a distance of 95.5 feet northeast- erly along said line from a Judicial Landmark placed at the intersec- tion of the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue and the north line of 66th Street; thence west 229.2 feet to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey there- of. (See Reference #6 of attached Boundary Conflicts). *This reference to the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue appears to be in error, and should be the cen- ter line of Lyndale Avenue. Howev- er, the Judicial Landmarks referred to later may be on the westerly line. Tract 4, Parcel 4: Tract D, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti- tles, County of Hennepin. Tract 5: That part of Govern- ment Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24 described as follows: Commencing 229.6 feet north and 256.6 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 1, thence north 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to center line of Lyndale Avenue, thence southerly along the center line of Lyndale Avenue 115 feet, thence west 306.5 feet to begin- ning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 7: Tracts B and C, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti- tles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Tract 8: Tract E, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot 1, distance 256.6 feet east of the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 a dis- tance of 229.60 feet to the point of beginning; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes, a distance of 104.7 feet to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence easterly along said southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Regis- trar of Titles, County of Hennepin, to its intersection with a line drawn northerly from the point of begin- ning and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, thence southerly along said last parallel line to the point of beginning, ac- cording to the Government Survey thereof. The west line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be published and become effective upon the land owner’s submittal of proof of recording a Registered Land Survey with the Hennepin County Surveyor or Examiner of Titles. The City Clerk shall be au- thorized to revise Section 1 above to reflect the newly issued R.L.S. number(s). The City Clerk shall then publish the ordinance in ac- cordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of January, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose City Clerk Published in the Sun Current February 6, 2020 1019325 CITY OF RICHFIELDORDINANCE NO. 2020-2AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 66TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AS PLANNED MIXED USETHE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:Section 1. Section 8 of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 9 to read as follows:(9) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale): Registered Land Survey Nos. 1635 and 1864.Sec. 2. Section 9, Paragraph 3 (Planned Multiple Residential) is amended to read as follows:(3) M-3 (Woodlake Point Con-dominiums): CONDOMINIUM NO. 0533 WOODLAKE POINT(3) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale).Tract 1: All that part of the fol-lowing described premises lying easterly of the center line of Gra-ham Avenue as deeded to Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2052 of Deeds, page 639; that part of Gov-ernment Lot 2 described as begin-ning at the intersection of the center line of 66th Street with the westerly line of Government Lot 2, which is the old Military Reservation line; thence northwesterly 114.6 feet along the said Military Reservation line to Judicial Landmark No. 11 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547; thence north along a line extended to Judicial Landmark No. 9 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547 to the intersection of said line with the southerly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of premises conveyed to the Village of Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2053 of Deeds, page 131; thence northeasterly along the souther-ly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of the premises con-veyed to the Village of Richfield in said deed to the east line of Gov-ernment Lot 2; thence south along the east line of Government Lot 2 to the center line of 66th Street; thence westerly along the center line of 66th Street to the place of beginning; all in Section 28, Town-ship 29, Range 24, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (See Reference #2 of attached Boundary Conflicts).Tract 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along the south line of said Govern-ment Lot 1 a distance of 64.8 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hen- nepin; thence southwesterly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to the west line of said gov- ernment Lot 1; thence south along said west line to the point of be- ginning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 3: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the south line of said Government Lot 2 distant 64.8 feet east from the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along said south line a distance of 88 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence south- westerly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to its intersec- tion with a line drawn north, parallel with the west line of said Govern- ment Lot 1 and its extension north, from the point of beginning; thence south along the last described par- allel line to the point of beginning. That the east boundary line of said tract has been judicially determine and Judicial Landmarks set pur- suant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 4, Parcel 1: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, com- mencing at a point, which point is marked by Judicial Landmark, and is located 256.6 feet east and 33 feet north of the southwest corner of Government Lot 1; thence north parallel with west line of said line of said Lot 90.7 feet to a point marked by Judicial Landmark; thence at right angles East 229.2 feet to the point of intersection with the west- erly line of Lyndale Avenue, which point is marked by Judicial Land- mark; thence southwesterly along said line of Lyndale Avenue 95.5 feet to the point of intersection with the north line of 66th Street, which point is marked by Judicial Land- mark; thence west along said line 195.7 feet to the point of beginning. Tract 4, Parcel 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot; dis- tant of 152.80 feet east of the southwest corner of said Govern- ment Lot 1; thence easterly along the south line of said Government Lot 1 a distance of 103.80 feet; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 229.60 feet; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes a dis- tance of 104.07 feet to the south- erly line of R.L.S. No. 1318; files of Registrar of Titles; County of Hen- nepin; thence westerly along last said southerly line to an intersec- tion with a line drawn northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with the west line of said Govern- ment Lot 1; thence southerly along last said parallel line to the point of beginning. That the east line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Nos. 10017 and 17641 and west line of said tract has been judicially de- termined and Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Cast No. 17641, according to the Govern- ment Survey thereof. Tract 4, Parcel 3: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing on a line parallel to and 256.6 feet east of the west line of said Section 27 at a point therein which is 123.7 feet north along said line from the south line of said Government Lot 1, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark; thence north along said parallel line a distance of 105.9 feet; thence east a distance of 306.5 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the westerly line* of Lyndale Avenue, which point of intersection is determined by re- turning to the point of beginning of said line and continuing north along said parallel line a distance of 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to the west line of Lyndale Ave- nue; thence southerly along said latter line, 115 feet to said point of termination of the north line of the land now being described; thence southwesterly along the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue a distance of 113.4 feet, more or less, to a Ju- dicial Landmark located in said line at a distance of 95.5 feet northeast- erly along said line from a Judicial Landmark placed at the intersec- tion of the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue and the north line of 66th Street; thence west 229.2 feet to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey there- of. (See Reference #6 of attached Boundary Conflicts). *This reference to the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue appears to be in error, and should be the cen- ter line of Lyndale Avenue. Howev- er, the Judicial Landmarks referred to later may be on the westerly line. Tract 4, Parcel 4: Tract D, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti- tles, County of Hennepin. Tract 5: That part of Govern- ment Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24 described as follows: Commencing 229.6 feet north and 256.6 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 1, thence north 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to center line of Lyndale Avenue, thence southerly along the center line of Lyndale Avenue 115 feet, thence west 306.5 feet to begin- ning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 7: Tracts B and C, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti- tles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Tract 8: Tract E, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot 1, distance 256.6 feet east of the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 a dis- tance of 229.60 feet to the point of beginning; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes, a distance of 104.7 feet to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence easterly along said southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Regis- trar of Titles, County of Hennepin, to its intersection with a line drawn northerly from the point of begin- ning and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, thence southerly along said last parallel line to the point of beginning, ac- cording to the Government Survey thereof. The west line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be published and become effective upon the land owner’s submittal of proof of recording a Registered Land Survey with the Hennepin County Surveyor or Examiner of Titles. The City Clerk shall be au- thorized to revise Section 1 above to reflect the newly issued R.L.S. number(s). The City Clerk shall then publish the ordinance in ac- cordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of January, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose City Clerk Published in the Sun Current February 6, 2020 1019325 CITY OF RICHFIELDORDINANCE NO. 2020-2AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 66TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AS PLANNED MIXED USETHE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:Section 1. Section 8 of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 9 to read as follows:(9) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale): Registered Land Survey Nos. 1635 and 1864.Sec. 2. Section 9, Paragraph 3 (Planned Multiple Residential) is amended to read as follows:(3) M-3 (Woodlake Point Con-dominiums): CONDOMINIUM NO. 0533 WOODLAKE POINT(3) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale).Tract 1: All that part of the fol-lowing described premises lying easterly of the center line of Gra-ham Avenue as deeded to Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2052 of Deeds, page 639; that part of Gov-ernment Lot 2 described as begin-ning at the intersection of the center line of 66th Street with the westerly line of Government Lot 2, which is the old Military Reservation line; thence northwesterly 114.6 feet along the said Military Reservation line to Judicial Landmark No. 11 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547; thence north along a line extended to Judicial Landmark No. 9 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547 to the intersection of said line with the southerly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of premises conveyed to the Village of Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2053 of Deeds, page 131; thence northeasterly along the souther-ly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of the premises con-veyed to the Village of Richfield in said deed to the east line of Gov-ernment Lot 2; thence south along the east line of Government Lot 2 to the center line of 66th Street; thence westerly along the center line of 66th Street to the place of beginning; all in Section 28, Town-ship 29, Range 24, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (See Reference #2 of attached Boundary Conflicts).Tract 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along the south line of said Govern-ment Lot 1 a distance of 64.8 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hen-nepin; thence southwesterly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to the west line of said gov-ernment Lot 1; thence south along said west line to the point of be-ginning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.Tract 3: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the south line of said Government Lot 2 distant 64.8 feet east from the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along said south line a distance of 88 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence south-westerly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to its intersec-tion with a line drawn north, parallel with the west line of said Govern-ment Lot 1 and its extension north, from the point of beginning; thence south along the last described par-allel line to the point of beginning. That the east boundary line of said tract has been judicially determine and Judicial Landmarks set pur-suant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.Tract 4, Parcel 1: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, com-mencing at a point, which point is marked by Judicial Landmark, and is located 256.6 feet east and 33 feet north of the southwest corner of Government Lot 1; thence north parallel with west line of said line of said Lot 90.7 feet to a point marked by Judicial Landmark; thence at right angles East 229.2 feet to the point of intersection with the west-erly line of Lyndale Avenue, which point is marked by Judicial Land-mark; thence southwesterly along said line of Lyndale Avenue 95.5 feet to the point of intersection with the north line of 66th Street, which point is marked by Judicial Land-mark; thence west along said line 195.7 feet to the point of beginning.Tract 4, Parcel 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot; dis-tant of 152.80 feet east of the southwest corner of said Govern-ment Lot 1; thence easterly along the south line of said Government Lot 1 a distance of 103.80 feet; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 229.60 feet; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes a dis-tance of 104.07 feet to the south-erly line of R.L.S. No. 1318; files of Registrar of Titles; County of Hen-nepin; thence westerly along last said southerly line to an intersec-tion with a line drawn northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with the west line of said Govern-ment Lot 1; thence southerly along last said parallel line to the point of beginning. That the east line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Nos. 10017 and 17641 and west line of said tract has been judicially de-termined and Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Cast No. 17641, according to the Govern- ment Survey thereof. Tract 4, Parcel 3: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing on a line parallel to and 256.6 feet east of the west line of said Section 27 at a point therein which is 123.7 feet north along said line from the south line of said Government Lot 1, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark; thence north along said parallel line a distance of 105.9 feet; thence east a distance of 306.5 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the westerly line* of Lyndale Avenue, which point of intersection is determined by re- turning to the point of beginning of said line and continuing north along said parallel line a distance of 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to the west line of Lyndale Ave- nue; thence southerly along said latter line, 115 feet to said point of termination of the north line of the land now being described; thence southwesterly along the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue a distance of 113.4 feet, more or less, to a Ju- dicial Landmark located in said line at a distance of 95.5 feet northeast- erly along said line from a Judicial Landmark placed at the intersec- tion of the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue and the north line of 66th Street; thence west 229.2 feet to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey there- of. (See Reference #6 of attached Boundary Conflicts). *This reference to the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue appears to be in error, and should be the cen- ter line of Lyndale Avenue. Howev- er, the Judicial Landmarks referred to later may be on the westerly line. Tract 4, Parcel 4: Tract D, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti- tles, County of Hennepin. Tract 5: That part of Govern- ment Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24 described as follows: Commencing 229.6 feet north and 256.6 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 1, thence north 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to center line of Lyndale Avenue, thence southerly along the center line of Lyndale Avenue 115 feet, thence west 306.5 feet to begin- ning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tract 7: Tracts B and C, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti- tles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Tract 8: Tract E, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot 1, distance 256.6 feet east of the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 a dis- tance of 229.60 feet to the point of beginning; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes, a distance of 104.7 feet to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence easterly along said southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Regis- trar of Titles, County of Hennepin, to its intersection with a line drawn northerly from the point of begin- ning and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, thence southerly along said last parallel line to the point of beginning, ac- cording to the Government Survey thereof. The west line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be published and become effective upon the land owner’s submittal of proof of recording a Registered Land Survey with the Hennepin County Surveyor or Examiner of Titles. The City Clerk shall be au- thorized to revise Section 1 above to reflect the newly issued R.L.S. number(s). The City Clerk shall then publish the ordinance in ac- cordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of January, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose City Clerk Published in the Sun Current February 6, 2020 1019325 CITY OF RICHFIELDORDINANCE NO. 2020-2AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 66TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AS PLANNED MIXED USETHE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:Section 1. Section 8 of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 9 to read as follows:(9) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale): Registered Land Survey Nos. 1635 and 1864.Sec. 2. Section 9, Paragraph 3 (Planned Multiple Residential) is amended to read as follows:(3) M-3 (Woodlake Point Con-dominiums): CONDOMINIUM NO. 0533 WOODLAKE POINT(3) M-3 (NW corner, 66th and Lyndale).Tract 1: All that part of the fol-lowing described premises lying easterly of the center line of Gra-ham Avenue as deeded to Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2052 of Deeds, page 639; that part of Gov-ernment Lot 2 described as begin-ning at the intersection of the center line of 66th Street with the westerly line of Government Lot 2, which is the old Military Reservation line; thence northwesterly 114.6 feet along the said Military Reservation line to Judicial Landmark No. 11 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547; thence north along a line extended to Judicial Landmark No. 9 set pursuant to Torrens Case No. A-2547 to the intersection of said line with the southerly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of premises conveyed to the Village of Richfield in Deed recorded in Book 2053 of Deeds, page 131; thence northeasterly along the souther-ly line of 65th Street, which is the southerly line of the premises con-veyed to the Village of Richfield in said deed to the east line of Gov-ernment Lot 2; thence south along the east line of Government Lot 2 to the center line of 66th Street; thence westerly along the center line of 66th Street to the place of beginning; all in Section 28, Town-ship 29, Range 24, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (See Reference #2 of attached Boundary Conflicts).Tract 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along the south line of said Govern-ment Lot 1 a distance of 64.8 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hen-nepin; thence southwesterly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to the west line of said gov-ernment Lot 1; thence south along said west line to the point of be-ginning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.Tract 3: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the south line of said Government Lot 2 distant 64.8 feet east from the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence east along said south line a distance of 88 feet; thence north, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 and its extension north, to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence south-westerly along the southerly line of said R.L.S. No. 1318 to its intersec-tion with a line drawn north, parallel with the west line of said Govern-ment Lot 1 and its extension north, from the point of beginning; thence south along the last described par-allel line to the point of beginning. That the east boundary line of said tract has been judicially determine and Judicial Landmarks set pur-suant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.Tract 4, Parcel 1: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, com-mencing at a point, which point is marked by Judicial Landmark, and is located 256.6 feet east and 33 feet north of the southwest corner of Government Lot 1; thence north parallel with west line of said line of said Lot 90.7 feet to a point marked by Judicial Landmark; thence at right angles East 229.2 feet to the point of intersection with the west-erly line of Lyndale Avenue, which point is marked by Judicial Land-mark; thence southwesterly along said line of Lyndale Avenue 95.5 feet to the point of intersection with the north line of 66th Street, which point is marked by Judicial Land-mark; thence west along said line 195.7 feet to the point of beginning.Tract 4, Parcel 2: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot; dis-tant of 152.80 feet east of the southwest corner of said Govern-ment Lot 1; thence easterly along the south line of said Government Lot 1 a distance of 103.80 feet; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 229.60 feet; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes a dis-tance of 104.07 feet to the south-erly line of R.L.S. No. 1318; files of Registrar of Titles; County of Hen-nepin; thence westerly along last said southerly line to an intersec-tion with a line drawn northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with the west line of said Govern-ment Lot 1; thence southerly along last said parallel line to the point of beginning. That the east line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Nos. 10017 and 17641 and west line of said tract has been judicially de-termined and Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Cast No. 17641, according to the Govern-ment Survey thereof.Tract 4, Parcel 3: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing on a line parallel to and 256.6 feet east of the west line of said Section 27 at a point therein which is 123.7 feet north along said line from the south line of said Government Lot 1, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark; thence north along said parallel line a distance of 105.9 feet; thence east a distance of 306.5 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the westerly line* of Lyndale Avenue, which point of intersection is determined by re-turning to the point of beginning of said line and continuing north along said parallel line a distance of 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to the west line of Lyndale Ave-nue; thence southerly along said latter line, 115 feet to said point of termination of the north line of the land now being described; thence southwesterly along the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue a distance of 113.4 feet, more or less, to a Ju-dicial Landmark located in said line at a distance of 95.5 feet northeast-erly along said line from a Judicial Landmark placed at the intersec-tion of the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue and the north line of 66th Street; thence west 229.2 feet to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey there-of. (See Reference #6 of attached Boundary Conflicts).*This reference to the westerly line of Lyndale Avenue appears to be in error, and should be the cen-ter line of Lyndale Avenue. Howev-er, the Judicial Landmarks referred to later may be on the westerly line.Tract 4, Parcel 4: Tract D, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti-tles, County of Hennepin.Tract 5: That part of Govern-ment Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24 described as follows: Commencing 229.6 feet north and 256.6 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 1, thence north 103 feet; thence south 82 degrees 56 minutes east 141.7 feet; thence north 82 degrees, 34 minutes east to center line of Lyndale Avenue, thence southerly along the center line of Lyndale Avenue 115 feet, thence west 306.5 feet to begin-ning, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.Tract 7: Tracts B and C, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Ti-tles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota.Tract 8: Tract E, R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota.That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point in the south line of said Government Lot 1, distance 256.6 feet east of the southwest corner of said Government Lot 1; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1 a dis-tance of 229.60 feet to the point of beginning; thence at a right angle westerly 2.20 feet; thence northerly deflecting to the right 89 degrees 38 minutes, a distance of 104.7 feet to the southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence easterly along said southerly line of R.L.S. No. 1318, Files of the Regis- trar of Titles, County of Hennepin, to its intersection with a line drawn northerly from the point of begin- ning and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1, thence southerly along said last parallel line to the point of beginning, ac- cording to the Government Survey thereof. The west line of said tract has been judicially determined and marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17641, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be published and become effective upon the land owner’s submittal of proof of recording a Registered Land Survey with the Hennepin County Surveyor or Examiner of Titles. The City Clerk shall be au- thorized to revise Section 1 above to reflect the newly issued R.L.S. number(s). The City Clerk shall then publish the ordinance in ac- cordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 28th day of January, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose City Clerk Published in the Sun Current February 6, 2020 1019325 AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.D. STAFF REPORT NO. 76 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Nellie J erome, A ssistant P lanner D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/8/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the adoption of a resolution granting a subdivision waiver for a minor boundary adjustment at 7020 Oak Gr ove B oulevard and 7000 Lyndale Avenue. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The property owner at 7020 Oak Grove Boulevard is proposing an adjustment of lot lines on the northern side of the property, between 7020 Oak Grove Blvd. and 7000 Ly ndale Avenue. C urrently the irregular northern property line of 7020 Oak Grove Blvd. includes a rec tangular "notc h" into 7000 Lyndale Avenue. The proposed adjustment will inc orporate two small, triangle-shaped areas from 7000 Lyndale Avenue into 7020 Oak Grove Blvd., smoothing the transition between the properties in that area. B oth property owners have agreed on and consented to the lot line adjustment. Both lots will remain conforming with zoning code requirements and there will be no adverse impac t on the neighborhood. Finding that all conditions are met, staff recommends approval of the request. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing a subdivision waiver for a boundar y adjustment between 7000 Lyndale Avenue South and 7020 Oak G rove Boulevard. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT N/A B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Subsection 500.05, Subdivision 2. - I n cases in which c ompliance with the City ’s platting requirements result in unnecessary hardship and when failure to c omply with said requirements does not interfere with the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Council may adopt a resolution authorizing a waiver from the subdivision requirements. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: 60-D AY RUL E: The 60-day c lock started when a complete application was received on J une 18, 2020. A decision must be given by August 17, 2020, or the C ounc il must notify the applicant that it is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days in total) for issuing a decision. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : None. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The City Council c ould deny the request for a subdivision waver with findings that requirements are not met. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: Tony Rosell, applicant, 7020 Oak Grove Boulevard. Anthony Pavelko, adjac ent neighbor, 7000 Lyndale Avenue South. AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter C urrent P roperty L ine E xhibit E xhibit S urvey - P roposed P roperty L ine E xhibit E xhibit Zoning Map B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SUBDIVISION WAIVER FOR BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN 7000 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH AND 7020 OAK GROVE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a subdivision waiver for an adjustment of the boundary line between properties commonly known as 7000 Lyndale Avenue South and 7020 Oak Grove Boulevard, properties legally described as: 7000 Lyndale Avenue South: Lots 1, 2, 3, and that part of Lot 4 lying Northeasterly of Southwesterly 25 feet thereof Block 8, Wood Lake Shores, Hennepin County, Minnesota, also Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 379 And 7020 Oak Grove Boulevard: Tract B Registered land survey no. 379 also Lot 5 and the Northeasterly Half of Lot 6, Block 8, Wood Lake Shores, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to adjust the boundaries between the aforementioned properties to eliminate an irregular boundary line; and WHEREAS, the adjacent property owner consents to the boundary line adjustment. WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to adjust the boundary lines of the above- described properties into parcels legally described as: 7000 Lyndale Avenue South: Lots 1,2,3, and that part of Lot 4 lying Northeasterly of the Southwesterly 25 feet thereof, Block 8, Wood Lake Shores, Hennepin County, Minnesota, also Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 379, files of the registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota except that part described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract B said Registered Land Survey No. 379; thence southwesterly 18.6 feet into the southwest corner of said Tract B; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Tract A 40.00 feet; thence northwesterly to the point of beginning and southeasterly extension of the northeasterly line of said Tract B. Subject to easements and restrictions of record, if any. 7020 Oak Grove Boulevard: Lot 5 and the Northeasterly Half of Lot 6, Block 8, Wood Lake Shores, Hennepin County, Minnesota, together with all of Tract B and that part of Tract A, registered Land Survey No. 379, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Tract B; thence southwesterly line of said Tract A 40.00 feet; thence northeasterly to the point of beginning and there terminating. Also together with that part of Tract A which lies southwesterly of the southeasterly extension of the northeasterly line of said Tract B. Subject to easements and restrictions of record, if any. WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval for the subdivision waiver; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that compliance with City Code Section 500.05, Subdivision 1 would result in unnecessary hardship and that failure to comply therewith will not interfere with the purposes of the platting regulations of Section 500.01. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A waiver for the subdivision of the Subject Properties legally described above is hereby granted. 2. City staff is authorized and directed to take any action necessary to effectuate this Resolution and to authorize the recording of conveyances complying with the terms of this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. _______________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ ElizaBeth VanHoose, City Clerk Current Property Line (7020 Oak Grove Blvd) AUGSBERG AVE S71ST ST W HARRIET AVE SGRAND AVE SGARFIELD AVE SLYNDALEAVESO A K G R O VEBLVDRichfield Zoning Map LAST UPDATED: 5/20/2020 Zoning Designation Park (Zoning District is R) R Single-Family R-1 Low-Density Single-Family MR-1 Two-Family ± 0 0.07 0.14 0.21 0.280.035 Miles 7000 Lyndale Ave S 7020 Oak Grove Blvd AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.E. STAFF REPORT NO. 77 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/6/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the adoption of a resolution supporting Livable C ommunities Demonstration Act grant applications to the Metropolitan Council to support redevelopment of the nor theast corner of 65th and Lyndale Avenue and of 101 66th Street East. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA ) is working with two developers to redevelop sites with Richfield's downtown area. Both developers are proposing to submit requests for Livable Communities Demonstration Ac count (L C D A) grants to support their projec ts. A resolution of Council support of the application is required in order to apply. Enc lave Companies is working to redevelop the northeast c orner of 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue as a mixed use development comprised of ground-floor retail, walk-up style townhomes, and apartments. P L H and Associates continues to work to redevelop the property at 101 66th S treet East as either a mixed use or strictly multi-family projec t. The Metropolitan Council's LC D A grants offer funding to c ities to assist with the implementation of their community development objections and comprehensive plans in way s that: I ntensify land uses and lead to more compact development or redevelopment; I nterrelate two or more of the following: development or redevelopment, affordable housing, and employment growth; Achieve a mix of housing opportunities; Create inc entives to preserve or rehabilitate affordable housing in fully developed areas; Encourage public infrastruc ture that connects communities, attracts investment, and provides project area residents with expanded opportunities for employ ment; Help to c hange long-term market incentives that adversely impact creation and preservation of living- wage jobs in the fully developed area. L C D A Development grants are intended for applicants that have a development or redevelopment project ready to get underway and begin construction within the 36-month grant period. Grant funded ac tivities may inc lude stormwater management, public realm improvements, renewable energy sy stems, site ac quisition and site preparation. Enclave Companies will move through the land use entitlement process this summer and, if approved, would anticipate an early 2021 construc tion start. P LH and Assoc iates has an approved project, but plans to make some amendments to include affordable units. They intend to move through this process this summer as well. Grant funds will be awarded in November. Applic ations are due on July 31, 2020. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Adopt a re solution supporting the submittal of applications to the Metropolitan Council for a Livable Communities De monstration Account Fund Dev elopme nt grants to support the re de ve lopment of the northe ast corner of 65th Stre e t and Ly ndale Av enue and 101 66th Stre e t East. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT 101 66th S t E The Emi was approved as a mixed use projec t with 31 market-rate apartments and 6,000 square feet of ground floor commercial space in 2018. On J une 15, Paul Lynch of P L H and Associates presented a conc ept to the Council and HRA that would modify the project to reduce the amount of c ommercial square footage and add affordable rental units. He indicated that Tax I nc rement Financing would be required to make this project financially feasible. Based on positive initial feedback, HRA staff will bring a preliminary development agreement with P LH and A ssoc iates to the HRA for consideration on J uly 20, 2020. 65th Street & Lyndale Avenue Representatives of Enc lave Companies first brought a proposal for the redevelopment of these properties to the C ounc il, HRA, and P lanning C ommission on September 24, 2019. The HRA approved a Preliminary D evelopment Agreement with the D eveloper on February 28, 2020. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The Metropolitan C ounc il requires the C ity to be the applicant and to submit a resolution in support of the grant applic ation. I t is the C ity's policy to seek grant funding when available and as appropriate. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The grant applic ation is due on J uly 31, 2020, and a resolution of support needs to be submitted as part of the applic ation. Grant awards will be announced in November 2020. Funds must be expended within 36 months of the grant award. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: No local match is required to rec eive L C D A D evelopment grant funding. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : T he City will be required to enter into a grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council, if funding is awarded. The C ity Attorney will review the grant agreement prior to execution. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Do not approve the resolution. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. _____ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT (“LCDA”) FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the City is a participant in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (“LCA”) Local Housing Incentives Account Program for 2020 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to apply for LCA Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds; and WHEREAS, the City has identified proposed project(s) within the City that meets LCDA purposes and criteria and are consistent with and promote the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council’s adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to adequately manage an LCDA grant; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges LCDA grants are intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes for LCDA development or redevelopment elsewhere in the Region, and therefore represents that the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and WHEREAS, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities LCDA initiative during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of LCDA grant funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: 1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s development goals and priorities for the proposed LCDA Project(s) to occur at these particular sites, and at this particular time: o 101 66th Street East; and o The northeast corner of 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue (6439 Lyndale Avenue South, 6437 Lyndale Avenue South, and 415 – 64 ½ Street. 2. Finds that the LCDA Project component(s) for which Livable Communities LCDA funding is sought: (a) will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and (b) will occur within the term of the grant award (three years for Development grants) only if Livable Communities LCDA funding is made available for this project(s) at this time. 3. Authorizes its staff to submit on behalf of the City one or more applications for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities LCDA grant funds for the LCDA Project components identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the LCDA Project on behalf of the City. Adopted this 14th day of July, 2020. __________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.F. STAFF REPORT NO. 78 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: K ari S i nni ng, D eputy C ity C lerk D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: E lizabeth VanHoose, C ity C lerk 7/8/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the adoption of a resolution appointing election judges for the P rimary Election of August 11, 2020, and Gener al E lection of November 3, 2020. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The State Primary Elec tion is on August 11, 2020 and the General Election is on November 3, 2020. Election J udges The City Clerk’s office is updating and verifying the City ’s election judge availability list. All individuals who have previously served as an elec tion judge were on the list submitted to the County Auditor by the major politic al parties, or have expressed an interest in serving as an election judge were asked to c omplete an online election judge application. Election judges will be assigned to the precincts based on availability, party balanc e, and the number required for eac h election. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Adopt a resolution appointing election judges for the Primar y E lection of August 11, 2020, and G eneral E lection of N ovember 3, 2020. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Minnesota S tatute 204B.21 Subd. 2 provides that elec tion judges for prec inc ts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the munic ipality and that the appointments be made at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges will serve. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The City Council is required by State Statute to make election judge appointments at least 25 day s prior to the election. The proposed resolution c ontains names of those qualified individuals who have indicated a willingness and ability to serve as an election judge for the Primary Elec tion of August 11, 2020, and General Elec tion of November 3, 2020. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: I f the City Council does not appoint election judges, the conduc t of the elec tion would not be valid. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The City Council must appoint election judges to serve at these elections to comply with Minnesota Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2. The names come from a list of people who have indicated their interest in serving as an elec tion judge to the County A uditor pursuant to the provisions of M.S. 204B.21 Subd. 1 and those who have previously served or indic ated interest in serving. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The City Council may c hoose to appoint other individuals as elec tion judges who are not named in the resolution. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type E lection J udge Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE PRIMARY ELECTION OF AUGUST 11, 2020 ANDTHE GENERAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 3, 2020 WHEREAS, a Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, August 11, 2020 and a General Election will be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 204B.21 Subd. 2 provides that election judges for precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality and that the appointments be made at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges will serve. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, that the following are hereby appointed as judges for said elections: James Alagna Lancetta Allen Robert Amundson Donald Anderson Jan Anderson Jean Anderson Joyce Anderson Jorina Andrews John Ashmead Mary Ann Ashmead Carol Athey Andrew Atkins Jim Atkins Stephen Aus Patricia Bailey Mary Barnes Barbara Bauer William Bednar Matthew Bell Rosemary Bernau Rosalie Bjorkman Kimberly Blomberg Suzi Blumberg Andrew Boeke Mary Boespflug Kenneth Boie Sara Boothe Linda Boyd Sandra Bradley Crystal Brakke Asa Brill Beck Nancy Buck Christie Burke Hazel Burnside James Bushey Marjorie Cain Leslie Carey Amy Carlsted Milissa Carter Carrie Chillman Doris Christine David Clark Margaret Cole Kathy Collias Michele Cromer-Poiré Kirsten Croone Barbara Cue Ellen Cutter Scott Dahlquist Julie Danielson Sandra Decker Charles Dilliard Catherine Dinndorf Sheila Domstrand Pema Dorjee Marguerite Dozois Cynthia Dubansky Dee Dee Edlund Liz Ekholm Taryn Ellis Debbie Eng Carolyn Engeldinger Jeanne Exline John Exline Mary Jo Fadell Lisha Fairbairn Denise Famodu Sheila Fitzgerald Ed Fletcher Francie Fletcher Ryan Flueger Sharon Foster Dean Gade Bridget Gaeleigh Claire Gahler Joe Garcia Dennis Gillespie Judith Goebel Jim Grante Rebecca Guarino Roger Guarino Richard Hall Robert Hall Kathy Hardegger James Harding Abdulkadir Hashi Shirley Hassler Mary Hayden Adrienne Hayes Iryche Hickenbotham Ruth Hiland Julie Hilden Linda Hinz Cheryl Hjortaas Dean Hoffman George Holter Janette Holter Margaret Horan Marilyn Jacobson Karen Jenkins Candace Johnson Ruth Johnson Sita Johnson Janell Joyner Andy Kahn Duane Kallis Thomas Keegan Yvette Keegan Christine Kelly William Kelly Claire Killian Elisabeth Kingdon Kathy Kinney Chelsea Knauf Cynthia Kuntz Brenda Kupfer Jamie Lane Katie Lankton Helen Lapakko Amy Larson Bruce Larson Patty Lester Nancy Lindberg Cherill Lindquist Allison Linsmeyer Rick Loney Barbara Louis Carol Lowe Lucy Lund Kathryn MacEachern Natalie Madgy Cynthia Mandl Karen Marso Lawrence Martin Arden Mathison Sharon Mattson Andrew May Michele McGee Joshua Medley Sandra Menning-Glavan Derrick Miller Richard Morey Isabelle Moulinier Thomas Murphy Sarah Musgrave Helen Nachicas Ivar Natins Lisa Nebenzahl Linda Nemitz Susan Nielsen Marilyn Nienkerk Summer Nimz Donna Nordin Cindy Norland Brad Obert Christopher Okey Gloria Olson Joan Olson Mary Olson Robert Olson Ruby Olson Mark Pafiolis Frank Pafko Jeannine Pafko Kate Panke Nayana Persaud Paul Peterson Wayne Peterson Carol Petkoff Monica Petrov Beth Picard Frank Ploog Wanda Poston John Preston Cynthia Purser Holly Rhodes Moses Roberts Julie Roemen Robert Rose Doris Rubenstein Jeffrey Rundgren Gail Sabasko Maureen Scaglia Sandra Schmidt Shannon Schmidt Margaret Schow Sarah Schroeder Anne Schuette Lynn Schuster Regan Sieck Mary Sievers Nicole Smith-Holt K. Lashel Solberg Erin Springer Margaret Stainer Katherine Stehly Charles Strauch Brett Stursa Robert Sunderlin Roger Swanson Erika Telkamp Cheryl Thiele Janet Thompson Suzanne Thorpe Doris Thorson Mark Tilc Patrick Tinjum David Tufford Mary Jo Tuttle John Twisk Kenneth Vevea David Vrieze Daniels Nancy Walstrom Sandra Walstrom Mark Wange Mary Watkins Lois Webb-Bradford Mark Wegener Bob Wells Andrew Weston Elaine Wetsch Katie Williams Jared Wills Lisa Wold Karin Wolverton Marian Woolery Jeff Wright Deborah Zierden PASSED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.G. STAFF REPORT NO. 79 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/6/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Continue the public hearing to consider the platting and vacation of easements at 6228 Penn Avenue South and 6200 Queen Avenue South (Lunds & Byerlys) to July 28, 2020. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: I n conjunction with an applic ation for a multi-family development in the existing parking lot of the Lunds and Byerly s grocery store on at 6228 Penn Avenue S outh, the property owner will be platting the site and requesting the vac ation of abandoned right-of-way therein. Given that the property is loc ated along both County and Mn-D OT right-of-way, both entities must review the plat. This review proc ess has taken longer than anticipated, but staff is hopeful that we will be ready to bring these items before the Council on J uly 28. A preliminary plat is required prior to the issuance of building permits and Lunds anticipates submitting for those permits in next few weeks. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: C ontinue the public hearing to consider a plat for the "Lunds of Richfield" Addition and the vacation of easements to July 28, 2020. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT N/A B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): All plats or subdivisions of land in the City must be approved by council resolution pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota State Statutes 462.357. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Per S tate Statute, the City has 120 days from the date of submittal of a complete application to issue a dec ision regarding plat unless the applic ant agrees to an extension. A complete plat application was received on April 29, 2020. The C ounc il must render a decision by A ugust 27, 2020. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper on J une 11. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.H. STAFF REPORT NO. 80 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regi s, F inance D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: C hris Regi s, F inance D irector O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Approve a thir d amendment to the Site Lease Agreement at 7401 Logan Avenue South between the City of Richfield and T-Mobile Central L L C ( successor in interest to AP T Minneapolis, Inc.) with regard to the extension of lease renewal ter ms. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The City of Richfield entered into a Site Lease A greement with A P T Minneapolis, I nc. on August 1, 1996. The agreement allowed the Tenant to erect cellular telephone antenna system on the City water tower located at the 7401 Logan Avenue South location. T-Mobile Central L L C is a suc cessor in interest to A PT. The original S ite Lease Agreement allowed the Tenant to erec t a c ellular telephone antenna system on the City water tower located at the 7401 Logan Avenue South loc ation. The original lease c ontained four (4) six (6) year renewal periods with the first period commencing on August 1, 1996 and ending on December 31, 2002. A t the present time, the lease is in the final six (6) y ear period with the lease set to expire on December 31, 2020. The tenant now desires to extend the lease renewal terms for four (4) additional five (5) year renewal periods commencing on J anuary 1, 2021. Each additional renewal term will be deemed automatically exerc ised without any ac tion by either party unless tenant gives written notic e of its dec ision not to exerc ise any options to the landlord before expiration of the current term. The annual rent will commence on J anuary 1, 2021 and will be $32,850. The rent will inc rease annually on each J anuary 1 by 4%. The original S ite Lease Agreement allowed the Tenant to erec t a maximum of nine cellular telephone antennas on the Logan Avenue water tower. On Dec ember 31, 1998, a first amendment to the original Site Lease Agreement was amended to allow the tenant to install up to twelve antennas rather than only nine as originally approved. On March 10, 2015, a sec ond amendment was approved to allow T-Mobile to modify its installation on the site by upgrading its antennas and equipment. As part of this amendment, an easement was granted to the tenant to provide for the installation of fiber optic cable as required for the upgrade. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: Approve the third amendment to the Site Lease Agreement at the 7401 Logan Avenue South location between the City of Richfield and T-Mobile Central, L LC (successor in interest to AP T Minneapolis, Inc.) with regard to the extension of Lease Renewal Terms. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): N/A. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The existing S ite Lease Agreement is set to expire on December 31, 2020. The Tenant has expressed a desire to continue the Site Lease Agreement with the C ity. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The annual rent c ommenc ing on J anuary 1, 2021 will be $32,850. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The City Attorney has reviewed the third amendment to the Site Lease Agreement. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None. AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Third A mendment S ite L ease A greement B etween the C ity and T-Mobi le C ontract/A greement Site: A1P0017A Site Name: Richfield WT Market MN THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE FOR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND LIMITED USE OF WATER TOWER THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE FOR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND LIMITED USE OF WATER TOWER (“Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Landlord”), and T-Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tenant”). Recitals The parties hereto recite, declare and agree as follows: A. Landlord and Tenant (or as applicable, their respective predecessors in interest) entered into a Lease For Communications Facility And Limited Use Of Water Tower dated August 1, 1996 (including any prior amendments, the “Lease”), with respect to Premises located at 7401 Logan Ave. S, Richfield, MN 55423. B. Landlord and Tenant desire to enter into this Amendment in order to modify and amend certain provisions of the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant covenant and agree as follows: 1. Tenant will have the right to modify its Antenna Facilities as described and depicted on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, and Landlord hereby consents to and approves of the modifications described and depicted on Exhibit A in all respects. 2. Modification of Term. All references to the Term of Agreement shall be amended to provide that the Agreement has a New Initial Term of Five (5) years (“New Initial Term”), commencing on January 1, 2021 and the Term will be automatically renewed for up to three (3) additional Five (5) year terms (each a “Renewal Term”) without further action by TENANT. 3. The terms and conditions of the Lease are incorporated herein by this reference, and capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meanings such terms are given in the Lease. Except as specifically set forth herein, this Amendment shall in no way modify, alter or amend the remaining terms of the Lease, all of which are ratified by the parties and shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent there is any conflict between the terms and conditions of the Lease and this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment will govern and control. 4. Landlord represents and warrants to Tenant that the consent or approval of no third party, including, without limitation, a lender, is required with respect to the execution of this Amendment, or if any such third party consent or approval is required, Landlord has obtained any and all such consents or approvals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date of execution by the last party to sign. 2 City of Richfield T-Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By:_______________________________ By:__________________________________ Name:____________________________ Name: Hossein Sepehr Title: Mayor____________________________ Title: Sr. Director, Network Eng. and Ops. Date:_____________________________ Date:_________________________________ AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.I. STAFF REPORT NO. 81 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector/C ity E ngineer 7/7/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the adoption of a resolution: designating Lyndale Avenue from 62nd S t to 77th St an “urban district” pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 169.14; and setting the speed limit of the corridor at 30 miles per hour and dir ecting Public W orks to erect signage accordingly. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Lyndale Avenue corridor from 66th S t to 77th St was reconstructed in 2019 and finished in 2020. One of the primary project goals was to address speeding along the corridor as part of the new design. Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 66th St is planned for a lane reconfiguration in 2022. The intent behind both projects is to improve the public infrastructure and inc rease safety by reducing speeds along the c orridor. Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 77th St is approx. 1.85 miles or 9800 feet. There are more than 125 businesses and residential properties along the corridor. The corridor is well within the statutory required minimum 100’ interval spacing with around 80’ interval spacing on average (see Polices below). RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: Adopt the resolution: designating Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 77th St an “urban district” pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 169.14; and setting the speed limit of the corridor at 30 miles per hour and dir ecting Public W orks to erect signage accordingly. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT See executive summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Minnesota S tatutes, section 169.011 defines an urban distric t: 169.011 D E FI N I TI O N S ... Subd. 90. Ur ban district. “Urban district" means the territory contiguous to and including any city street or town road that is built up with structures devoted to business, industry, or dwelling houses situated at intervals of less than 100 feet for a distance of a quarter of a mile or more. Minnesota S tatutes, section 169.14 allows for a 30 MPH speed limit in an urban distric t: 169.14 S P E E D L I M I TS, Z O N E S; R A D A R ... Subd. 2. Speed limits. (a) W here no special hazard exists the following speeds shall be lawful, but any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that the speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful: (1) 30 miles per hour in an urban district; ... Subd. 5b. Segment in urban district. W hen any segment of at least a quarter-mile in distance of any city street, municipal state-aid street, or town road on which a speed limit in excess of 30 miles per hour has been established pursuant to an engineering and traffic investigation by the commissioner meets the definition of "urban district" as defined in section 169.011, subdivision 90, the governing body of the city or town may by resolution declare the segment to be an urban district and may establish on the segment the speed limit for urban districts prescribed in subdivision 2. The speed limit so established shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit is established, and any speed in excess of such posted limits shall be unlawful. A copy of the resolution shall be transmitted to the commissioner at least ten days prior to the erection of the signs. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The Lyndale Avenue speed limit was previously posted at 35 miles per hour. Engineering staff and the project consultant have determined that designating the Ly ndale Avenue c orridor an urban distric t and setting the speed limit at 30 miles per hour will enhanc e public safety and be in the City and c ommunity's best interest. S peed limits are not currently posted on Ly ndale Avenue between 66th St and 76th St, and should be posted in the near future. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Speed limit signage was included in the Lyndale Avenue project budget. A limited c ost in the form of Public W orks staff time will be used to physic ally install the signs. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The City Attorney has reviewed the relevant statutes as they apply to this urban district designation and will be available to answer any questions. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Counc il could c hoose to not approve the resolution and require that staff perform a full engineering speed study to determine the appropriate speed limit based on ty pic al existing speeds along the c orridor. This may result in a determination that the appropriate speed limit should be higher than 30 miles per hour. Staff feels that this would degrade public safety for all users along the c orridor. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Lyndale Urban D istrict Resolution Resolution L etter Lyndale Memo - B olton and Menk B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DESIGNATION OF LYNDALE AVENUE FROM 77TH STREET TO 62ND STREET AS AN URBAN DISTRICT AND THE INSTALLATION OF 30MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGNS ALONG THE CORRIDOR IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD. WHEREAS, the Lyndale Avenue corridor from 66th Street to 77th Street was reconstructed in 2019 and finished in 2020; and WHEREAS, Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 66th St is planned for a lane reconfiguration in 2022; and WHEREAS, the intent behind both projects is to improve the public infrastructure and increase safety by reducing speed along the corridor; and WHEREAS, Lyndale Ave from 77th Street to 62nd Street is approximately 1.85 miles or 9800 feet and there are more than 125 businesses and residential properties along the corridor which is well within the required minimum 100’ interval spacing with around 80’ interval spacing on average; and WHEREAS, the Lyndale Avenue corridor meets the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 169.14, for designation as an urban district and a speed limit of 30mph. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Lyndale Avenue from 77th Street to 62nd Street is designated as an urban district; and 2. The speed limit shall be set at 30mph as allowed for in urban districts and signs shall be installed along the corridor indicating the 30mph limit. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk \\Burnsville4\h\RICH\T16114541\3_Design\C_Reports\2020-06-12 Urban District Memo\2020-06-23 Lyndale Ave Urban District Memo.docx MEMORANDUM Date: 6/23/2020 To: Joe Powers, P.E. John Broz, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Transportation Engineer City of Richfield City of Richfield From: Tim Lamkin, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Bolton & Menk, Inc Subject: Urban District Designation Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project City of Richfield, MN Recommendation It is recommended that Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 77th St be designated an “Urban District” pursuant to Minnesota State Statue 169.14. As such, the speed limit of the corridor should be set at 30 miles per hour (MPH) and signed accordingly. Background Information The Lyndale Avenue corridor from 66th St to 77th St was reconstructed in 2019 and finished in the spring of 2020. Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 66th St is planned for a lane reconfiguration in 2022. The intent behind both projects is to improve the public infrastructure and increase safety by reducing speed along the corridor. MN Statute 169.14 allows for a 30 MPH speed limit is an urban district. 169.14 SPEED LIMITS, ZONES; RADAR Subd. 2. Speed limits. (a) Where no special hazard exists the following speeds shall be lawful, but any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that the speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful: (1) 30 miles per hour in an urban district; Subd. 5b. Segment in urban district. When any segment of at least a quarter-mile in distance of anycity street, municipal state-aid street, or town road on which a speed limit in excess of 30 miles per hour hasbeen established pursuant to an engineering and traffic investigation by the commissioner meets the definition of "urban district" as defined in section 169.011, subdivision 90, the governing body of the city or town may by resolution declare the segment to be an urban district and may establish on the segment the speed limit for urban districts prescribed in Name: Urban District Designation Date: June 23, 2020 Page: 2 subdivision 2. The speed limit so established shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit is established, and any speed in excess of such posted limits shall be unlawful. A copy of the resolution shall be transmitted to the commissioner at least ten days prior to the erection of the signs. 169.011 DEFINITIONS Subd. 90. Urban district. “Urban district" means the territory contiguous to and including any city street or town road that is built up with structures devoted to business, industry, or dwelling houses situated at intervals of less than 100 feet for a distance of a quarter of a mile or more. Corridor Data Lyndale Ave from 62nd St to 77th St is approx. 1.85 miles or 9800 feet. There are more than 125 businesses and residential properties along the corridor. The corridor is well within the required minimum 100’ interval spacing with around 80’ interval spacing on average. 66th St Lyndale Ave 77th St 62nd St AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS - PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #4. STAFF REPORT NO. 82 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector / J ulie Urban Housing & Redevelopment Mgr. D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider a variety of land use approvals for a proposal to construct an 82-unit apartment building on 64th Street, east of Lyndale Avenue (future addr ess: 600 64th Street W est). E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: North Bay Companies (D eveloper) has submitted land use applications for a planned unit development (P UD) consisting of a new five-story, 82-unit building on 64th Street, and renovations to an existing 22-unit building at 6345 Lyndale Avenue South. The development site consists of five c urrent lots, including the aforementioned apartment building to be preserved, three duplexes and one single-family home that would be removed to make way for the proposed 82-unit building. T he site is located in the Lakes at Lyndale area. Since the late 1990s, the City has identified this area for reinvestment and/or redevelopment. Currently, four of the five properties are zoned and guided for medium to high density housing. T he fifth property, the single-family home at 514 64th Street West, is zoned and guided for single-family or low-density residential use. As part of their application, the Developer is requesting amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of the site; requesting that the guiding district be changed to Mixed Use and the zoning to Planned Mixed Use. T he Comprehensive Plan designates a large contiguous area just south of the development site as mixed use and a part of Richfield's downtown - encompassing the greater 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue area. Changing the designation of this property to Mixed Use would represent a logical expansion of that area, eventually extending up Lyndale Avenue to the city limit at Crosstown as envisioned by the Lakes at Lyndale plan. T he intent of the mixed use category is to create a vibrant, thriving city center. At a work session in November 2019, the Developer first presented a concept plan to the City Council, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Planning Commission for a 90-unit building. Prior to submitting a land use application, a neighborhood open house was held on February 27. Based on feedback from city staff and nearby residents, plans were modified to reduce the number of units to 82 and step the east end of the building down to 4 stories. T he proposed 82-unit building includes 56 studio units, 25 one bedroom units, and one two bedroom unit, which would be an AD A- accessible unit on the ground floor. Including the existing 22-unit building, there are 104 total units in the PUD. Plans presented to the Planning Commission included 117 parking spaces on site (65 enclosed/underground and 52 in surface lots), a ratio of 1.125 spaces per unit. T he development is eligible for a 10% reduction from the standard 1.25 spaces per unit requirement due to its proximity to frequent public transit service; however, the Planning Commission recommendation is to only approve the development plan if the parking ratio is 1.25 per unit. In response to the Planning Commission's feedback, the Developer was able to add four stalls (121 total) by reconfiguring the parking lot. While the reconfigured lot does not offer optimal circulation, it does reduce the number of curb cuts on the street and adds stalls. In addition, the Developer offers the following analysis of parking needs by bedroom size in support of the proposed parking ratio: # of Units # of Stalls Ratio Studio/Efficienc y (E xisting building) 22 25 1.14 Studio/Efficienc y (New building)56 56 1.0 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 25 1 40 1.53 Based on the Developer's experience with occupancy at the Henley I and the existing building, studios are occupied by one person and thus in need of one stall. T he one bedroom units at the Henley I are primarily occupied by one person; however, the proposed parking ratios would allow for over half of them to be occupied by households with two cars and/or provide guest parking. Given this additional information and the added four stalls, staff recommends that the Council approve the proposed plan with 121 parking stalls. T he proposal meets all Zoning Code requirements of the underlying MU-N zoning district. T he proposed building height (5 stories) is within the range allowed in the MU-N district (8 stories maximum). T he sole deviation from code is that the number of compact parking stalls proposed (27) is slightly higher than permitted (24, or 20% of the total parking supply). T he proposed development site and building are attractively designed and landscaped, and would provide a number of amenities to its residents, including a fitness center, bicycle storage & repair area, dog run, and outdoor amenity space. T he building mass is positioned back from 64th Street and from the neighborhood to the east, using the existing single-family property for landscaped buffering space, sidewalk, and surface parking. T he proposal enhances public infrastructure by extending a public sidewalk along 64th Street and adding a trail connection into Garfield Park from 64th Street. Additionally, the proposed plans offer an opportunity to preserve and improve an existing affordable apartment building. T he Planning Commission also recommends adding the stipulations that signage direct traffic exiting the parking lots to use Lyndale Avenue and that the curb cut from the street to the park path be handicapped accessible. T hose stipulations are part of the recommended motion. Staff finds that the proposed project meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code requirements, and therefore recommends approval of the applications. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: 1. Approve the attached resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to designate Lots 3-8, Block 5, Lyndale O aks Addition as Mixed U se; 2. Approve the attached O rdinance amending R ichfield Zoning Code Appendix I to designate Lots 3-8, Block 5, Lyndale O aks Addition as P lanned Mixed Use; and 3. Approv e the attached resolution granting a conditional use pe rmit and final de ve lopme nt plans for a planned unit de ve lopment at 6345 Ly ndale Av enue South and 600 64th Stree t West. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT North Bay Companies recently completed construction of the Henley apartments on the west side of Lyndale Avenue, as part of the larger Lyndale Gardens development. T he proposed building would continue the established land use pattern of multifamily residential development on blocks adjacent to major arterial corridors like Lyndale Avenue and surrounding the core downtown area. T he Lakes at Lyndale area has been identified as an area in need of reinvestment since the 1990s. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): T he Comprehensive Plan currently designates four of the five properties as 'Medium Density Residential.' T he single-family home at the east end of the development is currently guided for 'Low Density Residential.' T here is some indication that the apartment site should have been guided 'High Density Residential" and the current guidance was a clerical error. Allowable densities in these districts are as follows: High Density: 35-100 dwelling units per acre Medium Density: 8-34 dwelling units per acre Low Density: 1-7 dwelling units per acre T he existing apartment building is currently zoned High Density Multifamily (MR-3), the three duplexes are zoned Multifamily (MR-2) and the single family home is Single Family (R). I n order to proceed, the Developer must consolidate the properties and request a single guiding and zoning district designation for the property in its entirety. Given the partic ulars of the project, staff has recommended a Mixed Use designation in both c ases. T he City’s Comprehensive Plan designates a large contiguous area just south of the subject property as a mixed use downtown encompassing the greater 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue area. Changing the designation of the subject property to Mixed Use would represent a logical expansion of that area, eventually extending up Lyndale Avenue to Crosstown. T he intent of the mixed use category is to create a vibrant, thriving city center that will serve as Richfield’s downtown. T he city center is to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. Densities vary significantly throughout the downtown/Lakes at Lyndale area. At 78 units per acre, the proposed development falls in about the middle of the range. T he proposed Zoning District is Planned Mixed Use, with the underlying Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N) zoning district serving as a basis for code requirements. Planned unit developments (P UDs) are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resourc es and to encourage innovation in planning and building. P UD s provide flexibility in the application of requirements if the proposed development is well-designed and c an be suc cessfully integrated into the neighborhood. The proposal meets all Zoning Code requirements, aside from the share of compac t parking stalls discussed in the Executive Summary and is therefore asking for very little "flexibility." However, the project is offering an opportunity to signific antly improve an existing affordable apartment projec t without the displac ement of residents. The preservation and improvement of affordable housing options is an important goal of the City. A full discussion of all applicable review criteria is provided as an attachment to this report - see "Required Findings" below. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The HRA is scheduled to c onsider a Contract for Redevelopment on J uly 20, 2020. 60-D AY RUL E: The 60-day clock started when a complete applic ation was received on March 12, 2020. Due to the C OV I D-19 pandemic, the City notified the applic ant that it was extending the deadline for issuing a decision by 60 additional day s (120 days total) which extended the deadline for a dec ision to J uly 10, 2020. I n order to allow for additional discussion with key staff, the D eveloper agreed to extend further to allow for the current schedule. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The development is providing improved ac cess to Garfield park as part of the projec t c onstruc tion, at no expense to the City. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 27, 2020. S everal members of the public spoke and/or submitted comments. Draft Planning C ommission minutes are included as an attachment to this report. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed development with the conditions identified in the Executive Summary (6-0). The C ity Council approved a first reading of the zoning c hange on J une 9, 2020. I f approved by the City Council, the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment will be submitted to the Metropolitan C ounc il for a final review and approval. No issues are antic ipated. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Recommend approval of the proposal with modifications. Recommend denial of the proposal with findings that requirements are not met. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: Representatives of North Bay Companies AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type C omp P lan A mendment Resolution Resolution L etter Rezoning Ordinance Ordinance P UD Resoluti on Resolution L etter P UD Requirements B ackup Materi al Revised S i te P lan E xhibit P lans - A rch E xhibit P lans - C i vil E xhibit Zoning maps B ackup Materi al D raft P lanning C ommission Minutes E xhibit RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 64TH STREET TO “MIXED USE” WHEREAS, the City’s Comprehensive Plan provides a Guide Plan establishing particular planning needs for specific segments of the City; and WHEREAS, the “subject property” comprises five separate lots, addressed as 6345 Lyndale Avenue and 608, 602, 520, and 514 64th Street West; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan designates 6345 Lyndale Avenue South and 608, 602, and 520 64th Street West as “Medium Density Residential” and 514 64th Street West as “Low Density Residential”; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Guide Plan classification and determined that it would be appropriate to designate the subject property as “Mixed Use”; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval of amending the Comprehensive Plan at its May 27, 2020 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on June 23, 2020; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota that the City’s Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to designate the subject property as “Mixed Use” contingent upon the following: 1. The revision is submitted to and approved by the Metropolitan Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 64TH STREET AS PLANNED MIXED USE THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 8 of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code (Planned Mixed Use) is amended to add a new Paragraph 10 to read as follows: (10) M-4 (NE corner, 64th and Lyndale): Lot 1, Block 1, HENLEY 2. Sec. 2. Section 3, Paragraph 47 is repealed. (47) M-4 (NE corner, 64th and Lyndale). That area lying between the center line of Lyndale Avenue extended and a line distant 175 feet easterly thereof and parallel thereto, and between the center line of 64th Street and the north line of Block 5, Lyndale Oaks Addition. Sec. 3. Section 13, Paragraph 40 is repealed. (40) M-4 (64th near Lyndale). Lots 4-6, Block 5, Lyndale Oaks Addition. Sec. 4. Section 14, Paragraph 33 is repealed. (33) M-4 (NW corner, Lyndale and 64th). Lots 7 and 8, Block 5, Lyndale Oaks Addition. Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be published and become effective upon pending approval of a Development Agreement by the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The City Clerk shall then publish the ordinance in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND 64TH STREET WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a final development plan and conditional use permit for a planned unit development to include 82 new construction apartment units in a 5-story building and rehabilitation of an existing 22-unit building, on land that is legally described as: Lots 3 through 8, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing and recommended approval of the requested final development plan and conditional use permit at its May 27, 2020 meeting; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current and mailed to properties within 500 feet of the subject property on May 14, 2020; and WHEREAS, the requested final development plan and conditional use permit meets those requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No.______; and WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No.______; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of a planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are approved for a multi-family residential development as described in City Council Report No. ____. 3. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: • A recorded copy of this approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. • A preliminary plat must be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit • A final plat must be approved and recorded prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. • Signage directing exiting vehicles to Lyndale Avenue must be installed at each driveway exit from the development. • This approval does not constitute approval of specific signs. Sign permits are required and must be applied for separately. • Final lighting plans must be submitted to and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors. Pedestrian scale lighting shall highlight building entrances. • Final plans for sidewalks and improvements in and along the right-of-way must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. An ADA accessible ramp from 64th Street to the park connection path must be included. • Final stormwater management plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. All applicable stormwater fees must be paid to the Public Works Department. • Final utility plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Director. All new utilities must be underground. • A maintenance agreement must be executed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City’s Administrative Review Committee Report, and compliance with all other applicable City and State regulations. • Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer must submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete. • As-builts or $7,500 cash escrow must be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. 4. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or upon written request by the Developer, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9. 5. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Required Findings Part 1: Development proposals in the Mixed Use Districts shall be reviewed for compliance with the following (537.01, Subd.2): 1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City’s development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan and any redevelopment plans established for the area. The City’s Comprehensive Plan designates a large contiguous area just south of the subject property as a mixed use downtown encompassing the greater 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue area. Changing the designation of the subject property to Mixed Use would represent a logical expansion of that area, eventually extending up Lyndale Avenue to Crosstown. The intent of the mixed use category is to create a vibrant, thriving city center that will serve as Richfield’s downtown. The city center is to include a mix of residential, shopping, recreational and business uses. The proposed development adds households and a variety of housing types to the downtown. 2. Consistency with the regulations of the Mixed Use Districts as described by Section 537 of the Code. The proposed development meets all regulations of the Mixed Use District. 3. Creation of a design for structures and site features which promotes the following: i. An internal sense of order among the buildings and uses. The proposed development provides an active and attractive frontage along 64th Street, while the existing building on the Lyndale Avenue corner will be renovated. The building design language will be similar to the recently completed Henley apartments across Lyndale. ii. The adequacy of vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width or interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. The existing and new construction components of the project share parking facilities, and includes fewer curb cuts on 64th Street than exist today. iii. Energy conservation through the design of structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading. The proposal reduces meets green space requirements and will include attractive landscaping. iv. The minimization of adverse environmental effects on persons using the development and adjacent properties. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Part 2: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application (542.09 Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. See above – Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. See above – Part 1, #3. 3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development. The development is in compliance with the intent of the guiding MU-N District. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the development. The City’s Public Works, Engineering and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. The project enhances existing infrastructure by extending public sidewalk along 64th Street and adds a new trail connection into the underutilized southern end of Garfield Park. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties. Undue adverse impacts are not anticipated. The building mass is shifted away from 64th Street and stepped down at its ends to better blend into the surrounding area. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest. The final development plan, which establishes the terms and conditions of the development, meets this requirement. All uses are conditional uses in the PMU District. The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (Subd. 547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. See above – Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the Planned Mixed Use District and the underlying Mixed Use Neighborhood District. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. The mission of the Lakes at Lyndale Plan is to create a “thriving urban center” by “provid[ing] more housing opportunities, upgrad[ing] commercial properties and offer[ing] greater enjoyment of the natural and recreational amenities of Wood Lake and Richfield Lake.” The proposed use and its integration into the larger mixed use development is consistent with this mission. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development will comply with performance standard requirements with one exception. Code limits the share of compact stalls to 20% of the overall parking supply. 24 compact stalls (of 121 total) are permitted by code; 27 compact stalls are proposed. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City’s Public Works, Engineering and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. No undue adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. See above – Part 1, #1. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. W 64TH STLYNDALE AVENUE S4F 4F1F EXISTING PARKING PARKING GARFIELD PARK TRAIL ACCESS TO GARFIELD PARK RAMP ROOF DECK EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 3F PROPOSED BUILDING 5F22 UNITS 6345 LYNDALE AVENUE S 600 64TH STREET W 82 UNITS T G VISITOR BIKE PARKING PAD TO BE COORDINATED WITH PARKS DOG RUN GREEN BUFFER 18'-0" 25 SPACES 31 SPACES Copyright 2020 DJR Architecture, Inc. SITE PLAN RICHFIELD, MN HENLEY II 19-060.00 06.15.20 Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota Project Information The proposed apartment building is located at the intersection of Lyndale Avenue S and 64th Street W in Richfield, MN. The site is currently zoned MR-2 Multi Family with a planned land use of Medium Density Residential according to the Richfield 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The development team proposes using the Mixed Use- Neighborhood (MU-N) guidelines as a basis for design for the proposed project. The 3-story apartment building and parking lot currently located at the corner of Lyndale and 64th will remain. The adjacent single-family house and 3 duplexes will be removed to allow for new construction. The proposed project includes 82 new units (studios, 1BR, & 2BR) distributed over floors 1-5, with two levels of parking. The building provides ample amenity space for the residents at Level 1 and Level 5. The resident common space includes community kitchens, bike storage with maintenance equipment, fitness, and a furnished roof deck. 32 enclosed parking spaces are located below ground, 33 enclosed spaces are provided at the ground level, and 2 surface parking lots on the east and west of the building provide 25 and 27 spaces respectively. All the parking lots will be accessed from 64th Street. Large areas of green space are provided on the north and east side of the building. The 2BR unit at the ground floor will be ADA accessible with direct exterior access. Current Primary Zoning: MR-2 Multi Family Proposed Zoning: Planned Mixed Use (MU-N as basis) HENLEY II APARTMENTS, RICHFIELD , MINNESOTA PROJECT NARRATIVE Zoning Recap PROJECT RECAP Site Parking Required 117 Stalls Units *1.25 130 stalls 10% for transit -13 stalls Parking Provided 117 Stalls Parking (New & Existing) Proposed 5 Stories, 58’-8” Building Height Existing (6345 Lyndale Avenue S) Studios 22 New Construction (600 64th Street W) Studios 56 1BR 25 2 BR 1 (Accessible) Total Units 104 Unit RecapThis building has a similar design language as the recently completed Henley Apartments, without replicating it exactly. In order to add to the vitality of the street life, large amounts of glazing face the main corner, as well as 64th Avenue. Sidewalks will be constructed on the north side of 64th Avenue to improve pedestrian experience and will ultimately connect to a proposed southern entrance to Garfield Park. Masonry is used a high- quality material on the ground floor, while fiber cement panels, decorative metal siding, and lap siding are used in the upper floors. The metal panel is arranged in a weaving pattern to add visual interest to the main mass. Total Area 58,299 (1.34 acres) Buildings Footprint (Existing to Remain)- 4,700 SF Buildings Footprint (Proposed)- 15,642 SF Total Building Footprint- 20,342 SF 34% Impervious Site Area -42,601 SF 73% Pervious Site Area - 15,698 SF 27% Building Area- 76,940 SF- New Construction *includes 21,302 SF of parking - 14,100 SF- Building to Remain Parcels: 2702824220084 2702824220083 2702824220082 2702824220081 2702824220080 Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota SITE Richfield Lake Park Wood Lake Nature Center Little Bob’s Park Garfield Park Nicollet Park Schools Food Shopping Bus Routes Future BRT Line Parks Bus Routes (High Frequency)Routes: 515 HF, 558 Routes: 4, 558 Routes: 18 HF Routes: Orange Line BRT (Proposed)LYNDALE AVENUEW 63RD ST W 64TH ST W 65TH STGARFIELDPARKRICHFIELD LAKE RICHFIELD LAKE PARK Lyndale Garden Apartments Lakeside at Lyndale Gardens 1. MetroPCS 2. Devi Style & West Indian Grocery 3. Communication Center 4. Punch & Munch 5. Lakewinds Food Co-op 6. Veterinary & Dance Center 7. Richfield Liquor Store 8. Commercial Strip Mall 9. LA Fitness Henley Apartments 6345 Lyndale 22 Studios Henley II 90 Units Lyndale Plaza Lynwood Flats Henley Townhomes Christopherson Properties Apartments MULTI FAMILY HOUSING COMMERCIAL 1 2 4 5 8 7 9 6 3 Project Overview ZONING The Planned Mixed-Use district, with a MU-N as a basis for design, matches closest with the project’s goals. As described in the city planning, this project is located at an important transit node and provides high density housing along arterial streets. The project encourages alternate modes of transportation due to its proximity to existing and future transit infrastructure. As seen on the diagram to the left, high frequency bus transit, as well as a proposed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line, connect the development to the larger community. Dedicated bike lanes on Lyndale Avenue and 66th Street also lend themselves to development that uses alternate modes of transportation. Ample shopping and dining opportunities surround the proposed site which makes it ideal for a higher density housing project, as exemplified by the recent completion of the Henley Apartments & Townhouses, as well as the Lakeside at Lyndale Gardens project. The project also enhances pedestrian connections in the Lyndale Garden area by providing sidewalks that connect to existing infrastructure such as providing Garfield Park a southern entrance and creating sidewalks on the north side of 64th Street. To emphasize the pedestrian and bicycle connections, active uses are placed at the first floor to enliven the street. Generous amounts of landscaping are provided throughout to decrease impervious surfaces, as well as to act as a buffer to the single- family residences to the east. The project is able to achieve many of the Comprehensive Plan goals, while protecting affordable housing at 50% of the Area Median Income. The proposed project complies with the requirements under the Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N) guidance. All standards are met in terms of building height, building coverage, impervious surfaces, open space, setbacks, car and bike parking, lighting, architectural standards, and pedestrian and bicycle circulation. One slight variance is requested on the western parking lot reducing the parking lot setback from 8’-0” to 7’-0”. The proposed parking lot is still setback significantly more than its current location which is directly over the property line. IMPACT ON CURRENT RESIDENTS Throughout the initial design process, the development team has addressed many of the concerns suggested by neighbors and city officials. At the suggestion of staff, a southern entrance to Garfield Park was included with decorative landscaping to improve the pedestrian experience. This landscaping strip will also act as a buffer between the higher density project and the adjacent single-family houses. At the request of neighbors, the massing was revised to step down from five stories to four stories at the eastern side of the project. The unit mix was also revised to provide less studios but provide large units including a full ADA accessible 2BR unit on the ground floor. During construction, active steps will be taken to lessen the impact on surrounding neighbors such as staggering construction time of parking lots to avoid having people park on the street. An important aspect of the project is retaining as many of the existing tenants as possible while improving the common areas and units of the building on the corner of the site. Improvements to the exterior of the building are shown later in the application, but they include an improved entrance, upgraded windows for energy efficiency, exterior lighting, and improvements to the pedestrian realm such as new sidewalks and additional landscaping. The units will receive new paint, and updated cabinetry in the kitchens. Lighting would also be addressed to make the building more energy efficient. To avoid displacement during construction in the units, the contractor will work with the residents to perform the work when they are not in their unit. Relocation within the building will also be considered to units that have already been completed. Parking will always be provided for the residents on site even when the existing parking lot is being renovated. With all the improvements, the units will still remain affordable at 50% of the Area Median Income. 1/2 mile radius from site Neighborhood Context N Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota Landscaped Areas Stone Wall Chain Link Fence Concrete Wall Wood Fence Wood FenceConcrete Walk64TH ST W (A Public R/W) 96.834 W"35'92°98S 26.49S00°04'34"E101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613 . 3 1 Δ= 7 4 ° 1 8 ' 0 6 " R= 1 0 . 2 6 33.514 E"04'92°98N N00°24'00"W 134.1212" RCP 6" CIP 9" VCP 9" VCP 12" RCP 15" RCP12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F.PID:2702824220079 508 64th St W Richfield, MN 55423 Owner: N G Iverson & L A Iverson N Line of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 Sec. 27, T. 28, R. 24 P.I.D: 2702824220084 P.I.D: 2702824220083 P.I.D: 2702824220082 P.I.D: 2702824220081 P.I.D: 2702824220080 19 Foot Parking Easementper Doc. No. 56194552626 Existing Building to Remain 3F 22 Units Proposed Building 5F 86 Units Dog Run Trail to Garﬁeld Park IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTALS Total Area 58,299 (1.34 acres) Impervious Site Area -42,601 SF 73% Pervious Site Area - 15,698 SF 27% N Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota Rendering VIEW FROM SOUTH Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota Rendering PROGRAM DETAIL VIEW Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota Rendering GARFIELD PARK TRAIL Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota Existing Building Renovations As part of the project, the existing building at the corner of Lyndale Avenue and 64th St will remain. The following are minor improvements proposed for the property. 1. Entrance Canopy 2. Upgraded Windows 3. Landscaping 4. Sidewalks 5. Exterior Lighting PROPOSED UPDATES 1 2 3 4 5 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED UPDATES Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota W 64TH STLYNDALE AVENUE S4F 4F1F EXISTING PARKING PARKING GARFIELD PARK TRAIL ACCESS TO GARFIELD PARK RAMP ROOF DECK EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 3F PROPOSED BUILDING 5F22 UNITS 6345 LYNDALE AVENUE S 600 64TH STREET W 82 UNITS T G VISITOR BIKE PARKING GREEN BUFFER 20'-0" PAD TO BE COORDINATED WITH PARKS Copyright 2020 DJR Architecture, Inc. SITE PLAN RICHFIELD, MN HENLEY II 19-060.00 04.06.20 Site Plan N SITE PLAN 1/32” = 1’-0” Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota SETBACK 38'-0"63'-0" SETBACK 33'-0" 10,408 SF PARKINGPARKINGPARKINGPARKING 103 8 7 4 BUILDING OVERHEAD RAMP 32 SPACES C 182'-0"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"TYP.9'-0"TYP. AT COMPACT8'-6"19 8 33 SPACES 2,140 SF AMENITYAMENITYAMENITYAMENITY 10,024 SF PARKINGPARKINGPARKINGPARKING 221 SF TRASHTRASHTRASHTRASH C C C 395 SF 2B2B2B2B----1111 151 SF MEPMEPMEPMEP 456 SF BIKEBIKEBIKEBIKE 454 SF FITNESSFITNESSFITNESSFITNESS 174 SF MEPMEPMEPMEP 3 3 TRASH SETBACK 33'-0"86'-0" SETBACK 15'-0" 19'-6 1/2" 1'-0" 24'-11 1/8" 40'-6 3/8"182'-0"184'-2 1/4"31'-3"19'-4 1/4"97'-1"17'-0 1/4"18'-9 3/4"8"86'-0" 51'-11 3/8"20'-10 1/4"13'-2 3/8" EV STATION EV STATION 18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"TYP. AT COMPACT8'-6"TYP.9'-0"LEVEL -1 1” = 30’-0”LEVEL 1 1” = 30’-0” N Floor Plans Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota 550 SF 1B1B1B1B----2A2A2A2A 565 SF 1B1B1B1B----3333 439 SF SSSS----1111 435 SF SSSS----1111 439 SF SSSS----1A1A1A1A 439 SF SSSS----1A1A1A1A 439 SF SSSS----1A1A1A1A 439 SF SSSS----1111 441 SF SSSS----1111 549 SF 1B1B1B1B----3333 415 SF SSSS----3333 433 SF SSSS----3A3A3A3A 598 SF 1B1B1B1B----5555 588 SF 1B1B1B1B----1111 443 SF SSSS----4444 561 SF 1B1B1B1B----4444 436 SF SSSS----2222 432 SF SSSS----2222 440 SF SSSS----4444 439 SF SSSS----1111 80 SF TRASHTRASHTRASHTRASH 142 SF MEPMEPMEPMEP 77 SF LOBBYLOBBYLOBBYLOBBY SETBACK 14'-5"86'-2"33'-5" 40'-7 1/2"45'-6 1/2"183'-2"49'-7"27'-10 1/2"32'-5"37'-9 3/4"35'-5 3/4"SETBACK 14'-5"86'-7" SETBACK 33'-0" 52'-3 1/2"34'-3 1/2"181'-2"65'-4"50'-5"33'-0"32'-5"575 SF 1B1B1B1B----2222 415 SF SSSS----3333 SETBACK 38'-0"62'-7" SETBACK 33'-5" SETBACK 38'-0"63'-0" SETBACK 33'-0"181'-2"149'-2"5'-8 1/2"26'-3 1/2"BUILDING BELOW BUILDING BELOW ROOF DECK 700 SF 28'-2 3/8"34'-4 5/8"154'-10 1/2"554 SF 1B1B1B1B----2A2A2A2A 566 SF 1B1B1B1B----3333 439 SF SSSS----1111 435 SF SSSS----1111 445 SF SSSS----1A1A1A1A 445 SF SSSS----1A1A1A1A 445 SF SSSS----1A1A1A1A 439 SF SSSS----1111 441 SF SSSS----1111 561 SF 1B1B1B1B----4444 420 SF SSSS----2222 416 SF SSSS----2222 440 SF SSSS----4444 439 SF SSSS----1111 80 SF TRASHTRASHTRASHTRASH 142 SF MEPMEPMEPMEP 77 SF LOBBYLOBBYLOBBYLOBBY 534 SF 1B1B1B1B----2222 LEVEL 2-4 1” = 30’-0”LEVEL 5 1” = 30’-0”Floor Plans N Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 114' -0" LEVEL 3 124' -7 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -3 3/4" LEVEL 5 145' -11 5/8"12'-8 3/8"10'-7 7/8"10'-7 7/8"10'-7 7/8"14'-0"CORRUGATED METAL WITH WOVEN PATTERN FIBER CEMENT PANEL COLOR 1 FIBER CEMENT PANEL COLOR 2 METAL C CHANNEL ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE BRICK LAP SIDING ROOFTOP PATIO 58'-8"OVERHEAD GLASS GARAGE DOOR LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 114' -0" LEVEL 3 124' -7 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -3 3/4" LEVEL 5 145' -11 5/8" ALUMINIUM STOREFRONT FIBER CEMENT PANEL COLOR 1 FIBER CEMENT PANEL COLOR 2 SOLID CANOPY CORRUGATED METAL WITH WOVEN PATTERN ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE BRICK12'-8 3/8"10'-7 7/8"10'-7 7/8"10'-7 7/8"14'-0"58'-8"147' - 0" Exterior Elevations WEST ELEVATION 1” = 20’-0” SOUTH ELEVATION 1” = 20’-0” Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 114' -0" LEVEL P1 89' -0" LEVEL 3 124' -7 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -3 3/4" LEVEL 5 145' -11 5/8"14'-0" 10'-7 7/8" 10'-7 7/8" 10'-7 7/8" 12'-8 3/8" CORRUGATED METAL WITH WOVEN PATTERN LAP SIDING ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE BRICK58'-8"147' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 114' -0" LEVEL 3 124' -7 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -3 3/4" LEVEL 5 145' -11 5/8"12'-8 3/8"10'-7 7/8"10'-7 7/8"10'-7 7/8"14'-0"CORRUGATED METAL WITH WOVEN PATTERN LAP SIDING ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE BRICK BRICK DETAILING GARAGE DOOR SOLDIER COURSE58'-8"147' - 0" NORTH ELEVATION 1” = 20’-0” EAST ELEVATION 1” = 20’-0” Exterior Elevations Apartments Henley II PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION CLIENT LOGO © 2020 DJR Architecture 19-060.00 04.10.2020 600 64th Street W Richfield, Minnesota8:49 AM (HOUR AFTER SUNRISE)DEC 22ND9:11 AM (HOUR AFTER SUNRISE)MAR 21ST12:00 PMDEC 22ND4:35 PM (HOUR BEFORE SUNSET) DEC 22ND12:00 PMMAR 21ST6:28 PM (HOUR BEFORE SUNSET) MAR 21ST6:26 AM (HOUR AFTER SUNRISE)JUN 21ST12:00 PMJUN 22ND8:03 PM (HOUR BEFORE SUNSET) JUN 22ND SUN STUDY 1” = 160’-0”N Shadow Study Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:12 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............HENLEY IIRICHFIELD, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY RESUBMITTALDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:NORTH BAY COMPANIES2316 4TH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CONTACT: NATE DINGELS612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1L1.0CIVIL DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5L1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILSARCHITECT:DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.333 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTHSUITE 201 UNION PLAZAMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: SCOTT NELSONSNELSON@DJR-INC.COMCIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CONTACT: RORY SYNSTELIEN612-615-0060TBDC2.1VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENTS Stone WallChain LinkFenceConcrete WallWood FenceWood Fence Chain Link Fence DumpsterConcrete WalkConcrete WalkConcrete WalkConcrete Walk Concrete Walk Concrete Walk Concrete Walk Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Chain Link Fence Chain Link Fence Chain Link Fence Chain Link Fence64TH ST W(A Public R/W)S89°29'53"W 438.6926.49S00°04'34"E101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26N89°29'40"E 415.33N00°24'00"W 134.1212" RCP6" CIP9" VCP9" VCP12" RCP15" RCP[A] 15" RCP 12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F.1 Story Lap Sided HouseAddress: 608 64th St WFoundation Area = 1,339 S.F.GarageGarage1 Story Stucco House Address: 602 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,351 S.F. 1 Story Lap Sided House Address: 522 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,348 S.F. 1 Story Lap Sided House Address: 514 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,170 S.F. Garage GarageShedShedShedN Line of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of theNW 1/4 Sec. 27, T. 28, R. 24Wood Fence Chain Link FenceP.I.D: 2702824220084P.I.D: 2702824220083P.I.D: 2702824220082P.I.D: 2702824220081P.I.D: 270282422008019 Foot Parking Easementper Doc. No. 5619455 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING,STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS,FOOTINGS & BASE MATERIALS,PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PERUTILITY COMPANY AND/ORL.G.U. STANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGUN-USED UTILITY SERVICESPER UTILITY COMPANY ANDCITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING,STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS,FOOTINGS & BASE MATERIALS,PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PERUTILITY COMPANY AND/ORL.G.U. STANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX. OVERHEAD WIRES, COORD. W/UTIL COMPANY AND CITY AS NEEDED. FIELDVERIFY NEED FOR TEMPORARY POWER, ETC.EX. POLE, OVERHEAD WIRES, FENCE,ANDSIGNS TO REMAIN. PROTECTTHROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.EX. CB AND FIRST 32' OF PIPE TOREMAIN. REMOVE PORTION OF EX.STORM SOUTH OF RE-ROUTE TIE-INPOINT, SEE SHEET C4.0REMOVE EX. OVERHEAD WIRES, COORD. W/UTIL COMPANY AND CITY AS NEEDED. FIELDVERIFY NEED FOR TEMPORARY POWER, ETC.REMOVE EX. FENCEAND FOOTINGS.REMOVE EX. FENCEAND FOOTINGS.REMOVE EX. FENCEAND FOOTINGS.EX. FENCE AND RETAINING WALL TO REMAIIN,PROTECT THROUGHOUGH CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE EX. FENCEAND FOOTINGS.EX. GAS LINE TO REMAIN,PROTECT THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTIONEX. GAS LINE TO REMAIN,PROTECT THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTIONEX. GAS LINE TO REMAIN,PROTECT THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTIONEX. SIGN TO REMAIN.SALVAGE ANDREPLACE IN KIND ANDLOCATION ASNEEDED TOFACILITATEPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EX. 15" STORM SEWERAND MANHOLE BETWEENPROPOSED UPSTREAMRE-ROUTE POINT AND MANHOLEIN STREET TO THE WESTEX. CB TOREMAIN, TYP.EX. CB ANDSTMH TO REMAINEX. CB ANDOTHER EX.STORMSEWERSTRUCTURES TOREMAIN, TYP.PROTECT AS MANY TREES AS POSSIBLEALONG NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE.REMOVE AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATEPROPOSED GRADES, ETC. ALL TREES INTHIS LOCATION ARE ON OUR PROPERTYAND CAN BE REMOVED AS NEEDED.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TOREMAIN AND BEPROTECTEDTHROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.EX. SIGN TO REMAIN.SALVAGE AND REPLACE INKIND AND LOCATION ASNEEDED TO FACILITATEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION.EX. FENCE TO REMAIN, PROTECTTHROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTIONEX. CURB AND GUTTERTO REMAIN, PROTECTTHROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.EX. CURB AND GUTTERTO REMAIN, PROTECTTHROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EX. MANHOLE TO REMAIN,GROUT OPENING FORREMOVED PIPE TO EASTREMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:17 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCALREGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FORPROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCALREGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATEWITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THECONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS ASWELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITYREQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVEDBY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTERNORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATINGHOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BEBLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ONUNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE,BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NOROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THEOWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ANDMAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.17.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BERETURNED TO LGU.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACEANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.CITY OF RICHFIELD REMOVAL NOTES:1.ALL EXCAVATIONS IN THE ROADWAY MUST BE PATCHED WITH BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETEIMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATIONS ARE BACKFILLED. THE DEVELOPER WILL BE REQUIREDTO INSTALL FULL DEPTH, PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT PATCHES MEETING CITYSTANDARDS FOR ALL EXCAVATIONS IN THE ROADWAY.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:DL1TREE PROTECTIONN T S25'DRIPLINE WIDTHFURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ASSHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA.POSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS Stone WallChain LinkFenceConcrete WallWood FenceWood FenceConcrete Walk64TH ST W(A Public R/W)S89°29'53"W 438.6926.49S00°04'34"E101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26N89°29'40"E 415.33N00°24'00"W 134.1212" RCP6" CIP9" VCP9" VCP12" RCP15" RCP12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F.N Line of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of theNW 1/4 Sec. 27, T. 28, R. 24P.I.D: 2702824220084P.I.D: 2702824220083P.I.D: 2702824220082P.I.D: 2702824220081P.I.D: 270282422008019 Foot Parking Easementper Doc. No. 5619455 EXISTINGBUILDINGTRGTRASHDOG RUNNOPARKING67.9'24.0'49.4'6.8'20.0'22.0'24.0'18.7'8.0'5.6'14 STALLS @ 8.0' EA. = 112.0'16.0'TYP.24.0'16.0'TYP.12 STALLS @ 8.0' EA. = 96.0'13 STALLS @ 9.0' EA. = 117.0'12 STALLS + 1 AISLE @ 9.0' EA. = 117.0'18.0'TYP.18.0'TYP.56.4'104.4'15.0'R 2 0 . 0 'R3.0 'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5. 0 'R5.0'R5. 0 '6.0'TYP.6.0'TYP.6.0'TYP.12.0'27.3'201.8'33.1'33.1'19.3'4.7'12.5'CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.MATCHEXISTING, TYP.MATCHEXISTING, TYP.MATCHEXISTING, TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.CONC. WALK,TYP.BIT. PVMT. ,TYP.BIT. PVMT. ,TYP.BIT. PVMT. ,TYP.BIT. PVMT. ,TYP.BIT.PVMT. ,TYP.B6-12 C&G,TYP.CONC. DRIVEWAY APRON PERCITY STANDARDSCONC. DRIVEWAY APRON PERCITY STANDARDSB6-12 C&G,TYP.B6-12 C&G,TYP.B6-12C&G,TYP.B6-12 C&G,TYP.B6-12 C&G,TYP.SWCPFIELD VERIFY HOWPROPOSED PAVEMENTWILL TIE INTO EX. PARKTO THE NORTHEAST(OFF SURVEY)CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETERETAINING WALL. SEE GRADINGPLAN FOR ELEVATIONSCAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETERETAINING WALL. SEE GRADINGPLAN FOR ELEVATIONSGENERATOR PAD. TOP OF PADSHALL BE MINIMUM 6" ABOVEFINISHED GRADE.TRANSFORMER PAD. TOP OFPAD SHALL BE MINIMUM 6"ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.PED RAMP PER ADA ANDMNDOT STANDARDS, SEEDETAILS. SEE GRADINGPLAN FOR ELEVATIONSOF RAMP AND TAPERSTHICKENED EDGE CONC. STOOPAND STAIRS W/ HANDRAIL. SEEGRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATIONS38.4'8.0'6.0'6'SCREENINGFENCE, SEEARCH FORDETAILS10.0'30.3'4.0'3.0'22.1'NOPARKINGSTOPSTOPSNOWSTORAGE, TYP.SNOWSTORAGE,TYP.30' SIGHT TRIANGLE,TYP.30' SIGHTTRIANGLE, TYP.DOG RUN WITH FENCE ANDGATE AROUND PERIMETER.INSTALL SUBGRADE DRAINAGEPER MANFACTURERSSPECIFICATIONSR3.0'13.0'4.3'5.0'99.2'5.0'21.2'30.7'9.0'6.8'8.5'10.4'76.9'10.6'19.7'6.3'19.9'6.0'16.1'17.0'17.0'16.9'12.8'8.4'91.8'109.3'10.5'24.5'21.0'36.7'15.0'R3.0'R 3 . 0 '18.0'CURB TAPER,TYP.9.0'(3) "HITCHING STYLE" BIKE RACKS.INSTALL PER MANUFCATURERSSPECIFICATIONSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:21 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS,UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THESITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BECORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDSTREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFSITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE ANDSHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION.LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCHAS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDINGPADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOTPREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A.REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OFTRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITEIMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE.SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACEANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF RICHFIELD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1.SIDEWALKS MUST HAVE SAW CUT JOINTS2.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM DRIVEWAY APRONS BY A LONGITUDIANAL JOINT.3.SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% CROSS SLOPE. THE SIDEWALKSWILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND ANY SIDEWALKS THAT EXCEED A 2.0% CROSSSLOPE WILL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.4.ALL SQUARE HANDHOLE CASTINGS IN REPLACED SIDEWALK AREAS WILL NEED TO BE REPLACEDWITH NEW ROUND HANDHOLE CASTINGS APPROVED BY THE CITY OR COUNTY.5.ENGINEERING MUST BE PRESENT TO INSPECT ALL CONCRETE FORMS WITHIN RIGHT OF WAYPRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR. PROVIDE MINIMUM 24-HOUR NOTICE TO CITY ENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT.6.STREET SIGNS IN THE PUBLIC ROW TO MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS, SIGNS LOCATED INCONCRETE SHALL BE IN 4” SLEEVES OR MOUNTED TO STREETLIGHTS. COORDINATE WITH THECITY OF RICHFIELD FOR APPROVED LOCATION OF SIGNS7.INSPECTION REQUESTS SHALL BE MADE VIA EMAIL TO WKEWITSCH@CITYOFRICHFIELD.ORG ATLEAST 3-5 DAYS IN ADVANCE.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOSPECIALTY PAVEMENT - PROVIDE BID FOR THEFOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONS OF BASEMATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARY COMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVAL:ALL SNOW SHALL BE PLOWED TO LANDSCAPEDAREAS ADJ TO PAVEMENTS.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR ON HAULING DAYAND WILL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN PROPERTYMANAGEMENT AND TRASH HAULER.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR IN MAIL ROOM OFBUILDING. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SHALLCOORDINATE WITH LOCAL POSTMASTER Stone WallChain LinkFenceConcrete WallWood FenceWood FenceConcrete Walk64TH ST W(A Public R/W)S89°29'53"W 438.6926.49S00°04'34"E101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26N89°29'40"E 415.33N00°24'00"W 134.1212" RCP6" CIP9" VCP9" VCP12" RCP15" RCP12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F.N Line of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of theNW 1/4 Sec. 27, T. 28, R. 24P.I.D: 2702824220084P.I.D: 2702824220083P.I.D: 2702824220082P.I.D: 2702824220081P.I.D: 270282422008019 Foot Parking Easementper Doc. No. 5619455 EXISTINGBUILDINGTRGTRASHDOG RUNNOPARKING CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.NOPARKINGSTOPSTOPCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:27 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BYTHE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.4.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ATNO COST TO THE OWNER.5.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:18.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.10.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.11.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDEOF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.12.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHEREELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER ORHAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.13.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILSENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.14. TOLERANCES14.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.14.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.14.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.14.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.15.MAINTENANCE15.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.15.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.15.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSCITY OF RICHFIELD GRADING NOTES:1.INSPECTION REQUESTS SHALL BE MADE VIA EMAIL TOWKEWITSCH@CITYOFRICHFIELD.ORG AT LEAST 3-5 DAYS IN ADVANCE.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS Stone WallChain LinkFenceConcrete WallWood FenceWood FenceConcrete Walk64TH ST W(A Public R/W)S89°29'53"W 438.6926.49S00°04'34"E101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26N89°29'40"E 415.33N00°24'00"W 134.1212" RCP6" CIP9" VCP9" VCP12" RCP15" RCP12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F.N Line of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of theNW 1/4 Sec. 27, T. 28, R. 24P.I.D: 2702824220084P.I.D: 2702824220083P.I.D: 2702824220082P.I.D: 2702824220081P.I.D: 270282422008019 Foot Parking Easementper Doc. No. 5619455 EXISTINGBUILDINGTRGTRASHDOG RUNNOPARKING CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.NOPARKINGSTOPSTOPCONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT &REMOVE PUBLIC PVMTS., CURBS, ANDWALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK,REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND, ANDTO CITY STANDARD AND APPROVALREMOVE ALL UN-USED EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND CITY STANDARDSALL FINAL UTILITY SIZES, MATERIALS,LOCATION, AND CONNECTIONS TO BEVERIFIED BY A MECHANICAL ENGINEERAND COORDINATED WITH CIVIL PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.EX. 15" RCP STORM @0.31%(AB) (FIELD VERIFY)20 LF EX. 15" RCP STORM@0.31% (AB) (FIELD VERIFY)(RE-ROUTE)STMH 14MAKE CONNECTION TO EX. 15" RCP STORM 20' SOUTH OFEX. CB TO RE-ROUTE AROUND PROPOSED BUILDINGRIM=840.55IE(N)=834.93 (AB)(FIELD VERIFY)IE(SW)=834.93CBMH 2ARIM=840.61IE(E/BLDG)=837.31IE(W)=837.31SUMP=833.315 LF 12" RCPSTORM @1.00%201 LF 12" RCPSTORM @0.25%122 LF 12" RCPSTORM @0.25%MAKE CONNECTIONS TO EX STMHPER CITY STANDARDSEX. IE(E/W)=833.96PROP IE (NE)=834.00PROP. IE (N)=STMH 2RIM=841.60IE(N/S/E)=836.53SUMP=832.53STMH 3RIM=842.20IE(W/E)=837.03IE(NE)=837.9315 LF 12" RCPSTORM @2.00%CB 4RIM=842.23IE(SW)=838.2332 LF 12" RCPSTORM @0.25%CBMH 5RIM=842.51IE(W/N)=837.11CB 6RIM=841.12IE(S)=837.422 LF 10" PVC SCH40STORM @1.00%STUB PVC SCH40 STORM TO 5' FROMBLDG. COORDINATE CONNECTION TOBLDG INTERNAL STORM SYSTEM W/MECHANICAL/PLUMBERSTUB IE=837.33STUB 8" PVC SCH40 SANITARY TO 5' FROM BLDG.COORDINATE CONNECTION TO BLDG SANITARYSYSTEM W/ MECHANICAL/PLUMBERSTUB IE=833.3838 LF 8" PVC SCH40SANTIARY @1.00%MAKE CONNECTION TOEX. SANMH PER CITYSTANDARDS.EX. IE(E/W)=832.67PROP. IE(N)=833.00STUB 6" DIP DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO 5' FROM BLDG. COORD/CONNECTION TO INTERNAL SYSTEM WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER.(2) MAKE WET TAP CONNECTION W/GATE VALVE AND VALE BOX TO EX. 6"CIP WATERMAIN PER CITY STANDARDS.STUB 6" DIP FIRE SUPPRESSION WATER SERVICE TO 5' FROM BLDG. COORD/CONNECTION TO INTERNAL SYSTEM WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER.GATE VALVEAND VALVEBOX, TYP.TRENCH DRAINRIM=832.05 - 831.77ROUTE TO BLDG. INTERNAL STORMSYSTEM. COORDINATE CONNNECITONWITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER.UTIL CROSSINGBOT. STORM=±835.29TOP SANITARY=±834.17RAISE AND LOWER WATERMAIN AS NEEDEDTO ENSURE NO CONFLICTS WITH THE STORMSEWER CROSSING. PROVIDE MINIMUM 18"VERTICAL SEPARATION. PROVIDE INSULATIONBETWEEN WATER SERVICES ANDSTORMSEWERFILTRATION BASIN 130" PERF. CMPPROVIDE 40 MIL HDPE LINERAROUND ENTIRE SYSTEMTOP STONE=839.00TOP 30" CMP=838.5010" OE=837.5012" OE=837.00BOT. 30" CMP=836.006" PVC DT IE=835.00100-YR HWL=838.9512" INLETIE=837.2612" OUTLETIE=837.0010" OUTLETIE=837.506 LF 12" RCPSTORM @1.67%5 LF 10" PVC SCH40STORM @2.00%STMH 1RIM=841.2512" IE(NE)=836.9010" IE (SE)=837.406" IE (E)=835.0015" (SW)=835.006" PVC DT OUTLETIE=835.005 LF 6" PVC DTSTORM @0.00%61 LF 15" RCPSTORM @1.64%12 LF 12" RCPSTORM @0.25%12" INLETIE=836.5124 LF 15" RCPSTORM @0.36%64 LF 15" RCPSTORM @0.36%50 LF 15" RCPSTORM @0.36%21 LF 15" RCPSTORM @0.33%STMH 11RIM=841.02IE(S/NE)=834.07SUMP=830.07STMH 12RIM=841.27IE(SW/N)=834.25STMH 13RIM=842.10IE(S/NE)=834.48FDC, TYP.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:31 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF RICHFIELD UTILITY NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM),AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESSHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.1.ALL EXCAVATIONS IN THE ROADWAY MUST BE PATCHED WITH BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETEIMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATIONS ARE BACKFILLED. THE DEVELOPER WILL BEREQUIRED TO INSTALL FULL DEPTH, PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT PATCHES MEETINGCITY STANDARDS FOR ALL EXCAVATIONS IN THE ROADWAY.2.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISITNG UTILITIES3.ALL DISCONNECTS TO OCCUR AT THE MAIN UNLESS DIRECTED/APPROVED OTHERWISE BYCITY ENGINEER4.NO UTILITIES ARE TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE5.WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES INCLUDING HYDRANTS, CLEANOUTS ANDSHUTOFF VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS6.INSPECTION REQUESTS SHALL BE MADE VIA EMAIL TOWKEWITSCH@CITYOFRICHFIELD.ORG AT LEAST 3-5 DAYS IN ADVANCE.7. Stone WallChain LinkFenceConcrete WallWood FenceWood FenceConcrete Walk64TH ST W(A Public R/W)S89°29'53"W 438.6926.49S00°04'34"E101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26N89°29'40"E 415.33N00°24'00"W 134.1212" RCP6" CIP9" VCP9" VCP12" RCP15" RCP12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F.PID:2702824220079508 64th St WRichfield, MN 55423Owner: N G Iverson & L A IversonN Line of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of theNW 1/4 Sec. 27, T. 28, R. 24P.I.D: 2702824220084P.I.D: 2702824220083P.I.D: 2702824220082P.I.D: 2702824220081P.I.D: 270282422008019 Foot Parking Easementper Doc. No. 5619455 EXISTINGBUILDINGTRGTRASHDOG RUNNOPARKING CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.NOPARKINGSTOPSTOP2620.66'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE16.00'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE18.67'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE18.67'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE60.67'PARKING LOT SCREEN57.34'PARKING LOT SCREEN4 - BDP8 - KFG5 - BDP5 - BDP8 - KFG4-AP5-AP6-PSH3-WS2-WF2-CSO1-CSO10-AP4-AP2-SKHL3-WF44-WBJLAWN, TYP.SEEDING LIMIT6-FN6-FNEDGING, TYP.6-CAD9-CADEDGER, TYP.5-SSH5-KFG3-KFG5-SSH3-KFG5-SSH3-KFG5-SSH3-KFG5-KFG2-SKHL6-0' FT. HT.PRIVACY FENCE7-CAD1-SKHL7-CAD9-KFG6-BDP6-KFG5-CAD5 - SSH38 - KFG8 - SSH10 - KFG9 - LSRS6 - LSRS5 - KFG5 - SSH5 - KFG5 - SSH5 - KFG6 - RRD6 - RRD5 - KFG6 - LSRS6 - LSRS5 - KFG6 - LSRS3 - KFG7 - KFG11- TY1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEOEDGING, TYP.18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.DOG RUN ARTIFICIAL TURFSYNLAWN PET PLATINUM, TYP.OWNER APPROVAL REQUIREDPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONEDGING, TYP.42 - LSRS2620.66'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE16.00'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE18.67'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE18.67'PARKING & STREETFRONTAGE60.67'PARKING LOT SCREEN57.34'PARKING LOT SCREEN4 - BDP8 - KFG5 - BDP5 - BDP8 - KFG4-AP5-AP6-PSH3-WS2-WF2-CSO1-CSO10-AP4-AP2-SKHL3-WF44-WBJLAWN, TYP.SEEDING LIMIT6-FN6-FNEDGING, TYP.6-CAD9-CADEDGER, TYP.5-SSH5-KFG3-KFG5-SSH3-KFG5-SSH3-KFG5-SSH3-KFG5-KFG2-SKHL6-0' FT. HT.PRIVACY FENCE7-CAD1-SKHL7-CAD9-KFG6-BDP6-KFG5-CAD5 - SSH38 - KFG8 - SSH10 - KFG9 - LSRS6 - LSRS5 - KFG5 - SSH5 - KFG5 - SSH5 - KFG6 - RRD6 - RRD5 - KFG6 - LSRS6 - LSRS5 - KFG6 - LSRS3 - KFG7 - KFG11- TY1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEO1 - HEOEDGING, TYP.18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.DOG RUN ARTIFICIAL TURFSYNLAWN PET PLATINUM, TYP.OWNER APPROVAL REQUIREDPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONEDGING, TYP.42 - LSRSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:42 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cLANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDOG RUN ARTIFICIAL TURF - SYNLAWN PET PLATINUM,SAMPLES REQUIRED.1" DIA. ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP OVER FILTER FABRIC,SAMPLES REQUIRED. PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLANPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESSHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH, SAMPLES REQUIREDPROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLANPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULEAND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESEDGINGLEGEND1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/ORTOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING.OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OFHARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAININGPLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THEQUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OFTHE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWINGSEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIEDUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORSAND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'SACTIVITIES.12.REPAIR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROM LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.13.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE ANDCAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BECAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIORTO INSTALLATION.PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITESYMQUANT.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTCOMMENTSDECIDUOUS TREESCSO3CRIMSON SPIRE OAKQuercus robur x Q. alba 'Crimschmidt'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSKHL5STREET KEEPER HONEY LOCUSTGleditsia triacanthos 'Draves'4.0" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMPSH6PRAIRIE SENTINEL HACKBERRYCeltis 'JFS-KSU1'3.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMHEO7HERITAGE ENGLISH OAKQuercus x macdanielii 'Clemons'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMEVERGREEN TREESWF5WHITE FIRAbies concolor6' HT.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMWS3WHITE SPRUCEPicea glauca6' HT.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHRUBSWBJ44WICHITA BLUE JUNIPERJuniperus scopulorum 'Wchita Blue'48" HT.CONT.TY11TAUNTON'S YEWTaxus x media 'Tauntonii'24" HT.CONT.AP23ALPINE CURRANTRibes alpinum24" HT.CONT.SSH43STRAWBERRY SUNDAE HYDRANGEAHydrangea paniculata 'Strawberry Sundae'24" HT.CONT.BDP20BLOOMERANG DWARF PURPLE LILACSyringa x 'SMNJRPU'24" HT.CONT.FN12FIRESIDE NINEBARKPhysocarpus opulifolius 'UMNHarpell'36" HT.CONT.PERENNIALS & GRASSESKFG136KARL FOERSTER GRASSCalamagrostis x acutiflora "Karl Foerster"#1CONT.RRD12ROSY RETURNS DAYLILYHemerocallis 'Rosy Returns'#1CONT.CAD34CHICAGO APACHE DAYLILYHemerocallis 'Chicago Apache'#1CONT.BES-GOLDSTURM BLACK-EYED SUSANRudbeckia fulgida var. sullivantii 'Goldsturm'#1CONT.KRC-KISMET RASPBERRY CONEFLOWEREchinacea 'TNECHKR'#1CONT.LSRS75LITTLE SPIRE RUSSIAN SAGEPerovskia atriplicifolia 'Lttle Spire'#1CONT.REQUIRED LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS:THE FOLLOWING LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS ARE PER THE CITY OF RICHFIELD.ZONE: (MR-2) MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICTREQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS325 SF OPEN SPACE PER DWELLING UNIT = 325 SF X 90 DWELLING UNITS = 29,250 SF OPEN SPACE REQ'D (15,488 SFPROVIDED)LANDSCAPING & SCREENING REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 544.03)CLASSIFICATION: COMMERCIAL/MIXED USEEXISTING TREES SAVED: (3) CREDIT TOWARDS REQUIRED TREESPARKING LOT CALCULATIONSPERIMETER OVERSTORY TREE PLANTINGS BETWEENSTREET AND PARKING LOT REQ'D AT 1 PER 40 LF OFFRONTAGE (PROVIDED)INTERIOR PLANTINGS - (5%) OF TOTAL PARKING AREA TO BELANDSCAPED ISLANDS AT 180 SF WITH (2) OVERSTORY OR(2) ORNAMENTAL TREES (PROVIDED)LAWN - SOD REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.1LANDSCAPE PLANNOTES & DETAILS............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060HENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECT 24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.04/10/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1941404/10/20CITY RESUBMITTAL..........03/04/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:NDMP,PS..............Thu Apr 9 13:25:43 2020COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWERCONNECTIONS.3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNEENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR.4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PERNATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE ANDMETERING FACILITIES.6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE.7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE.8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE.9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT.EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED.12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADEPRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION.13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS.14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR.15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVERPOSSIBLE.16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USEMOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TOEACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODEALL WIRES.18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARCON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE.19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE.20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS.21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION.22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN.23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATHVALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX.24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE.IRRIGATION NOTES:FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTUREMIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONFINISHED GRADECOMPACTED SUBGRADEWATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED18" - VERIFY W/ PLANAGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIPN T SSTAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'SINSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENTSLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN1Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPERENNIAL BED PLANTINGN T SPLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEMBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.SIZE VARIESSEE LANDSCAPE PLANMODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANTMATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANTPLACEMENT4DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES)PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNKBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLRULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT3THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL TREE SHAPE)THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWNWITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER.STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER.WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLONSTRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZINGMETHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR.TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVEEXISTING GRADEMULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANICMULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANNOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROMPLANT TRUNKEXISTING GRADECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELYSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDBACKFILL AS SPECIFIEDCOMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP.RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT2 Planning Commission Minutes May 27, 2020 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Kathryn Quam, Commissioners Bryan Pynn, Sean Hayford Oleary, Peter Lavin, James Rudolph, and Susan Rosenberg MEMBERS ABSENT: none STAFF PRESENT: Melissa Poehlman, Asst. Director of Community Development Matt Brillhart, Associate Planner Nellie Jerome, Assistant Planner Chairperson Quam called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Pynn, S/Rudolph to approve the minutes of the February 26, 2020, meeting. Motion carried: 6-0 OPEN FORUM No members of the public spoke, no comments received. APPROVAL OF AGENDA M/Rosenberg, S/Hayford Oleary to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 6-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM #1 Public hearing and consideration of a variety of land use approvals for a proposal to construct an 82-unit apartment building on 64th Street, east of Lyndale Avenue (future address: 600 64th Street West) Richfield Planning Associate Matt Brillhart gave a summary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD), for which staff recommended approval of the three related applications regarding the Comprehensive Plan designation, the zoning designation, and PUD permit approval. Commissioners asked about affordability requirements, the parking spillover from adjacent apartment buildings, and traffic exiting the project into the neighborhood. Assistant Community Development Director Melissa Poehlman clarified that there is no zoning requirement that affordable units be included, but the developer is working to include a number of affordable units in the project. The developer observed that so far, at adjacent apartments, no tenants have opted to park on the street and roughly one parking spot per bedroom has been rented so far. The developer also noted that they were working to avoid displacement of current apartment residents and that a number of the units will remain affordable at 50% AMI. Public comments from emails, voicemails, and live call-ins focused on spillover parking, issues with snow removal and parked cars, residential density, park access on the southern side of Garfield Park, ADA accessibility, and safety. Residents observed spillover parking on 64th Street from nearby apartment buildings. May 27, 2020 2 M/Lavin, S/Rudolph to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 5-0 (Commissioner Rosenberg was not available to vote) Commissioners discussed parking spillover along 64th Street and issues with winter plowing and parking when parking is not free for these residents. Commissioners also asked about updating the existing building, and how the limited updates to the interior might be a disservice to current residents who will have higher rent but not necessarily nicer living spaces. Staff responded that upgrades to existing affordable rental units are very hard to do. From staff’s perspective, the opportunity to upgrade the existing affordable units and to grow the community with a new building next door is a win. Staff added that the improved connection on the south end of Garfield Park would improve accessibility, and that upgrades to the park would improve safety. Staff also clarified that there was nothing in code that required free parking, and that 1.25 spaces per unit meets city code. Commissioners further discussed parking issues and opportunities to use neighboring lots to meet parking space minimums. The developer explained the cost of underground parking, the parking ratios and the current parking use on the site, as well as how the design of the lot will be important in directing traffic away from smaller streets and towards Lyndale Ave. They also assured their openness to bike parking, electric car parking and charging stations, and anything else that will help alleviate parking issues in the future. M/Hayford Oleary, S/Lavin to recommend approval of a resolution that amends the Comprehensive Plan to designate Lots 3-8, Block 5, Lyndale Oaks Addition as Mixed Use; Motion carried: 6-0 M/Hayford Oleary, S/Rosenberg to recommend approval of an Ordinance that amends Richfield Zoning Code Appendix I to designate Lots 3-8, Block 5, Lyndale Oaks Addition as Planned Mixed Use M/Rudolph, S/Hayford Oleary to amend the original motion to delay the effective date of the ordinance until a development agreement is in place. Motion for amendment carried: 6-0 Motion as amended carried: 6-0 M/Lavin, S/Rudolph to recommend approval of a resolution granting a conditional use permit and final development plans for a planned unit development at 6345 Lyndale Avenue and 600 West 64th Street with additional condition that the PUD provide parking at a ratio of a minimum of 1.25 stalls per unit. M/Hayford Oleary, S/Quam to amend the motion to include the condition that signage be added to both planned driveways, directing traffic to Lyndale Ave M/Hayford Oleary, S/Lavin to amend the motion to include the condition that the trail from 64th Street into Garfield Park be modified to have a wheelchair ramp accessible to 64th Street. Motion for signage amendment carried: 6-0 Motion for wheelchair ramp amendment carried: 6-0 Motion with conditions carried: 6-0 ITEM #2 May 27, 2020 3 Continue a public hearing to consider land use applications for 6544 Newton Avenue South to June 22, 2020. The application has been withdrawn by the applicant. M/Pynn, S/Rudolph to cancel the public hearing for this item. Motion carried: 6-0 LIAISON REPORTS Community Services Advisory Commission: Met last week, discussions on budget reductions due to COVID-19. City Council: no report Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA): no report Richfield School Board: COVID-19 has affected budget, but reserves are expected to be enough to continue funding. Continuity of education will continue and finances remain in a good spot Transportation Commission: 65th street construction planned for next year, roundabouts and trails planned Chamber of Commerce: no report CITY PLANNER’S REPORT Poehlman gave an update on the Small Cell memo, presented to the City Council at the most recent meeting. City Council supported removing a requirement for conditional use permits for residential small cell installations, because the City has little authority to regulate these and the public hearings were disingenuous. Poehlman added that due to COVID-19, restaurant seating on sidewalks and parking lot areas will be temporarily allowed, in order to help businesses in Richfield. Poehlman also added that the Richfield COVID Small Business Loan program has gone smoothly and loans are starting to go out to applicants. ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting will be Monday, June 22, at 7pm, on Webex online meeting platform. M/Rudolph, S/Rosenberg to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried: 6-0 The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:15 p.m. __________________________ Planning Commission Secretary AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #5. STAFF REPORT NO. 83 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ulie Urban, Housing Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/7/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: Melissa P oehlman, P lanning & Redevelopment Manager C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Public hearing and consider a resolution approving a final plat of the R F64 Addition. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Development plans for the RF64 projec t (previously known as "Cedar Point I I ") were first approved by the City Council in September 2018 and amended in December 2019. The project is loc ated along the 6300 and 6400 blocks of 16th Avenue South and Richfield P arkway. The project consists of two apartment buildings on Richfield Parkway and 64 townhomes (16 townhome buildings of 4 units each) along 16th Avenue. The proposed RF64 final plat will subdivide the property into two lots for the apartments, 56 lots for the individual townhomes, and various outlots for parking, driveway s and other c ommon areas. The first two townhome buildings (8 units) are nearing c ompletion in the southwest corner of the project site, at 16th Avenue and 65th Street, and a separate plat for that specific area was approved by the Council on April 28, 2020 to fac ilitate the sale of those units. The proposed plat has been reviewed by the C ity Attorney's office and Richfield Public W orks. All comments have been addressed or inc luded as stipulations in the resolution. W hile a public hearing is required by State Statute, the plat is a tec hnical document dealing with the combination or division of land, and is not a rec onsideration of land use approvals for the development. The proposed plat meets requirements and therefore staff rec ommends approval of the attached resolution. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Adopt a resolution approv ing a final plat of the R F64 Addition. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Development Plans for RF64 were approved by the City Council on September 25, 2018 and amended on D ec ember 10, 2019. These approvals require the applic ant to re-plat the properties prior to issuance of Certific ates of Occ upancy. The C ity Council approved a preliminary plat for the entire development on D ec ember 11, 2018. More information on the RF64 project is available at www.richfieldmn.gov/rf64. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): All plats or subdivisions of land must be approved by City C ounc il resolution, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota State Statutes 462.357. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: A final plat must be approved before the Housing and Redevelopment A uthority c an sell the apartment property to the developer. Per S tate Statute, the City has 120 days from the date of submittal of a complete application to issue a dec ision regarding a plat unless the applic ant agrees to an extension. A complete application was received on May 27, 2020. The Council must render a dec ision by September 24, 2020. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper on J uly 2, 2020. No c omments have been received. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: Representative(s) of NHH C ompanies, L L C AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter RF 64 F i nal P lat B ackup Materi al RF 64 C ontext Map B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR RF64 WHEREAS, Cedar Point Investments, LLC (“Applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat that combines and resubdivides land generally located in the 6300 and 6400 blocks of Richfield Parkway and 16th Avenue South, on land that is legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is to be known as RF64; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed plat of RF64 on Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at which all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, as follows: 1. The proposed plat of RF64 satisfies the requirements of the City’s subdivision ordinances. 2. Final approval of the plat of RF64 is granted with the following conditions: a. The applicant must address to the City Attorney’s satisfaction all items listed in the plat opinion letter prepared by the City Attorney’s office. b. The applicant must address any outstanding comments by the City’s Public Works Department regarding easements for drainage and utility purposes. c. The Applicant must submit two mylar copies of the plat for signature by the City. d. The Applicant must file the final plat with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 60 days of the approval of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CURRENT LEGAL DESRCRIPTION Lots 2 through 14, Block 1, and Lots 1 through 5 and 9 through 16, Block 2, "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION" And All that part of vacated East 64th Street as dedicated in "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line drawn from the northeast corner of Block 2, said "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION", to the southeast corner of Block 1, said "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"; and lying easterly of a line drawn from the northwest corner of said Block 2, to the southwest corner of said Block 1. And Outlot C, RF64 TOWNHOMES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. N89°43'00"E 134.38 S00°16'58"W 1112.63S00°14'02"W75.07N89°43'01"E 134.44 OUTLOT DWesterly Line of Block 1,IVERSON'S 2ND ADDITIONFound 1/2 InchOpen Iron PipeFound 1/2 InchOpen Iron Pipe 3 421 2 3 4 3 421 3 421 6 578 OUTLOT CSW Corner of Block 1,"IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"NW Corner of Block 2,"IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"Vacated per Doc. No. N00°14'02"E92.14N08°13'32"E58.48S89°50'08"W 152.43 1 2 1 17TH AVENUE SOUTH 52.50S0°11'06"W52.50S0°11'06"W52.50S0°11'06"W52.5052.5020.00S89°48'54"E 123.68 N00°14'02"E 95.07N15°01'37"W30.39N00°14'02"E 348.74N15°15'01"E25.09N00°14'02"E 75.00S89°50'10"W 133.62 10.87N89°50'10"EOUTLOT A123.6217.6316.87N89°48'54"W 123.63 N00°14'02"E 103.7739.81 24.57 24.57 34.67 34.7224.5724.5739.8120.00N89°48'54"W 123.69 N89°48'54"W 115.30 S89°48'54"E 115.2820.0020.00Drainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot B14.4038.758.2044.4458.3752.5252.5058.4734.7424.5724.5739.81 39.81 24.57 24.57 27.76 32.7624.5724.5734.81 34.81 24.57 24.57 31.32 N10°11'53"W46.94S89°48'54"E 116.72 N0°11'06"E52.52N0°11'06"E52.52N0°11'06"E52.52N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.5031.3424.5724.5734.81 34.81 24.57 24.57 31.39 S0°11'06"W58.40S0°11'06"W58.42S0°11'06"W58.44S89°45'58"E 115.35 N89°45'58"W 115.41 75.0075.00Drainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot CDrainage & Utility Easement Over All of Outlot D 144.51170.49S00°14'02"W 315.00OUTLOT B 10.00 S89°54'01"E 139.37 443.8718.61 N00°12'15"E C=56.55CB=N4°30'41"WR=344.14Δ=9°25'32"56.61144.18 518.66107.4120.00 OUTLOT E20.0020.00S89°48'54"E 115.47 N89°48'54"W 115.46 5 49.7949.893 421 34.81 24.57 24.57 31.46 31.5024.5724.5734.81 N0°11'06"E49.82N0°11'06"E49.84N0°11'06"E49.86N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.5052.5034.81 24.57 24.57 32.96 5.3947.3031.5224.5724.5734.81 6 3 42152.5039.81 24.57 24.57 33.11 19.7033.486 578 39.81 24.57 24.57 27.96 N89°48'54"W 116.91 N89°48'54"W 122.06 S89°48'54"E 122.08OUTLOT F20.0020.00OUTLOT GOUTLOT HOUTLOT I 7 3 421 6 578834216578934216578103421N89°48'54"W 122.13 N89°48'54"W 122.17S89°48'54"E 122.1920.0020.00N89°48'54"W 122.23S89°48'54"E 122.28N89°48'54"W 122.29N89°48'54"W 120.37S89°48'54"E 114.38N89°48'54"W 114.40 52.5052.5033.1224.5724.5739.81 39.81 24.57 24.57 33.1752.5052.5033.2124.5724.5739.81 N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.5052.5052.5033.2324.5724.5739.8139.81 24.57 24.57 33.27N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.5020.0020.0020.0020.0052.5052.5033.3224.5724.5739.81 N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.5039.81 24.57 24.57 33.3452.5045.277.5031.4124.5724.5739.81 22.9030.4052.5034.80 24.57 24.57 36.4234.80 24.57 24.57 30.4443.7344.6734.80 24.57 24.57 30.4634.80 24.57 24.57 30.49N0°11'06"E44.02N00°11'06"EN00°11'06"E44.2244.42Found 1/2 Inch IronPipe w/Cap #13057N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50N0°11'06"E52.50Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe w/Cap #13057(RICHFIELD PARKWAY) Right of Way EasementPer Doc. No. A10157429Right of Way EasementPer Doc. No. A10157430N00°11'06"E 962.13Right of Way EasementPer Doc. No. A10157432SE Corner of Block 1,"IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"NE Corner of Block 2,"IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"Drainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot EDrainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot FDrainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot GDrainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot HDrainage & Utility EasementOver All of Outlot IC=65.43CB=N12°02'50"WR=152.94Δ=24°42'12"65.9426.97N00°18'08"E11.01 N00°16'58"E 962.548.25C.R. DOC. NORF64NBearings are based on the westerly line of Block 1, "IVERSON'SSECOND ADDITION" having an assumed bearing of N00°11'06"EFound Iron Monument (see map for type)1/2 inch by 14 inch Iron Monument Set Marked "RLS 44565"KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Cedar Point Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of thefollowing described property situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, to wit:Lots 2 through 14, Block 1, and Lots 1 through 5 and 9 through 16, Block 2, "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"AndAll that part of vacated East 64th Street as dedicated in "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line drawn from the northeast corner of Block 2, said "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION", to the southeast corner of Block 1,said "IVERSON'S SECOND ADDITION"; and lying easterly of a line drawn from the northwest corner of said Block 2, to the southwest corner of said Block 1.AndOutlot C, RF64 TOWNHOMES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as RF64 and dedicate to the public for public use the public way, and the easements fordrainage and utility purposes as created by this plat.In witness whereof said Cedar Point Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by itsproper officer thisday of ,20.Signed: Cedar Point Investments, LLCBy:, Its: STATE OF ,COUNTY OFThis instrument was acknowledged before me thisday of , 20,by , its of Cedar Point Investments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liabilitycompany, on behalf of the company. Notary Signature Notary Printed NameMy Commission Expires: Notary Public County, SURVEYORS CERTIFICATEI Rory L. Synstelien do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyorin the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctlydesignated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been or will be set within one year; that all water boundaries and wetlands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and allpublic ways are shown and labeled on this plat.Dated thisday of , 20.Rory L. Synstelien, Licensed Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 44565STATE OF MINNESOTA,COUNTY OFThis instrument was acknowledged before me thisday of , 20, by Rory L. Synstelien. Notary Signature Notary Printed NameMy Commission Expires: Notary Public County, CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTAThis plat of RF64 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota at a regular meeting heldthis day of , 20, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of MinnesotaStatutes, Section 505.03, Sub. 2.City Council, City of Richfield, Minnesotaby , Mayor by , ManagerRESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that taxes payable in 20and prior years have been paid for land described on this platdated this day of , 20.Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By:DeputySURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, MinnesotaPursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approvedthisday of , 20.Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By: COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that the within plat of RF64 was recorded in this officethis day of , 20, at o'clock . m.Martin McCormick, County RecorderBy: Deputy100255002550SCALE IN FEET AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #6. STAFF REPORT NO. 84 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A sst. C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 7/7/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Conduct a public hearing and consider appr oval of resolutions vacating utility easements and approving the pr eliminary and final plats of the Henley 2 Addition. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Earlier this evening, the Council will have considered a redevelopment proposal involving several properties at the northeast corner of 64th Street W est and Lyndale Avenue South. Re-platting of the property to combine the five lots is a stipulation of that approval. If the Council denied or delayed a decision on this earlier item, consideration of the plat and easement vacations should also be denied or delayed. T he developer has purchased three of the five properties and has the remaining two under contract. T he proposed plat will combine the five properties into a single lot. Existing utility easements that align with current lots lines and services will be vacated (removed), and new easements aligning with new services have been dedicated in the plat. T he proposed plat has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office, utility-providers, and the Public Works Department. All comments have been addressed or included as stipulations in the resolution. While a public hearing is required by State Statute, the plat is a technical document dealing with the combination or division of land, and is not a reconsideration of land use approvals for the development. T he proposed plat and vacation requests meet requirements and therefore staff recommends approval of the attached resolutions. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: 1. Adopt a r esolution vacating storm sewer and utility easements within the Henley 2 development site at 64th Street West and Lyndale Avenue South; and 2. Adopt a resolution approving the final plat of the He nley 2 Addition. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT None B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): All plats or subdivisions of land must be approved by City Council resolution, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota State Statutes 462.357. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Per S tate Statute, the City has 120 days from the date of submittal of a complete application to issue a dec ision regarding a plat unless the applic ant agrees to an extension. A complete application was received on May 20, 2020. The Counc il must issue a decision by September 17, 2020. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Notice of this public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: Representative(s) of North Bay Companies, applicant AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution - E asement Vacations Resolution L etter Resolution - P lat Resolution L etter E asement E xhibits E xhibit P lat E xhibit RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AND A STORM SEWER EASEMENT NEAR 64TH STREET WEST AND LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, the following described lands are subject to utility easements in favor of the City of Richfield: The rear 5.00 feet of Lots 3 through 8, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the following described lands are subject to storm sewer easements in favor of the City of Richfield: The West 10 feet of Lot 5, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And The East 10 feet of Lot 6, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, there are existing utility lines and storm sewer facilities within the easement areas. However, the Property is part of a proposed plat, and all necessary easements for utility lines will be dedicated in the plat. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the easements legally described above are no longer needed, upon the recording of the plat of the HENLEY 2; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The easement for utility purposes, which was reserved over the above- described property in the recorded plat of LYNDALE OAKS, is vacated, effective upon the recording of the plat of HENLEY 2. If said plat is not recorded within two years of the date of this resolution, this resolution shall be null and of no effect. 2. The easement for storm sewer purposes, which was reserved over the above-described property in the recorded plat of LYNDALE OAKS, is vacated, effective upon the recording of the plat of HENLEY 2. If said plat is not recorded within two years of the date of this resolution, this resolution shall be null and of no effect. 3. The City Clerk is directed to prepare a certificate of completion of vacation proceedings and to record the vacation in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. ____________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR HENLEY 2 ADDTION WHEREAS, North Bay Development LLC (“Applicant”) has requested approval of a final plat that combines several parcels of land located along 64th Street West and Lyndale Avenue South, on land that is legally described as: Lots 3 through 8, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Applicant has secured purchase agreement and/or consent of the fee owners of the land to make this application; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is to be known as HENLEY 2; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed plat of HENLEY 2 on Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at which all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, as follows: 1. The proposed plat of HENLEY 2 satisfies the requirements of the City’s subdivision ordinances. 2. Final approval of the plat of HENLEY 2 is granted with the following conditions: a. The Applicant must address to the City Attorney’s satisfaction all items listed in the plat opinion letter prepared by the City Attorney’s office. b. The Applicant must submit two mylar copies of the plat for signature by the City. c. The Applicant must file the final plat with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days of the approval of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Easement to be vacated MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 8th day of April, 2020 ______________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 Project No. 19414 SHEET 1 OF 1 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com DESCRIPTION The rear 5.00 feet of Lots 3 through 8, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Drawn By:CJ 16080 SCALE IN FEET 0 64TH ST W (A Public R/W) 10 EASEMENT TO BE VACATED10 MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 8th day of April, 2020 ______________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 Project No. 19414 SHEET 1 OF 1 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 0 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT TO BE VACATED: The East 10 feet of Lot 6, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Drawn By: SIW 10 EASEMENT TO BE VACATED10 64TH ST W (A Public R/W) MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 8th day of April, 2020 ______________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 Project No. 19414 SHEET 1 OF 1 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 0 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Drawn By: SIW DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT TO BE VACATED: The West 10 feet of Lot 5, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. N89°29'53"E 438.6926.49N00°04'34"W101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26S89°29'40"W 415.33S00°24'00"E 134.12 WIDTHVARIESWIDTHVARIESSouth Line of Block 5, LYNDALE OAKSC=99.39CB=S11°41'27"ER=702.71Δ=8°06'38"99.4711.49Δ=73°09'15"R=9.00S88°54'00"E 90.30N89°29'40"E 320.67133.12 LYNDALE AVE S64TH ST WS02°03'46"E10.24S75°57'50"W 123.62S00°18'41"E 64.18S57°45'45"W52.80228.2017.94LOT 1BLOCK 126.3924.00Drainage & Utility EasementDrainage & Utility EasementDrainage & Utility EasementDrainage & Utility EasementFound 1/2 InchOpen Iron Pipe(Plat = 100.39)(Plat = 26.15)(Plat = 435.38)(Plat = 134.03)(Plat = 413.50)(Plat = 13.65)(Plat = 76°13')C.R. DOC. NOHENLEY 2KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Northbay Growth, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the State of Minnesota,County of Hennepin, to wit:Lots 3 through 8, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as HENLEY 2 and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat.In witness whereof said Northbay Growth, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officerthis day of , 20.SIGNED: Northbay Growth, LLCBy: Its:STATE OF , COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by , its of Northbay Growth, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. My Commission Expires:Notary Public, Signature Notary Printed NameNotary Public County,SURVEYORS CERTIFICATEI Rory L. Synstelien do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correctrepresentation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been or will be set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways areshown and labeled on this plat.Dated this day of , 20.Rory L. Synstelien, Licensed Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 44565STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF __________________This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of, 20, by Rory L. Synstelien My Commission Expires:Notary Public, Signature Notary Printed NameNotary Public County,RICHFIELD, MINNESOTAThis plat of HENLEY 2 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof heldthis day of , 20, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.City Council, City of Richfield, MinnesotaBy:, Mayor By:, City ManagerRESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this day of , 20.Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County AuditorBy:, DeputySURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, MinnesotaPursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of , 20.Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County SurveyorBy:COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that the within plat of HENLEY 2 was recorded in this office this day of , 20, at O'Clock M.Martin McCormick, County RecorderBy:, DeputyNBearings are based on the South line of Block 5, LYNDALE OAKShaving an assumed bearing of S 89°29'40" WFound Iron Monument (see map for type)1/2 inch by 14 Iron Monument Set Marked "RLS 44565"Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwiseindicated, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way linesunless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:NOT TO SCALE10 5510 40102001020SCALE IN FEETDenotes a record dimension per the plat of LYNDALE OAKS(Plat=) 21.65.317.38.511.181.421.29.019.09.1 9.995.2 28.228.62.017.5 30.346.2 23.522.3 23.422.3 22.2 16.322.216.328.246.230.317.4 1.128.4 12.320.5 12.420.6 10.312.410.3 12.428.346.330.317.6 2.128.7 42.4 30.228.2 8.014.2 22.320.126.2 20.226.1 9.9 11.910.2 11.75.6 8.35.7 8.4Stone WallChain LinkFenceConcrete WallWood FenceWood Fence Chain Link Fence DumpsterConcrete WalkConcrete WalkConcrete Walk Concrete Walk Concrete Walk Concrete Walk Concrete Walk Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Bituminous Driveway Chain Link Fence Chain Link Fence Chain Link Fence Chain Link Fence12" RCP6" CIP9" VCP9" VCP12" RCP15" RCP15" RCP 12" VCP3 Story Brick BuildingAddress: 6345 Lyndale Ave SFoundation Area = 4,700 S.F. 1 Story Lap Sided House Address: 608 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,339 S.F.GarageGarage1 Story Stucco House Address: 602 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,351 S.F. 1 Story Lap Sided House Address: 522 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,348 S.F. 1 Story Lap Sided House Address: 514 64th St W Foundation Area = 1,170 S.F. Garage GarageShedShedShed72" RCP72" RCP Wood Fence Chain Link Fence 8" DIPNOPARKING NOPARKINGSTOPSTOPN89°29'53"E 438.6926.49N00°04'34"W101.41Δ=16°07'40"R=360.2613.31Δ=74°18'06"R=10.26S89°29'40"W 415.33S00°24'00"E 134.12 WIDTHVARIESWIDTHVARIESSouth Line of Block 5, LYNDALE OAKSC=99.39CB=S11°41'27"ER=702.71Δ=8°06'38"99.4711.49Δ=73°09'15"R=9.00S88°54'00"E 90.30N89°29'40"E 320.67133.12 LYNDALE AVE S64TH ST WS02°03'46"E10.24S75°57'50"W 123.62S00°18'41"E 64.18S57°45'45"W52.80228.2017.94LOT 1BLOCK 126.3924.00Drainage & Utility EasementDrainage & Utility EasementDrainage & Utility EasementDrainage & Utility EasementFound 1/2 InchOpen Iron Pipe(Plat = 100.39)(Plat = 26.15)(Plat = 435.38)(Plat = 134.03)(Plat = 413.50)(Plat = 13.65)(Plat = 76°13')VICINITY MAPHENLEY 2 600 64TH STREET WEST, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 2316 4TH AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 NORTH BAY COMPANIES PROJECTPROJECT NO.:COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV2.0PRELIMINARY PLAT............N44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.4-8-2020NCLIENTOVERHEAD UTILITIESFIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERTELEPHONE LINECABLE LINE WATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECABLE TV BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXTRAFFIC SIGNALGAS METERELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVEAIR CONDITIONERBOLLARDCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFLAG POLEHANDICAP SYMBOLFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEPAVER SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRECONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEGUARDRAILROOF DRAINCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BY.CJRS.PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTESPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Lots 3 through 8, Block 5, LYNDALE OAKS, according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County, Minnesota.DATE OF PREPARATION:4-8-2020APPLICANT:North Bay Companies2316 4th Ave SMinneapolis, MN 55404BENCHMARKS:Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrantlocated in the NE quadrant of Lyndale Ave S and 64th St W, having an elevation of843.67 feet.AREAS:Proposed Lot 1 = 57,262 Sq. Ft. or 1.314 AcresProposed Dedicated Right of Way = 1,037 Sq. Ft. or 0.024 AcresTotal Property Area = 58,299 Sq. Ft. or 1.338 AcresFLOOD ZONE:This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annualchance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0368F,effective date of November 4, 2016.________________________________________________________Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565rory@civilsitegroup.comPRELIMINARY PLAT: HENLEY 240102001020SCALE IN FEET AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED ORDINANCES AGENDA ITEM #7. STAFF REPORT NO. 85 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 7/14/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: B lanca Martinez Gavina, E xecutive A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 7/8/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the appr oval of the first reading of an ordinance amending Subsection 210.01 of the City Code related to City C ouncil salaries. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Chapter I I , Section 210 of the City Code establishes the salaries of the City Council. Subsec tion 210.01, Subd. 5 provides that salaries of Council Members shall be reviewed by the City C ounc il by May 1 in each year in which an election is held pursuant to Section 200 of the Code. An ordinanc e amending the salaries established by this sec tion must not take effec t until after the next suc ceeding munic ipal elec tion. T he 2018 ordinance change was consistent with past practice: the City Council salary increase was based on the increase granted to employees in the Management and General Services pay plan in the previous year. In 2018, City Council approved an ordinance for a salary adjustments that were the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage increase in the annual pay structure granted on January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2019 to the Management and General Services pay plans. Actual annual salary increases for the Mayor and City Council were 3% each year, based on the Management and General Services pay plans, effective January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2020 respectively. The City has a 30 y ear history of providing the same c ost of living inc rease to all of its employee groups. W ith 4 of the 5 union contracts having settled for 2021 at a 3% increase, staff antic ipate a 3% adjustment to be recommended for non-represented employ ees for 2021. In the past City council has also reviewed their salaries compared to other metropolitan cities. We have attached information on other metropolitan cities' salaries. On June 23 of 2020 the City council reviewed the comparable city council salaries and the City's past practices in setting future salaries during a work session. T he majority of City council expressed their desire to maintain City council salaries at the same rate, 0% increase, in 2021 due to the financial impacts of the C OVID-19 pandemic. T hey also directed staff to provide an economic trigger in the ordinance for 2022 that would set the increase to 0% if the economy has not improved, or, set the salary increase based on what is granted to employees in the Management and General Services pay plan in the previous year of 2021. T he attached ordinance provides for a 0% increase for 2021 and 0% increase in 2022 if the National Bureau of Economic Research (N BE R) finds the economy is in recession. It also includes that if the NB ER finds that the economy is not in recession then the salary increase would match the increase granted in the Management and General Services pay plans for the previous year of 2021. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the first reading of the or dinance amending Subsection 210.01 of the City Code related to City Council salaries and schedule the second reading for July 28, 2020. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Please see exec utive summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Chapter I I , S ec tion 210 of the City Code establishes the salaries of the City C ounc il. Subsection 210.01, S ubd. 5 C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: City Counc il needs to establish their salaries for 2021 and 2022 by ordinance before the next council election. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The City Council budget will reflec t a zero salary inc rease in the 2021 budget and the 2022 salary will either inc rease by zero or an increase consistent with the inc rease to staff pay plans in 2021. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Staff did c onsult with City Attorney Tietjen sinc e we are seeking guidanc e later than the May 1 date referenced in the ordinanc e. The May 1 deadline is direc tive and not mandatory. I t is c ritical to amend the ordinances before the upcoming election. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The City Council c ould defer ac tion on this item to a future meeting. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type S alary B ackup Materi al C C S alary Ordi nance Ordinance BILL NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 210 RICHFIELD CITY CODE PERTAINING TO CITY COUNCIL SALARIES THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Subsection 210 of the Richfield City Code is hereby amended as follows: Subdivision 1. Mayor. The annual salary of the mayor as of January 1, 2018 2020 is $11,662. Effective January 1, 2018 2021, the salary of the mayor shall remain at $11,662 be increased by a percentage that is the lesser of 3.5 percent or the percentage increase in the annual pay structure granted on January 1, 2018 to Management and General Services pay plans. Subdivision 2. Council. The annual salary of a member of the council as of January 1, 20182020 is $9,051. Effective January 1, 2019 2021, the salary of a member of the council shall remain at $9,051 be increased by a percentage that is the lesser of 3.5 percent or the percentage increase in the annual pay structure granted on January 1, 2018 to Management and General Services pay plans. Subdivision 3. Effective January 1, 2020 2022 the annual salary of the mayor and a member of the council as provided in Subdivision 1 and 2 above shall receive a 0% increase if the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) finds the economy is in recession. However, if the NBER finds that the economy is not in recession then the salary increase would match the increase granted in the Management and General Services pay plans for the previous year of 2021be increased by a percentage that is the lesser of 3.5 percent or the percentage increase in the annual pay structure granted on January 1, 2019 to Management and General Services pay plans. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective on January 1, 2021. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of July 2020. __________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk