05-26-2020 Complete AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
VIRTUAL MEETING HELD VIA WEBEX
MAY 26, 2020
7:00 PM
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
Call to order
Pledge of Allegiance
Open forum
Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments
are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to
address the Council must have submitted comments prior to the meeting to kwynn@richfieldmn.gov or by
calling 612-861-9711.
Approval of the Minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session of May 12, 2020; and (2) City Council Meeting of May
12, 2020.
AGENDA APPROVAL1.Approval of the Agenda
2.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended
actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any
Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the
regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are
recommended for approval.
A.Consider the approval of the Portland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Link Project:
1.Construction Cooperative Agreement;
2.Limited Use Permit; and
3.No Parking Resolution.
Staff Report No. 62
B.Consider approval of a request for a new Secondhand Goods Dealer license for GameStop Inc., d/b/a
GameStop #0633, located at 34 66th Street West.
Staff Report No. 63
3.Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4.Consider approval of an ordinance creating an Affordable Housing Trust Fund and authorize summary publication
of said ordinance.
Staff Report No. 64
R E S O L U T IO N S
5.C onsider a resolution requesting an advance payment of 2020-2024 Municipal S tate A id (MS A ) S treet F unds to
collect funds available from the completion of eligible past projects.
S taff Report No. 61
C IT Y MAN AG E R’S R E P O R T
6.C ity Manager's Report
C LAIMS AN D PAYR O L LS
7.C laims and P ayroll
C O U N C IL D ISC U SSIO N
8.Hats Off to Hometown Hits
9.A djournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
City Council Work Session
Virtual Meeting held via WebEx
May 12, 2020
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 6:00 p.m. held via WebEx.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Simon Trautmann;
Present: and Ben Whalen.
Council Members Edwina Garcia
Absent:
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Neil Ruhland, Communications and
Engagement Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly
Wynn, Senior Office Assistant
Others Present: Lisa Sorensen, Sorensen Consulting
ITEM #1
COMMUNITY COVID-19 IMPACT SURVEY
City Manager Rodriguez introduced the agenda item and Neil Ruhland.
Communications Manager Ruhland provided a background of the survey since the onset of
COVID-19 (coronavirus), the City wanted concrete information about what the residents were thinking,
feeling and needing regarding housing, food, utility and health. He reviewed 26 similar surveys from
surrounding communities to compile a short but informative survey. It consisted of 14 questions,
focused on qualitative data, had a strong demographic component and was made available in both
Spanish and English. The survey was then distributed by email, social media and through partner
organizations such as Richfield Public Schools, Richfield Foundation, Chamber of Commerce, La Red
Latina and MIRA.
Communications Manager Ruhland continued with response rate and information gathered. A
total of 736 residents responded. He then discussed the demographics surrounding the residents who
responded. He then went on to discuss that 74 percent of residents are social distancing most of the
time and 91 percent of seniors are social distancing either “all” or “most” of the time.
Communications Manager Ruhland then spoke of the top COVID-19 related stressors. 66
percent of residents stated getting cleaning supplies was very or somewhat stressful followed by
reduced wages, getting food and school closures. More specially, the Latinx respondents stated the
possibility of reduced wages and hours were very or somewhat stressful. He also included results of
top concerns regarding COVID-19. Getting sick was rated highest at 79 percent while
stock/investments and not being able to work followed respectively at 35 and 25 percent. The results
City Council Work Session Minutes -2- May 12, 2020
also included people of color ranking top concerns as getting sick, accessing medical care and paying
rent/mortgage while seniors’ concerns were getting sick, stocks/investments and accessing medical
care.
Communications Manager Ruhland discussed where residents are getting their information
regarding COVID-19, concerns accessing basic needs, and what residents need to feel safe in the
community. He also spoke about how residents’ mental health is being impacted by the Stay-At-Home
order. 36 percent of all respondents somewhat agreed the order was negatively impacting their
mental health.
Communications Manager Ruhland concluded with the following takeaways:
• Overall: Residents are following guidelines, wanting positivity, requesting one another
to follow the rules, concerned with everyday necessities like cleaning supplies, and
people are turning to the City (and other government sources) for accurate information
about COVID-19.
• Regarding people of color are they expect needing to access assistance programs at
a much higher rate than Caucasians, have concerns about lost hours and wages are
relatively high in Richfield’s Latinx community and paying rent/mortgage is a concern.
• Seniors have been mentally strong throughout crisis, health care and medication
access rank as high concerns, not anticipating needing to access assistance
programs, and most aggressive at adhering to social distancing.
• Parents are extremely worried about schools, access to child care services is a
concern and more than half of parents are nervous the Stay-At-Home order is
negatively affecting their mental health.
• Renters are concerned about food accessibility, paying rent is an every-present worry
and work hours/job security rates as high concern.
Council Member Supple asked if there was an indication if people wanting to access medical
care need it for preventative care or COVID-19 related concerns. Communications Manager Ruhland
believed the need was directed toward COVID-19 related issues but the questions were not vetted out
to differentiate.
Council Member Whalen wondered if conversations between parents and schools have been
arranged to develop more ways to support families and parents during this time. Communications
Manager Ruhland explained how many organizations are jumping in and help when possible. Many
people have the same belief that the smoothest way to get through this is together.
Council Member Trautmann thanked Communications Manager Ruhland for his work and
depth of insight. Communications Manager Ruhland stated he is always available for questions.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez gave praise to Communications Manager Ruhland and how fortunate
the City is to have his expertise.
Communications Manager Ruhland also thanked Kate Aitchison, Housing
Specialist/Communications Specialist. She also put in many hours of work on this project and has
been a great asset to the City.
ITEM #2
COUNCIL – STAFF PLANNING RETREAT UPDATE
Mayor Regan Gonzalez introduced Lisa Sorensen with Sorensen Consulting.
City Council Work Session Minutes -3- May 12, 2020
Lisa Sorensen shared what she is hoping to get from the session. She is hopeful Council and
staff will be able to share information, strengths, challenges, roadblocks, frustrations, and wins. The
session should also allow Directors to get feedback from Council and each other. This session will
then set up for the second session in determining goals and priorities desired in the next 12 months.
This leadership team is in unchartered territory but hopeful to come out of this better and stronger.
This session will help set priorities and timelines as well as some assistance in adjusting the budget
for the months to come. It will also create an environment to discuss the ‘new normal’ that has come
to be. Notes will be compiled during this meeting and then dispersed before the second session.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Lisa Sorensen for her time and appreciates her format in
what everyone is facing not only at work but in personal lives as well. She spoke of how this is a time
to either grow together or possibly break and is excited in the direction they are headed of only
growing stronger as a whole.
Council Member Supple appreciates that there will be time to think and reflect and is happy
that there will be two sessions.
Council Member Whalen agreed that giving everyone time to process information and
feedback in order to actively participate in both sessions. He spoke of how there aren’t too many
opportunities anymore to discuss and brainstorm visions where there aren’t decisions being made. He
believes this is exactly the right move to break this into two sessions.
Lisa Sorensen did ask Council and staff what their energy level was currently in a
questionnaire between 1 and 5. Almost everyone is at a 1 or 2 and at very low levels of energy which
is to be expected. There has been a lot of change in Council, staff and leadership in the last year and
this will give people a chance to come together again.
There was discussion of whether this meeting should be in person or held virtually. As much
as people would like to have this type of meeting in person, it was determined to be held virtually. As it
may reduce the sense of companionship, it will not put anyone or their loved ones at risk during this
pandemic. Everyone would like to promote safety and comfort.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Lisa Sorensen for her time and is looking forward to both of
the upcoming sessions.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:55 p.m.
Date Approved: May 26, 2020
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez
Senior Office Assistant City Manager
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 7:01 p.m. via WebEx.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Ben Whalen; Edwina Garcia; and
Present: Simon Trautmann
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager; Mary
Tietjen, City Attorney; John Stark, Community Development Director; Melissa
Poehlman, Assistant Community Development Director; Julie Urban, Housing
Manager; Jane Skov, IT Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst;
and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant
Others Present: Paul Lynch Jr., Managing Member with PLH and Associates LLC.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance
OPEN FORUM
No speakers. No constituents reached out prior to the meeting with any comments.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session of May
12, 2020; and (2) City Council Meeting of May 12, 2020..
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Council Meeting
Virtual Meeting held via WebEx
May 12, 2020
Council Meeting Minutes -2- May 12, 2020
Motion carried 5-0
Item #1
PRESENTATION OF THE EQUITY IN THE TIME OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC
PROCLAMATION
Mayor Regan Gonzalez read the proclamation and provided examples of staff efforts, a city
staff team (CARES Team), staff equity training, communication options and work of the police
department. There has been extra effort in putting out multiple types of communications, public safety
reaching out to vulnerable community and Community Development Department offering resources to
those in need.
Council Member Whalen spoke of how this pandemic is making it very apparent as to where
the system is lacking in terms of inequality in serving people of color and low income residents. He
mentioned VEAP and encouraged residents to reach out if in need as well as the Richfield
Foundation.
Council Member Garcia expressed her pride in the City for declaring this proclamation and
listing the action steps. She thanked Analyst Martinez Gavina for putting the item together.
Council Member Trautmann echoed his colleague’s remarks and added that when the City is
helping those defined in the margins, it is also helping the community as a whole. It shows how the
City is committed as a whole to help in these efforts.
Council Member Supple thanked Analyst Martinez Gavina for her work in putting the
proclamation together. She also commented on how this is very important work and will continue to be
a work in progress.
Analyst Martinez Gavina shared a brief background on the proclamation. She has been in
touch weekly with surrounding cities and working together to pass similar proclamations in those
areas as well. Bloomington, Edina and Richfield will continue to work together and pool resources.
Item #2
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
M/Whalen, S/Trautmann to approve the agenda
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #3
CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Meeting Minutes -3- May 12, 2020
City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar.
A. Consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing the City to affirm the monetary limits on
statutory municipality tort liability (Staff Report No. 58).
RESOLUTION NO. 11738
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY
MINNESOTA STATUTES 466.04
M/Garcia, S/Supple to approve the consent calendar.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #4
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT
CALENDAR
None
Item #5
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A FIRST READING
OF AN ORDINANCE CREATING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND
(STAFF REPORT NO. 59)
Council Member Supple presented staff report 59.
Director Stark explained how this is a conduit for funding and is a place to deposit housing
funds for affordable housing.
M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve first reading of an ordinance establishing an Affordable
Housing Trust Fund and set second reading and a public hearing for May 26, 2020.
Council Member Whalen expressed appreciation of the quick turn around on this item and is
excited to see what is able to be done with the funding. He voiced concern of who this funding will
serve and how it could be used in the future in different leadership. He proposed an amendment to
the ordinance regarding who would be included in the funding.
M/Whalen, S/Trautmann to adopt an amendment.
City Attorney Tietjen explained how the Council has the ability to lower the percentage but the
ordinance was drafted to allow the most flexibility.
Council Meeting Minutes -4- May 12, 2020
Director Stark recommended Council to adopt the ordinance as written tonight and allow staff
time to look more into the item. He also spoke of how this could negatively impact affordable housing
programs in the future.
Council Member Whalen expressed appreciation of the reminders of how this could impact
affordable housing programs. He commented on how developers may not be inclined to produce
affordable housing for renters. He also stated he will do more research himself before the second
hearing.
Council Member Supple mentioned the work session discussion around the impact COVID-19
is having on residents and how a major stressor on people in the ability to pay their rent and
mortgages. She believed it is important to pass this item to provide some stability for residents. She
then explained how she would like some more information on the amendment before making a
decision.
Council Member Trautmann agreed with Council Member Supple to provide rental assistance
is a priority. He mentioned how one in three residents in Richfield is a renter and the difficulty it can be
to find a new place to live. He recommended Council Member Whalen hold off on his amendment.
Council Member Whalen withdrew his amendment until the second reading and appreciates
everyone’s thoughtfulness around this program.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked Council and staff for the robust discussion. She expressed
excitement on the flexibility and finding vehicles to provide support services for residents.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
M/Whalen, S/Supple to adopt a resolution approving a final plat of the RF64 Townhomes
Addition.
Item #6
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF
LAND USE APPROVALS FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 101 66TH
STREET EAST (THE EMI) (STAFF REPORT NO. 60)
Council Member Garcia presented staff report 60 and asked Director Stark what will happen if
the developer is unable to comply with the new deadline.
Director Stark commented on how it is rare for developers to request a second extension but
these are unusual times regarding the pandemic. However, if the developer is unable to comply with
the new deadline the developer would have to start over with the 60-90 day process of Council and
neighborhood meetings.
Council Meeting Minutes -5- May 12, 2020
Council Member Garcia commented the developer could sell this project to another developer
if desired. Director Stark confirmed a sale of the project could be made as long as no changes were
made to the existing plans.
M/Garcia, S/Supple to adopt a resolution granting an extension of (up to) 180 days for a
conditional use permit and final development plan for a planned unit development at 101 66th Street
East.
RESOLUTION NO. 11739
RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF
A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 101 66TH STREET EAST
Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked for clarification on possibility of a third extension. Director Stark
confirmed a developer could come back in perpetuity for extensions but he didn’t recall staff allowing
more than a couple extensions for any projects.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez commented how there can be concerns from residents in the future
but does support the extension at this time.
Council Member Whalen introduced himself and asked the developer for an update on the
project and if it can be completed if the extension is granted.
Paul Lynch with PLH and Associates explained how they have been attempting to get the
project going but the availability of labor and increase in construction costs. He is hopeful to get this
completed.
Council Member Garcia asked if there had been communication with residents in the area of
the needed extensions. Director Stark stated there has not been resident reach-out for about four
months but it is not required to communicate extensions. Council Member Garcia believes residents
should be aware.
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #7
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Rodriguez reminded Council and residents there will be a live call in option to
participate in the public hearing at the May 26, 2020 meeting along with live streaming on Channel 16
and the Richfield website. She then discussed the $7 million put into the House Bonding Bill for the
77th Underpass project and she appreciates the advocacy done. She also spoke of reopening the
Richfield Liquor Store at 64th and Lyndale so the City will have 3 stores open all still with limited hours.
She commended the Community Development Department for their work regarding the small
business loan program.
Council Meeting Minutes -6- May 12, 2020
Director Stark confirmed there were 36 applicants and the requests will be extremely close to
the allotted $150,000.
City Manager Rodriguez went on to encourage residents to come in the mornings to utilize the
motor vehicle services that are available. The area gets very crowded as the day goes on. She also
spoke of the hard decisions being made within the Parks and Recreation Department.
Council Member Supple asked about the ability to allow programs to use parks to provide food
for children. City Manager Rodriguez commented that staff is coordinating with schools to help out
where possible.
Item #8
CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
M/Garcia, S/Trautmann that the following claims and payrolls be approved:
U.S. Bank 05/12/2020
A/P Checks 287049 - 287273 $ 1,913,408.13
Payroll: 153747 - 154064 655,723.23
TOTAL $ 2,569,131.36
Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina took roll call vote:
Regan Gonzalez: AYE
Supple: AYE
Trautmann: AYE
Whalen: AYE
Garcia: AYE
Motion carried 5-0
Item #9
HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS
Council Member Trautmann thanked Director Stark and staff for supporting small businesses
during this pandemic. He also commended the Red, White and Blue Committee in their discussions
and making the hard decision to cancel events.
Council Member Whalen expressed support for the Red, White and Blue Committee along
with the Parks and Recreation Department for having to make difficult decisions. He also spoke of a
local food drive with the help of VEAP, Richfield Rotary and local realtors. He then commended Neil
Ruhland and Kate Aitchison for all their work regarding the community resource letter and impact
survey. Lastly, he reminded residents to pick up trash in parks to help keep them looking wonderful as
they are being used more now than ever.
Council Member Garcia commented on what a wonderful job everyone is doing.
Council Member Supple gave a proud shout out to the 2020 graduation class and wanted
students to know the community supports them. She also reminded residents to fill out their Census
and expressed how important it is for Richfield as a whole. She then commended the volunteers
working with the Red, White and Blue Committee, Richfield Rotary, Veteran’s Park and everyone who
is offering time to help others. Council Member Supple also mentioned the progress on the sidewalk
poetry contest. The committee is still narrowing down the candidates and she is looking forward to
Council Meeting Minutes -7- May 12, 2020
seeing the winners. Lastly, she gave praise to staff involved in putting together the resource letter that
went out to residents.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez commented on all the hard decisions being made especially around
City events and cancelling them but is happy to see some going virtual like a Memorial Day program
and 5k. She mentioned the Richfield Farmer’s Market will open on May 16th and the Recreation
Department is focusing on safety for residents. She encouraged residents to take necessary
precautions to protect themselves as well as their neighbors, social distance and wear masks. Lastly,
she thanked Fire, Police and Public Works Departments for participating in the birthday patrols and
was excited to see they celebrated 100 patrols.
Item #10
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:16 p.m.
Date Approved: May 26, 2020
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez
Senior Office Assistant City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.A.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 62
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
5/26/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jack B roz, Transportation E ngineer
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
5/19/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
5/21/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider the approval of the Portland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Link Project :
1. Construction Cooperative Agreement;
2. Limited Use Permit; and
3. No Parking Resolution.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Ov erview
Hennepin County is the lead agency on the Portland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Link Project. The
proposed improvements will be accomplished in conjunction with a mill and overlay of Portland Avenue (north
of 66th Street) and new street striping including the roundabout at 66th Street. Pedestrian activated flashing
lights will be installed at the 66th Street roundabout crosswalks along with minor curb construction at the
eastbound Trunk Highway 62 (Crosstown) & Portland ramp intersection.
Construction Cooperative Agreement, Limited Use Permit & No Parking Resolution
The Construction Cooperative Agreement between the City and Hennepin County is a routine
agreement to memorialize the partnership and to outline each party’s financial and maintenance
responsibilities, and associated costs to improve the segment of the corridor on Portland (C S A H 35)
from 67th Street to Trunk Highway 62.
The Limited Use Permit between the City and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/D OT)
under consideration is a requirement from the state when municipalities or other entities construct trails
on Mn/D OT right-of-way, the trail over Trunk Highway 62 triggers this requirement.
The No Parking Resolution authorizes Hennepin County to erect "no parking" signage along the project
as detailed below.
Process
The preliminary layout of Portland Avenue was developed by Hennepin County and presented at two
Transportation Commission meetings and one public open house. Concerns were identified for bicyclists,
pedestrians, and motorists along the corridor. Through the process, the preliminary design was tailored to
address the identified corridor issues. The layout intends to improve the conditions for each of the modes as
described below.
At the February 6, 2019 Transportation Commission meeting, the preliminary layout for the Portland Avenue
Bicycle and Pedestrian Link Project was recommended for City Council approval and it was subsequently
approved at the February 26, 2019 City Council meeting.
Final design began in 2019 and has been completed in 2020 to develop construction plans and specifications
for construction bidding in 2020.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the Portland Ave nue Bicy cle and Pe de strian Link Proje ct:
1. Construction Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County;
2. Limited Use Permit with the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and
3. No Parking Resolution.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Key Points
The Portland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Link Project will connect existing bicycle lanes south
of 66th Street and existing bicycle lanes north of 60th Street in the City of Minneapolis, eliminating
the existing "bike gap".
This gap in the Hennepin County bicycle network was ranked by the County as the highest
priority to connect.
The project received Federal funding and was the top ranked bicycle project as determined by the
Metropolitan Council.
The Richfield Bicycle Master plan identifies Portland Avenue as a future bicycle route.
Design Features
Bicyclists - Concerns were identified due to the lack of facilities for bicyclists. The preliminary layout
includes:
On-street buffered bicycle lanes from 67th Street to Trunk Highway 62 (Crosstown).
I mproved crossings at 66th Street and the Trunk Highway 62 (Crosstown) ramp intersection.
Pedestrians - Concerns were identified related to discomfort, vehicle speeds, and safety when crossing
and walking along the corridor. The preliminary layout includes pedestrian activated flashing crosswalk
lights at the roundabout at 66th Street and Portland Avenue.
Parking - The existing condition allows for on-street parking on Sundays only. A visual survey of Sunday
parking did not identify any use by residents and no comments were received that expressed concerns
about the potential loss of Sunday parking on Portland Avenue. The preliminary layout prohibits all on-
street parking on the east and west sides of Portland Avenue. I n addition, a prohibition of all on-street
parking on the north and south sides of 66th Street from 5th Avenue to Oakland Avenue is required for
safe operations near the roundabout.
Motorists - Concerns were identified with safety and mobility along the corridor. Safety concerns
included above average crash and injury rates. I n addition, the existing speeds make it uncomfortable
and potentially dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists. The preliminary design features include:
Three lane roadway via a 4-to-3 lane conversion similar to Portland Avenue South of 66th Street,
with left turn lanes at intersections.
Traffic signal at 64th Street (same as existing).
Impacts - The design generally fits within the existing right-of-way, however, it will require a sidewalk
easement at the City of Richfield Water Plant and at 64th Street entrance to the park. To mitigate these
impacts, Hennepin County will plant additional trees along Portland Avenue adjacent to the park.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The Portland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Link Project, from 67th Street to Trunk Highway 62
(Crosstown), is consistent with the following approved plans:
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7 - Transportation)
Bicycle Master Plan
Pedestrian Master Plan
Complete Streets Policy
Arterial Roads Study
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The Cooperative Agreement, No Parking Resolution and Limited Use Permit need to be approved in
order to advertise for bids in 2020 and to facilitate the 2020-2021 construction timeline.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The estimated cost to the City for the new pedestrian activated crossing light systems portion of the
project is $110,000 and is to be financed by Municipal State Aid in 2020.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the agreements and will be available to answer questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
P ortland P ed. & B ike L ink L ayout E xhibit
P ortland P ed. & B ike L ink P roject E xtents E xhibit
C onstruction C ooperative A greement C ontract/A greement
C ost E stimate E xhibit A E xhibit
C ounty S treetscape Guidelines E xhibit B E xhibit
L imited Use P ermit C ontract/A greement
L imited Use P ermit E xhibit A E xhibit
P ortland No P arking Resolution Resolution L etter
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
LEGEND
City of
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
4/21/2020PW6631Default\\tempo\proj\035_1543\Design\Layouts\ORD_Layout001.dgn35
011543RICHFIELD AND MINNEAPOLISDESIGN SPEED mi/h_30ARE: XX,XXX (20XX COUNTS)PROJECT 035_1543 (SERVER TEMPO)A-MINOR ARTERIAL
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
COUNTY ROAD 35 PORTLAND AVE
RICHFIELD 35EXISTING R/W
PROJECT LOCATION
C.R. NO. VICINITY OF FROM DATE:PROJECT NO.TOTHE TRAFFIC VOLUMES SHOWNTHE ALIGNMENT AND GRADESTENTATIVE AND SUBJECT TOCHANGE WITHOUT NOTICELAYOUT NO.SCALE: 1in = ftSHOWN ON THIS LAYOUT ARE50MINNEAPOLIS
City of
PROPOSED WALK - TRAIL
RESTRIPING
PROPOSED ROADWAY
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
35
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
53
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
35 HENNEPIN
COUNTY
35
EXISTING BUS STOP
FLASHING BEACON (SOLAR)
RECTANGULAR RAPID
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
53
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
35
DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED RECONSTRUCT
WORK BY OTHERS
SIGNAL POLE
EXISTING TRAFFIC
NEW CURB
PROPOSED GRASS BOULEVARD
CITY LIMIT
MINNESOTAHENNEPIN COUNTYA
A
0'
SCALE
'50'25
Wood
Lake1.71.1FORT
SNELLING
NATIONAL
CEMETERY
MINNEAPOLIS-
ST. PAUL
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT0.10.30.10.9
RICH FIELD
POP.
Rich-
field
Lake
1.2
1.1
Grass
Lake
0.6
Mother
L.
2.3
W.54TH ST.S.D
IAMON
D
S.LK
.RD.S.E.60TH ST.
E.34TH54TH
AVE.AVE.AVE.AVE.AVE.AVE.Inc.27
33 35
1921
23
WOLD-CHAMBERLAIN
FIELD
L.R.T.PARK
Lake
16"Diamond
16"NG31
25
35,228 0.44B 52 35
62
121
35W
22
52
152
32
53
2C
77
2A
6'2.5'11'11'11'2.5'6'
50'
PROPOSED
SECTION A-A
11'11'
PROPOSED
SECTION B-B PROPOSED
SECTION C-C
PROPOSED
SECTION D-D
EXISTING
SECTION D-D EXISTING
SECTION C-C
EXISTING
SECTION B-B
EXISTING
SECTION A-A
12.5'12.5'12.5'12.5'
50'
11'12.5'12.5'12.5'12.5'
61'
12.5'12.5'12.5'12.5'
50'
8'11'10'11'8'
48'
PROPOSED
BRIDGE SECTION BR - BR
EXISTING
BRIDGE SECTION BR - BR
11'11'6'10'
TRAIL THRU LANE
2'2'2'2'10'2'
76'
11'10'11'4'3'11'11'8'3'
PARKING
64'48'
BUFFER BUFFERTHRU LANE
12'12'8'
1.17'
12'12'8'
1.17'
10'11'
1'
10'10'11'
1'
10'
1.17'1.17'
66.33'
66.33'
6'12'12'
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE TURN LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE TURN LANE TURN LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANE THRU LANE
THRU LANEBIKE BIKE
TURN LANEPARKING PARKING
MEDIAN TRAILTRAIL
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK
TRAILTRAILTRAIL
TURN LANE
TURN LANEBIKE BIKE
SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK
BLVD
SIDEWALKSIDEWALK
6'
THRU LANE
AR
EA
=
1
5
S
Q
'REM
=
4
8
SQ
'PERI
M
ET
E
R
=
3
0
'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
AREA
=
1
5
SQ
'REM =
4
8
SQ
'
PER
I
M
E
TE
R
=
30
'AREA
=
1
5
SQ
'
REM
=
4
8
S
Q
'
PER
IM
E
TE
R
=
30
'
AREA
=
1
5
S
Q
'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'B
B
C
C
D
D
BR
BR
S.P. 027-635-034
11/06/2019
HENNEPIN CO. PROJECT NO. 1543
CR 35 PRELIMINARY LAYOUT - 01
PRELIMINARY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE
E 60TH STPORTLAND AVE S (CR 35)E 61ST STPARK AVEMN HIGHWAY 62PORTLAND AVE S (CR 35)E 64TH STE 66TH ST (CR 53)PORTLAND AVE S (CR 35)
PORTLAND AVE S (CR 35)
PORTLAND AVE S (CR 35)E 66TH ST (CR 53)593659305939594160006001600960146020602460326036604060446048605260176023602560296033603760416056604561006108611261166120612461286105610961586121612561296133613062186224622862366244630063996301631163156308631263206328633663446329633363396400641264246430643664446425642965016448650065086516652050065276505660066016545660166166613661766206107616061236127613161356042604661106114611861226126603560396043604760345928592659245937593360136031AUTOCAREHONEST-1TAX SERVICECOBOSREALTORA G BOGENFAMILY DENTISTRYDIAMOND LAKE CLINICJIM'S AUTOCRASECS WIRELESSFARMERS INSURANCEKNOW NAME RECORDSAVENDARO BEAUTY SALONRISING STAR ACADEMYDAIRY QUEENSUBURBAN DRIVING SCHOOLSUPERAMERICACITY OF RICHFIELDAMERICAN LEGIONFUNERAL CHAPELMORRIS NISSENAPARTMENTSVICTORIA MANORTHINK STUCCOT&T AUTOMOTIVECITY OF RICHFIELDCITY OF MINNEAPOLISCOORDINATED WITH METRO TRANSITDESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TO BED LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATIONSCOORDINATED WITH METRO TRANSITDESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TO BED LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATIONSPARKING
PARKING
PARKING
BE REPLACEDSIGNAL SYSTEM TOE 67TH STCOORDINATED WITH METRO TRANSITDESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TO BED LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATIONSCOORDINATED WITH METRO TRANSITDESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TO BED LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATIONSVERTICAL SEPARATION
BUFFER TO INCLUDE
LEGION LAKE
NicolletPark
HerediaPark
VetsMemorialPark
62nd St E
64th St E
63rd St E
61st St E
60th St E
67th St E67th St E
65th St E
64th St E
61st St E
1st Ave S59th St E2nd Ave S6
2ndStE
Chester St
60th St E
Stevens Ave S2nd Ave S3rd Ave SClinton Ave S4th Ave SChicago Ave SElliot Ave SColumbus Ave S10th Ave SColumbus AvePark Ave SChicago AveOakland Ave S10th Ave S1st Ave S12th Ave S5th Ave SElliot Ave12th Ave S11th Ave SClinton AveOakland AveRoslyn Pl
LorenDr
Park Ave
Ap pl e Ln3rd Ave SClinton Ave S2nd Ave SStevens Ave S4th Ave S5th Ave S11th Ave SRamp
$+COUNTY52
$+COUNTY52
$+COUNTY53 $+COUNTY53
$+COUNTY35
66th St E66th St E Portland AvePortland Ave SPortland Ave SÉÉMINNESOTA62 ÉÉMINNESOTA62
RICHFIELD
MINNEAPOLIS
%&'(35W
SP 027-635-034 Location
CS AH 35 (Portland Ave S) from 67th St E to 60th St E
Hennepin
Disclaimer:This map (i) is furnished "AS IS" with no representation as to completenessor accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable forlegal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for anydamage, injury or loss resulting from this map.
Publication date: 5/7/2019
¯0 1,600800Feet
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
County Project No. 2154300
County State Aid Highway 35
City of Richfield
County of Hennepin
1 ___
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the
laws of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as the “County”), and the City of Richfield,
a Minnesota home-rule charter city, under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred
to as the “City.” The County and the City collectively are referred to as the “Parties.”
Recitals
The following Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement.
1. There exists a segment of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 35 (Portland Avenue) from
Minnesota Highway (MN)-62 to 67th Street within the corporate limits of the City, which will
be resurfaced and reconfigured to include enhanced multi-modal facilities along the roadway.
2. The segment of Portland Avenue mentioned above contains a gap in bicycle network between
MN-62 and 67th streets.
3. The Parties, in an effort to materialize the visions of their Complete Street Policies, to improve
motor vehicle operations and pedestrian safety, especially those needing accessibility features
along the corridor, and to minimize construction activity impacts to the public, have
collaborated and partnered to reconstruct improvements of the corridor from MN-62 to 67th
Street within the City’s corporate limits.
4. The Parties have agreed to enter into this Agreement to memorialize the partnership and to
outline each party’s financial and maintenance responsibilities, and associated costs to improve
a segment of the corridor on CSAH 35 from MN-62 to 67th Street, under County Project (CP)
2154300, City Project No. 40024, which improvements include grading, drainage, bituminous
surfacing, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, bicycle facility, traffic signals,
landscaping and other related improvements, and which shall hereinafter be referred to as the
“Project.”
5. The County shall be the lead agency in Project designs and construction administration
engineering, and be responsible for acquiring all necessary right of way and/or other
governmental agencies-required permits needed for the Project.
6. The City has indicated its willingness to cost participate in the Project as detailed herein.
7. The County Engineer has heretofore prepared an Engineer’s Estimate of quantities and unit
prices for the above described Project in the sum of Four Million Three Hundred Eighty Seven
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
2 _____
Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Two Dollars and Forty Eight Cents ($4,387,322.48), and a
copy of the Engineer’s Estimate and an estimated Division of Cost Summary, marked Exhibit
“A”, is attached hereto.
8. The County, under the supervision of the County certified arborist, intends to plant trees along
the Project corridor in conjunction with the construction of the Project and propose to transfer
ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the trees to the City after the establishment
period of two years as defined in this Agreement.
9. The Project will be carried out by the Parties under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 162.17, Subdivision 1, and Section 471.59.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Term of Agreement, Survival of Terms, and Exhibits.
Effective Date. This Agreement is effective as of the date of the final signature.
Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire after the date in which all obligations
have been satisfactorily fulfilled.
Survival of Terms. Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term,
cancellation or termination of this Agreement do survive such term, cancellation or
termination. Such provisions include but are not limited to: Maintenance
Responsibilities, Records/Audits, Indemnification, Insurance, Worker Compensation
Claims, Cancellation, Termination, and Minnesota Laws Govern.
Exhibits. Engineer’s Estimate of quantities and unit prices and estimated Division of
Cost Summary marked Exhibit “A” and Hennepin County Department of Public Works
– Transportation Division: Recommended Urban Landscape/Streetscape Guidelines
marked Exhibit “B” are attached and incorporated into this Agreement.
2. Construction by the County.
Contract Award and Administration. The County or its agents shall prepare the
necessary plans, specifications, and proposal; obtain approval of the plans and
specifications from MnDOT and the City; advertise for bids for the work and
construction; receive and open bids pursuant to the advertisement; enter into a contract
with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder;
administer the contract; and perform the required engineering and inspection; all in
accordance with the plans and specifications set forth below.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
3 _____
Plans and Specifications.
2.2.1. All design work performed by the County and its agents that is to be
incorporated into the bidding documents for the Project shall be prepared and
certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. All designs
which affect County facilities shall conform to MnDOT Design Standards applicable
to County State Aid Highways and to the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), and be approved by the County Engineer.
2.2.2. The plans and specifications are referenced and identified as S.P. 027-635-
034, TA2720(126), and approved by MnDOT.
2.2.3. At the request of the City, the County or its agents shall furnish the City with
any working copies of any plans, designs or reports at any time during the Project
design process.
Construction Supervision and Inspection. The County or its agents will administer
the construction contract, and perform all necessary engineering, inspection and testing
of all the contract work. All work for the Project shall be completed in compliance with
the MnDOT and City approved plans and specifications. The City Engineer or a
designated representative shall have the right, as the work progresses, to enter upon the
job site to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the County
Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary, but will have no responsibility
for the supervision of the work.
Plan Changes and Additional Construction.
2.4.1. The City agrees that the County may make changes in the plans or in the
character of the contract construction that are reasonably necessary to cause the
construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It
is further agreed by the City that the County may enter into any change orders or
supplemental agreements with the County’s contractor for the performance of any
additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or
desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project.
2.4.2. The City shall have the right to review any proposed changes to the plans and
specifications as they relate to the City's cost participation prior to the work being
performed, except in emergencies, and in those instances where the proposed changes
necessitate a re-engineering of the design and/or specifications, the County shall submit
the re-engineered design and/or specifications to the City. The City Engineer or
designated representative shall respond to the County’s request for approval to
authorize the issuance of any negotiated change orders or supplemental agreements
prepared by the County that affect the City's share of the construction cost within a
reasonable time frame.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
4 _____
Right of Way/Permit
2.5.1. The County or its agents shall acquire all additional right of way, permits and/or
easements required for the construction of the Project.
2.5.2. The City shall, without cost to the County or its contractor, grant the County and
its contractor the right to occupy the City right of way and/or city owned property as
necessary to perform the work described in the Project plans. This right is limited to
the purpose of constructing the Project, and administering such construction.
Traffic Signal/ Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) Related Work.
2.6.1. In addition to the City’s cost participation as provided elsewhere in this
Agreement, the City, at no cost to the County, shall: (1) install, cause the installation of,
or perpetuate the existence of an adequate three wire, 120/240 volt, single phase,
alternating current electrical power connection to the permanent traffic control signal
systems and integral streetlights included in the Project; and (2) shall provide the
electrical energy for the operation of all permanent and temporary traffic control signal
systems and integral streetlights installed as a part of the Project.
2.6.2. The City shall not revise by addition or deletion, nor alter or adjust any
component, part, sequence, or timing of the traffic control signal, however, nothing
herein shall prohibit prompt, prudent action by properly constituted authorities in
situations where a part of such traffic control signals may be directly involved in an
emergency.
2.6.3. The EVP Systems provided for herein shall be installed, operated, maintained or
removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements:
2.6.3.1. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an
emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and
169.03.
2.6.3.2. The City shall report malfunctions of EVP systems to the County
immediately after discovery of the malfunction.
2.6.3.3. In the event the EVP Systems or components are, in the opinion of the
County, being misused or the conditions set forth herein are violated, and such
misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof
from the County, the County shall remove the EVP Systems.
2.6.3.4. All timing of the EVP Systems shall be determined by the County.
Street Lighting. The Project will impact street lighting along the Project corridor, the
County or its contractor will install street lights per the construction plans. The City
agrees to participate in the cost to install the lights as shown in Exhibit “A”.
2.7.1. In addition to the City’s cost participation as provided elsewhere in this
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
5 _____
Agreement, the City, at no cost to the County, shall provide the electrical energy for the
operation of all the streetlights installed as a part of the Project.
Asbestos. The Project may include the removal of asbestos containing electrical
conduit. The County and its agents have completed the specifications for the safe
removal of asbestos containing electrical conduit. The County shall be responsible for
the oversight of the removal of asbestos containing electrical conduit and compliance
with the abovementioned specifications. The County will provide the City copies of all
shipping manifests and hauling records related to right of way asbestos removal on the
Project.
Detours. The Project may require limited detouring of traffic onto the City’s streets.
The Parties agree that there will be no additional compensation to the City for detours
onto its streets required to construct the Project.
3. Cost Participation.
The City shall participate in the costs of the contract construction for the Project as set
forth in the estimated Division of Cost Summary in Exhibit "A," which list all
construction items the City cost-participates in such as: Mobilization, Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), Traffic Control, and associated design engineering
and construction administration fees.
The respective proportionate shares of the pro-rata pay items included in Exhibit "A"
shall remain unchanged throughout the life of this Agreement. The estimated amount
on Page 1 of this Agreement and as shown in Exhibit "A" is an estimate of the costs for
the contract construction on the Project. Therefore, the unit prices set forth in the
contract with the successful bidder and the final quantities as measured by the County
Engineer's designated representatives shall govern in computing the total final contract
construction cost for apportioning the cost of the Project according to the provisions
herein, and the final quantities as measured by the County Engineer's designated
representatives for contract pay items in which the City is participating shall be subject
to the review and approval by the City Engineer.
The City also agrees to reimburse the County for the City’s proportionate share of design
and construction administration engineering costs for the Project. The City’s share of
design engineering costs shall be equal to ten percent (10%) of the total final amount of
the City’s share of contract construction costs for the Project. The City’s share of
construction engineering costs shall be equal to eight percent (8%) of the total final
amount of the City’s share of contract construction costs for the Project. The City’s
proportionate shares of design and construction engineering costs as listed in Exhibit
“A” are estimated, and the actual City’s proportionate shares of design and construction
administration engineering fees will be computed using the total final amount of the
City’s share of the contract construction costs for the Project.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
6 _____
4. Payment.
For informational purposes only, as referenced in the Engineer’s Estimate and an
estimated Division of Cost Summary, marked Exhibit “A”, the City’s estimated amount
to reimburse the County per this Agreement is $105,975.80. The estimated amount due
to the County from the City includes estimated costs of contract construction, design
engineering (10%), and construction engineering (8%).
After an award by the County to the successful bidder on the Project, the County shall
invoice the City for ninety five percent (95%) of the estimated City’s shares in the
contract construction costs and construction and design engineering costs for the
Project.
Payments shall be made to the County, in the name of the Hennepin County Treasurer,
by the City for the full amount due stated on the invoices within forty five (45) days of
the invoice date. The estimated City shares shall be based on actual contract unit prices
applied to the estimated quantities shown in the plans.
The payment should include the date, the name of the County’s project manager (Mr.
Josh Potter, P.E.), project name and county project number (C.P. 2154300). Payment
and supporting documentation should be mailed to the following address:
OBF/APEX A-12 GC
Mail Code 129
300 South 6th St
Minneapolis, MN 55487
In the event the County Engineer or the County's staff determines the need to amend the
construction contract with a supplemental agreement or change order which results in
an increase in the contract amount for the Project, the City hereby agrees to remit within
forty five (45) days of notification by the County of the change an amount equal to
ninety five percent (95%) of the estimated City shares as documented in the
supplemental agreement or change order.
The remainder of the City’s shares in the engineering and contract construction costs of
the Project, including additional costs resulting from supplemental agreements and
change orders, will be due the County upon acceptance by the County’s construction
engineer of all the construction work performed by the County’s construction contractor
and submittal of the County Engineer's final estimate for the Project to the City.
Upon final payment to the Project contractor by the County, any amount remaining as
a balance in the deposit account will be returned to the City, within 45 days, on a
proportionate basis based on the City’s initial deposit amount and the City’s final
proportionate share of the Project costs. Likewise, any amount due the County from the
City upon final payment by the County shall be paid by the City as its final payment for
the construction and engineering costs of the Project within forty five (45) days of
receipt of an invoice from the County.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
7 _____
All payments to the County must be postmarked by the date due or a late penalty of one
percent (1%) per month, or fraction thereof, on the unpaid balance will be charged to
the City. The City shall pay the amount due as stated on the statement, notwithstanding
any dispute of such amount. Should a disputed amount be resolved in favor of the City,
the County shall reimburse the disputed amount plus daily interest thereon calculated
from the date such disputed amount was received by the County. Daily interest shall be
at the rate of one percent (1%) per month on the disputed amount.
5. Tree Planting. The County will provide and plant twenty (20) bare root “gravel bed” trees in
accordance with the plans within the right of way along CSAH 35 from 67th Street to MN-62
in conjunction with construction of the Project.
“Gravel bed” trees are defined herein as bare root trees delivered from a nursery and
installed in an irrigated bed of gravel. During this time, trees dramatically increase their
fibrous root volume, which in turn decreases transplant shock and increases survival
rates making them particularly suitable for roadway corridors that are heavily salted
during the winter months. In addition, “gravel bed” trees are approximately one quarter
the cost of trees which are most commonly planted along roadways. The County has
the materials and resources available to complete the “gravel bed” tree planting along
the CSAH 35 roadway at a greatly reduced cost.
The installation process will be overseen by a County certified arborist. Hennepin
County Foresters will work with Sentencing to Service (STS) crews to install the trees
which will minimize planting costs. The trees will be maintained and watered for the
first two years (establishment period) by the County STS Forestry crew. County
certified arborists will pay close attention to the status of the trees during this period and
ensure that the proper level of care is given if any tree looks stressed. Any tree that does
not survive within the first two years will be replaced by the County.
The City hereby affirms that the County STS Forestry crew is permitted to fill its water
tank at a designated City facility to assist in watering efficiency during the two year
establishment period. The County intends to use “gator bags” for watering the trees and
employs a 500 gallon water tank for the watering efforts. It is estimated it will take
eight (8) tanks to water the trees planted with the Project at one time, and the County
STS Forestry crew will water the trees on average six (6) times per season. The City
agrees to provide the needed water for the trees at no cost to the County.
After the two-year establishment period, the City will own and maintain the planted
trees. The City shall thereafter maintain the trees and landscaping portion of the project
as stipulated in the maintenance section in this Agreement.
6. County Permit Issuance. The County reserves the right not to issue any permits for a period
of five (5) years after completion of the Project for any service cuts in the roadway surfacing
of the County Highways included in the Project for any installation of underground utilities
which would be considered as new work. Service cuts shall be allowed for the maintenance
and repair of any existing underground utilities.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
8 _____
7. No Parking.
As part of the Project, “No-Parking” signs shall be installed as represented in the plans.
In addition to the City’s cost participation as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, the
City, at its expense, shall provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street
parking on those portions of CSAH 35 constructed under this Project recognizing the
concurrent jurisdiction of the Sheriff of Hennepin County.
No modification of the above parking restrictions shall be made without first obtaining
a resolution from the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners permitting the
modification. In addition to the City’s cost participation as provided elsewhere in this
Agreement, the City shall, at its own expense, remove and replace city-owned signs that
are within the construction limits of the Project if requested by the County's Project
Engineer.
8. The City’s Maintenance Responsibilities. In addition to the City’s cost participation as
provided elsewhere in this Agreement, upon completion of the Project, the City shall provide
year-round maintenance at its sole cost as outlined below, except for maintaining the trees
planted along the corridor during the two-year establishment period.
Traffic Signal Components. Routine maintenance of permanent traffic control signals
and interconnect reconstructed under the Project, including the lamp on the luminaire
extension, the fuse and the wire from the lamp to the load side of the meter socket of
traffic signal systems, and EVP components. In the event that the City fails to perform
or request for the County’s assistance in performing these maintenance responsibilities,
the County with its forces, at its sole discretion and subject to the limitations imposed
by availability of manpower, equipment and replacement parts, and the condition of the
County Road System, will endeavor to perform these maintenance items and invoice
the City for the services rendered, and the City shall pay such invoices.
Street Lighting. The City shall assume routine maintenance of street lights installed as
part of the Project at no cost to the County. Maintenance includes but is not limited to
replacing burned-out lamps, replacing fixtures or any other lighting components as per
accepted City maintenance practices.
Sidewalks and Pedestrian Refuges. Routine maintenance of sidewalks and Americans
with Disabilities Acts (ADA) pedestrian ramps. Maintenance includes, but is not
limited to, winter maintenance, debris removal, patching, crack repair, and any other
maintenance activities according to accepted city maintenance practices. Additionally,
the City shall be responsible for winter maintenance on the sidewalk portions of the
medians.
Crosswalk Markings. Maintenance of the newly installed durable crosswalk
markings.
Storm Sewers. Routine maintenance of city owned storm sewer drainage systems such
as all trunk lines, grit chambers, ponds, storm water treatment and drainage structures.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
9 _____
Bicycle Facility. Routine maintenance of the newly constructed off road bicycle facility
(cycle track, trail). Maintenance includes, but is not limited to trail surfacing, sweeping,
and winter maintenance.
Green Bicycle Conflict Zone Markings. Routine maintenance of the newly installed
green bicycle conflict zone markings according to accepted City maintenance
practices.
Landscaping. After the two-year establishment period, the City shall own and
maintain the trees planted along the corridor as part of the Project. The rest of the
streetscape, landscaping and associated landscaping structures, installed as part of this
Project shall become the property of the City and all maintenance, restoration, repair,
replacement or other work or services required thereafter shall be performed by the City
at no cost to the County and shall be in accordance with the attached “Hennepin County
Department of Public Works – Transportation Division: Recommended Urban
Landscape/Streetscape Guidelines”, marked Exhibit “B.”
9. The County’s Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon completion of the Project, the County
shall provide year-round maintenance at its sole cost as outlined below:
Roadways. Maintenance of CSAH 35 reconstructed under the Project. Maintenance
includes, but is not limited to, sweeping, debris removal, resurfacing and seal coating,
and any other maintenance activities according to accepted County maintenance
practices.
Traffic Signal Components. The County shall thereafter retain ownership of and
maintain and repair the traffic control signal systems and their components at the
expense of the County except for those items identified as City’s responsibilities above.
(Traffic signal systems on intersection of CSAH 35 and MN-62 ramps are owned and
maintained by MnDOT under a separate agreement.)
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB). The County shall thereafter retain
ownership of and maintain and repair the newly installed RRFB systems.
County Road Pavement Striping. The County shall thereafter maintain and repair all
pavement striping for roadway users installed as a part of the Project at the expense of
the County.
Storm Sewers. Upon completion of the Project, the County shall retain ownership of
and maintenance responsibilities for those portions of the roadway storm sewer drainage
system functioning as catch basins and associated lead pipes that are within or between
the outermost curb lines of the County roadways as well as those within the radius return
limits of intersecting municipal streets, at no cost to the City.
10. Authorized Representatives. In order to coordinate the services of the County with the
activities of the City and vice versa so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the
Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated representative and the City Engineer or
designated representatives shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and the City.
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
10 _____
County of Hennepin:
Carla Stueve
County Highway Engineer
Hennepin County Public Works
1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340
Office: 612-596-0356
Carla.Stueve@hennepin.us
City of Richfield:
Kristin Asher
Public Works Director
1901 E. 66th Street, Richfield, MN 55423
Office: 612.861.9795
KAsher@Richfieldmn.gov
11. Assignment, Amendments, Default, Waiver, Agreement Complete, Cancellation or
Termination.
Assignment. The City shall not assign, subcontract, transfer or pledge this Agreement
and/or the services to be performed hereunder, whether in whole or in part, without the
prior written consent of the County.
Amendments. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of
this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an
amendment to this Agreement and signed by the Parties hereto.
Default. If the City fail to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails
to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, this shall
constitute a default. Unless the City's default is excused by the County, the County may
upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety.
Waiver. The County's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to
exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver
of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general
waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement.
Agreement Complete. The entire Agreement between the Parties is contained herein
and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the
Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are
incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement.
Cancellation or Termination. This Agreement may be terminated or cancelled by
each party by mutual agreement with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30)
day written notice. This Agreement shall be terminated or cancelled by any party upon
a material breach by the other party. In the event of a termination or cancellation, the
Parties will remain responsible for cost participation as provided in this Agreement for
Type text here
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
11 _____
obligations incurred up through the effective date of the termination or cancellation,
subject to any equitable adjustment that may be required to account for the effects of a
breach.
12. Indemnification. The County and the City agree to defend, indemnify and hold each other
harmless, including their officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any
liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including
reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of either
party or either party’s consultant or sub consultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by
them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of
the services required by this contract, and against all loss by reason of the failure of either party
to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this contract. The Parties’ liability shall
be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law.
13. Insurance. The County and the City agree that any future contract let by the Parties for the
performance of any of the work included hereunder shall include clauses that will: 1) Require
the contractor to indemnify and hold the County and the City, their commissioners, officers,
agents and employees harmless from any liability, claim, demand, judgments, expenses, action
or cause of action of any kind or character arising out of any act or omission of the contractor,
their officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) Require the contractor to be an
independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this
Agreement; and 3) Require the contractor to provide and maintain enough insurance so as to
assure the performance of its indemnification and hold harmless obligation:
Limits
(1) Commercial General Liability on an occurrence
Basis with contractual liability coverage:
General Aggregate $2,000,000
Products - Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000
Personal and Advertising Injury $1,500,000
Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury
and Property Damage $1,500,000
Hennepin County shall be named as an additional insured for the
Commercial General Liability coverage with respect to operations
Covered under this Agreement.
(2) Automobile Liability:
Combined Single limit each occurrence coverage or the
equivalent covering owned, non-owned, and hired
automobiles: $1,500,000
(3) Workers’ Compensation and employer’s Liability:
Work Workers’ Compensation: Statutory
If the contractor is based outside the State of
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
12 _____
Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota laws.
Employer’s Liability. Bodily injury by:
Accident – Each Accident $500,000
Disease – Policy Limit $500,000
Disease - Each Employee $500,000
(4) Professional Liability – Per Claim and Aggregate: $2,000,000
The above listed Professional Liability insurance will not be required in any
construction contract let by the City if the City’s contractors are not required to
perform design engineering as part of the construction contract.
An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable
method to provide the required insurance limits.
The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the
sole responsibility of the City’s contractors to determine the need for and to
procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with the Project.
All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of
policies shall be submitted to the County upon written request.
14. Worker Compensation Claims.
Any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the
performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by
the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and any and all claims that
may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment
Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so
engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act
or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on any of the work or services
provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the
County.
Any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in
the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed
by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that
may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment
Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so
engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act
or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on any of the work or services
provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the
City.
15. Records/Audits. The City agrees that the County, the State Auditor or any of their duly
authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
13 _____
reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and
transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the Project and
the accounting practices and procedures of the City which involve transactions relating to this
Agreement.
16. Nondiscrimination. The provisions of Minnesota Statute Section 181.59 and of any
applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action
Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though
fully set forth herein.
17. Minnesota Laws Govern. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and
interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal
relations between the Parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction
for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the Parties will be in the
appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota.
(This space left intentionally blank)
Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
14 _____
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
(Seal) By:_______________________________
Mayor
Date:______________________________
And:______________________________
Manager
Date:______________________________
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ATTEST:
By: By:__________________________________
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board
Date: Date: ________________________________
And: ________________________________
County Administrator
Date: ________________________________
REVIEWED BY
THE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE: And:_________________________________
Assistant County Administrator, Public Works
By: Date:________________________________
Assistant County Attorney
Date:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By:_________________________________
County Highway Engineer
Date:________________________________
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By:_________________________________
Department Director, Transportation
Operations
Date:________________________________
CSAH 35 (PORTLAND AVE) COUNTY PROJECT NO. 1543
DIVISION OF COST SUMMARY
(EXHIBIT A)
TOTAL Federal
Funding
Hennepin County
State Aid
Hennepin County
State Aid (REPP) Minneapolis
Minneapolis
(Force Acct
For Traffic
Items)
Richfield Metro Transit
Roadway (1)3,038,115.00$ 750,176.00$ 2,207,939.00$ 80,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Local 1 (2)218,580.00$ -$ -$ -$ 218,580.00$ -$ -$ -$
Local 2 (3)89,810.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 89,810.00$ -$
Local 3 (4)94,266.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 94,266.00$
Construction Total 3,440,771.00$ 750,176.00$ 2,207,939.00$ 80,000.00$ 218,580.00$ -$ 89,810.00$ 94,266.00$
Right of Way (5)250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Engineering & Construction
Admin (6)631,551.48$ -$ 564,000.00$ -$ 43,844.40$ -$ 16,165.80$ 7,541.28$
Traffic Signal - City Supplied
Equipment & Connections (7)50,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ -$ -$
Water - City Supplied
Equipment & Connections (8)15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
PROJECT TOTAL 4,387,322.48$ 750,176.00$ 3,061,939.00$ 80,000.00$ 105,975.80$ 101,807.28$
*All costs are estimated and will be updated based on bid prices after bid opening
NOTES:
Last Updated: 5/8/2020 At 4:00PM
(8) One Water Hydrant move prompted by project work, force account work for City of Minneapolis crews to complete wet tap and valve. Estimated Force Account Work =
$15,000 for one wet tap and valve for one hydrant relocation with city supplying hydrant to contractor.
County to reimburse city for 100% of total wet tap and valve costs post project via Force Account once documentation of the total costs (Time, Labor, Materials) are provided
by the city.
(1) Federal Aid Eligible items. Federal funding capped at $750,176.00 or 80% of Federal Aid Eligible items, whichever is less. In the case of this estimate, the $750,176 cap
controls. Hennepin County retains all federal funding share for this project due to not following county cost share policy. REPP funding for county cost share for roadway
lighting only in Minneapolis. Remaining above the cap is local match (Project does not follow standard county cost share policy) with Hennepin County covering all costs
except:
Note (2): Minneapolis covering 50% of temporary/permenant signal at Portland and 60th, 50% for new roadway lighting in Minneapolis, & 100% Pedestrian Refuge Median in
Portland Ave at Park Ave.
Note (3): Richfield covering 100% of RRFB costs at Portland Ave and 66th Street roundabout. 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin fees for these local costs
listed in Note (5) below.
Note (4): Metro Transit covering 100% of Metro Transit D Line underground and flatwork costs for platforms at Portland Ave and 60th Street. 10% Design Engineering and 8%
Construction Admin fees for these local costs listed in Note (5) below.
(2) Minneapolis covering 50% of temporary/permenant signal at Portland and 60th, 50% for new roadway lighting in Minneapolis, and 100% Pedestrian Refuge Median in
Portland Ave at Park Ave. 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin fees for these local costs listed in Note (5) below.
(4) Metro Transit covering 100% of Metro Transit D Line underground and flatwork costs for platforms at Portland Ave and 60th Street. 8% Construction Admin fees for these
local costs listed in Note (5) below.
(5) Right of way costs 100% Hennepin County.
(7) Traffic signal equipment supplied by City of Minneapolis includes cabinet/controllers and force account work for terminations.
Cabinets/controllers/terminations estimated cost = $50,000.00 per intersection, project has one intersection at Portland Ave and 60th Street.
Minneapolis to cover 50% of total signal cabinet and terminations costs through internal accounting. County to reimburse city for 50% of total signal cabinet and terminations
cost post project via Force Account once documentation of the total costs (Time, Labor, Materials) are provided by the city.
(6) For Local Costs in Notes (2), (3), (4): 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin for those local construction costs to be reimbursed by agency to the county.
Exception is Metro Transit which only reimburse's 8% construction admin costs as design completed under separate D Line contract.
(3) Richfield covering 100% of RRFB costs at Portland Ave and 66th Street roundabout. 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin fees for these local costs listed in
Note (5) below.
$287,424.40
Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 1 of 4
TAB SHEET ITEMITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT NOTES UNIT TOTAL TOTALNO NOCOST ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDQUANTITY COSTROADWAY COSTDRAINAGE COSTQUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST2011.601 AS BUILTLUMP SUM (17) $7,000.00 1$7,000.00 0.69 $4,830.00 0.06 $420.00 0.12 $840.00 0.03 $210.00 0.07 $490.00 0.03 $210.002021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM$160,000.00 1$160,000.00 0.69 $110,400.00 0.06 $9,600.00 0.12 $19,200.00 0.03 $4,800.00 0.07 $11,200.00 0.03 $4,800.002031.502 FIELD OFFICE TYPE DEACH (17) $20,000.00 1$20,000.00 0.69 $13,800.00 0.06 $1,200.00 0.12 $2,400.00 0.03 $600.00 0.07 $1,400.00 0.03 $600.00B 9 2101.524 CLEARINGTREE (11), (17) $200.00 15$3,000.0015$3,000.00B 9 2101.524 GRUBBINGTREE (11), (17) $250.00 15$3,750.0015$3,750.002102.518 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVALLIN FT (17) $1.00 6500$6,500.00 6500 $6,500.002104.502 REMOVE MANHOLEEACH (13) $500.001$500.001$500.00H 31 2104.502 REMOVE CASTINGEACH$200.009$1,800.009$1,800.002104.502 REMOVE CURB STOP AND BOXEACH$200.002$400.002.00$400.00B 9 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANTEACH$500.002$1,000.00 2.00 $1,000.00H 31 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH$500.00 11$5,500.0011 $5,500.002104.502 REMOVE FOUNDATIONEACH$2,000.00 1$2,000.001$2,000.002104.502 REMOVE SIGN TYPE CEACH$50.0027$1,350.0027$1,350.002104.502 REMOVE SERVICE INSTALLATIONEACH$700.001$700.001$700.002104.502 REMOVE SIGNAL SYSTEM DEACH$5,000.00 1$5,000.000.5$2,500.000.5 $2,500.002104.502 REMOVE LIGHT FOUNDATIONEACH$500.00 10$5,000.0010$5,000.002104.502 REMOVE SIGN PANEL TYPE CEACH$25.0036$900.0036$900.002104.502 SALVAGE LIGHTING UNITEACH$500.00 10$5,000.0010$5,000.002104.502 SALVAGE CABINETEACH$700.001$700.001$700.00I 203 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE CEACH$50.0018$900.0018$900.00B 9 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT$5.00 1300$6,500.00 1272 $6,360.0028 $140.00B 9 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT (18) $5.00 4555 $22,775.00 4465 $22,325.0090 $450.002104.503 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT$20.0062$1,240.0062$1,240.00H 31 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT$20.00 412$8,240.00412 $8,240.00B 9 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT$5.00 4164 $20,820.00 4063 $20,315.00101 $505.00B 9 2104.503 REMOVE STONE RETAINING WALLLIN FT (2) $15.0017$255.0017$255.002104.503 REMOVE CABLESLIN FT$3.00200$600.00200$600.00B 9 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE BLOCK WALLLIN FT (1) $15.0035$525.0035$525.002104.503 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT (10) $10.00 104$1,040.00104 $1,040.002104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE APPROACH PANELSQ YD$30.006$180.006$180.00B 9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD$15.0018$270.0018$270.00B 9 2104.507 REMOVE CONCRETE STEPSCU YD$1,500.00 4$6,000.004$6,000.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE WOOD RETAINING WALLSQ FT$30.0037$1,110.0037$1,110.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT$1.00 3577$3,577.00 3577 $3,577.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT$1.50 20466 $30,699.00 20298 $30,447.00168 $252.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ FT$2.00 2681$5,362.00 2666 $5,332.0015$30.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENTSQ FT (16) $3.00 3604 $10,812.00 3604 $10,812.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSQ FT (P), (7) $2.00 37458 $74,916.00 37238 $74,476.00220 $440.00A 8 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD (P), (17) $30.00 1649 $49,470.00 1169 $35,070.00415 $12,450.0065 $1,950.00A 8 2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD (P), (4), (17) $30.00 1149 $34,470.00 1119 $33,570.0030 $900.00C 10 2118.509 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2TON (14), (17) $35.00 218$7,630.00218 $7,630.002123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR (3), (17) $150.00 60$9,000.0060$9,000.002130.523 WATERM GALLON$50.0044$2,200.0044$2,200.00C, E 10, 11 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5CU YD (P), (17) $50.00 1632 $81,600.00 1530 $76,500.00102 $5,100.00C, E 10, 11 2231.509 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE (SPECIAL)TON (17) $150.00 2029 $304,350.00 2014 $302,100.0015 $2,250.00B 9 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD (P) $3.00 30174 $90,522.0030174 $90,522.00D 10 2301.502 DOWEL BAREACH$20.00 273$5,460.00124 $2,480.00149 $2,980.00D, E 10, 11 2301.504 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 10.0"SQ YD (P) $90.00 421$37,890.00 274 $24,660.00147 $13,230.0010, 148 2301.508 SUPPLEMENTAL PAVEMENT REINFORCEMENTPOUND (P) $2.25 1139$2,562.75222$499.50917 $2,063.25D 10 2301.602 DRILL AND GROUT DOWEL BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH (17) $20.0097$1,940.0065$1,300.0032 $640.00D 10 2301.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH (17) $15.00 236$3,540.00236 $3,540.00C 10 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3;C)TON$75.00 3412 $255,900.003410 $255,750.002$150.00D, E 10, 11 2401.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED)POUND$1.75604$1,057.00604 $1,057.002406.503 EXPANSION JOINTS; DESIGN E8HLIN FT$90.0034$3,060.0034$3,060.00D 10 2411.607 CONCRETE STEPSCU YD (17) $7,000.00 4$28,000.004$28,000.00B 9 2433.507 REMOVE CONCRETECU YD (6) $100.00 21$2,100.0021$2,100.002433.618 RECONSTRUCT APPROACH PANELSQ FT$50.00 160$8,000.00160 $8,000.00I 180-182 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT$65.00 1118 $72,670.001118 $72,670.00I 180 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS IIILIN FT$75.0046$3,450.0046 $3,450.00I 181, 182 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH (17) $1,000.00 3$3,000.003$3,000.00I 180 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH$1,300.00 3$3,900.003$3,900.00148 2503.602 COMMUNICATION HANDHOLE, (STANDARD), CIPEACH$2,000.00 4$8,000.004 $8,000.00ENGINEER'S ESTIMATECSAH 35 (PORTLAND AVE) BIKE GAP PROJECTSP 027-635-034 & SP 2775-30 & SP 157-020-031HENNEPIN COUNTY (PROJECT NO 1543)ALLIANT PROJECT NO: 180136DATE: MAY 4, 2020ENGINEER'S ESTIMATESTATE AID PARTICIPATINGSP 027-635-034FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATING SP 027-635-034NON-PARTICIPATINGCITY OFMINNEAPOLISMETRO D LINEHENNEPINCOUNTYSP 157-020-031RICHFIELDCITY OFROADWAYDRAINAGEHENNEPIN COUNTY180136_CostEstimate1 of 3Prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc.Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 1 of 4 Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 1 of 4 Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 2 of 4
TAB SHEET ITEMITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT NOTES UNIT TOTAL TOTALNO NOCOST ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDQUANTITY COSTROADWAY COSTDRAINAGE COSTQUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COSTENGINEER'S ESTIMATESTATE AID PARTICIPATINGSP 027-635-034FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATING SP 027-635-034NON-PARTICIPATINGCITY OFMINNEAPOLISMETRO D LINEHENNEPINCOUNTYSP 157-020-031RICHFIELDCITY OFROADWAYDRAINAGEHENNEPIN COUNTY2503.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGSPOUND (P), (17) $15.00 153$2,295.00153 $2,295.002504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH (17) $2,000.00 2$4,000.002$4,000.002504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH (17) $800.001$800.001$800.002504.602 HYDRANTEACH (17) $6,000.00 2$12,000.002$12,000.002504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOXEACH$350.002$700.002$700.002504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATEREACH (17) $700.00 12$8,400.0012$8,400.002504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH (17) $2,000.00 2$4,000.002$4,000.002504.602 ADJUST CURB BOXEACH (17) $150.00 30$4,500.0030$4,500.002504.602 0.75" CURB STOP AND BOXEACH (17) $600.001$600.001$600.002504.603 HYDRANT RISERLIN FT (17) $250.001$250.001$250.002504.603 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT (17) $130.00 79$10,270.0079 $10,270.002504.603 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT (17) $150.006$900.006$900.00I 184 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIALEACH$15,000.00 1$15,000.001 $15,000.00H, I31, 183-1852506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLYEACH$800.00 36$28,800.0036 $28,800.00H 31 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTINGEACH$600.00 15$9,000.0015$9,000.00I 183 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN HLIN FT$400.00 10.8$4,320.0010.8 $4,320.00I 183-185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN NLIN FT$400.00 25.5$10,200.0025.5 $10,200.00I 184 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SD-48LIN FT$580.00 14.5$8,410.0014.5 $8,410.00I 183-185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT$450.00 41.2$18,540.0041.2 $18,540.00I 185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020LIN FT$675.00 12.8$8,640.0012.8 $8,640.002506.602 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH (17) $3,000.00 2$6,000.002$6,000.002506.602 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SPECIAL)EACH (17) $800.00 25$20,000.0025 $20,000.00D, E 10, 11 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT$6.00 2560 $15,360.00 2560 $15,360.00C 10 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIALSQ FT$11.00 14029 $154,319.00 14029 $154,319.00E112521.5184" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1SQ FT$12.00238$2,856.00238$2,856.00D, E10, 112521.5186" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT(17)$10.0016995$169,950.0016726$167,260.00269$2,690.00D, E10, 112521.5186" CONCRETE WALK SPECIALSQ FT$15.003076$46,140.002609$39,135.00467$7,005.00C, E10, 112521.5183" BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT$6.003337$20,022.003337$20,022.00D, E10, 112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B424LIN FT$25.00338$8,450.00338$8,450.00E112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B612LIN FT$25.00168$4,200.00168$4,200.00D, E10, 112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624LIN FT$25.003123$78,075.003092$77,300.0031$775.002531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B924LIN FT$45.0087$3,915.0087$3,915.00E112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN R424LIN FT$30.00288$8,640.00288$8,640.00E112531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN SPECIALLIN FT(8)$50.00201$10,050.00201$10,050.00D102531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN SPECIAL 1LIN FT$100.00245$24,500.00245$24,500.00E112531.504CONCRETE MEDIANSQ YD$90.0024$2,160.0024$2,160.00D102531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD$70.00175$12,250.00175$12,250.00D102531.5048" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD$85.0062$5,270.0050$4,250.0012$1,020.00E112531.602CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE-SPECIALEACH(17)$600.002$1,200.002$1,200.00E112531.603CONCRETE CURB DESIGN VLIN FT(17)$50.00110$5,500.00110$5,500.00D102531.6048" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTERSQ YD(17)$100.00155$15,500.00155$15,500.00E112531.618TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT(17)$50.001269$63,450.001075$53,750.0024$1,200.00170$8,500.002533.503PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337LIN FT(12), (17)$15.00120$1,800.00120$1,800.002533.503 RELOCATE PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337 LIN FT (12), (17) $4.00180$720.00180$720.001482540.601STATION PLATFORM FOUNDATIONCU YD$733.009$6,597.009$6,597.002545.501LIGHTING SYSTEMLUMP SUM$150,000.001$150,000.000.5$75,000.000.5$75,000.002545.502LIGHT FOUNDATION DESIGN E MODIFIEDEACH$1,000.002$2,000.002$2,000.001482545.502EQUIPMENT PADEACH$2,500.001$2,500.001$2,500.002545.502EQUIPMENT PAD BEACH$2,500.001$2,500.001$2,500.001482545.502HANDHOLEEACH$1,500.001$1,500.001$1,500.001482545.502LIGHT FOUNDATION MINNEAPOLIS DESIGNEACH$1,000.001$1,000.001$1,000.001482545.5031" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$4.50416$1,872.00416$1,872.001482545.5031.25" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$5.0054$270.0054$270.001482545.5033" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$7.50164$1,230.00164$1,230.001482545.5034" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT (DIRECTIONAL BORE)LIN FT$32.5070$2,275.0070$2,275.002545.602ADJUST HANDHOLEEACH$750.004$3,000.004$3,000.002545.602INSTALL LIGHTING UNITEACH$500.002$1,000.002$1,000.002545.602INSTALL LIGHTING SERVICE CABINETEACH$700.001$700.001$700.002550.5032" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$4.0060$240.0060$240.002550.503POWER CABLE 1 CONDUCTOR NO 6LIN FT$4.00180$720.00180$720.001482550.603HDPE CONDUIT 1.5 INCH DIA, INCL TRACER WIRELIN FT$13.0091$1,183.0091$1,183.001482550.603RIGID PVC CONDUIT 3 INCH DIA, INCL TRACER WIRELIN FT$6.0012$72.0012$72.001482550.603RIGID PVC CONDUIT 1 INCH DIA, INCL TRACER WIRELIN FT$13.00122$1,586.00122$1,586.002557.603INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT(10)$30.00104$3,120.00104.0$3,120.002563.601TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORLUMP SUM$10,000.001$10,000.000.7$6,900.000.06$600.000.12$1,200.000.03$300.000.07$700.000.03$300.002563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM$120,000.001$120,000.001$82,800.000.06$7,200.000.12$14,400.000.03$3,600.000.07$8,400.000.03$3,600.002563.601ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTELUMP SUM$10,000.001$10,000.001.00$10,000.002563.613PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNUNIT DAY(12)$75.00110$8,250.00110.00$8,250.002563.615TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATORAMBY(12)$3,500.002$7,000.002.00$7,000.002563.615RELOCATE TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATORAMBY(12)$650.003$1,950.003$1,950.002563.618CONSTRUCTION SIGN-SPECIALSQ FT(12)$25.00500$12,500.00500$12,500.00I2032564.502INSTALL SIGN TYPE CEACH$150.0018$2,700.0018$2,700.00180136_CostEstimate2 of 3Prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc.Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 3 of 4
TAB SHEET ITEMITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT NOTES UNIT TOTAL TOTALNO NOCOST ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDQUANTITY COSTROADWAY COSTDRAINAGE COSTQUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COSTENGINEER'S ESTIMATESTATE AID PARTICIPATINGSP 027-635-034FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATING SP 027-635-034NON-PARTICIPATINGCITY OFMINNEAPOLISMETRO D LINEHENNEPINCOUNTYSP 157-020-031RICHFIELDCITY OFROADWAYDRAINAGEHENNEPIN COUNTYL2042564.502OBJECT MARKER TYPE X4-2EACH$90.002$180.002$180.00K2042564.518SIGN PANELS TYPE CSQ FT$45.00306$13,770.00296$13,320.0010$450.002565.501EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM DLUMP SUM$8,000.001$8,000.001$8,000.002565.516TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM DEACH$200,000.001$200,000.000.50$100,000.000.5$100,000.002565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEMSYSTEM(5)$20,000.004$80,000.004$80,000.002565.616REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM ASYSTEM$42,000.001$42,000.001$42,000.002565.616REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM BSYSTEM$35,500.001$35,500.001$35,500.002565.616REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM CSYSTEM$27,000.001$27,000.001$27,000.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM ASYSTEM$15,000.001$15,000.001$15,000.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM BSYSTEM$15,000.001$15,000.001$15,000.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM CSYSTEM$7,500.001$7,500.001$7,500.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM DSYSTEM$60,000.001$60,000.000.50$30,000.000.5$30,000.002571.602TREE PROTECTIONEACH$200.004$800.004$800.002572.503TEMPORARY FENCELIN FT(10)$5.00126$630.00126$630.00B92572.602TREE PRUNINGEACH$115.004$460.004$460.002573.501EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISORLUMP SUM$10,000.001$10,000.000.69$6,900.000.06$600.000.12$1,200.000.03$300.000.07$700.000.03$300.00F122573.502STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONEACH$150.0067$10,050.0065$9,750.002$300.002573.503SILT FENCE; TYPE MSLIN FT(9)$2.50200$500.00200$500.00F122573.503SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOSTLIN FT(15)$3.001000$3,000.001000$3,000.00F, G122574.505SOIL BED PREPARATIONACRE$1,000.001.01$1,010.000.99$990.000.02$20.002574.507ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD$60.00415$24,900.00415$24,900.00F, G122574.508FERTILIZER TYPE 3POUND$1.00351$351.00344$344.007$7.00G122575.504SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD$10.004446$44,460.004350$43,500.0096$960.00F, G122575.504EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3NSQ YD$2.50342$855.00342$855.00F, G122575.505SEEDINGACRE$1,000.001.01$1,010.000.99$990.000.02$20.00F, G122575.508SEED MIXTURE 25-151POUND$5.00121$605.00118$590.003$15.00F122575.508HYDRAULIC MULCH MATRIXPOUND$1.501965$2,947.501923$2,884.5042$63.002582.5034" SOLID LINE PAINTLIN FT$0.5017500$8,750.0017500$8,750.002582.5034" BROKEN LINE PAINTLIN FT$0.50860$430.00860$430.002582.5034" DOTTED LINE PAINTLIN FT$0.50182$91.00182$91.002582.5034" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINTLIN FT$1.003200$3,200.003200$3,200.00J2032582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.0012300$24,600.0012300$24,600.00J2032582.5036" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.004900$9,800.004900$9,800.00J2032582.5038" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$3.0050$150.0050$150.00J2032582.50324" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$20.00600$12,000.00600$12,000.00J2032582.5034" BROKEN LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.00860$1,720.00860$1,720.00J2032582.5034" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$4.003200$12,800.003200$12,800.00J2032582.5034" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.00228$456.00228$456.00J2032582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR)LIN FT$2.00600$1,200.00600$1,200.00J2032582.5036" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$3.00208$624.00208$624.00J2032582.50324" SOLID LINE PREFORM THERMO GROUND INLIN FT$30.00100$3,000.00100$3,000.00J2032582.518PAVEMENT MESSAGE PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND INSQ FT$35.001309$45,815.001309$45,815.00J2032582.518CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND INSQ FT$18.002277$40,986.002277$40,986.00J 203 2582.518CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN ENHANCED SKID RESISTANCESQ FT$20.00 1215 $24,300.00 1215 $24,300.00J2032582.618PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1SQ FT$30.00181$5,430.00181$5,430.00J2032582.618PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 2SQ FT$30.00216$6,480.00216$6,480.00$3,440,770.25$2,378,163.00$212,090.00$422,862.00$89,810.00$243,580.00$94,265.25NOTES:(1) AVERAGE HEIGHT OF INPLACE MODULAR BLOCK WALL IS 0.7 FT(2) AVERAGE HEIGHT OF INPLACE STONE RETAINING WALL IS 1.3 FT(3) FOR ALL SWEEPING AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, INCLUDES SWEEPER TIME ONLY AND NOT TRANSPORTATION TIME(4) QUANTITY INCLUDES TOPSOIL BORROW(5) EACH PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM INCLUDES: (3) FLASHER ASSEMBLY PEDESTALS, (3) CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, (3) PEDESTAL POLE AND BASE, (3) PUSH BUTTONS, (3) SIGNS, (3) RRFB (LED), (3) CONTROL BOX, AND (3) SOLAR ENGINE ASSEMBLY(6) FOR REMOVING CONCRETE WALK AT TH 62 BRIDGE; DOES NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK WIDENING WORK ON THE BRIDGE(7) REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT SECTION, INCLUDING CONCRETE BASE BENEATH BITUMINOUS OVERLAY(8) LOCATED IN BOULEVARD AREAS AT ROUNDABOUT; MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS(9) TO BE USED AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION(10) INCLUDES GATE(11) NO TREES CAN BE REMOVED BETWEEN APRIL 1 AND OCTOBER 1 OF ANY YEAR TO AVOID POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO ROOSTING LONG-EARED BATS (SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS)(12) ITEM NOT SUBJECT TO QUANTITY OVERRUN AS DETAILED IN SPEC 1042.3 SECTION (2)(13) WATER MANHOLE(14) 7 TONS ARE PERMANENT; REMAINDER IS TO BE USED FOR TEMPORARY DRIVEWAYS(15) INCLUDES 825 LIN FT TO BE USED AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION(16) PAVEMENT MAY BE REINFORCED(17) SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS(18) SAWING INPLACE CONCRETE BELOW BITUMINOUS CONSIDERED INCIDENTALTotal Opinion of Probable Construction Cost180136_CostEstimate3 of 3Prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc.Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 4 of 4
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
CSAH 35 (PORTLAND AVE) COUNTY PROJECT NO. 1543
DIVISION OF COST SUMMARY
(EXHIBIT A)
TOTAL Federal
Funding
Hennepin County
State Aid
Hennepin County
State Aid (REPP) Minneapolis
Minneapolis
(Force Acct
For Traffic
Items)
Richfield Metro Transit
Roadway (1)3,038,115.00$ 750,176.00$ 2,207,939.00$ 80,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Local 1 (2)218,580.00$ -$ -$ -$ 218,580.00$ -$ -$ -$
Local 2 (3)89,810.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 89,810.00$ -$
Local 3 (4)94,266.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 94,266.00$
Construction Total 3,440,771.00$ 750,176.00$ 2,207,939.00$ 80,000.00$ 218,580.00$ -$ 89,810.00$ 94,266.00$
Right of Way (5)250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Engineering & Construction
Admin (6)631,551.48$ -$ 564,000.00$ -$ 43,844.40$ -$ 16,165.80$ 7,541.28$
Traffic Signal - City Supplied
Equipment & Connections (7)50,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ -$ -$
Water - City Supplied
Equipment & Connections (8)15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
PROJECT TOTAL 4,387,322.48$ 750,176.00$ 3,061,939.00$ 80,000.00$ 105,975.80$ 101,807.28$
*All costs are estimated and will be updated based on bid prices after bid opening
NOTES:
Last Updated: 5/8/2020 At 4:00PM
(8) One Water Hydrant move prompted by project work, force account work for City of Minneapolis crews to complete wet tap and valve. Estimated Force Account Work =
$15,000 for one wet tap and valve for one hydrant relocation with city supplying hydrant to contractor.
County to reimburse city for 100% of total wet tap and valve costs post project via Force Account once documentation of the total costs (Time, Labor, Materials) are provided
by the city.
(1) Federal Aid Eligible items. Federal funding capped at $750,176.00 or 80% of Federal Aid Eligible items, whichever is less. In the case of this estimate, the $750,176 cap
controls. Hennepin County retains all federal funding share for this project due to not following county cost share policy. REPP funding for county cost share for roadway
lighting only in Minneapolis. Remaining above the cap is local match (Project does not follow standard county cost share policy) with Hennepin County covering all costs
except:
Note (2): Minneapolis covering 50% of temporary/permenant signal at Portland and 60th, 50% for new roadway lighting in Minneapolis, & 100% Pedestrian Refuge Median in
Portland Ave at Park Ave.
Note (3): Richfield covering 100% of RRFB costs at Portland Ave and 66th Street roundabout. 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin fees for these local costs
listed in Note (5) below.
Note (4): Metro Transit covering 100% of Metro Transit D Line underground and flatwork costs for platforms at Portland Ave and 60th Street. 10% Design Engineering and 8%
Construction Admin fees for these local costs listed in Note (5) below.
(2) Minneapolis covering 50% of temporary/permenant signal at Portland and 60th, 50% for new roadway lighting in Minneapolis, and 100% Pedestrian Refuge Median in
Portland Ave at Park Ave. 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin fees for these local costs listed in Note (5) below.
(4) Metro Transit covering 100% of Metro Transit D Line underground and flatwork costs for platforms at Portland Ave and 60th Street. 8% Construction Admin fees for these
local costs listed in Note (5) below.
(5) Right of way costs 100% Hennepin County.
(7) Traffic signal equipment supplied by City of Minneapolis includes cabinet/controllers and force account work for terminations.
Cabinets/controllers/terminations estimated cost = $50,000.00 per intersection, project has one intersection at Portland Ave and 60th Street.
Minneapolis to cover 50% of total signal cabinet and terminations costs through internal accounting. County to reimburse city for 50% of total signal cabinet and terminations
cost post project via Force Account once documentation of the total costs (Time, Labor, Materials) are provided by the city.
(6) For Local Costs in Notes (2), (3), (4): 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin for those local construction costs to be reimbursed by agency to the county.
Exception is Metro Transit which only reimburse's 8% construction admin costs as design completed under separate D Line contract.
(3) Richfield covering 100% of RRFB costs at Portland Ave and 66th Street roundabout. 10% Design Engineering and 8% Construction Admin fees for these local costs listed in
Note (5) below.
$287,424.40
Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 1 of 4
TAB SHEET ITEMITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT NOTES UNIT TOTAL TOTALNO NOCOST ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDQUANTITY COSTROADWAY COSTDRAINAGE COSTQUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST2011.601 AS BUILTLUMP SUM (17) $7,000.00 1$7,000.00 0.69 $4,830.00 0.06 $420.00 0.12 $840.00 0.03 $210.00 0.07 $490.00 0.03 $210.002021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM$160,000.00 1$160,000.00 0.69 $110,400.00 0.06 $9,600.00 0.12 $19,200.00 0.03 $4,800.00 0.07 $11,200.00 0.03 $4,800.002031.502 FIELD OFFICE TYPE DEACH (17) $20,000.00 1$20,000.00 0.69 $13,800.00 0.06 $1,200.00 0.12 $2,400.00 0.03 $600.00 0.07 $1,400.00 0.03 $600.00B 9 2101.524 CLEARINGTREE (11), (17) $200.00 15$3,000.0015$3,000.00B 9 2101.524 GRUBBINGTREE (11), (17) $250.00 15$3,750.0015$3,750.002102.518 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVALLIN FT (17) $1.00 6500$6,500.00 6500 $6,500.002104.502 REMOVE MANHOLEEACH (13) $500.001$500.001$500.00H 31 2104.502 REMOVE CASTINGEACH$200.009$1,800.009$1,800.002104.502 REMOVE CURB STOP AND BOXEACH$200.002$400.002.00$400.00B 9 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANTEACH$500.002$1,000.00 2.00 $1,000.00H 31 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH$500.00 11$5,500.0011 $5,500.002104.502 REMOVE FOUNDATIONEACH$2,000.00 1$2,000.001$2,000.002104.502 REMOVE SIGN TYPE CEACH$50.0027$1,350.0027$1,350.002104.502 REMOVE SERVICE INSTALLATIONEACH$700.001$700.001$700.002104.502 REMOVE SIGNAL SYSTEM DEACH$5,000.00 1$5,000.000.5$2,500.000.5 $2,500.002104.502 REMOVE LIGHT FOUNDATIONEACH$500.00 10$5,000.0010$5,000.002104.502 REMOVE SIGN PANEL TYPE CEACH$25.0036$900.0036$900.002104.502 SALVAGE LIGHTING UNITEACH$500.00 10$5,000.0010$5,000.002104.502 SALVAGE CABINETEACH$700.001$700.001$700.00I 203 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE CEACH$50.0018$900.0018$900.00B 9 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT$5.00 1300$6,500.00 1272 $6,360.0028 $140.00B 9 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT (18) $5.00 4555 $22,775.00 4465 $22,325.0090 $450.002104.503 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT$20.0062$1,240.0062$1,240.00H 31 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT$20.00 412$8,240.00412 $8,240.00B 9 2104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT$5.00 4164 $20,820.00 4063 $20,315.00101 $505.00B 9 2104.503 REMOVE STONE RETAINING WALLLIN FT (2) $15.0017$255.0017$255.002104.503 REMOVE CABLESLIN FT$3.00200$600.00200$600.00B 9 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE BLOCK WALLLIN FT (1) $15.0035$525.0035$525.002104.503 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT (10) $10.00 104$1,040.00104 $1,040.002104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE APPROACH PANELSQ YD$30.006$180.006$180.00B 9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD$15.0018$270.0018$270.00B 9 2104.507 REMOVE CONCRETE STEPSCU YD$1,500.00 4$6,000.004$6,000.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE WOOD RETAINING WALLSQ FT$30.0037$1,110.0037$1,110.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT$1.00 3577$3,577.00 3577 $3,577.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT$1.50 20466 $30,699.00 20298 $30,447.00168 $252.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ FT$2.00 2681$5,362.00 2666 $5,332.0015$30.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENTSQ FT (16) $3.00 3604 $10,812.00 3604 $10,812.00B 9 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSQ FT (P), (7) $2.00 37458 $74,916.00 37238 $74,476.00220 $440.00A 8 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD (P), (17) $30.00 1649 $49,470.00 1169 $35,070.00415 $12,450.0065 $1,950.00A 8 2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD (P), (4), (17) $30.00 1149 $34,470.00 1119 $33,570.0030 $900.00C 10 2118.509 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2TON (14), (17) $35.00 218$7,630.00218 $7,630.002123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR (3), (17) $150.00 60$9,000.0060$9,000.002130.523 WATERM GALLON$50.0044$2,200.0044$2,200.00C, E 10, 11 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5CU YD (P), (17) $50.00 1632 $81,600.00 1530 $76,500.00102 $5,100.00C, E 10, 11 2231.509 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE (SPECIAL)TON (17) $150.00 2029 $304,350.00 2014 $302,100.0015 $2,250.00B 9 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD (P) $3.00 30174 $90,522.0030174 $90,522.00D 10 2301.502 DOWEL BAREACH$20.00 273$5,460.00124 $2,480.00149 $2,980.00D, E 10, 11 2301.504 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 10.0"SQ YD (P) $90.00 421$37,890.00 274 $24,660.00147 $13,230.0010, 148 2301.508 SUPPLEMENTAL PAVEMENT REINFORCEMENTPOUND (P) $2.25 1139$2,562.75222$499.50917 $2,063.25D 10 2301.602 DRILL AND GROUT DOWEL BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH (17) $20.0097$1,940.0065$1,300.0032 $640.00D 10 2301.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH (17) $15.00 236$3,540.00236 $3,540.00C 10 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3;C)TON$75.00 3412 $255,900.003410 $255,750.002$150.00D, E 10, 11 2401.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED)POUND$1.75604$1,057.00604 $1,057.002406.503 EXPANSION JOINTS; DESIGN E8HLIN FT$90.0034$3,060.0034$3,060.00D 10 2411.607 CONCRETE STEPSCU YD (17) $7,000.00 4$28,000.004$28,000.00B 9 2433.507 REMOVE CONCRETECU YD (6) $100.00 21$2,100.0021$2,100.002433.618 RECONSTRUCT APPROACH PANELSQ FT$50.00 160$8,000.00160 $8,000.00I 180-182 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT$65.00 1118 $72,670.001118 $72,670.00I 180 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS IIILIN FT$75.0046$3,450.0046 $3,450.00I 181, 182 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH (17) $1,000.00 3$3,000.003$3,000.00I 180 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH$1,300.00 3$3,900.003$3,900.00148 2503.602 COMMUNICATION HANDHOLE, (STANDARD), CIPEACH$2,000.00 4$8,000.004 $8,000.00ENGINEER'S ESTIMATECSAH 35 (PORTLAND AVE) BIKE GAP PROJECTSP 027-635-034 & SP 2775-30 & SP 157-020-031HENNEPIN COUNTY (PROJECT NO 1543)ALLIANT PROJECT NO: 180136DATE: MAY 4, 2020ENGINEER'S ESTIMATESTATE AID PARTICIPATINGSP 027-635-034FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATING SP 027-635-034NON-PARTICIPATINGCITY OFMINNEAPOLISMETRO D LINEHENNEPINCOUNTYSP 157-020-031RICHFIELDCITY OFROADWAYDRAINAGEHENNEPIN COUNTY180136_CostEstimate1 of 3Prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc.Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 1 of 4 Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 1 of 4 Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 2 of 4
TAB SHEET ITEMITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT NOTES UNIT TOTAL TOTALNO NOCOST ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDQUANTITY COSTROADWAY COSTDRAINAGE COSTQUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COSTENGINEER'S ESTIMATESTATE AID PARTICIPATINGSP 027-635-034FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATING SP 027-635-034NON-PARTICIPATINGCITY OFMINNEAPOLISMETRO D LINEHENNEPINCOUNTYSP 157-020-031RICHFIELDCITY OFROADWAYDRAINAGEHENNEPIN COUNTY2503.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGSPOUND (P), (17) $15.00 153$2,295.00153 $2,295.002504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH (17) $2,000.00 2$4,000.002$4,000.002504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH (17) $800.001$800.001$800.002504.602 HYDRANTEACH (17) $6,000.00 2$12,000.002$12,000.002504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOXEACH$350.002$700.002$700.002504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATEREACH (17) $700.00 12$8,400.0012$8,400.002504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH (17) $2,000.00 2$4,000.002$4,000.002504.602 ADJUST CURB BOXEACH (17) $150.00 30$4,500.0030$4,500.002504.602 0.75" CURB STOP AND BOXEACH (17) $600.001$600.001$600.002504.603 HYDRANT RISERLIN FT (17) $250.001$250.001$250.002504.603 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT (17) $130.00 79$10,270.0079 $10,270.002504.603 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT (17) $150.006$900.006$900.00I 184 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIALEACH$15,000.00 1$15,000.001 $15,000.00H, I31, 183-1852506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLYEACH$800.00 36$28,800.0036 $28,800.00H 31 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTINGEACH$600.00 15$9,000.0015$9,000.00I 183 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN HLIN FT$400.00 10.8$4,320.0010.8 $4,320.00I 183-185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN NLIN FT$400.00 25.5$10,200.0025.5 $10,200.00I 184 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SD-48LIN FT$580.00 14.5$8,410.0014.5 $8,410.00I 183-185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT$450.00 41.2$18,540.0041.2 $18,540.00I 185 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020LIN FT$675.00 12.8$8,640.0012.8 $8,640.002506.602 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH (17) $3,000.00 2$6,000.002$6,000.002506.602 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SPECIAL)EACH (17) $800.00 25$20,000.0025 $20,000.00D, E 10, 11 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT$6.00 2560 $15,360.00 2560 $15,360.00C 10 2521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIALSQ FT$11.00 14029 $154,319.00 14029 $154,319.00E112521.5184" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1SQ FT$12.00238$2,856.00238$2,856.00D, E10, 112521.5186" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT(17)$10.0016995$169,950.0016726$167,260.00269$2,690.00D, E10, 112521.5186" CONCRETE WALK SPECIALSQ FT$15.003076$46,140.002609$39,135.00467$7,005.00C, E10, 112521.5183" BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT$6.003337$20,022.003337$20,022.00D, E10, 112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B424LIN FT$25.00338$8,450.00338$8,450.00E112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B612LIN FT$25.00168$4,200.00168$4,200.00D, E10, 112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624LIN FT$25.003123$78,075.003092$77,300.0031$775.002531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B924LIN FT$45.0087$3,915.0087$3,915.00E112531.503CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN R424LIN FT$30.00288$8,640.00288$8,640.00E112531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN SPECIALLIN FT(8)$50.00201$10,050.00201$10,050.00D102531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN SPECIAL 1LIN FT$100.00245$24,500.00245$24,500.00E112531.504CONCRETE MEDIANSQ YD$90.0024$2,160.0024$2,160.00D102531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD$70.00175$12,250.00175$12,250.00D102531.5048" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD$85.0062$5,270.0050$4,250.0012$1,020.00E112531.602CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE-SPECIALEACH(17)$600.002$1,200.002$1,200.00E112531.603CONCRETE CURB DESIGN VLIN FT(17)$50.00110$5,500.00110$5,500.00D102531.6048" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTERSQ YD(17)$100.00155$15,500.00155$15,500.00E112531.618TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT(17)$50.001269$63,450.001075$53,750.0024$1,200.00170$8,500.002533.503PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337LIN FT(12), (17)$15.00120$1,800.00120$1,800.002533.503 RELOCATE PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337 LIN FT (12), (17) $4.00180$720.00180$720.001482540.601STATION PLATFORM FOUNDATIONCU YD$733.009$6,597.009$6,597.002545.501LIGHTING SYSTEMLUMP SUM$150,000.001$150,000.000.5$75,000.000.5$75,000.002545.502LIGHT FOUNDATION DESIGN E MODIFIEDEACH$1,000.002$2,000.002$2,000.001482545.502EQUIPMENT PADEACH$2,500.001$2,500.001$2,500.002545.502EQUIPMENT PAD BEACH$2,500.001$2,500.001$2,500.001482545.502HANDHOLEEACH$1,500.001$1,500.001$1,500.001482545.502LIGHT FOUNDATION MINNEAPOLIS DESIGNEACH$1,000.001$1,000.001$1,000.001482545.5031" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$4.50416$1,872.00416$1,872.001482545.5031.25" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$5.0054$270.0054$270.001482545.5033" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$7.50164$1,230.00164$1,230.001482545.5034" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT (DIRECTIONAL BORE)LIN FT$32.5070$2,275.0070$2,275.002545.602ADJUST HANDHOLEEACH$750.004$3,000.004$3,000.002545.602INSTALL LIGHTING UNITEACH$500.002$1,000.002$1,000.002545.602INSTALL LIGHTING SERVICE CABINETEACH$700.001$700.001$700.002550.5032" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT$4.0060$240.0060$240.002550.503POWER CABLE 1 CONDUCTOR NO 6LIN FT$4.00180$720.00180$720.001482550.603HDPE CONDUIT 1.5 INCH DIA, INCL TRACER WIRELIN FT$13.0091$1,183.0091$1,183.001482550.603RIGID PVC CONDUIT 3 INCH DIA, INCL TRACER WIRELIN FT$6.0012$72.0012$72.001482550.603RIGID PVC CONDUIT 1 INCH DIA, INCL TRACER WIRELIN FT$13.00122$1,586.00122$1,586.002557.603INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT(10)$30.00104$3,120.00104.0$3,120.002563.601TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORLUMP SUM$10,000.001$10,000.000.7$6,900.000.06$600.000.12$1,200.000.03$300.000.07$700.000.03$300.002563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM$120,000.001$120,000.001$82,800.000.06$7,200.000.12$14,400.000.03$3,600.000.07$8,400.000.03$3,600.002563.601ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTELUMP SUM$10,000.001$10,000.001.00$10,000.002563.613PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNUNIT DAY(12)$75.00110$8,250.00110.00$8,250.002563.615TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATORAMBY(12)$3,500.002$7,000.002.00$7,000.002563.615RELOCATE TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATORAMBY(12)$650.003$1,950.003$1,950.002563.618CONSTRUCTION SIGN-SPECIALSQ FT(12)$25.00500$12,500.00500$12,500.00I2032564.502INSTALL SIGN TYPE CEACH$150.0018$2,700.0018$2,700.00180136_CostEstimate2 of 3Prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc.Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 3 of 4
TAB SHEET ITEMITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT NOTES UNIT TOTAL TOTALNO NOCOST ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDQUANTITY COSTROADWAY COSTDRAINAGE COSTQUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COST QUANTITY COSTENGINEER'S ESTIMATESTATE AID PARTICIPATINGSP 027-635-034FEDERAL AID PARTICIPATING SP 027-635-034NON-PARTICIPATINGCITY OFMINNEAPOLISMETRO D LINEHENNEPINCOUNTYSP 157-020-031RICHFIELDCITY OFROADWAYDRAINAGEHENNEPIN COUNTYL2042564.502OBJECT MARKER TYPE X4-2EACH$90.002$180.002$180.00K2042564.518SIGN PANELS TYPE CSQ FT$45.00306$13,770.00296$13,320.0010$450.002565.501EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM DLUMP SUM$8,000.001$8,000.001$8,000.002565.516TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM DEACH$200,000.001$200,000.000.50$100,000.000.5$100,000.002565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEMSYSTEM(5)$20,000.004$80,000.004$80,000.002565.616REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM ASYSTEM$42,000.001$42,000.001$42,000.002565.616REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM BSYSTEM$35,500.001$35,500.001$35,500.002565.616REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM CSYSTEM$27,000.001$27,000.001$27,000.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM ASYSTEM$15,000.001$15,000.001$15,000.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM BSYSTEM$15,000.001$15,000.001$15,000.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM CSYSTEM$7,500.001$7,500.001$7,500.002565.616TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM DSYSTEM$60,000.001$60,000.000.50$30,000.000.5$30,000.002571.602TREE PROTECTIONEACH$200.004$800.004$800.002572.503TEMPORARY FENCELIN FT(10)$5.00126$630.00126$630.00B92572.602TREE PRUNINGEACH$115.004$460.004$460.002573.501EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISORLUMP SUM$10,000.001$10,000.000.69$6,900.000.06$600.000.12$1,200.000.03$300.000.07$700.000.03$300.00F122573.502STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONEACH$150.0067$10,050.0065$9,750.002$300.002573.503SILT FENCE; TYPE MSLIN FT(9)$2.50200$500.00200$500.00F122573.503SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOSTLIN FT(15)$3.001000$3,000.001000$3,000.00F, G122574.505SOIL BED PREPARATIONACRE$1,000.001.01$1,010.000.99$990.000.02$20.002574.507ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD$60.00415$24,900.00415$24,900.00F, G122574.508FERTILIZER TYPE 3POUND$1.00351$351.00344$344.007$7.00G122575.504SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD$10.004446$44,460.004350$43,500.0096$960.00F, G122575.504EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3NSQ YD$2.50342$855.00342$855.00F, G122575.505SEEDINGACRE$1,000.001.01$1,010.000.99$990.000.02$20.00F, G122575.508SEED MIXTURE 25-151POUND$5.00121$605.00118$590.003$15.00F122575.508HYDRAULIC MULCH MATRIXPOUND$1.501965$2,947.501923$2,884.5042$63.002582.5034" SOLID LINE PAINTLIN FT$0.5017500$8,750.0017500$8,750.002582.5034" BROKEN LINE PAINTLIN FT$0.50860$430.00860$430.002582.5034" DOTTED LINE PAINTLIN FT$0.50182$91.00182$91.002582.5034" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINTLIN FT$1.003200$3,200.003200$3,200.00J2032582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.0012300$24,600.0012300$24,600.00J2032582.5036" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.004900$9,800.004900$9,800.00J2032582.5038" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$3.0050$150.0050$150.00J2032582.50324" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$20.00600$12,000.00600$12,000.00J2032582.5034" BROKEN LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.00860$1,720.00860$1,720.00J2032582.5034" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$4.003200$12,800.003200$12,800.00J2032582.5034" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$2.00228$456.00228$456.00J2032582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR)LIN FT$2.00600$1,200.00600$1,200.00J2032582.5036" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND INLIN FT$3.00208$624.00208$624.00J2032582.50324" SOLID LINE PREFORM THERMO GROUND INLIN FT$30.00100$3,000.00100$3,000.00J2032582.518PAVEMENT MESSAGE PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND INSQ FT$35.001309$45,815.001309$45,815.00J2032582.518CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND INSQ FT$18.002277$40,986.002277$40,986.00J 203 2582.518CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN ENHANCED SKID RESISTANCESQ FT$20.00 1215 $24,300.00 1215 $24,300.00J2032582.618PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1SQ FT$30.00181$5,430.00181$5,430.00J2032582.618PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 2SQ FT$30.00216$6,480.00216$6,480.00$3,440,770.25$2,378,163.00$212,090.00$422,862.00$89,810.00$243,580.00$94,265.25NOTES:(1) AVERAGE HEIGHT OF INPLACE MODULAR BLOCK WALL IS 0.7 FT(2) AVERAGE HEIGHT OF INPLACE STONE RETAINING WALL IS 1.3 FT(3) FOR ALL SWEEPING AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, INCLUDES SWEEPER TIME ONLY AND NOT TRANSPORTATION TIME(4) QUANTITY INCLUDES TOPSOIL BORROW(5) EACH PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM INCLUDES: (3) FLASHER ASSEMBLY PEDESTALS, (3) CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, (3) PEDESTAL POLE AND BASE, (3) PUSH BUTTONS, (3) SIGNS, (3) RRFB (LED), (3) CONTROL BOX, AND (3) SOLAR ENGINE ASSEMBLY(6) FOR REMOVING CONCRETE WALK AT TH 62 BRIDGE; DOES NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK WIDENING WORK ON THE BRIDGE(7) REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT SECTION, INCLUDING CONCRETE BASE BENEATH BITUMINOUS OVERLAY(8) LOCATED IN BOULEVARD AREAS AT ROUNDABOUT; MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS(9) TO BE USED AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION(10) INCLUDES GATE(11) NO TREES CAN BE REMOVED BETWEEN APRIL 1 AND OCTOBER 1 OF ANY YEAR TO AVOID POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO ROOSTING LONG-EARED BATS (SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS)(12) ITEM NOT SUBJECT TO QUANTITY OVERRUN AS DETAILED IN SPEC 1042.3 SECTION (2)(13) WATER MANHOLE(14) 7 TONS ARE PERMANENT; REMAINDER IS TO BE USED FOR TEMPORARY DRIVEWAYS(15) INCLUDES 825 LIN FT TO BE USED AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION(16) PAVEMENT MAY BE REINFORCED(17) SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS(18) SAWING INPLACE CONCRETE BELOW BITUMINOUS CONSIDERED INCIDENTALTotal Opinion of Probable Construction Cost180136_CostEstimate3 of 3Prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc.Exhibit A for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300 , page 4 of 4
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
Exhibit B for Agreement No. PW 04-19-20
CSAH No. 35; C.P. 2154300
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 1 of 6 LU1001 5/18/2020
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LIMITED USE PERMIT
C.S. 2775 (T.H. 62)
S.P. 027-635-034
County of Hennepin
LUP # 2775-0228
Permittee: City of Richfield
Expiration Date: 12/31/2029
Coop./Const. Agmt #PW-04-19-20
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434 , the State of Minnesota, through its
Commissioner of Transportation, (“MnDOT”), hereby grants a Limited Use Permit (the “LUP”) to City
of Richfield, (“Permittee”), to use the area within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. 62 as shown
in red on Exhibit "A", (the “Area”) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This Limited
Use Permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to resolution, a certified copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
Non-Motorized Trail
The Permittee's use of the Area is limited to only the constructing, maintaining and operating a
nonmotorized trail ("Facility") and the use thereof may be further limited by 23 C.F.R. 652 also
published as the Federal-Aid Policy Guide.
In addition, the following special provisions shall apply:
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. TERM. This LUP terminates at 11:59PM on 12/31/2029 (“Expiration Date”) subject to the right
of cancellation by MnDOT, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee ninety (90) days
written notice of such cancellation. This LUP will not be renewed except as provided below.
Provided this LUP has not expired or terminated, MnDOT may renew this LUP for a period of up
to ten (10) years, provided Permittee delivers to MnDOT, not later than ninety (90) days prior to
the Expiration Date, a written request to extend the term. Any extension of the LUP term will be
under the same terms and conditions in this LUP, provided:
(a) At the time of renewal, MnDOT will review the Facility and Area to ensure the Facility and
Area are compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highwa y and the Facility
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 2 of 6 LU1001 5/18/2020
and Area are in good condition and repair. If, in MnDOT’s sole determination,
modifications and repairs to the Facility and Area are needed, Permittee will perform such
work as outlined in writing in an amendment of this LUP; and
(b) Permittee will provide to MnDOT a certified copy of the resolution from the applicable
governmental body authorizing the Permittee’s use of the Facility and Area for the
additional term.
If Permittee’s written request to extend the term is not timely given, th e LUP will expire on the
Expiration Date.
Permittee hereby voluntarily releases and waives any and all claims and causes of action for
damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation arising from or related to any
cancellation or termination of this LUP by MnDOT. Permittee agrees that it will not make or
assert any claims for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation based upon
the existence, cancellation or termination of the LUP. Permittee agrees not to sue or institute
any legal action against MnDOT based upon any of the claims released in this paragraph.
2. REMOVAL. Upon the Expiration Date or earlier termination, at the Permittee’s sole cost and
expense Permittee will:
(a) Remove the Facility and restore the Area to a condition satisfactory to the MnDOT District
Engineer; and
(b) Surrender possession of the Area to MnDOT.
If, without MnDOT’s written consent, Permittee continues to occupy the Area after the Expiration
Date or earlier termination, Permittee will remain subject to all conditions, provisions, and
obligations of this LUP, and further, Permittee will pay all costs and expenses, including
attorney’s fees, in any action brought by MnDOT to remove the Facility and the Permittee from
the Area.
3. CONSTRUCTION. The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the Facility shall be at no
cost or expense to MnDOT.
Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by
the MnDOT's District Engineer. Approval in writing from MnDOT District Engineer shall be
required for any changes from the approved plan.
The Permittee will construct the Facility at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A", and in
accordance with MnDOT-approved plans and specifications. Further, Permittee will construct
the Facility using construction procedures compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the
highway.
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 3 of 6 LU1001 5/18/2020
Upon completion of the construction of the Facility, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed
slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are
perpetuated.
The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this LUP at
no expense to MnDOT and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State
One Call System at 1-800-252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation.
Any crossings of the Facility over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of
the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance.
4. MAINTENANCE. Any and all maintenance of the Facility shall be provided by the Permittee at
its sole cost and expense, including, but not limited to, plowing and removal of snow and
installation and removal of regulatory signs. No signs shall be placed on any MnDOT or other
governmental agency sign post within the Area. MnDOT will not mark obstacles for users on
trunk highway right of way.
5. USE. Other than as identified and approved by MnDOT, no permanent structures or no
advertising devices in any manner, form or size shall be allowed on the Area. No commercial
activities shall be allowed to operate upon the Area.
Any use permitted by this LUP shall remain subordinate to the right of MnDOT to use the
property for highway and transportation purposes. This LUP does not grant any interest
whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or
waterfowl refuge. No rights to relocation benefits are established by this LUP.
This LUP is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited
to public utilities which may occupy the Area.
6. APPLICABLE LAWS. This LUP does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation
imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations
relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by
the Permittee.
Permittee at its sole cost and expense, agrees to comply with, and provide and maintain the
Area, Facilities in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances and regulations issued
by any federal, state or local political subdivision having jurisdiction and authority in connection
with said Area including the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). If the Area and Facilities
are not in compliance with the ADA or other applicable laws MnDOT may enter the Area and
perform such obligation without liability to Permittee for any loss or damage to Permittee thereby
incurred, and Permittee shall reimburse MnDOT for the cost thereof, plus 10% of such cost for
overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of MnDOT’s invoice.
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 4 of 6 LU1001 5/18/2020
7. CIVIL RIGHTS. The Permittee for itself, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the
consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that in the event improvements are
constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Property described in this Limited Use
Permit for a purpose for which a MnDOT activity, facility, or program is extended or for another
purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the Permittee will maintain and
operate such improvements and services in compliance with all re quirements imposed by the
Acts and Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the United
States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, (as may be amended)
such that no person on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income-
level, or limited English proficiency will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of,
or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said improvements.
8. SAFETY. MnDOT shall retain the right to limit and/or restrict any activity, including the parking
of vehicles and assemblage of Facility users, on the highway right of way over which this LUP is
granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and Facility users.
9. ASSIGNMENT. No assignment of this LUP is allowed.
10. IN WRITING. Except for those which are set forth in this LUP, no representations, warranties,
or agreements have been made by MnDOT or Permittee to one another with respect to this
LUP.
11. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any
governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any
container on the State’s right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the
Permittee shall notify in writing MnDOT’s District Engineer and shall provide for cleanup of the
spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable
federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee.
12. MECHANIC’S LIENS. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen,
and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers',
mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed
or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for,
through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account
of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any
amendment or supplement thereto.
13. NOTICES. All notices which may be given, by either party to the other, will be deemed to have
been fully given when served personally on MnDOT or Permittee or when made in writing
addressed as follows: to Permittee at: and to MnDOT at:
Mayor State of Minnesota
Richfield City Hall Department of Transportation
6700 Portland Avenue South Metro District Right of Way
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 5 of 6 LU1001 5/18/2020
Richfield, MN 55423 1500 W. County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
The address to which notices are mailed may be changed by written notice given by either
party to the other.
14. INDEMNITY. Permittee shall indemnify, defend to the extent authorized by the Minnesota
Attorney General’s Office, hold harmless and release the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner
of Transportation and employees and any successors and assigns of the foregoing, from and
against:
(a) all claims, demands, and causes of action for injury to or death of persons or loss of or
damages to property (including Permittee's property) occurring on the Facility or connected with
Permittee's use and occupancy of the Area, except when such injury, death, loss o r damage is
caused solely by the negligence of State of Minnesota, but including those instances where the
State of Minnesota is deemed to be negligent because of its failure to supervise, inspect or
control the operations of Permittee or otherwise discover or prevent actions or operations of
Permittee giving rise to liability to any person;
(b) claims arising or resulting from the temporary or permanent termination of Facility user
rights on any portion of highway right of way over which this LUP is grante d;
(c) claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in
flood damages;
(d) any laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind
whatsoever filed or maintained for or on account of any work done or materials furnished; and
(e) any damages, testing costs and clean-up costs arising from spillage of regulated
materials attributable to the construction, maintenance or operation of the Facility.
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 6 of 6 LU1001 5/18/2020
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By______________________________
Its_Mayor________________________
Date_May 26, 2020________________
And_____________________________
Its_City Manager __________________
Date_May 26, 2020________________
By:_____________________________
District Engineer
Date____________________________
APPROVED BY:
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By:_______________________________
Director, Office of Land Management
Date______________________________
The Commissioner of Transportation
by the execution of this permit
certifies that this permit is
necessary in the public interest
and that the use intended is for
public purposes.
GENERAL NOTES:
1.ALL DIMENSIONS LOCATED AT CURB & GUTTER
ARE MEASURED TO THE FACE OF CURB
2.ALL STATION CALLOUTS REFERENCE THE
CSAH 35 ALIGNMENT
3.SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS (SHEET XX-XX)
FOR PAVEMENT INSET DETAILS
4.SEE SHEET XX-XX FOR PROPOSED CURB PROFILES
SPECIFIC NOTES:
1 SEE SHEET XX-XX FOR ADDITIONAL ADA
AND INTERSECTION DETAIL INFORMATION
2 SIDEWALK AND BOULEVARD PROFILES ADJUSTED ACROSS DRIVEWAY;
SEE DRIVEWAY TABULATION (SHEET XX) FOR DETAILS
3 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK; MATCH EXISTING
4 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE STEPS (SEE DETAIL SHEET XX)
5 BITUMINOUS WEDGE PAVEMENT REQUIRED FOR CROWN SHIFT
PAID SEPARATELY BY SQ YD
6 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE (MNDOT STD PLATE 7113A)
7 REPLACE COLORED CONCRETE REMOVED FOR CURB WORK
130 135
1
1
1
2
2 2
2
3
3
+13.8
1:5
5
1:80
+45.3 +75.4
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U U
U
U
U
U
U
U
M
LEGEND
PAVEMENT PATCH (MATCH IN PLACE)
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY
6" CONCRETE WALK
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL
BITUMINOUS OVERLAY 5
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 10.0"
3" BITUMINOUS WALK
AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY
4" CONCRETE WALK
10/25/2019
SHEET
LAST REVISION:
CHECKED BY:
CAD BY:
DESIGN BY:
LICENSE NO.DATE
..\Projects\2018\180136\DESIGN\Plan Sheets\cd180136_cp07.dgn
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
ALLIANT
COPYDRAFT
COPYDRAFT COPYDRAFTSTATION 129+00MATCHLINESTATION 136+50MATCHLINE 50
SCALE IN FEET
226
102
SP 027-635-034
CSAH 35/HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 1543
CSAH 35 (PORTLAND AVE) BIKE GAP PROJECT
10/25/19
KED
SAW
KAR
CONSTRUCTION PLAN
B624 C&G
BEGIN
27'
9'
+57.2
6.67'
10'
4'
4'
10'
6.67'
24'
25'
6.67'
10'
9'
4'
4'
12.67'
33'
13'
12.67'
+45.3
B624 C&G
B624 C&G
B624 C&G
+40.0
B624 C&G
END
+50.0
B424 C&G
BEGIN
MONUMENT SIGN
PROTECT CITY
STA 132+80.3
END CROWN SHIFT
PROPOSED CROWN
BE ADDED AT 90%)
(UTILITY PLAN WILL
8 LF 6" DIP
6" SLEEVE - 1 EA
HYDRANT - 1 EA
+77.0 OF 48.8' LT
BE ADDED AT 90%)
(UTILITY PLAN WILL
11 LF 6" DIP
6" SLEEVE - 1 EA
6" GATE VALVE & BOX - 1 EA
HYDRANT - 1 EA
+93.5 OF 45.7' RT
TRUCK APRON
CONCRETE
TRUCK APRON
CONCRETE
+37.0
BEGIN D424 C&G
END B424 C&G
D424 C&G
D424 C&G
D424 C&G
D424 C&G
D424 C&G
PORTLAND AVENUE S
6399
WATER PLANT
PORTLAND AVE S
6228
PORTLAND AVE S
6224
PORTLAND AVE S
6218
PORTLAND AVE S
6130
PORTLAND AVE S
6133 & 6135
PORTLAND AVE S
6129 & 6131MINNEAPOL
ISCITY OF RICHFIELDCITY OF EX BRIDGE 7269
BRIDGE MODIFICATION
BUS STOP BENCH
LOCATION FOR
COORDINATE
{ CSAH 35
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING “NO PARKING” TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS ON
PORTLAND AVENUE (CSAH 35) AND 66TH STREET (CSAH 53) UPON
COMPLETION OF THE PORTLAND AVENUE BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN LINK PROJECT
WHEREAS, Hennepin County, in conjunction with the City of Richfield, will be
implementing certain pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Portland Avenue
(CSAH 35) from 67th Street to Trunk Highway 62; and
WHEREAS, the layout proposes the prohibition of all on-street parking on the
east and west sides of Portland Avenue and a prohibition of all on-street parking on the
north and south sides of 66th Street from 5th Avenue to Oakland Avenue for safe
operation of the roundabout.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
That Hennepin County is hereby authorized and directed to erect the following signs at
the following locations as part of the Portland Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Link
Project:
“No Parking Any Time” on the both sides of Portland Avenue
(CSAH 35) commencing from the intersection of 66th Street
(CSAH 53) to Highway 62.
“No Parking Any Time” on the both sides of 66th Street (CSAH
53) commencing from the intersection of 5th Avenue to Oakland
Avenue.
That when the aforementioned traffic control signs have been so erected on said
street, they shall be official traffic control signs of the City of Richfield and failure to
observe such signs shall constitute a violation of the traffic ordinance of this City.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th Day of
May, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #2.B.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 63
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
5/26/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jennifer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
5/21/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider approval of a request for a new Secondhand Goods Dealer license for GameStop Inc., d/b/a
GameStop #0633, located at 34 66th Street West.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
On February 26, 2020, the City received an application for a new Secondhand Goods Dealer license for
GameStop I nc., d/b/a GameStop #0633, located at 34 66th Street W est. All required information,
documents, and fees have been received.
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed. The Public Safety Director has reviewed
the background investigation report. None of the information in the report would cause the Public Safety
Director to recommend denial of the requested license.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Approve the request for a new Secondhand Goods Dealer license for GameStop Inc., d/b/a
GameStop #0633, located at 34 66th Street West.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following:
The applicant has paid the required licensing fees.
The required proof of liability insurance has been submitted showing Zurich American I nsurance
as affording coverage.
All real estate and personal property taxes due and payable for the premises have been paid.
A criminal background check was conducted on the applicants and no criminal histories were
found.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The applicant has complied with all the provisions of the application process.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
There are no critical timing issues.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
Licensing fees have been received.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
There are no legal considerations.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Deny the request for the Secondhand Goods Dealer license for GameStop I nc., d/b/a GameStop #0633;
however, Public Safety has not found any basis for denial.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
GameStop Representative
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #4.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 64
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
5/26/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Julie Urban, Housing and Redevelopment Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
5/20/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W:
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
5/21/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider approval of an ordinance creating an Affordable Housing Trust Fund and authorize summary
publication of said ordinance.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
An Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Trust Fund) is a tool that can be used to support the preservation and
creation of affordable housing in the City. Through its Trust Fund, the City can support the rehabilitation and
preservation of existing affordable housing, promote the development of additional affordable housing, and
assist individuals with rental and down payment assistance.
Staff recommends that the City establish its own Trust Fund to further its affordable housing efforts. T he
City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (H R A) would administer the Trust Fund on behalf of
the City. Initial funding for the Trust Fund will come from the H R A's Capital Improvement Fund.
Additional funding would be identified through the regular budget process and be reported to the
Council on an annual basis.
At first reading, the Council discussed whether or not to eliminate the "moderate income" category from the
ordinance (i.e., households earning up to 120% of the area median income). To clarify, eliminating the
category from the Trust Fund would not preclude the HRA or the Economic Development Authority (E D A)
from undertaking activities that serve moderate income households. T hose funds would just not be
included in the Trust Fund. Rental assistance would only be done through the Trust Fund.
Council members asked whether our current down payment assistance program would be impacted
by eliminating the moderate income category. T hat program is targeted to households earning 80%
Area Median Income (AMI), so it would not be affected. T he down payment assistance program is,
however, federally funded and can continue to operate regardless of whether or not a Trust Fund is
created.
T he City could potentially suffer a potential negative financial impact from the income limitation if the
State were ever to create a state-funded matching fund. Legislation to create such a fund has been
introduced in past years but has not passed. T he more funding placed in a local Trust Fund, the
more match the City could potentially be eligible for.
Staff and HRA/E D A legal counsel recommend that Council retain maximum flexibility for the Trust Fund by
including all eligible categories. The HRA and E D A set funding and programmatic priorities through the
budget process and retain the ability to focus housing efforts on low and very low income households.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct a public hearing and by motion:
1. Approv e an ordinance establishing an Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
2. Adopt a re solution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance .
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
In 2017, the State Legislature approved legislation to allow cities to establish housing
trust funds in order to facilitate affordable housing efforts in the State.
On April 28, 2020, the City Council adopted an emergency ordinance to provide
emergency rental assistance to residents financially impacted by the COVID-19 crisis.
T he City and HRA Attorneys recommended that the City adopt an Affordable Housing
Trust Fund as a mechanism for providing rental and other housing assistance that may be
needed on a longer-term basis.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Minnesota Statutes 462C.16 establishes the authority for cities to create local housing trust funds.
The City's Comprehensive Plan supports the preservation, maintenance and diversification of the
City's housing stock and the provision of housing that meets the diverse needs of all its residents.
Ensuring housing stability for its residents and preserving and creating affordable housing furthers
these goals.
The HRA works to implement the Comprehensive Plan by administering a variety of housing
programs for people who own their homes and who rent their homes and for residents across the
income spectrum.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The City and HRA Attorneys recommend that a permanent Trust Fund be established in order to
facilitate continued funding of emergency rental assistance.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The HRA will provide initial funding for the Trust Fund from its Capital I mprovement Fund for
emergency rental assistance related to C OV I D-19 impacts. Additional funds may be added
through the E D A and HRA's regular budget process and will be approved by and reported to the
Council on an annual basis.
Programs that may be funded through the Trust Fund include:
C OV I D-19 emergency rent assistance (50% A MI )
Kids@Home (50% A MI )
Community Fix-Up Fund (115% A MI )
Sources of funds for the trust fund include, but are not limited to: donations; bond proceeds;
grants and loans from a state, federal or private source; appropriations by local government;
investment earnings; pooled Tax I ncrement Financing (TI F), and E D A and HRA levies.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
T hrough an Affordable Housing Trust Fund, the City may undertake affordable housing
activities such as pay for administrative expenses (10% maximum); make loans, grants
and loan guarantees for the development of affordable housing; match other funds from
federal state, or private resources; provide down payment assistance, rental assistance,
and homebuyer counseling services.
Activities may be directed towards people with very low (up to 50% Area Median Income,
AMI), low (up to 80% AMI) and moderate income (up to 120% AMI).
While the City's HRA has been conducting affordable housing activities since its inception
in 1974, the Trust Fund statute provides clear legal authority for a variety of affordable
housing-related activities and a budgeting mechanism for tracking those efforts.
While pooled T IF may be contributed to a housing Trust Fund, the same rules that restrict
the use of T IF would apply to the Trust Fund, so it is unlikely that those funds would be
contributed to the Trust Fund until such time that changes were made to the current
restrictive accounting requirements.
T he Ordinance was written by the HRA Attorney and reviewed by the City Attorney.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
1. Approve second reading with the modification that eligible renter households must be low or very low
income.
2. Approve second reading with the modification that all eligible households must be low or very low
income.
3. Approve second reading with the modification that any funding placed in the Trust Fund to serve
moderate income households be approved by a super majority (i.e., 4 out of 5 members).
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Housing Trust F und Ordinance Ordinance
Resolution for S ummary P ublication Resolution L etter
BILL NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Preamble.
1.01. In order to provide the City of Richfield (the “City”) with additional tools to support
the rehabilitation and preservation of existing affordable housing within the City,
promote the development of additional affordable housing within the City, and assist
individuals with rental and down payment assistance, the City has determined to create
an Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
Section 2. Definitions.
2.01. Persons of very low income means families and individuals whose incomes do not
exceed 50 percent of area median income, as median income was most recently
determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban development for the
Minneapolis-St. Paul- Bloomington, Minnesota Metropolitan Statistical Area, as adjusted
for smaller and larger families.
2.02. Persons of low income means families and individuals whose incomes do not
exceed 80 percent of the area median income, as median income was most recently
determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban development for the
Minneapolis-St. Paul- Bloomington, Minnesota Metropolitan Statistical Area, as adjusted
for smaller and larger families.
2.03. Persons of moderate income means families and individuals whose incomes
exceed 80 percent, but do not exceed 120 percent, of area median income, as median
income was most recently determined by the United States Department of Housing and
Urban development for the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minnesota Metropolitan
Statistical Area, as adjusted for smaller and larger families.
Section 3. Establishing Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
3.01. Pursuant to the authority granted to the City under Minnesota Statutes Section
462C.16, an affordable housing trust fund is established for the following purposes:
provide loans and grants to for-profit and non-profit housing developers for the acquisition
and capital and soft costs necessary for the creation of new affordable rental and owner-
occupied housing, for the rehabilitation and preservation of existing multi-family residential
rental housing including naturally occurring affordable housing and rental assistance and
homeownership assistance to persons of very low, low, and moderate income.
Bill No. _____ Page 2
2
Section 4. Funding Sources.
4.01. The Affordable Housing Trust Fund shall be funded by an annual budgeted
allocation of funds from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield (HRA) levy and funds from the Richfield Economic Development Authority (EDA)
levy, as approved by the City Council. Other sources of funding may include, but are not
limited to:
(a) Private cash donations from individuals and corporations
designated for the Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
(b) Payments in lieu of participation in current or future affordable housing
programs.
(c) Matching funds from a federal or state affordable housing trust fund; or
a state program designated to fund an affordable housing trust fund.
(d) Principal and interest from Affordable Housing Trust Fund loan
repayments and all other income from Affordable Housing Trust Fund
activities.
(e) The sale of real and personal property.
(f) Local government appropriations, development fees and other
funds as designated from time to time by the City Council.
(g) Tax Increment Finance (TIF) pooled funds.
Section 5. Purpose of Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
5.01. The City may use money from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to assist
proposed projects or programs to develop or preserve affordable housing for persons of
very low, low, and moderate income to include:
(a) Making loans at interest rates below or at market rates in order to
strengthen the financial feasibility of proposed projects;
(b) Guaranteeing of loans;
(c) Providing gap financing for affordable housing developments;
(d) Financing the acquisition, demolition, and disposition of property for
affordable housing projects;
(e) Financing construction of public improvements and utilities to aid
proposed affordable residential developments;
Bill No. _____ Page 3
3
(f) Financing the rehabilitation, remodeling, or new construction of
affordable housing;
(g) Tenant and project based rental assistance;
(h) Funding for acquisition and rehabilitation in conjunction with or related to
affordable housing projects;
(i) Funding to facilitate affordable homeownership opportunities
including down payment assistance, second mortgages, closing
costs, etc.;
(j) Administrative costs associated with affordable housing programs that do
not exceed ten percent of the balance fund;
(k) Interim financing of public costs for affordable housing projects in
anticipation of a permanent financing source (i.e. construction financing,
bond sale, etc.); and
(l) Other uses as permitted by law and approved by the City Council.
Section 6. Administration of Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
6.01. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield,
Minnesota (the “Authority”) shall administer the Affordable Housing Trust Fund on
behalf of the City.
6.02 The Authority shall determine the terms and conditions of repayment of loans and
grants from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund including the appropriate security and
interest, if any, should repayment be required. Interest on loans and grants shall be as
established by the Authority from time to time or at the time of approval of a specific
project or program.
6.02. The Authority shall report annually to the City on the use of the funds in the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund, including the number of loans and grants made, the
number and types of residential units assisted, and the number of households for which
rental assistance or down payment assistance were provided. The City shall post the
annual report on its Website.
Section 7. Council Action.
7.01. The City Council of the City of Richfield hereby ordains the implementation of the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
7.02. This Ordinance shall be effective on the 30th day following the publication of a
Bill No. _____ Page 4
4
summary of this ordinance approved by the City Council of the City of Richfield in the
official newspaper of the City of Richfield.
7.03. The summary of this Ordinance was reviewed and approved by the City Council
of the City of Richfield and the City Council finds that the summary of this Ordinance
clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of this Ordinance.
Section 8. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of
the City Charter.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota on ____________, 2020.
_________________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
Attest:
Beth Vanhoose, City Clerk
Action on this ordinance:
Date of introduction: May12, 2020
Date of adoption: _____, 2020
Motion for adoption:
Seconded by:
Voted in favor of:
Voted against:
Abstained:
Absent:
Ordinance adopted.
Date of publication:
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance adopted by
the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, at a meeting held on May 26, 2020.
Bill No. _____ Page 5
5
Beth Vanhoose, City Clerk
650776v2(JAE)
RC125-377
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION
OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND
WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above-referenced amendment of the Richfield
City Code; and
WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense
of publication of the complete text is not justified.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield
that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication:
SUMMARY PUBLICATION
BILL NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND
This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the
Richfield City Charter.
This ordinance establishes an affordable housing trust fund in order to provide
additional tools to support the rehabilitation and preservation of affordable housing,
promote the development of additional affordable housing and assist individuals with rental
and down payment assistance.
Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office
during normal business hours or upon request by calling the Department of Community
Development at (612) 861-9760.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of May,
2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS
AGENDA ITEM #5.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 61
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
5/26/2020
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: S cott K ulzer, A dministrative A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector/C ity E ngineer
5/18/2020
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
5/21/2020
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider a resolution requesting an advance payment of 2020-2024 Municipal State Aid (MS A) Street
Funds to collect funds available from the completion of eligible past projects.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the proposed resolution requesting an advancement of the 2020-
2024 MS A allotments to collect funds available from the completion of MS A eligible past projects. These funds
would then be available to be used to cover other eligible expenditures, including Lyndale Avenue
Reconstruction, spot A D A improvements, matching funds for the Portland Avenue Bike Gap project, and other
upcoming projects.
The maximum amount of MS A funds that Richfield can request is $4M. The estimated amount of past eligible
expenditures exceeds the $4M and so staff is recommending the City Council request an advance for the
maximum allowed.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Adopt the resolution requesting an advancement of 2020-2024 Municipal State Aid Street
funds.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Minnesota Statute 162.14 provides for municipalities to make advances from future year ’s
allocations.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/D OT) State Aid Office solicits requests for
advances on a year-by-year basis depending on the current statewide fund balance.
Advance is limited to five times the municipalities’ last construction allotment or $4,000,000,
whichever is less.
The past eligible projects were funded using other sources, but were approved by State Aid so
these funds would be available if needed. Those project include 77th Street J oint Repair; Richfield
Parkway; 76th Street East Reconstruction; and 66th Street.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Mn/D OT requires that all State Aid Street Fund advances be made via City Council resolution.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Mn/D OT State Aid Office considers advance requests on a first come, first serve basis.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
MS A balance (5/1/2020) - ($218,649)
Estimated 2021 Allocation - $1,000,000 (est. 15% less due to C OV I D-19)
Total estimated MS A disbursement from past projects - $4,880,000
Maximum MS A advancement is $4,000,000 less negative balance - $3,781,351
2020 Advance Amount Requested - $3,781,351
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney will be available to answer any questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
2020 M S A A dvancement Request Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ADVANCE OF 2020-2024
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Municipality of Richfield has implemented Municipal State Aid
Street Project(s) which require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State
Aid Construction Account; and
WHEREAS, said municipality has completed the construction of said project(s)
through the use of other Municipal funds and is requesting an advance from the
Municipal State Aid Street Fund to supplement the available funds in their State Aid
Construction Account; and
WHEREAS, the advance is based on the following determination of estimated
expenditures:
Estimated Account Balance as of date 5/14/2020 $ -218,649
Less estimated disbursements:
Project # 157-108-037 $ 700,000
Project # 157-361-027 $ 2,000,000
Project # 157-370-005 $ 500,000
Project # 157-020-029 $ 1,680,000
Project # $ NA
Bond Principle (if any) $ NA
Project Finals (overruns-if any) $ NA
Other_________________ $ NA
Total Estimated Disbursements $ 4,880,000
Advance Amount (amount in excess of acct balance) $ 3,781,351
WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance
with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subd. 6 and Minnesota Rules,
Chapter 8820.1500, Subp. 10b; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality acknowledges advance funds are released on a
first-come-first-serve basis and this Resolution does not guarantee the availability of
funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
That the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this
advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) of the Municipality
of Richfield in an amount up to $3,781,351 in accordance with Minnesota Rules
8820.1500, Subp. 10b. I hereby authorize repayments from subsequent accruals to the
Municipal State Aid Street Construction Account of said Municipality from future year
allocations until fully repaid.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 26th day of
May, 2020.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk