The URL can be used to link to this page

02-24-2020 Regular AgendaR EG U LAR C IT Y C O U N C IL ME E TIN G R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C EN TER, C O U N C IL C H AMB E R S F E B R U ARY 24, 2020 7:00 P M IN TR O D U C TO RY P R O C E E D IN G S C all to order P ledge of A llegiance Open forum E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who w ish to address the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting. A pproval of the Minutes of: (1) C ity C ouncil Work S essi on F ebruary 11, 2020; (2) C i ty C ouncil Meeting F ebruary 11, 2020; and (3) S pecial C ity C ouncil Meeting F ebruary 14, 2020. AG E N D A AP P R O VAL 1.A pproval of the A genda 2.Consent C alendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City C ouncil in one motion. Once the C onsent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for C ouncil discussion and action. All items listed on the C onsent C alendar are recommended for approval. A .C onsi der the approval of a contract, not to exceed $226,439, with K i mley Horn and A ssociates, Inc. for preli minary design engineering of the 65th S treet Reconstruction P roject between 66th S treet/Rae D rive and Ni collet Avenue, including the Lyndale Avenue P edestrian Improvements between 64th S treet and 66th S treet. S taff Report No. 32 B .C onsi der the first reading of an ordi nance amending S ubsections 705.17, 715.05, and 720.07 of the Ri chfi eld C ity C ode relating to sanitary sewer, water, and storm water uti lity billing and establishment of a new S ubsection 727 relating to the street li ght system. S taff Report No. 33 C .C onsi der the adoption of a resolution accepting grants and donations recei ved by the Richfield Recreati on S ervices D epartment in 2019 and authorizi ng the Recreation S ervices D epartment to administer the funds in accordance with any applicable grant agreements and terms prescri bed by donors. S taff Report No. 34 D .C onsi der the approval of the location of the Richfield D og P ark at Roosevelt P ark. S taff Report No. 35 3.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar P U B LIC H EAR IN G S 4.P ublic heari ng and consideration of the adopti on of a resolution specifying the use of funds from the Urban Hennepi n C ounty C ommunity D evelopment B lock Grant allocation for 2020 and consideration of a resolution reprogramming 2019 C ommunity D evelopment B lock Grant funds. S taff Report No. 36 R E S O L U T IO N S 5.C onsider approval of a resolution granting an amendment to the Market P laza / Village S hores planned unit development to allow a new building for a bank branch with a drive-up ATM. C onsider approval of a resolution granting a subdivision waiver to allow the creation of a separate lot for the proposed building. S taff Report No. 37 C IT Y MAN AG E R ’S R E P O R T 6.C ity Manager's Report C L AIMS AN D PAYR O LL S 7.C laims and P ayroll C O U N C IL D IS C U S S IO N 8.Hats Off to Hometown Hits 9.A djournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. R equests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the C ity Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota City Council Work Session February 11, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The work session was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 5:45 p.m. in the Bartholomew Room. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Simon Trautmann; Present: and Ben Whalen. Council Members Edwina Garcia Absent: Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant Item #1 PRESENTATION OF PREVAILING WAGES AND LABOR TRAFFICKING City Manager Rodriguez introduced the item and staff. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina gave a description of prevailing wage, current rates and research done in 2016 by City staff. She included some key points of current research as well as a study of 140 projects where 122 were using prevailing wage regulations. There was no evidence found to support the proposition that the absence of prevailing wage regulations attracted more bids. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina then listed some concerns of how to enforce prevailing wage regulations (1) understanding the hours worked by an employee; (2) contractors refusing to pay fringe benefits; (3) misclassification of employees; and (4) failure to pay overtime rate. She spoke of most cities do not have the resources or knowledge base to be able to enforce the ordinances. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina then gave some enforcement/monitoring practices (1) certified payroll records; (2) onsite interviews of employees; and (3) inspector check-ins. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina stated a recommendation of requiring City projects over $300,000 are regulated with prevailing wage. Council Member Whalen asked why is $300,000 the starting point. Director Asher spoke to the ballpark starting point. There would still be many projects affected but not too many to become overwhelming while they begin the process. City Manager Rodriguez added that cities with lower thresholds were not really enforcing and Richfield would like to enforce the regulations. The City will most likely have to outsource the enforcement. Council Work Session -2- February 11, 2020 Council Member Whalen wondered if it is any project or just fully publicly funded projects. City Manager Rodriguez confirmed it would be City funded projects. Mayor Regan Gonzalez questioned why other cities were not enforcing these regulations. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina explained cities may have the regulations in their contract but are not tracking them directly. Mayor Regan Gonzalez also asked if there would be addition legal protection for renters if developers were accused of not abiding by the regualtions. City Attorney Tietjen confirmed protection for renters if legal action were to be taken. Council Member Trautmann wondered if it would be feasible to create an enforcement prevision to incentivize private attorneys to enforce violations and then attorneys collect the fees from enforcing a wage violation. City Attorney Tietjen stated they could look into it but usually attorney fees are contractual. Council Member Supple believes it is worth having the ordinance to set a standard, even if not fully enforced. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked if there would be a difference in the processing and fees when working with someone who already includes prevailing wage in their contract versus someone who does not. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina stated there would need to be enforcement with any contractors as well as all subcontractors for the entirety of the project. Council Member Whalen wondered the City is expected to need another staff person. City Manager Rodriguez stated it would not be enough work to justify hiring another staff person and outsourcing the work would be more practical. Council Member Trautmann asked if it would just be outsourcing the compliance or piece or shifting in-house contract management to have a general contractor for these projects. City Manager Rodriguez stated it would depend on the project. Director Asher spoke in that it would be the compliance piece. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina believed it would be 10-20 additional hours a week. Director Stark spoke on the Redevelopment Contract Agreement to discuss what kind of controls they would want to have for projects that are not abiding by regulations. He stated they do not know of anyone that has terminated a project. Director Stark then added what some costs and limitations might be, including (1) developer unaware of subcontractor and suppliers; (2) staff not having capacity to conduct site visits; and (3) may set an unrealistic expectation that staff is monitoring the projects. Council Member Supple commented on her concern of a developer not knowing of all subcontractors and suppliers coming into their development. Director Stark explained a developer versus a contractor knowing due to the volume of employees on a project. Council Member Whalen echoed his concern but is hoping this would be the change in enforcing these regulations. He was also concerned about possible punishment to a developer for the fault of a contractor. Director Stark confirmed that is a possibility but developer may alter the language in their contracts to protect themselves. Council Member Trautmann was curious of any potential civil liability for making this item an ordinance. City Attorney Tietjen replied there would be no liability for adopting the ordinance. Council Work Session -3- February 11, 2020 Council Member Whalen recognized the representative from the Carpenter’s Union that was present. He believed it is still worth passing something like this and knowing we have partners in the community that monitor this problem. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina went on to describe prevention of labor trafficking. There is a state-wide movement to become engaged and an easy way to provide information is signs. She listed some costs an limitations such as (1) costs for labor trafficking prevention signs; and (2) lack of resources to investigate human trafficking cases. Council Member Supple commented as being the Human Rights Commission liaison and how they would like to be part of the solution and are willing to provide support. Council Member Trautmann expressed appreciation for bringing this topic into conversation and wondered if the signs would just be at construction sites or able to proliferate the message. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina described how some signs cover multiple forms of labor/human trafficking. Director Stark explained the inspections division would have to perform a scope and scale of each project. Mayor Regan Gonzalez wondered about other types other than signs. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina explained the signs are just a first step in labor trafficking prevention. Council Member Whalen agreed that signs are great but it worth to looking into more options. He also wondered if the City could require businesses need to have these signs posted. City Attorney Tietjen stated they could look into the matter but not sure if they could mandate it unless it is required by some state or federal law. Council Member Supple asked where the calls would be directed from the signs. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina listed a couple options and receiving support from the county. City Manager Rodriguez stated their research mostly surrounded labor trafficking but they have found there is a direct relation to metro transit so they would see if it’s possible to place signs at bus stops and other metro transit areas. Executive Analyst Martinez Gavina gave a summary of recommendations (1) prevailing wage requirement on projects over $300,000; (2) redevelopment contractual agreements; and (3) labor trafficking prevention signs; as well as next steps and suggestions. Council Member Whalen asked for clarification if the prevailing wage requirement would be proposed as an ordinance and then come back to Council. City Attorney Tietjen confirmed they are looking to make an ordinance. Council Member Supple suggested more research on the feasibility of the redevelopment agreement provisions. Director Stark believes the HRA would want to include the language on agreements and contracts. Council Member Whalen wanted to clarify by researching the feasibility would be to try it in agreements and contracts. Director Stark confirmed that notion. Council Member Whalen stated his support in the matter. Council Member Trautmann thanked staff for all their work and expressed his support in moving forward. Mayor Regan Gonzalez stated her support and would like staff to create a baseline of information to see if the work is effective. She also thanked staff for the presentation. Council Work Session -4- February 11, 2020 City Manager Rodriguez clarified steps moving forward as (1) developing language for an ordinance of prevailing wage; (2) moving forward with the redevelopment contractual agreement; and (3) labor trafficking sign distribution. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:45 p.m. Date Approved: February 25, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Maria Regan Gonzalez at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Ben Whalen; and Present: Simon Trautmann Council Members Edwina Garcia Absent: Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Neil Ruhland, Communications Manager; Jay Henthorne, Police Chief; Mike Flaherty, Public Safety Deputy Chief; Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Supervisor; Julie Urban, Housing Manager; John Stark, Community Development Director; Melissa Poehlman, Assistant Community Development Director; Chris Regis, Finance Director; Blanca Martinez Gavina, Executive Analyst; and Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance OPEN FORUM No speakers APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the minutes of the: (1) Concurrent City Council and HRA Work Session January 21, 2020; (2) Special City Council Work Session of January 23, 2020; (3) City Council Work Session of January 28, 2020; and (4) City Council Meeting of January 28, 2020 Motion carried 4-0. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Council Meeting February 11, 2020 Council Meeting Minutes -2- February 11, 2020 Item #1 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the agenda Motion carried 4-0. Item #2 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar. A. First reading of transitory ordinance providing funding for certain improvements from the Special Revenue Fund (Staff Report No. 27) B. Consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) funds for a vehicle to be used for distracted driving enforcement (Staff Report No. 28). RESOLUTION NO. 11718 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/POLICE TO ACCEPT GRANT MONIES FROM THE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY IN THE AMOUNT OF $94,100.00 OR A LESSER AMOUNT, AS AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TO FUND A VEHICLE FOR DISTRACTED DRIVING ENFORCEMENT C. Continue consideration of land use applications for Chase Bank at Market Plaza (6501 Woodlake Drive) to February 24, 2020 (Staff Report No. 29). M/Whalen, S/Trautmann to approve the consent calendar Motion carried 4-0. Item #3 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR None Item #4 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE, AND SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF SAID ORDINANCE, AMENDING SECTION 405 OF THE CITY CODE RELATED TO HOUSING MAINTENANCE AND ADOPTING THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE (IPMC). (STAFF REPORT NO. 30) Council Meeting Minutes -3- February 11, 2020 Supple presented staff report 30. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman reiterated this isn’t going to change the processes already enforced by the inspectors. It will provide better customer service, more consistency amongst inspectors, and consolidate many things into one document. M/Supple, S/Whalen to approve the resolution approving summary publication of an ordinance repealing Section 405 (housing code) of the city code of ordinances and adopting the International Property Maintenance Code with amendments. RESOLUTION NO. 11719 RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 405 (HOUSING CODE) OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES AND ADOPTING THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE WITH AMENDMENTS Council Member Whalen thanked staff for clarification and believes this will provide better quality buildings and customer service. Mayor Regan Gonzalez also thanked staff for their work and trusts this will create clearer guidance for staff. Motion carried 4-0 Item #5 CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE SOCIAL SERVICES TO THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND AUTHORIZATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THOSE AGENCIES (STAFF REPORT NO. 31) Mayor Regan Gonzalez read staff report 31. Housing Manager Urban spoke about the importance of these organizations and supplied examples of how organizations work with departments and outlined the services. She explained what a tough decision it was to make the selection. Council Member Supple thanked all the organizations and appreciates all the work they do within the community. Council Member Whalen echoed the gratitude for all the organizations. He also read a statement from Joe McDonald, CEO with VEAP, thanking City Council members and staff for their continued support. Mayor Regan Gonzalez also thanked all the organizations asked if anyone from those organizations would like to speak. She stated the services and support they provide for the community is greatly appreciated. M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the agreements between the recommended non-profit organizations and the City of Richfield, and authorize the City Manager to execute agreements for services with those agencies Council Meeting Minutes -4- February 11, 2020 Motion carried 4-0 Item #6 CITY MANAGER’S REPORT City Manager Rodriguez had nothing to report. Item #7 CLAIMS AND PAYROLL M/Trautmann, S/Supple that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 02/11/2020 A/P Checks 284501 - 284828 $ 1,719,385.80 Payroll: 152116 - 152452 671,282.89 TOTAL $ 2,390,668.69 Motion carried 4-0. Item #8 HATS OFF TO HOMETOWN HITS Council Member Whalen thanked staff for their partnership with “Let’s Talk Richfield” discussing the Census. He then reminded residents that early voting is open and available at City Hall. Council Member Supple commended the Recreation staff for another successful Ice Fishing Bowl at Taft Park. She also reminded residents the Arts Commission is doing another round for their sidewalk poetry contest and the due date is February 14th. Council Member Trautmann spoke about the opportunities available for children and adults at Wood Lake Nature Center. Mayor Regan Gonzalez sent best wishes to Council Member Garcia to feel better soon. She also spoke of her visit to the State Capital and encouraged residents to contact their local representatives and speak to them about policy issues that are important to the community. Lastly, she mentioned the next meeting for the Minnesota League of Women Voters is February 15, 2020 at 9:15am and will be in the Audi Dealership in Richfield. Item #9 ADJOURNMENT Council Meeting Minutes -5- February 11, 2020 The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:23 p.m. Date Approved: February 24, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Administrative Assistant City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Special City Council Meeting February 14, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 2:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Mary Supple; Simon Present: Trautmann; and Ben Whalen. Staff Present: Kelly Wynn, Senior Office Assistant Others Present: Lisa Sorenson, Sorenson Consulting ITEM #1 SPECIAL MEETING ITEMS • Special City Council Closed Executive Session in the Babcock Room regarding the City Manager’s 1-year performance evaluation. • Reconvene the Special City Council Meeting in the Council Chambers. Mayor Regan Gonzalez, City Council Members and Lisa Sorenson moved into a closed executive session in the Babcock Room where discussion of the City Manager’s performance was conducted. The Special City Council Meeting was reconvened in the Council Chambers. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 4:10 p.m. Date Approved: February 24, 2020 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kelly Wynn Katie Rodriguez Senior Office Assistant City Manager AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.A. STAFF REPORT NO. 32 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 2/24/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J oe P owers, A ssistant C ity E ngineer D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 2/13/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 2/19/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the appr oval of a contract, not to exceed $226,439, with Kimley H orn and Associates, Inc. for preliminary design engineering of the 65th Str eet R econstruction Project between 66th Street/Rae Drive and Nicollet Avenue, including the Lyndale Avenue Pedestrian Improvements between 64th Street and 66th S treet. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Consistent with City C ounc il direction, the Capital I mprovement Plan (C I P), and the C ity's C omprehensive Plan, staff is working towards the rec onstruction of 65th Street between 66th S treet/Rae Drive and Nicollet Avenue and improvements along Lyndale Avenue between 64th Street and 66th Street. Kimley Horn and A ssoc iates, I nc . has submitted a proposal to provide the preliminary and final engineering services for the 65th Street Reconstruction Project and Ly ndale Avenue improvements in an amount not to exceed $601,673. Consistent with past practices, staff is asking Council to authorize the preliminary design engineering services in the amount of $226,439. Following the conc lusion of preliminary design engineering, staff anticipates returning to Council for final design engineering authorization sometime in early summer 2020. PRO J ECT H IS T ORY The c urrent C I P and 5-Year Street Reconstruc tion Plan identifies the extents of the 65th Street Rec onstruction as 66th St/Rae Drive and Nic ollet Avenue. Due to potential redevelopment, reconstruction of the portion of the c orridor between Grand Avenue and Nic ollet Avenue was previously programmed for 2020, with the remainder of the corridor to be reconstructed in 2021. The public engagement process for 65th Street reconstruc tion between Grand Avenue and Nicollet Avenue began in late 2018, however due to the HUB redevelopment delay, the planned reconstruc tion projec t was put on hold in summer 2019 and the public engagement proc ess for 65th Street was paused. Stonebrooke Engineering, Inc. provided the preliminary design services prior to pausing of the project. Approximately $102,000 of their contract of $348,646 was expended before the project was paused and the contract with Stonebrooke Engineering was closed in June, 2019. T he project deliverables provided by Stonebrooke Engineering will be provided to Kimley Horn so as not to duplicate work. M OVIN G F ORWARD Staff is now proposing to resume the public engagement process for the full c orridor from 66th Street/Rae Drive to Nicollet Avenue. Additionally, staff proposes that the projec t include previously identified improvements along Ly ndale Avenue between 64th S treet and 66th Street. The Lyndale Avenue improvements were designed in 2014, but not constructed due to funding shortages; the existing 2014 design will be updated to align with the 65th Street Reconstruction Project. The project will also inc lude repair/replacement of C ity utilities along 65th Street and coordination with adjacent redevelopment projec ts. Kimley Horn's contract will inc lude c oordination with Barr Engineering, who are c urrently analy zing area drainage issues and will be c ontrac ted separately to perform stormwater/drainage design for the 66th Street/HUB/65th Street Area reconstruc tion. P ROJ E C T E S TI MATE Currently the C I P and 5-Year Street Reconstruc tion Plan (attac hed) identifies a total of $9M for the project which includes both Street Rec onstruc tion Bonds and Utility Bonds to finance it. I n 2014, the Ly ndale Avenue improvements were estimated at $150,000 to construct. I ncluding these improvements with this project will then inc rease the 65th Street estimate accordingly. I n addition, the on-going investigation to determine what the long-term fix is to the storm water flooding issues that oc cur at 66th Street between the HUB and Holy Angels will need to be determined and included as part of the 65th Street rec onstruc tion. I nitial findings indicate substantial work will need to be included in order to address the flooding. At this time we are confident that the projec t c osts will exceed the $9M identified, but to what extent is yet to be determined. Upon completion of the preliminary design, staff will have an engineer's estimate identify ing the cost of the project as presented to the C ity Council for approval. Consideration for approval is anticipated to oc cur in J une 2020, prior to moving forward into final design. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the contract with Kimley H orn and Associates, Inc. for preliminary design engineering of the 65th Street Reconstruction Project between 66th Street/Rae Drive and Nicollet Avenue, and Lyndale Avenue Pedestrian Impr ovements between 64th S treet and 66th Street, not to exceed $226,439. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The pavement and underground infrastructure condition along 65th S treet c ontinues to deteriorate. City staff have identified a need for complete rec onstruc tion of the roadway and utilities in the 65th S treet c orridor between 66th S treet/Rae Drive and Nicollet Avenue. Roadway improvements along Lyndale Avenue between 64th Street and 66th Street are rec ommended due to recent and future redevelopment. A long-term stormwater solution is needed in advanc e of the HUB redevelopment and should be inc luded in the 65th Street reconstruction. Kimley Horn and Associates, I nc. is in the City 's Engineering Consultant Pool and is an experienced engineering firm. Staff has negotiated a proposed sc ope of servic es that is typical and adequate for a project of this scale. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The reconstruction of 65th Street is identified in the City 's Capital I mprovement Plan and 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan. Council approval is required for expenditures over $175,000. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Staff and the c onsultant will resume the public input process shortly after the contract is approved. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Approval of the Kimley Horn and Associates, I nc. preliminary design contrac t includes expenditures not to exceed $226,439. No other expenditures are being c onsidered at this time. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The City Attorney will be available to answer questions. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type 65th S t. S cope of S ervices C ontract/A greement 65th S t. P roject E xtents E xhibit 65th S t S ources and Uses Tracking B ackup Materi al 2014 Lyndale Ave. P ed. Improvements E xhibit 5 Year S treet Reconstruction P lan B ackup Materi al February 12, 2020 Mr. Jack Broz, P.E. Transportation Engineer City of Richfield 1901 E 66th Street Richfield, MN 55423 Re: W 65th Street Improvements – 66th Street to Nicollet Avenue Proposal for Preliminary & Final Design Services Dear Jack, Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for preliminary design services for the W 65th Street Improvements project. We understand that the primary objective of this scope is to assist the City of Richfield in developing the preliminary and final design for improvements on W 65th Street from W 66th Street to Nicollet Avenue, including evaluation of corridor improvements that balance mobility, access, and non-motorized uses along the roadway. This project also includes the restriping of Lyndale Avenue from 64th to 66th Street. We understand construction is planned for 2021 and includes roadway, sidewalk, utilities, lighting, and streetscaping. Project Understanding The City of Richfield has requested Kimley-Horn provide a Scope of Services that includes project management, data collection, stakeholder engagement, traffic analysis, preliminary design, and final design for this segment of W 65th Street. The proposed design will adhere to Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) State Aid standards. Scope of Services The following is a summary of our proposed Scope of Services for the project. Task 1 – Project Management Kimley-Horn will provide project management and coordination services including quality assurance/quality control of the project deliverables. 1.1 Project Management/Administration Kimley-Horn will coordinate project management activities including project monitoring, progress reports, the development of a detailed work plan with specific staff assignments, and preparation of a project schedule indicating critical dates, milestones, and deliverables. 1.2 Kickoff Meeting Kimley-Horn will hold a kickoff meeting with a Project Management Team (PMT) including City of Richfield staff to discuss the scope and ◼ Suite 100 767 Eustis Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 ◼ TEL 651 645 4197 FAX 651 645 5116 Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 2 schedule for the project. Kimley-Horn will also hold an internal team kickoff meeting to review the project requirements with staff involved. 1.3 PMT Meetings Hold up to twelve (12) PMT meetings to discuss issues that arise during the public engagement and design work. Kimley-Horn will be responsible for preparing meeting agendas, meeting minutes, and necessary exhibits to conduct the meetings. 1.4 Quality Control Reviews Kimley-Horn will coordinate quality control reviews of deliverables. We will also conduct constructability reviews for the public utility layout and the 60 percent plans. Deliverables: Meeting Agendas, Minutes & Exhibits, Work Plan, Schedule, QA/QC Reviews. Task 2 – Data Collection 2.1 Topographic Survey A Kimley-Horn subconsultant will perform a field collection of survey data for the preparation of a base map for the project corridor. This includes horizontal/vertical control and topographic survey information, a utility structure survey, and existing right-of-way/easement identification from Lyndale Avenue to 66th Street. We will utilize the existing conditions information to develop a base map and digital terrain model for the project corridor. 2.2 Geotechnical 2.2.1 Soil Borings A Kimley-Horn subconsultant, Braun Intertec, will perform the subsurface investigation and analysis and prepare a report for the proposed roadway improvements. We have assumed a total of fifteen (15) soil borings at a depth of 5 to 10 feet. Actual soil boring locations and depths will be determined during the final design process. 2.2.2 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests of the soil samples obtained via borings will be completed. The tests will include classification (sieve analysis, density, moisture content, etc.) and one (1) R-value test. 2.2.3 Engineering Analysis and Reports A final geotechnical report will be prepared to include the following: • Description of the process for selecting boring locations • Soil boring location map • Descriptions of drilling, sampling, testing, and classification methods • Boring logs • Review of soil/groundwater conditions encountered • A detailed layout showing the limits of unsuitable foundation material Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 3 • Recommendations for pavement design and construction • Recommendations regarding utility installations Deliverables: Electronic Base Map, Geotechnical Report. Task 3 – Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholder engagement will be important for the success of the W 65 Street Improvement project. Kimley-Horn will follow the process laid out in the City of Richfield’s Guiding Documents for Public Engagement. We understand that two open houses were previously held during the preliminary design of the first half of the project from Nicollet Avenue to Lyndale Avenue. To supplement this previous engagement, Kimley-Horn will participate in two (2) public meetings for the overall preliminary design. These will be considered “Open House #3” and “Open House #4” in the City’s guiding document. A City Council Work Session and a Richfield Transportation Commission Meeting will be necessary prior to each open house. 3.1 Richfield Transportation Commission Meetings The Richfield Transportation Commission will be the policy-making body governing this project and will be responsible for hosting public meetings, consideration of recommended improvements, and approving the preliminary and final design plans. Kimley-Horn will present at up to two (2) meetings with the Richfield Transportation Commission, at critical milestones throughout the process. Kimley-Horn will prepare necessary meeting materials. 3.2 Public Meetings Kimley-Horn will participate in up to two (2) public meetings hosted by the Richfield Transportation Commission. The purpose of these meetings will be to engage the public and agencies in the development of the project. Kimley-Horn will establish meeting locations, prepare up to 10 exhibits per meeting, provide meeting summaries, and provide technical staff necessary to facilitate the meetings. Up to three (3) Kimley-Horn staff representing relevant technical areas will be present at each public meeting. Prior to construction, Kimley-Horn will participate in a “Kickoff to Construction” open house as described in the City’s guiding documents. Up to three (3) Kimley-Horn staff representing relevant technical areas will be present at each public meeting. 3.3 Stakeholder Meetings Kimley-Horn will meet with stakeholders along the project corridor as necessary. Anticipated stakeholders could include Metro Transit, the railroad, Hennepin County, Metro Transit, and local businesses. We have included up to eight (8) stakeholder meetings. Kimley-Horn will establish meeting locations, prepare agendas and exhibits, and draft Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 4 meeting summaries. One (1) Kimley-Horn staff member will be present at each stakeholder meeting. 3.4 Project Website A project website (hosted by the City) will be updated periodically throughout the design process (up to three (3) updates) to inform stakeholders on upcoming public meetings, provide project updates, and advise the public on key design considerations. Kimley-Horn will provide the City with initial website content and updates. Deliverables: Meeting Materials, Minutes/Summaries, Project Website Updates, Project Newsletters. Task 4 – Traffic Analysis Kimley-Horn will complete a traffic analysis that will document the existing operations, design year operations, and safety issues within the project limits. We will utilize the traffic forecasts prepared by the City’s previous consultant. The analysis will help confirm that the proposed design provides acceptable operations and assist in the evaluation of alternatives. 4.1 Multimodal Safety and Access Analysis Kimley-Horn will perform a review of existing multimodal access locations along the corridor. We will identify deficient areas and develop recommendations for improvements. 4.2 Intersection Control Evaluation Kimley-Horn will prepare an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) in accordance with State Aid standards for the W 65th Street/Lyndale Avenue intersection. We will evaluate roundabout and signal options at the intersection. Deliverables: Technical Memoranda, Roundabout Justification Report. Task 5 – Preliminary Design Kimley-Horn will develop concept alternatives as a part of preliminary design. Alternatives will be studied and vetted through the PMT as well as through the stakeholder engagement process. Decisions made throughout this process will be incorporated into the preliminary design. Upon conclusion of this phase, the design will be considered 30% complete. A preliminary layout, prepared consistent with MnDOT State Aid criteria, will be submitted along with cross sections for review. 5.1 Concept Alternatives and Evaluation Kimley-Horn will develop and evaluate conceptual alternatives in concert with the stakeholder engagement process. Up to three (3) conceptual alternatives will be developed. A preferred alternative will be selected through a process which combines technical analysis and stakeholder input. This process will be documented in an Alternative Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 5 Evaluation Technical Memorandum. The preferred alternative will be the basis for the preliminary design. 5.2 Preliminary Roadway Design Kimley-Horn will establish the overall roadway design to be the basis of the final construction documents. Preliminary design of roadway elements includes: • Incorporating comments received during the stakeholder engagement and PMT evaluation • Establishing the final horizontal and vertical design • Evaluation of the ability to incorporate on-street parking • Completing preliminary cross-sections necessary to identify grading limits • Identify necessary permanent and temporary easements 5.3 Preliminary Public Utility Design 5.3.1 Preliminary Watermain Design Kimley-Horn will meet with the City’s utility supervisor to discuss the overall required improvements for sanitary sewer and watermain. We have assumed that existing sanitary sewer and watermain including services within the project corridor will be replaced in the same general location, except for public utilities that exist within The Hub parking lot. We will develop up to two (2) alternatives for realigning these utilities to within nearby right-of-way. 5.3.2 Preliminary Roadway Lighting Design Kimley-Horn will meet with the City’s street supervisor to establish a street lighting design for the corridor in accordance with the City’s lighting policy. 5.3.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Design The City will complete a hydraulic assessment of existing drainage conditions within the project limits. Kimley-Horn will meet with City staff to discuss known drainage issues along the corridor and address them with the project improvements if possible. We have assumed that the existing drainage system will be replaced with similar sized structures and pipes as required. 5.4 Pedestrian Connectivity Review Kimley-Horn will evaluate existing pedestrian facilities and connectivity within and immediately surrounding the project corridor. We will review crossings, identify gaps, and evaluate potential improvements that can be incorporated into the project design. We will develop up to two (2) concept alternatives for improved pedestrian facilities for evaluation by City staff and stakeholders during the preliminary design process. The preferred set of improvements will be reflected in the preliminary layout. Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 6 5.5 Private Utility Coordination Kimley-Horn will conduct up to three (3) meetings with private utilities during the project design. The meetings will be held to discuss the overall project improvements, utility conflicts, schedule and general project coordination. Kimley-Horn will prepare agendas, exhibits, and meeting minutes. 5.6 Preliminary Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost Kimley-Horn will develop an Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Cost. Deliverables: Alternative Evaluation Technical Memorandum, Conceptual Alternative Layouts (3), Public Utility Concepts (2), Pedestrian Improvements Concepts (2), Preliminary Roadway Design Layout, Preliminary Cross-sections, Preliminary Public Utility Layout, Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Cost. Task 6 – Right of Way 6.1 Refine Construction Limits and Confirm Right of Way Needs We will review the proposed roadway geometrics, cross sections and grading limits and confirm the right of way and easement needs for the project. An exhibit will be prepared detailing the overall right of way/easement acquisition requirements. 6.2 Preparation of Legal Descriptions We will review the deed or title commitment for each parcel and prepare a proposed right of way acquisition exhibit and description suitable for recording. We have assumed that exhibits and descriptions will be required for up to 4 parcels. We have assumed that title work for each property will be provided by the City. 6.3 Survey of Acquisition Limits Field survey of acquisition limits will be performed. This will include staking permanent right of way and temporary easements for up to 4 impacted parcels. Deliverables: Overall right of way acquisition exhibit, legal descriptions (4) and exhibits (4) Task 7 – Final Design 7.1 Final Plans Following City Council approval of the preliminary layout, we will finalize the design of the proposed improvements and develop detailed final design plans and specifications. The documents will satisfy the requirements of the City and permitting agencies and adhere to current MnDOT State Aid standards for MnDOT State Aid Funding. The final plans will include the following sheets: o Title Sheet o General Layout o Estimated Quantities Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 7 o Private Utility Contacts o Soils, Construction Notes, Standard Plates o Earthwork Tabulations and Summary o Typical Sections o Miscellaneous Details o Standard Plan Sheets o Construction Staging Plan o Traffic Control Plan o Topography and Inplace Utility Plan o Removal Plan o Right of Way Plan o Alignment Plan and Tabulations o Construction Plan and Profile o Intersection Details o Drainage Notes o Drainage and Erosion Control Plan o Drainage Tabulations and Details o Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plan, Tabulations, and Details o Landscaping and Turf Establishment Plan o Signing and Pavement Marking Plan Tabulations and Details o Lighting Plan and Details o Signal Plan o Cross Sections Electronic AutoCAD files of the final plans will be provided to the City. The coordinates and elevations of all points will be provided in the Hennepin County coordinate system. Kimley-Horn will also provide Excel files used for design and preparation of construction plans as well as final plans and special provisions in Adobe PDF format. 7.2 Project Manual Kimley-Horn will prepare the project manual including technical special provisions for the project to be submitted both in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF format at the 95% plan submittal stage. 7.3 Cost Estimates We will prepare cost estimates at the 30%, 60%, 95%, and 100% plan submittal stages to include proposed construction and any right-of-way/easement acquisition costs. Draft estimates will be prepared for review by City staff. Comments from drafts will be incorporated into final cost estimates. 7.4 Permit Applications Kimley-Horn will prepare the permit applications for the project including: • Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Permit • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) We will submit the MDH permit application to the review agency and pay the required fee. We will prepare the SWPPP required for the NPDES permit Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 8 application but have assumed the Contractor, upon award, will submit the permit application and fee to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. A stormwater analysis will be performed to determine the necessary measures required by MnDOT State Aid. The report will also include hydraulic calculations necessary for State Aid approval. Based on aerial photography and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps there does not appear to be any wetlands in the corridor. We have assumed wetland delineation and/or permitting will not be required for the project. 7.5 Bidding Phase We will assist the City of Richfield during the bidding phase by distributing the plans and project manual to Contractors, responding to contractor questions, and preparing any necessary addenda. Deliverables: Final Plans, Project Manual, Cost Estimates (30%, 60%, 95%, and 100% completion stages), Permit Applications and SWPPP, Addenda. Estimated Costs/Fee KHA will provide the Scope of Services identified above on an hourly labor fee plus expense basis. We have broken down the fee estimate between preliminary and final design tasks per the request of the City. The following is a summary of our estimated fees and expenses. TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT $51,330 TASK 2 – DATA COLLECTION $35,540 TASK 3 – STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT $27,384 TASK 4 – TRAFFIC ANALYSIS $12,872 TASK 5 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN $89,813 TASK 6 – RIGHT OF WAY $11,784 TASK 7 – FINAL DESIGN $340,450 SUBTOTAL TASKS 1-5 $216,939 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES TASKS 1-5 $9,500 TASK 1-5 PROJECT COST $226,439 SUBTOTAL TASKS 6-7 $352,234 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES TASKS 6-7 $23,000 TASK 6-7 PROJECT COST $375,234 TOTAL $601,673 Labor fee will be billed according to our current standard hourly rate schedule. Reimbursable expenses (copy/printing charges, plotting, mileage, delivery charges, etc.) will be charged as an office expense at 6% of the labor fee. Mr. Jack Broz, February 3, 2020, Pg. 9 Schedule Kimley-Horn will begin the scope of work above after City Council authorization. The preliminary design work is anticipated to be completed by April 2020 and final design complete by December 2020. This schedule was prepared to include reasonable allowances for review and approval times required by the City and other public authorities having jurisdiction over the project. This schedule shall be equitably adjusted as the project progresses, allowing for changes in the scope of the project requested by the City. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. William C. Klingbeil, P.E. Jon B. Horn, P.E. Senior Project Manager Senior Vice President Copy: Project File Project ManagerTask LeadGraduate EngineerCAD/Graphics DesignerAdminSub-Consultant (Survey/Geotech)Total Hours Estimated Fees TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.1 Project Management/Administration (12 months)96 24 24 144 $24,840 1.2 Kickoff Meeting 3 3 3 1 10 $1,594 1.3 PMT Meetings (Up to 12)36 36 12 12 96 $15,576 1.4 Quality Control Reviews (assumes 4 reviews)16 40 56 $9,320 Subtotal 151 103 0 15 37 306 $51,330 TASK 2 2.1 Topographic Survey 4 8 239 251 $25,704 2.2 Geotechnical 8 2 10 $1,536 2.2.1 Soil Borings (assumes 15)50 50 $5,000 2.2.2 Laboratory Testing 3 3 $300 2.2.3 Engineering Analysis and Reports 30 30 $3,000 Subtotal 0 12 0 10 0 $32,200 344 $35,540 TASK 3 3.1 Richfield Transportation Commission (2 meetings)6 2 2 2 12 $2,026 3.2 Public Meetings (2 meetings)8 20 60 8 8 104 $14,144 3.3 Stakeholder Meetings (8 meetings)16 16 16 16 64 $9,968 3.4 Project Website (3 updates)2 2 2 2 8 $1,246 Subtotal 32 40 80 28 8 188 $27,384 TASK 4 4.1 Multimodal Safety and Access Analysis 4 8 16 28 $4,020 4.2 Intersection Control Evaluation 4 16 40 4 64 $8,852 Subtotal 8 24 56 4 0 92 $12,872 TASK 5 5.1 Concept Alternatives and Evaluation 2 16 40 16 74 $10,238 5.2 Preliminary Roadway Design 16 80 120 80 296 $42,360 5.3 Preliminary Public Utility Design 5.3.1 Preliminary Watermain Design 4 8 16 8 36 $5,204 5.3.2 Preliminary Roadway Lighting Design 2 8 16 16 42 $5,998 5.3.3 Preliminary Hydraulic Design 16 32 40 16 104 $15,448 5.4 Pedestrian Connectivity Review 2 4 8 2 16 $2,306 5.5 Private Utility Coordination 4 16 16 4 40 $5,852 5.6 Preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost 1 4 8 4 17 $2,407 Subtotal 47 168 264 146 0 625 $89,813 TASK 6 6.1 Refine Construction Limits and Confirm Right of Way Needs 2 8 16 16 42 $5,998 6.2 Preparation of Legal Descriptions 2 4 12 18 36 $4,586 6.3 Survey of Acquisition Limits 12 12 $1,200 Subtotal 4 12 16 28 0 $3,000 90 $11,784 TASK 7 7.1 Final Plans (assumes 250 sheets)100 350 920 800 2170 $307,150 7.2 Project Manual 4 16 40 8 68 $9,060 7.3 Cost Estimates (assumes 4)8 16 64 8 96 $13,224 7.4 Permit Applications 4 8 16 4 8 40 $5,412 7.5 Bidding Phase 4 8 16 8 4 40 $5,604 Subtotal 120 398 1056 820 20 2414 $340,450 SUBTOTAL TASKS 1-5 216,939$ REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES TASKS 1-5 9,500$ TASK 1-5 PROJECT COST $226,439 SUBTOTAL TASKS 6-7 352,234$ REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES TASKS 6-7 23,000$ TASK 6-7 PROJECT COST $375,234 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (FEES AND EXPENSES)$601,673 PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DESIGN FEE PROPOSAL (2/12/20) CITY OF RICHFIELD 65TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION DATA COLLECTION RIGHT OF WAY FINAL DESIGN STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT TRAFFIC ANALYIS PRELIMINARY DESIGN 63RD ST W 65TH S T WRAE DR LYNDALE AVE SALDRICH AVE SBRYANT AVE SCOLFAX AVE S66TH ST W GRAND AVE SPLEASANT AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SPLEASANT AVE SGRAND AVE S64 T H S T E 65 T H S T E 64 T H S T E 65 T H S T E 64 T H S T E HARRIET AVE SGARFIELD AVE S65TH ST W AVE LYN DALE AVE S 64 T H S T E 65 TH ST E M ILD R E D DR 66TH ST W 66TH ST W 65 T H S T E GRAND AVE S63 R D S T W 64 T H S T E 63 R D S T W 64 T H S T E 66TH ST E 66TH ST E 63 R D S T W 63 R D S T W 64 T H S T E 1ST AVE SNICOLLET AVE S63 R D S T W MILDRED DRCOLFAX AVE SBRYANT AVE SALDRICH AVE S63RD ST W 63RD ST W LYNDALE AVE S66TH ST W 6 6 T H S T W LYNDALE AVE SPLEASANT AVE S66TH ST W 65TH ST E 64 T H S T E 1ST AVE SNICOLLET AVE S1ST AVE SNICOLLET AVE S1ST AVE SNICOLLET AVE SNICOLLET AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SPLEASANT AVE SGRAND AVE SPILLSBURY AVE S63 R D S T W 64 T H S T E 63 R D S T W63RD S T W63RD S T W HARRIET AVE SHARRIET AVE SWoodl ake Dr Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 65th St Reconstruction Project Extents 2/4/2020 65th St Reconstruction/Lyndale Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Richfield Project No.41017 SAP No.TBD Sources and Uses Tracking - updated 02/20/2020 Council Action Council Action 2019 CIP 2020 CIP 30% Engineer's Estimate and Project Approval 60% Engineer's Estimate Final Engineer's Estimate and Project Bid Contract Award Planned Construction Year:2020 2020&2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 Estimated Uses: Design $600,000 $704,000 65th St Reconstruction $5,500,000 $6,100,000 Lyndale Ave Improvments Stormwater Improvements Change Orders Right of Way $50,000 $60,000 Legal $90,000 $100,000 Constrcution Admin/Engineering $550,000 $610,000 Staff $90,000 $100,000 Contingency $1,100,000 $1,220,000 20% Contingency 20% Contingency 20% Contingency 20% Contigency 10% Contingency 2% Contingency Total Uses $7,980,000 $8,894,000 TDB TDB TDB TDB Sources: Street Reconstruction Bonds $7,800,000 Utility Bonds $1,200,000 Total Sources $8,000,000 $9,000,000 TDB TDB TDB TDB Difference $20,000 $106,000 TDB TDB TDB TDB Notes Anticipated Debt Issuance (updated 02/2020): Street Reconstruction Bonds 2021 Utility Bonds 2020 $8,000,000 CITY OF RICHFIELDLYNDALE AVENUE ROADWAYIMPROVEMENT PROJECTSIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN CITY OF RICHFIELDLYNDALE AVENUE ROADWAYIMPROVEMENT PROJECTPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGSYSTEM PLAN Proposed Year 2022 2023 2024 66th Street Reconstruction Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 77th Underpass South Richfield Parkway 66th Street Reconstruction 65th Street Reconstruction Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 65th Street Reconstruction 77th Underpass 77th Underpass 69th Street Reconstruction 70th Street Reconstruction Street Reconstruction Bonds $13,000,000 $5,531,876 $3,000,000 $7,800,000 $4,500,000 $2,500,000 Municipal State Aid $8,308,595 $1,992,040 $700,000 $500,000 Utility Bonds $3,168,343 $1,200,000 City Utility Funds Water Sanitary Storm Grants Federal $7,000,000 State $7,100,000 $5,000,000 County $1,782,500 $1,500,000 Bloomington Other - 2020 bond request $7,000,000 Special Revenue - LGA $1,000,000 Transfer In from Sweet Streets $756,865 $212,066 $425,000 Special Assessment Metropolitan Airports Commission $300,000 MnDOT (in-kind & wall)$3,164,000 Three Rivers Park District $300,000 $100,000 Xcel Utility Rate Payers (CRFS)$1,325,000 CenterPoint Energy HRA Developer Financed $600,000 TOTAL $24,416,095 $9,700,219 $8,600,000 $600,000 $2,748,905 $1,200,000 $3,212,066 $7,800,000 $15,889,000 $8,000,000 $5,000,000 $2,600,000 sources uses difference 66th Total $27,165,000 $27,165,000 $0 Lyndale $12,912,285 $12,912,285 $0 77th Underpass $32,489,000 $32,489,000 $0 5-year Street Reconstruction Plan Projected Project Year Funding Sources 2019 2020 2021 AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.B. STAFF REPORT NO. 33 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 2/24/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regi s, F inance D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: C hris Regi s, F inance D irector 2/19/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A . C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez 2/19/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the fir st reading of an ordinance amending Subsections 705.17, 715.05, and 720.07 of the Richfield City C ode relating to sanitary sewer, water, and storm water utility billing and establishment of a new Subsection 727 relating to the str eet light system. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: At the J anuary 28, 2020 City C ounc il work session, staff presented for City C ounc il consideration the implementation of owner only utility billing. At the present time the City ’s utility billing system has been set up to generate utility bills by customer/account number, not by property owner and Property I dentification Number (P I D#). The implementation of owner only utility billing would require a change in the C ity ordinanc e sec tions that relate to utility billing. I f approved staff would c ommunic ate the change to owner only utility billing through the most c urrent utility cy cle billing and then implement the change in the next utility c yc le billing. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: Appr ove the first reading of an ordinance amending Subsections 705.17, 715.05, and 720.07 of the Richfield C ity Code relating to sanitary sewer, water and storm water utility billing and the establishment of a new Subsection 727 r elating to the street light system. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Owner Only utility billing is already in effec t for multi-family buildings. The proposed change would extend to single family and duplex rentals and would provide the following: Fewer Move I n/Outs proc essed by Utility Billing (UB) Staff at the C ity Reduces UB staff time for proc essing Move I n/Outs and Final Bills Reduces Public W orks staff time to obtain final readings Reduces printing and mailing expenses for Final Bills Ensures owner rec eives the quarterly utility bill and has an opportunity to pay it prior to C ertification Reduces UB staff time to generate multiple Certific ation Letters for unpaid balances Reduces printing and mailing expenses for C ertification Letters Allows for C lean-up of utility accounts W e do not always rec eive updated tenant information, leads to inc orrect billings to old tenant and c reates inefficienc ies. Eliminates the billing confusion of tenants moving in and moving out. W ould E liminate: C alls from property owners chec king on payments. Owners disputing late fees bec ause the tenant did not pay. Eliminates the issue of a renter moving out of a property without pay ing the final bill unbeknownst to the owner. The unpaid bill now becomes the responsibility of the owner. Eliminate utility acc ounts with the duplic ate P I D #’s. I mpact on renters: Renters would no longer automatically receive a bill for their utility charges but they do have the option to request a bill to see actual charges. T his may be helpful if the owner chooses to pass the charges on to the renter as opposed to incorporating the costs into the rent. T he change aligns the billing notification, ultimate responsibility for payment (enforced through year-end Certification process) and responsibility for maintaining the plumbing. For example it would eliminate situations where the renter is billed for excessive usage due to a leak but is not responsible for fixing the leak. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The change to owner only utility billing must be acc omplished through a c hange in the c urrent City ordinances. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Sec ond reading is of the proposed ordinance c hange is sc heduled for Marc h 10, 2020. At the conc lusion of publication of the proposed ordinance change, staff will begin to notify customers through communication with the regular cy cle billing. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: I t is expected that the City will realize savings in postage, printing/paper and mailing service c osts. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : City ordinances will need to be c hange in order to implement owner only billing. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A. AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Owner Only Utili ty B illing Ordinance C over Memo 1 BILL NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 705.17, 715.05, AND 720.07 OF THE RICHFIELD CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO SANITARY SEWER, WATER AND STORM WATER UTILITY BILLING AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW SECTION 727 RELATING TO THE STREET LIGHT SYSTEM THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Subsection 705.17 of the Richfield Code of Ordinances is amended as follows: 705.17. – Billings. Bills for charges for the use and service of the sewage system shall be made out prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the usual and customary practice. The City will place all accounts in the name of the fee title owner of the property and will send all bills and notices to such owner or the owner’s duly authorized property manager at the designated billing address. Any error in address must be promptly reported to the City. Tenants may request duplicate copies by submitting a written request to the City. Bills shall be payable at the office of the City Finance Coordinator. Bills are rendered quarterly. Section 2. Subsection 715.05 of the Richfield Code of Ordinances is amended as follows: 715.05. – Accounts, how maintained. All accounts shall be kept on the books of the City by the house and street number and under the account number assigned thereto and the name of the owner or of the person signing the application for services. The City will place all accounts in the name of the fee title owner of the property and will send Aall bills and notices sent out by the City shall be sent to the house or street number of the property such owner or the owner’s duly authorized property manager at the designated billing address. Any error in address must be promptly reported to the City. If non-resident owners or agents desire personal notice sent to a different address, they shall file an application therefor with the City. Tenants may request duplicate copies by submitting a written request to the City. Section 3. Subsection 720.07 of the Richfield Code of Ordinances is amended as follows: 720.07. – Establishing basic rate and billing. In determining charges, the Council shall, from time to time, by resolution establish a basic system rate to be charged against one (1) acre of land having an 2 REF of one. The charge to be made against each parcel of land shall then be determined by multiplying the REF for the parcel's land use classification times the parcel's acreage times the basic system rate. The City will place all accounts in the name of the fee title owner of the property and will send all bills and notices to such owner or the owner’s duly authorized property manager at the designated billing address. Any error in address must be promptly reported to the City. Tenants may request duplicate copies by submitting a written request to the City. Section 4. A new section 727 is added to the Richfield Code of Ordinances as follows: SECTION 727. – STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM 727.01. – Basic rates. The rates due and payable to the City for use of the street lighting system shall be established, from time to time, by resolution of the City Council. 727.03. – Billings. The City will place all accounts in the name of the fee title owner of the property and will send all bills and notices to such owner or the owner’s duly authorized property manager at the designated billing address. Any error in address must be promptly reported to the City. Tenants may request duplicate copies by submitting a written request to the City. Section 5. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. Adopted this ____ of ________________, 2020. By: ___________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.C. STAFF REPORT NO. 34 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 2/24/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ohn E vans, Recreation S pecialist D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector 2/17/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager 2/19/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the adoption of a resolution accepting grants and donations received by the R ichfield Recreation S er vices D epartment in 2019 and authorizing the Recreation S er vices D epartment to administer the funds in accordance with any applicable grant agreements and terms prescribed by donors. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Ric hfield Recreation Services Department rec eived a number of donations in 2019 from various individuals and organizations to fund different events and projec ts and require acc eptance of these grants by the City Counc il. T he Department received the following grants and donations in 2019: D ATE D O N O R P U R P O S E AMO U N T May 2019 Ric hfield Bloomington Credit Union E gg Sc ramble Event $800.00 J uly/August 2019 US Department of Agriculture Free S ummer Meal Program $3,907.98 October 2019 MN Family Chiropractic Farmers Market $774.00 October 2019 Renewing the Countryside Farmers Market $2,000.00 October 2019 University of Minnesota Farmers Market $1,148.00 November 2019 Hunger Solutions Market Buc ks: Farmers Market $4,074.00 RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Adopt a resolution accepting gr ants and donations received by the Richfield Recreation Services Depar tment in 2019 and authoriz ing the R ecreation Services Depar tment to administer the funds in accordance with any applicable grant agreements and terms pr escr ibed by donors. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Provided in the Exec utive Summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires every acceptance of a grant or devise of real or personal property on terms prescribed by donor be made by resolution and adopted by two-thirds majority of the City Council. T he Administrative Services Department issued a memo on November 9, 2004, requiring that all grants and restricted donations to departments be received by resolution and adopted by two-thirds majority of the City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statute 465.03. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: None D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: All of the donations listed were given without obligation to provide any additional matching funds. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Minnesota S tatute 465.03 requires every ac ceptanc e of a grant or devise of real or personal property on terms presc ribed by the donor be made by resolution and adopted by two-thirds majority of the City Council. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Should Council not ac cept the grants, the Rec reation Servic es Department would be required to locate alternate funding sources to c over the grant amounts. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Grant A cceptance Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANTS RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF RICHFIELD-RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO ADMINISTER THE FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GRANT AGREEMENTS AND TERMS PRESCRIBED BY DONORS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 reads in part as follows: Any city, county, school district or town may accept a grant or devise of real or personal property and maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Nothing herein shall authorize such acceptance or use for religious or sectarian purposes. Every acceptance shall be by resolution of the council adopted by two-thirds majority of its members, expressing such terms in full, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has received grants and donations as described below: DATE DONOR PURPOSE AMOUNT May 2019 Richfield Bloomington Credit Union Egg Scramble event $800.00 July/August 2019 US Department of Agriculture Free Meal Program $3,907.98 October 2019 MN Family Chiropractic Farmers Market $774.00 October 2019 Renewing the Countryside Farmers Market $2,000.00 October 2019 University of Minnesota Farmers Market $1,148.00 November 2019 Hunger Solutions Market Bucks: Farmers Market $4,074.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: That the City Council of the City of Richfield hereby accepts the grants and donations as listed above, received in 2019, and authorizes the City to administer the funds in accordance with grant agreements and terms prescribed by donors. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of February, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #2.D. STAFF REPORT NO. 35 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 2/24/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector 2/19/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez 2/19/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider the appr oval of the location of the R ichfield Dog Park at Roosevelt Park. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: T he City of Richfield has been exploring numerous options over the past several years for a dog park. As a city that is completely built-out there have been challenges finding a location that would fit the community's needs. After careful consideration, Recreation and Public Works Staff, WS B Engineers, and the Community Services Commission recommend adding the dog park to Roosevelt Park.T he factors that have been considered include: size in acres, area for large and small dogs, location in the city, access to water, lighting, safety, accessibility of parking and sidewalks, proximity to neighbors, amenities that may need to be eliminated to accommodate the dog park, budget, and environmental (soil drainage). We have explored numerous options and feel like Roosevelt Park is the best fit. W e would like to install the Ric hfield Dog Park over the course of spring and summer of 2020, so establishing the loc ation will greatly help the planning of the facility to move forward. The Rec reation D epartment will be working with Ric hfield Public Safety to establish rules for the park and city code that best support a safe and positive park fac ility for residents. Staff has researc hed other area municipal dog parks and will be learning from their best prac tices and c hallenges in the installation and establishment of rules. W e will also be working in tandem with Richfield Public W orks to do a lot of the installation in-house; this will help keep the project within budget ($80,000). A few acres of green spac e are needed to construc t a dog park. I n order to do so, we have to remove a facility that will have the least impac t on park users; the hoc key rink at Roosevelt Park will need to be removed. We will encourage those affected by this c hange to utilize Augsburg P ark rinks with a warming house just a few blocks north. Roosevelt Park meets the following c onsiderations: · Accessible parking and sidewalks · Enough space for a large and small dog areas · Access to water · Lighting · High visibility · Shade · Space for seating and path around premier · Optimal proximity to neighbors · Fits within budget · Minimal impact to overall park · Has proper soil drainage · Location is more c entral and c lose to high-density housing RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: Approve the location of the Richfield D og Park to Roosevelt Park. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Richfield residents have voc alized that they would like a dog park within the c ity for several years. W e have rec eived spec ific feedback from the c ommunity at our park system master plan open houses pertaining to the desire for a dog park and know it will be well supported. City Staff and W S B Engineers have thoroughly examined several potential sites for the dog park inc luding both Taft and Donaldson Parks, but for many reasons such as poor soils and feedback from adjacent neighbors, they have been determined as non-desirable choic es for the site selec tion. Roosevelt Park has been c arefully studied and City Staff and the C ommunity Servic es Commission recommend is the best choic e for a new dog park (C S C approved the rec ommendation on 2/18/2020). B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): N/A C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Staff need to determine a site selection for the dog park soon, in order to incorporate into budget and staff planning for 2020 spring and summer park projec ts. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The $80,000 budget for the Ric hfield Dog Park was previously approved in 2019 and has been set-aside for use when a site is selec ted. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Recreation Staff will be working with Public S afety to establish Richfield D og Park rules and making sure that City C ode as it relates to Animal C ontrol (section 905), supports the safety of people and dogs that utilize the park. This will require the adoption of additional subdivisions to the City C ode. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The City Council c an reject the recommendation and staff can continue to seek other options for a dog park loc ation. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type D og P ark S ite P lan B ackup Materi al F-%I k.+4u Large UOg Area IF395 F Proposed . Metro Transit T * Bus Stop ' S ON y AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM #4. STAFF REPORT NO. 36 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 2/24/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: K ate A itchison/C eleste McD ermott, Housi ng S pecialists D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: Melissa P oehlman, A cting C ommunity D evelopment D irector 2/19/2020 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez 2/19/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Public hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution specifying the use of funds from the Urban Hennepin C ounty Community Development Block G rant allocation for 2020 and consideration of a resolution r epr ogramming 2019 Community Development Block Gr ant funds. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Community D evelopment Block Grant (C D B G) funding is annually awarded to Hennepin C ounty (County) on a formula basis from the Department of Housing and Urban D evelopment (HUD ). The C ounty, in turn, allocates a portion of these funds to the City of Richfield to address local needs relating to affordable housing, community development, and public services. Staff is proposing to use the C ity's 2020 direc t alloc ation of $210,000 (estimated) as follows: $100,000 - D eferred Loan Rehabilitation P rogram $110,000 - First Time Homebuy er Down P ay ment Assistanc e Program The City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority's (HRA) Deferred Loan Rehabilitation Program provides assistance to low-inc ome homeowners for home repairs and maintenance, and the First Time Homebuyer Down Payment Assistanc e Program offers up to $15,000 in homebuying assistance to low and moderate- inc ome households seeking to purc hase their first home. Additionally, staff is proposing to reprogram funds from the 2019 CDB G allocations. T he First Time Homebuyer Program has been increasingly popular, and only $10,000 currently remains from the 2019 allocation. Staff recommends reprogramming $95,000 of the 2019 allocation from Single Family Acquisition & Rehabilitation to the First Time Homebuyer Program in order to provide sufficient funds for the program until 2020 funds are available July 1, 2020. Activity Approved Budget Proposed Budget Single Family A cquisition & Rehabilitation $95,000 $0 First Time Homebuy er Program $50,000 $145,000 The HRA will be asked to budget Housing and Redevelopment Fund money to fund the Single Family Acquisition & Rehabilitation Program (i.e., New Home Program), which purchases, rehabilitates, and resells homes through a land trust model. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the use of funds for the 2020 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant P rogram and authorizing execution of a Subrecipient Agreement with Hennepin County and any required third party agreements. 2. Adopt a resolution authorizing the r epr ogramming of 2019 Community Development Block Gr ant Program funds from Single Family Acquisition and Rehabilitation to the First Time Homebuyer Program and authoriz ing execution of any required agreements with H ennepin C ounty. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT I n 2019, the C ity allocated $95,000 of its 2019 C D B G award to the HRA for Single Famly Acquisition & Rehabilitation and $50,000 to the HRA for the First Time Homebuy er Program. $40,000 of the 2019 CDB G funds allocated to the First Time Homebuyer Program has been spent, and an applicant has applied for the remaining $10,000 with an anticipated closing date in mid-March, 2020. $100,000 of the 2020 C D B G funds is proposed to be alloc ated to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) for the Deferred Loan Program (Program), whic h provides no interest, 30-y ear loans up to $30,000 to low-income homeowners to address health, safety, and property maintenanc e needs. This Program has been in existence sinc e 1984 and is administered for the City by Hennepin County. I n the past year, one loan was completed and eight loans were started, 20 households are currently on the waiting list for the Program. Additional funding for loans is available through loan repayments (i.e., when a property is sold). $110,000 of the 2020 C D B G funds is proposed to be alloc ated to the HRA for a First Time Homebuy er D own Payment Assistance Program administered by City staff. This is a pilot program aimed at low and moderate income Ric hfield renters who are looking to buy homes in Richfield. I t provides no interest, deferred loans of up to $10,000 to use towards down payment and c losing costs. An additional $5,000 is available to households who are c urrent Richfield renters, have dependents under the age of 18 in the household, or have a household member with a disability. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): All funded ac tivities must meet one of three national objec tives: benefiting low and moderate inc ome persons, preventing or eliminating slums and/or blight, or meet an urgent need. I n addition, activities must be consistent with priorities identified in the C ounty 's Five-Year Consolidated Plan. Those priorities inc lude a variety of housing ac tivities such as housing rehabilitation, preserving and creating homeownership opportunities, public servic es to maintain or inc rease self-sufficienc y, and neighborhood revitalization activities. The C ounty recently updated its C onsolidated Plan. Current data was analy zed, a survey was made available, and several community listening sessions were held. The process c onfirmed the prioritization toward housing, including rehabilitation and creating homeownership opportunities, and suggested increasing efforts to serve households with incomes less than 30% of the Area Median I ncome and households of color. Up to 15% of the County's total C D B G allocation c an also be spent on P ublic Servic es. This amount is set aside for allocation through a single, combined competitive proc ess covering all the cities in the Hennepin County C D B G P rogram. Richfield staff encourage eligible Richfield service providers to apply and also participate in the review of these funding proposals. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The applic ation for 2020 funds is due to Hennepin County by February 28, 2020. Public Servic e agencies must submit applic ations to the County by February 28, 2020. Applic ations will be reviewed in March, and the C ounty Board will ac t on rec ommendations in May or J une. The 2020 Federal Fiscal Year will begin on J uly 1, 2020. Funds must be spent by J une 30, 2021. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The C ity's estimated direc t allocation for 2020 is $210,000. I n the event of a c hange in the final alloc ation, the amount allocated to the D eferred Loan Program will be adjusted accordingly. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : A local public hearing must be held prior to submission of the 2020 applic ation. Notic e of the public hearing for the 2020 C D BG funding was published in the Richfield Sun Current on February 13, 2020. Notic e of the public hearing for the reprogramming of the 2019 C D B G funding was published in the Richfield Sun Current on J anuary 30, 2020. Under C D BG guidelines, reallocating funds in such away that the amount awarded to a project decreases by more than 50% of the original budget c onstitutes a General Amendment, requiring a 15-day written comment period. The c omment period to reallocate 2019 funds was open from J anuary 30, 2020 to February 14, 2020. No written c omments were received. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Counc il may modify the amount of funds alloc ated to each projec t in a way that still meets funding guidelines. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Reprogramming Resolution C over Memo 2020 C D B G Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. ____ RESOLUTION APPROVING REPROGRAMMING 2019 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANY REQUIRED AGREEMENTS WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is participating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield adopted a proposal for the use of 2019 CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield proposes to reprogram a portion of the 2019 CDBG awards from the Single Family Acquisition & Rehabilitation Program to the First Time Homebuyer Downpayment Assistance Program; and WHEREAS, the City held a public comment period from January 30, 2020 to February 14, 2020, to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and priorities for the City’s proposed reprogramming of $95,000 from the 2019 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. Approves the reprogramming of $95,000 from the 2019 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County. 2. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize and direct the execution of any agreements with Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of February, 2020. _____________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth Van Hoose, City Clerk Activity Approved Budget Proposed Budget Reprogrammed Amount 1. Single Family Acquisition & Rehabilitation $95,000 $0 - $95,000 2. First Time Homebuyer Downpayment Assistance $50,000 $145,000 + $95,000 RESOLUTION NO. ____ RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2020 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY REQUIRED THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is participating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has developed a proposal for the use of 2020 CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on February 24, 2020 to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and priorities for the City’s proposed use of $210,000 from the 2020 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. Approves the following projects for funding from the 2020 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County. Activity Budget 1. Deferred Loan Rehabilitation Program $100,000 2. First Time Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance $110,000 TOTAL CDBG ALLOCATION $210,000 2. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize and direct the execution of the Subrecipient Agreement with Hennepin County and any required Third Party Agreements on behalf of the City to implement the 2020 CDBG Program. 3. That should the final amount of FY 2020 CDBG available to the City be different from the preliminary amount provided to the City, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to adjust the project budget of the Deferred Loan Rehabilitation Program to reflect an increase or decrease in funding. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of February, 2020. ____________________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM #5. STAFF REPORT NO. 37 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 2/24/2020 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Matt B ri llhart, A ssociate P lanner D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez 2/19/2020 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consider approval of a resolution granting an amendment to the Market Plaz a / Village Shores planned unit development to allow a new building for a bank branch with a drive-up AT M. Consider approval of a resolution granting a subdivision waiver to allow the creation of a separate lot for the proposed building. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Market Plaza and Village Shores ("Market Plaza") is a mixed-use residential and c ommercial development on the northwest corner of Ly ndale Avenue and 66th Street. C ivil Site Group ("Applicant") has submitted plans for a Chase Bank branc h building and drive-up ATM to replace the existing plaza/pergola area at the southeast corner of the development. The proposed building design and use as a retail bank branch c omplies with all zoning c ode requirements and provides c ustomer entranc es facing the parking lot and the public sidewalk. I n response to conc erns raised by the Council on J anuary 28, plans have been revised to include a larger south entrance vestibule with stairs provided inside the building. Previous plans showed the sidewalk entrance below grade, requiring exterior stairs and a railing surrounding much of the sidewalk frontage. An ac cessible path is provided between the public sidewalk and the entrance on the north side of the building, and an additional pedestrian route has been added on the west side of the building to provide a more direct walking route from 66th Street to Market Plaza's shops and c linic. The proposal includes a standalone drive-up ATM located northeast of the building, ac cessed by a "slip lane" within the parking lot. All vehicle ac cess will oc cur via the existing entrances and parking lot - no new curb cuts are proposed. Between the ATM lane and the public street, the Applicant proposes to build a pocket park/plaza with amenities ac cessible to the public inc luding attractive landscaping, benc hes and natural stone seat walls, public art, a bicy cle repair station, and space for bic yc le parking and/or a future bike share station (to be provided by others). I n the Mixed Use zoning distric t, drive-up window or teller service is a conditionally permitted use, provided that a number of conditions are met. The proposal meets 12 of these 14 conditions. The Applicant is asking the Council to allow the addition of a bank-related drive-up within 500 feet of the substantially similar B MO Harris Bank drive-up, and to allow a reduced queuing lane for the ATM. Planned Unit Developments may offer flexibility to c ode requirements in exchange for superior building design and innovative/effic ient use of land. A well-designed building with active street frontage and the pocket park amenity are a significant improvement over the existing parking lot plaza. The proposed drive-up ATM has been designed to minimize negative impact to the existing site and to public infrastruc ture. Finding that requirements are met, staff rec ommends approval of an amendment to the Market P laza Planned Unit Development (P UD), and of a subdivision waiver to allow the creation of a separate lot for the bank property. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: 1. Approve a r esolution amending the Planned Unit Development, Conditional U se Permit, and Final Development Plan for Market Plaza / Village Shores. 2. Approve a r esolution granting a subdivision waiver to allow the cr eation of a separate lot for the proposed building. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Market Plaza / Village Shores was completed in 1986. I n 2016, the C ity Council approved an amendment to the Planned Unit D evelopment, allowing the property to make major renovations inc luding the addition of a medical clinic , assisted living units, and resident amenity spac es. Modific ations to the building exterior inc luded improved fac ades, removal of dated building embellishments, and an updated c olor sc heme. The c orner plaza and pergolas were added to the property as part of the renovation. At the time, staff urged the property owner to consider eliminating the surplus parking in this area in favor of either permanent quasi-public space or an additional retail building at the c orner to ac tivate this key downtown intersection. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Planned U nit D evelopment / Conditional U se Permit / Final Development Plan: The proposal fails to meet 2 of 14 c riteria related to drive-thru facilities: A minimum distance of 500 feet must be maintained between substantially similar uses with drive-up window or teller service (as measured from property line to property line). The proposal is less than 500 feet from a substantially similar bank use (B MO Harris Bank at 6625 Lyndale Avenue). Measured property line to property line across the roundabout, this distance is just 185 feet. However, B MO Harris Bank is an unusual property in that it shares a single lot with the larger W oodlake Centre offic e complex. I f measured to the B MO Harris bank building, the distanc e separating the two banks is approximately 350 feet, still falling short of the buffer requirement. Policymakers may want to c onsider whether the proximity of the existing B MO Harris Bank alone warrants denial of this proposal. C onsiderations may also include if an over-conc entration of drive-thru uses near a primary downtown intersec tion is a conc ern specific to high-volume fast food uses, or if that c oncern extends to all drive-thrus. Queuing space for at least four cars (70 feet) shall be provided as measured from the drive-up service window or teller station. Such queuing space shall not interfere with parking spaces or traffic circulation. I n the initial plan submittal, the proposal included a muc h larger drive- thru loop that met the queuing requirement, but did not meet other requirements, nor did it allow for any plaza space. W ith staff's feedbac k, the loop was replac ed with the proposed ATM "slip lane" that is further from the public street and allowed for the plaza amenity. Code applies this requirement equally to all drive-thru uses, inc luding fast- food restaurants that are likely to have longer c ustomer dwell times than an ATM. Staff finds that it is reasonable to allow a shorter queuing distance for an ATM than other, more intense drive-thru uses. There are a number of sets of review c riteria that apply to this proposal. A full discussion of all requirements is included as an attac hment to this report. Dr ive-thru regulations/restrictions: Staff reviewed drive-thru regulations in several peer communities. W ith the exc eption of Minneapolis, who has banned all new drive-thru fac ilities, munic ipalities have chosen to address the potential negative impac ts of drive-thrus by applying a variety of conditions intended to reduce potential pedestrian conflic ts, limit noise, improve aesthetics, etc. W hile there can be negative impacts related to poorly -designed drive-thru facilities, there are also benefits assoc iated with these fac ilities. Further discussion is needed if the C ounc il wishes to consider additional c hanges to existing regulations. Subdivision: The A pplic ant requests approval of a S ubdivision W aiver to allow the creation of an outlot for the proposed bank building. Finding that the requirements in City Code Section 500 are met, staff rec ommends approval of the attached Subdivision Resolution. I f approved by the C ity Council, the A pplic ant would file a Registered Land Survey with the Hennepin C ounty Surveyor to effectuate the subdivision of property. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: 60-D AY RUL E : The 60-day cloc k 'started' when a c omplete application was rec eived on November 29, 2019. Due to the long gap between the Planning Commission meeting and City C ounc il consideration, staff informed the applicant that the City was extending the timeline for a decision by 30 days. A decision is required by February 27, 2020, or the C ounc il must notify the applicant that it is extending the deadline for issuing a dec ision by 30 additional days (120 days total - Marc h 28, 2020). D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : A public hearing was held before the P lanning C ommission on December 9, 2019. Notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the proposed development and published in the Sun Current newspaper. The Planning Commission voted (4-2) to rec ommend approval of the development plans. On J anuary 28, the Council approved an ordinance rezoning the Market Plaza property from Planned Multifamily Residential (P MR) to Planned Mixed Use (P MU). The C ounc il tabled consideration of land use applications to subdivide the property (Subdivision W aiver) and to amend the Market Plaza Planned Unit Development (Amend P UD ). The C ounc il directed the applicant to meet with Planning staff to discuss possible solutions to conc erns regarding the drive- thru and below-grade building entranc e and sidewalk frontage. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Approve the attac hed resolution with additional/modified stipulations. Deny the request with a finding that Code requirements are not met. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: David Knable, Civil Site Group (applic ant on behalf of owner) AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution - A mend P UD Resolution L etter Resolution - subdivision Resolution L etter Requirements attachment B ackup Materi al Zoning maps B ackup Materi al D eveloper narrative B ackup Materi al 3D Renderi ngs B ackup Materi al E xterior elevati ons B ackup Materi al B efore and A fter E xhibit B ackup Materi al S ite P lans B ackup Materi al S ubdivision - Registered L and S urvey B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. ______ RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 6501 WOODLAKE DRIVE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of an amended final development plan and conditional use permit to allow an additional retail building with drive-up ATM and associated site changes at the planned unit development commonly known as Market Plaza & Village Shores, located at 6501 Woodlake Drive, on property legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing and recommended approval of the requested amendment to the final development plan and conditional use permit at its December 9, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property and published in the Sun-Current on November 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that while the drive-up ATM would be located less than 500 feet from the drive-thru of a substantially similar use (BMO Harris Bank at Woodlake Centre), that existing drive-thru is not prominently visible from the intersection of Lyndale Avenue and 66th Street, and therefore the addition of the ATM lane would not create a detrimental overconcentration of similar drive-thru uses in this area; and WHEREAS, the requested amendment to the final development plan and conditional use permit meets those requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No.______; and WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield’s Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No.______; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of an amended planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. An amended planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are approved for an additional retail building with drive-up ATM and associated site changes as described in City Council Report No. ___, on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: • Customer entrances on the north and south façade shall remain unlocked and accessible to the public during all business hours. • Where a pedestrian route crosses the parking lot surface, a distinct paving material shall be used. Where parking spaces abut the pedestrian route, car stops shall be used to prevent vehicle encroachment onto the walkway. • West of the building, paved surface shall be reduced to only that which is necessary to facilitate trash pickup and egress from required building exit(s). • The extent of any retaining wall and/or railing placed near the right-of-way shall be limited to only that which is necessary for public safety, due to grade changes. Railing design requires approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits. • Snow storage is prohibited in the Market Plaza parking lot, and on the entire bank outlot property. All surface parking spaces must remain available year round. All walkways and stairways shall be cleared of snow and other debris. • The proposed public art piece shall be installed within two years of approval. • Easements for cross-access, parking, and signage are required. Proof of recording said easements must be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. • The property owner is responsible for the ongoing maintenance and tending of all landscaping in accordance with approved plans. • All new utility service must be underground. • All utilities must be screened from public view in accordance with Section 544.05. A screening plan is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. • No additional freestanding signage shall be permitted, except for smaller directional signs as necessary. Separate sign permits are required; this resolution does not constitute approval of any signs. • A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. • Subdivision of the property is required and must be recorded with the County. • The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City’s Administrative Review Committee Report dated November 18, 2019 and compliance with all other City and State regulations. • Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete. • A maintenance agreement must be executed and approved by the Public Works Director prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • As-builts or $7,500 cash escrow must be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy. • Unless specifically modified by this resolution, all conditions of prior approvals remain in place. 4. This amendment to the planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or upon written request by the developer, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9. 5. The planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of February, 2020. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts A, B, C, E, F, and G, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1635 AND Tracts A & B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1864, Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SUBDIVISION WAIVER FOR MARKET PLAZA AND VILLAGE SHORES AT 6501 WOODLAKE DRIVE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a subdivision waiver for the division of property legally described as: Tracts A, B, C, E, F, and G, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1635 AND Tracts A & B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1864 WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to re-subdivide the above-described property in a new Registered Land Survey, including several Tracts for the various portions of the existing mixed-use development, and a new Tract for the proposed bank building; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that compliance with City Code Section 500.05, Subdivision 1 would result in unnecessary hardship and that failure to comply therewith will not interfere with the purposes of the platting regulations of Section 500.01. WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval for the subdivision waiver; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A waiver for the subdivision of the property legally described above is hereby granted. 2. City staff is authorized and directed to take any action necessary to effectuate this Resolution and to authorize the recording of conveyances complying with the terms of this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th day of February, 2020. _______________________ Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Code Requirements / Required Findings Part 1: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application (542.09 Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. The Comprehensive Plan guides the area around 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue for Mixed Use development. Goals and objectives for the area include “continue expansion of the city center area by incorporating residential housing at 50 to 150 units per acre and providing commercial, office and recreational opportunities.” General goals include developing identifiable commercial nodes and corridors, promoting development that broadens the tax base, encouraging shared parking between different developments, and requiring pedestrian connections between land uses. Goals and Policies also include pedestrian/bike-friendly and transit-friendly building and site design features. The proposed additions to the site will improve these conditions. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. This requirement is met – the proposal repurposes surplus parking space into development that complements the existing buildings and uses on the site. 3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development. The development is in substantial compliance with the intent of the guiding Mixed Use (MU) District. Requested variations to allow the drive-up ATM, discussed in Part 2 #8, are not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the development. The City’s Public Works, Engineering and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties. No undue adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest. This requirement is met; appropriate stipulations have been incorporated into the final resolution. Part 2: All uses are conditional in Planned Unit Developments, and drive-thrus are conditionally permitted uses (Section 537.05, Subd. 5) in the underlying Mixed Use District. The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (Subd. 547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. See above – Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The proposed building design and proposed use as a retail bank branch complies with all zoning code requirements and with the purposes of the zoning code. The building activates the street frontage with a customer entrance and large windows, as well as a new pocket park/plaza area with amenities available to the public. See #8 below for requirements that are not met by the proposed drive-thru ATM. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. N/A 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development is in substantial compliance with City performance standards. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City’s Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any adverse impacts. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. See above – Part 1, #1. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. In the Mixed Use zoning district, drive-up window or teller service is a conditionally permitted use, provided that the conditions listed below are met, as outlined in Section 537.05 Subd. 5. A minimum distance of 500 feet must be maintained between substantially similar uses with drive-up window or teller service (as measured from property line to property line). This requirement is not met. The proposal is less than 500 feet from a substantially similar use (BMO Harris Bank at 6625 Lyndale Avenue). Measured property line to property line across the roundabout, this distance is just 185 feet. However, BMO Harris Bank is an unusual property in that it shares a single lot with the larger Woodlake Centre office complex. If measured instead to the BMO Harris bank building, the distance separating the two bank uses is approximately 350 feet, which still falls short of the buffer requirement. Policymakers should consider if an overconcentration of drive-thru uses near the City's main downtown intersection is a concern more specific to fast food uses, or if that concern extends to financial institutions as well. Considerations should also include whether the proximity of the existing BMO Harris Bank alone warrants denial of this proposal. Uses with drive-up window or teller service may not be located adjacent to a property with an existing drive-up window or teller service unless an applicant can demonstrate that the use will not be detrimental to pedestrian, bicycle or vehicle movements This requirement is met. While the property is directly adjacent to a Wendy’s restaurant with drive-thru (6500 Lyndale Avenue), the proposed drive-up ATM will not be detrimental to pedestrian, bicycle or vehicle movements. All vehicle access occurs within the existing parking lot and no new curb cuts are proposed. Separate pedestrian routes are provided throughout the property. No drive-up window or lane shall be adjacent to a public street. While the proposed lane runs parallel to a public street, it is not located between the building and street, nor is it closer to the street than the nearest parking lot drive aisle. Without more specificity in the Code regarding adjacency, it is reasonable to consider this requirement is met, as the drive-thru lane is 26 feet from the nearest property line. Drive-up uses shall be limited to one service window which is part of a primary structure and a single queuing lane. The City may consider one additional service lane for automated teller machines (ATMS) or similar facilities. In this case, the ATM is not part of the structure. However, there is no "primary" teller service window. As the ATM is the only drive-up feature, it is reasonable to consider this requirement met, as the ATM would otherwise be in compliance with this requirement. Drive-up facilities must be designed to minimize impacts to the pedestrian environment and adequately address circulation issues and potential noise or light pollution. This requirement is met. Drive-through canopies and other structures, where present, shall be constructed from the same materials as the primary building and with a similar level of architectural quality and detailing. This requirement is met. There shall be no curb cuts on public streets exclusively for the use of drive-up queuing or exit lanes. Drive-up traffic shall enter and exit from internal circulation drives This requirement is met. Queuing space for at least four cars (70 feet) shall be provided as measured from the drive-up service window or teller station. Such queuing space shall not interfere with parking spaces or traffic circulation. This requirement is not met. In the initial plan submittal, the proposal included a much larger drive-thru loop that met the queuing requirement, but did not meet other requirements nor did it allow for any plaza space. With staff's feedback, the loop was replaced with the proposed ATM "slip lane" that is further from the public street and allowed for the proposed plaza amenities to be added. By code, this queuing requirement applies equally to all drive-thru uses, including fast-food restaurants that are likely to have longer average dwell times per customer than an ATM. Staff finds that it is reasonable to allow a shorter queuing distance for an ATM than other, more intense drive-thru uses. Any drive-up service window, teller or order station, or exterior loudspeaker shall be located at least 150 feet from any parcel with residential uses on the first floor. N/A. The applicant shall demonstrate that such use will not significantly lower the existing level of service on streets and intersections This requirement is met. No new curb cuts are proposed and the proposal is not expected to generate significant amount of traffic. The City shall encourage operators to permit bicyclist use of sales and service windows. This requirement is met. Nothing in the plans would prohibit bicyclist use of the ATM. Alcoholic beverages shall not be served through a drive-up window. N/A. Exterior speakers shall comply with the noise control limits set by Subsection 930 of the City Code. N/A. R R PMR PC-2PC-2 C-2 PMR PC-2 PC-2 MR-3 R PMU R C-2 C-2 PMR PC-2 R R PC-2 PMR PMR PC-2 PC-2 R C-2 PC-2 C-2 C-2 R C-1 R C-2 R R R R R R R R R R R C-2 R R R R R R RR R PC-2 R PMU PMU PMU PC-2 R R PC-2 RRRRRR MR-2 MR-2MR-2 R C-2 R MR-2 R-1 C-2 R C-2 R R PC-2 R C-2 PC-2 RR MR-2 R R ± 6501 Woodlake Dr - APUD 1/2020Surrounding Zoning 0 250 500 750 1,000125FeetPMR - Planned Multi-Family ResidentialPMU - Planned Mixed UseC-2 - General CommercialPC-2 - Planned General CommercialMR-2 - Medium Density ResidentialMR-3 - High Density Residential 350 ft I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\6501 Woodlake Dr - Z.mxd65TH STREETLYNDALE AVE66TH STREET HARRIETGRANDproposed: PMU PRK MIXED MIXEDMIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED PRK MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED PRK MIXED CC MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MDRMDR MIXED MIXED LDR MIXED LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDRLDR LDR LDR LDR MDRMDR LDRLDR LDR MIXED MIXED LDR MIXED LDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDR PRK PRK PRK MIXED MIXED MIXED LDR MIXED HDR MIXEDMIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED MIXED LDR LDR MIXED MIXED LDR LDR LDR PRK LDR LDRMIXED MIXED ± 6501 Woodlake Dr - APUD 1/2020Surrounding Comprehensive Plan 0 250 500 750 1,000125FeetMIXED - Mixed UseCC - Community CommercialMDR - Medium Density ResidentialLDR - Low Density ResidentialPRK - Park 350 ft I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\6501 Woodlake Dr - CP.mxd65TH STREETLYNDALE AVE66TH STREET HARRIETGRAND ± 6501 Woodlake Dr - APUD 1/2020Distance to similar (financial) drive-thru 0 125 250 375 50062.5 Feet ~ 1 8 5 ft LYNDALE AVE66TH STREET ~350 ft"imaginary property line" Property Lines"imaginary property line" between Woodlake Centre office and BMO BankProposedChase BankBMO Harris Bank Woodlake Centre www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota • 55416 (612) 615-0060 6501 Woodlake Drive, Richfield MN Amended PUD and Subdivision Waiver Application – Project Narrative PID: 2702824230103 February 13, 2020 Project Narrative The property owners of 6501 Woodlake Drive are seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development Amendment and a Subdivision Waiver. The property owner will be subdividing a portion of their property to facilitate the construction of a new bank building and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The property is currently 4.59 acres and will be split into two new tracts. Tract A = 4.16 AC Tract B = 0.43 AC The property is currently zoned PMR - Planned Multi-Family and will be rezoned to PMU - Planned Mixed Use. The anticipated completion date for the project is Fall of 2020. Site Design The proposed site is located in the northwest corner of 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue. The site is currently a parking lot for the Market Plaza Shopping Center. There currently is a grade change between the front entry of the proposed building and the sidewalk in the 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue Right- of-Way. In the current parking configuration, this grade change is accommodated with a retaining wall north of the stalls adjacent to the intersection. To accommodate this grade change with the proposed building, we originally planned for a retaining wall and railing to be constructed along the 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue Right-of-Way. Based on feedback at our City Council meeting on January 28th, 2020, we have made revisions to our site plan to eliminate the need for a retaining wall and stair system off of the roundabout to access the new building. The building now will have entrances at two different elevations, with the higher elevation occurring adjacent to the Right-of-Way. The entrance off of the Right-of-Way will be at the same grade as the existing sidewalk in the intersection and the entrance of the parking lot will match the existing grades in that location. To access the site, an accessible sloped sidewalk will be constructed to the entry off the north side of the building. This sidewalk will line up with the crosswalk on Lyndale Avenue north of 66th Street. A second access (non-accessible) will be provided on the west side of the building to provide a more direct route to the Market Plaza Shopping Center. The project is requesting the City to allow a drive-up ATM in coordination with the construction of the bank building. The City has indicated that this drive-up ATM would typically not be allowed because www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota • 55416 (612) 615-0060 the City does not allow drive-thrus adjacent to public streets and also does not allow drive-thrus within 500 feet of similar uses. To mitigate the issues of the proposed drive-thru, the project will be making some concessions to their typical design standards and providing some additional site amenities to benefit the public. The concessions that the project is making is that they are willing to reduce the amount of vehicle stacking that they typically like at their drive-up ATM locations. This reduction will allow the drive-up ATM location to shift away from the public street and allow room to provide the additional site amenities to benefit the public. The amenities that the project will be constructing to benefit the public include: · Pocket Park with benches. · Space for public art. · Concrete pad to accommodate a future bike share station or bicycle parking. · A bicycle repair station. · Decorative fencing and natural stone piers. · Additional complementary decorative planting beds · Additional landscaping to screen the proposed drive-thru. These additional site amenities will not only help mitigate the construction of the drive-up ATM, but they will also enhance the public experience at the recently upgraded intersection. Architectural Design The design intent of the proposed Chase Bank is to compliment the surrounding architecture of the recently renovated Market Plaza and the newer adjacent commercial developments. The proposed Banking Center is comprised of a thin limestone veneer, aluminum composite panels and fiber cement architectural wall panels that are designed to achieve the refined look of wood. All of the exterior cladding options are modern finishes and are long lasting cladding materials that will mesh well with the development growth of the area. In addition, the floor to ceiling glazing was incorporated to provide connectivity to the retail customers navigating the Plaza and pedestrians traversing the adjacent public thoroughfare. This project will fit in with the character of the neighborhood and will bring a new service to this area. This project should have positive impacts to neighboring properties and will be a benefit to the City of Richfield for years to come. Sincerely, David Knaeble Civil Site Group a0610 GM 11- - t 0 T qF - y T 1 IL maw 7•' 4fr- ti • f qw 67 .411 di i v i - SIF 2• -4L J' _26 y jF Ilk 004, } } Ar L Will i rIlk �Y .A 4;. y 11 LLW & y e...y fee 'MrIA GL L IL I lYMN F Il- =.Vlmv� L 9 " V . j petco.,K ff an V%fli� - 1 Ir v..,. P, VI 4A 4 JAI). e., . . . . . . . . . . . . rk� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ......... ... ...... e S,_, _k F A .91: IMA VA AIF L ry' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114E i . . . . . . . . . 1 I I I I I V ip A %L L Z' 'IT V. % do Y"Y 4W ',-#rmJmmmE N, SITE INFORMATION U # 4 / 5 t �t x t r + 40^ EXISTING FILL ACCESS CURB CUT RICHFIELD 790 W. 66TH. RICHFIELD, MN TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 PARKS EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN TO REMAIN WEST 66TH STREET ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 2.11.2 20 PROPERTY LINE 441 SEE CIVIL aRAWlNG FOR MP DESIGN DESiGN Q' Z J COD 441 ZONING PROPOSED CHASE PARCEL: CU RFNT ZONI NG—Pf R MU — MAJOR AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ZONING TO PLANNED MIXED —USE COMMUNITY UM_O LOT AREA- 18,740 SO FT .43 ACRES) GROSS BUILDING AREA: 5,120 SQ ET BUILDING SETBACK, FRONT YARD REQUIRED. 10' MIf 2O' MAX PROPOSED. '-1 & '-4" (VARIANCE REQUIRED) INTERIOR SIDE YARD REQUIRED. 5' MIN PROPOSED: 43' CORNER SIDE YARD REQUIRED: r MIN PROPOSED: ED: 103'-3" REAR YARD REQUIRED: ' MIN PROPOSED: 3'—l" LANDSCAPING/PARKING SETBACK: REQUIRED: FRONT: 8' MIN SIDE YARD- ' MIN FEAR YARD. 5' MIN PROPOSED: FRONT: 1 5,-1 1 , SIDE YARD:O (VARIANCE IE(UIRED REAR YARD. 11'-5" MAX BUILDING HE[ HT:3 ' PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT. 21'-8" LOADING ZONE: N/A CAR PARKING COUNT DATA: PARKING: 1 20 SF PARKING REQUIRED = 13(INCL. 1 ACCESSIBLE) PARKING PROVIDED = 10(INCL. 2 ACCESSIBLE) `SHARED PARKING G WITH EXISTING PLAZA' (VARIANCE RE(UIRED DRIVE—THRU VFHICLE TACK If G; MINIMUM JEUIiED: CAFES + I TELLER PROPOSED STACKING, 2 CARS (VARIANCE RECUIRED SEE CIVIL UTILITY PLAN FOR PAVED AREA AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA CALCULATIONS. IF REQUIRED. N 0 2' 40' 600 Architect/Designer The Architects Partnership 00 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 t: 312. . oo f: 312.583.9890 TAP Project Number- 19074 THINTONE'►��,I��I-% FINISH COLOR: LIM rKAr-k T I-%A1.Ir1 THIN c. COL( COLOR: Al INVEST ELEVATION L.i\r—v .7LL1 I UU1 gun I lull n 11 I i ! ILJL„—JL__=JLJ1_JI JL___JL. —,J" RICHFIELD SOUTH ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS o W 6 th St. 02.11.2 20 RICHFIELD, IVIN 55423 T.0_ HIGH PAHA PF 1 {' TO MID PARAPET 19. A. T.Q. LOW PARAPET 16-4- B.0_ C.ANOPY & TO HIGH WINDOW R 0. 1.0 ACCENT PAHAPE 1 . 12' 10- T O WINDOW RO qV .1p8- I 0 LOW CANOPY IV .8-2- SCALE: 4„ = 1 Architect/Designer The Architects Partnership 200 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 t: 312.583.9800 f: 312.583.9890 TAP Project Number: 19074 PUBLIC SIDEWALK 1 "er T.Q. RAMP • D'-7IT TO SLAB TI IIAI CkTr-*Lnlr 1erKIr—r- M nr-KArAIT C' AKir-I Jh i 0 HIGIi ROOF . 21' 6' T-O. MID ROOF .19-4- Jk .0- AC.CfF1T ROOF + 121101 TO WINDOW RO qV . 1i74' T 0 l OW CANOPY . 8--f TO. SLAB CEMENT PANEL 041016110711 ►. � � � i ■ ■a■ IL ACM PANEL COLOR: ANODIZED ALUM. COLOR: ANODIZED ALUM. RICHFIELD 790 VIA 66th St. RICHFIELD, MN 55423 CEMENT PANEL WDRAIN NORTH ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 2.1 1.2 2 EfENT PANEL 'DRAIN LF: BARS ACM CANOPY COLOR. ANODIZED ALUM. 0E ANODIZED ALUM. THIN STONE VENEER a 10 1 [A I N aell,[ 1 COLOR: LIMESTONE SCALE: 4" _ �' FA PM3wJ IN ITJFEMI9T Architect/Designer The Architects Partnership 200 South Michigan Avenge Chicago, IL 60604 t: 312.583.9800 f: 312. 83.9890 TAP Project umber: 1 904 T.0 HIGH ROOF 2V 6$_ - T.O MID RODE AL 1 q'. d. TO i H WINd01M i 0 4 15' 0' TO }RAIN CANOPY OL .11'9' T.O. RAILING • F-1 U' PURl.10 SIDEWALK 2,.4. $� TO SIAR 0'-Q' ACM CANOPY COLOR: CHASE BLUE 6X6 HSS COLUK/ COLOR: CLEARANODI AL( A'+I4A AIP T / L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J SOUTH ELEVATION DRI E-THRU 66 HSS COLUMNS III@]11]: Ell 4��1: �1f 10111 M :19 1s1IL11�il RICHFIELD 790 W 66th St. RICHFIELD, MN 23 '_ED ACM CANOPY UM. COLOR: CHASE BLUE T 0 ROOF * l u. $� 5.0. CANOPY • JJT4r 6X6 HSS COLUMNS COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED ALUM. T.0 CURB ISIANO . M0,± $� NORTH ELEVATION DRIVE-THRIJ ACM CANOPY :AR ANODIZED Ell 01LTA1 T.0 ROOF *,2--8• $�- BO.CANOPY . 1 p'-B" $� T.0 CURO iSLAND . 04't $�- --------------- Ll WEST ELEVATION DRIVE-THRU ACM CANOPY COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED T-0. ROOF OL * J2-r B.O. CO NOPY OL 10'-r T.O. CURB ]SWO OL * 0'-' s ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 11.2.2019 ALUM. ACM CANOPY *6101: 1ITMA=l111I4 6X6 HSS COLUMNS COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED I�101,81 ACM CANOPY COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED F.O, ROOF * t2`-r 8.0 CANOPY OIL + I Cr4 �C ' T 0. fiI.lR9 ISMB ' + Vy [ lul I_ - EAST ELEVATION DRIVE-TH RU SCALE' " = 1' Architect/Designer The Architects Partnership 200 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 t'312-583-9800 f: 312.583.9890 TAP Project Number: 19074 r- J Iun1 CL iii• M. ,_ lflPSN � \ / \ I I _ —I — `�,I -------------------ON e -I 00 I ,o. N I = I � - - - woos oNinn O ❑ `, I I I a O I I I I 0 I I I I I L ,. nv ll l] a HC�.�L — Lk/— -t� Je LHZASIE 0 RICHFIELD 790 W 66TH ST RICHFIELD, MN O En ilk ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN 01.31.2020 Architect/Designer The Architects Partnership 200 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 t: 312.583.9800 f: 312.583.9890 TAP Project Number: 19074 Revised1/28 Council meeting Before and After - overhead view Before and After - side view Revised1/28 Council meeting 1/28 Council meeting Revised Before and After - Elevations Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 48776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:46:45 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............MARKET PLAZA CHASEBANK OUTLOTRICHFIELD, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALMASTER LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALCURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALLSOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED MANHOLE STORMPROPOSED GATE VALVEPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING STOPBOXPROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARYPROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORMPROPOSED SIGNEXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC.6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300MADISON, WI 53719608-833-7600ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /SURVEY:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1L1.0CIVIL DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANC5.2CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTBDDYH EOF=1135.52SB-1TOPROPOSED LIGHTEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITARCHITECT:THE ARCHITECTS PARTNERSHIP (TAP)200 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVESUITE 1020CHICAGO, IL 60604312-583-9800SITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNLT1.0LIGHTING PLANC2.1OVERALL SITE PLAN NOPARKINGNOPARKING 9 . 0 '9.0 ' 9 . 0 ' 9 .0 ' 9 . 0 ' 9 . 0 ' 9 . 0 '9. 0 ' 9 . 0 ' 9 .0 '9. 0 '9. 0 ' 9 .0 '9.0 '4.5'5.0'NOPARKING NOPARKING NOPARKING 90.70 NOPARKINGCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 48776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:47:15 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.1OVERALL SITE PLAN............SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTO66TH STREET WESTLYN D A L E A V E N U E S O U T HPROPOSED CHASEBANK BUILDINGEXISTING MARKETPLAZA BUILDING 90.70 TRACT ATRACT BProposed Division Line 8.72N54°57 '39 "E 40. 2 6 N20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 5.00S69°35'06"EN20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 7 1 . 2 7 REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTAND BASE MATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.SAWCUTPAVEMENT FULLDEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND ROOT BALL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND ROOT BALL, TYP.SALVAGE EXISTINGOVERHEAD LIGHTPOLEPROTECT EXISTINGPYLON SIGN DURINGCONSTRUCTION, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGSTREET SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING WOODTRELLIS AND CONC. FOOTINGS,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCONC RETAININGWALL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB ANDGUTTER, TYP.SAWCUTPAVEMENT FULLDEPTH, TYP.RELOCATEHYDRANTEXISTING FIBER OPTICLINE, FIELD LOCATEDURING CONSTRUCTIONAND PROTECT FROMDAMAGEREMOVE EXISTINGHANDHOLECONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSREMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 48776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:47:03 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE ANDLOCAL REGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEARESTJOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AREAPPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THEDURATION OF THE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ONTHE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING,DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THEPLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN AMANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT,DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITYMATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALLCIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALLINCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.CITY OF RICHFIELD REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 90.70 8.72N54°57 '39 "E 40. 2 6 N20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 5.00S69°35'06"EN20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 7 1 . 2 7 6.2'18.0'TYP.24.0'53.9'78.7 '9.0'TYP.9.0'TYP.NOPARKINGR4.0'5.0 '4.1 '85.6 '18.0'16.0'COMP.15.5'5.0'10.4'6.0'(7) STALLS @ 9'=63.0' (2 ) + ACC .@ 9 '=27 .0 '24.0'R10.0'18.5'13.7'R3.0'R5.0'CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSACCESSIBLEPARKING SPACE,INCL. SIGNAGE,STRIPING ANDRAMPSCONC. WALK, TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.B612 C&G,TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTIONEXISTINGMONUMENT SIGNPED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.BIT. PVMT.,TYPBIT. PVMT.,TYPB612 C&G,TYP.MATCH EXISTINGCONC. WALK, TYP.MATCH EXISTINGCONC. WALK, TYP.MATCH EXISTINGC&G, TYP.MATCH EXISTINGC&G, TYP.MATCH EXISTINGPAVEMENT, TYP.MATCH EXISTINGPAVEMENT, TYP.CURB TAPER,TYP.ENTIRE PARKING LOT:EXISTING NO. STALLS = 263PROPOSED NO. STALLS = 231ATM DRIVE-UPAREA,SEE ARCH. PLANCONCRETE PAD FOR EITHER FUTUREBIKE SHARE STATION OR (5) GROUNDMOUNTED "HOOP" STYLE BIKE RACKSBIKE REPAIR STATION ANDPUMP, COORD. W/OWNERFOR SELECTION8.0'20.0'EXISTINGCONCRETESIDEWALK ANDBIKE PATH9.0'THICKENED EDGECONCRETE PADR8.0' R25.0'R25.0'R3.0'3.5'3.2'MODULAR BLOCK RETAININGWALL W/ 42" RAILING ALONGTOP, COORD. W/ARCH PLANS& SEE GRADING PLAN FORELEV. RAILING TO BE MIN. OF3' FROM BACK OF PUBLICSIDEWALK. WALL TO FINISH ATSTAIR.R16.0'R8.0'20.0' 5.0'7.9'2. 0 'R1 9 . 0 '4.0'4' DIA. CONC PAD FOR ART INSTALLATIONGROUND MOUNTED ART PIECE.COORDINATE W/ INSTALLATION OF BASE& LIGHTINGMATCH AT EXIST. WALK , TYP."POCKET PARK" PLAZASTAMPED & COLORED CONC., ART PIECE SPACE, (4)BENCHES, NATURAL STONE SEAT WALL BLOCKS,DECORATIVE FENCING & STONE PIERSDECORATIVEFENCING,SHOPS REQ.(8) 24"X24" NOM. NATURALSTONE PILLARS TO MATCHSEATWALL BOULDERSNATURAL STONELANDSCAPE RETAININGWALL, SEE GRADING &LANDSCAPE PLANSEXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE,FIELD LOCATE DURINGCONSTRUCTION ANDPROTECT FROM DAMAGE3 STALLS @ 9'=27.0'R3.0'7.4'8.1'TAPER CURB,SEE GRADINGPLANCONC. WALK, TYPCONCRETE STAIRSAND HANDRAILS3' CURBCUTREPLACE EXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER AND BIT.PVMT. TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONSREPLACE EXISTINGCONCRETE SIDEWALK TOMATCH EXISTING CONDITIONSREINSTALL SALVAGEDLIGHT POLE, COORD.W/ LIGHTING PLANREPLACE EXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER AND BIT.PVMT. TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONSREINSTALL SALVAGEDLIGHT POLE, COORD.W/ LIGHTING PLANLIGHT POLE, COORD.W/ LIGHTING PLANCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 48776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:47:07 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUTNOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS ANDPAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTERCOMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS.STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREETOPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITEIMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BESTAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OFBUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUTNOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURBRAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A.REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC.WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ORREQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEELANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF RICHFIELD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1.PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FROM RICHFIELD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR ANY EXCAVATION INLYNDALE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY.2.RICHFIELD ENGINEERING MUST BE PRESENT TO INSPECT ALL CONCRETE FORMS WITHINRIGHT-OF-WAY PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR. MINIMUM 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTO 90.70 TRACT ATRACT BProposed Division L ine 8.72N54°57'39 "E 40. 2 6 N20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 5.00S69°35'06"EN20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 7 1 . 2 7 NOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 48776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:47:21 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOILCORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOILTESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALLREQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATIONSYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNEDAND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVALPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TOESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADESACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO ANAREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED INEMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERETURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUMDEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDINGADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPESBETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISHGRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVEBECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THECONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THENEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THEDIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEERSHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANYUNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THEPRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESSDIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHEDSHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER,CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSCITY OF RICHFIELD GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS 90.70 8.72N54°57 '39 "E 40. 2 6 N20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 5.00S69°35'06"EN20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " E 7 1 . 2 7 34 - KFG23 - KFG3 - LSRS3 - LSRS3 - AJS4 - DHW6 - DHW2 - MGD2 - MGD1 - RBC1 - SSC1 - ABM1 - SHL1 - SHL1 - EKC1 - SSCSTEPPERS, SEE LEGEND18" MAINT. STRIP, SEEDETAIL & LEGEND, TYP.18" MAINT. STRIP, SEEDETAIL & LEGEND, TYP.LAWN, SEELEGEND, TYP.LAWN, SEELEGEND, TYP.LAWN, SEELEGEND, TYP.EDGER, SEE LEGEND, TYP.EDGER, SEELEGEND, TYP.4 - AH1 - ERC1 - ERC3 - PA 1 - BHS1 - BHS2 - PA7 - SHJ5 - MGD2 - SGJ3 - CAD4 - CAD1 - RBC 1 - RBC5 - CAD1 - ABM1 - RBC4 - CAD14 - BES5 - BHBS5 - BHBS21 - BES3 - CAD7 - BES25 - BHBS10 - BHBS12 - PPCB1 - RBC3 - AJS15 - AC - HEDGE10 - VMG8 - VMG17 - AC - HEDGE44 - LSRS9 - LSRS11 - KFG9 - CAD4 - BESSTEPPERS, SEE LEGENDPROVIDE RIP RAP,SAMPLES REQ.3 - AH3 - SGJNOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:47:47 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cLANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NPLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITESYMQUANT.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTCOMMENTSDECIDUOUS TREESABM2Autumn Blaze MapleAcer x freemanii 'Jeffersred'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHL2SKYLINE HONEYLOCUSTGleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMEKC1Espresso Kentucky CoffeetreeGymnocladus dioicus 'Espresso'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMEVERGREEN TREESBHS2BLACK HILLS SPRUCEPicea glauca 'Densata'6' ht.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMERC2Eastern Red JuniperJuniperus virginiana6' ht.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM9TOTALORNAMENTAL TREESSSC2SPRING SNOW FLOWERING CRABMalus 'Spring Snow'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMRBC5RED BARON FLOWERING CRABMalus 'Red Baron'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM7TOTALSHRUBS - CONIFEROUS & EVERGREENMGD9Muskingum Gray DogwoodCornus racemosa 'Muszam'36" HT.CONT.AC32Alpine currantRibes alpinum24" HT.CONT.DHW10Dark Horse WeigelaWeigela florida 'Dark Horse'24" HT.CONT.SGJ5Sea Green JuniperJuniperus chinensis 'Sea Green'24" HT.CONT.PA5Pyramidal ArborvitaeThuja occidentalis 'Pyramidalis'36" HT.CONT.SHJ7Sky High JuniperJuniperus scopulorum 'Bailigh'36" HT.CONT.AH7Annabelle HydrangeaHydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle'24" HT.CONT.75TOTALPERENNIALS & GRASSESKFG68KARL FOERSTER GRASSCalamagrostis x acutiflora "Karl Foerster"#1CONT.BHBS45Blue Heaven Little Blue StemSchizachyrium scoparium 'Blue Heaven'#1CONT.LSRS59Little Spire Russian SagePerovskia 'Little Spire'#1CONT.BES46Goldsturm RudbeckiaRudbeckia fulgida 'Goldsturm'#1CONT.CAD28Chicago Apache DaylilyHemerocallis 'Chicago Apache'#1CONT.PPCB12PLUM PUDDING CORAL BELLSHeuchera 'Plum Pudding'#1CONT.AJS6Autumn Joy SedumSedum 'Autumn Joy'#1CONT.VMG18Variegated Moor GrassMolinia caerulea 'Variegata'#1CONT.282TOTALKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRALL PLANTING BEDS - DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH, 1"-3" CRUSHED "TRAP"ROCK, DK. GREY IN COLOR, SAMPLES REQUIRED. PROVIDE EDGING ASSHOWN ON PLANLAWN - LOCALLY GROWN/SOURCED BLUE GRASS-BASED SOD, CUT WITHIN24 HRS. OF INSTALLATION. "BIG ROLL" INSTALLATION PREFERRED WHEREAVAILABLEPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESALL TREE RINGS - SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH, SAMPLES REQUIREDPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS- SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLANFOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESEDGING - COMMERCIAL GRADE STEEL, INCLUDE ALL ENDS, CORNERS &STAKES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS/SPECS. PROVIDEPRODUCT DATA & SHOP DRAWING PRIOR TO INSTALLLEGEND1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4"DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSINGOPERATIONS) OF ROCK MULCH - SEE LEGEND BELOW.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH TOOUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE.ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OFNURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROMDISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OFACCEPTANCE PERIOD.4.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OFPLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THEPLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.5.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPEMATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1)FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.6.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4"LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ONTHE DRAWINGS.7.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND ANDOVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS.CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES ANDSHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION.8.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTILACCEPTANCE.9.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROMLANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.10.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATEDFROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.11.REPAIR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROMLANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.12.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATEDATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIPCOVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATIONPER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTHE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATIONSYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.14.SEE IRRIGATION NOTES FOR GENERAL & SPECIFIC IRRIGATIONSPECIFICATIONS - COMPLETE SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED PRIOR TOINSTALLATION1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMITIRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FORIRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS.3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUNDFACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TOUNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTINGDAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR.4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITYCOMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES.EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITHTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEPROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES.6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFYWITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE.7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE.8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE.9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THEFINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0"BEYOND PAVEMENT.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUITWITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE ANDCAPPED.12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN ANDSQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENTFORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION.13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS.14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR.15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED.LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITHOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATIONWIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICEONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRETO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHESTVALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES.18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BYINDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOWCONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE.19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE.20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS.21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMESIN AN UPDATED CONDITION.22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN.23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTHOF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVELSHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX.24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOXCOVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE.IRRIGATION NOTES:FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTUREMIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONFINISHED GRADECOMPACTED SUBGRADEWATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED18" - VERIFY W/ PLANAGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIPN T SSTAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'SINSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENTSLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN1PERENNIAL BED PLANTINGN T SPLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEMBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.SIZE VARIESSEE LANDSCAPE PLANMODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANTMATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANTPLACEMENT4DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES)PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNKBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLRULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT3THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL TREE SHAPE)THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWNWITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER.STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER.WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLONSTRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZINGMETHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR.TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVEEXISTING GRADEMULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANICMULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANNOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROMPLANT TRUNKEXISTING GRADECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELYSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDBACKFILL AS SPECIFIEDCOMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP.RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT2ROCK MAINT. STRIP AT BLDG FOUNDATION - 1" DIA. CRUSHED "TRAP" ROCK,DK. GREY IN COLOR, OVER FILTER FABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED. PROVIDEEDGING AS SHOWN ON PLANSTEPPERS - NATURAL STONE, 20"X20" CUT BLUESTONE. FLAME FINISHPREFERRED, PROVIDE SURFACE FINISH OPTIONS & PRODUCT DATAREQUIRED LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: 3 - LSRS1 - SSC1 - ABM1 - EKC18" MAINT. STRIP, SEEDETAIL & LEGEND, TYP.LAWN, SEELEGEND, TYP.LAWN, SEELEGEND, TYP.4 - AH1 - ERC1 - ERC3 - PA 1 - BHS1 - BHS2 - PA7 - SHJ5 - MGD2 - SGJ3 - CAD4 - CAD1 - RBC 1 - RBC5 - CAD1 - ABM1 - RBC4 - CAD14 - BES5 - BHBS5 - BHBS21 - BES3 - CAD7 - BES25 - BHBS10 - BHBS12 - PPCBPROVIDE RIP RAP,SAMPLES REQ.3 - AH3 - SGJMATCH EXISTINGCONC. WALK, TYP.CONCRETE PAD FOR EITHER FUTUREBIKE SHARE STATION OR (5) GROUNDMOUNTED "HOOP" STYLE BIKE RACKSBIKE REPAIR STATION ANDPUMP, COORD. W/OWNERFOR SELECTION8.0'20.0'R16.0'R8.0'20.0' 5.0'R19.0'4' DIA. CONC PAD FOR ART INSTALLATIONGROUND MOUNTED ART PIECE.COORDINATE W/ INSTALLATION OF BASE& LIGHTINGMATCH AT EXIST. WALK , TYP."POCKET PARK" PLAZASTAMPED & COLORED CONC., ART PIECE SPACE, (4)BENCHES, NATURAL STONE SEAT WALL BLOCKS,DECORATIVE FENCING & STONE PIERSDECORATIVEFENCING,SHOPS REQ.(8) 24"X24" NOM. NATURALSTONE PILLARS TO MATCHSEATWALL BOULDERSNATURAL STONELANDSCAPE RETAININGWALL, SEE GRADING &LANDSCAPE PLANSREPLACE EXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER AND BIT.PVMT. TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.1LANDSCAPE PLANPLAZA ENLARGEMENT............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060MARKET PLAZA CHASE BANK OUTLOT 9540 LYNDALE AVENUE S, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300, MADISON, WI 53719 E J PLESKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT 24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.2/12/20ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:15016.0211/25/19CITY RESUBMITTAL2/12/20CITY RESUBMITTAL........11/06/19CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:BNDK..............2/12/2020 12:47:52 PMCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSEE SHEET L1.0LEGEND01" = 5'-0"5'-0"2'-6"N1POCKET PARK/PLAZA ENLARGEMENT4' MAX.BOULDER WALLN T SFILTER FABRIC, TYP95% COMPACTED BACKFILL SOILIN 6" LIFTSBOULDER WALL, TYP.FINISH GRADE, TYP.6" MINIMUM COMPACTEDAGGREGATE LEVELING PADCOMPACTED SUBGRADE18"8"TYP.3 SECTIONS OF FENCING BETWEENPIERS SPACED 6' O.C. MAX.3"23"X23" NATURAL STONE CAPSECTIONCAP AND BRICK PIER#3 MASONRY TIES @12" O.C. VERTICALLY ALL SIDESCONDUIT REQUIRED FOR FREE STANDING PIERS(2) HOLES FOR STEEL DOWELS INTO CAP4'-3"5'-0" 2"CLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASECONCRETE FOOTINGCC'1/4" THICK EXPANSION JOINT AT ABUTTING CONCRETEMATERIAL (TYP.)MATERIALS VARY-SEE PLANSPOURED CONCRETE INFILL#3 MASONRY TIES @12" O.CVERTICALLY BOTH SIDESCONCRETE FOOTING2" CLEAR (TYP.)3"1 1/2"TYP.POURED CONCRETE INFILL2"SECTION C-C'1/4" SAW CUT GROOVES IN BOTTOM OFCONCRETE CAP ALL FOUR SIDESMORTAR DOWEL TO GRANITE1'-8"BRICK VENEER WITH 3/8" MORTAR- COLOR TO MATCH BUILDINGWITH LIGHT FIXTUREFREE STANDING BRICK PIER ELEVATIONCAP PLAN1'-11"1'-11"CLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE#4 TIES @12" HORIZONTAL AND 4-#5VERTICALLY (TYP.)#4 TIES @12" HORIZONTAL AND 4-#5 VERTICALLY(TYP.)FINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADE1'-8"8"8"TYP.4'-3"5'-0" TYP. 8"5'-0" TYP. 8"8" CONCRETE POST FOOTING1/4" THICK EXP.JOINT (TYP.)ALUMINUM POSTGROUTED IN PLACEORNAMENTAL FENCE AND COLUMNN T SFINISHEDGRADEPROVIDE (2) ELECTRICAL BOXES ANDCONDUIT. RUN TO SWITCHING INDOORSSEE ELECTRICAL.3-RAIL FLAT TOP (#1230) 42" HT, WITH HEAVY DUTYPOSTS, 6' O.C. BY COURTYARD ALUMINUM FENCESYSTEMS2 S30°49'25 "E3.33176.65 N00°10'26"W33.00 N00°10'26"W 123.27 96.1549. 0 0 279.52 90.70 105.90 104.20 229.81103.00100.00N30°32'34"W 109.45N38°43'37"E 72.12 N00°10'26"W 279.52N88°27'19"E 157.47N79°35'06"E 43.26N88°27'19"E 162.05N88°27'23"E 53.0715.70Δ=18°22'46"R=48.9447.94Δ=15°15'55"R=179.9235.90Δ=20°59'15"R=98.0018.74Δ=35°46'54 "R=30.00 23 . 1 7 Δ= 2 4 ° 0 8 ' 3 2 " R= 5 5 . 0 0 N15°53'58"E12.84N19 ° 0 0 ' 1 5 " E 5 8 . 0 4 S69°33'07"E8.71N68°47'40"W 54.53S59°49'12 "W 163 .92 S00°21'57"E 75.98 46. 7 2108.983.70196 . 3 2 17. 9 0TRACT BS68°47'40"E9.1646. 7 2 6.67 (Rec.)S07°34'18"E 107.87S89°47'46"E 162.7749.0 7 Δ=8° 3 6 ' 4 9 " R=32 6 . 4 0 S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 3 0 7 . 4 2N69°35'06"W5.00S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 40. 2 6 S54°57'39 "W8.72S89°30'24"W 87.41S00°29'36"E5.00S89°30'24"W 356.60N14°26'04"W 224.62102.58Δ=9°44'08"R=603.69N58°44'04 "E 442 .10TRACT AN59°12'09"E 350.01S30°49'25"E37.36S59°10'35 "W 206 .19S30°44'10"E6.89S14°15'50"W4.36N75°44'10"W14.82 S14°15'50"W2.75S59°15'50"W 74.77S30°44'10"E38.29S75°44'10"E35.08S14°15'50"W12.82S75°44'10"E11.78S14°15'50"W18.55N75°44'10"W4.61S14°15'50"W14.65S75°44'10"E23.71S14°15'50"W 49.33N75°44'10"W11.52S14°15'50"W16.24N76°06'16"W18.62S59°33'56"W13.05N75°50'00"W 35.35N14°12'33"E 53.02 N75°25'17"W21.90N14°06'23"E19.81 N75°53'48"W26.23N14°23'57"W 73.67TRACT DTRACT AT R A C T CT R A C T DT R A C T AT R A C T BT R A C T AT R A C T AR.T. DOC. NOREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTASHEET 2 OF 3Denotes Hennepin County cast iron monument (Found).Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch Iron Pipe set marked with a plastic capLinetype & Symbol Legend inscribed "RLS 44565".The bearing basis is the west line of the Goverment Lot 1, Section 27,Township 28, Range 24 which is assumed to bear North 00 degreesBENCHMARK:Denotes JLM set Pursuant to Torrens Case No. 10017 (None Found)Top nut of the fire hydrant located on the north side of 66th street307 feet east of the southwest boundary corner.Elevation = 848.75 feet (NGVD 1929 Datum)10 minutes 26 seconds West. Denotes site benchmark60153001530SCALE IN FEETNStreet Level Lower Vertical Limit = 844.0Upper Vertical Limit = 860.34Elevation View(No Scale) N88°27'19"E 157.47N79°35'06"E 43.26N88°27'19"E 162.05N88°27'23"E 53.0715.70Δ=18°22'46"R=48.9447.94Δ=15°15'55"R=179.9235.90Δ=20°59'15"R=98.0018.74Δ=35°46'54 "R=30.00 23 . 1 7 Δ= 2 4 ° 0 8 ' 3 2 " R= 5 5 . 0 0 N15°53'58"E12.84N19 ° 0 0 ' 1 5 " E 5 8 . 0 4 S69°33'07"E8.71N68°47'40"W 54.53S59°49'12 "W 163 .92 S00°21'57"E 75.98108.983.70196 . 3 2 17. 9 0TRACT BS68°47'40"E9.166.67 (Rec.)S07°34'18"E 107.87S89°47'46"E 162.7749.0 7 Δ=8° 3 6 ' 4 9 " R=32 6 . 4 0 S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 3 0 7 . 4 2N69°35'06"W5.00S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 40. 2 6 S54°57'39 "W8.72S89°30'24"W 87.41S00°29'36"E5.00S89°30'24"W 356.60N14°26'04"W 224.62102.58Δ=9°44'08"R=603.69N58°44'04 "E 442 .10S89°30'26"W 130.70N14°12'03"E 63.13 N75°47'57"W21.97N14°12'03"E20.33 N75°53'48"W26.03N14°22'48"W 74.90N59°12'03"E 524 .41S07°34'16"E 104.28S30°47'57 "E6.58N59°12'03 "E12.00S30°47'57"E28.13S59°12'03"W13.60N75° 4 7 ' 5 7 " W 5.67S59°12'03 "W 306 .85 S14°12'03"W 147.36 N79°59'10"E 137.38N08°07'01"E 55.02 TRACT ATRACT CTRACT AT R A C T CT R A C T DT R A C T AT R A C T BT R A C T AT R A C T AR.T. DOC. NOSURVEYORS CERTIFICATIONI Rory L. Synstelien hereby certify that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes508.47, Subd. 4, I have surveyed the following described property situated in the county ofHennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit:Tracts A, B, C, E, F, and G, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1635ANDTracts A & B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1864I hereby certify that this REGISTERED LAND SURVEY was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesotaand this Registered Land Survey is a correct representation of said parcel of land.Dated this day of , 20Rory L. Synstelien, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 44565RICHFIELD, MINNESOTAI hereby certify that this REGISTERED LAND SURVEY was approved and accepted by theCity Council of Richfield, Minnesota at regular meeting thereof heldthis day of , 20.If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportationand the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City, or the prescribed 30 day periodhas elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by MinnesotaStatues Section 505.03, Subd. 2.City Council of Richfield, MinnesotaBy: , By:Mayor ManagerRESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that taxes payable in and prior years have been paid for land described onthis REGISTERED LAND SURVEY.Dated this day of , 20.Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County AuditorBy: , DeputySURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, MinnesotaPursuant to Minnesota Statues Section 383B.565 (1969), this REGISTERED LAND SURVEY has beenapproved this day of , 20.Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County SurveyorBy: REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that the within REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. was filed inthis office this day of , 20 at o'clock M.Martin McCormick, Registrar of TitlesBy: , DeputyREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTAThe bearing basis is the west line of the Goverment Lot 1, Section 27,Township 28, Range 24 which is assumed to bear North 00 degreesBENCHMARK:Top nut of the fire hydrant located on the north side of 66th street307 feet east of the southwest boundary corner.Elevation = 848.75 feet (NGVD 1929 Datum)10 minutes 26 seconds West. 60153001530SCALE IN FEETNSHEET 1 OF 3Garage LevelNo Lower Vertical LimitUpper Vertical Limit = 844.0Elevation View(No Scale) N88°27'19"E 157.47N79°35'06"E 43.26N88°27'19"E 162.05N88°27'23"E 53.0715.70Δ=18°22'46"R=48.9447.94Δ=15°15'55"R=179.9235.90Δ=20°59'15"R=98.0018.74Δ=35°46'54 "R=30.00 23 . 1 7 Δ= 2 4 ° 0 8 ' 3 2 " R= 5 5 . 0 0 N15°53'58"E12.84N19 ° 0 0 ' 1 5 " E 5 8 . 0 4 S69°33'07"E8.71N68°47'40"W 54.53S59°49'12 "W 163 .92 S00°21'57"E 75.98108.983.70196 . 3 2 17. 9 0TRACT BS68°47'40"E9.166.67 (Rec.)S07°34'18"E 107.87S89°47'46"E 162.7749.0 7 Δ=8° 3 6 ' 4 9 " R=32 6 . 4 0 S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 3 0 7 . 4 2N69°35'06"W5.00S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 40. 2 6 S54°57'39 "W8.72S89°30'24"W 87.41S00°29'36"E5.00S89°30'24"W 356.60N14°26'04"W 224.62102.58Δ=9°44'08"R=603.69N58°44'04 "E 442 .10TRACT ATRACT AN64°43'15"E 149.18N65°03'40"E 142 .41N75°47'56"W 133.48N14°12'04"E 118.92 N30°47'56"W 43.53N59°06'53"E 285.12S30°47'56"E 81.41S59°12'04 "W 190 .61 S14°12'04"W 62.92S75°47'56"E 40.17S14°12'04"W 96.35(RLS NO. 1635=149.21)(RLS NO. 1635=43.93)(RLS NO. 1635=81.39)T R A C T CT R A C T DT R A C T AT R A C T BT R A C T AT R A C T AR.T. DOC. NOREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTASHEET 3 OF 3Elevation View(No Scale)Denotes a record measurement per REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1635(RLS NO. 1635=)High Rise Level Lower Vertical Limit = 860.34 Upper Vertical Limit = 949.75The bearing basis is the west line of the Goverment Lot 1, Section 27,Township 28, Range 24 which is assumed to bear North 00 degreesBENCHMARK:Top nut of the fire hydrant located on the north side of 66th street307 feet east of the southwest boundary corner.Elevation = 848.75 feet (NGVD 1929 Datum)10 minutes 26 seconds West. 60153001530SCALE IN FEETN N88°27'19"E 157.47N79°35'06"E 43.26N88°27'19"E 162.05N88°27'23"E 53.0715.70Δ=18°22'46"R=48.9447.94Δ=15°15'55"R=179.9235.90Δ=20°59'15"R=98.0018.74Δ=35°46'54 "R=30.00 23 . 1 7 Δ= 2 4 ° 0 8 ' 3 2 " R= 5 5 . 0 0 N15°53'58"E12.84N19 ° 0 0 ' 1 5 " E 5 8 . 0 4 S69°33'07"E8.71N68°47'40"W 54.53S59°49'12 "W 163 .92 S00°21'57"E 75.98108.983.70196 . 3 2 17. 9 0TRACT BS68°47'40"E9.166.67 (Rec.)S07°34'18"E 107.87S89°47'46"E 162.7749.0 7 Δ=8° 3 6 ' 4 9 " R=32 6 . 4 0 S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 3 0 7 . 4 2N69°35'06"W5.00S20 ° 2 4 ' 5 4 " W 40. 2 6 S54°57'39 "W8.72S89°30'24"W 87.41S00°29'36"E5.00S89°30'24"W 356.60N14°26'04"W 224.62102.58Δ=9°44'08"R=603.69N58°44'04 "E 442 .10TRACT AT R A C T CT R A C T DT R A C T AT R A C T BT R A C T AT R A C T AR.T. DOC. NOREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTASHEET 3 OF 3Sky Level Lower Vertical Limit = 949.75 No Upper Vertical LimitElevation View(No Scale)The bearing basis is the west line of the Goverment Lot 1, Section 27,Township 28, Range 24 which is assumed to bear North 00 degreesBENCHMARK:Top nut of the fire hydrant located on the north side of 66th street307 feet east of the southwest boundary corner.Elevation = 848.75 feet (NGVD 1929 Datum)10 minutes 26 seconds West. 60153001530SCALE IN FEETN