03-26-2019 Concurrent CC, HRA, and PC Work Session AgendaSPEC IAL C O N C U R R E N T C IT Y C O U N C IL, H O U SIN G AN D R ED E V E LO PMEN T AU TH O R ITY, AN D
P LAN N IN G C O MMIS S IO N W O R K S E S S IO N
R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C E N TE R, B AR TH O LO ME W R O O M
MAR C H 26, 2019
5:45 P M
C all to order
1.D iscuss proposed development for C ity Garage S outh (301 77th S treet West) site
A djournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at
least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
March 21, 2019
Council Memorandum No. 17 HRA Memorandum No. 2
The Honorable Mayor Housing and Redevelopment
and Authority Commissioners
Members of the City Council City of Richfield
Subject: Proposed Development for City Garage South Site
Council Members and HRA Commissioners:
On February 11, 2019, MWF Properti es presented a proposed 55-unit workforce
housing development for the City Garage South Site (301 77th Street West). At the
work session on March 26, staff will present additional information to policymakers
regarding the proposed development. Chris Stokka from MWF Properties will also be in
attendance to answer questions.
Policymakers are asked to review the information provided in this memo, visit the site
beforehand, and prepare any questions you may have. Staff is asking for direction from
policymakers on the questions posed at the end of the memo.
Summary
Staff is bringing the development for your consideration for the following reasons:
1. The property is guided and zoned for multi -family housing. Staff has used this
designation as a guide in seeking development for the property.
2. Under the Inclusionary Housing Policy, developments either provide affordable
units or make a payment in lieu to the City. The proposed project offers an
opportunity to create affordable units in place of the units that are forgone in
favor of the in lieu payments.
3. An analysis of our existing housing stock, the City’s affordable housing need
allocation, and feedback from the community suggest that there is a need for
accessible housing, housing with supportive services, and larger rental units for
families. The proposal provides 15 three-bedroom units and four to six units of
housing for people with disabilities, accompanied by supportive services.
Site Background
The property formerly housed the offices for the City garage. Following the construction
of the new Public Works facility in 2007, this building was demolished and ownership of
the site was transferred to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to develop
the site. The I-494 Corridor Master Plan and related zoning amendments were adopted
during this same time frame and the property was guided for Medium Density
Residential (MDR) based on its location. The I-494 Master Plan as a whole looked to
create an urban, pedestrian -friendly, economically sustainable district that would be
distinct and unique to Richfield. Sites farther from freeway access were designated for
housing, while commercial uses were focused on areas with superior access.
On an interim basis, the site is being leased by Richfield -Bloomington Honda for
employee parking. The HRA’s lease with Richfield-Bloomington Honda allows for
termination of the lease with at least 30 days’ notice.
The proposal from MWF is the second housing development that has been proposed for
the site. In 2017, Nicolai Apartments proposed 21 units of market-rate housing. The
feedback provided by policymakers at that time was that the City/HRA would consider
providing tax increment to develop the site , but that the building design needed to be
improved. The developer decided not to move forward with the development.
The Proposed Development
MWF is proposing 55 units, with the following breakdown of unit sizes and rent and
income limits:
Unit Size Affordability # of Units
1 BR 30% AMI
50% AMI
6
7
2 BR 50% AMI
70% AMI
21
6
3 BR 70% AMI 15
Note: The income for the 3BR units is 70%; however, rents will likely be less than the
maximum allowed.
The proposed development would include four to six units for people with disabilities.
Supportive services of approximately 30 hours per week would be provided for the
households occupying those units.
The developer plans to apply for housing tax credits to provide equity for the project.
The Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program (LIHTC) is a federal resource for housing
in which an investor purchases tax credi ts and receives a 10-year reduction in their
federal tax liability. The proceeds from the sale of the tax credits is invested in
affordable housing that must then remain affordable for 30 years.
A limited amount of tax credits are made available per stat e. Points are awarded to
projects based on a variety of factors as laid out in the State’s Qualified Allocation Plan
(QAP) (e.g., economic integration, access to high performing schools, access to transit).
Tax credits are allocated to projects that score the highest, given the amount of funds
available. The Program is highly competitive . In Minnesota, typically one in three
projects is awarded funding. The site is one of relatively few areas in the City that
receive a high number of points under the QAP priorities.
These websites provide additional information on the LIHTC Program:
www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-low-income-housing-tax-credit-and-
how-does-it-work
www.mnhousing.gov/wcs/Satellite?cid=13589052 54471&pagename=External%2
FPage%2FEXTStandardLayout
Policies
The following policies provide guidance in making land use decisions for the property:
1. The Comprehensive Plan is the policy document that describes the
community’s vision for the future of Richfield. It is a roadmap that staff uses to
direct developers to appropriate locations for particular projects. It is the
document that is used to determine zoning districts . The zoning of a property is
required by State Law to match its Comprehensive Plan de signation.
In 2005-2006 the City amended the Comprehensive Plan and zoning
designations along I-494. Based on anticipated changes to I-494 access and a
desire to both take advantage of the I -494 visibility and to create a more livable
corridor, the area was guided for a mix of commercial and higher density
housing. This particular property and the surrounding properties were guided for
medium-density residential housing (MDR), which allows densities between 8
and 34 units per acre. The City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy offers a density
bonus of up to 15% for projects that include affordable units, thereby allowing up
to 39 units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of 5 9 units per acre,
which will require the property to be re-guided to high density residential (HDR).
All other parcels along I-494 that are guided for either multi-family housing or
mixed use allow for higher densities – either 35-100 units per acre or 50-150
units per acre – which suggests that re-guiding to HDR would be consistent with
the Plan.
A Comprehensive Plan amendment typically requires a super majority approval
from the Council; however, in the case of an affordable housing development, a
simple majority is all that is required.
NOTE: The adjacent properties at 301 77 th Street West (LaMettry’s) and 7600
Pillsbury (Havenwood) were formerly guided MDR but were re-guided to
Community Commercial and HDR, respectively.
.
2. The City’s affordable housing need allocation, as determined by the
Metropolitan Council for the 2030 Comprehensive Plan time period, is as
follows:
At or Below 30% AMI 66
From 31 to 50% AMI 29
From 51 to 80% AMI 26
TOTAL UNITS 121
3. The Housing Visioning policy, adopted in 2013, recommends giving priority to
projects that serve a mix of incomes. It is, however, unlikely the City will be able
to meet the allocation of 66 units for households earning below 30% AMI through
mixed-income housing alone. The proposed development would serve incomes
between 30 and 70% of the AMI.
4. The City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy commits the City to “building a
community that is welcoming and affordable to a diverse population of individuals
and families at all stages of their lives.” It requires new developments receiving
financial assistance from the HRA to reserve 20% of all units as affordable to
households earning no more than 60 % of the Area Median Income (AMI) or
contribute 15% of the tax increment financing (TIF) (or the value of other types of
assistance) in lieu of including the units.
In the past, in lieu contributions have been used for a variety of
programs/projects currently funded by the Housing and Redevelopment Fund:
Richfield Rediscovered, commercial acquisitions for redevelopment, apartment
purchase assistance (e.g., Seasons Park), and New Home Program. At the time
of approval of the Inclusionary Housing Policy, the HRA indicated that the in lieu
payments should be used to create affordable housing elsewhere.
Zoning Considerations
The property is zoned Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MU-N). In this zoning district,
apartments are a permitted use. The developer will be required to apply for Site Plan
Approval.
At such time that the developer formally applies for Site Plan Approval, staff will review
the plans for conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and provide guidance to the
Planning Commission as to how it meets/does not meet the rules and standards.
Neighborhood Input
The City’s current Comprehensive Plan was developed wi th significant community input
over the course of nearly two years (2017-2018). A stated goal of the Plan is providing a
full range of housing choices for all members of our community. A need for more
affordable housing, especially housing at/or below 30% of AMI, is called out as a
specific need. This site has been designated as a housing site for the past 12 years.
The Council is allowed to re -guide property so long as a land use application has not
been submitted and the new designation is compatible with th e surrounding
designations. An additional public process is required prior to any land use designation
change. A site cannot be designated to allow only market rate housing vs. affordable
housing.
The community may provide feedback to the HRA regarding whether or not it is
appropriate to sell the property to the developer for the proposed use and/or whether it
would be appropriate to use TIF to repay the City for the cost of the land.
Adjacent neighbors include the auto body shop, storage facility, mis cellaneous
commercial uses, and Havenwood Senior Living. New Orleans Court Apartments and
Townhomes are one block to the east.
The developer plans an open house for the neighbors and interested community
members to ask questions about the proposal and off er feedback on the proposed
design and project features in April.
Environmental Considerations
Underground storage tanks were removed from the property in 1999 , and clean-up of
contaminated soil from the tanks was completed in 2000. A Phase II environmental
report was completed in 2007. Sporadic detections of petroleum-related contamination
were identified in soil samples, but no significant soil or groundwater contamination
patterns or “hot-spot” areas were identified.
Questions were raised about the impact of the railroad tracks on the development. The
developer has spoken with staff from Minnesota Housing. They have stated that the low
traffic volume and speed make the railroad’s impact negligible and do not disqualify the
proposed site for consideration for the LIHTC program. A significant amount of both
single and multi-family housing is currently located all along the railroad tracks. The
long-term plan for the tracks is for it to become a trail.
The LaMettry’s auto body shop i s located just to the east of the development. While the
building is new and was constructed with an up -to-date ventilation system, additional
analysis will be required to determine the potential for negative air quality on the site.
Staff is currently working to identify the appropriate manner in which to evaluate any air
quality issues related to LaMettry’s.
Timing
Applications for 2020 tax credits are due to Minnesota Housing on June 3, 2019. The
developer must provide evidence of site control and City financial participation with the
application so they need a purchase agreement (or development agreement) for the site
by this date. Consideration of this request would come before the HRA in April or May.
The developer plans to apply for land use approvals during the summer. A final decision
on the allocation of tax credits would occur in November. Construction would take place
during 2020, and the development would open in 2021.
City (HRA) Financial Participation
Control of the site and City financial participation is required for the tax credit
application. Staff is recommending that the City’s financial participation be provided by
the HRA through a land write-down. This method has the benefit of lowering
development costs, which improves the project’s score. The HRA would repay itself
through tax increment over a period of time. The site is currently in a tax increment
district. Sales proceeds will be used to pay down the bond d ebt for the Public Works
facility.
The estimated appraised value of the property is between $400,000 and $500,000. A
write-down of this amount would equal a subsidy of between $7,300 and $9,000/unit. If
approved, this subsidy would be far less (on a per -unit basis) than the HRA typically
provides as a subsidy.
An analysis of need and of the tax increment generated will be conducted before the
proposal is brought before the HRA. The estimated end-value of the development is
$7.5 million.
Questions to Consider
The proposal raises the following questions for policymakers to consider:
City Council/Planning Commission
Is the site appropriately guided for housing?
If it is, should it remain guided for medium density or should it be re-guided for
high density?
If not housing, what designation would be most appropriate?
City Council/HRA
Is the proposal consistent with the Inclusionary Housing Policy?
Are the Council and HRA in support of affordable housing that is not in mixed-
income developments? If not, how should any in lieu payments be used?
How does the Council/HRA envision providing the City’s allocation of housing
affordable at 30% of the AMI?
HRA
Does the proposed work force housing warrant a reduced land price? Are the
proposed terms, to pay ourselves back with tax increment over time, acceptable
to the HRA?
Respectfully submitted,
Katie Rodriguez
City Manager
KR:ju
Attachments
Email: Department Directors
Planning Commission
ATTACHMENTS
Tax Credit Income/Rent Limits
Hennepin
4/1/2018
Income limits by household size
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
30% 19,830 22,650 25,470 28,290 30,570 32,820 35,100 37,350
35% 23,135 26,425 29,715 33,005 35,665 38,290 40,950 43,575
40% 26,440 30,200 33,960 37,720 40,760 43,760 46,800 49,800
45% 29,745 33,975 38,205 42,435 45,855 49,230 52,650 56,025
50% 33,050 37,750 42,450 47,150 50,950 54,700 58,500 62,250
55% 36,355 41,525 46,695 51,865 56,045 60,170 64,350 68,475
60% 39,660 45,300 50,940 56,580 61,140 65,640 70,200 74,700
70% 46,270 52,850 59,430 66,010 71,330 76,580 81,900 87,150
---- Maximum Gross Rents By Bedroom Size(Post 1989) ----
0 1 2 3
4
5
6
30%
495 531 636 735
820
905
990
35%
578
619
742
858
957
1,056
1,155
40%
661 708
849
981
1,094
1,207
1,320
45%
743 796
955
1,103
1,230
1,358
1,485
50%
826
885
1,061
1,226
1,367
1,509
1,650
55%
908
973
1,167
1,348
1,504
1,660
1,815
60%
991
1,062
1,273
1,471
1,641
1,811
1,980
70%
1,157
1,321
1,486
1,650
1,783
1,915
2,048
Februrary 11th, 2019
Outline
Development Team
Developer - MWF Properties
Builder - Eagle Building Company
Management Company - Velair Property Management
Development Summary
Location
Job demographics example
Project features
Site Plan
Rendering
Q&A
Development Team
DEVELOPER
Builder Property Manager
Established in 1999
1,249 units developed. 342 under construction. 250 units
breaking ground in 2019.
Long term owners – Have never sold a property.
Company philosophy:
Build and maintain relationships
Maintain positive reputation
Curb appeal
Strong management
Community Relations
Headquarters in Richfield
Repeat business
Rochester – 11 properties
Forest Lake – 2 properties
Vadnais Heights – 2 properties*
Shakopee – 2 properties*
Waconia – 2 properties*
*Approved but not completed
Built 14 of MWF’s properties (all since 2012)
Headquarters in Richfield
“It’s always nice to work with professionals. My hats off to [Eagle
Building].”
- Building official, City of Eagan
Recent Projects
7
Forest Oak Apartments II
Forest Lake, MN
Opened May 2016
Lafayette Square
Davenport, IA
Opened February 2017
Recent Projects
8
Red Rock Square
Newport, MN
Opened August 2017
1st Avenue Flats
Rochester, MN
Opened April 2017
*Visit www.mwfproperties.com for further details.
Recent Projects
108 Place
Bloomington MN
Construction Start April 2019
Boulevard
Mounds View, MN
Opening Fall 2019
Thomas Avenue Flats
Saint Paul, MN
Opening March 2019
Sarazin Flats
Shakopee, MN
Opening Fall 2019
Interior Photos
10
Interior Photos
11
Interior Photos
12
Interior Photos
13
Manages all of MWF’s properties.
Corporate leadership – 84 years of combined
experience
•Heavy focus on:
Curb appeal
Applicant screening
Community Relations
Responsiveness
•Headquarters in Richfield
Community Relations
Richfield
Development Summary
Four stories over underground parking
Mix of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units.
Income limits between 50% and 70% of Area Median Income
Income ($56,560 for family of four).
Five to six 30% units set aside for residents with disabilities.
Universal Design.
On site manager, caretaker, maintenance.
Resident Occupations
(example)
Occupations - Interlaken Place - 10/2018
Realtor
Delivery Driver Bank Teller
Documentation Specialist Retired
Retired Property Manager
Nursing Home Aide Teacher Assistant
LTS Teacher & Retail Assistant DJ
County Worker Machinist
Store Clerk Sales
US Postal Worker Registered Nurse
Teacher Retired
Splicer Store Clerk
Spa Specialist Entertainer
House Cleaner Property Caretaker
PCA Retired
Southdale Pediatric Associates Retired
Hair Stylist Waitress
Store Clerk Massage Therapist
Commoscope Sales Business Development Manager
Service Representative Equipment Technician
Horse Show Groomer and Stable Management
Driver
Location
MWF and Velair
Headquarters
Site
Location Benefits
High Demand:
Help replace 698 NOAH units lost in 2017.
Access to transit – Local bus line is only 10 feet from
property.
Adjacent to multiple roadways and freeways.
Within walking distance of many “workforce”
employers.
Within walking distance of a multiple public parks.
Two blocks from management headquarters
Project Features
On site management
Community Room
Fitness Center
Secure Access (fob system)
24 hour surveillance
Secure package room
Bike Friendly – Hanging Bike Racks, Fix it station
Underground Parking – Included in rent
Green Features: LED lighting, low flow fixtures, recycling chutes and
receptacles throughout building.
In unit laundry
Preliminary Site Plan
Similar project rendering
Project Financing
Utilize Section 42 tax credits to help fill gap created by
lower rents.
Annual submission to Minnesota Housing (June 3rd)
Highly competitive, 1 of every 3 applications approved.
Important Scoring Factors:
Transit
Economic Integration
Schools
Cost Containment
Local Participation
City Participation
Necessary to help fill funding gap
Necessary to make proposal competitive for funding.
Recent examples of local financial support for tax credit
housing projects:
Shakopee: $296K in fee waivers
Bloomington: $527K in land write down
Mounds View: $570K in TIF & Land write down
Rochester: $600K in TIF
City Participation
•MWF requesting land write down.
•Would help the project by:
-Helping fill the financing gap
-Make the project more competitive – points for:
-Cost containment
-City participation
•City would get paid back via higher property taxes of
completed project (win/win).
Preliminary
Development Schedule
April 2019 - Execute development agreement.
June 3rd, 2019 – Apply for financing
Nov 2019 – Begin closing process and develop full drawings.
April 2020 – Close on financing. Construction commences.
Dec 2020 – Construction Completion. Leasing Period begins.
April 2021 - Lease-up complete.
THANK YOU
Questions?