Loading...
07-10-2018 Regular AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, COUNCIL CHAMBERS J U LY 10, 2018 7:00 PM INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS Call to order Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. Pledge ofAllegiance Approval of the minutes of the: (1) Special City Council work session of June 26, 2018; and (2) Regular City Council meeting of June 26, 2018. COUNCIL DISCUSSION Hats Off to Hometown Hits AGENDAAPPROVAL 2. Approval of the Agenda 3. Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval. A. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution granting a subdivision waiver, allowing the division of 7428 Brya ntAve nue into two lots. Staff Report No. 114 B. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing an interim use permit to allow Richfield Bloomington Honda to use City -owned property at 7700 PillsburyAvenue for employee parking. Staff Report No. 115 C. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution calling for a public hearing on the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Cedar Avenue Tax Increment Financing District, and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2018-1. Staff Report No. 116 D. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution appointing election judges for the State Primary Election of August 14, 2018, and General Election of Tuesday, November 6, 2018. Staff Report No. 117 4. Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. Public hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution approving the Five -Year Street Reconstruction Plan (2019-2023) and authorizing the issuance of street reconstruction bonds to finance the 2019-2020 reconstruction projects. Staff Report No. 118 6. Public hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution for a preliminary plat of "Lyndale Gardens 2nd Addition" which will incorporate 6328 Aldrich Avenue and reconfigure existing lots and outlots of the Lyndale Garden Center site to align with approved development plans. Staff Report No. 119 RESOLUTIONS 7. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution granting an amendment to a planned unit development to allow construction of a K-8 school at 6500 NicolletAvenue (Bremer Bank site). Staff Report No. 120 OTHER BUSINESS 8. Consideration of an appeal of a Therapeutic Massage Therapist License application for Deming Lai. Staff Report No. 121 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 9. City Manager's Report CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS 10. Claims and Payrolls Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. 11. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Special City Council Work Session June 26, 2018 CALL TO ORDER The work session was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 6:00 p.m. in the Municipal Center. Council Members Edwina Garcia; Maria Regan Gonzalez; Michael Howard; and Simon Present: Trautmann Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor Absent: Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/HR Manager; Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director; Jay Henthorne, Public Safety Director/Police Chief; Wayne Kewitsch, Fire Chief; Melissa Poehlman, City Planner; Jack Broz, Transportation Engineer; Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk; Mike Koob, Deputy Public Safety Director; MaryKaye Champa, Recreation Supervisor; and, Jared Voto, Executive Aide/Analyst. Item #1 COMMISSIONER RECOGNITION EVENT Mayor and City Council Members hosted members of the City's Commissions and thanked them for their service. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:58 p.m. Date Approved: July 10, 2018 Jared Voto Executive Aide/Analyst Pat Elliott Mayor Steven L. Devich City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Meeting June 26, 2018 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Pro Tempore; Edwina Garcia; Michael Howard; Present: and Simon Trautmann. Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor. Absent: Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/HR Manager; Jay Henthorne, Chief of Police; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; Melissa Poehlman, Planning & Redevelopment Manager/Assistant Community Development Director; Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Manager; Jack Broz, Transportation Engineer; and Jared Voto, Executive Aide/Analyst. OPEN FORUM Kris Johnson, 7045 Oak Grove Boulevard, spoke regarding opposition to the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction project, specifically the removal of trees, four roundabouts in a ten block area, and the ability to cross Lyndale Avenue. Larry Koch, 471 Big Horn Drive, Chanhassen, representing Nola Wagner, spoke regarding the opposition to Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction project and specifically the intersection at Lyndale Avenue and 70th Street. He submitted his comments for Council's consideration. Carol Anderson, 7052 Oak Grove Boulevard, spoke regarding the intersection of 70th Street and Lyndale Avenue and the proposed roundabout. She stated she is not against roundabouts and asked to keep the traffic light at 70th Street. Dave Huss, 7028 Oak Grove Boulevard, spoke regarding the proposed roundabout at 70th Street and Lyndale Avenue and stated he could not imagine a safer environment for pedestrian and bikers than with a light at the intersection. Jackie Hayes, 7024 Oak Grove Boulevard, spoke regarding the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction project and stated she attended all of the open houses and discussed the ways to make it safest for 70th Street and Lyndale Avenue. She strongly recommended keeping a light at the intersection and requested the process of Council approval be changed in the future. Council Meeting Minutes -2- June 26, 2018 Kevin Kateley, 7005 Oak Grove Boulevard, spoke regarding the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction project and specifically the process of the Transportation Commission and their feedback and disagreed with the proposed alignment of Oak Grove Boulevard to Lyndale Avenue. He also commented that he believed the process should be changed. Public Works Director Asher commented on the approach of reconstruction project is a community -based design. She stated the goals of the project were to make it safer for everyone, pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles. She discussed the process moving forward and stated a meeting was scheduled with the residents of Oak Grove, but it was postponed and she hoped to still have a meeting with the neighbors. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez thanked the residents and stated she hoped the residents meet with staff and asked that the Council be invited to the meeting as well. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Howard, S/Garcia to approve the minutes of the: (1) Special City Council work session of June 12, 2018: and (2) Regular City Council meeting of June 12, 2018. Motion carried 4-0. Item #1 SWEARING -IN OF CITY OF RICHFIELD POLICE OFFICERS MACABE STARIHA, HAILEY QUANBECK, CHRISTOPHER BARBER, AND MATTHEW HOTZLER. Chief Henthorne welcomed staff, residents, and guests. He thanked the family members of the officer in attendance and swore -in Officers Macabe Stariha, Hailey Quanbeck, Christopher Barber, and Matthew Hotzler. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez thanked the officers and their families. Council Member Garcia acknowledged the officers and their families stated the Council's support of the police officers. Council Member Trautmann welcomed the officers and stated he was proud of them. Item #2 COUNCIL DISCUSSION • Hats Off to Hometown Hits Council Member Garcia spoke regarding attending the dementia luncheon last week hosted by the Richfield Advisory Board of Health and Bloomington Health Department. She also discussed the Council Meeting Minutes -3- June 26, 2018 Commissioner Recognition Event earlier in the evening and stated her appreciation of the work of the commissioners. Council Member Trautmann spoke regarding June being Pride Month and wanted to take the opportunity to state that it is part of the values of the city. He also stated he's recently been able to meet with a lot of the leaders in the city and wanted to thank them for all of their work. Council Member Howard spoke regarding the upcoming 4th of July activities, taking place July 2-4, and mentioned the Commissioner Recognition Event and thanked the commissioners for their service to the city. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez spoke regarding the dementia friendly kick-off event and discussed the free lunch program available at our local parks for children 18 years old and younger. Item #3 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA City Attorney Tietjen stated that Consent Calendar Item 4.E. needed to be revised from a motion to approve the agreements to a motion to adopt a resolution to approve the agreements. M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Garcia to approve a revise Item 4.E. of the Consent Calendar to adopt n resolution. Motion carried 4-0. M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Garcia to approve the agenda, as revised. Motion carried 4-0. Item #4 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Devich presented the consent calendar. A. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution establishing an absentee ballot counting board for the 2018 State Primary and State General Elections. (S.R. No. 106) RESOLUTION NO. 11510 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT COUNTING BOARD FOR THE 2018 STATE PRIMARY AND STATE GENERAL ELECTIONS This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11510. B. Consideration of the approval of eight (8) solar project agreements with iDEAL Energies for the installation of solar panels on city facilities. (S.R. No. 107) C. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution approving the submission of the limited use permit with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for the 66th Street Streetscape elements within MnDOT right-of-way (ROW). (S.R. No. 108) RESOLUTION NO. 11511 Council Meeting Minutes -4- June 26, 2018 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY OF RICHFIELD LIMITED USE PERMIT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL IN THE RIGHT- OF - WAY OF TRUNK HIGHWAY No. 35W AT CSAH 53 (66TH STREET) This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11511. D. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution approving an agreement related to the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Landscape Partnership Program. (S.R. No. 109) RESOLUTION NO. 11512 RESOLUTION APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR MNDOT LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11512. E. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution approving the revised Richfield Parkway Infrastructure Construction Agreement and the Maintenance Parcel Agreement between the City of Richfield and Chamberlain Apartments, LLC. (S.R. No. 110) RESOLUTION NO. 11517 APPROVING REVISED RICHFIELD PARKWAY INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT AND MAINTENANCE PARCEL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND CHAMBERLAIN APARTMENTS LLC This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11517. M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Howard to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried 4-0. Item #5 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR None. Item #6 CONSIDERATION OF A VARIETY OF LAND USE APPROVALS RELATED TO A PROPOSAL FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT 101 66TH STREET EAST (66TH STREET AND 1ST AVENUE). Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 111. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman provided additional information related to the comprehensive plan process, the history of the site, and the proposed project. She stated the project meets the objectives of the comprehensive plan amendment and the developer has made a number of modifications to address concerns of the adjacent property owners. Council Member Garcia stated that although this was not a public hearing and the Council has agreed to allow the developer and a representative of the neighborhood for speak. Council Meeting Minutes -5- June 26, 2018 Paul Lynch, PLH Associates, stated the project has been worked on for two years and has been a mixed -use development from the beginning and hoped it was a project that could be embraced by the community. He was available to answer any questions on the project. Council Member Garcia asked about the desire of the developer to place a restaurant in 2,000 square feet of the commercial space. Mr. Lynch said that no tenants are secured at this time, but if a tenant did come forward he would support it. Council Member Garcia stated she would like to support the project but did not believe a restaurant would work in the space. Council Member Trautmann stated and he no longer has concerns about the financing of the project. He stated he was also concerned about a fast food restaurant in this space and asked staff if this is something that can be restricted. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman stated there is nothing in the ordinance that can restrict fast food chains and explained restaurant designations by class. Council Member Howard asked about how convenience stores are treated based on the ordinance. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman responded that convenience stores are defined by code and could be identified as prohibited in this location or can be something that is added. She stated the resolution could be amended to add convenience stores since it is defined. Council Member Howard stated he would be interested in adding that stipulation to prohibit convenience stores. Council Member Trautmann asked for the definition of a convenience store. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman stated she could find and share the definition. Council Member Howard thanked Mr. Lynch for the letter and appealed to him to continue working with the neighborhood. Council Member Howard and Mr. Lynch discussed the possibility of placing a fence between the project and adjacent property and Mr. Lynch stated he would continue to work with neighbors. store. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman read the definition of a convenience Council Member Howard asked staff about excluding convenience stores as a use. Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman responded Council could amend the resolution adding a stipulation that prohibits convenience stores. Julie Lapensky, 6621 Stevens Ave, spoke on behalf of the neighborhood and thanked the Council for the opportunity to speak and for visiting the neighborhood. She stated she understands the benefits of the development to the City and to the developer, but that the neighborhood does not want it. She stated the issues as traffic, parking issues, and screening to neighbors immediately adjacent. She provided detail of solutions that the neighborhood is requesting and provided her written comments and documents for Council's consideration. Council Meeting Minutes -6- June 26, 2018 Council Member Garcia stated she had been meeting with the neighbors and stated a convenience store or restaurant would bring so much traffic that it would disrupt the neighborhood and stated she would entertain Council Member Howard's stipulation. She also discussed the parking and belief that there will be spillover parking and the need for employee parking due to the commercial space. She discussed the landscaping buffering and the modifications that have been made and stated the City needs to be vigilant in ensuring stipulations are adhered to. She stated she would be casting a "no" vote. Council Member Howard stated globally he is supportive of the project and it adds value to the community. He stated this project represents progress in the city and represents progress on 66th Street and creates a vision for the future of the corridor. He also discussed this project will expand the tax base and give some relief to single-family homeowners and this project expanding the available housing in Richfield. He stated he appreciated the work of the neighborhood and the changes that have been made by the developer throughout the process. He stated he was inclined to support a stipulation barring convenience stores in the development. He commented on the approach to monitoring parking and traffic and asked to put a definition to what triggers a response from the City. Council Member Trautmann appreciated the neighborhood's commitment and stated that he would be supporting the project. He stated he doesn't take it lightly that this could be uncomfortable. He is reminded that there was a time when the Richfield City Council did not want development and single-family homes will not sustain us. He also commented on the placement of the building away from the single-family residences and abutting 66th Street. He stated he was on the fence regarding a stipulation barring convenience stores. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez asked about what accountability looked like with the developer working with adjacent neighbors as the process moves forward. Assistant Community Development Director responded there are specific stipulations in the resolution that require the developer to work with adjacent property owners and read specific stipulations. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez asked for clarification and timeline with regard to traffic counts or studies. Assistant Community Development Director responded there are stipulations regarding the Public Works Department monitoring traffic counts and patterns following the completion of the development. There is not a timeline because the timeline for the completion of the development is not known, and will be waiting for the 66th Street Reconstruction project to finish. She stated there is a general threshold of 1,000 cars per day along a major arterial; however, the street has a particularly low traffic count now, so that threshold will likely be lower than 1,000 cars per day. She stated the Public Works Department is committed to monitoring the patterns. Council Member Trautmann stated that without a specific number, if the neighbors are not happy, the City will need to do something about it. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez asked for clarification on a class 3 restaurant designation and sales of liquor. Assistant Community Development Director read the definitions of the permitted and non - permitted restaurants for the area. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez stated Richfield is not in a position to determine if we can accept redevelopment or not. She stated the city has limited opportunities for redevelopment and broaden our tax base. She stated she thinks of her role as a council member is not to say yes or no to Council Meeting Minutes -7- June 26, 2018 change, but to working together to influence what the change looks like and how it benefits the community as a whole and impact our neighbors. She stated she would be supporting the development and thanked the community members for all the work they have done. M/Howard, S/Regan Gonzalez to include a stipulation prohibiting convenience stores in the resolution. Motion carried 3-1. Council Member Trautmann opposed. M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Howard to approve a second reading of an ordinance rezoning 101 66th Street East from Single-family Residential (R) to Planned Mixed Use (PMU); and adopt a resolution granting a conditional use permit and final development plan for a planned unit development at 101 66th Street East. RESOLUTION NO. 11513 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO BE BUILT AT 101 66TH STREET EAST Motion carried 3-1. Council Member Garcia opposed. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11513. Item #7 CONSIDERATION OF A VARIETY OF LAND USE REQUESTS RELATED TO A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT CONDOMINIUMS, TOWNHOMES, AND APARTMENTS ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE FORMER LYNDALE GARDEN CENTER PROPERTY AND AN ADJACENT SINGLE-FAMILY PROPERTY. Mayor Pro Tempore Regan Gonzalez presented Staff Report No. 112. Council Member Garcia commented that she believed the developers did a good job of holding open houses, receiving comments, and responding to the comments, and commended the developer for their work. Council Member Howard stated he was excited to see the project moving forwarded and read a portion of the staff report about diversifying Richfield's housing options and improving Lyndale Avenue as a gateway to the community, and fits with the vision of where Richfield is headed. M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Howard to adopt a resolution that amends the Richfield Comprehensive Plan to designate Lots 1-2, Block 1, Lyndale Gardens Addition and 6328 Aldrich Avenue as Mixed Use and allow a housina development that is less than 50 dwellina units Der acre RESOLUTION NO. 11514 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF 6328 ALDRICH AVENUE TO "MIXED USE" AND ALLOWING A DENSITY LOWER THAN 50 UNITS PER ACRE Motion carried 4-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11514. M/Garcia, S/Trautmann to approve a second reading of an ordinance that amends Richfield Zoning Code Appendix I to designate 6328 Aldrich Avenue as Planned Mixed Use Council Meeting Minutes -8- June 26, 2018 Motion carried 4-0. M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Howard to adopt a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit and Final Development Plans for a Planned Unit Development on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lyndale Gardens ?nd Addition_ RESOLUTION NO. 11515 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Motion carried 4-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11515. Item #8 CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR A THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ENTERPRISE LICENCE FOR LONGSHI, INC. Council Member Howard presented Staff Report No. 113. Support Services Manager Anderson provided additional details on the staff report. City Attorney Tietjen stated the applicant was notified in writing of the meeting, although he is not present. M/Howard, S/Trautmann to adopt a resolution of denial of the therapeutic massage enterprise license application of Lonashi. Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 11516 RESOLUTION OF DENIAL OF THE THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ENTERPRISE LICENSE APPLICATION OF LONGSHI INC. Motion carried 4-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11516. Item #9 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Devich stated he had nothing to report. Item #10 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS M/Garcia, S/Regan Gonzalez that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 06/26/18 A/P Checks: 268844 - 269252 $ 3,090,743.68 Payroll: 137052 - 137415 659,991.49 TOTAL $ 3,750,735.17 Motion carried 4-0. Council Meeting Minutes -9- June 26, 2018 OPEN FORUM None. Item #11 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:43 p.m. Date Approved: July 10, 2018 Pat Elliott Mayor Jared Voto Steven L. Devich Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 3.A. STAFF REPORT NO. 114 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Matt Brillhart, Associate Planner/ Sadie Gannett, Assistant Planner DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Acting Community Development Director 6/27/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution granting a subdivision waiver, allowing the division of 7428 Bryant Avenue into two lots. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The property at 7428 Bryant Avenue is a double lot, measuring 100 feet wide. The existing house sits entirely on the north half of the property. The property owner would like to divide the lot into two 50 foot wide lots, in order to sell the vacant lot for construction of a new home. Splitting a lot requires City Council approval of a subdivision waiver. Finding that lot dimension requirements are met, staff recommends approval of the subdivision waiver. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution granting a subdivision waiver for 7428 Bryant Avenue. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT • None B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes. etc) Subsection 500.05, Subdivision 2. - In cases in which compliance with the city's platting requirements result in unnecessary hardship and when failure to comply with said requirements does not interfere with the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Council may adopt a resolution authorizing a waiver from the subdivision requirements. Subsection 514.11, Subd. 2. Lot area, dimensions and coverage. The property is located in the Single Family Residential (R) Zoning District. Minimum lot requirements are as follows: Lot Dimensions Width (ft.) Depth ft. Area (sq. ft.) Minimum Required 50 100 6,700 Grandfather clause: Lots of record which do not meet these minimum requirements may be used for single-family home development, provided that the width of such lot is not less than 40 feet and such lot contains at least 5,000 square feet in area. The proposed lots are 50 feet wide and 6,500 square feet in area. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: • 60-DAY RULE: The 60-day clock started when a complete application was received on June 15, 2018. A decision must be given by August 14, 2018, or the Council must notify the applicant that it is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days in total) for issuing a decision. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • None E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • None ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • None PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Dustin Endres, applicant on behalf of property owner ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Resolution ❑ S urvey ❑ Zoning Map Type Resolution Letter Backup Material Backup Material RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SUBDIVISION WAIVER FOR 7428 BRYANT AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of a subdivision waiver for the division of property commonly known as 7428 Bryant Avenue, legally described as: Lots 8 and 9, Block 12, IRWIN SHORES, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to divide the above -described property into two parcels, legally described as: Parcel A: Lot 8, Block 12, IRWIN SHORES, Hennepin County, Minnesota Parcel B: Lot 9, Block 12, IRWIN SHORES, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval for the subdivision waiver; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that compliance with City Code Section 500.05, Subdivision 1 would result in unnecessary hardship and that failure to comply therewith will not interfere with the purposes of the platting regulations of Section 500.01. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A waiver for the subdivision of the Subject Property legally described above is hereby granted. 2. City staff is authorized and directed to take any action necessary to effectuate this Resolution and to authorize the recording of conveyances complying with the terms of this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July, 2018. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk . `\ U L G K ; Q) -- 0 Solar � � Trge R PA- ,— Maple EL � .�- Solar Tree �E Solar Solar Tree Tree S89°53'51 " E Solar 130.00 Tree Solar a Tree14C G4rp9e Q a'`' on line a E Uj J I� 2 CNI o PARCEL LO 12" Hockberry EXISTING HOUSE Lot Split Survey for: ENDRES CUSTOM HOMES, INC. at 7428 Bryant Avenue South o .LO Water Feature N89053'51 "W Brick Landscape 0 n V— ' 29.7 ' --------------------------------------- L6 1" Cherry w I» N BCherry V-- 130.00 Flagpole • 22» Ash 0 S 60 I I 60 0 LU W T cc m EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 8 and 9, Block 12, IRWIN SHORES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I' V 00191"U �MOR0i121IIl►11 Lot 8, Block 12, IRWIN SHORES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL B DESCRIPTION Lot 9, Block 12, IRWIN SHORES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. N Scale: 1 inch = 20 feet Total Area = 13,000 square feet (0.30 acre) Parcel A = 6,500 square feet (0.15 acre) Parcel B = 6,500 square feet (0.15 acre) LEGEND o Iron Monument Set • Iron Monument Found 0 Concrete Surface 0 Bituminous Surface -S— Sanitary Sewer -W— Watermain Inv. Invert Elevation PPS Power Pole X K Fence I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 31st day of May, 2018 REHDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal Drive • Suite 110 • Eagan, Minnesota • Phone (651) 452-5051 JOB: 184-2200.089 7428 Bryant Ave - SUBD 7/2018 Surrounding Zoning and Comp Plan Feet Zoning: 0 40 80 160 240 320 400 R - Single Family Residential Comp Plan: N LDR - Low Density Residential I:\GIS\Community Development\Staf \Assistant Planner\Projects\7428 Bryant Ave Ave -Subd.mxd AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 3.B. STAFF REPORT NO. 115 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Matt Brillhart, Associate Planner DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Acting Community Development Director 6/27/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing an interim use permit to allow Richfield Bloomington Honda to use City -owned property at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue for employee parking. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Due to parking constraints on their property, Richfield Bloomington Honda (Honda) has been using the City - owned property at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue since 2013. Honda is requesting to continue leasing the property for temporary use as an employee parking lot. 7700 Pillsbury Avenue is the portion of the former City Garage site that lies south of 77th Street. This property is zoned Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MU-N) and parking as a standalone use is not permitted; therefore an interim use permit (IUP) is necessary. Honda's current interim use permit expires on July 31, 2018. They have applied for a new three year interim use permit. Staff is recommending approval of an 18 month IUP, effective August 1, 2018 and terminating on January 31, 2020. At the discretion of the Community Development Director, the IUP may be extended up to three times, in six month periods, not to exceed a total length of three years. A proposal for apartments on this site went to a Council Work Session in August 2017, but that proposal has not progressed further. No other redevelopment plans are proposed for the property at this time. Should the Council grant approvals for a code compliant land use, terms of the IUP and lease allow the City to terminate these agreements. In order to approve the IUP, the Council must find that the temporary nature of the permit warrants waiving certain provisions of the Zoning Code, in this case the prohibition of parking lots as a standalone use RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing an interim use permit to allow a standalone parking facility at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT • Honda's prior land use approvals include the addition of a parking structure to fully accommodate their parking needs, to be built by 2020. If a building permit application for the parking structure has not been received by June 1, 2020, Honda must return to the Council to request an extension or amendment to the approved final development plans. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etch • The purpose of an I UP is to allow a use that may not be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan to operate for a limited period of time. The Council may waive ordinance provisions upon a finding that the temporary nature of the interim use will eliminate the adverse effects the provisions were intended to prevent. The Council must find that the temporary nature of this permit makes the nonconforming use permissible. • In evaluating a request for an IUP, the Planning Commission and City Council shall also consider its compliance with the criteria outlined in Subsection 547.15 of the City Code, further articulated in the attached document. • By Ordinance, IUP's terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: a) The date or event stated in the permit (e.g. approval of redevelopment plans); or b) Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was issued. • The lot is to be used for employee parking only. No parking of inventory vehicles or customer vehicles shall be permitted at any time. A maximum of 77 vehicles shall be stored on site and no vehicles shall be parked or stored on grass or buffer areas. The parking lot shall be kept in a good state of repair, with sealcoating and/or patch repair as necessary, and kept clear of any debris. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: 60-DAY RULE: The 60-day clock started when a complete application was received on May 29, 2018. A decision is required by July 28, 2018 or the Council must notify the applicant that is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total) for issuing a decision. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • The required application fees have been paid. • City staff are drafting a lease extension agreement with Honda for continued use of the City -owned property. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • A public hearing was held at the Planning Commission meeting on June 25, 2018. • Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the site. No members of the public spoke at the public hearing. • The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the I UP. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • Approve an interim use permit for a different length of time (up to five years maximum) or with additional conditions. • Deny the request with a finding that the requirements necessary to issue an I UP are not met. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Tim Carter, Richfield Bloomington Honda ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Resolution ❑ Requirements attachment ❑ Consent Agreement ❑ Site plan & Zoning Map Type Backup Material Backup Material Backup Material Backup Material RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A STANDALONE PARKING FACILITY BY RICHFIELD BLOOMINGTON HONDA AT 7700 PILLSBURY AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Richfield adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 2009 to guide the development of the community; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Zoning Ordinance or other official controls to assist in implementing the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests an interim use permit to allow Richfield Bloomington Honda (the "Applicant") to conduct off -site employee parking at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Property is zoned Mixed Use — Neighborhood (MU-N) and the requested interim use of the property is not permitted in the MU-N District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 25, 2018 to review the application for an interim use permit; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property, and published in the Sun Current newspaper on June 14, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the temporary nature of the proposed interim use eliminates the adverse effects the prohibition was intended to prevent. Termination of the permit in 18 months, or upon granting land use approvals for code -compliant redevelopment plans, eliminates the detriment that a standalone parking facility will have on the area; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all materials submitted by the Applicant; considered the oral and written testimony offered by the applicant and all interested parties; and has now concluded that the application is in compliance with all applicable standards and can be considered for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed interim use permit request meets all applicable conditions and restrictions stated in Zoning Ordinance Subsection 547.15. 2. An interim use permit for a standalone parking facility by Richfield Bloomington Honda at 7700 Pillsbury Avenue, as described in City Council Staff Report No. is approved with the following conditions: a. The interim use permit will expire on January 31, 2020, or upon violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued, whichever occurs first. b. The Community Development Director shall hold discretion to grant a maximum of three (3) six-month extensions of the interim use permit, to expire no later than July 31, 2021. c. The City may terminate the interim use permit 30 days following City Council approval of code -compliant redevelopment plans for the property. d. The parking lot is to be used for employee parking only. No parking of inventory vehicles or customer vehicles shall be permitted at any time. A maximum of 77 vehicles shall be stored on site, and vehicles shall not be parked or stored on grass or buffer areas. e. The parking lot shall be kept in a good state of repair, with sealcoating and/or patch repair as necessary, and kept clear of any debris. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July 2018. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Interim Use Permit Requirements Subsection 547.15 Subd. 3. a) The period of time for which the interim use permit is to be granted will terminate before any adverse impacts are felt upon adjacent properties. Staff recommends that the permit expire in 18 months. At the discretion of the Community Development Director, the interim use permit may be extended up to three times, in six (6) month periods, not to exceed a total length of three years. At that time, if conditions continue to warrant, the Council may issue a new interim use permit. b) The use will terminate upon a date or event that can be identified with certainty. Interim use permits may not be granted for a period greater than five (5) years. Staff recommends termination on January 31, 2020. As stated above, the Community Development Director may issue three extensions of six (6) month periods, and terminate no later than July 31, 2021. c) The use will not adversely impact the health, safety and welfare of the community during the period of the interim use. It is not anticipated that employee parking will adversely impact the community or this area within the next six months. d) The use is similar to existing uses in the area. Surface parking lots are a common feature in the area, due to the proximity to Richfield Bloomington Honda's main campus. e) An interim use shall conform to zoning regulations except the City Council may waive ordinance provisions upon a finding that the temporary nature of the interim use will eliminate the adverse effects the provisions were intended to prevent. The site is zoned Mixed -Use Neighborhood (MU-N) and is currently vacant. The short-term nature of the permit will not prevent future mixed -use redevelopment of the site. Should the Council grant approvals for a code compliant land use, terms of the interim use permit and lease allow the City to terminate these agreements. f) There is adequate assurance that the property will be left in suitable condition after the use is terminated. The property owner has signed a consent agreement agreeing to this condition. g) By agreement, the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. Not applicable. The property is owned by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. h) The property owner, by agreement, agrees to any conditions that the City Council has deemed appropriate for permission of the use, including a condition that the owner will provide an appropriate financial surety to cover the cost of removing the interim use and interim structures upon the expiration of the interim use permit. The applicant must continue to comply with all conditions of the current interim use permit. i) The property owner agrees to abide by any additional conditions that the Council deems appropriate for permission of the use. Additional conditions are detailed in the attached Resolution. CONSENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007 the City Council of the City of Richfield adopted Ordinance No. 2007-19, which establishes a framework for regulating temporary use of land through the issuance of interim use permits; and WHEREAS, Section 547.15 Subdivision 2 of this Ordinance requires an applicant for an interim use permit to sign a Consent Agreement wherein the applicant acknowledges and agrees that the proposed interim use will not impose additional costs on the public if there is a future need for public acquisition of the applicant's property through eminent domain, that the applicant has no entitlement to future reapproval of the interim use permit and that the applicant will abide by the conditions of approval that the City Council attaches to the interim use permit; NOW, THEREFORE, R I Gh fit up 6001),1 (l\ojk "as applicant for an interim use permit for )0*,e k (nj at 77av A //S b& r (use of property)"(location) �� �► , agree as follows: 1. The applicant acknowledges that the proposed use is temporary and terminates upon expiration of the interim use permit. The applicant has no legal or equitable right to future reapproval of the interim use permit and must file a new application for that purpose. 2. The applicant will comply with all conditions imposed by the City Council on the interim use permit. 3. This Consent Agreement shall be binding on any owner, operator, tenant and/or user of the property for which the interim use permit has been granted and the applicant is authorized to sign this Consent Agreement on behalf of said owne� operator, tenant and/or user of the property. / DATED: 6-/ 11 / 18 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknow dged before me this � day of 20& by pvv, Gas �q-rMAhe QrK, of VuLAAAD L g Dom (y.� a Minnesota Cot pofa t ,,,, , on behalf of said company. THOMAS W PATTON NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public �E� � MINNESOTA r` My Comnw'.iion Ex{ tot Jan. 31. 2= 0 Z N o _ Lo LIj Z z O F— C D z_ w 77TH STREET _ O O J Cn m = Z�7 M ti J r` 1W_ sy T 2 CD 1.0 U_ CC 0 �� c Y a 0 U tr F 0 O 11 J Er se 24,_0, �,_0� E._0e .�_ 30-_10. 24'-0' K'-0' z O D—gs ■ Prellminary 0]/01 I15 ❑ Bltl ❑ Penrd 5el ❑ Cons[rvRim Fgvklons O L1J z Lu O.y. ¢ TOTAL PARKING: 77SPACES _�€9 OBI CC y 00 �UU c Ilill= lil f �a gg Proles N.rser 8 A13-014 - PROPOSED SITE PLAN (SURFACE PARKING) SAw[kumher PROPOSED TEMPORARY PARKING SITE 6- 1 SCALE , - 30 0 5 10 20 40 1.01 A 7700 Pillsbury Ave - 7/2018 lUP Surrounding Zoning R R R R R R R LU Q > > R R p R MR-2 Q R R Q R Q H R R R MR-2 R co R R 0 R J � R R R MR-2 CL R R w R R PMR LU R R R 2 R R R R MR-2 R R R R R MR-2 R R R tl� 77TH STREET 77TH STREET MU-N MU-N MU-R - Mixed -Use Regional Feet MU-N - Mixed -Use Neighborhood 0 80 160 320 480 640 800 PMU - Planned Mixed Use N PMR - Planned Multi -family Residential R - Single Family Residential I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\7700 Pillsbury Z.mxd 7700 Pillsbury Ave - 7/2018 lUP Surrounding Comprehensive Plan LDR LDR LLJ LDR MHD Q LDR LDR p LDR MHD Z Q LDR LDR � LDR MHD LDR LDR LDR MHD LDR LDR LDR D ' LDR LDR L MHD LDR LDR LDR MHD 77TH STREET HONDA RCO [KKK] I:ZK6] LDR LDR L LDR LDR Q QL LDR j LDR LDR OIL J 10- � wL LDR LDR HDR L LDR L MHD 7700 PILLSBURY AVE S HDR LDR R LDR LDR 77TH STREET HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR R CITY OF BLOOMINGTON RCO - Regional Commercial -Office Feet CCO - Community Commercial -Office 0 80 160 320 480 640 800 HDR - High Density Residential N MHD - Medium -High Density Residential LDR - Low Density Residential I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\7700 Pillsbury CP.mxd AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 3.C. STAFF REPORT NO. 116 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Julie Urban, Housing Manager DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: John Stark, Community Development Director 7/2/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution calling for a public hearing on the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Cedar Avenue Tax Increment Financing District, and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2018-1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In March 2018, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) entered into a preliminary development agreement with NHH Companies, LLC to develop a multi -family housing project in the Cedar Point I I area (bounded by 63rd Street to the north, Richfield Parkway to the east, 65th Street to the south, and 16th Avenue to the west). The proposed development includes 218 market -rate apartments on Richfield Parkway and up to 80 for -sale townhomes along 16th Avenue. The financial feasibility analysis indicates a substantial gap in the project. Significant acquisition costs for the existing single-family homes on 16th Avenue; the high cost of structured parking, stormwater improvements, and construction materials required to meet sound attenuation standards, and the desire to include affordable townhome units necessitate the need for public assistance to bridge the gap. The development currently sits within the Cedar Avenue Tax Increment Financing District (District) that was established in 2005 and extended in 2017. Under the proposed modification, the east half of the site and the proposed apartment development would remain in the existing District, and a new Housing TI F district would be established to cover the west half of the site and the proposed affordable townhomes. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing by the City Council on the proposed adoption of a modification to the redevelopment plan for the Richfield redevelopment project area, the modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Cedar Avenue Tax Increment Financing District, and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Finance District No. 2018-1 Housing therein and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT • A 1999-2000 study commissioned by the City of Richfield and the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) concluded that many of the structures in this area, including all single-family homes, were not capable of withstanding the negative impacts of low frequency noise. As a result of the study, this area was identified as a Redevelopment Area in 2000. • In 2004, the Minnesota Legislature approved the creation of a special Redevelopment TI F District to provide a funding mechanism for redevelopment of the area. • During the economic downturn from 2007-2011, there was little interest in developing this area due to weak market conditions. • Upon conclusion of the recession, HRA staff concentrated their development efforts on the Cedar Point I I area. The challenge of property acquisitions and the significant financial gap in the project made it difficult to find a developer and project that could succeed. • In 2014, homes along 17th Avenue were purchased for the construction of Richfield Parkway from 63rd to 66th Streets leaving 14 fewer homes to be purchased in the development area. • In 2015, the HRA signed a pre -development agreement with Boisclair Corporation to redevelop the area with single family homes and townhomes. In 2017, the HRA cancelled the agreement with Boisclair due to slow progress in solving the acquisition and other development issues, • In the Fall of 2017, NHH Properties and Boisclair Corporation approached the HRA and Council with a new development team and plan for acquiring the remaining single family homes and closing the financial gap. • In March of 2018, the HRA signed a pre -development agreement with NHH Properties (dba NHH Companies, LLC) to redevelop the area with 218 market -rate apartments and up to 80 townhomes affordable to households earning 100/115% of the area median income. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etch The project has considered a variety of ways to include a minimum of 20% affordable units. The proposed plan to provide 100% market -rate apartments and 100% affordable townhome units has proven to be the most feasible. Establishment of a Housing TI F District will ensure that the affordable units will be included in the project. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan housing goals and policies include: • Maintain an appropriate mix of housing types in each neighborhood based on available amenities, transportation resources, and adjacent land uses; • Promote the development of a balanced housing stock that is available to a range of income levels; • Promote housing diversity to serve families at all stages of their life -cycle, and • Promote the development, management, and maintenance of affordable housing in the City through assistance programs, alternative funding sources, and the creation of partnerships whose mission is to promote low to moderate income housing. The Cedar Corridor Master Plan, approved in 2004 and amended in 2016, calls for development in the area that responds to the challenges of the area's proximity to the airport and provides a diversity of housing types. Richfield Affordable Housing Policy encourages the development of projects that: • Contain a mix of market -rate and affordable units, with a higher proportion of market -rate units. • Include attributes such as townhome/row style housing C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: • State Statute require that the County, School Districts, and other taxing jurisdictions receive notice of the proposed Tax Increment Plan and other information on fiscal impacts related to the modification/establishment of a Redevelopment Project Area and/or TI F District at least 30 days prior to the hearing. • The HRA must also consider the modifications and the plan. This is tentatively scheduled for August 20, 2018. • The Planning Commission must determine whether the establishment of a such a district would be consistent with Richfield's Comprehensive Plan. This is tentatively scheduled for the July 23, 2018, Planning Commission meeting. • A public hearing before the Council is tentatively scheduled for August 21, 2018. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • The estimated tax increment available through the existing Redevelopment TI F District is approximately $6.9 million over the life of the District. • The estimated tax increment available through the creation of a new Housing TI F District is approximately $6 million over the life of the District. • Without the TI F, this project would be unable to proceed. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • The City's financial advisor and HRA attorney have reviewed the required documents. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • Do not adopt the resolution. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Representative of NHH Properties. ATTACHMENTS: Description Type ❑ Resolution Resolution Letter Resolution No. Resolution calling for a public hearing by the City Council on the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Cedar Avenue Tax Increment Financing District and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2018-1 and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") for the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on August 21, 2018, at approximately 7:00 P.M., to hold a public hearing on the proposed adoption of a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the proposed modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Cedar Avenue Tax Increment Financing District, and the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2018-1 (a housing district), and the proposed adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor (together, the "Plans"), all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of certain designated areas within the City; and Section 2. Notice of Public Hearing of Plans. City staff is authorized and directed to work with Ehlers to prepare the Plans and to forward documents to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions including Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 280. The Community Development Director is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, together with an appropriate map as required by law, to be published at least once in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10, nor more than 30, days prior to August 21, 2018, and to place a copy of the Plans on file in the Community Development Director's office at City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July, 2018. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth Van Hoose, Clerk AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 3.D. STAFF REPORT NO. 117 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Kari Sinning, D eputy C ity C lerk DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk 7/3/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution appointing election judges for the State Primary Election of August 14, 2018, and General Election of Tuesday, November 6, 2018. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The State Primary Election is on August 14, 2018 and the General Election is on Tuesday, November 6, 2018. Election Judges The City Clerk's office is updating and verifying the City's election judge availability list. All individuals who have previously served as an election judge were on the list submitted to the County Auditor by the major political parties, or have expressed an interest in serving as an election judge were asked to complete an online election judge application. Election judges will be assigned to the precincts based on availability, party balance, and the number required for each election. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution appointing election judges for the State Primary Election of August 14, 2018, and General Election of Tuesday, November 6, 2018. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT • Minnesota Statute 204B.21 Subd. 2 provides that election judges for precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality and that the appointments be made at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges will serve. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes. etc) • The City Council is required by State Statute to make election judge appointments at least 25 days prior to the election. The proposed resolution contains names of those qualified individuals who have indicated a willingness and ability to serve as an election judge for the State Primary Election of August 14, 2018, and General Election of Tuesday, November 6, 2018. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: • If the City Council does not appoint election judges, the conduct of the election would not be valid. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • N/A E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • The City Council must appoint election judges to serve at these elections to comply with Minnesota Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2. The names come from a list of people who have indicated their interest in serving as an election judge to the County Auditor pursuant to the provisions of M.S. 20413.21 Subd. 1 and those who have previously served or indicated interest in serving. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • The City Council may choose to appoint other individuals as election judges who are not named in the resolution. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: None ATTACHMENTS: Description Type ❑ Resolution Cover Memo RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE STATE PRIMARY ELECTION OF AUGUST 14, 2018 AND THE GENERAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 6, 2018 WHEREAS, a State Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, August 14, 2018 and a General Election will be held on Tuesday, November 6, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, that the following are hereby appointed as judges for said elections: Yvonne Atkins Carol Athey Nancy Lindberg Donna Englert Mary Barnes Holly Rhodes Angie Faison David Clark Roger Swanson Nancy Gibbs Judy Goebel Mark Tilc John Holter Sita Johnson Lancetta Allen Kari Sinning Richard Morey Donald Anderson Julie Smith Christopher Okey Andrew Atkins Marlys Solt Robert Olson Pat Bailey Judy Wood Marjorie Cain Kimberly Blomberg Mary Ann Ashmead Doris Christine Mary Boespflug Sara Boothe Liz Ekholm Linda Boyd Jorina Andrews Lawrence Martin Crystal Brakke Barbara Bauer Monica Petrov Asa Brill Beck Rosemary Bernau Jeffrey Rundgren Nancy Buck Jack Exline Joyce Anderson Hazel Burnside Robert Hall Rosalie Bjorkman Virginia Cain Lester Loney Janette Holter Leslie Carey Robert Amundson Andrew May Kathy Collias Jan Anderson Linda Nemitz Michele Cromer-Poire Ellen Cutter Doris Thorson Julie Danielson Carolyn Engeldinger Elaine Wetsch Charles Dilliard Francie Fletcher James Atkins Catherine Dinndorf Claire Gahler Terri Behrends-Singer Marguerite Dozois Jamie Lane Ryan Fluege Cindy Dubansky Sarah Musgrave Ruth Hiland Dee Dee Edlund Stephen Aus Rick Loney Lisha Fairbairn Scott Dahlquist John Twisk Sheila Fitzgerald Ed Fletcher Sandra Decker Dean Gade Janell Joyner Wallis Durhamn III Bridget Gaeleigh Helen Nachicas Denise Famodu Joe Garcia Margaret Schow Sharon Foster Dennis Gillespie James Alagna Roger Guarino Jim Grant Andrew Boeke Mary Hayden Rebecca Guarino Jeanne Exline Brad Obert James Harding Grant Gartland Bob Wells Abdulkadir Hashi Thomas Keegan John Ashmead Adrienne Hayes Marilyn Nienkerk Brenda Kupfer Iryche Hickenbotham Linda Hinz Cheryl Hjortaas Karen Jenkins Rosine Johnson Ruth Johnson Yvette Keegan Beth Kindon Cynthia Kuntz Bruce Larson Amy Larson Daniel Leslie Bonnie Leslie Cherill Lindquist Kathryn MacEachern Natalie Madgy Abe Malicsi Cynthia Mandl Karen Marso Sharon Mattson Michele McGee Sandra Menning-Glavan Isabelle Moulinier Thomas Murphy Ivar Natins Donna Nordin Cindy Norland 2018. Kevin O'Dare Marlene Odegard Mary Olson Joan Olson Ruby Olson Frank Pafko Jeannine Pafko Nayana Persaud Paul Peterson Carol Petkoff Beth Picard Frank Ploog Janet Purdie Moses Roberts Robert Rose Doris Rubenstein Gail Sabasko Maureen Scaglia Sandra Schmidt Shannon Schmidt Sarah Schroeder Anne Schuette Mary Sievers K. Lashel Solberg Katherine Stehly Mary Jane Steinhagen Chuck Strauch Brett Stursa Catherine Sullivan Robert Sunderlin Erika Telkamp Cheryl Thiele Janet Thompson Mary Jo Tuttle Phyllis Unger Kenneth Vevea Linda Vigen David Vrieze Daniels Erin Vrieze Daniels Nancy Walstrom Sandra Walstrom Katie Williams Lisa Wold Marian Woolery Jeff Wright Christina Yousa Janelle Zein Elabdin Deborah Zierden PASSED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTON: PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM # 5. STAFF REPORT NO. 118 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Jeff Pearson, City Engineer DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director 6/29/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Public hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution approving the Five -Year Street Reconstruction Plan (2019-2023) and authorizing the issuance of street reconstruction bonds to finance the 2019-2020 reconstruction projects. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Jeff Pearson, City Engineer, will present the Five -Year Reconstruction Plan prior to the public hearing. The City is authorized under Minnesota Statutes to prepare a five-year plan for street reconstruction in order to issue general obligation bonds to finance the cost of the reconstruction described in the plan (Street Reconstruction Bonds). Staff has prepared a Five -Year Reconstruction Plan for the purposes of utilizing the Street Reconstruction Bonds to finance the work in place of special assessments or other funding options. There are two projects included in the proposed plan and resolution identified for utilizing up to $12,500,000 in Street Reconstruction Bonds, they are: • 66th Street Reconstruction • Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction For planning purposes the proposed plan also identifies the following projects for reconstruction within the next 5 years: • 77th Street Underpass (Underpass of Trunk Highway 77) - funded • 65th Street Central • 76th Street West Reconstruction • 70th Street Reconstruction The proposed plan includes the replacement of the City's underground utilities (storm, sewer, water) when a road is reconstructed. A courtesy mailer was sent out city-wide on June 29, 2018. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Adopt a resolution approving the Five -Year Street Reconstruction Plan and authorizing the issuance of street reconstruction bonds to finance the 2019-2020 reconstruction projects. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT The Five -Year Street Reconstruction Plan was last updated in April 2016 Changes from the previous plan include the addition of the following projects: • Reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue between 67th Street and 76th Street. Lyndale Avenue had previously only been identified in the Capital Improvement Plan as a pavement rehabilitation and preservation project. Rapidly deteriorating utilities and pavement base has made the project a priority for reconstruction. • Reconstruction of 76th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. 76th Street received a mill and overlay in 2016 to address failing surface pavement. The poor base condition of the roadway continues to be an issue and requires full reconstruction. • Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd and 5th Avenues. During the reconstruction of Portland Avenue it was determined that the 84" storm sewer line below 70th Street is failing. The City will continue to monitor the condition of the pipe but a full reconstruction is expected to be required within the next five years. • Construction of Richfield Parkway South from 68th Street to 66th Street. The Parkway will be funded and constructed as part of the Chamberlain Development Project. The reconstruction of Penn Avenue has been removed from the 5-year plan. Although the project remains a priority for the City and is included in our CIP, Hennepin County will need to commit to funding before the City can include it in it's 5-year plan. At this time, staff is seeking approval to move forward with financing for the projects proposed for 2019 reconstruction (with the exception of the Richfield Parkway South and 77th Street Underpass projects which identify alternative financing sources). B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etch In order to utilize the Street Reconstruction Bonds, the following must occur: • Creation of a Five Year Street Reconstruction Plan • Public Hearing regarding the Five Year Street Reconstruction Plan and Issuance of Bonds, notification published June 28, 2018. • Adoption of a resolution approving the Plan and giving preliminary approval for the issuance of Bonds • City Council must unanimously approve the plan and resolution by a vote of all members present at the meeting Within 30 days of the public hearing, voters may petition for a referendum, or vote, on issuing the bonds. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: • The public hearing, adoption of the plan, resolution and reverse referendum period need to stay on track in order to provide sufficient time for final approvals to complete the projects identified for 2019 reconstruction. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • The adoption of the proposed resolution provides preliminary approval for the issuance of street reconstruction bonds totaling a maximum of $12,500,000 to finance the projects identified for completion in 2019. • The bond sales, which are limited to a maximum of $10,000,000 per year, would occur over two years. • The current estimates for the bonding portion of the project are: 66th Street and Utility Reconstruction $ 2,200,000 Lyndale Avenue and Utility Reconstruction $ 9,500,000 Bond fees / interest $ 800,000 Total $ 12,500,000 Exact bonding amounts will be based on actual project costs E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • Minnesota Statute requires the City to hold a public hearing on the plan and issuance of the bonds. • All of the members of the City Council present at the meeting must vote to approve the plan and the issuance of the bonds. • The bond issuance is subject to a 30-day reverse referendum period upon approval. • The City Attorney will be available to answer questions. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • None PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: City residents ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Resolution 5-Year Recon Plan Type Resolution Letter Exhibit Public Hearing Mailer Backup Material follows: CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF STREET 17�K�1►f.�1_Y_:Z�l [W : slel P -11 Y:I � l x11 a 04 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the "City"), as Section 1. Background. 1.01. The City is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, subdivision 3b (the "Act") to prepare a plan for street reconstruction in the City over the next five years that will be financed under the Act, including a description of the proposed work and estimated costs, and to issue general obligation bonds to finance the cost of street reconstruction activities described in the plan. 1.02. Before the issuance of any bonds under the Act, the City is required to hold a public hearing on the plan and issuance of the bonds. 1.03. Pursuant to the Act, the City, in consultation with its City engineer, has caused preparation of a 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan dated June 15, 2018 (the "Plan"), which describes certain street reconstruction activities in the City for the years 2019 through 2023. The reconstruction activities described in the Plan include, but are not limited to, the reconstruction of the following projects identified for completion during 2019-2020 for which it seeks to issue general obligation bonds to finance in part the costs of the following projects: 66th Street Reconstruction (2019) Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction (2019 — 2020) 1.04. The City has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to authorize the issuance and sale of general obligation street reconstruction bonds pursuant to the Act in the maximum principal amount of $12,500,000 (the "Bonds"). The purpose of the Bonds is to finance the costs of the Project as described in the Plan. 1.05. On this date, the City Council held a public hearing on the Plan and the issuance of the Bonds, after publication in the City's official newspaper of a notice of public hearing at least 10 days but no more than 28 days before the date of the hearing. Section 2. Plan Approved. 2.01. The City Council finds that the Plan will improve the City's street system, which serves the interests of the City as a whole. 2.02. The Plan is approved in the form on file in City Hall. Section 3. Bonds Authorized. Error! Unknown document property name. 3.01. The City is authorized to issue the Bonds in a maximum principal amount of $12,500,000, in order to finance the Project described in the Plan. City staff, its financial advisor, and its legal counsel are authorized to take all actions needed to call for the sale of the Bonds, subject to the contingency described in Section 3.02 hereof. 3.02. If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent (5%) of the votes cast in the last municipal general election, is filed with the City Clerk within 30 days after the date of the public hearing, the City may issue the Bonds only after obtaining approval of a majority of voters voting on the question at an election. The authorization to issue the Bonds is subject to expiration of the 30-day period without the City's receipt of a qualified petition under the Act, or if a qualified petition is filed, upon the approving vote of a majority of the voters voting on the question of issuance of the Bonds. 3.03. City staff are authorized and directed to take all other actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July, 2018. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Error! Unknown document property name. 2 77" Street Underpass (2019-2020, Approved and Funded) Construction of a new 77t Street underpass of T.H. 77. The Underpass will be the final piece of the 77t" Street corridor, designed as an arterial reliever to 1-494 in order to reduce congestion. The underpass will improve access to and from the Metro Transit South Garage, and provide direct access for cars, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users from Richfield to MSP and the Mall of America. 66t" Street (2018-2020, Approved and Funded) Reconstruction of 66t" Street (CR53) from Xerxes Avenue to Richfield Parkway. This project includes reconstruction of failing pavement, replacement of City utilities, undergrounding of parallel overhead utility lines, and improved bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. The project also addresses safety and traffic flow concerns through the use of additional medians and roundabouts. Residential Mill & Overlay (2018-2020, Approved and Funded) As part of a 6-year initiative to perform major maintenance to extend the life of the City's residential roads, originally constructed in the mid-70s, asphalt streets will receive a mill and overlay. To date, approximately 60 miles of the City's residential roads have been completed with the remaining 40 miles to be resurfaced over the course of the project. The project also includes catch basin and curb repairs, along with replacement of City utility manholes. The bonding required to complete the project is financed through the increase in Franchise Fees effective April 2014. Lvndale Avenue Reconstruction (2019-2020. Lavout Approved and Fundina Consideration 7/10/18) Reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue between 66th Street and 76th Street. The roadway layout design was determined through a public involvement process led by the City's Transportation Commission. The design is consistent with the recommended alternative identified in the 2009 Arterial Roads Study. This project includes reconstruction of failing pavement, replacement of City utilities, undergrounding of parallel overhead utility lines, and improved bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. 65t" Street Central (2020, Tentative and Unfunded) Reconstruction of 65t" Street between Nicollet Avenue and 66t" Street. This project will replace the failing concrete road surface with new asphalt. The project will also replace City utilities. Consistent with the City Complete Streets Policy, a public involvement process would be used to determine the future design of the roadway. 70t" Street Reconstruction (2021, Tentative and Unfunded) Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd Avenue to 5th Avenue, including sidewalk, curb, and gutter as well as undergrounding of parallel utilities. The reconstruction will include replacement of City utilities including an 84" storm sewer pipe that will connect to the storm system installed June 15, 2018 Page 1 of 2 with the Portland Avenue project. Design of the roadway will include a public involvement process. 76t" Street Reconstruction (2022, Tentative and Unfunded) Reconstruction of 76th Street between Sheridan Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including replacement of City utilities, undergrounding of overhead utilities, retaining wall and sidewalk replacement. The exact design of the roadway will be determined through a public involvement process. A mill & overlay took place in 2016 that upgraded pavement condition until the full reconstruction can take place. June 15, 2018 Page 2 of 2 5-year Street Reconstruction Plan Projected Project Year Funding Sources Proposed Year 2018 (Approved in 2017) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 6 Year Mill & Overlay 77th Street Underpass 66th Street Reconstruction South Richfield Parkway 66th Street Reconstruction 77th Street Underpass Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction South Richfield Parkway 66th Street Reconstruction Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction 77th Street Underpass 65th Street Reconstruction 70th Street Reconstruction 76th Street Reconstruction Projects To be Determined Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 5,800,000 $ - $ 4,000,000 $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 7,500,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 8,000,000 - $ 3,500,000 Municipal State Aid $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 450,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ $ 1,000,000 $ City Utility Funds Water $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ Sanitary $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Storm $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ 2,500,000 $ $ Grants Federal $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $7,000,000 $ $ - $ $ State $ $ 2,100,000 $ $ $10,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Count $ $ 6,000,000 $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Bloomington $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Other - unidentified $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Special Revenue $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Special Assessment $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Three Rivers Park District $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ Xcel Utility Rate Payers (CRFS) $ $ - $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ $ - $ $ 100,000 $ 800,000 $ CenterPoint Energy $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ - $ HRA $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Developer Financed $ $ - 1 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL $ 5,800,000 $ 8,100,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 3,700,000 $10,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 600,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 2,000,000 $7,700,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 5,300,000 $ -PROJECTS ER-77th - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Street Underpass (2019-2020, Approved and Funded) , Construction of a new 77th Street underpass of Trunk Highway 77. x ' r x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 66th Street Reconstruction (2018-2020, Approved and Funded) -------------------------- _10 Mill & Overlay (2018-2020, Approved and Funded) ETTResidential ERM (funded by Gas & Electric Franchise Fee increase effective April 2014) Richfield Parkway Reconstruction (2018-2019, Approved and Funded) ' Reconstruction of Richfield Parkway from 66th Street to 68th Street. — — — - -IAICHFIELD Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction (2019-2020, Layout Approved and 'I Funding Consideration 7/10/18) 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan Reconstruction between 67th Street and 76th Street, and replacement of A public hearing will take place on underground utilities. July 10 at 00 p.m. ------------------------- Richfield 65th Street Central (2020-2021, Tentative and Unfunded) •• •ing a 5-year street reconstruction plan Reconstruction between Nicollet Avenue and 66th Street. nd the issuance of bonds— for Lynclale Avenue. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 70th Street Reconstruction (2022, Tentative and Unfunded) Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd Avenue and 5th Avenue. street reconstruction plan is designed to ., - street reconstructionexpenditures -------------------------- 76th Street Reconstruction (2022, Tentative and Unfunded) . -• - - •- •• Reconstruction of 76th Street between Sheridan Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. Richfield Public Works • 1901 E 66th St. • Richfield, MN 55423 RICHFIELD STREETS. 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan Estimated Annual Property Tax Increase (20 year) Property Value 2019 2020 2021 $150,000 $58.37 $31.94 $38.86 $200,000 $86.60 $45.73 $55.64 $250,000 $108.83 $59.52 $72.42 $300,000 $134.06 $73.31 $89.20 _40jrPublic Hearing: Tuesday, July 10, 201 7 p.m. City Council Meeting Richfield Municipal Center —Council Chambers 6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield, MN 55423 Comments or questions: Jeff Pearson, City Engineer, 612-861-9791 or jpearson@richfieldmn.gov Visit www.richfieldsweetstreets.org/overview for Proposed 5-Year Plan u.� F� AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM # 6. STAFF REPORT NO. 119 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Melissa Poehlman,Assistant CD Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: John Stark, Community Development Director 7/2/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Public hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution for a preliminary plat of "Lyndale Gardens 2nd Addition" which will incorporate 6328 Aldrich Avenue and reconfigure existing lots and outlots of the Lyndale Garden Center site to align with approved development plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council approved land use plans for the former Lyndale Garden Center site and an adjacent single- family home at 6328 Aldrich Avenue on June 26, 2018. Lyndale Gardens LLC ("Applicant" and property owner) is now proposing to plat land to align with approved development plans. The proposed plat of "Lyndale Gardens 2nd Addition" has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office and staff. Prior to consideration of a final plat application, the applicant will be required to satisfactorily address all comments. No major issues are anticipated. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct and close a public hearing and by motion: Adopt a resolution for a preliminary plat of "Lyndale Gardens 2nd Addition." BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT • None B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes. etc) • All plats or subdivisions of land must be approved by City Council resolution, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota State Statutes 462.357. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: • Per State Statute, the City has 120 days from the date of submittal of a complete application to issue a decision regarding plat unless the applicant agrees to an extension. • A complete application was received on April 25, 2018. The Council must render a decision by August 23, 2018. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • None E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • Notice of this public hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current newspaper. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • None PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Representative(s) of Lyndale Gardens LLC ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Preliminary Plat Type Resolution Letter Exhibit RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT FOR LYNDALE GARDENS 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, Lyndale Gardens, LLC ("Applicant") has requested preliminary approval of a plat that combines and resubdivides properties legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is to be known as LYNDALE GARDENS 2ND ADDITION; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed preliminary plat of LYNDALE GARDENS 2ND ADDITION on Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at which all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, as follows: 1. The proposed preliminary plat of LYNDALE GARDENS 2ND ADDITION satisfies the requirements of the City's subdivision ordinances. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat of LYNDALE GARDENS 2ND ADDITION is granted with the following conditions: a. The applicant must address to the City Attorney's satisfaction all items listed in the plat opinion letter prepared by the City Attorney's office. b. The applicant must address any/all comments by the City Engineering Department. c. Easements described by Doc. Nos. 2928405 and 2917948 shall not be vacated. d. The Applicant must apply for final approval once construction of improvements has been completed or construction of said improvements has been secured by contract and bond. e. The Applicant must submit a completed application for final plat within one year of preliminary plat approval. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July, 2018. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Parcel A: The South 45.00 feet of the North 225.00 feet of that part of Government Lot 3, Section 28, Township 28, Range 24, lying south of the south line of Lot 4, Block 2, Ray's Lyndhurst 2nd Addition, which lies between the southerly extension of the East line of said Block 2 and the East line of the alley in said Block 2 and its southerly extension. AND Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lyndale Gardens AND Outlot C, Lyndale Gardens M N N 0) L E .F n i ti r` U L m o� U ti 'o 0 0 i U N 'o no z wa wQ I W. v O H QO QG' L co Q MILDRED Q Q RtC SITE� o, W° _ w ' ' Wo e�' Q Rq o VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) 1 r/1 rL 1r ' r 22 7z O � O 1 W 28 V27.-,`:-_O �w ` O� o J ;� W - O in \ O w a:l c0 c0 v w COI c00 O O O� Q �� 01 8 ' "W i� \ O P� 0 „ — HOUSE Nki N I \�H - HOUSE O < r5„ RROI 84Aa INVE=8/39. 4Z111R3'11'S0"W � v ,589INV N 89.PARCELA 60.01 1 IN s 825 A7_z 81 5 S8� 1 50 W a—e ce RIM=843.7ooeTe 84s --- -- — — M\� \I NV W=839.5� �839.7. e .� CP ° (D —Cenc-ram _Cu840 — v' L''' L �� / - - _ I ° v / PRO OSED ATE MAIN EASEMENT I = , W v- v >> STORM SEWER LINE o e II III II IIIlIIIIlCll_i irIIIIeCI I 1 — I2 _-- It v-843y:`e o 6'H� N —Q_ — I MRIM_ .9SSTORM MANHOLE RI_842. N4�o STORM CATCHBASIN PARCEL B \INV W=8a I838. 323 STORM APRONENV 5=32.2 nd \��SANITARY SEWER LINE vL 82s�,I BUSINE O slcNSANITARY MANHOLE � \GAS LINE BURIED I 1 1 z ELECTRIC LINE — BURIED 11s 1I1 1 111 BITUMINO�S R;AREA M=8 2.3 ELECTRIC LINE — OVERHEAD SCURE6 M INV=8 1.9 QQ POWER POLE �\ c�� p v�v� v v3�; �i ���� �1�l/=�=� =�-J°=_ _��=—T - = vv�v� v v - \ STREET LIGHT \ S v�vv v91 �, v\ i �� — — �lll/l///�� v��vvvvIIII ° ° /v 100 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER \ S • \v E nX o ELECTRIC METER 0QK / �II � II !WATERMAIN U, P -0- ?oHYDRANT \ �,; \ \ vvv v v — yh \ I II I� _ � l J / III IIII / I I w INv -P „ � S -P P. J a? o POST/BOLLARD \\ `'SA \ \�� \\ \` O ��� ��/ / IIII �I I / Av I\ I I Q r » SIGN \ rh \ \ '� \ '� /// \ �' / I� I I I / I a ' Rc c pp o �� \ CHAIN LINK FENCE — v . � �° /�/t5`IIII I , , I I A I \ I R M= a:7, L� J 11 / IMGL=842. +v RIYv1=841.0 X WOOD FENCE _ \\ �\ —Q,,J IIIr f r \ / 1 I \ — — — =836.7 M IN =837.0 O HANDRAIL A V \ \ \� VA\y' �II�y_� _ ��� _ _ _� _ _ III II I� �I / CO N 82=834. Q� / RIM �� \ \\\ — _ \ = y _ — _ J 256.43 N88'24'S0"E coM��\ (��\ =839.4 — — INV-833.7 RETAINING WALL \ \ \ \ --_— = __ _ _ _ — — — �' / _\ I 24" 21" RCP — RIM=841.6 /777777777777 \\\ \ — -�� � — — \ \ ' IM 840.4 ~ \ \ / INV=8 3 0 I �" V SW=830.E BUILDING LINE \\ \ \ \\ jf�N S= 32.5 PARCEL E 72� RCP\ \ MH I INV N=834.E TREE LINE \ \ _ _ �� \\ V W= 3.3 N STUMP \ - \\\'I� �\. �� a_m ___U\tility and drainage easernR4M1=842.8 MH J �� � M840.8 MH \ \\ \\\\ pe\r Doc. No. 4423473 INv 823-8 A \ I � \ / \ INV=822.7 \ VA\� \�AAs\\\y A o /� I ��2�34 �%� �� •� � I =836.0 \ r \ 1 \ \�`o\\\\ \\ \ \ RI -841 — �rr—�asemen �TREE \ \ \ \\\\ �T Iv1 - orm setae' O��Se �P� l \ HH 7 J �\ \ \ Pond \ \ _ r RQUES $40& 2 BITUMINOUS SURFACE \ / — EC s 2g25 PARCEL C \\ 1 IN = _ DO RIM841.8 i \ CONCRETE SURFACE \ \ 82 STMH \ ^RIAN MH M=841.6 moOBSCURED RIM=838.4 \ / AREA A / � � NOTES: \ \\v� w. 1. Utilities are from electronic files and surveys provided by the client from RLK, Carlson McCain and /FOo Ulteig Boundary Topographic Surveys and Gopher State One Call Ticket numbers 180330582, \ 180330603, 180330604, 180330605, and 180330606\\ \ \ and are verfied where possible. °�� \\ 1 b o,°� l 2. Watermain located in Lyndale Ave was drawn in � scaled off of City of Richfield As -Built plans, as no ° \ \ \ \ \ \ \ marks were located In the field. ; 1 \ \\ \ \ °1) \ \ 1 \^,\ ` \I \ 8 2.952 / 3. All distances are in feet °mac 4. The basis of bearings is assumed �3 5. Easements are shown as listed in Torrens Certificate CR. Numbers 1373514, 1373515, 1373519, 1373520, and �� 1 \ �� I\ Cam, 1451623. 6. Survey was conducted under winter conditions. 6, Unexposed utility and topographic features may have been obscured at the time of survey collection. 7. Corner monuments to be set after platting \ \ V \ v PRELIMINARY PLAT - LYNDALE GARDENS 2ND ADDITION For: The Cornerstone Group Richfield, Minnesota .81 , �31 08 itW /, LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Ownership: The Cornerstone Group Inc 5324 Oliver Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419 (Contact: Colleen Carey, 952-484-6857) Parcel A: The South 45.00 feet of the North 225.00 feet of that part of Government Lot 3, Section 28, Towhnship 28, Range 24, lying south of the south line of Lot 4, Block 2, RAYS LYNNHURST 2ND ADDITION, which lies between the southerly extension of the East line of said Block 2 and the East line of the alley in said Block 2 and its southerly extension. (Torrens Certificate Number: 1451623) Ownership: Lyndale Gardens, LLC 5324 Oliver Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419 (Contact: Colleen Carey, 952-484-6857) Parcel B: Lot 1, Block 1, LYNDALE GARDENS (Torrens Certificate Number: 1373514) Parcel C: Lot 2, Block 1, LYNDALE GARDENS (Torrens Certificate Number: 1373515) Parcel E: Outlot C, LYNDALE GARDENS (Torrens Certificate Number: 1373520) EASEMENTS Blanket utility, drainage, ingress, egress and parking easement encumbering Parcels B, C, D and E. Document number T05109577. Blanket access and parking easement encumbering Parcels B, C, D and E. Document number T05382874. PROPOSED LOT AREAS: Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 79,716 Sq. Ft. 58,514 Sq. Ft. 47,856 Sq. Ft. X 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 of 1 Job # 11177 4/19/2018 - 5:OOPM AGENDA SECTION: RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM # 7. STAFF REPORT NO. 120 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Matt Brillhart, Associate Planner DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Acting Community Development Director 6/27/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution granting an amendment to a planned unit development to allow construction of a K-8 school at 6500 Nicollet Avenue (Bremer Bank site). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Partnership Academy, a public charter school, has been based in Richfield since 2002, operating out of leased space at Church of the Assumption (305 77th Street East). Partnership Academy (Applicant) has been searching for a site to build a new school facility in Richfield for several years, and currently has the Bremer Bank property at 6500 Nicollet Avenue under contract. The Applicant proposes to demolish the bank building and construct a two-story school facility on the site. The proposed building and outdoor play area would have frontage along Nicollet Avenue, with parking provided in surface lots to the west of the building and adjoining existing parking areas for Hub Shopping Center. Bus circulation would make use of an existing driveway south of the building. The new school facility will allow the Applicant to increase enrollment from the current 284 students in grades K-5 up to a maximum enrollment of approximately 470 students in grades K-8. If approved, demolition of the bank building would begin this fall, with the new school building projected to be complete by May 2019. The Bremer Bank building was constructed in 1967 and is part of a larger planned unit development (PUD) along with the Hub Shopping Center and vacant grocery store site. The Applicant is requesting an amendment to this PUD to allow construction of the school building. No other changes are proposed elsewhere in the Hub PUD at this time. Deviations from code requirements are minimal and primarily relate to adequate on -site parking supply for school staff. The Applicant has provided a narrative addressing their parking needs, and a detailed discussion of parking requirements is included in the "Policies" section of this report. Finding that the proposal meets requirements, staff recommends approval of the amended planned unit development, conditional use permit and final development plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution granting an amended planned unit development, conditional use permit, and final development plans for a K-8 school at 6500 Nicollet Avenue. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT Prior to construction of the bank building in 1967, Richfield Theater stood on this site from 1947-1967. 65th Street was realigned to its current route in 1979-1980, and its original alignment was vacated. The site includes a portion of the vacated 65th Street, which formerly ran between the bank property and the medical clinic building at 6440 Nicollet Avenue. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etcy Comprehensive Plan: As part of the Comprehensive Plan update (Richfield 2040) a market study and small area plan were completed for the Nicollet & 66th area, including the Hub and Bremer Bank properties. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as 'Mixed Use'. The addition of a school to this area is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as schools are permitted in the Mixed Use and General Commercial zoning districts. Existing businesses and potential future businesses in the immediate area could be positively impacted by the influx of school employees and parents shopping and/or dining in the area. Planned Unit Development / Conditional Use Permit / Final Development Plan: There are a number of sets of review criteria that apply to this proposal. A full discussion of all requirements is included as an attachment to this report. The following variations from standard requirements are requested: Parking requirements for a K-8 school are one space per employee, plus eight visitor spaces. 50 parking spaces are proposed on site. The applicant has indicated in the attached narrative that the projected staffing level will be 63 employees at the time of opening in fall of 2019, and could grow to a maximum of 75 employees by 2024. Parking requirements can be reduced by 10% at this location for proximity to frequent public transit service. The projected employee counts result in an initial requirement of 64 spaces, and 75 spaces at full capacity in 2024. The applicant's narrative states that the 50 spaces provided on -site will be sufficient for current staffing levels, and that they are working with Hub Shopping Center ownership to obtain a cross -access agreement to use surplus parking on the Hub site. A stipulation in the attached resolution requires the applicant to provide a minimum of 64 parking spaces (either through on -site construction, an agreement with adjacent property owners, or some combination thereof) prior to opening. Increased enrollment (above 380 students) will require either a parking utilization study to confirm excess parking or the securing of additional off -site parking, as approved by the Community Development Director. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: 60-DAY RULE: The 60-day clock started when a complete application was received on June 11, 2018. A decision is required by August 10, 2018 or the Council must notify the Applicant that it is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total) for issuing a decision. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The required application fees have been paid. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • A public hearing was conducted at the Planning Commission meeting on June 25, 2018. • Notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the site. • The Planning Commission voted (5-1) to recommend approval. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • Approve the proposed PUD amendment with additional and/or modified stipulations. • Deny the amendment with a finding that the proposal does not meet City requirements. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Lisa Hendricks, Partnership Academy ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Resolution ❑ Requirements attachment ❑ Site plans ❑ Rendering & elevations ❑ Partnership narrative & response letters ❑ Zoning map Type Resolution Letter Backup Material Backup Material Backup Material Backup Material Backup Material RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A K-8 SCHOOL AT THE HUB SHOPPING CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of an amended final development plan and conditional use permit to allow construction of a new K-8 public school building to replace the Bremer Bank building in the planned unit development at Hub Shopping Center, located at 6500 Nicollet Avenue, property legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, RICHFIELD HUB SUPERBLOCK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the public school would initially serve approximately 380 students in grades K-5, expanding to a projected enrollment of 470 students in grades K-8; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing and recommended approval of the requested amendment to the final development plan and conditional use permit at its June 25, 2018 meeting; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on June 12, 2018 and published in the Sun Current newspaper on June 14, 2018 and; and WHEREAS, the requested amendment to the final development plan and conditional use permit meets those requirements necessary for approving a planned unit development as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section 542.09, Subd. 3 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. ; and WHEREAS, the request meets those requirements necessary for approving a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Section 547.09, Subd. 6 and as detailed in City Council Staff Report No. ; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of an amended planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. An amended planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are approved to allow a new K-8 public school building at 6500 Nicollet Avenue, as described in City Council Report No. , on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: • A recorded copy of the approved resolution must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. • Fence height shall not exceed six (6) feet. Fence material shall be a decorative metal style. Chain link or vinyl fence shall not be used in areas visible from public right-of-way. Along Nicollet Avenue, fence shall not extend into the required five (5) foot front yard setback. • The property owner is responsible for the ongoing maintenance and tending of all landscaping in accordance with approved plans. • Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must provide proof to the City that a minimum of 64 parking spaces are available to staff and visitors. Parking may be provided through a combination of any of the following: (i) constructing additional parking on site or (ii) securing additional parking on adjacent property. Plans for construction of additional on -site parking must be approved by the Community Development Department. • All required parking spaces shall remain available year round and shall not be used for snow storage. • A parking study shall be completed prior to any increase in enrollment beyond 380 students. A parking utilization study may also be used to reduce required parking at the Community Development Director's discretion. • Separate sign permits are required. This resolution does not constitute approval of any signs. • The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated May 10, 2018 and compliance with all other City and State regulations. • Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit the developer must submit a surety equal to 125% of the value of any improvements not yet complete. • Unless specifically modified by this resolution, all previous conditions of approval remain in place. 4. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall expire one year from issuance unless the use for which the permit was granted has commenced, substantial work has been completed or upon written request by the developer, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period of up to one year, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 9. 5. The approved planned unit development, final development plan and conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of July, 2018. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Required Findings Part 1: The following findings are necessary for approval of a PUD application (542.09 Subd. 3): 1. The proposed development conforms to the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and any applicable redevelopment plans. This requirement is met. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for mixed use development. The proposed building and use would replace a bank building. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. This requirement is met. The proposed building has been designed to function in a substantially similar manner as the building it replaces, incorporating bus circulation into the existing Nicollet Avenue drive aisle shared with Hub Shopping Center. 3. The development is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, and departures from the guiding district regulations are justified by the design of the development. This requirement is met. The purpose of the guiding C-2 (General Commercial) District is to allow a wide variety of uses serving Richfield and the surrounding area. These uses are expected to be attractive in appearance from all sides and compatible with adjacent properties through compliance with the Performance Standards specified in Zoning Code Section 544. 4. The development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets or other public facilities and utilities that serve or area proposed to serve the development. The City's Public Works, Engineering and Recreation Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 5. The development will not have undue adverse impacts on neighboring properties. No undue adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. The terms and conditions proposed to maintain the integrity of the plan are sufficient to protect the public interest. This requirement is met; appropriate stipulations have been incorporated into the final resolution. Part 2: All uses are conditional uses in the PC-2 District. The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (547.09, Subd. 6): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. See above — Part 1, #1. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The purpose of the Zoning Code is to protect and promote the general welfare of the City. The proposal does not conflict with this purpose. The purpose of Planned Unit Developments is to provide an opportunity for innovative and creative development. The proposed building will replace an existing building within the PUD and does not conflict with this purpose. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. The proposed use is similar to the previous use and is consistent with the previously adopted Planned Unit Development for this area. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. The proposed development is in substantial compliance with City performance standards, except the following deviations from requirements: 5. Parking requirements for a K-8 school are one space per employee, plus eight visitor spaces. 50 parking spaces are proposed on site. The applicant has indicated in the attached narrative that the projected staffing level will be 63 employees at the time of opening in fall of 2019, and could grow to a maximum of 75 employees by 2024. Parking requirements can be reduced by 10% at this location for proximity to frequent public transit service. The projected employee counts result in an initial requirement of 64 spaces, and 75 spaces at full capacity in 2024. The applicant's narrative states that the 50 spaces provided on -site will be sufficient for current staffing levels, and that they are working with Hub Shopping Center ownership to obtain a cross -access agreement to use surplus parking on the Hub site. A stipulation in the attached resolution requires the applicant to provide a minimum of 64 parking spaces (either through on -site construction, an agreement with adjacent property owners, or some combination thereof) prior to opening. While the amount of open space and pervious area is increased, the proposal provides six fewer trees than required for a site of this size. This shortfall is due to preserving much of the existing parking lot in the northwest corner of the site as -is, and a desire to provide usable open space for play. Due to shared parking lot drive aisles with the abutting Hub Shopping Center, the property does not include landscaped areas along its western and southern perimeter. Hub Shopping Center itself is nonconforming in regards to parking lot landscaping standards. 6. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. The City's Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any adverse impacts. 7. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate provisions have been made to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 8. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. See above — Part 1, #1. Partnership Academy has been located in Richfield since 2002 and has sought to construct a new school facility for many years. 9. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. Boundary and Topographic Survey for: 6" -W / GV 411 ' H STP�8ET ;SST �\ GV •� \ \ \ tn \ \ 777T77777 Ash ---Ash < 1 ' Ash I /I / I ' ti I 0 aq I _-_T7, F w d' 5 0- CID l__ 0 — JN w Sign LL 10 I U OAsh -21 -- 30-----------� l / I � I c II E � II I "U — � � I I I 01 Z I N I EO "G-G G t: r 24" ST Y� M 1: EXISTING BUILDING O = ;� W I I PARTNERSHIP ACADEMY ASSOCIATION at 6500 Nicollet Avenue South UTILITY STATEMENT The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and existing drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantee that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated, although he does certify that they are shown as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. 100 I W 111111111,2171,911 All _ I I'77 I I:. •......:........ , � I N ill . _• 0� ' _ _ � MH( gA8 \\ 8 - S89°56'44"E 148.00 - ------ Top 846.10 ---- r--- r -I I J--- h I \ --?---- 4 .1 10" In 8 3 8., 42.7 P - - G G G G G- -- --- G!?---- r v. G: G G G G G G r - G- -- G-r--- it � �, 10" ST - o"r_i.zii- MI� I I I.. 74" •� ' -Tuji I1 F is" inv. d'4.3.y `� 10" HH I j Ash / 10"` inv. 843.5 Locust I MHO )n I\ I--- — - -- ---- — - --I-- -- — -- -- -\ -ti/ ti. N U --- --�, -- —T—-----------�—, I --T �, `' —� -- — '" _ , . �� Fop Li4/.41J --LJ i U�UB Vaive•v.'e Gas: O ;t i.i.. ; I inv. 839.2 ca I I -- U'rilit'✓ F:iSPIYIPIIt nal \ F2-Tl-HI=TF1 r) HI IF2 .I IG FR �I f1r't! _.. _.._.__._... ---- ----- _ cRuildryoihaC:K L.I"` j :: � ` ; Top 845.87 MH Inv. 833.2 GB + Top 843.521 0 \ Inv. 840.0 1 i Hyd. cD I / i II I I I I � � ()0 o I I N i I I I I I I I I � I � i I � ------ c -------------------=---1E3'"--Vh---------'-- t------------{ W I W n I — -- Top 845.57 --- ----------r_--_-1------- \ I Inv. 838.8 MH T _ s T t I U r �. MH — — — — — — — — �' L- -- — -- �- — - — — IL — 1% I i9To 845.57 �— — — — — -- p T .fi / I Inv. 4 . U 8 08 Locust I I i I 51 ICB 0-5T \ CP To 842.53 1 I I - - 847- LP I Top 847.05 I Ash _ 847 I I I 41 Inv. 833.9 M:H II 12 Ash J I Inv. 838.5MH I � � I Top.8 .75 Inv. -837.9 - 847 15'� I- S8 59 52 W / 250.26 N ° }. z I .. 10 l l EXISTING BUILDING / 100 II' !Ili dl CB Richfield, Minnesota A f /ITrC— * Bearings shown are based on the plat of RICHFIELD HUB SUPERBLOCK. * Utilities shown are from information furnished by the City of Richfield and respective utility companies in response to Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 180790456 and are verified where possible. * Contact Gopher State One Call for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. * Area = 78,102 square feet (1.79 acres). 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet • Iron Monument Found o Iron Monument Set ® PK Nail Set S — Sanitary Sewer ST Storm Sewer w— Watermain 1-6- Hydrant GV o Gate Valve MH O Manhole CB O Catch Basin Inv. Invert Elevation • Guard Post GL -)�- Ground Light 0 Electrical Transformer El Electrical Outlet C ❑ Communications Pedestal HH ❑ Handhole Concrete Surface „_- Bituminous Surface —G Buried Gas _l Buried Communications E Buried Electric GM= Gas Meter __'I Access Easement per Document No. T1957839 _ Parking Easement per Document No. T1957839 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, RICHFIELD HUB SUPERBLOCK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 23rd day of April, 2018. REHDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary C. Huber, Lane Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal Drive - Suite 110 • Eagan, Minnesota • Phone (651) 452-5051 JOB: 184-3038.010 N 10" 19„ UAsh Ash m I � I w I mU) J N U_ _U I � L ai a 4-1 ;_ (L) m ro w I I � •N l _G—G MH .8 2 E 12" Inv. 837.6 N GV • 65TH STREET GV. 10„ —.—• Ash — G 'Sc O �I C� I ' Q� Xcj � Wl a EXISTING Ign IwjL 8 C: BUILDING W I Sign I i W I GM. W .:.. _ 4, I M SJ, N H ------------------- I c, EO / u �— — "0 �� r-----------------=-------------=------' ------ �� �f---.Top Ir-----------r-----------r-----------r------,� II 01 // Top 846.10 1' E i ii i i i 10" In . 843.1 12 1 yl I I I I I I ,I II 11 - —G G G---r�------G- G G G G G //� I II 1 I I 1 1 1 ,I II G �� 8" v. 42.7 • G., G G G G G G $ ----------------- --- , V I r'� I G I I I I I ,1 n CB 10" ST :•1 ------�`__- MH `.. G ci ;;Q \I� ��' 14" 7 ---- Top 5.97Z LoOcusf II '' O `` Ash hhr I �� - 1 I I I I I II �� p„ Inv. `8.yJ.9 0 I O,' ` ___________ _AS------------------------1---''' I I I I I I `\ .� O ©©//���� I MH Sign ------------- 10" Inv. 8�F=_____�_= 1 N 1 1 1 0 U W O Top 847.40 O 0 Valve MHO 12"—ST� —12" —ST MH Inv. 839.2 '._ Utility Easement per HUB SUPERBLOCK - ; �' MH U I M H 1- CB O op 843.52 iv. 840.0 CB I w 0 N� —18" —W �� I t18"; W 8" —W I —w , i Top 845.57 U--------- 0 O �i I 12" Inv. 840.9 I I I I r--------------- ---- 1 I 1 I r I I I - I S r-----� - --- �_ MH CD r--�� I I 6 I 11 -�„• , I ✓ S 18" Inv. 838.8 I; / i 11 ' D i /�`� it �'-•\ i i i i� I I �r) i i i �i i `\ i 18" —ST I MH ST I U OI I $ I I Q �; lyrl ;Locust j r ;; �'\ 10 f i i i i +\ I I i i i ii S, .n = i %i ST J I I —i— i— i T -•r I� —`-' _I 1 I I 1 I I I I II g Top 845.57 — — j I I — 4- I _ , --------- Inv. — i — I I I I I — — - — I I r 11" II II I Inv. 840.8 .•� ; ; Cp V' I -i Q LJI Locust 11 I I I I I I O II -f I I I 01, I I I II 1 I I I I I 1 I 11 �511 I I J II 1 1 I I I I I 110'• 2---1------L-- ---L- }----�-- w-t----.•J `---------LLO---------------------2-------L-----J------1-------------- -- -----------�-Top 84 6B�---- LP w (771 II -- I �_ Inv. 8 2.7 0 -----=------------------ ------1Dcust----- II 11 O '1 E E—, - , , 8 y li E---E i E i ' Q GL �,,�OaO" rGL �� GL �',, GL �� O GL 3',i ii 1 �---J ' 2 I 9 10' ;. ; % +y_� - B M oc; 0 845.0 MH L (T �777TTT TTTT�77TTT�� 777TTT��77TTT1�777TTT1�777TTT��77TTT1�77�jTTTTT1�777,�1`Tl�, ---- --- ---� . ; nv. 842.2 Top 846.02 WF 14"1 S .�` '�, U� i r R 0 1 12'=ST MH Inv. 841.2 n " Tree �^ r , ` ' i C ,: 1 , , �q a . , Top 84. `•� �,,'' Inv. 841.8 G� v PROTECT TREES--" ; LLV ✓ DURING CONSTRUCTION I 1 I I C C 14" i Tree GM ; y i ; c~n I II II r __________________ rry. r 11 11 ;, O �✓------J L1---------- J-L•------ -- Ly EXISTING BUILDING ® N Z 10 cs, J, Ash 0 2 � .I, . I I O,t4sh' cn N 1 . `\� V 5�'J ---- rt r� - ry lyrr I ��,• Q ``----ALL/�1111LLU11d/1LL/1�111LLL/�1111LL/_/1111`, Q % /_/111 LL/�1 1LL/_/�111LLL/_/1111LL/_/�111� '-----L1--_----��-.�L_ l_--id ,' `` i •' •- I 1 �1LL_�1'11LL_�----zJ �, ------L----------------------- \ N `\ `�� r�--L_____ C__-____}}II ____�__ \1MHO .. I --- I` --- ------ I ` z I Ash T`` ` ``` , , �2 6 E V) 1 i E I 1u.�, 1 I _ -� -------------��_Lu I r I 2 6 �---- O ' nl `� ._ 1 ou .r GV CD, S Ash tiylr ----------------------- r----------------------------------•--�JJ i LU r Ash Q LP N4H J CB 0ST I \�` ��`..� i� '� ��\ r f S I \��;., 0 Top 842.53 Inv. 838.5r=====-------- ��� %i' y rAsh O I MH 3 V Top Inv. 842.75 837.9 -______-______-________________ _ �c O CB Hyd. E o� N on a N �. J_ v GD Z °° 04 a N Q 00 z ►`~ U O � U W 0 N N L a a QQ. a z° a� o ,o w v a�'i 3 to a •Q•�r� a a� +,00 DEMOLITION NOTES 2 01 — Remove concrete curb & gutter a >" o 2Q — Remove concrete pavement �>. a 3 ( — Remove bituminous pavement °�' ° v o °' a� E Q4 — Remove sign E E 4 z° 05 — Remove building and canopies © — Remove bank drive—thru teller equipment & bollards QQ — Remove parking stall striping i i ® — Remove tree i Q9 — Remove remove landscaping lighting LO cO NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDING NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVAL/ABANDONMENT AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING POWER POLES, OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES, BURIED ELECTRIC LINES, BURIED COMMUNICATION LINES AND BURIED GAS LINES WITH THE APPROPRAITE UTILITY COMPANY. LEGEND O O O BITUMINOUS TO BE REMOVED CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED IY `•' T1 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED w EXISTING WATERMAIN s EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ST EXISTING STORM SEWER G EXISTING BURIED GAS LINE E EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC LINE c EXISTING BURIED COMMUNICATION LINE 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet LIJ W — LL O Q T — LL U J = � LiJ z � Ld � U — Q CL SHEET NUMBER C1 6 5TH STREET co o� rn " L;j Z 110' A h Ash o Ash G o0 1G) Vol) 2 04 w 1�07= 0 W10 z • N � i W a EXISTING ===, 8 BUILDING PROGRESS PRINT 10" O 1 Ash O I : . 6-7-18 34 ��. z Sign i a R:0 Or v o W o a°'i v °CO uTE� O — a a ° :.. O O a U C N t CL - U : AO P 1 t 12 L 0 $ O °�ov° a� O O ta�Ea� v 6' FE CE Loa I E 4 Sign O 1 000 r- I I .- ACCESSIBLE PARKING G 7 PROOF OF PARKING ADDITIONAL STALLS = 28 e ('moo 1 4 0 CC" s BIKE RACK O SITE SUMMARY "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN (R5-1) PER MMUTCD BIKE CK (6 SITE AREA = 78,102 SQ.FT. rr _ _ . 6.. DISTURBED AREA 51,250 SQ.FT. Locus EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 67,460 SQ.FT. 10" PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 54,206 SQ.FT. Locust g FENCE PROPOSED BLDG AREA = 22,967 SQ.FT. (29.4%) ~ w tBOLLARD Ui o SITE NOTES m �V) O1 - All dimensions between curbing and to radius points are to face of curb. BIKE RACK 4 - All dimensions abutting curbs are to back of curb. a () O3 — All curb and gutter on private property shall be type B612 unless otherwise noted. ®— All parking stall striping width is 9.00' unless otherwise noted. PROPOSED BUILDING O "BEGIN ONE-WAY' SIGN - PARKING STALLS PROVIDED FFE — 847.25 STANDARD STALLS ACCESSIBLE STALLS TOTAL 1 t 48 2 50 BICYCLE RACKS PROVIDED = 16 1 CONCRETE STEPS W/RAILINGS 2 - 6" RISERS Uj PROOF OF PARKING STALLS zSTANDARD STALLS ACCESSIBLE STALLS TOTAL z Uj 75 3 78 8 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE �J I IIIIIII W o TRASH & MECH. FFE = 846.25 z U ss�e� Q = U �F < _ r� D = Uj CONCRETE STEPS W/R iti::: - O 2 6" RI ,S D L. LEGEND 0 PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED STD. DUTY BITUMINOUS BOUNDARY/ROW/BLOCK LINE EASEMENT �j SHEET NUMBER BUILDING/PARKING SETBACK LINE 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet C2P TR E ET � Z10g65TH S� Gv. \ \ \Lo Ash Zyl...'. Ash sh 841.2 842.4 ' a / 0 I / / ~ Q co i k�� LU X��I I . co co / / L" 42.0 = EXISTING N ,gn C . :=4 w 844.9 <845.1 X 845.4 ^ BUILDING o I A s4 � W I 8421 I L � � I Li Sign i E I - IJ Q) WI /( w M LLJ , _ i C9 - I : 40 842.4 I d, 847.0 N I MATCH x Co M H qa / 84s.7 I I / a 847. x MATCH _ 846.85 / = ... MATCH Lij N I EO MATCH C 847.90 848.10 847.80 846.2 846.3 - - - - - - x x r E O F / I t CONSTRUCT CB OVER EX. $"o°S SEWER TOR- 846-10 MATCH 845.75 IF GG G- J G G G TG-- G G G C -G G G / 7 IG ny. 7. Ge G G G G �- - x CB 1 '., 10' ST H :. MATCH 845 2 MATCH MATCH TOP 846.40 844.5 x845. MATCH 2 846 Top 845. 1 ust 845.0 s42.s T P 8 .00 INV 844.0 (MATCH" Inv. 843 96 Q I (846A� HANGE CASTING TO NEENAH as MHO 4 - - - - - - SignI V 8 4.0 (M CH) 0" Inv. 843.5 iv I�+s 2 845.65 R-257 C OR APPROVED EQUAL /v24-ST MH 12"-ST- ��" 12" -ST 8 .35 Top 849.40 PLAY PACEalv MHO 84655846.85 .Inv. 839.2 845.80To,p 843.55 845.2 �tility sement per RICHFIELD HUB SUPERBLOCK ---- 845.70 JMH 12 Inv. 830.8 ✓ xx M H 845.1 12" Inv. 837.2E � s4s.so 845.5 846.o0 w(�-r° s4 a °' U'\ 12" Inv. 837.6 NE 846.45 11 846.75 _W- EOF 0- P 18' W MATCH 846.8 18846.65 �� 846.25 / e Top 845.57 18" -W Sas.00 _ 10- W U xRAI 5 xsas.W S 12" Inv. 840.9 GV 845.25 846.40 846.65 846.55 $ 18" Inv. 838.8 MH 3 co I 47.0o REMOVE EX. CB AND CONSTRUCT A 15" AREA MH ST 18" -ST-L • I I / x DRAIN OV END F EX 10" STORM SEWER MATC ST Cc I I I r7 00 I I I I I CB+' s 40 846.50 s4s.so u'-A 1 AREA Df�AHd 1 Top 845.57 Top 843.2 844.1 844.70 - - - - - - - - - - 844.9 TOP 845.00 Inv. 840.8 nv. 840.0 s45.3o 846.30 vl s4s.so INV 842.7 MATCFt)T 844. 845.20 847 ( C P I- w _ Top 84�5.56 (0N 844. �845.85 DC9 847.00 847.00 nv. 847.00 8� 6., I812.7 847.00 LOCUSt \ 847.7° 847. 47. 845.25 �6 ° E- c� 846.60 1 , '�st � B M CB 846.25 847.21 84725 Op 845.0 MH hv.842.2 To 46.02 Hyd. ti p I _� i s4s.10 �• 2-ST MH _ Inv. 841.2 a CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" WATER SERVICE AND s47.21 Top 845.3. '` I REMOVE REMAINING PIPE TO THE SOUTH 846.85 s4s.so 84s.3o Inv. 841. h `t ro (0.46� 847.00 846.00 V) I O I � 847.00 I I C 845.35 0 N I 844.8 GM ,. I C9 846.25 I T 845.00 y _ �- I �fj ° I 847.00 �. ED 8 459 I O PROPOS UI LD ING �, I 846.75 846.50 _ 844. 84 .8 845.10 FFE - 847.25 I I " 844.7 s 847.00 843.7x 84470 / / MHO 847.21. 846.1 \0 � I I Lu I 845.2500 \ , 0 844.50 847.10 I CO m W Z846.15 ,� w � s4s., 843.7 84 8 4 845.10 (n tl � 846.05 4 � � 84 / 847.0 8 6.8 I � I 845.00 847.00 847.05 76 � I ILQ �I 846 td w 1- : I 46.3 N CD 844.75 846.15 = w 1I I Q I 843.9 �F 846.10 -----, TRASH & M CH 646.2i FFE = 846.25 844.00 I S x843.3 R3 846.00 Gar. Ent. x 844.65 4- i 847.80 848.20 843.5 43.3 Bus 2 3 i 847.21 847.00 847.75 S FILL ABOVE FFE - I 843.3 843.90 x 846.10 LP Uj 845.90 84740 .3. 846.60 471 MATCH I M:H J ST I� 843.6 a 844.90 C To 4L83CP 846.65 Inv. 38.5 843.1 844.25 - 846.6 O I 843.4 x844.3 846.8 846.7 845.25 ° � 845.7 845.95 846.3 x ~- MATCH I 846.75 MH s q I 847.15 �A� MATCH I V Top 42.75 I I nv. 837.9 i I 4 a4847 2 845.846.2 847.3 . x 846.5 (n I 37 ../, x. I 847.4 844.9 x N I \ 846.0 x ?47.0 x847.6 847.8 • / 846.4x / v • � 845.4' Q� GRADING NOTES 1❑ - All elevations shown are to final surfaces. 2❑ - Contractor is responsible for obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Storm Water Permit for Construction Activity before construction begins. EROSION CONTROL NOTES O1 - Contractor is responsible for all notifications and inspections required by General Storm Water Permit. O2 - All erosion control measures shown shall be installed prior to grading operations and maintained until all areas disturbed have been restored. O3 - Sweep paved public streets as necessary where construction sediment has been deposited. ®- Each area disturbed by construction shall be restored per the specifications within 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. O5 - Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence around them and cannot be placed in surface waters, including storm water conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches. ©- Excess concrete/water from concrete trucks shall be disposed of in portable washout concrete basin or disposed of in a contained area. 0 - Spring/summer temporary turf establishment: seed shall be MNDOT Mixture 21 -11 1 ® 100 Ibs/acre and mulch shall be MNDOT Type 1. Winter temporary turf establishment: seed shall be MNDOT Mixture 21-1 12 ® 100 Ibs/acre and mulch shall be MNDOT Type 1. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE - The site must be inspected once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. - All inspections and maintenance conducted must be recorded in writing and records retained with the SWPPP. - Areas of the site that have undergone final stabilization may have the inspection of these areas reduced 9 Y p to once per month. - All silt fence must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented within 24 hours when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. - Surface waters and conveyance systems must be inspected for evidence of sediment being deposited. Removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. - Construction site vehicle exit locations must have sediment removed from off -site paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT - All solid waste must be disposed of off -site per the MPCA disposal requirements. - All hazardous waste must be properly stored with restricted access to storage areas to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be in compliance with MPCA Regulations. UTILITY NOTES 0- All sewer services to extend to a point 5' from proposed building. 0- Bring water main into proposed building and cap at the floor. O- Verify all service locations and inverts with mechanical engineer before construction. O- All watermain to have a minimum of 7.5' of cover. N 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet LEGEND U �) U CZ 00 �. J • ev cC Z >� o 4L O O� z, 00 04 a N ao W X o_ a L v Q ZI Z a�ivL_ v c w °' v� 0 Or _v Q_ v v a� 00 5 o�-0 0 N� 0 (D U0>'O n=-3 L U O v v W L N N v _Ev- Z 000" I I LO I ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN -1 O PROPOSED STORM SEWER ~ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER z PROPOSED WATERMAIN O U 0 PROPOSED CONCRETE �- 0 PROPOSED STD. DUTY BITUMINOUSLLJ z Q loco PROPOSED CONTOUR z CZ)UJJ 1023.54 PROPOSED ELEVATION -J U LL Q = SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE BOUNDARY/ROW/BLOCK LINE � J EASEMENT Q cr O z LIJ ------------- LOT LINE 48af Z BUILDING/PARKING SETBACK LINE cr - CZ)Q U DRAINAGE ARROW w w EXISTING WATERMAIN s EXISTING SANITARY SEWER z EXISTING STORM SEWER Q Q sr o EXISTING BURIED GAS LINE cj:� 0 E EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING BURIED COMMUNUCATION LINE SHEET NUMBER c 980 EXISTING CONTOUR x 995.50 EXISTING ELEVATION C3 h F 50' APPROVED MnDOT SILT FENCE FABRIC FASTEN TO STAKES 2' O.C. OPENING FOR LARGE EVE PERFORATED WALL SILT FABRIC TO BE WRAPPED AROUND SCB IF NEEDED TOP VIEW CROSS SECTION VIEW NOTE: USE THIS TYPE OF INLET PROTECTION BEFORE THE CASTING IS INSTALLED. HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN W/OUT FILTER B 400 MICRON FILTER BAC REQUIRED INSIDE BASKE 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERI 1 SILT FENCE 2 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3 IINLET NFRASAFE OR PROTECTION EQ AL 4 C4 NO SCALE C4 NO SCALE C4 NO SCALE C4 Un 12" 20" Note: Where contours indicate, ignore 0.75"/ft slope indicated above and match adjoining pavement slope to prevent gutter from "ponding". B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER C4 / NO SCALE 4 NOTES: 1. GATE FRAME WORK TO BE 2" OD 2. FRAME MEMBERS TO BE ASSEMBLED WITH CONTINUOUS WELDS 3. TRUSS/BRACE RODS: 3/8" GALVANIZED, STEEL ROD, TIGHTENER AND CONNECTORS 4. GATE ACCESSORIES PER MASTER HALCO, INC. 5. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS 10 C4 CHAIN LINK GATE NO SCALE FINISHED GRADE TOOLED CONTROL JOINT ® 5' MAX. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE APPROVED JOINT SEALANT CONCRETE 3/4" CHAMFER 1/2 4.. 3/8" 1 �2" p• I 4" — SAND BASE J COMPACTED SUBGRADE 1/2" PRE —FORMED EXPANSION JOINT 30' OC MAXIMUM OR AS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS. ALSO INSTALL WHERE WALK ABUTS FIXED OBJECTS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK C4 NO SCALE END & CORNER POST TOP OPTIONS TOP & BOTTOM FABRIC OPTION w w J Y � O U � O z Y TOOLED CONTROL JOINT ® 5' MAX. PAVEMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE APPROVED JOINT SEALANT CONCRETE -7 - I� 12" �I 1/2" PRE —FORMED EXPANSION JOINT 30' OC MAXIMUM OR AS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS. ALSO INSTALL WHERE WALK ABUTS FIXED OBJECTS. GRANULAR BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 7 SIDEWALK INTEGRAL CURB C4 NO SCALE POST TOP ROUND END & POST 2-718 2-7 8 DIA. 1 5/8" OD RAIL RAIL TIE CHAIN LINK FABRIC, TOP SELVAGE NUCKLE1 HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN W/OUT FILTER E 400 MICRON FILTER BA( REQUIRED INSIDE BASKE 2X3 HDPE FRAME It MERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS EMERGENC NOTE: USE THIS TYPE OF INLET PROTECTION AFTER THE CASTING IS INSTALLED. INLET PROTECTION (INFRASAFE OR EQUAL) NO SCALE 1.5" — BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, (SPWEA240B) TACK COAT, 2357 1.5" — BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, (SPNWB230B) 6" —CLASS 5 OR CLASS 7 (MNDOT 3138) APPROVED SUBGRADE NOTE: VERIFY ADEQUACY OF PAVEMENT SECTION WITH ENGINEER AFTER SUBGRADE SOILS ARE EXPOSED AND BEFORE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IS PLACED. PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE (2)-1.5" ROUND GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE RAILINGS TO BE INSET 4—INCHES FROM EDGE OF CONCRETE TO CENTERLINE OF RAILINGS, PRIMED AND PAINTED (SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR PAINT COLOR) #3 EPDXY —COATED REBAR CONTINUOUS IN NOSE OF EACH STEP (1" CLEARANCE) EXPANSION JOINT 12" NOTE: RAILING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE i 5. OWNER AND ARCHITECT BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: BROOM FINISH CONCRETE SURFACE 2% 12, TYPICAL #4 REBAR ® 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS 4" — CLEAN SAND BASE — COMPACTED SUBGRADE 12" H EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE STEPS & RAILINGS NO SCALE U U Q S 04 o �Cz� �� 04 � � C N `I t L� ' U ev cC a) z • a? 0 MO CIS! a O 06 a N �_ 00 ap Z J F— w x Ci- v a z° (n C UJ vrn v v a) 316 — Q Or _vm�r� O �EL C3 -0 v �4- v cn� �A +` 2 �_� U 0 .n=�3 L O Q t N E N v _Eve z LINE POST LOOP CAP Z w ui � o 1 5#' OD T P RAIL— m N U N U LINE POST TIE COATED, 2" MESH WITH KNUCKLED o TENSION BAR SELVAGE TOP AND BOTTOM. FABRIC TO BE o f ON OUTSIDE OF POSTS. d I 10.00' MAX SPACING Li 3. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 11 C4 yl ; , I� �� 1 ' �f �� 1 • �f� AIR DRIVEN LINE POSTS IF APPROVED BY ENGINEER FABRIC, POSTS, CONNECTORS AND FITTINGS TO ALL BE BLACK VINYL COATED 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE NO SCALE i z � o ZE 0 Q U_ J LL1 LL_ Q U Q 2 U LLJ — LL O LIv W z J � U Q Fes- LLI � 0 SHEET NUMBER C4 65TH STREET W z Q PLANT, SHRUB AND TREE LIST PLANTS & SHRUBS SYMBOL QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ROOT HA 88 Hosta Hosto # 1 Pot TY 7 Taxus x media 'Tauntonii' Taunton Yew #5 Pot EV 26 Viburnum opulus 'Nonum' Dwarf European Viburnum #5 Pot BJ 8 Juniperus sabina 'Broadmoor' Broadmoor Juniper #5 Pot BH 11 Hydrangea arborescens Bella Anna Hydrangea #5 Pot DL 128 Hemerocallis 'Stella de Oro' Stella de Oro Daylily #1 Pot KF 95 Calamagrostis acutiflora Karl Foerster #2 Pot Si 16 Juniperus chinensis 'Spartan' Spartan Juniper #7 Pot TOTAL 379 TREES SYMBOL QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ROOT DE 5 Ulmus davidiana var. japonica 'Discovery' Discovery Elm 2 — 112" B&B HL 5 Gleditsia triaconthos var. inermis 'Harve' Northern Acclaim Honeylocust 2 — 112" B&B RB 10 Betula nigra River Birch (1—stem) 2 — 112" B&B PC 3 Malus 'Prairifire' Prairifire Crabapple 1 — 112" B&B TOTAL 23 LANDSCAPING QUANTITIES DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPING AREA = 78,102 SQ.FT. TREE REQUIREMENTS = 1 TREE PER 2,500 SQ.FT TREES REQUIRED = 32 SHRUB REQUIREMENTS = 1 SHRUB PER 1,000 SQ.FT. SHRUBS REQUIRED = 79 0 10 20 40 60 iiiia Scale in Feet LEGEND PROPOSED MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED HYDRANT ► PROPOSED GATE VALVE / PROPOSED FLARED END PROPOSED STORM SEWER 00 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 10 PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED CONCRETE 0 PROPOSED STD. DUTY BITUMINOUS PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS ioso PROPOSED CONTOUR • 7023.54 PROPOSED ELEVATION SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE • • • CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BOUNDARY/ROW/BLOCK LINE — — — — — EASEMENT ------------- LOT LINE BUILDING/PARKING SETBACK LINE O SOIL BORING -------- DRAINAGE ARROW EXISTING WATERMAIN w EXISTING SANITARY SEWER s EXISTING STORM SEWER ST EXISTING BURIED GAS LINE c EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC LINE E T EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE LINE EXISTING BURIED TELEVISION LINE Tv 980 EXISTING CONTOUR x 995.50 EXISTING ELEVATION �o z oLLJ J Q CL Q = U � � _ � Q U C= LL- Q 0 � zz Q SHEET NUMBER L 1 gAnership Peadem� Sru ene s,�es, 50% REVIEW DATE KD 7 FLOOR PLAN - 1 ST A-101 SCALE : 1/8°= l'-o° >m 2 uj in a a x y 19 LLI z H a L F uj J J 0 V II H �J ARM D\ ARCHITECTS 616 677 5997 OFFICE 616 813 2452 MOBILE RMD@RMDArchitects.net 1744 MARNE ESTATES DR. TALLMADGE TOWNSHIP, MI 49435 0 W U) U) W Q 0 r- 00 0 Q CO 0 O J Q Ld V) SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN -1 ST PROJECT NUMBER PA1 2318 SHEET NUMBER A-101 50% REVIEW SIGN OFF DATE 1, 11 1, 11 I I N I ` 0 I E-4 FLOOR PLAN A-102 SCALE : 1/8°= l'-o° 2ND 0 CIO Lu z z C J Lu 'RM D\ ARCHITECTS 616 677 5997 OFFICE 616 813 2452 MOBILE RMD®RMDArchitects.net 1744 MARNE ESTATES DR. TALLMADGE TOWNSHIP, MI 49435 w Q 0 haml-04 i T SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN -2ND PROJECT NUMBER PA1 2318 SHEET NUMBER A-1 02 50% REVIEW DATE PRECAST PANELS WITH REVEALS INTEGRAL COLOR — SHERWIN WII WEB GRAY r\/rr)r)/-\\A/ Ar)/'1\/r- r-A(-I I \A/IKIrl/'1\A/ O" 1All IITr- r)AI\Ir% Ar)/'lI IKIrl r- KITIr)r- nI III r\IKI/\ UI \1\-,[\ I LI V L/I\..i\ / I I UI \1\..i1 \ UI \1\. [\ L LI V L/I\.1\J I I Li \I\. I \ UI \I\�I \ L LI V L/I \. \ / I I UI \I\_1I \ Li \I\1I \ I LI V Li I\..i\J I I Li \I\. I \ JEFFERSON SERIES JEFFERSON SERIES JEFFERSON SERIES JEFFERSON SERIES SAHARA SANDS MONTICELLO MONTICELLO SAHARA SANDS PPP-rAgT PONIPI C \A/ITI-I RP-\/P-Al C R" \A/I-IITP- PONY) APnI INIF) P-NITIRP- PI III F)INl(_ L1 PRECAST PANELS WITH REVEALS INTEGRAL COLOR — SHERWIN WILLIAMS WEB GRAY JEFFERSON SERIES SAHARA SANDS I CV 1 00 00 o I I Lo N I , 00 N Ib o_ I � I in 00 co I co I N N c-3 EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION A-101 SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" A-102 PRECAST PANELS WITH REVEALS INTEGRAL COLOR — SHERWIN WILLIAMS WEB GRAY UI \1\..i1 \ I LI V L/I\. \../ I I UI \1\. [\ JEFFERSON SERIES SAHARA SANDS 8" WHITE BAND AROUND ENTIRE BUILDING AT TOP OF UPSTAIRS WINDOWS, TOP AND BOTTOM OF DOWNSTAIRS WINDOWS AND AROUND EACH INDIVIDUAL WINDOW. .EYEBROW ABOVE EACH WINDOW � N I i� co 00 O p I ih N I � , 00 N 00 0 I � I i(7 00 N N A-102 EXTERIOR NORTH ELEVATION SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" METAL CANOPY SCHOOL SIGN EXACT LOCATION TBD Fil L 2L — — — — — — — — l — — — — — — — — — BRICK 1—ENDICOTT BRICK JEFFERSON SERIES SAHARA SANDS 8" WHITE BAND AROUND ENTIRE BUILDING AT TOP OF UPSTAIRS WINDOWS, TOP AND BOTTOM OF DOWNSTAIRS WINDOWS AND AROUND EACH INDIVIDUAL WINDOW. -------------------------------------- —----- -------------- a------------------- :J------ I----�J BRICK 2—ENDICOTT BRICK JEFFERSON SERIES PRECAST PANELS WITH REVEALS INTEGRAL COLOR — SHERWIN WILLIAMS MONTICELLO WEB GRAY INTEGRAL COLOR — SHERWIN WILLIAMS v� �v MONTICELLO SAHARA SANDS MONTICELLO WEB GRAY SAHARA SANDS cD I N n 1 � 00 o I N 00 N 00 o_ I � � I in 00 oo I oo 1 N N c-5 EXTERIOR EAST ELEVATION �tl Vi SCALE : 1/8"= V-0' A-102 PRECAST PANELS WITH REVEALS INTEGRAL COLOR — SHERWIN WILLIAMS WEB GRAY cD I N I 00 00 o I , N _I 00 N 00 _o I � I in 00 00 I 00 N N DICOTT BRICK SERIES KE -5 EXTERIOR SOUTH ELEVATION A-101 SCALE : 1/8"= 1'-0" A-102 S >m E LLI G a aF CL LLI = J yJ �O LLIV z z � O a� d� a 0 (f) LLI z z 2 C J LLI ARM D\ ARCHITECTS 616 677 5997 OFFICE 616 813 2452 MOBILE RMD@RMDArchitects.net 1744 MARNE ESTATES DR. TALLMADGE TOWNSHIP, MI 49435 0 LL 0 w co r- co 0 Q cfl 0 0 Q w c / SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT NUMBER PA1 2318 SHEET NUMBER A-201 June 11, 2018 Dear Melissa, Attached are the final documents related to the expectations outlined in the Administrative Review Committee (ARC) Report dated May 11, 2018. Thank you to you and your team for working with us to make the needed changes in order meet the requirements and expectations outlined in the report. Additionally, below I have included the specifics related to parking that was discussed last Friday, June 8, 2018 with Karl Jentoft and Ben Ford over the phone. Narrative regarding Staffing and Parking: Staffing: Partnership Academy currently has 57 full-time employees and I part-time employee. We anticipate we will have 63 employees when we open at 6500 Nicolette Avenue South in the fall of 2019. At full capacity, in 2024, we project we may have up to 75 employees. Parking: While we can accommodate all the required parking on our property, we prefer to build 50 parking spaces and use some of our current parking lot as a playground. We currently have 8-10 staff members who use public transportation and do not parka carat our facility. With the new location at 6500 Nicolette Avenue South, we anticipate this number will increase to about 15 due to the improved public transportation options in the area. We are also in discussions with Brixmor, the developer who owns the HUB, to obtain a cross parking agreement. They have been very supportive and we hope to have something in writing shortly. While they thought we may currently have a prescriptive right to park in the lot already, we have asked to obtain something in writing. If the 50 proposed parking spaces do not meet our needs and we are not able to find additional parking offsite, we are willing to create more parking spaces on our current lot. If there is anything further that we can provide regarding our development project please let me know. Sincerely, Lisa Hendricks Executive Director Partnership Academy is a Preschool - 5t" grade public charter school that has been operating in Richfield at the Church of the Assumption at 305 East 77th Street since 2002. Partnership Academy also operates a preschool program at a separate location in Minneapolis at 2539 Pleasant Avenue South due to limited space at its current site. Partnership Academy serves a total of 284 students from predominately low-income communities. Partnership Academy is currently in its sixteenth year of operation and is authorized by the Audubon Center of the North Woods. Partnership Academy's current facility does not have the capacity to meet the needs of the preschool program and the growing Partnership Academy program. Additionally, the current space has very limited green and play space and students have been limited to a black top parking lot for play space. The existing facility also needs significant updates and improvements that the current landlord has been unwilling to pay for. Partnership Academy, through the Partnership Academy Association Building Company, has been looking for a permanent home since 2007. Partnership Academy Association Building Company is under contract to purchase and develop the Bremmer Bank property located next to the HUB shopping center at 6500 Nicollet Avenue South to become the permanent campus for Partnership Academy. This site is affordable and works within the school's budget. Partnership Academy Association Building Company is planning to finance this project using tax exempt bonds with Piper Jaffray as its bond underwriter and hopes to close on the purchase by the end of June 2018. Development management and consulting is being provided by TenSquare. The new facility will enable the Partnership Academy to consolidate its preschool program and elementary school into one facility. Additionally, the school plans to expand its program from 5t" grade to 8t" grade in order to meet the demands of current families. The school plans to add one grade level each school year, retaining current fifth graders for sixth grade in the 2018- 2019 school year. By expanding organically to eighth grade, Partnership Academy projects a maximum enrollment of 470 students by the 2023-2024 school year. The new facility will be located on a 1.8 acre site at 6500 Nicolette Avenue South in Richfield, Minnesota. The site is close to current Partnership Academy families, is close to a large city park, is easily accessible for families and provides adequate parking. Partnership Academy Building Corporation will demolish the existing building late this summer and plans to start construction early in the fall. The planned 40,022 square foot building will be new, ground up construction with 23 classrooms, 18 pullout spaces for small group learning, a 6,480 sf gymnasium, a serving kitchen, outdoor play space, associated office and administrative space, and restrooms. Partnership Academy Association Building Corporation has engaged RMD Architects for initial architectural services. RMD has completed a conceptual site plan and conceptual drawings based on the programmatic and physical needs of Partnership Academy. RMD is currently developing full architectural plans for the Project that are scheduled to be completed by May 15, 2018. The Project is projected to begin construction by September 2018 and be completed by May 2019. True to its namesake, Partnership Academy has built many strong community partnerships over the last sixteen years. Most notably in the last year, Partnership Academy: Played a key role during the Seasons Park apartment transition to a new owner, Aeon, last fall In partnership with the City and other community organizations, Partnership Academy held several listening sessions at the school for current residents regarding the Seasons Park sale Assisted City Council Woman Maria Regan Gonzalez with organizing a bus tour and site visit to some of Aeon's other properties for current residents to become more familiar with the new owner's rental properties Provided several bilingual staff to provide support to residents at Season's Park/Aeon during the transition process Partnered with the City of Richfield Park and Recreation Department and Recreation Services Director Jim Topitzhofer to secure the US Bank Places to Play grant in the amount of $38,000 to support the completion of the Richfield Community Band Shell at Veteran's Park Partnership Academy believes this project is a great opportunity to meet the needs of its current students and allows the school to meet the demands for growth from its stakeholders. Additionally, the project will be an opportunity to bring new families into the city and the projected growth plans will provide additional jobs and resources to the community. Some of these resources include: ESL classes for adults, La Red Childcare Network training, healthy living classes with Fairview Southdale Hospital, University of Minnesota, CLUES and continued community service partnerships with City of Richfield officials. This project is a great fit for Partnership Academy and will greatly benefit the overall Richfield Community. From: Ken Erickson <Ken.Ericksongbrixmor.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 3:57 PM To: Karl Jentoft <karlgthetensquaregroup.com> Subject: Partnership Academy, Richfield, MN Mr. Jentoft: We are in receipt of your plans for the proposed Partnership Academy Association at 6500 Nicollet Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota. As you are aware, we own the immediately adjacent shopping center known as "The Hub". As we discussed, Brixmor is evaluating a redevelopment of the The Hub. Such redevelopment will be a long term, multi -phased development. The reason for this email is to let Partnership Academy know we look forward to being their neighbors and look forward to working with you in the future. Brixmor realizes that we both synergistically utilize a shared ingress/egress drive and that cross -parking occurs between our respective properties without a formal cross -access & parking agreement. We foresee no reason that such activity cannot continue to occur temporarily until such time we formalize an agreement in the future. Any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Ken Erickson VP, Re/Development Direct (847) 562-4101 Cell (224) 651-4725 6500 Nicollet Ave APUD 6/2018 Surrounding Zoning and Comprehensive Plan R LDR I R LDR I R LDR 64TH STREET R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR I R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R LDR R MHD 65TH STREET MR-2 MHD PC-2 MIX: MIXED C-2 PC-2 HUB MIXED R LDR LDR LDR C-2 CC MR-2 W Q R LDR J J W 0 R LDR C-2 CC U) Q J m R LDR PC-2 MIXED 66TH STREET R SCH HOLYANGELS a] LDR R LDR LDR LDR R CC C-1 Cr, R R CC LDR R R CC LDR C-1 CC R R CC LDR R R CC LDR C-2 CC W D Z W C-2 CCO Q H W J J O U /Z C-2 CCO R -2 LDR R LDR C-2 CC R LDR LDR R LDR R LDR R W LDR D Z R W LDR Q ~ R (n LDR R LDR Zoning: C-1 - Neighborhood Commercial Feet C-2 - General Commercial 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 PC-2 - Planned Commercial R - Single-family Residential Legend MR-2 - Multi -family Residential N Comp Plan: 350 foot notification area MIXED - Mixed Use CCO - Community Commercial/Office 6500 Nicollet Ave MHD - Medium -High Density Residential LDR - Low Density Residential I:\GIS\Communit Develo ment\Staff\Plannin Tech\Pro'ects\6500 Nicollet Ave - Z.mxd AGENDA SECTION: OTHER BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM # 8. STAFF REPORT NO. 121 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/10/2018 REPORT PREPARED BY: Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Manager DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Jay Henthorne, Director of Public Safety/Chief of Police 7/3/2018 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Steven L. Devich, City Manager 7/5/2018 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of an appeal of a Therapeutic Massage Therapist License application for Deming Lai. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On May 14, 2018, staff received a Therapeutic Massage Therapist License application for Deming Lai. It is unlawful to practice or provide massage services in the City without a therapist license. The required background investigation was completed and the Public Safety Director denied the Therapeutic Massage Therapist License application on June 6, 2018 for failure to meet the eligibility criteria under City Code. The applicant did not provide the required evidence of good standing with the American Massage Therapy Association, the Associated Bodywork and Massage Professionals or other organization of therapeutic massage professionals having a similar code of ethics, as approved by the Public Safety Director. In addition, the applicant does not have the required two years of experience practicing massage therapy and submitted a copy of a diploma from a New Jersey institution that misrepresents dates of attendance, based on information obtained by staff during the background check. Section 1188.15 subd. 2 states the Public Safety Director must grant or deny the application and send notice to the applicant upon denial informing the applicant of the right to appeal to the City Council within 14 days. Staff sent a letter stating reasons for the denial on June 6, 2018. Mr. Lai provided a written notice of appeal on June 20, 2018. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Support the denial of the Therapeutic Massage Therapist License application submitted by Deming Lai. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT On May 14, 2018, staff received a Therapeutic Massage Therapist License application for Deming Lai. The required background information revealed the following: The applicant provided a copy of a diploma in Advanced Massage Therapy from US PC Tech, Jersey City, NJ., dates of attendance from July 9, 2010 - September 13, 2011. US PC Tech closed in February 2010 per the Department of Labor and Workforce Development located in the State of New J ersey. -According to the training Evaluation Unit from the Department of Labor and Workforce Development located in New Jersey, all transcripts need to have a raised seal. The certificate provided in the application documents did not have a raised seal. The reason for this, according to the Department of Labor, is that they have seen an increase in fraudulent transcripts and documents from Massage Therapy schools throughout the state. - The applicant is not listed as a member of the American Massage Therapy Association - The applicant then supplied a certificate of completion from The American Academy of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine located in Roseville, MN. Date of graduation is January 2018. The National Certification Board of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork has revoked the American Academy of Acupuncture and Oriental Massage as an assigned school status. - The applicant does not have the minimum required two years of experience practicing massage therapy. By way of background, Mr. Lai also submitted an application for a therapeutic massage enterprise license (for Longshi, Inc.) at the same time he submitted the application for an individual therapist Iicense.The Council accepted staff recommendation and denied the enterprise license at its meeting on June 26, 2018. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc) • Richfield City Code Subsection 1188.15 requires the Public Safety Director to verify the information supplied on the Therapeutic Massage Therapist license application and investigate the background, including the criminal background of the applicant to assure compliance with this section. Within 21 days of receipt of a complete application and fee, the Public Safety Director must grant or deny the application. • Section 1188.11 subd 2. states Therapeutic Massage Therapist license application must contain the following: (i) Evidence that the applicant (1) is a member in good standing of the American Massage Therapy Association, the Associated Bodywork and Massage Professionals or other organizations of therapeutic massage professionals which has similar written and enforceable code of ethics and has been currently approved by the Public Safety Director. • Additionally, Section 1188.11 also states an applicant must have two years of experience practicing massage therapy. C. CRITICALTIMING ISSUES: • N/A D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • N/A E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • N/A ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION . • The City Council could choose to allow the issuance of the Therapeutic Massage Therapist License. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Deming Lai, Applicant