92-7947R99
RESOLUTION N0. 7947
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 GENERAL SERVICES
SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides for the
adoption of a pay plan for General Services employees from time-to-time,
and
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 1993 pay plan for
position classifications for General Services employees. The City Manager
is authorized to add or reclassify positions as necessary. Examples of
positions in each pay grade are attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby
does establish for the year 1993 the following pay plan, which is to be
effective January 1, 1993, and subject to all applicable provisions of the
City Code:
GENERAL SERVICES COMPENSATION PLAN
Step 1 2 3 4 MERIT_RANGE
Range
GS1 YR 18,366.40 19,260.80 20,259.20 21,278.40 23,462.40
MO 1,530.53 1,605.07 1,688.27 1,773.20 1,955.20
BW 706.40 740.80 779.20 818.40 902.40
HR 8.83 9.26 9.74 10.23 11.28
GS2 YR 20,259.20 21,278.40 22.,318.40 23,462.40 25,875.20
MO 1,688.27 1,773.20 1,859.87 1,955.20 2,156.27
BW 779.20 818.40 858.40 902.40 995.20
HR 9.74 10.23 10.73 11.28 12.44
GS3 YR 22,318.40 23,462.40 24,668.80 25,875.20 28,579.20
MO 1,859.87 1,955.20 2,055.73 2,156.27 2,381.60
BW 858.40 902.40 948.80 995.20 1,099.20
HR 10.73 11.28 11.86 12.44 13.74
GS4 YR 24,668.80 25,875.20 27,206.40 28,579.20 31,553.60
MO 2,055.73 2,156.27 2,267.20 2,381.60 2,629.47
BW 948.80 995.20 1,046.40 1,099.20 1,213.60
HR 11.86 12.44 13.08 13.74 15.17
GS4E YR 26,499.20 27,830.40 29,244.80 30,721.60 33,904.00
MO 2,208.27 2,319.20 2,437.07 2,560.13 2,825.33
BW 1,019.20 1,070.40 1,124.80 1,181.60 1,304.00
HR 12.74 13.38 14.06 14.77 16.30
GS5 YR 27,206.40 28,579.20 29,993.60 31,553.60 34,798.40
MO 2,267.20 2,381.60 2,499.47 2,629.47 2,899.87
BW 1,046.40 1,099.20 1,153.60 1,213.60 1,338.40
HR 13.08 13.74 14.42 15.17 16.73
GS5E YR 29,244.80- -30,721.60 32,240.00 33,904.00 37,398.40
MO 2,437.07 2,560.13 2,686.67 2,825.33 3,116.53
BW 1,124.80 1,181.60 1,240.00 1,304.00 1,438.40
HR 14.06 14.77 15.50 16.30 17.98
Resolution No. 7947 Page
GS6 YR 29,993.60 31,553.60 33,155.20 34,798.40 40,331.20
MO 2,499.47 2,629.47 2,762.93 2,899.87 3,360.93
BW 1,153.60 1,213.60 1,275.20 1,338.40 1,551.20
HR 14.42 15.17 15.94 16.73 19.39
GS6E YR 32,240.00 33,904.00 35,630.40 37,398.40 43,368.00
MO 2,686.67 2,825.33 2,969.20 3,116.53 3,614.00
BW 1,240.00 1,304.00 .1,370.40 1,438.40 1,668.00
HR 15.50 16.30 I 17.13 17.98 20.85
a. Step 1 - Start
b. Step 2 - One year from anniversary date
c. Step 3 - One year since lastincrease
If an employee is rated Needs Improvement,
may not advance to step 3 until performance
Satisfactory or higher.
d. Step 4 - One year since last'~increase
If an employee is rated Needs Improvement,
may not advance to Step 4 until performance
Satisfactory or higher.
the employee
is rated
the employee
is rated
e. Merit Ranae - One year since last increase for those rated Above
Satisfactory or Outstanding. Satisfactory and Needs Improvement
performers may not advance to or within the Merit Range. Salary
increases in the Merit Rangelwill be determined by the supervisor
and may range between 2~ - 5$.
An employee within the Merit'IRange who is performing at least at an
Above Satisfactory level will receive a percentage salary adjustment
equal to the percentage of the overall range adjustment. An employee
within the Merit Range who is performing at a Satisfactory level will
receive a percentage salary increase equal to one-half (~) of the
overall percentage adjustment.
An employee within the Merit'IRange who is performing at a Needs
Improvement level will not receive a salary adjustment, provided
however, that such employee's salary would not remain at an amount
less than the new rate for Step 4 of such employee's current salary
grade.
f. Employees whose competency level and/or performance are rated
Unsatisfactory may not advance to the next step until their
performance improves. ',
Passed by the City Council of the City of 'chf'eld, 'nnesota this
9th day of December, 1992.
l
Martin J.~3 irsch Mayor
ATTEST:
~~'~ o~
c.~ y
r
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
Resolution No. 7947 Page 3
GENERAL_SERVICES POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
GRADE POSITION TITLES CLASS
1 Clerk Typist Non-Exempt
Data Entry Operator Non-Exempt
Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt
Switchboard-Receptionist Non-Exempt
2 Community Development Technician Non-Exempt
Community Service Officer Non-Exempt
Custodian Non-Exempt
Lead Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt
Licensing Clerk Non-Exempt
Liquor Clerk/Cashier Non-Exempt
Senior Clerk Typist Non-Exempt
Transportation Specialist Non-Exempt
3 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
Accounting Technician Non-Exempt
Accounts Payable Clerk Non-Exempt
Code Compliance Officer Non-Exempt
Dispatcher Non-Exempt
Health/Licensing Specialist Non-Exempt
Leased Housing Assistant Non-Exempt
Liquor Account Clerk Non-Exempt
Secretary Non-Exempt
Utility Billing Clerk Non-Exempt
Arena Operations Assistant Non-Exempt
4 Assessment Clerk Non-Exempt
Assistant Turf Supervisor Non-Exempt
Central Services Technician Non-Exempt
Data Processing Technician Non-Exempt
Engineering Technician Non-Exempt
Social Services Supervisor Non-Exempt
Solid Waste/Environmental Specialist Non-Exempt
4E Administrative Aide Exempt
Associate Planner Exempt
Media Assistant Exempt
Payroll Accountant Exempt
Project Assistant Exempt
Zoning Administrator Exempt
5 Assistant Building Superintendent Non-Exempt
Housing Inspector Non-Exempt
5E Administrative Assistant Exempt
Assistant Golf Course Manager Exempt
Assistant Liquor Store Manager Exempt
Community Center Programmer Exempt
Community Development Assistant Exempt
Leased Housing Specialist Exempt
Motor Vehicle Licensing Supervisor Exempt
Naturalist Exempt
Planning and Research Specialist Exempt
Resolution No. 7947
Recreation Supervisor
Redevelopment Specialist
Rehabilitation Specialist
Youth Resource Specialist
6 Electrical/Building Tnsp
Programmer/Analyst ~,
Senior Housing Inspector
6E Accountant
Housing Supervisor
Administrative Assistant
(Rev. 10-92)
4
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt