Loading...
93-8037R85 RESOLUTION NO. 8037 RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 GENERAL SERVICES SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides fqr the adoption of a pay plan for General Services employees from time-to-time, and WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 1993 pay plan for position classifications for General Services employees. The City Manager is authorized to add or reclassify positions as necessary. Examples of positions in each pay grade are attached. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does establish for the year 1993 the following pay plan, which is to be effective August 1, 1993, and subject to all applicable provisions of the City Code: GENERAL SERVICES COMPENSATION PLAN Step 1 2 3 4 5 MERIT RANGE Range GS1 YR 18,366.40 19,260.80 20,259.20 21,278.40 22,776.00 23,462.40 MO ~ 1,530.53 1,605.07 1,688.27 1,773.20 1,897.00 1,955.20 BW 706.40 740.80 779.20 818.40 876.00 902.40 HR 8.83 9.26 9.74 10.23 10.95 11.28 G52 YR 20,259.20 21,278.40 22,318.40 23,462.40 25,875.20 MO 1,688.27 1,773.20 1,859.87 1,955.20 2,156.27 BW 779.20 818.40 858.40 902.40 995.20 HR 9.74 10.23 10.73 11.28 12.44 GS3 YR 22,318.40 23,462.40 24,668.80 25,875.20 28,579.20 MO 1,859.87 1,955.20 2,055.73 2,156.27 2,381.60 BW 858.40 902.40 948.80 995.20 1,099.20 HR 10.73 11.28 11.86 12.44 13.74 GS4 YR 24,668.80 25,875.20 27,206.40 28,579.20 31,553.60 MO 2,055.73 2,156.27 2,.267.20 2,381.60 2,629.47 BW 948.80 995.20 1;'046.40 1,099.20 1,213.60 HR 11.86 12.44 13.08 13.74 15.17 GS4E YR 26,499.20 27,830.40 .9,244.80 30,721.60 33,904.00 MO 2,208.27 2,319.20 2,437.07 2,560.13 2,825.33 BW 1,019.20 1,070.40 1,124.80 1,181.60. 1,304.00 HR 12.74 13.38 14.06 14.77 16.30 GS5 YR 27,206.40 28,579.20 29,993.60 31,553.60 34,798.40 MO 2,267.20 2,381.60 2,499.47 2,629.47 2,899.87 BW 1,046.40 1,099.20 1,153.60 1,213.60. 1,338.40. HR 13.08 13.74 14.42 15.17 16.73 GS5E YR 29,244.80 30,721.60 32,240.00 33,904.00 37,398.40 MO 2,437.07 2,560.13 2,686.67 2,825.33 3,116.53 BW 1,124.80 1,181.60 1,240.00 1,304.00 1,438.40 HR 14.06 14.77 15.50 16.30 17.98 GS6 YR 29,993.60 31,553.60 33,155.20 34,798.40 MO 2,499.47 2,629.47 x,762.93 2,899.87 BW 1,153.60 .1,213.60 x,275.20 1,338.40 HR 14.42 15.17 15.94 16.73 GS6E YR 32,240.00 33,904.00 3 ,630.40 37,398.40 MO 2,686.67 2,825.33 ,969.20 3,116.53 BW 1,240.00 1,304.00 ,370.40 1,438.40 HR 15.50 16.30 17.13 17.98 a. Step 1 - Start b. Step 2 - One year from anniversary date 40,331.20 3,360.93 1,551.20 19.39 43,368.00 3,614.00 1,668.00 20.85 c. Step 3 - One year since last increase If an employee is ra~ed Needs Improvement, the employee may not advance to Step 3 until performance is rated Satisfactory or higher. d. Step 4 - One year since last increase If~an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee may not advance to Step 4 until performance is rated Satisfactory or .higher. e. Merit Rancte - One year since last increase for those rated Above Satisfactory or Outstanding. ~iSatisfactory and Needs Improvement performers may not advance toor within the Merit Range. Salary increases in the Merit Range will be determined by the supervisor and may range between 2$ - 5$~~ An employee within the Merit Range who is performing at least at an Above Satisfactory level will receive a percentage salary adjustment equal to the percentage of the overall range adjustment. An employee within the Merit Range who'is performing at a Satisfactory level will receive a percentage salary increase equal to one-half (~) of the overall percentage adjustment. An employee within the Merit Range who is performing at a Needs .Improvement level will not receive a salary adjustment, provided however, that such employee's salary would not remain at an amount less than the new rate for Step 4 of such employee's current salary grade. f. Employees whose competency level and/or performance are rated Unsatisfactory may not advance to the next step until their performance improves. Passed by the City Council of the City of R~chfipld, Minnesota this 26th day of July, 1993. I // ~f K Martin sch ~ Mayor ATTES ~• ~~.~~'W ~-L~ ~ ~ ~ '~, Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk Resolution No. 8Q37 GENERAL SERVICES POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE GRADE POSITION TITLES CLASS 1 ~ Clerk Typist Non-Exempt Data Entry Operator Non-Exempt Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt Switchboard-Receptionist Non-Exempt 2 Community Development Technician Non-Exempt Community Service Officer Non-Exempt Custodian Non-Exempt Finance Clerk Non-Exempt Lead Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt Licensing Clerk Non-Exempt Liquor Clerk/Cashier Non-Exempt Senior Clerk Typist Non-Exempt Transportation Specialist Non-Exempt 3 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt Arena Operations Assistant Non-Exempt Code Compliance~Officer Non-Exempt Dispatcher Non-Exempt Health/Licensing Specialist Non-Exempt Leased Housing Assistant Non-Exempt Secretary Non-Exempt 4 Assessment Clerk Non-Exempt Assistant Turf Supervisor Non-Exempt Central Services Technician Non-Exempt Data Processing Technician Non-Exempt Engineering Technician Non-Exempt Social Services Supervisor Non-Exempt 4E Administrative Aide Exempt Associate Planner Exempt Media Assistant Exempt Payroll Accountant Exempt Project Assistant Exempt Zoning Administrator Exempt 5 Assistant Building Superintendent Non-Exempt Housing Inspector Non-Exempt 5E Administrative Assistant Exempt Assistant Golf Course Manager Exempt Assistant Liquor Store Manager Exempt Community Center Programmer Exempt Community. Development Assistant Exempt Leased Housing Specialist Exempt Motor Vehicle Licensing Supervisor Exempt Naturalist Exempt Planning and Research Specialist Exempt Recreation Supervisor Exempt Redevelopment Sp cialist Rehabilitation Specialist Youth Resource Specialist Exempt Exempt Exempt 6 Electrical/Building Inspector. Non-Exempt Programmer/Analy~t Non-Exempt Senior Housing Inspector Non-Exempt 6E Accountant I' Housing Supervisor Administrative.Assistant Exempt Exempt Exempt (Rev. 10-92)