The URL can be used to link to this page

08-13-2019 Regular AgendaREGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 13, 2019 7:00 PM INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS Call to order Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. Pledge of Allegiance Approval of the Minutes of the: (1) City Council Work Session of July 23, 2019; (2) Regular City Council meeting of July 23, 2019; and (3) City Council Work Session of July 30, 2019. PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation on Richfield Health Resource Center COUNCIL DISCUSSION 2. Hats Off to Hometown Hits AGENDAAPPROVAL 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are recommended for approval. A. Consideration of the reappointment, the firm of BerganKDV as the Citys auditor for the financial reporting fiscal years 2019 and 2020, and to authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute an agreement for such services. Staff Report No. 93 B. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the purchase of three temporary construction easements and three permanent right-of-way easements at 6600 Lyndale Ave S, 6701 Lyndale Ave S and 6801 Lyndale Ave S as related to the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project. Staff Report No. 94 C. Consideration of transfer of funds to close out a certain capital project fund. Staff Report No. 95 D. Consideration of the approval of the purchase of a truck chassis from Nuss Truck and Equipment for $106,953 and dump box/snowfighting equipment from Towmaster, Inc. for$104,668, totaling $211,621 plus taxes and licensing in 2020 for use by the Public Works Department. Staff Report No. 96 5. Consideration of items, if any, removed from Consent Calendar RESOLUTIONS 6. Consideration of the adoption of resolutions to approve conditional use permits to allow small wireless facilities at multiple locations throughout the City. Staff Report No. 97 7. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution appointing a representative to the Board of Directors of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board. Staff Report No. 98 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 8. City Manager's Report CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS 9. Claims and Payrolls Open forum (15 minutes maximum) Each speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. Comments are to be an opportunity to address the Council on items not on the agenda. Individuals who wish to address the Council must have registered prior to the meeting. 10. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota City Council Work Session July 23, 2019 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 5:00p.m. in the Bartholomew Room. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Mary Supple; Present: Simon Trautmann; and Ben Whalen Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Administrative Services Director/Assistant City Manager; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Amy Markle, Recreation Services Director; Chris Regis, Finance Director; Wayne Kewitsch, Fire Chief; Mike Flaherty, Deputy Public Safety Director/Deputy Chief; Bill Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director; Neil Ruhland, Communications and Engagement Manager; Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk ITEM #1 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 2019-2020 GOALS & OBJECTIVES City Manager Rodriguez gave a presentation on the goals and objectives that City Staff and Council agreed upon. There was discussion on a few items to focus on such as equity being a staple in all things that we do. Council Member Trautmann thanked the City Staff for their work on this project. Mayor Regan Gonzalez also thanked City Staff and advocates for the use of the City's strong suits to become a better community for all. Ia:Z61T/117:911a17_,111104N7:/:1'daIZ/_Vto] /_1I&II:7_,1111 1111*71*21Z4017►yi/_111[97►I_1►I ITEM #2 PROPOSED 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET (CIB) AND 2021-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) BASED ON COUNCIL DIRECTION AT THE MAY 14, 2019 WORK SESSION City Manager Rodriguez presented an overview of the budget schedule and stated that there will be more information to come on August 27. Finance Director Regis went over the capital improvement budget and capital improvement plan. There was general discussion about the prioritization of the City projects to help residents. Community Development Director Stark shared the reasoning behind the HRA deficits in the future. City Council Work Session Minutes -2- July 23, 2019 Public Works Director Asher presented the utility rates increase an d With the impending projects, there was discussion about the storm water run-off and where it would go. Public Works Director Asher also proposed two different options for the increase of storm water of which the Council agreed with a steady increase versus a variable increase. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked about organized recycling/organics and how that could affect the residents. Recreation Services Director Markle explained the benefits of organized recycling/organics for homeowners as the City would be able to negotiate a lower price with the vendors. Council Member Trautmann urged for communication to the residents about the organized collection. Mayor Regan Gonzalez asked Fire Chief Kewitsch about the change in office staff. Fire Chief Kewitsch stated that the additional staff will help with the amount of inspections that the Fire Chief has to process throughout the City. Council Member Supple asked about $10,000 that the Arts Commission has for public art and where that money is found. City Manager Rodriguez stated that this will have to be looked into. Council Member Garcia asked about $500 for each commission. Assistant City Manager Dmytrenko stated that the staff liaison for the commission is in charge of the monies and she would have to check on the procedure that is followed. Council Member Whalen asked about Local Government Aid (LGA) and how that can be used. Mayor Regan Gonzalez also asked about the history of LGA for the City. Assistant City Manager Dmytrenko shared that the monies from LGA are not always there and the City cannot count on it. Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked City Staff on their work on the budget. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:34 p.m. Date Approved: August 13, 2019 Kari Sinning Deputy City Clerk Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Katie Rodriguez City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Meeting July 23, 2019 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Edwina Garcia; Simon Present: Trautmann; and Ben Whalen Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Amy Markle, Recreation Services Director; Wayne Kewitsch, Fire Chief; Mike Flaherty, Deputy Public Safety Director/Deputy Chief; John Stark, Community Development Director; Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Supervisor; Rick Regnier, Chief Building Official; and Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk OPEN FORUM Jeanne Streitz, 6701 17t" Ave S, requests permission to build a home on the southeast side of Veteran's Park. Robert Hall, 7309 Oliver Ave S, spoke in support of Jeanne Streitz's request to build. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Trautmann, S/Supple to approve the minutes of the: (1) Special Concurrent City Council and Planning Commission work session of June 25, 2019; and (2) Regular City Council meeting of June 25, 2019. Motion carried 5-0. Item #1 COUNCIL DISCUSSION • Hats Off to Hometown Hits Council Meeting Minutes -2- July 23, 2019 Council Member Supple mentioned the sidewalk poetry that was installed along 66t" Street and the event that was held in celebration; the Richfield Arts Commission webpage also has an interactive map of the locations of the displayed poems. Council Member Supple also stated that Mayor Regan Gonzalez attended the Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit ground breaking ceremony and is looking forward to the project to take place to offer residents more access. Council Member Supple expressed her excitement for Night to Unite on August 6. Council Member Trautmann extended an invitation to all to attend or register for the Urban Wildland Half Marathon and 5K. He thanked Staff for their work to help make the race happen after the flooding and rerouting. Council Member Trautmann also promoted the Experience Adventures, joint program with Three Rivers District, which will take place in Taft Park on August 17 for free. Council Member Garcia thanked Richfield- Bloomington Honda, specifically Tim Carter, for offering the use a vehicle for the 4' of July Parade for the City Council. Council Member Whalen acknowledged and thanked the volunteers, staff, and organizations involved in Red, White & Blue Days. Council Member Whalen also wanted to up lift Dave Synder, who has been accomplishing some good works through the Community Housing Team along with Council Members Whalen and Supple, in doing some door knocking at apartments and talking with residents about housing and what their dreams are for the community. Mayor Regan Gonzalez attended the 494 Business Update meeting with other businesses throughout the surrounding area at Best Buy Corporate to get an update on the 494 construction and how it will affect the community and businesses, and the timeline of the construction. Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked City Staff for their work on everything that they do to keep the City going. Item #2 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA M/Garcia, S/Whalen to approve the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. Item #3 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar. A. Consideration of a resolution authorizing negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 77th Street Underpass Project and approval of distribution of the Notice of Decision documenting this decision. (Staff Report No. 85) RESOULTION NO. 11636 AUTHORIZING NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE NEED FOR AN EIS FOR SP 2758-82, SP 157-108-035, AND SP 157-594-003 AND APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NOTICE OF DECISION B. Consideration of the approval of accepting the quotation of $225,000 to replace play equipment at Jefferson, Nicollet, and Taft Parks from Northland Recreation and authorize the Recreation Services Director to execute the quotation. (Staff Report No. 86) Council Meeting Minutes -3- July 23, 2019 C. Consideration of the approval of the continuation of an agreement with the City of Bloomington for the provision of food, pools and lodging inspection services for Richfield for 2020. (Staff Report No. 87) D. Consideration of the approval of a Temporary On Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the Church of the Assumption, located at 305 77th Street East, for their annual festival taking place August 17-18, 2019. (Staff Report No. 88) E. Consideration of the approval of a two-year use and indemnification agreement between the City of Richfield and Tom Price for the use of a 4,690 square -foot strip of land along the edge of Lincoln Field. (Staff Report No. 89) F. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the purchase of three temporary construction easements and three permanent right-of-way easements at 6999 Lyndale Ave S, 6645 Lyndale Ave S and 6749 Lyndale Ave S as related to the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project. (Staff Report No. 90) RESOLUTION NO. 11637 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO MAKE PAYMENTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AT 6999 LYNDALE AVE S., 6645 LYNDALE AVE S., AND 6749 LYNDALE AVE S. AS PART OF THE LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT G. Consideration of the termination of the Marketing License Agreement between the City of Richfield, Minnesota, and Utility Service Partners Private Label, Inc., d/b/a Service Line Warranties of America. (Staff Report No. 91) M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the consent calendar. Council Member Whalen clarified the negative declaration for the environmental impact study means that no further studies are necessary for the project. Council Member Trautmann made a note about the termination of the Marketing License Agreement between the City of Richfield and Service Line Warranties of America thanking Staff for bringing to the Council's attention and stating that the current contracts between individuals are not voided and urged residents to talk to their homeowner's insurance to add a rider to their policies. Motion carried 5-0. Item #4 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR None. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF THE REVOCATION OF EMPIRE Item #5 TOBACCO LLC BUSINESS LICENSE FOR VIOLATIONS OF RICHFIELD CITY CODE AND MINNESOTA STATUTE 144.414. (STAFF REPORT NO. 92) Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 92. Council Meeting Minutes -4- July 23, 2019 Support Services Supervisor Jennifer Anderson gave more information about the license and the compliancy. Fire Chief Kewitsch presented the Fire Department's discoveries and violations within the building. Council Member Garcia opened the public hearing. Lensa and Lula Mohamed, 624 E Lake St Minneapolis, spoke on behalf of their business. M/Garcia, S/Supple to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Council Member Supple asked if the revocation is permanent to which City Attorney Tietjen stated that it simply means revocation of this license and if they wanted to make the necessary changes for compliancy they could reapply for the license. City Attorney Tietjen also stated that the license is for the entire property. Council Member Whalen shared that there currently is not a zoning code for a club and wanted clarification on that zoning. City Manager Rodriguez stated that an ordinance change would have to take place in order for the zoning to change. Mayor Regan Gonzalez appreciated the business owners coming to share their story and explained why the license is being revoked. Council Member Garcia thanked the staff for bringing it to their attention. M/Garcia, S/Supple to approve revocation of the business license of Empire Tobacco LLC located at 6414 Nicollet Ave South, Richfield, Minnesota and furthermore, approve a resolution with findings supporting the revocation. RESOLUTION NO. 11638 REVOKING THE BUSINESS LICENSE OF EMPIRE TOBACCO LLC LOCATED AT 6414 NICOLLET AVENUE SOUTH, RICHFIELD, MN 55423 Motion carried 5-0. Item #6 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Rodriguez had nothing to report. Item #7 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS M/Garcia, S/Whalen that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 7/9/19 A/P Checks: 278720 - 279096 $ 1,833,058.49 Payroll: 146561 - 146943 ; 43049 - 43055 705,008.76 TOTAL $ 2,538,067.25 Council Meeting Minutes -5- July 23, 2019 U.S. Bank 7/23/19 A/P Checks: 279097 - 279528 $ 2,034,523.71 Payroll: 146944- 147330 ; 43056 - 43057 713,392.15 TOTAL $ 2,747,915.86 Motion carried 5-0. OPEN FORUM None. Item #8 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:56 p.m. Date Approved: August 13, 2019 Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Kari Sinning Katie Rodriguez Deputy City Clerk City Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota City Council Work Session July 30, 2019 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 8:00 a.m. in the Heredia Room. Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Mary Supple; Simon Present: Trautmann; and Ben Whalen. Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director; Amy Markle, Recreation Services Director; Bill Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director; Chris Regis, Finance Director; Jay Henthorne, Chief of Police/Public Safety Director; John Stark, Community Development Director; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; Wayne Kewitsch, Fire Chief; and Neil Ruhland, Communication and Engagement Manager. Others Present: Scott Morrell, Rebar Leadership. Item #1 COUNCIL -STAFF RETREAT Scott Morrell, Rebar Leadership, lead a facilitated discussion with City Council and City staff that included developing and approving the Standards of Engagement document; which are the standards that guide our interactions between and amongst the Richfield City Council and City Staff. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 11:52 a.m. Date Approved: August 13, 2019 Kari Sinning Deputy City Clerk Maria Regan Gonzalez Mayor Katie Rodriguez City Manager REPORT PREPARED BY: AGENDA SECTON: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 4.A. STAFF REPORT NO.93 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8/13/2019 Chris Regis, Finance Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Chris Regis, Finance Director 7/24/2019 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITYMANAGER REVIEW: N/A. Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the reappointment, the firm of BerganKDV as the City's auditor for the financial reporting fiscal years 2019 and 2020, and to authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute an agreement for such services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For the last six years the City of Richfield has used the auditing firm of Bergan KDV to perform the annual City, HRA and EDA audit. The engagement of that firm was the result of a selection process performed in the fall of 2013. BerganKDV is a leader in the metro area in auditing municipalities. Many of their clients consistently receive the Government Finance Officer Associations Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting. The City has received a proposal from BerganKDV for audit services for the fiscal years ending 2019 and 2020. They are proposing fees of $45,150 for 2019 and $46,050 for 2020. The fees represent a 2% increase each year. City staff has developed a solid working relationship with BerganKDV and consequently recommend their reappointment for the audit of fiscal years ending 2019 and 2020. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the reappointment of the firm BerganKDV as the City's auditor for the financial reporting fiscal years 2019 and 2020, and to authorize the City Manager and the Mayor to execute an agreement for such services. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT N/A. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etch • It is most important to note that the selection of an auditing firm is exclusively within the purview of the City Council. The function of any auditor is to audit work performed by staff and report directly to the City Council with the results. • The agreement with BerganKDV will be for a two year period, fiscal years ending 2019 and 2020. The agreement will be subject to the annual review and recommendation of the Finance Director, satisfactory negotiation of terms and the concurrence of the City Council. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: • It is critical to select an audit firm now as firms are in the process of setting their schedules for the upcoming audit period. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • The fees submitted by BerganKDV for the fiscal years ending 2019 and 2020 are as follows: • Year Ending December 31, 2019 $45,150 • Year Ending December 31, 2020 $46,050 • BerganKDV is a leader in auditing municipalities in the Twin Cities' area and audits numerous municipalities that consistently receive the GFOA Certificate of Achievement. • BerganKDV can also provide the City with considerable finance and accounting expertise in addition to their standard audit services. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: N/A. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(Sl: • If the City Council does not wish to reappoint BerganKDV, staff could go and solicit bids from other firms; however, firms at this time are currently setting their audit schedules. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: None. REPORT PREPARED BY: AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 4. B. STAFF REPORT NO.94 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8/13/2019 Logan Vlasaty, Project Engineer DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director/City Engineer 8/5/2019 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITYMANAGER REVIEW: N/A Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the purchase of three temporary construction easements and three permanent right-of-way easements at 6600 Lyndale Ave S, 6701 Lyndale Ave S and 6801 Lyndale Ave S as related to the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As part of the project, certain temporary and permanent right -of way easements must be acquired for construction. Permanent right-of-way and temporary construction easements are sometimes needed in order to implement major infrastructure projects and facilitate the construction thereof. Property owners receive compensation for both types of easements but for temporary construction easements the area remains under their ownership after construction is complete. The three previously mentioned properties have accepted the offer to purchase and completed the necessary paperwork to finalize the transaction. In order for the easements to become effective, City Council must approve the resolution authorizing payment to the property owners in the agreed upon amounts. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing the purchase of three temporary construction easements and three permanent right-of-way easements at 6600 Lyndale Ave S, 6701 Lyndale Ave S and 6801 Lyndale Ave S as related to the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT • The City Council approved the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project final design on April 9, 2019. • Permanent right-of-way and temporary construction easements are sometimes needed in order to implement major infrastructure projects and facilitate their construction. • These 3 easements are necessitated by the larger footprint of the new roundabouts compared to the footprint of the e)asting roadway design. • The value of the easements are determined via negotiation between a real estate appraisal firm and the property owners following standard appraisal practices. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etcy • The city has authority to acquire easements through an 'offer to purchase" and if no agreement can be reached the city can acquire property though eminent domain for public purposes. • The subject properties have been identified as requiring easement purchase for the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: • Timely payment for and acquisition of the easements will allow construction to continue progress as planned in through 2019. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • 6600 Lyndale Ave S (PID: 27-028-24-32-0347) requires a temporary construction easement payment of $14,200.00; a permanent easement of $53,100.00; and an additional settlement of $5,000.00 for a total of $72,300.00. • 6701 Lyndale Ave S (PID: 27-028-24-32-0126) requires a temporary construction easement payment of $1,475.00 and a permanent easement of $11,725.00 for a total of $13,200.00. • 6801 Lyndale Ave S (PID: 27-028-24-33-0019) requires a temporary construction easement payment of $748.00 and a permanent easement of $1,002.00 for a total of $1,750.00. • Funding for the purchase of the easements required for the construction of the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project will be provided by City funds as part of the overall project costs. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • The City Attorney will be available at the meeting to answer questions. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION (Sl: • None PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: None ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ 6600 Lyndale Easement ❑ 6701 Lyndale Easement ❑ 6801 Lyndale Easemen' ❑ Easement Resolution Type Contract/Agreement Contract/Agreement Contract/Agreement Resolution Letter Date To: Re HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 510 N Chestnut Street, Ste 200 Chaska, MN 55318 952,448.4630 800.448,4630 toll free www.henningprofessionalservices.com Letter of Transmittal July 18, 2019 X Logan Vlasaty Richfield Maintenance Facility 1901 E. 66th Street Richfield, MN 55423 Lyndale Ave. Reconstruction City Bella on Lyndale (6600 Lyndale Ave) We are enclosing For Your: Remarks: Permanent Easement Temporary Construction Easement Payment Request W-9 Multiple right of entry letters Regular Mail Fax Fax and Mail Hand Deliver ❑ Review ❑X Records [—X] Approval Information Please send or email a copy of the check back to Henning Professional Services for the acquisition file. From: Leah Traxler HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Date: July 17, 2019 To: Logan Vlasaty, City of Richfield Cc: Sarah Lloyd, Bolton & Menk Tim Lamkin, Bolton & Menk From: Leah Traxler, Henning Professional Services Re: Lyndale Ave. Reconstruction City Bella on Lyndale Document recording Lender approval fees 510 N Chestnut Street, Ste 200 Chaska, MN 55318 952,448.4630 800.448.4630 toll free The City Bella mortgage loan is a Commercial Mortgage Backed Security. As a condition of the loan, City Bella was required to gain their lenders approval prior to conveying the easements to the City of Richfield. If City Bella were to convey the easements, they would have been in default. The lender reviewed the easements, appraisal and offer. A requirement by the mortgage company for approval was for City Bella to obtain an endorsement to their title policy. The title company writing the endorsement for City Bella's title policy is recording a set of original, signed easement documents as a part of their process. The City of Richfield does not need to record the enclosed easements. A scanned copy of the recorded easements will be provided to the City. City Bella is eligible to be reimbursed for actual, reasonable lender service fees charged for the lender approval. A separate claim will be prepared and submitted on a later date. HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Date: July 17, 2019 To: Logan Vlasaty City of Richfield From: Leah Traxler, Henning Professional Services, Inc. Re: PAYMENT REQUEST Lyndale Ave Reconstruction PID: Property Address: Make Check Payable to: Mail to: Payment Amount: SSN/EIN: 510 N Chestnut Street, Ste 200 Chaska, MN 55318 952.448.4630 800.448.4630 toll free www.henningprofessionalservices.com 27-028-24-32-0347 6600 Lyndale Ave. S, Richfield, MN City Bella on Lyndale Barry Kushner, Board Treasurer 6000 Lyndale Ave. S. #1404 Richfield, MN 55423 $72,300.00 Provided on attached W-9 I Settlement / Pavment Summary Permanent Easement $53,100.00 Temporary Easement $14,200.00 Additional Settlement $5,000.00 TOTAL (rounded to): $72,300.00 Memorandum of Uuderstanding for Settlement `' City of Richfield Lytulale Ave. Project Fee Owner: City Bella on Lyndale Property Address: 6600 Lyndale Ave. S. PIN: 27-028-24-32-0347 On this , leday of �� , 20� 9. , City Bella on Lyndale, Owners of the above described parcel of propert ocated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, did execute and deliver a conveyance of real estate to the City of Richfield. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed upon between the parties that: The Owner has been furnished with the approved estimate of just compensation for the property acquired and a summary statement of the basis for the estimate. The Owner understands and acknowledges that the Agent for the City of Richfield has no direct, indirect, present, or contemplated future personal interest in the property or in any benefits from the acquisition of the property. That in frill compensation for the conveyance of said property, the City of Richfield shall pay the Owner the sum of Seventy -Two Thousand Three Hundred and no/l00 dollars ($72,300.00) for easement(s) and damages. Permanent Easement $53,100.00 Temporary Easement $14,200.00 Additional Settlement $ 5,000.00 Rounded Total $72,300.00 In the event of a clerical error, Grantor, whether one or more, agrees to cooperate in correcting the error including but not limited to resigning all documents. City of Richfield Date: �"30 By: City Bella on Lyndale Date: By: Its: / /(� /Y/l Date: � % By: .CJ�L.�/liC/L(�GGt Its: 6 C�& ��-� t 0� A �f1858+. OCc-�2P MINNESOTA S ETARY OF S ATE IIIV�IIIIIIIIIII IIIII'�IiIII'�IIII IIV III' III'II!Illill 38170380002 AMENDMENT gF ARTICLESI OF INCORPORATION F A COOPERATIVE Chapter's 308A and 308 READ THE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM COOPERATIVE NAME: The Gramercy Club at City Bella The following amendments of articles or modifications to the statutory re uirements regulating t e above cooperative were adopted: (Insert full text of newly amended or modified article(s), indicati g which articles) is (a e) being amended or added. If the full text of the amendment will not fit in the space provided, please I o not use this form. I stead, retype the amendment on a separate sheet or sheets using this format.) ARTICLE I, NAME 1.1 Name. The name of the Cooperative is "City Bella on Lyndale". This amendment was adopted by the vote of a majority of those voting or the amendment and a duly noticed and validly held meeting of the members, after the amendment was approved by the board of directors. 1 certify that I am authorized to execute this amendment and I further cert fy that I understand that by signing this amendment, I am subject tg the penalties of,perjury as set for in section 609.48 as if I 1,,ad signed this amendment under oath. Signature of an individual authorized by MN law to sign on behalf of the cooperative. (See instrIctions for further details.) Name of a Contact Person George Thomas T Q-PARTMENT OF STATE Daytime Phone Number 612 236-1344 FILED INSTRUCTIONS APR 2 7 2010 1. Please Type or Print Legibly in Black Ink. 2. Firing Fee: $35.00 Payable to the MN -Secretary of State Secretary of S#ate 3. Signature Requirements: For a 308A cooperative, the chair, vice -chair, president, vice-presic ent, secretary or assistant secretary may sign this amendment; for a 308B cooperative, the chair, vice chair, records officer or assistant records officer may sign this amendment. FILE IN -PERSON OR MAIL TO: Minnesota Secretary of State - Busi ess Services Retirement Systems of Minneso a Building 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 St Paul, MN 55103 (Staffed 8:00 - 4:00, Monday - Friday, a cluding holidays) All of the information on this form is public. Minnesota law requires certai information to be provided for this type of filing. If that information is not included, your document may be returned unfiled. I his document can be made available in alternative formats, such as large print, Braille or audio tape, by calling (651)296-280 /voice. For a TTY/TT (deaf and hard of hearing) communication, contact the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 nd as them to place a call to (651)296-2803. The Secretary of State's Office does not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, sexual oi ientation, national origin, age, marital status, disability, religion, reliance on public assistance or political opinions or affiliat ns in employment or the provision of service. Domesticcoperativeamendment. Rev. 6-07 PERMANENT EASEMENT City of Richfield Lyndale Ave. Project FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City Bella on Lyndale, a Minnesota Cooperative Corporation, Grantor, hereby grants and conveys unto the City of Richfield, its contractors, permittees, successors and assigns, Grantee, an easement for roadway purposes to grade, construct, operate, maintain, use, alter, repair and remove a public roadway, trails, sidewalks, bridges, structures, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, other public facilities and utilities, boulevards and appurtenances, including for drainage and utility purposes, together with all other rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment and unrestricted use of same over, under and across the real property situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, as described, to wit: A perpetual easement for roadway, drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1745, on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, being part of CIC No. 1174, The Gramercy Club at City Bella, A Condominium, according to the CIC Declaration on file and of record in said Office of the Registrar of Titles, described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 20 degrees 20 minutes 29 seconds East along the southeast line of said Tract A, also being the northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue South, a distance of 113.33 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence North 20 degrees 31 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 18.87 feet; thence North 73 degrees 09 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 17.68 feet; thence North 20 degrees 20 minutes 29 seconds East, a distance of 65.04 feet; thence South 69 degrees 39 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 5.46 feet; thence North 54 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East, a distance of 32.31 feet to the southeast line of said Tract A, also being said northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue South; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly lines of said Tract A and said northwesterly right-of-way line to the point of beginning. Grantor hereby conveys all grass, shrubs, trees, natural growth, earthen materials, landscaping, improvements and structures existing or that may be planted or grown on the easement described herein. Grantor hereby agrees to not damage, destroy or remove any grass, trees, shrubs or natural growth replaced by Grantee on the easement described herein. Grantor hereby releases Grantee from any and all claims for damages to the premises resulting from the uses and purposes granted herein and lying within the boundaries of the easement described herein. Grantee shall have the right to use and remove all grass, shrubs, trees (including overhanging branches), earthen materials, structures and improvements, which lie within the boundaries of the easement described herein. To have and hold same, together with all of the rights and appurtenances belonging thereto, all of which shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. City Bella on Lyndale -P&� P4,w Its ZFS-1 D+jT Its STATE OF �� ) SS. COUNTY OF ) On this day of V , 201C , before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared �Y L A�'P �j� and fL%i � &n'oe } V-A)I �5 0 (Print Name) (Print Name) to me personally known, who by me duly sworn did say that they are the ?2E51 D EN'- and Vi C P (title) (title) of City Bella on Lyndale, a Minnesota Cooperative Corporation, named in the foregoing instrument, and that they are authorized to sign said instrument as the free act and deed for and on behalf of said limited liability company. (Seal) JESSICA MARGARET HAMILTON \ tary Public NOTARY PUSUC MINNESOTA r� r �•,a• MyCanmissionExoresJan.31,2020 ��G 0 My Commission Ex es Drafted by: The City of Richfield Public Works Department 1901 E. 66th St. Richfield, MN 55423 o c Y ry Q L -�° O� 00 m -d0 3 d m d Y °. o N z a ¢ d ry 4 9 t— t t 3 z 3 q« h- o o ° °�'�^ °pc s °t m n O o z L-„ o m w v«« >r c E o °f c o tv a u t9 < Z` p u Z n� u wV a z `�`o ` w o zz �� O o 3 Zaz p c q o .`- 3 q r �' H i zri m_ n m w z u r d z w~ 'n uY1O� s i n O a Nl o Uu act N "._Oa Nit O um O m _LL » n K c Y E y o N° N y v 00 QN F- Z c w ¢z0 m N m '" c E m W N u 'rw' Z Z O z W =' w¢ ~ a O m_ c m Y c c w 0� z W L o- m H ¢ m ry d o w z da no ¢ u �v ,y p c u o oa C m 0.d« cC hm� 3 t� r1 Q c C.da air O �� 1 _.. ��aZ„^ ;m o �m i i W v= Z Z do_ ndu° m v d3 um � 3 to to w jN Z LJ a d 9i C a C z — ° Z a O �OO r^ mmn 0 G QOO F a L m d u N V d N C e o „ w l C A "O - Z m u Wm U N u O„ N 1p O �' r- Z O �/ F >O �N OO �mN ?`09 /`i+ N Nz Z a m E m o� c ,R Lu " s u O o a � E»� bO � N 4° `r �LA L i z 7 m w u 3 _ I W `o ~ u c N wC� u Lu W Q G ire a„�� „e u �? „ __ ~ GQ `' w u N o ry `o `, _ I W O „ o 6 v E W O u z d U) z ' « O �2u� o�3yp�o N ♦i.i --' I WCL � JW O ° v i K c c Y° '7. O I ID Mau OE i, i lD \I\ N3^b3jb�N1>y0 34 7 M / OA/4 \ � r r / fz O Out j 09 m m I/ ♦ ♦�� _� u' a 6Z 0 t \ FF Fi 0 a O ? J w tOZN-- .♦i N I� T 3„620Z OZN i r b \ �zwA - z�a z > i >z�, i a0D G^ - _ J Fes- z = ?o z00 ' 0 n `y N O i' O m 0 Wd64ZT6TOZ/TZ/EBMP'TJ-VIl36ALUiviinl:)A7N3WW93HidO-O:)7T-3SVI A T6S6TT\wase3\OEM\OVJ\TVSt,TT9T1\HJIN\:H TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT City of Richfield Lyndale Ave. Project FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City Bella on Lyndale, a Minnesota Cooperative Corporation, Grantor, whether one or more, hereby grants and conveys unto the City of Richfield, its contractors, permittees, successors and assigns, Grantee, a temporary easement for construction purposes for work space, construction operations and to grade and construct slopes both cuts and fills associated with construction or reconstruction of a public roadway, trail and pedestrian facilities, together with all other rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment and use of same, over, under and across the real property situated in Hennepin County, the State of Minnesota as described, to wit: See attached Exhibit A Temporary easement shall start June 11, 2019 and expire December 31, 2019. Grantor hereby agrees that all earthen material, other material, trees and vegetation excavated, removed or taken by Grantee from within said temporary easement shall become the property of Grantee. Upon restoration of disturbed areas per plans and specifications determined by Grantee, Grantor does hereby release Grantee from any claims or damages resulting from the construction of said slopes associated with the road project and all work in connection therewith. This agreement is binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto. EXECUTED as of this. day of 2019. City Bella on Lyndale 2 ', G STATE OF V-A N ) SS. COUNTY OF ) On this �� day of , 20 I, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared MAY DELAPP and t� /t'P_ J (0,1-4J (Print Name) (Print Name) to me personally known, who by me duly sworn did say that they are the /� ?IZESl TENT and !C e r �/� ✓,C S�l�f' 11.9 (title) (title) of City Bella on Lyndale, a Minnesota Cooperative Corporation, named in the foregoing instrument, and that they are authorized to sign said instrument as the free act and deed for and on behalf of said limited liability company. (Seal) E E;1CA MARGARET HAMILTON NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTAy Cor Wssion Expires Jan. 31, M ary Public 2—p21) My Commission ExAs es Drafted by: Wilson Development Services, LLC 510 N. Chestnut St., Suite 500 Chaska, MN 55318 Exhibit A A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and across that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1745, on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, being part of CIC No. 1174, The Gramercy Club at City Bella, A Condominium, according to the CIC Declaration on file and of record in said Office of the Registrar of Titles, described as follows; Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 51 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds West along a southwest line of said Tract A, a distance of 7.41 feet; thence North 19 degrees 21 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 102.51 feet; thence North 70 degrees 38 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence North 19 degrees 21 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 92.34 feet; thence South 69 degrees 37 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 43.85 feet; thence North 46 degrees 53 minutes 48 seconds East, a distance of 44.74 feet to the southeast line of said Tract A, also being the northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue South; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly lines said Tract A and said northwesterly right-of-way line to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows; Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 20 degrees 20 minutes 29 seconds East along the southeast line of said Tract A, also being the northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue South, a distance of 113.33 feet to the point of beginning of the exception to be described; thence North 20 degrees 31 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 18.87 feet; thence North 73 degrees 09 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of17.68 feet; thence North 20 degrees 20 minutes 29 seconds East, a distance of 65.04 feet; thence South 69 degrees 39 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 5.46 feet; thence North 54 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East, a distance of 32.31 feet to the southeast line of said Tract A, also being said northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue South; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly lines said Tract A and said northwesterly right-of-way line to the point of beginning. 66TH STREET WEST 0 So — SCALE ® _\ P.O.B. POINTOF BEGINNING r----1 PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION / L_--_J EASEMENT (AREA: 5,314 SQ. FT.) ! J 4�j 4Y J p O \6600LYNDALEAVENUE SOUTH CITY BELLA ON LYNDALE PID: MULTIPLE Np EDF j,9sr�E? \�N5413:19"E 32.31 y 3 N73 0977" W 17.6E N20 3195"W 13.87 \, �T N STREET h O �l I P.O.BIfi - N510642"Ws: MOST S'LY COR. OF ,� �� ;_,�; ,A, Z41 TRACT A, RLS NO. 1745 SHEET 2 OF 21 08olton & Menk. Inc. 2019, All Rights Reserved JOB NUMBER: T36.114541 FIELD BOOK: DRAWN BY: ARK FILE NO.5314 PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION Ate mporary easement for construction purposes over, under and across that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 174S, on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, being part of CIC No. 1174, The Gramercy Club at City Bella, A Condominium, according to the CIC Declaration on file and of record In said Office of the Registrar of Titles, described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 51 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds West along a southwest line of said Tract A, a distance of 7.41 feet; thence North 19 degrees 21 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 102.51 feet; thence North 70 degrees 38 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence North 19 degrees 21 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 92.34 feet; thence South 69 degrees 37 minutes 30 seconds East, ad Istance of 43.85 feet; thence North 46 degrees 53 minutes 48 seconds East, a distance of 44.74 feet to the southeast line of said Tract A, also being the northwesterly dght-of-way line of Lynda le Avenue South; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly lines said Tract A and said northwesterly right-of-way line to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 20 degrees 20 minutes 29 seconds East along the southeast line of said Tract A, also being the northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyn dale Avenue South, a distance of 113.33 feet to the point of beginning oft he exception to be described; thence North 20 degrees 31 minutes 35 seconds West, ad Istance of 18.87 feet; thence North 73 degrees 09 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 17.68 feet; thence North 20 degrees 20 minutes 29 seconds East, a distance of 65.04 feet; thence South 69 degrees 39 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 5.46 feet; thence North 54 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East, a distance of 32.31 feet to the southeast line of Bald Tract A, also being said northwesterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue South; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly lines said Tract A and said northwesterly right-of-way line to the point of beginning. Said temporary easement shall expire on SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty Licensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. .2019 Eric R. Wilfahrt Date License Number 46166 REVISION: EASEMENT AREA 3/21/2019 REVISION: EASEMENTAREA 4/17/2019 EASEMENT EXHIBIT 6600 Lyndale Avenue South, Richfield, MN ®BOLTON BURN VILLE, MINNE OTA 55337 & M E N K (952) 890-0509 SHEET 1 OF 2 PART OF: TRACT A, RLS NO. 1745 (CIC NO. 1174, THE GRAMERCY CLUB AT CITY BELLA, A CONDO.) HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FOR: CITYOF RICHFIELD JOB NUMBER: T16.114541 FIELD BOOK: DRAWN BY: ARK FILE NO.5314 527-T28-R24-32 J, A/IL OH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC Date: June 11, 2019 To: Logan Vlasaty City of Richfield From: Leah Traxler, Wilson Development Services Re: PAYMENT REQUEST Lyndale Ave Reconstruction OFFICE 952.448.4630 800.448.4630 FAX 952.448.4676 51 0 N. CHESTNUT STREET SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 WWW.WILSONDEVELOPMENTSERVICES.COM Property Owner: Paul J Zilka and Ann Zilka Property Address: 6701 Lyndale Ave. S. Richfield, N N 55423 Property Tax ID: 27-028-24-32-0126 Make Check Payable to: Paul J Zilka and Ann Zilka Mail to: 6611 Knox Ave. S. Richfield, MN 55423 Payment Amount: $13,200.00 SSN/EIN: Provided on attached W-9 Please Record Easement Docynle`rt(s) and provide copy of check to Leah Trailer. Settlement / Payment Summary Permanent Easement $11,725.00 Temporary Easement $1,475.00 TOTAL (rounded to): $13,200.00 6,W ` ILSON \'P DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC Date To: Re OFFICE 952.448.4630 800.448.4630 FAX 952.448.4676 510 N. CHESTNUT STREET SUITE 200 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 WWW.WILSONDEVELOPMENTSERVICES.COM Letter of Transmittal June 11, 2019 X Logan Vlasaty Richfield Maintenance Facility 1901 E. 66th Street Richfield, MN 55423 Lyndale Ave. Reconstruction Zilka (6701 Lyndale Ave) We are enclosing For Your: Remarks: Regular Mail Fax Fax and Mail Hand Deliver Memorandum of Understanding for Settlement Permanent Easement Temporary Construction Easement Payment Request W-9 ❑ Review �X Records �X Approval Information Please send or email a copy of the check back to Wilson Development Services for the acquisition file. From: Leah Traxler G Memorandum of Understanding foi- Settlement City of Richfield Lynda le Ave. ]t"roject Fee Owner: Paul J. Zilka and Ann Zilka Property Address: 6701 Lyndale Ave. S. PIN: 27-028-24-32-0126 On this WJay of , J vn�_� , 20 1 Paul J. Zilka and Ann Zilka, husband and wife, Owners of the above described parcel of property located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, did execute and deliver a conveyance of real estate to the City of Richfield. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed upon between the parties that: The Owner has been furnished with the approved estimate of just compensation for the property acquired and a summary statement of the basis for the estimate. The Owner understands and acknowledges that the Agent for the City of Richfield has no direct, indirect, present, or contemplated future personal interest in the property or in any benefits from the acquisition of the property. That in full compensation for the conveyance of said property, the City of Richfield shall pay the Owner the swn of Thirteen Thousand Two Hundred and no/100 dollars ($13,200.00) for easement(s) and damages. Permanent Easement $11,725.00 Temporary Easement $ 1,475.00 Rounded Total $13,200.00 In the event of a clerical error, Grantor, whether one or more, agrees to cooperate in correcting the error including but not limited to resigning all documents. City of Richfield Date: �� `� By: Date:/ By: c L� Paul J. ca Date: � `i l � By: Ann Zilka PERMANENT EASEMENT City of Richfield Lyndale Ave. Project FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Paul J. Zilka and Ann Zilka, husband and wife, Grantor, whether one or more, hereby grants and conveys unto the City of Richfield, its contractors, permittees, successors and assigns, Grantee, an easement for roadway purposes to grade, construct, operate, maintain, use, alter, repair and remove a public roadway, trails, sidewalks, bridges, structures, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, other public facilities and utilities, boulevards and appurtenances, including for drainage and utility purposes, together with all other rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment and unrestricted use of same over, under and across the real property situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota,- as described, to wit: A perpetual easement for roadway, drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 25, Block 4, LYNDALE SHORES ON WOOD LAKE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 25; thence southeasterly along the northerly line of said Lot 25, a distance of 44.04 feet; thence southwesterly to a point on the westerly line of said Lot 25, distant 25.78 feet southwesterly of said northwest corner; thence northeasterly along said westerly line to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that part thereof lying within the existing right-of-way of Lyndale Avenue South, being the westerly 4.00 feet of said Lot 25 as described in Document No. T952770, on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, said Hennepin County. Grantor hereby conveys all grass, shrubs, trees, natural growth, earthen materials, landscaping, improvements and structures existing or that may be planted or grown on the easement described herein. Grantor hereby agrees to not damage, destroy or remove any grass, trees, shrubs or natural growth replaced by Grantee on the easement described herein. Grantor hereby releases Grantee from any and all claims for damages to the premises resulting from the uses and purposes granted herein and lying within the boundaries of the easement described herein. Grantee shall have the right to use and remove all grass, shrubs, trees (including overhanging branches), earthen materials, structures and improvements, which lie within the boundaries of the easement described herein. To have and hold same, together with all of the rights and appurtenances belonging thereto, all of which shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. Paul J. Zi a - L) Ann Zil STATE OF & _TeJVV :.S ()T0� ) ) SS. COUNTY OF C EIA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the _�Aday of, J �Jvlk_ 2019, by Paul J. Zilka and Ann Zilka, husband and wife as their free act and deed. Notary Public RICHARD L. ZILKA I NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA., as My Commission Expires January 31, 2020 k My Commission Expires Drafted by: The City of Richfield Public Works Department 1901 E. 66th St. Richfield, MN 55423 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION CTION EASEMENT City of Richfield Lyndale Ave. Project FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Paul J. Zilka and Ann Zilka, husband and wife, Grantor, whether one or more, hereby grants and conveys unto the City of Richfield, its contractors, permittees, successors and assigns, Grantee, a temporary easement for construction purposes for work space, construction operations and to grade and construct slopes both cuts and fills associated with construction or reconstruction of a public roadway, trail and pedestrian facilities, together with all other rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment and use of same, over, under and across the real property situated in Hennepin County, the State of Minnesota as described, to wit: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and across those parts of Lots 24 and 25, Block 4, LYNDALE SHORES ON WOOD LAKE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 25; thence on an assumed bearing of South 69 degrees 40 minutes 27 seconds East along the northerly line of said Lot 25, a distance of 44.04 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence continuing South 69 degrees 40 minutes 27 seconds East along said northerly line, a distance of 5.94 feet; thence South 80 degrees 00 minutes 21 second West, a distance of 41.75 feet; thence South 20 degrees 24 minutes 52 seconds West, a distance of 17.13 feet; thence North 68 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 4.52 feet; thence South 21 degrees 01 minute 38 seconds West, a distance of 45.97 feet; thence South 30 degree 01 minute 01 second West to the southerly line of said Lot 24; thence westerly along said southerly line to the southwest corner of said Lot 24; thence northerly along the westerly lines of said Lots 24 and 25 to a point distant 25.78 feet southerly of said northwest corner; thence northeasterly to the point of beginning. EXCEPT those parts thereof lying within the existing right-of-way of Lyndale Avenue South, being the westerly 4.00 feet of said Lots 24 and 25 as described in Document No. T952770, on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, said Hennepin County. Temporary easement shall start June 11, 2019 and expire July 1, 2020. Grantor hereby agrees that all earthen material, other material, trees and vegetation excavated, removed or taken by Grantee from within said temporary easement shall become the property of Grantee. Upon restoration of disturbed areas per plans and specifications determined by Grantee, Grantor does hereby release Grantee from any claims or damages resulting from the construction of said slopes associated with the road project and all work in connection therewith. This agreement is binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto. EXECUTED as of this 44�— day of Paul J. Zil Ann Zil STATE OF NGW Q Z S 0 f A ) ) SS. COUNTY OF AJ (�� ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the AJay of, 2019, by Paul J. Zilka and Ann Zilka, husband and wife as their free act and deed. RCCi E-N RICHARD L. ZILKA NOT PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commissi n�Exo� Ires L. ,lanuary 31, Notary Public My Commission Expires Drafted by: The City of Richfield Public Works Department 1901 E. 66th St. Richfield, MN 55423 Date To. - Re HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 510 N Chestnut Street, Ste 200 Chaska, MN 55318 952.448.4630 800.448.4630 toll free www.henningprofessionalservices.com Letter of Transmittal July 19, 2019 X Logan Vlasaty Richfield Maintenance Facility 1901 E. 66th Street Richfield, MN 55423 Lyndale Ave. Reconstruction Jorge and Ashley Marin (6801 Lyndale Ave) We are enclosing For Your: Remarks: Permanent Easement Temporary Construction Easement Payment Request W-9 Regular Mail Fax Fax and Mail Hand Deliver Review [_X] Records FX-] Approval Information Please send or email a copy of the check back to Henning Professional Services for the acquisition file. From: Leah Traxler HENNING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Date: July 19, 2019 To: Logan Vlasaty City of Richfield From: Leah Traxler, Henning Professional Services, Inc. Re: PAYMENT REQUEST Lyndale Ave Reconstruction PID: Property Address: Make Check Payable to: Payment Amount: SSN/EIN: 510 N Chestnut Street, Ste 200 Chaska, MN 55318 952.448.4630 800.448.4630 toll free www.henningprofessionalservices.com 27-028-24-33-0019 6801 Lyndale Ave. S, Richfield, MN Jorge Roy Marin and Ashley Jo Marin $1,750.00 Provided on attached W-9 Please Record Easement Docuuzent(s) and provide copy of check to Leah Traxler. Settlement / Payment Summary Permanent Easement $1,002.00 Temporary Easement $748.00 TOTAL (rounded to): $1,750.00 PERMANENT EASEMENT City of Richfield Lyndale Ave. Project FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Jorge Roy Marin f/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durazo a/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durzao and Ashley Jo Marin, f/k/a Ashley Jo Bronk, spouses married to each other, Grantor, whether one or more, hereby grants and conveys unto the City of Richfield, its contractors, permittees, successors and assigns, Grantee, an easement for roadway purposes to grade, construct, operate, maintain, use, alter, repair and remove a public roadway, trails, sidewalks, bridges, structures, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, other public facilities and utilities, boulevards and appurtenances, including for drainage and utility purposes, together with all other rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment and unrestricted use of same over, under and across the real property situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, as described, to wit: A perpetual easement for roadway, drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 6, Block 4, M. P. Johnson's Lyndale Shores on Wood Lake Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence easterly along the north line of said Lot 6, a distance of 17.32 feet; thence southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Lot 6, distant 7.99 feet southerly of said northwest corner; thence northerly along said west line to the point of beginning. Grantor hereby conveys all grass, shrubs, trees, natural growth, earthen materials, landscaping, improvements and structures existing or that may be planted or grown on the easement described herein. Grantor hereby agrees to not damage, destroy or remove any grass, trees, shrubs or natural growth replaced by Grantee on the easement described herein. Grantor hereby releases Grantee from any and all claims for damages to the premises resulting from the uses and purposes granted herein and lying within the boundaries of the easement described herein. Grantee shall have the right to use and remove all grass, shrubs, trees (including overhanging branches), earthen materials, structures and improvements, which lie within the boundaries of the easement described herein. To have and hold same, together with all of the rights and appurtenances belonging thereto, all of which shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. STATE OF SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the 16 day of, by Jorge Roy Marin f/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durazo a/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Di Ashley Jo Marin, f/k/a Ashley Jo Bronk, as his free act and deed. 2019, STAMP G LEAHRAE GULSETH TRAXLER Kofary Public Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2024 f / M Commission Expires b 1 Y P {remainder of page intentionally left blank} W041 (�o fttiv- Ashley Jo Marin STATE OF I Y� 0 6LD4�- ) COUNTY OF no Y I � SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of, _ 2019, by, Ashley Jo Marin f/k/a Ashley Jo Bronk, married to Jorge Roy Jorge Roy Marin Durazo a/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durzao as her free act and deed. STAMP l Notary tlic LEAHRAE GULSETH TRAXLER Notary PublicMinnesota l T}C My Commission Expires Jan 31. M. My Commission Expires + O� Drafted by: The City of Richfield Public Works Department 1901 E. 66th St. Richfield, MN 55423 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT City of Richfield Lyndale Ave. Project FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Jorge Roy Marin f/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durazo a/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durzao and Ashley Jo Marin, f/k/a Ashley Jo Bronk spouses married to each other, Grantor, whether one or more, hereby grants and conveys unto the City of Richfield, its contractors, permittees, successors and assigns, Grantee, a temporary easement for construction purposes for work space, construction operations and to grade and construct slopes both cuts and fills associated with construction or reconstruction of a public roadway, trail and pedestrian facilities, together with all other rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment and use of same, over, under and across the real property situated in Hennepin County, the State of Minnesota as described, to wit: A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and across that part of the herein described Parcel A, being a strip of land 2.00 feet wide, lying southeasterly of and adjoining the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Parcel A; thence easterly along the north line of said Parcel A, a distance of 17.32 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Parcel A, distant 7.99 feet southerly of said northwest corner, and said line there terminating. AND Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and across that part of said Parcel A, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Parcel A; thence on an assumed bearing of South 13 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West along the west line of said Parcel A, a distance of 38.09 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence South 79 degrees 22 minutes 20 seconds East, a distance of 18.12 feet; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 12 seconds East, a distance of 5.91 feet; thence South 70 degrees 22 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of 13.44 feet; thence South 05 degrees 05 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 17.10 feet; thence South 29 degrees 27 minutes 46 seconds West to the south line of said Parcel A; thence westerly along said south line to the southwest corner of said Parcel A; thence northerly along said west line to the point of beginning. Parcel A: (Certificate of Title No. 1454507) That part of Lot 5 lying Northerly of the Southerly line of the Northerly 8 feet of that part of said Lot 5 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of said lot; thence Northeasterly along the Westerly boundary line of said Lot a distance of 25 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the Southerly boundary line of said lot to a point on the Easterly boundary line of said Lot, 25 feet from the Southeasterly corner thereof; thence to the Southeasterly corner thereof, thence along the Southerly boundary line of said lot to the place of beginning, and Lot 6, Block 4, M. P. Johnson's Lyndale Shores On Wood Lake Addition. Temporary easement shall start June 11, 2019 and expire July 1, 2020. Grantor hereby agrees that all earthen material, other material, trees and vegetation excavated, removed or taken by Grantee from within said temporary easement shall become the property of Grantee. Upon restoration of disturbed areas per plans and specifications determined by Grantee, Grantor does hereby release Grantee from any claims or damages resulting from the construction of said slopes associated with the road project and all work in connection therewith. This agreement is binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto. EXECUTED as of this day of dLJ 2019. signature page to follow) STATE OF ) SS. COUNTY OF ✓i ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the I K by Jorge Roy Marin f/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durazo a/k/a Jorge Roy Ashley Jo Marin, f/k/a Ashley Jo Bronk, as his free act and deed. 2019, STAMP 7- LEAHRAE GULSETH TRAXLER Notary Public Notary Publio-Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2024 My Commission Expires {remainder of page intentionally left blank) MEM ��► II "d I STATE OF SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of, J- 2019, by., Ashley Jo Marin f/k/a Ashley Jo Bronk, married to Jorge Roy Marin f/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durazo a/k/a Jorge Roy Marin Durzao as her free act and deed. STAMP . LEAHRAE GULSETH TMXLER Notary Public-Minnes0a r... My Commission Finn Jon 31, W24 1 Notary Public 1 My Commission Expires f Drafted by: The City of Richfield Public Works Department 1901 E. 66th St. Richfield, MN 55423 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO MAKE PAYMENTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT RIGHT- OF-WAY EASEMENTS AT 6600 LYNDALE AVE S., 6701 LYNDALE AVE S. AND 6801 LYNDALE AVE S. AS PART OF THE LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield is the official governing body of the City of Richfield; and WHEREAS, the City, a Minnesota municipal corporation acting by and through its City Council, is authorized by law to acquire land and other interests in real estate which are needed for public use or purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that public safety and convenience required that the City undertake and complete improvements known as the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction Project to improve the pavement conditions, replace deteriorating sidewalks and upgrade aging underground utilities while improving operational safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to acquire temporary construction and permanent right-of-way easements encumbering each property described above; and WHEREAS, the good faith efforts of employees and agents of the City, in addition to the property owners, has resulted in the acceptance of offers to purchase the aforementioned easements without need for further negotiations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Richfield hereby authorizes the Mayor and the City Manager to make payments to each property owner and make effective the agreed upon easements to ensure timely progression of the project in 2019. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August, 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk REPORT PREPARED BY: AGENDA SEC10N: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 4.C. STAFF REPORT NO.95 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8/13/2019 Chris Regis, Finance Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Chris Regis, Finance Director 7/24/2019 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITYMANAGER REVIEW: N/A. Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of transfer of funds to close out a certain capital project fund. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City has one capital project fund where the project has been completed or there has been little or no activity. For the purposes of the Engineering division this project can be closed out. The project fund is the Portland Avenue Reconstruction. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the transfer of funds to close out a certain capital project fund. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT N/A. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes. etch • The City's financial policies do not directly address the closing out of City funds. • The City's auditors have recommended that non -budgeted transfers between funds be approved by the City Council. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: N/A. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • The following tables reflect the funds to close and the corresponding funding sources or recipients. Fund to Close Balance Funding Recipient Amount Portland Avenue Reconstruction 29,024 MSA Fund 29,024 E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: N/A. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)- None. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: None. REPORT PREPARED BY: AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM # 4. D. STAFF REPORT NO.96 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8/13/2019 Chris Link, Operations Superintendent DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director/City Engineer 8/5/2019 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITYMANAGER REVIEW: N/A Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the approval of the purchase of a truck chassis from Nuss Truck and Equipment for $106,953 and dump box/snow fighting equipment from Towmaster, Inc. for $104,668, totaling $211,621 plus taxes and licensing in 2020 for use by the Public Works Department. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Public Works Department currently has seven dump trucks to provide routine snow removal and various other services to the public. Public Works plans to decommission and auction off an old tandem -axle truck that is at the end of its useful lifespan and replace it with this smaller single -axle truck. This smaller single -axle truck is more maneuverable and responsive and will be dedicated to managing the City's newer and more complex streetscapes. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the purchase of a Truck Chassis from Nuss Truck and Equipment for $106,953 and dump box/snow plowing equipment from Towmaster, Inc. for $106,953 plus taxes and licensing in 2020 for use by the Public Works Department. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT Replacement schedules are set for each piece of equipment once purchased. The following are taken into consideration when deciding on when to replace vehicles: • Year of purchase • Replacement date/depreciation • History of repairs • Technology upgrades B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etcy • Purchasing supplies, materials, and equipment through a cooperative purchasing program allows the City to purchase items at a lower cost due to the purchasing power of a large group. • The City of Richfield currently purchases from four cooperative sources: • Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Program • State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program • National Joint Powers Agreement Cooperative Purchasing Program • Houston Galveston Area Council • The State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program will be used for the purchase of the new dump truck and equipment. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: • Approval at this meeting will ensure delivery of the vehicle in the year it is budgeted (2020). D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: • The 2019 Revised/2020 Proposed Budget includes $220,000 for this purchase. • The quoted price for the equipment totals $211,621 not accounting for the vehicle sales tax and licensing fees. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • According to Minnesota Statutes, when the purchase of materials, merchandise, equipment, or construction exceeds $175,000, authority to purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION (Sl: • None PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: None REPORT PREPARED BY: AGENDA SECTION: RESOLU110NS AGENDA ITEM # 6. STAFF REPORT NO.97 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8/13/2019 Melissa Poehlman, Asst. Community Development Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Melissa Poehlman, Acting Community Development Director 8/6/2019 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of resolutions to approve conditional use permits to allow small wireless facilities at multiple locations throughout the City. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SAC Wireless, on behalf of AT&T (Applicant) is requesting approval of conditional use permits (CUPs) in order to allow the installation of small wireless facilities in several residential areas. The Applicant is proposing to replace four City -owned light poles and two utility poles with new poles that will accommodate the attachment of small wireless facilities. The poles are located in the right-of-way, but are adjacent to the following residential properties: 7044 Harriet Avenue, 7100 James Avenue, 6645 Thomas Avenue, 6845 Thomas Avenue, 7400 Nicollet Avenue, and 7444 Upton Avenue. These sites were identified by AT&T's radiofrequency engineers as areas where cellular coverage was lacking and where light poles, utility poles, or other structures that could feasibly hold a small wireless facility were present. The small wireless facilities are able to fill pockets of poor cellular coverage that signals from a traditional tower cannot reach. In order to better -coordinate with the Lyndale Avenue reconstruction project, the installation proposed for appro)amately 7108 Lyndale Avenue has been withdrawn. In order to approve a conditional use permit, the Council must find that the request is consistent with the purpose and goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code; complies with applicable performance standards; and will not cause "undue adverse impacts" on governmental facilities, utilities or services; or on the public health, safety, or welfare. The proposed installations do not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code. The placement of the installations on existing (or replacement) poles limits aesthetic impacts in the Single -Family Zone, and the supplied frequency studies indicate that radiofrequency emissions will be within the acceptable limits for the general public set by the Federal Communications Commission. Afull discussion of CUP requirements can be found in an attachment to this report. Finding that the proposal meets requirements, staff recommends approval of the CUPs. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Approve several resolutions for conditional use permits to allow small wireless facilities at multiple locations throughout the City. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT State law gives "telecommunications right of way users" the right to install facilities in the right of way. This right is subject to local governmental authority to manage right of way permitting. In 2017, the Minnesota Legislature amended the definition of a "telecommunications right of way user" to include persons deploying facilities to provide "wireless service." Wireless providers may deploy a "small wireless facility" or a "wireless support structure" in the right-of-way. While the City's authority to deny permits in the right-of-way is limited, cities may make such facilities or structures a conditional use in right-of-way located in "a district or area zoned for single-family residential use or within a historic district." The City Council held a work session to discuss this issue on July 25, 2017 and directed City staff to move forward with an amendment to make these facilities a conditional use in single-family residential areas. This process allows the Council to attach "reasonable conditions" to an approval. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etcy • Small wireless facilities are a conditionally permitted use in the Single -Family Residential (R) District. • The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has established guidelines for human exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Separate evaluations of each individual site are included as attachments to this report. All sites will comply with established FCC guidelines. • A full discussion of general CUP requirements and required findings can be found as an attachment to this report. • A public hearing was held at the July 22 Planning Commission Meeting. Several residents raised concerns over the health impacts of the proposed installations. While issuance of a Conditional Use Permit requires the Council to find that the proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare, Attorney Andrew Biggerstaff of Kennedy and Graven explained that in order to reject an application based on health impacts of the installations, the City would have to show (with evidence) that the Federal Government's ruling on the exposure limits were wrong. • Establishing setbacks or buffers from residents diagnosed with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) was also discussed at the Planning Commission Meeting. Further investigation has shown that EHS is not currently recognized as a medical diagnosis by the World Health Organization therefore the City Attorney does not recommend establishing a policy to require a buffer. • A policy to prevent a proliferation of installations in residential neighborhoods was also discussed. The Director of RAN Engineering at AT&T has indicated that the required spacing to avoid signal interference between small cell facilities is approximately a one to two block radius. A policy related to spacing seems unnecessary at this time. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: 60-DAY RULE: The 60-day clock 'started' when a complete application was received on July 12, 2019. A decision is required by September 10, 2019 or the Council must notify the Applicant that it is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total) for issuing a decision. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. All installations and maintenance will be the responsibility of the Applicant. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: • A public hearing was held on July 22, 2019. • Several members of the public spoke at the public hearing. Draft minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting are attached to this report. • The Planning Commission recommended approval (6-0). ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION (Sl: • None PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: Joe Goldshlack, SAC Wireless Valerie Bruggeman, AT&T ATTACHMENTS: Description Type ❑ Resolutions Resolution Letter ❑ Site Plans Exhibit ❑ Required Findings Exhibit ❑ Zoning Map Backup Material ❑ Frequency Study- 6645 Thomas Ave Backup Material ❑ Frequency Study- 6845 Thomas Ave Backup Material ❑ Frequency Study -7400 Nicollet Ave Backup Material ❑ Frequency Study -7444 Upton Ave Backup Material ❑ Frequency Study -7044 Harriet Ave Backup Material ❑ Frequency Study- 7100 James Ave Backup Material ❑ Draft Planning Commission Minutes 072219 Exhibit RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 7444 UPTON AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co -located on a city -owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 7444 Upton Avenue, legally described as: That part of Upton Avenue South adjacent to Lot 8, Block 2, Penn Lake Terrace 2nd Add WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its July 22, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current on July 11, 2019 and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on July 9, 2019; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated July 2, 2019, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 6645 THOMAS AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co -located on a city -owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 6645 Thomas Avenue, legally described as: That part of Thomas Avenue South adjacent to Lot 15, Block 4, "Tingdale Bros.'Lincoln Hills". WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its July 22, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current on July 11, 2019 and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on July 9, 2019; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated July 2, 2019, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 6845 THOMAS AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co -located on a city -owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 6845 Thomas Avenue, legally described as: That part of W 69t" Street adjacent to Lot 13, Block 4, "Tingdale Bros.'Lincoln Hills Third Addition" WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its July 22, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current on July 11, 2019 and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on July 9, 2019; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated July 2, 2019, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 7044 HARRIET AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co -located on a city -owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 7044 Harriet Avenue, legally described as: That part of W 71" Street adjacent to Lot 9, Block 4, Augsburg Park WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its July 22, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current on July 11, 2019 and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on July 9, 2019; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated July 2, 2019, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 7100 JAMES AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co -located on a city -owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 7100 James Avenue, legally described as: That part of James Avenue South adjacent to Lot 1, Block 6, "Forest Lawn" WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its July 22, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current on July 11, 2019 and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on July 9, 2019; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated July 2, 2019, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 7400 NICOLLET AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests a conditional use permit for a small wireless facility to be co -located on a city -owned light pole in the right-of-way on land generally located at 7400 Nicollet Avenue, legally described as: That part of Nicollet Avenue South adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, "Nicollet View Gardens" WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield held a public hearing for the requested conditional use permit at its July 22, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a small wireless facility; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the Sun Current on July 11, 2019 and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property on July 9, 2019; and; WHEREAS, the requested conditional use permit meets the requirements necessary for issuing a conditional use permit as specified in Richfield's Zoning Code, Subsection 547.09; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A conditional use permit is issued to allow a small wireless facility on the Subject Property legally described above. 3. This conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in Section 547.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance: a) The recipient of this approval shall record this Resolution with the County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.36, Subd. 1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 547.11, Subd. 7; and b) The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City's Administrative Review Committee Report dated July 2, 2019, and compliance with all other City and State regulations. c) Approval does not constitute approval of the Small Cell Pole Attachment permit required by the Public Works Department or the Electrical Permit required by the Inspections Department. d) Separate approval of an antenna permit is not required. 4. The conditional use permit shall expire one year after issuance unless 1) the use for which the permit was granted has commenced; or 2) Building permits have been issued and substantial work performed; or 3) Upon written request of the applicant, the Council extends the expiration date for an additional period not to exceed one year. Expiration is governed by the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subdivision 9. 5. This conditional use permit shall remain in effect for so long as conditions regulating it are observed, and the conditional use permit shall expire if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for 12 or more months, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 547.09, Subd. 10. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of August 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk ° 63 0 / \ 0 § 22 // ( ) FF} \(3} [ §j ]( kLd3 086( )) )� \ §\2 /\�2 �6 §/ o <o� § § mom/ »�)F- 0 }( }N zgg >g w) § z 6F± 7(\} ) )\ \� S z < \ �< k I, §< =2 § )la §k u yg d >< o z a §k } Ad 2 \ mq \ »_ »2 �- _ »�£ z� . z. ±. z ». z ». KS -0 0 LU � @ R = � c � � � �e _? = O I o > Q > $ < U) < _� cn / � � : 0- e E m - Z D c/ w S 0 o LO o It m= 0-m O_ O E cQa) - / '-0' a r-- co r-- r- 0- @ @ . . . . w M ) \ ° ELI \ [3 3 of o IL\ e 0 ) rR§ \R$} ) k80 \} ) §8m3 ) §\a %\�2 »6 o <o� } 6�» } }-i zgg \L}� * 2 z J(@ 2R)} ) )j � >( / §Q � / }\z< S ogg0 )b) )� 0 0 m §\ §\(\ \ / \" § j 5/ \9 uj uj 0 z # I 0 I� uj \I � z ± zz 0 \ § \ LLJ CD \X 0 \ < C \j 0 § Lo ~ �� \ » I 0 =F I m I� I } D` O W r Z O w a ! S r 0 O w w Y N V F�"'F Oz G a O Q m Z pw LL i F it m V w w w w iOFO�-u Zz 'VZwO�} 02 Uw w :Z�w 00 ma y i Z.o W Owp :zrzpUZ ¢ WW 0 S Z-- S � V ,¢�Wa3W O O(w3 I w U w 'r a >m0ZNw a zr r K W p a Wp J Z O (, � I5 C) 37W �m�mz F^ZOa(.5� w 0=0 Z u Z d m 0- S w w 0 w z YO.f�:Jw zVOaF m o 0 m Z} O Z U 0 0 ,Q LL< w a r¢ w I Z)O F Z w r p Z w V i V S w a Y r V r w} ug wp O} Q J X w Z Z aOwl awamw 16 rl� o6 u F m Z x O =r r Z ^ a mdpFwmapwNW °0 O p ZO 00OF U E zr OQOZU OZU¢ (° 0U000 VZUUz,w Om0aZoLL w Z VaSO YnZWOO -O=V O7NWWO ozI�wOVmOa o ZVVN Waz FOrmOw �KF o 0Vti �a�aN��QH wu OzdO�awmzwO�Om? OZwZ U cn 0 w U) O z m U) w H O z W Ln Q o o w= J word <w W J O M O Y a Q z Z w W U �?QOmZf011 M W J J O ¢waQ¢rw rcL N0LLJ � r LUI W W U Z N J r d z Z LU W U' Z = rrrn�"tL3 L.i N Q � w= J worn rw W J O M D Y LY ¢ a Z m z U0 �z O O M W J J O Q Q W Q z Q O F wF-Z: Miww rm w,IwwU ZIn A wwz W W U= 3 Z= F-F-vzn�L)3 r p 3: N I rri I 00 I U O.0 O w0 CV c0 vi O-0 LLJ r N W O Q V) z 0_ O- �00 O m� OJ o 3 �aa I J WnN O O I m O J ¢ I �Q Om Ucli 0 �O wO I U 0_ 0' 00 O 0 NUN Ja Oz r U) Na J� U D =i N LLJ w 0 0 Q 0 d z z 0 x LJJ 0 ZO O x W U D r rn x aw�3 Q U Z Ld O = L Z w O w on o 0 p� on F rZ Q�� Wes_ I F QOe (, �k M: o Zw m? ¢0^ UW U �, 2 Nrn J0 1 do �N Z¢ Om 2-k LO Owl Qa0 UOo Qn W w_ Zow c op �¢ Qo0 W r w Q'w 20 Ln W O O� m < a0 x c x Ot CV wgsx �� X Ow 5 � w UO Uw0 rU W ao¢ ��'- U O` o amj U a O o a� N r zm M� Q oQJ U O w w w oz Q J �O� <� z zu' I U wz F a x 02r noo x U x UJ' 00 0 per: m dQ Z o 6w 1 w U) O d �� w Nc W m -k r Z Jo OU monnp WZO6�QUO .o HWON dQ�0, QUO UWOO 0 CAN Nr. \ZM o w CU'W Ito d 02 w LU de Wk Nd wZ'N Oe (00) ¢_ In Wik Q.. d DEE .N^_.V _ .-. wa- O O 0000 UOOa 1,2IVWRld aNV Vf10-n d0 d01 U38 vinNININ 9 00 U) to W CLr } W m� J LLIQ w d Owe W w)Y -jW V) Nn{N/N/N ,i NIMMMN .9 (n 11 U) w } W m� J F Q Q Z WO a cn Ow'- �w � O Y Ldz0 NnN/N/N , ;�' NnN/XbN ,9 U wW U) Z LY 0' LLJ Ua zw N N U) = 0 Q } (/I W = W Z Ju)m r w N r Ozw m � - L) lv 0zDx0 Q U QU wU �� cc L M Q LU u d Ln u ]GIS 1332j1S u �o �a 1N3W TOM1V2�1iva TOM�8 f13N o N33M138 -NIW „O-V „Ztl 0 o¢ oa Ld Z z I Ldzw 00 ��L) in k �CD ZZ X D W p� Z Z L X � W p� Z Mf CDCD ZZ F::o co J X m N C� Z Z X m S *]AV SVhOHl Ld O 2 lz Z Q 2 W m Q C T W W (n = O p , 0- O } M m E 0 LO Q0 x m 0� O O� W H ZZ X w O W (n J o mao Uz N aZo rrrF- r a U) ar, ew zzza w o S N a D D Q 0 0 W Wm \O ZSOLd }d Z0 mw i" �mcna�� x O a 0 w r 3m Wm 3333M"j W Z E w W W W W U z z z z z Z w m W r w 1 w w � � w � _ 4 co J co Z Iw J dO O r 3 J N H J = N Q d Z U r U S JAV SdWOHl - w J 3 Z Q z r = J r X ��a w k L W Q cn cu O LO 00 �A0/ \ Z L W HAV 1HIN IVH �I7VM3aIS li3NONOO ONIlSIX3 w} = J m ro Li Sao 0 00Q n- (� N �fNl7 Z Q} W O M W ' = WZ U 0 N W LO d 3: W W W WZ)U w ZwX w Q� a o i Ld w U) wO w w0 H J U z �> a_j� uj�ZZ 0 0.ri Q O O _ wow Z = \ Z Q O O w Q d o w MOr) w w w ~ Z Z Z Z O m H V _Ei Z LLJ F- z Y JAM ES AVE S. O W H X W W J Q U O z Nwa z .�z zo z z � o Q - v L" w OF-- Z = \ Z O it Q Q p 3 3 3 3 wwww zzzzmw o Q� ZZ w xm wm i m A A y - �E cod 2 Ow y , + 1 ' E ~ 4. � i�vlrgAves rrv�in �Av S IrA A+veeS _pp'vlllllptlllw +� x s ° James hvie MWLT } ve,5 4 James S_fflr' James Ave'S � lk - ' t �� •� ''��" - � -" �,� Ike r a �4 M k S Xo �vm OM1 '�AV i17001N A7b'M3aIS 313bONCO �i�`JM301S 313?JONOO w w 0 J Q' O w d H w�0 L J20 w O U' U d J U Q U O HU' wJ z w d W J 2 z0- w VI z d C9�dF H H � O ZO- H J V1 w Z Z U = w J X U 0 <Ld O0 M - WwwWWW a ZLLJ H U Z Z Z Z m Z U z_ _ aw w aLLI -(n Z�a� zz �l x _J X M 0 0 WZ 0 H O V) d X � W = W U J Q d W W Z of 0 w Ld x W H J F W d J N Z Z O Z) O Q =) 0 U) W Z = \ Z 0 Of U 0 0 OfDo Q Q O m Z Z Z Z W 0] F- NnNAAV NOldn S Code Requirements / Required Findings Part 1 — Conditional Use Permit: The findings necessary to issue a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) are as follows (547.09, Subd. 6): The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. This requirement is met. The locations of these facilities are designated as "Low -Density Residential". The Utilities section of the Comprehensive Plan states that the provision of public and private utilities is essential to a healthy community. This proposal to upgrade privately owned wireless equipment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. This requirement is met. The purpose of the Zoning Code is to protect and promote the public health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. The proposed use is not inconsistent with these intentions. The properties are in the Single -Family Residential (R) District. The purpose of the R District is to provide residential locations that are safe, attractive and quiet. The proposed use of attaching small wireless facilities to existing poles in the right-of-way does not pose threat to this and is conditionally permitted in this district. Given that there is not currently an excessive concentration of small wireless facilities in this location, this requirement is met. 3. The proposed use is consistent with any officially adopted redevelopment plans or urban design guidelines. There are no specific redevelopment plans that apply to the properties. 4. The proposed use is or will be in compliance with the performance standards specified in Section 544 of this code. Section 544 of the code does not apply to small wireless facilities in the Single -Family Residential District. 5. The proposed use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, utilities, services, or existing or proposed improvements. Small wireless facilities located in the right-of-way require a permit from Public Works and are required to meet certain conditions. The facilities will be co -located with existing utilities. The City's Public Works and Engineering Departments have reviewed the proposal and do not anticipate any issues. 6. The use will not have undue adverse impacts on the public health, safety, or welfare. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. There is a public need for such use at the proposed location. Maintaining and providing up-to-date wireless facilities at multiple locations is necessary to maintain a thriving community. 8. The proposed use meets or will meet all the specific conditions set by this code for the granting of such conditional use permit. This requirement is met. d:w S ITE SSE RF COMPLIANCE. EXPERTS 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1 100 • 703.276.1 169 fax info@sitesafe.com a www.sitesafe.com SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 14826417 USID - 215053 Site Name - CRAN RUMW SDALE 002 (MRUMW030829) 6645 THOMAS AVE. SOUTH RICHFIELD, MN 55423 Latitude: N44-52-54.59 Longitude: W93-18-49.07 Structure Type: Light Pole Report generated date: May 3, 2019 Report by: Scott Broyles Customer Contact: Ryan Peck AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 51TE SAFE rr Sirr�+.r9a •..e 1 Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 REPORT SUMMARY....................................................................................................3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY..........................................................................3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY......................................................................................................4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE............................................................................................... 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY............................................................................................7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS......................................................................................... 8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE................................................................................................11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT................................................................................. 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE............................................................................. 11 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION....................................................................................12 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS..............................................13 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................14 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.......................................................................................... 14 OSHASTATEMENT............................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES........................................................16 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS.......................................................................................17 APPENDIX E - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS........................................................18 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................... 18 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS............................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS..........................................................................................19 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES......................................................................................... 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 A imSITESAFE ♦• Sim+.... •...... General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1 % General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? No The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 215053 CRAN RUMW SDALE 002 MRUMW030829 RFDS 4.16.19 CD's: 215053_CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002_MRUMW030829_CDS (REV A) (1) RF Powers Used: Customer Provided Powers 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Parapet Available Parapet Height Fall Arrest Anchor Anchor & (Y/N) (inches) Available (Y/N) Parapet Info Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 A 51TE SAFE rr Sirr�+.r9a •.tee 1 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre -Site Visit AT&T Sianaae (Existing Sianaae) AT&T Signage Locations NOeor alr�txr ...w: N , y Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warnin 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Signage Signage Locations 1 -011 -011 -am] E U M 0 r=A Access AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 A 51TE SAFE rr Si rrr+r r9e ewrerrs 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: • Site Scale Map • RF Exposure Diagram • RF Exposure Diagram - Alpha Sector Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002 I FENC LIGHT I OLE = 27' AC L GR UND W 641h Sti eet Carrier Identification (Feet) •AT&T MOBILIIV LLC •VERI20N WIRELESS 01MOBILE OSPRINT OIINKNOVJN CARRIER Sign Legend wwwsitesafe1 m 25.9No Gautionl Caution2 Notice2 Notice, Warning Warning2 Info, Info2 RF Safety Plan Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002 S/3/2019 S:42:18 PM Barrier proposed Barriers/ Signs . � 21 m § 5 S s §CD CD CD ~ k \ \ \ g 7 � w / \NO / Cl) f 0Ej Cl) \ u - x )jc CD CD E E E J\ co no no k CL 0 / w / w / w 2 \ \ 2 % \ Cl) / E m m m CD S 5 CD 3 0 z z z 2�c CD CD \ ) / ) / 7 / G 2 ><± m » 0 0 0 ® »& »& a_ .he ± o 0 06 a up up op §�3>3>D f eo eo eo /\///\ k u u u ; = e = e = e ) \ \ \ 0 0 0 2CL ////// / / / K « K � « 56TESAFE 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. • Ground = 0' The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002 Composite View (Feet) LIGHT POLE = 27AGI % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 Carrier Identification AT&TMOBILITVLLC �VERI20N WIRELESS T-MOBILE CI SPRINT <5 nUNKNOWN CARRIER 0 12.7 25.5 Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002 S/2/2019 6:06:47 PM Sitesafe OET-6S Model Near Field Boundary: 1.S * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002 Elevation View (Feet) 0 6.5 13.1 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_002 S/3/2019 S:44:22 PM % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification •AT&T MOBILRV LLC •VERI20N WIRELESS 01M11ILE 0-111 OIINKNOVJN CARRIER Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs Sitesafe OET-GS Model Near Field Boundary: 1.S * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level(0) 56TESAFE 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RIFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non -compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RIFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Light Pole Access Location No Signs - Controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. Notes: The area with the potential to exceed the General Public MPE limits is extends beyond 16' from the antenna. Sitesafe would normally recommend the appropriate RF signage on the structure at the vertical safe distance below the antenna, however, per AT&T's signage policy, no signage should be recommended in this instance and controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. MPE is calculated to be 15,1 13.26 at the antenna level and MPE safe Distance is 27' Horizontal and 4' vertical. Signage may already be in place. Sitesafe does not have record of any existing signage because there were no previous visits or data supplied regarding them. All remediation is based on a worst -case scenario. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 56TESAFE 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry, and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Scott Broyles. May 3, 2019 <A�' Young Min Kim AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 56TESAFE Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 51TESAFE: Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density 1000 0.01 —Occupational — —General Public 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 51TESAFE Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/CM2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 f/300 6 1500- 5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H I2 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1500- -- -- 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 15 56TESAFE Appendix C - Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst -case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 56TESAFE Appendix D — RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. • Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. • Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. • Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. • Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 56TESAFE Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / for field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the for field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 56TESAFE Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst -case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 56TESAFE Occupational/Controlled Environment- Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 - Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.aov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement- A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 56TESAFE Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://vvww.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) http://www.ncrr)online.orq Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.orq American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.org Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) httr)://www.eQo.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://vvww.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofreguencyrodiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://vvww.icnirp.orq World Health Organization (WHO) http://vvww.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones American Cancer Society (ACS) http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph risk/committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurveY/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation httr)://www.hr)a.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health httip://vvww.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7l47.ipdf AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 (F% 93 SITESAEE RF COMPLIANCE EXPERTS 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1 100 • 703.276.1 169 fax info@sitesafe.com . www.sitesafe.com SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 14826418 USID - 215057 Site Name - CRAN RUMW SDALE 005 (MRUMW030831) 6845 Thomas Avenue South Richfeld, MN 55423 Latitude: N44-52-41.56 Longitude: W93-18-48.85 Structure Type: Utility Pole Report generated date: June 24, 2019 Report by: Zyotty Thamsil Customer Contact: Ryan Peck AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. OF;-q�EITE Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY........................................................................................ 3 1.1 REPORTSUMMARY.........................................................................................................3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY.......................................................................... 3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY......................................................................................................4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE............................................................................................... 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY............................................................................................ 7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS......................................................................................... 8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE................................................................................................ 11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT................................................................................. 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE............................................................................. 11 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION.................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS .............................................. 13 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................14 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.......................................................................................... 14 OSHASTATEMENT............................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES........................................................ 16 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS....................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX E - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS........................................................ 18 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................... 18 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS............................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS.......................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES................................................................•------------------------ 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 >z 0(�! TE�AEE 1 General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC I Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1 % General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? No Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary General % of FCC General % of FCC Power Occupational Public Location Public/Uncontrolled Occupational/Controlled Density Approach Approach Exposure Limit Exposure Limit (mW/cm2) Distance (in) Distance in 41 Proposed Equipment Antenna Face 3,709.9 742.0 37.1 60" 168" Level UE Relay N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Level Ground I <1 <1 <0.01 N/A N/A Note: Xcel Energy has a maximum occupational safety distance of 60" or 5'. The safety distance listed in section 1.1 is based on the reduced power that will produce a compliant site with Xcel Energy policy. The reduced powers are listed in the antenna table in section 3. The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 215057 CRAN RUMW SDALE 005 MRUMW030831 RFDS.052119 CD's: 215057 CRAN RUMW SDALE 005 MRUMW030831 CDS REV 0 5.17.2019 RF Powers Used: Provided by customer 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Parapet Available Parapet Height Fall Arrest Anchor Anchor & (Y/N) (inches) Available (Y/N) Parapet Info Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 >z 0(�! E5��E� 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre -Site Visit AT&T Sianaae (Existina Sianaae) AT&T nonce ; \ MUM clarrtxa � CAMIN AL AL SignageF z�'--� Locations y Access Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Signage AT&T SignageF41 A& A c.uixva +� corona A AL , y' ` -,. - Location77 Information l Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha 3 Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 >z 5iTE�AEE 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: Site Scale Map RF Exposure Diagram RF Exposure Diagram - Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_005 BUILDING PROi. I14' G RA ! D1N = 21 ( PPR X.) G ASS REA f ) �i ® UTILITY j .l �17--1 P LE HOIVAS A E S _LF GR UND EVEL 0' ' STRLLI AREA GR 4GVSS SSA EA �I BUII.DING (APRRO . (Feet) l 9.2 18.5 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_00S 6/24/2019 6:36:03 PM I Carrier Identification 01T&T"IlUVLLC 9-11ONWIRELE11 0T-M11ILE CI SPRINT O UNKNOWN CARRIER Sign Legend ��C�41) 1—i- C ti 2 Notice2 N k,1 Warning W—n,2 Info1 In 2 RFSa ty Plan Harrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs 21 m § 6 6 6 § G CD CD / & & & . � 3 \ ƒ \ < x w ) �� m )13 2 � 9 < % - \ / - � . )/e CD CD k \ CL ; a) CL o 2 / 0 IL ELe e k ƒ \ \ © IL b & Em a a do �5 3 3 f m J c o 0 � k � ; / / R 2 x ± & Q ƒ \ \ \ >K >K >K .he o-?\?\s\ o 0 0 / °/ 29 9/0 c� / ° o/ o/ o/ ) / / / \ \ \ \ / / ;\L\L\LU )2\2/§/ �o�o0-0C, 0->2>2>2 « « « . � k \ § C°O\ 6jyg IL 7C) o = o = f\5= 505: oD >>�D 272E 2 \cm \ / 76 \ \ \ § /§§y \ % E _ (D / 3//\ §k(\ Cm\/\ ID >=oo >°5z 2D0 c \»/ s±oG` E}ƒ§ o-�= z(D ID boo= 0 c»?»\ /j0�� =ay /§»^° c222 /f032 =$°u= \fo £EEG oo» 55[=/ E3o2%` 2J2E Sc`GG \{�\c =e§_s \{\2\ caQ:- o�c.gz s o 0 7 » � �p(\ °-_ °R //gys gJ±§9 w=�go o = 7 o 0)/oa73 =.:oc ;=\s oR2=c =eooE 51TE SAFE 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. • Ground Level = 0' • Building = 14' • Building = 21' The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the some level. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_005 GRASS AREA GRASS AREA (Feet) LIGHT POLE THOMAS AVE S GRASS AREA 0 UTILITY POLE GROUND LEVEL = 0' W 69TR STREET GRASS AREA % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0'- 6' %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification 0AT&TMOBILIILLC gVERIZONWIR-11 T-MOBILE CISPRINT O UNKNOWN CARRIER BUILDING = 14' (APPROX.) BUILDING = 14' (APPROX.) 0 9.8 19.7 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_005 6/24/2019 6:33:47 PM Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_005 Elevation View (Feet) 0 4.7 9.4 W W W.sitesafe.con' Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_HS 6/24/2019 6:46:01 PM AT&T CENTERLINE = 45' % of FCC Public Exposure Limit %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification .AT&TMOBILIILLC •VERIZONWIRELE55 •T-MOBILE 6 SPRINT O UNKNOWN CARRIER Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level(0) 51TEEiAFE 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non -compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Compliance Remediations Install three 17.25" x 17.25" Caution 2 signs in triangular format 4' below the antennas. The geometric center of each sign must be positioned at the bottom distance. The Caution sign text must specify that a distance of 14 feet must be kept from the antenna. Notes: • Signage may already be in place. Sitesafe does not have record of any existing signage because there were no previous visits or data supplied regarding them. All remediation is based on a worst -case scenario. • Any existing signage that conflicts with the proposed signage in this report should be removed per AT&T Signage Posting Rules. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 •. ��:_�. SAFE 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Zyotty Thamsil. June 24, 2019 Young Min Kim AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 51TE SAFE Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 51TE SAFE Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density 1000 0.01 —Occupational — —General Public 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 SITE SAFE Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 1 z, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1S00 f/300 6 1S00- S 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1s00- -- -- 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 0 5!TE EiAFE Appendix C - Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst -case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 51TE5AFE Appendix D — RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. • Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. • Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. • Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. • Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 51TE SAFE Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / far field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the for field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 51TE SAFE Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the some direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst -case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 51TE5AFE Occupational/Controlled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 - Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.aov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement - A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 0 5!TE BAFE Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://www.sitescfe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) http://www.ncrponline.or-a Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.orq American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.cnsi.orq Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) http://www.epa.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.htmI National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/rcdiofreguencyradiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://www.icnirp.org World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones American Cancer Society (ACS) http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph risk/committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurvev/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation http://www.hpo.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandcrd/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eec7l47.pdf AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 d3S ITE SAFE RF COMRLIANCE EXPERTS -- f �- 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1 100 • 703.276.1 169 fax info@sitesafe.com a www.sitesafe.com SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 14826489 USID - 217104 Site Name - CRAN RUMW GALCT 001 (MRUMW027858) 7400 NICOLLET AVENUE RICHFIELD, MN 55423 Latitude: N44-52-08.22 Longitude: W93-16-41.99 Structure Type: Light Pole Report generated date: May 3, 2019 Report by: Scott Broyles Customer Contact: Ryan Peck AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 51TE SAFE rr Sirr�+.r9a •..e 1 Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 REPORTSUMMARY.........................................................................................................3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY..........................................................................3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY......................................................................................................4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE............................................................................................... 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY............................................................................................7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS......................................................................................... 8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE................................................................................................11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT................................................................................. 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE............................................................................. 11 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION....................................................................................12 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS..............................................13 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................14 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.......................................................................................... 14 OSHASTATEMENT............................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES........................................................16 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS.......................................................................................17 APPENDIX E - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS........................................................18 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................... 18 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS............................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS..........................................................................................19 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES......................................................................................... 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 A 51TE SAFE rr Si rrr+r r9e •.errs General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1 % General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? No The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 217104 CRAN RUMW GALCT 001 MRUMW027858 RFDS 4.16.19 CD's: 217104 CRAN RUMW GALCT 001 MRUMW027858 REV 0 4.12.2019 RF Powers Used: Customer power used 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Parapet Available Parapet Height Fall Arrest Anchor Anchor & (Y/N) (inches) Available (Y/N) Parapet Info Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 A 51TE SAFE rr Si rrr+r r9e •.errs 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre -Site Visit AT&T Sianaae (Existing Sianaae) AT&T Signage Locations CAM".,.:ri , y Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warnin Warnin 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Siqnaqe Signage Locations r=A 1 -011 -011 -am] E U M 0 Access AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 A 51TE SAFE rr Si rrr+r r9e ewrerrs 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: • Site Scale Map • RF Exposure Diagram • RF Exposure Diagram - Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_001 m In O D t^ � D W 4tl' S reet G OUN D LIGHT POLE = 27AGL FIBER BOX % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' Carrier Identification (Feet) ®AT&TMO111.11 LC 01E111INIIRELESS 01M11ILE 01P1I1T O UNKNOWN CARRIER Sign Legend 0 7.9 15.8 \\/ �\■ .�� wwwsitesafe.com 1-tim,i C-t-2 N—,I w—i,g g2 mint mm2 RF Szrety Plan Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_001 5/3/2019 4:51:26 PM Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs 56TESAFE 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. • Ground = 0' The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_001 Composite View (Feet) LIGHT POLE = 27AGL FIBER BOX W 74th Street z % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 Carrier Identification AT&TRA-LITVLLC OVERIZONURELESS T-MOBILE 0SPRINT <5 nUNKNOWN CARRIER 7.6 15.1 Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_001 S/3/2019 10-SS:2S AM Sitesafe OET-GS Model Near Field Boundary: 1.S * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_001 Elevation View (Feet) 0 6.8 13.6 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_001 S/3/2019 4:S0:07 PM % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification •AT&T MOBILRV LLC •VERI20N WIRELESS 01M11ILE 0-11T OIINKNOVJN CARRIER Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs Sitesafe OET-GS Model Near Field Boundary: 1.S * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level(0) 56TESAFE 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RIFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non -compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RIFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Light Pole Access Location No Signs - Controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. Notes: The area with the potential to exceed the General Public MPE limits is extends beyond 16' from the antenna. Sitesafe would normally recommend the appropriate RF signage on the structure at the vertical safe distance below the antenna, however, per AT&T's signage policy, no signage should be recommended in this instance and controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. MPE is calculated to be 15,1 13.26 at the antenna level and MPE safe Distance is 27' Horizontal and 4' vertical. Signage may already be in place. Sitesafe does not have record of any existing signage because there were no previous visits or data supplied regarding them. All remediation is based on a worst -case scenario. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 56TESAFE 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry, and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Scott Broyles. May 3, 2019 -' Young Min Kim AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 56TESAFE Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 51TESAFE Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density 1000 —Occupational — —General Public �£ 100 3 \ £ 10 Z \ N \ C \ 0 1 � `m \ i a° 0.1 0.01 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 51TESAFE Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/CM2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 f/300 6 1500- 5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H I2 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1500- -- -- 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 15 56TESAFE Appendix C - Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst -case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 56TESAFE Appendix D — RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. • Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. • Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. • Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. • Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 56TESAFE Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / for field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the for field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 56TESAFE Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst -case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 56TESAFE Occupational/Controlled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 - Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.gov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement - A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 56TESAFE Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://vvww.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) http://www.ncrr)online.orq Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.orq American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.org Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) httr)://www.eQo.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://vvww.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofreguencyrodiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://vvww.icnirp.orq World Health Organization (WHO) http://vvww.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones American Cancer Society (ACS) http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph risk/committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurveY/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation httr)://www.hr)a.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health httip://vvww.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7l47.ipdf AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 d3S ITE SAFE RF 00MRLIANCE EXPERTS 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1 100 • 703.276.1 169 fax info@sitesafe.com a www.sitesafe.com SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 14826409 USID - 215058 Site Name - CRAN RUMW SDALE 007 (MRUMW030816) 7444 SOUTH UPTON AVENUE RICHFIELD, MN 55423 Latitude: N44-52-02.68 Longitude: W93-18-54.22 Structure Type: Light Pole Report generated date: May 3, 2019 Report by: Scott Broyles Customer Contact: Ryan Peck AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 51TE SAFE rr Sirr�+.r9a •..e 1 Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 REPORTSUMMARY.........................................................................................................3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY..........................................................................3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY......................................................................................................4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE............................................................................................... 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY............................................................................................7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS......................................................................................... 8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE................................................................................................11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT................................................................................. 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE............................................................................. 11 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION....................................................................................12 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS..............................................13 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................14 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.......................................................................................... 14 OSHASTATEMENT............................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES........................................................16 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS.......................................................................................17 APPENDIX E - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS........................................................18 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................... 18 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS............................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS..........................................................................................19 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES......................................................................................... 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 A imSITESAFE ♦• Sim+.... •...... General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1 % General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? No The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 215058 CRAN RUMW SDALE 007 MRUMW030816 RFDS 4.16.19 CD's: 215058 CRAN RUMW SDALE 007 MRUMW030816 CDS REV 0 RF Powers Used: Client Provided Powers 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Parapet Available Parapet Height Fall Arrest Anchor Anchor & (Y/N) (inches) Available (Y/N) Parapet Info Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 A 51TE SAFE rr Sirr�+.r9a •.tee 1 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre -Site Visit AT&T Sianaae (Existina Sianaae) AT&T Signage Locations NOeor alr�txr ...w: N , y Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warnin 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Sianaae AT&T Signage Locations A zk' / `L Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 A 51TE SAFE rr Si rrr+r r9e ewrerrs 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: • Site Scale Map • RF Exposure Diagram • RF Exposure Diagram - Alpha Sector Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_007 G OUN LIGH POL = 27 3 AG W 51" St eet Carrier Identification (Feet) •AT&T MOBILIIV LLC •VERI20N WIRELESS �T-MOBILE OSPRINT OIINKNOVJN CARRIER Sign Legend 0 wwwsitesa18.5m 37 G-tionl 1-1-2 Notice2 N—,I Warning Warning2 Info1 Info2 RF Safety Plan Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_007 S/3/2019 S:33:40 PM Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs . � 21 m § 5 5 s § 6 CD CD ~ k \ \ \ g J ƒ ƒ j 7E w \ // f a ± j m\ \ u - x )0c CD CD 0 \ E E E IL 7 7 7 k 0. / / / 2 > w w w § \ / 2 % \ \ Em )/no m m CD S CD 5 CD S 6 Cl) Cl) Cl) 2 2� c CD 0 r / ) / 7 / G CD 2 !x± G » ƒ 0 0 0 ® »& »& >& he 0 0 0 k m /c -C -C 0o up op ug f eo 0o eo /\///\ k u u u = e a e = e ) \ \ \ 0 0 0 0CL ////// / / / K « K � % a 56TESAFE 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. • Ground = 0 The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_007 Q Composite View uu (Feet) 0 19 38 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_SDALE_007 S/2/2019 S:42:4S PM % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' - 6' %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= 500 >= 100 >= 5 < 5 Carrier Identification •AT&T MOBILRV LLC •VERI20N WIRELESS 01M11ILE 0-111 OIINKNOVJN CARRIER Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs W 75th Street Sitesafe OET-GS Model Near Field Boundary: 1.S * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged 56TESAFE 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RIFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non -compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RIFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Light Pole Access Location No Signs - Controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. Notes: The area with the potential to exceed the General Public MPE limits is extends beyond 16' from the antenna. Sitesafe would normally recommend the appropriate RF signage on the structure at the vertical safe distance below the antenna, however, per AT&T's signage policy, no signage should be recommended in this instance and controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. MPE is calculated to be 15,1 13.26 at the antenna level and MPE safe Distance is 27' Horizontal and 4' vertical. Signage may already be in place. Sitesafe does not have record of any existing signage because there were no previous visits or data supplied regarding them. All remediation is based on a worst -case scenario. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 56TESAFE 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry, and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Scott Broyles. May 3, 2019 Young Min Kim AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 56TESAFE Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 51TESAFE: Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density 1000 0.01 —Occupational — —General Public 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 51TESAFE Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/CM2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 f/300 6 1500- 5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H I2 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) (V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1500- -- -- 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 15 56TESAFE Appendix C - Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst -case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 56TESAFE Appendix D — RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. • Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. • Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. • Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. • Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 56TESAFE Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / for field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the for field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 56TESAFE Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst -case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 56TESAFE Occupational/Controlled Environment- Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 - Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.aov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement- A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 56TESAFE Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://vvww.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) http://www.ncrr)online.orq Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.orq American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.org Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) httr)://www.eQo.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://vvww.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofreguencyrodiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://vvww.icnirp.orq World Health Organization (WHO) http://vvww.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones American Cancer Society (ACS) http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph risk/committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurveY/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation httr)://www.hr)a.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health httip://vvww.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7l47.ipdf AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 d3ITESAEE RF COMPLIANCE EXPERTS 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1 100 • 703.276.1 169 fax info@sitesafe.com • www.sifesafe.com SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 14826475 USI D - 217402 Site Name - CRAN RUMW GALCT_002 (MRUMW027852- MRUMW030143) 500 WEST 71 ST STREET Legal address is: RICHFIELD, MN 55423 7044 HARRIET AVE Latitude: N44-52-28.27 Longitude: W93-17-09.15 Structure Type: Utility Pole Report generated date: May 1, 2019 Report by: Zyotty Thamsil Customer Contact: Ryan Peck AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 0 SITESAFE Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY........................................................................................ 3 1.1 REPORTSUMMARY......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY.......................................................................... 3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE............................................................................................... 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY..........................•----•---......---...----......---.......----...---......----..... 7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS......................................................................................... 8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE................................................................................................ 11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT................................................................................. 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE............................................................................. 11 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION.................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS .............................................. 13 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................... 14 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.......................................................................................... 14 OSHASTATEMENT............................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES........................................................ 16 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS....................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX E - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS........................................................ 18 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................... 18 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS............................................................................................... 18 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS.......................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES...............................................................•--.....---......---...... 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 S�TESAF� General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1 % General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? No Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summar % of FCC General % of FCC Power Occupational General Location Public/Uncontrolled Occupational/Controlled Density Approach Public Exposure Limit Exposure Limit (mW/cm2) Distance (in) Approach Distance in Proposed Equip ment Antenna Face 3,709.9 742.0 37.1 60" 168" Level UE Relay N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Level Ground <1 <1 <0.01 N/A N/A The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS:217402 CRAN RUMW GALCT 002 MRUMW030143 RFDS.041719 CD's: 217402 CRAN RUMW GALCT 002 MRUMW030143 CDs REV A Consolidated Redlines.042219 RF Powers Used: Provided by customer 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Parapet Available Parapet Height Fall Arrest Anchor Anchor & (Y/N) (inches) Available (Y/N) Parapet Info Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 SITESAF� 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre -Site Visit AT&T Signage (Existing Signaqe) AT&T Signage Locations Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Sianaae AT&T Signage Locations Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) 2 Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 0 5rTE=5aF� Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: Site Scale Map RF Exposure Diagram RF Exposure Diagram - Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_002 BUILDING 19' UILDI G=2 P EE -�i ILITY i OLE t U Y J Q — Q N W W 71 ST W u z U w a BUILDING= cr a Carrier Identification AT&T MOB ILITY LLC VER12ON WIRELESS T-MOBILE SPRINT UNKNO\VN CARRI ER (Feet) • • •Sign Legend 0 •� l 10.9 21.7 Z Z www.sitesafe.c m Site Name:CRAN RUMW GALCT 002 5 1 201911:54:40 AM Propos', rs/ Sig- ME 0, � 2 C $ > C 0 C C $ 2 Q � I.- § G 3 S 1-4 / % 10 j E tj n» / «G�a 3 CL \ ~ Lu10 m £ )J\ol \ a � k �� ° » \ )0 o CD \ \ \ k \ 'E 0 y 5 \ / x / \L/ / / \ J ■ > » \ 2 b / \ o . G )IEa a m \ CD CD ��% \ 0gy m co -C \ a) CD CD CD z \ 0 LU \ k ( k E �� S 2 \ ƒx / ^ f ( 0 0 0 \ _. r y K K & cm \ \ \ \ I 0 § \ \ \ \ �G -a0 0 0 / / / «° ( \ \ 0 \\ ) \ \ \ /\ < < < /\ / G j / j &\LU\LU\§ )m0m0m0 ©0IL0IL0IL 0a. ///\// / 2 /� < < < { e /\\/ ) 6==g CL s%z\ f = o = 9%fs C) n �coz ==o\ \F— 0 LU .0 760 0 g=0c \/-a) \ G / \ \{\/ ±52% \2\\ \E0 E } *2oa }3\= 20 o \®0 af`® E\ƒ§ 6\42 ±S2® -0 0 ° f > d § 0) 0 -C cm u= 0 (D (D cu- e o Ck)\\ \a-- /�E�0 oog= 00cuo E G 1=1 2\t2E 03`0 zo= — � D C- £o§,e 8- o0 /444\ §)\/» / 2t \ o= /Eo 55�Ge °=:—o c0 c 2±�@� @%±§R w=�go /=2oy e o - =z�. os />z\e / } \ \ / � k 51TE SAFE 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. Ground Level = 0' Building = 15' Building = 19' Building = 22' The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_002 (Feet) ds 2 .1 .—sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_002 S/1/201911:S3:33 AM GROUND LEVEL = 0' W 711T ST of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0'- 6' >= S000 >= S00 >= 100 >= S < S Carrier Identification AT&T MOBILITY LLC VERI20N WIRELESS T-MOBILE SPRINT UNKNO\VN CARRIER U O O Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs Y J a Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_002 Elevation View (Feet) 0 15 30 W W W.Sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_002 5/1/201912:09:09 PM % of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= S000 >= S00 >= 100 >= S < S Carrier Identification •AT&T MOBILITY LLC •VERI20N WIRELESS ®T-MOBILE OSPRINT OUNKN11-1RRIER Barrier Proposed Barriers/ Signs — — — — — Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level(0) 51TE SAFE 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non -compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Utility Pole Access Location Place 2 Caution (17.25" x 17.25") signs opposite each other on the mounting structure (e.g., pole) 4' below the bottom tip of the antenna. The top of each sign must be positioned at the bottom distance. Notes: This report's diagrams do not show the Access locations because the data provided did not include them. Signage may already be in place. Sitesafe does not have record of any existing signage because there were no previous visits or data supplied regarding them. All remediation is based on a worst -case scenario. Any existing signage that conflicts with the proposed signage in this report should be removed per AT&T Signage Posting Rules. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 5MTE5A�E 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry, and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Zyotty Thamsil. May 1, 2019 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 5MTE5A�E Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated modelfs) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 51rr=sal= r= Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning Sig nage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Po6er len Unal CCU 1000 General Public 100 E 10 \ _a N \ m 1 \ `m 3 0.1 — a — 0.01 0 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 SITE SASE Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) Wirt) (H) (A/m) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 f/300 6 1500- 5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time I E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) I H 12 or S (minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) (V/m) (H) (A/m) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1S00 -- - f/1500 30 1500- -- - 1.0 30 100,000 f = frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer- (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 15 5MTE5AFE Appendix C - Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: Locked door or gate Alarmed door Locked ladder access Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst -case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 SITE 5AF-E Appendix D - RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation (s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 5 MTE 5AF-E Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / far field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the for field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 5MTE5A�E Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment- Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst -case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 5MTE5AFE Occupational/Con trolled Environment- Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 - Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.gov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement- A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 51TE SASE Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://www.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency- safet National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) httr://www.ncroonline.org Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.org American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.orq Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) http://www.epa.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf L Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofreauencyradiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://www.icnirp.orq World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/celIphones American Cancer Society (ACS) htto://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.euroioa.eu/health/ph risk/committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurvey/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7l47.pdf AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 d3SITESAEE RF COMPLIANCE EXPERTS 8618 Westwood Center Driv e, S uite 315, Vienna, VA22182 703.276.1100 e 703.276.1169 fax info@sitesafe.com • www.sitesafe.com SAC Wireless, LLC on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 14826478 USID - 217097 Site Name - CRAN RUMW GALCT 005 (MRUMW030146) 1701 WEST 71 ST STREET RICHFIELD, MN 55423 Latitude: N44-52-27.88 Longitude: W93-18-03.74 Structure Type: Light Pole Legal Address: 7100 JAMES AVE Report generated date: May 3, 2019 Report by: Yasir Alqadhili Customer Contact: Ryan Peck AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. Al rights resery ed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. O��STE5AFE Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY..................................................................................................3 1. 1 REPORT SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY................................................................................ 3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY...............................................................................................................4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE..........................................................................................................5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY.......................................................................................................7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS....................................................................................................8 5 SITE COMPLIANCE............................................................................................................11 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT........................................................................................ 11 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE.................................................................................... 1 1 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION...............................................................................................13 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS.....................................................14 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION.........................................15 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS.................................................................................................. 15 OSHASTATEMENT...................................................................................................................... 16 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES...............................................................17 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS..................................................................................................18 APPENDIX E - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS...............................................................19 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................................ 19 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS...................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS.....................................................................................................20 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES....................................................................................................22 AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 9)2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 2 5tT£aAFE General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Antenna Level 9,890.0% General Public Limit at antenna level Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground <1% General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? I No The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 217097 CRAN RUMW GALCT 005 MRUMW030146 RFDS 4.16.19 CD's: 217097 CRAN RUMW GALCT 005 MRUMW0301 46 CDs REV 0 RF Powers Used: Provided by customer 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Parapet Available Parapet Height Fall Arrest Anchor Anchor & (Y/N) (inches) Available (Y/N) Parapet Info Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 3 017s=!M�5 1.3 Signage Summary a. Pre -Site Visit AT&T Signage (Existing Signage) AT&T Signage Locations Notice Caution Barriers Caution ilk Information 1 Information2 Notice Warning Warning Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon Note: No Previous site visit bySiteSafe. b. Proposed AT&T Sianaae AT&T Signage Locations MEW— r< a at .__._ , Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) 2 Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 9)2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 SIiES,❑,F'� 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: Site Scale Map RF Exposure Diagram RF Exposure Diagram - Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 9)2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 5 Site Scale Map For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_005 ■■■■■■■■■■■■I■■■■■■ �` ' ■■I MEMEME114 hw., NEI NEI ■��■��.:�■�■■■■11■■�i�i�' NEI 611 NEI IWIM11111111119"MENEM- , _ �,�� " 1�■I■■■■Il�f�'If�l■■I■■■■II MENEM 0 MM ANY. NIS==IC�`17■■■■■I oil =====1 pm -�■I■�■■11 MENNEN MEM111111102AMMINE01011 MEMMINEE1 EMMMMMMMM MMM11MMMMMMMF.E1 %of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' -6' Carrier Identification (Feet) O• 0 Mae E OsoAN, O NKNo N ARaa Sign Legend (( 0 15.3 30.6 (V ((V ■ ■ (V M a E (a www.sitesafe.com 1-1-1 Noece2 Nonni v,a, a mro1 1-2 RFS—y Pia Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_005 pro d Barriers/ S/3/2019 S:27:S1 PM Barrier pose A r El CII) § S CDS § 6 S S ~ \ \ \ < 7§Jj «00o % / 0 m § ® _L■/ / \ 0 r /0c CD CD k J J * j j E t s s s CL 0 0 0 k\ \ \ 2 § § } ) ƒ a a a ± § ■ 5 5 5 c r co _ Q c c c � k k 0 E 5 2 § \ 2 & Q \ \ \ \ _ 0 0 0 a- & & \ \ \ 77D 2 \ \ \ 0 0 0 a ] 2 / / \ c J 3 0 $f / / J \ \ \ < < < / / / &§J®J®J \ \ _ e e c0 0 0 / o/a/a/a- « y « \ \ \ � { « 09 J \\ / �(// ta{= l 0 E2 a- \5}\ 5\\s 7b_2 2 a)o esoƒ .> y o a % / [ t°27 $\/ /f0 �£$[ 322E (D o =. o -C 0 zn 2\\E �\e E\ /&Gb +e—= °/\\ « y \ 7 C) }� \ \ £\\2 /S2® /9«\ o\S= 0 Noo [/ 2^ 2 == ±�9+0 §\22 ±%EE —2e+ E '22-0 5coo ao=— /\$ o0 0 g==4- 70 \/\ \ \\- //y/ 2£ " /aa\ 70 3>zy 5 e 2 = =zoo 51TE5.At= E 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with it s height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. • GROUND LEVEL = 0' • BUILDING = 18' • BUILDING = 25' The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. 92019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 8 RF Exposure Simulation For: CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_005 GROUND LEVEL =0' BUILDING=2S' ............ a ) B 0 W. 71IT ST GROUND LEVEL =0' d B BUILDING =18' Q D a ITYPOLE =27.3'AGL ....................................... %of FCC Publ is Exposure Limit Spatial average 0' -6' (Feet) 0 1S.3 30.5 www.sitesafe.com Site Name:CRAN_RUMW_GALCT_005 S/3/2019 5:33:00 PM %of FCC Public Exposure Limit >= 5000 >= S00 >= 100 >= S < S Cartier Identification 0—Moa1�m LLI ©„ER=a�wAE� 01"111LE 01111r 01111-n 111111 Barrier Proposed Banters/ Signs GROUND LEVEL=0' BUILDI a GROUND LEVEL=0' BUILDING =18' Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.S * Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level (0) 51TE5At= E 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, SiteSafe has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RIFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non -compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions for Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, and our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage, and an analysis of predicted RIFE levels. AT&T Mobility, LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are implemented: Option 1: Utility Pole Access Location • Place 2 Warning 2 signs opposite each other on the mounting structure (pole) 6' below the bottom tip of the antenna. The top of each sign must be positioned at the bottom distance. • Notification letter to the homeowner(s) of the potential for exposure limits to be exceeded in elevated parts of the tree at the antenna level and if any work needs to be completed where someone would be working on the tree at antenna level then ATT should be notified prior to any work starting so they can power down the antenna(s). Option 2: Utility Pole Access Location Option 3: Option 4: • Place 2 Warning 2 signs opposite each other on the mounting structure (pole) 6' below the bottom tip of the antenna. The top of each sign must be positioned at the bottom distance. • Work with the homeowner to cut the tree down. • SiteSafe recommends reducing the power deployed at the antenna to reach At&T roles and achieve the 16' SD role. • SiteSafe recommends moving the antenna to a different pole. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 11 51TE5At= E N otes: • The area with the potential to exceed the General Public MPE limits is extends beyond 16' from the antenna. Sitesafe would normally recommend the appropriate RF signage on the structure at the vertical safe distance below the antenna, however, per AT&T's signage policy, no signage should be recommended in this instance and controlled access to the structure should be implemented by AT&T and the structure owner. • AT&T Mobility, LLC will determine the appropriate signage size for the 27' Safety Distance. • Signage may already be in place. Sitesafe does not have record of any existing signage because there were no previous visits or data supplied regarding them. All remediation is based on a worst -case scenario. • Any existing signage that conflicts with the proposed signage in this report should be removed per AT&T Signage Posting Rules. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 12 51TE5At= E b Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry, and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Yasir Alqadhili. May 3, 2019 - Young Min Kim AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 13 51TE5At= E Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for anysuch conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 14 51TE5AFE Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulations as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible 6tposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density 1000 0.01 — Occupational — -General Public \ 10 100 1,000 10,000 Frequency (MHz) AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 15 51TE5At= E Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time IE12, Range Field Field Density(S) IH12orS(minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100). 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 -- -- f/300 6 1500- 5 6 100,000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time IE12, Range Field Field Density(S) IH12orS(minutes) (MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm2) 0.3-1.34 614 1.34-30 824/f 30-300 27.5 300-1500 - 1S00- - 100,000 f = frequency in MHz 1.63 (100)* 30 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 0.073 0.2 30 -- f/1500 30 -- 1.0 30 *Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: (a) Each employer - (1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; (2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. (b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR § 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization orstartup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 16 51TE5At= E Appendix C -Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways (e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: • Locked door or gate • Alarmed door • Locked ladder access • Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst -case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 1007. for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 17 51TE5At= E Appendix D - RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. • Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. • Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. • Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. • Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 18 51TE5At= E Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the refl ection factor is 1.0. The near / far field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the a ntenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the for field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use ad isdosureoutside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 02019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 19 51TE5At= E Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule -The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance - The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duty Cycle -The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) -The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the some direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst -case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) -The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 9)2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 20 51TE5At= E Occupational/Controlled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activityand can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 -Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for theiremployees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safetyand health. For more information, visit www.osha.aov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromagnetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement - A technique used to average a minimum of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero (0) to six (6) feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6-foot tall human body will absorb while present in an electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) -The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. 9)2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 21 51TE5At= E Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://www.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety httn://www.fcc.aov/encyclopedia/radio-freauency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) httl2://www.ncrponline.org Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.ora American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.orQ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) httio://www.eoc.aov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) httl2://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osho.gov/SLTC/radiofrequencyrodiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) httio://www.icnirp.orq World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.who.int/peh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute htto://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellQhones American Cancer Society (ACS) httQ://www.ccncer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.as0sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph risk /committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey httr)://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/RFEESurvey/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7l47.odf AT&T Proprietary (Infernal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wnlfen agreement. ©2019 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 22 �.; Planning Commission Minutes 11 7- �W g July 22, 2019 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Allysen Hoberg, Commissioners Bryan Pynn, Sean Hayford Oleary, Peter Lavin, James Rudolph, and Kathryn Quam MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Susan Rosenberg STAFF PRESENT: Matt Brillhart, Associate Planner Sadie Gannett, Assistant Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Andrew Biggerstaff, Kennedy & Graven (City Attorney's office) See attached sign -in sheet for additional speakers Chairperson Hoberg called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Rudolph, S/Pynn to approve the minutes of the May 29, 2019 meeting. IVlntinn carried • Fi-n OPEN FORUM No members of the public spoke ITEM #1 APPROVAL OF M/Lavin, S/Pynn to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 6-0 PUBLIC HEARING(S) ITEM #2 ■ 19-VAR-04 — Consideration of a request for variances to allow construction of an attached garage addition at 2015 Forest Drive. Associate Planner Matt Brillhart presented the staff report. ...... M/Pynn, S/Rudolph to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 6-0 M/Lavin, S/Pynn to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a restaurant at 7120 Chicago Avenue S. 'No Motion carried: 6-0 ITEM #3 19-CUP-03 -04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09— Consideration of a request for conditional use permits to allow small wireless facilities at multiple addresses throughout the city. Assistant Community Development Director Melissa Poehlman presented the staff report, adding that the site adjacent to 7116 Lyndale may be changed to 7108 Lyndale, due to a relocated light pole as part of the Lyndale Avenue reconstruction project. Public hearing speakers (see attached sign -in sheet) asked questions regarding the definition of "co -location", potential costs to the public, and potential health risks of 5G wireless signals. M/Quam, S/Rudolph to close the public hearing. Motion carried: 6-0 July 22, 2019 Poehlman clarified that AT&T was the only applicant at this time, and other carriers could apply for other locations in the future. She stated that "collocate" means using or replacing an existing pole primarily used for street lighting or public utilities, rather than installing a separate pole for exclusive use to support wireless facilities. Commissioner Hayford Oleary inquired if multiple carriers can be required to use the same pole vs. each provider needing a separate pole. Poehlman clarified that it was not a requirement that the carriers would need to share a single pole vs. separate. Regarding questions of health, Poehlman stated that the State Legislature and Federal government have tied cities' hands and limited the ability to stop these facilities. The Federal government has decided on the question of health impacts. Poehlman further stated that the Planning Commission's discretion in this CUP process was largely limited to questions of neighborhood character, by potentially regulating the quantity/frequency of pole locations. Commissioner Lavin inquired if the City could limit installations around residents with known electromagnetic sensitivity. Addressing general health questions, Andrew Biggerstaff (City Attorney's office) stated that to reject an application, the City would have to show that the federal government ruling (on health impacts) is wrong. To Commissioner Lavin's question, Biggerstaff stated that the city can impose "reasonable conditions" on any CUP, but what those conditions are, and how sensitivities could be proven, what documentation the City would require from residents making that claim would all need further analysis. Commissioner Hayford Oleary inquired if the Commission could amend the findings to state that this is reasonable because it uses existing poles, as compared to adding a large number of additional poles to a block? Responding to a number of questions from the Commission, the AT&T representative clarified that each carrier's equipment would likely be on separate poles, due to equipment capacity on each pole, as well as interference. Poles or equipment would have identification stickers. Commissioner Hoberg — Do customers contact you regarding gaps in coverage or how is that identified? ATT rep - Both customer feedback as well as monitoring our own network for gaps. Commissioner Rudolph inquired about the 5G buildout timeline. ATT rep — investment is limited by capital, and they will analyze network after this installation. Rudolph — At what distance would another provider's equipment interfere? ATT rep — don't have exact number. Commissioner Lavin — Do we have schedule/plan of how densely these poles can be located? Would it be 2 per block, 3 per block, etc. Poehlman — nothing in code regarding spacing. Biggerstaff — The Legislature may also prohibit separation requirements, but we will have to confirm. Lavin — Can we relay suggestions to City Council regarding placement near those with sensitivity? Poehlman — We can continue to study this. There would have to be some standards as to a safe radius, a list of health concerns, etc. July 22, 2019 M/Hayford Oleary, S/Pynn to recommend approval of conditional use permits, amending Finding #2 to state that the applications are not counter to the Comprehensive Plan's aesthetic criteria because there is not currently an excessive concentration of small wireless facilities in these locations. Motion carried: 6-0 Poehlman clarified for the Commission the limited aspects staff would be studying, rather than studying the health impacts of 5G generally. LIAISON REPORTS Community Services Advisory Commission: Commissioner Pynn discussed park improvements. City Council: No report. HRA: Commissioner Quam gave an update on the first-time homebuyer program. Richfield School Board: Commissioner Rudolph gave an update on the school construction projects. Transportation Commission: Commissioner Hayford Oleary gave an update on Lyndale Avenue reconstruction and announced a bike ride event with the Mayor, taking place on 66th Street. Chamber of Commerce: Commissioner Lavin provided an update on Chamber of Commerce activities and events. CITY PLANNER'S REPORT Poehlman noted that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was nearing final approval by the Metropolitan Council and noted the Urban Wildland race taking place on July 27. ADJOURNMENT M/Rudolph, S/Pynn to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:38 p.m. Motion carried: 6-0 Planning Commission Secretary AGENDA SECTON: RESOLU110NS AGENDA ITEM # 7. STAFF REPORT NO.98 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8/13/2019 REPORT PREPARED BY: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: CITYMANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 8/7/2019 ITEM FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Consideration of the adoption of a resolution appointing a representative to the Board of Directors of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 25, 1990 the City Council approved an ordinance to levy a 3% tax on gross receipts of lodging from Richfield Hotels and Motels pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. The establishment of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc (RTPB) and the appointment of directors was also a part of the resolution. Currently, there are five director positions on the RTPB. The term of each appointment is for three years. Current appointments to the RTPB and the ending dates of their terms are as follows: 1. Gordon Vizecky, representing the Richfield Chamber of Commerce, term ending December 31, 2019. 2. Raj Bhakta, General Manager of Baymont Suites, term ending December 31, 2021. 3. Whitney Bain, General Manager of Candlewood Suites, term ending December 31, 2021. 4. Tony Lawler, Regional Operations Manager for Empire Hotels Group which owns Four Points by Sheraton, term ending December 31, 2021. 5. Vacant. The vacant position was formerly filled by a Motel 6 representative: the property was acquired and vacated as part of the 77th Underpass project. The RTPB amended their bylaws on March 12, 2019 to fill the position with a citizen representative. RTPB recruited candidates in March and interviewed 3 candidates at their April 2019 meeting. They are recommending Lisa Rudolph. Lisa is an active volunteer in the City of Richfield and currently serves as Chair of the Community Services Commission. Since much of Richfield's tourism is generated by Recreation Services events, she should be a strong addition to the RTPB. The agreement with RTPB is almost 30 years old and due to be updated. Staff will present several recommendations to strengthen and update the agreement at a future work session, tentatively scheduled for September 10, 2019. One of the recommendations is to increase citizen representation on RTPB which is consistent with this recommended appointment. The action is to appoint Lisa Rudolph to a term ending December 31, 2021 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion: Adopt a resolution appointing Lisa Rudolph to the Board of Directors of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT This information is contained in the Executive Summary. B. POLICIES (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etch The City Council has the authority to make appointments to the RTPB. C. CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES: Since the RTPB is a relatively small board the Council should make the appointment to make it easier to ensure a quorum of the Board, allowing RTPB to continue to conduct their business. D. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no cost to the City in making the appointment. E. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: The appointment conforms to City ordinance and bylaws of the RTPB. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION (Sl: The Council could choose not to appoint Lisa Rudolph but that would make it more difficult for RTPB to conduct their business. PRINCIPAL PARTIES EXPECTED AT MEETING: ATTACHMENTS: Description Type ❑ Resolution Cover Memo RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPOINTING AT -LARGE CITIZEN DIRECTOR TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RICHFIELD TOURISM PROMOTION BOARD, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has levied a 3% tax on the gross receipts of lodging from hotels and motels in the City pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 469.190; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 469.190 authorizes the proceeds of the tax to fund a Tourism Promotion Board for the purpose of marketing and promoting the City as a tourist or convention center; and WHEREAS, the RTPB amended their bylaws to create an at -large citizen director position at their meeting on March 12, 2019. WHEREAS, the articles and bylaws of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc. provide the City Council of the City of Richfield appoint five (5) directors to the Board representing the Richfield hotel -motel properties, the Richfield Chamber of Commerce and an at -large representative from the community of Richfield; and WHEREAS, each director shall serve as a director until his or her successor has been appointed and has qualified, or until his or her earlier disqualification, death, resignation, or removal; and WHEREAS, the RTPB recommends Lisa Rudolph to be appointed to the at -large citizen director position. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, that the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board directors be modified as follows: Appoint Lisa Rudolph to the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board to complete a three- year term ending December 31, 2021. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 13th day of August, 2019. Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk