04-09-2019 Regular AgendaR EG U LAR C IT Y C O U N C IL MEET IN G
R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C E N TE R, C O U N C IL C H AMB E R S
AP R IL 9, 2019
7:00 P M
IN TR O D U C TO RY P R O C E E D IN G S
C all to order
Open forum (15 minutes maximum)
E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments
are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who wish to address
the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting.
P ledge of A llegiance
A pproval of the minutes of the: (1) S pecial concurrent C ity C ouncil, HRA , and P lanning C ommission work session of
March 26, 2019; and (2) Regular C ity C ouncil meeting of March 26, 2019.
P R E S E N TATIO N S
1.P roclamation: National P ublic S afety Telecommunicator Week (A pril 14-20)
C O U N C IL D ISC U SSIO N
2.Hats Off to Hometown Hits
A ttending the Richfield Red, White, & B lue D ays P arade (4th of July)
AG E N D A APPR O VAL
3.A pproval of the A genda
4.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended
actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any
Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the
regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are
recommended for approval.
A .C onsider adoption of a resolution to support the Metro Transit D L ine B us Rapid Transit P roject and the
stops within Richfield along P ortland Avenue at 66th, 70th, 73rd, and 77th S treets.
S taff Report No. 50
B .C onsider adoption of a resolution authorizing Recreation S ervices staff to accept a $25,000 outdoor
recreation grant from the Minnesota D epartment of Natural Resources for improvements to a dock and
boardwalk at Wood L ake Nature C enter and execute agreements necessary to complete the project.
S taff Report No. 51
5.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar
O T H E R B U S IN E S S
6.C onsider acceptance of a bid tabulation and approve award of a contracts for the C itywide Water Meter
Replacement P roject to C ore and Main L P for S chedule A work for $2,808,741 and Vanguard Utility S ervice, Inc.
for S chedule B and S chedule D work for $1,070,677.45 and authorize the C ity Manager to approve contract
changes up to $175,000 without further C ity C ouncil consideration.
S taff Report No. 52
7.C onsider approval of:
F inal design plans and specifications for the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction project from 66th S treet to
76th S treet; and
The bid tabulation and award of contract to R.L . L arson E xcavating, Inc. in the amount of $10,672,483.27
and authorization of the C ity Manager to approve contract changes under $175,000 without further C ity
C ouncil consideration.
S taff Report No. 53
8.C onsider adoption of a resolution providing for the sale of $8,865,000 General Obligation B onds, S eries 2019A .
S taff Report No. 54
9.C onsider approval of a facility dedication request to dedicate the stage of the Richfield C ommunity B and S hell to
the P eterson F amily.
S taff Report No. 55
C IT Y MAN AG E R’S R E P O R T
10.C ity Manager's Report
C LAIMS AN D PAYR O L LS
11.C laims and P ayrolls
Open forum (15 minutes maximum)
E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments
are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who wish to address
the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting.
12.A djournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Special Concurrent City Council, Housing
and Redevelopment Authority and
Planning Commission Work Session
March 26, 2019
CALL TO ORDER
The work session was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 5:45 p.m. in the
Bartholomew Room.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Edwina Garcia; Simon
Present: Trautmann and Ben Whalen.
HRA Members Mary Supple, Chair; Pat Elliott; and Maria Regan Gonzalez.
Present:
HRA Members Sue Sandahl and Erin Vrieze Daniels.
Absent:
Planning Commission Sean Hayford Oleary; James Rudolph; Susan Rosenberg; Peter
Members Present: Lavin; Kathryn Quam; and Allysen Hoberg, Chair (arrived at 6:00 p.m.).
Planning Commission Bryan Pynn.
Absent:
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; John Stark, Community Development
Director; Julie Urban, Housing Manager; Melissa Poehlman, Planning &
Redevelopment Manager/Assistant CD Director; and Kari Sinning, Deputy
City Clerk.
Item #1
DISCUSS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CITY GARAGE SOUTH (301
77TH STREET WEST) SITE
Mayor Regan Gonzalez introduced City Manager Rodriguez who reminded the Council and
Commissioners that this meeting is not to decide what happens with the site but a discussion of the
options for the site. She thanked Community Development Director Stark and Housing Manager
Urban for their work on the presentation of which Council Member Garcia echoed.
Community Development Director Stark stated how the comprehensive plan and City policies
can influence what the site could be and how the feedback (need) from the community affects the
proposals.
Housing Manager Urban gave an overview of the site and the proposal from MWF Properties,
a 55-unit workforce housing which could provide 1 bedroom units at 30% AMI for residents. The
communities input for what will be built here is important.
Special concurrent Council, HRA and Planning
Commission Work Session -2- March 26, 2019
Community Development Director Stark spoke about the financial aspects of the site and
stated questions for the Council and Commissioners to discuss.
Planning Commissioner Lavin defined “workforce housing” as an affordable housing project.
Community Development Director Stark stated that there is no single definition of workforce housing
or affordable housing. Commissioner Hoberg gave examples of people that would be classified as
workforce housing.
HRA Commissioner Elliott stated that what we call the housing isn’t important but what we
offer the community is; the safety of children in the area is a concern. He posed a question regarding
a potential nuisance claims from LaMettry’s Auto Body if a housing unit was built there. He also
inquired if there was any commercial interest in the property (i.e. from Richfield Bloomington Honda).
Community Development Director Stark responded that other cities have used different tools to
address odor nuisance problems but he does not believe that this will be an issue and Richfield
Bloomington Honda has not expressed any interest in the property.
Council Member Supple read aloud a statement of support from Commissioner Vrieze Daniels
who was unable to attend.
Planning Commission Chair Hayford Oleary stated that the site is a good location for high-
density housing and provides additional housing for Richfield residents.
Council Member Garcia agreed with Planning Commission Chair Hayford Oleary and stated
that Richfield does not have area for expansion and we need affordable housing for the Residents.
The proposed amenities and the building size are very much needed to invest into our people.
Council Member Whalen thanked the staff and the developers for the opportunity to have more
30% AMI units which is needed in Richfield. He also commented on the availability of units for people
with disabilities and larger families.
Council Member Supple stated that the accessibility of the proposed plan and the support staff
for those with disabilities is a significant influence. However, there is no green space available on the
lot for children to play or families to spend time with one another. Overall the pros outweigh the cons;
the City of Richfield needs housing and it’s great to have a local developer.
Commissioner Quam is in favor of the company and agrees that we need housing but we need
to look at it as a whole.
Council Member Trautmann likes the developers and the financial aspects but dislikes the
location. There are structural deficits of the site.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez is in support of the idea but it’s not an ideal site. She posed a question
as to what could be done to make it more neighborhood like. Council Member Whalen stated that
there is already housing along 77th street that already seems too ostracized from the rest of the City.
There was discussion about the wall along 77th street.
Commissioner Rudolph posed a question of the impact on the schools which Community
Development Director Stark stated that there will be a meeting with the School Board in May.
Commissioner Rosenberg stated that she is proud of the work to provide affordable homes for
people and shared thoughts on how to include those already in the residential areas of 77th street.
Special concurrent Council, HRA and Planning
Commission Work Session -3- March 26, 2019
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:01 p.m.
Date Approved: April 9, 2019
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
Jared Voto Katie Rodriguez
Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 7:01 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
Council Members Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor; Mary Supple; Edwina Garcia; Simon
Present: Trautmann; and Ben Whalen.
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Jay Henthorne,
Police Chief; John Stark, Community Development Director; Amy Markle,
Recreation Services Director; and Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk.
OPEN FORUM
None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Regan Gonzalez led the Pledge of Allegiance.
At this time the meeting was moved to the Bartholomew Room to be audio recorded since the
audio/visual functions were not operational in the Council Chambers.
The meeting was called back to order by Mayor Regan Gonzalez at 7:15 p.m. in the
Bartholomew Room.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Garcia, S/Trautmann to approve the minutes of the: (1) Special City Council work session of
March 12, 2019; and (2) Regular City Council meeting of March 12, 2019.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #1
PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL NATIONAL SAFE DIGGING MONTH IN
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Meeting
March 26, 2019
Council Meeting Minutes -2- March 26, 2019
Mayor Regan Gonzalez introduced the representatives from CenterPoint Energy and read the
proclamation aloud.
Item #2
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
• Hats Off to Hometown Hits
Council Member Garcia gave a reminder about purchasing a legacy brick for the Bandshell at
Veteran’s Park; shared that Mayor Regan Gonzalez received a Bush Fellowship and is very proud of
her accomplishments.
Council Member Trautmann congratulated Mayor Regan Gonzalez on her fellowship and
mentioned registering for Richfield Parks Summer Programs.
Council Member Whalen also congratulated Mayor Regan Gonzalez; attended a session on
the Bus Rapid Transit route and is excited to see the results; and extended kudos to Neil Ruhland, the
City’s Media Coordinator, for his continuing efforts.
Council Member Supple congratulated Mayor Regan Gonzalez; read aloud a letter from Brent
Parsons from the Richfield Hockey Club which thanked the Ice Arena and City Staff; and shared that
the Community Wellness Expo will be on April 13th at the High School.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez thanked everyone for their congratulations on her Bush Fellowship
and explained the process and how this will help her to become a better leader for the community;
mentioned the promotion of Josh Nelson to lieutenant in the Fire Department and thanked Brad
Bennett for his 30 years of service in the Fire Department; mentioned the State of the Community is
April 11th; reminded everyone that Earth Day is April 22nd and the Woodlake Nature Center is ;
highlighted the City’s Adopt a Park Program; attended MICC (Minnesota Independence College and
Community) Gala and read aloud a statement from the program; and mentioned that the City was
awarded the TRAIL (Transportation Resource to Aid Independent Living) Blazer Award for 2018.
Item #3
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
M/Supple, S/Trautmann to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #4
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar.
A. Consideration of approval of the Pathway's to Policing Grant between the Minnesota
Department of Public Safety and the City of Richfield Police Department to partially fund a
non-traditional police officer candidate. The total funds available are $25,392.31. (S. R. No.
45)
B. Consideration of the approval of a bid tabulation and award of contract to Bituminous
Roadways Inc. for the 2019 Mill and Overlay project in the amount $2,051,632 and
Council Meeting Minutes -3- March 26, 2019
authorization of the City Manager to approve contract changes under $175,000 without further
City Council consideration. (S. R. No. 46)
C. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution supporting the elimination of the exemption that
prevents Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving a portion of the sales tax on leased
vehicles through the county state aid formula. (S. R. No. 47)
RESOLUTION NO. 11616
SUPPORTING THE REPEAL OF THE EXCLUSION OF HENNEPIN
AND RAMSEY COUNTIES FROM RECEIVING MOTOR
VEHICLE LEASE SALES TAX (MVLST) FUNDS AND A
RETURN TO THE ORIGINAL MVLST COUNTY STATE AID FORMULA
D. Consideration of the approval of an amendment to the Hennepin County Cost Participation
Agreement for the acquisition of right-of-way for the 77th Street Underpass of Trunk Highway
77 Project. (S. R. No. 48)
M/Garcia, S/Trautmann to approve the consent calendar.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #5
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
None.
Item #6
CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE
2020 CENSUS (S.R. NO. 49)
Council Member Trautmann presented Staff Report No. 49 and stated the importance of the
census.
Mayor Regan Gonzalez offered previous census statistics and how the 2020 census will help
the community. She also stated a phase given by the Census Bureau to “remember the babies” as
children count in the census.
M/Trautmann, S/ Supple to adopt a resolution supporting the 2020 census.
RESOLUTION NO. 11617
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE 2020 CENSUS
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #7
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Rodriguez had nothing to report.
Council Meeting Minutes -4- March 26, 2019
Item #8
CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
M/Garcia, S/Trautmann that the following claims and payrolls be approved:
U.S. Bank 03/26/19
A/P Checks: 275951 - 276385 $ 1,900,323.26
Payroll: 144253 – 144587; 43046 928,542.50
TOTAL $ 2,828,865.76
Motion carried 5-0.
OPEN FORUM
None.
Item #9
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:50 p.m.
Date Approved: April 9, 2019
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Mayor
Jared Voto Katie Rodriguez
Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.A.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 50
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
4/9/2019
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jeff P earson, C ity E ngineer
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
4/2/2019
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
4/2/2019
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider adoption of a resolution to support the Metro Transit D Line Bus Rapid Transit Project and
the stops within Richfield along Portland Avenue at 66th, 70th, 73rd, and 77th Streets.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Metro Transit is planning improvements to the Route 5 corridor with the D Line Bus Rapid Transit (B RT)
project, and are currently coordinating advocacy at the legislature to secure the remaining funding for the
project. The project would be a positive asset to the city of Richfield and enhance the overall metro transit
system.
The D Line will substantially replace Route 5, running primarily on Portland Avenue within Richfield and on
Chicago, Emerson and Fremont Avenues in Minneapolis. Rapid bus brings better amenities, such as:
Faster, more frequent service;
Pre-boarding fare payment for faster stops;
Neighborhood-scale stations with amenities;
Enhanced security; and,
Larger & specialized vehicles.
D Line stations in Richfield will be located at:
Portland Ave. & 66th St.;
Portland Ave. & 70th St.;
Portland Ave. & 73rd St.; and,
Portland Ave. & 77th St.
Currently, Route 5 is the Twin Cities’ busiest bus route, carrying about 16,000 customers each
weekday. During rush hours, Route 5 buses make up less than 2 percent of vehicle traffic but carry
more than 20 percent of people traveling through the corridor. T he D Line is projected to be about
20 percent faster than Route 5 with longer station spacing, fares collected at stations, and raised
curbs for accessibility.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt a resolution to support the Metro Transit D Line B R T Project and the stops within
Richfield along Portland Avenue at 66th, 70th, 73rd, and 77th Streets.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
See Executive Summary
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
A similar resolution of support was approved by the Richfield City Council at the April 24, 2018,
meeting.
The Metro Transit D Line B RT Project is consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
(Chapter 7 - Transportation).
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Resolutions of support from project stakeholders will help Metro Transit as they attempt to secure
funding for the project.
The D Line is at a critical point in needing to secure final funding to move forward on schedule.
The remaining $20 million needed is included in the Governor's bonding proposal for the 2019
legislative session.
Changes in elected leadership in Richfield and at the State level make it important to reaffirm
Richfield's support for the Metro Transit D Line B RT Project.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
There are no financial impacts to the City in approving this resolution of support.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
None
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
D L ine B RT F act S heet B ackup Material
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE
METRO D LINE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield’s Comprehensive Plan promotes an integrated
transportation system that will serve the future needs of its residents, businesses, and
visitors; as well as supports the City’s redevelopment plans to complement the
metropolitan transportation system; and
WHEREAS, Metro Transit’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) offers riders fast, frequent
service with numerous amenities, that will give riders on the region’s transit system more
mobility options and connect people with jobs; and
WHEREAS, the A Line BRT, which opened in summer 2016, has drawn increased
ridership and is an overwhelming success; and
WHEREAS, the proposed build out of the region’s BRT system would connect an
additional 200,000 people to 500,000 jobs; and
WHEREAS, the existing local bus route in this corridor has the highest productivity
in terms of carrying the most passengers each hour; and
WHEREAS, the D Line could result in a faster trip, up to 25% faster, by stopping
less often, deploying bus priority at traffic signals, and implementing off-board fare
payment; and
WHEREAS, the D Line would operate in Brooklyn Center, Minneapolis, Richfield,
and Bloomington; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield will benefit from improvements to stops within
Richfield, which will offer improved amenities, including security features, improved
lighting, real-time signage, and heated shelters. The stop locations in Richfield are:
• Portland Ave. & 66th St.
• Portland Ave. & 70th St.
• Portland Ave. & 73rd St.
• Portland Ave. & 77th St.; and
WHEREAS, the D Line project still needs to secure $20 million in funding to move
forward with construction in 2020; and
WHEREAS, Governor Walz’s capital budget directs $20 million toward the
implementation of the D Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Richfield expresses its
support for the Metropolitan Council’s D Line BRT project, with the inclusion of the four
stops listed above, which would serve this community and urges the Minnesota Legislature
to adopt Governor Tim Walz’s state bonding proposal to invest $20 million in the Metro
Transit D Line BRT Project.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9th day of April,
2019.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
The D Line will improve transit on Chicago Avenue and Fremont Avenue.
Rapid bus improvements add up to a faster trip and a more comfortable experience on Metro Transit’s busiest routes. Route 5 is the Twin Cities’ busiest bus route, carrying about 16,000 customers each weekday. During rush hours, Route 5
more than 20 percent of people traveling through the corridor.
How will D Line rapid bus service improve my ride?
Rapid bus service is a package of transit enhancements that adds up to a faster trip and an improved experience with enhanced stations and larger specialized vehicles.
How much faster will the D Line be?
The D Line is projected to be about 20 percent faster than Route 5.
Instead of stopping every block, buses will make limited stops at stations spaced farther apart. Fares will be collected at stations—just like light rail—and not on the bus. Raised curbs at platforms will make it easier to step onto the bus. Complete snow removal will improve winter boarding, too. D Line buses
PROJECT CONTACT:Cody Olsondline@metrotransit.org
612-349-7390
The new D Line
Faster transit is coming to the Route 5 corridor.
PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE (subject to change)
metrotransit.org/d-line-project
How will the project be funded?
The total project cost is about $75 million. $40 million has
stations along the entire D Line. 494
94
94
11-02-37173-18
Limited stops, more frequent service
The D Line would be the primary service in the corridor, with increased service on nights and weekends.
Local bus Route 5 would continue to run at a reduced frequency to serve local trips at existing bus stops.
More green time with signal priority
To keep moving, D Line buses can “ask” traffic signals for early or extended green lights.
What makes the D Line different?
Priority ST
Route 5
Service every 30 minutes, 1/8 mile between stops
D Line
Service every 10 minutes, 1/2 mile between stations
Today, buses stop in the right-turn lane with little space for customer amenities. Merging back into traffic causes delay.
Typical Current Bus Stop
Curb extension provides space for a D Line station and eliminates side-to-side weaving. Far side stops can use signal priority to help the bus keep moving.
\Curb Extension Station
metrotransit.org/d-line-project
Curb extensions for speed & space
The D Line will run in general traffic and won’t widen the roadway. Instead, the project will add curb extensions or bump-outs at many stations.
Pre-boarding fare payment for faster stops
For speedier boarding through all doors, D Line buses won’t have fareboxes. Customers will purchase a ticket or tap a Go-To Card at the station, just like light rail. Police officers – not bus operators – will ensure customers have paid.
Neighborhood-scale stations with amenities
Stations are equipped with features for a safe and comfortable experience, similar to light rail. Standard features include heat, lighting, security features, real-time bus departure information and trash receptacles.
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #4.B.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 51
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
4/9/2019
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector
3/29/2019
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
4/2/2019
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider adoption of a resolution authorizing Recreation Services staff to accept a $25,000 outdoor
recreation grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for improvements to a dock and
boardwalk at Wood Lake Nature Center and execute agreements necessary to complete the project.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Wood Lake Nature Center applied for an Outdoor Recreation Grant for $25,000 from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources. The grant program is structured to increase and enhance outdoor
recreation facilities in local and community parks throughout the state.
I n addition, W ood Lake has been given a $25,000 donation from retired Richfield teacher Marlene Glaus to
improve the area of the already installed Marlene Glaus overlook. These funds will be used as matching funds
for the grant.
Staff determined the best use of the grant funds, if received, is to remove the existing dock and replace it with
a U-shaped boardwalk. This boardwalk would be two 40’ docks attached by a horizontal 40’ dock, all being 8
feet wide. This lagoon boardwalk would serve students better doing marsh studies and also be an amenity for
weddings and the general public. Staff has received quotes for this project for slightly under $50,000.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing Recreation Services staff to accept a $25,000 outdoor
recreation grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for improvements to a dock and
boardwalk at Wood Lake Nature Center and execute agreements necessary to complete the project.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Recreation Services Department has received a number of grants from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources including several Conservation Partners Legacy Grants.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources requires a resolution of Council approval in
order to release the funds to the City.
The Administrative Services Department issued a memo on November 9, 2004, requiring that all
grants and restricted donations to departments be received by resolution and by a two-thirds
majority of the City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statute 465.03.
City Council considers approval for all City contracts and agreements by policy.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
I n order to complete the project in a timely fashion and finish construction in the warmer months,
Council approval is required at the April 9 meeting.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
W ithout this grant, there would be insufficient funds to complete the lagoon boardwalk project.
W ood Lake would lose out on valuable rental income and student field trip capacity.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires every acceptance of a grant or devise of real or personal
property by a two-thirds majority of the City Council.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources requires a resolution of Council approval in
order to release the funds to the City of Richfield.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
There are no alternative recommendations associated with this item.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RECREATION SERVICES STAFF TO ACCEPT A $25,000
OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO A DOCK AND BOARDWALK AT
WOOD LAKE NATURE CENTER AND EXECUTE AGREEMENTS NECESSARY TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield will act as legal sponsor for a project to improve
and replace sections of dock and boardwalk at Wood Lake Nature Center, and
WHEREAS, an Outdoor Recreation Grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources in the amount of $25,000 will provide approximately 50% of the necessary funds
for this project, and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has the legal authority to apply for financial
assistance, and financial capability to meet the match requirement (if any) and ensure
adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for
its design life, and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has not incurred any development costs and has
not entered into a written purchase agreement to acquire the property described in the Cost
Breakdown section on this application.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has fee title or permanent easement over the land
described in the site plan included in the application, and
WHEREAS, upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Richfield may
enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and
will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement
including dedicating the park property for uses consistent with the funding grant program
into perpetuity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield is hereby authorized to
accept the grant funds from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and execute
such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9th day of April,
2019.
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #6.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 52
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
4/9/2019
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Russ "B utch" L upkes, Utilities S uperintendent
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
4/2/2019
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
4/2/2019
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider acceptance of a bid tabulation and approve award of a contracts for the Citywide W ater
Meter Replacement Project to Core and Main LP for Schedule A work for $2,808,741 and Vanguard
Utility Service, Inc. for Schedule B and Schedule D work for $1,070,677.45 and authorize the City
Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City Council consideration.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The City has 10,534 residential and 236 commercial water meters. These water meters serve a critical role in
the City's water utility infrastructure since they serve as the "cash registers" for the utility division. The City's
current water meters were installed between 2007-2009 and have reached the end of their expected
lifespan. T he batteries of these water meters are prone to failure and significant staff time and
resources are being dedicated to replace failed meters on a case-by-case basis. City staff
recommended a citywide water meter replacement project and on February 26, 2019, the City
Council directed staff to solicit bids for this project.
T he City held a bid opening for the project on March 27, 2019, and four bids were received. T he bid
documents included pricing provisions for furnishing and installation of the water meters
and required bidders to break down their pricing into the following elements:
Schedule A: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for furnishing the water meters.
Schedule B: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for installing the water meters.
Schedule C: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for furnishing and installation of the water meters.
Schedule D: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for furnishing and installation of special items.
Based on review of the four bids, City staff recommends awarding two contracts. Award the first
contract to Core and Main LP for $2,808,741 to furnish the City’s metering equipment (Schedule A)
and award the second contract to Vanguard Utility Service, Inc. for $1,070,677.45 to install the
metering equipment and furnish and install special items (Schedule B & D). T he result of this award
combination yield the lowest cost to the City.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Accept the bid tabulation and approve award of contracts for the Citywide Water Meter
Replacement project to Core and Main LP for Schedule A work for $2,808,741 and Vanguard Utility
Service, Inc. for Schedule B and Schedule D work for $1,070,677.45 and authorize the City Manager to
approve contract changes up to $175,000 without further City Council consideration.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Public Works staff held a work session to brief Council on the project on February 11, 2019, and at the
February 26, 2019, City Council meeting staff was authorized to solicit bids for the project. Staff
provided Council with project details, including:
Problem
The City of Richfield Public Works Department W ater Utility division has been working towards the
implementation of a citywide water meter replacement project. Water meters serve a critical role in the
City's water utility infrastructure since they serve as the "cash registers" for the utility division. The
project is necessary due to the increasing failure rate of our existing water meters as they reach the end
of their usable lifespan. Over 10% percent of meters read per week are reading faulty, resulting in
inaccurate billings and significant staff time and resources being dedicated to replace the failed meters
on a case-by-case basis.
Solution
Staff surveyed other municipalities with similar meter troubles and worked with engineering firm S E H,
I nc., to identify a solution to this problem and it was determined that a citywide meter replacement project
was the best option, since the margin of failing meters is expected to increase as time goes on. A
citywide project rather than piecemeal replacement ensures that the meter and reading technology will be
uniform throughout the City and will return stability to our water utility department and our customers'
utility service.
Meter Selection Process
I n pursuit of the best water meter for Richfield, staff surveyed other cities and met with multiple meter
suppliers to select the best product. Richfield staff prioritized:
Overall metering accuracy;
Low-flow reading ability to allow for accurate leak detection to aid in water conservation;
Low maintenance & ease of repair;
Battery longevity & warranty; and
An ability to upgrade to advanced metering infrastructure (A MI ).
W ith these considerations in mind, staff selected Sensus brand water meters for this project, which have
a 15-year warranty, including battery.
Timeline & Resident Outreach
The project will be a three (3) year program. The schedule is subject to change based on certain factors,
but tentatively follows this timeline:
Year 1 (2019): Pilot program, all commercial properties, failed meters, and 30% of residential
meters
Year 2 (2020): 30-40% of residential meters
Year 3 (2021): Remaining residential meters & project completion.
General resident outreach will consist of:
Social media postings;
Utility billing inserts; and
Sun Current advertisements.
I ndividual resident outreach by contractor will consist of:
Mailing an initial appointment notice;
Door knocking & door hanger notice;
Mailing a second notice;
Certified letter to the property owner; and
Turning account over to Public W orks for replacement by P W staff.
Contractor's Staff
As part of the project bid specifications, the contractor will be required to have all project staff undergo
B C A background checks and wear the required I D badges that include the Richfield logo. The
contractor is also required to have staff available to conduct all scheduling related to the replacement, a
licensed plumber on staff and available, and supervisors in place to respond to customer concerns or
complaints. At no point will the contractor's staff be allowed to enter a home if a competent adult over the
age of 18 is not present at the property.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Minnesota Statutes 471.345: For City contracts or purchases estimated to exceed
$175,000, sealed bids shall be solicited by public notice in the manner and subject to the law
governing contracts or purchases by the City of Richfield.
The scope of the project - 10,858 meters - means the contract cost will exceed the statutory
threshold requiring sealed bids.
The project has been identified in the 2019-2023 Capital I mprovement Budget/Capital
I mprovement Plan.
The ad for bid was published in the Richfield/Bloomington Sun Current on March 7 and 14, and
on the Quest C D N website on February 27.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The acceptance of the bid tabulation and the award of contracts will allow the project stay on
schedule to begin in May 2019.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The project is identified in the 2019-2023 Capital I mprovement Budget/Capital I mprovement Plan.
Funding for this project has been accounted for in the current year's Water Utility budget and in
the coming years' budgets.
The engineer's estimate for Schedules A, B & D of the project was over $4,400,000.
The cost of contracts being considered (Schedules A, B & D) will total $3,879,418.45.
Three (3) combinations of bids were received for Schedules A, B & D of the project with the
lowest being $3,879,418.45 and the highest being $4,044,525.00.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney reviewed the bid specifications and contracts and will be available to answer
questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Award Recommendation L etter B ackup Material
B id Tabulation E xhibit
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax
April 1, 2019 RE: Richfield, Minnesota
Water Meter Replacement Project
SEH No. RICHF 148484
Russ Lupkes, Utilities Superintendent
City of Richfield
1901 E 66th St.
Richfield, MN 55423
At 1:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 27, 2019, four bids opened and read aloud for the above-referenced project. The
project bid documents included pricing provisions for furnishing and installation of the water meters.
The project bid form was structured to require bidders to break down their pricing into the following elements:
• Schedule A: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for furnishing the water meters,
• Schedule B: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for installing the water meters,
• Schedule C: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for furnishing and installation of the water meters.
• Schedule D: Proposed unit pricing and quantities for furnishing and installation of special items.
A summary of the bids received is presented below and a detail bid tabulation is attached.
Contractor
SCHEDULE A
FURNISH METERING
EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE B
INSTALLATION OF
METERING
EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE C
FURNISH AND
INSTALL METERING
EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE D
FURNISH AND
INSTALL METERING
EQUIPMENT*
1 Core and Main LP $2,808,741.00 No Bid $4,063,929.33 $136,854.20
2 Vanguard Utility Service Inc. No Bid $1,028,677.45 No Bid $42,000.00
3 HydroCorp No Bid $990,080.00 No Bid $128,720.00
4 Thirkettle Corporation No Bid $1,162,231.91 No Bid $73,552.00
Engineer's Estimate $3,222,739.00 $1,188,022.00 $4,410,511.00 $66,000.00
*Schedule D Is for furnishing and installing special items, (new isolation valves or meter horns), for small quantity
items that will be need infrequently.
Evaluation of Bid Results
For the City, a complete project requires that the meters be supplied and installed. Accordingly, the results of the
bids presents two different project award scenarios: Schedule A + Schedule B + Schedule D; or, Schedule C+
Schedule D.
Richfield, Minnesota
Water Meter Replacement Project
Page 2
Scenario 1
BID ELEMENTS Bidder Combinations BID PRICES
TOTAL PRICE
OF AWARD
OPTION
OPTION
RANK
DIFFERENCE
IN TOTAL
PRICE
Schedule A +
Schedule B +
Schedule D
Core and Main LP +
Vanguard Utility
Service Inc.
$2,808,741.00 +
$1,028,677.45+ $42,000.00 $3,879,418.45
Lowest
Combined
Price
--
Core and Main LP +
HydroCorp
$2,808,741.00 +
$990,080.00+ $128,720.00 $3,927,541.00 $48,122.55
Core and Main LP +
Thirkettle Corporation
$2,808,741.00 +
$1,162,231.91+ $73,552.00 $4,044,524.91 $165,106.46
Engineer’s Estimate $4,476,761.44
Scenario 2
BID ELEMENTS Bidder Combinations BID PRICES TOTAL PRICE OF
AWARD OPTION
DIFFERENCE IN
TOTAL
SCENARIO 1
PRICE
Schedule C +
Schedule D
Core and Main LP
$4,063,929.33+
$136,854.20 $4,200,783.53 +$321,365.08
Engineer’s Estimate $4,476,511.44
Award Scenario 1
Under Scenario 1, the City would award one (1) contract to Core and Main LP in the amount of $2,808,741.00 to
furnish the City’s metering equipment and then award a separate contract to Vanguard Utility Service, Inc. in the
amount of $1,070,677.45 to install the metering equipment (B & D) furnished by Core and Main LP. The result of this
award combination yields the lowest pricing for scenario 1 to the City, but will require administration of two separate
contracts.
Award Scenario 2
Under Scenario 2, the City would award one (1) contract to Core and Main LP in the amount of $4,200,783.53 to
furnish and install the City’s metering equipment. The result of this award selection will cost the City an additional
$321,365.08, but will only necessitate administration of one contract.
Richfield, Minnesota
Water Meter Replacement Project
Page 3
Discussion of the Bids Received
A review of the bid values submitted and specifically the low bid combination submitted by Core and Main LP and
Vanguard Utility Service Inc. compares favorably with the Engineer’s estimate for the bid combination of A, B,& D
$4,476,761.00. SEH engineers can conclude that both contractors have a sufficient understanding of the project and
equipment to perform the construction for which they bid. Accordingly, if the City wishes to award this project to the
low bidder, the project should then be awarded to Core and Main LP in the amount of $2,808,741.00 for Schedule A and
Vanguard Utility Service Inc. in the amount of $1,070,677.45 for Schedule B and Schedule D combined. SEH makes
no representation or warranty as to the actual financial viability of the contractor or its ability to complete its work.
We thank you for the opportunity of working with the City of Richfield on this project.
Sincerely,
Miles B. Jensen, PE
Project Manager
dmk
c: Jeff Ledin – SEH Brainerd Office
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.Page 1 of 1
TABULATION OF BIDS
Water Meter Replacement Core & Main LP Vanguard Utility Service, Inc.HydroCorp Thirkettle Corporation dba Utiliuse
Richfield, Minnesota 15800 W. 79th St.1421 W. 9th Street 5700 Crooks Rd, Suite 100 16914 Alamo Parkway, Building 2
SEH No.: RICHF 148484 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Owensboro, KY 42301 Troy, MN 48098 Selma, TX 78154
Bid Date: 1:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Item
Bid A - Furnish Metering Equipment 3,148,029.44$
Bid B - Installation f Metering Equipment 1,188,022.00$
Bid C - Furnish and Install Metering Equipment 4,335,801.44$
Bid D - Furnish and Install Metering Equipment 66,000.00$
Core & Main LP
Vanguard Utility
Service, Inc.Core & Main LP HydroCorp Core & Main LP
Thirkettle
Corporation dba
Utiliuse
Bid A - Furnish Metering Equipment 3,148,029.44$ $2,808,741.09 $2,808,741.09 $2,808,741.09
Bid B - Installation of Metering Equipment 1,188,022.00$ $1,028,677.45 $990,080.00 $1,162,231.91
Bid D - Furnish and Install Metering Equipment 66,000.00$ $42,000.00 $128,720.00 $73,552.00
$4,402,051.44 $3,879,418.54 $3,927,541.09 $4,044,525.00
Bid C - Furnish and Install Metering Equipment 4,335,801.44$ 4,063,929.33$
Bid D - Furnish and Install Metering Equipment 66,000.00$ $136,854.20
4,401,801.44$ 4,200,783.53$
Engineer's Estimate
Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price
Bid Values
$2,808,741.09
$1,028,677.45 $990,080.00 $1,162,231.91
$4,063,929.33
$136,854.20 $42,000.00 $128,720.00 $73,552.00
Award Option 1 - A, B & D Engineer's Estimate
TOTAL BID PRICE - Award Option 1 (A + B&D)
Award Option 2 - C & D Engineer's Estimate Core & Main LP
TOTAL BID PRICE - Award Option 2
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #7.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 53
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
4/9/2019
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: L ogan V lasaty, C ivil E ngineer
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
4/2/2019
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
4/3/2019
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider approval of:
Final design plans and specifications for the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction project from 66th
Street to 76th Street; and
The bid tabulation and award of contract to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount of
$10,672,483.27 and authorization of the City Manager to approve contract changes under
$175,000 without further City Council consideration.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
City Engineer J eff Pearson will provide a short presentation on the final design and c over elements of the
final layout and walk through the proposed construction timeline.
Lyndale Avenue is one of the oldest c orridors in the c ity. Originally, Highway 65 crossed the state along this
corridor and while major traffic was shifted to I nterstate 35W , Lyndale Ave remains a critic al corridor
connecting Richfield residents to the commercial area at 66th Street, the Wood Lake Nature Center, Richfield
High School, and provides a gateway to the c ommunity with acc ess to both I nterstate 494 and the Crosstown
Highway. The phy sical condition of the roadway and underground utilities are past their service life and
require reconstruction.
The Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction projec t was advertised for bid beginning on February 28, 2019, and bids
were opened on April 1. Three bids were received. The bid doc uments c ontained an alternate item for bid of
in-pavement lighting to supplement the pedestrian activated flashing lights at 75th and Ly ndale Avenue. Staff
reviewed the bids and recommends including the alternate bid item and awarding a contract to the lowest
bidder, R.L. Larson Excavating, I nc., for $10,672,483.27.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion:
1. Approve the final design plans and specifications for the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
Project from 66th Street to 76th Street.
2. Approve the bid tabulation and award of contract to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount
of $10,672,483.27 and authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes up to $175,000
without further City Council consideration.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Final De sign Dev elopme nt
The City Council approved the preliminary layout for the reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue at the
J une 12, 2018 meeting.
The recommended preliminary layout of Lyndale Avenue was developed through many
Transportation Commission meetings, four public open houses, multiple business meetings,
neighborhood meetings, and technical analysis.
Many concerns were identified related to property owners, pedestrians, bicyclists, parking, and
motorists within the corridor.
Through the final design process, the project final design was developed to address the corridor
issues identified in preliminary design.
The design's effectiveness and impacts were reviewed and modifications to the final design were
made to limit impacts.
The final design is intended to improve the conditions for each of the modes as detailed below.
Proje ct De scription
Pedestrians - Concerns were identified related to discomfort and safety when crossing and walking
along the corridor. I ncluded in both the preliminary layout and final design are:
Medians to provide refuge and one-way crossing of traffic to improve crossings
Boulevards/trees to buffer a new sidewalk along the east side of Lyndale
Boulevards/trees to buffer a new shared path on the west side of Lyndale
Bicyclists - Concerns were identified due to the lack of facilities for bicyclists. I ncluded in both the
preliminary layout and final design are:
Bicycle cycle track from 66th Street to 67th Street
On-street buffered bicycle lanes from 67th Street to 70th Street
On-street bicycle lanes from 70th Street to 76th Street
Parking - Concerns were identified related to a lack of parking in the commercial areas as well as the
residential areas with alley access. I ncluded in both the preliminary layout and final design are:
On-street parking on the east side of Lyndale north of 67th Street
On-street parking near the businesses on the west side from 75th Street to south of 76th Street
On-street parking near the residents on the east side from 72nd Street to 74th Street
Motorists - Concerns were identified with safety and mobility along the corridor. Safety concerns
included above average crash and injury rates. I n addition, the existing speeds make it uncomfortable
and potentially dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists. Mobility concerns included crossings and the
delays at the signals at 77th and 76th Streets. The final design features include:
66th Street to 70th Street
Two lane roadway with center median
Compact roundabouts at 67th, 68th and 70th Streets
Lake Shore Drive "right-in/right-out" access
70th Street to 76th Street
Three lane roadway with left turn lanes and medians at intersections
Traffic signal at 73rd Street
Close access to Augsburg Avenue
Impacts - The existing right-of-way for Lyndale varies along the corridor from 66 feet to approximately
100 feet. The final design generally fits within the existing right-of-way, but there are impacts at some
adjacent properties as described below:
Sidewalk easements at the compact roundabouts
Easements and retaining walls at the compact roundabouts along W ood Lake Nature Center
Temporary grading easements along W ood Lake Nature Center to adjust to the new design
Temporary grading easements and/or short retaining walls to adjust adjacent properties to the new
design
Driveway easements to adjust driveways to the new design
Additional Considerations - Since the preliminary design approval in summer of 2018, staff
have contacted and/or met with each property owner along the corridor to discuss specific
project needs and impacts with the property owners and adjust the final design appropriately.
Such adjustments to the final design include:
Re-routing the multi-use path to avoid conflicts with mature trees along the corridor.
Additional plantings to help create private property screening from Lyndale Ave traffic.
The addition of RRF Bs (rectangular rapid flashing beacons) to aid in pedestrian crossings at the
following roundabouts and high use crossings of Lyndale Ave:
67th St
Lakeshore Drive
70th St
75th St
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue is consistent with the following approved plans:
5 Year Street Reconstruction Plan
2040 Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7 - Transportation)
Bicycle Master Plan
Street Reconstruction Guiding Principles Document
Complete Streets Policy
Arterial Roads Study
The City Council approved the preliminary design contract for the project at the August 8, 2017
City Council Meeting.
The Transportation Commission recommended a preliminary design for Council approval at the
May 16, 2018 commission meeting.
The City Council approved the preliminary design for Lyndale at the J une 12, 2018 City Council
Meeting.
Minnesota Statutes 471.345: For City contracts or purchases estimated to exceed
$175,000, sealed bids shall be solicited by public notice in the manner and subject to the law
governing contracts or purchases by the City of Richfield.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The final design needs to be approved and contract awarded in order to achieve substantial
completion of the project in the original 2019 construction timeline.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
A majority of project funding will come from the sale of Street Reconstruction Bonds that the City
Council authorized at the J uly 10, 2018, meeting.
Base bids ranged from $10,650,433.27 to $11,369,963.05.
Base bids, including the alternate bid item, ranged from $10,672,483.27 to $11,394,693.05.
Staff has elected to include the alternate bid item in the contract award, therefore, R.L. Larson
Excavating, I nc. was the lowest bidder in the amount of $10,672,483.27.
The engineer's estimate from J anuary 2019 at 95% plan submittal for the cost of construction was
$9,691,248.75.
The roughly $960,000 difference between the lowest base bid and the engineer's estimate is likely
due to increased material costs and a small number of bidders.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the contract and will be available to answer questions.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Residents impacted by the project
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
B id Tabulation E xhibit
A d for B id E xhibit
95% S ubmittal E ngineers E stimate - January 2019 E xhibit
F inal L ayout E xhibit
P reliminary L ayout S ection #1 E xhibit
P reliminary L ayout S ection #2 E xhibit
Open House 1 to 4 S ummaries E xhibit
P erformance Measures and D esign Recommendations E xhibit
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Bid Opening
April 1, 2019
1:00 p.m.
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
Bid No. 19-03
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Elizabeth
VanHoose, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive; open and read aloud
bids for the Lyndale Ave Reconstruction Project, as advertised in the official newspaper on February 28th and
March 7th, 2019.
Present: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
Logan Vlasaty, Civil Engineer
Michael Peterson, Utilities Supervisor/Engineer
Jared Voto, City Manager Representative
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
Bidder’s Name Base Bid Bid
Alternate
Total Amount Bid
RL Larson Excavating Inc $10,650,433.27 $22,050.00 $10,672,483.27
Ryan Contracting Co $11,369,963.05 $25,000.00 $11,394,693.05
S.M. Hentges & Sons $11,092,880.40 $24,260.00 $11,117,140.40
The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the April 9, 2019 City
Council Meeting.
_______________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
SAP 157-363-032
City of Richfield
Richfield, MN
RECEIPT AND OPENING OF PROPOSALS: Sealed proposals for the work described below will be received by the
Richfield City Clerk, City of Richfield, 6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield, MN 55423 until 1:00 p.m. on March 27, 2019
at which time the bids will be opened and publicly read.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: The work includes the construction of approximately:
REMOVE ROADWAY PAVEMENT 41,000 SQ YD PREFABRICATED MODULAR BLOCK
WALL
7,400 SQ FT
REMOVE WALK 70,500 SQ FT CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 329 LIN FT
COMMON EXCAVATION 15,500 CU YD LIGHTING UNIT 64 EACH
AGGREGATE BASE 12,000 CU YD PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM 7 EACH
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1,800 SQ YD TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM 2 EACH
CONCRETE WALK 75,000 SQ FT RCP SEWER PIPE 5830 LIN FT
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 21,900 LIN FT PVC SEWER PIPE (6-12”) 11,800 LIN FT
TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS STREETS 9,500 TON DIP WATERMAIN (6-12”) 7,800 LIN FT
BITUMINOUS TRAIL 3,700 SQ YD CONSTRUCT SANITARY MH 320 LIN FT
together with numerous related items of work, all in accordance with Plans and Specifications.
COMPLETION OF WORK: All work under the Contract must be substantially complete by November 15, 2019. Final
completion shall by June 30, 2020.
PLAN HOLDERS LIST, ADDENDUMS AND BID TABULATION: The plan holders list, addendums and bid tabulations
will be available for download on-line at www.bolton-menk.com or www.questcdn.com. Any addendums may also
be distributed by mail, fax or email.
TO OBTAIN BID DOCUMENTS: Complete digital project bidding documents are available at
www.bolton-menk.com or www.questcdn.com. You may view the digital plan documents for free by entering
QuestCDN project #6158585 on the website’s Project Search page. Documents may be downloaded for $30.00.
Please contact QuestCDN.com at 952-233-1632 or info@questcdn.com for assistance in free membership
registration, viewing, downloading, and working with this digital project information. Specifications on file in the
office of the City Engineer, 1901 66th Street East, Richfield, MN 55423. An optional paper set of project documents
is also available for a nonrefundable price of $100.00 per set, which includes applicable sales tax and shipping.
Please make your check payable to Bolton & Menk, Inc. and send it to 12224 Nicollet Avenue, Burnsville, MN
55337-1649, (952) 890-0509, fax (952) 890-8065.
BID SECURITY: A certified check or proposal bond in the amount of not less than 5 percent of the total amount bid,
drawn in favor of City of Richfield shall accompany each bid.
OWNER'S RIGHTS RESERVED: The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any irregularities
and informalities therein and to award the Contract to other than the lowest bidder if, in their discretion, the
interest of the Owner would be best served thereby.
Dated: /s/ Katie Rodriguez
City Manager
Published:
Richfield Sun-Current: February 28, 2019, March 7, 2019, Publish Thursday, submit Thursday by 2 pm 1 wk
prior
QuestCDN: February 26, 2019,
S.A.P. 157-363-032ITEM MNDOTESTIMATEDTOTAL TOTAL NO. NO.UNIT COSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST1 2021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM 500,000.00$ 0.2 100,000.00$ 0.2 100,000.00$ 0.2 100,000.00$ 0.2 100,000.00$ 0.2 100,000.00$ 1 500,000.00$ 2 2031.502FIELD OFFICE TYPE DEACH15,000.00$ 1 15,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 15,000.00$ 3 2101.524CLEARINGTREE300.00$ 90 27,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90 27,000.00$ 4 2101.524GRUBBINGTREE200.00$ 90 18,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90 18,000.00$ 5 2104.502REMOVE LIGHTING UNITEACH250.00$ 42 10,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 42 10,500.00$ 6 2104.502REMOVE SIGNEACH50.00$ 70 3,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 70 3,500.00$ 7 2104.502SALVAGE SIGN TYPE SPECIALEACH76.00$ 12 912.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12912.00$ 8 2104.502REMOVE MANHOLEEACH350.00$ -$ -$ 37 12,950.00$ -$ -$ 37 12,950.00$ 9 2104.502REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOXEACH200.00$ -$ -$ -$ 47 9,400.00$ -$ 47 9,400.00$ 10 2104.502SALVAGE HYDRANTEACH400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 18 7,200.00$ -$ 18 7,200.00$ 11 2104.502REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH350.00$ -$ 85 29,750.00$ -$ -$ -$ 85 29,750.00$ 12 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT12.00$ -$ 4460 53,520.00$ -$ -$ -$ 4460 53,520.00$ 13 2104.503REMOVE WATERMAINLIN FT8.00$ -$ -$ -$ 8635 69,080.00$ -$ 8635 69,080.00$ 14 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT10.00$ -$ -$ 10500 105,000.00$ -$ -$ 10500 105,000.00$ 15 2104.503SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT7.00$ 935 6,545.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 935 6,545.00$ 16 2104.503SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT4.00$ 2890 11,560.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2890 11,560.00$ 17 2104.503REMOVE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT3.00$ 17257 51,771.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17257 51,771.00$ 18 2104.503REMOVE RETAINING WALLLIN FT8.00$ 183 1,464.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 183 1,464.00$ 19 2104.503REMOVE FENCELIN FT5.00$ 2020 10,100.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2020 10,100.00$ 20 2104.503REMOVE CABLESLIN FT0.50$ 37677 18,838.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 37677 18,838.50$ 21 2104.503REMOVE NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT2.00$ 12559 25,118.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12559 25,118.00$ 22 2104.504REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD8.00$ 2552 20,416.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2552 20,416.00$ 23 2104.504REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD7.00$ 4718 33,026.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4718 33,026.00$ 24 2104.504REMOVE PAVEMENT (STREET)SQ YD10.00$ 41000 410,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41000 410,000.00$ 25 2104.518REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALKSQ FT1.00$ 70574 70,574.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 70574 70,574.00$ 26 2104.518REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIANSQ FT22.00$ 994 21,868.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 994 21,868.00$ 27 2104.603ABANDON PIPE SEWERLIN FT6.00$ -$ -$ 520 3,120.00$ -$ -$ 520 3,120.00$ 28 2105.607STRUCTURAL SOIL BORROW (CV)CU YD90.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80 7,200.00$ 80 7,200.00$ 29 2106.507EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD9.00$ 15500 139,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15500 139,500.00$ 30 2106.507COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD10.00$ 1550 15,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1550 15,500.00$ 31 2211.507AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5CU YD25.00$ 12200 305,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12200 305,000.00$ 32 2301.504CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"SQ YD60.00$ 960 57,600.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 960 57,600.00$ 33 2301.604CONCRETE PAVEMENT 8.0" SPECIAL 1SQ YD90.00$ 286 25,740.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 286 25,740.00$ 34 2301.604CONCRETE PAVEMENT 8.0" SPECIAL 2 SQ YD90.00$ 562 50,580.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 562 50,580.00$ 35 2301.602DRILL AND GROUT DOWEL BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH20.00$ 1217 24,340.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1217 24,340.00$ 36 2360.504TYPE SP 12.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) 3.0" THICK (TRAIL)SQ YD25.00$ 3707 92,675.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3707 92,675.00$ 37 2360.504TYPE SP 12.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) 3.0" THICK (DRIVEWAY)SQ YD25.00$ 2189 54,725.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 54,725.00$ 38 2360.509TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON70.00$ 6376 446,320.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6376 446,320.00$ 39 2360.509TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B)TON65.00$ 3188 207,220.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3188 207,220.00$ 40 2411.618PREFABRICATED MODULAR BLOCK WALLSQ FT75.00$ 7372 552,900.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7372 552,900.00$ 41 2411.507STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS UCU YD20.00$ 2667 53,340.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2667 53,340.00$ 42 2411.607CONCRETE STEPSCU YD1,000.00$ 5 5,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5 5,000.00$ 43 2451.607STRUCTURAL BACKFILLCU YD25.00$ 2389 59,725.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2389 59,725.00$ 44 2502.6024" TP PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUTEACH500.00$ -$ 4 2,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 4 2,000.00$ 45 2503.50312" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS VLIN FT41.00$ -$ 2152 88,232.00$ -$ -$ -$ 2152 88,232.00$ 46 2503.50315" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS VLIN FT45.00$ -$ 1920 86,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1920 86,400.00$ 47 2503.50318" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS VLIN FT50.00$ -$ 291 14,550.00$ -$ -$ -$ 291 14,550.00$ 48 2503.50321" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IIILIN FT55.00$ -$ 483 26,565.00$ -$ -$ -$ 483 26,565.00$ 49 2503.50324" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IIILIN FT58.00$ -$ 604 35,032.00$ -$ -$ -$ 604 35,032.00$ 50 2503.50327" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IIILIN FT62.00$ -$ 33 2,046.00$ -$ -$ -$ 33 2,046.00$ 51 2503.50330" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IIILIN FT70.00$ -$ 174 12,180.00$ -$ -$ -$ 174 12,180.00$ 52 2503.50348" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IIILIN FT130.00$ -$ 108 14,040.00$ -$ -$ -$ 108 14,040.00$ 53 2503.50312" PVC PIPE SEWER (C900)LIN FT80.00$ -$ 20 1,600.00$ -$ -$ -$ 20 1,600.00$ 54 2503.50316" PVC PIPE SEWER (C900)LIN FT85.00$ -$ 25 2,125.00$ -$ -$ -$ 25 2,125.00$ 55 2503.50324" PVC PIPE SEWER (C900)LIN FT95.00$ -$ 20 1,900.00$ -$ -$ -$ 20 1,900.00$ 53 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH800.00$ -$ 18 14,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 18 14,400.00$ 54 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH1,300.00$ -$ 6 7,800.00$ -$ -$ -$ 6 7,800.00$ 55 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREACH1,500.00$ -$ -$ 10 15,000.00$ -$ -$ 10 15,000.00$ 56 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (INSERT A TEE)EACH5,000.00$ -$ -$ 1 5,000.00$ -$ -$ 1 5,000.00$ ROADWAYLANDSCAPEENGINEER'S ESTIMATE - 95% SUBMITTALLYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTIONCITY OF RICHFIELDBMI PROJECT NO. T16.1145411/11/2019STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAINITEMUNITNOTES
ITEM MNDOTESTIMATEDTOTAL TOTAL NO. NO.UNIT COSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COSTROADWAYLANDSCAPESTORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAINITEMUNITNOTES57 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICEEACH300.00$ -$ -$ 117 35,100.00$ -$ -$ 117 35,100.00$ 58 2503.6028"X6" PVC WYE (SDR 26)EACH375.00$ -$ -$ 5 1,875.00$ -$ -$ 5 1,875.00$ 59 2503.60210"X6" PVC WYE (SDR 26)EACH425.00$ -$ -$ 11 4,675.00$ -$ -$ 11 4,675.00$ 60 2503.60212"X6" PVC WYE (SDR 26)EACH500.00$ -$ -$ 100 50,000.00$ -$ -$ 100 50,000.00$ 61 2503.6034" PVC PIPE SEWER (SDR 26)LIN FT30.00$ -$ -$ 40 1,200.00$ -$ -$ 40 1,200.00$ 62 2503.6036" PVC PIPE SEWER (SDR 26)LIN FT35.00$ -$ -$ 5070 177,450.00$ -$ -$ 5070 177,450.00$ 63 2503.6038" PVC PIPE SEWER (SDR 35)LIN FT60.00$ -$ -$ 704 42,240.00$ -$ -$ 704 42,240.00$ 64 2503.60310" PVC PIPE SEWER (SDR 35)LIN FT65.00$ -$ -$ 720 46,800.00$ -$ -$ 720 46,800.00$ 65 2503.60312" PVC PIPE SEWER (SDR 35)LIN FT70.00$ -$ -$ 5285 369,950.00$ -$ -$ 5285 369,950.00$ 66 2503.60316" STEEL CASING PIPELIN FT150.00$ -$ 16 2,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 16 2,400.00$ 67 2503.60324" STEEL CASING PIPELIN FT175.00$ -$ 20 3,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 20 3,500.00$ 68 2503.60330" STEEL CASING PIPELIN FT200.00$ -$ 16 3,200.00$ -$ -$ -$ 16 3,200.00$ 69 2504.601TEMPORARY WATER SERVICELUMP SUM60,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1 60,000.00$ -$ 1 60,000.00$ 70 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAINEACH1,800.00$ -$ -$ -$ 9 16,200.00$ -$ 9 16,200.00$ 71 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE (1")EACH350.00$ -$ -$ -$ 94 32,900.00$ -$ 94 32,900.00$ 72 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE (1 1/2")EACH360.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1 360.00$ -$ 1 360.00$ 73 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE (2")EACH370.00$ -$ -$ -$ 11 4,070.00$ -$ 11 4,070.00$ 74 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE (4")EACH500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 3 1,500.00$ -$ 3 1,500.00$ 75 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE (6")EACH600.00$ -$ -$ -$ 4 2,400.00$ -$ 4 2,400.00$ 76 2504.602INSTALL HYDRANTEACH5,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 16 80,000.00$ -$ 16 80,000.00$ 77 2504.6021" CORPORATION STOPEACH300.00$ -$ -$ -$ 94 28,200.00$ -$ 94 28,200.00$ 78 2504.6021 1/2" CORPORATION STOPEACH400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1 400.00$ -$ 1 400.00$ 79 2504.6022" CORPORATION STOPEACH500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 11 5,500.00$ -$ 11 5,500.00$ 80 2504.6024" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH1,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 3 4,200.00$ -$ 3 4,200.00$ 81 2504.6026" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH1,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 21 31,500.00$ -$ 21 31,500.00$ 82 2504.6028" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH2,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 6 12,000.00$ -$ 6 12,000.00$ 83 2504.60212" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH2,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 17 42,500.00$ -$ 17 42,500.00$ 84 2504.60216" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH3,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1 3,000.00$ -$ 1 3,000.00$ 85 2504.6021" CURB STOP & BOXEACH400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 94 37,600.00$ -$ 94 37,600.00$ 86 2504.6021 1/2" CURB STOP & BOXEACH500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1 500.00$ -$ 1 500.00$ 87 2504.6022" CURB STOP & BOXEACH600.00$ -$ -$ -$ 11 6,600.00$ -$ 11 6,600.00$ 88 2504.6031" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICELIN FT30.00$ -$ -$ -$ 4193 125,790.00$ -$ 4193 125,790.00$ 89 2504.6031 1/2" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICELIN FT35.00$ -$ -$ -$ 27 945.00$ -$ 27945.00$ 90 2504.6032" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICELIN FT40.00$ -$ -$ -$ 467 18,680.00$ -$ 467 18,680.00$ 91 2504.6034" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT40.00$ -$ -$ -$ 150 6,000.00$ -$ 150 6,000.00$ 92 2504.6036" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT45.00$ -$ -$ -$ 816 36,720.00$ -$ 816 36,720.00$ 93 2504.6038" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT50.00$ -$ -$ -$ 362 18,100.00$ -$ 362 18,100.00$ 94 2504.60312" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT65.00$ -$ -$ -$ 6576 427,440.00$ -$ 6576 427,440.00$ 95 2504.6044" INSULATIONSQ YD20.00$ -$ -$ -$ 200 4,000.00$ -$ 200 4,000.00$ 96 2504.608DUCTILE IRON FITTINGSPOUND8.00$ -$ -$ -$ 192 1,536.00$ -$ 192 1,536.00$ 97 2506.502CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY)EACH800.00$ -$ -$ 29 23,200.00$ -$ -$ 29 23,200.00$ 98 2506.502CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL (2'X3')EACH1,300.00$ -$ 47 61,100.00$ -$ -$ -$ 47 61,100.00$ 99 2506.502CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN HEACH1,500.00$ -$ 2 3,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 2 3,000.00$ 100 2506.502CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT335.00$ -$ 217.26 72,782.10$ -$ -$ -$ 217 72,782.10$ 101 2506.502CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020LIN FT450.00$ -$ 24.33 10,948.50$ -$ -$ -$ 24 10,948.50$ 102 2506.502CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 72-4020LIN FT575.00$ -$ 88.7 51,002.50$ -$ -$ -$ 89 51,002.50$ 103 2506.502CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM MH)EACH700.00$ -$ 28 19,600.00$ -$ -$ -$ 28 19,600.00$ 104 2506.502CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM CB)EACH750.00$ -$ 70 52,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ 70 52,500.00$ 105 2506.502ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTINGEACH400.00$ -$ 12 4,800.00$ -$ -$ -$ 12 4,800.00$ 106 2506.603CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (48" DIA)LIN FT300.00$ -$ -$ 320.9 96,270.00$ -$ -$ 321 96,270.00$ 107 2521.5184" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT5.50$ 43934 241,637.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 43934 241,637.00$ 108 2521.5184" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1SQ FT7.50$ 12308 92,310.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12308 92,310.00$ 109 2521.5184" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2SQ FT7.50$ 8163 61,222.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8163 61,222.50$ 110 2521.5186" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT9.00$ 10744 96,696.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10744 96,696.00$ 111 2521.5186" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1SQ FT12.00$ 61 732.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 61732.00$ 112 2531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B612LIN FT14.00$ 5770 80,780.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5770 80,780.00$ 113 2531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT16.00$ 4130 66,080.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4130 66,080.00$ 114 2531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B660LIN FT50.00$ 11710 585,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11710 585,500.00$ 115 2531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN R412LIN FT20.00$ 275 5,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275 5,500.00$ 116 2531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN V1012LIN FT80.00$ 56 4,480.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 56 4,480.00$ 117 2531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V6LIN FT30.00$ 25 750.00$ 25750.00$ 118 2531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V10LIN FT35.00$ 25 875.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25875.00$ 119 2531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V10 (MODIFIED)LIN FT40.00$ 55 2,200.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55 2,200.00$ 120 2531.503CONCRETE CURB DESIGN B6LIN FT40.00$ 79 3,160.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 79 3,160.00$ 121 2531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD65.00$ 1500 97,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1500 97,500.00$ 122 2531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1SQ YD75.00$ 15 1,125.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15 1,125.00$ 123 2531.5048" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD90.00$ 714 64,260.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 714 64,260.00$ 124 2531.5048" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1SQ YD100.00$ 233 23,300.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 233 23,300.00$ 125 2531.603CONCRETE SILLLIN FT13.00$ 971 12,623.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 971 12,623.00$ 126 2531.6047" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTERSQ YD75.00$ 123 9,225.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 123 9,225.00$ 127 2531.618TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT45.00$ 1736 78,120.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1736 78,120.00$ 128 2540.602ENTRANCE MONUMENT 1EACH50,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 50,000.00$ 1 50,000.00$ 129 2540.602ENTRANCE MONUMENT 2EACH25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$
ITEM MNDOTESTIMATEDTOTAL TOTAL NO. NO.UNIT COSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTQUANTITYCOSTESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COSTROADWAYLANDSCAPESTORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAINITEMUNITNOTES130 2540.602INSTALL BIKE RACKEACH200.00$ 4 800.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4 800.00$ 131 2540.618CONCRETE PAVERS (CONRETE PAVERS ON CONCRETE SUBBASE)EACH12.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4000 48,000.00$ 4000 48,000.00$ 132 2545.502LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 1EACH4,000.00$ 28 112,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28 112,000.00$ 133 2545.502LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 2EACH4,000.00$ 36 144,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 36 144,000.00$ 134 2545.502LIGHT FOUNDATION DESIGN E MODIFIEDEACH800.00$ 64 51,200.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 64 51,200.00$ 135 2545.5032" NON-METALLIC CONDUITLIN FT6.00$ 12670 76,020.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12670 76,020.00$ 136 2545.503UNDERGROUND WIRE 1/C 6 AWGLIN FT1.25$ 26030 32,537.50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26030 32,537.50$ 137 2545.503UNDERGROUND WIRE 1/C 8 AWGLIN FT1.25$ 13015 16,268.75$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13015 16,268.75$ 138 2557.603CHAIN LINK SAFETY FENCELIN FT25.00$ 1350 33,750.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1350 33,750.00$ -$ 139 2563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM175,000.00$ 0.2 35,000.00$ 0.2 35,000.00$ 0.2 35,000.00$ 0.2 35,000.00$ 0.2 35,000.00$ 1 175,000.00$ 140 2563.601ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTELUMP SUM20,000.00$ 0.2 4,000.00$ 0.2 4,000.00$ 0.2 4,000.00$ 0.2 4,000.00$ 0.2 4,000.00$ 1 20,000.00$ 141 2564.502OBJECT MARKER TYPE X4-2EACH77.00$ 25 1,925.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25 1,925.00$ 142 2564.502OBJECT MARKER TYPE X4-4EACH124.00$ 24 2,976.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24 2,976.00$ 143 2564.518SIGN PANELS TYPE CSQ FT40.00$ 765 30,600.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 765 30,600.00$ 144 2564.518SIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIALSQ FT50.00$ 96 4,800.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 96 4,800.00$ 145 2564.602INSTALL SIGN TYPE SPECIALEACH200.00$ 12 2,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12 2,400.00$ 146 2565.501EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM ALUMP SUM8,000.00$ 1 8,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 8,000.00$ 147 2565.501EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM BLUMP SUM8,000.00$ 1 8,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 8,000.00$ 148 2565.516TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM ASYSTEM210,000.00$ 1 210,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 210,000.00$ 149 2565.516TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM BSYSTEM190,000.00$ 1 190,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 190,000.00$ 150 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM ASYSTEM25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 151 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM BSYSTEM25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 152 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM CSYSTEM20,000.00$ 1 20,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 20,000.00$ 153 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM DSYSTEM25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 154 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM ESYSTEM25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 155 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM FSYSTEM25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 156 2565.616PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM GSYSTEM25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 25,000.00$ 157 2571.502DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B&BTREE700.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 178 124,600.00$ 178 124,600.00$ 158 2571.502DECIDUOUS TREE 2" CAL B&BTREE500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2 1,000.00$ 2 1,000.00$ 159 2571.505DECIDUOUS SHRUB NO 5 CONTAINERSHRB70.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180 12,600.00$ 180 12,600.00$ 160 2571.507PERENNIAL 1 GAL CONTAINERPLT25.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2500 62,500.00$ 2500 62,500.00$ 161 2571.602TREE GRATE & FRAMEEACH2,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6 12,000.00$ 6 12,000.00$ 162 2571.524TRANSPLANT TREETREE600.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6 3,600.00$ 6 3,600.00$ 163 2571.524CONIFEROUS TREE 6' HT. B&BTREE500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5 2,500.00$ 5 2,500.00$ 164 2573.502STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONEACH225.00$ 129 29,025.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 129 29,025.00$ 165 2573.503SILT FENCE, TYPE MSLIN FT2.00$ 1500 3,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1500 3,000.00$ 166 2574.507COMMON TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD40.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 675 27,000.00$ 675 27,000.00$ 167 2574.507LOAM TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD60.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 680 40,800.00$ 680 40,800.00$ 168 2575.504SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD8.00$ 13050 104,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13050 104,400.00$ 169 2575.508HYDROMULCH (SEED MIX 36-711)SQ YD2.00$ 1279 2,558.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1279 2,558.00$ 170 2575.513MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 6CU YD68.00$ 120 8,160.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120 8,160.00$ 171 2575.607LANDSCAPE ROCKCU YD70.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 130 9,100.00$ 130 9,100.00$ 172 2582.5034" SOLID LINE PAINTLIN FT1.60$ 566 905.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 566 905.60$ 173 2582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT1.20$ 13986 16,783.20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13986 16,783.20$ 174 2582.5038" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT2.80$ 11492 32,177.60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11492 32,177.60$ 175 2582.50324" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT24.00$ 242 5,808.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 242 5,808.00$ 176 2582.5034" BROKEN LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT1.20$ 2780 3,336.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2780 3,336.00$ 177 2582.2034" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT3.00$ 298 894.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 298 894.00$ 178 2582.2036" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT6.00$ 298 1,788.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 298 1,788.00$ 179 2582.20312" DOTTED LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT20.00$ 203 4,060.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 203 4,060.00$ 180 2582.5034" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT3.00$ 2069 6,207.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2069 6,207.00$ 181 2582.518PAVEMENT MESSAGE PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND INSQ FT28.00$ 1099 30,772.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1099 30,772.00$ 182 2582.518CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND INSQ FT18.00$ 4980 89,640.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4980 89,640.00$ ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS5,948,224.65$ 815,973.10$ 1,128,830.00$ 1,233,321.00$ 564,900.00$ 9,691,248.75$
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
0.40%-0.75%VPI: 206+73.26EL: 847.10VPI: 210+23
EL: 848.50
A = -1.15%
K = 86.77
L=100'
VPI: 212+40
EL: 846.86
A = 1.17%
K = 85.46
L=100'HP: 210+07.60EL: 848.37LP: 212+54.41EL: 847.00VPC: 209+73EL: 848.30VPT: 212+90EL: 847.07VPT: 210+73EL: 848.12VPC: 211+90EL: 847.24205+50 847.5206+00 847.2847.0206+50 847.11847.1847.21847.3207+00 847.31847.3847.41847.4207+50 847.51847.5847.61847.5208+00 847.71847.6847.81847.7208+50 847.91847.7848.01847.8209+00 848.11847.9848.21847.9209+50 848.31848.0848.36848.0210+00 848.35848.0848.26847.9210+50 848.11847.9847.92847.8211+00 847.73847.7847.54847.6211+50 847.35847.5847.17847.5212+00 847.05847.4847.00847.3212+50 847.02847.3847.11847.4213+0012" RCP4" DRAIN6" PVC12" RCPXXXXXXXXXXXXX/////////////205
210
LABOR READY
METRO PAWN &
GUN
LABOR READY
BP
BARRET LAWN
CARE
GROCERIES OF THE
ORIENT BROADWAY PIZZA SUPERAMERICA
MAINSTREET VILLAGE
RETIREMENT
JOY'S PATTAYA THAI DAIRY QUEEN LYNWOOD COMMONS APARTMENTS
METRO PAWN &
GUN
+92
68' L
+84
10' R
+94
10' R
+88
9' R
+88
1' R
+29
8' R
+75
8' R
+75
1' R
+36
30' L
+04
31' L
+35
25' L
+80
26' L
PPPP+68
54' R
+05
55' R
+77
56' R
R25'R25'
R20'
R
2
0
'
+25 +11 +15 +80
+69
+56 +03
+98 +60
306
310
+98
13' R
+74
60' L
+73
67' R
+08
38' R
+30
61' R
+10
25' L
+32
60' L
+09
33' R +98
38' R
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 76TH STREETW 75TH STREETBICYCLE RACK (4)
6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
11' TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
9' PARKING
6' BLVD
10' TURN LANE
11' THRU LANE
10' THRU LANE
10' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
11' THRU LANE
8' TRAIL
6' WALK
8' TRAIL
C6.04
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
1:2
FENCE (BY OTHERS)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
1 1
1 1
LYNDALE AVE S.B.FENCE (BY OTHERS)
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
SIGNAL SYSTEM A
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
6' BIKE LANE
10' RIGHT TURN LANE
4' BLVD
2 2
3
3 3 3
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
PEDESTRIAN FLASHING SYSTEM A
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
SHEET NOTES:
CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR
TRANSITION DETAILS.
SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
FOR FENCE DETAILS.
2
3
5' MEDIAN
7' MEDIAN
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILEMATCHLINE AMATCHLINE ATRANSITION B618 TO B660 C&G
1
B612 C&G
B6 CURB
B6 CURB B612 C&G
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:51:43 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
TRANSITION B618
TO B660 C&G
NINE MILE CREEKREGIONAL TRAILNINE MILE CREEKREGIONAL TRAIL5' BLVD
BEGIN S.A.P. 157-363-032
STATION 205+97
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
0.42%-0.49%
VPI: 215+35
EL: 848.09
A = -0.91%
K = 219.49
L=200'
VPI: 219+10
EL: 846.24
A = 1.11%
K = 90.47
L=100'HP: 215+26.40EL: 847.86LP: 219+04.76EL: 846.37VPC: 214+35EL: 847.67VPT: 219+60EL: 846.54VPT: 216+35EL: 847.60VPC: 218+60EL: 846.48847.11847.4213+00 847.22847.3847.32847.5213+50 847.42847.6847.53847.7214+00 847.63847.8847.73847.9214+50 847.80848.0847.85848.0215+00 847.86847.9847.85847.9215+50 847.81847.8847.74847.7216+00 847.64847.6847.52847.6216+50 847.40847.5847.27847.4217+00 847.15847.3847.03847.2217+50 846.90847.1846.78847.0218+00 846.66846.9846.53846.8218+50 846.42846.7846.37846.6219+00 846.39846.5846.49846.5219+50 846.63846.5846.78846.4220+00 846.94846.6847.09846.8220+5012" 12" RCPXXXX/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////215
220
RICHFIELD TRANSMISSION
CENTER GENTLEMAN'S CHOICE HAIR
REPLACEMENT
AUDIO PERFECTION
JAMAR WEST APARTMENTS DEAN BJORKSTRAND
LANDSCAPING 7400 LYNDALE BUSINESSES
WOODLAWN TERRACE 734573407344LYNWOOD COMMONS APARTMENTS
+27
67' L
+75
8' R
+75
1' R
+44
10' R
+44
17' R
+84
10' R
+84
17' R
+08
1' R
+08
9' R
+30
1' R
+30
8' R
+84
8' R +96
17' R
+96
10' R
+40
10' R
+43
56' R
+95
56' R
+31
55' R
+56
26' L
+12
22' L
+47
77' L
+77
77' L
+46
96' R
+80
96' R
R 20'
+24 +36 +15
+84
+58 +17
+81
315 320
+22
15' R
+21
38' R
+10
33' R
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 74TH STREETW 75TH STREET6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
11' TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
6' BLVD
6' WALK
8' TRAIL
11' THRU LANE
10' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
11' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
C6.05
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G
11
11 1
1:10
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
FENCE (BY OTHERS)
FENCE (BY OTHERS)
3
3 3
B618 C&G
B618 C&G B618 C&G
3
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
7' MEDIAN
7' MEDIAN
7' MEDIAN
B618 C&GB618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5 PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
B612 C&G
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:51:53 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
0" CURB HEIGHT0" CURB HEIGHT
6" CURB HEIGHT6" CURB HEIGHT
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SHEET NOTES:
SEE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
FOR FENCE DETAILS.
3
5' BLVD
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
0.61%-0.49%
VPI: 222+40
EL: 848.25
A = -1.10%
K = 90.89
L=100'
VPI: 226+75
EL: 846.12
A = 0.98%
K = 152.33
L=150'HP: 222+45.49EL: 848.11LP: 226+74.59EL: 846.30VPC: 221+90EL: 847.94VPT: 227+50EL: 846.49VPT: 222+90EL: 848.01VPC: 226+00EL: 846.49847.09846.8220+50 847.24846.9847.40847.0221+00 847.55847.1847.70847.2221+50 847.85847.3848.00847.5222+00 848.09847.5848.11847.5222+50 848.07847.5847.96847.5223+00 847.83847.4847.71847.3223+50 847.59847.2847.47847.2224+00 847.34847.1847.22847.0224+50 847.10846.9846.98846.7225+00 846.85846.6846.73846.4225+50 846.61846.3846.49846.6226+00 846.39846.6846.32846.3226+50 846.30846.3846.33846.4227+00 846.39846.4846.49846.5227+50 846.62846.6846.74846.7228+00XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI= S 841.29I= W 833.07////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
225
7341733573297328731673127308724072367300733273367340732173177309730573017237723372567245+17
16' R
+17
8' R
+40
10' R
+95
28' R
+84
39' R
+17
40' R
+37
42' R
+04
22' L
+28
24' L
+63
28' L
+07
19' L
+75
27' R
+01
70' R
+37
70' R
+35
65' L
+01
65' L
+62 +30 +63 +48 +10 +24
7 +76 +37 +78
+61
42' R R108'R100'325
+02
2' R
+46
25' L
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 73RD STREET6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
11' TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
9' PARKING
6' BLVD
6' WALK
8' TRAIL
C6.06
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
1:10 1:10
1:20 1:20
1:5 1:5
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
B612 C&G OUTPUT
(6" HEIGHT)
1
SHEET NOTES:
CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR
TRANSITION DETAILS.
2
B612 C&G
(0" HEIGHT)
B612 C&G
(0" HEIGHT)
6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
11' TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
9' PARKING
9' BLVD
2 2
B618 C&GB618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
8' TRAIL
8' BLVD
6' WALK
LYNDALE AVE S.B.SIGNAL SYSTEM B
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
B612 C&G
(6" HEIGHT)(0" HEIGHT)
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:52:03 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
1:10
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
1.05%
0.50%-0.50%
VPI: 230+00
EL: 847.73
A = -1.00%
K = 225.75
L=225'
VPI: 232+45
EL: 846.50
A = 1.55%
K = 64.38
L=100'HP: 229+99.26EL: 847.45LP: 232+27.29EL: 846.67VPC: 228+87.50EL: 847.17VPT: 232+95EL: 847.03VPT: 231+12.50EL: 847.16VPC: 231+95EL: 846.75846.74846.7228+00 846.86846.7846.99846.8228+50 847.11846.9847.23847.0229+00 847.33847.0847.39847.1229+50 847.44847.2847.45847.2230+00 847.43847.3847.39847.4230+50 847.32847.5847.22847.6231+00 847.10847.7846.98847.8231+50 846.85847.9846.73848.0232+00 846.67848.1846.71848.1232+50 846.85848.2847.08848.3233+00 847.34848.4847.60848.5233+50 847.87848.5848.13848.6234+00 848.39848.7848.66848.8234+50 848.92848.9849.18848.9235+00 849.44849.0849.71849.1235+50XXXXXX/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
230 23572367230722272167128712071167108
7125723372297225722172177211720772017147713371297100+07
19' L +20
19' L +49
22' L
+40
27' R
+95
42' R
+84
33' R
+95
1' R
+45
7' R
+95
11' R +45
12' R
+03
10' R
+03
15' R
+88
10' R
+85
20' R
+25
1' R
+19
12' R
+04
1' R
+04
10' R
+82
1' R
+82
7' R
+24 +01 +68 +31
+33 +82 +14 +72
+86
+47
+86
96' R
+53
94' R
+24
77' L
+55
73' L
330
335R175'FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 72ND STREETW 71ST STREET12' THRU LANE
12' THRU LANE
10' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
11' THRU LANE
11' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
11' TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
9' PARKING
6' WALK
10' TRAIL
C6.07
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
1:10
1:5
1:10
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
1
1 1
1B612 C&G
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G
SHEET NOTES:
CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR
TRANSITION DETAILS.
2
2
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
9' MEDIAN
9.5' MEDIAN
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
6' WALK
6' BIKE LANE
8' TRAIL
6' BLVD
6' BLVD
6' BLVD
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:52:13 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
-0.47%
VPI: 237+28
EL: 851.58
A = -1.52%
K = 197.29
L=300'HP: 237+85.49EL: 851.09VPC: 235+78EL: 850.00VPT: 238+78EL: 850.88849.71849.1235+50 849.97849.2850.22849.3236+00 850.44849.4850.63849.5236+50 850.78849.6850.91849.7237+00 851.00849.9851.06850.1237+50 851.09850.2851.09850.3238+00 851.05850.2850.99850.2238+50 850.89850.1850.77850.1239+00 850.66850.0850.54850.0239+50 850.42849.9850.30849.8240+00 850.19849.7850.07849.7240+50 849.95849.6849.84849.5241+00 849.72849.4849.60849.3241+50 849.48849.3849.37849.2242+00 849.25849.2849.13849.1242+50 849.01849.1848.90849.0243+00XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
240
OAK GR
712570667040703670267020711971137170057035707204
R +82
1' R
+82
7' R +40
17' R
+40
1' R
+63
10' R
+18
10' R
+64
1' R
+76
1' R
+63
17' R
+71
17' R
+17
8' R
+76
8' R
+16
22' L +53
26' L
+57 +12 +49 +15 +86
+47
4
L +55
73' L
+82
63' L
+03
79' L
+38
86' R
+04
79' R
340R175'FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 71ST STREETOAK
GROV
E
B
LVD
6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
18' TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
6' BLVD
6' WALK
8' TRAIL
10' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
11' THRU LANE
11' THRU LANE
10' TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
9.5' BLVD
8' TRAIL
C6.08
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
1
1
1
1
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)B612 C&G
SHEET NOTES:
SEE TYPICALS FOR
BOULEVARD CONSTRUCTION
7' MEDIAN
7' MEDIAN
6' BIKE LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' BLVD
6' WALK
WOODEN FENCE
END FENCE AT
CORNER OF GARAGE
(SEE LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR DETAILS)
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
16' MEDIAN
1:10
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
4 4
4
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)B612 C&GW 71ST STREETINSTALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
B618 C&G
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:52:22 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
DRIVEWAY BY OTHERS
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
-0.19%0.08%-0.60%
-0.50%VPI: 245+69.87EL: 848.10VPI: 246+67.67EL: 847.92VPI: 244+85
EL: 848.03
A = 0.55%
K = 180.62
L=100'
VPI: 247+45
EL: 847.45
A = 0.10%
K = 970.87
L=100'
VPI: 249+85
EL: 846.26
A = 1.02%
K = 98.30
L=100'LP: 245+19.70EL: 848.07LP: 249+83.85EL: 846.39VPT: 245+35EL: 848.07VPT: 247+95EL: 847.20VPT: 250+35EL: 846.52VPC: 244+35EL: 848.26VPC: 246+95EL: 847.75VPC: 249+35EL: 846.51848.90849.0243+00 848.78849.0848.66849.0243+50 848.55848.9848.43848.8244+00 848.31848.8848.20848.7244+50 848.12848.6848.08848.4245+00 848.07848.3848.09848.0245+50 848.09848.2848.05849.8246+00 848.00849.2847.95848.2246+50 847.87847.9847.72848.0247+00 847.58848.0847.44847.9247+50 847.31847.9847.18847.8248+00 847.06847.7846.93847.6248+50 846.81847.5846.68847.5249+00 846.56847.4846.45847.3249+50 846.39847.2846.40847.1250+00 846.47847.1846.60847.0250+50XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XX
XX
X
X
X
245
250
RICHFIELD
H
I
S
T
O
R
Y
C
E
N
TMUSEUM
OAK GR
O
V
E
L
U
T
H
E
R
A
N
CHURCH
+76
1' R
+76
8' R
+23
10' R
+23
1' R +57
25' R
+61
1' R
+64
7' R
+60
24' R
R3
0
'
+03
28' L
+36
23' L
+63
73' R
+61
75' R
+15
1' R
+16
6' R
+77
21' R
+82
24' R
+73
1' R+71
4' R
+57
13' L
+67
18' L
+95
14' R+72
24' R
+84
R45'
+91
99' R+55
114' R
+87
16' L
+54
58' R
+98
47' R
345
350
+06
19' R
+93
13' L
+78
20' R
+56
111' R
+59
108' R
+60
105' R
+84
93' R
+86
96' R
+89
97' RR5'R5'
+50
20' R
+04
136' R
+50
155' R
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 70TH STREET6' BIKE LA
N
E
10' THRU
L
A
N
E
TWLTL
10' THRU
L
A
N
E
6' BIKE L
A
N
E
6' BLVD
9.5' BLVD
6' WALK
8' TRAIL
6' BIKE LA
N
E
10' THRU
L
A
N
E
10' THRU L
A
N
E
6' BIKE LA
N
E
10' TRAIL
2' BUFFER
2' BUFFER
6' BLVD
C6.09
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
1:10
6' WALK
1
1
B612 C&G
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G
RETAINING WALL 2
SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS
RETAINING WALL 1
SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS
B612 C&G
BEGIN CONCRETE SILL
BEGIN CONCRETE SILL
END CONCRETE SILL
END CONCRETE SILL
R424 C&G
(OUTPUT)B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM D
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM B
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
V1012 C&G
SHEET NOTES:
SEE MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS FOR ROUNDABOUT
DETAILS
4
4
PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM C
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:52:33 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
CHAIN LINK SAFETY FENCE
(SEE LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR DETAILS)
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
0.48%-0.49%
0.52%-0.69%
VPI: 251+30
EL: 847.02
A = -1.21%
K = 82.57
L=100'
VPI: 254+95
EL: 846.31
A = -0.97%
K = 102.81
L=100'
VPI: 253+40
EL: 845.56
A = 1.17%
K = 85.43
L=100'
VPI: 257+90
EL: 844.85
A = 1.21%
K = 82.68
L=100'HP: 251+22.97EL: 846.87HP: 254+94.34EL: 846.19LP: 253+49.00EL: 845.71LP: 257+80.74EL: 845.00VPC: 250+80EL: 846.75VPC: 254+45EL: 846.07VPT: 253+90EL: 845.80VPT: 251+80EL: 846.67VPT: 255+45EL: 846.06VPC: 252+90EL: 845.91VPC: 257+40EL: 845.10846.60847.0250+50 846.73847.0846.83846.9251+00 846.87846.9846.82846.8251+50 846.70846.7846.53846.5252+00 846.36846.4846.19846.3252+50 846.01846.2845.85846.1253+00 845.74846.0845.71845.9253+50 845.75845.8845.85845.8254+00 845.97845.7846.09845.7254+50 846.17845.7846.19845.6255+00 846.14845.6846.04845.5255+50 845.91845.4845.79845.3256+00 845.67845.2845.54845.2256+50 845.42845.1845.30845.0257+00 845.18845.0845.06844.9257+50 845.00844.9845.02845.0258+0048" RCP12" RCP12" RCPXXX X X X X X X X
XX X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
255
RICHFIELD HISTORY CENTER AND
MUSEUM
682968176843684368316825+06
1' R
+06
6' R
+76
5' R
+76
10' R
+27
5' R
+27
10' R
+83 +78 +33
+34
88' R+01
96' R
+57
22' R +59
33' R
R300'+5
25'
+30
18' L
355R175'+45
1' R
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 69TH STREET10' THRU LANE
11' TURN LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
11' THRU LANE
4' MEDIAN
11' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
4' BLVD
6' WALK
10' TRAIL
3' BUFFER
2' BUFFER
C6.10
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
11 1
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G
B612 C&G
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
RETAINING WALL 3
SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS
RETAINING WALL 4
SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS
6' BIKE LANE
10' THRU LANE
10' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
6' WALK
10' TRAIL
2' BUFFER
2' BUFFER
B618 C&G B618 C&G
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:52:42 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
CONCRETE STEP
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
CHAIN LINK SAFETY FENCE
(SEE LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR DETAILS)
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
0.72%
0.82%
0.91%-0.95%
1.22%VPI: 259+26.21EL: 845.83VPI: 260+07.60EL: 846.57VPI: 263+30
EL: 848.94
A = -0.40%
K = 248.82
L=100'
VPI: 264+90
EL: 850.25
A = -1.31%
K = 76.27
L=100'VPI: 260+80
EL: 845.88
A = 2.18%
K = 45.96
L=100'HP: 265+02.54EL: 850.10LP: 260+73.84EL: 846.15VPC: 262+80EL: 848.33VPC: 264+40EL: 849.84VPT: 258+40EL: 845.21VPT: 261+30EL: 846.49VPT: 263+80EL: 849.35VPT: 265+40EL: 850.00VPC: 260+30EL: 846.36845.02845.0258+00 845.12845.0845.28845.2258+50 845.46845.2845.64845.2259+00 845.82845.1846.05845.5259+50 846.28845.7846.50845.4260+00 846.41845.8846.21846.2260+50 846.15846.5846.23846.8261+00 846.44847.1846.74847.5261+50 847.04847.8847.35848.1262+00 847.65848.4847.96848.7262+50 848.27849.0848.56849.3263+00 848.84849.4849.08849.6263+50 849.31849.7849.51849.8264+00 849.72850.0849.92850.2264+50 850.05850.3850.10850.5265+00 850.06850.5849.96850.5265+5012" RCP12" RCP12" RCP10" PVC12" RCP
1
2
"
R
C
P
8" PVC 12" RCP10" PVC
8"
P
V
C
1
2
"
R
C
PRCP
XXXX
XXX X X X X X X
X X X
260
265
VFW
WOODLAKE
C
H
I
R
O
P
R
A
C
6809674167376733672567176709680167496745+08
117' R
+22
103' R
R25'
+18
1' R
+21
7' R
+19
14' R
+16
15' R +16
18' R
+14
17' R
+12
6' R
+15
1' R
+72
21' R
+56
77' L+16
80' L
+70
18' L
+98
18' L
+69
27' R
+90
37' L
+68
18' L+87
13' L
+47
+41
+01
+57
+15
+05 +43 +18
+98 +18
+97
18' L
+84
27' R+00
23' R
+55
25' R
+30
18' L +40
13' L
360
365
+46
55' L
+65
19' R
+78
13' L
+81
21' R
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.LAKE SHORE DR SW 68TH STREET6' BIKE LANE
11' THRU LANE
6' MEDIAN
11' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
4' BLVD
6' WALK
10' TRAIL
9' PARKING
C6.11
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
3' BUFFER
2' BUFFER
1:
2
1:2 1:10
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
RETAINING WALL 4
SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS
BEGIN CONCRETE SILL
END CONCRETE SILL
BEGIN CONCRETE SILL
END CONCRETE SILL 1:2R424 C&G
(OUTPUT)
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
6' BIKE LANE
11' THRU LANE
11' THRU LANE
6' BIKE LANE
4' BLVD
6' WALK
10' TRAIL
6' MEDIAN
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
SHEET NOTES:
CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR
TRANSITION DETAILS.
SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
FOR ROUNDABOUT DETAILS.
2
2
3' BUFFER
2' BUFFER
PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM E
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
LYNDALE AVE N.B.
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
4
4
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:52:53 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
INSTALL FENCE
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
CHAIN LINK SAFETY FENCE
(SEE LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR DETAILS)
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
835
840
845
850
855
860
865
870
875
-0.06%-1.21%-0.49%0.36%
0.45%-1.03%0.23%VPI: 265+89.65EL: 849.76VPI: 266+50.01EL: 849.98VPI: 267+53.39EL: 849.91VPI: 271+96.83EL: 848.29VPI: 269+40
EL: 849.23
A = -1.48%
K = 60.82
L=90'
VPI: 268+45
EL: 848.80
A = 1.67%
K = 54.05
L=90'
VPI: 270+61.99
EL: 847.98
A = 1.26%
K = 79.32
L=100'HP: 269+22.53EL: 849.09LP: 268+65.53EL: 848.95LP: 270+93.47EL: 848.07VPC: 268+95EL: 849.02VPT: 268+90EL: 849.00VPT: 271+11.99EL: 848.09VPT: 269+85EL: 848.77VPC: 268+00EL: 849.34VPC: 270+11.99EL: 848.49849.96850.5265+50 849.83850.4849.80850.3266+00 849.89850.2849.98850.0266+50 849.96849.9849.94849.9267+00 849.93849.7849.91850.0267+50 849.65850.0849.34849.9268+00 849.10849.8848.97849.7268+50 848.95849.6849.05849.5269+00 849.09849.4849.02849.4269+50 848.86849.3848.61849.2270+00 848.37849.1848.19849.0270+50 848.09848.9848.07848.8271+00 848.12848.8848.18848.7271+50 848.24848.9272+00 272+50 273+0012" RCP270
FAIRCHILD MADDOX
& LEONIDAS
CITY BELLA
WOODLAKE CHIROPRACTIC
MCDONALDS
BMO HARRIS BANK
+50
17' R+47
18' R
+50
1' R +54
5' R
+45
81' R
+46
80' R
+43
111' R
+61
106' R
+57
4' R
+58
1' R
+60
15' R +65
18' R
+69
7' R
+91
55' L
+95
75' L +02
68' L +03
67' L
+99
14' L
+97
17' L
+02
14' L
+05
19' L
+10
63' L
+47
12' L
+26
18' R
+43
1' R
+43
6' R
+86
24' R
+94
30' R
+64
20' L
R26'
+68
18' L R30
'
+34R80'370
+78
13' L
+81
21' R
+45
108' R
+47
106' R
+49
103' R
+60
103' R
+58
101' R
+57
98' R
FEETSCALE
02550
HORZ.
FEETSCALE
0510
VERT.W 67TH STREET12' THRU LANE
12' THRU LANE
9' PARKING
11.5' BLVD
11.5' CYCLE TRACK
9' PARKING
11.5' CYCLE TRACK
11' THRU LANE
12' TURN LANE
12' THRU LANE
9' PARKING
9' PARKING
C6.12
STREET PLAN AND PROFILE
17' MEDIAN
LYNDALE AVE S.B.
1
B612 C&G
(OUTPUT)
B612 C&G (OUTPUT)
BEGIN CONCRETE SILL
END CONCRETE SILL
BEGIN CONCRETE SILL
END CONCRETE SILL
R424 C&G
(OUTPUT)
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
B618 C&G
R5'R5'
7" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8" AGGREGATE BASE (CV), CLASS 5
PROPOSED PROFILE GRADE
EXISTING PROFILE
SHEET NOTES:
SEE MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS FOR ROUNDABOUT
DETAILS
4
4.5' BLVD
V6 CURB
PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM G
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
DATELIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SHEET
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2019, All Rights ReservedcH:\RICH\T16114541\CAD\C3D\114541C601.dwg 3/1/2019 4:53:03 PMDESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
CLIENT PROJ. NO.
REVISION DATENO.
R
12224 NICOLLET AVENUE
BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337
Phone: (952) 890-0509
Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.comTIM LAMKIN JR.
47099 2/19/19
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 157-363-032, LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
ZAP
KME
TL
T16114541
PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SYSTEM F
SEE SIGNAL PLANS
4" CONCRETE WALK
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
4" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 2
6" CONCRETE WALK
6" CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL 1
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
LEGEND NOTES:
1. SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL SHEETS FOR ADA,
INTERSECTION, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS.
2. ALL OFFSETS, RADII, AND STATIONING ARE TO FACE
OF CURB AND REFER TO LYNDALE AVE SB
ALIGNMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONSTRUCT B660 CURB & GUTTER AT ALL
LOCATIONS EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED.
4. SEE MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND LANDSCAPING
PLANS FOR MEDIAN DETAILS.
5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY JOINT LOCATIONS WITH
ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
RETAINING WALL
FENCE
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE
STANDARD PLATE 7113
(PAID FOR AS
6" CONCRETE WALK)
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
1
8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PAVEMENT SPECIAL 1
3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
END S.A.P. 157-363-032
STATION 271+97
RICHFIELD
LIQUOR
CHIPOTLE
SARPINO'S
SPRINT
NOODLES AND
COMPANY
POTBELLY
STARBUCKS PEOPLE
READY
LABOR
READY
BP
BARRET
LAWN
CARE
GROCERIES
OF THE
ORIENT BROADWAY
PIZZA
SUPERAMERICA
RICHFIELD
TRANSMISSION
CENTER
GENTLEMAN'S
CHOICE HAIR
REPLACEMENT
AUDIO
PERFECTION
FOUR
POINTS
HOTEL
FRANKLIN
SQUARE
APARTMENTS
TUSHIE
MONTGOMERY
& ASSOCIATES
WEIS
BUILDERS
AVINITY
MAINSTREET
VILLAGE
RETIREMENT
JOY'S
PATTAYA
THAI DAIRY
QUEEN
LYNWOOD COMMONS APARTMENTS
15779
849.93
CSWM
15802
849.39
TRBS
15803
849.33
TRBS
15804
849.18
TRBS
15805
849.07
TRBS
15815
849.33
TRDT 11
15816
849.37
TRDT 10
15854
847.54
WEMT
15910
847.34
HYWM
15911
847.37
PLLP
15912
847.93
BNCH
15913
848.13
PLLP
E 15914
847.25
MHEL
15915
847.08
TFSP
E 15916
846.84
MHELSIG15917
847.07
TFSC
E 15918
846.90
MHEL
E 15919
846.97
MHEL
15920
848.11
PLLP
15979
848.42
TRDT 15 /MULCH AROUND
15980
848.40
TRDT 13 /MULCH AROUND
16030
848.35
CSWM
H16033
847.67
HHCM
16052
848.93
TRDT 14
16071
848.35
PLLP
16109
848.63
TRDT 9 / MULCH
16110
848.24
TRBS
16111
848.23
TRBS
16112
848.12
TRBS
16113
848.23
TRBS
16114
848.13
TRBS
16115
848.00
TRBS
16116
848.20
TRBS
16117
848.26
TRBS
16118
848.48
TRBS
16119
848.36
TRBS
16121
849.29
TRDT 2 / ROCKS N FLOWERS
16122
849.14
TRBS16123
849.07
TRBS
16124
849.28
TRBS
16125
849.00
TRBS
16126
849.19
TRBS
H 16128
847.98
HHCM
16138
848.50
CSWM
16139
848.67
CSWM
16140
848.94
CSWM
16153
847.93
HYWM
16157
848.10
PLLP
16185
848.51
TRBS
16186
848.68
TRBS
16187
848.69
TRBS
16224
848.73
TRDT 15 /DIRT
16234
848.47
CSWM
16271
848.37
PLLP
16291
848.75
TRDT 14 /MULCH
16292
848.75
TRDT 12 /MULCH
16336
848.77
TRDT 8 /MULCH
16337
848.59
TRDT 11 /MULCH
16338
847.81
PLLP
16375
848.42
TRDT 2 /3
16376
848.13
TRDT 2 /5
16377
848.00
TRDT 14
H 16423
848.25
HHFO16424
847.97
PLLP
16468
847.53
CSWM
5006
848.81
VFCP /IP
5010
849.94
VFCP /IP
5011
848.45
VFCP /IP
5012
848.13
VFCP /IP
5014
848.04
VFCP /IP
5015
847.47
VFCP /MAG
5016
846.83
VFCP /MAG
5222
849.30
VFCP /SPIKE
5227
848.53
LMFR /PROP PIN 5-8IN RBR
5235
847.74
VFCP /MAG NAIL ON BIT
5236
848.92
VFCP /TEMP X ON BIT
5244
846.88
VFCP /X ON CONC 5245
850.65
VFBM TNH
5251
850.50
VFBM /TNH SE QUAD 74TH-LYNDALE
5259
848.90
VFCP /TEMP X ON CONC
5266
850.45
VFBM /SE COR HC RAMP AT 7400
5267
850.44
VFBM /TNH
5273
848.17
VFCP /TEMP
5274
851.06
VFBM
U15044
847.47
MHOT /TELE
15055
846.36
PMTL
15056
846.50
PMTL
15057
846.78
PMTH
15058
846.84
PMTH PMRT U15159
846.73
MHOT /MNDT
15190
846.30
PMRT
E 15291
847.29
MHEL
15292
847.17
TFSP
15294
847.43
PLLP
15295
847.71
BNCH
C 15332
846.99
MHCMC15333
847.00
MHCMCO15343
846.67
COSN
15344
847.19
WEMT
15405
846.80
GRAT TRDT 3
E 15424
847.55
MHELY15425
847.36
PLLD
15426
846.89
TFSP
E 15431
846.98
MHEL
E 15462
847.19
MHEL
15486
848.89
TRDT 13
15487
849.18
TRBS
15488
849.17
TRBS
15489
849.20
TRBS
15490
849.23
TRBS15491
849.65
TRBS15492
849.79
TRBS15493
849.90
TRBS15494
849.90
TRBS15495
849.91
TRBS
15498
847.33
TFSP
15564
849.40
TRDT 14 / MULCH AROUND
15565
849.12
TRDT 13 / MULCH AROUND
15566
848.61
TRDT 11 / MULCH AROUND
23147
851.11
TRSP /LARGE ROOT
23213
850.94
TRCT 16
23214
852.31
TRDT 50
23215
852.68
TRDT 18
23235
849.30
CSWM G23332
849.37
TRDT 26
23333
849.45
TRDT 4
23334
849.32
TRDT 4
23335
849.54
TRDT 4
23392
849.56
TRSP /14INF23428
849.37
MKFOC23429
849.42
MHCM /VAULT
23437
849.91
TRDT 20
23438
850.26
TRDT 24
23439
850.50
CSWM
23444
850.63
TRDT 24
23445
849.89
TRDT 24
23463
850.12
TRDT 24
23481
849.27
TRDT /CLUSTER
23494
849.35
PLLP TFSG /71ST-LYNDALE AVE. NO-PARKING
23507
849.06
TRSP /12IN
23508
849.77
TRBS /4.0 DIA
23513
848.04
TRCT 22
23514
848.03
TRDT 6
23515
847.94
TRDT 12
23516
847.92
TRDT 10
23567
849.18
TRDT 8
23568
849.31
TRDT 8
23569
849.30
TRDT 10
23622
848.53
TRDT 18
23623
848.98
TRDT 18
23629
848.48
CSWM
23630
847.86
TRBS /4.0 DIA
23644
848.27
TRBS /6.0 DIA
23645
848.20
TRDT 12
23646
847.92
TRDT 12
23647
848.36
TRDT 18
23667
848.29
TRCT 14
23668
847.81
TRDT 6
23680
849.55
TRDT 20
23720
848.77
HYWM
23725
849.57
TRSP /14IN
23726
849.62
TRCT 10
23727
850.78
TRDT 2423728
849.77
TRSP /12IN
23729
849.47
TRCT 16G23748
848.78
MKNG
23756
850.62
TRCT 10
H 23784
848.42
HHELG23809
848.71
MKNG
E 23833
848.29
MHEL
23834
848.55
PLLP TFSG /NO-PARKING BUS-STOP
23836
849.08
TRCT 14
23843
847.88
TRDT 8
23844
847.87
TRDT 6
23845
848.18
TRDT 16
23846
848.22
TRDT 1623847
848.45
TRSP /12IN
H 23856
848.25
HHEL
23883
847.63
TRBS /3.0DIA23884
847.51
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23885
847.52
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23886
847.70
TRBS /3.0DIA
23889
847.42
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY23890
847.37
TRBS /3.0DIA
23891
847.29
TRBS /3.0DIA
23892
847.39
TRBS /3.0DIA
23893
847.40
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY23894
847.41
TRDT 1223895
846.96
TRBS /3.0DIA
23896
847.26
TRDT 15
23897
847.08
TRBS /3.0DIA
23898
847.09
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23899
847.18
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23900
847.02
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23901
846.98
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23902
847.11
TRBS /3.0DIA23903
847.50
TRSP /18IN
23904
847.18
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY23905
846.95
TRDT /3IN SPECIALTY23906
847.36
TRDT 1223907
848.19
TRDT 12
23925
846.64
TRDT 1823945
846.67
TRDT 4
23946
847.19
TRDT 28
24011
851.22
TRDT 30
24110
847.18
TRDT 24
24111
846.39
TRDT 26
24112
846.89
TRDT 24
24113
847.92
PLLP TFSG /SCHOOL XING
24128
847.94
CSWM 24164
851.19
TRDT 14 24165
851.22
TRDT 16
24178
849.29
TRDT 26
24179
848.67
TRDT 30
24180
848.27
TRDT 30
24244
847.92
CSWM
24245
847.89
TRDT 22
24246
848.24
TRCT 12
24270
847.64
TRDT 32
24271
847.89
TRDT 32
24272
847.82
TRDT 26
24279
847.87
VFCP /IP
24286
848.05
TRDT 16
24351
847.29
PLLP
24380
847.44
MBOX24388
847.37
TRCT 4
24389
847.49
TRCT 4
24390
847.49
CSWM
24398
847.42
PLLP
24427
847.57
TRDT 8
24428
847.65
TRDT 30
24451
847.76
TRDT 24
24495
846.94
HYWM UGWM B
24498
846.75
TFSP
24525
847.53
TRDT 5
24526
847.56
TRDT 5
24527
847.64
TRDT 6
24528
847.57
TRDT 1024529
847.44
TRDT 48
24530
847.44
TRSP 24
24579
847.49
TRDT 30
24617
847.86
PLLD
24620
847.74
TRDT 30
24630
847.95
TRDT 24
24631
847.92
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24632
847.77
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24633
847.56
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24634
847.24
TRBS /3.0 DIA24635
847.45
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24643
847.58
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24644
847.62
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24645
847.56
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24646
847.51
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24647
847.44
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24648
847.50
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24649
847.21
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24650
847.16
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24651
846.96
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24652
847.35
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24653
847.24
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24654
847.15
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24655
847.36
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24656
847.29
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24657
847.39
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24658
847.70
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24664
847.58
TRDT 14
24665
847.38
TRDT 4 /X4
F24666
847.40
MKFOC24667
847.49
MHCM UGFO1 B /VAULTH24668
847.29
HHEL
24669
847.14
TFSP PEDB TFSG
C 24688
846.50
MHCMSIG24705
852.20
SIGB
24763
847.45
TRCT 18
24764
847.40
TRDT 12
24765
847.30
TRCT 12
24766
847.53
TRCT 14
24767
847.73
TRCT 14
C 24772
846.86
MHCM UGFO
24797
847.68
TRDT 30 24798
846.84
TFSP
H 24799
846.83
HHEL
H 24824
847.08
HHELH24852
846.66
HHEL
24859
847.46
TFSPG24877
847.21
MKNG
24894
846.57
BNCH
24907
847.89
TRDT 16
24963
847.54
TRDT 424977
848.00
TRDT 8
24978
847.61
PLLP
24989
847.66
TRDT 12
24990
847.70
TRDT 12
25016
847.34
TRDT 625039
847.91
CSWM
25043
848.39
TRDT 14
25163
848.26
TRDT 425190
848.78
TRDT 8
25196
848.98
TRDT 22
H 25203
847.82
HHEL
25288
848.89
FLAG25289
848.76
FLAG
25290
848.86
TRDT 5
25300
847.90
PLLP
25310
849.03
TRDT 36
25311
848.81
TRDT 20
25330
848.86
MBOX
25362
849.53
TRDT 8IN X3
25368
848.76
TRDT 10
25369
848.88
TRDT 12
25399
848.54
TRCT 14
25400
848.46
TRCT 12
25448
847.99
TRDT 4G25497
846.83
MKNG
C 25510
846.37
MHCM
25598
847.30
HYWMG25633
847.27
MKNG
25707
846.87
PLLP TFSG /BUS-STOP NO-PARKING
25719
847.95
TRDT 24
25720
848.58
TRDT 22 25721
848.88
TRDT 18
25722
849.37
TRDT 30
25723
848.60
TRCT 12
25724
847.88
TRDT 18
C25744
845.62
MHCM /FIBER VAULT
25772
848.21
TRDT 3
25778
848.66
TRCT 24
25838
848.26
TRCT 6
25951
847.68
TRDT 10
25988
846.60
TRDT 12
25989
846.68
TRDT 12
25990
846.76
TRDT 12
25991
846.42
TRDT 12
25992
847.36
TRDT 12
25993
847.74
TRDT 6
25994
847.56
TRDT 6
25995
847.59
TRDT 4
26003
847.16
PLLP
26004
847.91
TRDT 1026154
847.65
PLLP
26157
847.43
HYWM
26168
848.23
TRDT 36
26179
848.72
TRDT 36
26191
846.94
TRDT 8IN
26192
846.96
TRDT 14IN
26216
848.59
TRDT 8IN
26308
848.10
TRDT 26IN
H 26479
847.96
HHEL
26499
847.88
PLLP
26500
847.52
CSWM
26560
849.11
FLAG
26578
848.10
CSWM
H 26579
848.09
HHEL ?
26605
847.81
CSWM
26670
849.53
TRCT 12
26690
847.51
HYWM
26743
849.50
TRBS 2.0
26744
849.34
TRBS 2.0
26745
849.26
TRBS 2.0
26746
849.33
TRBS 2.0
26747
849.42
TRBS 2.0
26748
849.41
TRBS 2.0
26749
849.38
TRBS 2.0
26750
849.27
TRBS 2.0
26751
849.20
TRBS 2.0
26752
849.29
TRBS 2.0
5017
850.26
VFCP /HYD
5018
850.95
VFCP /HYD
5023
848.00
VFCP /SCRIBE X X X X >>>>>>>>
>>>>17776
849.77
BLDS
17777
849.35
BLDS
17778
849.08
PMHC17786
849.07
TRDT 15 17787
850.14
TRDT 15
17788
848.93
TRBS
17789
849.27
TRBS
17790
849.22
TRBS
17791
849.50
TRBS
17792
849.63
TRBS
17793
849.84
TRBS
17794
850.08
TRBS
17795
850.30
TRBS
17796
850.10
TRBS
17797
850.10
TRBS
17798
850.08
TRBS
17799
850.00
TRBS
17800
850.09
TRBS
17801
850.00
TRBS
17802
850.23
TRBS
17822
849.52
TRBS /IN MULCH
17823
849.65
TRBS /IN MULCH
17824
849.69
TRBS /IN MULCH
17825
849.82
TRBS /IN MULCH
17826
849.56
TRBS /IN MULCH17827
849.54
TRBS /IN MULCH17828
849.82
TRBS /IN MULCH17829
850.20
TRBS /IN MULCH17830
850.11
TRBS /IN MULCH17831
850.05
TRBS /IN MULCH17832
850.16
TRBS /IN MULCH
17841
850.31
TRBS
17842
850.01
TRBS
17843
849.98
TRBS Y17875
850.27
PLLD Y17877
850.25
PLLD
17942
850.00
PMHC
17948
850.72
BLAS
17978
850.51
TRDT 4
17979
850.36
TRDT 4
17980
850.30
TRDT 4
17981
849.66
TRDT 9
17982
849.65
TRDT 26
17983
849.71
TRDT 7
17984
849.69
TRDT 12
17985
849.82
TRDT 21
18081
848.33
PLLP
18082
849.36
FUEL
18085
849.23
FUEL18161
849.62
TRCT 2
M18162
849.32
MTNG
18216
849.12
FUEL
18217
849.09
FUEL
16120
848.87
TRDT 15 /DIRT
H24494
847.11
HHEL
11777
846.35
TRDT 20
11778
846.80
TRDT 20W11905
845.18
MHWM M11978
845.70
MTNG
18278
845.68
PMHC
18281
846.38
TRBS
18282
846.43
TRBS
18330
848.17
BLDS
18348
846.44
TRDT 5 M18359
846.42
MTEL OHEL B
C
X X X X X X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>METRO
PAWN
& GUN
JAMAR WEST
APARTMENTS
DEAN
BJORKSTRAND
LANDSCAPING
7400 LYNDALE
BUSINESSES
WOODLAWN
TERRACE
FEETSCALE
25 500
LYNDALE AVE S W 74TH STW 76TH STW 75TH STW 72ND STW 71ST STALDRICH AVE S
GARFIELD AVE S
GARFIELD AVE S
LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTYFEETSCALE
25 500 W 76TH STW 74TH STW 73RD STW 73RD STALDRICH AVE S
LYNDALE AVE S
BRYANT AVE S
BRYANT AVE S
OAK GROVE BLVD
HARRIET AVE S
PEDESTRIAN FLASHING
BEACON CROSSING
CLOSE
CLOSE
CLOSEW 77TH STW 77TH ST
OAK GROVE
LUTHERAN
CHURCH
LYNDALE
FIELD
RICHFIELD HISTORY
CENTER AND
MUSEUM
VFW
GRAMERCY PARK
COOPERATIVE
CITY BELLA
VILLAS
LAKE SHORE
DRIVE
FAIRCHILD
MADDOX &
LEONIDAS
CITY BELLA
WOODLAKE
CHIROPRACTIC
MCD
O
N
A
L
D
S
BMO HARRIS
BANK
WOOD LAKE
NATURE CENTER
LYNDALE
FIELD
5029
849.59
VFCP
5030
849.98
VFCP
5031
852.97
VFCP / HYD
5032
853.45
VFCP / HYD
5033
850.26
LMFM
5034
852.43
VFCP /HYD
5003
848.38
VFCP /IP
5004
850.38
VFCP /IP
5008
847.07
VFCP /IP
5009
850.20
VFCP /IP
5050
849.60
VFCP /IP
5200
852.05
VFBM /TNH 70TH-LYNDALE
5201
849.91
VFCP /SPIKE
5202
851.06
VFCP /SPIKE
5204
852.18
VFBM /TNH
5206
851.11
VFCP /SPIKE
5209
850.83
LMFR /5-8IN
5210
852.31
LMFR /5-8IN
5218
851.42
LMFR /.25IN
5221
851.59
VFBM /TNH NE-QUAD 71 ST-AUGSBURG AVE
5268
849.46
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
5269
849.06
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
5275
846.39
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
5279
846.79
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
H 10055
848.97
HHTF
H10060
848.24
HHCM
10128
849.46
PLLP
10129
849.80
TRDT 6
10130
849.25
TRDT 6
10131
849.36
TRDT 6
10132
849.42
TRDT 6
10133
849.28
TRDT 6
IVB
10134
849.33
IRCV
10139
849.10
PLLP
10140
849.31
TRDT 6
H
10162
848.82
HHTF
H
10188
848.00
HHTF
10239
848.53
PLLP
10240
848.50
PLLP
H
10241
848.42
HHTF
10247
848.64
TRDT 8
10248
848.38
TRDT 6
10249
848.34
PLLP
10263
847.94
LMFX
10266
849.55
LMFM
10290
849.68
TRDT 4
10291
849.78
PLLP
10292
849.64
TRDT 4
10293
849.80
TRDT 4
10294
849.72
PLLP
V
10312
849.78
VNPI
V 10313
849.77
VNPI
10321
849.73
TRDT 6
10322
849.64
TRDT 4
10323
849.77
TRDT 6 10324
849.80
PLLP
TRASH10341
849.35
TRSH
10344
849.56
TRDT 6
10345
849.58
HYWM
10346
852.83
VFBM /TNH 10347
848.87
BNCH
Y
10363
849.61
PLLD Y
10364
849.52
PLLD
H10389 849.45HHEL10390
849.57
PLLP
10394
849.73
BLDSF22032
848.03
MKFO UGFO
22054
848.24
TFSP PEDB22067
848.22
HYWM
22075
847.32
PLLP
H 22114
848.44
HHTF
22115
848.54
TFSP PEDB
22147
848.51
BNCH
22162
848.61
TFSP PEDB TFSG /CROSS WALK - BUS STOP
22164
848.71
TRSP /10IN
22165
848.76
TRSP /10IN
G22175
848.52
MKNG
22176
848.63
TRDT 18
H 22178
848.15
HHEL
22199
848.70
TFSP PEDB
E 22200
848.69
PDEL
H 22201
849.17
HHEL
H 22271
848.76
HHEL UGEL B
22313
848.94
PLLP TFSG UGEL1 B /NO PARKING
22332
849.28
IRSH
22346
850.94
TRDT 24
22348
850.46
TRDT 36
22370
848.63
TRDT
H 22385
849.18
HHEL UGEL
22437
849.26
PLLP TFSG /35MPH NO- PARK BUS STOP
22441
849.57
TRBS 22453
849.25
TRDT 24
U
22472
847.66
MHOT /VAULT
22476
849.59
HYWM
C 22477
849.46
PDCM
22478
849.60
TRBS /6.0 DIA
C 22508
849.51
PDCM UGFO E
IVB
22580
850.54
IRCVIVB
22581
850.59
IRCV
22602
849.97
BLDS / STORM DRAIN FOR DOWN SPOUT 6IN CLAY
22640
851.40
TRCT 8 /18IN DIA
22641
850.78
TRDT 8 /10IN DIA
22647
850.38
TRDT 6
22705
850.39
BLSP
22733
851.30
TRDT 8 /CLUSTER
22734
851.19
TRSP /6IN
22765
851.62
TRDT 24
22766
851.25
TRDT 1822767
850.50
PLLP TFSG /NO PARKING
G22834
850.10
MKNG
G22894
850.19
MKNG
22896
848.96
TRDT 20
22897
850.69
TRDT 24
22957
852.07
TRSP /20IN
22965
850.98
CSWM
23003
852.13
TRDT 10
23030
851.95
TRDT /18IN
23067
851.09
TRDT 18
23068
851.14
TRDT /16IN
23069
851.03
TRDT 22
23147
851.11
TRSP /LARGE ROOT
G23161
849.16
MKNG
23182
848.74
HYWM
23183
851.59
TRCT 5 /12 IN DIA TRUNK
23184
850.75
TRCT 8 /8IN
23185
850.80
TRCT 8 /6IN23186
850.97
TRCT 6 /8IN
23187
850.95
TRCT 6 /6IN
23188
851.03
MBOX /CRANK SHAFT IN CONC
23193
851.72
TRSP /12IN
23202
851.93
TRDT 18
23203
851.93
TRDT 26
23204
852.35
TRSP /24IN
23205
852.10
TRSP /26IN
23206
852.49
TRDT 20
23207
852.73
TRDT 8
23208
852.91
TRDT 4
23215
852.68
TRDT 18
23223
850.21
TRDT 30
23231
849.75
TRDT 6
23232
849.09
TRDT 3
23245
848.69
PLLP
23251
848.72
CSWM
23310
849.10
MKNG
26435
849.51
TRDT 16IN
26442
850.37
TRDT 4
26443
850.54
TRDT 24
26444
849.80
TRDT 4
26445
849.76
TRDT 4
26460
848.02
TRDT 6
26768
847.42
PLLP
26835
846.65
PLLP
26862
851.70
TRDT 30
26863
851.18
TRDT 30
C
26891
846.38
MHCM /VAULTF26892
845.95
MKFO
26894
846.24
TRDT 4
26906
847.80
TRDT 5
26908
847.62
TRDT 4
26935
847.90
TRDT 36
26987
845.45
HYWM
27026
846.01
PLLP
27073
847.17
TRDT 14 27101
847.04
TRDT 16
27147
845.65
PLLP
27198
844.98
PLLP
27306
847.52
TRCT 16
27308
847.51
TRCT 3
27340
844.89
TRDT 5
27396
845.72
PLLP
27480
845.50
HYWM
C
27498
845.50
MHCM UGFO B /FIBER DUCTE
27500
845.46
MHEL UGEL /DUCT
27524
847.09
TRDT 40IN
5025
849.82
LMFX
5026
850.10
LMFM
16497
846.67
CSWM UGWM E
E
16546
850.09
MHEL
16547
850.11
CSWM
16548
850.20
PLLP
16549
850.06
CSWM
H
16550
850.39
HHEL
H
16551
850.47
HHCM
16553
850.29
CSWM
16554
850.29
CSWM
16555
849.99
CSWM
16556
849.49
PLLP
16710
850.02
TRBS16711
850.22
TRBS
16712
849.84
TRBS16713
849.71
TRBS
16714
850.11
TRBS
16728
852.78
TRDT 12
16803
851.27
TRCT 11
16804
851.08
TRBS
16808
851.18
TRDT 12 16816
850.78
TRDT 2-8
16837
850.16
PLLP
16838
850.22
TFSP
E
16839
850.20
MHEL
16841
850.42
PLLP
16843
850.44
PLLP
16844
851.31
TRDT 15
16848
850.63
HYWM
16849
850.39
PLLP
16851
849.59
TRDT 15 16852
848.55
TRDT 14
16853
848.95
TRDT 1216859
850.20
PLLP
16860
849.59
PLLP
16862
850.06
HYWM
H 16870
849.75
HHFO UGFO B
E 16872
849.38
MHEL UGEL B
16880
847.84
PLLP
16924
849.45
TRED
H 17067
850.40
HHTF
E
17068
850.68
MHEL
17069
850.64
TFSP
M
17104
851.08
MTELTRAN17105
851.09
ETRN
H
17140
850.08
HHEL
17141
849.83
TFSP
17142
849.93
TRBS / MULCH
17143
850.19
TRBS / MULCH
17144
850.12
TRBS / MULCH
17145
850.10
TRBS / MULCH
17146
850.03
TRBS / MULCH 17164
850.87
TRDT 15
17177
850.23
PLLP
17178
850.93
TRDT 13
17179
850.89
TRDT 10
17180
850.71
TRDT 12 17181
849.75
PLLP
17226
849.92
TRBS / ROCK
17238
850.41
TRBS
17239
850.31
TRBS
17240
850.66
TRBS
17241
850.66
TRBS
17242
850.00
TRBS
17243
849.82
TRBS
17244
849.80
TRBS
17245
849.76
TRBS
17246
849.91
TRBS
17247
849.55
TRBS
17248
849.69
TRBS
17249
850.11
TRBS
17250
850.45
TRBS
17251
850.30
TRBS
17252
850.24
TRBS
17275
850.13
TFSP
E 17284
849.59
MHEL
E 17285
849.67
MHEL
17288
849.75
PLLP
17308
850.56
TRDT 10
17309
850.52
TRDT 10
17310
850.68
TRDT 9
17311
850.76
TRDT 10
17358
850.17
TRDT 5
17391
850.28
PLLP
CBRC B
R=848.31
I=S 844.97I=I=I=I=I=
17417
850.01
HYWM
E17419 849.92MHEL17420
850.56
TRDT 12
17488
849.86
BLDS
17489
849.79
BLDS17493
850.31
TRDT 4
17494
850.31
TRDT 3
17497
850.29
TRDT 3
17498
850.24
TRDT 4
17502
850.24
TRDT 3
17503
850.13
TRDT 4
17504
849.50
PLLP 17506
849.98
TRDT 317507
849.94
TRDT 3
17574
849.58
TRDT 13
17579
849.50
PLLP
17589
849.75
TRBS
17590
849.70
TRBS
17591
849.85
TRBS
17592
849.80
TRBS
17593
849.65
TRBS
17594
849.60
TRBS
17595
849.58
TRBS
17596
849.64
TRBS
17597
849.54
TRBS
17598
849.61
TRBS17599
849.60
TRBS
17600
849.65
TRBS
17601
849.62
TRBS
17602
849.54
TRBS
17603
849.56
TRBS
17604
849.57
TRBS
17633
849.16
PLLP
17675
850.06
TRBS
17676
849.87
TRBS
17677
849.98
TRBS
17678
850.02
TRBS
17679
849.96
TRBS
17680
849.78
TRBS
17681
849.86
TRBS
17682
849.66
TRBS
17683
849.69
TRBS
17684
849.58
TRBS
17685
849.45
TRBS
17686
849.53
TRBS
17706
848.99
TRDT 1417712
849.78
TRBS
17713
849.90
TRBS
17714
849.67
TRBS
17715
849.78
TRBS
17716
849.64
TRBS
17717
849.49
TRBS
17718
849.66
TRBS
17719
849.61
TRBS
17720
849.68
TRBS
17721
849.64
TRBS
17722
849.43
TRBS
17723
849.60
TRBS17724
849.63
TRBS17725
849.65
TRBS
17726
849.68
TRBS
17727
849.67
TRBS
17728
850.09
TRBS
17729
849.88
TRBS
17730
849.85
TRBS
17731
849.87
TRBS
17732
849.89
TRBS
17733
849.83
TRBS
>>>>>>>>X11025
850.75
TRDT 9 11026
849.72
PLLPM11076
851.31
MTNG CBRC
R=849.74
I=S
W 846.48
846.54
I=I=I=I=I=
11095
851.03
TRDT 9
11106
851.02
PLLPTRAN11303
833.38
ETRN UGEL B /3.3X5.2M11324
832.57
MTNG UGNG E
11412
837.57
TRDT 4111418
842.93
CSWM
11419
834.31
TRDT 40
11420
835.23
TRDT 39
11421
833.27
TRDT 45
11453
844.74
TRDT 42
11591
851.97
IRSH
11653
851.16
TRDT 26
11708
850.97
TRDT 4
11728
852.00
TRBS
11729
851.66
TRBS11730
852.13
TRBS
11731
852.04
TRBS
11732
852.23
TRBS11733
852.36
TRBS
11734
852.37
TRBS11735
852.40
TRBS
11736
851.92
TRBS11737
851.71
TRBS11738
851.82
TRBS11739
851.89
TRBS
11740
852.03
TRBS11741
851.99
TRBS
11742
852.15
TRBS
11743
852.09
TRBS
11744
851.98
TRBS
11745
852.17
TRDT 14
11746
852.08
TRBS
11747
852.18
TRBS
11749
852.00
TRDT 15
11750
851.64
TRBS
>XXXXXCCXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5051
846.05
VFCP /TEMP MAG
5052
832.00
VFCP /MAG
5053
831.54
VFCP /SPIKE
5054
834.00
VFCP /SPIKE
5055
828.78
VFCP /SPIKE
5056
838.36
VFCP /SPIKE
5057
843.03
VFCP /SPIKE
5058
830.97
VFCP /SPIKE
5059
834.19
LMFR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>STRUCTURAL WALL (< 5')
LANDSCAPING WALL (< 2')
LANDSCAPING WALL (< 2')
STRUCTURAL WALL (< 8')LANDSCAPING WALL (< 2')5 PARKING STALLSLYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTYFEETSCALE
25 500
LYNDA
L
E
A
V
E
S
LYNDA
L
E
A
V
E
SW 71ST STW 70TH STW 69TH STW 68TH STW 67TH STW 66TH STAUGSBURG AVE S
GARFIELD AVE S
GARFIEL
D
A
V
E
S LAKESHORE DRIVE SLYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTYFEETSCALE
25 500
OAK GROVE BLVD
HARRIET AVE S
CLOSE
PEDESTRIAN FLASHING
BEACON CROSSING
\\metrosouth4\h\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2017-10-25 Open House\2017-10-25 Open House Summary
revised.docx
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
October 25, 2017 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Wood Lake Nature Center
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to share the purpose of the Lyndale Avenue reconstruction project,
project goals and objectives, project history, and solicit public input. This open house was geared toward
building a common understanding of current conditions, opportunities, and potential impacts in the
corridor and project area.
Staff Attendees:
BOLTON & MENK – Tim Lamkin, Sarah Rippke Lloyd, Haila Maze, Zachary Parsons.
CITY OF RICHFIELD – Jeff Pearson, Jack Broz, Kristin Asher, Liz Finnegan, Logan Vlasaty
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS – Wesley Dunser, Phil Chillman, Ken Severson, Gary Ness
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately fifty (50) interested participants who attended the open house to review the
materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included
Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, and community context
Two large layouts of the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss and provide comments
Surveys and comment cards to solicit input from participants
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through surveys and comment cards. The
following summarizes the most frequently mentioned themes in the public comments collected:
Safe and improved pedestrian facilities, particularly sidewalks and crossings (19 mentions)
Safe and dedicated bike lanes on corridor, with connections to other facilities (13 mentions,
though 4 opposed)
Address speeding, including via traffic calming (5 mentions)
Maintain existing trees and green space (4 mentions)
Improve signal at 73rd Street (4 mentions)
Convert the road from 4 to 3 lanes (3 mentions, though 2 opposed)
\\metrosouth4\h\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2017-10-25 Open House\2017-10-25 Open House Summary
revised.docx
Safer pedestrian and auto access for apartments and businesses at southern end of corridor,
particularly Lyndale Commons (3 mentions)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Traffic
Safety/Distracted
Driving
Traffic Congestion Traffic Speeds Signal Timing or
Location
Pavement
Condition
Lane Width Presence of
Parking on the
Corridor
Other
Traffic-Related Concerns Along the Corridor Today
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Pedestrian
Safety and
Accessibility
Bicycle Safety
and Accessibility
Transit Safety
and Accessibility
Corridor
Appearance
Impact on
Adjacent Uses
Other Concerns About the Corridor Today
16
7
16 16
9
4
14
6
18
5 7
28
22
1 0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Walk Transit Bicycle Auto Truck
How is the Corridor Used
R:\Projects\Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction\Public Involvement\Open House 2 material\2017-11-29 Open House Summary.docx
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
November 29, 2017 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Wood Lake Nature Center
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to reflect back feedback received to date, present a draft problem
statement and goals, provide information on the corridor's existing issues, and educate on safety tools
design elements that will address the corridor's issues. Feedback was collected on whether the process
has been responsive to feedback to date, and whether the safety tool and design elements would be
preferred on the corridor.
Staff Attendees
BOLTON & MENK
Tim Lamkin, Sarah Rippke Lloyd, Haila Maze, Zachary Parsons
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Jeff Pearson, Jack Broz, Kristin Asher, Liz Finnegan, Logan Vlasaty
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS
Ken Severson, Jeffrey Walz, Gary Ness, Jack Wold, Sean Heyford-Oleary, Art Felgate
RICHFIELD CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Meeting Notification
The following notifications were done regarding the November 26 Open House:
Approximately 900 mailers were sent to residents within proximity of the project, advertising
both open houses.
An ad in the Sun Current paper was printed in the November 23, 2017 publication.
An ad on Facebook was promoted from November 22 – November 29, targeted towards those
in Richfield.
Multiple Facebook posts were created on both the City Facebook page as well as the Sweet
Streets Facebook page.
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately sixty (60) interested participants who attended the open house to review the
materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included
Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, community context, problem statement, work done to date, and feedback summary
Series of boards with information on specific design elements and safety tools
Large layout of the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss and provide comments
Surveys and comment cards to solicit input from participants
R:\Projects\Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction\Public Involvement\Open House 2 material\2017-11-29 Open House Summary.docx
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through surveys and comment cards. The
following summarizes public comments collected:
Address ways to accommodate bicycles safety, and make connections to other facilities;
difference of opinion if needed on Lyndale
Pedestrian and business access improvements south of 74th
Need better pedestrian facilities – sidewalks and crosswalks
Difference of opinion on need for on-street parking
0
5
10
15
20
25
What We've
Learned
Addressing the
Problem
Speed/Conflict
Point Reduction
Bicycle Facilities Parking
Survey Questions: Support For Concepts
Yes No Not Sure
0
5
10
15
20
25
3 Lane Section Access Control Roundabout Compact
Roundabout
Raised Median RRFB
Number Saying "Yes" to Concept
South Middle North
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-02-20 Open House
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
February 20, 2018 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Oak Grove Lutheran Church
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to review what has been done to date to respond to community
feedback and complete supporting technical analysis, and to provide input on potential design concepts
for the corridor and for key intersections.
Staff Attendees:
BOLTON & MENK – Tim Lamkin, Sarah Lloyd, Zachary Parsons
CITY OF RICHFIELD – Jeff Pearson, Jack Broz, Logan Vlasaty
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS – Ken Severson, Paul Chillman, Jack Wold
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately ninety (90) interested participants who attended the open house to review
the materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included:
Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, community context, problem statement, work done to date, feedback summary, and
evaluation process
Boards outlining the different roadway, intersection, and bicycle alternatives
Series of boards with information on specific design elements and safety tools
Large layout of the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss and provide comments
Surveys and comment cards to solicit input from participants
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-02-20 Open House
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through surveys and comment cards. In
total, there were 65 comment cards and surveys submitted. The following summarizes public comments
collected:
76th Street to 74th Street
Concept 1: Many supported this concept – those that commented opposing the concept seem
to dislike 3-lane concept.
Concept 2: Many supported the compact roundabout with median— Concern with business/
driveway access if a median would be installed
Concept 3: Decent support for the 4 lane concept—but many disliked it and did not see it as a
change to what is there already.
70th Street
Most people preferred the roundabout. There was an overall pedestrian crossing safety concern.
Concept 1: Most people preferred the compact roundabout as it would continue to move school
traffic and reduce backups. The only worry here was pedestrian crossing safety.
Concept 2: Most who supported this option requested faster signal times and generally said yes
to this because they did not like the concept of a roundabout.
Lakeshore Drive to 67th Street
Concept 1: People tended to support the compact roundabout concept more frequently than
the signal. The main concerns were driveway access if a median were to be installed and safety
crossing the intersection.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Have the common themes
from previous open houses
been accurately captured?
Do you agree that the
problem statement captured
the overall concerns of the
community?
Does the evaluation process
help find solutions important
to the community?
Would you support an
alternative that impacts
adjacent property if needed
to successfully address the
existing problems?
Baseline Survey Questions
Yes No Not Sure
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-02-20 Open House
Concept 2: People who supported this generally did so because they did not prefer
roundabouts.
Bicycle Facilities
People liked the cycle track and moving the route to Aldrich the best.
Concept 1 Traditional Bike Lane: many thought this option is unsafe and hazardous to drivers
and bikers
Concept 2 Buffered Bike Lane: People who liked this option liked how it was out of the way a bit,
and that the area would be plowed in the winter
Concept 3 Cycle Track: Most preferred option
Concept 4 Move Route: Many people preferred this option as well, but people who preferred it
also answered with the “No need/desire” when asked if they bike on Lyndale.
Parking
The concept of adding spaces was generally well received. Concerns were right of way issues, losing
trees, and “not needing” it.
Concept 1 Pocket: People liked pocket parking
Concept 2 Parallel: People were neutral on this one.
Concept 3 Back In: Either they loved it or hated it. The main concern was the actual task of
backing into a spot. They said that is not only difficult, but would hold up traffic.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Yes (Regularly)
Yes (Occasionally)
No (No
need/desire)No (I feel unsafe)
Do you bike on Lyndale Ave?
Do you bike on Lyndale Ave?
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-05-01 Open House
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
May 1, 2018 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Oak Grove Lutheran Church
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to provide the public an opportunity to review and comment on the
recommended alternative for the corridor, prior to final approval by the City of Richfield.
Staff Attendees:
BOLTON & MENK – Tim Lamkin, Sarah Lloyd, Zachary Parsons
CITY OF RICHFIELD –Jack Broz, Logan Vlasaty, Liz Finnegan
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS – Ken Severson, Wesley Dunser
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately seventy (70) interested participants who attended the open house to review
the materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included:
• Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, community context, problem statement, work done to date, feedback summary, and
evaluation process
• Series of boards with information on specific design elements and safety tools
• Series of boards on traffic impacts of different intersection alternatives
• Large layout of the recommended alternative for the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss
and provide comments
• One page handout summarizing project status
• Comment cards to solicit input from participants
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-05-01 Open House
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through comment cards. In total, there
were 12 comment cards submitted. The following summarizes public comments collected:
• Generally positive response to recommended alternative, including improved bicycle and
pedestrian crossings and safety
• Some remaining concerns about the safety of using roundabouts on this street
• Need to adequate turn restrictions and signalization to protect bicycles and pedestrians, with a
few specific suggestions
• Specifics related to impacts of construction on individual properties, and how this should be
addressed
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
Improve Pedestrian Experience
Bike Lanes, Trail/Sidewalk, Green Space, and On-street Parking
Corridor
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
3-lane Section
Reduces excessive speeding.
Speed study show’s 40% of traffic
speeds along Lyndale Ave during the core hours of the day.
Proven to Reduce Crashes
Half of the intersections have injury crash rates 3 times the state average.
Lakeshore Dr & Lyndale Ave is 12 times the state average.
Narrows Roadway Footprint to allow for other Features
Common theme from all open houses was to add bikin g, green space and
parking throughout the corridor.
Corridor
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
77th St. to 76th St.
Add dedicated turn lanes and reduce to one
thru lane approaching 76th St.
Add bike lanes and eight on-street parallel
parking stalls along Kensington property.
Parking need at Kensington property.
Consistency throughout the corridor.
76th St. to 74th St.
Add a raised median at 76th St and 75th St and consolidate entrances at 75th St.
Add pedestrian flashing system to south side of 75th St. Intersection.
Reduces conflicts points, which reduces number and severity of crashes.
Provides refuge and shorter crossing for pedestrian and bicycle along and across the
corridor.
Features Considered, but not recommended
Eliminating right turn lanes at 77th St and 76th St. Traffic would likely back up past 75th St
to the north and 77th St to the south during morning and afternoon commutes.
Roundabout at 75th St. Initially reviewed in conjunction with a center median to 76th St.
But even without the median, the impacts to the properties at 75th St and impacts to
business access was greater than the benefits of a roundabout at this location.
Four lane undivided roadway. This option was reviewed in the case that driveways
could not be consolidated. That is not the case and this option does not meet any of the
project goals.
South Business Area: 77th St – 74th St
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
74th St Intersection
Add a raised median
Reduces conflicts points, which reduces
number and severity of crashes.
Provides refuge for pedestrian and bicycle
crossing.
73rd St. to 72nd St.
Add Pocket Parking & Bus Pull-out
Common theme from open house to provide bus pull out.
Provide parking for residents short alley-only driveways.
73rd St. Intersection
Replace Signal
Provides better access to
Lyndale Ave during peak hours.
Existing Signal.
72nd St. Intersection
Provide for School Bus Traffic.
Heavily used intersection by Richfield
School.
Augsburg Ave Intersection
Close Access to Lyndale Ave.
Reduces conflicts points, which reduces
number and severity of crashes.
Oak Grove Blvd Intersection
Realign Intersection.
Reduces speeds of turning vehicles
Reduces potential cut-thru traffic.
Improves sight lines
Features Considered, but not recommended
Roundabout and 73rd St. One of the trade-offs with a 3-lane section is that turning and
crossing traffic onto Lyndale Ave may experience increased delay. There were also
significant property impacts to the four corner properties at 73 rd St.
Residential Area - 74th St – 70th St
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Close Access to Oak Grove Blvd from Lyndale Ave. Policy is that the entire
neighborhood would need to agree and request the closure, which is not the case at this
time.
Design Recommendations
70th St Intersection
Compact Roundabout
Reduces vehicular speeds.
Reduces conflict points
70th St to 69th St
Narrowed Section with Buffered Bike Lanes
Reduces impacts to Wood Lake area.
Left turn not needed, but adds space for bike lane
Maintains adequate space for maintenance and emergency vehicles.
69th St to 68th St
Narrowed Section with Median & Buffered Bike Lanes
Reduces impacts to Wood Lake area.
Residents have access through alley.
Adds space for bike lane and maintains adequate space for main tenance.
Features Considered, but not recommended
Boulevard along Wood Lake area. Impacts to Wood Lake were considered too great to
include a green boulevard in this area. There will be a narrow 2 -ft paved boulevard,
which will allow minimal snow storage. The trail is also buffered from traffic by the bike
lane.
Shifting the entire section to the east. Impacts were too great to residential properties
with other options available.
Two-way center left turn lane between 69th St and 68th St. The additional space the left
turn lane would impact the residential properties and/or Wood Lake. These impacts
Wood Lake Area - 70th St – 68th St
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
were considered too great with other options available. This was a common theme at
previous open houses. Residents in this area have alley access to their properties.
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
68th St Intersection
Compact Roundabout
Reduces vehicular speeds.
Reduces conflict points
Provides U-turn access for residents
Lakeshore Dr. Intersection
Right In/Out Access
Pedestrian flashing system
Reduces conflict points. Injury crash
rate is 12 times the state average.
Median will help slow vehicular traffic
and provide refuge for pedestrian and
bicycle crossings
68th St to 67th St
Buffered Bike Lanes
Adds space for bike lane and
maintains adequate space for
maintenance.
67th St Intersection
Compact Roundabout
Reduces vehicular speeds.
Reduces conflict points
Provides U-turn access to
Lakeshore Dr.
Features Considered, but not recommended
One-way stop, tee intersection at 68th St. Residents on the west side between 68th st and 67th St
do not have an alley or through access on Garfield Ave. A roundabout provides a safe U -turn for
access to their driveways. A roundabout also provides safer crossings for pedestrians as
compared to the one-way stop.
Full access at Lakeshore Dr. Injury crash rate is twelve times the state average at this
intersection. Limiting vehicle turns will reduce the number and severity of crashes.
Signal at 67th St. 40-50% of traffic speeds along the corridor, especially dangerous in this area
with an older demographic. Roundabouts are proven to reduce traffic speeds. Roundabouts also
reduce the number of conflict points for vehicles and pedestrians creating a safer environment.
Back-in diagonal parking along City Bella property. This would provide an additio nal 15 parking
stalls. This alternative is still be reviewed with the property and city planning staff and may be
incorporated if a benefit is seen.
North Business Area: 68th St – 66th St
67th St to 66th St
Cycle Track & On-street Parking
Cycle track keeps consistency with
66th St.
Addition of on-street parking was a
common theme at all the open houses.
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #8.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 54
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
4/9/2019
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance D irector
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: C hris Regis, F inance D irector
3/27/2019
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
4/3/2019
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider adoption of a resolution providing for the sale of $8,865,000 General Obligation Bonds,
Series 2019A.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
I ncluded within the City’s 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan, adopted by the City Council on J uly 10, 2018,
are two projects, the reconstruction of 66th Street and the reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue.
The 66th Street project is a county road project and 2019 will be year three of construction. The project is
estimated to cost $61,292,000. The City’s cost share includes 25% of road construction, 66% of storm sewer,
100% of water/sewer utility replacement, and any additional streetscape elements not cost-shared by the
County. T he project has included reconstruction of failing pavement, the replacement of City utilities,
undergrounding of parallel overhead utility lines, and improved bicycle and pedestrian
accommodations. T he project also addresses safety and traffic flow concerns through the use of
additional medians and roundabouts. Funding for the 66th Street project is provided by the
combination of the issuance of general obligation bonds, Municipal State Aid, Federal grants,
County and local funding, and utility rate payers.
The Lyndale Avenue project will reconstruct the roadway between 67th Street and 76th Street and include the
replacement of City utilities.
The City previously issued for the 66th Street project the $9,130,000 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds,
Series 2017A and the $9,770,000 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2018A, of which $4,000,000
was for the 66th Street project.
Staff is proposing issuing a bond in the par amount of $8,865,000. The par amount is net of a $1,000,000
cash contribution from the City. The source of the cash contribution would be Local Government Aid set aside
funds.
Debt service for the bonds will be provided by an estimated annual debt service tax levy of $477,390 and a
$151,340 contribution from the City’s utility funds.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt a resolution providing for the sale of $8,865,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series
2019A.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The 66th Street project began in 2017 and should be completed in 2019.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The 66th Street Reconstruction project and the Lyndale Avenue project are part of the 5-Year
Street Reconstruction Plan approved by the City Council on J uly 10, 2018.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Construction for the both projects is expected to begin in mid-April 2019 or as weather permits.
Therefore, it is important to have the necessary financing in place.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The estimated total cost of the Lyndale Avenue project is $10,000,000.
Funding for the project is to be provided by general obligation bonds, Municipal State Aid funds
and Xcel rate payers. Estimated funding and costs is as follows:
2019 General Obligation Bonds (Net of Par) $7,500,000
2020 General Obligation Bonds (Net of Par) 2,000,000
Municipal State Aid 450,000
Xcel Rate Payers 50,000
Total Funding $10,000,000
Street Reconstruction $6,822,000
Utility 3,178,000
Total Project Cost $10,000,000
The estimated total cost of the 66th Street Reconstruction Project is $61,292,000.
Funding for the project will be provided as follows:
2017 Street Reconstruction Bonds (Net of Par) $9,000,000
2018 Street Reconstruction Bonds (Net of Par) 4,000,000
2019 General Obligation Bonds (Net of Par) 2,200,000
Municipal State Aid 8,200,000
Federal Funds 9,632,000
Hennepin County 26,500,000
Overhead Utility Rate Payers 1,325,000
Other 435,000
Total Funding $61,292,000
The par amount of the 2019 bonds to be issued is $8,865,000 which is net of the $1,000,000 City
cash contribution.
The City will contribute $1,000,000 of Local Government Aid set aside funds to buy down the par
amount of the bonds.
The debt service on the bonds will be provided from an annual debt service tax levy and an annual
contribution from the City’s utility funds of $151,340.
The average annual estimated tax levy will be $477,390.
The estimated annual increase in taxes due to the issuance of these bonds for a residential
property valued at $230,000 will be approximately $29.94.
The final bonding for the Lyndale Avenue Street Reconstruction project will occur in 2020.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Legal Counsel has reviewed the Pre-Sale report and resolution.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
A second option for the City Council to consider would be to issue the bond at a par amount of
$9,875,000, forgoing the $1,000,000 City cash contribution. The utility funds would still contribute
$151,340 annually to the debt service on the bonds.
The estimated annual tax levy would now increase by $72,610, to $550,000.
The estimated annual increase in taxes for a residential property valued at $230,000 would increase to
$34.44.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Brian Reilly, Ehlers & Associates, I nc.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
P re-S ale Report $8,865,000 G.O. B onds, S eries 2019A E xhibit
Resolution No. _______________
Resolution Providing for the Sale of
$8,865,000 General Obligations Bonds, Series 2019A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is
necessary and expedient to issue the City's $8,865,000 General Obligations Bonds, Series 2019A (the
"Bonds"), to finance the 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue street and utility projects in the City; and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its
independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60,
Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City for the sale of
the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 PM on May 14, 2019, for the
purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9h day of April, 2019.
___________________________
Maria Regan Gonzalez, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #9.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 55
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
4/9/2019
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: A my Markle, Recreation S ervices D irector
3/29/2019
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: K atie Rodriguez, C ity Manager
4/2/2019
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consider approval of a facility dedication request to dedicate the stage of the Richfield Community
Band Shell to the Peterson Family.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The City Council adopted a Facility Dedication Policy in 2008 to establish guidelines for dedicating
recreational facilities and amenities in the city. The policy states the City does not accept requests to
permanently rename recreational facilities or amenities, but as an alternative offers guidelines to dedicate
such facilities to the memory of an individual or organization by granting the installation of an onsite
dedication plaque.
The City rec eived a Richfield Facility D edication proposal from the Friends of the Band Shell for a plaque at
the Richfield Community Band Shell in dedication to the Peterson Family. The plaque would read, "Dedicated
to the Peterson Family. Richfield's own & Minnesota's first family of music."
The C ommunity Services Commission reviewed the proposal and disc ussed the request at their February 19
and Marc h 19, 2019, meetings. Rick J abs, Friends of the Richfield Band Shell Chair, explained the group’s
recommendation to the Commission is to dedicate the stage of the Richfield Community Band Shell to the
Peterson Family. He said that the group is following the Fac ility Dedication Policy proc ess to honor the
Peterson Family, who, the group feels, made a significant contribution to the community. Some Community
Services C ommission members raised conc erns, partic ularly that this seemed to be a naming of a facility
after the Peterson Family and that they had not made a signific ant financ ial contribution to the project. Other
members responded that the Peterson Family had made a significant musical contribution and Mr. J abs
clarified that the facility will still be named the Richfield Community Band Shell. I n a follow-up communication
with Mr. J abs, staff clarified that the stage would also not be named for the Peterson Family. All promotional
material and communication will refer to the Richfield Community Band Shell.
The Community Services Commission recommended approval of the proposal by a vote of six to two.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve a facility dedication request to dedicate the stage of the Richfield Community
Band Shell to the Peterson Family.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Friends of the Band Shell was formed in 2016 to raise funds and promote the project.
Ground was broken in 2017 for the Richfield Community Band Shell.
The band shell has been designed to hold concerts, theater productions, choral groups, dance
groups and will be available for weddings, church functions, youth programs and businesses that
want to gather in a beautiful park. I t is expected to attract many new people to Richfield.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City’s Facility Dedication Policy was adopted by City Council in 2008 to establish guidelines
for dedicating recreational facilities and amenities including athletic fields, park buildings, and
other recreational structures located in the City of Richfield in honor of an individual or
organization. As the policy indicates, the City does not accept requests to permanently rename a
park, recreational facility or amenity in honor of an individual or organization, but as an alternative
offers guidelines to dedicate such facilities to the memory of an individual or organization by
granting the installation of a dedication plaque on-site of such facilities.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The Richfield Community Band Shell grand opening is scheduled for Thursday, J une 6, the first
day of the summer Entertainment in the Parks series.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
There is no financial impact to the City for the proposed facility dedication request.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
There are no legal issues associated with the proposed facility dedication request.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
City Council has the option of denying or modifying the proposed facility dedication request.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
F acility D edication P olicy B ackup Material
B andshell S tage D edication Request B ackup Material
Final Draft 03/11/08
City of Richfield
Recreation Facility and Amenity Dedication Policy
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for dedicating recreational
facilities and amenities including athletic fields, park buildings, and other recreational
structures located in the City of Richfield in honor of an individual or organization. The
City of Richfield does not accept requests to permanently rename a park, recreational
facility or amenity in honor of an individual or organization, but as an alternative offers
the following guidelines to dedicate such facilities to the memory of an individual or
organization by granting the installation of a dedication plaque onsite of such facilities.
Nomination Criteria: Nominations for dedicating City of Richfield facilities or
amenities in the memory of an individual or organization shall be based on one or more
of the following criteria:
1. In honor of organizations or individuals (living or deceased) who have made a
significant contribution, financial or otherwise, to the City of Richfield or who
have played a leading role in advancing the City of Richfield as a good place to
live, work or recreate..
2. In honor of a person, place or event that played a significant role in the history of
the City of Richfield.
The individual or organization for which the dedication is sought shall be deemed to be
of good general character and should not be associated with unlawful or unseemly
activities.
Dedication Guidelines: The dedication of City recreational facilities via this policy shall
be limited to significant facilities or amenities, including but not limited to buildings,
rooms in buildings, athletic fields, ponds, bridges, playgrounds, and trails. The dedication
of minor amenities such as water fountains and benches are not part of this policy and
will be addressed by the Recreational Services Department. Fundraising projects
conducted by the Friends of Wood Lake that benefit the Wood Lake Nature Center are
exempt from this policy.
The dedication of City facilities or amenities shall normally be limited to no more than
two per year to maintain the stature of the facility dedication honor. Any undedicated
City recreational facility may be nominated for dedication using the criteria of this policy.
The nominating person(s) shall be entirely responsible for all costs associated with the
dedication including application and background check fees, recognition, and memorial
plaques. The size, style, text and location of the memorial plaque shall be subject to
review and approval of the Recreation Services Director and the Nominating Committee.
Application Process: The process for dedicating a recreational facility or amenity to the
memory of an individual shall be:
1. The nominating person(s) shall request a City of Richfield Recreational Facility
Dedication Nomination form from the Recreation Services Department office.
Nominations for deceased individuals will not be accepted until after a six-month
time period from the date the individual passed away.
2. A fully completed City of Richfield Recreational Facility Dedication Nomination
form shall be submitted to the Recreation Services Director and the Nominating
Committee along with the specified application fee.
3. The completed application will be reviewed by Nominating Committee
(consisting of assigned members of the Community Services Commission) for
completeness, accuracy and adherence to policy guidelines.
4. All individuals nominated shall be subject to a criminal background check.
5. If the nomination is rejected based on the above review, the nominating person
designated on the application will be notified in writing.
6. Nominations that pass the above review will be forwarded to the Community
Services Commission for review at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
7. Within 60 days of the Community Services Commission meeting at which the
application is received, a recommendation will be made. If rejected by the
Community Services Commission, the nominating person designated on the
application will be notified by City staff in writing.
8. If approved, the recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for final
review and approval or denial.
9. Nominating parties will be notified in writing of the City Council’s actions within
two weeks of the meeting at which action is taken.
10. The City Council shall have the authority to override this policy when they deem
doing so to be in the best interest of the City.
Revocation:
Recreational facility dedications may be revoked by the Community Services
Commission should information later come to light that runs counter to the substance and
spirit of this policy.