Loading...
09-27-82 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 297 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Approval of An Off- Street Parking Permit for House of Prayer Lutheran Church, 7625 Chicago Avenue House of Prayer Lutheran Church, 7625 Chicago Avenue, has applied for an off - street parking permit for a new parking lot on their property south and east of the existing church building. The church has also requested that the performance bond require- ments be waived. Access to the proposed lot would be from Elliot Avenue. The proposed lot would provide an additional 28 off - street parking spaces. The proposed parking lot would meet all city off - street parking standards. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council approve the off - street parking layout and authorize the execution of an off - street parking agreement by passing the attached resolution. If the council wishes to waive the perform- ance bond, the language of the resolution shauld be altered by removing paragraph number 3. Respectfully submitted, ��L r'(cm,�S Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN /eja cc: Community Development Director City Planner City Engineer F- r-I u 0 • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR OFF - STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION No. 82 -6, CONTRACT NO. 2346 Name: House of Prayer Lutheran Church 7625 Chicago Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Location: Same Use: Church BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the proposed geometric layout of the off - street parking as contained in Off - Street Parking Application No. 82 -6, Contract No. 2346 is hereby approved subject to and upon completion of performance of the contract for such off - street parking as hereinafter authorized. 2. That the proposed off - street parking contract for the improvement of said off - street parking, bearing contract No. 2346 be placed on file and that the manager be authorized to seal the same for and on behalf of this city. 3. That the off - street parking operator provide the City of Richfield with Surety in the form of cash, passbook saving withdrawal authority, or performance bond in an amount to be determined by the community development director and city manager, to ensure the off - street parking lot is constructed within the terms and regulations of the Off- Street Parking Agreement. L 4. That responsibility for the pr_gper upkeep and maintenance of said Off - Street Parking lot shall remain the responsibility of the off - street parking lot operator in accordance with Ordinance Code 4.05. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of , 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk -Ve :b East 77 'h Street ;v I i 1� a " o, C y 0 G CITY OF RICHFIELD, :MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 296 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Change Orders for CP 7571 - Lyndale Avenue Traffic Signals and Street Lighting The following changes are necessary for City Project 7571, street lighting and traffic signal on Lyndale Avenue at 70th and 73rd Streets: Change Order No. 1: 1. Change traffic signal poles from hinged truss and transformer base to stationary truss and integral rotable high base; - $2,000.00 2. Change location of services with meter and safety switch on service pole; - 2,000.00 3. Furnish and install two meter sockets for lighting service points; + 362.64 Total Change Order - $3,637.36 Change Order No. 2:. 1. Remove 20' traffic signal mast arm, south- bound land of Lyndale Avenue at 70th Street, and replace with 15' mast arm to correct visi- bility problem; + 630 2. Add two additional traffic detector loops at both 70th Street and-.Lyndale Avenue and 73rd Street and Lyndale Avenue to correct detection problem; +$3,390.00 Total Change Order +$4,020.00 NET CHANGE + 382.64 The net total change from these two change orders is to increase the original contract amount of $127,158.00 to $127,540.64. It is recommended that these two change orders be approved. Re pectfully submitted, N� Qa. Karl Nollenberger City Manager KENNEL LICENSE INSPECTION REPORTS 17 1. Margaret McAdams 6400 16th Avenue 3 dogs: 1 Male Irish Setter 1 Female boxer 1 Poodle Female One person occupies the dwelling which is in_;gocd repair, as is the garage. The yard is fenced "nd will keep the animals on the owners property. The pets are not kept for breeding purposes, and are exercised in backyard. There were no unpleasant odors present. Two of the three abutting property owners have signed a petition of approval. 2. Herman Rude 7430 Blaisdell 4 dogs 3 Poodles, 1 male, 2 female 1 Male German shepard One person occupies dwelling, and the house and garage are in good repair. The yard is fenced and will keep the animals on the owners property. The pets are not kept for breeding purposes, and are ex- ercised in backyard. There were no unpleasant odors present. The abutting property owners have signed-,-z petition of approval for this kennel license. 3. Joyce McPheeters 7340 Emerson Avenue 4 dogs 4 Poodles, 1 male - 3 females Six persons occupy dwelling, and the house and garage are in good repair. The yard is not fenced, but the kennel area is enclosed and in fair repair. The kennel area will keep the animals on the owners property. The animals are not kept for breeding purposes, and are exercised in kennel area. There were no unpleasant odors present. The abutting property owners have signed a petition of approval for the kennel license. 4. Dorothy Masoner 6326 Clinton Avenue 3 dogs 1 male and 2 female dachsunds Three persons occupy the dwelling, and the house and garage are in good repair. The yard is fenced and will keep the animals on the owners property. The pets are not kept for breeding purposes, and are exer- cised in backyard. There were no unpleasant odors present and the abutting property owners have signed a petition of approval for the kennel license. 5. Garnette Kelher 6314 14th Avenue 13 cats One person occupies the dwelling, and the house and garage are in good repair. _The yard is fenced and.will keep the animals on the owners property. The pets are not kept for breeding purposes, and are exercised in backyard. There were no unpleasant odors present and the abutting property owners have signed a petition of approval for the kennel-license. All of the pets are licensed. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 295 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Authorization to Participate in Grant Application The Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 (Section 16 (b) (2) as amended, makes capital assistance grant funds available through the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to private, non - profit corporations and associations for the purchase of equipment and facilities for use in transporting handicapped and elderly persons. It has been the MnDOT policy to use such funds solely for the purchase of lift - equipped buses. Grants are made for replacement of vehicles, for expansion of current services, or for initiation of new .-services. No operating funds are available under the program. The city currently has a vehicle, without a lift, that seats approximately 14 passengers. This vehicle -is scheduled for re- placement in about three years. It is proposed that application be made for a 16(b)(2) grant that would purchase a replacement vehicle with a lift. Such a vehir -Ie would cost approximately $31,000 - $33,000, and would have a capacity to carry approximately 17 passengers, with additional capacity for at least two wheel- chairs. Notification of the grant award would occur in about Jan- uary, 1983. Should Richfield be a recipient, it would take 18 -24 months for delivery, following MnDOT's purchase of a vehicle on behalf of the grant recipients through competitive bidding proced- ures of the State's Procurement Division. This timing would approximate -the city's schedule for replacement of the current vehicle. The state requires that only private, non - profit organizations may apply for the grant. The city does not qualify under this stipulation. However, the Richfield Lions Club has agreed to act as the sponsoring agent in the grant application. Also under the stipulations of the grant program, 80% federal funding is avail- able from the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA), U. S. Department of Transportation. The remaining 20% must be funded at the local level. The source of funds used to provide the 20% local share cannot be federal, and must be available at the time that the vehicles are ordered. The State of Minnesota is aware ft • • Council Letter No. 295 -2- September 27, 1982 that, through a cooperative arrange, the Richfield Lions Club would be the sponsoring agent, but the City of Richfield would be responsible for the local share of the vehicle purchase, should a grant be awarded. Inasmuch as the city plans to replace the existing transportation vehicle, it is anticipated that the funds scheduled for that replacement would be used as the local shares should the grant be received. It is recommended that the city council authorize application by the city, in a cooperative effort with the Richfield Lions Club, for a State Department of Transportation Grant under the provisions of Section 16(b)(2) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. Respectfully submitted, �'L t4 „ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN /eja - cc: Community Services Director #L 7 p CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 294 Agenda September 27, 1932 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request to Use a Portion of Lyndale Avenue Right -of -Way for Landscaping Purposes Mr. and Mrs. Marquardt, 7300 Lyndale Avenue, have requested that they be allowed to plant a number of shrubs adjacent to their property, within the public-right-of-way of Lyndale Avenue. A copy of the proposed landscape plan is attached for your in- formation. The staff has reviewed the proposal and found the following: 1. There is approximately 20 feet between the property line and the curb line of Lyndale Avenue. All plant- ings will be at least 10 feet from the existing side- walk. Sufficient snow storage space will be retain- ed. 2. Lyndale Avenue has recently been improved, so any need to use the portion of the right -of -way proposed for the planting for public, purposes, is unlikely. 3. A portion of the new shrubs would be within the corner visibility triangle. These plantings would have to be maintained so that they do not obstruct vision between the height of 2 and 1/2 and 10 feet above the adjacent streets. The applicant has agreed to alter the plan to insure that corner visibility is maintained. 4. The applicant has signed an agreement holding the city harmless from damages in a number of situations. A copy of this agreement is also attached. It is recommended that the city council approve the proposed use of the Lyndale Avenue right -of -way for landscaping purposes, and authorize the Mayor to execute the hold harmless agreement on behalf of the city. 'Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: City Attorney Community Development Director • C • �j Cam cs PlAi 14 . �.Irjj •&k\0 �p � \b I 1.11 I -j <z ku A L?l AGREEMENT THIS AGREZZMENT, made and entered into this day of 1982, by and between the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter "city" and Gerald R. Marquardt, hereinafter "Permittee ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Pe=4 ttee is owner of the parcel or tract of land legally described as: Lots 1 and 2, Stock 1, Irwin Shores No. 2 and WHEREAS, the Permittee is desirous of utilizing a part of the unimproved portion of Lyndale Avenue, for landscaping purposes; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to permit such use based upon the conditions hereinafter contained, NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed by and between the parties as follows: I. City hereby grants permission to Permittee the right to use for landscaping -,•zpcses the following portion of Lyndale Avenue (hereinafter referred to as subject property). All that portion of Lyndale Avenue abutting the above described Property and lying between the.east property line of the above des- cribed property and a line 10 feet west of the sidewalk included in the foregoing legal description. 2. In the event that the Citv shall need to use the subject area for roadway or other public purposes at any time, the permission granted in paragraph one (1) above, shall terminate upon thirty (30) days written notice by the C'_ty to the Permittee. The Permittee shall not erect or permit the erection or -2- construction of any improvements on the subject area, except land- scaping which is hereby permitted, without prior written approval by the City. 4 All improvements constructed or placed in the subject area by the Permittee shall be removed upon the termination of this per- mission. The Permittee shall make no claim against the City for the value of any improvement which is affected by the termination of the Permission herein granted. 5. Permittee agrees to indemnify the City and save it harmless against any claims, actions, causes of action or costs or expenses of defending the same, arising out of or by reason of the granting of this permit or by reason of the use or occupancy of the City's right -of -way pursuant to the permission herein granted. 6. The City shall not be held liable by the Permittee or any representative thereof, for damages to improvements on subject prop- erty, caused by cleaning, snow removal or any other maintenance ac- tivity by the City. 7. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the bene- fit of the parties and their heirs, successors and assigns. ITT TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA By John Hamilton Its Mayor Gerald R. Marquardt \ -; i: 2 � iC_..' CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 293 Agenda September 27,1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Purchases in Excess $2,500 The city charter stipulates that the city council must auth- orize the purchase of all merchandise, materials, construction or equipment when the amount exceeds $2,500. There are three such items on the council agenda of September 27, 1982. Vestibules One of the items included in the energy improvement capital project is vestibule entrances for the lower level of city hall. Two written quotations were received for installation of vesti- bule entrances underneath the existing canopies on the three doors. Gopher Glass quoted $9,590. It is recommended that the city council authorize the purchase from Harmon Glass and Glazing, Inc. in the amount of $9,165.00. Liquid Carbon Dioxide The City of Richfield combines with other municipalities such as Minneapolis, to receive formal bids for liquid carbon di- oxide, a chemical used in the treatment and softening of water. Richfield has typically used 200 tons per year. Bidding was based on furnishing the chemical for the period of November 1, 1982 through October 31, 1983. This essentially becomes a master purchase order for the budget year 1983. Under the cooperative bid agreement, it is necessary for the city council to take action to accept the lowest -bid by a responsible bidder. It is recommended that the city council accept the bid sub- mitted by Cardex Division of the Chemtrom Corporation in the amount of $54 /ton, FOB destination, with no cash discount, and authorize the purchase of an estimated 200 tons, for a total 1983 purchase price of $10,800. Overhead Doors The energy improvements capital project includes the install- ation of insulated overhead doors for the public safety facility. Council Letter No. 293 -2- September 27, 1982 Two written quotations were for the fire station on the level of the police part of Co. quoted $6,870. It is ri authorize the purchase from amount of $6,706. received for the six doors, three upper level, and three for the lower the building. Twin City Garage Door 2commended that the city council Steel Structures, Inc., in the Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Community Services Director Public Safety Director Finance Coordinator KN /ej a CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 292 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Inspectional Services Contract with the City of Bloomington As council members may recall, Richfield presently provides our food service inspections and certain of our building inspec- tion programs under three separate contractual arrangements. The food service inspections are provided by a private contract san- itarian. Overview and management of the food service inspection program is provided under a contract with the Bloomington Depart- ment of Inspections. The City of Richfield now employs two building inspectors whose services, under a third contract arrange- ment, are sold to the City of Bloomington in the equivalent of three - quarters of these two inspectors. During the council discussion of the 1983 Public Safety De- partment budget, we discussed the fact that the staff was review- ing all three of these contracts in an attempt to maximize the benefit to the city of our contractual services approach to food and building inspection services `We We have now completed negotia- tions with the City of Bloomington which will consolidate the three separate contracts we now have into a single contract for services between the cities of Richfield and Bloomington. Under the newly negotiated contract, Bloomington will continue to pro- vide management overview for our food service inspection program, as well as providing the actual food service inspections of our retail food and restaurant establishments. In the area of build- ing inspections, we have negotiated a program where one of our two building inspectors will become an employee of the City of Bloomington. In turn, we will purchase back the equivalent of one -half time building inspector to work in the City of Rich- field. The net effect of these changes, and the development of a single consolidated contract for these services, will enable the City of Richfield to provide a somewhat higher level of both food and building inspection services at no significant change in cost. Presently, the programs involved in this contractual Council Letter No. 292 -2- arrangement have a cost of $63,195, adjusted for 1983 dollars. The single contract we have negotiated with the City of Bloom- ington will provide all of the present services, in addition to some expanded levels of service for 1983. The 1983 cost of this new single contract program will be $63,875, or a net in- crease of $680 over the present cost. The advantage to the City of Richfield in the new single contract program with the City of Bloomington is that fact that we will be receiving a higher level of both food and building inspection services at essentially the same cost. Under our present contractual arrangement, we are selling the equivalent of three - quarters of our two building inspectors to Bloomington and retaining the equivalent of one and one - quarter building in- spectors to serve the City of Richfield. The new contract pro- vision would provide for Richfield to retain one full -time build- ing inspector and receive the services of an equivalent half -time building inspector from the City of Bloomington. Therefore, our inspection time availability would increase. Additionally, be- cause of the contractual arrangement to purchase the equivalent of a half -time building inspector from the City of Bloomington, we will, in effect, be able to divide that time into a variety of building inspection specialities. This will greatly enhance our ability to provide a more comprehensive building inspection program to meet the needs of our community. With regard to the food service inspection program, the new contract will provide a much more efficient process to meet this important community responsibility. By consoldiating both the management of the food service program, as well as the field in- spections, we will be able to spend less staff time in coordina- ting these two activities. Additionally, since Bloomington has three food inspectors on their staff, we will have access to a broader range of specialities than_ -we have under our present arrangement of contracting with 'a single private party for this service. Under this arrangement with Bloomington, we will also be able to provide our restaurant operators with some important health training programs for the restaurant staffs in our commun- ity. This will be similar to the programs the Bloomington staff presently provides for restaurants in Bloomington. This should be a significant added service for the Richfield restaurant own- ers, as well as a significant preventative program with regard to food borne illnesses. We are confident that the new contractual arrangement with the City of Bloomington will provide a higher level and a broader variety of both building inspection and food inspection services for our community, with no significant increase in cost. It is the recommendation of the Public Safety Director, in which I concur, that the city council authorize the Mayor and City Man- ager to execute the attached contract. Respectfully submitted, ` � ���. Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Public Safety Director City Attorney • • 0 AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this day of , 1982, by and between the City of Richfield (hereinafter "Richfield ") and the City of Bloomington ( "Bloomington "), WITNESSETH: In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth below, the above parties hereto agree as follows: I. The period of this agreement shall be from November 1, 1982, through October 31, 1983, unless termination occurs. 2. For the period of this agreement, Bloomington shall provide Richfield with the following services, in and on behalf of Richfield: a. Plumbing inspections and code enforcement as necessary. b. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning inspections and code enforcement as necessary. c. Food service inspections and code enforcement as necessary (a minimum of two inspections will be done of all restaurants and at least one inspection will be done of all grocery stores). 3. Bloomington shall have control over the manner in which the inspections and code enforcement activities are conducted and over the determination of what enforcement action is appro- priate. 4. Bloomington shall assume the expense of performing the inspections and code enforcement. 5. Richfield shall pay Bloomington the sum of $31,000 for services provided pursuant to this agreement. One -half of this amount shall be due on May 1, 1983, and the remainder shall be due on October 31,-1983. 6. This agreement shall terminate as follows: a. Upon the expiration of 30 days after service of written notice upon the other party; or b. at any time, upon the agreement of the parties; or C. in any event, on October 31, 1983. 7. In the event of a termination prior to October 31, 1983, a pro rata reduction of the compensation owed by Richfield to Bloomington shall occur which reflects the period remaining on the agreement at the time of termination. S. Bloomington agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harm- less Richfield, its officers, agents and employees from all actions, liability and damages for property damage, personal injury or death a resulting from the acts, omissions or neglect of Bloomington's employees relating to the performance of its obligations hereunder. e .i 9. Any employee assigned by Bloomington to perform its obligations hereunder shall remain the exclusive employee of Bloomington for all purposes including, but not limited to, wages, salary and employee benefits. To the extent required by law, Bloomington shall secure written options from its employees elect- ing to remain in the various wage and benefit plans of Bloomington. Upon proper execution, this CITY OF RICHFIELD 'Agreement shall be a legal and binding obligation upon the City of Bloomington. - - By: Its Mayor City Attorney -sue By: Its City Manager CITY OF BLOOMINGTON By: Its Mayor By: Its City Manager I N. CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT Whereas, the Cities of Richfield and Bloomington are parties to an agreement dated February 16, 1982, by which cer- tain Richfield employees were loaned to Bloomington and by which Bloomington agreed to perform certain services for Richfield; and 0 Whereas, that agreement provides for cancellation upon mutual agreement of the parties; and Whereas, the parties desire to cancel that agreement and enter into a new agreement; NOW THEREFORE, the Cities of Bloomington and Richfield hereby cancel the aforesaid agreement, effective upon the date on which the cancellation has been approved by the City Councils of both cities. CITY OF RICHFIELD By: Its Mayor Date Cancellation Approved: - .:,By: Its City Manager CITY OF BLOOMINGTON Date Cancellation Approved: By: Its Mayor By: Its City Manager -:g 7 � CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 291 September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Canvass of Election Attached to this council letter is a resolution providing for canvass of the results of the statewide priraar-y election on September 14, 1982. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution, certifying these election results. Respectfully submitted, LL- '�J'L' Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: City Clerk KN /eja RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DETERMINING RESULTS OF STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION, IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, HELD ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1982. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the council having re- ceived and considered the tally of votes by the judges of the primary election held September 14, 1982, the results are determined to be as follows: Votes cast for Candidates: U.S. Senate: Mary Jane Rachner (R) . . . . 155 Dave Durenberger (R) . . . .2754 Charles E. Pearson (D) . . . . 173 William A. Branstner (D) . . . 130 Mark Dayton (D) . . . . .3743 Eugene McCarthy (D) . . . . . 927 U.S. Congress Fifth District: Keith W. Johnson (R) . . . . .2122 Martin Olav Sabo (D) . . . . .3243 Senate District 40: Richard Holt (R) . . . . . . . 870 Patrick A. Mazorol (R) . . . .1311 Michael 0. Freeman (D). . . .2603 Helen Yates (D) . . . . . . .2023 Representative District 40A: Steven 0. Lindgren (R) . . . .1925 James C. "Jim" Swanson (D). .2787 District 40B: Robert E. Lindgren (R) . . . . 369 Phil Riveness (D) . . . . . .-,21 Governor and Lieutenant Governor: Wheelock Whitney & Lauris Krenik (R) . . . . .1640 Harold E. Stassen & Rollin H. Crawford (R) . . . . 122 Lou Wangberg & James H. Lindau (R) .1224 E. W. Peterson & Christine 0. Peterson -(D) 255 Warren Spannaus & Carl Johnson (D) . . . . . . .2884 Rudy Perpich & Marlene Johnson (D) . . . . .2083 Secretary of State: Mark Hanson (R) . . . . . . .2315 Joan Anderson Growe (D) . . .4182 -2- State Treasurer: Bonn Clayton (R) . . . . . . . . .2347 Robert W.(Bob) Mattson (D) . . . .1743 Iry Stern (D) . 1791 John H. Allers (D) . . . . . . . . 721 Attorney General: Elliot Rothenberg (R) . . . .1575 Sharon (Scarrella) Anderson (R) .1086 Hubert H. "Skip" Humphrey III (D).4451 Sheriff: Harlan "H.J." Kemper. . . . . . . 174 Don Omodt . . . . . . . . . . . .2249 Jerry Schilz. . . . . . . . . . 832 Charles Stenvig . . . . . . . . .1149 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following list of judges were those certifying returns of said election: Shirley Gisselquist (D) Louise Carlson (R) Ilene Helen (R) R. Jean Rand (D) Helen Connolly (D) Pearl Stage (D) Ralph Roberts (R) Elayne Gilhousen (R) Mary Jane Suess (D) _llen Brandon (R) Jan Bray (D) Margaret Fleming (D) Jan Nunn (D) Ione Waller (R) Eloise Friend (R) Lois Awes (D) Rose Hoppenrath (R) John Gera (D) Lucille Brandell (R) Linda Bloomgren (D) Alice Dickinson (R) Dave Arnold (R) Catherine Alfano (D) Charles Fanning (R) Ethel Hommes (R) Matthew Kasinkas (D) Mary Lou Janco (D) Maxine Evans (D) Mary Morton (R) Wilbur Johnson (D) Philip Carney (D) Franc Gray (R) Phoebe Nelson (R) Beverly Stelman (D) Myrtle Lindgren (R) Barb Vinge (D) Esther Anderson (R) Betty Obenchain (D) Helen Peterson (D) Pat Brenner (D) Betty Halloran (R) Alice Strom (R) Jane B. Nelson (R) Rae Pritchard (R) Donna Vidas (R) Mabel Sanford (R) Bernadette Lais (R) Gladys Juengling (D) Muriel Bernstein (D) Pauline Huber (R) Marie Gera (D) Gertrude Herl (D) Joyce Rodeberg (R) Audrey Winslow (R) Ann Mullerleile (R) Lois Kovach (D) Pat Bunting (D) James Jungels (D) Corrine Cosgrove (D) Dolores Tester (R) Janice Anderson (R) Mary Ann Schindler (D) Shirley Comstock (R) Barb Cook (D) Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of September, 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 290 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Accessory Uses in Residential Zoning Districts. Second Reading. On September 13, 1982, the city council gave first reading approval-to an ordinance amendment which would correct a prob- lem with the residential section of the zoning ordinance. The principal uses in an R, Residence, district include schools, public recreational facilities, and churches. A necessary accessory use to these principal uses is off- street parking. However, off - street parking areas are not currently listed in the ordinance as permitted accessory uses. The ordinance amend- ment specifically lists off - street parking areas as permitted accessory uses. It is recommended that the city council conduct a public hearing on this matter, and then give second reading approval to the attached ordinance amendment:- Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Community Development Director City Planner .City--.Clerk KN /ej a AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III SECTION 3.30 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter III, Section 3.30 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield dealing with accessory uses in the "R" Residence District is hereby amended by amending subdivision 2, paragraph j., thereof to read as follows: (j) Parking areas and garages. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of y 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk �7 • • �y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 289 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Public Hearing Regarding Adoption of Assessment Roll on CP 765, Alley Maintenance The city council has scheduled a hearing to be held on Septem- ber 27, 1982 related to assessment for the cost of current mainten- ance services on alleys, for the period April 1, 1982 through March 31, 1982. The city clerk, with the assistance of the city engineer and the technical operations coordinator, calculated the proper amounts to be assessed against every assessable lot, piece or par- cel of land specially benefited. The proposed assessment was prop- erly filed with the city clerk, notice was duly published and not- ices were mailed to the owner of each parcel described in the assess- ment roll. The cost of current maintenance services for this period totaled $28,158.52, and include labor, material and equipment re- lated to alley patching. Due to the volume of the material, the assessment roll is not included in the council packet, but a copy of the assessment roll for alley maintenance April 1, 1982 through Narch 31, 1982 will be available for,council reference and review at the September 27, 1982 public hearing. Serving as a reference at this time, it is noted that: High assessment for parcel: $156.09 (6301 Penn) Low assessment for parcel 4.10 (6428 Emerson) High assessment for alley: $971.58 (Penn- Oliver, 63 -64) Low assessment for alley 61.41 (James- Irving, 63 -64) Total assessment- $28,15 '8.52 75 alleys = $375.45/alley average $28,158.52 = 71,837.73 total footage = $39.1973�/foot average $.391973 x 50' foot = $19.59865 average per 50' parcel As of this time, the city staff has received one written and eleven verbal objections to the assessment. Of the eleven verbal objections received, the staff would recommend complete abatement of two assessments and reduction of a third. The two recommended to be abated are at 6301 Dupont and 6300 Colfax, properties that are on a grass type alley which received no patching type mainten- ance. There is another alley in this block that did receive main- tenance, but these two properties do not abut this alley which was Council Letter No. 289 -2- September 27, 1962 maintained. A reduction is recommended for 6336 Oliver Avenue. The alley in this block is a stub type alley with only a portion, an estimated half, of the property at 6336 Oliver abutting the alley. The assessment was calculated for the full alley footage and the recommendation would reduce the assessment to be calculated only on that portion of the property abutting the alley. Of the other objections, one was that the property owner at 1305 East 66th Street received notification of assessment for this property as well as the property at 1301 East 66th Street. The error was noted, corrected and the property owner of 1301 East 66th Street was notif- ied of the assessment. The remaining seven objections were of a general complaint nature, related to use or access of the alley, type of work performed, and cost of maintenance. It is the staff recommendation that no adjustment be made for parcels at 6745 Harriet Avenue, 6320 Logan, 6336 Thomas, 6636 Grand, 14 East 69th Street, 6800 Penn or 6310 Queen. The city staff will be available at the hearing to answer questions related to the special assessment for current services that may not have been raised prior to the hearing. The public hearing provides an oppor- tunity to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment. It should be noted that the alley assessment practice for repair of alleys was a council decision in 1981 coupled with the alley construction assessment practice. One -third of the alleys in Richfield have now been constructed with permanent concrete. Special assessments for alley maintenance were made on the basis each front foot of assessable property abutting a given alley being assessed an equal amount, without regard to valuation. The total cost per alley was determined on the labor, equipment, mater- ials and related charges directly pertaining to a given alley. This is the first hearing related to assessment of alley main- tenance costs. This first period includes costs for alley patching only. The second assessment period, April 1, 1902 through March 31, 1982, is now in effect and will include not only alley patching, but also snowplowing. Since the assessment period for this hearing is April 1, 1982 to 14arch 31, 1982, there is the possibility that persons now being assessed did not own the property when the services were provided. The uncertainty of the amount of the assessment as well as the volume of the assessments make the filing of pending assessments early in the year very difficult. It is suggested that property owners who can document that the property changed hands after.January 1, 1982, be relieved of the assessment. The city ordinance provides that special assessments for current services may be certified to the county auditor for collection along with current taxes. This certification may provide that the special assessments be completely paid either in the first ten years or in up to ten annual installments. However, it is recommend- ed that the certification adopted by the city council provide that payments be due and payable within the first year rather than in installments. The adopted assessment roll for the period April 1, Council Letter No. 289 -3- September 27, 1982 1981 through March 31, 1982, will be certified to the county auditor by October 8, 1982. The city has the right to charge in- terest on the amount assessed, in that the city provided the funds initially for the current services. It is the recommendation of the staff that the interest rate be established at 8 percent, the maximum permitted by law. This policy was followed with the spec- ial assessment for current services for L /H /N maintenance. A property owner may make payment by November 15, 1982 in order to avoid interest payments. Payments made after that date, up to December 31, 1983, would include an interest payment. Following the hearing, it is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution. The city council may make changes in the assessment roll as a result of the hearing by adding the phrase "and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just." Respectfully submitted, 6)� AIL,,�Y_ , , Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Community Services Director Community Development Director City Engineer Finance Coordinator RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON CITY PROJECT 765, ALLEY MAIN- TENANCE FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 1981 THROUGH MARCH 31, 1982 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current services related to maintenance of alleys in the City of Richfield. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota as follows: 1. Such proposed assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto-and a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall con- stitute the special assessment against the lands named there- in, and each tract of land therein.included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current services in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable before or during 1933 and shall bear interest at the rate of 3 percent from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay whole of the assessment on such property to the city treasurer and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with in- terest accrued to December 31 of the year in which payment is made.. Such payment must be made before November 15 or in- terest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of September, 1962., John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk ALLEY MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALLS: CO11PLAINTS Earl Maffett, 6745 Harriet - general complaints John Hakel, 6320 Logan Avenue - absolutely cannot use alley because of terrain Kenneth Severson, 6836 Thomas - complained about sweeping Mr. Akimoto, 1305 E. 66th Street - error in assessment notice Mrs. Lund, 6636 Grand - does not use alley Mary Egger, 14 E. 69th Street - has no access to, and does not use alley Jean Pfleiderer, 6301 Dupont - not an alley, just grass (no assessment recommended, there is no alley there) Stan Winsness, 6336 Oliver - alley 40' not 80' (1/2 of lot not on alley) Howard Olson, 6800 Penn - excessive cost due to few lots (actual cost) Woodrow Johnson, 6810 Queen - excessive cost Sherie Christiansen, 6300 Colfax - not an alley, grass lot (no assess- ment is recommended, there is no alley there) Written Complaint - Claude Clough, 6637 Thomas Avenue (copy attached) Letter also signed by residents of 6632 Sheridan, 6628 Sheridan, 6629 Thomas, 6636 Sheridan, 6640 Sheridan, 6633 Thomas Avenue, 6624 Sheridan, 6620 Sheridan, 6613 Thomas Avenue, 6617 Thomas Avenue and 6645 Thomas. INFORMATION ONLY CALLS Mrs. Wheeler, 6315 Dupont Dave Loroziok, 6540 Emerson Floyd Skada, 6713 Sheridan Cathy Weber, 67 "17 Queen Carl Enestvedt, 6705 Sheridan Carol Nelson, 6916 Russell Francis Oag, 6601 4th Avenue Lorraine Baggenstoss, 6345 Russell Don 114aki, 6920 Queen Arthur Lacher, 6936 Penn J. Fowler, 6916 Penn Mrs. Hensler, 6909 Upton Mr. Armstrong, 6632 Vincent Ethel Johnson, 6533 Girard Avenue Air. Zadel, 7201 Harriet Avenue Resident, 6712 Sheridan Avenue Walter Anderson, 6306 Irving Avenue Mrs. Kane, 6720 Russell Avenue Felix LaValle, 7225 Harriet Louis Harding, 6414 Harriet sE ' z.o , t l g° 7- C-L AvDE CLZU c� 0 (,e 3? Tt+o+- vk s so . R `c6F I�t.D1 55 A-'L 3 c I TY CF co-Ioo �otZ� L�u� So , 1 CR Fi ELI> ATr C-Ily CLE�tt, -� Sy�.YtA K. �ERC� DEAR t-i5. 8 C-R Gj , M wove D L,t K4E T® T1-�E cI-ty c aQ etc. c Lr a EFoR.E OR SENT'• z°i Sr z FoR, T!*15ik Cat�1 StDC- f�r411 ®t�. L FEE- L., THE SPEC l,4 L. A S S E ss HEAT o t= fsa t3-z- ACIA I AST KY PRa PE7R.Ty I'S A 81T - 14 tCt A FOR AL�C-y MAINTERA xcE AFP,\L.. 11 t 98 1 T� t2o � Cc M k� R.c-t� 31 t I � 8 z.. • Rl-,-PAIRZ of AL.LE',15 1RCL.VDtwi Soct-4 w., o P-V--, AS CLr.-A(- t NCB oil o f PoT Ro (-es) coc-D I NCB ROCC -16, Ct RA D t RC- , 4A D Sup EEP I qC, AS L C AN D SEV15RA L, o t= Mkt -nRIEF A y — 74o o-t v�-s - s Re-R l bAg , (Q (e - (p -7 ST. w A s I ge4 E R ko orst N CZ RA► D iE�Q1) 1 N S IEZA D t T wa S T}k E PoT t+o L. es S-Mo D b t fl W LAST • (T1kE A LLEy & E 11JC -j t-tc S NL�,V S AN9 A wk C%% Pti i C� -r-1 -L AC-1 RE E ) A F C- u L.D Pi i D Fa P.- TEA ! s t-t t rib k slz� pl*-y 1 C-E Pfko PE K-N o w �-zC- R o v PQ A ?A 10 -2-0 - oo EACH P Ro I'E -R.'C I S 5 i Tk-�E 7o-i14L wool D gE X440 , eo 0 A cc_a tZ fl t 9 C`t To yo u k" o F F t C (A L. P U a t CA<Tib9 Co v rs`T -7 S ALLEY -S) 4M 0 is -rAL.. Co S T Ac L LC- y S 4N'14 E A 8o u T PRo t R~T 1� s �lv p ►.10 -' T ALLEYS Ps B b u-T tZ 6F F P M ''-,EPCT-x E S FOR, A L�L -7-S A L.LEY S, THE M,A nA LooKS UltE7 Tlkt 5 , Zo (N E ZPIEf TIES) oo . ( PE:K PRO P2Zy) A 'Y S (AULEy s` = 430/. 000 , I Cc 1 TRIe A kt o o o T p �• F'1clukr -o you.42 WAO�ACASSv! (N3Cl AVER%►ONE- w S sSNLT "r �E S& v-CC LL AC S .3 �3a 1, 9�c►4�� t4 LJoc� EL.S L. t tt.� �} t S ; Zo CPRo�ERi° �C-s� x3o 3Z CI' �t�P•) Z 5L��ys �¢53 4-8-0, oo -- —� (`( 3 2- CoCp Cleft. -me r � >�o � N.T o w E D • _ Ss t 1JC-q S o H E: Tel i 1N F 5o , 7-1:' woc)LO APP RECI rd�TE A 1�- 'ETt�tZyG'?LAN P<i 1 Ott 'fit•( My ��t_L • A P C-S t O E 9TH A&4*z &4-�k a�l L yip Slo L7, f7 Lj 41- CZ's r \1 T F N vA k--,- y T�k'E� 'A�( 1. w5tclt� SORS ujN�o Fe:eL TRS(fz, P%SSF,55maq-1 1 T== AND w4i-zT�D 7-b I kCLUDED w t Tkk Ttfl cm' k- e-R ER,. H y N EF t Cz t- 136 k s o ry T 7-t+E t4,z LLE Y 7b 5C- O-L) (TE- A% S C- D L%J 7rk CE I R, iYF I 'R 1k N RID DC- L I q C-P, t W='( TtA 15 LEM Er P, -7c T"e C-ITY C-t--C-RK- SE-fT, 2-2- ) tct&-Z- CWC-C*ae:SDM PR (o R -7c) Tkkc- cc Q t.4 ct � H E-c- T-1 M Ef 5 ePT" Z1, 19 8 7- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 288 Agenda September 27, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf ield Council Members: Subject: Proclamation Declaring Richfield Wellness Week - October 3 through October 9, 1982 There is an item on the September 27, 1982 city council agenda providing for the designation of the Week of October 3, 1982 as-Richfield Wellness Week. A copy of the proclamation de- claring "Richfield Wellness Week" is attached. The week of October 3, 1982 has been designated as Wellness Week by Governor Quie, in an effort to create a greater awareness of the benefits of positive health habits and of the wellness concept. On Monday, October 4, 1982, Bloomington Public Health per- sonnel will conduct a wellness seminar for Richfield City em- ployees, which will include testing for blood pressure and glau- coma, as well as provide diptheria tetanus booster shots, and explore the wellness concept. It is recommended that the city council proclaim the week of October 3, 1982 as Richfield Wellness Week. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City ManaGer cc: Personnel Manager Department Directors WELLNESS WEEK PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, WeUne z in a concept that pnomo.tez a whoUiztic approach to ovenaU health, -inctud.ing phy4- icat and men.tat weft being, and WHEREAS, -there in an .incneazing awmenezz on the pant of ind.iv.iduatz of the need to assume gaea-teA ne- zponzib.iii-ty bon -their own weU being, and WHEREAS, health pnomo-t.ion and wettnesz are pAac.ti- ca.2, pnom.iz ing and bene6 iciat appnoachez to cunb.ing the Alz4ng costs of health cane, and WHEREAS, Covennon Qu.ie has pnoctaimed OctobeA 3, .through Oc.tobeA 9, 1982 as WeVnenz Week, and WHEREAS, the Btooming-ton Pubtic Heatth DepaA-tmen.t haz' developed and is cooAdina.t.ing an aneaw.ide pnezen-ta- .t.ion on the WeUne z Concept, and WHEREAS, R.ichj ietd has been invited to paA tic.ipate in the Weiinezz pnezen-ta.t.ionz by making .them ava.itabie to city empioyeez, and pnomo-te the WeZtnenz Concept. NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED, that 1, John Ham.i.Z.ton, Mayon of the City of R.ichi ietd, do hereby pnocia.im the week of Oc-toben 3 -through 9, 1982 to be RICHFIELD WELLNESS•WEEK DONE at the City of R.ich6ietd, Minnesota this 27th day of Sep.tembeA, 1982. John Hamitton Mayon