Loading...
09-08-80 agenda CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~~ C. Council Letter No. 330 Agenga September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Approval of Minutes, Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contract for Central Garage Remodeling Project The city garage remodeling is a multiphasic project. One of the items in this project is the addition to, and remodeling of, the south end of the facility. At the May 27, 1980 city council meeting, the council authorized preparation of final plans and specifications, and the solicitation of bids for this building addition. Funding for the project is available through Capital Improve- ment budget appropriations from the special revenue fund. It has been the intent of the city council and staff to complete as much as possible of the work on the project in 1980, with essentially only finishing work to complete in 1981. To accomplish this goal, it is recommended that $55,000 in the 1980 Capital Improvement bud- get funding for a sidewalk project be transferred to the 1980 fund- ing for the central garage project, and that the $55,000 scheduled in the Capital Improvement Program for the garage in 1981 be reas- signed at that time to the sidewalk project. On September 4,1.980, bids were opened for the addition and remodeling of the central garage facility. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulations is attached for city council review. The specifications call for an addition to the garage facility with all proposals to include an indication of calendar days from start to completion and submittal, on a lump sum basis, to furnish all materials, labor, skill, tools and equipment for the purpose of awarding a single construction contract, including all general, mechanical and electrical work. Finish work on the remodeling is to be provided by city staff personnel. The bidding has a good response, with nine contractors submit- ting proposals. .The estimate for the work was $60,000, as was noted in the council letter and action of P4ay 27, 1980. Henry O. Mikkelson Company, is the apparent low bidder with a proposal in the amount of $58,700 and 90 calendar days to completion.. Henry O. ~ti.kkelson Company has worked for the city on other projects and it is the opinion of the staff and the architect that the bid proposal sub- mitted by this contractor is excellent. With the transfer of funds, sufficient monies will be available in the project for award of this contract. Council Letter No. 330 -2- September 8, 1980 i ~. It is recommended that the city council take the following actions 1. Accept the bid minutes and tabulations for the Richfield Municipal Garage addition and remodeling project. 2. Adopt the attached resolution transferring special revenue monies currently assigned to the sidewalk project to the central garage remodeling project. 3. Approve the low bid of Henry O. Niikkelson Company in the amount of $58,700, and authorize the Dlayor and City Manager to execute the contract documents. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Services Director Finance Coordinator RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING SPECIAL REVENUE MONIES FROM CITY PROJECT N0. 727 TO CITY PROJECT NO. 692 WHEREAS, Transitory Ordinance No. 16.64 provided $55,000 to be allocated to City Project No. 727, and WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best interest of the city to transfer $55,000 of special revenue monies from City Project No. 727 to City Project No. 692, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city staff is author- ized and directed to transfer $55,000 in special revenue funding from City Project No. 727 to City Project No. 692. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of September, 1980. Donald J. Priebe, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening September 4, 1980 Addition and Remodeling Richfield Municipal Garage Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Sylvia Burgh, Acting City Cler, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the Addition and Remodeling of the Richfield Municipal Garage as advertised in the official newspaper on August 27, 1980. Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director Marshal Raaen, Technical Services Supervisor Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER AND BID SECURITY BASE BID NUMBER OF DAYS ABJ Enterprises, Inc. B B 5% $68, 198 120 _ Action Construction Co., Inc. B.B 5% $69, 369 10 C. 0. Field Co. B B 5% $71, 300 110 Construction General, Inc. B B 5% $87, 900 150 G. G. Kranz & Sons, Inc. B B 5% $62, 700 90 Henry 0. Mikkelson Co. B B 5% $58, 700 90 Kloster - Madsen, Inc. B g 5% $67, 190 90 Knutson Construction Co. B B 5% $69, 074 120 Norman T. Berglund Construction Co. B.B. 5% _$.63, 397 120 The Acting City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the regular city council meeting of September 8, 1980. Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk /6 Q t CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 329 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Certification of Delinquent Sewer and Water Utility Accounts There is a resolution on the September 8, 1980 city council agenda designating the annual accumulation of unpaid sewer and water utility accounts. Although the Richfield utility ordinance places unpaid water and sewer charges as a lien against the property, some homeowners have traditionally chosen to have the charges certified and included in their annual property tax billing. A $10.00 Certification Charge (preparation for certification to taxes of delinquent accounts) shall be charged against each delinquent account as authorized by Ordin- ance 8.12 subd. 12. The attached resolution represents those delinquent accounts which have occurred from August 30, 1979 through August 30, 1980. It is recommended that the city council adopt this resolution certi- fying delinquent water and sewer accounts. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Finance Coordinator i RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING UNPAID SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CHARGES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO BE COLLECTED WITH OTHER TAXES ON SAID PROPERTIES WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 8.23 establishes rules, rates and charges for water service in the City of Richfield, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 44.075, Subd. 3, provides that all delinquent water service ck~arges not paid may be certified to the County Auditor with the taxes against such property, and shall be collected with other taxes on such property, and WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 8.12 establishes rules, rates and charges for sanitary sewer service in the City of Richfield, and WHEREAS, Subd, 12 thereof provides that all sewer service charges not paid within fifteen (15) days after the quarterly due date may be certified to the County Auditor with taxes against such property, and shall be collected with other taxes on such property, and WHEREAS, an assessment roll has been prepared specifying the amounts which shall be certified against each particular property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, that 1.~ There is hereby determined to be a total uncollected amount for water and sanitary sewer service of $46,773.00 2. That a $10.00 Certification Charge shall be levied against each delinquent account; such charges totaling $7,620.00 3. That such amount is hereby certified to the County Auditor for collection with other taxes on said properties. 4. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin County Auditor. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of September, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City clerk ~t i3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Y Council Letter No. 328 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Resolution Relating to Airport System There is an item on the September 8, 1980 city council agenda providing for council consideration of endorsement of a resolution recommended by the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council. A copy of this resolution is attached. This resolution was considered and adopted by MASAC at their ~` August, 1980 meeting. -.~ --$asically, the resolution expresses the cancern of MASAC, ~r and other agencies supporting the resolutions-nth a ~ee-e-rrt a~k'~''~ ~~~~ a~-t~~y~t~ire-M~tr_opQ_litan Airports Comm.ia~ion to designate ~~ =` the Anoka County Airport as a minor role facility. The designa- r'' tion of airport classification relates to future funding possi- bilities which may be available for development of various airports within the Metropolitan Airports System. The resolu- tion supports designation of the Anoka County Airport as an in- termediate facility, which would enable it to be further devel- oped, to some extent, to meet excess needs of the aviation net- work in the metropolitan area. Designation and establishment of such an intermediate facility could have some long-range possibilities for diverting aircraft operations from the met- tropolitan airport facility, and thus limiting the noise impact of those aircraft operations on Richfield. ~ .~ ~ ,i 'i~tre- M~o~~nd Coune-l-Member- Luettinger represent Richfield on MASAC and can address this matter further at the council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja ,~ t Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (~ ~~ 6040 28th Avenue South / ~ \ I M~nnea;?a~s - Sant Pa u~ ~me~na! ona: A roor! r ~ 1 i f1\ J \ / ~ STANLEY W OLSON Cnai~man \ ~ / ~ X969-1979 M~nneapo~~s M~nnesora 55450 5!2 '~6.g4,. JAN DEL CALZO. Chairperson RESOLUT{ON N0. 1-80 WHEREAS, the Metropolita~~ Aircraft Sound Abatement Council, a joint citizen/ user advisory group to the Metropolitan Airports Commission on environmental matters has continuously studied methods of reducing aircraft noise impact; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council is tide longest standing joint advisory group of its kind in the Country and has established a national reputation for its constructive achievements in dealing with aircraft noise related problems; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council strongly supports the concept of a secondary reliever airport system to serve as a reliever to the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport guaranteeing the viability of Inter- national as an air carrier facility; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council recognizes the need for a system of reliever airports in the Twin Cities metropolitan area to meet the needs of air carriers, business operators, and private aviation activities; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council has implemented programs to reduce aircraft noise impact for the benefit of the majority of persons residing near Metropolitan Airports Commission system airports; and WHEREAS, the growth of general aviation in the Twin Cities metropolitan area has continuously grown requiring a system of reliever airports to reduce pressures on Minneapolis/St. Paul International; and WHEREAS, the Anoka County Airport is the only facility capable of limited development to meet the increased aviation needs of the northern metropolitan area communities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council strongly objects to the designation of the Anoka County Airport as a perman- ent minor role facility limiting the airport's regional potential in meeting the needs of general aviation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council strongly objects to the downgrading of the Anoka County Airport as a secondary reliever airport to the disadvantage of the metropolitan system of airports for the purpose of serving the parochial interests of one community, r RESOLUTION N0. 1-80 (cont.) -2- t BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the .Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council strongly urges the Legislature of the State of Minnesota to permit the appropriate development of the Metropolitan Airports Commission systems of airports as outlined in the Metropolitan Council Development Guide to meet the needs of the metropolitan area as a whole by designating the Anoka County Airport as an intermediate facility. Passed this day of 1980• APPROVED: Chairperson Technical Advisor ATTEST: Secretary . ~s'~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 327 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Amendment to Off-Street Parking Permit Lyndale Hardware At the August 25, 1980 city council meeting, the city council approved an off-street parking layout for the Lyndale Hardware Store. Mr. John Sief, representing 5 & M Corporation, owners of the Lyndale Hardware Store, has subsequently requested that the off-street park- ing permit be amended to allow the construction of an additional 2,331 square feet of office space to the second floor of the bu7_d- ing. This additional space will he occupied by three additional tenants. No changes in the size or design of_ the parking lot are proposed. The parking lot approved by the city council provided 100 off- street parking spaces. City off-street parking guidelines indicate that for the existing 26,433 square foot building, 133 spaces would be required. It would require 12 additional spaces for the addition- al 2,331 square feet of office space. Since no new spaces are prop- osed, the total development will be 45 spaces short of the number of spaces required by city guidelines. It is the opinion of the staff that this shortage could lead t.o parking problems during peak busi- ness periods. This off-street parking shortage could be made worse when on-street parking spaces are eliminated on Lyndale Avenue. When the Lyndale Hardware lot is full, customers will park in off- street parking spaces owned by adjacent businesses, which would possibly have a negative impact on adjacent property owners. It is the staff's opinion that, because of the problems dis- cussed above, a minimum of 12 additional off-street parking spaces should be provided. Alternative methods for providing such addi- tional off-street parking spaces are as follows: 1. Lyndale Hardware could purchase additional land to provide more parking This is an unlikely possibility, as adjacent property is slated for other uses in the L/H/N Redevelopment Plan. i Council Letter No. 327 -2- September 8, 1980 2. Lyndale Hardware could enter into a shared parking agreement with adjacent property owners to make addi- tional parking available to Lyndale Hardware customers. The total number of spaces available would have to be sufficient for all parties covered under the agreement. It is the staff's opinion that a sufficient number of spaces would still not exist under this option. 3. Lyndale Hardware could petition to vacate Circle Place. Currently, 16 parking spaces exist along Circle Place. Lyndale Hardware would only gain half of the right-of- way (30 feet) if Circle Place were vacated. According to city guidelines, 44 feet would be necessary to provide 20 foot deep parking spaces and a 24-foot wide driving aisle. The city may want to maintain public access on Circle Place for future development in the area. If the street were vacated, an access easement could be maintained to assure such access. A variation of this alternative would be to vacate only the north 26 feet of Circle Place. This would provide space for 16 additional spaces and a sidewalk along the building. The remain- ing 34 feet of right-of-way would provide a sufficient driving aisle, and would maintain access for future development. 4. The city could develop a parking lot as indicated in the redevelopment plan on the three lots west of the building now occupied by Star Auto. Such a lot could provide approximately 50 additional spaces for businesses in the area. The development of such a lot is questionable, and at least a year away. This alternative would not solve the immediate parking shortage for Lyndale Hardware. It is recommended that the city council approve the amendment to the off-street parking permit with the stipulation that Lyndale Hardware provide a minimum of 12 additional off-street parking spaces. It is further recommended that Lyndale Hardware should proceed to petition for vacation of the north 26 feet of Circle Place to accomplish this. Respectfully submitted, ;' Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA office of City Manager Council Letter No. 326 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Approval of Phase II, Hub PUD Final Development Plan: Hub Shopping Center Property, Special Use Permit, Offstreet Parking Permit and Vacation of a portion of Pillsbury Avenue History On February 12, 1979, the city council approved a preliminary plat, PUD plan and rezoning for the Hub/Summit/Penny's PUD. The PUD plan indicated that the development would be completed in four phases, with each property owner responsible for the improvements to be undertaken oh their property. At that time, the council also considered a request for the vacation of Pillsbury Avenue between 65th Street and 66th Street. The council delayed setting a public hearing on the proposed street vacation until one of the following events occurred: 1. Issuance by the city, pursuant to an application and the filing of a final development plan by Penny's Super Diarket, Inc., or United National Corporation with respect to its own property, of a special use permit allowing development pursuant-. to a final development plan covering: a) the proposed North Addition; or b) the proposed Market Addition; or c) the proposed Financial Institution/office building 2. The elapsing of two and one-half years after the effective date of the rezoning to FC-2, or 3. A joint request by Penny's Super Market, Inc. and United National Corporation that the hearing be scheduled at an earlier date. On August 13, 1979, the city council approved a final develop- ment plan, special use permit and offstreet parking permit for the Phase I site and building improvements on the Hub Shopping Center property. United National Corporation is now requesting city council ap- proval of a final development plan, special use permit, and offstreet ~ parking permit to allow them to complete Phase II site and building improvement work on their property. Council Letter No. 326 -2- September 8, 1980 Proposal Improvements which United National Corporation are proposing to construct in this phase include the following: 1. Building improvements will consist of the construction of a new freestanding restaurant in the south parking lot approximately 106 feet east and 173 feet south of the shopping center. The res- taurant will be approximately 75 feet northeast of the Minnesota Federal Building. The restaurant will be a Burger King restaurant with a seating capacity of 96. The restaurant will be integrated into the planned mall addition, when it is constructed in Phase III. The restaurant will be 39 feet by 98 feet and will have a height of one story. Building materials will be brick, wood and glass on the walls with a wood shingle roof. Landscaping will consist of juniper and red barberry in bark chip planting beds along the south and east sides of the building. 2. Concrete curbing and an eight foot wide sidewalk with handi- capped ramps and bomanite crosswalks will be constructed on the west side of the south parking lot. 3. A catch basin will be constructed in the southwest corner of the south parlcing iot. 4. Existing curbs on Pillsbury Avenue will be removed and pavement will be repaired. 5. Four new concrete curbed and landscaped end islands would be constructed in the northwest corner of the United National property. 6. Three light standards would be removed and replaced by two new light standards in the northwest corner of the United National property. 7. The parking area in the northwest corner of the United National property would be restriped as shown on the site plan. 8. A four foot concrete sidewalk would be constructed on the north side of the Korner Plaza store. 9. A low sign would be constructed in the southwest corner of the United National property and a pylon sign would be constructed on the north side of the United National property. Zoning and Other Ordinance Requirements 1. Section 3.34A, subdivision 5 of the zoning ordinance requires that, prior to commencement of any construction or development of the land, and after rezoning, an applicant shall submit a final develop- ment plan, consistent with the council-approved PUD plan, and an ap- plication for a special use permit for said development. A special use permit in conformance with the final development plan must be obtained before the PUD district can be devoted to the uses provided in such plan. In this case, the property owner must submit a final development plan and obtain a special use permit for development of the property for each phase of the overall Hub/Summit/Penny develop- ment. Council Letter No. 326 -3- September 8, 1980 2. Section 3.41 of the ordinance code requires that it be dem- onstrated that the development would not be detrimental to the public welfare, and Section 3.34A, subdivision 3 requires that development be coordinated with subdivision regulations. 3. Section 4.05 requires that an off-street parking permit must be obtained for parking areas in commercial zoning districts, and sets standards with which parking areas must comply. Council Stipulations on PUD Plan Phase I At the February 12, 1979 city council meeting, the council ap- proved the PUD plan, preliminary plat and rezoning, subject to stipu- lations which were agreed to by the developer. The developer, United National Corporation, was to incorporate these stipulations in the final development plan. The council's stipulations are: 1. That the plan be brought into compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet area; 2. That the parking lot be redesigned to effectively park and move traffic in accordance with design standards of the city and county. All driving aisles and access must be dimen- sioned on the plan; 3. That new signs must conform to the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Urban Design Guidelines as adopted by the city council; 4. That, if within the United National Corporation parking lot, cars are allowed to overhang public right-of-way, United National Corporation be responsible for replacement of any damaged city property; 5. That all transformers be protected as per city code and screened when visible to the public; 6. That a separate sanitary sewer line be provided for the kitchen waste at the proposed restaurant. This line should have a grease trap and interceptor to prevent grease from plugging the sanitary sewer line. 7. That an eight foot sidewalk be constructed at the rear of Korner Plaza. 8. That the unprotected light standards southwest of Korner Plaza be temporarily protected. 9. That end islands without trees be all concrete as per the Urban Design Guidelines. 10. That all end islands should be landscaped (trees) or concrete. Council Letter No. 326 -4- September 8, 1980 Staff Findings `l~he staff has reviewed the proposal and found the following: 1. That the vacation of Pillsbury Avenue between 65th Street and 66th Street would have to be accomplished before the site im- provements could be constructed, because they would be within the existing public right-of-way, 2. That the proposed final development plan is in substantial compliance with the PUD plan previously approved by the city council. The financial institution which was to be constructed in Phase II was constructed in Phase I and the restaurant which was to be con- structed in Phase I is now proposed to be constructed in Phase II. The size of the restaurant is 3130 square feet, which is 4870 square feet smaller than the restaurant approved as part of the PUD plan. This reduction in size will not be detrimental to the project or the general public welfare, however. The reduction in size results in an increased amount of parking available and increased building separation until construction of the mall addition. The setback from 66th Street will be the same as that for the restaurant approved as part of the PUD plan. 3. That the PUD plan stipulations will be met as follows: a. The plan conforms to the urban design guidelines. b. The final development plan indicates that all new signs will conform to the urban design guidelines. Sign details have not been provided as of yet, however. c. No parking will overhang public right-of-way. d. One transformer pad will be constructed in Phase II, and will be screened from 66th Street. It will be visible from the Hub center. It will be completely screened from the public when the mall addition is constructed. In the interim, the transformer should be protected from damage by automobiles. e. A separate sanitary sewer line, grease trap and in- terceptor will be provided as required by the city. f. The final development plan indicates that only a four foot sidewalk will be provided. An eight foot sidewalk would leave only a 22 foot driving aisle, which is two feet under the minimum required by city guidelines. A six foot sidewalk would provide a sufficient driving aisle and additional pedestrian space. United National Corporation has indicated that they would provide a six foot sidewalk. g. The final development plan indicates that no light standard protection will be provided. United National Corporation has indicated that they will protect the light standard. h. All end islands constructed during Phase II will be either landscaped or of concrete. Council Letter No. 326 -5- September 8, 1980 4. The development will not meet the following off-street parking standards: a. Eighteen-foot deep parking stalls, instead of 24-foot deep stalls, are indicated along 65th Street, Pillsbury Avenue, adjacent to the Summit Bank property, adjacent to the financial institution, and adjacent to the driving aisle to the west curb cut on 65th Street. b. Twenty-two feet wide driving aisles, instead of 24-foot aisles are proposed in the western portion of the north parking lot. c. A twenty foot wide driving aisle is shown immediately north of the restaurant, instead of the twenty-four foot wide aisle required by city guidelines. It is the opinion of the staff that these departures from city off-street parking guidelines will not result in conditions which will be detrimental to the general public welfare. The departures are necessary to maximize the number of parking spaces available, and the dimensions provided should be sufficient due to the trend toward smaller cars. Staff Recommendations Based on review of this application, the staff would recommend the following: 1. That the city council approve the final development plan and special use permit subject to the following stipulations: a. That design details of all new signs should be approved by staff. b. That the transformer adjacent to the restaurant should be protected from automobiles. e. That a six-foot wide sidewalk should be provided at the rear of Korner Plaza. d. That an easement for buses to use vacated Pillsbury Avenue right-of-way be provided. e. That United National Corporation provide a performance bond or other acceptable security. 2. That the city council approve the off-street parking layout and authorize the city manager to execute an off-street parking agreement by passing the attached resolution. This approval should be subject to the stipulation that the site work to be constructed within the Pillsbury Avenue right-of-way shall not begin until after Pillsbury Avenue is vacated. 3. That the city council set October 13, 1980 as the public hearing to consider the vacation of Pillsbury Avenue between 65th Stree~. and 66th Street. Respectfully submitted, i ;..! i ~ ~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Community Development Director City Planner Y I ,, ~ ~ ~,G 0~ ~ : ~~ ~vov S 0 ~ ~ j _~ . _:~__ - -_ 6 a x : ! ~ \ - T-r_.:: ~3-r(.c- ~! 'f ;~.~ Ali '~ ~~~\ _ - .1 ~ I_'l LI ~lil)li~' ~~~ 15. L { i y _,i `~ ~•~ - -~ .~~~ t 5 / .~ ~_ _.~ ~ 3:, : L s :,, I ,_ _ _ C _ ~ - ~ 1.-~~sa- g~ - 1 ~~ _ ~iL~-Li. _._,__ _ ~~ a _ ~ - ~ 11~1:~~1'1~'01;1•lt•.~~Ts. I rr ~ l If ~~~( ~I I 9 ~ I g~ { .- ~- pr ~ f ~; ~ t - ~_ ~ - ~ ; - I I ~ I i ~ . _ ~~ ~, __ _ 6 • f I ~ ~ ~ ~~ I~ lx%~ >.y -Y/ ~` I ~L.fL-j~ \ I U I . = x~ e ~ II =~ '-- --~= - -- - I . \ ~---~-- !' \ ~ II ~ ~ ~q ~.~ I I I _ \ICOLI,Is'1' A~~3. . R It I i - ~--~'--------~---- ------- --- ~~--~~ z~-:~ _~_ I .v f-~ Roaa $o •9' 80 OCJ $$$~~j ppi of ~ • ~Z r ~~5 t ~ ~ „ . vv t' ~2 oz Ap ~ ~~ , ~ ~~ v ~ ~ j i~t 6~.. ~y` Ftl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~•F 6 ~ ~~ {{ ~ c (' Qp~ ~~{,i•t6 ~`~ ~~x`C t. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~4~ C E~j d 5 3 ~ ~; ~ p } ~.. d ga~4. I Y~ ~ 4~G ~ aa € .~ F~~r LF iii~ ~ ~] ~~ i~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ L 1 :4 q`- •~~F~ ~~ ~~t ~ f ` ,~ Y:g R ~ F r ~ s ~ ~ ~ t ~ S3; ,., .. ~.at~ tt8tt ~~ c.a.: ~ ~ ~i a, „fit • ~~ v 11~1111L-11~~~~ ~~ ~~~:===~i' ~ C~i:_y._ 1Y ~lJ ~~ ~~l)1)7'I'IO\ SI'1'T•. PI,A\ GRELIMMARY 'U~~~ ~ ^ ~,~a ~SSOC-u,->v._.. a ~' ~aeooa-oH Hoiss~nno~ - Ind (~~,,~~ rI X11_ ~ • ` ~_~~~S~U l~J©U~OC~J vlasauun.~ d-~9yH71M 'JNI}1 a.,.,. - ~Ni~ a~~anea_ ~~..N~~~~~d~~h~,~nhn Q „~~ - .:.~.:..._.--r -.r .. d ~ l R j R~ R~ l N ', i ~ ~ g S ~ 3 3 0~ - - ' 3 ~. N ~ ~~ ~ ~~- \ C ~ -]- of ~ h ~'i . - I _ ~I .' ,'~ I ~~ ~, _ __ - irv ~~. `` ~ L ~ X ~ , O E C ~ ~ : ~ a _ a ~ e"1 7L o 3 N iC J ~rr !G 7 V O O N O H Z i Q of J ~, a ac o O a J o LL o -- ~iLJJtl -ON LAOIS SInW O-J- ~___ --~ `JNIH N o.,,,. - ~Ni~ a~~ana a_ a J $~ z. £r ~Y yF ? ~ ;` r„fc pJ~O ~IE~ ' =o'ai \` ~-/C p~ i 9 ~ S 9 ~ I ; ~~ ~ _: ~ ' "~~ ~ ~, - ` ~ J o a ! I ~ ~ ~. ~ E I.~~, C I ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~, I, ` i ~~~J1 t ~ 1~~ ~ I ~ III I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~lg ~ ,~, ,~ ' '~'iI ~I'~I i ,~ (I I ~ I I I L i Ja ~! v~g >z~ :~ -~Y Z 0 ~' _ Q W J W H W 3 Z LO L a W J W H Q w ~' z: ~; ;; Fr g~g4 4° x ~~ :~ J z t O ' I- ~ a w J W H O J .t ~: yj Z O I- a w J W H O z ~1 `----- 1'1 1' LS ~\'1' A~"T ~' ~. I-. a~. i '-~ ,I . --~~i-- ~ ; __ . _ . . - - a /, 4~ p '' •~ ~ ' I i .~ ~Y ~ S1 .: ~. .r. - - ~ 1'ILISI;GRS' A~'1:. _ _ T , :: ,c~~~ - ~ ~ ~-- --- - - - ~ I r ; ~ ~'~. ~bi ,~ ~._ ~ ~,. wry -, _- f ._, ~ `~ _ ~ ~ , ~~ r-~ ~I - ~ - ~` ~ - i 111 \'11~'(-lil'II A~Ts. ,~' r ~= ~ ~ --- S ~r~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ; ~l-~ l__l 1 . I~ y -~- ~ S ~ ~ - F - i t II~~ ~I - - y . . , i! I;LAISU~LK A~'B. ,r. ~ _~ I, , I : •~ -) ~ - ~/ ~ . ~ ~ i . ~' I ~! i I' 1.11_1 ~ ~~ ~~ - ~ _ - - - --tom-- T '~ ~ ~ ~ : J ~ I, n i .. i ~~~ -r -_ t~ S ~ c r ~i - u \ ll /-' J t _ hIC(H.I.Lrl' A~"13. ~~ ~~'-"77 1~: ly)q° _ , I/ "~'~". ~.~~-tea `,~, ~. ~ - I I~ .i. ~ __ _-. oaf pp`"~s'st~d~ve? S ~ ' °~?f ,F, ~~"(o :,e ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~Gy~ ~~ ~~~ ~n~~b~F ~1~~°, 3s~;=gg ~ ,c ~ R;6~;y~i,: K~i ~ t6(h{~ d ~4 3i ~:S ~~~a ~~ ~p~f ~~~R s5 ~ iff rq ! $ ~4 ~ ~~ ~s g{"=:3 ~~ G ~i ~ a~d i ' ~~s ~ `~ a { ~ ~ ~ a r 3~ ^t rr~~XBj'~fjf~d,Fe ~ ~r a e ¢ ~ `~= c u( cad F?b ( ~:~ € A 1 ~ 5 ~s: b C ~7i y A i3~piE ~~ ,~:r YS > ~~ 2 r V~7~Fd dR M,:~ ~~ ~~;~, L ~:4 ~ t ~ii ~~ j ~ ~ A 4 Z ~ c ~ 1 $ 4y ~o'iS~ ~~ §`` z a~ a+. ., 3.w=. aa8ta Y G1: t ' e t ~_A ?.h" ~ ~~ ~"~~ C ~ 4 7~ a x ld 3 3o ~ g a3ede ~n.. ~ t t °,~re~ '< ~ ~^ LJ-~~~~~ ~ ~~ I-IIJI~ _x"1'I(1~ -.....__~.- sI1'T 1'LA,~i ~ PRELIMINARY ~ ~ ~" ~" ~ ~~~~~X RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION N0.80-10, CONTRACT N0. 2329 Name: United National Corporation Address: 745 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10022 Location: HUB Shopping Center 66th Street & Nicollet Avenue Use: Phase II, HUB PUD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the proposed geometric layout of the off-street parking as contained in Off-Street Parking Application No.80-10, Contract No. 2329 is hereby approved subject to and upon completion of per- formance of the contract for such off-street parking as hereinafter authorized. 2. That the proposed off-street parking contract for the improvement of said off-street parking, bearing contract No. 2329 be placed on file and that the manager be authorized to sign said contract and the clerk be authorized to seal the same for and on behalf of this city. 3. That the off-street parking operator provide the City of Richfield with Surety in the form of cash, passbook saving with- drawal authority, or performance bond in an amount to be determined by the community development director and city manager, to ensure the off-street parking lot is constructed within the terms and regulations of the Off-Street Parking Agreement. 4. That responsibility for the proper upkeep and maintenance of said Off-Street Parking lot shall remain the responsibility of the off-street parking lot operator in accordance with Ordinance Code 4.05. Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of September, 1980. STIPULATION: The site work to be constructed within the Pillsuury Avenue right-of-way shall not begin until after Pillsbury Avenue is vacated. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk r .. ~~ '~ C RESOLUTION NO. 6039 RESOLUTIOiJ DECLARIiG COUNCIL INTENT LdITrI RESPECT TO THE VACATION OF A PORTI0~1 OF PILLSBURY AVENUE WHEREAS, a petition has been submitted requesting the vacation of Yills:~ury Av~m~e bott~een 65th and 6th ncrE~ets signed b % all of the abutting property owners; and ~~HEREAS, the City Council has now approved the rezoning of certain areas crossed by Pillsbury to PC-2 and anticipates that certain development and redevelopment projects generally as described in the PUD plan drawings submitted as part of the rezoning application are elpected soon to commence within the area rezoned; and WHEREAS, such development and redevelopment is consistent with the Lyndale-Hub idicollet Commercial Redevelopment Project to which the City is committed; and WHEREAS, the vacation of Pillsbury Avenue between 65th and both Streets is a necessary condition to the commencement of various essential aspects of the project as generally described in the PUD plan drawings; and b~7HERE~~S, it is the desire o.f this council, consistent with its legal obligations, to make the clearest possible statement of its intention with respect to the vacation of such portion of Fillsbt:~-~• Avenue, 2JO:J TLiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit~.~ of Richfield, r;inr.osota, as follv~,os: 1. Receit~t of the vacation p`titicn above describedL is hereh1• acY.nocaledged, it having been determined that saki petitior_ rs ir. compliance with the provisions o- Richfield Ordinance Cede ~ 12..0, ~ Subdivision 2. 2. A public hearing on the proposed street vacation shall be " set to occur upon, and only upon the .happening of any one of the following events: a) Issuance by the City, pursuant to an application and the filing of a final development plan by Penny's Super Market, Ir.c., or Unites National Corporation with respect to its own property, of a special use permit permitting development .y pursuant to a final development plan coverir:g: (i) -the proposed North Addition; or (ii) the proposed `Market Addition; or (iii) the proposed Financial Institution/ office building b) The elapsing of two and one-half years after the effective date of the rezoning to PC-2, or c) A joint request by Penny's Super rlarket, Inc. and United National Corporation that the hearing be scheduled at an earlier date. 3. Based upon its knowledge of the proposed develoorrent, and " the desires and expressed positions of abutting property owners tognti7er with its knowledge of Pillsbury Avenue between 5th and 66th Streets, the council is nova of the opinion that the vacation of such street would be in the public interest, but recognizes that its final determination ors the appropriateness of the vacation of sai~: street must await the public hearing and other proceedings in connection therewith required by law. Passel by the City Council of -the Cit<~ of Ric!~field, ^Tin.~<~sota thiss~'t~r~ ,_,-: u' ~ day of F~..~_. ~zt-i<<~i , 1._ _ . I,`?? ~e.7? ~ . ?mow ~ `,~~•,- s `\ t11 liw- 1 : .. _, . +~ .j Bill 1980- TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PILLSBURY AVENUE SOUTH CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The following described portion of the Pillsbury Avenue South right-of-way is hereby vacated: All that part of Pillsbury Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the north line of Block 2; Richfield Plaza Addi- tion and the extension across if of the south line of said Block 2, Richfield Plaza Addition, Hennepin County, `,Iinnesota. Section 2. There are currently located within the street right-of-~vay hereby vacated certain water mains, storm sewers, sani- tary sewers, telephone and electrical facilities and the respective appurtenances. Said vacation is subject to easements running in t favor of the authority or authorities owning or operating any such facilities for the purpose of operating, maintaining, reconstructing, constructing and repairing any such facilities over, under, across and through the following described portion right-of-way vacated: Beginning at the southwest corner of Blocl~ 2, Richfield Plaza Addition, thence west 8.08 feet to the actual point of beginning;, thence north parallel to the east line of Richfield Plaza Addition 576.84 feet, thence west 42 feet, thence south 576.84 feed parallel to the east line of Richfield Plaza Addition, thence east 42 feet to the point of beginning;, all in Hennepin County, [Minnesota. Section 3. The 1layor and City bianager are authorized to take all such action as is required to #;ive effect to the vaca- tion of the portion ol~ Pillsbur~• Avenue South provided iii the foregoing; Section 1. ;. -2- , Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minne- sota this day of 1980. Donald J. Priebe, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk /D CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of-City Manager Council Letter No. 325 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor ~.~ ~~ t~ ~T ~ ~Z ~ ~ and Members of the City Council ~ ~,,~ pc , City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Approval of Bond Sale, City Project 705, L/H/N Street Improvements There is an item scheduled for the September 8, 1980 city . council meeting relating to the sale of bonds for City Project 705, L/H/N Street Improvements. The bond sale is scheduled for September 8, 1980, and information relating to the sale will be available for council members at the September 8, 1980 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, 1 ~ ~i~ ~.c~~-~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/ej a CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 324 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and DSembers of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Presentation of 1981 Budget Proposal There is an item scheduled on the September 8, 1980 city council agenda relating to presentation of the 1981 budget proposal. Mr. Karl Nollenberger, City Manager, will give a brief oral presentation relating to the budget proposal at the September 8, 1980 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of C ity Manager Council Letter No. 323 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: L ion's Club Presentation Each year, the community center co-sponsors a fund raising kP breakfast with the Richfield Lion's Club. Mr. Robert Beuscher, Lion's Club President, has requested an opportunity to appear before the city council at their September 8, 1980 city council to present a check to the city for the proceeds of this breakfast. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/ej a cc: Community Services Director /6D Y CITY OF RICHFIELD, D4INNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 322 Agenda September 3, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council I~iembers Subject: Purchases in Excess of $1,000 Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that the city council must approve purchases of merchandise, materials equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1,000. There are several such items on the council agenda of September 8, 1980. Fencing The Babe Ruth organization has requested that the pony league field in the east youth baseball complex (in the vicinity of the golf course) be extended. It is also necessary to fence the youth athletic complex from the golf course. We have recently experienced some problems with patrons and participants of the youth baseball and softball activities parking at the golf course. Fencing in this area should help solve that problem, and provide additional protec- tion to the substantial investment at the golf course. Quotations were obtained from three companies to provide the 1,960 feet of 48" chain link fencing and the necessary posts, tie-ins and other fittings necessary for the city staff to install this fencing. Crowley Fence Company submitted a written quotation in the amount of $4,950. Amco Steel Fence Company, Inc., submitted a writ- ten quotation in the amount of $5,538. Crown of Minnesota, Inc., submitted a written quotation in the amount of $5,030. It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of fencing materials, as described, from Crowley Fence Company, in the amount of $4,950. Funding for this purchase is through the capital improvement program's appropriation for minor park improvements. Carpeting for Ice Arena Lounges A portion of the funding in the Ice Arena Improvement Project provides for carpeting of the lounges at the Richfield Ice Arena. Quotations were solicited from ten firms for this work, to include removal of existing carpet, floor preparation and installation of new carpeting, with all work to be completed in September, 1980. Council Letter No. 322 -2- September 8, 1980 2'he firms contacted include Minneapolis Builders Supply Company; Commers Interiors, Inc.; Marvin J. Gottlieb Company; Home Carpet, Inc.; Packaged Furniture and Carpet; Cook Paint; Doherty Furniture and Carpet Company; Funk-Hanecy Distributor; Pink Supply Corporation and Sherwin-Williams. Quotations were submitted by Minneapolis builders Supply Company, in the amount of $2,271.00; Commers Interiors, Inc., in the amount of $3,370.00; Marvin J. Gottlieb Company, in the amount of $3,492.48; Home Carpet, Inc., in the amount of $3,462.22; and Pink Supply Corporation, in the amount of $2,931.75. It is recommended that the city council authorize the purchase of carpeting for the ice arena from Minneapolis Builders Supply Company, in the amount of $2,271.00. Grass Seed The Rich Acres Golf Course has recently opened all 18 holes of the regulation course for play. Although the course is open for play, it is essential that a seeding program continue. A constant reseeding program will be necessary for a three to five year period. After that time, occasional seeding will be required following un- favorable weather conditions or heavy use of the facility. To establish a favorable turf for playing conditions, five steps must be followed: 1. Eradication of undesirable species; i.e., crabgrass, clover, etc. 2. Insuring seed contact with soil through thatching and cultivation. 3. Fertilization. 4. Seeding. 5. Irrigation. When the golf course was under construction and first seeded, 90 pounds per acre of blue grass was applied to the disturbed areas, and 60 pounds per acre to undisturbed areas. It is recommended that ad- ditional seeding be done this fall, and that 30 pounds per acre now be applied. Over a 60 acre area, this amounts to roughly 1,800 pounds of seed. The best time to seed is just prior to cooler fall temperatures and moisture conditions. This period is between August 15 to September 15. In establishing the turf during construction and the subsequent seeding programs, O.M. Scotts, Inc., products have been used. This product is manufactured only by O.M. Scott in that the chemical mix- ture is a hybrid bluegrass with Baron Victa and.Bristol in certain percentage. In order to provide the best possible playing surface, it is necessary to continue using this product. Council Letter No. 322 -3- September 8, 1980 The quotation frdm O.M. Scotts, Inc., would provide the required 1,800 pounds of grass seed for $4,680. Starter fertilizer will also need to be ordered. By purchasing 40 units of the starter fertilizer from O.M. Scotts at the same time seed is purchased, a discount of 15%, or $702 is given on the cost of the seed. The total purchase price can be summarized as follows: 1,800 pounds blue grass 40 units starter fertilizer Less 15% discount on cost of seed TOTAL COST It is recommended the city council seed and starter fertilizer for the golf from O.M. Scotts, Inc., in the amount of be financed by the golf course project. Weed Eradicator $4,680 528 ( 702) $4,506 authorize the purchase of course as outlined above $4,506. This purchase will An important step in establishment and maintenance of a desirable playing turf at the golf course is the eradication of undesirable species, such as crabgrass. Crabgrass is not wanted in a professional turf canopy because it does not blend in color or texture with most turf grasses, dense growth may reduce the stand of desirable turf grasses, and it quickly deteriorates into ugly, gray bare areas when it dies in the fall. Although turf management practices of mowing, watering and so forth have some effect, a sound control program is only effective when. combined with efficient herbicide treatment. Crabgrass is an annual plant which, upon heavy traffic, can be spread over a large area quite quickly. To stop the spread of the plants, it is necessary to stop the development of the seeds before they become mature plants. This approach is the most effective, as it is directed at the plant during its weakest stage of development in its life cycle. Control measures should halt development of the seed but not affect established turf areas. The primary areas of the golf course requiring treatment for crabgrass are fairways, roughs, Acres Golf Course, this amounts existing conditions at the golf playing turf, the best product Course is provided only by O.M. factured by O.D1. Scotts and not chemical mixture is patented. tees, greens and aprons. At the Rich to approximately 64 acres. With the course, including the type of grass available for the Rich Acres Golf Scotts, Inc. The material is manu- by any other vendor, in that the Council Letter No. 322 -4- September 8, 1980 r It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of 256 bags of weed grass preventer as outlined above from O.M. Scotts, Inc., at a unit cost of $25.85 for a total purchase price of $6,620. Respectfully submitted, k ~ ~l ~<~.,S.W~~--~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Services Director r J /69 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 321 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Assessment Rolls for Diseased Tree, Nuisance Abatement and Weed Destruction There are several resolutions on the September 8, 1980 city council agenda, certifying special assessments to Hennepin County. These resolutions provide for the following certification: 1. Resolution certifying special assessments for weed destruction. This is a one-year assessment at 8% penalty. 2. Resolution levying special assessments for nuisance abatement. This is a one-year assessment at no interest or penalty. 3. Resolution levying special assessments for abatement of diseased tree. This is the assessment roll for diseased tree removal on private property which has been performed by the City at the request of the property owner. The assessment is certified at the city's actual cost of the tree removal, less the amount of the city and state subsidy for which the removal qualifies. The subsidy provides for a maximum of $100 or 50% of the removal costs, whichever is less, per tree. This abatement is spread over three years at the rate of 8% per annum. It is recommended that the city council adopt the resolutions certifying these special assessments. Res/pectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager xN/jf cc: Finance Coordinator RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR WEED DESTRUCTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the following described properties are hereby specially assessed in the following amounts for expenses incurred by the City in connection with abatement for weed destruction pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, 1969, Chapter 715, Se. 17.271, to-wit: PROPERTY ID DIVISION N0. ADDRESS AMOUNT 27-028-24 21 0072 46095 6336-6338 Nicollet Ave. $ 25.00 29-028-24 43 0005 46793 6816 Thomas Ave. 25.00 25-028-24 23 0125 45880 6433 20th Ave. 25.00 25-028-24 23 OOI1 45880 6509 Longfellow 7.00 35-028-24 11 0090 45315 1544 Fern Drive 7.00 34-028-24 13 0094 46931 7216 First Ave. 15.00 26-028-24 44 0065 45197 6900 Cedar Ave. 25.00 34-028-24 23 0133 45590 7320 Grand Ave. 30.00 27-028-24 34 0016 44827 6800 Pillsbury Ave. 20.00 26-028-24 12 0152 45225 6204 13th Ave. So. 45.00 27-028-24 43 0038 46230 6827 Second Ave. 10.00 25-028-24 24 0029 45880 6528 Standish Ave. 20.00 28-028-24 21 0057 46065 6300 Humboldt 7.50 34-028-24 23 0132 45590 7320 Grand Ave. 15.00 28-028-24 11 0012 44828 6334 to 6340 Aldrich Av 68.75 33-028-24 33 0035 45627 7615 Penn Ave. 20.00 26-028-24 34 0095 44985 6901 Elliot Ave. 5.00 28-028-24 33 0159- 46792 6941 Penn Ave. 20.00 33-028-24 44 0090 46610 7700 Lyndale Ave. 10.00 29-028-24 42 0082 46790 6716 Washburn Ave. 50,00 28-028-24 31 0061 45355 6601 Logan Ave. 7.50 34-028-24 33 0011 44834 400 West 78th St. 30.00 Total 487.75 2. That the above listed assessments be spread over a period of one year at the rate of 8% interest per annum. 3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of September, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk i RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The following described properties are hereby specially assessed in the following amounts for expenses incurred by the City in connection with abatement of a nuisance health hazard pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.23, to-wit: PROPERTY ID DIVISION NO ADDRESS AMOUNT 25-028-24 23 0125 45880 6433 20th Ave. So. $ 25.00 29-028-24 42 0082 46790 6716 Washburn Ave, 20,00 26-028-24 34 0095 44985 6901 Elliot Ave. 15.00 29-028-24 43 0109 46793 6945 Xerxes Ave, 40.00 33-028-24 32 0042 44833 7515 Penn Ave. 40,00 27-028-24 34 0016 44827 6800 Pillsbury Ave. 30.00 33-028-24 22 0117 45414 7126 Oliver Ave. 85.00 Total $ 255.00 2. The above special assessments are to be spread over one year at no interest. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of September, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk ~• RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ABATEMENT OF DISEASED TREES WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 4.11 establishes rules and regulations with reference to the abatement of diseased trees on private property in the City of Richfield by tree removal, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 429,101 provides that all unpaid or special charges for such tree removal may be certified to the County Auditor with the taxes against such property, and shall be collected with other taxes on such property, and WHEREAS, an assessment roll has been prepared specifying the amounts which shall be certified against each particular property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the .City of Richfield as follows: 1., That the following described properties are hereby specially assessed in the following amounts for expenses incurred by the City in connection with abatement or removal of diseased trees pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.101: PROPERTY ID DIVISION NO ADDRESS AMOUNT 34-028-24 22 0029 44925 7036 Garfield Ave. S. $ 108.09 27-028-24 43 0073 46290 6921 Nicollect Ave, S. 417.37 32-028-24 13 0019 45566 7200 Upton Ave, S. 91.88 26-028-24 43 0024 46190 6804 13th Ave.. S. 182,29 25-028-24 24 0107 45880 6438 23rd Ave, S, 262.50 25-028-24 23 0119 /+5880 6409 20th Ave. S. 75.94 26-028-24 43 0085 46271 6925 13th Ave. S. 75.63 Total ,$1,213.70 y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 320 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Appointment to Civil Service Commission Recently, Mr. A. P. Anderson resigned as a member of the Civil Service Commission due to the fact that he had moved out of the City of Richfield. This leaves a vacancy on the civil service commission for a term which will expire in February, 1982. The following persons have indicated an interest in being appointed to the civil service commission: George Cavitt Charles Purfeerst Jack Duich Mary Reiter Jim Juen Thomas Scaglia Alvin Moline Stephen Wilmes Henry Patzke Applications have been received from those listed above, and copies of those applications are attached to this council letter. This item has been placed on the September 8, 1980 city council agenda for council consideration. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja Date Au,qust Z5, 1980 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME Cavitt George ponald (Bon Cavitt) Last :First ~ Nliddle HOME ADDRESS 6404 Mashburn Ave. S. Richfield, 19N 55423 Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home 866-~66o Business same APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission ~• Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commissior:~_ Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why ;you are interested in serving: Areas of expertise include communications (print, television and radio), human relations and public relations. Served as 1st president of the Minnesota Association for Brain Injured (lfABI}. Participated in the organizational development and served as 1st president of the rinnesota A. G. S. (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) Foundation. Currently developing a series of modular seminars having to do with 'job enrichmentl~ which will hopefully lead participants to greater product ivity. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~TITYACTIVITIES: Served for a number of years with the Sheridan School P. T. A. Aetive in 11en's Club and currently serving on the 'play"council of St. Richard's Church. Have written and produced a number of shows, television and radio announcements for the I~etropol itan and 1~'innesota Senior Citizens Federations. EP•'ceed .many local civic affairs and have been a speaker before some of Richfield~s civic clubs and organizations. . OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency DOIJ CAVITY creative communications Address_ 6404 I/ashburn Avenue S. Richfield Position ~,,,„o„ years v.; /firm,~ag~:,c~; 23 Other work experience (optional) Radio and television announcer/advertising and sales promotion consultant/ radio news director. REFERENCES (Optional) A. Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number B. Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number C. Full name Relationship Mailing address. Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 Date c--R,~. / ~ -- ~ ~~~ j __ APPLICATION FOR CITi' OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME ~~ «~ ~C ~ ~/,--~.E~ ~ja-ty ~ ~ Last First Middle r IT HOME ADDRESS ~ ,~l ,~- 1 -~- ~. ~-~l,'.~~ ,~:: 1f~~..~--~f4t.~<~ ~'-~,x,i~, -~ 5~~'2.? Street No. City J Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home ~'~ ~ - c~~G ~ Business ,~~I ~ - }`fit-~ ..~~ APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you. for this municipal commission/committee ~ why yo~},are interested in serving: y y~ F•- ~ i~ ~~~` ~~. ~~~ ~ ~ CIV C ,° PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ~/, /f~ ~ T, 1,, ~. .,~.: l / t OCCUPATION: ( ~~ c Employing ,firm, agency r ~~..~ ':-C.,t~2.c-.~ Address ~ ~ - l - Position '~- i'~ ~ ~ `~ Y ~ o~;--.; .-~-~__: ~~'~~_*, ~ e a r s w /firm a g ~ ~ _ . , _ ~ ~ .~...r,,~ v Other work experience (optional) -_ r i -.-~ , . ' REFERENCES (Optional) ~; A~[ Full name ~ , ~ - elationship _ Mailing address Phone number "~~J Full name Relationship Mailing1address Phone number C . ~ 9 ~.i1 /L -C ~- ~'~ tom. ~Z~~ ~...~.~ (/` L~~,-.~~_,.~.~~ _ - Full name Relationship Mailing address y "r ~ Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richf field, MN 55423 Date ~ ~- 2, ~ •- f' (,~ APPLICATION FOR CIT`f OF RICHFIELD `~' ADVISORY COMMITTE-E~O-R COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME U U ~.'n t 1 \ YYl Last :First Iviid~:le HOME ADDRESS Street No. City MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Zip Code Street No. City Zip Cede PHONE: Home n ~ ~~~ Business ~ ~ ~ •- ~ (~ ~_ APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commissior:~_ Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~.vhich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: (~ ,' i ,. C\~. d" ~. ~ • _;1 ~ ~~~- ~~S CIVIC, PROFE~,SIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: OCCUPATION: + -~ Employing .firm, agency ~~~, l.,e ~2rm ~h C~ r~+~c~ ~~ Address ~ ~0 t~ ~r~~ ~ ~v~ ~C ~ ~~ 1,)11 ~ \ n~ ~ s~43s _. Position ~C'f1\yt~ CL3t-v~ ~ Eta years w/firm,!agenc.: ~ ~ Other work experience (optional) ~J `~ h, c~ S S ~? t'C is L ~~1 F= t~ l.; ~ l~,CT v ~. ~ i.~r~ -- ~'~ t ~-~ ~ ..~.hT~ L ~~ r' ,u'~. ~ l c,r ~ / .~ l _ -t- Z S C'~v1l..y vP ~G ~~h C ~_ ~ ~ _ rn ~~ 1~~.iGiPnce l J REFERENCES {Optional) Fu11 name ~ Rel tionship CCU ~h?.v1C'~ ~vC a, ~c.~tnr 7 "~r~C" ~~C7°- ~~107 MailiRq address ~ ~ Phone number B . 1-~~Y.,~ 1 \. Full name ~j~ Mailing address C. _: ~.,.r.~,ut Relationship Phone number Full name Mailing address Relationship Phone number Return to; City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 Date ~ y ~ ~`r APPLICATION FOR CIT`I OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT }, ~ t NAME I " 1 ~ ~ I f~ ~ l~' ! ~' ~ vl ~ F first HOME ADDRESS ~~'~``~' ~~Y~ T!/~~ ~` 2r/c Street No. City MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Last IViiddle ' ~ ~~~%~ Zip Ccde Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home ~~~r ,~~J~ ~ Business ~~.~ ~ ' ~ ~'C~ APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission~_ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~vhich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why ;you are interested in serving: .~ CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU,NITYACTIVITIES: .~ _ c i~ ' i ,~ ~ _ ~ OCCUPATION: ~ _ ~~ Employing ,firm, agency G~~"~/'' -~~5~~ /~~ ~ ~~ ~~_~ Addre s s_ ;~ .~L~ ,l l3 ~,~ ~`~ Jam" ~/ Position ..~~~-" ~' C~ l~ Years w/firm,.~age;~~~-_; ;? f Other work experience (optional) ~ - I ~' fir ilia' C ~/1'D~/~L`lI REFERENCES (Optional) A. Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number B. Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number C. Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave Richfield 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 D<3te January 23, 1980 APPLICATIOiv' FC1'. CIT'~ OF RICFiF'IEI.7 ADVISORY COM:vIITTEE Or; C""Ot.2?yfISSIOi~' APPOII~iT~,-iF.'~':' NAME Patzke Henry V. "Pete" Fast lr.~t '.i_,...:lr 7409 Aldrich Ave. So. Richfield., Mn. 55423 HOME ADDRESS Street No. l.lty' 7_is r'~~1e ';'TAILING ADDiZESS (if di:ferent from homF addres.~) Street No. ~,1tV Zip 'ode I~HCNE: Horse 869-5049 APPOINTMEP~IT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission ~ Park and Recreatio:. Advisory Comm._ Senior Citi`en & Handicapped Advisory !~orr~missior. 866-0031 Business Human Rights Commission Civil Service C'a :rr~i.ssior:__.~ Advisory Board c~ :=ieaith Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experienc.~ ~F.'hich you believe gualif~. ;you for this municipal comi:>issioni~committee and :vh~~ ~-ou are .nterested in ser~.~~ g: Past experience as Mayor of City of Mahtomedi and member of that organizations ,~i`,","_..o ~_~.~.-ssie~. ~,,, „a ~.r,,; ~,y +-~,,, ~.T., ~.;,, r~..,,t~, vi.,~=~~a~ss~.on when first organized. Have desire to help improve and maintain standards now ~xist_ing in city whPrP T ltye and am emploveed and as well have the time to spend on such e~ideavors. C..IVIC, PRCFESSIONAi, AND COMMUNITY :ACTIVITIES: Former Mayor of City of Mahtomedi -Past member of Planning Commission for City o~MaTztomedi an~Washington County - ast mem er o o ice iv3T-3ervic- e Commission Past member of Governor_'s Advisiory Council -Past President and Director of ~~'trz't~~rtTal- Asp rrs ; ~~t-i~ i-t---L~3n~-er-r-C~i~~ence ; Currently President of Richfield Noontime Lion's Club and member of Ad Hoc Housing Carunitt~e .. OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency Summit State Bank of Richfield Address 6500 Nicollet Ave - Richfield Mn. 55423 Position Vice-President & Director fears ~,v/firm~agenc~; 3 Other work experience (optional) Trlorked for 31 years at Northwest Airlines, Inc in just about all - rlpnartmpn,~ the last Gixt~an AirlinAC F l ~ ~S ManagaY of T\Tnrth~~ACt „}„yoyees Credit Union REFERENCES (Oi~.; ~or_al) A. Full name Relationship ' Mailing address Phone number B. Full name Relationship Mailing addre::s C. Fv 11 name Phone number Relationship Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 Att: E~ieen An.:arson APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR /COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME '' ~ /i-u ~ -r'S Last ? :~ first ti~iiddle HOME ADDRESS ~~ > ~CC~rc~j,, 1~~50, ~/, r ,.~ Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home ~~ l ~' ~'~ 7_~_ Business _ ~,~ 7 ~ ~,~'~ APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission_~s~c~°'~c'~ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commissior:~;Z,~G~m,r~ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience :^~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: 1 -e ~C l ~S ~G~~-P ~Gt C ~~~^D' C~.r:O ~' ~ -p~1 ~ 5 rcC /' i !i~-f~ L- G~.fJ/ ~s~ c r ~ ~ ^o C,~ Cry ~ irn cl ~ ~( lS . Gt ~2 C.~ t( Gv '~ (~/ cult ~ • rc t ~ GV ~--d s~ c~ GC t ~ ~y(c ` 6t CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: OCCUPATION: `/ Employing ,firm, agency ~~~~ `7 ~ ~~ 1~~ ~ ~ ~~,~ 5,~. ~,~ ~~~,~ '/ / / r Address ~t ~ S~`!~I ..e j.~, /~ u !'"~ -P ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~~ ~~ lU~ Position o ~,~ K .~C,`<c `,rs w; fir:r,!agenc~; _ ~l Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) A . ~ ~, ' Fu11 ame Mailing address ~ Full name Mfa it in~goa/did re s s C . h ~ m"ot" Gn o-Yc Full name Mailing address ~l /(O /7- ~/ - ,S ~~~~>l~ Relationship ~~~' a Phone number ~X -P~'~,c )(r G Relationship 7~ Phone number --P ~ Relationship ~~ 7 r. ~- < Phone number ~~ ~~ ~~~~ Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield S5423 Richf i~ld, MN 55423 Date ~ ~~"- ~ ~ APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR /COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME '' ~ /t u . ~ -c~S Last L/ :First Middle HOME ADDRESS ~~~ ~ /?CC h2~jr~ `~,~'SD' f, Gfi, ~-i-E'/~ ~ 5~~~~ "Street No. City Zip .Cede MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. / City Zip Code PHONE: Home ~~ ~ -"' ~b ~ ~ Business ~,~-~ 7 ~- ~,j APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission_~s~c~°~'.c`~ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commissior.~c~m,r.-Q Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience :vhich you believe qualify you for this municipal commis(sion/committeeJ~and why ;you are interested in serving: _2 u l ~S / e1~-P y of C /~ ~~^cr c,c~.~p ~ -p~ ~ S ~cc /~ r y~-P ~ G~,IJi `s~ r ~ !mot 6 '~~ cf ~-P " ~` ~~--, ./jyL r `LL _"" G(/G~r ~ r ~K 1 ..aa r /_er,~,~ 0 e~~~,. ~ -~ ,`Kr_ ~ctCVS' '. (~ctit~~, K~, /~ctc.cv!-rs~(~ ~~ /.riCr~~~(e`~~ C G'-/t ~ T t"u c ~,' p-r+ ~- ~ a--~ ~~s ~ cuter 'u ~ CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~iITYACTIVITIES: OCCUPATION: ~/ / Employing ,firm, agency ~f i~ ~ Aso /~~( ~ ~~ ~ ~-~. c~ ~ y ~~ // f ~~" Address _ ~ ~ S!7 ..e~., ~ u t''~-t --P ~~~ ~~~; cr ~l ~~~ ~S ld3 Position ,` ~ ~C,~a `,~.rs w/firm,!agenc~; f ~ _ Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) A. ~j r' Full ame ~f i ~--P a Relationship M,a(~ilinjg ad(dress /~ /' / Phone number B . __l~_ ' G, , I ~ l~ ~.f' ~ (J'~l ~10~ ~X' -~c~u 1~~ G ~ ~ ~~'-Pc ~~ ~~~~f Full name / Relationship /mot '' --e ~/ - S~ a~~ 5~?~ ~ ~ - ~l ^ _ MJailing aQddress / Phone number C . h ~ ~oC ht o-~ ~ ~-~ c ~ ~ <~ /J Full name ' j Relationship ~~ Sh-Pi^~G~e^~~e~(/~ .S~~cr~r~-s~~3T7~o'~ ~~~~~ ~ 5^5 ~-~i~,/~~~7- t'~/ Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richf field, MN 55423 Da to August 28,1880 APPLIC?~TION r OR. CIT`~ Or RICHF'TELD ADVISOR` COMMITTEE OR COP/SMISSION APPOII~iTViE?vT NAME Reiter Mary Frances Last !'ir~t i'v>i::~ie HOME ADDRESS 208 Pleasant Lane Richfield MN. 5523 Street No. City lip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address; Street No. City yip ode 866-6605 866-~OOti. PHONE: Home Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE.; Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission_ Civil Service Commission ~ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~,~~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commissioni~commit*_ee and why you are Interested in ser~~~ing: 1955-1970- Personnel-Richfield Deputy Registrar of Motor Vehicles 1978-79-Returned to college,updating studies in Sociology, Psychology and Political Science I also strongly believe that there should be a woman serving on the Civil Service Commission. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNIT`Y' ACTIVITIES: Delegate - St. Paul-Minneapolis Archdiocesan Council Formers League of Women Voters Girl Scout Leader Community Centers Board Holy Angels Alumnae Board Co-Chair Richfield D.F. L. OCCUPATION; Employing ,firm, agency Reiter Tax Service 6637 Lyndale,Richfield Address Position Associate Other work experience (optional) Fears r.•~ /fir;riagenc. REFERENCES (Optional) A. Myron Gunderson Fu 11 na COI Knox,Richfiald Re ~o ~nshi p Mailing address Phone number B. Cornelius McCoy Full name Relationship 6833 Blaisdell 869-4205 Mailing address Phone number C. Fuil name Relationship ~ -~ Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Ivlanager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 ~+t,: E~leer, Hn~~erson Date ~ ~ h 7Y ~ ~~ APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME SC /~C L- ( 4, ~ N~ ~+~S ~ . Last (~ :Fir's`t Nl~d~ile HOME ADDRESS 1~~~~ LVAcS~~(J~N ~(C~~(E~-Q ~S~Z~ Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission: ~~~ Advisory Board of Health Other CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~tITYACTIVITIES: ~-h j~(~-~ ~oG ~fti Utc ~% ~-SSoC ~( -~ t ~~~ h Ldcs~ f 3 ~ ~- ~S ~~.t Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency ~~ ~ J ~J:;N Q( (~a C 6 (J ~~~ Address 5~ v cS Position ~" e l ~ ~ W GX ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~;.,--.~ (/ years vc/firm ag.. ,_.; Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) Fu11 name Relationship ~13 ~{S ~v55~•~~ 1~V~ ~o g"~~( r~~7S Mailing address Phone number ull name Relationship ~a33 M~~~~ ~r~~5~ ~r~t - ~?~3 Mailing address Phone number c.~ G ~ C ~y -r~ Full name _~~ Relationship Mailing address phone number Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue X225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richf field, MN 55423 NAME ~ ~ fi / h(1 ~ S .S, ~ C?..~? Y1 t. ~1 ~~ C> ti ~' ~ G~ Last First Ivi idyl le APPLICATION FOR CIT`~ OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT r-~ ~ _ 1 ii _ HOME ADDRESS ~' ~ ~~' ! ~ ~~ -f"~'1 ~-G~z~~ ~(C h - ~ ~- ! c~ ) ~, L-f Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. Date - ~ ~ ~ O~U City PHONE: Home~(0 C~ ^ ~ C? ~l ~ Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Zip Code Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commissior:~_ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why ;you are interested in serving: -~ d ~ ti c-r .~ '~` 'j~~~~~ ~J ~~"ez,~,~~ t.c ~:~L~,'~ ~'1 ~E^~c-tA.~ ~1 ~C~1Z.~ ~~ j CIVIC, PROFES IONAL AND COMMU~1 -~ f .~ ~~ ~,~^ ~~ ~.1~~yT~-~~ 6 ti~% ~. OCCUPATION: Employing firm, agency ~ Sz..-~,~~~~ ~~`~ C)--f,~l~>'L~r~;,1~'(~- Address Position ~~~,~„~„~@ ~- ~~-G~c~~,~,~ years w/firm~agen~~ l~~f'rr~J(n~y, g Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) Full name tionshi . ~r~~~ tam ~R,~. ~-~:~-~~~~ Mailing address Phone number Full name elationship c~ ~ Mailing address C . ~i~ Full name Mailing address ~~ Phone number R lationship Phone number ., . Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Blooming-~on Ave Richfield 55423 Ricb~ field, Mir! 55423 /~ ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 319 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Authorization to Submit Grant Application On April 28, 1980, the city council authorized the staff to submit preliminary applications for grants to develop Rich Acres Park and the Monroe/Fairwood Park complex. These applications were sub- mitted to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs, a section of the State Planning Agency, for Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (LAWCON) monies and state natural resource fund monies through the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LMCR). We recently were notified that the preliminary application for the Monroe/Fairwood Park complex has ranked high enough to be eligible for submission of a final grant application. The project is tenta- tively eligible for $143,750 in programmed state funding assistance. The city would be required to provide funding for the remainder of the project cost, which is currently estimated to be $256,250, for a total estimated project cost of $400,000. The deadline for submission of the final grant application is October 3, 1980. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution, authorizing submission of the final grant ap- plication and confirming the city's long-range commitment to devel- opment of the Monroe/Fairwood Park complex. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenbe ger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Services Director s RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FILING OF FINAL APPLICATION FOR GRANT TO DEVELOP OPEN SPACE UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCE FUND WHEREAS, the State Natural Resources Fund provides for the making of grants to assist local public bodies in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield desires to develop certain land known as Monroe/Fairwood Park, which land is to be held and used for permanent open space, and WHEREAS, in order for the proposed project to be eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation plan and five-year action program, or capital improvement program, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has an original or revised five- year action program, or capital improvement program which includes Monroe/Fairwood Park, and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the cost of developing said interest(s) shall be $400,000, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the application be made to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency for a grant from the Nature Resource Fund (Minnesota Law, 1979, Chapter 333, Section 31, Subdivision 3, paragraphs (j) and (k) for an amount presently estimated to be $143,750, and the City of Richfield will pay the balance of the cost from other funds available to it. 2. That the city manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file A) such application, and B) the five- year action program, or capital improvement program with the State Planning Agency, Office of Local and Urban Affairs, and to provide such additional information and furnish such documents as may be required by said agency, to execute such contracts as are required by said agency and to act as the authorized correspondent of the applicant. 3. That the proposed development is in accordance with the plans for the allocation of land for open space uses and that should said grant be made, the City of Richfield will develop and retain said land for use(s) designated in said applica- tion and approved by the Office of Local and Urban Affairs and the H.C.R.S. Resolution No.~ -2- • 4. That the United States of American and the State of Min- nesota be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the regulations of the Department of the Interior, effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th Day of September, 1980. Donald Priebe, rlayor ATTEST: Sylvia Bergh, Acting City Clerk / ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, DIINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 318 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Traffic Control Requests The Traffic Committee reviewed the following requests at their last meeting: 1. parking restric~cions. The council requested that the committee investigate the possibility of establishing parking restrictions in this area. Presently, parking is not allowed on the south side of 73rd Street. The committee decided, after review, that establishment of further parking restrictions on 73rd Street would force parking onto neighboring residential streets, and create yet additional parking congestion problems. The committee recommends no change. 2. 6640 5th Avenue: Request for Parking Restrictions The council also requested that parking congestion in front of this address be investigated. Fifth Avenue is used for on-street parking by city hall visitors, when the city hall parking lot fills up, particularly on days when court is held at city hall. Parking restrictions adjacent to this address would simply move the parking problem down the street, so the committee recommends that on-street parking remain unrestricted in this area. 3. s. Grego e KN/jf already signed in this mends the installation tion of 76th Street. or Parking Restrictions Upton Avenue, has requested that ay" signs be posted on 76th Street idan. Most of 76th Street is fashion, so the committee recom- of the requested signs on this por- Re$pectfully submitted, ,/ Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: City Engineer Community Development Director ,community Services Director /~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter N0. 317 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Approval of 1981 Community Health Service Plan On July 25, 1977, the Richfield City Council adopted a Com- munity Health Services Plan, through a grant from the State of Minnesota to subisdize and support our local health programs and activities. These monies have enabled Richfield to purchase per- sonal health services from the City of Bloomington and to maintain our local environmental health programs. In the year 1980, we anticipate approximately $82,915 in subsidy through this grant program. On August 27, 1979, the city council approved by resolution a two-year Community Health Services Plan, covering the period 1980-1981. However, since it is not very feasible that long- range projections from 1979 to 1981 would be very accurate, the state therefore requires that the anticipated 1981 budgetary plan approved by the city council one year ago be updated. For council review, the following changes are proposed to the 1980-1981 Community Health Services Plan: 1. Local participation has been reduced to $138,562, from $167,651, to more accurately reflect our share of costs for personal and environmental health services. With the anticipated state subsidy of $85,716, our new total expenditures of $224,278 is down from the previously pro- jected total expenditures of $253,367. 2. The cost of the personal health services provided through our contract with Bloomington are expected to increase, due to inflation, from the previously proposed $86,400 to approximately $93,650, which would be an increase of $7,250 in 1981 over 1980. 3. The environmental health activity, as included in the original 1979 plan, projected a budget of $129,234. The 1980 portion of the 1980-1981 plan proposed a budget of $97,850, which was $31,384 less than in 1979, due to the reorganization and budgetary reductions implemented in the fall of 1979. However, the projected costs of the en- vironmental health activity for 1981 has been amended to reflect an increase of $6,849, due to inflationary pressures. ~. ' Council Letter No. 317 -2- September 8, 1980 It is the recommendation of the Advisory Board of Health and the Public Safety Director, in which I concur, that the city council adopt the attached resolution, approving the 1980-1981 revised Community Health Services plan in order that the city may make application for a community health services subsidy to support the services described in that plan. spectfully submitted, R e "~ AI Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Public Safety Director RESOLUTIONd NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A PLAN IN APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY FOR 1980-1981 WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Richfield is the official governing body of the City of Richfield and functions as the official Board of Health of the City of Richfield; and WHEREAS, the city council is committed to promote, support, and maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in support of public health services on the local leval throughout the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Richfield has reviewed and approved the plan for the provi- sion of public health services in the City of Richfield, and recommends that the city council authorize its submission in application for a grant; and WHEREAS, the city council finds this plan consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by the Advisory Board of Health and as expressed by the citizens of Richfield; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield, that the revised 1980-1981 Community Health Services Plan for the City of Richfield be approved and author- ization hereby given to submit said plan in application for a Community Health Services Act subsidy for 1931. Passed and adopted this 8th day of September, 1980 . Donald J. Priebe, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia Bergh, Acting Clty Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City '~4anager Council Letter No. 316 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Dlembers of the City. Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Variance, 6745 15th Avenue rir. xicnara rs. Swanson nas submittea an applica~lon ror a variance to reduce the required thirty foot side street side yard setback from the existing twenty-two feet to fourteen feet, to allow construction of an addition to his existing house. The site, located at 6745 15th Avenue, is zoned "R", single family residential. Zoning Ordinance Requirements 1. Section 3.30 subdivision 4, paragraph 3 lists setback requirements; 2. Section 3.39 lists exceptions and modifications to yard requirements; 3. Section 3.40 subdivision 6, lists three conditions which must be met b4fore a variance may be granted. Staff Findings ing: The staff has reviewed this application and found the follow- 1. There are no special conditions affecting this par- ticular lot. The lot is 134 feet long by 75 feet wide and is not significantly different than any other lot in the City of Richfield. 2.• Denial of the variance would not preclude the appli- cant from reasonable use of his property. The ex- isting structure could be expanded in ways which would not require a variance. However, the applicant has indicated-preference for this proposal due to the location of existing rooms in the house. 3. property. Although the proposal would be only 14 feet from the south property line, the distance between . Council Letter No. 316 -2- September 8, 1980 the back of the curb on 68th Street and the proposed addition would be 33 and 1/2 feet and the 50 foot visibility triangle would not be obstructed. The staff feels that this is adequate space, and would not pose any safety hazards. Staff Recommendation Because the three conditions of granting a variance have not been met, the staff must recommend that the city council deny this application. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission reconunends. that the city council Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City I~ianager KN/eja cc: Community Development Director City Planner f s . i~ .._ ~_~...T,:,.. ~S .._..._._ _ ::~~.J.~ _ .,_.. c::~.. ,~ in ~onin.r, :- reuues~ for variance v ~..~ - ,~;o. ;c: t ~ a~^~~~ ~~• or lane lcca~ec ate. ;.. ,~ ,, Special lise Aparrr~ent Use Owner/Applicar. r.Cdress ~S ~ ~_ ~ Bus. Phone Plct ~srcel ~ . ;~=, J1OC:. J ~~ ;;~ [ OL °'?==cl G1:;:2?':Sr.CnS O: rO~er~~~ (a~~aCieeG~ all neCeSSarV G~'_'a~•:intiS S~ _ ~ I;?aD E:._s:._::g use of lane r~; ~' E:._s ~_::~ ~wi ld_. ~s? ~ 1'es ~~ Pao . S ~ 'r'e ', ;.~.c~.2.t'_`S_~ . s;.,l~ycr~aa-t`~ L~7 ° ~~~.~.-..___~_._ 1 I D te. YCC r CCC2\'C'i: :; :' :~^CC`11%:: D3LC ~~ \- ~ \ ~ REQUEST FOR VARIANCE OF ~~ Jr -- ~` FOR PURPOSE OF - ; .,.~ Legal Description: We, the undersigned, being otaners of immediate adjoining land as above described, do hereby ;.oncur with the variance as requested. SiQna~ure, f O~.ners Address Leal Description 1 -~ ` -~ ._ i L --- I ~ '- ------- - --- -- -- - ----- - "" - - - ----- ---I ----- -- ~ ---- _-~ -- -- ------ I- - --_ ---------------~ - i _. _. . Yy_ a ~--__ _._ - - -- _ ~ - -- ---- -._._ _ . L ~~~~ . ~~ 13 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ a O Q -G ~~-, ~ v IW ~ D Q ,v N Q ', y ^ ~~ a ~ ^a a it ~. 10 ~..~ e 68th V ^ n ~ o ~ r ~ -~ 8" = a N ~ ~ N ., y CJ _ ° N Ao N N om If Q r N ~ F JJJ ~ O n ~ ~ I W Q ~• ~ _. - f V Q ~ ~ - ~^ w O N W ~4 _ __ I Q „ ~. _ d ~n9~n 0 J. I I m PETITiO MAP ., Y :;; 1409 ° D N ~ 7 t N ~ n ~ D - -- +- ~ - G -- --- - D _ -- ---- . , L ,+- Y ~, W U ~, Q V a ~ ~ 0 v i0 ~ o i6 u ~ ~. 1 e per, a .1 5 2 0 0 n Q 14 1 3 a a a V N 13 4 ~a 12 5 v {:?},:}i r ~:: ::: :Y . . r I T E `T ~~~~' ~~:~: : k'r W Q N 10'1 ~' ~ a .~. ~ 4 N ~~ ~ _ 8'~ n ~ ---~- U T;a 0 m ~' U i P a ej5 D fl Ifi I o h ° I 15 . a m o Q 14 3 O? N D ~ ~ 3! 4 Q ~~ N 12I 5 a'O N M a 1 11 C IV a N ~. ~~ 10 7 ~ ° D Q r ° 9 8 a v Q ^ a Na__i34 1 C D I~S ~ n a I I', CY Q ^+ -~ -- ~, ~ ;a ~ D ~, a 98 a f ? L S T. W f, n D a ~fi~i ~- ~ ~- ~ ~, ~ ~~ J 15 ;2 a o D 14: 3 a ~ a ~ V 13j4 NQ 12j5 ~ry a I I is ~ , } N I~uJI r^ ~ :oil ~M M j ~J ~- ~ ~ 9 8 I r A ~ oQ 1512 D; ( ui ~~ D c N 13 4 a a I2~ N Q 5 'D 6 a ~ a I I : m y~ 10 ~' U 17 ~ ,~, m0 9 I8 ~~ O z 0 / ~ i / j~ ~/ /, ~ Q , S T. L ~~ C ~ ~ 16 io .~- I ~ m m ° n 18 2 U a ° l`. JJ ,~ Q 14, U 3 l v lJ w 13 4 ° N - ~ ^ 12 N - 15 l I M ~ 11 Ifi a M I 10 17 U ~~ 318 ( ~ y ~_ ~' C ,~ .~ T. ;- ~, ~ 6th ~/ ' / ~ =~ _ ~ 1i~111 7 a ~ 1~ 1 ~ °~. ° ~ ~ J / / 1611 :i ~ i6 I l~ ~ 7 ~- ~o `O ~_ / i ~ I c ~J a ~r ~ o -~-- ~/ j /' ~~ / F /' ---- - --- ---- 'D v~. n Y r.. oa l1 a J O Signatures on hetitinn 1______ J J A ^ 8 3 ~ :n = ® _-~_- - . 4 rs ~ v '^ ® 1413 __ j ~l / LJ LJ N N ! I N ,,/~, ~ !~ !25 I i~ l25 `. .'~ r N j ~--- .:- s+ . , 67th ~C, N p ~N p. N ry ~ - p U~, ao - n ~ C] ^~ 67th <v R CJ _ ~,~ V p w --`~. ^ ~° n p pN N p V r ^ , ~A ~p _ o ~_ ~ ~D ~ h D ,o 68th op pg 0o D o - a U N _p ~p ~~ ., D y N ~ _ v O, D N N _. ^ m p D^ ~o „ r ~p ~ m L_ 69th ~ ~p J lol ~ s~ p; a D 0 8 DT 3 c np T 4 p° Np s s p~ n d ~ 1 ~'1. 1~' ~ ~ W Q L ~-- '~- -~-a - _-~"T^ u ~D ~°- ~._ ~^ _ ____ ___ .~ ~~ ~ . C-~~ ~~ -101 n N1 ~N ~ loft LAND USE MAP ~- ~--~- ~T~7"' ~ p~ n _+ p [~ ZONING MAP_ T'a m ~ pa b ~D 6~ ~~ ~u e5 D_ ~-, _ ~; ~. .r o ~ P W s, p `~ ! L L- rp 4 _ ~ , ~p N .V ^~ ~, - A p --- M ~p o r` b o a n ,o i6 ~ i D° ~p 15 2 pm O n p 14 3 p a Q ~_ Na 13 4 p V ~p 12 5 ;, p 1 1 6 N ~p 10 T p~ ~Sp,T~ e p~ . p 16 I p ~p 15 2 pm '~ D I4 3 pa N p i 3' 4 p o N iL 5 D M p 11 6 D ~p lo , p~ a p 9 ~ b 8 D a ~ ~ W Q YI N p . 13 4 ~~ 'M ~~ ~p 11!n p . ~, ~p p: Q p D --~-- 9~8 - 0 7 Y S T. ~ 's ~' ~ ~ ("~ ~ i 5 ; 2 ~ ~ 3 ~^ p ~ 143 • a _D N ~ p 1314 N p i2j5 t I (~ p,, ! , I i~)7 {~ N ! ~ I..J ~~ ,p 9 B p^ s S T. z 0 Z L W n 16 1 p~ op 15 2 p ~,p 14; 3 D° 13 Np !2 4 p'' . -~ 5 p~ p li 6 p ~p 10 7 SD 9 ~8 Da L -~- ~~ 16 ,o 1 O Um c n I6 2 U a LJ ,~ p 14 3 lJ v i3 4 N N 12 5 `N° ~~ 11; 6 p~ D I~ I7 "' 1 c s ~ 918 a _ 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ST. r vto ; / ~. /. I 1 ~ %~ ~~ ' Tp 152 pD ;p 152 ~ °o D ~ --- _~- _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~i - I Y ! ._7 N f--7I °~ ! 2 5 ~ ° -, 12 5 ~ e --i.J- ~~ / ~ LLLJJJ 1 ;'3 -.: s 0 W A c Q OD .~- m m A -_y. <D a 'Y :. Vii! 15th AiVENUE 6.74 5 O I r~ I m ,~ l ~ I O I I ~8~ rn I o x c 514` ~ .i yI~ I 1 I ~--18 ~ ~ I I I l r I m I °' ca • o I I i = X O y~ C ~+ H A ~ N n m ~.i ~~ u N CITY OF RICHFIELD, DSINNESOTA Office of City BTanager Council Letter No. 315 Agenda September 8', 1980 The Honorable Niayor and T~iembers of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members Subject: Request for Special Use Permit, 7625 Chicago Avenue Rev. Stephen Hachig, representing House of Prayer Lutheran Church, has submitted an application for a special use permit to allow a day care center use at the House of Prayer Lutheran Church, located at 7625 Chicago Avenue.. The property is zoned "R", single family residential. State statutes indicate that a day care operation for fewer than 10 children is a permitted use in residential zoning districts. When 10 or more children are involved, local. approval is necessary. Day care operations of 10 or more children are considered schools under terms of Richfield's zoning ordinance, and the operation of schools in an "R" zoning district requires the issuance of a special use permit. The proposed day care use is a "Latch Key" operation. Latch Key day care operations are for school age children only, including children in kindergarten. The projected enrollment for the proposed day care use is 30 children between the ages of 5 and 12. The facilities to be used at the existing church are approximately 7,645 square feet, plus limited use of the existing outdoor recreational facilities. Pdo new construction is contemplated. Zoning Ordinance Requirements 1. Section 3.41, subdivision 5 governs the issuance of special use permits. 3. Section 3.30, subdivision 2, paragraph 1 allows schools in "R" zoning districts by special use permit only. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed this request and found the following: Council Letter No. 315 ~ -2- September 8, 1980 1. The 2. The Richfield Fire Division has inspected the facil- ities and indicated that the necessary changes are being made in order to meet the fire code require- ments for this building use. 3. The staff feels that, based on projected enrollment and the hours of usage, the increase in traffic due to the use would not be significant and would not ad- versely affect the surrounding area. The children will attend the day care program only before and of ter school. Therefore, the heaviest increase in traffic would occur in the morning at approximately 7:00 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., and in the afternoon at approximately 4:30 p.m. 4. Sufficient parking is available on the site. Adjacent property owners on the west side of Chicago Avenue have indicated that a parking problems occurs along Chicago Avenue because of the existing nursery .school use, and have in the past filed a petition requesting that "i1o Parking Anytime" restrictions be established on the west side of Chicago Avenue. The day care re- quest should have no affect on this situation because the entrance is on the Elliot Avenue side of the church property. 5. An outdoor play area is available on the site and is sufficiently screened and setback to avoid disruption of adjacent residential land uses. Staff Recommendation Because this application is in substantial compliance with the conditions governing issuance of special use permits, the staff recommends that the city council approve issuance of this special use permit, with the following stipulations: 1. That the facilities me 2. That the facilities meet all applicable federal, state, and county regulations for day care service, and obtain the proper and necessary licenses for such. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission recommends that the city council grant this special use permit application with the listed stipulations.: Respectfully submitted, Karl Dlollenbe~ger City Manager cc: Community Development Director C itv Planner t i DATE: CITY OF RICc?F IELD, Richfield, I~?innesota Department of Public ~~'orks - Building Division 6700 Portland Avenue South (612) 869-7521 APPLIC.TION IS HEREBY ~'~IADE FOR: Q A chsnge in zoning ~ Special lise Q A request for variance CJ Aparr.ment Use By: House of Pra~~er Lutheran .C~?irch Owner/Applica: b25 Crica~o Ave. S Address Richfield. MN ~~~,?'i City g,~b_g~,71 Bus. Phone For the property or land located at: Address: 7025 Chiea:~o Avg S Plat Parcel Su'~division: Block Lot GereY'al dimensions of property (attached all necessary drawings, maps): Existing use of land: Church Existing zoning: Sin~-le Fariily Residential Existing buildings? 0 Yes 0 No. Proposed changes in use: None - Addition of Day Care/Latch Kev Pro~;ra.m Proposed changes in zoning: Alone Variance requested: None Attach al]_ necessary di ~CJlI:.^.S, I`13^;~ ~ ?nd ~;1~~ dE?Vt~~ C^_:^.t?!lt '~~ ,^S Annlicants Sicnature ~ Date: ~T ~ o~ , _ ,~~ Fee~~s Recei~•ed E;v(~~-tom ^eceznt ~,~~~ Date ~ 36~ ~ USE OF PRAYER DAY CARE/LATCH Ki:` The "House Of Prayer" Day CarejLatch Key is scheduled to open September 15th, 1980. Our dasired opening enrollment is 30 children. Fifteen of these children ~*ill be kindergarteners c-.>hile the remaining fifteen children caill be school age, up to 12 years. Hours will be 6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., year round. The amount of time each child spends at the center will depend of their regular school hours, their parents working hours, regularly schedled school vacations, etc.. The fee for part time kindergarteners is $35.00 per week. For school age part time children, the fee i~ $30.00 per week. Full time enrollment for both groups is $9.00 per day or $45.00 per week. The space alloted for the centers activities is Fellowship Hall and classrooms 3 and 5, c~:ith limited use of the surrounding outdoor playground. It is our intention to provide a ~-yell qualified day care facility which will meet the needs of the community as c~:ell as provide an effective atmosphere for growth and learning. The day care will provide a safe, secure atmosphere, where children can build lasting relationships with the staff, other children, and the church. House Of Prayer Day Care{Latch Key will be operated by Marian and Ruth Garrison. Marian has completed a ten month course at Suburan Hennepin County Area Vocational Technical Center in Eden Praire in Child Development. The training included working is nursery schools, day care centers, elementry schools, and working with mentally and physically handicapped children. She received a teachers assistant certificate. She also to;~k general education courses at St. Mary's Junior College and Metropolitan Community College and received her Associate of Arts Degree in Child: Development. Ruth trraduated from the University of Minnesota in 1979 with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Speech and Communications, emphasizing interpersonal, small group dynamics. In 1978, she helped re-establish a day care facility located on 36th and Bioominoton, in south Minneapolis. She designed and carried out many of the administrative duties and assisted in hiring a complete staff. She has the legal qualifications to be a head teacher, and has taught as a substitute at the day care. She has also had training in first aid and emergency treatment through her caork as a nursing assistant at the Veterans Fiospitol. The scheduled hours of the day care required that we hire an assistant to meet the teacher/child ratio. An assistant has not yet been hired. We are looking forward to working c-rith the community. Ruth Garrison and Marian Garrison ~, ~ •- REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERh4IT OF FOR PURPOSE OF N~usc~ ~,-F ~~~; ;,~,,- czU Ctci e /L~~f~~, k~,<< Legal Description: We, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above described, do hereby concur with the Special Use as requested. Signature of Owners Address Leal Description i `' ..12, ~ E/ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~/~ ~ v~`L ~ ~ Y 1, ~~~' LC..t'YlJ _~ (' c ~ ~ ~.3 ~~e"~~P.:wtii ~:''~~.. 1 e t1 / p~ / 1 t ~ ~j , n/~, '~ ~~ / " -~ l i. ~ /~ ~ ,a'~ i /~ /' L~ j ~~*77 _~' ~; ~ ~ a~ 7~tro~~ ~~~..iJ.%~t,~.~ ~.,C.C,r~ .~~ / ,~ i~ - /' ~~~ -~ -.~ C. ci .~_ _ _ / L~ ~ ~/y 6/ _ ~~ ._i~ ~ _~ ~ ~~j1 ~C-C .~.-- ~ pie _~_ ~.T' ._~ ~~ ~ _ ..~~....-_ J ~/~ _ .~ ~ Y'~+~ ~ I L~ ~ T F ~~ / ~ ~ 5Y / ~ ~". ~ _ ~ r it ~___'_' _~~__ - _ _~. - r ~~~=----f -~ - - ~ // `` /) f ~% ~~V ~'~J /till/ , ! ~ ~c.,l~Gi ~ ~ -- ~ k ~~ ~ '- ~ Y -- - -- ~~+ e-.__. __ --• - - ~, ~t77~d ~~r,~ 'Z''''`~` ' f~'G'SG"' /''~ `tea I ~ ~ ~L~~ tL~~, i -------~-- -~ - ---f-- ----}- ------ -----_ __~..~~ s ~ '" - REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PER,~fIT OF FOR PURPOSE OF~,uSe c,~ ~^CLL-(~r t~~z~ C`cv,c ll~Zti G,, /~C,~ Legal Description: We, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above describe do hereby concur with the Special Use as requested. Address Legal Descripti:: emu, .~, i~ n r.n nt I ( ~ ,: ~~n 1 ------- t ,; - - - -- - --- --- - - I - - -- --- - Signature of Owners .-, n 16 1 u ~ ~ U 16'I- U~ F-1611 ~•.~ ~~ 16 II U~ c N~ ~ 14 f3 ~ o .. ~ 14 ~ PETITIOiV I~iAP 0. ^~- D 13 ~4 ~ w `V ~ 13 ;4 D ~ 1374 Q , w _ n 13 I4 ~ W Q N ~ ~ N ~ N ~ N ~D I ~` r~ f a ~ N N D IZ I ~ rv ~ (G ~ J ~ ~ v ~ 12 15 - N r ~~~~~ N 1 _-_ ~ t____ o lo;~ Q ~ ~o loin oo ~ ~ lo,, o~ ~ o to ~ o~ QgiB ~~ n g 8 ~K Q a 9 8 ~~ n Q 9 8 (-~d L~ j_,J r r r r ' r 76th ST. i Nn 6 ~, o Y. ~ e ~ -~a ~, ' I I .___~ l~ 1 ~ ~ '. ~ ' u-~ -_ Q Q U V SITE ~~ , _ _, 1 w S T. __-~ 1 r - -I a a i I ~~ 1 i ~ } i i -- I ~ ~ ~ f ~- - -' -- =~ ~' I I i i 1 ~. s 0 ~ 16 ,_ I 1 D^ °' a 15 2 ~ o Vii; :;:,;:; - a 0 ,_a 12 5 a~ ~:~::~:: ~; a 10 T 7 ~ .. p D 9 8 U ~_ ~ ~ n 1 ~ Q u i '~ -__----- ~-` Signatures on Petition Mi-- --~- U •- R U ~~ U+ 1 1 16 1 I Iw „°~ I' 16 I a~°, t 1~~ 18 1"r'.~'~-ites - U U A u ~ LJ l.J 2 ~ m r ^ 15;2.. ~a T ~ ~ , u v J ~ ~ IS ~2 o o r 15 I2 Do o a~ IS 2 m I j3 ~o ,~ 14,3 ~ ZONING MAP 413 - . "~ I ~ ' 4 _ ~1.~ 13 ~ 4 3 4 ~ ~1.~ D" ~- a I DN Q V V 1 ,N Q ,J ~ Q~ Q N a 13 I4 O~ ~ ~ ~ ` 1.~ _~ N I2'3 ~N J~ IZ 5 DN a Q I N N Q d c .__ IZ 5 ~ N - _ ~ ~ O II •C Q ~ 11 16 N n ~~~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ 10~~ 0~ - o r. ~ 10 i7 D:. n ~ 10 7 Qm m a 10 7 Qm s ~ ~ ; n 9le aQ r 9 8 ~' ~ f _ ~• LJ ~, ~ I ~v '^ D 9 ~ 8 ~ n ~ Q 9 8 ~v th I D gl e 0 u= ~ 4 ~.m _~ s D N -~ n ry Do r 1 ~ . h .. ~ D 18 I D~ r $~ 17 2 • ~ - -15f4-- - -d ~D D- ^'D I4~5 ~` '' 1316 N D -~ 127 D N P D I I; 8 ~ D~ ~~ ro;s i ~ 0 U i U SITE n I ~ - N II r I _. i i ' 0 w S T. S T. s .~-3~G: s - __ __ ~ ~ - -- -- - - --- ~n. GENERAL COMMERCIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ~ I6 I u X~'. u 16 ! UrI '~ ~ ~ 16 I1 l l'^I In ~ ~ 161 r°, °U 18 1 r r r ~ ~^ o ~ 152 ~~ "D 152 C LAND USE MAP D~ o~ 15 2 ~ N D 141 3 D , i ~ ~ 14 ;3 i r; ~ J - ' ~ 13 ;4 ~ ~ " ~J a ~ 13 '4 D ~ " N j L _ N ~ D ~ c N~ Q N Q 12 ~ 5 12 ~~ T i n „ ~ D 6 ~, ~ II q ~°; ~ 10 7 ~ °, _ _ ___- .°,~ D 10 , 7 D o e D9~8 OX r an 9 8 00° ~ l J ~' 76th ~0 t 1 Q h `c' 2 2 0 `, 3 3 ° ~ "_' r i 4 4 D- L _, _ ~ ~ - 5 [] ~ ..~ 5 - O N "~ 6 6 `~ N °' ~ 7 N _ 7 n ~® 8 Q m ~ 11 M Mf ^ ~ 10 9 a a io ^ • r _ D ~ h 18 i ^ c ~' g D 7 ,, ~ ~ -- 1 -- ~ 5~ 4-- ~ - a n n I D v ^ I415 D ~~ l36 -+ ^ N .~ 127 D N ~ M i1~8 Dm M T °~ ro;s I ~ p U U a ~ ~ 19 v_ u U ' D V D !3- 4- N D° 12 I 5 DN a II ~ ;;; D i O 6 Dh T D ;' Q ~~ a g ~ g Q a v, n j ,,, ~ 13 i4 Do > N D 13 4 D~ a a I ,. ,~ N D 1 N N a Ii 5 DN ~~-~ __ o N F a i t s ., ~~ i t 6 °,n' ~ 10 7 D m m Q 10 7 D ,~~ ~ ~ a ~ 9 I8 a v n 9 8 v ~ r LL1l ~' r - S T. ,', D 16 r_ I a D 15. O 2 -~ m `~ ,~ 14 ; 3 D a 4 _ ~y Q N ~ D N D 12 !5 «; D 11 6 ;x, 10 7 D n D 9 8 Q^ S T. s 0 ~ 16 , ~ t- 1 h. D 15 2 Dp ,~ 14 3 a N ` ~v D 12 ~ 5 DyD=~ D !i ' 6 ®~~ M~ 10 T a~P ~ r D 9 B D - -- -----J ~ __- -- SINGLE FANl1LY RESI[~ENTIAL ~ _._'_ ' f~~iULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - -~ ~~" W ~'~ `~y .~ y: s n •~' a ~= o rtf :. n -- m z - c -~ m "~ n~ ' ~:` l',~ iii .. ~; i c` ~^,~K no s,y 1 I I I 1- r ~f j j 1 ~--- ~ -- i _ ~ i r -- i ~ j i~ t j V I I I I " j /I, ~ '~'' _- - t _ ~ _ _ ~ .. _ J =i-~j. ----- -- -- -- --~~_~---- i.~-7 r-- IiL~ . EAST 77TH STREET 2g m r r 0 1 n m z c m ~~21 '_'~~Ilb -c:. - ~~ j A~ ^ __ ~ 0 U M '~ tV .~-+ ._ ^ L Q. (~ ~~ C N O T I C E O F H E A R I N G August 15, 1980 Dear Property Owner: I w~uiu like to take this opportunity to invite you to a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue Sc,uth on Tuesday August 19, 1980 at 7:30 PM. The Planning Commission will be hearing a request for a special use permit to allow a day care center use at House of Prayer Lutheran Church, located at 7645 Chicago Avenue South. I would encourage you to appear at this meeting and give testimony for or against this matter. Should you have any questions or need specific information on t-.his matter, please feel free to contact me or the Planning Division Staff at 869-7521. Respectfully, .n • ~. ~ 1,. ~- Rick Jopke Associate Planner City of Richfield -~--r7 ~-- l' , e ~' j _ _ ~/~ ~ 7 f 67 1..~,,~ ~~ "-%- ,l ~°-C~ C^ `,'g/-lam LF~-~N..iCL. a*.,..Q~ ,+ it _c~~.C,+.z.• r Cit.~`t ~,c j~~t.LC`,~c.i co~ „ ~.-c~-.z~t~ <~_'~'. _ /-~~ 2,~' t*l~ph~t~ ~. ~l fi ~? ~ 7 ~ ~ :. (fi 1 2 ~ -~ ~g ~~--~~ y`Z`Q~. ~l° j.~-,, ~~.~'~, yea e=+c±~~i a+~~an~funi~~ r:.r~~loyes "' .t ._ ; w CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: 7 Council Letter No. 314 Agenda September 8, 1980 Subject: Adoption of Transitory Ordinance, Authorizing Disposition of Property, Second Reading On August 25, 1980, the city council gave first reading approval to a transitory ordinance providing for the disposition of city property to the S & r1 Company (Lyndale Hardware). The property to be disposed of was formerly known as the Amoco Service Station and the Betty Crocker Pie Shop. Both are located in the vicinity of 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue. The parcels contain 8,697 and 9,442 development square feet, respect- ively. The planning commission found the proposed sale to be in conformance with the comprehensive plan. The terms for disposition of this land were part of a de- veloper's agreement between the city and the S & M Company which was also considered by the council on August 25. The terms reflect consideration to the S & M Company for the easements which the city is purchasing to undertake improvements to Lyndale Avenue and 66th Street, and consideration for damages to the facility because of the loss of off-street parking adjacent to Lyndale Avenue, and the resulting "costs to cure.:' The city will convey this property, valued at approximately $73,000, to the developer and pay an additional $75,000. This transaction, valued at $148,000, represents a settlement with the developer for the damages to his property. If the damages are not negotiated, it would be necessary that they be determined under condemnation pro- ceedings. A condemnation settlement could be significantly higher. The notice of public hearing for second reading of the attached transitory ordinance was published in the Sun newspaper on August 27, 1980. ^ ~' Council Letter No. 314 -2- September 8, 1980 It is recommended that the city council hold the scheduled public hearing, and after consideration of testimony, give second reading approval to this transitory ordinance to permit this rehabilitation project to get underway. Respectfully submitted, I~~,,,5,. -~1~~J~-gin '~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Planner Housing & Redevelopment Specialist City Attorney s f APPENDIX A TRRAPJSITORY ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 16.66. A TRANSITQRY ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY OF THE CITY., City of Richfield does Ordain: Section 1. The following property of the City is hereby authorized to be sold and disposed of; All of Lots 18 and 19, Block 1, Fairwood Shores subject to a permanent easement for roadway and landscaping purposes running in favor of the City of Richfield, its successors and assigns over the easterly 22.00 feet of said Lots and the northerly 40.00 feet of said Lot 19 lying westerly of said easterly 22.00 feet; and All of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Fairwood Shores subject to a permanent easement for roadway and landscaping purposes running in favor of the City of Richfield, its successors and assigns over that portion lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the easterly line of said Lot 3 distant 30.00 feet southerly from the northeast corner of said Lot 3 to a point on the westerly line of said Lot 4 distant 35.6 feet southerly from the northwest corner of said Lot 4. Section 2. The terms and conditions of such sale shall be determined by the City Council. ~k - CITY OF RICHFIELD, D'IINNESOTA Office of City :Manager Council Letter No. 313 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayo and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Execution of Easement Agreement, G6th Street Improvement Project Attached is an easement agreement provided to the city by Super America Stations, Inc. This agreement provides an easement area at 826 West 66th Street for the installation of improvements along that street. In 1977, Superamerica requested a zoning district change and special use permit to permit the expansion and renovation of their service station facility at 826 West 66th Street. The easement was provided to the city as part of the conditions granting the rezon- ing and special use permit. The Assistant City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and has found it acceptable. The statement contained in numbered para- graph two of the agreement does not place any additional obligations upon the city other than those which are imposed by existing law. It is recommended that the city council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the attached easement agreement. Respectfully submitted, (~ { ,.. Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Attorney i EASEMENT AGP~'E*".ENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEAIENT entered into this 10th da;' of July 1980, by-and between SUPERA"°.RIC;, STATIONS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "SUPERA.^SERICA"), and the CITY OF RICHFIELD, a A;innescta municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CI'"Y"): W I T N E S S E T H: -"~'K9~~A.~ KAY ir~ :.: <-~n3M ^.~'lr^Y Af'- S,'. ,.~ That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SL'PERF'V;ERICA hereby grants unto the CITY, its successors and assigns, forever, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, a permanent easement for right-of-way pruposes over, under, across and through those portions of Tracts E and C, Registered Land Survey Number 642, Files of the Registrar of Titles County ~f Hen*!epin, State cf Minneso*_a, lyi::g Nc~t.':erly ~: and within 20 feet of the following described line: Beginning at a point which is 20.1 feet East and 33 feet North of.the South East corner of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 28, Township 28, Range 29 West; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the left on a curve whose radius is 606.69' (Delta Angle 230 43', tangent 127.29'), a distance of 250.86 feet; thence tangent to said curve, a distance of 163.4 feet; thence deflecting to the right on a curve whose radius it 590.69 feet (Delta Angle 420 50', tangent 212.09') to the East line of Rae Drive. The Easement granted herein by SUPERAMERICA to the CITY is granted upon the following terms and conditions: 1. CITY agrees that its use of the Easement will not in any way interfere with the ingress and egress to SUPERAMERICA's property. - 1 - E 2. CITY agrees to indemnify and hold SUFERA~tERIC.4, its officers, agents, employees and invitees harmless a~,ainst an~- cost, liability, expense or obligation of CITE", its officers, employees, invitees, contractors, subcontractors, or others working for CIT1" in any work on said Easement, and against any liability' to any third parties for personal injuries, death or property damage occurring as a result of or in an~• way connected with acts or omissions, negligent or otherwise, of CITY, its employees, contractors or subcontractors, in the performance of the work, including its occupancy of the Easement. This provision is not intended nor shall it be construed to relieve SUPER.4blERICA or its successors and assigns from any obligations to paj• duly levied special assess^•;ents heretofore or hereafter levied for public improvements in the easement area. 3. SUPER.4.'~1ERIC.4 covenants that it has fee simple title to the hereindescribed property and that the same is free from all incumbrances and that SUFERADIERIC.4 will warrant and defend the title thereto against the claims of all persons. IN WITNESS l9HERE0F, this Easement Agreement is executed as of the date first herein written. WITNESSES: SUPER.4?~tERICA STATIONS, INC. ~~ _ _____ R. ~', Ja kson f ~ 7 A~~~ Borl. -~-_~~1 --- WITNESSES: Bv: Richard A.`Jq~fien - Its: President __ ATTEST: By : ` d ~ ~ /~ ~-- lt . I1. 5 e i e Its: Assistant Secretary CITY OF RICHFIELD B~ . " Its: ATTEST: By: Its: t ST.aTE OF MI:'dXESOTa COU\1'1' OF DA}:OTA On this ~~/~ day of ~ ~ 19 ~ U before me a _ ~.._._,w _ _ _-_~.,_ _._-. ~otarv PubSic t,•ithin an ~or s~ai County personall.• appeared -~ ~ R. A. • Jensen and A-. 1•~. Seiffe3•t to me personally known, l:ho, being each by me duly sMOrn did say that then are respecti~•ely the President and the .assistant Secretar~• of~the corporation ''"'"°'""'""°""'"'"'"- "~ --~~~~ ~- named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed - to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument tti•as signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said R. A. Jensen and tti, h`. Seiffert acknotiledoed said instrument to be the free act and deed of ~ ~,d~corporation. :~~"`_~ 7. ADONPJA J. BORi( ~~j//~~/~~C ~ ~ %'~..tic't~i; NOTARY P Nv~nnAMnY 1~ILi.~_ti ~_~' ~, ~~-Ci - - . a V•, UBi.IC -MINNESOTA ~,OLaT~ F'ub'l iC 115." DAKOTA CCU%TY ' My Commission Ezpirc; Dec. 12, 1983 YWVW~M'v'.'V'JV J. YV:V:,v:,. ,.v. ,.rW ~ STATE OF ) ......... .... ) S S COUNTY OF ) ~.~~,~ ~~~.-~~ „~ z ~;t,~5~~ On this day of 1980, before " me appeared to me personally known, who, eing y me my sworn, id say that he is the of THE CITY OF RICHFIELD; t at t o sea a ixe to t o oregoing instrument is the seal of the CZTY OF RICHFIELD, and that said instrument was executed in behalf of THE CITY OF RICHFIELD by authority of its and said ac now a ged said instrument to be t e ree act and deed ~ THE CITY OF RICHFIELD. NOTARY PUBLIC My coTr¢nission expires This Instrument Prepared By: ry _ est>_no, Attorney Ashlan Drive Russell, Kentucky 41169 - 3 - _Y nt 1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Dianager Council Letter No. 312 Agenda September 8, 19$0 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Off-Street Parking Permit, 6310 Penn Avenue s~i.~ . icc ~vaaai~vaa, ict+.i ~. .:.~~.ii ~.....y i.i~. ... u... ..... ..~~ ., ....~.t. ~....Z , ~..... ... ~..~~.. 6310 Penn Avenue South, has submitted an application for an off- street parking permit for a lot providing 89 parking spaces. On December 23, 1957, the city council approved an off-street parking application providing 36 parking spaces for The Canteen Company at the aforementioned address. Shortly thereafter, on February 24, 1958, The Canteen Company submitted, and the council approved, a new off-street parking application providing for 55 parking spaces. On June 27, 1966, The Canteen Company submitted yet another off-street parking application which was approved by the city council, providing 122 parking spaces. The applicant is now proposing to expand the existing building. The proposed expan- sion will remove 33 parking spaces and, therefore, a new off-street parking permit is necessary. A sketch of the proposed new parking layout is attached. The staff has reviewed this application and found that: 1. The required number of off-street parking spaces under terms of city ordinance is 78, and that the number of spaces proposed to be provided is 89. 2. No changes or alterations are being proposed on the existing parking lot, except removal of the 33 parking spaces. Therefore, the proposal will not affect existing conditions such as surface water drainage or curbing. .The proposal will alter on-site traffic flow, but will have no adverse affect on off-site traffic flow. 3. The off-street parking application is in substantial com- pliance with the off--street parking guidelines and Section 4.05 of city ordinances regulating parking areas. // _, Council Letter No. 312 -2- September 8, 1980 Because this off-street parking application is in compliance with the city's guidelines and ordinances relating to off--street parking areas, the staff recommends that the city council approve this application. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Engineer t~ U E E N A V E N U E ~. ~ ~- r- 2 5' 631 ) Z C~ PENN AVENUE -----~ -l .-.. .~ 25~ y I ~, ~~ - RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION NO. 80-9, CONTRACT NO. 2328 Name: Lee Johnson The Canteen Company Address: 6310 Penn Avenue Location: 6310 Penn Avenue Use: Manufacturing BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, .Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the proposed geometric layout of the off-street parking as contained in Off-Street Parking Application No. 80-9, Contract No. 2328 is hereby approved subject to and upon completion of performance of the contract for such off-street parking as hereinafter authorized. 2. That the proposed off-street parking contract for the improvement of said off-street parking, bearing contract No. 2328 be placed on file and that the manager be authorized to sign said contract and the clerk be authorized to seal the same for and on behalf of this city. 3. That the off-street parking operator provide the City of Richfield with Surety in the form of cash, passbook saving withdrawal authority, or performance bond in an amount to be determined by the community development director and city manager, to ensure the off- street parking lot is constructed within the terms and regulations of the Off-Street Parking Agreement. 4. That responsibility for the proper upkeep and maintenance of said Off-Street Parking lot shall remain the responsibility of the off-street parking lot operator in accordance with Ordinance Code 4.05. Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of September, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk /6 ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 311 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Tabulation of Bids for Demolition and Salvage of Betty Crocker Pie Shop Building On May 27, 1980, the city council authorized the staff to ad- vertise for bids to demolish the Betty Crocker Pie Shop. Demolition was appropriate because the building was vacant and the site is needed for improvements to 66th Street and for the proposed S & M Company, Lyndale Hardware, renovation project. Subsequent to teat action, the staff was authorized by the city council on June 23, 1980, to negotiate the sale of salvageable property. Ordinarily, all salvage rights are awarded to the demoli- tion contractor. However, because of the restaurant equipment re- maining in this building, and the interest expressed by potential buyers, it appeared that the city could attain a better financial position by selling the salvageable equipment directly to purchasers. Quotations for salvageable items on this property were solicited after various city departments identified items which they could utilize. The offers for direct sale of equipment total $5,098.55. A list of the buyers, items, and quotations are attached. On August 25, 1980, bids were opened for the demolition of the building. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for council review. It is recommended that the city council approve the bid minutes and tabulations, and award the contract to Carl Bolan~ier & Sons Company, the low bidder, in the amount of $5,500.00. It is also recommended that the salvage bid list be approved and that the items listed be sold to the specified parties at the specified prices. The net cost of demolition, i.e., demolition less salvage from di- rect sales, will be $401.45. This net cost does not include the value of the property salvaged by city departments. Respectfully submitted,. Karl Nollenberger KN/jf cc: Community Services Director Individual A. R. Duggan Salvage Betty Crocker Pie Shop Equipment roof air conditioner electric "free standing" sign Price 551.00 110.00 Total 661.00 Aslesens counter six doors all booths and tables revolving bakers oven gas grill grill stand stainless table with over shelves and sink compartment walk in cooler/freezer six foot canopy three compartment sink dishwasher hot water heater Pat Johnson two wooden benches lamp post fixture bag of stones Rog Ostberg four parking lights eight coach lights all floor lights in kitchen ten recessed chrome lights six wall globe lights four flood lights five wood ceiling beams one exit light Dave Spryshak Dale Vallencourt two spot lights two spot lights two glass doors Mrs. LaPlomme two fake evergreen trees Paul Larson all but ten lights-recessed chrome lights lowered ceiling 150.00 725.00 960 .00 55.00 60.00 210.00 1,100.00 120.00 255.00 480.00 185.00 5.00 10.00 1 .00 26.00 30:00 5.00 8.00 6.60 4.00 5.00 .95 2.00 2.00 2.00 40.00 GRAND TOTAL 4,300.00 16.00 85.55 2.00 4.00 40.00 20.00 5,128.55 r CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening August 21, 1980 Demolition and Site Clearance Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the Demolition and Site Clearance as advertised in the official newspaper on August 13, 1980. Present: Joyce L. Wilde, Acting City Manager Arthur Bailey, Engineer Michael Eastling, Engineer Dennis Kraft, Community Development Director Don Fondrick, Community Services Director Sylvia Bergh, Acting City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER BID SECURITY AMOUNT A. Kamish & Sons, Inc. 5% B. B. $7,200 Carl Bolander & Sons 5% B. B. 5,500 Bachman Construction 5% B. B. 5,700 The Acting City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the regular city council meeting of September 8, 19$0. Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk 9~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 310 Agenda September 8, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Vacation of a Portion of West 65th Street In June, 1978, a request was filed with the city council to vacate a portion of 65th Street between Pillsbury Avenue and Nicollet Avenue. Because the proposed vacation would have caused access problems to the Richfield Medical Group offices at 8 W. 65th Street, the portion of 65th Street adjacent to the Richfield Medical Group offices was not vacated at that time. The portion of 65th Street between Pillsbury Avenue and the Richfield Medical Group offices was vacated, however. Summit Bank and Richfield Medical Group have now filed a joint petition to vacate the remaining portion of 65th Street between their properties. A map showing the portion of street to be vacated is attached for city council review. The staff has reviewed the street vacation petition and found the following: 1. The petition is in proper form and has the required number of signatures to initiate the street vacation process. 2. The proposed vacation is in compliance with the LHN Re- development Plan, and is necessary for implementing that plan. • 3. All Richfield Medical Group access issues have been resolved. Summit Bank will provide access easements to Richfield Medical Group over the portion of 65th Street to be vacated and over the road immediately west of the Richfield D7edical Group building. 4. Necessary utility easements will be maintained. 5. Traffic flow will not be hindered because 65th Street has been relocated as part of the LHN public improvements. 6. Twenty-one additional offstreet parking spaces will be available to bank and medical group customers. 7. There will be a reduction in street maintenance costs. Council Letter No. 310 -2- September 8, 1980 It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution acknowledging receipt of the petition and setting a public hearing date on this vacation for October 13, 1980. It is also recommended that the council give first reading approval to the attached transitory ordinance to vacate the street. Respectfully submitted, 1 CJ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Engineer City Planner ' ~ PETITION FOR STRrET VACATI0:1 j,. City of Richfield, Minnesota Petition No. Dated Received To: The City Council of the City of Richfield, J.'Zi nnesota described or. We,~~• ~t~~~ie~rsigned, owners of land abutting on 65t~? Street ~~ `~ hereby petition that the part of such street, described Attacher.:ent 1~ be vacated by the City. of Richfield. Signature of Owners Record Ocrners and regal ;- Description of the Property i • , ~ ~ 1. _ ~ 2. ell 0. Gustafson (Attachrzent B) 3.T/~~~`,1~, Pichfield Medical FroDerties - ~~ Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 692, files P,egi strar of Tit1e> • ~Q ~ ~ ~~,~- Hennepin County, Minnesota Examined, checked and found to be in proper fore and to be signed by the required number of owners of land abutting the street, alley or public grounds (City Code of Ordirarces, Sectior_ 12.01) per cent City ClerJt • checked by Map attached r ATTACii_•?E'1T ~B Descriz~tion of Parcel: All of that part of the Southeast I/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said quarter-quarter to a point 511.6 feet Nort'~ along said line from the Southeast corner thereof; thence ~^7est parallel to the South line of said quarter-quarter, 50 feet to the actual point •of beginning mar'{ed by a judicial landmark; thence North along a line . parallel to said East line a distance of 174.3 feet to a point marked by a judicial land- mark; thence Jest at right angles 148 feet to an intersection with a line paralle l to and 198 feet 6dest of the East line of said quarter-quarter at a point 186.2 feet South of the South line of Rearrangement of Nicollet Homes Second Addition which point is ~~~arked by a judicial landmark; thence North along said parallel line 186.2 feet to the South line of said plat which point is marked by a judicial landmark; thence ~dest along said latter line a distance of 162.26 feet to an intersection with an extension of the tdest line of Blaisdell Avenue at a point marked by a judicial landmark; thence South along said tJest extended line of said avenue a distance of 202.45 feet to a point mar:{ed by a judicial landmark; thence , East 60 feet to a point in an extension of the East line of Blaisdell Avenue, 14 feet North along said line from 'its intersection caith the North Iine of the South 1/2 of the Sout~.east 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 27 which point is marked by a judicia 1 landmark; thence South along said extended East line of Blaisdell Avenue 218.98 feet to the point of intersection of said line with the North line of the South 451 feet of said quarter-quarter crhich point is marked by a judicial lar_d.•nark; thence East ' along said latter line a distance of 125.26 feet to a point marked by a judicial landmark; the.*~ce North parallel to the East line of said quarter-quarter a distance of 60.6 feet to a point marked by a judicial landmark, which is in a line parallel to the South line of said auarter- quarter; thence East along said line 125 feet to said actual point of beginning. ATTAC'TT A Description of Street to be Vacated: The entire. width of. West 65th Street; from the West line of Nicollet Avenue in a westerly direction to a Line formed by the Southerly extension of the west line of Registered Land Survey 692, Hennepin County, Minnesota. . 6 5th S ~ „ .- - INEW1 _ _ ~~- Drive- i Bank I I Medical L I Building I I '.~4 3 r.~ s.. boat k curb w z w a w J I J O I v Bank Building Q N Scale: l"=40' z property I~ne r t RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING STREET VACATION PETITION AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk request- ing the vacation of an alley easement described as follows: The entire width of West 65th Street; from the West line of Nicollet Avenue in a westerly direction to a line formed by the Southerly extension of the west line of Registered Land Survey 692, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, said petition complies in all respects with the require- ments of Richfield Ordinance Code 12.04, Subdivision 2. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: 1. The petition for vacation of that portion of West 65th Street described above is received. 2. A public hearing on the alley vacation in said petition shall be held on September 22, 1980. 3. The City Clerk is directed to publish notice of such hearing in the official newspaper of the city and post notice of said hearing in the manner provided by Rich- field Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdivision 3. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of September, 1980. Donale J. Priebe, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk 4 'T'RANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE .PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC STREET CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The .following described portion of West 65th Street is hereby vacated: The entire width of-West 65th Street; from the West line of Nicollet Avenue in a westerly direction to a line formed by the Southerly extension of the west line of Registered Land Survey 692, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to take such action as is required to give effect to vacation of the public right-of-way as provided in the foregoing Section 1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1980. Donald J. Priebe, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk