Loading...
10-13-80 agenda-# ~y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 368 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of. Richfield Council Members: Subject: Designation of Auditor to Conduct Audit of__~ 1980 Financial Records There is an item on the October 13, 1980 city council agenda providing for council discussion and designation of a firm to audit the city's 1980 financial records. The annual financial audit for the City of Richfield has been conducted for many years by the firm of Olson and Clough, with the exception of one year in the early 1970's, when the State Auditors did the annual fin- ancial audit. Olson and Clough have submitted a proposed agreement for 1980 auditing services, a copy of which is attached. During the past year or so, at least two other firms have contacted the city to express an interest in submitting a proposal for auditing services. These firms include Robert G. Englehart and Company of Minneapolis, and Peat Marwick and Mitchell. The city charter in Section 2.08 provides that "the council shall provide for an audit of the city's accounts at least once by the State Department in charge of such work, or by a certified public accountant." It is recommended that the city council discuss this matter at their October 13, 1980 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Administrative Services Director Finance Coordinator ~=- - - - AGREEMENT FOR AUDITING SERVICES - ~""~ THIS AGREEMENT, dated this day of , 1980, by and between the CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the accounting firm of OLSON & CLOUGH, Certified Public Accountants, a co-partnership consisting of ROGER L. OLSON, RICHARD G. CLOUGH and DARRELL D. STRAUMANN, hereinafter referred to as the "Auditors", WITPdESSETH: In consideration of their mutual convenants and agreements as hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto contract and agree as follows: I. ,.;w;;~. . __ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. The Auditors agree to make a limited general audit of the financial statements of the City for the year ending December 31, 1980. The examination will be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly, will include such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as are considered necessary in the circumstances. The examination will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with debtors, creditors, legal counsel, and banks. At the conclusion of the examination, the City will be requested to furnish written representations about the financial statements and matters related thereto. The engagement will be directed to the expression of an opin- ion on financial statements and is subject to the inherent risk that material errors, irregularities, or illegal acts, including fraud or defalcations, if they exist, will not be detected. However, the Auditors will inform the City of any such matters that come to their attention. ;,,~ _ - ._ It is understood and agreed that the responsibility for the establishment and enforcement of an adequate system of internal accoun- <'"='~"= ting control rests with the City. The Auditors will, however, call ~,~,_. .. attention to any internal control deficiencies discovered which they '""'"""""` -" - believe to be significant. - €.:; t. I I . • The examination shall also encompass financial statements of the City of Richfield Police Relief Association and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield for the same period. . - .. III. ,~ If circumstances disclosed by the audit call for a more detailed investigation than would be necessary under ordinary circum- t .._ ~ -° - - +i stances, such circumstances will be called to the attention of the City •_ ~.~ .; 7 _~ authorities before proceeding further with the investigation. If -- •' _~ authorized to proceed further with the investigation in this area, compensation for the additional services will be at regular rates designated later in this agreement. : i ~ • IV. • To facilitate conduct of the audit, the City agrees to pre- ? pare for the Auditor's use, certain exhibits, schedules, worksheets and • to have the financial statements and accounts and records ready for the '~ Auditor's examination prior to commencement of their final field work as follows: ~.~., _ _... Balance all general ledgers. Ts <' Prepare a reconciliation for each bank account. -~ Prepare a reconciliation for each fiscal agent account. ~~"-- Fill in and sign bank confirmation forms, to be provided by the Auditors. - ~•'_~; Prepare accounts receivable aging for all types of f~ accounts receivable which tie into and agree with ~ the general ledgers controlling accounts. Prepare accounts receivable confirmation requests, ~.- -_ ~ using drafts to be provided by the Auditors. '~ Prepare schedules of bad debts written off during „-.. _. _. _ - - the year. Y+ ~ ! ~ '~ ~__ . ~ yam- S"pp¢L+ ~i~~ -_ Prepare schedule of taxes and special assessments receivable by fund which ties into general ledgers of the various funds. Price, extend, and foot original inventory sheets for all types of inventories for all funds, have them checked prior to the commencement of the auditors field work, and journalized so that the -^~-=~-~~-~" ~~, general ledgers will reflect the proper amounts. Prepare an analysis of all investments, including ~ marketable securities, certificates of deposit, -__ '~ etc. by fund. The analysis should list investments ~~ on hand at the end of the previous year, invest- ~ ments purchased and sold during the current year, .~ and investments on hand at the end of the current --_- - --.---- ~ - - year, including all interest earned on investments ~ during the year, as well as interest earned but not collected as of the end of the current year. Update fixed asset ledgers/schedules-for all funds ' for additions, and/or eliminations during the year and record current year's depreciation on all fixed a asset ledger sheets. Fixed asset ledgers/schedules should be tied into the general ledger accounts as j of the close of the current year, by fund. '~ "~'`"'b` `` Prepare a schedule of insurance in force, includ- ing any prepaid insurance as of the end of the. cur- rent year, if premiums have been paid for more than - --: -.. - -M annual periods. Prepare a schedule of interfund balances which ties into the general ledgers of the various funds. ?# Prepare a schedule of accounts and contracts pay- >4 able by fund and journalize year end payables so - !. that the general ledgers will reflect the proper amounts. A schedule of salaries payable by fund should be prepared supporting all salaries and wages due but •.,"~ not paid as of the end of the current year, and - salaries payable should be journalized so that the general ledgers will reflect the proper amounts. The minute books should be up to date at the commencement of the auditors examination. __:. ~"'"~` :~ Prepare an organizational schedule and chart. Prepare working trial balances for all funds from general ledgers. ' Prepare any other schedules or worksheets needed by the Auditors to expedite their examination. ~._ Prepare financial statements for all City Funds, - ~ the Richfield Police Relief Association and the ~ - - R Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield in E-' accordance with generally accepted governmental ~ a accounting principles. ~ #~,., y = If any of the above mentioned exhibits, schedules or work- sheets have not been completed by the City, if any of the financial - - statements have not been completed, or if the accounts and records are not ready for the Auditor's examination at commencement of their final `-'~;'':` -~"'"'"'~'~' ~ field work, the Auditors shall have the option of completing said " - ~± exhibits, schedules, worksheets, or financial statements and making any Y ._ required adjustments to have the accounts and records ready for their examination, however, said work will be considered clerical, book- ------- - _- - - keeping and accounting services and will be billed at regular rates - designated later in this agreement. - - .. - -_ ._. V. The Auditors shall provide the City with at least twenty (20) ~ copies of the reports on their examination and shall issue their - - -'~ ~ management letters containing specific comments and recommendations 3 ' '~ with re and to the followin g 9 '~ (a) Non-conformity with procedures prescribed by statute. (b) Non-conformity to accepted principles of • governmental accounting. (c) Defects in accounting plan and financial _ -_ procedures that make proper accounting and auditing difficult. " (d) Any failure of the accounting department to - - make financial reports required or needed for administrative purposes. e An si nificant internal accountin control ( ) Y 9 9 weaknesses that come to their attention. _- ~ (f) Any other problem areas or general conditions ' that come to the Auditor's attention which ecific comments or recommendations ire s # . p requ _.__. -..: Three seperate reports will be issued. One report addressed --- -. to the Common Council of the City will be issued covering financial .:~. statements of all funds of the City, one report addressed to the Board : - of Trustees of the Richfield Police Relief Association will be issued :: _ .: ~~' covering financial statements of the Richfield Police Relief Associa- tion, and one report addressed to the Chairman and Commissioners of the - - +~ Housing and Pedevelopment Authority of Richfield will be iss~__.. _. _- - ing financial statements of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of F~' Richfield. } .. _. .. VI. The Auditors agree to consult with City personnel regarding the accounting system and any problems that may arise during the fiscal year ending December 31, 1980, and up to completion of the Audit Report for said fiscal year. These additional consultation services will be billed at regular rates designated later in this agreement. VII. Final field work for the audit will be started by the Audi- tors after receipt of notice from the City that the financial state- ments are completed for the year and ready for the Auditor's examina- tion. If mutually convenient, the Auditors may start field work prior to the close of the calendar year 1980. VIII. The City herewith engages the Auditors for the work herein- before specified and agrees to pay the Auditors for such work as follows: City Audit (Including Police Relief Association) $14,000.00 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Audit $ 2,600.00 The City also agrees to reimburse the Auditors for report printing, postage, and miscellaneous expenses. Consultation services hereinbefore specified shall be billed at the following hourly rates: Partners $40.00 - $45.00 per hour Audit Supervisor $32.00 per hour Clerical, bookkeeping, and accounting services hereinbefore specified shall be billed at the following hourly rates: Audit Supervisor $32.00 per hour Staff Accountants $20.00 - $23.00 per hour VIII. The Auditors shall provide the City with a detailed statement as to the names of accountants, classifications and hours worked for any additional services billed at the above specified hourly rates. - _- Payment of the Auditor's fees shall be made as work pro- gresses, and claims therefore are submitted by the Auditors. Monthly {~" - progress payments will be at the rate of seventy percent (70~) of the total fee and expense billed for the time expended to the date of the " - "'~ '` billing with final payment to be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Auditor's Report and an itemized claim form showing the } •- r~ - -- ~ balance due the Auditors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. _ - _ _ - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINtdESOTA BY - 8 1 MAYOR a BY - MANAGER ': (Seal) ,, ._ ~/D CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 367 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor .and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Alley Paving Program 'At the September 22, 1980 city council meeting, the city council discussed alternatives for resurfacing the city's alleys. After that meeting, the staff was directed to schedule a series of neigh- borhood meetings to describe the alley resurfacing program and to draft a resolution outlining an assessment policy which would pro- vide that the properties served by alleys be assessed for the cost of any alley surfacing program. State statutes regarding special assessments requires that a preliminary engineering report on a project be filed and a public hearing be set. The resolutions, which will be distributed at the October 13, 1980 city council meet- ing will provide that the council meet the legal requirements to begin the special assessment process. As council members are aware, the city`s alleys have been rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Alleys rated 1 n not only have potholes, but the oil and soil surface in general is deteriorated so badly that a patch has no surf ace to adhere to. These alleys need a major renovation because any patches would not last long enough to make it worth the time spent patching them. As the number ratings of the alley increases, the integrity of the surface increases, up to the one alley rated "5", which is in quite good condition. It is proposed-that three neighborhood informational meetings be scheduled for early November. The dates of November 6, 12 and 13 are suggested. Perhaps these meetings could be held at the Nature Center. Property owners who live adjacent to alleys rated 1 will be invited to the first meeting. The second meeting will be for persons living on alleys rated 2. The third meeting will be for neighbors of alleys rated 3, 4, and 5. Attached to this council letter is a draft text for an informa~ior~ai _,_:.;c:~u-re that is to be sent to all of the neighbors prior to the neighborhood meet- ings. The residents will be informed of the options available and the advantages and disadvantages of each, as described in the bro- chure. Because the alleys exist solely for the benefit of those living adjacent to them, all costs involved in maintaining or re- surfacing the alleys will be borne by those residents. At the Council Letter No. 367 -2- October 13, 1980 meetings, the staff will explain the qualities of the various types of surfaces being proposed as well as the economics of each. It is recommended that the city council take the following actions at the October 13, 1980 meeting: 1. Adopt the resolution receiving the preliminary engin- eering report and scheduling a public hearing on alley improvements for November 24, 1980; 2. Confirm the dates and location for the neighborhood meetings 3. Approve the text of the brochure to be sent to all neighbors prior to the neighborhood meetings. Respectfully submitted, ~D Karl Nollenberger City Manager . KN/eja cc: Community Development Director City Engineer COMPARISON OF COSTS OVER 30 YEARS FOR ALTERNATIVE ALLEY SURFACES YEAR OIL STABILIZATION ASPHALT CONCRETE 1981 $50 $78 $124 1982 47 76 121 1983 44 73 117 1984 41 71 114 1985 65 69 110 1986 61 66 106 1987 57 64 102 1988 53 72 98 1989 85 70 94 1990 80 67 90 1991 75 63 87 1992 70 60 83 1993 111 57 79 1994 105 55 75 1995 98 62 71 1996 92 58 67 1997 146 55 64 1998 137 52 60 1999 128 49 56 2000 120 45 52 2001 192 12 0 2002 180 28 0 2003 168 26 0 2004 156 25 0 2005 257 23 0 2006 235 22 0 2007 221 21 0 2008 205 19 0 2009 329 45 0 2010 309 42 00 Total cost over 30 years = $3,907.50 $1,519.50 $1,766 ~Ssumptions: Average lot size 60 foot width 30-year life for alley 20-year assessment roll Oil stabilization cost of $5/lineal foot, surface redone 4 years Asphalt cost of $20/lineal foot, resealcoated every 8 years Concrete cost of $32 lineal foot 8% annual interest rate on assessments 7% annual increase in costs of oil stab. and asphalt resurf. -- Richfield's alleys are a constant headache -- Frequent complaints are received by the city, about pohholes, dirt, water, etc., in alleys -- Weather and traffic cause rapid deterioration -- It has become more and more difficult for the city to maintain the alleys in acceptable condition -- Alley improvements have been delayed because of other needs'; including housing, streets, water, parks, sewers -- Alley improvement is the next logical step -- It makes sense to permanently improve the city's alleys now, because of the increasing deterioration and continually rising costs Treatment Advantages Disadvantages Costs 1. Oil Stabilization relatively doesn't hold up $5/lineal foot inexpensive needs redoing every 4 years energy shortages will continually inflate costs 2. Asphalt moderate cost not structurally sound $20/lineal foot can be damaged by oil, etc. must be sealcoated every 8 yrs. energy shortages will inflate future costs 3. Concrete rigid surface most expensive initially $32/lineal foot no maintenance can be shaped to aid drainage 30-year life 4. Do nothing none weat and tear on private vehicles using alley continued maintenance w/ - no permanent solution dirt, dust, puddles It is proposed that property owners benefitting from the alleys will be assessed 100q of the costs of the project. For the owner of an average 60-foot wide lot, the annual costs of the alley improvement project for each alternative are shown on the attached ~ - ~ -° sheet. It is assumed that the cost of the improvement would be assessed over 20 years, with eight percent interest charged on the assessment. It is also assumed that a 7y increase per year will be experienced in the cost of the petroleum products used every ., four years for the oil stabilization process and every 8 years for the asphalt sealcoating. As can be seen, the total cost paid by the average homeowner over the 30-year projected life of the alley is slightly less with asphalt, than for concrete, and considerably more expensive for the oil stabilization process than for either of the other two alternative= The annaul cost of the oil stabilization process becomes more expensive within nine years, by 1990, and continues to get increaseingly more expensive than the asphalt sost each year thereafter. The annual cost of concrete is slgihtly higher than that of asphalt for the - _ first twenty years, In late 1979, the city conducted a visual survey of all alleys, in an effort to i_ - -~ the condition of the alleys, and to rate those which are most in need of repair. _.._ -~ ratings of the alleys r^nged from "1", those in worst shape, to "5", those in best shape. Most of the alleys in the city were rated "1," "2," or "3," meaning that they need immediate repair; or at best, that a permanent surfacing solution must be reached within the coming ...<_,. _ ;. _ few years. It is in response to the identified poor condition of most of the city's alleys that the city council is now considering a permanent alley surfacing program. s - _ In early November, 1980, the city staff will meet with groups of neighbors who have alleys behind their houses, to describe the alternative alley improvement programs, and to solicit suggestions and responses from those neighbors regarding their preferences for a permanent solution to the problem of deteriorated alleyways. For many years, the city routinely repaired alleys with the oil stabilization process, which involves digging up the surface, and relaying it with a gravel and oil mixture. Many of the city's alleys now are comprised of that type of surface. However, the oil stabilization process cannot be done indefinitely, for with each layer of resurfacing, the overall surface of the alley becomesddeeper and thus harder to dig up the following time the process is used. The surface which results from the oil stabilization process, while similar to an asphalt surface in the beginning, is not a rigid surface, and is easily broken down by heavy vehicles (such as garbage trucks) which often use the alleys, oil and gas spills, or drainage problems. Furthermore, the surface is very difficult to repair on a lasting basis; repair materials work their way out of the potholes, and do not adequately adhere to the overall alley .surface. A second possible alley surface could be constructed of asphalt, similar to the surfacing used for the city's streets. This process would provide many of the same advantages to the alleys that it provided to the streets. However, asphalt does need sealcoating every 7 to 8 years, which would create an on-going maintenance demand on this type of surface. In addition, an asphalt alley, because it has no curbs to stabilize the edges, tends to break down along the edges. Finally, asphalt is difficult to shape to aid drainage. A final alley surfacing alternative is concrete. This is the surface that is being recommended by the city staff. Concrete surfacing would last, with virtually no repairs necessary, for at least 30 years. Concrete can be formed to provide a slight "V" shape in the center, which greatly aids drainage. Furthermore, concrete is almost indestructable, regardless of heavy traffic, oil and gas spills, etc., which threaten other alley surfacing materials. zY. ~. _ s.. ~.~s, . ~, , - _ .. . RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION RECEIVING PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CITY PROJECT 762 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of-the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A preliminary report on proposed City Project 762 o.f the City dated the 13th day of October, 1980, prepared by the city engineer, is hereby received and ordered to be placed on file. 2. A public hearing on said proposed improvement is hereby called to be held on November 24, 1980, commencing at 7:00 o'clock P.M., in the council chambers in the City Hall of the City of. Richfield, 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give published and mailed notice of such hearing in the manner required by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this- 13th day of October, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Major ATTEST: Sy via~K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PROPOSED CITY PROJECT 762 BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rich.f_ie1d, Minnesota, as follows: . 1. The Gity Council .finds it appears necessary and desirable that the City make the assessable public improvement of permanent surfacing or maintenance of all alleys in the City of Richfield. 2. A preliminary engineering report on such proposed assessable public improvement is required by law in the event that said improvement or any part thereof is specially assessed against the benefited property within the city. The city engineer is therefore authorized and directed to prepare a preliminary report of such proposed improvement and to submit the same to the City Council at the earliest convenient time. 3. Such report shall indicate the estimated cost of such proposed improvement, shall indicate whether such proposed improve- ment is feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement. 4. Such proposed improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as City Project 76L. Adopted by the city council o.f the City o.f Richfield this 13th day of October, 1980. Dona J. Prie e Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk ~~ ~ 8 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 366 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Public Hearing on Request for City of Richfield to Issue Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Six Fold Real Estate Company (Canteen Company of Minnesota) has Six Fold Real Estate Company (Canteen, Company~of Minnesota} requested that the City of Richfield issue Industrial Develop- t?ovom,n Rnnr~c ~-h f i nannP 'I"hP C(~T1StY'llCt1O11 of an additional The amount of the requested bond issue is $275,000. This fig- ure includes $190,000 for construction, $37,000 for equipment acqui- sition and installation, $20,000 for architectural and engineering fees, $10,000 for legal fees, $5,000 for interest during construc- tion and an additional $13,000 for various contingencies. This bona. is to be paid off over a ten year period. It is anticipated that the construction of this facility would begin on or about October 15, 1980 and be completed by January 1, 1 981 . additional 18 new An informal economic was conducted by the D7idw concluded that the projec feasibility study of the proposed project y National Bank of St. Paul. The study rent financial conditions. Midway National Bank proposes to ture this financing as a tax-exempt first mortgage industrial rather than as industrial revenue bonds, and further intends purchase the note themselves. struc- note to the is- ect (e.g., the Corporate Travel facility that the city council acted upon this summer, which is located in a topographically de- pressed location). In this particular request, neither of the above condition exist. However, the requested action is consistent with Council Letter No. 366 -2- October 13, 1980 State Statutes and will add to both the employment and the tax base of the City of Richfield. The Canteen Corporation of Minnesota has a record as a steady employer within the community. An argu- ment could certainly be made that if the council would be willing to issue IDR bonds for new businesses coming into the community, sound consideration should also be given to the expansion to busi- nesses which are already located and operating within Richfield. It is recommended that the city council hold a public hearing to consider the issuance of $275,000 in Industrial Development Revenue Bonds to the Six Fold Real Estate Company, and that they In an attempt to provide assis- tance to the council in this matter, we have attached a list of guidelines which the council may wish to consider as a part of this process. These guidelines have been used by the staff in evaluating this proposal. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director GUIDELINES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA The Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, 1980, as amended) authorized the City of Richfield to is- sue Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (IDR bonds). In the past, the city has received periodic requests to issue Municipal Industrial Revenue Bonds, and it is anticipated that ad-' ditional requests will be made in the future. This type of bond can be issued by the City of Richfield as a means of encouraging the development of economically sound industry and commerce within the community, and as a means of maintaining and promoting economic and industrial vitality. The following guidelines will be utilized to help both the city council and the staff to fairly and consistently evaluate IDR bond requests. 1. Projects for which IDR financing is sought shall be either of an industrial or commercial nature, and shall be com- patible with the overall development plans and objectives of the city. The project shall also be evaluated in terms of its compatability and consistency with the zoning or- dinance, comprehensive plan, housing plan, and other simi- lar ordinances and plans of the City of Richfield. ..~~. 6. The city council shall have the right to review and not issue municipal revenue bonds at any time prior to the actual time of issuance of the bonds, if it determines that it is in the best interests of the city not to issue these bonds. The city may also withdraw from participation should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. A decision of the city coun- cil with respect to withdrawing from the process shall be noncontestible. 7. The office of the city attorney of the City of Richfield will be responsible for the processing and coordination of applications for Industrial Revenue Bond financing. 8. Tax exempt mortgage financing will be allowed as an al- ternative to bond financing but will be subject to the same policies, rules, and regulations as bond financing. 9. The applicant shall be required to furnish seven copies of all materials required by the city. The applicant shall select qualified financial consultants and/or underwriters to prepare all the necessary documents and materials as required by the Richfield City Attorney's office. 10. All applications submitted for consideration by the city council shall be furnished on forms provided by the State of Minnesota, Department of Commerce Securities Division, for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bonds. The city council may, at its discretion, require the applicant to provide additional materials under certain circumstances. 11. Projects of a unique nature may result in the city council requesting that the applicant provide additional financial or economic information so that the city council may fairly evaluate the desirability and feasibility of the project. RESOLUTION NO. 6329 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AND SIX FOLD REAL ESTATE COMPANY RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City") is an incorporated municipality authorized and em- powered by~the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as amended (the "Act"), to issue its revenue bonds to finance the cost of the acquisition, construction and improvement of any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise engaged in assembling, fabricating, manu- facturing, mixing, processing, storing, warehousing or distrib- uting any products of agriculture, forestry, mining or manufac- ture; and WHEREAS,. the City proposes to issue its industrial develop- ment revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt instrument or may be in one or more series or in part in the form of a note or notes and in part in the form of bonds, any of the foregoing being referred to herein as the "Bonds") pursuant to the provisions of the Act as then in effect to finance the cost of the construction and equipping of a facility (the "Project") to be located in the City and to be owned or leased from the City by Six Fold Real Estate Company, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Contracting Party") and to be leased or subleased by the Contracting Party to Canteen Company of Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, the principal shareholders of which are major part- ners of the Contracting Party (the "Company"), for use as a food processing plant; and WHEREAS, the Act declares that the welfare of the State of Minnesota requires the active promotion, attraction, encourage- ment, and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, the em- ergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unem- ployment, and the state has encouraged local government units to prevent such economic deterioration; and WHEREAS, the Contracting Party has represented ~to the City that the financing of the Project under the Act will encourage the Contracting Party to construct and equip the Project and that the Project will be more financially feasible with the aid of tax exempt financing; and WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable for the pro- motion and development of industry and commerce in -the City that the Project be undertaken at the earliest practicable date, and the Contracting Party has requested satisfactory assurances from the City that the proceeds of the sale of industrial development revenue bonds of the City in an aggregate amount sufficient to finance the Project, currently estimated not to exceed $275,000, will be made available; and WHEREAS, the City deems it necessary and advisable that it take such actions as may be required under the Act as then in effect to authorize and issue industrial development revenue bonds to finance the cost of the Project, currrently estimated not to exceed $275,000; and WHEREAS, a form of agreement, designated as a "Preliminary Agreement" has been prepared under which the Contracting Party has stated its willingness to arrange for the construction and equipping of the Project and to enter into contracts therefor and, at the time of delivery of the bonds, to convey, grant or lease the Project to the City, and/or agree to complete the con- struction and equipping. of the Project, and to enter into a lease o~ the Project from the City, or a contract to purchase the Pro- ject from the City, or a loan or financing agreement with the City, with respect to the Project, or any combination of the fore- going, or any other form of "revenue agreement", as defined in the Act, under which the Contracting Party will be obligated (directly or through its notes or other secured or unsecured debt obligations executed and delivered to evidence its obligations thereunder) to make periodic payments sufficient to pay the prin- cipal of, interest on and redemption premium, if any, on the bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable, and such lease, contract or agreement shall contain such other provisions as may be required by the Act as then in effect and such other provisions as shall be mutually acceptable to the City and the Contracting Party; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that no project shall be undertaken until the Commissioner of Securities has approved the Project, on the basis of such preliminary information as the Commissioner may require, as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that prior to submitting an appli- cation to the Commissioner of Securities requesting approval of the Project, the City Council of the City shall conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project, no- ~tce of which hearing is to be published at least once not less than l5 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for said hearing, in the official newspaper and a newspaper of gene-' ral circulation of the City; and - 2 - WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on Monday, Octo- ber 13, 1980, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at City Council Chambers, 6700 Portland Avenue South, duly noticed, and held in accordance with law, and as a result of said public hearing the City has determined to proceed with the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, Be it Resolved by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. That this City Council hereby finds, upon the basis of information given it to~date, that the Project will promote, attract, encourage and develop economically sound industry and commerce in the City of Richfield, will prevent the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment in the City of Richfield, and will otherwise further the purposes of Section 474.01 of the Act. Section 2. That in order to provide for the construction and equipping of the Project in the City, with the resulting public benefits which will flow therefrom, it is deemed neces- sary and advisable that Bonds be issued in an amount sufficient to finance the Project, currently estimated not to exceed $275,000 and that the Preliminary Agreement hereinafter referred to be approved and executed for and on behalf of the City. Section 3. That the Preliminary Agreement by and between the Contracting Party and the City, substantially in the form and with the contents set forth in Exhibit A_ attached hereto, be and t:he same is hereby approved and authorized. Section 4. That the Mayor is hereby authorized and di- rected to execute, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to attest and to affix the seal of the City to, the Preliminary Agreement substantially=in the form and with the contents set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 5. That in accordance with the Act, the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities for the Commissioner's approval. of the Project. The Mayor, City Attorney and officers, employees and agents Qf the City are hereby authorized to pro- vide the Commissioner with any preliminary information he may require for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, if it i_s approved by the Com- missioner. Section 6. ,That it is the present intent of the City to issue and sell Bonds in an amount sufficient to finance the costs of the Project, currently estimated not to exceed $275,000, subject to the execution of the Preliminary Agreement herein authorized, the approval of the Project by the Commissioner - 3 - of Securities and the conditions specified in the Prelimin- ary Agreement. Provided, however, that the City may in its sole discretion withdraw its approval of the Project at any time if, in the judgment of the City Council, the public interest and the purposes of the Act would not be served thereby, and provided further that nothing in this Resolu- tion or the Preliminary Agreement shall be construed to constitute a legal obligation on the part of the City to issue the Bonds. Section 7. That all resolutions and parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this -13th day of October, 1980.- Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT THIS PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT is between the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, party of the first part (hereinafter referred to as the "City"} and Six Fold Real Estate Company, a Minnesota general partnership, party of the second part (herein- after referred to as the "Contracting Party"). . 1. Preliminary Statement. Among the matters of mutual in- ducement which have resulted ire the execution of this Agreement are the following: (a) The City is an incorporated municipality of the State of Minnesota authorized and empowered by the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as amended (the "Act"), to issue its revenue bonds for the purpose of financing .the cost of the ac- quisition, construction-and improvement of any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue produc- ing enterprise engaged in assembling, fabricating, manufacturing, mixing, processing, storing, warehousing or distributing any pro- ducts of agriculture, forestry, mining or manufacture. (b) To promote, attract and develop economically sound industry and commerce in and near the City and to further the other purposes set forth in the Act, the City proposes to finance the contruction and equipping of certain facilities to be owned or leased from the City by the Contracting Party and leased or subleased by the Contracting Party to Canteen Company of Minne- sota, a Minnesota corporation, the principal shareholders of which are major partners of the Contracting Party, for use as a food processing plant (the "Project"), such.Project to be located on a site within the City. (c) The City Council has given preliminary approval to the Project and has indicated that it is its present intent to issue and sell its industrial, development revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a single debt. instrument or may be in one or more series or in part in the form of a note or notes and in part in the form of bonds, any of the foregoing being referred to herein as the "Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount of not exceeding $275,000 to pay the costs of constructing and equipping the Project.. 2. Undertakings on the Part_of_the City. Subject to the conditions above stated, the City agrees as follows: (a) That it the issuance and sale Act as then in fo-rce, exceed $275,000, whic costs of the Project, costs of the Project, all expenses incurred will authorize, or cause to be authorized, of the Bonds, pursuant to the terms of the in an aggregate principal amount not to z amount appears necessary to finance the and apply the proceeds thereof to pay the including reimbursement to the City of in connection with the Project. (b) That it.will adopt, or cause to be adopted, from time to time such proceedings and authorize the execution of such documents as may be necessary or advisable for the authorization, issuance and sale of the Bonds and the financing of•the construc- tion and equipping of the Project, as aforesaid, including a lease agreement, a sale agreement, a loan or financing agreement or any other form of "revenue agreement" pursuant to the provisions of the Act then in effect (any of the foregoing being referred to herein as the "Revenue Agreement"), all as shall be authorized by law and mutually satisfactory to the City and the Contracting Party. - (c) That it will take, or cause to be taken, such other acts and adopt such further proceedings as may be required to implement the aforesaid undertakings or as it may deem appropriate in pursuance thereof. 3. Undertakings on the Part of the Contracting Party. Subject to the conditions above stated, the Contracting Party states and agrees as follows: (a) That the Contracting Party has found a purchaser for the Bonds. (b) That it will enter into a contract or contracts for the construction and equipping of the Project. (c) That contemporaneously with the delivery of the Bonds it will enter into a Revenue Agreement with the City under the terms of which the Contracting Party will obligate itself to pay (directly or through its notes or other secured or unsecured debt obligations of the Contracting Party executed and delivered to evidence its obligations thereunder) sums sufficient in the aggregate to pay the principal. of and interest and redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable, any such Revenue Agreement to contain such pro- visions as shall be required by law and as-shall be mutually acceptable to the City and the Contracting Party. (d) That it will take such further action as may be required to implement its aforesaid undertakings or as i-t may deem appropriate in pursuance thereof. - 2 - 4. General Provisions. (a) A11 commitments of the City under paragraph 2 hereof and of~the Contracting Party under paragraph 3 hereof are subject to the condition that on or before one year from the date hereof (or such other date as shall be mutually sat- isfactory to the City and the Contracting Party), the City and the Contracting Party shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms for the Bonds and of the sale and delivery thereof, and mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph 3 and the proceedings refer- red to in paragraphs 2 and 3 hereof, and all necessary consents shall have been obtained. (b} If the events set forth in (a) of this paragraph do not take place within the time set forth or any extension thereof, the Contracting Party agrees that it will, at the re- quest of the City, reimburse the City for all reasonable and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses which the City may incur at the request of the Contracting Party arising from the execu~ tion of this Agreement and the performance by the City of its obligations hereunder, and will pay the preliminary fees of bond counsel, and this Agreement shall thereupon terminate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, the parties hereto have entered into this Preliminary Agreement by their officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day of 1980. CITY OF RICHFIELD, HENNEPTN COUNTY, MINNESOTA [SEAL] By Mayor Attest: City Manager SIX FOLD REAL ESTATE COMPANY BY Witness: [City's Letterhead] Minnesota Department of Commerce Securities Division 500 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Pinnesota 55101 Re: City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota - Application for Approval of a Municipal Industrial Development Revenue Bond Project for Six Fold Real Estate Company ° The undersigned hereby certifies, on the basis of repre- sentations made to him by Six Fold Real Estate Company (the "Contracting Party"), that the City Council has found that the project (the "Project") to be constructed. with the proceeds of an issue of not exceeding $275,000 of_ industrial development revenue bonds (the "Bonds") of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "C.ity") will satisfy the public purpose of the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as supplemented and amended (the "Act"). The proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of not exceeding $275,000 will be used to finance the construction and equip- ping of an approximately 5,000 square foot food processing facility in the City, to be owned or leased from the City by the Contracting Party and to be leased or subleased by the Contracting Party to Canteen Company of Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation all of the shareholders of which are major partners o.f the Contracting Party. The Project will include the con- sruction of an addition to an existing facility and the acqui- sition o.f_ certain equipment. V~hen completed, approximately 18 new jobs will be created by the Project in the City at an annual payroll of approximately $216,000, based on currently prevailing wages. Thus, the Project will promote the devel- opment of economically sound industry and commerce, prevent the emergence of areas of unemployment and economic deteriora- tion and retain an existing industry to use the available resources of the community, all in accordance with the provi- sions of Chapter 474.01 of the Act. . The Project does not include any property to be sold or affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. A public hearing was conducted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subd. 7b on October 13, 1980 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at the City Council Chambers in the City. At such public hearing all interested parties were af.f_orded an opportunity to express their views. Finally, information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Sub. 8 will be submitted to the Department of Economic Development upon a revenue agreement being entered into between the Contracting Party and the City. Very truly yours, CITY OF RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA By Mayor ~ midu~a~ v ~b~ bank UNIVERSITY AND SNELLING AVENUES SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 TELEPHONE 612-646-2661 October 2, 1980 Commissioner of Securities Minnesota Department of Commerce 500 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Re: City of Richfield, I-Iennepin County, i~2innesota. - Application for Approval of a Municipal Industrial Development Revenue Bond Project for Six Fold Real Estate Company (Canteen Company of Minnesota Project) Dear Commissioner: At the request of the above-named. Borrower, we have conducted an i.nforma.l study as to the economic feasibility o:f the proposa7_ that the above-named munic_ipali.ty issue its industrial development revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, to finance, in whole or in part, the above-referenced Project. Our study has led us to conclude that on the basis of current financial conditions, the Project is economically feasible if it is done as a municipal industrial development project. We propose to structure this financing as a tax-exempt first mortgage industrial revenue note rather than as industrial revenue bonds. lUe intend to purchase the note our- selves, subject to your approval of the Application veing submitted contemporaneously herewith, th.e final apL~roval of the mLUZi.c-i.pali_ty, the opinion of bond counsel and the mutual agreement of all parties as to maturity, price, interest rates, security and other terms and documentation. Very truly yours, ~~i`" ! ~d~mcs ~ Ritt Vi ce~re s ident JAR: df OM-00~ 24-01 This Application must be submit.!~~~ to Commissioner in duplicate STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE -SECURITIES DIVISION APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PROJECT Date To: Minnesota Department of Commerce Securities Division 500 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 The governing body of Richfield ,County of I-Iennepin , Minnesota, hereby applies to the Commissioner of the State of Minnesota, Securities Division of the Department of Commerce, for approval of this community's proposed municipal Industrial Revenue Bond Issue, as required by Section 1, Subdivision 7, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes. We have entered into preliminary discussions with: FIRM Six Fold Real Estate Comr~anv ADDRESS 6310 Penn Avenue, South CITY Richfield STATE Minnesota 55423 State of Incorporation Attorney Russell .T. Sudeith, Jr. Address T-J-1080 First Natl. Bank Bldg. St. Pau ^~Iinnesota 55101 Name of Project Canteen Company of Minnesota Project The major partners of Six Fold This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): Real Estate Compan~~ com;~rise all the shareholders of Canteen Company of Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation engaged in food processing. Upon completion of the project, Canteen Comb_anv o_f Minnesota wi11 lease the facility from. Six Fold Real Estate Company. The funds received from the sale of the Industrlal Revenue Bonds will be used to (general nature of project): construct and equip an a~nrr7ximat~ly S,nnn ~FrnarP fnni- fnnrl processing addition to an existing facility. It will be located in Richfield, County o.f Hennepin, Minnesota The total bond issue will be approximately $ costs now estimated as follows: Cost Item Land Acquisition and Site Development Construction Contracts Equipment Acquisition and Installation Architectural and Engineering Fees Legal Fees Interest during Construction Initial Bond Reserve Contingencies Bond Discount Other 275,000.00 Amount to be applied toward payment of _ 190,000.00 37.000.OC 20,000.00 . 10,000.00 5,000.00 13j000.00 it is presently estimated that construction willk gi,-i on or about October 15 -, 19 8O , and will he completed on or about January 1 19 81 . Vl~hen completed, there will be approximately 1`3 _ new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of approximately $,~216~000. 00 cased upon rurrenily prevailing wages. The tentative term of the financing is ten years, commenciny ,Tanuarv 1 .I g ~~ The following exhibits are furnished with this application and are incorporated herein by reference: 1. An opinion of bond counsel that the proposal constitutes a project under Minnesota Stat., Chapter 474.02. 2. A copy of the city council resolution- giving preliminary approval for the issuance of its revenue bonds. 3. A comprehensive statement by the municipality indicating how the project satisfies the public purpose of Minnesota Stat., Chapter 474.01. 4. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue or a letter confirming the feasibility of the project from a financial standpoint. 5. A statement, signed by the Mayor, to the effect that upon entering into the revenue agreement, the information required by Minn. Stat. Sec. 474.01 Subd. 8 will be submitted to the Depart- ment of Economic Development. 6. A statement signed by the Mayor, thiat th;.~ project does i~ot include any property to be sold or affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. 7. A stater~nent signed by the P~ayor that a public hearing was conducted pursuant to PJlinn. Stat. 474.01 Subd. 7b. The statement sha11 include the date, time and place of the meeting and that all interested parties .were afforded an opportunity to express their views. 8. A copy of the notice of publication of the public hearing. and appointed ~11e, the undersigned, are duly elected representatives of _ Richfield ,Minnesota, and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final conclusion. Signed by: (f'rincipa! Officers) Mayor City P•4anager Tliis approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Commissioner or the state of the feasibility of the project or the terms of tha.`~ to he executed or the bonds to be issued therefor. revenue agreement Date of Approval Commissioner of Securities iVlinnesota Department of Commerce AT''I'ORNG1 .i A'C LAW FELHABER, LARSOIV, FENLON AND VOGT PRO FIiSSION AI. ASSOCIATION WEST 1080 FIRST' NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RICFIARD S. FELHABER GUSTAV A. CARSON SALNT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55]01 ROIIERT J. FENLON 612 222-6321 THOMAS M. vocT EDWARD J. BOHRER DAVID R. Hots RUSS4:LL. J. SUDF.ITH, JR. , WILLIAM K. ECKLIIND CHARLL'S F. BISANZ, JR. JAMES J. CRONIN 1980. Minnesota Department of Commerce Securities Division 500 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 DANIEL R. WAUiT'LER JAMES M. DAWSON RONALD R. KIRCHOFI' JAMES A. BLOMQUIST ROBERT' L. BACH STEPHEN J. BURTON MARK G. MISHEK ALICE O'BRIEN BIiRQUIST TIMOTI IY J. PABST Re: City of Richfield., Hennepin County, rinnesota - Application for Approval of a Municipal Industrial Development Revenue Bond Project for Six Fold Real Estate Company Gentlemen: We have been requested to act as co-bond counsel in connec- tion with the proposed issuance by the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, P%[innesota (the "City") pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, 1980, as amended and supplemented (the "Act"), of the City's industrial revenue bonds to provide funds to construct and equip a facility to be located in the City, to be owned or leased by Six Fold Real Estate Company (the "Contracting Party") and to be leased or sub- leased by the Contracting Party, for use as a food processing plant. In connection therewith, an Application (the "Application") is submitted to you by the. City. A copy of. the Application is attached hereto. B~ised upon our review of a form of the Application, the Act, and such other matter of .law as we have deemed necessary, we are presently of the opinion that said facility qualifies as a "pro- ject" under Chapter 474.02, subdivision la of the Act. Very truly yours, TJP : j 1}~ m ~ o9?~W"pN-Y hv,Y~v~ ^pcyNp m«v pLOEa ^? c mL°m mL T3ro u m~~ c wU o7« ripiU J~L~~j CL Cu~ ~ u~ t OO CO y 6L O _ QUU ; r ^ ' t YtY E3O.p~D000 nF4 ~ O +N.~ V1 ON yyN nL 6N~OL •'96.0 .7 a N.C 11« OCJ ~D~rLL ~'GO ICY p~~..+«C..~ N'-~ -+w p Y C q Td LYOn cou<xiovu~na LO DLL G.. u EYa.O ~ CL 6n' CD ~ O ~ m . p , ., .- O wL _. c-9«~. ..m?,n~ o ~p L.O 3 YL '~ cao v °U V " =`oL y=n `o ooy ~,Nmm`r yj .,u , ~G ~am ,oFppcas Yr cvW nvw ei L. n9~Jf'ON CL O~nOL yOy~CVp~OE ~ ~ d _ _r Y C mL;pa' o°cU_~~c-u °' C, +, jL mL~~t°pi~u vU °_''°« •O N c'~vN~"o aaG° au~Y GO.a ac o~w C~C~ C'~ m~.~c° p.o~L eL°vo~`W m~i~° «' _...OLy °.: LOCL-Sy' ~ 'NOLC ~ COLU.. ~... ry c ~'~yaEp~~~"c `p aapp9c- Qa y=Jd:.~6=0«>hOLlm ao 3' a ~o Y pcaa m. . .. L CC'~~~ •, q._ T,« UDC- ay cca °am 99 'E« NYu0~0 N 3~~U ° 9c~~' "+r-«°_, n m~" y T« C n p 3~°~ou mo9 t~'ca ° U=4pNp 3.JEU~E 0 `~UcYv CpJ L' nUVC~F b ~a l6 w vv4•om~~oo v mu,tia~.~-,~4am Y p~ y ... ti 0° a+ S •p L Y N N '~ N 9- D 0 4 G •o Gl y na a9 G fS. G 0 qN C .N+inG C Oqr° ^61 c0~"mm ~ OYG OC OUJ :tl ~ j ~"'N+~' ^ l^ U '0 UN 41 pog~S~~2:dm`o°~c~~03oa'DNu°J . ^ I a 3 N ° m~ C m° U N '° t ~' W `~•' U •O ',', ° •p N ~" to U~ 1 ~ ty `~ O F G U C C s .'.: G L ~6 O a~ ta. U N> q ro~ .~ m J ~ G .~+ p, 'ci 4 ."' U.C v N ~- ~ •p ~ ~ ~ 3 ' m ~ C °• ~ Q G C 4 E D ~~++ ~~bOG~~ ~LV ~x...OO7c.~ ~ a°C. ,p ca. 6 ryM-~ W ~ 4! O ~ m T ~': t C y. F G 4 g m °',G ,~~ m 0 0° t' F y n 4 y a, O •O m W" ~ v 'CSC7P 4 O 3 L pG V 7 y • N ° 00. ~ ~ 'N Q) µUG « ~ N . y y , L v m:: v 3 ' G m? ~'- ~ v, p v c. a r. ~'~ O y •r{ q ,~J ' 3 L C tc~ovc~~c^~E ~vE~c~osau~mi r..~ a Q °ou vr~~°, aa.... z°3v~y° _voL,,., 3 ~ ~'a°p~~~ a~a We°~ `~i:aa~ga N ,O ~ q ° ~" ° Ul v _ m3 t ; ; Q "~;" ~ E O U.C y>w ~ , ,."_'W Cfl1 „ a C' ~. O U" '~ tr 7 G U 0 U c. O C t° F U~ M QI 27 n , .Y 3 m J L ao~~m"u~°yc~'~cwao•oou aUw~ O N_ U y U 0 E O ... ' 4-I ~ X ° U O N x~o .~ ~ E (ti G 0 ' L ',-~ ~ ~'~"vy~"~"-c~c~y3~ a,v:o v3cs~Ct«vrvL •x Eov- U 0 o 3 >, : a 'c°°u .C G1 U iJ .+ U U .C ! = "t+ F •p ~oF°'~3~ uNy-~, ...c ~~oo~~~ N N d J u ~O G N m~o> q ~ c~.~a4'~a. ~E~'cvo .E~aEu«>;° ~ U c v .cc '~ y v v v o' ~ m µ 3 m a'o -' 3 f0 v C G G q 7 `n ro ~ L ' y ,~ ~ O 4 ~ o ~ , y GO . y •p L'OL M G Y N a t 1' v~ N 0 °y G ° 4 ~ T•"C ~ a a ~ J ~ O ~ ~ O ~ > b~ ~ U O C , ~ •O ~ p . w + m G . '' ' ma`~ °G o cgO U Z ~ y N p c °iv^= y c°~ 3~~o'°mc OE~ ° U ,... s , w m c .o ~ ~, ~ v - E v by o ? o ''m ~ ~ ~ m a ~ ~. "''^ N `n G '^ ~ ti 9w ro u '= ~ _ L V ~ L . ° . ~ .. N3G '•JG gw « G O ~ `fib' ° ~.O O ~ +~GL:4 G O N CSw N pD ° m C~ O° N a~ U ., ~ ~ p fn i -'O m U_= CO ~~' O~ - ~ c. U 'V A O ... x r o'o^ °rv~~E~.. v.c° ~ c~~o•ycc vc~..°_U,a~v~ Ea•~~~~~Cec., o v "a q _ l/ s U ~_ r ~ ~,° c .. 3 - ~ . c 3L..`AU3 c, ~9 GOC~QI L ~..,iro ~° p s 3 ~ ~ D O' O . , °ti Tm3°~o.=y^a~=~F~ N~rt°m~cm ~o W I a ~ °q,`~~' ~ E L'.. ..O:J ..,m :S~C 'p N i `,. 'C aEO ~ C «L q 0° ^Em •tiv°s'~oo~~% ~ `~ ="~3s ~ ~ ~ ~ ° rowt C ~ a i Eo o ~ , " ~ c °o.c tzc ~. • a ~ q q > Q C 'u ' =o °T ` ' y ` ° ~ Or vym a. -`•~~ ~ mc~y ~ co 2 ~"o o c ~ •v q av ar ~ C y ~ y G c y 0~ mEvo - v °~~6 my v c ~ C ~ a,. ~-U ~ ~ .0 O N y, .~ ~, ~n ~n °. L U M u ° ;r .. O 'O N. ~°'-mv 3v "m "=voU'^ca F z ~ ~ R' -' ° « ~ m- A .- v :~ ro C 2 r a c O v w~~~,~~~ v~cF~r,~y~~~a°'Gt0 a ~9 « L °a ~ ~,~. V 4. ~ F vcN~'"c~~vmm`'~"':~~EE.,'~ x ~~ .,. G~ ,. _ v :'omx ~o >.~ .03 yr ~ s u ~. s L u~ ~v >' J O ~ ~'o"~`v~°Ev=« v°,°~~`o °ouo4G~ ~v ti •c ^ m i." WR `" a 3 ~ va m o ~ a0, v >%d^%m~wv m° "~ ~ w ~avma~?+i.~y~~p~o7a~~yuc°L o .- 3 v~ (p n°~'«E33o:. ~ Jt,...~3~'c3n~:n ~ v i •o ~'' .r V (~. l .. L ~. ° L v _ t0. . 5 =. _ - ~ ° J~ v \ O W -~. .~ ~~ ~' a t' N ~' s J 4 0 r a O Orw J ~ p. N] Z Z'- ~ ?Ory I Y ~ V ?~ I J~Z~ i •G`a~ ~ 7 C , _ ~, ~o c w o N •E ;: a, E ~~'// $ r a AFFIUAVII' Oh It 1JI31.I(:A'I'ION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF KAMSEY Ad No 25542 N071CE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RICHFIELD, HENNE-~ PIN COU MrY, MINNESOTA S'L75, 000 INDUSTRIAL DEVEL-• OPMENT REVENUE BONDS,~- SERIES 7980 (CANTEEN COM-~~ PANY OF MINNESOTAI PROJECT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Cify of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City"), that it will hold a pub- lic hearing at the Cify Council Chambers, 6700 Portland Ave nue South, Richfield, Minneso- fa 55423, on Oetober 13, )98D, at 7:OD o'clock p. m. to consider a~ proposal of Six Fold Real Estate; Company, a Minnesota general' partnership (the "Conirar--ling Party"), that the City assist in' financing the hereinafter de- scribed project pursuan4 to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Acf, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as amend- ; ed, by the issuance of industrial ' developrneM revenue bonds of the Cif y. The proposed project will con- sist of the construction and egvippiny of a 5,000 square foot addition fo the existing facility' orated of 6310 Penn Avenue 1 South, Richfield, Minnesota. 55423, which will be owned by the Contracting Party and leased fn Canteen Company of Minnesota, a Minnesota corpo- ration (the "Company„) for use as a food processing tacility. The esfimatrd total amount of the DrenoGrrd hnnrl is n Said band or bonds, if anrt when { issued, will be payable solely from sums to be paid by the Confradiny Party pursuant fo a revenue a reerneni, and shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any proper- ty of the City, the State of AAin- nesota or any political 5ubdivi- - li lion thereof, nor conslihlte a F debt of the City, the State of Minnesota or any political sub- division thereof, nor be a charge against the general credit nr taxing powers of the City, foe State of A4innesofa or any political subdivision }here- of, within the mraning of any constitutional or statutory limi- tation. All parties desiring to appear at the public hearing will br. at- Porded an opportunity to ex- press their views with respect to the proposal fo undertake and finance said project. A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Commissron- or of Securities of the State of Minnesota for approval of the project, together with all at- tachmenfsand exhibits }hereto, is on file in the office of the, City Clerk of the Gity of Richfield and will Ue available for public inspection during regular busi- ness hours. Dated this 22nd day of Septem- ber, 1980, S; Ivia Beryh, City Clerk. Press Disp Sep 26, no 297 ROSEMARY J' FRANK _ ,being duly sworn on oath, says: that he is, and during all times herein stated has been, Clerk of the Northwest Publications, Inc., publisher of the newspaper known as the St. Paul Dispatch, St. Paul Pioneer Press, St. Paul Sunday Pioneer Press, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of St. Paul and the County of Ramsey. 1-'hat the Notice hereto attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper and was printed and published therein on the following dates: 26th day of day of day of day of day of day of day of SEP , 19 _80 ,19 ,19 ,19 ,19 ,19 ,19 r Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day (>f SEP , 19 80 - -r Not~lr~ Public RAf1SEY __ County, 1'Iinnesota My commission expires -" f1AR 13 _ , 19 82 ,. ......• Penn Y•lh ~~ ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 365 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for City Funding for Project Charlie III The Richfield City Council adopted the 1981 budget for the city on October 6, 1980. At that time, the city council did not include funding for Project Charlie III in the Aid to Other Agencies budget. Project Charlie III-Community is a chemical awareness program directed at providing information referral on chemical use and abuse to residents of Richfield. The program. is an outgrowth of the project Charlie chemical awareness program be- gun in Edina and Richfield in cooperation with the school dis- tricts and the Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. agency. In 1979, the city donated $2,965 to this program to be used in initial publicity and information distribution efforts. Representatives of Project Charlie III had requested fund- ing for 1981 in the amount of $3,160 out of a proposed budget of $5,660. A copy of their proposed 1981 budget is attached. Ms. Rosie Nielsen, a member of Project III-Community, has requested an opportunity to appear before the city council at their October 13, 1980 city council meeting to ask the city council to reconsider the'. funding request .in the amount of $3,160. Respectfully submitted, ,~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja .' PROJECT CHARLIE III -COMMUNITY 1981 Proposed 2400 Pamphlets and racks - 12 racks throughout the community at a cost of $200 a year per rack . 810 Postage and supplies, stamps, non-profit monthly fee, paper, pens, etc. necessary for day. to day operation . 950 Printing, general information flyer, letters, program materials . 1500 Program expenses, speakers, films, youth events, 4th of July Fun Run, etc. needed to promote awareness in community . $ 5660 Revenue General donations from community, civic groups , churches , individuals 2100 Program Fees 400 City of Richfield 3160 5660 ~_ ~' ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 364 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Presentation by Fred Babcock VFW Post The Fred Babcock VFW Post has requested the opportunity to appear before the Richfield City Council to present to the Pub- lic Safety Department a new picture of Fred Babcock, a Richfield police officer who was killed in the line of duty. Representatives of the VFW Post will be present at the October 13, 1980 city council meeting to make this presentation. Respectfully submitted, 1 / , Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Public Safety Director ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 363 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Vacation of a Portion of Pillsbury Avenue Lying Between 65th Street and 66th Street On September 8, 1980, the city council gave tirst reaaing ap- proval to an ordinance which would vacate the portion of Pillsbury Avenue lying between 65th Street and 66th Street. The council also scheduled second reading of the ordinance and a public hearing on this matter for the October 13, 1980 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, "~.~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Engineer lic hearing on this matter until November 10, 1980. UNITED NATIONAL ,CORPORATION 745 FIFTH AVENUE • NEW YORK, N. Y. IO151 ~212~ 758-9200 October 3, 1980 Mr. Richard Joepke Acting Planning & Development Director City .of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Re: Richfield Hub Superblock. Vacation of Pillsbury Avenue Dear Rick : Preliminaries required for the vacation of Pillsbury Avenue have not yet been concluded and we therefore request that second reading of the petition to vacate, now scheduled for the October 13 meeting of City Council, be deferred. We will be in touch with you very shortly regarding a new date for the second reading. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, Richard Naiman Vice President/Construction RN/b cc : Ricl~ Simon Robert Levine, Esq. Ralph Laiderman Robert Dalton ., i ~ , •.• .. .! Bill 1980- TRANSITORY ORDINANCE N0. + AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PILLSBURY AVENUE SOUTH CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The following described portion of the Pillsbury Avenue South right-of-tivay is hereby vacated: , All that part of Pillsbury Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the north line of Block 2, Richfield Plaza Addi- tion and the extension across if of the south line of said Block 2, Richfield Plaza Addition, Hennepin County, ',Iinnesota. \~- Section 2. There are currently located within the street right-of-~vay hereby vacated certain water mains, storm servers, sani- tary sewers, telephone and electrical facilities and the respective appurtenances. Said vacation is subject to easements running in favor of the authority or. authorities owning or operating any suer: facilities for the purpose of operating, maintaining, reconstructing, constructing and repairing any such facilities over, under, across and through the following described portion right-of-way vacated: Beginning at the southwest corner of Bloch 2, Richfield Plaza Addition, thence west 8.08 feet to the actual point of beginning, thence north parallel to the east line of Richfield Plaza Addition 576.84 feet, thence west 42 feet, thence south 576.8~i feed parallel to the east line of Richfield Plaza Addition, thence east 42 feet to the point of beginning, all in Hennepin County, ;iticinesota. Section 3. The 1layor and City Manager are authorized to take all such action as is repaired to give effect to the vac;t- tion of the portion oC Pillsbur~,~ Avenue South provided in the fore#;oing Section 1. ~~~ ..~ s.:: .. . r ~ •, - `~ - Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minne- sota this day of 1980. Donald J. Priebe, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk ~_ 3yts ~9 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~~ The Honorable Mayor ~ ,~ and ; Members of the City Council ~- City of Richfield ~ cr Council Members: ~ Council Letter No. 362 Agenda October 13, 1980 Subject: Street Lighting Project, Penn, Nicollet, Portland Avenues oj- nd Avenues and to detail the in a resolution. To do this it to the special assessment pro- feasibility and costs involved in the t. The next step is for the council to officially receive the preliminary engineering report and order a public hearing. It is recommended that the public hearing be scheduled for March 9, 1981, as indicated in the attached resolution. Setting the hearing date for March 9, 1981, will allow suf- ficient time for the staff to assess the feasibility of using low pressure sodium lights in this project. As you know, this type of lighting will be installed as a test on Lyndale Avenue between 74th Street and 77th Street, and on Cedar Avenue between 66th Street and 76th Street. By March, we will be in a position to make recommen- dations regarding the type of lighting to be used for this project. It might also be appropriate for the council to address the policy to be used in assessing-the costs for this project. As described in council letter No. 348, the estimated cost of the project is about $3.08 per foot. The assessment for the ornamental street lights that were installed as part of the city-wide street improvement project was $2.00 per front foot, which was approxi- mately the full cost of the street lighting at that time. The first step of this process is for the council to order a preliminary engineering report. The attached resolution indicates the feasibility and estimated costs of the project. The policy Council Letter No. 362 -2- October 13, 1980 It is the recommendation of .the staff that the city council initiate the street lighting project for Penn, Nicollet and Port- land Avenues by adopting the attached resolutions, providing for: 1. Ordering a preliminary engineering report; 2. Receiving the preliminary report; 3. Ordering a public hearing on the project for March 9, 1981. Respectfully submitted, r K ~ ,~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Engineer Community Services Director r p = ~ ~- i ~ _ ~ t. Council Letter No. 348 Agenda September 22, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~; _ City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Street Lighting Policy The city installed a uniform system .of street lighting on all ~~t;~=:"' residential streets during the mid-1970's, in conjunction with the :~~ permanent street improvement program. This system provides a light '~~`~' at every interval of 220 feet, (two mid-block lights) and has produced t~ ~ a standard of well lit, high visibility streets in the City of Rich- 4-1. _ field. There are five streets which were not included in the lighting :<<~~-,;_; ;, ` program which need to be addressed at this time: Penn Avenue, Nicol- let Avenue, Portland Avenue, 76th Street and 66th Street. The three ;~_.}j •r,j:''. north-south streets (Penn, Nicollet, Portland) have one light at each intersection. Seventy-sixth Street has no lighting other than spill- over from the lighting system on adjacent avenues. Sixty-sixth Street has lighting at each intersection plus the spillover from adjacent L avenues. In addition, the portion of 66th Street in the LHN redevel- opment area has been upgraded to a high standard of visibility. The current lighting on 66th Street provides the same standard of lighting " established in other areas of Richfield. However, the lighting on .,:.; - .Portland, Nicollet, and Penn Avenues, and on 76th Street does not meet the standard of high visibility that has been established in the rest of the city. These streets have a high volume of vehicular traffic, ''• high pedestrian use, and high density housing. The purpose of this •~` council letter is to propose a policy for improvement of the lighting levels on these streets. '~~ The details of the street lighting improvement policy are as ~';' '`` follows . _ .;~`: _~:. ,. ". ~_ ,, a r ~ .i jjl { ' y, ~i.S. _ .~'F.'f `.i., L r :_ ~14`~n x ~ k~~~ a:;~~. ~XS~:i~7 d 1. High Visibility Standard of Lighting ,The city has established a standard of lighting in the past ;when the permanent streets were installed. Penn Avenue, ;Nicollet Avenue, Portland Avenue, and 76th Street do not meet these standards. Midblock lighting should be provided 'on 76th Street. This could be achieved by having NSP in- stall 47 midblock lights on existing NSP poles, as was done on the other east-west streets. Since the poles are already in place, there would be no installation charge for this 'ghting and therefore_,_the city would incur no capital cost. ___ The lighting for Penn, Portland & Nicollet Avenues would re- • quire 120 lights at a cost of $178,239, including installa- tion. This cost represents the cost of installing light poles and standards on all of these roadways. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~• Council Letter No. 348 -2- September 22, 1980 ~; • ~~•- 2. Initiation of Project The city council can initiate a street lighting program through one of two methods. A lighting improvement project may be initiated by a petition signed by the owners of af- fected property totaling 35 percent or more of the total assessable footage. Upon receipt of such a petition, the council may order an investigation of a project with sched= uling of necessary procedures and hearings required by law. A lighting improvement project may also be initiated by the council at its discretion. In the case of such council initiation, the property owners shall be notified in ac- ~~~~.. cordance with. normal procedures and legal requirements. 3. Assessment for Li hting Cost It is proposed that the property owners on Penn Avenue, ~''~`~. Nicollet Avenue and Portland Avenue be assessed for 100 ` percent of the cost of the street lighting.- These property '~~~~~~~~~ ~;'.' owners were not assessed previously for any of the street lighting that was installed with the permanent streets from ,t'~ 1972-1977. The previous lighting assessment for that project " y ~ was $2.00 per front foot (75 ft. lot assessed $150). The , ~'~~~~` ;.: estimated assessment for the proposed project .would be $3.08 r .,~ per foot, at current costs ($231 for 75 ft. lot). There would be no assessments necessary for the 76th Street proj- ect, since the city would incur no capital costs for light- ing there. This method of installation of lighting for the streets (as opposed to avenues) is as the norm from 1971 to 1978. :,r ``~rt~~"~` 4. Operating Cost Considerations . If the city were to light Portland Avenue, Nicollet Avenue, _ Penn Avenue and 76th Street, 44 of the current NSP-owned -- lights on those areas would be eliminated and replaced with 120 city owned lights, with an additional 47 NSP-owned lights to be installed as well. This net increase of 123 lights would increase the operating budget of the city by $5,035.20 a year for increased maintenance and energy charges. How- ever, updating of these major arterial streets to the estab- lished lighting standard is necessary to provide the same I level of service to all Richfield residents. The city has =~' initiated a test of low pressure sodium lighting to evaluate ;` the energy savings and the public reaction to this type of _, lighting. The results_of this evaluation should govern any _. decision regarding the choice of a bulb for new lighting in r' such a project, and any other lighting policy in the future. ,~.,: - ` The city staff will be present at the September 22, city council ,; °~`°`'"~' meeting to discuss this matter in greater depth. If the council desires to proceed further, a resolution detailing the policy should ~ ' ~ r ..f ~: } o , r • r' ~ a . ,~ •_ ~ _ x ,., .. t .a, sty':,,. ••-. ;1.~ v ...,i: -.:. .~ .~.~. ,~. ".+ .vK..s:. .. . ._,.~vC ... w.. .... ....1. : ..r ... ., _-r}: .... 4.-.e-.:.. ... ; 5e . .y. 4 ,. -.. _ r r +n ~.:. > .~ .. .. ... ~ Council Letter No. 348 -3- September 22, 1980 C _ ;:o be drafted for future adoption by the council. Subsequent to that time, a public hearing would be in order on this matter. Respectfully submitted, ~~4e arl Nollenberger _ ~ City Manager RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PROPOSED CITY PROJECT 761 WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council desires to maintain a high level of illumination on all of the streets in Richfield. WHEREAS, the standard for street lighting established in the permanent street program has not been met on Penn Avenue, Nicollet Avenue and Portland Avenue; BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council finds it appears necessary and desirable that the City make the assessable public improvement of street 2. A preliminary engineering report on such proposed assessable public improvement is required by law in the event that said improvement or any part thereof is specially assessed against the benefited property within the city. The city engineer is therefore authorized and directed to prepare a preliminary report on such proposed improvement and to submit the same to the City Council at the earliest convenient time. 3. Such report shall indicate the estimated cost of such proposed improvement, shall indicate whether such proposed improve- ment is feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement. 4. Such proposed improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as City Project 761. Adopted by the city council of the City~of Richfield this 13th day of October, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk ~t is~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA office of City Manager Council Letter No. 361 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of .Richfield Council Members: Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000 Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that the city council must approve purchases of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1,000. There is one such item on the city council agenda of October 13, 1980. Brochure Paper The City of Richfield and the Richfield School District jointly publish a brochure four times a year. The brochure, delivered to each Richfield residence, includes information of general interest through the Newsletter section, and program information for Parks and Recreation and Community Education. Costs are shared by the city and the school district. The Winter 1980/81 brochure is scheduled for distribution in late November/early December. Quotations for the text paper have been solicited, with the following submitted: Turnquist Paper, $14.92/m; Butler Paper, $15.34/m; Wilcox Paper, $17.59/m. The cover paper for this bro- chure will be ordered separately. It is recommended that the city council authorize the purchase of brochure paper from Turnquist Paper in the total amount of $1,611.36. Approximately one-half of this cost will be paid by the school district. Respectfully submitted, -~~.~ ~1~~~:,~c~ 1 Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Services Director ~ /3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 360 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Human Rights Commission Appointments At the present time there are three vacancies on the Human Rights Commission to fill unexpired three-year terms. These vacancies are the result of two resignations and the death ~f ~r in May, ~9~~, and one is for a term which will expire in May, 1982. Applications which have been on file, or recently received, are attached to this council letter. The persons who have expressed an interest in being appointed to this commission are as follows: Terrill Anderson Roxanne Johnson - Nancy Lindberg~l Sister C. LeClair -~- (Charter Comm. Member) John Landers ~, (Charter Comm. Member) Matthew Little Diane McKeown X Lia Ozols - George Seltz - (Charter Commission Member) Sister LeClair, John Landers and George Seltz are presently members of the Charter Commission. Mr. Landers and Mr. Seltz have terms which will expire in February, 1982. Sister LeClair's term expired in May, 1980, however, no new appointments have been made to the Charter Commission at this time. This item is placed on the October 13, 1980 city council agenda for consideration at that time. Respectfully submitted, ~i ^ Karl Nollenberger City Manager ~G~-_ KN/eja ,.Jy~ , Date ,7nnP 23, 180 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME__ AndPrGOn Terrill G. Last :First hilddle HOME ADDRESS 7501 Elliot Ave. So. Richfield 55423 Street No. City .Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address} 1625 West 75th Street ~1-B Richfield City Street No. PHONE: Home 861-5354 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission XX Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission: Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience :^rhich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/commit*_ee and why ;you are interested in serving: I think that as a life long resident along with my political involvement in the community I would like to volunteer my services to the city-. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~IITYACTIVITIES: Member of .the 37th District DFL Central Committee Third District DFL Secretary Member, Richfield Jaycees. 55423 Zip Code Business 725-2041 _;~,-. OCCUPATION: Employing .firm, agency Vice President Walter F. Mondale Address_ Federal Courts Building Minnea~,olis Position Stiff Ass~st~~t `fears w/firm%agen~~~; -recently started Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) A. Full name Relationship Mailing address B. Phone number Full name Relationship Mailing address C. Phone number Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APFOINTMENT NAME Johnsor. Roxanne Gay Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 1617 W. 75th St. Richfield, MN -55423 MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address} PHONE: Home 869 - 3362 Business Appointment Preference: 296-8790 Planning Commission Human Rights Commission ~ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commissionfcommittee and why you are interested in serving: I, myself, have been the victim of_ discrimination in employment and have initiated a lawsuit in my defense. Because of this, I co-founded a support group for other women who are also involved in such action or who are contemplating such actiono_ I am a member of the affirmative action committee with the Department of Economic Development. ~~iost important: I am committed to safeguarding human rights for all of use CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL ACID COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES : DFL 37th Central Committee, Board of Directors f~~r- the DFL Feminist Caucus, member of the Coalition for a Progressive DFL, member of Minn- esota yeomen's Political Caucus, Delegate to 1978 DFL state conventions OCCUPATION: Employing .firm, agency. Tourism Bureau, State of Minnesota Address 480 Cedar Street, St. Paul, Minnesota Position Tourism Representative years with firm lZ. ,_ Other work experience (optional) Cabin Attendant with Northwest Airlines, sold food products, promotional writer for the Star and Tribune, freelance copy- writer and artist. REFERENCES (optional) a. Carol Docken friend 7520 Cahill Rd. 944-6678 b. Beverly Braun friend 1385 Skiles Ln 645-1744 c. Mike Steinberg friend 6065 79th Ave, N. 566-557? - Date ! •._ <1 -~~ APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME ~tli~.'tl`=~~ •~-Jc" t~;~; ~-ti-'t~t~~K~~;~~ J,-- Last First Iviid4le HOME ADDRESS '1~ ~ ~.7- ~:~<<-~t~.~n., i ~, ~1~':~: <<_ s_~_;, i,~~°- ~i~ ~}'}ti. ; c. ~-Z Street No. ~ City Zip Ccde . MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) - ~flillti Street No. ~ City Zip Ccde PHOTdE: Home C~ ~- -f~~/~~ ~ Business 1~~~~~•~l~~ APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: - Planning Commission~_ Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Ccmmissior:~ Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health j( Advisory Commission~_ ~ Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you .for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: ('l~rl'^,~l[./ ~<,?t.~,~,~~' ^~ / i~~' l~f-,'~ ~n /t~;t?~~~r~i~'. (..rl~li;,l;; c;; /~ / ~ . ,P,~?1~'r/, f?(7`i,~ r!i ~J,~)!r~c~c=t' /'~i-!~ •~~7T~s /'~.i-i f-";~-:=:/S~ , / / ,~ - ,r /:Il'~.r'~ !-;9F /iz 1~ iii ,/ift~~irt c (`_.i~ ~~ f`i~rY s CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~iITY ACTIVITIES: ~_ ~/ /rl:I 111~~-~1~/~~,~~ir;1 jai ..~.~~~rt~,~~%/~ ~^~~~,':~•s> ~C7~il~~ //G~~<ilt .~i` ;'ii ~iit;- T9/ fir~:Y /;~tl /fj~~`'C i l /~~~~ `ic' >. ,,,yy 5 C- .-- <., _ ~ '. .. ,. ..- ~, _,"312 '4- .. ,~ _ r ~. ~ ' =r Si ~ ~ f "~ t -. .. y 3 ~.~~~. _ _-~. 2'~ ~.al ._.... .tdv <~.aWt'rY.h.-:..~w~_ ~' ~- - _ ~~.. _~~:~aw~-41RS~":_-.a~L'i~i_,•+~-~S sa,irALZw6L,Kr ~.t~i .a.~~a ~ ~~-i.~YTIY. *~ r~..~.-.bl: _.+~~. OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency. 1t~' R~~ I ),~~~',~}t~r~ric4 (tir.-, Address ~'`--~ ~~ - / }} ~ _ Position ~ ~_.~~.; ~~,"~•~•.1l Years w/firmm,%age:,~~",~ r Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) Full name Relationship {ZlC• 1~\f~~ i.l S'C G-~ ~ f~;i'r;"' l~l.~ L1_~L~ - 1 <lcti _ Mailing address Phone number • Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number =, ~, Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number _ : ; ~, _ " t _.. _ Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe "}" ~` 6700 Portland Avenue , 7225 Bloomington Ave. ;J w~ .~ ~ ~-. Richfield 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 --- `~ ~ - t.~"x ~ A ~~'~. ~,..'as. ~,_ }>- ~ ~.ig ':~4 c"i.1..X~_~~- s~. -+ ^-v ~ `~ '-~,-r { ie .,m.~i~.,.::: Date July ~., 1980 `l ~ ~t APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD D ~~~~ 1'~t __ lUL 1g80 Lf ADVISOR' COMMITTEE OR COPJIMiSSIO~r APPOII~i?'1~FTVT 7 NAME LeClair Sister Charlotte Anne CSJ Rich~te~d City/ ~a~8ger Last - ~ First ;vi_udie Academy of the Holy Angels HOME ADDRESS 6600 Nicoll.et Avenue Richfield Minnesota 5523 Street No. City Zip Cede MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home addressl Street No. PHONE: Home 866-3327 miry i~-ip ~:,~de Business 332-5521 -ext. 228 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commis: ion X Citril Service C'ommissionY Advisory--Board of Heaith Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~^.~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/commit*_ee and why ,,-ou are interested in ser~~~irg: My education in and teaching of cultures for many years has incJ_uded work concerning races, society and nations: and each area involves human rights essential for the development of peoples wherever and whoever they are. My present work at St. Maryts Junior Colleges because of our studentst diversity in age, educations social and physical handicaps personal grawth~ and professional goals has offered me constant eCCepen~.ng iSn awareAeness tt~~of and service fpoCrTthe needs of those seeking encouragement and CI~e1p inOmeeting ~he rig~its and needs Hof themse~ve's and others. The Human Rights Commission offers opportunities to serve others through enlarging ~ of ath~r~s~--~'~' ~~~ ~-~-~s~aer the hungr~''3 the HR Commission can encourage the whole city to respond to the needy. The Senior Citizens= Commission answers many needs for the elderly; the HR Commission can contribute another facet of power to enrich the lives of the elderly whatever their race or culture. Protecting justice and fostering education for all Richfield citizens are two major -..:__... e emen s o e s reng ene z.n is ci so a eac person may f~.n i e an opportuni~ to grow truly in maturity and happiness. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, AND COT~1ITy AGTIVITIFS: 2 years on Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission; It years on Richfield Charter Commission (have applied for second appointment); ProLife group; Joint Religious Legislative Coalition; helped to register people in South Hennepin County for heat assistance; state il~'L convention delegates 1980; revising scientific paper on natural family planning; attend grief group meetings; belong _ _,. 1.. I~Q T ~..... ... ..1 .......«.~.• T?~TR nronw+~i ~~F e,e.. T: n.+4:.+n1 l~L. ...~~ ..t ~.~~ d f,~ .,.,._, ~~ ,_ ~, OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency St. Maryts Junior Co1.1~ge Address 2500 South Sixth Streets Minneapolis Minnesota 551~51a. Faculty assistant in anatomy physiolo~r~ pathology -- testing PositionResearch in Development and Pears ~,;/firm/agenc~ beginning 8th year Other work experience (optional) Taught in private high schools for 36 years REFERENCES (Optional) A, Mrs. Jerome Ulrich -- friend Full name Relationship 7601 Aldrich Avenue South Richfield Minnesota 55!,23 telephone -- 866-8171 Mailing address Phone number g . Dr. Grace Carlson -- friend Full name Relationship St. Marys Junior College: 2500 South Sixth Streets Minneapolis MN tel. - 332-552 Mailing address Phone number C, Mr. John T. Peltier -- A & P supervisor far 7 years Full name Relationship 1862 Dayton Avenues St. Pauli Minnesota 6~.6-8597 ailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 ~ - Att: ~ Eileen Anderson _ ~- _. . , ,,. Date ~ _~~_;,~ APPLICATION FOR CIT`f OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMEPJT NAME T,-inrbPr~; ~T-n~v ,~, Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 67U6 ^o,i,~ -~rl~ ~ •;vP ~n_ :~; ~~~~'~ ~1~ ~~4'?3 Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No City Zip Code PHONE: Home ~~~ _~%~:a7 Business .APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission~_ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why ;you are interested in serving ,=i S (' '~ "~ ('. P ;^ n ^ !' -? I ",~' ? ~. n ~ ~ r ~ n ; f" P ;1 ~ ~; ~: '- 'T F? ~ `' ? T'1 ?T ~ ~ ~T :^- ~i ? '.~ iT ^ ' ~,'1 .+ co,.~,_anlt ~ n:~__:,. 1.~-:^ 1 ~,'^e ~~n „~M~__.:~ _c~.:~ :i ~1 en._..i1e .fie t:J !'GC'?"~e '~_re ^~n i, ,'Ti;: O `•i-~? ~CS1C2i:t~S '^C T Se?"1~o .~.,t i- ~.i r '^UGl'] ~nT .~~._ ~ rrvi r•- ~ ?~ '~ ^TT ;y,r.,•pv,t~_ y-- 2.Y1d t~':~ S CO'~ •,,.~1.5 -i ~~'^ ~-°Y'VP~ S V7 C.P f'.'`i C' `~ -r.rc CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~TITYACTIVITIES: 1_ Nro~PC~t ~ ^~ -^. 7TT .~r~~r~ ~, ^,.~•-~ ri ttP~ ~ ~~~t,1 c' -sP ~t; .-,,,, ^, -, ^,• `~e2 Yc?rEi?`?t: ~',jT? cCrt* .t'. F• -SL i~.:l.!ar?iF? ;c.-~'OOl ~''~r" Z'E%?r) ~.'• ~.L~Zt 1F? 1 ~jF', ~j~~r; j7~ -f'.1 Y' T, SAP -,J• n'~^f• P? - ±`1 .'~Ci "i_ni('. ~. f~^^-' P~i~ ~ C~ Ele:~cntu'rs,~ (irnu v e"r) - -- - - - -- - - - - 4 ^~~temb r ~f' t~ ^^_fl P1^ T.c~ ~>>~ ~r' •:n~-en ~T~.-erg 5. rrle:,~ber of ~~e universit;~ of '~,Iin_~esota ~o~re::~nkers Date APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME 1- ~ 7-•T L C Last J~ First hi1~::1e HOME ADDRESS ~ ~ D CJ /, ~~il/~./ ~l!`~ J~ • ~ 1Q~ ~~~~ Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) !'G ~-'j'+-~~-~ Street No. / / City Zip Code PHONE: Home `~~ ~ ° ~ ~-~ ~ Business L~ ~7' ' ~ l j 3 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE//: Planning Commission I~ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission~_ Civil Service Commissior:~/_ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~,^,~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why ;you are interested in serving: ~g ~ 4 L li ~YVl~~~~ L ~ , ~ ~ ~~liv `~~ LLB ~ ~ 'L~ r ,~ ;?icy ~~ `,~' , ~~~ ': z~~ ,~~lc~l2~~ CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~TITYA~ITIES: ~~ ~ c~ C.: lit. 7'~~ :~ ~~ ~ `'Gf,~ ~~Z~~- ~' i ~/1,CL~,f L2'~~-(~'M ~ ~%~/.~.,~ l mss- ~--~1~v ~t..r yU, t .'~av~,. /~`.~~I / ` ~~~ OCCUPATION: / ~ ~_ Employing .firm, agency~1,`~ ~ ~ ,!.`t}N"1)SC-ft ~~ ~ ~{~'~~~{J ~~,tT~=~ ~,~ Address D ~ (~ ~' ~b_ f~ ~ Lt:G Position '~ -. ~ ~~l~h years w/firm~agenr.."a Other work experience (optional} ~j ~" ' ~ f O - REFERENCES (Optional) ~. // /~ i. / Fu11 name - ~ Relationship Mailing address Phone number ~i, s. ~, tz,~ rAN ~ti` ~ ~1~Lti~~l2~~y.-.~~ic-~.~~"~~~-~,~~ ;~ ~.;~ ,~~tc,~~~ ~"t~,t~~5ji~~~-Iz Full name ~ Relationship _ ~ oc t c u ~~~ tZ ~~ ~ To ,cs i~C~1 . ~-~_ !~~.<,.Q . 7 3"~ - o ~, ~ E Mailing address Phone number c . _ " ~~ t~- l ~ u ~ ~ Si=r ~~ ;'~~~ z i~~ ~~Qr~ ~~-J}--,~--~ .~-µ-~~ - 'r Full name Relationship r/~ ~~ OH fc. C1zo ye f~L~ i~ GCi cf-{ ~"i ~L l~ ~~~ / ~ ~ ~- ~ 7 Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 -- `_r, ` ~ Date 2- 6-80 ~--°'~ ~' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY MS. MCKEOV~N DID NOT INCLUDE FRaNT SIDE. APPLICATION FOR CITi' OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME MCKEO~VN DIANE Last First Nll~ule HOME ADDRESS 7104 Portland Avenue Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home 869-2040 Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission xx Human Rights Commission xx Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commissior: Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission xx Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~tITYACTIVITIES: ~{ OCCUPATIONS Sud s i AlA~ ~ Employing .firm , agency I'n(~Gf~'F Ti C 1~~ ~) P)~ ~ ~ ~e S ~~tu ~.. o F C e ~ i ~eo~ pta-Tl~ Address '7 c~S' O) ~,~ (r ~ tl T'~ (Z ~'(~~ ~ , ~ C7 , Position~j~lOt~Sj(~Id~L~iV~~~, CLF,E'KYears w/firm~agenc; /5 A. B. C. ~~u~ nio~ ~~~p~o Other work experience (optional} S ~CRETA2.`~ 0 ~ 37TN ~~1~'1 ~1C~ ~~L- ' APi'~r>>C~ 5 ~~. REFERENCES (Optional) Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number i ,~ ~ f ~/~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ , n.~ ~ ~~z~ Return to: City Manager's Office or Mayor Don Priebe 6700 Portland Avenue 7225 Bloomington Ave. Richfield 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 Date January 17 , 1980 . APPLICATION FOR CIT`~ OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE CR COr:~MISSION APPOII~iT'~iE?~TT NAME Ozols Lia Last First i~i_iuie HOME ADDRESS 2012 W 6F~th St . R1 ch°~ eld ~. Minn X5423 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address; Street No. amity ~~i~ Codt; PHONE: Home 861-3930' Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Cornmissior.~ Ci~~~il Service Cor::missior: Advisory Board of Heaith~_ Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~^~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commissions`committee and wh.y you are interested in serving: Grad. University of Minn. with 8~.~. in Medical Technoloa~y. Worked 22 ,years in a Hospitals (331 bed and 781 bed} Clinical~~:. as ~d~ninistra,tive Director. ";Specific areas ofre~sr: Planning`'~,nd Development (short&long range goals},Policie.~,Procedures, service to other institutions, set objectives, staffing, Licensure and accre a on , ~, ,e c. , rye , ommun ca o c oor nation Education and Training, Performance evaluation, Quality control and , . _ ~ control Cancer C-omputer Personnel and others. CIVIC, F~ROFESSIO'IvAL AND C~MMUNITYACTIVITIE~S: Participated as an inspector for CA,P. President academic sorority Campaign coordinator far a state representative OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency Abbott-Northwestern Hospital Address 27th and Chica;o av So ,Mi nn~an~1 1 Q ~ Minn ~~.~7 Position Adm. Lab. Director Years w/firrr~agen~^r ~ Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) ~~- A. Geors~e Adamovich Vice President Full name Relationship See above 874--4000 Mailing address B. Full name Phone number Relationship Mailing address Phone number C. Full name r ~.~ Mailing address ~~ I Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 Att: Eileen Anderson Date ~-~vL <~ APPLICATION FOR CIT'i OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT ~~. NAME ~'~~~ % ~f~ C C-~` ~ ~~~~ Last ~'ir t i/•iiudle HOME ADDRESS ,n ~~ I ~5 ~ t~~11 ~-~ . ~~ C~~~~iF 1~ ~~l~1.~~r~ `~~, ~ ~ Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from, home addressl Street No. City Zip Code ~ r ( ( ~~ PHONE: Home • ~ (' ) ~ l ~~ Business ~>>~ ~~ l ` ,~~ l APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: - / V . Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~^~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why ;you are Interested in serving: I have been deeply committed to human and civil rights since I first became aware of the existence. of prejudice and intolerance. Being a member of the Jewish faith, I believe that I have a sensitivity and z 5 z z e e e s In whether it is because of their religion, race, creed or sex. I majored hat my academic and practical experience•in the areas of constitutional law well quallf~;~ m~ for servlc:° on ~11e i~uTtlctil 7 ~,11tS f'olnlnlssiori I 1~P1 i eVe that human and civil rights cannot be simply a lofty ideal but must be a basic right of the citizens of ever communit ~lar e or small, in t11s country. I wou o everyything in my power as a commissioner to see ~~~ ~ P~odSI~S~S1I'~l~1AL ~~eD ~~~.~p,Y}~~c~~~I,~~lled equally to all the citizens ~~"' ~` of Richfield. Member of the Hennepin County Bar Association, State Bar Association; Vice-President of the Richfield Charter Commission; present member of the Richfield School District Advisory Committee; former member of the Richfield Referendum Committee; present member of the School District Long-Range Planning Committee; former member of Memorial Park Citizens Advisory Committee. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 359 Agenda October 6, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Special Assessment of Property Located at 6400-02 Nicollet Avenue At an earlier meeting, the city council established a prelimin- ary special assessment of $5,145.50 for the property located at 6400-02 Nicollet Avenue.. At the special assessment hearing of September 22, 1980., the property owners Richard and Patricia Nelson appeared to protest the amount of the assessment. Further staff review of the subject parcel has indicated that the property is used as a non-homsteaded residential duplex, and is zoned commercial.. While the property is zoned for commercial use, the very limited size of the parcel (10,375 square feet)- and the lack of availability of vacant contiguous land, make general commercial reuse a not very feasible possibility (it is unlikely that a person could economically justify clearing $50,000 to $60,000 in buildings off this parcel and then constructing a small commercial building plus required off-street parking). If the property in question was located outside the L/H/N area, the property owner would have been assessed $820 for a front street and lighting as a part of -the permanent street improvement and light- ing programs.. The property owner has already paid the $429.59. for side street and driveway apron improvements. This means that by virtue of being in the L/H/N area this property owner is being assess- ed an additional $4,325.50 for improvements. A review of the L/H/N plan inddcates that this is the only single family or duplex property in the L/H/N area which is being assessed and which is not scheduled for acquisition. If the property owner in question was located north of 64th Street on Nicollet Avenue, the property owner would not have any front street assessment, since Nicollet is a county road. However, a street lighting program is now being organized for that area at an assessment rate of $2.00 per front foot. This amounts to $164.00 for the property in question which received lighting from the ' Council Letter No. 359 -2- October 6, 1980 L/H/N developments. Because of the above mentioned special con- ditions, it is recommended that the city council reduce the special assessment for this property from $5,145.50 to $820, or to $164.00. Respectfully submitted, ~.~ ~ I V ~ Karl Nollenberge City Manager KN/eja cc: Director of Community Development Director Administrative Services City Attorney City Engineer ~ l 7 ~~~ ~ ~ / ~~ `~ I ~J -~ - ~ --~ / -- ~ f ----- . -- _ _ _, - --- -- I ~ . ,_ ..~_ CROSSTOWN HYW. _ CROSST~#= _ 1tYW.-- -'/- ~ / ~ _ _ ~ __~ ~ ~ -~_ _ ~ _ =- - - - - ,~ ~ ~ - ~ i I ,., __ _ - --_- - - - -~ - - - _ _ _ -_ - -- - ~ - -l11 I ~I ~ ... .._. - _ , ~i ~ - - ,, - ~ - - 1 _ , ~- -- J ~_ i ~ ' _ i r - / I ~ ---~ ~o ' IF - / i.- _a J ~ ~ ~ J _~- r-._ _._ I -..__ __~ __.- _ _ _ _ - i ~ L ~ J L ~~__ ~ ~l. l~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~_ - _J ~ - ,-_ i - ~ - - .~ ~ ~ ( " I ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ _ - - j --iw w -. ~ - ~~ ~- w I ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ E F Q W ~~ ~ I .. I, ~ ...__, FFF _ ~ ~ _ ~ _ `__ I Z ~- ~ _ _ r _ - L i ~ r i~ I - , ~ ~ ;_ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ; - - ~ ~ ----~- ~ Ir II _ J 'I _ _._ ---~ I ~O ~ I` ;~ i Q ~" 3 ~- ~J ,: ~ ,f~ ~~.~- • ~33 I i~ I~I ; Q,, I Q _N~. -~Z I Q,r ] ' ___I F_- ~~~ _ 35 , I w i ' RICHFIELD ~ _~~ ( ;116 J ~ ~ ~ r-=, I ~ ~~ 1 ~ ; 1=~ ~~ WC ~~ ~ _ _ }--I- ~~~ _ L_ ~ - ~ ---- m' ~~ ~ ~ I~I ~ 1 _ L n y~~u~u n/~~/~~ ~, I7 °' ~ ' I rsa Itn ~ sr. I ~ i_ 1 T. ~ _ _ _- - _ L.._ ca to _1 _~ ,-~_ __ k ~ - I II f. I _ _ ~~ ~ 71 ~ 66 I ~ } I ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~J - - ~' ~ -+ . { '~ Iii ~" ~, - ~ , 6 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ Io - i { ~~~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 L I ~ ~~ j. - ~--- ~ -- 70 , -~ - it LAKE I I ___ _ -I i ii I i ~ '. .3'. I ~ 15 ~16~ ~ ---~ ~ __- ~-_ -~ - - -• 6~' '-.~ r ,~~ ~f • 4 I f _ ~ T ~~ 1 3 13 1N _ ~4~~-~ I~~II~I I J 64 ~ - _. ---_ i, ~ ~ i30 79 ~ 78 77 78 76 74 73 86 67 -~ , - ---- I __i ~ ~ - _.. ~- 65 th sT I _ ~- - ~ 1 ~ ~,~ 17 th ST. - r- - - ~ i - ~ I i ~ I 11 \ ` 39 36 ~47 ~ i ~ 69 ~ 66 i_ i i \1 _ 5, ~~ ~i ~~ _ ~ ~ - 16 ~~.,. ~ -. I 37 ~ 46 ~ ~ ~4 ~ - _ _ ~ ~- 19 40 r. ~ I 68 -~ ul I I ~~ ~ T I ~ 2- ~ ~~. 38 45 ~ I a _ ~ __ .- 1 - 41, i 67 r 3~ I ~ I __ ~ V 21 I 20 - ~ 44 1 60 52 __ - ~' ( ~ ~ _I _ ~ 3 I ~ ~ ~ W W I I I S ~~_ _~ ~~ ~/ -~ / W 6 N Q 4 0 i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ ~F ~ ~ ~~ L ib ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ 2s : --7 ~ 2d moI 32 i ~ ~~ " J : a mf 4 49 ~ i 1 3 14 i 25 -i 62 83 ~ ~ ~- I I _ - __ ~, _ _ _ 1 • ~ 66 th ST. • L 1 _- ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ I / ~~ ~.~ 10a. ,10' ~ 1os ~ to ST.--- ~ 11 t1~fl~1a~11~11~11~11~11Ef1~1~ -- - ~ ~~ Q, ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 i ~ _ ~ ,~ ~J 1141i~ ~ 130 I i, 11 ~ e !- - ~ ~ - ~~ ~ --~ ~ 1~,_.I i IlI I ,1 --loo ~~ a9 ~ / ! / 112 i 12s ~ 121 ~ jf ~ , _ r` i ~ -- ~ __f ~a vy o~om,a boa Its - - -- urn BOUNDARY ~ I ~ ~ ~ r `~! ~~ ~~ q~ (.. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1zo ~-~ --- - - ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~~; ~/ ~- of ~~ h . ~ J ~ `_~~ ~~ ___ -. ao KEYED TO LIST OF PLAT ~ ._ ~ ~ __~ ~ ~ - of ~ ~ ~ . s6, ~9yF L_. 1 ~~ 1n - ~ & PARCEL NUMBERS ~u f I- - -- I i ~ ~- ~ ( I ~ ~ I' _ I+ mA - , I/ (; ~`~ / /is4y oz sl -, - ' Io3 /F `L ~ . !~ Ins ~ 1aa ~ I ~ __ ~ - ~ ~ -III I . -r .~ i- _ ~ . I f - 1 . ., '; Q~ ~~ ,~ I _ , 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 1 .,. ~ ~ - so ~. ~ ~ ~ i i 5, 23 F ~ ~ _ ~ _~~ ~~ - ~ i ~ _. ~ lJ10~ "- - - v ~~ ,~ ~~6a) /_ I~ 122_ ~ ~ i I ~ 3 ' , ~ 4kF ~ _ _ -- ~ _ - ~ --~- ~ ~ z I ~ < / ~ ~ ~-., sT to sT ~ r - J ~ ~ ~ ~ r -_ ~~-/ ~ __~ sy ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~.1a6 - ~n/~~u n ~ ~ sT to sT. I ~/ I ~ oy ~ ~~ ~, ~ L X14 --- ] ~ ~. I ~- ; r- ~ ~''~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ / ~~~ ~ ~ r - III ~ ~ ~ - ~, ~ ,. _ I ~ --. / ~ ~ _ r 1 ~ ~ f ~~,~ ~ ~- ~ _ ~ 'C ~~ ~ RiD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ / ~-- ~ I I ~ _7 I 1 ~ - i i ~ J %' LAKE ( -1 ~ I, i ~ ~ ~{{ 'r p'~ ~-: ~_-_~ ~~ ~ 11 - J r -~ - i' PROJECT BOUNDARY r cam sr. 1 ~~ ocT. e, lase o u~o eao EXHIBIT ~-1 ~y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 358 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Dlembers: Subject: Request for Variance, 710 East 78th Street 710 to reduce the required 55,896 squar to 55,071 square feet. The varianc of a 33' by 25' garage. The garage storage and workshop facility. where the swing set is currently located, and the swing be•moved to a grass surface south of the swimming pool. The proposed garage, to be constructed with a combination brick veneer and metal siding exterior, would be used for storage space. The property is zoned "MR", Multi-family Residential. In January, 1963, the city council approved a special use per- mit allowing construction of a multi-family complex, consisting of 221 dwelling units at 620 through 740 East 78th Street, and 701 through 741 East 78th Street. The group housing section of the ordinance indicates that for multi-family projects of this size, 300 square feet of outdoor living space per dwelling unit is re- quired. The required square feet of outdoor living space at this complex would be 66,300; however, the city council in 1963, ap- proved the proposed development with 55,896 square feet of outdoor living space. Zoning Ordinance Requirements Section 3.37 subdivision 13 of the zoning ordinance lists outdoor living space requirements. Section 3.40 subdivision 6, lists three conditions for granting variances. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed this proposal against the three con- ditions that must be met before a variance may be granted, and found the following: Ms. Nancy Erickson, representing Heritage Central Apartments, East 78th Street, has submitted an application for a variance Council Letter No. 358 -2- October 13, 1980 1. That there are no special conditions affecting this par- ticular property. This property is not significantly different than any other multi-family zoned property in the City of Richfield; 2. 3. That denial of the application would not preclude exist- ing or reasonable use of the property. That the proposed garage would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to persons in the neighbor- hood. The proposed garage would decrease the outdoor and the staff feels that this would ersons residing at the site. Staff Recommendation I~ecause the three conditions for granting a variance have not been met, the staff must recommend denial of this application. Pla_nninq Commiss~_on Re<~ommendation The planning commission recommends approval of this variance request. Respectfully submitted, .., Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Planner ;- ~, c::~. ^~ ~n .o^_r.g L 1 S~sc_~:1 vse `~ y re~4c=~ ~o~ vs~i~::ce ~ Apc...`,:,ent Use ~~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ h' L v' C. ~ ~~ ~~ ~C~ -~- ~~ ! Ga:u , C`G ~lr 'G ~ ~. C_ { ~ ~ - C OZ~ ~ ~_~ C ~ G- n ~ -~ _ ~,o --ecs l ~~ G (,~~~ ~%~ ~ J 1~F~1 ~t~fj~~~L~ ~~-t'-- ~_ onoy c„t,a;.•~ c~nn: Dlcc:: '.Ct ~-»r 1 C~1:':~:!S_C='-S C= ~~^^21-LV ~~~._.._ ._2C ~11_ T°"~5:.=~~_' C=~t`:__•'S~ ...-^S~. L._ G L E:._s `_::g ~:.~ ld_-.cs' ~ yes ~ P:o . _ D:.^.CCSFC. C1ci Cj _S 1;7 L`Se: ~ ~~l J ~~ ~n~~~'. _ ~V~ ~~.^-t,/S~Ov---i'V ~'Ti2a4 , _ -~ /~' ^ n .'~D~11 C^1:~5 S. ~.:atL': ~ t I~~}" ,/'>C -- Fccci~~~ T=__- i ' ;'cccirt :. . ~ ~ ~. 1 1 i t i on i `~ % t%eSC'.Iih2c:5t C:~l"i2°T' Of th e ;}C1Zt h~TeS L 1/, Oi t::e South:Yest 1/K of the South;yest 1fL of Section ~5-28-2~ ; thznce ~io~ th along saidr..ast line of file Sc;:t'~.°Nest 1/~ of Sout haeat 1/4 of S3uth:-resL 1/~- a dis- tance o~° 525 felt t3 a point 132.5 feet South of th° ::. i,o: ~h line of th° Sout~•+'est 1/~ of South:~resL 1/~ o'? Soot :+est 1/~; t:=s;,ce Wiest ar_d aarallel ~•rith said :~aat to a line deac^i bed ii,:s a d? stan~° o~ X28.2 ,.ee t~hich is ;;-~~ian eoual distant beti~een East armed ~,~ est line of said South~~rest 1/~ ©f So:ith:~i2st 1/~ of So~ath-- ;.ieSt 1/=; the .ae Sa~zt2~ 523,1? fs~t to thL Sout~~ .lice o~ ' '' /~ O1' ,7 rJT.ILh:7e3`L 1/= Qf S`JLlt~.iieSt ~/4; the a~z,j_-:e3, 1 {- ~et ta7 1~^° , . -~harie° =--SL .:28.6 1' T] ~~.~, Of J2~i.'7ni7:~. i,1S3 th? U Ti1I"'`L Oi ~J7uC,?'1'rTBSi, 1/G Df ~ OLti,11°i°St ~/C Os' S°CUa.0:1 JJ~ ~Oi+i;S~ j~ 28, xS 225C 2~ a. d°SE> ~~J°'ti c~..S fc711©:~TS: Co::~~=~si:~~ at a point 2C~ feet Mort'.: of the Southoas~ C.'.3i:121' Oi tL^P SCL1th~d2Si. ~./~ Of th2 .SOt,~tl:`Test 1/~; tD.p:?G~. ~ ... ~-' o a 1i r ~° S.-"-.~ d ~Q'.~t't':J2S'G ~LL O~ ~:o, ~~ alo::;, ~,~ Est _ ~e South~rsst 1/a ~~5.5 feet to Uhe ,forth lire os tho So~zth _ 1/2 of said Soutn:~T°st 1/4 of Sout'~::-rest 3./4; tJ.orce . ,'Test ~.lon~ said 'i0?"'t=~` Fine 656.28 fezt; t?ienc° Soutn - . 655 _1 fret to a point in t'~e South 7i,ne of the y ~ ~t ~ ry ~~+ ti L~~.~t ~ iti °S L --/' t71 SC?.it ~>r2s L 1/A s 6i7 1 .?5 SG'~°.. L it ° J ti C?Z L_ o SouthYast cornar of the said South:res t 1/4 of ;oat; x~ s ~*-^e mast along said South li;,e ~-=a.25 feo~'c to a roin~ 2G9 feet T~12st of the ao:zt`:=east eornor of t>zQ said ,~-~'JUti:iT2$t ~/~s Of SJZ:tI"1%~CS~ 1/1; t'ti.~.Il^, iTOJ,"th parallel .r?th the~~is~ line of s id~Souti~:•Test 1/~' - - of Soiithirest 1/` ; 2C9 :ZLAt; thoncs ;~ st 209 feoi. to point of be;~innin~_ . r2 I 1~' I1 ~ 2 a.~ W - D 13 ~4 -~--- > ^ f Q ~-- -- , --- M ~ ~~-3~1V 9 14 ~ :, ~ 11 ` 6 8~ 5 Q^ n~ l 0 I~ 7 1 7Ig ^C ~ ~ 9 i8 lrl I._ n ,~ ~~ 1-1 „ ~, ~~~® USA ^r N D 12 ' D 'V ~~ ^~ ~ ^ -I ,6 ._- ~ ~--'--'t-..~--- L. ^9 8 ~y ~ • Ll I I . I-i - A ~ - U Q A N 7 ~ -°; ~' ^ 76th I ^- 2 T -~ n 1 i3 3 ("~ z 12 ;4 3 ^~ Q ~ II 15 ~ I ^c la 6 ~~ Q Q 5 v ~ u', '~ [9 t r ~ ~. ~.J ~../ 1, Y I ( 1 Lj t~ ?3 -- i -- Uv i 16 ; 4 ~ ..- 15 5 ~.--- n ° - --~~ { LJ 14 T~ 6 n L~ °' ~ 13 ~ 7 N 0 -~ ~ I i , 8 II 10 ~9 j ~! ~ ^ v ~I LJ t . ~ I LJ ~ o 2,2 0 . f '7 - `, --- 3 13 0 ~d ~/~ r'~ '~J ~I-- ---- 4~a ^ e m r• O ~ Q _ h (-1 --`-- r 6~----~ - Q ~ N ~ ---j ~ ;` v Ip =^ 8 ,~ ~ `8 a I t ! ^ «, ^ 10 I9 ~ y r 7th i s 2 U °, ' f g~ ~ 2 ~ o {~ -' U H~~ u 1 n f ~ ~ _ 14 3 ~ n Q ^ ~ > ^ ,314 ^~ > N ^ --~- a ~ Q 12 5 ^~ ~ 1215 ^N ^ --.---- .. ,. 11 6 ^ M: D 11 ~6 ^~ n 9 8 ^r ^ 9 i8 ^~ ~ CJ i _^ G r f6 1 ~ ;nn l~!2 ~ _ 'U J U _ t~ --~--~5-,4-. n LJ , .._-_~ ^ - _U Ia~5 ^:, ,. X36 ^~ -~~12`7 ti ^ ^ II.B I n m t-,' n n ~U f0 9 ^ v J r U U N ^ N ^ M • ^ ~^ e r •, ^ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL `~''~~• - • -• - l l r ! MULTIPLE FAMILY -RESIDENTIAL - ~ - ~ • •-~ ~ ;:;~~~~.~,,- i CHURCH. ... _. ....._ _.._.__...~._..-.~..o. .. ~.~ .. ~ ~ v-....r., . S zi~4 r .-, -._ '.,°- - ~~ilt~'~'s..._...._ __ • ._.._ _. c lJ U L° lJ ,z~ - , ~- ~ -- Q 14 '3 C- ~ _ lJ (~ 14 ~3 n _ - ---- . lo~~ ~: Q ~j ~~ ' ~ Q ~ U U M -~- T C~N ~ - 12 _ ~ I ~ ^ 9. 4 ., -~ ., all ' 6 j}; -- -~- -•-L-J • ~ =~ Q i l . 6 U •~ - - -_ _ ~ _ ---- 1 7 ~6 O„ ~ j 9 ,8 ~ j ~. <' ~~ 9 '8 a LJ Imo .1... 13 13 - r'. ~ ~ i2 '4 ~ a= Q ~ I I ! 5 J `_ ~r Q O ~~ N 1' 5 a ~ 7 ° a ~. ^~ 19 i l C . . 18 ~ 2 ~! ~ U 17'3 _ LJ` n ~ 16:4 ~~• I S//~~5 N ~ •/ - ` ~•~ ~ 14 ~ 6 "' y . ~ ^• ( °' ~ 13 ; 7 `' ~ i l , 8 I1 x,10 ~ 9 ~ C• v ~ 76th 1 I I l___J ~' 2 2 0 -~ =~~ _ J 3 ~ 3 ... ~y u .O . Ct'T - _ r` ----- 4'4 a e mm~ L ~•j~ +J c Q M1 (~ 5 '----- - Q [2 N ~ -~ 5 ~` / ~ L/ ~p T n m II n r c ~ I lJ ~ 19 D ° i5 2 U~ ..n 143 ! , ~ 5 ' 2 I ~ o ~ a _~ I. ~ Q N ~ 12 5 ~ ~ a 12 15 .. _ a II •6 Q r ~ 11 '~ ~; ~ f0'T ~ ~ U IO T U i ' n 9~6 O° rl 9i8 LJ r~ ~ ~; 18 I ~, n IT i 2 •j l r J~ i -~. "- ~~ -15i4-- --~ ~ - u I a ~5 _ ~ t3 6 ~ ~, y ~ 12 ' 7 ~ : - r_ ~ N ~,Q ~ 11.6 ~m h T ~~ O y~ ~V J P ' ~ Q lJ J r U U 77th ,ti. _ ;t• ;I; _ _ :~: `• .'l• .~. .;. . •l• • ~ • .'r.j .. •~._. • ~~'^'• •lr.' .'~.'. .T.• .~. .t'.•. .._~~.' .I.'. . ~'.• 1:' • .~...• ~(•••••i•••.r.•.. .~.:.•. 1 :~':•. .k:•••••'•••'•:•••• •C••••••••••'•••••••'••~'••:•••. .~:•: :~: :r.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. •~•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. . i:::: •~ 3.;.: :E:~:•1•:•:•••:• .1. _~~ ~• _ - GENERAL COMMERCIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL v~~f-Y ~"~ ~ . L~~S~ •. .r_..... N N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N L a" f a Dc °~ ~ ti P f ° ~ ~, r , s ~} ., U, ;F; .~. .a;• ;r; S. A. .'~ t .i. .~. .~. •.~. .t, .~. .~. ';' :~: .~~: :~: :~: :~: •`• "" •e .. .. .r+•.f~~Y~k .~1w - ---~ 1. ~ ~q • ~ ~ ~. 6 J N W V 3f1N3AV OJVOIN~ ~ p I J J ' ~ ~ ( m m 1 1 ~ ~ I I 0 ~ m m ' ~ I I I 1 ~ •.µF; :~~ I :~~ ~~' I I • ~' F- ~ ~: ~ W ~ m :~; m I ~ ( :~: m m ~. I a 1 I a .~:. Z M •:#~:•:d•:• ' ~ ..tL` .~.. Q I o •.a•.~.•. (~ N ~ a Z I °° up V w L ~t w ~ W __,~ w~a U . ( ~~~' ~ ~ o a ~ m ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ I m I W ( ~ 1 a ~ m ~ ~ I 1 Q i _ ~.~ - - m - - .J Z v. r wT I1J J Q. U ~r s CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 357 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Special Use Permit, Woodlake Lutheran Church, 7525 Oliver Avenue South operation of a day care and nursery school at Woodlake Lutheran Church, located at 7525 Oliver Avenue South. No new construction is contemplated to accommodate-this use. State statutes indicate that a day care operation for fewer than ten children is an al- lowable use in residential zoning districts. When ten or more children are involved, local approval is necessary. Day care cen- ters or nursery schools with enrollments exceeding ten children are considered schools by Richfield's zoning ordinance, and require a special use permit to operate. The projected combined maximum enrollment for the Woodlake Lutheran Church program is 60 children. The proposed use will be located in three rooms of the church educational wing and will utilize existing playground facilities. The surrounding land uses are multi-family to the west, single family residential to the south and east, and a public school to the north. 5040 square feet, plus use of the playground area now existing the west side of the church. The property is zoned "R", single family residential. Zoning Ordinance Requirements Section 3.30 subdivision 2, paragraph 1 of the zoning ordin- ance allows schools in "R" zoning districts by special use permit only. Section 3.41, subdivision 2, governs the issuance of special use permits. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed this proposal and found the following: 1. That the proposal is in substantial compliance with con- ditions governing the issuance of special use permits. 2. That sufficient parking exists on the site. 3. That an outdoor recreation area bounded by a solid fence and the church is available on the west side of the church. Council Letter No. 357 -2- October 13, 1980 4. That the proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses and should not adversely affect these uses in terms of traffic, character or lifestyle of the neighborhood. The site does have adequate off-street parking to accommodate the four full-time and nine part-time employees. The proposal will use the north entrance for access to the educational wing of the church, which is fronted on the north by 75th Street and the West Middle School; the south by the church; ancY the west by multi-family dwell- ings. The proposal should minimally affect these sur- rounding uses. Alternatives for access to the classrooms exist, should problems arise in the future. Staff Recommendation Because this application is in substantial compliance with the conditions governing the issuance of special use permits, the staff recommends that the city council approve this special use permit request with the following stipulation: Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends approving this special use permit request without the listed stipulation. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~'~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Planner - -.i. ~+e4 ~ fr.a .M,~~q-'r •. +:.. <.`~~.~~'-~E~ a 'gc°'4iw. ;~`. ~~S.y., ~, .~ -,µt~w,~fih~~ ~~","~~.~ .tea L.1'i ~ ~ ~ ~7 ~ IHI ~1 P ti F , IS I ERCIAL ` GENERAL COMM - SINGLE FAMILY- RESIDENTIAL ~~ MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ., ~ ~ i ~~ --~ '~ ~ `' `~ . ,`~ \ ~ ~_ `~ .\ , '~ - --- -- ~~ '~ ~ ~~ '. ~_ ~~ .~~- .. %j T. W Q 1 I ~ ,.l _ ~_. ._~ h N i - ._ I ~;, Q 171 ~-- ,' ~ 16;1 ' ,. -- 12 ~ ~ -_ - --;•-- -- __~ - I~-.Q_° (5~2 fem.. ~ , ,~ _ v _ - 141-Q_T - - 14.3 - Z ~ ,-~? ~ O LL1 ~ 4 , n ~ j ~ 14 5 L -- ~ Q _ ~ - t- Q -- - 13;6 ~_ N ~~ 2 5 ~ JI ~ , o ~ w r 12 ., .. ~ 16 „~Q I I P ~~ 7 --- 9 ~~ f ~ e ---- - -•----- !0 ~ ~ 9;8 Y ~,: ~~ Q~ ~0 ~ ~i , ,a - ~..1l. N 1 _ , ,n I ,--, ~, ~ . N ~ ~ ~~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ I (~ ~ • ~- ~1 •~ `fi`t' ~O ; . ,o ,o i is ;~ ~ a~ ~, ~t~ ! I I L`u ~ _~ i ., _ ~ ~' - ~; Q ~'- z - ~ -- „ -LL- Q* - `~ -- ,Q Q i J ~! ~; ----r "- IJI~ ~ .~ C ~~ ~ ~~ "'V ~ w 'r.. --- S i G~ ; - ~ I l l l 9 I -_ S T. - -~ ~ a, .~ .~:7~: ::~:;: ` •'A~. i ~ .;~: 76th r...i--r:.....a;-.. ~:{~,~.4sW.r:~-.EyRS~c•Y.o~v~*-r•s-+.,~+,.~.._.... -~I-~~+V.'s~1Q~.. ~~aa~4zac~sw •'..' • •"71~.~i.h7S°.`~'-:3t't^'.`-.t'elt~'+tsl.~?~i",whr:. <y„~ -4. ~ .~~ --~ - fit. .-~-=. \•~ \~ ~.~ ,~ ~ ~~ \\\ \\ GENERAL COMMERCIAL `~ 0 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ~ ' MULTIPLE .FAMILY RESIDENTIAL `~ ` ~ ~ lnst~~ut~onal - ~ ~ ~. \ \ \ •~ '~ ~~ `\ ~ `~. • - Q _ 8;~ ~ o ~ ~~ s3~ • ~_~ , , . ~ ~ o 54 ` N ---1- i D ~:,~ ~" N ` n ~. _ . _ ..~~q 2C~F I 7nn~ 76th W J O V - J - ti 1 i 15' 2 ~ l m ~ -~ _ - -' ~4~ 3 ~ c _ _~ : _ ~ _ o t- Q - ~2~5 N ~ u 6 O O W Z :: ~ ~ ( n I ~ I ~ ~- _ -v ) ~ c'. +" O O ~ l'; v .J (~ ~. ~ ~; ~`: -`~J- ~ Q:--- ---~ CI ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ' ~ ~~ --~ --I a V I~-~ .) ~ J~ , - - ~ /, ~T. ... a ~J U ` ~ :901•:•:•:•:•:•:•:••• W ~ `-~ ~. M ~; ~Jv -- a I :l:g:}D: (.~ i to I .....:~:~ i ~zo ~ ~~: i , .•.a~a .............~,... S T. ::~ ! •i f • •' •-•~ Y - ~ I _ _ J . I. • O O ~t :i: •V-~:• ~A , ~ . • ~ I =: • • • ~ ~ I ~J( • ~ • , ~ ,I S l ~ J a~ ~ i i _ ^ ~, ~ -` -- ~ i - ' ~_ ' I sl ~ -~ ~~ ~ fl / ~ (. - . -._. . -.. . _.... -.-.-.I I ~rance to be used I j ~~ i j „ ; i I o~ ~ NAVE ~ ~ ~ I ~ I N i , PLAY AREA J I ( ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ' 1 •_ / ' / ~ NARTHEX ~ d i 0 ~i~~ ~w+~ i ST WOODLAKE LUTHERAN CHURCH Q O -~- ~z N Scale ~ I~~ = 60~ . W 76th ~7 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 356 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: ~5tn Street wnicn lies between Summit Bank and Richfield Medical Group. At that time, the council set October 13, 1980, as the date for a public hearing to consider this matter. The council also gave first reading approval to an ordinance which would va- cate the street, as requested. The staff has reviewed the street vacation petition, and found the following: 3. That all Richfield Medical Group access issues have been resolved. Summit Bank will provide access easements to Richfield Medical Group over a portion of the 65th Street area proposed to be vacated, and over the road immediately west of the Richfield Medical Group building. 4. That necessary utility easements will be maintained. 5. That traffic flow will not be hindered, because 65th Street has already been relocated as part of the LHN public improvement project. 6. That twenty-one additional off-street parking spaces will be available to bank and medical group customers with vacation of the street. 7. That there will be a reduction in public street mainten- ance costs with vacation of the street. Subject: Request for Vacation of a Portion of 65th Street Council Letter No. 356 -2- October 13, 1980 A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached for city council review. It is recommended that the city council give second reading approval to this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, fir, ~ '? Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Community Development Director City Engineer t `T'RANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC STREET CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN': Section 1. The following described portion of West 65th Street is hereby vacated: _ The entire width of West 65th Street; from the West line of Nicollet Avenue in a westerly direction to a line formed by the Southerly extension of the west line of Registered Land Survey 69.2, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to take• such action as is required to give effect to vacation of the public right-of-way as provided in the foregoing Section 1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, i~iinnesota this day of 1980. Donald J. Priebe, i•:ayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk 65th STREET back of curb W Z W a w J U Z t Scale: l"=40' Pr I nert~ I CIS ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 355 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Release of Wendy's Off-Street Parking Bond On June 26, 1978, the city council authorized execution of an off-street parking contract with C & C Investment, Inc. to construct a new parking lot in conjunction with the construction of Wendy's Restaurant. Inspection of the site by city staff indicates that the owners have complied with the terms of their off-street parking contract. At the September 22, 1980 council meeting this item was removed from the consent agenda and the staff was instructed to investigate the poor condition of the ground cover near Wendy's. The boulevard in front of Wendy's that is in city right-of-way along 65th Street was disrupted by NSP when they buried their cable. As part of the city's undergrounding agreement with NSP, the city staff does all of the landscaping behind NSP's crews. The staff seeded this area in August. The seeds have germinated and started growing so by next spring we should have a grass boulevard again. The scattered rocks and gravel in the boulevard will be cleaned up this fall. Because the owners have complied with the terms of their off- street parking contract, the staff recommends that Wendy's bond be released. Respectfully submitted, J Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Services Director Community Development Director r ! RESOLUTION NO. r RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND ON OFF-STREET PARKING C&C Investments, Inc. ~ 1301 Cambridge Street, Mpls, MN Location: 6500 Lyndale Avenue S. Use: Restaurant WHEREAS, C&C Investments, Inc. 1301 Cambridge Street, had an off-street parking agreement with the City of Richfield relating to 6500 Lyndale Avenue South, which contract bears the designation of Contract No. 2268, and which contract was guaranteed by an off- street parking operator's bond in the amount of Eleven Thousand Dollars {$11,000) on which the Capital Indemnity Corp. appears as surety, and WHEREAS, said C&C Investments, Inc. has substantially complied with the provisions of said agreement and now seeks to be relieved of any further obligation under said bond, and WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring said C&C Investments, Inc. to continue to provide a bond for security on the performance of said agreement. NO6~d, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: That the city manager is hereby authorized and directed to release C&C Investments, Ines for any and all acts committed or incurred in violation of said Contract No. 2268, on and after the day of 1980. Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this day of 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk ~/a2, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 354 Agenda October 13, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Vacation of Utility and Drainage Easement on Bourbon and Basin First Addition Attached to this council letter is a The petition is of proper form, and is signed by owners of the property which the easement bisects. This easement was dedicated in 1972, to provide utility ease- ments to ensure adequate drainage and fire protection for a res- taurant proposed to be built on the site. The restaurant was never constructed, the property has remained vacant, and the utility and drainage easement has remained with the property. In April, 1980, the city council granted a variance to allow construction of an office building at this site. Vacation of this utility and drain- age easement is necessary to allow development of this site in accordance with the plan approved by the city council. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed this request and found the following: 1. That the application is of proper form and has the required number of signatures of abutting property owners; 2. That the proposed roadway on the west side of the property will provide access for the necessary utilities; 3. That the vacation will not be detrimental to the general public welfare. Staff Recommendation and since vacation adversely affect the staff recommends Commencing at the point on intersection of the East line of the West i of the Northwest a of the Southwest a Section 33, Town- ship 28, Range 24; thence on said East line of West ? of Northwest a of Southwest a of Southeast a of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24, south 127.31 feet; thence Southwest 31 feet on the line known as North 70°34'43" East; thence west 137.68 feet on the line known as North 89056'51" East to the starting point: ~.,,r . _~.~:,o~ approval to vacate the following described easement: Council Letter No. 354 -2- October 13, 1980 From said starting point, the 10 foot wide parcel of land bound by 5 feet on either side of the follgwing described land: South 170 .feet on the line known as North 0 03'09" ~est: thence southeast 375.35 feet on the line known as North 20 $4'27" West: thence east 33 feet on the line known as North 89 53'52" East. Planning Commission Recommendation his easement. Respectfully submitted, ~= ^ • c~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/jf cc: Community Development Director City Engineer ' .~.'i...i'~ ~:J i ~ Gr j~ :,I ~:C.:?,;Ciro WILLIAM D. HARPER STEVEN E. WIRTH Mr. Rick Jopke City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota HARPER & WIRTH ATTORNEYS AT LAW 944 MINNESOTA BUILDING 46 EAST FOURTH $'fREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551D1 55423 August 19, 1980 TELEPHONE (612) 227.6695 CABLE: HARWIR Re: Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement relative to: The West 2 of the Southwest a of Southwest of Southeast a of Section 33, Township 28 North, Range 24 West of the 4th Principal P~4eridian. The West lZ of the Northwest a for the Southwest 2 of the Southeast 4 of said Section 33, Township 28, Range 24 West of the 4th Principal Meridian. All lying in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Dear Mr. Jopke: Enclosed please find: 1. The original of a "Request for Vacation of Easement," duly signed by the owners of said property; 2. An official plat map showing the location of said easement, and; 3. A copy of the Land Surveyor's letter of explaination. The grantees of said easement are indicated on the enclosed plat map. The vacation or moving of the easement is essential to the construction of the office building to be located on the property. The Condon-Naegele group has assured my clients, J.E. Erickson & Sons, that the sole action taken relative to said easement was to include its appearance on the plat map. No other deeds or documents of colzveyance were executed. I appreciate your prompt cooperation relative to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me for further assistance if I can be of help. Cordially, Steven E. Wirth SEW/bas cc Charles W. Erickson Industrial Business C, E. COULTER 8e ASSOCIATES INC. City Lots Topographic hlapping LAND SURVEYORS JOHN A. PETERSON (RANK R. LENZ, JR. 3300 LYNDALE AVE. SO. h11NNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55408 824.0370 August 14, 1980 City of Richfield 6700 Portland Ave. So. Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Attention: Mr. Rick- Jopke Dear Mr. Jopke: Platting Farm Surveys Lakeshore Judicial We have been asked by :~+s. Chales Erickson to explain what we know in regards to the 10 foot drainage and utility easement as created and dedicated in our record plat of BOURBON AND BASIN FIRST ADDITION which has been duly recorded in the Office of tie County Recorder. This 10 foot easement through the middle of the property was created to provide a water main loop through the property which would provide fire hydrant service to the proposed restaurant. To the best of my knowledge this was the only purpose for this easement and I have no knowledge whether or not this 8 inch water main was ever constructed; ho~•ever I do know that there are no fire hydrants visible on the above mentioned property at this time. I hope this satisfies any questions regarding this easement. If I can be of further assistance please contact me. ,= `~7- y truly yours ~ ' ~ __ _ . - ~ - ~ / ~ ~-, '~" ,n` A. ters , Pr si2tent Copy to Charles Erickson. HENNCPiN CCUr+I"r, ~"^+. D ~ ~~ . ,~, GI~cCTOR ? ~ ~~,~1/1 CEPJTY AM MRtnn•tl.,n OaN I,°I H At• 10 I~•Y MI W plrnnl Yr•~.-~ I.KA M) M ~r~ wM M YK. ~t~. I `, ` i :. .~ I ~ •.. .:_ '1 '. _. SCALE j I INCH=~OOFEET ~~~ .i ~•- O DENOTES IRON A+ ~uUMFNT ALL BEARINGS SHO-'.•: AF.E ASSUMED ;._ ~~ I i f, U ~` ,-- ~ ~~ ~ I s w Q~ _ ,~t• ~u 7 N. l.lUfi OF SW ~hL OF SE'/u OF SEG. 'H3 t Y,.~- `.• , • • r ... 328.~f4 • • 3I JJ 76TH ST. a W N M ~ ~ N ', ~~,~ ~ ~ ' / / , . 0 ,~i i . DOG. ;=0. 3101~u1 0 - ~ ~~ I N 23f.1B ..... .. ~ . ~_ ~ '~ ~ E N 89°S~• 5,, . ~ to T S -! I ~ q ~ . U ~. N f '. rs ~ a,,, i•~ o , 3 as oM i I ' 3 7 ~i ~ ~ ~ W , ~~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 3 lil , ~ N ~ 0 2 iin e N ~ ~ 4 i' ~ _* \ 1~ r N 0 \ ~ ~ 1 'L (~`~ LN \ ~ 3 L 2 6` `"' ~ oo a~ ~O ~ li N ~ ~ ?~F\~ ~ 9 . . A 'vp "k ~ Go \ ~ 4 c ~,C ~ pa~9 ~ v , ti 0 , W ~ , Z A ,~ " ~` „ a~ Q~o ~ ~ ~.'6 S ~y c ~ 2 ~ 1 .9 ~ . 6 V~ F D \ S s 3 A V ~ . f : . . 7 F \ ~ ' ' ~ " S2 f Ar89°57 • .. ~ . __ ~•o. ' .325.00• ~'~^ ~ N ~ ~~ ~~ ~ \ 'y ' '. y ~ a ~, . - , ,. ~ N •@ ~e 99 ~ -~ p s 70 ..__. A u tF 0 LL 2 7 u3 N J M A U W Fem.. ly I~ O •"~ f c r2~`03J ~• s Fem.. 0 U ~ ka; , •~'. c~o <c+ N ~ ~ b .• ~ aQ ~~~?~~~ ?. F- x 0 0 .' a sic ako>c3 ~` p1 ' J ~ v ~ ~ k ~ ' •4cs,~32 • o,~ ~• . ~ 9 to J ~ ' >3@99., ~ N 0 ~ N ~ ~ 2 4 V Q 3 n ~+ ~~ o~ ~N 34 Q~ ~y $I m iI .xl irl .c tY 1' Nl..so co ~~ -r~ - ~ t I.c ( ffi ~ ' o c N -1 Gl'~~ .~> 3nd Xt1~~OJ ,- _ PI m101~~I~ N -iN~n~P YI/l~\tx-J 1~'a Oi _IN 1_.i I I • ~ - ~ N N V N Nl Y'- - _ ' t~ ~) V n I I .•-~ I I ~ ^ i I I ~.~ `Ir I~.J''-• Jt r' _1~ i_ I I '- I r ~I o I ~'-' ~ - _ i I_ -. _ ~ ar l cc i •- r ac c» ~a fo • •. i ,`:.f• I - - -J I ao . r as . f, -- ~ ~~nd ~.NOdna I I x .r. r .,~,~,,1,3,1 ,.,) ^I- ~~^^I ' •'»• - •~ '._ - _. sr' Z[. ,. i_. f~c .b41 ao ~. .. ^: 1 .. ~ • -c ~ ~ `.tV11"if {)1 11 .. ,L-iDJI:~ _~_•_~_ :._ -f'~~ 1-~^ .. ~r'-'ice. I 1^ I.- i-: irk !i~?)$!I~~;~If O: _IN i ~ JJ ,7 t\ m' ~. -IN I n l v l_l)/•~ m i C1 ~ ~ ~ = N N n Q I!1 cD ! n y ~ i; I.~If )4~)i(f: ?' ~ ~._ NON N IIN "'\Y- ~ f~ tO f.' V ~ ml _I /i ! 11l /l1jl++(( Lim I~ 1 ~ ~~ I .~r F _ - I _ _ I I ._I^ ! I~ I (` 1./~YU~'1f ?3S ,f`-' _ i I -' I- ~ ^~-- -' ;- -~~ ~'i ~'L: _:_ I ~s_ _ - ~ j Sli~`il, a/1f r 1 [r ~ r uc.d ~ .ofa I n a I r a. I •2 1 :: 1 c r i u. ,. s+a- iota I w v I If t~ I- ;s.f. ij{i~,., ~~~~1~ ~~nb NOSN3W~ -r' f2 ~ f[fa oo Sl -~ fO ~ o tr y• ~ 111'.t. xl 1 l~ I ~ ° +,~ r 1" - - I iD ~ 11 i3 '3, ~ y. 7, u - -~ )J ! ! _ ~I nl ~ t I ~~~ lii~~l /~I~1 i~ ~i l ~ - !f ~-- - NIwIIP t211D m' i1 _ ~~n~ I I 11, N N I N N N Ql I m n ~ ~: - i I i rN ~.L-. _ ~ ~ I I i ', _ ~2< co I cc1l t (c~ I I r I I ex I rt ~ laf ~ 1~ I I 1 1 and .. .. 1NOL'V~~l~ ~'~ fl [t I •_ 1C O. - •t•t{ ~ tiV [~ 2. ~1 ~ r: - ff J.i9a I ~~ ' I ~. ~ 1 r [. ~ , ~,. i- l ~ m IQ1 ~Qi~_IN ~N 1 nIC I /'(1~I ~ ~~~ I .. ~ 1 1 t ll i I ~ I I I r" ~ w. sr cc (m.l nF.. u-a, col I lei I sl i •x IDA,~I-/~~~f i•c i 1 I I ~~~` .~._..~_ f; •a I ~o• f.l a- xo i a I .~ ,o• .t Ic. xa r• ~ / n m! ~0 ~rN S I N( ~ M I I _~ I m n ~ rD n c Inlx.V ~ r ; m . .+ // 1 ~ - I _ N N -- ___ _ -.. - - - ~ I ~ _~- __' _ - _ i \' ~~, ~~ ~~~=r: ~' ~• • •. • i~j v •:~.~:: - ~ 3~t' :r z: yc »r, .~. ,. ~ I ~ I r, ^ -- r-. r ..;:oriY.~: .. i a~ .[ Q . ~`.~, n n~~,,,.• ;t d ~~~ .~~,= z- r U S U ~?J XONN '.••pp51~ i ~~ .. I -~ ~ ~t~JVLJO-~i--- Crv~ -.~ 22. :r .:-fx K- -f, p 'DIDIDi~1~DIG 4•~y :SI IS~N.''i~ •Nr i- ~ ~ r l ^. _ r1 r ^ .. = J W ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~; ~ N ~ 0 ~.L~ U Z ~ a a a z z J c~c I ~ G 1J J Q t- Z w 0 W J =-I,~_ F- ; ~ " Q ' J U c~ z ~ N ~~ >~~~~ ~~ '~I I tI ~t i~ i t~ I `yf r --• ,`~ _ -t .. ` r ~,.,. ?i~t1 Xd~~OJ I _. ~~'i 0 ~- `gyp O m _" ~ -~ G I l~" ~ - I D ~~~~ '~- i ice:; ``,n .~" ~~ ~ -{ .~ ~ , ' . ~-; I ~ ~ `, - r i c:~ I ;~ ~ i ` ~• i ~ i~: l .~ ` ~, .;~ .~, , I ~ , , ~ i I I , '~ i,~ i of 1~. ~ - ~ ~ \ T \ I ~` 9 J 1 ~ _ I ~\ ~ ___.~ 0 ____-- `. ,~ Ir~- ~ x,11 \~ \ / f nc , r~ 1 . II ~ ~ ~ \~. / .S f~ 7^i ~ 1 1 I~ LI ..I ..I _ ., r I11 ~'\\\~ J~1 __nAy~ /• 1 ' I, i~ ii /' 11 ~ha', Z I ~~J' ,. ~ , _I 1 ~ -~.._ >.~, -M ~ Y D~9 /; C }•q ~ 1 ' ~ ; WEST 76th STREET - \~~ ~- I ~... 8 a f ~` PROP S OR ~ 1~~ i "' . iu CORPORATE ATRAVEL INC. -._,k--....«.. ~• ,'~^--- -"""~ _ RiCHFcLO, A7INNESOTA I ~ BN'BN ~n7YTECTS t ° - - •~ ~--~ -.. -_,_ r ~- REQUEST FOR VACATION OF EASEMENT This instrument, made the 2(,~- day of w ~C , 1980, among Condon-Naegele Realty (also known as Condon-Naegele Realty Co., a partnership consisting of Richard F, Condon and Robert O. Naegele, and also known as Condon Naegele Realty,) a Minnesota partnership consisting of Richard F. Condon, Robert O. Naegele, William O. Naegele and Robert O. Naegele, Jr. party of the first part, and J.E. Erickson & Sons, a Minnesota General Partnership consisting of Charles W. Erickson, Thomas E. Erickson and Kathryn E. Wirth, party of the second part, witnesseth: WHEREAS, the party of the first part and the party of the second part are owners of the following described land in the City of Richfield, County of Hennepin, and State of Minnesota, to-wit: The West 1/2 of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28 North, Range 24 West of 4th Principal Meridian. The West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the South- west 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of said Section 33, Township 28, Range 24 West of the 4th Principal Meridian. WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain plat map dated the 20th day of December 1972, surveyed and platted as Bourbon and Basin First Addition by said Richard F. Condon and Robert O. Naegele, partners of said Condon-Naegele Realty, the owners at the time of said lands, and recorded on the 29th day of December 1972, in the office of the register of deeds in and for said county, ~-- ~ in Book 195 of plats, at page 24, the public was granted a Drainage and Utility Easement on the last described land as therein mentioned; and WHEREAS, the said Drainage and Utility Easement is legally described in the City of Richfield, County of Hennepin, and State of Minnesota, to-wit: ''F~`9. Vii,., •s~'4a -tah'~m~ 1 b;..;.1, ~..~ ,M-aq ~~-- s Eommencing at the point of intersection of the East line of the West 1/2 of the North- west 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24 and the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24; thence on said East line of West 1/2 of Northwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24 south 127.31 feet; thence southwest 31 feet on the line known as North 75° 34' 43" East; thence west 137.68 feet on the line known as North 89° 56' S1" East to the STARTING POINT: From said STARTING POINT, the 10 foot wide parcel of land bound by 5 feet on either side of the following described land: south 170 feet_on the line known as North 0° 03' 09" West: thence southeast 375.35 feet on the line known as North 20° 44' 27" West: thence east 33 feet on the line known as North 89° 53' 52" East. WHEREAS, the party of the first part and the party of the « second part desire the cancellation, vacation, and annulment of said Drainage and Utility Easement; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby requested that the above described easement be forever cancelled, vacated and annulled. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on the day and year first above-described. ____~, _ J.E. Erickson & Sons, a Minnesota'.General ~ Partnershi / By y ~ J l ~.c.; -~1~., Charles W. Erickson By -_~ r - _. _S; Condon-Naegele Realty (also known as Condon-Naegele Realty Co., a partnership consisting of Richard F. Condon and Robert O. Naegele, and also known as Condon Naegele Realty,) a t•;inrescta partne-ship consisting of Richard F. Condon, Robert O. Naegele, William O. Naegele and Robert O. Naegele, Jr. Thomas E. Erickson BY ~l~l t7~cc~,t,~ G~ ~L/.t2,~~ Kathrynr~. Wirth -2- _. ,,,_ '~. _. _.... -. '-._ _~ . ,._ ., w-a ~.. _ - .. ~-_ _ , _. Commencing at the point of intersection of the East line of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24 and the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24; thence on said East line of West 1/2 of North- west 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24 south 127.31 felt; thence southwest 31 feet on the line known as North 75 34' 43"o ast; thence west 137.68 feet on the line known as North 89 56' 51" East to the STARTING POINT: From said STARTING POINT, the 10 foot wide parcel of land bound by 5 feet on either side of the following described land: south 170 feet on the line known as North 0 03: 09" West: hence southeast 375.35 feet on the line-known. as North 20 44' ~7" West: thence east 33 feet on the line known as North 89 53' S2" East; and WHEREAS, it is found that the above described easement is no longer necessary for a public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager , are hereby authorized to execute the appropriate documents to carry out the vacation of the above described drainage and utility ease- ment. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of October, 1980. Donald J. Priebe Mayor .,t ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Deputy City Clerk