Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03-08-76 agenda
,r i CITY OF RICHFIELD , MIN NE~SOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 77 ', Agenda March 8 , 19.76 'The Honorable Malyor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield .+ Gentlemen: ~: ~ ~I, Subj ~ ct: Street Width for Irving Avenue Between i " _66th Street and 62nd Street ` ,, F On February~9, 1976 the Richfield City Council adopted resolutions establishing stree .widths in the area bounded by 35V11, Penn-Avenue, 62nd Street and 66 h St feet. Because of concerns expressed by residents who were in attendance at tlae February 9th meeting,. street widths for Irving Avenue were only tentatively established as follows: 65th to 66th Street 30 feet 64th to 65th Street 32 feet 63rd to 64th Street 32 feet 62nd to: 63rd Street 36 feet ! - The city council rquested -city staff to contact residents on Irving. Avenue to obtain their reacti~ns to these proposed widths and report back to the council on March 8th;. Th: staff has contacted these residents and results !of this .survey are-as foll ws: 1. A petiti n was received from residents on the block of Irving Avenue etween 66th and 65th Street -requesting to have the street c~I nstructed to"a width of 26 feet, instead of"30 feet-. This petition was signed by 13 of 16 property owners residing onthe block of Irving between.65th and.66th Street: 2: A petiti n was received. from residents living on Irving north of 66th treet requesting. that the street widths be constructed r as follo ,, , .62nd to .63rd Street 36 feet 63rd to 65th Street No less thin 32 -feet- \~~ 65th to fifth fitraat ~fl fast y Council Letter Noj. 77 -2- March 8, 1976 This petition also requested that in order to eliminate parking problerr~s, which .have :existed in the past, parking restrictions be placed on Irving Avenue if the street is constructed to a width of less than 30 feet. This petition was signed by 46 of 66 prop- erty owners residing ~on Irving Avenue north of 66th Street. Most of these, residents reside north of,65th Street. 3 . In_ addition to the petitions received, city staff received several telephone calls from concerned residents.,. expressing varying desires for specific street widths: A. 65210... Irving Avenue wants a 36 foot street _B. 643:9 Irving Avenue wants a street constructed so that they will not lose. any trees . C. 6421. Irving Avenue: wants a wide street. D. 641':0 Irving Avenue wants a 3b foot street instead of 32 feet. E. 631;3. Irving Avenue wants a 30 foot street. It is the recommendation of the public works director, in which I concur, that the city council take final action on March 8, 1976 establishing specific street widths for Irving Avenue from 62nd Avenue to 66th Street. The council may confirm the widths tentatively established on February. 9th, or the council may wish to amend those proposed widths based on the petitions received from residents of the area . Respectfully .submitted, J C~~ J Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/e j a cc: Public Works ~ Director .:.~~ ' ,._ li The Honorable Mayor and Members of.the City Council L ;CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject; Request for Variance, 7501 Portland A~~enue South Mr. Dale Jajcobson, 7501 Portland Avenue: South, is requesting two side, yard variances and a jfront yard variance to' he side and front yard requirements of the zoning ordinance. II Proposal Mr. Jacobsgn proposes to add a second story to his one-story rambler arid. to build a 5 x 14~ foot addition onto the front of his home. This addition on the front of the home will extend from ground level to the top of the proposed second story.. These plans are part of a total remodeling project which will include; 1. Second story addition: for kitchen; dining room, living room and one _ bedroor~n and bath; I; 2 . Remode ing of existing first :floor for bedrooms; 3. :The 5 X 14 foot addition on_the front for a new entrance, !,foyer and stairway access to the main living area on the second floor; .~ 4. New windows and siding on all sides; 5: Fireplace. (£xhibits 1 and attached) Issue The. applicant's proposal will require variances to the. following two sections of the zoning .ordinance; i ~ 1.' Seca 3..39,. Subd. 2, Para 2, which regulates front yard setbacks in a single flamily residential district to the established building setback line. T'he applicant's request is to allow construction of ari enclosed. _I I .: ~, f~- ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~~ • Council Letter No. 76 -2- March 8, 1976 i five foot addition into an established front year setback of 35 feet. A#ive foot variance to he zoning requirement is required. 2. A variance to Sec. 3.3'0, Subd. 4, Para 3, which regulates side yard setbacks in the single family district. Aside. yard of l0 feet is required when a home exceeds 12 stories .- The applicant's request is to allow the construction of a second story on a one story home ..The existing side y ~rd setback is 9' 7" . A five- inch variance to the zoning requirement 'I is .required. When considering variances to zoning ordinance standards, the city council '~, is acting as the !Zoning Board of Appeals. The issue before the Board of Appeals in this: case is; Are all of the necessary criteria established in the zoning ordinance for granting a vajriance satisfied i All three of ',the following criteria must be satisfied for the Council to approve ~'~ .the .variance; 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the particular land, b',uilding or use (single family residential) not common to other • properties in similar zoning districts, 2. Granting the variance is necessary for the preservation of and enjoyment of substantial property- rights . (This has been interpreted to mean that if the variance is not granfed the person would not be able to use his property for any residential use .) 3. Grantin. the variance will not materially and adversely affect the hea th ~ or safe~y of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. The three variances being requested, a front yard variance and two side yard variances, must each be judged on the above criteria. Background Zoning Land Building Regulations Parcel 59,9.' x 123.9' 41.4' x 27,8' N/A (7 , 422 sq, ft.) (1,150 sq, ft. ) Existing .Set acks Front Yard 35" ~ South Side .Yard 9.07' j North .Side Yard 9.6' `I r~ _'i fr C Council Letter No, 76 -3= March 8, 1976 Zoning Land Building Regulations Proposed Setbacks Front Yard 30' 35' South Side Yard 9`.07' 10' iJorth Side Yard 7 , 7' Zoning/Land Use S. F. Res./S, F. Res. Surrounding Land :Use Land Use Zoning i N-S. F, Res. S, F. Res, E-S. F. Res. S. F. Res. W-S. F. Res. S, F. Res. S-S. F.-Res.. S. F. Res. {Exhibits 2 and 3 atta''ched) ` Building setback exist for a number of reasons.. They were first implemented as a means of providing for adequate amounts of light and ventilation, fora healty environment and ,for fire protection. None of these conditions can satisfactorily exist when residential land is developed up to the: lot line. .Setbacks are also used to insure a degree of uniformity between various land use districts which would also not exist if construction were allowed at any place on the site. :Another reason is to provide both priva y and security, Findings - Request for: Variance to Front Yard Setback Requirement 1 ., The front ex ansion into the required front yard is to be used !for stairway to second fl or and front entrance only; 2 . The; front ex ansion will be 5' x 14' by two stories; 3. The expansi n will not decrease the front yard to less than 30 feet; 4. Expansion ill not inhibit visibility at the existing intersection of 75th Street nd Portland Avenue since the intersection is controlled with a stop pn 75th Street before entering Portland Avenue. However, this type of expansion on a corner lot could prevent establishment of 75th Street s a through street with a signalized intersection ',any time ~n tfie future because of the limitation on side visibility placed in the intersection by the side yard expansion; 5. The home onj the adjacent land parcel to the south has` a 35 foot setback, ,i I ,j i, ;: j i ~ ,. e;}.~ Council Letter No 76; -4- March 8, 1976 i i Findings - Request fo'r Variances to Side Yard Setback Requirements 1. Height of both the north and south sides of the home will be approximately 20 feet from ground -level to ;the eave. The height is now 9 feet. The highest part Hof the home will be 28 feet from .the ground;: at the middle of the. proposed. second floor where the roof slopes upward from. the north and south side; 2'., The home on'the adjacent parcel to the south has a side';yard of five feet;.. 3~. The adjacent; home. is a one story rambler; 4. The total dis'itance between the homes would be 14.07 feet; 5. The required iside yard for atwo-story. dwelling is 10 feet, .therefore a variance of 1'~1 .3 inches. wou d be required on the south side and a variance of 2.3 feet would therefore be required on the north -side yard; 6. The existing ,distance on the north side is 9.6 feet to the property line and 21.6 #eet to .the 75th- Street curb. .With the proposed additions, the • distance will be 7.7 feet to the north property line and 19..7 feet to the curb. City Staff Recommend tion The city staff has reviewed the proposed variances according to the three criteria' established by the zoning ordinance. Although staff feels that he granting of:these variance's will not substantially affect the property or conflict with the intent for establishing side and front yards, staff recommends that the variances not be granted , The recommendation to not grant .the. variances is based on the following ..:review of the criteria: 1. There are special circumstances or'conditions affecting the particular land, building., or use referred to in the application, note common to other roe '~ p p roes in this or similar districts. It is the opinion of the staff that there are no special circumstances or conditions which affect this property which are not common to other properties in this or similar .districts . ' • Council Letter No. 76 -5- March 8, 1976 • 2 . The granting of the application is necessary for'the preservation and enjoyment 'of substantial property rights. . It is the opinion of the staff that this variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . The denial of this variance does prevent the applicant from-:full ehj oyment of his property as a private single family residental;property owner. 3 . The granting of the application will not materially _and adversely affect the health pr safety or persons residing or work in in the nei hborhood of the property ,of the applicant and will not- be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the " neighborhood. ;i It is the opinion of the staff that the granting of the variance will not materially and adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in theeneighborhood of the :property. i Planning Commssion'Revew and Recommendation • On February 25,~ 1976 the planning commission reviewed the application. The commission` took testimony in favor of the. application from Mrs . Janet Jacobson, Robert Wheeler and a nearby neighbor, Mr. john Stanko: The planting commission recommends the granting, of the variances: Respectfully submitted, "~:1 Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/bll cc: Planning Director Public Works Director i• 5 9. 9 ~ 0 • 1 _ p~y~~}} i'1 V , ~~{''~ ~ ~ ~. '...~ ~., ~ ~S Td ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4f . ti ~.. ~+ .w ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r., a r, g+, ~ 89, a> i i iL' ..^tr~ ~~ L 1 ~~ ~ Sy , ~` cn o o ~-: i ~/g Vl A ~ N rums .. ~ ~^ ~ `_ i~1~_~I] - -_ ~ ~9 vVVA' ~': 'w o ~~~ w .°' _ ,_ C; ~~ 0 ~ff- . tv: i ® .. b `r era ^ ~~ .a, ~ ~ ~ n W • , t+a yt .A w tH ~y-... ~ ~ v.~ _ ~ 4 ~ ~ s. ~o ~~ o mo ° coo ° ~ -.t ~ • n ~ °~ t> lP' A ° l;t w H o -_ ~ w b n V ~'9D - Zi w '°'7 1 y~OP ', t~,t~8 ~~~ °bs zyAOV • tiv.~u D~ '7 Yt ~'- ,_ ~ ~ - °~o ~ y }# ~ -~ ~ ~~- .I.a fit- Vt (i• Y`1_ ~ -" 1 s ~` yu .; ,~v _ .,~ * 1 w~ b~ ( ~ .q !!! sr >~SI W .~~~ y Ci t t ~ tida 3y/ ~. f ~VO9 ~ L~Op ~ fADD ~ p'c,o 00 ! ~ Yaa ate ~ ~~ y ~ y ' ExHisir ~ O ~ C,p ~ V w ~ ~ - ~~ c N ~ i 4, ? N O ~: - ~ ...' t ~..- ~ f ~ 1 .. .: o .a i 1 , ~ . 4 .,w V y f ... 1 V f lv ..! vi C ~ if 1 k ~ `.i ~ ~ `~ ~ t ~ ~ 1 ^ .~ -. ,~. ~ r-. ~ ~~ D Z ~! i ~` , - Z ~ f~ Y i ~ ~'- ~. U C 1 .~ ~~\.~ ' •4 -~.~ _ ~. L nU. rAZ y a. ; c, +~ G i ~ i r. ~ i . ~. ° ~z ~ 3:%I ~ 7 Q 7a ... ~ 1~ (,o C -~ 3 .c 3 .. .. ~~. ; 3 ~.! p M`i N N yN N jy iv ~t 1 P. ~ ~Y llf' ~ ~V'. i / ~ ill. ~ ~J~ V V ~ ° tl O p O ~ b ~ ~ h o .~ ~ q ~ J I.v r n ~~ V~ r to I H W ~ ~, N tv W -.,, n /.o~ t~ Jl N t\ ` ~M ~~ a .Ptysi -a ~ +~ i~~'.y"J'• f 4r. T~.3 '; 15Y.4i l-. SET t !% 1 ( .;.+F ~ ~ s'~ ~ ~ -~ f ~..~ s~fr~ ~ i ~~y ;~: ! u v ~~i ~ ~-~ oc~ ~ i ~..~ /4n.9c X9.9 70 .~ ~d ~ n K' ~ ~a i - - ' RcL _ / ~ t -_ 1 y` y, ~~ w ~s am 9 . l - ,,.~ ~ ~ ;~ R 11 .: °o v 1 0 ~j ~...r ~..~1 .w``_ E x. ....._ .. _. ~G ~ ~ o ~ 4, . k- . o J ~' T__T ....., 4.. _ . M x l ~ ' .+ ~ ~y ~~ ,Ja ~ ` , .. Rx.. .fit ~ ~ .. ~w 1`~ (A • O_ Oi . .~~ ;. .: '~ ~ 1. .,. _., !w ~~~ . 1 ^ ~ ~--j '544 33 32 2i lip ~75t4 7`~'. ?~'~. C ice. • '' jga5 i9 \3 T7 21 g u9 •J: ( L! ^ ^ (~ t_..l ^ n Q cti p ~ w A cn ~ tD y 0~ A W N - - 75x4 3S 'S2 2C r0 r4 03 750u ~~. 7<,,a5 3? ;~ 2. 1t o5 75G% Q ~ ~ ~ Q o ~i^ ^1n 7"~. bas 3d 32 2h 2~ i? ~ .4 g1°:^ _. t~'~ ~a -. ___ _ PC~RT'LA~vD AVE. C9 o 7EOS ' -o 7543 o 39 ~ ca } 33 c~ ~ 27 c~ 2 i 15; o o GS 7501 ^ t~ ;~, ` A w N Q) ~ A t~ N ~ .i ~ ~ .J„a~ 'L. 4 ' 7 - 32 ~~ 4 CS I'5~.,~: ,....i ~ 7??0 54.8 7445 ^ 35 27 21 ~~ ^ 7~~`, C~ i 7405 ~ 740 °^ .~ 30 28 24 IB 14 t2 74CQ r .i i ~ __~ wl.. --, lS.~'t 1 -- IfI1i05 bbfP !J 7601 7545 39 I 3, ,~27 ~ 21 I7b01 1 C~} ~0 O O~ C;1~.,~ i JI _ ! ~ %~ to 17s .. . v co cD tG p % ~ ~ ~,1 A N ~ 0) tiJi ~ d 4j N . - 0) y ~ ~ ~ 1 W N •.~, i ~q ~Wisryq 7~..-c. ' as 38 ( ~ ~ 32 2.6 2C t4 ~ ~7°•CC 7445 3fl 33 27 21 i5 ~ C9 7 4 1 0 O ~ O © ^ ^ ~ ~ rr -~ -- ~ l._J tp d - N W A Cn O) m v f73 ~ J~ W N '- ^ ° o co o o o ~ o 7aa4 38 32 26 20 ~4 ~ '°-'- : k t a. a `, _ AVE... x 1 !S t+ OS 7601 ~r^. ~ .~., i. A W N A W N ~ 4 ~ .. . ~~ 7545 C 7 39 O: 33 ~ 27 0~ O 21 O f5 C~ 04 CO 01 . SO I , O _ ~- N W A tr ~ to y ~~ {s W N ~ I ~C~ ! G7 0 o O 3s 32 ze zc la ce 7sce 7445- ~-39 ~ 33 27 21 IS C9 740t ~ I s ,~ ~- ®. y U • W N - o C] O o ~ O .C7 . T444 ~38 32."'~ 26 20 i4 C8 7400 --P 39 I 33 2'7 21 f5 C9 7301 ~ ' o 0 o c~ c~ o p - N W # tJl Ol y ~ CS G>s A W N ~, ~ C7 o CO ~ o fe 3z 26 zo 1• oe 7seo 1 ~x HiBiT n. ^ !^ ^ ~ ^ 7aaa 7a 30 2fl I za zz Is I6 !~ ea '.~%~ 7445 0 39 0 33 0 27 o 21 C~ IS o d9 0 740j~ 0 ~ ~ ~ N W A to 0) m ~ m w + w N - 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 7444 (. 3tt 32 2 fi 20. 14 U 8 7400 ..~~1 AG ~ A~dE . SS ~ 33 27 21 . IS 09 7501 7445 39 33 27 2f IS JB 7401 .. ""'T _ ,~ _ ~ ~~ d .~ ~ ~~ '~ . -T- , _ r--= ~~ _ `~ .~~- -+.~.wa....w - • { ti,sr,: 4' s.~ , i + ~ ~ i i ( I ! ~ i i J ` { I ~ j { ~ 1 I 1 r 1 r _:' ~ ~ I ~ r 1 t r ~ ~ j 's ~._,._ i ~: ..._. ~. _ , ... . .._.._ ! f s~ 1 1 _ 4 f r ! t ,i ~^ ,.: -- T_ _ ~ . r ' { V- u ~.- __.~_~-_-..,-.._. -- -- -- 1 1 i { . ~ ---- - .. ..---'~+q - -- --- !t°eo~.r~ tsar u~ _ 'l! 1i } . it } ,`'{ ..~ ~' I !~ ' .'. is r!. k.;_._ < _~ - -- ~ _ =-`"_f~ • s +. ~ ' (f ~ +: i it _ .__ .____ _ i _ `. ~ ~ , ,~ . _ _ --- - ,.. it : ~ {° ~` _ _ _ `~, - N x ,, c~ 1 F ` 1~~ z i ,..~~~--- - _ ..,..,.,,,~ v' , - 13 ~. l .. _ - `__ _. _ . __._.___._.. ~____..~.._ -- t~ _, ._, .. _: _ ._. .~ .. :~ ~, ~~ ., . _. . _. 1 . .. _. _ , . .. ..~ ,~ _ _ _~_ ._________ y-:-- - .._ .._ ____ R- . _i .. .. _ (• -. - 111 ~ _. f1~ _.__ _..ac 3~ ~.`. t. .._..___. .. a:a 't 1, ~ ~.... . ; i ,~ .. s _~ R: ~~ ~ ... ; ~ __ _ _ _ ~. ' ' ~~ ... ~ ._.--__. -_.__-----• _. -_ .. .. ..__ ~ j .._. _ __. ___--- _. ..------- i -- ~t~. .;~ ~.f 'fit i l;; y4. ~~1 ... 1 - ~l je~ a w r, t..s~~ ~ _~.._... ~ 1~!._x~-1 rr ~4^ T ~ ~ _ _~, .. .~ - _ .. ~- .... ::: 7 ~ , - -- i ~r _ ` :ice;- _ _~.,. _:: ~ ~ I ~ I~ . ~" ~. •~ ,, . ~ _____.__ ___ 1'ti. ..__ _ ` '^ i ..,-: -~: .` CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA } Office of City Manager '~ Council Letter No. 75 Agenda. March 8, 1976 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfieldi Gentlemen. , i Subject: Application fora Special Use Permit to:,Operate a Day Care Home, 7.509 13.th Avenue . Ms . Jenneane Anderson, 75.09 13th Avenue requests the. issuance of a special use permit to use her home to provide group family day care for pre- school children age two years and older. A special u e permit is required for this use in a jresidential dstrictper Chapter. III, Part IV Section 3.30, subd . 2 , paragraph 1 of the city code . (Exhibit A) . Group family-day care is defined as a program providing day care at • one time for more than five, but fewer than eleven childr ~t anv one t me, including the. provider's or helper's own. children. who are under school age. Background. Information The subjecf property is a single family residence located one' home south of 75th Street on the east side of 13th'Avenue. The surrounding property is zoned residentia; .and .its use is residential (Exhibit B) . The city's comprehen- j - sve plan indica es that this area is best suited for residential uses. Land Building Parcel 75''x 1$3' 1 l0I sq. ft. (9,982 sq. ft.) (First floor) R ar yard 45.0:0 sq. ft. ~- Group .family day, care homes are licensed. b~H _nn oin Co_n_tY, ri .conformance with state statute s, for no more than ten children .under school age, including -the provider' and h leer's children under school.-age. At the present. time, Ms. Anderson has fiv chil ren in her care. She would .like to extend t is to include up to childre Ms. Anderson has been a fami y day care and! foster mot er or the past egh years. She has three natural children and`'three foster children- afi home, one of I hom is pre school age and is included in the day care total. She has all the qualifications required by state statute for lcensure. as a provider of group family day care. ~' ~, N Council Letter No, 75 _2- ,March 8, 1976 '. Zoning 'Ordinance _ Require merits .~ The zoning. ordinance requires issuance of a special :use` permit for. operation. of a .school in an "R" district as follows: i Conditions Governing Issuance. The council shall not grant a permit for any of-the uses enumerated: n'subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds that.the establishment, and maintenance of the use for which a use pe mit i o ht ill d t b trim (1 t l h he l h f r ss ug w no e e en a , ) to t e. a t , sa ety, c morals, omfort, conveniences or welfare of the persons residing or .working in the neighborhood of such use, or (2) to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvement in the' neighborhood. Staff Review and Recommendations The staff ;ireviewed the application. relative to Section 3.41, subd. 5, and £ind s the following : I. A beneficial community service is derived from this type of operation. There is a definite need in Richfield'-'for child care facil ities since 15% of the married female population with children. unde r six years of age is :employed on a full time ba si Day care facil ities are important to the individual family, and an important • elem ent in the city's economic and social• stability. 2 . This ,facility could generate up to 20 trips per da°y in-addition to the a iverage single family residential trip generation of eight to ten trips `. The 75 .foot lot frontage will- allow. for an adequate loading and d rops-off for children. The proposed facility will not create detri ~nenta 1 traffic problems . 3. The acility and operator are .licensed by the Hennepin County Welfare Depa rtment in accordance with Minnesota State Statute. ~,, *Ma imum licensed capacities: If .the nurr ~ber of children in Then licensed capacity shall care is no t more than: be: PROVIDER & INFA NTS TODDLERS PRESCHOOLERS PROVIDER ONLY HELPER 0 0 10 10 10 0 7 7 10 1 5 10 2 5 10 _ 3 4 !, 10 4i 4 10 5-6! _ 9 7-8', g *State of M; nnesota, Department of Public We fare, I>PW'Ru1e #2 11~, l: i Council Letter INo. 75 -3- March 8 1976 4. The rear yard is ,fenced for the protection of the children and adjacent property. The staff ~inds.'the conditions of the ordinance to be satisfied and recommend issuance of the special use permit with the stipulation that the property owner continue to belicensed by Hennepin 'County and that the house be inspected for day care us;e by the public safety department and the environmental health .:department I _ ; `' Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The p anni~ng commission reviewed. this .:application at its February 25, 1976 meeting. The planning commission recommends. issuance of the special use permit. i Respectfully submitted , ~. ~~~;~-~ ~ i Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager r L • ~ s T a ~ ~ ~ .. 3.3;1 USE ^LVUL..T1Cl~~ .C" ,1„~_D'r ~E D1.~1_,_„T (..} S~.:L•rl.v_~ion 1. ~_iCllL~~L'r!-(J:~C::, rn ciia •' " Distriot, un:ess otharcaise provided - i. th~_~ rha~ster ,zo bu_Iding ox lard sh~.ll ue us~ and no building Jh412 harpafter be ~ct_d or struc~ur.:.ll~ a.li-.ered ~~ccapC fo_~ one: or, more of t1;e follo~~~ing uses; ~'•.) ^inEin '~.l:li 1,~ c:«nlli-~:: 'at:d their acccscory bL'ildi:Lbs. `~). ;;o;~e2'.sd i--'•' -74. ;Di 11 Ir73-22). . ~ {3) IIora~ occun~ tors. ~ ~ . Z4) It i;, .~=our_d and deL-erri~nnd t:?~i: the occupancy of 2 sinGl~ family rosidenc~ "it:'`a ti*~gle {a.mily residence neihcorizcod by 4 number of unr~l~:ted .parsons ends to disru,t and dis!.urb the ~ c.:iarac~_or oZ such aeighbo=hood; that such occupancy tends to :adversely: af.`-.~c-t 7Y.C,???~Ey valc~atio~?s of °:ha other single fam? ?y residences in such nai;huo-rhood; tl?at such occuna~cy ter_ds to involve patterns of liuizg and conduc* _ chi ch are d i~ ra_ a_~t .from and of `eas ive and anr_oyinU to the residents of other s in~le f~ami2y Yesic?ence structures is the !aigl?uorhooa; that such occupancy tends. to create sne.;ial !~o"_iae p_o5lams yor the city; tnzt such occupancy is-.ore.. in the nature of a nultiple •residantal use of pron`rty ar:d should more apn-roprialely be in the multiple ~r~sidence areas c-. a?e city;.and that 'such occupancy of a residential unit in a . -. mult•_p2e i~si,d~,ica Bona of i:ha city is Iess Iiksly to result in such adverse influences -~ ~_ er such advs=se inrluenc_s T~:+iII be .o Lally ab~anL in su~h:.multiple residence zones, lt'is t^la;~iul fora s~r_le family resideno~ struo-lure in tl^.e res~d~ntiai areas-to be. • occupied by a group oY-individuals, e:cceedno th;-ee is number, clho are not related. by • blodd, r~arriaga or ~:dopton. ~ . Subd. 2. Usn_s b•~ S~ec_al TJse Permit, The iollocring uses a~_a permi tted only upon the rocu_eme~,t of cpecial us. per!*!i is as provided in Section 3.~tI of• this chapter; (1) ^:?u•_c'•?~s, '_+.i crarias, r.:usec:ms; s^_hoo? s, memorial- buildi~ ~s„~ including name nlat~~ and `cull~~_?z ~~~a_ds m~ei:iIlb tea ~-e~u~_emaats of this coda). ~• ~ (2)„ Club., g61f courses; lodges, :~raternity or sarorily houses, s~Tithout ser- •, • v.~.cew ro tna ;u:.~_c customarily carr~ad on 4oa business. :. {3} Iiosni~als, clinics and other buildi:?;~ used for the treatment of human ail-' `~ Qentc. r•• ;4) ;hilantli_opic and cha_ita'le instituticns other th4n those heretofore mentioned. ''5~ Th? !-"i:,7 of mcr~ • h~ , '-~- ^,-dars b•.: ;~. residence ari'1 _ ib~ . Fub2 is utility irsiallatiQn;,. __- Subd.`3. Hsi~.u` ~erul4tons. P*o building sha22 hereafter bs erected or.structurally altered i.! the residence district to e<cceed 35 feet or 2 1/2 stories in height subject " to mcdific4_ion:, and exceptions nrovidsd in Caction 3.39 of this chapter. •: ~ub3. ~s. Lct ::.ea, frontage and Yard ^equi-rements. The foliG[91n~ renuirements sha1L . " be ocserved l:y 412 buildings i~~ th= =~:" district hereafter erected or structurally -..altarsd, ~ub.2ct to the modifications arov_ded:in Section:3.3: of this chapter:- . . <1) Lot ~La~. Evazy buzLding designee _or.the housing or one family, together c~ith its ac•sa:aory buildi~zgs, shall ba losatsd on a lot in -one o-nership having an -• ~8ze. of •not Less Y.'Ian COQ, s~-uIIre feet including the adjacent one-half of the' abutting alley, • ~ ~ . ~ •. (2; F=:onL Yard.-Each building shall have a front yard .of not less than 30 :: r. _' £eet sub~ece: to !~ouuied re~uireinent~ coctained in Section 3.3; of this chapter: (3}, s_ae Yard. Each building shall hrve tt~o side .yards, one on each side of tti~ building. +he side yards in the case o".1 I/2 story or smaller buildings. •_ shz1l have a ~~ridth~o~ not less than ive feet and in the case of larger buildings ~• ~Ll h:.ve a ta:dth o£ not :ess than I4 feet, subject to modifications and specifi- Cations pxo~~ided for in Section 3.3; of thi.; chapter. Each d~relling Io- ~a ~• ~. ", . • . - . _ .. ,, .:. :.. . _. .. - _ .. • - ~ 2-11-74 _ ,,,~ .. 1 .. ` .. ^-~^d •~,f t i .~; Y'a: ~._ r ~;?_ ` ~' ~ ~ ~ ._. ^ fi r~~--T•d r ~^-•- ~1.• `~`~F~~ f .P, - ~ ,.1+~, i ~ $- r ~ _._. _ ro ' ~~ E C ~ t ! ~~ b r ~ > ~ VV-t a..:Gl; I~- rtr.- t -~.f ,it t .; t' /t ~ 1. ~,~ 2 • ~ ~,~ F :r a _~ a^«~ ~` - ~ >C.` .~~ f¢.. ~Ii 4.i.f in ~~ ,fli n a `n~ ta(~ It`fl i1 t.i < '` t, ~" Y~ . \\ ".~ 'r. ~ ~ ~ w •~I~j .'7. ~...~ .;. '^.r- ~t :.G% 4 •~ •e Vi'i' °` `~f •vCy ./ i ~ L'C', ~ i !' ` ~ v1 •kk~ •..-r.a ieat~...~.~.1,_. u.;. - i •~ -y E ~'J \\ ~ ii- _ f i :~_ x 3 ~ ~ ~ + 3' ' ~ ~ ~ '_e'° ~, .. ' `) /``y ''~ ~1 .l- F, .gyp `\ i ~~ ! ~ r'~ ,LY7 {J. __ a ~B - 1a ~ 1f1i : x , ~ ` ~ ` ! '^`° `? 10-' ~ ~ ~~i_^ ~ ~ i t /.~ 't^°j ~r E(! ~c~~_._ f Y-~-_..~:.~. _.~.t-__~~:_._.._ i ~~ ~-~ ;l~y^ ~ ~ 111 ~ ~, •r. l ! ~~ 9 X11. s\ Z• / l ~~ v '~, ~...:~:~._~".~`t- ~ 3 c . ,~, 4.41; ~ ~' ~ ~~~yy' is ~.: ~j rti ~~`,a ~ ~~lc•'~~,.t r• $ ay i+e''_'~ Qf~p ~' it i'8 .1`~;•.$' ,2~'~1..___~~Z~ _ ; J ca ~ `' g°'~, ` 9'~3J-~ •/ i 4.3~': .4.~~ ;, ~ i7 ! cnw-~-f'.-.ii Y.n 1 __.__.~t:_- .ter. -... ~~ `R i%~r ~~y., t.~~.r_._. '.: y ,.Z~7 kc ~. :.~2~..~_- E. ~z/ f~~ _ ,z~ ~33.1C ~z i," - ~; ~~ _! ._~Gr__rT -:..Zt~l~.. +• `~'K ~ ~ r;_^_ !0 Tn~ ~ v ~`r. ~30 ,.,r~' ' v: `il ~ ~ ~° 3 ~c ~-c!n' (J•+,+o ):y; 4. ~p t !! `i i I z r~ ~ ir~~ t. :: ~ ! t~- T-^ ~ t -E t~ ~r~~ r. a, n .J• 1`. V1 t~, '3 _. _Z~,4v ~31Y- J x, r ~_;;Y3~. 33i! ~x.i_;i ?t3 tk ~t.~ ' i`~ ;~ ~a;r-)~ ~r. ,s? ,z-,,; t"• i37 ~~ t ~ ~ t •~~~ ~ r' 4 rz ._ t~ ,x; f ~" " _ r. ~ ry Ni ~ ~. ~ ~: 2 ,,. $/ .•,' ,S i '~_'Lk1 111 ~ ~ ~. ( 3i / A f ~ oaf'' ~~ i~.. , ~ :.~ 3 - ,x ~ j' , ~_ x33 ~' ~~.- b~; rxi ~~~ ; x+qy - 7Y_, ~~, n; r , - xi .,(fir. r{~ ~q -e++t'__ . fr ;.. T[ L r r r t ~ ~~r.. rv ~'J hj, • i ~ ~' i it-. l; .y c. _._:r:r..r~ c;LG .,•=~, ~~ ;~- ~ 3• t 3~~. i .3~J ~~ ~~ ~~~ { - --+~~ 3 ° := ~ t z 9 ~s. 1. .z :~ { ~ , .~ ~1i1-Ri-.... _ yyyL i d~'i ~n :v cr.; ~Sx j *~ t- r. r. i 1 i 1 (H I ~C .a+ ~ O '.~" i 1 I~ ~ i ~# • ~, ~ s, <~ ~. fir. ~p ~ r t^ ~ _ l.c_!..~.~...r r ,~ '' .~ Z `n~ 1 z . ~ ;~, i• 14 l ~'J; •''" 3 x3 t<x •;~ O . ~ J r33 ~G !x J .7~~~ r7 [~1; _ y' r :a'' ~ ^. a~ fr~ W ~~~ , Q ~^= ~xo° ~J i V r (~ ''~:~: r • - • ~ ~~ ~ j Sr `~ ~~ ~_~~ . t ~ k ~.~ " ~q ~' t _~ ~ ' t i : ._f ; - E •. r,. ^c f n '~~ ~~~ I:: ~ ~ L.._1.1.:,.,,,. -- ~ ~-=- _c~. ~ ~ __._ _ ___~ . _. ____ _ __.._ --~-- '~ --~^-.- .i~ ... 'R j..c. ~o~ r ~ h~1r,~ E~ S'~r `~ r•~ ~:, r,` i. t'.'~_•~~. ~..~. (r', :ice ~~ ~'`:.i`.r~ ct 'j •~ r~ i ~r~.t ~.~ r ~9 ~,^t ., ~i •.. -~ ` ' ~ ~ . t~~ X2..;.3 ~.7 ~ ~ %' "~ ; " 'o •• ..~. f ~ •i a'So iw E ~~ O~ y ~} .,t i r+ ~n • 35 "~ tiar' 2 !4 '''°~w~'" 3 '33.Zc ~ij Zc '3;^r-~fAe'' ~ ~ r ~' i t J '~~: .... ~~ i ~1~~~ ~ . ~. ~ r. ~„7"~. ,a N D pN _ N ~ ~ .. ~ p N N p .~~ '~p N ' N p 12 t rJ p'v N p 12~ N 5 N p 8 1 T . p N M ~ p ii e pM ~ p li e ~ ~ ~ p , z . Dn ~•,~~ ~ p i0 7 p~ M p to ~ p~ ~p 6 3 p p~ ~ ~ s s p~ ~ p ~ ~ p~ ap ~ ~ pn ~-,- +~ ~~ U~' a _' a' _. ~' p 16 0 1 pri o p 1s 2 p m 0 o'p 14 $ '..pQ N p 13 0 4 pN N p 12 5 p N ~.p i1 6 pM ,°; p lA 7 p N A C a r g p a li: ti p Is 1 pS o p 15 2 pc LJ , ,, ,, 154 p _ I 1 0 N LJ N N m N p li 5, pN ~ `--' 1 i ~ *~. 6 ~ ~ ~U lo ? p~ w ~ ~ 9 g p d ,;, ~~ N p i6 0 1 p n o p tg 2 p o N p p N N t2 5 a ~~ n p it 6 ~p h - L~- - 9 op r ~ po r~ ~p 15 2 p~ p i4 3 _ p !3 N '4 ~ N v.,p 12. p :5 ^' npll s ~~ a ` n p 9 6 p n f o I6 ^o t p o p 15 2 p ~' p 14 3 p Q ~~ p~ 12 5 l.~ " ;p it s r ~~ IC~ ~ ~ p~ N n A - a a g p Q ~ ~ r l ~~ l' ~ ~i. ! ~` rs 1 p o p t5 2 (- } o ,n p 14 3 0 _0 13 4. O Q N N N D 12 5 pN . „p 11 s p~ .. . 0 to 7 p °' h p 9 8 p ~ ~ r ~s®/ 7"' w N D ! n H V ~ n _~. p 6 3 p ~ ~ ~-} D ~ 4 Dp ap , TSth _. {~ 16 tJ 1 (~ t.J i- ~p 15 2 p~ p p t4 3 7 ND i pa Np i2 5 ~N p 11 e p ~, ~p to 7 p M ~ n ti p 9 a~ 8 v r~ n 76th: ~.i.~ ~p ,s 1 p8 ep 15 2.po .n Q 14 3 ' v 13 Np 4 p~ N p 12. 5 D N ~p tl e p~ npltJ ~ p~ ~p 9 e o 8 p~ ~ op !j o p ry ~, 1-` x.1.1 ~ ` _ p a. ^~ r ('1 N (_f l ;~: ;1 ~p M 1~ ap ~~ n mp ~: ~ ~q yr-, ~:: '.~ W U ~= a it MU ' 1i~. ^t_.J r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA i Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 74 i ~ Agenda March 8, 1976 i The Honorable Mayor i and , i Members of the City Council City of Richfield I -i Gentlemen: i Subject. Application for Special Use Permit for. Expansion Of i i Existing Restaurant at 3000 W. 66th Street Mr. T. T, Judgje, vice president and treasurer of Poppin' Fresh Pies, Inc. , 608 2nd Avenue Souith, Minneapolis, .has submitted a request for a special use permit to enlarge th~~e existing Poppin' Fresh Pies, Inc. Restaurant on West 66th Street. The following i!,tems are attached to this council letter and' will be referred to throughout this report: ~~ ~ 1. Exhibit 1 -~~Current zoning of the restaurant site and the immediate surrounding area 2 . Exhibit 2 - ~'~,The current land use in the area of the restaurant site 3. Exhibit 3 -Proposed site plan prepared by the applicant 4. Exhibit 4 -Restaurant standards, Sec. 3.33, Subd. 4 .Applicants Proposal The applicant proposes to enlarge the existing restaurant building from 3, 330 square feet to 4, 212 square feet. This proposal represents an increase of 888 square feet, or 26.5 per cent. The addition is proposed to be located on the west side of the current building and will provide sating capacity for an additional 46 cu tourers. The proposed addition will not extend into the existing front yard etback and the required side yard setback.. The driveway from West 66th Stre t into the Southdale Square parking area will be reduced from the present 30 foot width to 27 feet. This reduction is necessary in order to construct the building roof overhang. without creating a hazard to trucks entering the' parkin, area ..The addition will be constructed in the same. architectural style as the existing building.. _Council Letter No. '74 -2- March 8, 1976 • ~' Zoning Ordinance, Requirements The zoning ordinance permits restaurants a use in a C-2 general commercial zone upon the issuance of a .special use. permit. A special use permit is also required far an expansion of an existing restaurant. Background> A special use .permit for a restaurant on this property was issued in 1971 Several stipulatigns .were a part of the special ..use permit issued at that time..: r 1 . The cityr council on'Decemberl3, 1971 approved a variance of n five feet from front. yard setback requirements to allow construction 3 5 feet from the front property .line . 2. Before issuance of a building permit, an off-street parking contract for the total shopping center, including the proposed pie shop, must be';approved by the city council. 3. Final buxldi n Tans mu t g p s be approved by the chief inspector before the issuance of a building permit. I 4. Drainage. plans for the. parking lot area must be approved by the 1 city engineer. 5. Landscaping and. lighting plans must be approved by the planning director All of these stipu ations have been satisfied. Findings.: Building The new addition will have the same front yard as the existing: building (35 feet). The side yard setback from the west property line will b'e 35 feet. This 35 feet includes a 27-foot wide driveway, and eight feet of landscaped area adjacent to t e building. There is not a required side setback in a C-2 District. No cha ge is proposed on the north and east sides of the buildings. The power transformer which presently occupies space in the area of the proposed addition will be relocated to one parking stall in the parking area directly behind th building. The addition will be comprised of a-new dining room with 46 seat and a storage. room. An emer enc exit and sidewalk g Y to the driveway will be maintained on the west side of the building. • I Council -Letter I~To. 74 .3_ Seating Cou Existing Seating 105 '~, Additional Seating 46 Landscaping I' The existing landscaped area will be reduced from 4, 595. square feet to 3,9.23 square feet. The landscaped-:area to remain is forty-three percent of the total site area. ~, Thin is a six percent reduction in landscaped area. :The new landscaping. around the addition will be a continuation of the same type of planting ma erals whichipresently exist along>the front and west side of the building. Landscaped Area Size of lot 9, 225 square feet ';Existing 4, 595 square feet- 49% I Proposed 3, 923 square feet - 43% Parking • Restaurant seating capacity will be increased by 46 seats. Three new employees are a ~' ticipated. When the off-street pa rking.guidelines are applied: (one stall for each three seats. and one stall for each. one an`d .one-half employees), 17 additional pa~king spaces are required. This restaurant utilizes the parking area of the shopping center. Total shopping center parking Stalls Available 461 xisting parking stalls required ,(includes restaurant) 419 Additional stalls required for estaurant addition 17 otal stalls available/total stalls required 461/43.6 Excess stalls available 25 There are existing parking stalls. available to provide the 17 additional spaces required for the restaurant. i ..Council Letter No. 74 -4- March 8, 1976 • ~ Staff Recommendation ~ - The staff isj of the opinion that issuing this special use permit is sat- isfactory. .However, any additional linear building expansion along 66th Street to .the east or we twill have a material detrimental effect on businesses located on the east part of Southdale Square, by placing re frictions on the present high visibility of the area which could have an adverse effect on ..those businesses. It is the opinion of 'the. staff that issuance of a special use permit is generally consistent with the standards contained in Exhibit 4. Moreover, the special use:.permit would not be'expected to have a detrimental effect or be injurious> to other property in the immediate neighborhood. The staff recommends issuance of the special use permit with the .following. stipulations: ' - 1 : That new landscaping on the 'south and west: sides be consistent in type~land density to that which presently exists on the property. 2. That any necessary repairs be made to the driveway and parking ~I, area in, conformance with. the city's off-street parking requirements. 3 . That existing shopping center driveway width be reduced by three feet and that a new a ro be ' n i a nst lled at the p West-66th Street entrance to reflect the re u d ced driv ewa w' h idt Y Planning Commission Review and Recommendation h T e lannin commi p g ssion reviewed his application at its Februar 25 Y , 1976 meeting. Mr. Herbst, real-.estate manager for Poppin'' Fresh, appeared before the commission. The planning commission recommends issuance of the s ecial -use errr~i p t with the followi p n sti ulatio ns• g P 1 . That ne landscaping on the south and west sides be consistent in type and density o that which presently exists on the property. 2: That ex'sting shopping center driveway width be reduced, by three feet and a new apron be installed at the West 66th Street entrance ,~ to reflect the reduced driveway width: Respectfully submitted, ~1 . G" ! "_ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager ~; WSB/'eje cc: Planning. Director :, r ! ` f ~ ~ { ~ r '4 ` at Y ~. + , }r IL • ~ _ t • teas C• f A . -y.f ..t a ... _..~ .._ .... r-. ~ ...._... _ . _ _ IIIIIII77J J r . j ~-....~....~.~.~.t ' n. ~ 1... 3j ~~ r. ;s ~1 -. ~* 3 -~. l {!.~ _Y i • •~. .. ~• < ts.. v.. ... .- 4 ~..~ ~_~~.v_ `yt _. .l .~»~ ~~... ~'y~ N ..F'~~ . ae~..-._~ _ r«+Y+r.~..._ » l.. .r~J.~ r r Y. •~ a... .... ... .. _ f. {.r.~.-.....---•-~ - r ~ ,' n •: is ~! ' to . V`~~QP~ _~ ~.r,,,.-v~,~,~...,-S .. a Rc ... w~ ~y f. y~r. LC ~S n ~. `ii M _ ~. ~ ...,..-.....-.- ---.rr.`~.w".... - T ~ ° ?' t L~s - ,~. t' -y s'•. r.. A. 1 s_ •a., Kit ~~ _- .~.~~ .w w~--~s.~...~.+~.~....~ry. I A 1_ - ' f K~ ~ = 4 K ~ t ~_l ~a.<.JYX' r' ~~y__ a V(i > 5 ; j} #} ^ +~ ~' t,~: '~"T ". a ~. ~ ,~ ya .~ l t~ j ~:~ t ~^ r+t +E Y~ ~ ~ .1 ^ ~ . _ __ y • ._ • -~ . GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ., T ` ~ MULTIPLE RESIDENCE LIMITED DUSINESS ~ . -~----- xr"' -- ~~ +_~~ 1J os 12 .,.,~___ '"`'' e , -'~ L~ t , ( 1' e 6301 u .~-_ _ -~. h~ Q ---- --- a o ~_' ` 1 ~. zs ~ ~~ n ~:_.~ 35 g.r 1~~~ ~i;Vii~~~~' ~ ~,.~^ 32 ~~ A j e ~ _ {{ E 6 a tai C B (~ e ~,,. ~ y a ~ ~ .- ' 2TOZ -`^a f.._ i~~l ..~ 2901 29.T• t3 1 09 i5 ^ ~I~Oi; ~2~_ _c~s t ~ J ~: ~ S ~'~ 3 ' .Z 1 5~4 ?3 ~ S~4 .3 12 t 5 `~....:, ;2 ~! ~V'3 66 ~ 13-•~ fi 5 `r, . ~ _~fi~~l 8 ~.~ ~ ~f51~ {55.2 ~. ;~ 23 6 :~tiz _ ~ ~ - • 22 -X6616. -- Is i .T'~ - ._ 2 ,7 tL u. ~3 z z 7 ~2 t- z2 ~: Zt ^ 2! 8 20 i_ :.J 2L 8 zo `` ' ~ _ j~_•_ 2t z~~ j„ r-r ~ "s r--1 r ~ 1 l . t9 10 _26 29:.1 _ :28 ~• .l ;. ,29 zS l '9u ~~zs 19 10 1 ~ t9~~t0 1_ ~ 19~ 10 I _ _ __ ~ .- . 17 !2 ~S6 37 L= (7 12 ,. J36 37 --'r 1T 12 ~ ,.iG 3' ~ ~ ' ~~ t r" atJ !8 (3 ,.:sc 16 13 C"~' 4!; J t6 13 eau 4~ ' ... 604 ., , ~a•~3 ( i G~~4 ' ~ ,r !'~ !4 ~ acss !S t4 j ~~ 14 ~ C 67#h • 1 .. ~ Z3 2 t~o4 w • ~: 23 2 ~" ~ 23 Z ~ ~ ~~ ,_ ..... .'-yr--gym.. ~ r Exh~b;r ~ '1 / ,4 ~ [ (~ - iJ i ~. .: ~ t1 .• t, l; y . I ~ -. .. ~~ ~ ~A~ F • ~~ ~f I~ ~ ~ ~ '` III ~ ~ ~ ~ . Z ' ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ - ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ 1 { ~ ~ ~ ~ F i ~ I ~ ~ ~ t~tB~T 3r I o ~ __ . i t 2 ' ' -- ~ ,. i 4 i~ #ta; `~'~z~ ~~ s~ s~~ ss d ~ T~~ o f i ~ `~~ ~ t t plc :.J: j' `~ _.~ ~~~ ~ _ - ~, ~: ~a ~ ~ ~E -- k4+ c kF c _ c i ~ 1,1[~',,, F ur' n,,;, ~ ~~. 11 I 'qF j ' I. .. i. ~ , _ i O # _ V r- I. ~ 1 a p is --: - x i; II t S ~ i, ... ~~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ . I -- _ _....._ .. ,. ,; ..; , t a ~ ~ ' t ~ ~ ~ F~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ .. I'; . . _ - ~I . t.: i _ - !i. ' (d) the station or garage will not display any banners, noisy ribbons d ~° J Y PP d g (~•~: All exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated as not to be a nuisance :o adjacent properties.. _ • (1} If the station or garage is to~be located in a shopping. center. or other integrated development, it will be in archiaectural harmony with the rest of the center or development. (m) The station or garage will not provide for the outdoor. operation `• •of 1ub•rication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor display of merchandise; but the outside underground storage of gasoline and other petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary display of merchandise within 4 feet of the. station building is permitted. tn) If the station or garage is not te.be.located on a county road or _ state highway,. it shall not be operated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. - and 6:00 a.m. of the. following day. (o) If thesite is at an intersection, provision will be. made forean _ - unobstructed area on the site, adjacent to and within SO feet of the inter- _ section, .free of vehicles, signs (other than a pedestal sign), displays .~ or other'materi.als which tend-to obstruct intersection visibility. Subd. 4. Regulations Relating to Hotels,.*lotels, Restaurants and Cafes. ' ~~.A special use permit shall not be granted for a hotel, motel, restaurant - ,--or,cafe unless the council finds that the.propos.ed use will be: in substantial ~ ~~.•compl-ance with the. follo~:ing> standards: ~- • •'• (a) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion -'either oti the public streets adjacent~to~the_site or on the parking areas . on~or'adjacent to the site or on streets adjacent to the site unto which traffic to or from the site is channeled. ., (b)- Adequate provision will be made, through the use of building-set- _ .backs, buffer areas, screening, and exterior treatment or placement of the •~building.on the site to ,avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust, and any other ,. -. sources of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent properties. . . 6~ 3/23/70 ;~. - .. _ ,;~ - .. .. . .. _ .. ~ ,.. • ~ ,;,,; - - _ r. or similar attention-distracting or visibility-obscuring devices in the ' area in front of building setback lines. ,, (e )` The minimum frontage on any street will be 120 feet and the -minimum area of the site will be 12,000 square feet for a station with rout :pumps or less; and stations with more pumps will have sufficient additional frontage area to provide equivalent and sufficient space for servicing vehicles, for off-street parking, for-safe vehicular approaches. into the station, and for good visibility-for. pedestrians and driverse - (f}. No ,driveway will be flared .outward on-the. boulevard in such .a way.. as-to encroach upon-the boulevard of adjacent property, . (g) The sta~on.or.garage will comply with the oft-street parking, • sign construction and other regulations of the clay. (h) Any .required buffer or screening area will be so constructed as to obstruct headlight beams of automobiles on the station property from. beaming-onto adjacent residential property.- (i) Pump.slands will not be so close to street or adjacent property Tines as to create the likelihood of encroachment by vehicles upon street - right-of-way, sidewalk areas or adjacent property.. (j) Only one permanent detached ground display sign, pedestal type may -be erected on the street frontage at or near the prcpErty line adjacent to the street,. except that if the frontage oil tiYe:"sb3~eei:.:is .in:excess-Qf l50 feety two ``such signa may be allowed by the council. on such frontage, sub`ect to an .other a lcable sign re ulation, .., .•,, R.. (c) Adequate provision will be made through the use of building setbacks, 4 _ Screening, landscaping, exterior design and placement of the building on-the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust,'-and any other sources of nuisance or •~ ~ annoyance to users, or patrons of L-he.facility. (d~ Adequate off-street parking space is available for. patrons and em- gloyees. ' (e) If liquor is to be sold on the premises. (1) the property abuts upon a major street, (2) access to all off-street parking spaces. is from internal driveway systems and is not directly from public streets, and. (3) provision is made for-well-designed vehicular stacking space allowing for an efficient and orderly flow of traffio from the site onto adjacent major streets. (f) The proposed facility will provide an aesthetic .appearance. which will not detract from or conflict with the existing or proposed architectural forms of buildings in the same area. (g) The use will not create an excessive burden on public parks, public open-space, streets, or utilities requiring. public services which are proposed to serveth'e facility. (h) The proposed development will not conflict with the comprehensive development plan of the city.. Subd. 5. Height Regulations. In a "C-2" district no building shall hereafter be erected or structurally altered to exceed three stories or 40 feet in height, subject:. to-the modifications and exceptions provided-in Section 3.39 of Chia chapter.' Subd. 6. Lot Areas and Yard Requirements. (The same minimum requirements shall be observed for the "C-2" district 'as are provided for a•"C-1" district ~ in Section 3.32 of this chapter.) • (1) Except as provided in paragrapri (2) of this subdivision the same mini- mum requirements shall. be observed for "C-2" district as are provided for a "C-1" district in Section. 3.32. (2) A gasoline service station may construct a canopy extending into the building setback area of the lot on which it is :located provided that such canopy complies with the following regulations: (a). It must be designed 'and constructed to serve as protection for customers and attendants from inclement weather. • (b) It may extend-into the front yard area distance of 10 feet, as measured :from the centerline of the gasoline pump island closest to the street lot line but in no instance closer-than five feet from skis lot line. (c) Only one canopy shall be permitted at each service station, unless it is located on a corner lot. (d) it shall be designed.. and constructed as an integral part of the main service station building and shall extend from such building. ~(e). The canopy shall not be constructed to a height exceeding sixteen feet. (f) The canopy shall not be designed .for use. nor .shall it be used as a location for any business or advertising.sgn of a.germanent or temporary construction. (g) Lighting ,located on.the canopy shall be designed as an integral part of the canopy providing that fixtures shall. not extend below the bottom ~. j TY F RI ~'I-IPIELD MI E O ~~ CI O ~, NN S TA Office of City Manager _,~ Council Letter No. 73 ' Agenda. March.. 8, 1.976 The Honorable Mayor ,, and Members of the City Council- City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Special Use Permit to Display { and` Se11 Automobiles; ~_ Attached to'this council letter is a request from the Richfield Bank and Trust Company for a special :use permit to display and .sell automobiles in the parking lot on the~~ north and west side of the. bank building : In-addition to .the .letter from 'Monroe. Steverson there is a description of the proposed activity as well as a copy ofia letter from Oak Grove LuaheranChurch indicating that the bank may.use the church parking lot on April 30 and May 1. '~, The proposed activity would constitute "cap sales" and, therefore, .does • require a special ;use permit to allow it to be Iocaced' in a C-2 District. Mr. , Steverson is requesting that the city council depart from 'the estab- lisled procedure of having specia use permit requests :considered `by the planning commission initially. The city attorney has advised me that referral of this matter to the: planning commiss~.onis discretionary with the city.council in that it relates only to a one-time two day activity and does not involve any .development.- Therefore, the city` coui cil cauldwaive reference to~the planning .. commission and consider this .request ion its merits at the March 8 meeting and . m. ake a decision o~n whether to issue a special user-permit. A copy:, of the Rch- field .Bank. and Trust Company off-street parking layout for the area where car- sales are propose fs attached for information purposes. If the city c~uncil wishes to issue the special use permit, it is suggested that th following conditions be made a part of the' issuance: '~ 1 That th" special use permit is temporary n.nature, covering only the two day period of Friday, April 30 and Saturday, .May I, 197 2. -That-sh~ uld the bank wish to renew this request in the future or cond}~ ct the activity on a 'more regular basis, the ma tter should be handled in the regular mannerr including consideration i', ~ . .. 6625 LYNDALE AVE.. S0. RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA-5.5423 I TELEPHONE: 861 -7355 A N I N D E P E N D E N T B A N K i~l~r. ch 3, 197? f Daembers of City Council Richfield, Iyti.x~n.esota Ee : April 30 and PJ~.y 1 applicaticn to conduct Auto Shov~r Gentlemen: Our request for. special cor~sideratior~'on this application i.s based as follor;s: Gur date ~:as selected three weeks age. Since this type of event ta~:es • considerable planning vr~.t.l area auto dealers, ~;e could rLct v~ait until iaar. eh 23rd fore a Planning Commission meeting a_nd then. bait until- the Council r~eveting of April 12th far final decision. This event, to be successful, needs pre-planning and promotion.. 2'Y:e entire event. «rill be conducted on our property - no tents - rio temporary building - no charge of land use. We believe-this type of event gill be attended and appreciated by area people and sill create enth~.zsiasm in our business community. Your favorable consideration of this request grill be greatly appreciated. ~, Sincer Ys ~~ ~~ ""/"!~ ~ I"~. ~' ~~o~roe Stenerson, Va.ce President Public Relations Department ~",S : eh .. 3 . a t 7 ~ ., - - ~ .. :~ .. .a . Y QAK GROVE LUTE-I ERAN CHURCH ~ 71ST AND' LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH ~ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 '~~ PfiONE 869-4917 Na-rch 2, 1976 Ivr. PJonroe Stererson Richfield Ban1c t'c Trust Co~,pany Richfield, 2v~i nnesota, Dear P~fonroe: Oak Grove Lutheran Church is happy to offer its parking facilities for the use of Richfield Bank ~ Trust on Friday, April 30 from 8-5 and on Saturday, tJiay lst from 8-1 PRr: The par!~ing facility to be used is on the corner of ?lst Street and Augsburg Avenue. • Sincerely, _~~~ • Pastor Harald Grindal . HG~ro - . ~;`~°., at Ricn.f:;_eld. Rack & `i.`r11St CO .? ara ~r,tcnn~lt= ~.~.3?~:f?incr t0 Cond~]c'V an ~~~~.1t0 .5':?O:?~~ Friday, April. jOtY~ and. ~cturdas;, rr~ay 1. HoLirs of or~rati.on 9:00 A.~~~~. ~i;o 7:00 p._,'. . and a:00 ^ .1T. to 1+: j0 P."•a. _ - 1 . ~;~le exnect to ~.n-.=_~te 6 or 8 s~.~h~_lrba.n area ne~,v car deal ers to di spla~r and sell Cars on ol,r parking 10'': - snee~.~1^~11,'r O?! t~@ nori;,~ and lVeSt S1dE' of our bui ldir.g.. _ 2. Total number oz cars to be d5_spla;jed tna~r be 2~. 3. mach dea]_er ~rolald be permitted. tc have tzrro sal.err~en in attendance. ~+. Vehicles wolzld nog be removed from d_ispla~r area dvri.ng hours of op2ratl.oTz. 5. Bank personnel ~~rould. be a~=ailable or_ the. lot to discuss auto firanc~_r_.g. ' , 6. Coffee and donuts c;ou1_d be se.rsred thro~z7hout the hours of op~raticn. 7. Taro off-dutzr R].eti3fi eld. Policemen tirould be er?pl.oyed by the bark to direct traffic in t?~e Harriet and L~~ndale Aver.tla area. 8, ~!ll vehicles 1~rould be re~?o~=ed ~'rorn the lot dl.,rir. night ~;o•.~rs: 9• Plastic. pennant streamers :Rrould be used. to d.eeorate the barLk par kin;^; lot • area. 10.. Bank rnai nten~nce personnel z~nill keep the entire area in first class anpsaran.ce, as L1SlZ3l. Tn. preparation f or this r_?eeting, Z discussed the :basic plan .-,~.th r+Tr. T~'latme Rlzr~grawff City P.~axzager, Thursday, February 12_. On Thursd.a~=, Februaryy 2ntYi T received a letter from .T~:Ir. ~31zrl;graaff indicating somA of the city roo~.~irements to cons:i.der. Aceord~r:e; to slaggestion from Per. Bizrs,~,raaff, I contacted Pr7r. Kuehl FebrLlar~= 27th and discussed the nrocedtiral approac?~. I then h.ad a to enhone con~.•ersation tirith. r,Lr. Cla..y-t;on LeFevere, city legal counsel, to clarify a fever of rn~r gLlestions. Follovr-?r_,; this discussion ?" proceeded. to city staff A~onday, I~Jiareh 1 to prepare pror_er application to appear at the Richfield City Council rllonday, ?,iarc:n 8th. Proper applications and fees have been submitted to cit~r staff. Iri relation t " ~ A ~~ O Otf Str . r -'no' ' 'A P_t l~c'L_~~ _ .r i n ~. ~__, consz.a__at_o._s. ,re tiV01 t ld _, ___ ~ agree to ho1_d our en ~Zre ____ • 120 car space parkin; lOt easy of harriet ~venua for.. over-flo'rr trafri C. This' tiv~.ll he: aecomplis'ned ~v di.reetin~ otlr tenants to parkin; Z.r. our 67t_^. an.n_T,~mdale nvznue parkin; ].Ot and OLIr emplO:ree$ tVi1.1 11S'' $,he ~ln.'_^'!{7.2?S;' 10'f; On 7ZSt' ??1C~ flt.l?.S}JLt_'•"_, i1VP:112B (Oak Gxo~re Talt~era..n Cht~?^c'.i) . See letter. attached from Pastor `iarold C=rinda.~,1:. / Q„ 1IU. 6STH ST. Sole . 1~~= 40~ - . f ~^.~pora.ry Exist. aiQq f -tier Curb ~ ~ ~+PProx. locotion~~ t0 canc. ~, si d e v:o I k 1- ----- f r j - ~-. i / \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ 7 ~• r 4 R t:es . \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ ~. \ . J ~.~ S rock mulch 5t~"c^t J„ 8~.1~r:P?: Q t°~~nt Julep Juniper •~ ~ ( ~ / / / / / f 1. i . "~ t ~. _ Jt ~ ~ ~ So''° ~ ~ ~r7lM z,yr;.t Jl:e~ 'z-:.fie. i --- \ ~ ~ . - - - ~ i - _ _ OFF-STREET PARf:y,'•iG ?•iO. 7u-10 , --- OkiiEP, A?~ AUDP,ESS: Richfield Eank & Trust Co. - = - 6625 Lyndale Avenue Seuth LEGAL. BESCRl''F~IOF: Lot 1, Block 3, J. T,t_ u2u,;e„'s Ada'r= (Paxcel 6a0G} USE: Additional Parking For Richfield Brfnk & Trust Co . . COu.iCIL ACTIG_d: ~Tuly 22, 197 ' Ir0. ADDI T IG:+AL PhR?iI;eG S?~'iCr.S : k0 _....- • E. S_ City of.Richfield _I Gentle men 'Subject: Amusement Device Licenses Renewal for 7th Hour - At the February 9, 1976 city council meeting the pity council adopted the. attached resolution relating to amusemen device licenses at the 7th Hour estab~ lishment-. The city council by adapting that resolution indicted that a final decision on the licenses would be mad~:a.t the IVlarch 8,-1976 city council-meeting... Mr. Ronald! Benson, the applicant for the 7th Hour amusement device. licenses, has advised me that he intends: to appear at the March. 8, 1976 city council meeting.ar~d make a presentation in accordance with the provisions of • the Febxuary. 9, 19176 resolution< . Respectfully submitted, ` 1 I i •~.J . Wayne S. Burggraaff .City Manager WSB/eja cc: City Attorney Fublic Safety Director ~~ ~~ I Y ~. RESOLUTION NO: 5482. RESOLUTION DENYING. GENERAL AMUSEMENT LICENSES TO ESTABLISHMENT AT 609 EAST 66th STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the city. council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows; I. The council herewith finds and determines: 1. Richfield Ordinance Code S 5.18 requires that a license be '~~ obtained for each amusement device which: is used in the city.. i 2. An application .has, been. made by Ronald Benson for a renewal '~ of the amusement device licenses first granted- him in September, 1975. ~, 3 .. The amusement devices for which lcensure is sought are all located at 609 East 66th_Street and are. used in -thee operation of an arcade ', known a s the 7th Hour. ' 4.- The lot on which the 7.th Hour is located is in close proximity ', to residences as well as several retail businesses . '~, 5 . Since the 7th Hour began operation in September, 19 75 , the • ar o i incidents which a e t of the area have observed the foll w n PP residen s g to relate directly to the .operation of .the 7th Hour: it I a'. -Litter in the form of cans, bottles, paper and broken glass have been discarded on the grounds surrounding the > ~~ 7th'Hour and in the general neighborhood. _. b. Noise from squealing tires of automobiles believed to be driven by patrons of the 7th Hour have disturbed the adjacent residential. neighborhood. 6. Many of the problems v~h ichare now. occurring in the immediate - vicinity of the 7th Hour appear not to have existed at all prior. to the 7th Hour beginning operation . II. The application for licenses to operate amusement. devices at 609 East 66th Street is therefore denied. The effect, of this resolution is, j however, .stayed until-the councilmeeting of March. 8, 1976. At thaf: time; -the city council shall .consider any plan which the applicant may formulate to relieve the adverse- impact to the surrounding area . Such. a plan might include the following elements: f ~ - - ' ~_. v. 1, Rules governing the conduct of patrons while on the premises and. while leaving or coming onto the premises; and providing for sanctions for failure to comply.. 2. A policy or procedure for. cooperation with nearbyresidents in responding-to their complaints concerning 7th Hour patrons. Should the city council determine at its March 8, 1976 meeting, that the 'plan proposed by the applicant is reasonably fashioned to eliminate the current ' problems,-the council may then vote to grant the requested amusement device licenses subject to any conditions or stipulations .which it may deem necessary to promote, the public health, safety, welfare 'and morals.. ~ Passed by the city council. of the City of Richfield this 9th day of February, ~ 1976. Laren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Council Letter No . 71 ~ Agenda March 8 , 19 7 6 ,: The H'onorabie Mayor .and Members of'the City Council City of Richfield ~' Centlemen• i i Subjecfi: Amusement:J~evi.ce Licenses. for Toy Pony At the February 9, 1976 city council meeting fihe city council- adopted the afitached reso'lutian relating' fio amusement device licenses at the Toy Pony establishment. The city council by adopting` fihat resolution,. indicated that a final deci~',on on the ..licenses would be made afi the March 8, 197.6 city council rneeti.ng. The applicant for the Toy Pony licenses has not advised m~ as to whether • he or his representative intend to appear at'the March 8, 1976 city council meeting. Since tie last time the city council considered this matter on February 9, there has been an incident at the. Toy Pony which is a violation of state.: and municipal gambling regulations. The atfiached letter hats been seni. fin the applicanfi advisinr~ him of-this alleged violation. Tlie violation nay he considered by the city council in making a decision on whether to issue the amusement device licenses for the Toy Pony. . Respectfully submitted, n j ~. Wayne`S. Burggraaff ~. City Manager .WSB/eja ~ ~~ ~~ev~,ud; cc: Public Safety IIirect~r ...:..City Attorne .1 n RESOLUTION NO. 5481 - I, RESOLUTION DENYING GENERAL ~ AMUSEMENT'-LICENSES. TO ESTABLISHMENT AT 611 EAST 77TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: T. The council herewith .finds and determines: 1. Richfield Ordinance Code S 5.18 requires that a license be obtained for each amusement device which is used in the city. 2. An application has been made by J. Richard Anderson for- a renewal of the amusement device licenses. first granted him in September, 1975. 3. The amusement devices-for which licensure i sou ht are g all. located, at 611 East 77th Street .and' are used .in the operation of an arcade known a s the Toy Pony . 4. The lot on which the Toy Pony is located is in close proximity to residences, as well as to several retail businesses. 5. Since the Toy Pony began operation in September, 1975 the residents of the area, business patrons. and a business owner have- observed the following incidents which appear to relate- directly to the operation of .the Toy Pony; a. .Litter in the form of cans,. bottles, paper and broken glass have been discarded on the grounds surrounding the Toy ~ ~ . Pony and in the general neighborhood. b.- Patrons. of the Toy .Pony have been seen to leave the -2--. ;- - Toy Pony. and loiter upon surrounding private property. c. In the evenings, youngsters .have been entering an apartment building located near the Toy Pony, running up and down the halls, smoking in the hallways, anddisturbing tenants... d. Youngsters have been scratching windows of the Richview Nursing Home, located behind the Toy Pony and disturbing and annoying the residents . • ' e. -When the establishment closes at night, perhaps as late as after midnight, the patrons leave the. area by car and on foot in a boisterous and disturbing manner which annoys the residents in the area . f. Patrons of the Toy Pony park their vehicles on other private' parking lots in the area , • g. Loud voices coming. from the interior of,ahe Toy Pony .can be~ heard in the .business. premises located next door. These noises include profanities and obsenities which tend to annoy and alarm the patrons of that establishment. h. Patrons. of the business located next door, a beauty shop,. have been verbally accosted- by patrons of the Toy Pony and have .stopped patronizing the business . i. Patrons of the Toy Pony stand around the windows of the beauty shop and sit on the vehicles owned by patrons of the • beauty. shop • 9 , Transactions believod to involve drugs have been observed in front: of the Toy Pony. k. Acts of vandalism including siphoning:. of .gas, damage to -3- _,,~, _ vehicles., driving across lawnshave, all occurred in the immediate vicinity of the Toy Pony. 6. Many of the problems which are now occurring in the immediate vicinity of the Toy Pony .appear not to have existed at all prior to the Toy Pony beginning operation. 7. The council concludes that the nuisance consequences created and caused by the operation of the Toy Pony are the direct result of a failure on the part of the owners. or managers of the Toy Pony to exercise adequate control over the business enterprise and supervision of the patrons . 8 . The ..continued operation of -the Toy Pony on the same basi which. it has operated heretofore would cons itute a public nuisance: contrary to the.. general health, safety, welfare and morale. of the community. II. The application. for licenses to operate amusement devices at 611 East 77th' Street is therefore denied._ The effect of this resolution is, however, stayed until the council meeting of March 8, 1976. At that time,. the city council shall consider any plan which the applicant may formulate to relieve the adverse impact to the surrounding area . Such a plan might include the following elements: 1. Rules. governing the conduct of patrons while on. the premises and while leaving or coming ontothe premises; -and providing for sanctions for failure to comply. 2 . The placing of a light at the rear of the .building. 3. A policy or procedurefor cooperation-with nearby apartments, nursing homes and retail businesses in .responding to their complaints concerning Toy. Pony patrons. -4 a~- Should the city. council determine at its; March 8, 1976 meeting that the plan _proposed by the applicant is reasonably fashioned to eliminate the current problems, the council may then vote to grant the requested: amusement device licenses subject to any conditions or stipulations which it may deem necessary to promote the public health, safety, welfare and morals. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 9th day of February, 1976. ~~ Loren L. I~aw Mayor .ATTEST: ~~ I ~ ~ . ...Thomas Moran, City Clerk I march ~, 1975 Mr. j• RiC~'°z3rC~ ~3"tCaer~~blY . 14100 Vilest 66th street ' ,. Eden Fralrie, ~~~~ Dear ~~..And~rs~sn: ' Rer 1975 Toy ~`o%y ~ir°aus~srraent Device Licenses . ' As yot- 'v.:nc~~~', the 121chfl~:ld City' Ct~uncil ~~rill co~side~ at ids regularly ° scheduled I~zarch 3, 19?6 ~ne,~tfng ~~Jb~t~°~cr to grar~~ or to dn~ r~ou ., applfc:ation fear 1.6 ~mus€:rnent machine lic~ns,es: ~n ntai~in t~;at decislon the council mad car~sidur all iniarmatlon,relatir~e tca licensors includixrg, bt~t not 1ir:~itud to, evcnt:~ ~~4~ick~ lY~vc occurred siric~~ t~~e February g, 1976 council r~ieeting. Specifically, L°he cou;icil will consider °v~hcther the Tby F~ony.and`its managers acid agents have p~n~~titted and al1U~A,~ad ~~,:urtain arfaus~m€~~°rt devices for vahich licensurP is sottcxlit ko be used as garr~bling cle~l~es wit~~in the meanin~t of ~4lnrgescata Statute 6Q9, J5, subaivi~.lon 4e Tn making this determfnatlon the council will consider the alleg~t:on that on F~brtra.ry 17,, 1976, at or about 5:50 p<m. a detective of the F,ichfield Public S~~.kety Departr.~ent went to the business premises oz To F'an located u ~+1 ~- ~ .~ t V ~a y E s~, 77th Stireet and wh 1 Y i e them. did observe two cardboard signs attacl~ed to tho taps of two separate plnbell- machin:~s. Th;: signs read "Ti~u parson who gets highestsct~re an this mackxine by 9.30 p. m. tanigla~ wins $1.00 in cash. The person wor}.ing must see score to ciualify. If over ? 00, 000 points, person working mint see. machine being turned aver, " You are ontltled to ba present at that meeting to offer testfmony, exhibit, or statements at tho hearing and to interrogate anyone who may give evidence agafnst the granting of your licenses. You have a right to be represented at th6 hearing by counsel and you may have a verbatim transcript made of the hearing at year expense-. The city council, !n dr~termining whether the licenses should be issued, wl1P consider the kind of information enumerated above, together with .4 ~` _ ~ _ . ... .: ., ~~ CITY OF RICE-IF'I£LD, 1VIlNNESOTA Office of City 1VLanager ! .Council Letter No, 69 ;. Agenda March 8 , 19 7 6 ~.he Hanarable IV~eyor - and '; Members of the City Council , / `l City of Rirhfiald ',' l Gentlemen; Subject: Compensation of the` Mayor and...Council Members ~,t the February 10, 1976 city council meeting -the city council appointed Mr, Ralph Bruins jas chairrzan of a citizen's committee to be. composed of five r:~Prnbers for fihe purpose of reviewing :salaries for the mayor and council members , The .committee wajs requested to submit a report at the March 8th city.. council meeting , - A copy of the report submitteu by Mr. Bruins is attached.. You will note that it was ,the unanimous recommendation by the: committee $ha the mayor's salary be increased o $5,400 .per. year and that council members: salaries be increased to $4, X20 per year, An ordinance amendment reflecting these proposed adjustments is attached, Inasmuch as the last ordinance amendment for an adjustment in council salaried failed for lark of afour-fifths vote,: it would be necessary'to renew: the entire process and give -the attached..ordinance amendment first reading at the March 8th council meeting, Respectfully submitted, . 1I ~ ~ ~~ ~`yu Wayne S . Burggraaff City 1VIanager V-~'SBf bll i _ . i y_' .. AN ORDINANCE AMEI~TDING ORDINANCE CODE. SECTION 12 , 02 SUBDNISION 1, ENTITLED "COMPENSATION OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Ordinance Code 12.02 , Subdivision l ,entitled "Compensation of Mayor and. Council Members" is he,:eb`y emended to read as follows: "Subdivision 1. Annual Salary. The annual salary of the Mayor is ($4,800) $5,400 and the annual salary for each. member of the council is- ($3, 600).$4, 020 .to be effective 30 days:.:after its publieatior~. Salaries of such officers shall be reviewed by December of each year., Passed by the City Council. of the City of Richfield, this day of 1976. COMMITTEE TO REVIEW.MAYOR AND .COUNCIL SALARIES- . MINUTES February 26, 1976 ME~RS PRESENT: Chairman. Ralph .Bruins Gertrude Ulrich 7.210 Dupton Ave. S. 7601 Aldrich Ave. S. Richfield, Mn .55423 Richfield, Mn 55423 J. C. Briggs ~ Lee Moritz 7240 Dupont.-Ave.. S. 6710 Sevens Richfield, Mn 55423 Richfield, Mn 55423 James Ryan 7028 Lakeshore-Dr. Richfield, Mn 55423 MEMBERS.ABSENT: None The Chairman convened the meeting at 7:30 a.m. with all members present. The committee reviewed the duties of the Richfield Gity Council, separating the duties of the Citg Council and the Housing Redevelopement Authority 'at the suggestion of the Chair., It was pointed out that the two bodies are separate entities, and at~some time in the future, the membership of the two bodies may 'not coincide, as demands of each .body on its members continues to grow. The committee recognized the many hours of work inuolved in the bi-monthly rneetinq of the Council, the_gro~aing number of ,special meetings, in addition ta~dget and capital mprovement'~hearings. Each Councilman also acts as l onto meetings of the. various commissions and .committees established by thee.Councl, and to other governmental bodies. Tne committee also recognized the time the Mayor and Councilmen spend in meetings with citizens' groups.,... businessmen interested iri locating in the city, services to citizens in need of pecial help., and time spent at various official functions. Salaries of council and mayors in other suburbs in this immediate area were reviewed. Further discussion revolved around the need to set salaries high enough so that itizens of low or moderate means could afford to serve on the City Council.. he members of the committee were in agreement that public office must not, . ecome a privilege only the wealthy can afford. M/Ulrich S/Ryan that the committee recommend that .the mayor's salary be in- 'creased to $5,400 and council salaries be increased to $4,020. Motion passed lunanimously. espectfully submitted. . Gertrude .Ulrich, Secretary • k j /~ CITY OF RICHi'IETD, i`ViNNT'~OTA Uff1Ce Uf Clt~7 TJ~anager Council Letter No. 6? ~ Agenda March 8, 1976 ,, The Honorable Mayor a rLd `. I' MembFrs of the: City Council City of Richfield L Gentlemen: - ~I 'i Subject: Approval of 19%6 Agreement with Richfield Pola.ce ' Supervisory Employ~.es Bargaining. Unit I Copies of the 1976 Richfield Police Supervisory Employees Bargaining Unit agreement have previously been distributed;to members of the city council. The bargaining' unif~ has advised mo that they have approved the agreement and it is, therefore, be';ing submitted to the city council for action'by the :city. It is recommended that thy: city council ad.ap~ the attached resolt~ti.on approving the 'contract and also the attached resolution authorizing the transfer from the coni:ingency fund to cover the new costs created by the agreement. Respectfully submitted, ~. C~~~ ~ . Wayne. S. Rurggraaff ~ f ~ City Manager WSB/eja ,; cc: Finance hirectbr Public Safety Director i .. I 1976 EQUIVALENCY TABLE LIC SArETY -POLICE MANAGEMENT ~_ E Ht)URLY RATE ~ BI-WEEKLY RATE MONTHLY RATE ANNUAL RATE GRAD P 4 (Sergeant) 12 7 1153) (7 569..22 1 233.31 , 14,799.72 Step 7. . . . 2 7.51 (7.5055) 600.44 1,300.96 15,611.44 3 7.92 (7.9173) 633.38 1,372.32 16,467.88 <4 8.35" (8,.3515) 66$.12 1,447.60. 17,371.12 5 8.81 (8.8096) 704.77 1,527.00 ~18,32t+.02, P 5 .(Lieutenant) 1 48 7 (7.4786) 598,29 1,296.30 15,555.54 Step . 2 7.89 (7..8889) 631.11 1,367.41 16,408.86 3 8.32 (8.3216) 665..73 1,442.42 17,308.98 • 4 8.78 (8.7781) 702.25 1,521.54 18,258.50 5 . 9.26 (9.2596) 740.77 1,605.00 19,260..02 .` P 6"(Captain) 1 t 04 8 (8.0425) 643.40 1,394.03 16,728.40 ep S . 2 8.48 (8.4836) 678.69 1,470.50 17,645.94 3 8.95 (8.9490) ~ 7.15.92 1,551..16 18,613.92. 4 9.44 (9.4399) 755.19 1,636.25 T9,634.94 5 .. 9.96 (9.9578) 795.62 1,726.00 20,712.12 ~ . ~ I RESOLUTION NO. ' RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMEIvTT BETWEEN CI7.'Y OF RICHFIELD AND THE RICHFIELD POLICE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES BARGAINING UNIT FOR THE° YEAR 19 7 6 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Richfield Police .Supervisory Employees Bargaining Unit. have reached a complete understanding concerning rates-of pay," hours and other conditions of employrrient for the year 1976, and ' WHEREAS, the Personnel Ordinance requires that. contracts between the City-and the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate. bargaining unit shall be implemented by-council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe City Council does hereby approve .the Labor Agreement between .the City of Richfield and the Richfield Police Supervisory .Employees Bargaining Unit for the year 1976 and orders the provisions of the labor agreement to be implemented effective January 1, 1976. PassEd by the City Council of. the City of Richfield this 8th day of March, . 1976. i• Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas j. Moran _ City 'Clerk ~, • RE S OLU'1'ION NO . RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF' t'lPPROPF.L41'ION FROM THE 1976 CONTINGENCY TO PUBLTC SAFETY DEPA.RTMM~Iv''T WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5420 appropriated funds for each department of the City .for the year 1976; a.nd WHEREAS, a contingency appropriation was rzade in the General Fund for various purposes, including the 197b salary adjustments and related fringe benefit contributions; and WHEREAS, the labor contract between the City of Richfield and the Richfield Police .Supervisory Employees for 7.976 provides 'for a pay plan and certain supplemental wage benefits; and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined necessary to adjust the 1976 budget appropriation to reflect adjustments required by the labor contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED ley the City Council of the City of Richfield that the sum of. be transferred from the contingent appropriation of the General Fund to she Public. Safety llepartr:ent. Passed by the Council of the City of Richfield tri_s 2'sth day of March, 1976. Loren "L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran .City Clerk i ~D .CITY 4F RICHFIEZD, PJIINNESOTA j Office of- City Manager j , Council Letter_No. 66 Agenda March 8 , 19.76 The Honorable Mayor and ; . .. Members of the .City Council ~ City of Richfield ! . Gentlemen: Subject: Red Cross., Expansion into South Hennepin Area A representative of the Minneapolis Area Red Cross appeared before the Human Rights Commission on February 3, 1976 to present a prapnsal for Rid Cross expansion into the South Hennepin Area. The Red Cross is proposing establishment of a! South Hennepin Chapter and requested the.Human Rights Commission to support their expansion efforts.. At that time they commission passed a resolution in support- of the Red Cross plans to establish a South Hennepin Chapter and also indicated comm- fission vuillingness'to provide assistance to the Red Cross in suggesting. con- tacts for volunteer', etc. . The Human Rights Commission also vofied to recommend that the' city council support the proposed program of the Red Cross to establish a South Hennepin Chapter. Mr. Bi11 Siemens, Chairman of the :Humane Rights Commission, will be present at the March 8, 1976 city council meeting to further discuss-the . Red Cross plans . ~~ I '~ Respectfully submitted, j G~ J~eG~ . ~ Wayne S. Burggraaff -City Manager J WSJ/eja I cc, Chairman, Hu~r-an Rights Commission i i /~ CITY OF RICHI=IELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager . Council setter No. 65 Agenda March. 8, 1`976 The Honorable Mayor ~ ' and ~i Members of the City Council City of Richfield:. ~ .Gentlemen: Subject: -Lease Agreement with Hennepin County for Communications Equipment For many years, the City of Richfield has participated in a leasing program with Hennepin County for all mobile and portable communications equipment used in the polio =division. All of the rnuni.cipal spoiice agencies in Hennepin County, with the exception of the City, of Minneapolis, particpa e in this same joint leasing program. The leasing program provides opportunity for all Henn- epin County police agencies to operate standardized ;equipment, with the capa- bility of inter-agency communi,ca ions. `Thee leasing program also p»orides 24 hour, seven. day per~week maintenance ervice, by 'couniy personnel,. for the • leased equipment! Participa ion-in this program gives he City of Richfield a backup dispatchi.r~g capability for alI police informational requests.. The pro-~ gram also establishes a revolving fund which is used to update the radio communications equipment we use. The. formal. leasing agreement has-not. been updated for several years . The equipment leased by the city has changed since. that time anal Hernepin County has submitted a new: lease agreement to the city which reflects the current equipment in use.i A list of the equipment we lease and a comparison of 1975 charges.' compared) to 1976 anticipated- charges for` his equipment is .attached. ;: Payment of'1976 charges is provided in the adopted budget for 1976. F. It is the recommendation of the public safety director, in which i concur, that the city council adopt the resolution .authorizing -the city manager to exe- cute.a 3.976 lease ;agreement with,Hennepin County :for. the purpose of continuing.` the city's partici anon in the leased police communication's program. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff" - '~ City Manager. zNSB/e7a cc; City Attorney Public Safety! Director Finance Director. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY a; RADIO EQUIPMENT LEASING EXPENSES with ; , _ _ HENNEPIN COUNTY Unit Rate Total Year: 1975 Number. of Units Per Annum - VHF Police Mobiles .. 17 @ $150.00 _ _. $ 2,550.00 UHF Police Mobiles 11 @ $150.00 =: $ 1,650.00 Mobile Teleprinters 9:. @~~$225.00 _ $ 2,025.00 Portables 2 ~ @ $ -0- _ $ -0- Total-Rent $ 6,225.00 Unit Rate -- Year: 1976 Number of Units Per Annum ~ .Total ~"'"~ ~~ VHF Police Mobiles 17 @ $162.00 _ $ 2,754.00 UHF Police Mobiles 11 @ $162.00 = ~ 1,782.00 Mobile Teleprinters 9 @ $243.00 =. $ 2,187.00 :Portables 10. ~ @ $125.00 = $ 1.,250.00. ..Total Rent $ 7,973.00 Note: ~ '~ The rates for 1976. were.. developed by a committee of th e Hennepin County .: Administrator's O ffice, in which the Richfield Public Safety Director participated, and reflect only the current actual .cost for these items. 8 ~a cn. ,.atF1S V~~ :~ f ~ - _ RESOLUTION NO, RESOLUTION APPROVING LEASE AGREEMENT -WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has participated in a leasing program with- ,Hennepin County for all mobile and portable :communications equipment used in the police division for many years, and • WHER}~AS, the formal leasing agreement has not been updated for several years; and the equipment leased by the City of Richfield has changed since the time of the original lease, and ' WHEREAS, Hennepin County has submitted a new lease agreement to the City of Richfield which reflects the current equipment in use, and WI3EREAS, funds are provided in the 1976 adopted budget for this .purpose... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF RICHFIELD that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for or on behalf of the City of Richfield and the Clerk is authorized and directed to affix the city seal thereto. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of 1~ilarch, • 1976. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST:: _ -: •AMENDMENT TO SECTION 6.01, SUBDIVISION 8, 'PARAGRAPH (2) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY. OF RICHFIELD F.C nT?narRT. Section 6.01, Subdivision 8, Paragraph (2) of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield relating to .exemptions from the ~ ' ~~ payment of license fees for food vending machines, is hereby amended to provide as follows: . "(2) Food services in governmental subdivisions, charitable institutions, houses of worship, homes for the aged, child-care homes, schools, charitable and nonprofit hospitals, and employee coffee shops, are required to apply-for and obtain a license., but are not .charged a fee therefor,, but are. subject to-.all other requirements of this section; provided that any food vending machine located in any such, establishment must be-owned by the establishment in order for any license fee thereon to be issued. License fees shall not be ;waived, .•under the provisions of thin paragraph (2)., as to any institution or organization of the type mentioned herein, unless it is a nonprofit organization or institution." ' Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota . this day of , 1976. .~ t ' __ Loren L. Law Mayor . ~ ~ ATTEST: . . F . ~: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk .. z. • .~ ~; • F. _ _ ~: CITY OF RLCHFIELD, MINNESOTA ' Office of City Manager _~ Council Letter No. 63 Agenda. March 8, '1976 The Honorable Mayor and ~ - Members of the City Council City of Richfield f Gentlemen.:. ,` _.. Subject:, Approval of Plans and Specificatior~~ ar~.d Authorization i ! to Request Bides on Gity °Project. No. 674 On the March 8, 1976 city council agenda there are three resolutions which will: provide for city. council approval of plans and specifications ands authoriza- tion for taking bids for City Project No, 674, the 3976 permanent street mprove.- ment project.. Approval is requested for the plans and specifications for street L paving,'orna,mental street lighting and sod restoration and tree planting for Districts 10 and 11 The resolutions would also authorize he city manager to, call for bids on these three components of the project.- Background Information The 197.6 permanent street project covers Districts 10 and 11 .: District ZO.: includes that are ~ bounded on the north by West. 66th Street, the east by Penn..... Avenue, `the south. by he north service drive of I-494, and the west by Xerxes Avenue. Districtill„is that area bounded on the north by 62nd .Street Crosstown; the east by I-35W, `the south by 66th Street and the west by Xerxes Avenue. On February 10~, 1975, the city. council. ordered preparation of engineering reports for the str et paving :program in Districts 10 and 11. On May 12 1.975. the- council recei ed those engineering reports and seta date for a' public hearing. The con ulting engineers were authorized-and directed to.proceed with the final su ey work and the preparation of plans and specifications . On September 29 and' 30, and October l and 2, 1975, the public works director and his staff `met with residents in the project districts to discuss and review the plans . On Octob 'r 6,' 1975 , the city council held a public hearing and adopted a reso ution autho zing the -1978 permanent street improvement project. The final plans and specifications for City Project 674 have .been. completed and reviewed by t e public works director. The estimates for construction are ~~ a s follows; ~ _ District No. 10 $1,.988,4:00 (permanent paving) 314,!100 (street lighting) 2.42,,400 (sod and tree replacement) Total District No. 10 $2, 545, 200 ,. Council'Letter No-. 63 -2- March 8 1976 . ~ ~ - ,, Dis~rict No. 11 $1, 487, 520 (permanent paving) 228 000 street li htin g 9) f ( i 150, 000 (sod and'tree replacement).. Tota!1 District No. 11 $1, 865, 5`20 These estimates,it~clude indirect -costs .such as p an preparation and construction supervision a`s we'll as actual construction costs.; The city council. will recall that the staff proposed to bid all.. sod restoration and tree :replacement as separate contracts . The separate contracts will allow the city to establish more stringent specifications-and insure better"coordination among various aspects of the.-prop- osed project.. The attached resolution would authorize the staff to call for two separate bids. on the. sod restoration and tree. replacement project, in two parts. Recommendation . ~ , It is recommended .that the council approve the plans and specifications for. _the permanent street paving, ornamental street lighting, and, sod restoration and tree replacement for City Project 674. It is .further recommended that the city council authorize the city manager to .call for-bids for the permanent street paving, ornamental street lighting, and sod restoration and tree replacement. April 2, 1976 has. been` tentatively scheduled as the day on which the bids woulfl be received for alI parts of the project except Part B for the sod and tree replace- merit.. Bids for Palrt B of the sod contract which is area 10, are tentatively sched- uled for a' bid opening 'date of April 9 , 19 7 6 . Respectfully submitted f ~. ~~ Wayne S . Burggraaff City Manager ' V1TSB/ej.a ccs Public Works~Director Finance Director `. 'i i RESOLUTION NO ' RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TO BE RECEIVED ON APRIL 2, 1976 FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND APPURTENANCES THERETO. CITY PROJECT N0. 67~+ Districts Nos. 10 and 11 Clerk's File No. WHEREAS, by Resolution No• 5307 passed by the City Council on the 10th day of ...February, 1975, a preliminary report for permanent street surfacing, concrete curb it and gutter and appurtenances. thereto for Gity Project No. 67~+, Districts Nos. 10 and 11, by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc._ (Consulting Enginers) was so ordered, ` and. _ ~I f 'WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 5360, passed by the City Council on the 12th day of May, 1975, the. preliminary reports so ordered were received, a public hearing on said improvement was so ordered to be held on the 6th day. of October, 1975, and Qrr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers,, were authorized and, directed to proceed with the final survey work and.the preparation of plans and specifications, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 5+13; passed. by .the City Council on the 6th day of October, 1975 the improvement was so ordered,. and WHEREAS, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has presented such plans: and. specifications to the council, for approval. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minn- esota, as follows: 1. That such .plans-and specifications are hereby approved, Clerk's File Na. 2:. That.. sealed bids will be ublicly-o ened by-the City Manager on P p April 2, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. in the council chambers of the city hall and that-such bids will be tabulated and presented to the City Council for award on April 12,-1976. 3. That all bids shall be filed with the-City Clerk not later than- 11~'s00 a.m. on the 2nd day of Apria,-1976 and that said bidswill ~ be opened and read aloud at that time. 4. That-the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids on .said improvement as_required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this .8th day of March, 1976. ~ Loren L. Law Mayor ~ ~ ATTEST: . Thomas J:'Moran City Clerk RESOLUTION N0. - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ' '~ ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TO BE RECEIVED ON APRIL 2,..1976 FOR ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING AND APPURTENANCES THERETO CITY PROJECT NO. 674 Districts Nos. 10 and 11 Clerk's File No. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 5307 passed by the City Council on the 10th day of February, 1975, a'preliminary report for ornamental street lighting and_ appurtenances thereto for-City Project No. 674, Districts Nos. 10 and 11, by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. (Consulting .Engineers) was so ordered, and WHEREAS, ,pursuant to Resolution No. 5360, passed by the City Council on`the 12th day, of May, ;1975, the preliminary reports so ordered. were received, a public hearing: ;on said improvement was so ordered to be held om the 6th day of October, 1975, and Orr-Schelen-Mayeron &. Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, were authorized and- •directed to proceed with the final survey work and the preparation of plans and specifications,..and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 541+, passed by-the City Council on the 6th day'of October, 1975 the improvement was.so ordered, and WHEREAS,' Orx-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inca, Consulting Enginers, has presented such plans .and specifications to the council for- approval.- NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Mnn- esota, as follows: 1. That such plans and specifications are. hereby approved, Clerk's File No. 2. That sealed bids will be publicly.. opened by the City Manager on April 2, 1976 .at 11:00 a.m. in the council chambers of the city_ hall. and-that such. bids. will..be ,tabulated and., presented. to' ~ ~ . the City Council for award. on April I2, 1976. 3. That all bids shall be filed with the City Clerk not later than • 11:00. a.m_. on the 2nd day of April., 1976 and that said bids will be opened and read aloud at,that time. ~+, That the City'C1erk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids on said improvement as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of March, 1976.. ,,ATTEST:. Loren L. Law Mayor Thomas J.~Moran 'City :Clerk ' RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING. 'ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TO BE RECEIVED ON APRIL 2, 1976 FOR -SOD RESTORATION AND TREE REPLACEMENT :CITY PROJECT N0 674 District No'. ll 'Clerk's._File No. WHEREAS, by Resolution No .'.5307 passed by the :City Council.,on the"10th day of February; 1975, a preliminary report. for sod restoration and tree. planting for City Pro~eet No. 674, District No. 11, by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. '(Con-- sulting.Engineers) was so ordered,. and .WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 536.0, passed~by the City Council on the 12th ~, .-day of May; 1975, the preliminary report so ordered was received, a public hearing- on said .improvement was so ordered to be held on the 6th day of October, 1975, and ''Drr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates,..Inc., Consulting Engineers,.were authorized and directed to proceed with the final survey .work and the preparation of plans .and specifications, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 5413, passed by the City Council on the 6th.-day of .October, 1975 the improvement was so ordered,-and WHEREAS, Orr=Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engneers';.has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID by the City-Council of the City of Richfield, _~ P~Iir~nesota, as follows: 1. That such plans and. specifications are hereby approved, Clerk's File No. 2. Than sealed bids. will be publicly opened by the City ,Manager on April 2, 1976 at 11.:00 a.m. in the council chambers of the-city hall and that such bids will be tabulated and..presented to the City Councilfor award on April 12, 1976. 3. That all bids shall be filed with. the City. Clerk not later than 11:00 a.m. on the. 2nd day of April, 1976 and that said bids will I be opened and read aloud at that time. 1+. That the 'City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise 'for bids on said-improvement as required by law. ', Passed by the-City Council of the Gity~ o~ Richfield this 8th day o~ March, 1976 Loren' L~. Law Mayor. .ATTEST: • ~ ' :.. ~;. Thomas: J: Moran City< C exk RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AA?D SPECIFICATIONS-AND ORDERING ' _ ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TO BE RECEIVED ON APRII, 9, 1976. FOR SOD RESTORATION. AND TREE REPLACEMENT CITY PROJECT N0. 671+ District No. 1:0 Clerk's File No. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 5307 passed by the City Council on the 10th day of February, 1975, a preliminary report. for sod restoration and tree planting for-.City Project No. 671+, District No. 1.0, by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. (Con= salting Engineers) wasso`ordered, and : WHEREAS, pursuant. to Resolution No. 5360, passed by the City Council on the 12th day of May, 1875, the preliminary report so ordered. was .received, a public hearing on said improvement was so ordered to be held on the ;6th day of October, 1975, and Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, were authorized and directed-to proceed with the final survey work and the preparation of plans and specificatons,.and WHEREAS, by Re~lution No. 51+13, passed by the City Council on the 6th day of .October, 1975 the improvement was so.ordered,:.:and WHEREAS, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron& Associates., Inc. , Consulting Engineers, has presented such plans .and specifications to the council. for approval. ~~- NOW THEREFORE, .BE IT RESOLVED by the City. Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That such plans and specifications are hereby approved, Clerk's File No. ~2. That. sealed bids will be :.publicly opened by the City Manager on April 9, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. in the council: chambers of the city hall and that such bids will be :tabulated and presented to the City Council for award on April-l2, 1976• 3. That all bids shall be filed. with. the City Clerk not later than 11:.00 a.m. on the 9th day of April, 1976 and that said bids will be opened. and read aloud at that time. >+. That the Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for .bids on said improvement as required. by law.. Passed. by the City Council of the City of Richfield this $th day of March, 1976. ATTEST: Loren L. Law Mayor T erk ho s J-Moran Cit~ Cl ma y