Loading...
07-28-75 agenda" 4:. CITY OF RICF3FIELD, ,MINNESOTA . Office of City Manager ~~ Council Letter No. 250 Agenda July 28, .1975 .:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen• .Subject:.Ratification of City Manager`s Action to Accept Plan for Use of Additional CETA Funds Sfnce 1971 .the city has been involved in the use of Emergency Employment. -Act funds and more recently, CETA funds . The procedure for .the receipt and use of these funds has been that the city manager worked with department directors in determining the positions to be funded and kept city council mem- bers advised of funds received and positions funded Council members have been kept advised by memorandum and budge*~?ng procedures: Most recently tl'ie city has received .additional CETA funds and the city manager advised council members of this action as well as the positions to be funded. However, in-this particular instance. the Mayor has requested that a special item be placed on the caz ncil agenda for the city council to ratify this action... . Information on .the most recent CETA funding and positions to be funded has already been submitted to the city council. However, it should be emphasized - that the following criteria were utilized in selecting the positions to be funded " for the next ten month period: Criteria 1. Position. upon which the city would not become dependent after funding ceases and can be terminated with little or no serious .impact on service delivery. 2. Opportunities to save money while at the same time meeting CETA goals and regulations. 3. Departmental needs for the next ten months and ability of S departments to supervise additional employees during this .period . Council Letter No. 250 -2- July 28, 1975 ~' In March of 1975 we made an assessment of departmental needs when CETA funds were first available. This assessment was updated and revised when the .city became aware of the fact that sup~lernental CETA funds would be available. With only a few exceptions, all of the needs expressed by department directors have been met through a combination of the initial CETA funding {two park maintenance personnel and two. public works main- tenance personnel) and the additional funding received this week. Respectfully submitted, ~~.~. Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Personnel Director Department Directors . . ,~ L _ = ,. Ci'I'S.' OF FtZCHFIELD, MII~~ivESOT'A Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 249 Agenda jury 28, 1975 The .Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield _Gentlemen; Subjects Naming of Responsible Authority Concerning Privacy and Security of City .Records In June of this year the Governor signed into law '_house File No. T014 vahich amends the state's data security and privacy act. In accordance with this legis- lation, it is necessary for the city to name a responsible authority concerning privacy and security of city records and to make reports to the State Commissioner of Administration• concerning the kinds of files and procedures which the city has r and which are covered by provisions of this act. A copy of the act is enclosed for your information. • It is recommended that the city council designate the city manager as the .responsible authority for purposes of this legislation so that the appropriate in- formation can be properly filed with the Commissioner of Administration. Respectfully submitted, ,~~ ,~o, e S . Burgg ff ~, -City Manager WSB/e7a *4. .. • . FIRST REGULAR SESSION ~~1. ~est~ Y EkF'C~AL SEC®~~5-~-•Cf3LI.ECT~®Pd, S~C~.IIIIT'Y f '~ ~I'3~ ~~S SEP~~I~AT~®I,1 • ~ CHAPTER 401. . • H.F.No.1014 _ • .. ~Goded in Part] .. An Act relating to the collection, security and dissemination of data on in- i ~ " , • y '~ dividuats by rho state 'and its political subdivisions; clarifying news- ^ sary definitions; changing reporting requirements; restructuring .the • ~ • duties of responsible authorities arsd the rights of subjects of data; t .. providing for issuance of rules relating to the implementation of the act i -- ~ by rho commissioner of administration; providing for tiro establishment • of a privacy study commission; providing penalties; appropriating i' ~. ~ ~ ` ~ monoy; arnendtng Nlinnesofa Statutes 1974, Sections 15.162; !5.163; , . ~ 15.165; t5.t66; 15.167; and Chapter 15, by adding sections; repealing " Minnesota Statutes 1974, Sections 15.164 and 15.168. ~• - - -Ire it enacted DI/ the T,egisl¢ttrre of the State of Dli~r~resota: • r Section 1. i•Iinnesota Statutes 197, fiection 15.I62, is amended to read: _ ' '•` " 't " 15.(62 Collection, socurity and dissemtnatiom of records; definitions Subrli~•ision 1. As used in sections 1~.1~2 to 15.ifi8 the terms defined in this section hate the meanings given them. Subd. 2. "Commissioner" n2cans the commissioner of the department of administration. • _ .. Subd. 2a. "C'onfidential data on inditidnals" utcans data tthich is not ~ ". s • ~. pt but is (a) expressly made confidci~tia] by late as a m >>i: rti''M`r ifi:•il snb•cct. of •~ta; (h) co, ec ec : a c2t; ar crrnunai rnte~ igatn•c . ~ . • agency as part of an :2etire int•estigation unclertakeu for the purpose of the - cotnxnencement of a legal action, prot•ide~] that the burden of proof as to - whether snch ini•cstigation is actite or in anticipation of n legal action • ''• ~ ~~ is upon the agency; (c) data tthich supplies the basis for the diagnosis • of the medical ar psychiatric condition of an individual as determined by a • licensed physician. ' ~ _ Sntx3. 3. "Data on indicidnals" inchules all records, files and processes .. ' which contain any data in which. an individual is or can he identified and • " ` ~ whiclt is kept. or intended to be kept on a permanent a• tem)torary basis. • ~ . It includes that collected, stored, and disseminated by manual, ntcchanical, • ~ electronic or an}• other means. Data on In(lltldlialR includes data classified • • ~ as public, private or confidential. • _ Subd. 4. "Individual" means a natural person. In the ease of a minor „~ .. individual under the age of ]F, "individual" shall mean rt I2atrnt ar goaedian • acting in a representatit•e c~paeity, except n•here such n2jnor individual ' - ~ indicates .otltertt•ise. - - - ~ Snbd. "5. "Political subdit•ision" includes counties, nnmicipalities, school' districts .and any boards, commissions, districts or authorities created pur- '•~ scant to local ordinance. It incIndes nay nonprofit corporation tthich is a • community action agency organired to r)ualify for public fun<Is, or any non- • profit social set•t•ice agency tthich performs sert•ices under contract to any .~ political subdivision, statewide system or state agency. .- , • ,'. ~ . ~, ~ _ ~ - -.. ~ ` ~ ~' . • _ .._•.-.1 °"6• ~~ g 69th LEGISLATURE ' ~ Stibd. 5a. "Prit•ate data on indit•Iduals" means data which is not Public but which by la«• is acces ibl s e to the indit•idual subject of that data r . ~ Subd. 5b. "Public data on inrlit•idtrals" means data trhich 3s accessible to • the public in accordance with th • F ~ e pro~ isions of section I5.I7. Subd. 6. `'Responsible authority" at the state le~•cl means an ffi • y o ce es_ tabIished by law as the body responsible for the collection iutd use bf any set oP data on fudit•idaais or summar d t " y a a. Responsible authority" in any politicrr2 subdit•ision means the person designated by the got•erning board ~ of that political b • . su dit ision, unless otherwise proeided Dy state ]an•. 1~'ittr - ~ respect to statewide systems, "responsible authority" m h a ` • . eans t e state of- • facial int-oh•ed, or iP nuu•e than ate state officiarl, the official designated by the commissioner. • - . • • Subd. 7. "State. agency" means the state, the university of Jinnesota, and any office, officer, department, division, bureau board com i i • , , m ss on, au- thority, district or agency oP the state. ~ • .. ' , - Subd• 8. "Statett•ide system" includes :any record_keeping system in which ~ -data on individuals is coll t '••" ec ed, stored, disseminated and used by means trf a system common to one or • more agencies of the state or more than one of its politichl subdivisions • • t . ... Subd. 9. "Sammar3• data" .means statistical records and reports dertt•ed from datz on indi~•idnals b t i • t ~~~ ~ u • n tt hich individuals rErc not identified suet ~ from which neither their identities • E ~' txn any other characteristic that could uniquely identify an inctit•idnal i s ascertainable. T • - 5t~ - Sec. 2. -Minnesota •ttutes I974, Seetiorr ];i.]G3, is amended to read: 15.163 Reports fo the legislature ~ Subctivisian 7• On or before August 1 of each year the resj~onsibie au- thoritt• shall clocuutnnt and fil n . ;.y - h. e report «•ith the commissioner of admin- istration, n•hicli sha)1 be a public record.: The report shall co t i 1 ~ . n a n the fol- ~ lowing information: _• ~ (a) The title, nruuc, end addresti, of the:respr,nsible auth r` - o rt} - _ Eh) A statement of which records containing daEu on individaaris rnttin- I tained by the responsible Allth 'I ' , • ot Cy 7U e classified as confidential and which are classified as prn•ate. The recponsibid authorit sh ll t ! . y ri submit s<rmple copies of any forms which will, when exec•nted, contain data on individuals ' '. classified as private or co fid ~ ~ n ential. € • e~ ~ ~ (c) The purposes for tr•hich private or confidential data on individuals is authorized to be used • collected di i f ' , . , ssem nated and stored. _ _ . '" •(d) The responsible authoritys policies and practices regarding storiige, • ~ duration of retention, and disposal of data on individ l • - ua s, including a de- • i scription of the prot•isions for maintaining the integrity of prit•ate and confidential data on individuals I • - . .. Subd. 2. On or before December I oP each • year, the .commissioner shall prepare a rnport to the legislature sununarizIn th i f ~' l' „ . g e n ormation filed by ~ rnsl~onslble authorities lniistiant to subdit•ision ] and uotifyin~ the legisla- ttrre ~of any rcbl F ; .• • ~ p ems relating to the administration, implementation and ~ enforcement of sections 1~.1G2 to ]S IfS avhich mi h • . g t, ~ iu his opinion,. rerluire legislatit•e action. • ~.• Sec. .Minnesota Statutes 197, Chapter 15, is amended by adding a to read: • _ ~ I 15.t1i4t t)utles of responstblo authority , (a} Data on indh•iduals is antler the jurisdiction of the responsible au- thority t~•ho may. appoint au indi •id • t ual to be in charge of each file or system i containing data on individuals. } k. • •~. • (b? Collection and St01'a a of g public, prirate or confidential data on in- dividuals and use and disseminati f on o prit•ate and confidential data on in- • ~ 2 •• ' . ~' 1 ..~'_ . ... .' _ ! _ - r. • .. i .. • ~. •, • ;r • "'• - • - - .. - . t r- FIRST REGULAR SESSYON ~-~• ~~ ~• • dicidual5 sha11 be limited to that necessary for the tldministr:ttion and man- • r - agement of programs specifically authorized by the legislature, local go~ erning -body or mandated by the federal government. f K ~ ~ (c) I'rirate or confidential data on indi~•icluals shall not be used, collected, - - StOCC(l (11• dlS:ie.I111natCd tot' ant pUCpOSCfi OthCr than thOSe Stated t0 atl ITl- • 1516:) or, in dirldual at the time of collection in accordance with section the case of data collected prior to :ingust 1, 19Tx, for any purpose ocher s (1) the responsible authority le l • b , un s att y than those originally atitharized e es- files a statetncnt with the commissioner describing the purpose and ne . ~ slty of the purpose with regard to the health, safety or welfare of the • public and the purpose is appro~•ed by the commissioner, or (2) the purpose • - - is subsequently authorize<l by the state or federal legislature, or (3) the • ptirposc is one to t~•hich the indi~•idual subject, or sahjects of .the data ha~•e given their informed consent. (d) The use of summary data derit•ed from prit•ate or confidential data • w ~ ' on individuals ender jurisdiction of one or more responsible.snlthorities shall be permitted, pro~•idect that summary data is pnbiic pursuant to section 1~i.17. • The responsible- authority shall prepare summary data from prit-ate or pro~•ided rson f • , any pe confidential data on indi~•idttals upon the request o _ ~ -. that the. request is in ~~•ritiug and the cost of prcp:u•ing the data is borne. _ ~ ~ ~ ~ by the requesting person. The responsible authority may delegate the po«•er ~ . ~• _ to prepare summary data to the administratit•e officer responsilrie for any • crntral repository of s:unmary data, or to a Person outside of its agency _ ~ if the person agrees iu writing not to disclose pril•ate or confidential data on individuals. - ~ j (e) The responsible authority shall establish procedures and safeguards to ensure than all public,' pri~•ate or confidential data on indit•idnals is • ~( ' accurate, complete and current. Emphasis shall be placed on thc~ data se- d fibs containing private or confidential i t f er zc comptr cnrity requirements o data on inditiduals arhich .are accessible directly ~•ia [eleconununications ' technology, including security chu•ing transmission. • ~ - Sec~. -1. \Iinncso[n statutes ]97d, section li.l(Mi, is amended to read: 15J65'"'Iitr~hts of subjects of data • ,r. The rights of indi~•iduals on whom the data is .[ored or to be stored • shall be as follows: . : , ~ (a) An lT1dICl(lilal Fl`;l:e(l LO Supply private or confidential datx concerning ~ ' ~ himself shall he informed of: (11 both the purpose and intended use of the ~ .. • ~ rennestecl data, (2) R'hether he may refuse or i, legally required to supply ,, ~ the requested data, and f3f any knon-n consequence arising from his supph•- ing or refusing to supply private or confidential data. (b) )upon request to a responsible authority, an indi~•idual shall Ue informed trhether lie is the subject of stored data on indi~•iduals, whether it be classi- _ • ~ fled as public, pri~•ate or confidential. Cpon his further request, an inditidual ` ~ - ~~•ho is the subject of stored public or private data on individuals shall be - ; •- shown the data ~~•ithout any charge to him and, if he desires, informed oY the • content and nleaniug of that data. :after an indit•idual has Ucen shown the - - data and inforrne(1 of its meaning, the data need not be disclosed to him for - sit months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected. The re- .- • sponsiblc authority shall pro~•ide copies of the data upon request by the cost of providing copies 3s h h • at t e ided t individual subject of the data, prot borne by the requesting iudit•idual. (c) An incli~•ichtal nuiy contest the accuracy ot• completeness of public or •.f - private data concerning himself. To esercisc this right, an incli.•iclual shall - • notify in «•riting the responsible authority describing the nature of the dis- shall ~t•ithin 30 days Correct the data thorit ibl a ' • y u e agreement. The respons if the data is found to 1)e inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past . . •. 3 ~_ .: ~ • ~ • ~ _ .. +. • is • • j; • ---.a • (,~1. L~Q~ 69th LEGISLATURE recipients of inaccurate or incomplete datA, or notify the individual of dts- ed except under conditions of • di l h r os sc e agreement. DAtn in dispute shAit not demonstrated need find then only* if-the individual's statement of disagreement f ~ is included «•ith the disclosed data. The determination of the responsible visions of the Administra- h - e pro Authority is Appealable in Accordance with t • tlve procedure act r relAting to contested cases. 1 Section 15.0424 et seq. Sec. 3. liinncsotA Statutes ]974, Section 1:5.166, is amended to read: • (5.166 C[vU penalties Subdi~-ision 1. \ot~cithstanding section 466.03, a political subdivision, re- • _ .' sponsible authority or state agency which violates any provision of sections ho suffers any damage as a result oP r • ' ~ son w 15.162 to 15.163 is liable to A lre person damaged may bring an action against the po- and the the violation • , , litical subdivision, responsible authority or state agency to cover Any damages '1n the case of n willful • y , ,' sustained, plus casts and reasonable attorney fees. oliticAl subdivision or state agency shall, in addition, be linbie he n l ti i i ,~ • - p , t o v o a to exemplary damages of not Icss than $100, nor more than X1,000 for each d any immunity to A cause of iv _ e violation. The state is deemed to have wa . ~ - - action brought under sections 15.162 to 1x.168. _ ~ _ Subd, 2. A political subdivision, responsible Authority or state agency ]G2 to 15.168 may be enjoined tions 15 ~ `" . which ~•iolates or proposes to violate sec make any order or judgment As may b:• a }~ y by the district court. The court m necessary to prevent the use or employment by any person of any practices - which violate sections I:~.162 to la.lfi3. section may be commenced in thi ~ s Subth 3• An action filed pursuant to in which the indicidnal Alleging damAge or seeking relief resides, count h y e t or in the county- wherein the political subdivision exists, or, in the case of '~ the state, any- county. • Sec, 6. Minnesota Statutes 1374, Section 13.167, is amended to read: ' ~ t5.1fi7. Penait{es Any person who willfully violates the provisions of. sections 13.16? to 13.168 Ated thereunder is guilty of a mul . ; or an}• lawful rules and rc•Kulations pro \villful violation of sections I5.1fi2 to 15.168 by any public . a misdemeanor. employee constitutes just cause for suspension without pAy or dismissal of • the public employee. Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Chapter 1a, is Amended by adding a ~' section to read: 15.167{ Duties of the commissioner ommissioner shall with the advice of the intergovernmental informs- Th - e c services ach•i~ory council promulgate rules, in.A000rdance with the rule- i i • on l making procedures in the administrative procedures act which shall apply to l subdivisions to implement the li i . • ~ ca t state Agencies, staten-ide system; and po And Administration of sections 15.162 to 1x.169. The rules shalt rcement f ` . • . en o not affect section 15.16:1, relating to rights of subjects of data, and section study commission. rivac h ~ ' ~ y e p 1x169, relating to the powers and duties of t the adoption of rules authorized by this section the commissioner t i • ~ o or Pr shall give notice to all state agencies and politicAl subdivisions in the same s as required by section 15.0412, sub- ti _ ` ~ e manner and in addition to other par enclosing a cops of .the rules and i ng, division 3, of the date and p1ACe of hear reputations to be adopted. ~ • - ' Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 1974, ,Chapter la, is Amended by adding a sec- .. ~ . "~ .. - tlon t0 reAd: '•t • ~ 15.169 Privacy study commission Subdivision i. Establishment. There is hereby created a privacy study whom shall be Appointed by f . commission consisting of six members, three o d three of whom shall be appointed by the ' ~ . the committee on committees, An __ 4 -_.. .: , -- _... ,. _. .. , ~ _._~_ .. r • ~ ~ - -- - _ -~ • -. ' ~.: • , i .. : , , • i . _ ..-_, • ~ ~ . FIRST KEGULAIt SESSION ~~it. ~•®~. • speaker oP the house. The commission shall act from the time its members arc uppointe<1 until the commencement oP the 1977 regular sesstan of the. legisla- tore. Any vacancy shall be filled by the appointing power. f•M Subd. 2. Organization and procedure. At its first meeting the commis- sion shall elect achairman, avice-chairman and such other officers from its membership as it may. deem necessary. The commission shall adopt rules governi~ig its operation and the conduct of its meetings and hearings, which rules arc not subject to the pl'OClS10nS Of the fldmllllStratl\'L` pl'OG(`dure5 aCt. Sutrd. 3. Duties and powers. '.the commission shall make a. Continuing study and investigation of data on indi[•iilttals collected, stored, used and dis- • seminate(Y by political subdi[-isions, state agencies, statewide systems and.. ' • _ any. other public or private entity in the. state of Minnesota the conunissiou may deem appropriate for such study and investigation. The. po[vers and duties of the commission shall include, but are not limited to tl)e follo[ving: (1) the holding of meetings at times an<i places it designates to accomplish ' ~ the purposes set forth in Taws 1375, Chapter 401. The commission may hold '. ,-: hearings at times and places concenieut for the 3>urpose of taking evidence • - and testimony to effectuate tt)e purposes of I aws 1975, Cliapter 401, and for those purposes the commission may, through its chairman by a tiu•ee-fourths ' Y ~ vote of its rncmbers, issue subpoenas, inclucliug subpoenas cloves tect)m, rc- _ quiring the appearance of persons, production of relevant records and the ` i~ ~. giving of relevant testimony. Iii the case of contumacy or refusal to whey a subpoena issne(l tinder authority. herein provided, the district court in the • county where the refusal or contumacy occurred may, upon complaint of the • - commission, punish as for contempt the person guilty thereof. • (2) the study •of all data on individuals collected, stored,. used or dissemi- { nated in the state of .linnesota inclu(liug, but not limited to that collected, - •stored, used or disseminated by any political subdivision, state tigency or - • ~~ state[i•ide system in order to determine the standards and procedures in force • for flac protection of private and confidential data on individuals. In con- ducting such study, the commission shall: (a) determine what cxecuti~•e orders, attorney general opinions, regulations, • laws or judicial decisions govern the acti[•ities urrdcr study and the extent - to which they are. consistent with the rights of public access to data on individuals, privacy, due process of la[[• and other guarantees in the Con- . ~ stitution. - (b) determine to [[•1)at extent the collection, storage, use or (iissemination . ~ _ of data on individuals Ys affected by the rcquirernents of federal taw. ~ (c) examine the standards and criteria governing programs, policies and practices relating'to the collection, storage, use or dissemination of data on individuals in the state of Minnesota. • ~ - (d) collect and utilize to the maximum extent practicable, ail findings, re- ' - ~ ports, studies, hearing transcripts, and recommendations of governmental • ~ legislattu•e, and private 1)odies, institutions, organizations and. individuals. R•hich pertain to the problems under study by the commission. (3} the recommendation to the legislature of the extent, if any, to which the requirements 'and principles of this act should be applied to information F ~ ~ practices in existence in the state of .Minnesota 6y legislation, administrative . action or voluntary a(loption of such requirements and principles, andreport.., : # r,. on such other legislative recommendations as it may determine to-be necessary - to protect the privacy of individuals [while meeting the legitimate needs of government and society for information. • Subd. Q. Office. The commission shall maintain an office in the capitol • group of buildings in space provided by the commissioner of administration. ~'~ Subd. 5. Suppifes; staff. The commission may purchase equipment and ' supplies and employ such profess)onal, clerical, and technical assistants #rom ' the senate and house staff as it deems necessary in order to perform the ` • -~ ! duties herein prescribed. The commission may invite consultants and other - . . 5 .. . . • ~ .. . - .. ,. . - • ~; .. • ` .# . _ ---~ - - . .. 1• , • { j ~h. ~.~~ G9th LEGIST.tbTURR ~r ' I ns to appear before it and offer testimony and compen- • knowledgeable perso x ~ sate them appropriately. Subd. 6. Assistance of other agencies. -The commissi4olitical subd'vis[olty, f K I informtxt.ior including any data on individuals from anY P ` i r e ' law tb the n t~ithstanding any StatCwldC SgStenx, Ol' Sll'1)OSCS Of aCt3ariCl tllC in carrying out tl)e p 1 d alxd dlrCCtCd t0 promptly i . ze contrary, such employee or agency is author h data or information requested. u ' c furnish any s 7. Expenses, re(mbursement. Members of the commission shall he Sabd " ~ I . compensated as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 3.10?. sistant or staff of ~ Subd. 8. Penalties for disclosure. (i) Any member, as e of his employment or official position, has i t • ' • • ~ r u ho, by V tlxe commission x\ possession of, or access to, agency records which COnCalll private or confider- rohibited by law, and also h is hi p c fiat data on individuals the disclosure of te n to l+now that disclosure of sucL data is prohibited, •. , ~ ' ' kno\ving or having reaso willfully discloses such data in :iny mamxer to any pcrson,or ageixcy not en- .-: - ~ titled to receive it shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ission who knowingly and (2) Any memlier, assistant or staff of the comm btains any pri~-ate or confidential data on irdiciduals _ wi2lfnlly requests or o es the disclosure of which such person is not entitled by t ' ens `under false. pre • ~ ~ ` law shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. commission shall report its find- Th • e Subd. 9. Report io the legislature. ings and recolxlrxeuclations to the legislature as soon as they .are available, supplement them d ma • y in any Case not later than Novemller 1~, 197G, an thereafter until January 13, 1977. Onc copy of the report shall be filed \vith ( f clerk of the house of hi } ~ e the secretary of • the senate, one copy \vith the c tatives and ten copies ~\'ith the Icgislati\•c reference library.. ' - ~~ represen Subd. 10. Appropriation. There is appropriated from the general fund the as mucix thereof as ' ~ sum of X25,000 for the hienninm ending June 30, 1977, or s incurred by the commission. Lspenses of the s c accessary, to pay the cspen commission shall he approved by the chairman or another member as the rules ner that other state es- of the commission pros'ide and paid in the same man • ~ • pcnses arc paid. Sec. 9. :1linnesota Stathtes 1974, Sections 15.16# and 15.168, arc repealed. g ~, • Sec. 10. This act is effective the day following final enactment. - ~ Approved June 5, 1973. .. - .. s s.. ~;;~ .. •' r '•i • ~ • _ .6 _ _ _. -- .. --- _ - ;. . ~ _ ~ .. • ,.. • , ~ i; ~.. ,_ ~~ • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 248 Agenda July 28, 1975 The Honorable 1Vlayor and . Members of the City Council City of Richfield .:; Gentlemen; Sub}ect: Revenue Sharing Actual Use Report Attached to this council memorandum is a copy of the Revenue Sharing " Actual Use report for'the period from July 1, 1974 through June 3'0, 1975. t is 'Federal regulations require that this report be filed with the Office of Revenue Sharing and also published in the local newspaper. Prior to the staff's com- ',• ` ' ~p'letion of these tasks,.' we are .submitting the report to the council for review. " - This report reflects in summary form_the actual use of general revenue sharing funds during the last half of the 1974 budget year and during the first half of the 1.975 budget year..' Council members will recall that in 1974 these funds were used for a variety of capital outlay items and partial support of the .nature. center operation'., In 19.75 all revenue, sharing funds have been used _ to .help finance the general fund budget. The report indicates the areas in` tne. ` general fund budget to which the revenue. sharing. funds have been allocated. It 'is recommended that the city council approve ~ this report and authorize its publication and submission to the Office of Revenue Sharing,, U. S. Treasury Department. Respectfully.submitt d l 'JVayne Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja '• "HARING E. N`~ GENERAL REVENUE SHARING PROVIDES FEDERAL FUNDS DIRECTLY TO LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS. YOUR GOVERNMENT MUST PUBLISH v3 THIS REPORT ADVISING YOU HONJ THESE FUNDS HAVE BEEN USED OR OBLIGATED DURING THE YEAR FROM JULY 1, 1974. THRU JUNE 30. 1975. ~W THIS IS TO INFORM YOU OF YOUR GOVERNMENT'S PRIORITIES AND TO ENCOURAGE YOUR RAR7ICIPATION IN DECISIONS ON HOW FUTURE FUN DSv",a SHOULD BE SPENT. NOTE: ANY COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE USE OF THESE FUNDS MAY BE SENT TO 7HE OFFICE OF REVENUE ' ~o SHARING, WASHINGTON. D. C. 20226. ~_~ ACTUAL EXPENDITURES _ ~o IC) OPERATING / THE GOVERNMENT t ~~ T,,, w, •1) CATEGORIES IB1 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE OF ~'' ~ ~' '~ ~' r-~."~J t'-' ~ t l ~ t PUBLIC SAFETY has received General Revenue Sharing ~,~ _ $ 8,244 $ 154,148 payments totaling =.U 1 ~ ~~` 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION $ $ 3 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION $ 7 594 $ 17,135 4 HEALTH $ $ ' ti RECREATION $ 92 ~ 827 $ 37 a 023 6 LIBRARIES $ $ 7 SOCIAL SERVICES FOR AGED OR POOR $ $ S FINANCIAL 65 ADMINISTRATION $ $ 9 MULTIPURPOSE AND GENERAL GOVT. $ during the period frvm July 1, 1974 thru June 30. 1975 {~ ACCOUNT NO. c:•'~. ,~ iJ ~;= 'sa •`••~':3 b,''U U ~'!3t~': ! L...t•tf'i.i=! !^t",r~' >~Tt~i-ft~ I:Ci..i! f°iYf'f~'1 ~v~~~~ Itlu1,11,1~i11~,, rlt~~l;t1t111[tr,Gt1~~;,t1r,Idtti s111irL 10 EDUCATION $ ~/ lDl TRUST FUND REPO R7 (referto instruction D) 95 066 1. Balance as of June 30, 1974 $ ~ tt SOCIAL .DEVELOPMENT $ 2. Revenue Sharing Funds -~tT ;~;~.;, Received from July 1, 1974 thru June 30, 1975 $ ~ ~''` '""' t2 HOUSING & COM- MUNITYDcVELOPMENT $ 3. InterestReceiJed 21 99$ , or Credited (July 1 1974 thru .)une 30 1975) $ 13 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $ , , 4. Funds Released from Obli ations $ g 3 319 0 14 OTHER (Specify) 5 ~ 5.-Sum of lines 1, 2, 3.4 $ $ 6. Funds Returned to ORS $ ~ t5 TOTALS $ 108,665 $ 208,371. • 7. Total Funds Available $ 319 ,053 NONDISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET 8. TotalAmount Expended 1317,036 li l l $ S C l ( CERTIFICATION: I certify that I am the Chief Executive Otficer and, umn B and co umn um o, ne 15, co ) _.. i respect to the~nti lement funds reported hereon. I certify that they not been used i violation of either the priority .expenditure 9. Balance as of June 30, 1975 $~2 ..017 irement (Se~ion ) or the matchin funds prohibition (Section the Ac (F) THE NEWS MEDIA NAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT A COMPLETE COPY OF THIS _ .{k ( ;~}( ~ 7I28~75 REPORT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN A LOCAL NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCU- , , ' 1 HAVE A COPY OF THIS REPORT AND RECORDS DOCUMENTING THE CATION Signature of Chiet Exe ive Date Wayne 5 • Burggraa C ty Manager . City Hall CONTENTS. THEY ARE OPEN FOR PUBLIC SCRUTINY AT ld 00 l d i hfi Mi 5423 rvameandTitie - , Port an Ave. S. R c e nn. 5 67 IMPORTANT: THE UPPER HALF OF THIS PAGE-MUST BE PUBLISHED (SEE INSTRUCTION H) It is not required that the lower half of this-form be published. (G) TAXES AND DEBT (refer to instruction G) Has the availability of Revenue Sharing funds enabled your govern- . ment to: (Check as many as apply.) ^ Prevent new taxes ~ Maintain current tax levels Reduce taxes ~ Prevent new debts Prevent increased taxes ~ Reduce old debts IH) PUBLICATION (refer to instruction H) The upper part of this report was published in the following 338 ~ 7 6 newspaper on the stated date at a cost of {~ Name of Newspaper Richfield Sun Date Published August 7, 1975 11) Person completing this report (Please print) R. D. Nelson City Accountant Name Title (612) 869-7521 (Area code) Telephone Number DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FOR REVENUE SHARING USE ONLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 0 ~_ ~_ Z s° f7 O '~ in -1 C1 " O 'n r7 rn C> •tt m m z c m N S D 39 DN io ~~ ~~ ~z 0 w N THIS REPORT MUST BE RECEIVED BE(~ORE SI~PTEMBER 1, 1976-- BY: OFFICE OF REVENUE SHARING 2401 E STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON. D.G. 20226 ~, ~ ~ 7 CITY OF R1:CHFTELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 247- Agenda July 28, 1975 The Honorable -Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield ~ . Gentlemen: . Subject:. Information on Retaining a Consultant to Examine the City`s Data Processing System At the last city council meeting, the~ci.ty council deferred consideration of the question of whether to authorize the taking of new bids of computer. equipment or rather to retain consulting service prior to such artion. A copy • of Council Letter No. 225 which was submitted at that council meeting is attached hereto . . ,~ • Inasmuch as this matter has been before the city council a number of times in the past several months, I have made an effort to attempt to crystalize the various possible actions- which tl-~e city council might take with respect to the issue. The various actions are indicated in the following list of five alternatives: 1. Decide to retain existing equipment which would potentially limit opportunities for service improvements and economies in the future. 2. Authorize the city manager to readvertise for bids for equipment based on slightly .revised specifications and bidding procedures . 3. Authorize the city manager to select a consultant and prepare a tentative agreement for council consideration which would provide for an examination and analysis of the city's existing data processing • system and for preparation of specifications and-supervision of taking of new bids for equipment. 4. Authorize the city manager to select a consultant and prepare a tentative agreement for council consideration which would provide -for preparation of specifications and supervision of taking of new bids for equipment. ' . ~:ouncii 1,etter 1vo. ~4~ -z- July 28, 1975 ~~ '' 5. Authorize the city manager to readvertse for bids with the understanding that a consultant, would be retained to review .the city's specifications and assist in making changes if any were required . It is requested that the city council take action on this matter so that the city staffcan either plan its work within the capabilities of the existing system or proceed as rapidly as possible toward acquisition of new equipment. Respectfully submftted, r ~. Wayne S.. Burggraaff . City Manager WSB/eja • ~ . Y ~ ~. ~ r /'~ .~:.~ .. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No . 2 2 5 Agenda -July 14, 1975 Deferred July 2 8 , 19 7:5- The Honorable Mayor and Members- of the City Council: -City of Richfield Gentlemen: `Subject: Information on Retaining a Consultant to Examine -the City's Data Processing System -The purpose of this council letter is to provide information requested by the, city council on retention of a consultant to examine the city's automated data processing system. Background Information ~. $ ~ . On March 10, 1975 the city council authorized the city manager to request bids to purchase new equipment for the purpose of upgrading the city's exist- ng computer system. The city. has lea sed a computer system since 19 69 . In examing the city' s need for data-processing service and improvements that have occurred within the industry, it was determined that the city could upgrade .the present. system to a random access disc type system and at the same time reduce costs of the system`s operation. The upgrading of the computer system would provide the city. with additional information storage and an instant retrieval process. Information was presented to the city council which indicated that by purchasing the equipment proposed there would be a total savings of more than $6, OOO during the first five years when the equipment was being amori- tined, and an annual savings of more than $21, 000 after the first five years . At a time when budgets are very tight and the .city is restricted in its ability to levy, it appeared to the city staff that the purchase of equipment with resultant savings in this magnitude indicateda very substantial increase in productivity through .improved technology. On March 24, 1975 three bids were received and on April 14, 1975 the city manager- recommended that the city council approve. the low bid from Data/3 ~~ Computer Corporation in the a mount of $ 7 2 , 9 64 which was three percent under. the s^ City Council ,Letter No. 225 ~ _2_ July 14, 1975 estimated cost of this equipment. While three bids were received, some companies indicated to the city council that. they were either unable to bid equipment. based on the city's specifications; had inadequate time to bid, or were not aware. of the opportunity to bid. The city council considered the city manager's recommendation and the complaints from bidders and made a decision to reject all bids . , _ ', In subsequent discussions of this matter the city manager recommended that the city council authorize the taking of new bids for this equipment. However, .Mayor Law suggested that perhaps it might be desirable for the city to retain a consultant to examine the city's automated data processing system and the need for equipment to operate that system. In accordance with the Mayor's suggestion., the city .council asked the staff to obtain information as to what it might cost for a consultant to examine the city's data processing system and hardware needs. Scope of Services It has been difficult to obtain specific information in. accordance with the _ city council's request since there is a great variety of work which a consultant could do on a data processing system. Inasmuch .s the city council did not indicate the specific type of consulting service which they would like to consider, thestaff made an arbitrary decision to include .the following general items in the scope of services which we used when visiting with consultants: . ~~ . 1. Examine present data processing system and applications and determine potential future use of data processing service - for the next five years in the city organization. 2, .Develop equipment requirements and prepare bid specifications including a definition of how bids will be evaluated. 3. Hold prebid meetings with interested bidders. 4. Evaluate bids received . 5. Submit an independent recommendation to the city council for the award of a bid. ~ The overall objective of utilizing a consultant would be to follow the • initiative of the city staff in enhancing the city's technical capacity in the . data processing system and at the same time reducing operating costs. Council Letter No. 225 -3- July 14, 1975 Estimated Cost of Services , Inasmuch as we were only attempting to obtain general information and not seeking specific proposals for service, our conversations with potential consultants were of a general nature. However, ten consultants were contacted with four indicating that they worked mostly in the application of computer software.. The .remaining six consultants did indicate a qualification for examining overall systems and. designing .hardware requirements and evaluating bids submitted, For the -most part our discussions were conducted over the phone so that consultants have not fully examined -the city's system. However, they were advised as to the number of .programs which the city presently utilized,. the size of our. operation and the kinds of products produced by the system. - Those consultants contacted by the city indicated that fees ranged. from $200 to $500 per day .depending upon the- consultant and the type of service required. Most consultants indicated .that engagements of this nature re- quired ten-twenty days of consulting service. Thus; fees could range from $2; 000_ to $10, 000. Summary Council members will recall that the city staff has previously indicated that consulting services are not required for this particular project and that the recommendation of the city staff as indicated previously would be to authorize taking of bids again for equipment similar to that previously specified. However, if it is the decision of the city council to retain consulting ser- vices, then it would be appropriate for the city council to authorize the city manager to obtain formal proposals for such services and to negotiate a lent- ative contract to be submitted to the city council for consideration and action.. Respectfully sub ' ted, ~ `/~.~- A ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Finance Director _~ :: CITY CAF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City. Manager Council Letter loo. 246 ,; Agenda ,July 28, 1975 A The Honorable Mayor a nd Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Status Report on Purchase of Property at 6444 22nd Avenue At the June 9,.197.5. city council meeting the city council authorized the purchase of :property at 6444 22nd Avenue for park purposes. The city council in this authorization provided that the maximum purchase- price would be $20,400 unless the city attorney could negotiate a lower figure and also stip- ulated that special assessments and taxes would be paid by the seller. The .city attorney has negotiated the final- purchase of this property with the cast to be approximately $20,825 dependir_g upon closing date. In effect, i the city attorney has been able to negotiate a lower price, except for the fact . that there now exists unpaid specials in the amount of $9.50 on this property which did .not exist when negotiations for the purchase of this property were initiated. The bulk of the unpaid special assessments represent costs for street improvements which resulted from special assessment hearing actions taken by the city council late last year. A copy of a letter from the city attorney's office outlining the proposed agreement is attached. The letter details the nature of the agreement and the approximate maximum cost of $20, 825. Although the maximum cost exceeds. the figure specified by the city council in the amount of $425, it is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of this property as outlined in the attached July 15, 1975 letter from the city attorney. ' ~ Respectfully submitted, 1~ ~ • Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja _ - . cc: City Attorney Park and Recreation Director Finance Director LAW OFFICES i LEFEVERE, LEFLER, HAMILTON AND PEARSON ~, .1100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING CLAYTON L LEFEVERE ~RBERT P. LEFLER MINNEAPOLIS, IvIINNES OTA 55402 TELEPHONE fff )SEPH E. HAMILTON (61.2}333-0543 CURTIS A. PEARSON - p -. J. DENNIS O'BRIEN - July 15,. 1775 JOHN E. DRAW2 .JOHN B. DEAN DAVID J. KENNEDY ~ ~ ~ ''3 WARREN. R. SAG STU EN a 1=~ '{i GLENN E. PURDUE - ~ ~ ~~~ Y ~ t: WILLIAM E. FLYNN (1 ~~ ~ . DAVID J. BUTLER ~ ~ U ~(~' 1 JAMES D. CARSON tt''p~ [ ~V~ ~a ~7~J kichfiield City (~~ar~~ger • Mr. Wayne S. Burggraaff - City.Manager.`. City of Richfield -f 6700. Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 5:5.423. Re: Property at '6444 >22nd Avenue South Dear T~Tayne • Mr. Laxman Sundae. came into: our office last. Friday fore the. purpose of discussing the. proposed sale of the above property to the City'. • Mrs Sundae. met with Mr. Le~'evere and myself and agreed to accept the following offerF if sash were made. by the city: Purchase price - $19,650.00 Taxes adjusted as of date - 'Tax rate is approx- of closing mately $50.00 per •~ month City would pay unpaid - This is approximately specials: $950.00 City would pay for - This is approximately abstract continua- $25.00 ...:tiara Thus, if the. closing were to occur on September l,-.1975 the cityts.costs would be approximately $20,825.00.. .The proposal which was recently presented to the City Council would-.have resulted in a cost to the city of approximately $21,435.00 with the same assumptions. It, should `be noted that any rents due from the tenant after the. date of closing would be assigned to the city. The< property rents on a monthto month basis with rent at $180.00 per `month. This' would be of special importance. if the city . decided not to act. i~t~nediately to demolish the structure. then the city does move to demolish the stCUCture it might be possible either to sell the ho~.s.~ for relocation elsewhere or to recover some salvage value from. demolition. y ' LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, HAMILTON AND PEAR50N Mr. Wayne S. Burggraaff .July 15, 1975; Page 2 .The new proposal should,• if action on it is desired., be taken to the City Council for its approval and authority to 'enter into .I a purchase agreement. I am enclosing a copy of our draft of the purchase agreement. . If you have any questions, please 'advise. Yours. very truly, ~ hn B.-Dean JBDsnj enclosure ~. ,I ;~ ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager. - Council Letter No. 245 <. • Agenda July 28, 1975 . The Honorable. Mayor . ' and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen .Subject; Discussion of Archery Courts at Legion Lake Requests have- been received by the city staff for an area which could be used as an archery court. It has been determined that it would be possible to use land at Legion Lake along 66th Street to accomodate 4-6 archery. tar- gets . - The Legion Lake site would be setup perpendicular to 66th Street which would provide sufficient open space and visibility. Tie north-south range would be established with a maximum 60 yard shooting distance which would still provide'adequate safe area behind the targets . The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission has recommended approval ~. of an archery range at this location. No cost would be involved in this project except for installation of the targets. It is recommended that the city council approve this project so that the program could be initiated yet this year. Respectfully submitted, ~. Wayne S. Burggraaff .City Manager W SB/ej a cc; Acting .Park and Recreation Director Public Safety Director ~, ry .. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . Office of _City Manager Council Letter. No. 244. "Agenda July 28, .1975 The Honorable Mayor and . i ~. Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen• Y Sub2ect: South Hennepin FIuman Services Council Presentation Mr. Phillip Riveness, Executive Director of the South Hennepin Human Services Council, ryas requested an opportunity to make ~a presentation to the city council at the July 28, 1975 city council meeting. The purpose of this presentation is to convey to city council members proposals for future firi] ncing of SHHSC as described in his attached letter. ~A two page summary of the SHHSC budget is also attached. more detailed documentation is available in my office for anyone interested in this material. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager W SB/e; a cc: Environmental Health Director 6401 France Avenue South • Edina, Minnesota 55435 • Phone 920-1194 • - Serving: • Bloomington Eden Prairie Edina Richfield • July 24, 1975 • Mr. Wayne Burggraaff City Manager, City of Richfield • 6700 Portland .Ave.-So. Richfield, .Minn. 55423 Dear Mr. Burggraaff: .The Board of the SHHSC requested that I apprise you and your Council of Hennepin County's recent policy decision: regarding Community Boards. Enclosed is a copy of the Guidelines for County Funding of Community Boards .and our letter of response to Hennepin County. . Following our response to Hennepin County and a series of discussions on the subject of municipal match, the County altered its municipal match requirement. The adjusted County policy calls for a 10% municipal match, in 1976 (hard or in kind), 20% in 1977 (hard match only) and 35% in 1978 and there- after. The County Commissioner did suggest that the 20% re-- quirement for 1977 would be open to discussion. Our total budget request to Hennepin County, for 1976, is $112,111. Of that amount, $51,111 is for the non-direct sexvices support of the SHHSC (the remainder is for the support of the South. Hennepin Individual and Family Counseling Service). It is for this portion of the budget that the County is request-- ing a local match of 10% in 1976. Based on the 1970 Census for the. South Hennepin area, this amounts to 2.8~ per capita. Rich- field's estimated proportionate share would be $1,329 in 1976. Page 2 (Cont.) Mr. Burggraaff • _ I am enclosing a copy of our 1976 Budget proposal as re- quired by the Joint Fowers Agreement. I would appreciate your sharing this information with your Council. I am available for any clarification you may require, and-will keep you apprised of any future developments. Sincerely, hill~`~.T. Riveness Executive Director _ PJRs jp .. Dr. James Weichers Associate Administrator - _, Health and Social Services 2037 .Administrative Tower Henn. Cty. Government .Center - Mp1s., Minn. 55487 - Dear Dr. Weichers: , The Executive Board, of the South Hennepin HuTnan.Services (t nT711 f`1 1 _ Fla4 ~-la lY aT nr~r~nrtiini t-~f to rosfi oT.f i-i~o ry fii no i _r.nn .ter .. te.__ j ~ _.. y County Funding of Com,:nunity Boards, that your office has developed. We are especially pleased that an effort .has been.. -made. to delineate the emerging role of Community Boards.. We are convinced what the payoff, in terms of more appropriate. and acceptable services., will be increasingly evident in our four city area. ' The-first three implementation guidelines are consistant with the posture that the SHHSC has assuraed for some time. We - recognize the utility of a multi-service orientation-, the necessity for limiting the number of Community Boards in each planning area, and the advantages and credibility of a Joint Powers A-gr~emFnt. We would like to .discuss further, our future monitoring and evaluation role of direct services.-. -Stem four, of the implementation guidelines, however, which prelates to the question of municipal participation for our non- . ..direct service budget, is-not as supportable as the others. We were-apprised by you, some time ago, about the possible advantage of soliciting financial support by the municipalities for some aspect of our activities. We were quite surprised, •. .~ Page' 2 (Cont . ~ . Dr. Weichers however, at the nature and magnitude of financial support, that the guidelines would require.. " We were originally assured that municipal match would not be ~~_': a requirement, since the nature of .the. human services problems we have-been addressing,. and anticipate addressing in 1976, have not been the responsibility of municipal government. The. .South Hennepin cities, in varying degrees,, have indicated an increasing sensitivity,to the human service needs of their residents, and have responded~by allocating funds for health care, youth counseling, senior citizen programming, chemical dependency counseling, recr`ational programming for the mentally retarded -and other human services.- Other responses include. ordinance changes and special- use permi s to accommodate residential programs, the elimination of physical barriers for the disabled and housing for low-income and elderly persons. The cities have not, ho~~ever assumed responsibility for planning,. providing and coordinating a continuum of care for persons who are mentally i11, mentally retarded,. chemically dependent, youth in need of out-cf-home' . ~ 5G'1.Vlt:cS, 1.'J ~1-1124 U1UC ,, t.''LCr.. .7 Ulal - d41. 1~r1 ~.1GO, d~L ~i.11.7 ~v 1~1~ it1 time, are still considered the responsibility of Hsnnepin County. The municipalities also have some real limitations on their ability 'to support the.SH.FISC financially., The cities, as you know, are circumscribed by levy limitations:. The impact of increases in '" property valuation is .reduced by the Fiscal Disparity Agreement. The South t3ennepin area currently provides the Metro .region with. - I4 million dollars of additional revenue under the terms of the Agreement. The SHHSC is prepared to. encourage the four municipalities to make some contribution to the non-direct service portion of our budget.. The Joint and Cooperative Agreement, under which we operate, provides for voluntary financial participation by the municipalities, -although it clearly states that no party shall be required to -~ provide funds. The progressive level of funding, required by the ..proposed guidelines, does not seem to reflect the County's primary responsibility for meeting human services needs, or take into account the fiscal limitations that have been imposed on the cities. - The SHIISC has been an integral part of the evolvement of the concept of Community Boards. We have been encouraged by the County's commitment to community participation, and feel that the !-Ic~a;th~ & Sc~ci~ ervices i ' .Administrative Tower ` _ . _w__-__ ....~__ Telephone .348-1f 306 ' ''+ __ t _ _ ..:{~!'. = ~ ~~~€ t! ~~~rf ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~! June 19, 1975 ~. i i Mr. Phillip J. Riveness, Director South Hennepin Human Services Council 6401 France Avenue South Hinneap.olis, Tiinnesota 55435 Dear Phil: As you know, for ti?e past few months, staff in Health and Social Services Admini.stYation have been developing a set of guidelines for County funding of community boards to reflect the policy direc-~- tion expressed by the Board cf:Ccinmissioners. -That task has now been i:OiTipiC:teu aii'.e i:,.te ei?~~.GSeCt_ eulCic.! ~.iz--~ :tavc e~uGtl ii Tiai'iliuii~Siy ! > approved by the Health and Social Services Committee of the County Board. The guidelines will also be reviewed by the full Board~of Commissioners, and it is conceivab]_e that some minor modificaticr_s might occur after tliat scrtitin3r; bur. we will be using the guidelines in the development of 19%6 budgets and work plans for community boards. 1 I would also like to inform you that, for 1976, your agency's budget .will be transferred from the r?1/~2/CL budget to Health and Social Services Administration. W~~ feel that this is more appropriate for the kind of activities performed by. your agency and Board, and :ill . permit a broader focus than is possible tinder Consultation and Edu- cation funding through LR/hR/CD. We have recewed your 1976 program and budget proposal and, following staff review, will be requesting a mee*_3_ng to discuss the questions of funding and work plans.- Requests for: direct service funds (such as scheduled and unscheduled intervention) should continue to be channeled through the County departmeriL- respon,ible for. funding the service (M}i/riR/CD, Welfare, etc.). I wou]_d appreciate your sharing these ..items with your Board and staff. If you have any questions about either the funding guidelines Nennepin County is an Allirm~tive Action Employer ~..... ' . _..._. :... ~.. ,. _ . _ _ _ .. _ .. s Page 2 - Mr. Phillip J. Riveness ~ June 19, 1975 • or the 1976 budget process, please contact Phil Eckhert in the Office of Planning. and Develapment.(3.48-4466). He will be serving as the County's liaison with South Hennepin for program and budget purposes., - ~ Sincerely., r, `James E.. k7iechers, Ph. D. Associate County Administrator ~. 1h I enc cc Mrs. June Schmidt, Chairman, South Hennepin Human Services Board Hennepin'County Board of Commissioners H. Leonard Boche, :ZH/MR/CD Department Jean Burhardt, Office of Planning and. Development ~ ~ ' ~t-` o ~ - . GUIDELINES .FOR COUfdTY FUNDI~~dG OF COMMUNITY BOF~RDS The following~is a set of implementation guidelines for the establishment and funding of Community Boards within Hennepin County. 1. Effective January 1, 1976 all county funded comm~- pity boards will have amulti-purpose, human service orientation (as opposed. to addressing a single . disability or target group such as mental health or chemical dependency). To reflect this broader focus, County funding of community boards will be . ~ through Hennepin.,County Health and Social Service Administration. The exception to this rule will be for the funding. of direct services as required by other county departments and .providing that .these services are consistent withiterrl five . of these guidelines. . _ 2. Not more than ane Community Board will be funded . ~ within each of the County planning areas. .The ..County will not recognize any groups within the planning areas in the City of Minneapolis anti l City discussions regarding the Citizen Advisory Committee plan have been .resolved and a framework for.City-County relationships established. 3. Community Boards will not be eligible for County funding until they have been. endorsed by munici- palities within the planning areas-via Joint .Powers agreements. / r.:.- ~ `~_~_ 1;?7"~;i~r"',l. C=E> .rye ~ ----- '~ C}~~par,,., n~ __ - prgani zati o~~ pUG2 ; 19'l6 SU'w'J1:_:O~t OF" ~.C7?'JITiCS i SH~iSC ~,~______ _~ -------------1-'--__ ...."~ . ~ ~ - 1974 1975 1976 "st of rctivities n •,i_"1 ~~a~i cnc.ver 1 rog. c~• St:b-Progr~^~s ~2`/c~ 1S iC'~/::5~~ ______ f ~iC_t'.1c7~ 4 -..._~ -. ; ----- ~_,._._ _~- -~,'~`'~J,n~ ~?cc~u~st ~, ~~.nn 594.964.00 $125,711.00 ~.......,-~•---- G.I'•'"~~ "l;~G_T ~:=SSi.SS ~U''r~~ VE~r ` -•-r------' . ~ ~ . Health ~i.r,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J I ;~'w •`,.~.•. MH~P4R r P1"OCjI"i:'': CocJ~ ', "'"' -"' ~Zenn Human l f } !~~~.- -:._.. ~..•I. South ePin ~SHHSC { r' ~; 'i~s~.r~i.r..~-s--C.ca:anc _...__.._.r r ~;lses to titi~ qt:~s ti o~-~s 1 ~ s'~'~ -- ~ r ~ •-•~~ J;?n ~j d '.';1 fll'..;1"1, ?'L~ i. -z 11CCC:S,S ,•1,. i Ti •4. ~:.~ ~~-. - a :r 1 ,, - :~_ ~rstr~~sti~~r.,. t,se ad~i .. p., ." .. Overview. of Entire Program The SHHSC has evolved~`in 1974 as a visible and credibheoi~anoU~er of . change in the South Herrepin area. Drawing or. treement,gbetween the unique mandate from the.-Joint and Cooperativand9Richfield, we have become :cities of Eloomington, Edina, .Eden Prairie,. -i creasingly seen as a model for community input and coordination in the n - delivery of human services, - - the past-year, will be The contacts that the SI~ISC has made ir, - :..particularly advantageous in-the future, old andldeliberately.putiaeuhave . :our present and future objectives vigorou y .established a base of community knowledge and expertise gnat provides 'an excellence frame of reference'for entertaining new service proposals.. We are increasingly-seen by agencies, governs'`e~bsentninStheapastS~mOur as a coordinating link that wds conspi.-~-ously continzzed role in the South Hennepin area lends further credence ao Hennepin.-County's commitment to increase citizen-participation in • - -program. planning. . onti Hued ope_ation of .the South ~~errepir. i TYie dest~ablishr~ent and c . Individual and Family Counseling Serv~ca~eaas `~e~irten~dritorcontinoue~P a vital and appropriate service in ou . the Counseling Service, to•.insure that i.t ~ monitoring- ~arid evaluating ro riate to - remains a dynamic resource in the .South Hennepin area, app P the changing.. needs of our communities-. ~ ' The increase in ,our .purchase of service request, whic1Jneranc~51pate . renewing with Family &,Children's Service, reflects inflat Y increases. ~ ~de•. have found it • necessary- to request f aodd~.budget, sinorder person; in~t'ne Consultation and Education-portior? :• - ' to achieve- the objectives -of• a. comprehens-ive. ~ao~k plan- - - We are . acrain grateful to Fairview S~outhda•le Hospital ~ for providing ' h of.f ice ~ space, furnishing :and accounting. services, aft a miriima•1 us wit .cost. This significant contribution pe entsexam~lehofacomrr-unityhsupnort. costs dawn to • a m~.nymurn and. is ari excell .P ~, . - -~ ~ ~- •-. : ~., . • .. - -• .'•: "-- ions ar><d intentions. We feel that our 1976 . objectives . complement. the' p of Hennepin•.Courity and will result in new level.s~ of collaboration in ' addressing. comritun~.ty needs :. -.. ~ : • ,~ _a ~ , : ~ . .. - -.. .. • ~. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office. of City Manager 243 No tt l . er Le Counci ....Agenda July 28, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and -" Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen; _Subject: F~equest from James Hansen Relative to Monooe Park Development Mr. James Hansen representing West Richfield Girls Softball, has requested the opportunity to appear before the city council to discuss de- velopment of Monore Park. Council members will recall that the adopted capital improvement program provides -for development of this park together with Fairwood .Park in 1978. . ~ Information which Mr. Hansen has prepared relative to his request is attached. If Mr. Hansen is seeking a change in the constr~rction schedule. for . Monroe Field it would be appropriate for -the city council to refer this matter to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and to the Planning Commission since recommendations on the revised 1976/81 capital improvements are in the process of being prepared. In view of. other present scheduling and. priorities of other projects, it would be difficult and would involve adjustments on other projects if the Monroe Field project were scheduled for a time earlier than 1978. However, it may be possible to do some temporary work involving just a few hundred dollars which would help the West Richfield Girls Softball group to meet the needs for facilities prior to the time that Monroe-Fairwood is re- developed in 1978. If the city council would like to pursue the alternative of some temporary work it is recommended that the city council request Mr. Hansen to meet with the city staff to discuss this- matter so that arrangements to do this work could be made in conjunction with the 1976 budget. Respectfully submitted, ~ Wayne S. Burggraa.ff ~., - ~ . ~~ity Manager WS13/eja cc: Acting Park. and Recreation Director Finance Director CITY OF RICHrIELD, MINNESOTA Office.: of City Manager Council Letter No. 242 Agenda July 28, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council .City of. Richfield Gentlemen: Subject; Issuance of Permanent Licenses to Richfield Lanes On a number of occasions the city council has considered the question- of whether to issue various licenses to Richfield Lanes, 6449 LyndaLe Avenue. The most recent date that this matter was considered was the June 23, 1975 city council meeting . At that time the city council acted to revoke the food and food fleet license and the two beer licenses, but authorized the city manager. to issue provisional temporary licenses for these purposes when the basic sanitary. requirements were met. The city council further provided that this matter be considered again at the second council meeting in July to .determine if permanent licenses should be issued. Falio~,n~ing the June 23 meeting the provisional licenses were issued when it was determined that basic sanitary requirements had been met. In prep-ar- atian for the July 28, 1975 consideration of this item, an inspection was made of Richfield Lanes on July 23, 1975. A copy. of a~ memorandum from the Environmental Health Director detailing the results of this inspection is attached. Review of the attached memorandum indicates that a number of the required improvements have been made, but that certain other improvements and corrections have still not been completed . In view of the fact that a number of the improvements have been made and that less- than half of the license- .year remains, it is recommended that the city council issue the permanent licenses. However, it should be emphasized to the - applicant that issuance of the permanent licenses does not relieve him of the responsibility to make the additional corrections and improvements required for minimum code compliance. City Council Letter No. 242 -2-• July 28, 1975 ,~ , . ~ CITY QF RICHFIELD, .MINNESOTA ©ffice of Environmental Health.Director ro City Manager aaTe July.25, 1975 FROM Environmental Health Director sue~~cs Richfield Lanes, 641+9 Lyndale Avenue An inspection-was. made of Richfield~Lanes on Wednesday, Ju1.y.23, 1975 to determine if compliance had been made of previous orders. In the letter of .February 21, 1975 to Arnold Gleason, a copy was.alsosent to Mr. E. G. Ege of the Calhoun .Realty Company, representative for~Kenneth Agar, present .owner of the Richfield Lanes. The completion date for remodeling was set for August 1, 1975, with the exception of the installation of a new floor covering in the food preparation area, which was to be completed by February 1, 1976. Mr. Agar agreed to comply with those. requirements. Quarry. tile. has been installed in the food preparation:area more than six months before the due date. Marlite has been installed on the wall: surfaces: of the food preparation areas and a new food service counter area. has. been provided. Some old equipment has been removed. The new decor has improved the appearance of the b'Gsiness. The toilets have new lighting and the exhaust fans repaired. Steps and other areas have been painted or were in the process of being painted. There are, however, some other problems which ~rere not corrected as noted at the time of-the inspection. Makeup air has not .been provided. Ceiling the has not been provided in .the food preparation area. Food vehicles used for.hoine delivery have not beeiz identified ' so that they can.be inspected and approved for that use. Light bulbs have not -.been provided for'the Superior refrigerator. Rubber .seals have not been properly glued or .sealed in .the other refrigerator. Approved locker. facilities have not .:been-provided for employees. The pizza oven is still in need of repair. .There are other minor problems which have not been corrected. O -~.~ ~ ~v I. F. Roesler /(/ ~ // y,. ' \ Environmental Health Director ~/Ch C '~~~ jU ~~ \ ~~o~Q, 9>S IFR:ml C/~~~ ~a~@/' '~ ~~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~' Council Letter No'. '241 Agenda: July 28, 1'975 The Honorab e Mayor and Members of-the City. Council City of Richfield Gentlemen; Subject: Proposed City Charter Amendment At .the .May 12, 1975 city council-meeting first: reading consideration wa-s. given to amendments by ordinance to the city charter. Inasmuch as 'the. ordinance amendment which was .considered by<the city council at that meeting was n- complete, the Charter Commission re-submitted a draft of the proposed ordinance amendment and first reading consideration was approved at he May 22, 1.975. city council meeting. - - The attached ordinance amendment relates to. .changes in the areas 'or primary elections, nomnation'by petition and canvass ofelections, As council members will recall, the proposed amendments are supported 'by the charter commission. The ordinance is before the city council for second reading consideration.. :Respectfully submitte , l • Wayne.. Burggraaff • _City Manager WSB/eja cc: City Attorney • `, R 4`.. ~ ~ Bill No~. 1975-•12 . •Transitory Ordinance No. 16.33, Charter ,. - ~ ~ Amendment Ordinance No. 3. '~• • AI~T OItDIIQANCE +- . ~ . • ... . Relating to Flectians; Changing , - the<Date for the. City Primary Election; Changing Filing. Dates .. • ~ and Changing the Time During ' ~6~hich the .Canvass of Votes shall . be Completed; .Amending Sections ~ _ -. •. 4.02, 4.04 and ~.0? of the .. . - . ~ . Richfield City Charter . ~ ,. ~ ~ _ " CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: - - Section 1. The Richfield City Chartex',. Section 4.02 is amended to read: - - ~ - . - - "4.02. Primary Elections. [On Tuesday four weeks in ad- :~ vance of the] On the first Tuesday after the second Alonday in - Sentemb_er preceding the regular municipal election there shall .beta primary election for the selection of two nominees for -each elected office at the regular municipal election unless - no mare than two nominees file for each elective office. The .-;~ city clerk shall give at least two weeks previous notice of - • ~ the. time aced place of holding such election and of the offir_ers - to be-elected by posting in at least one public place in each • ~votirg precinct and by publication at least once in the official - newspaper, but failure to give such notice shall not invalidate such election." :` ~ -. Section 2. The Richfield City Charter, Section 4.04,.is amended to read: . . ~ - "4.04.- Nominations by peti.tion.. All candidates for elective office provided for. by-this charter shall be nominated • by petition. The name of any registered voter of the city shall ,. --be printed upon. the ballot as a candidate for an office whenever .:a petition signed by at. least ten registered voters has been . filed with the city clerk in his behalf at least [eight] two ~-.weeks before.the municipal primary election date provided in . Section 4. 02. [regular municipal election]." ~ ~ _ _'- ~ Section 3. The Richfield City .Charter, Section 4.07, is amended ~~ to read "4.07. Canvass of elections. .The council. shall meet and canvass the elccti.an returns [within five days after] at the ne:ct reglr:Lar- or. special: rou?ZC:i.l l:l^E_t]_ng irlr.;ec'.iat:ely foll.owine~ ~.ny recJul~zr, prirn~~r:y> OI: Sp~'C:1~:.~. C~C'l':i:l.',Ie but _i.n _n0_eVCnt 1_a_ce?~ t:han_ t:he I`i0ildily' reE~xt following, acid shall make %tll.l, declaration of. the re:~u~-ts a~' soon as possible, and file. a statemox~t tlze:re:of with the city clerk. ' a • .. • ,. _ ..: :' • ~ ~~ ~,Chis. stai:ement shall include: (a) the total number of good ballots cast; (b) the total number. of spoiled or defective ballots; (c) tp;~, •. true vote for each candidate, .;with an inc~S.catian of those who ~~~er e _ . elected or nominated; (d) a true copy of the ballots used; (e) the names of the judges and clerk of election; and (f) much other in- ' f ormation as may. seem pertinent. ~'he city clerk shall forttiwitli notify all persons elected or ;nominated of their election or nomination. Tn ease of a tie vote, the council sha11 determine- the result by lot. TFe city lerk shall•be the. final. custodian I of the ballots.' • Section. 4, Subject to tal , e provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 410..12, Subdivision 7 ~ this ordinance is effective 90 days after its publication, or on ~Tanuary 1, 1976, whichever ~s later.. ' i i I fol ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office: of City Manager ~, Council Letter No. 240 :Agenda July 28, 1975. The 'Honorable Mayor azd Members ofthe City Council ...City .of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request from john H. Langer Attached is a letter from Mr. John Langer, President of Korner Plaza, Inc. requesting the opportunity to speak at the July 28, 1975 city council meeting. Initially: the city had required Mr. Langer to install ventilating fans in bathrooms in his store which are presently'.not ventilated in any way. Mr. Langer had requested an opportunity to appeal this. requirement before the Board of Building, Health and`Fre Appeals. Subsequent to the city is uing the<requirement for the installation of the fans it has'been determined that city codes do not provide a basis by which the city can make such a requirement and Mr. Langer's request for an appeal is therefore--moot. He has nevertheless requested an opportunity to speak to the city council: regarding enforcement of health and fire codes.. Respectfully submitte Wayne Burggraaff City Manager W SB/e j'a ~~ ~ -~ Pt u IN THE HUB SHOPPING CENTER ' ~ a--. -~F=~ ~;~ ~~-~'~.p ~'j 66TH & NICOLLET AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 5.5423 - __ July 21, 1975 City of Richfield. Wayne S. Burrggrath, City Manager '6700 Portland Ave. So. Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Gentlemen: On July ~, 1975 by certified mail we filed notice of appeal from that Notice of June 5th 1975 by Bruce Nordquist, Health Inspector. .This appeal was to the Richfield Board of Building, Health and Fire Appeals. - If you should. drop the above charges cir not place the hearing on the .Council Agenda for the meeting of July 28th, 1975, T wish to • ~ request your placing John H. Langer, President of Korner Plaza on the -July 28th 1975 meeting to present a short statement regarding the enforcement of Health and Fire Codes.' V t my yo s, OHN H. LANGE , PRESID KORNER PLAZA, IATC. JHL:HH CCz MAYOR.LAW CITY COUh~CIL -- JUL ~1 1975 Richfiield City Manager 8Gb-5071 ~i ~~ r~.~, CIT_ Y OF .RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 239' Agenda July 28, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and- Members of the City Council :City. of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Release of Off-Street Parking Contract Bond On the_July 28, 1975 city council agenda there will be ,a resolution. re lating to he release of bond covering an off-street parking .contract for Mark Z. Jones II . Thee-property: involved is a 19 unit apartment building located at 7:500 Cedar Avenue. The public works department has inspected this property and confirmed that the requirements of the off-street parking contract have been met. It is recommended that the bond be released. ' Respectfully submitted, f~, ~. 1;.- I"'r V~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City. Manager WSB/eja ' cc: Public. Works Director -,..-. .~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION. RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND ON OFF-STREET PARKING Mark Z. Jones II 5290 Villa Way, Minneapolis Location: 7500 Cedar A:-enue South Use: One 19 Unit Apartment Building .a ' WHEREAS, Mark Z. Jones II, 5290 Villa Way, Minneapolis, Minnesota, had an ~~ .~~ off-street parking agreement with the City of Richfield, relating to 7500 Cedar Avenue South, which contract bears the designation of Contract No. 2047 and which contract was guaranteed by a bond of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, in the amount of $6,500.00, and WHEREAS, Mark Z. Jones II has complied with the provisions of said agreement and the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland now seeks to be relieved of any further obligation under said bond, and WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring~Mark Z. Jones II to continue to provide a bond for security on the performance of said agreement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: That the city manager is hereby authorized and directed to release the FidF~lity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland for any-and all acts of Mark Z. Jones II, committed or incurred in violation of Contract No. 2047 on and after the 28th day of July, 1975 Adopted by the City. Council of the City of Richfield this 28th day of July, 1975• ATTEST: Loren L. Law Mayor Thomas J. Moran City Clerk {..._ ~a ;/' CITY OF RIC~-iFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter. No. 23$ Agenda July 28, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of .Richfield Gentlemen: Subject; Ordinance Amendment Relating to Possession or Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places At the request of the city council the city attorney has prepared the attached ordinance amendment relating to the consumption of alcoholic beverages. The proposed amendment provides for the following two changes: 1 . It would remove the offense of public intoxication from the ordinance, since public intoxication was eliminated as a crime by state statute in 1972 . •~ 2. It would make the` possession or consurription of any alcoholic beverage, in city parks or other public places illega'1. The current prohibition extends only to intoxicating liquor. This proposed amendment is being presented ;for first reading consideration. Respectfully submitted, ~.. ~~ V1Tayne S. Burggraaff _ City Manager WSB/eja ~ ~ ~ ~ ~( ~C~ • AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER X, PART III, SECTION 10.1b OF THE ORDINANCE _ CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA .CITY OF RICHFIELD .DOES ORDAIN: • Chapter X, Part IIT,. Section 10..16, Subd. 5 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota making the consumption and possession of alcoholic beverages a misdemeanor offense is hereby amended as follows: "Subd. 5. Public [Intoxication or] Possession or Consumption of Alcoholic ~3everages. [Whoever appears in an intoxicated condition or] Any person who consumes or possesses intoxicating liquor as. defined by Minnesa'ca Statutes Section 30.07, Subd 2 or non-intoxicating malt l~.quor as defined • ~ b~ Minnesota Statutes Section 340.001, Subd. 2. while on a public street or other public place, or on any private property without the consent of the owner of such property, or while in a vehicle upon any public street." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of , 1975. _ Mayor- - Attest: City Clerk • • 111V i1V11VL~J IJ Lei 1Vl4r VL and' Members of ahe City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Traffic Automobile Noise ,: Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr: Donald J. Jacobson requesting an opportunity oappear at the July 28, 1975 city council meeting to discuss traffic .automobile noise and some. new regulations concerning such noise which he in- dicates may become effective in about a month. Mr. Jacobson resides on Fortland Avenue and has on many occasion .filed complaints with the city about automobile noise on Portland Avenue. >Last year • in response to his complaints, one of our police officers did use a noise meter and took several decibel readings indicating"automobile noise levels. However,. because of the fact that automobile noise on Portland Avenue is for the most part a function of general traffic noise:. and not noise connected with a specific vehicle, it has been extremely difficult to take the kind of action which Mr. Jacobson be- lieves would reduce ahe noise level. Respectfully submitted,. Qrs.. ~ w'_ HAF.L & SJO(~UIST. P. ®.. ALFRED E. HALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW PAUL L. SJOQUIST 12904 NICOLLET AVENUE DONALD A. JACOBSON gURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 TELEPHONE 894.1055 AREA CODE 612 r July 14, 1975 . D (~ (~ lam! ~~ ~~ JUL 7ES 1975 Mr. Wayne Burggraaff RIChf1E~t~ ~lty ~~t1agef City Manager of Richfield . 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Dear Mr. Burggraaff: This is a request that I be placed upon the agenda of scheduled appearances. before the City Council at the Richfield City Hall on July 28, 1975 for the 7:00 P.M. meeting. I would appreciate it if I could be number 1 or 2 on the agenda as I am planning to discuss the problems of noise pollution due to automobile traffic in Richfield, give and explain new regulations on noise pollution to the Council and request action in that area. • To be more specific, I live at 6436 Portland Avenue and have lived there for ten years. During that period. of time traffic- noise. has become steadily worse due to increased traffic, which nothing can be done about and noisy vehicles, which something can be done about. For all practical purposes, there has been no enforcement of existing laws on vehicle noise, although I have previously complained to the Richfield Police Department several times. - I have discussed this problem with Mr. A. B. Perez, Chief of Noise Pollution Control, of -the State of Minnesota Control Agency.. He has. informed me that new regulations, specifically NPC-4, will become effective. in approximately one month; There are absolute requirements in terms .of distance and noise level as measured upon a sound meter.. More important, his agency will shortly institute a training program for law enforcement officers. Mr. Perez has agreed to appear on the agenda with me to explain his agency and to provide copies of this regula- 'tion to all.. members of the Council. I am going to request the Council to direct that a man be trained under this program, and that ordinances and regulations • Mr. Wayne Burggraaff Page Two July 14, 1975 pertaining to vehicle noise: be enforced. Sincerely yours, ll'~!~,1~~Gt j~~~ti Donald A. acobson DAJ/sd cc: Mr. Loren Law, Mayor ~ City of Richfield Mr. A. B. Perez Chief of Noise Pollution Control Mr. I. F. Roesler Environmental Health Officer,. _ Richfield ~` CITY OF RICHFIELD,; MINNESOTA ..:..:Office of City Manager -Council Letter No. 236 Agenda July 2 $ , 19 75 The Honorable Mayor and Members: of the City Council City` of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject; Request, from Fireside Pizza for Adoption of .City Ordinance Regulating Wine Licenses Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr. David Miller representing. Fireside. Pizza. Mr. Miller is requesting that the .city council request the preparation of an ordinance which, _if adopted by he city council, would provide for the issuance of on-sale wine licenses in accordance with new legislation enacted by the State Legislature earlier this year. A copy of'the new legislation is attached for your. review. Previsions con-- cerning the on-sale wine licenses begin with Subdivision 20 on page 801. If the city `council wishes to provide an opportunity for local restaurants °to makeapplication for. wine licenses, the city attorney should be requested to `prepare an ordinance amendment to the .municipal code which would provide' 'for the- issuance of on-sale wine licenses"in accordance with the state iegis- la tion . \ Respectfully submitted, ~.~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager • WSB/eja cc: City A torney • June 30, 1975 Municipal F3uilding ~. 6700 P ortl and Ave . S o . Richfield, l~'Iinn. 5523 I~Zr. Burggraaff This. correspondence is being made to the-city of Richfield to show our interest in the new act recently past by the Minnesota . Legislature, allowing wine licenses to be issued.to restaurants which hold a 3.2 beer license.. Our restaurant Fireside Pizza, falls into this category. I have talked to the City Attorney and City P~Ianager and have been directed to write the Richfield Council 'to express our desire to obtain such a license. I am aware this is new leg- . islatian and steps must be taken by the City Council to include this new act as paxt of the cities laws, pertaining to the issuance of wine and beer licenses. T would appreciate any advice in regards to steps I must take in order to qualify for a license, after it has been enacted into the city ordinance. I am enclosing a copy of the act to which I have been referring, for the convenience of the council. Sincer . . ~~ David J. Mill r Fireside Pizza do/DJM ~ t~ l~J ~ ~ !Y! JlJ' ~ ~~75 r~ . Rtcnr~e~a l-ity manager ~- ~~1. 34Jr •~ 69th LEGISLATURE . • • • TING LI UOR-LICENSES-CITIES . INTOXICA @ .. CHAPTER 345 _ H.F.No17G - - - _ - - [Coded in Part] Aa Act relating to Intoxicating liquor; issuance of licenses by cities; •amend- lag Minnesota Statutes 1974, Sections 340.11, Subdivisions 7a, 18 and . ~ by adding subdivisions; 340.13, Subdivision 4; and 340.353, Subdivision 5; ropealing Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.11, Subdivisions 6 and 7. • - Ba it enacted by tke Legislature of the !State o~ bfinnesota: .. Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.11, is amended by adding ' ' a subdivision to read: ' ' Subd. 5a. Number of on-sate licenses. Except as provided in subdivision 18, or as otherwise provided by law, no on-sale licenses shall be issued in any city in excess of the following limitations, which shall apply equally to all cities regardless of whether a municipal liquor store is maintained: _ (s) In cities of the first class, one license may be issued for every 1,500 population, up to a maximum of 2001icenses. (b) In cities of the second class, not more than 18 licenses may be issued, plus one additional license for every 2,500 population in excess of X5,000. - (c) In cities of the third class, not more than 12 licenses may be issued. - . - {d) In cities of the fourth class, including •those cities whose acts of in- corporation arc repealed by Laws 1973, Chapter 123, Article V, Section 5, not more than seven licenses may be issued, ~ . . {e) In statutory cities of 5,000 to 10,000 population, not more than siz licenses may be issued. _ ~ {i) In statutory Cities of 2,500 to 5,000 population, not more than five ll- , tenses may be issued. (g) Ia statutory cities of 500 to 2,500 population, not more than four li- .eeases may be issued. (h) In statutory cities of under 500 population, not more than three licenses -• maybe issued. ' .. ,~ For purposes of this subdivision the term statutory city does not include those cities whose acts of incorporation are repealed by Laws 1973, Chapter 123, Article V, Section 5. For purposes of this subdivision population shall be determined by the ` most recent federal decennial census or by any special census taken pursuant _ . to law. , This subdivision shall not be construed to' increase or decrease the number ` . • _ o! on-sale licenses which may be issued in any municipality. _ ~ ~ . _ SeG 2. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.11, Subdivision 7a, is amended to read: _ . Subd. 7a. Annexation or consolidation. Except for the limitations ou • ownership of licenses imposed by section 340.13, subdivision 3, a license validly issued within the number prescribed by this section shall not be sub- sequentiy rendered invalid or illegal by reason of any consolidation or annexa- Lion of territory to a city, and may thereafter continue to remain in effect and be renewed.. Any such license which is located in territory which is annexed to or consolidated with a municipality which operates a municipal- ~ liquor store may thereafter continue in effect and be renewed, and the pro- ` • $0~ • - i 4 FIRST REGULAR SESSION ~CI~. 345 including restrictions and limitations, set forth in subdivision 5a and visions , -section 340.353, subdivision 5, shall not apply to the issuance or renewal of such licenses. Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.11, .Subdivision 18, is amended to read: _ • Snbd. 18. The governing body of any city, including statutory cities and Cities issuing "on-silo" licenses pursuant to section 3.40.3"x3 may issue "on- , sale" licenses in CXCeS3 of the number authorized by this section, upon au- thorization by the voters xf [hc municipality voting at a special election Called for such purpose or lit the geueral election in the municipality. Such ~ - governing body may by majority vote direct that the following question be placed on the' ballot at a special election called for such purposes or at a ~~ general election of the city: Shall the city council be allowed to issue `on- sale' licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor at retail in excess of the number now permitted by law?" If a majority of voters voting on the ques- • tion at such election vote in the affirmative, the governing body may issue _ "on-sale" licenses in such number as it shall determine without regard to xhe number authorized by this seMion. , Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 34011, is amended by adding a • subdivision to rnad: Snbd. 20. On-sale wine licenses. (a) "On-sale wine licenses" shall mean licenses authorizing the sale of wine not exceeding 14 percent alcohol by volume, for consu3nption on the licensed .premises only, in conjunction with • the sale of food. (b) For purposes of this subdivision "restaurant" shall mean an estab- , lishment, _under the control of a single proprietor. or manager, having appro- priate facilities for serving meals, and where, in consideration of payment -, therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and • which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service _ • to its guests. - which maintains a municipal liquor store or any unici alit ) An ~• ( p y y m e ' municipality or county authorized to issue "on-sale" licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor may issue on-sale wine licenses to any restaurant hav- ing facilities for seating not fewer than 25 guests at one time. The licenses shall be in addition to 'the number of on=sale licenses for the sale of intoxi- eating liquor authorized by the intoxicating liquors act.l The Pee for on-sale wine licenses shall be set by the issuing authority, but shall not exceed one half oP the license fee charged by the issuing authority for an on•sale license, or $2,000, whichever is less. Licenses issued pursuant to this sub- _ -- ••-division shall not be effective until approved by the commissioner. The licenses shall autLorize the s~ile of wine as herein provided on all days of the .week unless the. issuing authority restricts the license's authorization to • ~`~ the sale of wine on all days other than Sunday. ' < ~ '.. .. •1 E7 U.S.G.A. 4 201 et sea. - . - - .Sec. !'i. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.13, Subdivision 4, is amended • to read: • . Sabd. 4. Licenses .prohibited in municipalities having municipal stores _ tad limited to retailers. Except in the case of bona fide clubs and veterans' - ,organizations, as authorized by the last paragraph of section 340.11, subdivi- "sion 11, no "on-sale" or "off-sale" license, other-than a license issued purse- . tut to section 340.353, subdivision 5, shall be directly or indirectly issued in 'any city maintaining its own exclusive- liquor store, nor shall such license ` - be issued to a person who holds a manufacturer's or wholesaler's license issued pnraaant to any provision of chapter 340. - - ~~ ` ..., .. - ;_ ~..~ . • ~l. 34Jr - 69th LEGISLATURE. ~. Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.353 Subdivision 5 is amended , , . to read: , Snbd. 5. Issuance of Ilcenses to private persons. Clause 1. Notwithstand- ing any provision of chapter 340, which may indicate the contrary, any city owning. and operating a municipal liquor store on the effective date of this . act may, 'at the discretion of the governing body,. issue "on-sale" liquor li- censer to private persons for the operation of liquor stores in conjunction • with any establishment defined in section 340.07 as a hotel or restaurant and , the requirements of those definitions relating to seating capacity and the number ot_ guest rooms shall apply for purposes of this section. The city - Issuing any "on-sale" licenses pursuant to this subdivision may thereafter in Connection with the operation of the municipal liquor store continue to .engage in the sale of intoxicating liquor at either on-sale or off-sale, or both, or may resume operation of any municipal on-sale or off-sale store previously discontinued. . Clause 2. The number of "on-sale" licenses is.4ued pursuant to this secs Noa by any municipality shall not exceed the number authorized by section 340.11, .subdivision 5a ; provided, that the provisions of section 340.11 sub- , division 18, shall apply to any city issuing licenses pursuant to this section. • Clause 3. No city shall issue licenses as provided in this section until au- Niorized by the voters of the city noting on the question at a special election . Called for such .purpose, the election to be conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the :Minnesota election law. • Sec. Z Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 340.11, Subdivisions 6 and ? are , repCaled. ' • Approved June 4, 1975. - . . '. PUBLIC HEALTH-MATERNAL AND CHILD - NUTRITION ACT. , { .. . - CHAPTER 346 - :~ i ' • " . C d d ., .. [ o .. e ) _... ~... f• - - ; An Act relating to public health; providing nutritional supplements to. high • risk women and children; approprfatiag money. • Be tt enacted by the Legislature of the ,State of Minnesota - ~~ _ Section 1. ,~,, ' -•145.891 Short title ~ .: ,~.:: Sections 145.891 to 145.897 shall be known as the " t I . ' ma ernal and child nutrI- -Non act of 1975." ~ - - Sec..2. - . ~ ,{.- ... . !45.892 Definitions •. , r , Subdivision 1.. For purposes oP sections 145.891 to 145.897, the terms de- • fined in this section have th i ` . e mean ngs given them. - Subd. 2. "Local health agency" means the county public health nursi r: ng sere- ' ice or any public or private nonprofit organization which enters into a contract ` ~ ~ ' ' with the board of health pursuant to sections 145.891 to 145.897. , __ .:. 802 ~: CITY OF RICHFIELD, 1VIINNESOTA Office of City Manager. - Council''Letter No. 235 A enda jul 28 1975 • • g. Y :The Honorable 1Vlayor and Members of. the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: 1975 Street Saving Program On the July 28; 1975 city council agenda there is an item- providing-for. '`discussion of the treet width of 71st Street between South Lakeshore Drive and Knox Avenue. :.The city has received a petition signed by 2~ of .the residents Yn the vicinity of 71st Street between South Lake hove Drive and Knox Avenus. ;The petition re-' quests the city to install a street wider .than .the 24 .foot street that the city council approved on June 9 , 1975 The city council will recall the city council discussed this street on June 9, 1975. The city staff had indicated that the construction of a 32 foot street would require the removal of :12 trees and the installation of some retaining walls.. The .residents who had been contacted by the<city staff had indicated their desire to have a street narrower than the 32°foot proposed by the city staff. Attached is a copy of the petition received from the residents. .Respectfully submitted, . . ,.~ r- ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja 'cc: Public Works Director } ~~~ /! ' si~~ned property' owners in the vicinity of ?1st Street Yee s the undex b ox Ave: & 35'rt''object to the proposed na,rro.~rer width of 'Ilst between Yn . ro~pt review of the. matter: ~ J Street. '4~e therefore request a P ~ ~,1 ~~~.~`~? ~-- ,~ -e 7 ~ ~ ~ G% t ~;~ . ~ . _.~~.~ ~~ o~ ~~ ~~~ ~. , ~~ ~ l~i~~'r " ~ / ~ ` / ~ / I r ~~~ .,l ~ 2~~ ~ ~Ct~~ ~ t~ ~ ~~ ~2 ~ _ ~~ ~~ , do ~ ~~ 7i~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~. ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~-~ i ~~ Cl C.:l t~:1 C~ ~ C~ ~ Q ~ d ~ ~ ~t .._.. ~.. Ge+ ~bc~ :.,a ~a 32 ,:, ~C.......~~...ti cu 71:,0 ~ ...F.~.w ~~> ~ . 15 ~ Q O? ~' '201 ~ ~ .n, vs r4 G6 '200 ..~oo,..s.,~+.s ~~ _7141 O 3J C? 53 (~ 2T Cl 2~ U t5 [~ 04 O 7.U~ C~ l~,.J Q T;ti4 .:~ 32 '_6 20 la G8 1,0 ~ l~~J~" 7201 I U C~ 14 08 7 } ~;.^°°~' -P•l 5 0 9 Z v i ~~~c~~ 71+5 33 33 { t"i 'LI lS L9~ :tvl ~ W N -- a•. 3s 34 ~ ?4 ~~O ~ 14 !p R: S ; CG RL \ R ~ _.. OJ J f/!/ R ~ ~ `~ Clj~ t' fU ~ f` N S .~ T ~ ~ ~ ® ~ a J o: ~l ) . I 7144 3tt ' +~f^^38 ~~ 24 .^O , •s 1 O~ C` Jy Ub r/ S 3. ~~'~. ~ ~} D C_r.I i l._._J t._a ~--~ ~~~-_ _~ U C~ Cl D ~~a ~ C:.~ C~ %G .4 38. 32 ~U 2v 1? U9. 7J0~ Q 1 1 ~._-1 1r..~ ca ~- o __~ - __~ ,r~_ ~ T w ''~-~~ .A ~ . W ~~_ N . ir--~ I a~ ,~ SS SO 26 ?U t: O6 ~a 7Wt ~ p 'x(:,45 37 si 7r ~ i' ~15"~ 05 7~0-0y1 L ~ ~J i ~ ~ 1 1 ~ l.._J c~ ,- '°.~-- ~? ~ - - ~ °- cam, - 1 t~ •~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~I 34 I 30 24 20 12 1O C4 7C+C~ p4 %r ~ 35 . ,,,~r~ 37 J' 1 ,`.._~~Q ~ " (g "' ", I ~ 29 ~ `J . I 2$' in ~ , 21 ~ A l5 ~ 1Y !! p Cv C7 ~ N 70a, 1 ~ 8 s p {~ 3 -:-• ; 0 l , 20 I ~ f ~ lU Q4 700 ,C~ Q ' ~ l,y :~ g ~ ~ ' C7 i ~ { CI C~ C7 _ ~ i.., ..L ~ ,~. N d ~ r- ~J ^ ' D C~ ~~ C~ O ~ Y044 38 ( 3G 24 IS tG U4 G00 r„ " w m 1{ i~V i~V ~' {~~ 4"=> t .Y' ~ y1 l ; .1 1 l wS . 710c} 1 ""F ". li ~ ~ ~~,.Z I chi 1 ~ ~ ff ~ 1 N W ~~ 7C4~ 38 o 34 ;a ;. 1 28 a ~ ~ ~ 2G 1 o 4 j 7000 _ ,~ ~ ~ ~ tJ'~_~ , .,.....~ .. ~.-._...~._..,._..a,~.,,.,,, .~.. 'a." ... _ ~; ~~ o 7~,, 3 S ~(~~ l._J (~I~S L~._J (I I~ (~G~S L~.J l._.J 7 f 0' 1 ~ " ~~ 1 ~ ~ . 4 "- 146 ~Y l" !! ~ 34 28 ~ 20 i4 G~ ~ 10 t ~s kn, ~'. - The undersigned are property owners on 71st .between Knox and 35W, We are the property owners that are directly involved, as we all border on 71st in this area.. We would ask the .Council to re-affirm their action on June 9, 1975,. that is to leave the street at a 24 foot width. 7101 Knox 7045 Knox (s~Yl.ing`or so~.d) .~ ~ 7100 James (selling) ~ 7044 James f,', ~~., .~-, 7045 James ~ /~ ~ 7101 James~i, " ~-~~ ~ Y~s~`-_ `~ ~ 704'4 Irving... ~~,'.~. ~?~;~ ., 7100 Irving 7 04 5 Irving "~ ;~,,', ~': 710 I-~ 1 r II ~ ~~~~~~~ ~i~~:c CITY OF RTrHFIIaLU, IVi1N.NESO'i`A Office of City Manager.. •. : .Council Letter No. 234 : , Agenda july 28, 1975 The I3onorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Award of Bid for Cane New Offset Duplicator and -~ New Attack .Mini-Pumper ~1t 11:30 a . m, on July 28, ° 1975 in accordance with. previous authorization .granted by the city council, .the city manager opened the above mentioned items.. ~~Z 9 Offset Duplicator S ~ ~~~~s l~ 7 ~~ Four bids wire received from vendors on the offset duplicator. Itek Graphic Products possesses the low bid in the a~Y~ouni; of $6629.0.0. IYi checking. the specifications Itek appears to meet. all requirements. Itek has also agreed to supply all OSHA required safety equipment for the press included in the bid price, -City staff members conducted tests on the Itek press to determine its campatabil= ty v~ith. our Itek FTatemaker. From those tests, it appears that the Itek press is computable .with our platemaking unit. The tests have demonstrated that the press is capable of high- quality printed output.. In addition, Itek is in compliance with all City Affirmative Action requirements and non-collusionary clauses. It is, therefore, .recommended that the council award the bid for an offset duplicator to Itek Graphic .Products in the amount of $6, 629.00. Attack :Mini-Pumper This- morning at I I :30 a , m. bids were also opened for the fire division min- pumper, As indicated on the attached bid tabulation sheet, three bids were received which. ranged in price from $18,200 to $20,530. The .Public Safety Director :has reviewed these. bids and found that the low bid, . Laverne Fire Appartus, did not bid on the chassis and cab specified in the original hid :request. General Safety Corporation, the second low bid, does appear to meet the required specifications. It is the recommendation of the Public Safety Director tha t the rnini~pumper purchase be awarded to the General Safety Corporation in the amount of $18, 925.00, Caunci! Lettier lvu. ~3~ -~-- ~ luiy ~a, ly/5 It is, therefore, my recommendation that .the city council award the offset duplicator bid to" Itek Graphic Products in the amount of $6, 629.00. It is also _recommended that the council approve the. attached resolution rejecting the bid of. Laverne Fire Apparatus because it does not meet bid specifications and take- actfan to award the bid for the Attack Mini-pumper to General Safety Corporation in the amount of $18, 925.00. Funds are available in the 1975 budget for the purchase of these items. - ,; Respectfully. submitted, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ L ~~.~ . Wayne S. Burggraaff • Cfty Manager . WSB/eja cc: Finance Director - _ . Public ,Safety Director .~ ~ - a • ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD $id Opening July 28, 1975 OFFSET DUPLICATOR. - Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No., 1015, a meeting of the administrative staff was called to order by Wayne. Burggraaff,'City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids on Offset Duplicator as advertised in the official ne~,aspaper on July 17, 1975. Present: Wayne S.~Burggraaff, City. Manager - Peter Eberz, Public Works Director Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director Tom Moran, City Clerk 3 The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER AND BID SECURITY TOTAL BID DEDUCT FOR DAVTDSON 400 TRADE-•IN NET BID • Olson .Graphic • Products No Bid • A B DICK $345 G~rtified Check • $8,582- - $1,707 ~ $6 875 Addressograph- Multigraph B.B; 5% $8,394.20 $ 500 $7, 894 20 • Itek Graphic Products $350 Certified Check $7,769 $1,140. $6-, 629 Perfection Type Inc. B. B. 5% $7,593 $ 300 $7, 293 The city manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and conside red at the regular council meeting on July 28, 1975. • ~ Thomas J, Moran City Clerk LJ sy4 R P TABULATION OF BIDS, Bid No, 75-3 Offset Duplicator..... Opened: 11:30 A.M. July 28, 19.75 Council. Action: July 28, 1975 DEDUCT I'OR DAVIDSON BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID 400 TRADE-IN NET BID Olson Graphic ~ - Products No Bid A B Dick $345 Cert. Check $8,582 $1,707 $6,875. Addressograph Multigraph B. B. 5% $8,394.20 $ S00 $7,894.20 Itek Graphic Products $350 Cert. Check $7,769... $1,140 ~ $6,629 Perfection Type Inc.. B. B. 5% $7,593 $ 300 $7,293 ~ -Manager's :, Recommendation -Low Bid - Itek Graphic Products -Amount $6,629 . i CITY' OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening July 28, 1975. ..ATTACK MINI-PUMPER Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative. staff was called to order by Wayne $. Burggraa~f, city manager., who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud., sealed bids on Attack Mini-Pumper. as advertised in the official newspaper on July 17, 1975. .Present:. Wayne, S, ~urggraaff, City Manager Peter Eberz, Public Works Director Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director Tom Moran, City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER AND ' BID SECURITY BASE BID . .General Safety Equipment Corp. B. B. 5% $18,925 .Pierce Manufacturing Inc. B~.B~ 5% $20,530 Diking Fire. Equipment B. B. $998 $18,200 The city manager announced that the bids-would be tabulated and considered at the regular council meeting on 7uly 28 1975. 7."homas J. Moran City Clerk i G ~ - - TABULATION OF BIDS, BID N0. 75-4 . Attack Mini-.Pumper . Opened: 11:30 A.M, Ju1y 28, 1.975 Council Action; July 28, 1975 BIDDER BID SECURI•TY TOTAL BID PRICE ~'c General Safety Equipment .Corporation. B.B. 5% $18,925 Pierce Manufacturing,. Inc, B,B, 5% $20,530 - Viking Fire Equipment B.B, $998 $18,200 ~' Manager's Recommendation r RESOLUTION NO, RESOLUTION DETERMINING LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER AND AWARDING .CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF A ATTACK MINI-PUMPER WHEREAS, competitive bids have been received by the City for the sale to the City of an Attack Mini-Pumper, .and WHEREAS, it appears necessary for the council to evaluate the bids received and to make a determination as to the lowest responsible bidder based upon such evaluation: NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The city .council herewith .makes the following determination: a. There are sufficient variations in the design, construction, and other features of an Attack. Mini-Pumper so that such equipment is not capable of precise or exact specifications . it is, therefore, necessary for the council to make a determin- ation of which of the bidders is the lowest responsible bidder on such equipment and, in so doing, to consider in addition to the bid price, the quality, suitability, adaptability, and delivery ' of the equipment far the use it is intended. b. Based on such general criteria,' the bid of General Equipment .Corporation is hereby found and determined to be the lowest responsible bid on the Attack Mini-Pumper. c. This determination is based upon such. considerations as: (1) The General Safety Equipment unit meets all bid specification requirements . (2) The General Safety Equipment unit best meets all operating .requirements. (3) -The equipment bid by Viking Fire Equipment (Luverne Fire apparatus) is incompatible with the city's. needs in the following areas: a. The type cf cab proposed and the wheel base do not meet specifications, and will result in operating difficulties for the intended -use of this unit. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 28th day of July, 1975. ATTEST: Loren L. Law Mayor ''~ .. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ' Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 233 x Agenda. July 28, 1975 The :Honorable .Mayor and Members ~f th.e City Council City of Fichfie ld Gentlemen: Subject: Transitory Ordinance Appropriating Funds for -~ - Landscaping Sprinkler System Improvements - .Ear?ier this year the city council approved the installation of landscaping sprinkler systems at a number of locations withj.n the city including parks, vaater treatment plant, Cedar Liquor Store and city hall properties. The .city council also requested that the city make an effort to perform this work by force _ account rather than entering into outside contracts, As the council is aware, :this work is underway by force account. However, the transitory ordinance. p~viaing funds for the installation of the sprinkler sysi:ems .was not compietaly adopted`earler this year. Therefore, it is .recommended that tie city council . adopt a transitoi°y -ordinance appropriating $~20, 000 to cover cost of materials and force account cost accounting for sprinkler system projects at the city hall and :the Cedar Avenue liquor store and for other properties to the extent that the-se funds remain available. "The .attached"trans.itory ordinance is presented for first reading consideration, Respectfully submitted, _ - 1 ~ .~ ~~~ ~ ayne S. Burgg f City Manager WSB/eja ~~ . ~k` •J r,T ~ .. TRANSITORY ORDINANCE N O. 16.34. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE. OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of Richfield does ordain: • Section 1. It is found and determined to be necessary .and expedient for the City to expend .money from the Special Revenue..Fund for landscaping and underground` sprinkling: systems at certain public buildings such as .city hall and the Cedar Avenue liquor store and other public properties such expenditure being for a capital .improvement for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds . - Section 2. The expenditure of $20, 000 from such Special Revenue Fund for such purpose is hereby authorized pursuant to provisions of Section 7.12, Subdivision (2) of the city charter. Section 3 . The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursua~-to capital improvements budget .appropriations heretofore made and- pursuant to contracts authorized from time to time hereafter by council resolution. Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield this day of - 19~75 . Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: - Thomas J. Moran City Clerk -