The URL can be used to link to this page

03-24-75 ageanda /3 ~~ .. . .CITY OF RICHFIELD, MTNNESOTA Office of City .Manager ' ~ Council 'Letter No. 94 Agenda ,March 24, 1975 Thee. Honorable Mayor and Members of the., City Council ~ City of Richfield Gentlemen• Subjects City Participation in State Capacity ~ ~ . ;. ~, , Building Training Program `"' On June 19, 1974,: the :city council authorized city participa~cion in a ~ ~ ~~~! two year Public Affairs Leadership and Management Training Program (P~`;L PJI j . In addition, a report on this training program was made to the city council - ~ ' on November 25,' 1974, and city council members unanimously agreed ~Tith ; , ; .~ the city's continued participation in this raining effort.. ' ` " ; ~~. ~ 3~s a result of the successful training efforts by the PALM organization and certain participants. of the original training program, including the city of Richfield, the State of Minnesota is being offered a unique ;gpportunity to participate. in an. intersse organizational development training ~: program. This program is being offered to three tares in the-nation with Minnesota being. one . The program is being offered through both the local ~. 1?1~~L`h~ organization .and the National -Training and Development Service (NTDS) . will provide an opportunity for approximately, ZS organ- This training program . izations to enter into. a training program somewhat similar to the initial training effort developed through PALM and in which the city is currently participating. The State Capacity Building Program will provide an intense two week training program for two people from each organization, plus the availability of NTDS consultants for i:urther training sessions during "the one year that. this program. will be in operation. This training effort will be funded in part by the . local participating organizations and ,some private foundation funds. However, the majority of the financing will be contributed by NTDS. The National Training and Development Service is anon-profit organization that has been established by the seven major public interest groups serving state` and `local governments for the. purpose of providing organizational training and development. concepts. to state and local government employees. Council members may recall that training consultants from NTDS were responsible for the intensive one week training session `that the original PALM participants attended last May.. These consultants are also providing additional training to the original PALM participants on a monthly basis through the_ ,original co«~:~a,~ct ~~ .~.; ~ ` rc: the city has with PALM . ,~.. ,1 t i;' ,_ For. the past three summers NTDS has sponsored a four week intensive training -.program in organizational development and charge for various governmental gfficials. It had,been my intention to request that the c ty council allow me to attend this training - program scheduled for this summer... The cosy of .this training program is approximately $2, 000 plus travel expenses and runs for a period` of four. consecutive weeks. However, since Minnesota has been designated as one of the three -states in the nation to receive training from, NTDS through. the State Capacity'Buildng Program, designated representatives of the various units of local governments -in Minnesota are able to receive the benefits of the training program that has been held each summer -by NTDS for. a substantially reduced cost. The local PALM program vriill' allow the City of Richfield to enter into this State Capacity Building Program for a cost of $500. .The ..cost for each of the other participating organizations will be $1, 000. If the city chooses to"participate' in this program, it will be possible for. the City of Richfield to provide training skills ao another member of the management staff. In addition, we will be allowed to participate in future training efforts that will be :designed for the ' participants in the State Capacity. Building Program. Although these future training '~ ~s efforts will be based on problems diagnosed in the various <participating organizations, they may, very well deaf with such things as supervisory skill development, time management, motivational skills and others. Of course, we will be able to continue our organ izational training program hat has been previously. outlined to-the city council. In effect, we will be able .to provide a larger `number of training. opportunities to our management staff for a comparatively small cost. It is tla.erE?fore recommended that the ra.ty council authorize city participation in the .State Capacity Building Training Program a;nd that the city manager be allowed to attenr3 the -two week inten~~ive .training program in May of this -year. Respectfully submit /~~~ ~~ /~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager, WSB~ ~e ja cc: Administrative Assistant Planning Director. ~ ~' .~ ~~ ,:: ,- ~.~ ._ ~ - _. _ - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of -City Manager Cou ncl Letter No . 9 3 Agenda March 24, 1.975 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City. of Richfield Gentlemeri: Subject: Hearing Regarding Whether to Revoke Soft Touch Sauna License On February 21, 1975 the Supreme Court filed an opinion affirming the action of the city council in revoking the sauna license previously issued to the Soft Touch Sauna. The city council action was taken during 1974 and • the license which was revoked would have. expired at the end of 1974. The .Soft Touch Sauna has filed an application for ~ 1975 sauna license. The license application has been reviewed and denied by the city. manager,. The .grounds for .the suspension are those: listed in the attached letter addressed to Ms. Rebecca Rae Rand, licensee for 'the Soft Touch Sauna, Inc. In accordance with my letter Ms. Rands-attorney has requested a hearing on the denial of this license application. This hearing has been scheduled for the March 24; 1975 city council agenda.. It is the recommendation of the city manager that the-city council confirm the denial of this .license application because of the information contained in the attached letter to Rebecca Rae Rand. Supplementary information supporting the data; contained in the letter. to Rebecca Rae Rand will be presented during the hearing at the March 24 city council hearing. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City .Manager WSB/eja cc: Public Safety Director City .Attorney. March 11, 1975 ~ Ms. Rebecca Rae Rand 1530 South 6th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota Re; License Application of Soft 'touch Sauna, Inc. 6~ N - Dear Ms. Rand: '~" ~ Your application for an annual license to operate a sauna in the _ ~ City of .Richfield at 6521 Cedar Avenue has been duly reviewed ~ and considered by the City. On the basis of that review your ~+ i ation re uesting such license is denied. The denial is ® appl c q p ~-,,~ based upon the following: ~ .~ 1. That Soft Touch Sauna had in its employ during ~ ~' ~;~ the year 1:974 an employee, Cynthia Doyle, who was ~ ~ ,, ~ convicted of conduct involving moral turpitude which '® ~'~ ~`~ formsa basis for suspension, revocation or non-renewal ~ a~'"",~iie~~' purs~.ant to Richfield Code., Section 5.25, Subd. 9 (3) (6). ® ~,q, "~ ---~~'"°~J~~ 2, That agents and employees have during 1974 engaged ~_'-~. ;,~ ~,. ~;,~in conduct involvingmoral turpitude and conduct inimical ~` ~° to the public .safety,. health, .welfare or morals . Such ~~ ~c~ conduct includes acts of prostitution .and a scheme to ~ pay off :cab drivers who engage in pandering activities. ~ ;: Such conduct subjects your application to the provisions of. Richfield Ordinance Code Section 5.25, Subd. 9 (3). ~, ~ r.~,,,io,. 3. Soft Touch Sauna has' employed persons who have ~ L~ engaged in prostitution activities and who are, there- ' ~ »°"~ fore,-.persons of bad repute. Richfield Ordinance Code ~ 5.25, Subd. 9 (5) . ® ~~ ~ Y 4. The 1974 license issued to Soft Touch Sauna, Tnc. , ~ r ~ was duly revoked by the Richfield City Council on ~ O ~ ~ August 19, 1974. Issuance of a new license at this w ~ c~~ ~ time is precluded by Richfield Ordinance ;Code, ~ ~ Section 5.25, Subd. 6 (3). M~" ~, `~ 'w'" ~, ~ ~ Your are further notified that you may appeal my .denial of your application to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held at least IO days from the date of this notice. That. ~.: telephone: 869-7521 (612) MS. Rebecca Rae Rand a M h 11, •1975 age Two . meeting is scheduled for March 24, 195. Please advise us of your desire to request such hearing on or before 12:00 noon on the Wednesday immediately preceding that meeting. Representatives of Soft Touch Sauna,.. Inc. have the right to appear at the hearing and to offer testimony, .exhibits or statements at the hearing. .Such representatives hall also have the right to cross-examine witnesses who may give evidence against it. Soft Touch Sauna has the right to be represented at the hearing by counsel and to have a verbatim transcript made of .the proceedings at its expense. The City Council, in determining whether a license should be issued will consider the information enumerated above together with all. other material which it may deem relevant. ~ - .- .The City will not attempt to terminate the business activities of Soft .Touch Sauna unless you do not request a hearing or unless the Council shall deny licens ure . If you have any questions, please advise. .Yours very truly, ~ ~ • ~ ,l/} ~~~~. ~ Wayne- S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/ej a cc: City Attorney City Clerk . Public Safety Director • ..-- _ ~it'VL~ t9~ ~.,,`,j.,.~,,s ~~ v~~iCi ~3 C~c~`..'C~"a,l%g ~,.:"Ie cs.i"i'~iNL ~~ 3'{a3'~aa~i.ri ~~'..tlr^l~+.a..t~ Ss ~.J.i.SJ? pry, 3--~`~;-~} atzd "~3~ ~~T.~:.:.I i3G~, ~~~ ~.-2--~~. Cax'`,~ ~t~c~s~a.c~.w~.~'gz~~. ~, ~~€$cey iio~.t, coa.: ur ~; ~ the s~an:~ givee ~Sq~ Sgi ~~`z, ~~ ~t .. '•,- Lz "' ~ ~?~.3.e~ ~:° ~a37 ~~fe t0 S2Itt~ L~~ ~'~ sa-~5 ~ ~~e ~~ ~ ~~- rd, ~.~atec~ ~ ~ wc~~ie~c~, ;~~~, : a g~:..c'_~ r.,n a fame. ~~c ~,'•..ss~er as~:ed. oz~ ces~ r:a~z~. ~ f:es~~at.~d, ::rza~u.~~ug ~ia~- LJ'c3~'s. ~.~~ ~~~e t?a here go .~;. ~.~ ~o t~",e fact ~2L ~? ;~ ~aa been ~-~'a.K ~ ~3 2~C%ht'~' CO~Isr~?'Sc'i~s.C3~ €~2~ ~.: L~~:~ C~ ~.}I~ ~,'3.~.s t3 ~r--G~'~d~• °~ 8 aCG:~~c ~C~aC~'r a€~ .etc ~a~ die kid ~o ~~ a. s~eci~z,c a.es~~s~~:., ~as:~~~~.p i ~e~::.we~ ~' ~~ ~o~~ be ~o=-a~ ~d ~,e ~ri~~a ~ o~ ~~ ~ ~:~~ ~L{2ar, ~c~ ~e :"e~~ ie3, ~~ ;'tom, f:~te r*e-t~-~t~~zag~ S4t..*•uw3Y~ ~ s~4e~ ;i~es~'. ~~a ~is~a~c~Ze~ :~z~~ -~..:~o~ed ~' ~.`~.'~ u~~ ~S ]~t5 v C! i ~L' ~'~s ~ ~ t3e:3 a^a~=.~ ~CIy' '~i a`~~a ~'•'CIJ ~ a ~.~~'a ~ Qw of Cz~ ~ ~$. ~e s~~e~. ~a~ ate?. a~.so t~s ~~ cxt ~ , hover ~:~ S~~ cav _ ~+~~~p ~~ {~ ,. n ~ r}~` . r ~} ~y r.~-cue ~- -,.~-~~ ~~°.r ~t~1 :~L~ 4.4iiAL. f.i v`/ i.~ ~i.4.v i~~i.G2da ~r~yc•: r~`~r f3 ij 1.1 ~r iI a,4 `tv'i~~ iY~~.1 w.~v aw~L.1. y ia~s.J'7Z`aY.£~`~ ~~'ri..e~' ~3QG'~..~...~._un~.S~ .4. t~x~J:cZ~~i ~~~v~2a~ ~»£3 ~£3I2 l~aa:4T tls.+cC.c~+aZSe ~'Z ~.~~c'~. ~~'a~ `.a~. ie~ ~a4t~ ~e~ e ~ S 'ii~S`t.°- ~.~-v1i..~3". ~`L~s '~. it+~~.c~w"~'"'iA3L1~e44+ _ ~e ~~a~,.£1 tszta~ it ~~S ~3.fiiruZ~ t~ is ~ as ~~e~.:sone, ~a€e~ 3.:~ ~e crr,..~.d. `~:~.. ~s at ~:e F.a~~ssv~ at oo-r r~~ a~ ?~3~ ~:*_-s ~e co~.€~i ~~ arianaer~ ~~.~~ ~~ fo*- ~o~ ~~u.c~a be~~er Y~..~s:.. ~ ga~ae ~~ a ~n a~~ ~n~ e cu~e~ ~e iadwsson 5~~, Le:~:~~g ~o ~e ~~. relied. a ~o~ ~.z~` ~: aa~e, -. of R~~~ ~'~?.~:~. ~e ~~Led f'ina ~e ~cu~ ~e rase ox ~e rao~. ~ivse~ ate. S¢t. 5~.~ men oLaceed~a to t:~e F,.:3dissm ~ Seu and acged Yes:~dene~ of~e xo~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ for ~e ca ~.~. ~'~~ ca~.~. r~~r ca,,~ o ~ '~~!~ ~- ' .. ~ 5 ~. ~seese arr~.~~d a~ ~e ror,~, ~ ~?~43 ~o ~, ....,~:~ ~s ~e~.. ~iri~~. anu g ~2a~°d tszew`e X12 C3~ way-. (~ws ~~as af~~t I had. ~ca~.~ec~ ~s.e S.7 ~~ ~o, ate=, ~ n.p ~;~~ .a diffe~-en~ ~-~s~a~cr~e~, Lean e ~e .~ ~ar~ ~~~c~ ~o ~:~V~a•~~~~: D~~r~.g~.~ 2s~ecl ~t?~' ~.~~, ~ comae ~~ Sze ~2L~i~st3~ Soa~h ~E3 p~e:~; ~~ ~~ to '~~i ~zz~ ~€~ find ao~~ ao~~.or~. ~~e ~a ~.u'd s~..1~3Se~. as F,3.~.~. T'~~~I a~:.~ed ~~~ ~.~ :~C9t~~,f3 j~SOna~.i~ ~ent~. ~.~L`e`~I~i C2'T3 '~ 3.~'~ ~ ~2t? ~~' c~~d ^aL~^.~ . -Q,"L. ~~..~? ~.L^~LLP ~~'I~~ i:~e ~t~' ~ `~i S~ fa2e~P_ ~.{r~4,~~~p it"~a.'.3 ~x"~.,,a S?~C2.L:S~ :#.~t~l:: ~s ~~~ du~~ aa.3 nc~ ~~~~^g. het. '~r~- .as:~:~ i~ ~esa~~ ~-a~a~s ctr.~.d ~e :~tle cis ~ his ~~.~~ ~s ~~ hid zee ~~.~ - ' .~.~~.. ~~"~ ~ets~:~.e ~. :~~s n~ pr~3~~esst`~~ ::and ~a~ ~~e cad ~au~u ~ d~gatc"z~d. ~dia~:e ~.~ and. ~S ~Y.~s.Vf3~ ~ ~ tii3r2£' ~;ta3 ~+~~`E'4. ~ . ~e1~ a~xd Sgt. Sr~.4~ ~c~. peed ~o t~~ X3.0. I,t~~~t, mare ~~ c~~ed a ~i~ pares ~ f~onfi~ ~~ dri~ter fz~--cad mss, idgd o~se~.~s as L pies stns ~e spas ~Q f~ and axe seed ~~~ ~.ra. ~~e ~s~e t~~e +ca~ ~~ as?-red ~~~re t~ ;ire ;gi;~. ~ in~o~r~ ~Z~ ~a~ ~e pz~u~e~s r~~-f~ ? dad s~.^~e a.~~an~r4~ ~~h ~~~ ~o ~~a us ~a a ~~.ace 3.r~ca~ed.:.n ~:~.^ ~~ ~f c°,si.31 and ~t?~c^~~. ~~ ~~~~ ~, Y`~.e:-~ys.~L'tig~ Sat~.3~', ~ ~~~~ ~.Ld. t~~~'.~ ~`~~ i ~.s .e~ p3zce~. ~e ~ea~: ~~ ~o sa3* ~~at r.~~.c i ~-~~o~:r~ .s ~'~e ~es~. ara~,~ad and ~e ~~~~d ~~. ncne aa3r ~e::~~er. ~e pi~-cee~a eased tan ~~~~~~ ~~tit ~Z''r c'.~'taa~,~~ ~~' Q;i ~•.'~~:2~~.~' T.C~o ~~ I.i?,7 ~3.S t~~ 43~ Aga°{~ ~ S '~^~.~.. ~~.,~.i~ ~~U'3~ - .ava~.~.x~a~ `~ ~.~~ o~ w~~a ~.~ tzae ~~~. £~: ce ~e crosses ~y~, . e~s~~o•.~nd an' ~'~~ ~~~a ti'~~:~s ~ ~~="~e '~Ts.~L`z^_.ai..•': 's`~2~ ~+.~4.~~' ~""~• ~ i~ t'e~. ~ ~C't3~3.~a ~'"'..'~'~d ~'it". i ~.~'2~'„ ~~~c`. '"~aexi 20d SL~.,~.. S;~i~ aw~:ed ~~ t~' a~ ~e ~'`3£'i'.~~'C ~~xld ~2 u f2z~- Q{~-'~4 G~ ~a : ~e ~r~zeu aL rem--~,--.~:~~. ~e ~ep~.ied "~.~ e~~.d r•~n ~.~~ ~o ~~~.~ bum rha~ ~ ~.e a~t~~, a~~o~~ ws~~ €~ ~;ave ~~ ~ nepfl~3.ated ~~.~ ~~;~.. ~~s po~~ rn sn~seq~en~ e~~en~s are same as 3n ~~ ~g~. 5~i~~s SLa~e~ ._ _. :~f~ ~ ~. . n ..o.....•.3.» x'r$,~.,, ~....~? K:_'~l. .mss. awl! a t__ :o„ce rirz }~~ e sr~as~ IIo}}f (~n~~'A I{.I.3F~ :Et:~~ 3p~~fl~4~'~.}~, ~1~~ ~.--2-5~, ans3 ~i~~ . ~'~jg~...T``~~ ~as:~:T(~? ~0~ ~"~G~J• ~~~~~dt ipCw'.ab ~f w /, r ~ t y ~ r rt r -~ ~n 4 ~~~-~~- a.~f~.cers ~~e rnti_zed ~~ Rxc~f~.etd ~ t~f~.ice~. P~vn~~d Hot arak ~~s ~;~-? ~~ thaw yep ire c~onac~ct~ an iove4~igat3an ~.sr~roiv tae ~~~ :a bCr~ and :.heir associQ~ion ~i~ t~ze Pew-A-~,cr.~~;e SaLn2, 3754 ~Ceda~ Aveo :~~a~s to ~ast~.~°~io~z. s~pse ~x~ficers s~tet~ thaton the cve:~~Q of -~~-~14 e~ had had crx~~erv4~~on wit`s ~ Ski ~i~II2r~.vers which they ~.r~eta -~- the ~~.•*s of ~ and ~ ~a~ss3 C~3 and ~ w5 res~xti~~.p. i~ese cz~ c`~:~.vexs had s~ffez`ed to t4?~.e the ~ P.ichf:.e~.d o~zi~~ tt~ ~e i~~-A--~-~;~~ . ~~a s~hic~~t tuep a3.so cai"s.ed ~e~~r's 3oczfied at 3$~h aad Ceram and twat ire ~-ffiters :~ouid e~eot diffeie~z~ tpges of SAS ~+tI2 a par~p 17p 4he . ~a~ of ~~~'~', math ~ese ra?~ drivers gam the offices the gricr~s . ~f $35sQ~ for a bicx,~ ~w~ and ~~~.~~ for seal. iuterese. ~sese grwces ~-x3~d Ise oar ~e nor~~ ~ r..hsx~;e for a sauna and message. .. ~t s~u~.d ~not..~d tl~t this ~for~tzc+xzL~S gives urt~tt:.~;~.p to ttzese >fficcrs znd that the officeHs a~eQd ; o cwt ~xi~z one ~f ~e scan drivers y~x the e~eui~ ~f ~-~24-~4 poi t.~e `gos~ ~f gQici~ ~a ~e Rem--A~~L ~& ~f aiona ~it~i Sgt, lease and Offic~r ~~ ~t ~s &icz~f:~.e~d cff~A-=-s :~ ~e ~efL ~.zard in Rich.'"ieid ozs 4-~~-74 at sg~"~. ~~{~ h7's. ?ffic~cided t~Zat se~.f z~o~ ~i~h ~ff~er Holt ~ot~d atte:~r:. to :c~~.ct one of the 2 ca» i~ers ~ wi7 en€~ a~t~ tt'~ s~~e ~e saw .~en~ ~i~y,Lh~ ~.~ re~^_rr~s to ~he,~R~.e.°a,~~~~-A~-lunge Saute. ~iff.~.ce~-~y1 'To7t t~~.~i~3.;'It3~2£~d L1L~ ~.~i3 c~e a~{+3 i.Le t~C~a."3 ai-~ o~F.C.a"Y,.C.i ~. '~..~.~~yaQ~ ~.[~..~ ~.4.4At:ci.7.. ~s on~~p a€: t~sat ti~z 3~t ~ Sze d.a.sga^.er ~~id iii us o~.~ ~t the Radiss~rya~~nx~o¢~.~~ys~+~earel+C~=w~iv~c~et~r.~yy~rol~ ~s~~.~.~ ~~ i~gad~ ~Z.~rooaa a ~~ r~ ~~s4~~+-i3`v aY. vL.-G: y.~d' 4~iLS.~ trV~f4` 4~i. •iMLL1+,.rGi oJ- i.i~.~.~~'M'Ri a. ~~~Gwi 4ii~~ ~~.~.6~~~~ .~4`~i ' could arran~ to haZre x:s t~~:en tv erne of ~~. ~e d~.sg"L~chwr ~'ed ~~e ~c::~.d ca~.i us at d~~~ ~s at Rooms 2~~4 a~ the P.ads.sso~+ S~Lh 3ote~. ~+:~~ he did xzot. 6f~e; 4ev~. teleg:~one ~a~.is ode ~p E~ff~.cer ~o' L and t~r~.~:t to the Cds~ ~o. a d~.sgatcb:er ~~o ca3~.ez~ ~.i~se~f F.~~ sta~c:~;e . ~t~ send a .c:a~ ~zfih. a drawer ~o ~ou~.d ~e us try R+s-~-T.u;e Satins. end he was sni-e t~xat he ~~.~ ta.~:e ire of ~ a ~a~~g t~se saw awn e~r~ts ~rd~t at ~^vs ar~d BI...~ had ~r:v,c~as~~ ~~ades ~ s:.a~ed t axzp c~~ ct.3~ ~riv~'. cou~~ ~~-a these artang~.enLS at ~~ s~~ ~rxt t~ t he xd Se~!d one ~~ss~s~ he ~-r~:e~ ~o3~.d ~aF~e caxe cif us. Aggrr~a ~ ~i.tes 3a ter; ~~35 rrs, ca'a p~;~.~.ed into ~.he ~:ad-i sso~ axsd t~se c~riverid~d ~Zi~e as ~-~A~~, ~~a.ch kneLr to die t<he s~r* ~r seat ~p e d~.sna4che~d ~~e got zntr~ his ~r ~d sued sr3~ and cedar t~ Lie ~una~'. ~ff~."s staled ~xt ~.ep ~d tamed ~ S"~ ~~ drivers ~~ and ~~. t~Ze gre~-:.or,.s ~ver~.ng and re~~ d t~.e co~ers~tiQn t ©~fa.cers might std Holt ~xad. i~ad.. ~4 aw~;.ed ETA ~~ ~ ne eras mare of this saw s it~.tic~n and he tflid ~'!~~ officers to sgba.~c . free~.p that he ~e~~ ~ ~a~~re ~~czng a~r~^st. He stated mat every ~o~~d ~d ~o ~=? ~e a 3.-~iszg 4nd thep ire ~tts~ ae?.g? r~ thew bzr#.s grit, ~Te as~~ed E~ if where +~as sone bass word sue' sr~~th~.ng that ~3e sr~ou?d Sap to il.-+dira~e stir desires ax;d ae std t~~A~ ~~ ~~a~.~.d in,~rod~e ass ~ersosa~.~.p to ~ec.p. ~:e asked h~ if he ~a:sted ~:s ~o ~I;e care .of him before sae went z.n~o t..he sa~r3 ~.n regards tca ~~ and aye staffed t~.at aragt~~sing tie ~xars~ed to do for ~:~~ t~4~:ic~ ~ agnreoia4ed ~tMt t~zat tsep gac`cd ug an ecve~c~ge ~oa~z~.p for the 4 da.sca~:c~:e, s a~ ~. ;at B~U~ td4`K care ~'~ ts~Ze~a with a gercentage that he cared tot ~o tei? u- C#fficQ:~ ~.~ men as'~:ed h~ if this ~~as patent in add:.twon to hip S~si~.~`~ ~3 ~'~~, he sta~v-d ~~~a~ ~'pes, ~~" ~co~-cq~~ayrel}.Qc,~f k~im by ~S'n~ ~':~ a. n 3+ 'gyp ~ p' ~Ad ~{~ ~n.~ 41.Le ~~c~:i~..c7~~ ~.{~.~w`> ~(~ i3 c.T:..E+.~ t}f th.e tuK..9 ~:t~~ae ~._ "~.5.... p h~se~.f, ~ as'~edh~si0~.fiser Hoit~ again if aye .c~as sapr,~; schat a.f the :::eia~ -~A- ;mange was gaping h~ additia~.~. nsoa~.ess for bring~.a ; ~.n cLS~o~ers for alssres:a~~ .~ r 2-7 v'3 s- 3 ri ac _ };Ns^,~3t>'„~d f~ n~t~d ~ ~~ ~aaversat~o~ -~ u~.ace bet~.~en t~Ze Pad?ssan js~.•tt:~ ~-=ate. 3ocated at ~~~• a~ f?i~way i~~ to ~~4 and "s-~i~~~ray 3~ ana ~,-~; . a •-ax`iz +~:: 3~t~ t~~on~ fi~.~~=_`e1d ~.nta I~~~.s tQ 3E:.~ and Czdar. As c~ :~caed ti3e sau_~a ~. stated t i~~ bldg=men ~s the ~xises the n~.~~ aQ~.are but because ~~e did nat have a ?.at o~ ~~p ~o~~ ~ucz~ shtrs? d ~e of f~ex ~e b~~.v %t3 tie saL,~~. ~e stated. t~tat "g~`~.~. ~iu~'e tt~ ~Say~ the nom pr_;.~es fax the sa*.xna a. d mat he that fit spas ~3~~.f~~ £ax a ~1c~ ~o ~.s~. ~e nee a~ ~5~.€~~ poi ~ -s~ai~t3.ap -~ ~e a~ su ~SU~ : ~~ ~?5. ~~ ~qw ~ou~.d get a ~~.~,~ ~o~ ~ ~. c~~es an,' ~e stated these are ~e n„~. ~~ces mat ~e~ szggest# ~~ said that ~ "-~'. ~s ~rettp set i.n her . pz3.~s zr~t that we ~~~d hagg~ wi~ex, ~~ ~~ saw ~.4 ~s raid ~o ~~e bq d=~aceY ~o~t ~~.~ acted to ~£ . ~~ y ~ ~e e~a.s Q:.vBn .a ~~. €3 t3 t-i~. ~3 e as~z3 if ~e a~$ s go~~~zd t© ~~.~: and ~~ a~t~ ~e ~~auid be ba~.~cat. G~i; ~ s. 6~s~n ~~.~-a~ a~ ~e sa~Aa ~t ~s c~bse~ed t B~ ~.s nat a~ rye b~5y~ SSA {3ff~£~'_x ~3ait s'35:~~t~ i:::~Yr~ '~h at ~~.tf3 $E tI~3t ~.~..ag ~t~'~ ua3z".~u it r~?-~e any di~exass~ as tt~ whs.t tq~ u~ sex~tice ~,~ t~a~a.s ~ec~~4e~ a~ tus pr ~.ee~*~, ~e Mated that t:~ze se~i~ mid be t~ spa uv dottbt ~,d ti~:e prices ~~x~.d ~Za~e tai '~ dec~.ded ~z~an. ~ ~~..~.ed about .tie ~rice~ .or Q sau.aas and deb 3~J~~ stated that ~.eze s~.s t3n~.,~ a:re ~~at2r IIad ~k~,ch '~ ~rei~{3uis:~ed to {3~fi~x ~'t~a.t, ~ ~:en a ~a ~~ a ~Z~o~N ~~~ ~~:.~ica o~~^~ex s ~Zad ~~ed d2 t<~e sex.a ~. n•~ez aad xece i~.~d ~ ~ . i~ ~ chime, ?~.~ ~ ~' theca shy ~e tae ~biC~.~ ~ o ~~ ~tse ~€~r the ~~Lsa~2 and t:~e sau.~a and sho~~r, ~~d 3ax t~.a~ nczbic~, sat .~ the sauna fox a~~xo~ ~.~ -.utey, ~i~`~'~~.''~~. c~.i2d ~~~.~ br~Cc:. Wit) ~ e C~.'03 C~.e~ ~~:~ c~uT~d .:.L .L S~~@fltd'.L'G 2 pc~~dex ir- ~~ .ssa~e aid ~'~d~uted ~ras~d~. ? as=~ed `~ ~e to~~ ~~ i ~ ~t a~~~d ~p ~.ist sn::uid xe~a~.A oz~ aad she stE'~a s~Ze dvt~~ct - . not ~e-~oT,~e ~.t b~~t ~ ecxu3d i ~ ~. wantedro, ~ ie~t €~e t~~e~. ana ~~e s~sage ~.,astea a~~rrc~ ~.~ :ten d:~xing~ie~ tip we :.n~~oed ~uxse~~?es end dad s~~~. ta.i.~. abc~ t ewe ~. ~x~ and a9~t hax e.~oer ienee as a -- t~sse~:se4 ~ toed her that ~e :-tee sta}~r~; at the ~.ad~..ssan S~t~ and ~r~ beie sin ~y...siness ~a~ i.~s ~age~es. She stated that s~P dad ;~ a ~sse~se ~~ ap~r~ ~ x~n`.~xs and. had ~~~~d t$e ent,re tom;: at ~e'~ ~«~r~g°a, ~<t. th4 end ~~ e~ssa~e six: as~ed ~ doted azs.i.n~ e3.se a;; d ~, sa:~d 'F~e~ tie ~~ d~~-i~~r ~~~.dixs t~z ~-~qbe extras", Sb.~ :~:.aLed Ya,~~.~. gon barmy to - te~? ~ ~~t :~1. ant and k Vice". ~ sued ~ e~~.d nct ~~~ ~.,a.t ~ ~,Tanted mat .fie eab d~z~a2r bad tc~~.d us that ~e {~xi~s wee ~~~.~3~ and :~Yu.~~. the sued that ;=qes thosL ~i~a were crrrect',; anc~'~that for ~~5.~{~ ~.w t~cr,~.d b~ and ~~~.+~{~ €~as a s~a~.ght ~.aq4`. ~ asked i.~ .e ~9 was ~ ~z a h.G ~ ~ wr_d ha~.•~ and s*ne s~tyd s~es.~ ~,~ ~.~ ~a2€~~ ~u and qss~ man Ito whate~ter q~ ~~<^t:3. I sued ~ d.id sxot the ~ had eno~:gi3 rx~arxe~r ~.t:y ~ a~xd ~ it s~ou~.d ba a3.~. xi i~ ~. ~ ~:~ at a meter dat4~ ~t thin taw she became *,rerp ~,rtdi~r,.ant a ,u as~:ed i~' ~k~«~.d ga. bt~~a~~ ~ mon~~ xrom ray ~iez:d and ~ told ner ~ did riot ~~~t •~.~ to ~w c~'t~at ~ ~~as doing anci that i~ ~ did nog. xe~ra th~,s even:. ~. E7oa"id met tk~e newt xzi Wit. S~zY sa~.d ~~:~e~.3 nor ~2~.€3~ ~` ~.~ d:s.'.3~e qou a ~~s::~. ~p?o bum. ~rc~s :~oza`t ?.~rati i~~e :.he ~~e that ~ou~.r~ ~t ax~e~, ~ dec~.inLd t~:w c~~i=er ate? ;?~n:Qd if sbc t.ou3d acc,~r~ap us to t~ze hfl :e~.. S~~e stags ts~Qwe.~~ "4n,~~°r:, t© 'ce merle through B~'~~ X17.2 ~rex, and ti at th.e r,3r3.~e ~ouid ~ra~wb"1q ~~b~zt ~~.f~G.{at1,~ but cue conid pz:e~t Qnr g~~ a nd t~zey s~r~u~.d step ~ro~ 3 to ~ hx: I statr~d sae ccd ~ossib~.~t ~~a thsase arrarsgem~nts tine tse:,:t~q, ~xh.ch she ~~er. ~~d b~ a3.rigk~t. ~ - ,.. ._ . r:~;~~~tc~,of Off. ~. t~nrn, Morals Sad, given fn the B of IZ on ~1x/7~a, at O~a20 hx~• ~,,,3,,.Ge~ steno ta. Havnen, typing. I',?:: Arrest offoroPCcPro~~.tu~ion~andbPCO/.ar~~. • ~u tits Re3.ax Lcyunge Sauna at 37.4 Cedag Ave So, xn ac~if-:.g on severa3. complaints in reg3rd~ to pos~rible iI]~e¢al activities above location. entered this sauna posing as 3 cus~:om°r. Offfee~s 'was first t . a jl~ :~tho greeted h~_m and asked F~itat &i1e co~.;ld ho3p h~.ra with. Off3.cer checked board and advised this female t~~t he would have" a k.ater bed massage tahich pr,~i-ced at $3.2.00. Off. t.7..rn gave t.hxs re~-alc: a $2t3 bilk. c~*hich serf nwnbeac ~;ecordered earlier by Sgt. Neese and received 8 in chaste, 4his ~t3:~:e there c~~ere 2 gentle~.~rt wafting is~ ihe`~fo~e= area e~tch3.~tg 'i`3l anc3 ..,_ icer c:~ss advised that there were tt~~o parties ahead of him for the ~~aterbed that Beclcy teas the only :€rl caor:kingeton:~~;r:te Officer observed. three roaaas c•iY c.~ere i.dent3.fied by numexa~.s I, ; 1, and 1ZI. Officer c~a3 offered cofree inv~.ted to coatcia qtr until, a room csas available so that iae could take a ;iz. Off3.cers had general conver~atioZi with the 2 u~~Zes and the geceptionist {.~pprox 0230 hrw Officer cE,ar~ i.nvzted ~:o A tI2~s3.~~;~31g room to change tais clothes talcc~ A sauna. Off. tonic a sauna and retua~ed to the foyer area ~atoped in osae3. and Ind coflcee artd 4ras .advtsecl that tae Fear next Pot Lhr cater besi. icers observed def on several occasions going from~xoon to room acd observed to be cl.o'cned in n pair of lady's ur~de~-panit~ a~~.d a I:t!clcsicin vppea~n ;•aith f~:inge eove~ca=_3g rise unc~axpants~. d short time Inter Officer c:ss ~.~a ::he roo:~ cvii:h tihe c~aterbud and def eratexed ~~nd asked officer .c;hut type of gage h~ deu:I.red. €3fficern stated he could have an oil. ~.assage at t:hich time s~,rini.led poc~der upon the b~zciL and ulscn cc~mpleting .ihA beck massages 3tabed shit, you wanted. 03.3. and I s~:arted cJ:Ith pota~l+=r". De-r ~t th3a tie wiped ponder fresm gay bade and i~roeeeded •czith an oil c~asage. Upon eo~3.et~trzg ~ic a xda officer was advised to turn over at his baci~ and. dsf massaged es~ anc~ sto~~2ch cress a:~d the front of the legs. De~E told cif=~.oer that mass~z~;e eras comp`seted and astced if he cared for taiZOwher massage. Officer ced the def if sine would retrS.eve hi3 money from the room he haci chanted ~iZes Z.~, . k~ ~ would reeve ;~noti2ey r,~~ssage. lief left and re4ua-ned with r.~y xsexs at cai~i.ch times Officer z~c~irieved leis money artd upon removing th.e 8greed 1 price of $8 fog the 2nd r~ssage, def staL-ed put your eight b::c~s eway, g°ttt giving another r~ssage". .cer questioned th:~s to ccilicla def reg~Iied ''ycnzr T~idd3.ng that you F:ant a 2nrl ~~ ge aren't you?" Officer rlue~tiorted thin and she stBtecl "wegre mot io the .ess to cio ~~11. ih:~s massag3.n." OFricer at this tie stated he cans i.~aterested tress unfaMZ.lia~• Uitt~ ti~is p`;:ti.cul.:ar ply:ce and ~:-ru~oc~:€~lx naked shat tiro char;- .c~ be fo:. atheA services. lief stated it ru:~a ;15.00 to $S0.00. Officeru =d if rile $15.00 cans c~ahat hQ ihau.~ht it teas a*ad clef ret~3'~ed "th~tt'i~ s hat~ci3ob", .cer then asiced~ c~t.at the $50.00 c:~,u and def rep3.i.ed "f:ikZt's the good lay". .ecr nucsti.oned if ti2ere ir.3s anything else and clef stated "iherers var~.ous ~~a prl.ced inbetcaee-:a. Officer ~:sked i.f sho c~:~~g refo~•ri.ng to wi~zt the officer tilittllCii''.g Z3x1d clef stated "a b3.oW fob is $30.0© If 1:hat`3 tciaa.t your ihinicita~;" _ce:: saYd that clas chat his hhouyhts c~ere and t~slzed if there wasrt¢t g xeaaoua-- pric© fox th3.a goad lay rig $50.OJ sec~aed rather e.~pensive. statced that a lay ~taa 5 SO 8nd there c,~s no P6 ice other thou the ~ ~.~Q that tt~e .cer cnul.d get laid but why didn't fie Piave u Llow~ob far t[te $30. Officer told t fiat he di.dza't particularly lil.e that to whic:~ def rcpl.xeci "cael3., hoc bout a nd j cbt°. Off ice~_ told clLf ire ti:ounht hs wouici save zss .money ton~.ght and sly ~:ctea~-n at u i.af~e~: des to to :tee E:ox. ~Jef thanked officer a*td .left the room offl.cer 'i TIt'112d1.uE:el.y xoil.owed ider and observed :lLt the iobEay Sbt. Neese and Off . ;. (}ff. darn dressed ~znd advised def sine was under arrest for PC-Prostitution. t~las assisted by Off. darn, .Sgt. i7Fese in retrieving her cl.a~hes wh3.ch Caere fir: nom msrited "office". Off. darn hands;r3 def her c2othitag piece by pieca~ checlrir~ ~i as he ~~ent. for possible weapons. .: r ,. ~~ .. . r . ~ti~t~.r~; cie:~`s pur:.>^ orffceru reta~,ned the purse and s chcctc of this .revea; ' { a~g~~: cc~,Lt~ ~. -~`•.~{.e pn::'•::~ Y s~b~4~ ^.ce •~Fi~.et~~d to be c~a~cotics. Def ~~a~ I:2~ised she tsa.s u~~lcj~ .;:rest ~'or k~C~:~I:~;~r.. It ~neuld be ~tote3 L-hr~t a~.on~ witi~ ~iLe powdery :~uhstax~-ve t1~c n ~ ~~ rt~st~.c rube ~^PPro~. 5" lou~tla. route to crn: rthouse zc:ld of~~c.-t_rw tF~:t stye ~~d beez2 rip~d offc gor a total . ~2 ?.Vs an-: ~:i~y cacren`E° ~JE ou;: c::tcyz~:rf~ tI~€; peop~.3 respons3.blefor that type ~, ~s za~:izer t~~rxi tue ~,~co ie en~,::~;cd i:~ v.1 ce.. ; „. jlsxti~ (q\ y. '. Sq z. ._.. - 1T - CITY OF RICI-IFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~ Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 92 Agenda March 24, 1975 The Honorable IVlayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: - _ ,,~; ' Subjeet: Bids on Permanent Street Improvement Construci:ic~n ;_, Areas Nos. 8, 12A and 12B anal Determination o Width of 70th Street Lyndale Avenue to 675 F'e-et East and 67th Street from W. Pleasant to Harriet On March 20,; 1975 bids were opened by the city manager for,permaneY~t ;, ; ,, street. improvement construction in Districts Nos . 8, 12A'and 12B, :City ~ Project No. 667, in accordance with previous city council authorization. -, -~ ` 'Ihe city clerk,. public works director, planning director, administrative assistant anc~ a member of the consulting engineer's office also represented the city at the bid... opening. The Minutes of the bid opening are attached for city council review. District-No. 8-includes-that area bounded on the north by Wood Lake and • 7Dth Street,:. the east by West Pleasant Avenue, the south. by 78th Street and the west by 35W Districts Nos.` 12A -and 12B includes that area bounded on the :north;;by 66th Street, the east by West Pleasant Avenue ~ the south by '~ 70th Street end the west by Lyndale Avenue. ; .The attached'bid_tabulation .indicates the amount bid by each of .the 9 bidders- for-the proposed project. The consulting engineer's cost estimate for the construction of this project .was $1, 800 y 000. The low bid of Minne ota Valley Surfacing Company at $1,513,481.25 is 16.6% below this estimate. 1°/ra below !q`14 t~o~f~'k+~le It is the recommendation of the consulting engineer, the public works director and myself .that the city approve Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company as the low bidder and authorize the Mayor. and City Manager to execute contract documents with this firm. subject:to approval by the Minnesota Highway Department of the State Aid plans:. In addition to the. awarding of the contract for Areas Nos, 8, 12A and 12B ~. ~` Council Letter No:. 92 -2- :.Agenda Tviarch 24, .1.97.5 ;5 1.,' The city council has requested that the .staff have an` item on _the agenda to discuss the width of 70th Street between Lyndale Avenue and a` port 675 feet east of Lyndale Avenue (70th Street adjacent. to Lyndale Fend).-.As council members will recall, on February ZS, 1974, the city council passed a resolution indicating that 70th Street between Portland Avenue and Lyndale Avenue.. sould be con- structed to a 'width of 36 feel. If the council wishes to-retain the scheduled 44 foot wide street adjacent to Lyndale Field it is necessary for the city council to pass a resolution amending the street'wdth and parking restrictions for 7:Oth Street. Affected .property owners have been advised .that this subject will be dis- cussed at the March 24th meeting. 2 At the regular scheduled council meeting of February 10, 1975 +h~; ~ •~° ~~' ~,,; city council discussed street width and parking restrict-?.ors for various state aid streets loca ed within the 1975 paving pr~g~am. At .this time the.'. staff indicated that those residents effected by "~~• -these streets were notified and an information meeting was held on February 6, 1975: Although. the staff did hold an information meeting with those residents adjacent to 67th Street betvaieen Ha:rr~~t ~' " '~ .. Avenue and West Pleasant Avenue, we neglected to have this item on the council agenda . 67th Street between Harrief and Pleasant _ ,~, { '' Ave'izue is a State Aid Street :and it is necessary for the city to in- `~Y~ ` ~ `sta'll either a 44 foot wide street or a 36:foot_street with parking ._ ., restricted on one_ s ide . • Tfi .r - ~~ ~s the recommendatori'of the city staff that.. because of the existing banl~s:. ~;~nd close approximation to the property line of the residents along this. .5, :, fortion'of 67th: Street, tYrat 67th Street between: Harriet Avenue and West Pleasant Avenue be constructed to a -width of 36 fee and parking be banned from ,one side ,of :the street, Respectfully submitted, ,. _ Wayne S. Burggraaff City lVianager WSBf kl cc: Public Works Director Finance Director- ': ,,:, ~~, ' ; t t< ~~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening March 20, 1975 STREET PAVING AND APPURTENANT WORK City Project No. 667, 667A and B PHASE II Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative staff was called to order by Wayne Burggraaff, City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids on street paving and appurtenant work, City Project No. 667, 667A and B, Phase II, as advertised in the official newspaper on February 27th and March 6th, 1975. Present: Wayne S. Burggraaff, City Manager Gary Eide, Administrative Assistant Peter Eberz, Public Works Director Richard Krier, Planning Director Thomas Moran, Finance Director LeRoy Nyhus, Orr-Schelen-Mayern and Company The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID Minnesota Valley Surfacing Co. B. B. 5% $1,513,481.25 C.. S. McCrosson, Inc. B. B. 5% 1,588,634.00 McNamara-Vivant lnc. B. B. 5% 1,627,841.25 Hardrives, Inc. B. B. 5% 1 ,701 ,183.50 Northwest Bituminous Co., Inc. B. B. 5% 1 ,545 ,008.75 Fischer Sand And Aggregate B. B, 5% 1, 557 ,156.25 Lundin Construction Co., Inc. Riegger Roadway B. B. 5% 1, 528 ,855.75 Alexander Construction Co., Inc. B. B. 5% 1, 616 ,509.65 B-Tu Mix B. B. 5% 1,747,154.20 The city manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the council meeting on Monday, March 24, 1975. • Thomas J. Moran City Clerk N r '~ i N (D C) (D '~ O rK r 0 r• i O cf- C N N (D L!) • ~ n N• OR (_] 1 O cF {f} N v . VI N W v N N Vl ~x ~ ~ ~ ~ m t-3 ~ µ ti' K K O K O '~ 0 ~1 ~ K ~ C] Cn U i ~' C B c f- ~ i u ~ K ~ O ~ ~ H ~ ~ UO] ~-' ~ ~ ~ N bd ' ~ c+ ~ 04 ~ ~ ~ ~ f7 N• C~ Q~l ~ C] ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ n 0 O ~ H ~ v ~ ~ O H bd t7j trJ td trJ bd td trJ tzl t~ t~ ~ ai bd td b~ bd bd ~ d vi ~n vi ~n vi `n ~n vi vi O - H H FC O O\ O 1 dl O d\ Vt ~J1 ~J'1, ' Vl vt F-' ~'i --J K ltt ~i ~ ~i CA N -~ ~i 1-' K -G" ~ O? vl -J ~ vl N OD W n W n ~O oo n v-i O~ t--' O ~ -G" o H O c+ --~ c+ p: -F' cF O W vl O V 1 Q ¢ N ¢' ~ N ¢ ~ O N --J --~ N M ~tl ~ O Vt Vl O Vl V1 Vl Vl ~ N• N• H ~ in in `i c~ try ~-d o ~• m ~m~C wO~ ~ ~ (~D ~ H n N ~ '~O. O ~ K ~ ~~-~ ~ O ~ ~ n '~ ~ ~ ~ ',~ n cr ~~ `~ ~' H g~i ~ O ~O ~i v. V~'1 'x (D n N ~ ~ o ~ ~ o o• N~ ~o rn ~ rn yr ~ -~ N N ,b go I-' N ~.. RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO MINNESOTA VALLEY SURFACING COMPANY, 12008 12TH. AVENUE SOUTH, BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA, FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, AREAS NOS. 8, 12A AND 12B CITY PROJECT N0. 6b7 Clerk's File No. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That it is hereby determined that the bid of Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company is the lowest bid by a responsible bidder for the construction of City Project No. 667, Areas Nos. 8, 12A and 12B, permanent street surfacing. 2. That the bid of Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company for the construction of the above referenced project on a unit price basis, at the price contained in ' their proposal of March 20, 1975., with an estimated construction cost of $1,513,x+$1.25 is hereby accepted. 3. That-the proposed contract between Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company and: the City of Richfield be given Clerk's File No. and be placed on file. That said proposed contract for the .construction of said city project is hereby approved and adopted and the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for or on behalf of the City of Richfield and the Clerk is authorized and directed to affix the city seal thereto.. ~+. That payments to be made under the terms of said contract shall. be charged against the`Construction Fund.. 5. That the Corporate Surety Bond in the sum of the estimated contract price which-accompanies said proposed contract is hereby accepted and approved. 6. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to return the security documents to the unsuccessful bidders upon execution of said proposed contract. Adopted by the City Council this 2~+th day. of March, 1975• ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk Loren L. Law. Mayor ~.. <• RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION RELATING TO DESIGN OF CERTAIN STATE AID STREET - 67TH STREET FROM WEST PLEASANT AVENUE ,TO HARRIET AVENUE BE TT RESOLVED by the-City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: 1. The city council, having explored all alternatives, hereby deter- mines that the benefits of constructing the following designated municipal state aid street with a 36 foot width outweigh the benefits of a ~+~+ foot traveled roadway width. When such roadway is improved by concrete curbs and gutters and permanent street surfacing, it shall be designed and constructed at a 36 foot roadway width. 2. Upon completion of such improvements on such municipal state aid street or any segment thereof, parking on one side of the improved portion of such street shall be prohibited and suitable signing to than effect-shall be installed. 3. The municipal state aid street to which this resolution is applicable is 67th Street from West Pleasant Avenue to Harriet Avenue. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 2?+th day-of March, 1975• ATTEST: Loren L. Law Mayor Thomas J. Moran City Clerk ~~ CITY OF RIGHFIELn , MINNESOTA .: Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 91,- Aganrla 1VIarch 24, 1975 The. Honorable Mayor .and Me~ribers of the :City Council City of Ricnfeld Gentlemen: Subj ecti: Bids oh. Street Lighting for nistricts 7 , 8 , 9 12A and 12B, City Projec~ No. 667' On March 20, 1975, bids were opened by the city manager for ornamental. s reef --light installation in T~istricts Nos . 7 , 8 , 9 , 12A and 12B in accordance with previous city.. council .authorization. The director of public works, planning director, finance director, administrative assistant, and a member of'the con-` sulting engineer's office also represented the city at the bid opining. The minutes of the bid opening are attached to this council letter. District No. 7 includes than area bounded on .the north by 74th Street, th'e east by Portland Avenue, the south by 78th Street and the west by Pleasant Avenue. T~istr.ct No. 8 includes that area bounded on the north byVlTood Lake and 70th Sfreet,`the east by West Pleasant Avenue, the south by 78th-.Street and the west by''35W. District No. 9 includes that area bounded on the north by 66th Street, the east by 35W , the south by 76th Street and the west, by Penn. Avenue. District No. 12A and 12B includes that area bounded on the north by 66th Street,. the,east by West Pleasant Avenue, the south by 70th Street and the- -west by Lyndale Avenue . The attached bid tabulation indicates the amount bid by each of the eight bidders- for the proposed .project. There-.were three alternate bids as follows: 1. Aluminum standards 2. Stainless. steel standards 3. Add or deduct for power/doo luminaires. The: city has installed the stainless steel standards in the other portions of: the city where the street improvement program has been completed ....,The .power/door auminaires :will .provide an easy access for maintenance and changing ,of the ballasts . In addition, if it becomes feasible to convert. to sodium typ° lamps , _~ _, Council Letter No. 91 -2- Agenda March 24, 1975 it will .be less ,cos ly with the. power/door luminaires . The consulting engineer's cost-estimate for the construction of this project was $52.0., 000:00. The low bid recieved was that of Wenzel Plumbing and Heating,.. 'Inc.. at .$469, 734.00 for stainless steel .standards., .plus the addition of Alternate Bid III for power/door luminaires_at $2,000.00, for a total bid of $471, T34.00 . This` low bid is ten percent below the estimate. - It is the recommendation of the consulting. engineer, the public works director, and, myself that the city council approve Wenzel Plumbing and Heatin~~, Inc. as the low bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Man~~er . toexecute a contract with this .firm for the stainless s'teei standards 3n~1 power/door uminaires . Respectfully su'om ed , g c~,. • , ~'~ ~~ ~. Wayne S. Burggraaff ~~~ . Czty: Manager WS3/b1j cc: Public Works Director Finance T~arector ~,p0 3- `~ • Z.ou ~....._._. .~ ~o+ ~ ~~•~~ ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening N;arct~. 20, 1975 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING AND APPURTENANT WORK City Project No. 667 Areas No. 7, 8, 9, and 12A, B Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative staff was called to order by Wayne Burggraaff, City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids on residential street lighting and appurtenant work in Areas No. 7, 8, 9 and 12A, B, City Project No. 667, as advertised in the official newspaper February 27th and March 6th, 1975. Present: Wayne Burggraaff, City Manager Gary Eide, Administrative Assistant Peter Eberz, Public Works Director Richard Krier, Public Works Director Thomas Moran, Finance Director LeRoy Nyhus, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. • • The following bids were submitted and read aloud: TOTAL BID ITEM II Stainless Steel ALTERNATE BID ITEM IIT GE Power/Door BIDDER SECURITY Standards Standards Luminaries Premier Electric Construction Corp B B 5°/ $499,000 $479,000 + $ 3,100.00 TOTAL BID ITEM I BID Aluminum Electric Service Co. B. B. 5% 533,889 509,556 + 3,611.52 Collins Electric Co B B 5°/ 531,926 506,342 + 3,189.00_ Batzli Electric Co B B 5% 565,472 568,348 + 3,037.00 Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc B B 5% 494,494 469,734 + 2,000.00 Electric Repair & Construction Co ,Inc B B 5% 539,700 514,723 + 23,000.00 Egan-McKay B B 5% 555,440 523,760 + 3,316.00 Hoffmann Electric Co B B. 5% 543,506 515,284 + 3,687.00 The city manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the council meeting on March 24, 1975. Thomas J. Moran City Clerk ' ~ i .'7 N K N N C1 O c+ ~• 1 r O ~+. P~ ~ ~ O ~ ~. ~ c+ N N ~ ~ ~ t3' (D N. Fi ~ hi- N O c ~ O FO-' ff~ H ~ ~ -J H H ~ ~ ~~ • ¢ ~ K O O W o~, K ~ ~ O am ,. ~ N c N ~ C) N ttj c+ ~ N ci- W O ~ ~. tY (D ~ N ~ "~ • ro Oq ~ F+. H `~ N ~ .~ . -'t ~ ~ . ch N ~ N ~ n O F'• O ~ O ~ ~y P V '~ ~ ~ v ~j O O x ~+ ~i t~ ~ '~ ~ ~ n c~ ~d F-' ° ~ ° ~ ~m ~m • ~ ~ t ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~i N ~-'• ~ ~i N ~ ~ ~' ~ n~ b trJ m o ~ ~ ' ~ '~ ~ tD C) F- N CA (D (D P~ fz H ~ N ~ ~ n • ~. W ch (~ (D n ~ ~ W O C] C] C~ 0 0 ~ O O, ~ 0 ~ 0 . F-' ~ ~ ~ c+ p ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~ (1 1 A d- cf. N. O ~ ~ ~ n bd tzi Gd td trJ bd GJ bd bd bd bd bd td t~ td td td ~ fD III Vt ~Ii V1 Vl Vl Vl Vl ' ~- _ vl ~n vi -~ ~n vi v~ i ~ i W w ~ W v i ~ v i ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ O " O O ~ N ~ a d~ O O -~" N O~ ~O O H O O O O O O 0 O ~ 0 a a m Cn . c+ ~ . ~ _ * ai ~ N N N O\ 01 O O -~ U] H H ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ N ~ ~ ( D N W ~ O O ~ 9 p p ~ N W ~ " v 1 F -' O O O O O O O O ~+ Lf2 O O O O O O O O ~ R+ ~ O P~ N ~ N W y W y W V N V W V ~ W V W V W V O N~ W ~ N O ~~ ~ F -' O O W H -J d\ O O - 1 ~O 1-' O ~ H ~ O O O O O O N O H O ~t W - ~ ~ ~ (D N c~bdo~ ~ ~ ~ wo~ ~ N ci+ H n N N '.~ O ~c+~ N m tb ~c+d O Cl2 ~ o r~ C7' ~ Qq. C~ ~ ~ rah ci- N W ~S' ~~ ~ y pq b ~ ~. Fi I-' P~ O. ~ n ~ O v~ ~ m n c+ .c+ N Fi ~O ~. O . c+ N~ ~ -~ ~ V W V N R~ N N bd RESOLUTION N0. '~ • RESOLUTIC~1 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO WENZEL PLUMBING & HEATING, INC., 3600 KENNEBEC DRIVE, EAGAN, MINNESOTA FOR ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, AREAS 7, 8, 9, 12A AND 12B CITY PROJECT N0. 667 Clerk's File No. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That it is hereby determined that the bid of Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc. is the lowest bid by a responsible bidder for the construction of City Project No. 667, Ornamental Street Lighting, Areas. Nos. 7, 8, 9, 12A and 12B. 2. That the'bid of Wenzel Plumbing.& Heating, Inc. for the construction of the-above referenced project. at the price contained in their proposal of March 20,•1975,-with an estimated construction cost of $~+69,73~+, using stainless steel standards., and the addition of_Alternate Bid III in the amount of $2,000. for power/door luminaires, is-hereby accepted, subject to submitting the city an Affirmative Action Plan. 3. That the proposed contract between Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc. and the City of Richfield be given Clerk's File No. , and be placed on file. That. said proposed contract for the construction of said city project is hereby approved and adopted and the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for or in-behalf of the City of Richfield and the Clerk is authorized and directed to affix the city seal thereto. 1+. That payments to be made under the terms of said contract shall be charged against the Construction Fund. 5. That the Corporate Surety Bond in the sum. of the estimated contract price which accompanies said proposed contract is hereby accepted and approved. 6. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to return the security documents to. the unsuccessful bidders upon the execution of said proposed contract. Adopted by the .City Council this 2~+th day of March, 1975 ATTEST:. Loren L . Law Ma~ror Thomas J. Moran City Clerk _,, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office: of City Manager Council Letter No . 9 0 Agenda March 24, 1975 The Honorable,.. Mayor and Members of he City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Resolution Relating to Equalization of Assessments in Metropolitan Area Mayor Law has requested that an.item be placed on the 1Vlarch 24, 1975 city council agenda for the .purpose of .giving. consideration to adopting: a resolution encouraging. equalization of assessments throughout the Mefropol- i'tan Area.. A letter from. Mayor Al Hlde from Plymouth together with ,a proposed draft - of aresolution is attached for city .council consideration. Respectfully submitted, '` ~ -~ ,Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja Mayor.Loren L. Law CJty of Richfield 6700 Portland Ave. Richfield, MN 55423 _ Dear Mayor.Law`: y-'~~z;~.~~`-- Qur taxpayers are agas n ce! ng required tc, Oc;V a d;'sproport.ionate Shur? of metropn i i tarp area taxes . i F ~ Com~;~~ ss i c,ne~ of -~ axut! on ~ ~ .1973 i=~ea E Estate Assessments Sa I es ft4T i c STUdy an. i :~ i nd i rates ~i~iiz1 ~!ennep i n G~~unfiy !oasis a I ! counties i n t:ie :seven-ceun i~y a sea i n fie r7s cf The re ! :.-i ensh i F of ! oca I assess~;,ents to '~arke± trar..,,;c~'-!~^s. ,°,ttache~ is a co~;~p3r!:^n of 1-~•'~• 8~~re~={-G S~icc ra'tics for 1972 a!ja i~i73 ~:s prepared ~y the (,a:rn~~ssioner of Taxa~ i.,~:. As aresult: cf thaw disp:~rities, ~'enr~fpin County taxpayers. are bain~ req~:i red to (i) contri bu#e a uIS~rOp.r-i'i ona to share of the growth i •~. the wunty's ccmmerci a [ ;:r,,; : ndustri z! tax base to the other counties, (in 19;~ This is estim?{~d a± rrx~re than ~0,700,OGJ}; and (2} pay u disprop~rt;or~ate share of metropolitan area iu?ce3. Wou i ~ you join us i r. f i ghti r.g for our c. t i zPrs b adopting the attacht~d resolution at yLur ne~~ Council meeting and for`vard~ng it 'to these lister' in 'he resoiutier.. This magi°r' must he Corr~c;'ed and ! believa ~:L.it uc, ~~~POi:41~ a Ci'iiii;c!'!c=v C'ifG~ i v `f i!@ c~7i't!i~t?:`'! ftL'~ +~~ i-1Gnr~r,~ili~ u~un , f'!la .G~:~r~'~i ~ a iG~~c:r UT' i 3:<~ti:.... Znd the Legi s i ayure, ~Wi~o ~: i I l dE~:.:~*~d that' apprOpri ~' ~° UJ~r"~Gl'i v° R?e~SUi e5 be `taken by she n:E'-?'r0~'Ul 1 t cn GO~~i~T~ °a tc~ brine t~i~ei r assess;nenTs i n line x~i th marret transactions. The c~„+f i deuce ~f tho citizen ? n his c~ovarr.r,ent and i n us as go~~err~mr:r+t ofEi~.:~aia is to a IargL .^~asure det~errr.?^ed by hew equitably tie hanJle acid adr^ir~ister matters such as this -- it is a matter. of integrity: Sincerely, ~. ;. ~n ~ ~ ~ ~, Iw .~ ~ ~°~ ~ Mayr~r D ~iRR '~ 1975 3025'HARBOR LANE, PLYMOUTH; MINNESOTA 55441, TELEPHONE (612) 546-3571 Z n . .. O O1 I O 1~ M t0 Ot r d F-' r OO i~ al lp l0 C1 O1 O v z H ~ 'r N 1 N ! 01 O t0 M ~l ~ _ Q (~ ( 3 rn M r CO u~ CO- . I e- O O n n O ~~ v M M d CO. CO i~ t~ r n O~ N M 1~ tp IA 117 t0 ~ . F-- 1~ t~ 00 tD l0 f~ W p... v O . U i.. . N N M d r fem. CO Ol ~ n Ol Ol M M ~D l0 N r t0 1~ 1~ t~ t0 1~ ' ~~ M N CO CbV O M O O - - i~ OI - 00 IA O N ~ O 00 CO . } 1~ 1~ 61 K 1~ h I~ W v N ¢ ~ N t0 O1 O N O r n D Ol O -1~ 1~ t0 N _ _ O n ~ n ~ t.. v - N O - t-+ ¢ M V N d N d ~ d (.._ W 1~ ~ ¢ d' Ol r r tl' tp O r OO . <L' ¢ Z H Ol Ol' Ol W W O O N >- C- W 1- W J Z Z q _ Z N M r d Ot d N - O W I~ I - U S 61 M N to fM CO ~-- Ol Ol 01 C1 01 N Z Z - ~ dd _ ' ~ O W W M M r ~ ~ t t F-' N W r r ~ - ¢ N N MM -(r W N - 1 M 1~. ~ Ol 1~ LA M r ~ W N Imo) 00 ~. E- ~ a: } U ~ N ~ ll7 i~ CO OD lZ7 p, Ll ¢ F- Q r - ~ W b f~ l0 t0 O7 01 ~'~ W 7 F-' 1 1 W H = O Qt ¢ O X NM C'3 1-- V Q n n . C7 N O N ` Ol M CO i~ OD O1 d1 ¢ W ~ f~ . . . . rr.. W 01 r O t0 LI) ct . J - d r 00 OD Y~ n O 1 T ¢ v d - 1 W Z ~ 3 ~ ~ N ~ - d) 3 7 _ 1~ a M d CO IA d r 01 . N C/ N N Ce ¢ n l ~ ~ d Ol M N r N ~ N a' d O O ~ R' 1~ (~ ~ OD .1~ l0 00 t~ V- tee- •~ . Z U - ~ - N ~O ~ _ ¢ ~ t~a~ ¢ s. N U N 00 tD f~ d .Y N y n ^ ~ i d) N Ol O~ ~ M IA IA N r r r r . 1`~ OO n CO S- rt2 b v ~ _ eONN S C O c C _ ~ - O 41 ~ M M O 00 ap r Ol 00 - w ~ E - 1 - n l . . . . Rf y N 01 r N N M M 61 r ~ - {.a y y~ r 01 O~ OI OO !~ N 61 O dl W ~ ~- ¢ v y y y - X GI y y /~ O C¢d z ~ c ¢ N O M 01 M M f~ d r d N - h~ n ~ . ~ +~ ~.a - - Of O N d O~ f~ O) M b b . r Ol O~ O~ OD tD 00 O~ 4- +~ +~ v O y y W W 6! }1rr IiS 1~ b - ~N W J tq [Y CL' - ¢ N J J ¢ z W o v cY_ . C7 W 5.. . S CL 1-" IL W O !-- N W - N c,~ .. t3 N `..¢ X ~.. ~ O _ O _ C7 W d d ¢ O Z O ... DRAFT RESOLUTIOPd ~,. 4JHEREAS, the Commissioner of Taxation's 1973 Real: Estate Assessment Sales Ratio Study again indicates that Hennepin County communities are leading all counties ~ in the r~ tropolitan area with respect to equity in assessing,. and 4lHEREAS, the aggregate sales ratio indicates that the counties of Carver, Dakota, Ramsey, Scott and ~~Jashington are failing to maintain appropriate assessing levels, thereby shifting the burden for metropolitan area services and. functions to ..the taxpayers of Hennepin and Anoka Counties, and tlHEREAS, by law the Commissianer of Taxation is charged with the responsibility of equalizing the assessments in those counties failing to prflvide for a proper level of assessment, which responsibility to date the-Cor~roissioner of Taxation has failed to exercise, N04l, TF{EREFORE, BE I t HEREBY RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY CO!;;yCIL OF TE•fiE CITY OF that this Counci Thereby requests that the Commissioner of Taxation require local assessors' and Boards of Re vievr to properly assess and equalize all property 4vithin the metropolitan area so as to correct the grievous errors ~:~hicY~ have appeared in the 1972 and. 1973 Peal Estate Sales. Patio Studies conducted by his department, so as to more properly provide for equalization in assessments among all properties in the metropolitan area, and FURTHER, that the Council of the City of hereby pledges .its support to the Commissioner of Taxation in carrying out-these responsibilities, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to the members of the Hennepin County legislative delegation. ~. CITY OF RICHFIELT~, MINNESOTA Office of City'Manag'er • ~~ Council Letter No.:89 Agenda- March 24 1975 The Honorable- Mayor `and Members of the City Council City of Richfield ..Gentlemen: Subject: Hearing Regarding Whether to Deny Food and- Food Fleet Licenses for Richfield Lanes The city council, at its meeting on March 10, .1975 , deferred action on certain licenses requested by Richfield Lanes, 6449 Lyndale Avenue. .The staff recommended that these license applications be deferred until this meeting ;in order to provide sufficient-time to provide a more accurate report to the city...: council. The Richfield-Lanes has specifically applied for licenses to operate a food, food fleet, on-sale beer and off-sale beer operations within the premises . It should be noted here that it is the city staff's -understanding that the ownership of the Richfield Lanes: has changed hands effective March 15, 1975. Therefore,: it is necessary for the new owner to apply for the required licenses. In the past, t e ci y Richfield Lanes into complete compliance with the various city ordinances. dealing with the preparation and serving of food . The environmental health director has , on numerous. occasions, written .specific orders to the former owner of this premises outlining the various .actions that he should take in order to provide a sanitary delivery of various food services. The most recent inspection by the environmental health director, this past-week, has again revealed. numerous violations of the city's health ordinance as it relates to-the preparation and serving of food . It is therefore: the recommendation of the environmental health -director, the city attorney's office, and myself that the-food and food fleet license application by Richfield. Lanes be denied. We are recommending th.e denial of these two licenses with the understanding Ghat once the applicant has met the various code requirements, he may again reapply for the licenses. This should be considered as a public hearing by the city council.. The city staff will present the specific city code violations in relation to the distribution and serving of food . The owner of the Richfield Lanes will be notified of this-hearng::and. may be present at thecity council meeting.- Food and Food Fleet h 't has had a` difficult time in attempting to bring-.the • ,,~ `' Council Letter No. 89 -2- Agenda March 24, 197.5 .~ On.and Off-Sale Beer The new owner of the Richfield Lanes has also applied for an on and off-sale ~3.2 beer license. It should be noted that under the current city ordinance, if the city council denies the. food license to this establishment, they will. be ineligible to receive an on-sale beer license. Representatives of the police division of the city's Public Safety department have met-with the new owner of the Richfield Lanes . The city's representatives have clearly outlined the types of problems that they have experienced with the former owner of this establishment, as well as the clientele that has inhabited this place of business. In addition, they have outlined various recommendations to the-`new owner that.. he should follow in policing his own business and in strictly complying with various city codes. and state laws. It is therefore the recommendation of the Public Safety :nepartrnent, city attorney's office, and myself that the Richfield Lanes be granted an off-'sale beer license with `the understanding that if they do not strictly comply with -the city ordinance and state law, 'the. staff will recommend to the city council that their license be revoked. Respectfully submitted C.~ ~- ,. ~J ,;) Wayne S~ , Burggraaff City Manager WSB/blj cc: Public Safety Director` _: City .Clerk • ,-~ ~ ~'" CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager.. Council Letter No . 8 8> Agenda'March 24, 1975 The Honorable. Mayor and Members of -the City Council. City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Resolution,Supporting Amendments to the Open Meeting Law Mayor Law has requested:.that an item be placed on the March 24, 1975 city council agenda for the purpose of considering proposed amendments to the open meeting law. .~ Attached is a copy of a communication from 'the State League of Minnesota Municipalitie concerning this matter. If the city council believes that the proposed amendments are desa.rable and wishe to support the proposed changes, consideration'shouid be given to adopting the resolution which is included in the information from the League . Respectfully submitted, ~• VlTayne S. Burggraaff City ..Manager WSB/eja ~~ ~, { 1# ?'~. ~ 1i1~ ~PE~ 6~a~e~s~ ~~i~ March 10, 1975 le~~u~ of rr~innesota rrlunicip~ii~t-ems T0; MCENICIPAL OFFICIALS SUBJECT: PROPOSED AIUSENL'dUIENTS TO -THE -OPEN MEETING LAW Find enclosed a draft of legislation that is being put into bill form by Representative Howard Neisen of Mounds View. This proposal is the result of input from various groups and individuals as well as the application of the League Legislative Policy in this matter. A summary of the bill is also enclosed along with a sample resolution that your City. Council may wish ~o adopt in support of this proposed legislation, Please send copies to your State Senator and Representative as well as a copy to the League office. Please feel free to modify the resolution to include any addi- tional information that you urish to convey. Following your sending the resolutions • to your members of the State Legislature, may we suggest that also a personal contact be .made to let them know of your support of this type of legislation.. Also, please send us any information that would identify problems that .the present ' open meeting law has caused you or your community in the discharge. of duties of the elected offices in the public interest, If you have. any questions; or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me on this matter. As a matter of further information, Representative Neisen feels that if the bill .comes-out of the Revisor's-of Statutes .office this month, he will be able to schedule hearings in the house in early April. Dean A. Lund D LL Lr 1~ ~ ';,~ < < Executive .Director f~;~ ~~' i~~~ Enes. Richfi~l~i Ciiy P~iar~ager ~~: Pj r 300 hanover building, 480 oedar street, .saint paul, minnesoba 55101 C612J 222-28F31 1. ~ '~:~~ ,Atli ~~~o ;~„.. 6eac~ue e~ r~~~ne~c~c mun~c~~cletres II~1 C)pen Meetings Law Modifications - Municipal officials as a group and the League of Minnesota Municipalities,.strongly agree r~~ith the basic premise of the "open meetings law" -- that is, to assure the public`s right to be informed. about the conduct of the public's business. However, . the League is proposing amendments for two reasons. First, a recent Attorney General's opinion interpreted the law as applying to deliberations as well as formal actions. of local governing bodies and further said that the law applies to deliberations of two members of afive-member cour_cil. The League believes this opinion is too restrictive and should be clarified. Second, the League believes that there are certain specific instances where the public interest would be better served by briefings for elected officials in closed sessions.- Draft amendments proposed by ;the League 1. To define "meeting" so that the law applies only to instances where a quorum of the body is present.. 2. To permit a local governing body, by a 2/3 vote, to go into closed or executive session for a specific item of discussion, specifically: • a. To .discuss and plan negotiation strategy in the matter of public employment relations. b. To meet and negotiate with the exclusive representatives of any employee group. c. Attorney/Client relationship.. d. , Land Acquisition, e. Discussion of the character of an employee, as opposed to competence, except employee may request a public hearing. f. Evaluation of job performance or conduct of any employee. g. Considering application for employment on a person who is employed at the time of the meeting and who requests that preliminary consideration be made of their application at a closed meeting. The law would provide that a written or taped record of the meeting would be made and' deposited with a court authority, to be released publicly when the information is no longer sensitive. However, in employee matters, the record would remain closed, unless the employee wants the record made public. Suggested action Action will likely not,come up until late March or early April. In the meantime, review the problems that you are having on the matters listed above with your respective Tegislators and attempt to gain their support for these amendments. 10/75 QC:p jr 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C61 2] 222-2861 ' LMM Draft 3/6/75 -B A bill for an .act relating to open meetings of public bodies ,• amending Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 471.705, Subdivisions 1, 2 and by adding subdivisions.. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 471.705 is amended to read: j471.705 7 /rMINNESOTA OPEN MEETING LAW.7 Subdivision 1. The following words used in this section shall have the definitions-indicated., ('a) Meeting means the convening of a quorum of the constituent membership of a public body whether corporal or by means of electronic equipment, to discuss or act upon a matter over which the public body has supervision, control, jurisdiction, or advisory pcarer. (b) Public body means the state legislature, and any state agency, board, commission, or department when required or permitted by law to transact public business in a meeting, and the governing body of any school district however. organized, unorganized territory, county, city, town, or other pub lie body, and of any committee, subcommittee, board, department or .commission thereof. (c) Quorum, unless otherwise defined by applicable law, means a simple majority of the constituent membership of a public body. Subd. 1 2. Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute,. all meetings; . including executive sessions, of any eta~e-age~e~T-bea~d3-eyes}ems-e~-~epe~~~ea~- wke~-~eq~}~e~-e~'-pe~te~.-b~-haw-~e-~~a~eae~-~~tb~}e-b~s~~ese-~-a-~ee~~~gT-a~~ Abe-ge~e~~~g-bed-e€-ems-e eh®e~-~is~ ~ie~-kewe~e~-e~ge.~~sed~-~e~ga~i$ed.-~e~~i~e~7 ee~#~y'~ -ei ~y~-~ex~3 -e~-®~he~-p~.~1~ e=b e~T-e~~-a€-ems-e e~i ~~e e~-e~.beex~~~ee~ - bee:~~s-eepa~~~e~~-e~-eese~e~-~~ie~ee€T public body shall be open to the public, except meetings of the board of pardons, the Minnesota corrections authority and closed meetings permitted under this section. The votes of the members of ae.ek e~e~e-ager~e~T-~i®s.~dT-a®m~~ea yea-®~-~e~e~~~ae~t-ems-e €-e~eb-ge~e~~~~g-bed3~T-eex~~ees sebeet~ees-b®a~~.y-~ep~.~~~e~~-®~-eex~ise}ems a public body on arty action taken in a meeting herein required to be open to-the public shall be recorded in a journal kept for that purpose., which journal shall be open to the public during all normal business .hours. where such records are kept. The vote of each member shall be recorded on each appropriation of money, except for payments of judgments,' claims and amounts fixed by statute.. No final action, decision, or vote with regard to any matter considered in a closed meeting shall be taken except in a me ting which is been to the public and in co h ance with this section. This section 'shall .not-apply to ' (a) any state agency, board, or commission when exercising quasijudicial functions involving disciplinary proceedings. (b) or to the gathering g of members of any public body in numbers of a uorum or more:. for social functions unrelated to the ublic business which is conducted by the body; or to attend regional, state, or national conventions, workshops, training sessions, or similar meetings, including traveling to or ... ( over ) '- -2- from_the convention, worksho or training session Notice shall be given of , the gathering of members to attend regional, state, or national conventions, workshops, training sessions, or similar meetings, in the manner provided in subdivision 5. Sub d. 3. A public body may hold a meeting closed to the public upon an affirmative vote of two-thirds of its; members, taken at an open meeting held, under the provisions of subdivision 1. A meeting closed to +„he public shall be limited to the matters allowed to be exempted from discussion at an open meeting by subdivision ~.. The vote of each member on the question of holding a meeting closed to the public and the nature of the reason for holding a closed meeting, as provided in subdivision l~, shall be recorded-.and entered into the journal. Closed meetings may be held only-when in .the. judgment of the public body the public discussion of the matter specified in sub division ~. would be detrimental to the public interest., Either a transcriut or a tape.recordir_g shall be"made of any closed maeting and deposited with the clerk of district court. The ublic bcd ?na• bs resolut~o~1 make the contents or the transcript or tape public at any time. i'he district tours mom, aeon. petition by an interested citizen and after a ~ublrir~e tYie contents af' the transcript or tape public,if, in the o inion of~*~e court, the public interest would be served,' but only after suf`fi_cien ~, -tir e -has passed To + preven., dlsruutlcn o• or prejudice to the issues or ersons d~~cassed at the closed meeting. However, +..he contents of an to e or transcript shall not be made public in the follo~r~~in .cases interviews -..for acL~riihistrative ~csitions ,~rhere abplicants for reasons of "present employment Zv:sh their a lica~:.ion to ,:emair. confidential "in case theT are note a ointed for the position scugr~t; or in t~~e ;natter of discussion of the character of an` employee unless publicaticr. is demanded by the employee. Sub d. 4, A meeting of a public body may be closed under the provisions ~of. this section in .the follovring instances: (a) When a public body meets with its representatives to discuss and plan negotiation.strategy to comply yvitr. the meet and negotiate provisions of the public"employment relatiors act of 1971 as amended; or arty superseding Federal or state legislation; (b) When the representatives of a public body meet-and negotiate with the exclusive representative cf,any employee group estab lished pursuant to the' public employment relations act of 1971 as amended; (c) When a public body meets with its attorney seeking legal advice con- ' cerning' any matter involving actual or potential litigation; (d) When a public body meets. to determine the, feasibility of land acquisition for any public purpose; (e) .When a public body meets to discuss the character, as opposed to the professional competence, or physical or mental health of a single individual .provided that such individual may require that such discussion be held. at an open meeting; ,and provided that nothing in this sub-section shall permit a meeting °. closed to the public for discussion of the. appointment of a person to a public- - bodY3 (f) When such public body meets to consider and evaluate the job performance or .conduct of any .employee; (g) When a public body meets to consider the application for employment of person who is employed at the time of the meeting and who requests that, the reliminary consideration of .the: application be at a closed meeting; however, the appointment of the-person must be at an open. meeting. • . , ~ -3- Sub d. 5. All public bodies shall give notice of their meetings as follows: ~~ (a) All public bodies shall give written public notice of their regular • meetings at the beginning of each calendar year. The notice shall include the dates, times, and places of such meetings. (b) All public bodies shall give supplemental written public notice of any regular, special, or rescheduled meeting no later than '.'2 hours before the meeting. .The notice shall include the agenda, if any,, date, time, and place of the meeting.... (c) Written public notice shall include, but need not be limited to (1) posting a copy of the notice at the principal office of the public body holding the meeting, or if no such office exists, at the building in which the meeting is to be held, and in at-least three other prominent places within-.the governmental unit; and (2) mailing a copy of the notice to arty person who requests notice of such meetings; any such person shall be given notice of all special or rescheduled meetings in the same manner as is given to members of the public body. (d) Where an emergency occurs that requires that the governing body meeting be held in less than 72 hours, notice shall be posted as in (c) (1) and. the governing body must adopt a resolution waiving notice of the meeting by unanimous vote. Subd. ~ 7. Any person who ~~®~a~ee-s~a~~.~~~sie~-~ is adjudicated to be in violation of this section shall be subject to personal liability n the-form of a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $100 for a single occurrence. • An action to enforce this penalty may be brought by arty person in any court of competent jurisdiction where the administrative office of the governing body is located. Upon a third ~i®~a~~®~-~3~ adjudication of violation relating to the same person connected with the same .governing body, such person shall forfeit any further right to serve on such .governing body or in any other capacity with such public body for a period of time equal to the term of office such person was then serving. The court .determining the merits of any action in connection with any alleged third violation shall receive competent, relevant evidence in connection therewith and, upon finding as to the occurrence of a separate third violation, unrelated to the previous violations issue its order declaring-the position vacant and. notify the .appointing authority or clerk of the governing body. As soon as practicable thereafter in the appointing authority or the governing body shall fill the position as in the case of any other vacancy. Subd. 3 7. This section may be cited as the "Minnesota Open Meeting Law". ~.. .. e Whereas, the City of supports the intent of ~ ~~ the open meeting law which is to have the public business; conducted openly so that the public can be informed of the decisions and actions being taken, and ~ Whereas, nevertheless there are certain matters of a confidential nature which j may not be in the public interest at a particular time to disclose publicly, and I Whereas, the Attorney General has rendered an .opinion which appears. to be. I more restrictive than the legislature intended. ~', NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED-THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~~ respectfully urge the Minnesota State Legislature to consider changes to the open meeting law which would provide for amendments to the law as proposed in the draft legislation submitted by the League of Minnesota Municipalities, and i i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be transmitted to the Governor of the State of Minnesota, .Members of the State Legislature and the League of Minnesota Municipalities. s . -~ ~ ~~ ,~ e -~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA .Office of City Manager f=, Council Letter No . 8 7 Agenda March 2'4, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City .Council City Cf Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Resolution Concerning Comprehensive Study of Tax and Fiscal Matters Fertaining to the City of Minneapolis `and Surrounding :Suburbs Mayor Law has requested that..the attached communication be included , on the :March 24 city council ::agenda for discussion purposes. { The communication comes from Mayor Frank Fleetham of St. Louis Park who is.xepresentng the ,steering committee of the suburban coalition. Mayor Fleetham is requestiMg that the city council: give `consideration to adopting the attached: resolution relative: to thin: matter. Respectfully submitted:, ~• Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc; Liquor .Store Manager Finance .Director City Attorney _~ CITY OF ST.: LOUTS PARK, MINNESOTA .5005 Minnetonka Boulevard ' St. Louis Park, Minn. 920-3000 March 11, 1975 Dear Mayor: Throughout the past weeks, a dozen municipalities, in cooperation with the Chambers of Commerce that represent those communities, have been involved in a "crash" program to meet the challenge posed by a one-sided tax study prepared for the Downtown Council and the Minneapolis Industrial Commission. About one week ago, we held a news conference and were able to successfully draw media attention to a very preliminary study shawing errors in the Minneapolis study. However, members of that original group feel that we must. continue our. efforts so that the legislature does hear-the whole truth about. the tax picture in our area, and not a biased study intended to provide tax relief for the downtown businessmen. The Ghambers of Commerce of suburban Hennepin County and at least 16 communities have bought about the initial formation of a Coalition of Suburban Chambers: of Commerce and Communities.. This letter is being sent as a formal request for your membership in this organization. At this point we do not see a need for a direct financial contribution, but rather a dedication of one member of your staff .and .one elected .official to be members of our "research pool" that will further expand our study base and provide the expertise necessary to produce a study of the caliber to compete with the study financed. by the Downtown Council and the Industrial Commission. The Chambers of Commerce hope to continue this process one step further and are currently investigating the possibility of joint sponsorship of a suburban tax analyst who would work with the Chambers, the municipalities, the schools, and other agencies to develop .an authoritive picture of the tax structure in suburban Hennepin County. The cities currently involved are not sitting still. This week some of our members will be meeting with the leadership of the Downtown Council. We are in the process of scheduling an informal meeting with the suburban legislature and.have requested an appearance before .the official Hennepin County delegations of the Senate and House. Please bring the enclosed resolution before your body for action at your next. meeting and forward the original to your legislators with a copy to myself so that we may include you in our organization. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions you can contact me at 929-7429 or Dennis Sederholm of the West Suburban Chamber of Commerce at 938-6337. Warmest regards, Frank G. Fleetham, Jr., Mayor - Steering .Committee Suburban Coalition SAMPLE RESOLUTION RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION REJECTING. MINNEAPOLIS TAX STUDY AND PROVIDING FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF FACTS AND CONTINGENCIES WHEREAS, the Minneapolis Downtown Council and the Minneapolis Industrial Commission recently caused a study to be made which contended that State tax laws should be modified to provide additional state aid to the City of Minneapolis, and WHEREAS, the study implied that the City of Minneapolis has been subsidizing suburban Hennepin County communities, and WHEREAS, the release of the. study on January 16, 1975 was done to influence members of the State Legislature to support modifications based upon said study, and WHEREAS, several of the suburban chambers of commerce and suburban communities have taken the initiative to respond to the study with preliminary facts that,demonstrate the inaccurateness of the Minneapolis study, and WHEREAS, the City Council:. has determined that considerable additional research and investigation is required before such a study can be realistically utilized by the Legislature, therefore BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of that the State Legislature is hereby requested to withhold any action based upon the Downtown Minneapolis Study until such time as the entire facts and mpl-ications'can be appropriately investigated and reported, and BE IT-FURTHER RESOLVED that the City: Council of endorses: a comprehensive study of the tax and fiscal matters and the relationship of suburbs and the City of Minneapolis, to include the impact of changes in tax aid formulas on the entire stateas well as the metropolitan area, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that (1) the suburban chambers of commerce. set up a municipal government task force to provide input for said studies, and (Z) that the City of hereby designates ' and to represent (elected official) (staff member) the City on such task force. Adopted by-the City Council ,~ ~~. ~. CITY OF .RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ` Council Letter No. 86 Agenda 1Vlarch 24, 1975 The :Honorable Mayor ~. and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen• Subject: Purchases in Excess: of $1, 000 Chapter 6, Section '6.05' of the City .Char-ter stipulates that the- city' council must approve the purchase of merchandise, materials, ,equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1, 0,00.- This letter contains two such items. for council approval. Purchase of Water. Meters for the Junior High Schools and, Two Elementary Schools. The construction of swimming pools at the tw.o junior high schools requires the installation of two water meters at each location to"provide the pools with metered city water. The city is reimbursed for the- cost of these meters. In addition, he Porta.and Elementary School and Lincoln Hills Elementary School will .each need two meters in order to .allow them to switch from private well to city water. The cost of the meters will be reimbursed to the city. Also, the city is proposing to purchase two additional meters, of similar size, which will be carried in inventory...and used as replacements when needed.- The staff has solicited quotations for the purchase. ~~f 10 water meters . It is therefore recommended that the city. council approve the purchase of water meters in the amount of $2, 554. Renewal of Contract for Alarm and "Protection Services at the Cedar Liquor. Stare Each of the Richfield liquor. stores is equipped with burglar alarm and detection apparatus. This equipment is owned and maintained by private firms on a .contract basis. At this time it is necessary to renew the two-year. contract for alarm and protection service at the .Cedar Liquor Store. This contract provides Council Letter No. 86 -2- ~ March 24, 1975 the store with efficient equipment. maintenance and quick service in the event of equipment breakdown. or actual damage by a burglary. The cost of this ,two year contract is $1,152.00. Funds are. available in the 1975 budget for this purpose. It is recommended that the. council approve this purchase in excess of $1:,000... Respectfully submitted, - ,. . ~ ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager V1lSB/ej a cc: Public. Works Director Liquor Store Manager Finance Director Administrative Assistant •. ¢.:~ 3 k,~ .~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No . 8 S Agenda March ,24, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and'.... Members of the City Council ' City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Transitory Ordinance Providing for the Expenditure of Money from the`Special Revenue Fund for Land, Acquisition andConstruction of a 'Muriicpa Off- Sale. Liquor,Stote • - At the March l0, 1.975 city councia meeting,,the city co.uncifi gave. first reading consideration to a transitory.ordinance. to provide for the transfer, of $375, 000 from the' special; revenue fund to provide funds for the land acquis- ition and construction of a municipal off-sale liquor'store. ,..~~ ,-: .-: A copy of the ordinance `is .:attached and it is recommended that it be "~ given second reading consideration. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Finance Director " Liquor Store Manager _~ J TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 16.30. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF A MUNICIPAL OFF-SALE LIQUOR STORE. City of Richfield does ordain: Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the city to expend money from the special revenue fund for the acquisition of land and construction of a liquor store such improvements being capital improvements for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2: The sum of $375, 000 is hereby authorized to be paid from the special revenue fund for such purposes. Section 3: The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council resolution. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 24th day of March, 1975. Loren L . Law Mayor ATTEST: Thom~~:s J. Moran City Clerk • {~ r ,. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~ .: Office of-:City Manager ''~ Council Letter No . 84' .. Agenda March 24, 197:5 , The Honorable Mayor and. Members of the, City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen Subject: Request for Authorization to Submit an Application For Flood Plain Insurance As the city council is aware,. the. City of Richfield was notified by the State of Minnesota and the Department of Housing and Urban:- Development that certain areas of the city: were-considered to be in a flood hazard area; and,therefbre, under the provisions of the .state law and federal regulations the City of Richfield had to apply for participation in the National Flood In- surance Program. These areas are _as follows: • , .Street. 1 . The area east of 23rd Avenue and north of 66th 2 . The area .located between '21st Avenue and Standish Avenue between 66th Street and 6.4th Street 3 . The. area north of 63rd Street between Cedar Avenue and - 16th Avenue 4 . The area around Legion. Lake 5. The area around Wood Lake 6. The area adjacent to Sheridan- Park 7. The area around Grass Lake or :Richfield .Lake The City of Richfield submitted an appeal to the State of Minnesota regarding these designated areas. On April 9, 1974 we were notified. by :.state officials that they had determined that there was not a major flooding area in the City of Richfield and that no part of-the city, in their opinion, should be included in the flood hazard area. In addition, the city has submitted an appeal to the. Department of Housing and Urban Development asking their review of the federal designation of flood hazard areas located in the City of Richfield. The submission. of this appeal was delayed until sufficient technical data could be obtained by the city staff and the city's consulting: engineering firma We have not .had, nor do we expect, an immediate answer on this appeal ' process. a - ~. ~. Council-Letter No. 84 -2- March 24, 1975 The federal regulations provide that lending :institutions covered by the federal insurance .program may not insure mortgage commitments .for develop.- merit or sale of property included in the -flood plain unless the municipality is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program and unless the in- dividual property owner holds flood insurance. Since. these regulations go into effect July 1, 1975, it is the staff's opinion that the city should apply for flood plain insurance at this point in time. In this way we will insure..., that-any delay in reviewing the City of Richfield's appeal will- not adversely affect a Richfield property, owner from selling or a prospective owner from purchasing property within the city . Attached is a copy of the proposed .application form app ying for flood.. insurance for,the City of Richfield: In addition to this basic application,. it is :necessary, that the .city council pass two resolutions. The first resolution assures the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Insurance Administration that it will enact any necessary land use control measures to meet the criteria set for the National Flood Insurance Program regulations.. In ~. addition, it CNOU1d be necessary for the city to designate a responsible officer ` to coordinate and work with the administrator of the federal insurance program. The second: resolution indicates that the City of Richfield has a building per- rnt system which the community has adopted. Copies of .these. resolutions are also attached to this letter for the city councl's_review. ' It is recommended that- the city council pass -the attached resolutions -and authorize the administration to submit this application to the Na Tonal Flood Insurance Agency. Respectfully submitted, yw~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff '~~ City Manager W SB/e j a ce: Public. Works Director ,~ <~ ,~ ~:x •~ 11 I E .~ _ ~`~. _ , » OMB No. 63-R1404 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND UFttiAN utvtwrmr:rv~ ~ FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION T{ON FOR PARTICIPATION IN 7NE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM* C A APPLI DATE T'o be suGmifted to: FEDERAL INSURANCE. ADMINISTRATOR Department of Housing and Urban Development, WasF-ingtotf, D.C. 20410 1. APPLICANT. (City, Town, etc.) City of .Richfield, Minnesota • ADDRESS (County, State) . • 6700 Portland. Avenue South,: Richfield, Minnesota 55+23 2. OFFICIAL, OFFICE OR AGENCY WITH OVERALL RESPONSIBILITY (Sea Appendix A(2)) TELEPHONE 612869-7521 ~ , City .Manager ADDRESS (Street or Box No., City, State, ZIP Code) ' 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 5523 3. PROGRAM CORDINA70R.(Offfciat, if different from above, with tesponsibitity tot coordinating program) TELEPHONE __. •~Director of Public .Works 612-869-7521 ADDRESS (Street or Box No., City, State, ZIP .Code) 6700. Portland Avenue South., Richfield, Minnesota 55+23 _ 4. FIRST FLUOR ELEVATION INFORMATION WILL BE RECORDED BY: (See Appendix A(3)) TELEPHONE Director of Public Works 612-~869~7521 ADDRESS (Street or Box No., City, State, ZIP Code) ' 6700 Portland Ayenue.South, Richfield,. Minnesota 55423 5. LOCATION OF COMMUNITY REPOSITORY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION OF FIA MAPS Director of Public Works ADDRESS 1 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423 ~ s. ESTIMATES FOR ONLY THOSE AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOOD AND/OR MUDSLIDE AS KNOWN AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AREA POPULATION NO. OF 1-4 FAMILY STRUCTURES NO. OF SMALL BUSINESS STRUCTURES NO. OF ALL OTHER STRUCTURES 415 Acres 800 153 11 12 • 7. ESTIMATES Of TOTALS IN ENTIRE COMMUNITY * NOTES Sa6tnit the first and second copies to the .POPULATION NO. OF t-4 FAMILY STRUCTURES NO. OF SMALL BuSNESSSTRUCTURES NO. OF ALL OTHER5TRUCTURFS FederallnsuranceAttministration; the third copy to the State Coordinator; Retain 47 X231 11,000 500 500 the last copy for your files. IiUD-1650 (4-73) _- ~ -Designated by FIA but under appeal by City of Richfield - - . -. _ ' . • Suhnut the Following Information as Enclosures Se~rt Under. ~ , ~ ~ ~ Enclosed Separate Cover Other ~ ,I. a. Copies of those sections of existing ordinances adopted by the community which meet the requirements of Section 1910.3(a) and/or 1910.4'(a) of the enclosed program regulations (Appen- dix C). N.A. - , b. Where national building codes (BOCA, NBC, SSBC, UBC, etc.) i or state building codes have been adopted locally, copies of the. legisiatiVe measures adopting these codes should be submitted and X not the codesthemselves. c. If building permits are already required for all construction, but local regulations do not contain specific recognition of flood '~' . hazards (as required in Section 1910.3(a) (2)-(4) and/or 1910.4(a) ~ ' of the program regulations, Appendix C), then the Resolution in B-1 enclosed ' Appendix B-I and/or B-II may be adopted and submitted. ` d. In cases where the applicant has extraterritorial jurisdiction ' over the issuance of building pernuts outside its normal bound- aries, afull explanation of the extent end applicability of this. N.A. authority must be included. IL A resolution containing, at a minimum, the information listed in the enclosed Sample Resolution (Appendix A). The items con- taine$ in .the Resolution are taken from Section 1909.22 of the program regulations (Appendix C} A enclosed III. Two copies of a base map of the community clearly delineating its . corporate .limits .which can be reproduced for publication. The map should approximate to the extent possible the enclosed . Sample Base Map (Appendix_ D): N: A map of the entire area under the community's jurisdiction,. identifying areas known to be subject to flooding and/or mudslide, and showing the names of rivers, bays, gulfs, lakes, and similar bodies of water. This may be a freehand drawing. V. A copy of any studies or reports prepared by a Federal agency. (U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Geological Survey, Soil Cons;rvation Service, etc.) containing flood and/or mudslide infor- mation about your community. A detailed study of the com- munity's flood hazard areas will be arranged by the Federal Insur- ance Administration at no cost to the community. However, to avoid duplication, please submit a copy of any available studies or regorts. If a copy cannot be obtained, please provide information as to where we may locate a copy. If no formal report has been prepared, submit a brief summary of the community's history of ' floodin and/or mudslides including if possible the locations of Enclosed Area designated by FIA under appeal ~;~. . . g , any known high water marks and/or mudslide occurrences. VI. A list of the incorporated communities within the applicant's ' boundaries if the application is made on behalf of a political sub- division containing one or more incorporated communities. Desig- nate those. incorporated communities which are to be included N.A. under this application, if any. -~----- - ; HUD-1650 (4-73) ~~~~~ ~~~ y~~ Zp~ ~0 ~ ~$~~~'~ E Zp~ Og OF g~~pyU2 g2~0 0~ ~ 0 ~ ~S-~ g~2 ~~-°.°~y~. ~ 0~ ~~~ C0~2.~,A`~y ~ ~~Z ~.°~.ti es wtitn ~~12 ,D .~gE gEp .~ ~S o .~e~ e~ti ,_ ~ ~~ gAR~" ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~10g' s~~~e 5 t° 404 igs~ance ~~ 0~5 1`~C -S1~1A`~ ale ale ooa' ~~ ~ ~~ pg~ ~; a.~ ~y , ~~Sp~ A 2 p0~ Z 20 CO gy°nf se y°~`5 sy~,tiZe~ 3 e~vay yati~ ~ 'R~5 ~c1S1'S' ~ ~' o y ~ gpp~ ty ° Sa~,s.yn~ -yy s na i°~ a ~ti°oa 4 ;` ~' Og ~~ S.B~'~ ~0 ~.e C ~,g ~ c e~.e~a 6~ ~ a c°~"s'ti.~ the es F ~Yp-1~ ~ y~1s °.~ '~ tyan o,~ ~ ,~ y9 e ~ e se tiri es5~ a S~'~ tayn a~ ~ aga ~e tY,e sari e pct ° ~eq~'y~ ~° ~a,~,d. U` c°z't~o ~~ „yes°t ~.r g~5 ~ leas ~ ~-~ ati~'ap ~° ~ yns,~x o~cy 5 Yeyatyn~ na ~,s ~a4 ex 35y ~ ~ c t~ a G .~on~"ea~•, ana e y ys ty°~~ ~ t'~ti y act1° as°4t e S'a`y ' essay '~~°~ e ~ ~eyy e ~a flt ° ictia 1 '~° 6tat riec 3 'r,'~e5 S' by tY' ygte °~~ 5:, an °,~yty sofa t as e an tia tc. ~2e~ 15 try yn a ti~~ ay auto ~i~-i'Y'e ,ne~e~oy ~ yyy ee ~a~ ~e ~~y~, ~r.~ ~ 6 a.~t ~ ~ ti ~aZa~ a fyo° e yep aY't o~'cy,- t 2t ~egaat itn tats°ne a '~ 003 cyal as t~ ,as is c tY,a as zit ~ ,~, to ~ ~~ 54e .~°~y osses 4 at t'~ a'C,~-° a22.'~a" ~g').5~ ~~9. gel .ipea"~5 ,~~ ~ tyog Yia~i .,~ys oa ~- ct ; ~ tr ~yst~ °a b s c° .~.~o~ a-~a ne~,t~- ocay. leas ~~'~ a~e~e~t ~ 2 ~5p~~~ a'~ce ~~ ~~ ~~ 4y ~5~an~e ~,~,~'°~~'ty ~ ''~ ~ayy b y~e ~i~~~ fan $.~ Z s~ as r ent 4 °~, y ~ a est ~ av s z~~ ~ to ~ ~ ~~-ayn ~~g.~~pg.~~ ae~a,~' os e.e~°~ o ay ~'yo nsy~'~,~"ity .,cys ~~oa a ~oo~-~'-y~y ce~~'tin~ .~y°o `fir", e Fe o.~ '~Y' yye .fat'- es4° at 3 Y' n ° c°'L' p~I ~ s tY' e ~ ect tce e ~ ~o~ ~ .~yo° at~-° ,lest. ~ '1y 5e,~e ~o~ tY' e~~p °~ to to yst~a cyay e yoc .deg: ~i~~ as' ATTEST : p. n tizl s ~y yc~y e~ ``1ti ~yn s`Pe t'~ ~ may as • ate a.~e t ~,' tati ,ae yon a~ e A .yn~ tti~Y ato ale .~y~ a-yn even 3 ~ayn leas Sect ty ~~ st tr s Y'a~o ti~en nyst~ yatin an3 oa "Py zo°~a o~ a~ nt~oo t.,~ yn the C2 02 a~,~e ~~ aye t the ~~,L°°3 ~ en°y y'~y dye ~ ~~t~on ~ set ~ ~ est5 Bate o~ e.~t ag t`~e ay a~ aent ~ es'Q ~~a Thomas J . Moran ,°~. 2 • l ~eyei1~ s~~ycy ova ,yi49nncy off. ana ~ 4 a'~' es ~ ~e eY'~' a~ yy~yb nett n \ .' la t~4s o e scc ey~a occ ay' 6t ~.~'~eyc°,~,o ae t° ~ y,~ytya~ ae e~ ~,at1° • Yr°e5e t ,ase tb. ~ ~o~~'e ~ ?a°~ea iri .~~n1t4~ ~~ sY a y~4y ~ <rol ~~ ate ~ awe t~ ~ yarn e co the went . Coo4e~ ~ae~ate °oa `8. ~e o~ a~o~ °~neaeyo4 l~1 .~~ti° ~oo'P,e~v~ ~~.s' ,~,y a tig sty Y:e .ti t 9ga' alb 9~'~ati ~,~..Qe~ ~e A ~:yty ~" es e ~ 6 tie ~ to e C°~ ,~gas~ tog se4o • g t~ eme S,l~a9vl ~ wit 4 ~,a~ lad ~ st 1 oa ,g1ay ~~ ~ f ° 1 \ ~ ~ ~- ~, ~= i RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION INDICATING THAT THE CITY OF RICHFIELD HAS A BUILDING • PERMIT SYSTEM. WHICH THE COMMUNITY. HAS ADOPTED AND THE REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR THE SYSTEM. :WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has adopted and is enforcing the Minnesota Building Code and the City of'Richfield zoning- ordinance; and. WHEREAS, Section 301 of the the aforesaid prohibits any person, firm or corporation from erecting, constructing, enlarging, altering, repairing, improving, moving or de- molishing any building or structure without first obtaining a separate building permit for each building or structure from the Department of Public Works, Division of Inspection, and WHEREAS, the Chief Inspector must examine all plans and specifications for the pro- posed construction-when application is made to him for a building permit. n U NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: 1. That .the Department of Public Works, Division of inspection shall review all building permit applications for new construction or substantial improvement to deter- mine whether proposed building sites will be reasonably safe from flooding. If a-proposed building site is in a location that has a flood hazard any proposed new construction or substantial improvement (including prefabricated and mobile homes} must (i) be designed (or modified) and anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure, (ii) use construction materials and utility equipment that are resistant to flood damage, and (iii) use construction methods and practices that will minimize flood damage;- and 2. That the Public Works Department shall review subdivision proposals and other. proposed new developments to assure that (i) all such proposals are consistent. with the need to minimize flood damage,(ii) all public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas., electrical, and waste systems are located, elevated, and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage, and (iii) adequate drainage is provided so as to reduce exposure to flood hazards; and 3. That the Public Works Department shall r~,quire new or replacement water supply systems. and/or sanitary sewage systems to be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltra~ tion of flood waters .into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters, Passec~~by-the City Council of the City of Richfield this 24th day of March, ],975• ATTEST: Loren L. Law Mayor Thomas J. Moran City Clerk . ,. RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND ON OFF-STREET PARKING Texaco, Incorporated 1730 Clifton Place, Minneapolis Location: 7733 Portland Avenue So. Use: Addition to third bay for car wash equipment WHEREAS, Texaco, Incorporated, 1730 Clifton Place, Minneapolis, .Minnesota, had an off-street parking agreement with the City of Richfield, relating to 7733 Portland Avenue South, which contract bears the designation of Contract No. 2118 and which contract was guaranteed by a bond of the Travelers Indemnity Company, Hartford, Connecticut, in the amount of $10,700.00, and WHEREAS, Texaco, Incorporated has complied with the provisions of .said agreement and the Travelers Indemnity Company now seeks to be relieved of any further obliga- tion under said bond, and WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring Texaco, Incorporated • to continue to provide a bond for security on the performance of said agreement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to release the Travelers Indemnity Company, Hartford, Connecticut for any and all acts of Texaco, Incorporated committed or incurred in. violation of Contract No. 2118 on and after the 2~+th day of March, 1875. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 21+th day of March, 1975• Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: •' Thomas J. Moran City Clerk ~._ /~ CITY Off' RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No . 8 2 V Agenda, IViarch 24, 1975 The Honorab a Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Commission Appointments; The following appointments to various commissions need to be made by the city cau ncil: • Advisory Youth Commission Two -unexpired three year terms (adults),, one .term expiring June 1, 1:975,, and one term expiring .June 1, 1976: `No applications have been received for these positions. Human-.Rights Commission Attached is a letter of resignation from .Michael Glapion from his -'commission. This laves a vacancy fora erm expiring on May 27, 1976,- No applications have been received for this vacancy. Respectfully submitted, S. ~ Wayne S. Burggraaff - . City Manager WSB/eja ~' ' i Michael J. Glapian ` 6921 Upton: Ave. South Richffield- MN 55423 March 4, 1975 Dear Commission Members, Effective April 1, 1975 I shall b,e terminating my position on the Human Rights Commission. As of"that date..I will have moved out of the Richfield Community end taken up residence in Eden Prairie, where my wife and 2.-.have just recently purchased another home.. It is with deep regret that I tender my resignation. My association and involvement in this commission as well as in this Community has. ..added a beautiful chapter to my life. I hope that what I have learned here. can be utilized in the future at some other level in business. and government'. The diverse nature-- of the people whomake up this commission gives testimony-to "Mans humanity to man," a YSelief I brought with me to this Chamber; a belief which. is .firmer because of what has taken place ~~ within this chamber. Please accept this resignation knowing that you will always be remembered and knowing that I will always remain interested in the work you are doing here. The accomplishments of this commission only scratches the surface of the problems confronting. us today, but if this .Commission were not, there would be rio scratches. Keep on Scratchn In-the name of Love, Peace and Brotherhood I am, Sincerely..... Mich l Gla ' o CC: The Honorable. Mayor and Gity Council Members. .~. ,~ ~~~ r :~~~ ~1 ' . ~' ::~ CITY OF RICI~FIELD , MINNESOTA Office of City IVI"anager ' Council Letter No. 81 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Passenger Waiting Shelters for Metropolitan Transit Commission The city council at its meeting on February 24, 1975, deferred a request of the Metropglitan Transit Commission to construct passenger waiting ,stations at two locations within the city of Richfield. These locations are:. 1 . Nicollet Avenue north of 66th Street 2. Lyndale Avenue south of 6Cth Street During the discussion of the bush shelter locations, council members expressed interest in'obtaning information-about locating bus stops at mid-block locations , requested that the Public Safety. Department review the locations of the two proposed bus shelters from a safety,'standpoint, and asked if information. could also be obtained on the problem of buses stopping for extended periods to get on schedule. The Public Safety Department has inspected the location of the: proposed bus shelters. at 66th and Nicollet and .66th and..Lyndale. In their opinion, both locations are suitable and present,no significant `safety problems . r According to the Metropolitan. Transit Commission representatives, mid-block bus stops. cause considerable problems to both drivers and .pedestrians. Pedestrians are inconvenienced by: 1. Unshoveled sidewalks leading to mid-block bus stops'. 2 Snow piled at the curb which must'be climbed to reach the bus 3. Mid'-block locations may encourage bus passengers to cross major streets at mid-block, thus causing hazards for pedestrians and drivers alike, The following are among the disadvantages which drivers may experience , because of.mid-block bus stops: 1. Motor"vehicle drivers would be surprised by_unexpected mid-block stops, thereby increasing the potential for accidents . "fir' Council_Letter.No. 81 -2- Agenda March 24,, 1,975 2 . Drivers attempting to pass :buses. at mid-block locations may encounter serious .hazards . Although the, corner b'us stop location embodies some disadvantages , it also has some practical advantages . Drivers. and pedestrians alike are accustomed to this arrangement and area, °therefore, better equipped towa ch for problems at bus stop loca'tians , In addition, most bus shelters are. located at end-block locations and are` thereby able to ser~~e two routes concurrently., This results in a 'savings in costs and minimizes the clutter so often found at major intersections Metropolitan Transit Commission representatives were also contacted on the issue of buses stopping for extended periods of time to get on,schedule. According to the MTC, this problem normally occurs with new drivers who are not accustomed to -their routes. MT?G officials are now informing all.{new drivers of the best methods to stay on schedule, i.;e. -observing-speed limits 'and adjus ing -their pace to passenger volume. Tn this 'manner, bus delay hopefully can be diminished in most-cases without creating.. problems.: for automobile :drivers . Attached to this 'letter are sketches of the proposed locations . The Metro- politan Transit Commissionhas contacted the affected property owners in relation to the proposed location of these bus shelters. As' per our contract with the MTC, it is-necessary for the city .council to issue the' permits for the construction of these shelters . The city staff has reviewed these locations and recommends that they be approved. Respectfully submitted, ~• .Wayne S .:Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Public Works- T~irectar `".` ~~G c, :~~ k~ O O d t'v N• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ r ~ rr o ~ n t ~ C ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (ct P. W 'z3 K ~ H ~ ~• N ~C tD ~ ~ ~ O ~ O (0 N ~' . fCD ~ ~ fi a a ~• ° ._ . b° ~ ° b ~ ~ ~ ~ •,, o 'd cN+ ` . N ~ ~ ~ '~ CA C3 ~' O ~ (D ~ rn ~ ~• o ~ ~ c+ N c+ N n r o ~ c~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, H • VV ~ ~ y H ~ o ~ ~- ' n ~ K to - -' H ~ ~. N ~ a ~ O O .~ o Oz~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ tt ~ *i ~ 1 t~i-~ n V~'t0 n ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ x ~ . ~' - ~ G r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ w ~+- ~ ~ w A ' 3 ~ C3 ~' Y W - ghel~n ~ ~-~e ~,.u s ~ ~. a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ` °z ~ . x n cn N H ~ M ~ i o ~ ~z -~ ~® . .~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ . ~. ~~~ ~ .. 4 d ~ --~-~ • ~ I ~* ~° ~ .. ~ c~ o a~ m ~ ~ ~ tz rn s v -.+ ~ . OD Dc' ~ ~~ '~' ~ 't3 ~ O ~ ~ ~ r H ~ ~, H H H O `d ~ ~ td [rJ O ~~ ~ K V~i ~ K W N• x _ \I ~ ~ O n`~ !" ti es Z N ~ ~ v ~ F -' N ~ pp H N ~ x • ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ c+' I ` cN+ N~ ~~N~ ~ ~ ~ H O H ~ ~ ~ [li c* ~ W d H ~ _ '.3' µ (D- Q~. H °z x N n ~ H H t~ pa - ___ ~ z ° m oao ~~~ ~K~~ G ~~ ~ ~• ~- ~ o ~a ¢, ~• m ~r~ M c+. K ct ~ :3' N ~i. (D F-' N K ~ . A N O ~" (D ~ ~ ~ ~ 'tS ~ ~., ~ Y iJ Sv ~U' O ~ 't3 0 ~ 0 N ~ ~ O ~ ~u O f _ O O ~~ ~ ~ ~t- :~ UKi ~ ~ ~ CA pq ~ ~ ~ c+ '~ w ~' N ;z' O z --~ ~- '„ ,~ ~~ Council Letter No. 80 Agenda March 24, 1975 The Honorable 1Vlayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen• Subject; Agreement with Richfield Swim Club for Use of Swimming Pool Facilities in 1975 h / C CITY OF RICHFIELD , MINNESOTA Office of City Manager On the March 24 1975 city council agenda:, there is an agreement wit the Richfield Swim .C ub ;for the-use of the municipal swimming pool facilities during 1975. This is the same agreement that the city has had with the swim club for the past several years. fihe swim club would use the outdoor pool_from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.`m. Monday through Friday'.and, upon request, on Saturday and Sunday. The pool-would be closed on June 28 and 29, 1975:, for the purpose of adcomodating an AAU swim meet hosted by the Richfield Swim Club. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, at its ..February 19 , 1975, meeting, recommended approval of the. use of the municipal pool for the swim.: meet. It is recommended that the city.- council approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute it on behalf of the city.. - Respectfully submitted, ~7 . Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Parks: and Recreation nirector ~ ~"'~~'~' ~~~ -~''~" ` ~ ~,.~ 'CITY OF ,RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~~ Council Letter No . 7 9 Agenda :March 24, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and.. , Members of the City, Goundil City of Richfield Gentlemen• Subject:. Authorization to Allow the City Manager to Enter Into a Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with the State ' -of Minnesota In recent years, the"city has benefited from its participation in the Hennepin - County Cooperative Purchasing Organization.... Through this cooperative effort, the city has experienced ''significant avings in time', labor, and money. During this period. of time, we'have also purchased certain items off state • contracts. Until now, this informal arrangement between_Richfield and the state purchasing office has been ,sufficient to meet our purchasing needs.' Recently, the city s aff has_been informed that the State Cooperative Purchasing Organization is soliciting new members . By entering into formal agreement with the Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Organization, we will be able to purchase a greater variety of items. Membership in the .state organization. will increase the city's purchasing optigns . In effect, the city will. belong to both the Hennepin County and Minnesota Cooperative .Purchasing Organizations.. To enter into this agreement, it is necessary for the city council to authorize the City Manager to sign an agreement with the state. This agreement will .perpetually allow. Richfield to purchase from, the various. state contracts. It is recommended that the council approve the attached resolution-authorizing this agreement. Respectfully ~§ubmitted , ~. Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Administrative Assistant Finance Director • R T RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the city council endorses the purchase of supplies and materials at the most advantageous price to the city, and WHEREAS, competitive bidding encourages competitive prices, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 471.59 of 1969 authorizes the State and its political subdivisions to enter into agreements of this nature; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEn that the City of Richfield authorize the City Manager to enter into a cooperative purchasing agreement with the State for the purchase of various supplies, commodities and equipment. BE IT RESOLVET~ that the city council hereby authorize the City Manager to execute this agreement with the State of Minnesota . Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield the 24th day of March, 1975. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk • s: ~a CITY OF RICHFIELD , MINNESOTA. Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 78 Agenda March 24, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield -Gentlemen: Subject: Traffic Control Signs at 65th Street and' Newton Avenue and at 67th Street and Vincent Avenue The city received a petition from the residents in the vicinity of Newton Avenue and 65th Street ,requesting the installation of either afour-way stop sign or a two-way stop sign at the intersection of 65th Street. and .Newton Avenue . -The attached petition has been signer3 by thirty residents 'in the immediate vicinity of 65th Street and Vincent Avenue.'`' The `city staff reviewed the tra,ffiic situation at this intersection ,and recommends '~ hat the reques for the installation of four-way stop signs be denied inasmuch as less than 1 , 0.00 cars per twenty-four hour .period are entering, the intersection. This volume of traffic~is.substantially below the_mnimum traffic volume warrants required under the Minnesota Manual on Urform Tra`ffic`Control Devices for the installation of four-way stop signs... - - The city staff has also reviewed the request for the installation of a two-way stop sign at this intersection stopping' north' and... south bound Newton Avenue traffic. The staff recommends that the stop signs be 'ins alled at 65th. and Newton Avenue stopping north and southbound Newton Avenue traffic. This recommendation- is based on the. fact that the minimum warrants for the installation of`a,two~nray stop have been met. The city has received a petition from the residents in the ,vicinity of Vincent Avenue and 67th Street requesting the installation'of a two-way stop sign at the _intersection of 67th Street and Vincent Avenue. The- attached petition has been signed by thirty-six residents in the immedate'v~cinity of 67th Street and Vincent :.Avenue. The city staff has reviewed the traffic situation at this intersection and recommends that the stop sign be installed at 6:7th and Vincent Avenue stopping north and south bound traffic on .Vincent Avenue at 67th Street. This recommendation is based on the fact that there have been four accidents recorded at this'iritersection ~' during the last twelve month period.. RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION RELATING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS "STOP" SIGNS ON NEW'T'ON. AVENUE AT 65TH STREET STOPPING NEWTON AVENUE TRAFFIC AT 65TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richi'eld, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the City Engineering Division is hereby authorized and directed to erect the following signs at the following location, to wit: "STOP" signs on Newton Avenue at 65th Street stopping Newton Avenue traffic at 65th Street 2. -That when the aforementioned traffic control signs have been so .erected on said street, they shall be official traffic control signs of the City of Richfield and failure to observe such signs shal]. constitute a violation . of the traffic ordinance of .this city... Passed by the City Council of the City of .Richfield this 2~+th day of March, 1975. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk • `' FEBRIIARY 19,1975 WE TtiE-UNDERSIGNED ARE INTERESTED AND CONCERNv ABOUT. TIE SArETY OF THE CHIDDREN INTHE NEIBORHOOD WE WOULD LISE A TOUR-WAY STOP. IE THAT IS1NT POSSABLE, ATWO-WAY STOP i NAME AT 65TH+NE`fJTON AVE. S0. ADDRESS. ,, ; -~. 3 ~ ~ ~~ c f Sys" i~~~~i~ ~~'`~"~'~ ... .. ~. ~~ J ~- 7 ~ g : --- to -~Ir~~..~ 1 . _ ., . 11, ~ ~~~~~~ ~j ~~~J 13 ' ~ a~^r ',~~~V ~: ~',~ .~~~ 1~ Lb `. ~' 17 ' %r-/ 1.g • ,~ ~ Q,~ic.~ ~ ' 20 ~. ~ ~ o~~-- r- . ~-, , ry~,,A,~, ~y,~g ~j~~-N- ~~ S° - ~ ~~ . -~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ cv ro,v S o . ~~ic~ - ~. G ~°~ ~~ ~T ti~ A•~e Sep 6 y l 1 ~~~~~~ ILt ~ y 2 ~. ~ y 1 ~ ~~~~oti., ~v X725- ~s~ y ~~ ~ ~ ~~ z, ~, ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~/f K~ ~~~ ~m , ~:~ a ~ - .~ ~S~S ~ ~w ~a ,.~ S ~ s ~~ -~ ~, ~~. ~ ~ ~~ ~~: _.'~' L ~~ }C~ 2g ~ ~~'ao ~e S ~ a 3b . ~~, 31. ~o.S D ~ ~ti~, ~ , . „~,, ~~' •~ ~~' S 3~ 3~~ 35. RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION RELATING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS i "STOP" SIGNS ON VINCENT AVENUE AT 67TH STREET STOPPING VINCENT AVENUE TRAFFIC AT 67TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City. of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: l: That the City Engineering Division is hereby authorized and directed to erect the following signs at the following location, to wit: "STOP" signs on Vincent Avenue at 67th Street stopping Vincent Avenue traffic at 67th Street 2. That when the aforementioned trafficcontrol signs have been so erected on said street, they shall be official traffic control signs of the City of Richfield-and failure. to oberve such signs shall constitute a violation of the traffic ordinance of this city.. • Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 21+th day of March, 1975• Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas. J. Moran City Clerk ~\ ' ; 53 ~' PEf IT IOM FOR LOCAL lP~1fROVEi.IENT j~j~ '~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ CITY OF R1CI:FIELD> P~11NN. ~ _,. !'ETITIOId NO• .,, •-; . DATE RECEIVED TO: THE CITY COUfJCjL OF THE CI?Y DF RICNFIELD~ P:ijNNE~TA~ ~IE~ THE UNDERSIGNEDi Ot7NERS ~~~~'Xx~v;~~ra~m~r}5~XR1>~~t~9RX)~K~]~~P~I~E OF THE REAL PROPERTY ABUTTING OAK in the vicinity. of 67th, Street and Vincent Avenue Xt~1X HEREBY PETITION THAT SUCH STREET BE IMPROVED eY the installation of stop signs stopping northbound and southbound Vincent Avenue +raffir a-~7t.h Si'.rPP1: ______- • SI GNATURE OF OP;NERS HOUSE N0. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ./ __.. _ - - , ~ r ~~ ' ., ,; , , , ;: y ., ~~ ~ ~- t . : j,t - ~ -` i' ,,~ . '^~ ` "_~ ~ fl; , - ,^ J ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~, n ~~~ _. I Z._ ~ , ~~ / P : 1 g (:; ~ -t,,:~. ' ~,.;•'~~ ~~,~--~" '~ cw ~ ~ +~c~'~~ 1-~~"LC-LLB. -~ ~.. Z ~. i ~ ~ r ' 1 1 t~ r ~ 12. _, . fi .. . , ~ ~ -- - 14. '1 mss: ~'J .ar lf'' ~~,:~.~~, ,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Y 1 > ~ f ~ 1<<f ~ i t ~ ~~ ~~~ _ > ~.,(~^G-~i ``i9c.'-L"-c~ ~ "~ ~--~t-,i ~ ~: ~ 15 ~ y ~ ~ i , - 1r L . ~f~~t / ~ ,t r'. /~~ry~~.. ~ 19~ r y ~ , r~ J L• > i.! ;` (/ ~'{ ~••ln'~!"V ~ f 1a ~ /~ ~. ~k' 3' ~i1C_ • jp~ ~ !r. l.r~,-ti- ,/!.'1....,?..w , s-- ~,..:J.~..t~Lr./'~:>'.1 i ` /~ i /f,Q..(! ~; l EXAMINED. CHECKED AND FUND 7D BE ~i~ PADPER FCRM AND TO BE SIGNED BY 'THE REQUIRED NUMOER OF OL'/NERS OF PROPERTY AFFECTED BY Ti-E ~~IAKING OF Td-!£ 1n7Pi~DYEa,ENT PETITIONED FOR. PER CENT 'u9l_9 CITY CLERK: ~:~ ., ~~ ,~ r ,f ,, G/ ,..~) ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ , q '~ ~ ~ / , ~ _ e > /t,, , n ~ ~ y' . ~v ., i . ~/ ~ ~ L t 1 ~ ^" n ~,.~-~.~ { ~l a/ ~-t~~~~ -~' b7/ ~l ~ ~. ~ ~ ~-- s ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ Sc3 ~ ~~ ~vi~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~.5 ~i~