02-18-75 agendaCITY QF RICHFIhLD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Zetter No . 52
.Agenda February 18, 19:75
True Honofab e D/Iayor
and
Members of the City Council
City df Richfield -
Gentlemen:
Subject: Discussion of School'. District` Swimming Pool Project ' ~ ' ~'
Tf~e city council rnet ~on February 3`with'the` Richfield board of education to
discuss bids- which had.: been received for the:.construction of two swimming
<pools. At that -time the school board asked the city council to consider some , ,
method of providing $300, 000 to assist in the initial capital outlay requirements.
for the construction of these swimming pools. Since that meeting I have been
advised that the school-board has met again and has reached a decision to with-
draw its request. fora $300, 000 commitment from the City of Richfield. It is
further `my understanding that the .school board intends to proceed with the con-
. s ruction of the pools including the separate diving pool and that it will be
possible for the district to finance these pools in some' way. .
The school board does not,- however, intend to` construct. the outdoor wading
.pool-and. patio at the-West Junior High Sehoo.l.: We have been`advised'that if the
,city is interested in constructing ahe e facilities hat it will be necessary for
the city to provide funds .so that the school .board can take advantage of thee.
current bids and go ahead with this part of the project.
Therefore, it i important that the. city council give consideration at the
February `18 meeting`as to whether the city wishes to 'make a commitment of
approxima tely $90, 000 for this purpose. It would be possible to make- such a
commitment..and provide the funds early in 1977 and not disturb the other projects
and programs in the current capital improvement program. This could be done
by moving ahead as quickly as possible with the third liquor store profect,wththe
;c~~aal of getting that store operation underway by the end .of the as rrent year, The
].97:6 profits of the third store operation. which are not included in the proposed
canal mpro~Tements program could then be used for this purpose.: We anticipate
that net pr~;e~s for 1976 would- come very close to the amount required-to-fund the
outside wading pool and patio at the West Junior High School.
,,
'V
{
~. ~. February 5, 1975
~~ - TD: $~ard of Education
Ra.chfield Public Schools
• FRDM. Carlton 19. Lytle, Superintendent
SI~BJ£CT: Sl9IAZMTNG POOLS -FINANCING OF
• 1, I-nave carefully studied the 1974-79 Capital Improvements Program
~~ the City of Richfield and a draft of the 1975-80 program.
2. The major change in the new Capital Improvements .Program is that
pertain projects had to be dropped since federal revenue sharing
. i-unds had to be used for operational purposes instead of for capi-
ta1 improvements.
3.: ~e City Planning Com,-nission has spent literally hours on this pro-
gram and is presenting the program to the City Council on February
3D, 1975 ~,rith their endorsement.
4. In vie~~i of the above, I am convinced-that it would not. be in the
best interest of the community to disturb a plan That has been so
thoughtfully developed.
. 3. 3~iany of the items that are included in the City Capital Improvements
• Program"have indeed been on the dralaing board for sometime. '
~. ~ti'hile I.am convinced that the City Council would willingly juggle
#.he plan out of the urgency of the situation, it ti,~ould appear that "
the school. district is in as good a position to disrupt their pro-
gram as the.City is.
a~, 1t is, therefore, my recommendation that the school district withdraw
heir request for $300,000 in fee prepayment from the City and examine
their own progran~s for the needed funds. .
8. 'his recommendation is made with a view of what tiaould be in the best
interest of the citizenry of the City of Richfield.
` ~'(~-
1tL 'ON titi . L TLE
~14L.dj~ _ - Superintendent "
t
2~$~75
DRAFT ~ , ,
POOL USAGE
School Use - Up to six o'clock .(6:00 p.m.) each school day. Reserve
usage rights for scheduled .meets or events. -
City Use -From six o'clock (6:00 p.m.) each week day, and all day
.. Saturdays and Sundays and during the Summex.
School Responsibility -The school will be responsible for the
custodial maintena~ice of the pools.
City-Responsibility -The Cit}~ will be responsible fox and
Locker room
Life Guards pay the
attendants,
,
folloiaing: Instructions,
etc. for the period of City use.
• The City will pay a usage fee of $25,000.00 pe r pool per yeax.
•
--, j
` '~~~.
;~~_,. '7~1 hIDU 20 li~S 10 ~ 55
November 19, 1974
-"
.~ Mr. Carlton Lytle.
Superintendent of Schools
70th Strut and Harrzet Avenue
"~"'°'~`'~ ~ Richfield, rllinnesota 55423
~`
B ~ ~ Duar Carl:
fS'~
~j It is my understanding that the new schoohpools will probably not be
,~~~ ~ completed and available for. use until late 1.975 or perhaps early 1976.
However, the legislative constraints which have been placed on our
~ ,;.~>:,. ability to finance municipal services, are making it necessary for us
to project revenues and expenditures well. into the 1976 year. Theie-
~~~ ~~ fore, we would appreciate it if you could advise me of the times when
-~-~~ ~ the pools might be available for municipal programs and what the rent-
_® al fees. iilight be, just as soon as this information is developed.
~~ ~
~; Once we receive this information, we can begin consideration of the
Q amounts and types of indoor pool related programs that we can afford.
:•-.
~ Sincerely yours,
~:.~ ~ .
~..
~ ~ %
~~ (~ Wayne S. Burggraaff .
~...~ ~ City Manager
~ WSB/eja
cc: Part: and Recreation Director
~ ~ Finance Director
,:®
q t~~ t7
O
. ~~~~ ~
" tolophono:1369-7521 (612)
~' 2/7/75
....City Usage
.Letter from Rayne
Our joint commitment to the people
~:
Breakdown of Usage Fee
Custodial Alaintenance
Gost of one (1) man plus $ 15,000.00
Operational Cost 3,325.00
(a) Electricity $2,700.00
(b) {9ater 1, 200.00.
(c) Heat 2,000.00
Chemicals
• (d) 750.00
.
50% of $6,650.00 _ $3,325
.. '-
• _ •
$ 18,325.00
Estimated tIours
School year 43 hours per week X 40 weeks 1,720 hours
Summer 93 hours per week X 12 weeks 1,116 hours.
2,836 Total Hours
_ -
~STI~ iliT~D CDST OF ~'DOZ DI'I<~~'IDN ~:
Schools fn the axes did not have a oast ~alysis that t~ould
identify pool electrical costs. ~ lacal 1.ght~ng oompany (Sterling
k;lectric} consulted General :lectric end ~rork~Ed nut a oast estin~te
abased on a well lighted-pool, 100 candle powers operating 4000 hours
per year. Oost would be $2700.00,
_~
No schools could substantiate a oo~t figu:c'e far grater. S ools,
once filled, required only. supplement ~.ater in re3.3tive? y sm~.ll a~:ounts.
Some pools here cle~:ned annually but amore ~equently once every two or
three years. The largest water use was in the shok'er area. k1200.OC
is. an average annual k~ater use at the jun~.ar high schools now. (based
on figures for the last si:: month period ~.n 1973 at the tko junior high
• schools) If the pool .doubled the anount used 3t would be about k1200.0U
additional.
}!E:1T •
'Only one school had a figure for mating the pool area. They
~testin~ated" X1000.00 for a three nbnth .steer period in an indoor-
- outdoor pool and ~4oao.0o for the year. .~' oDSts ~'or the two junior
high schools from duly thru December were Y4~DD,DD, Three schools
. expressed that they estimated ninimal heating oasts but could not
Sive a figure. A major problem ~,Tas cooling the pool area for meets
• so spectators could be comfortable. ITsing tfiii.s bit of knowledge a
figure of ,2000.00 seems fair. (I oan't substantiate this in any way)
Ci?E}... 'I~~LS ~ ~;
Three schools supplied figures for all c}:emicals that were in
• the ~ OO ran e. One se}~ool used chemical tablets and included all ~~-
ti.5 g
-ma:tntenance including water and had.a w?_200.00 figure. Some used
bromine and found it very expensive so had converted to chlorine to -
reduce the cost factor.
Ci,'STO~IhL -
Estimates varied from 2 hours per da;~ to 12 hours per day, all
but one agreed that less than $ hours was necessary to perform all
the duties 3rvolved in raaintenar_ce including care of the locker rooms.
Toro of the most experienced people felt that 2 to 4 hours tras very
sufficient. (The purc},Ase of an automatic vacuum k~s suggested as
a useful. tine saving device)
. ' ~ ~ ARMSTE;ONG 4941 Olson Memorial Highway
T O R S E T H Minneupo-is, Minne,sota 55422
.••~ SKOLU AND ~~~ ~~~~ ~3 At~ I, s ~0
RYDEEN INC.
• ~ ARCHITECTS ... ..
•`•- --•~ & Et~lGWEERS TELEPHONE: 612-545-3731
January 9, 1975
-•._._
.Independent School District X2$0
7001 Harriet Avenue
Richfield, Minnesofia 55423 .
Attenfiion: Mr. Carlton Lytle, Su{~erintendent
Re: East and West Junior High Schools (Aool Additions)
You tequesfed our estimate of increased water usage for each building for the pool
.additions at East and V`lest Junior High Schools. .This estimate is based on installed
fixture units and water use averages of present buildings.
The<East pool addition will require approximately 300,000 gal. per three month
period. This does not include the initial fill- of about 150,000 gallons.
The West pool addition will require n{~proximately 440,000 gal. per three month
period with initial fill of 21D,OD0 gallons.
The empirical numbers used as "fixfiure units" have been established by codes and
may nofi rtrflect actual. consumption accurctely, though these parameters are accepted
in .common usage for quanfiay estimates.
Very truly yours,
tiRMSTRONG, 70i:5ETH, SKOLD ~ RYDEEN, INC. ; , .
Bye ~f., ~~',,//
Harold E. Shull •.
~_ HES.mIk
cc: File (1) _
. •
.~
CITY OF RLCHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 51 `
Agenda of February 18, 1975
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Hearing on Proposed 1975/80 Proposed Capital
Improvements Program
`The proposed 1975/80 Capital Improvements Program was received by .
the city council at the February. 10, 1975 city council meeting:. A hearing on
the program was established for February 18, 1975.'._
Iti is the recommendation of the staff that the city .council :approve this
proposed program- by adopting the. sample resolution which is contained in
thus document following the°city manager's budget message.
Respectfully sub fitted,
1
`.~ `?~,
~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~y
- ~
.Wayne. S. Burggraaff ~ ~
City Manager
WSB/eja `
cc: Planning Director
...Finance Direactor
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 50
Agenda Februar~> 1R, 1975.
The Honorable Mayor ;,
-: and -
-Members of the City Council
City of 'Richfield
Gentlemen:..
Subject: Hearing On Application Materials for Community
Development :Block Grant Program
The Housing and Community Development Acf of 1974 contains a requirement
that those municipalities applying for funds must hold two hearings on the appli-
cation materials :required for a community development block grant. -The first such
hearing is scheduled for February 1~, 19.75. Following this hearing the application
will be put in final form and submitted` o Hennepin Ccunty. ?n accordance with
previous.agreements, Hennepin ,County will then: develop a single grant application
representing `20 municipalities and forward this application to the Metropolitan.
Council and ultimately the'. local HUD office. A second hearing.-on this grant
application should. be held sometime during the' month of March.
The hearing is for the purpose of considering' the following two. documents
both of which are attachedr (:1} Housing Assistance Plan for the<City of Richfield;
(2} Community Development. plan and. Program .for the Years 1975/77.
IG~Ir. Phil Katzung fro.m'the Metropolitan Countil will be .present to review the
housing assistance plan. Council. members will recall that-this is the..document tivhch
~ has been prepared by the Metropolitan Countil under the terms of an agreement
with the City of Richfield.
' ' The second item which must be considered at this hearing is the community
development plan and program.. This documentis related to the city's capital
improvemen program in many respects. It indicates how the citY~ ~wou`id pr~~pas
to spend. the .community development money which we would hope to rECeiv~ through
this block grant .program over the next three year period.
Council Letter No. 50 -2- - February 18`, 197`5
:s
CONIl~NNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
STATEh~ENT OF NEED
-Senior Citizen Center: Reconstruction of the vacated library building .
. for senior citizens, .the facility's reconstruction will make the physical .
`improvements necessary. to deliver integrated housing and other social as
well as recreational services. .
Estimated Cost.: and Source`of Funds
• 1975
Community Development Funds $ 50`000
:Special Revenue Funds 50,000
Total cost $100,000
Data source: 1975-1980 Capital Program
- t9ater Backwash System:- This project consists of the .installation of a water
ystem to recycle backwash water at the city's water. treatment plant. The
system is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to prevent the
• discharge of untreated backwash water into Legion Lake-Park.
Estimated Cost and Source of Funding
1975.
-Community Development Funds $`40 000
Water User Fees 50,000
Total Cost $ 90,000
Data ource: 1975-.1980 Capital Program -
- Well Pump: An additional .well pump. is needed in .1976 toprovide adequate
water"supply at peak periods.
Estimated Cost:and Source of Funds
• ~ 1976.
.Community Development Funds $ 75 000
~~ Water User Fees 75,000 •
Total. Cost $150,000
Data source: 1975-1980 Capital Program
..2..
- Management Space Resource Needs Analy sis- ,
(mace Utilization Study); .The purpose of the management planning study is to
contribute to the development policy and priorities for providing structural
space needs.
Estimated Cosh and Source of Funds.
1975
Community Development Funds $ 7.,500
Special Revenue Fund 7,500
Total. Cost $ 15,000
- Housing Rehabilitation: ..This project is to provide a interest right down and
grant program for .the rehabilitation of both renter and owner occupied single
family housing. An estimated total of 53 units will be rehabilitated.
Estimated Cost. and Source of Funds
1975 1976 1977
Community Development Funds $ 10,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000
HRA ~ -0- 7,500 7,500
-----
Total .Cost $ 10,000 $ 52,500 $ 52,500
- New Home Pro ram: The purpose of this program is to assist in the elimination
spot renewal
of residential deterioration.: The program consists of the purchase on .the open
market of existing vacant homes and lots which are in a dilapidated condition.
The method of financing will be to establish a revolving fund through funds gained
in selling-city owned lots in New Ford Town and through Community Development
funding. The revolving fund will be repaid from the resale of land.
Estimated Cost and Source of Funds
(to ,start .revolving fund) ..
1976 ~ 1977
i ConIInunity Development Funds ~ $ 50,000
Sale of Lots 30,000. ~. .
Total Cost $ 80,000..
3..
-`Arterial Lighting: Street lighting on the following streets, Lyndale
•
and Nicollet.
Estimated Cost and Source'of Funds
. 1977
Community Development Funds '~$~90;000
Total Cost $ 90,000
- Commercial Improvement: Although the LHN Commercial Improvement Program-
is not completed a need for public funding will be necessary to carry
out the program. The 1977 estimated costs in this case are very sketchy ,
and'only include community development funds.
Estimated. Cost and Source of Ftirids
1976 1977
Community Development Funds $ 20,000 $140,000
_.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPA~NT PLAN SUMMARY
Both thelong term ,short term objectives address the statement of need.
Long Term Development Objectives
a
- To conserve the:-residential aspects of Richfield,
- To improve the residential environment of the community;
- To eliminate deterioration and blighting influences to residential and
commercial areas,
- To improve-.the service delivery system of .city government.
- To provide a greater range of housing ,choices,
Short Term Development Objectives
- Im .rove and elim`na
p ~ to deterioration in residential neighborhoods surrounding
the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Commercial area.
~- Provide. for renewal o~ approximately I0 deteriorated homes.
-Provide for the rehabilitation of approximately 53 homes.
-Provide arterial street lighting-along residential neighborhoods.
- -.Improve the :water system to residential neighborhoods.
- Eliminate backwash water discharge into Legion Lake Park.
- Reconstruct a facility for senior citizens in the old library.
- Acquire a site for construction of a senior citizen housing project.
~ _ ._
:
.
;.
~ o
"~
.~
O ~`
~
• n
n
~
rn
~ o
0
A 0
i
C3. ~
d.
. ;: -
u
0
o
~
dd
z 't\
0 0 0 -
0 0 0
0 0 0
w .~ w
° ~
~
. ~
r-i N
~64
~ p ~ O
~
I O
O
O
r~
i-~ O w w
~
N
~ ~ ~ n O
M N
_ ~ e-i
[~ ' -
~ ! t-
r-f p
O ~ O
~ O
O
O
p
® O
w ~ O
.~
' O
w O O
~
~ ~
I Ch p
~ Q
N p
O
~
t~4
~
a
o
4 ~ ~ ~ `~ ~
p
1--i
~ ~
'~}
~
h
Q O
`
?
'' r-I O
O O
O p
O O '
p
O
H
H ~ O O t1'~ O O
O O ~ O ~ ~
~ ,Gq, O
r-1
U 3e}
N ~
i-~ O
O
O O
O
O O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
II
N cd V1 w w w O O O O O O .
N
~ O
U O O
O O t.n
~ to O
~ O
~ O
O O i
r--1
fi~
r-1
ri
-{
pp t
I
~ .
l
b0 ~
~
O .~
~ ~
~ ~
~
i
~ t~~ ~
n ~
"~ s~ a a~i
N cd ( c
0 O 1~ ~ -
. ~ ~ ~ x a ~ ~
~
~
~ .
~ a ~
.° ~
z ~~
°
Q
H
, a c
v
~, z • - - '
r
pART I, SURVEY OP 1~OtJSING CONDITIONS
's to "accurately survey the condition of the housing stock in the
This part i
community ~~ . _
data were used as-the most accurate in#ormation available at .
Two sources of are:-
this time on conditions of housing in Richfield.. They
1970 Census - 4th Count and 6th Count (Special run)
1.
Metropolitan
2 , Re ort on Surve of Hou Econom cd1Research Corporation.,
Council, prepared by
January 1975
' itations on the accuracy of the Census data area aTetthelage of the st ucture
The hm
old, and thatthe housing "conditions" being measure
Nonetheless, it is possibleto
and the lack of some or all plumbing facilities .
ain information from this data, and it is possibolnsto separate rental housing
g
conditions from owner occupied housing con iti
Count data was used to determine the number o ssbb ten deras
.:19.70 Census .6th
units in Richfield, as well as the ltsaherecare thos'edunits which have incomplete
shown on Table I. Substandard u .
• plumbing facilities .
abilitation units were determined from 1970 Censuos 93u~rt andOUnt
Suitable for Reh all occupied units built prior t
These estimates were made taking.
within the range of values and rents affordabled by thosend modoef verl low value ons
($199/month rent , $19 , 999 .value) -but cxclu i ~
and rent (below $10,000 value and below $100/m his) rocess as being not capable
rehabilitation. Very few units were excluded_~n t p
of rehabilitation. (Owner-occupied 39 , renter-occupied 11)
.thus achieved as shown on Table I was compared redhf the Me'ropolitanY
The total
information, Re ort on Surve ~ of Housin Conditions, prewas conducted throughout
Council by Economic Research a ea ° including thesCity of Richfield, during the
ttie seven-county metropolitan ,
.spring and summer of 1974. All structures w awa d d ; points l to structures depend-
and rated according to uniform criteria which
in on the number and severity of structural defects which were visible on the
g
exterior. '
the original survey was to determine the number of substan_~ ~ •
The. purpose of Richfield had 0 substandard •
structures in the metropolitan area . In this survey ,
.structures .. -
e number of housing units which could be rehabilitated were then
Estimates on th These estimates show that 333
:prepared using the original survey information.
structures need soma. or possibly major rehabilitatioS hown on Table Ich compares
favorably to the' 19.10 Census figure of 401 • structur: 1
. ~ .
• ~ .. 3
Form /approved
Otd[) taa. G3-F214~
U.S. OE•PARTMCNT OF 110WSING AND URUAN DEVELOPMENT
HOUS1uG ASSISTAIC[ PLAN f 1-T
w-.. r,~ r / ~ c+r to\I~V (1G ~-~nl F~f:`_J1; f~t)~~7n1 1 Ini~iS
a~
•
_ - . r~~_ r-a-.
1. NAR4C OF APPLICANT . . - ~.-_~.__,- -
2. ApPLICATIUW Nur.)t3[R -_ -
3. U OE~ICINAL
[] AtdE:JD1IENT
City of Richfield, •Minnesota 4. PROCr~AM YEAR.. _
From:. To: .
TlFS AN7
' NUhdUf_RS• of YEAH-F)our~ro Fiou Iraq uviTs
U?/ai:CY S7A
A. CCL
CC~3UFTIU.w OF 19CU31Jy:~ UidI7.S TOTAL 01VNER -TYPE RENTAL -TYPE
t. e. OCCUPIED t7NITS. TOTAL
14,8061
10,1401
4,6661
b. suasTANDARD 671 461. 211
~. ALL OTNER' 14 , 7392 i0 , 0942 ~
2
4 , 645
2, e. VACANT UNITS: TOTAL _
1801. 1,22°~
~ 341 2
1221
b. SU6STANDARD 11 O1
1
.
~. ALL oTHEH 1792 342 1222
3. TOTAL OCCUPIED AND VACANT
UNITS 2
14 , 986 2
10 ,174 4 r 78II2
B. SUITA[3LE FOR REHAF3IL)TATIU+J ~ ~.
~. occuPlEO UNITS
• 3963 3433 533
2. VACANT UNITS
S3 3
3 23
.,-.
3. TOTAL SUITABLE FOfi flEHAa1L-
ITATION 4013 3463 SS3
C. DATA SO~.fRCES A1VD 6^.ETHODS
1Vol. VI Census Data, 1970, Special run supplied by HUD• -
2Figure. computed. from above data. •
3Metropolitan Council computation from Fourth Count Housing Data, 1970.
Estimates number of occupied units built prior to' 1939 within range of value or rent
.available to low and moderate income persons, excludeswery low values as not
rehabable ...Will test against Metropolitan Council Special Rehab Survey available
2 -1-75 , and Richfield's own data .
• ;.
t~
. -PART IL, IiQUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OP LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
e ur ose of this Part is to determine the number of households curs Nn 11 re u ~e
Th P P
ing in Richfield • as well as those expected to reside in Richfield that q
housing assistance.
• For the purposes of this Part, the households "in need" are. those. (1) whose
incomes are within the limits of the Section 8 Hous~am because of currentts
Program, and (2) are likely to apply for such a Prog
"inadequate living conditions". .
Tncomc~• ;mits for the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program are as
fol~ows s
(Moderate) (Low) •
• Lower Income Very Low- Income
Family Size 80% of Median 50% of Median
• 1 $ 7,800. $ 4,700
• 2 10,000 6',250.
3 11,250... 7,050 _ ~ .
4 12,500 7,800
S ~ 13,250 ~ 8.,450.
6 14,054 9,050
? 14,850 9,700
8 or more ~ 15 , 600 10 , 300
Both families and the elderly are eligible for assistance. .
Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program is Develorment Act of 1974. • •
program authorized by the Housing and Community P
An eligible recipient of rental assistance would Pay Samount/and the fairfor
rent, and HUD would pay the difference between thi
market rent the property owner would normally receive for the unit.
~. ~ ~.
"Inade irate living conditions" include:
- lacking plumbing facilities
- overcrowded
paying more than 25% of income for rent
owners in housing over.30 years old and valued at less than
;•' ~~. $10 , 000.
All of these factors were combined in a special computer tabulation of 1970 Census
data, with a breakdown by size of household as shown in-Table IIa.
The total. households needing assistance in Richfield are shown in Table II. It
includes all renter households (1.,103.) within income limits and living in "inadequate
conditions° except for non-elderly one-person households, .who would not be
eligible., It also includes 20 elderly owner households having- low-or very low
income and living: in inadequate living conditions., .
larger families .(families. with 4 or more minor children) are spearated out to deter-
mine the number of units 'needed :with 3 or more bedrooms . Thin number was reached
by counting half of'a1i income-eligible/inadequately-housed S-person households,
and all 6 or more person households imthe same Category. This totalled 31-large
families
Elderly- households .needing assistance were drawn from the same special tab of
X970 Census: data. 29:9. is the number of elderly renters and owners with low or
ry low incomes and in "inadequate living conditions".
The number of handicapped (person disabled more than 6 months and unable to
work) in Richfield was 392 in 197.0 Census . Four per cent of all households in
Richfield were found to be income eligible and inadequately- housed.. .This four
per cent need factor applied to 392 gives us an estimated 16 handicapped eligible.
for Section` 8 housing; subsidies. and in need of assistance. Thus, the total elderly
and handicapped is 315 (29916) .. . .
In Migration -
According to Metropolitan Council estimates , 101 new households are expected to
reside in Richfield .1975-1.980. We estimate four per cent of these will be "in
need" 'oral households of which 20%, of'about 1, may be expected to be handicapped
or elderly.
. ..
• -n-
~ ~ _ -
, Q
~
~
J VI
Q i ~p
,(~~ _-• •~'_
~
-
! O ~ ~
w
~. ~ .~
o Q s ~ ~~E w0 ~ ~
~
a~ A
~
~ .-t
r
1-
~
V
h ~ ~
A tr U
R7 ~ ~ a
lV ~
~ •~
uJ s Q ~.~ p+ {]~ ~ O.
O lf) Q
~ ~ O f'+ O ~'+ ~ O ~
O ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ N .L ~ U!
U d ~ ~ u1~- -'~'-t A' tl~
Z Q
a
li
~-
N
~~
w -
~
r•4
1LJ u. J J n "~ ~
~ '~'-
f11 'O
~ O aq LL
Sn
~
J ..l W ~ fr'
V
u. m ~ ''ts S•a
to O ~ .~ O ~ ~
1 N ~
Z ~ ~ N ~ -
~
'd
Q p
w c
~ y~
p O
~
N
IJ3
i ~
.,~ ~ ~
O
n y
4 u1 ,,,
-.-~ -
H N ~ c0 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
v p i n ~ ~~
~
¢
O `~ O r-i ` ~
Y . N
~
', cn c0 :?~ 'T3 t11
~
xr
. Qa !-'i
t+ ~
~ ~ ~
~ O C
O
N - J ~ •
1-~ '^J 'i
~ .--i
~ o
i a- ~ J "
u M ~ M .~
x d3
i . N .~ ~
O
~ ~ ~ ~ a
a
w O~
p ~
W
1 ~,,~ ,..{ tD `-t O
~ w O ,~
E
~ ~ N N • is ~ U ,-+ lp
r-1 r-1 ~••~ .~ -.-1 ~ ~` ~
l
0 v
N `', ~
p
O O ~
O w U a
>~
.-c o f o ~
~-+
n cn N b~ ~ .-a ~
W
a O
W w
~ O
a ~ .~
W d d
a w ~ ~ +~ •`{ RS '•i
a O ~ td ~ -'~''i ~ ~
u
~ a
Q s Q
U ti
V to U
O~ Q ~ L U 'Z3 ~ ~"~
N. ~
O 3
O U
O
O
O o
7 V ti ~ O ~~
O ~_ N ~ O .-a ~
s.
~ Q ~
y Q L u) I Q v _ C
L~ o
V ~ .
a
=
~ to X .
= Z N
U ~
~ N ~ ~
' ~
• L .
-a cn 2 a x O o o ~ ° }
~ ~ N ~
E v ~.
4-1 ' ? iG ` Q ~ t
~
iL [L O w J
} w
4
'. c _o
O
~1
utl•' h
O
7
J
Q J
~
W
~
O `t •~ ~ ~
V .
'i N Q
J
Q .I
n.
W O
'I. "
ill O
F- W
L p.'
~ o (~
't
N
M O O ci tai Q a r N Ci ~
~
• •
,
Q
7. r
~ U ] cV ..
Q
~ ~ C ~ ~
•
,~
- r.
.-
• -
.. '
-7
.. .
_. ___. _ . T~113LE TIa ~ '
RICHFIELD HOUSING ASSISThNCE NEEDS
Moderate Income
Renter
Occupied Low. income eligible Eligible
)
"
tal
T
Households housing
in "inadequate
(in "inadequate"housing) ,~ o
1 person (elderly)
116 80 .:
196
_ - 298
158 456
2 -
3 & ~. .
151 252
403
5
12 21 -
33 .
-
4 ~ 11
15
6+ ~ -
. -.~---
441•. 662 1.,103
• -
Count of elderly inadequately housed/income eligible .
Owners 20 ::. ~:..- :, ~ -
Renters . 196 - 1 person - .
77 -~; 2
- 6. 3 -.
- 299 - .elderly + 16 handicapped = 315
_ ~ _ ,
8 -
P11RT III . ANNUAL. GOALS FOR HOUSING ASSISTI~NCE
This portion of the. Housing Assistance Plan is to establish realistic annual
,..goals in order to meet some of the housing needs .identified in Part II.
The constraints on setting realistic goals are: .
1. Lack of information on fundng• availability from HUD.
2 ~~ HUD allocation and distribution of funds to Richfield
and the rest of the metropolitan area.
3. Capability and capacity of Richfield in undertaking a
housing assistance program.
Given these constraints , and the identified need for assisting 1,129 .households
as shown in Part II, :.the following goals are proposed (and shown on Table III)
First Year Goals
1. Utilize the existing housing stock through-the Section 8
Existing Housing Program on.a scattered basis.
2 . Serve elderly as we 11 as non-elderly in approximate propor-
tion to need .
3 . Begin rehabilitation program to improve substandard housing
through the. use of Community Development Block Grant Funds .
Three Year. Goals
In addition to the First Year Goals, the following:
4. Construct new low-rise building of 100 units for elderly.
Site will be convenient to shopping, transportation and
public facilities .
5. Construct S homes for larger families on sites scattered
throughout Richfield. 'i
_.
. 6. Complete rehabilitation of SO homes throughout Richfield ~. -
through the use of Community Development Block Grant ' .
funds and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rehabilitation -.
...loans . ~ ~ I
. .
:.
..
_ _
/.
.~
.. g ..
- Fgtm ilppn
• OM[3 No. 6
U.S. U%PARTMENT Ot' HOLI;;ING AND URCS,!1N OF°VCLOPR1QiJ7
t-~ou~~rJC i:.ssssrA:~~~ rs.AN
7~1~;i.C Ill - ~1(!~i'si.!/,I_ GSA! ~~~ ~ F;~U;SI"-G ~~Si~'i'/1f•i~~
. r. rvf.rr~ ur ArruCANT 2• APPLICATION NUMD[:Ft D. ^ OFStGiNAL
Richfield, Mlriri@SOtS a. PROGRAM YEAR ~ Ah1EfV0,11cNT.
FfOm• Ta:
NUMBERS OF UNITS (~rccpt as nntcdJ
A. CATEGORY FIRST YEAR GOAL 7HF1cE YEAR GOAL•
TOTAL TYPES OF UNITS' TYPES OF UNITS
Naw
Exist
Rohsb• TOTAL
Plow
Exiot
Ra
~. roTAL 5p 47 3 ~ 250 I05 95 50
z. ELDERLY 17 17 125 -100 25
3. NON-ELbERLY LARGE 2 2
11
6
a. oTt-DER 31 28 3 114
64
50
f3. SOU,~C~S OF ASSlSTAPJCE
1. HUD
a. sECrioN a•• 47 47
AMOUNT ~ $ $ $ ~ $ $ $~
b. CD f?LOCK GRANTS
3
10 ~ a0~
46
$ 75 6_
; 000
e, OTHER
2. STATE AGENCIES
IDENTIFY PROGRAM: a.
b.
~.
• '
3,
OTIfER
e. FARMfiRS HOb1E AD.
,-
b. LOCAL PROGRAMS r •• 4
S1
,ooa
e. OTN E R • (specify)
uvnu,~a
:a
~.
t
(~
4 "
i
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF hIOUStNG ANO URC3AN DEVELOPMENT
--,- HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN -
TAC3LE IV GENERAL LOCATIONS OE LONER INCOME HOUSING
1. NAME. OF APPLICANT ~ 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ^ ORIGINAL
• ^ AMENOh1ENT
Richfield, ~11nrieSOta 4. PROGRAM YEAR
'
- From: To:
A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION
- 1. NEW CONSTRUCTION: CENSUS TRACT NUMBERS #44 i; #48
2, REHABILITATION: CENSUS TRACT NUMBERS scattered Locations throw bout Clt -
B. EXPLANATION OF SELL-CTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS.
1. NEW CONSTRUCTION
First Priority
Census Tract #44 -central business district is .located in center of
tract. This area is currently under study for revitalization and offers
potential sites, both vacant and to `be redeveloped, that are convenient
to transportation, shopping, medical and other public facilities.
Second Priority
Census-Tract #48 -adequate transportation. near potential (vacant) site.
2. RE HABI CITATION -
To be scattered throughout city.
:;: ~ •. -
;, ., -
~: ... .. M
Q'
> ~~ ~I'I
' 'w wM w J 1 ~~~ 4
w «.•
- .a,r ro. i ~~1. '~:t3~ S`73 dra ~> >KY`v 1'4'- ~'S5 b '. s J`SN ~,. t'vq, ~ 'r ~.
1 ~ to a a ~It ~>'~I.t r5/. ~'L j'i'r ~ ~Y't J .+ a ~''' ~i vw x.anu
r x{gnU 1 ~~-~(~'s» f'~ L ~J'{ K y, .f~ J }J ~ l7 ,1~{Y J J'n yl x,j~~1 J~.
' 1L' II L__~~L_.M~ r. ~> y '~ Y,.7' {? t 1 t VN~ ~ y 1 1.~~,.. ~Y • ~ _ ~w tea.
w..~Mr Mt{ ~ l_J~~V ~~ J .)' Y `, L 1 ~J 1 ~'~ i y J ~~ T ~ U 1 t~ J `~J w r~.
•w rn 1 1 a r _ f~~ ~ r »TJf,3 -~ v ~if,~^ ~'+ j t _~
1 ~l_J~~ ~~ tT~J ~a,> ~, a t y ~ ~'.J Iw „w ~y
w wa ~ '• ~xl } v.,.r'ti 2} i' 3 >4ysa.«T. at #y~3r ~~i it f { ~ ~_ y
~''~~~''~~ Y .. (' ~t v..'r 1 r' r r+ w« per
_N « 1 i~L-~1C~ ;'.~: ~~;`A ~ Pwi ~ _ •jfW > - ~Y 't r ~ r;~~~ I~~
y 5~52S.itSl~:;K2SfS1~.~ ~itp`I°.«_ b ____ _.-~~_ S\ w w ~3i/
.~~ ~~` E~L~L-__J~_1 _ _~C~ ~~ .-YfS~~_ _ '~--~~ --r.' •(E w xola.wwr
~++ «w ~- - ---it-=•--- ---fir-~~- i_ .':/~i~, ~.. wa
-,r-- ~''r--~ ~- -, i --, w w>,
4 ~ ~-3 -
'M «w ~IJL --1C _:L_JL_ I .; 1. JL A ;'ll W w•
,,. w~~ e `~ tea-- ~ _JC_J~L 4:~ j i-.~IIyg~°'{' ~r-~~i,--~s - _ l~! yr ww
• '- ®.~ >wT wva 4SF~, c f ^ ~ r s• S~ ~-~. II ~_IIL- ~ ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ l~ -°. '~ 1 - ti~l~ ~xr aa+n
~p w aw+ t '~~ t ^ K, w4. J~~~ J1J~ ti. ~ ~C<<~~~' .4 _~ ;eve ~ }};
w owao ~~ ~.C ~fFi~ ~ 'fig ~l-J ~. ~~ ~~~ y ~S-~'a----. `;~ 1+ wlw>o~
yr wwxw W r• (. -i~-. ..~.-_~6°..~ ..` i r
ti^ F ~ F ~ -Jl__~L__', ~:_ '~~~r~e"'i.^: a~~•-~~'.7~'_ J -tlil'w ww
a n t
~w.vw r,. r. rC~ ,E.c, "a ~I _J~L_-_ ..ms. i ~ }7i .ar axrvro
.~,, W «~,xb ICY ; < <: ~ F. r 9 , ~ ,--~~~~ _~ - ~ 1._ ~ - r I i:# . ,. r~»N,
~b. ontN. 1 - I ~e.~.'s -~h•#-}'~ ,.y- - } ~ 'id ,~ '- yb.~ ~ _ti ~ 5 - ~~ 4 v+ wo
>
~y
'w t ~ `
i~r b+N b - Tc4
_ J ~ Ls M~
A I
9>r ibrOb• 1 74A~+r~~s~ aTuTR~G90•( ~~we~~e^.~R"..b>r.~i~ ^~i~s .. l/s ant01M
1V x, Y _~ ~ f :~ w-x1d~YY
_ z. ax.nbv rf - ~ , '2 ~ a: if =~"r's_~ a Bu ._~ ~t ~ ..: ~ ~ ..sit sn a..nrv .. -
~N~Jr~O~ s 1 ~-J' ~ Y k r __~y'4 £t_ '_ f~'- ~ Qi ,i - S _ ~ {(I ~w snN
- i 1Mtbrnx ~«~ . .4:~ `1\ f ~ --- 1%~~ ~ - _ ;Yr liwxx
_ wouu.n I~c'*eF `~'_~ x`~ '•`~ ~~ .~J~'-3~ °"_.~ -~ \ k x(111 bv~i•a,.. -
? !• . ~, •• yF ~.~' j F,. su'~~ ~ x S't "•ex' ~ ~-:+i / as .HNn
K W an<N
~i1 r
w uc. it 1~~`~,~~~ ~Z t+~ ; ~ _U Y~`~ <~f 'x f` ` ~ ~~.._~L~~7~~ -tea/, 'h1 w Narx.
' yr >«nw. { '~~t ^''?~_~ ?..L»n~. 71~ ~ Y :!' ~ F '1^ ~;~~ s~(..~L./=•~- L!~ 'w'S I.s~ ~w- aww
w aNxwr ~E".~SS+ ~.~.~ ~ r is >r;~r ""y'~'.~y~l~ 1 . T"~ ~~
'w OnY Y -- ~~ rea - +~ L_ ~ w OnN
xm+cm JL~~ ~~-T_A` -F rt -
~,. nxr '- ~ 1 .t ~ .
.y. xNgl
'sv xoa«w t t'~ 'jf> r~`~ it I' ~L__J~_ __ ~ t.~ t __ Ot li~ 'w w•w
w~a.,ro S. 1 - w sa.ro .
r_ '(f~'
ti~~~-7yp,.~ f ~ ,~ ~ ~ 1~~ _ -i~'s~',~~J ~v~ ~ hc' lermx.,.ecrx ~~ b`r'....
:, r;+,r ,~ .~ S ~-~r"~"~"S~('°~` ~~ua~'i~-- 1 ~ ~>. ~,_~e•,,y 1 . ~ a.. ~ ~%' ~ w xlre
,....aye ~ ~ ,.. , - r- ~• II k~ s (:
' av w.ou - ~~ ~ ;~a;'~ _. _~- ~"'~,J~~ 9 _ ~ :-?~s~? J ~~ ~ ~.ar_ • w .w.x.
4.
'M. anxw'~ .. w rl+rw
' L C C C C' C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
~ * • a : • a a a + • .r ~ e a s a• a
. - .• 3 t i i ~ i t i- R R c R R R R R t R
- • r a •. b b r. r r r r. r r • a r Y r•