12-13-76 agendaCITY OF RIGHF.iELD MINNESOTA
"~ Office of-City IVlanager
. ~ Council Letter No. 396
Agenda December 13,- 1976
The Honorable Mayor
.and
Members of the City, Council
City of Richfield
~ Gentlemenr
~ ". Sub}ect: Purchase zn Excess of $1, 000
Chapter 6, Section 6.05 of the City :Charter stipulates that the city
council mu t approve purchase of merchandise,-materials-' equ,rment or
construction when the amount exceeds: $1, 000. There is one such extra
item. for the council agenda of December 13, 1976.
Council members are aware that the city prepares and distributes a
quarterly newsletter to all Richfield residents. -The revision in postal
rates which became effective in December, 1975., increased the cost of .
each of: these mailings to in excess of $1, 000. The ltichfie ld quarterly
newsletter is now being prepared, for mailing in mid-December, and it
is necessary that the city council approve a purchase in excess of'$1,000
for postal costs of this publications, in-the amount of $1, 247
Funds are available in the 1976 budget for this expenditure.
Respectfully submi ted,
. _
~,
Wayne S . Burggraa ff
City Manager
WSB/bll
cc::Administrative Assistant
Finance Director
,.
F
CITY OF RICHPIELl7, MINNESOTA
Office of City Nianaetar
•
Council Letter No. 395
Agenda December 13, 1976
The Honorable T~hyor
and
- 1Vie:nbers of the City Council
City of ..Richfield...
C~ntlemen°
` Subject; Sign Application :Approval
On the December 13,>1.976 city council agenda there is a request from
mope Presbyterian Church `for fermi sign to install a ~' x 10' ~igr; 'or, the ~~
boulevard. adjacent to Portland Avenue, Section 3.36, subdivision (4) of
'the clay .code allows direction and .information signs of a public or .qua s i-
pubiic nature,. upon first securing approval of the city council.
Attached is a copy of the application for this sign.
_.
•
Respectfully submitted,
/:/fin /~ ~, ! '\ f"~ ~ ~..~~ ~~.~ f
. l,~ ~
. ~ayne S. Burggra~af~
~ City. Manager
WSB/eja
cc: Pub?.ic ~IVorks Director
~ ~ ~ ` . /~i's'I .
~ CITY OF RICHFIELD ~ A~~~~- ~ r~"`~ _ _ ~r_.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPAF,TPdENT (~(p~' ! ,.~..-~ ~;~_,
g_ _ .: ...
PROTECTIVE INSPECTZO;~I DIVISION ?~~'""~" ---•
c,r '~
.APPLICATION FOR .OUTDOOR ADVER'CISING PERMIT ~~ it~ :~„~~«~
~~~ ~ a~ a ~~
Date ~~~~ 197 Fresent Zoning hrs~.;~~.2;Q-P ee `Paid ~~-" m
~, .
Location '7/3~~ C~c~`~~~~5 Is sign. erected at this date Yes ~ No
Sign Erector;...,-~~~ ~~ /ho~,~-~~ Address~`~~~ --~-~'~ ~ ~G~, S`-~~~~ 77'701;'
Owner of Si.gn~~~r :/~s~ G~~.,1 ~.~ ~ ~,? ~~,~,f v~ ~, ~~ ~.~~C ~'lG~lo~ S -.
~'~;~, ~-, Address .~ ~'
Type of Sign:. Wall ~ Hanging ~. Ground ^ Roof ^ .Pedestal ~ Pylon
Single Face ^ Double Face ~ Business ^ Advertisin
g ~ Sq. Ft. ea. side .,5 ~
Estimated cost $ /~~~ lonstx•ucted of~ - ~fic~-P : Completion Date ~a~.~~-~`~
Total height from:/ (Ground) .(.i~eefj~„ft. Space beneath sign to: (Ground) ~: ~-
~~~
If illuminated: Name Af Electrical Contrac~r Address
--
Clear Glass C1 Frosted Glass ^ Plastic Covered ~( Shaded [~ Other
.Flashing ^ Revolving [J Traveling ~, Zip ^ Other ^ Wattage
~pplying for this Permit the Undersigned agrees:
1. Ta accept. and abide by all provisions of Ordinances #2.03 and #3.271 of the .City of
Richfield and all other pertinent ordinances or regulations that may be adopted in
the future.
2. To notify Chief. Inspector when sign is ready for inspection, but before erection crew
has left-the job.
3. Electric wiring on illuminated signs must comply with City of Richfield electrical
ordinances.
Signature of Applican ~~~,~~~-mc--~`~z.~~~
Address~~~~ ~ts~ ~~ ~~, ~~~~ telephone No. ~~~-~~ 1~/{~
Approval Recommended ~' Denied _ ~~ Date /2./ '~ 19 j~
Chief Inspector
Approval Recommended ~ Denied n
~ Approved
.Q Denied ^
Date 19
Directox of Public. Works
Date 19
Pdanager
.Approved by Council:
. Date
<Council Stipulations
~: ` 413.26
~ `}
t ,
'GROUND S1 GIJ PEDESTAL SIGN FIANG ING S! GN
_ Y110TH __ `~•i :~ ._... Pr'IDTH __.._._____~ s ~~•--- t91DTli Y.__.._..ii ~ ,
,~ LEGEND ~~` ~~.EOEN.D ~~ ~• LEGEND
+ 1 - r ~ t~
v o ~ ,°
~-~ 1
,~ ~ ~P I
~ ~~
., ~ ~ I i=~
:~ ~ _ ,:
z :~t rj: INDICATE: DI STANGE .~ ~ 1 i
a, ~ ~~ 1 ^ti (~ .. FROM TF{E DUILaING
------- ./~ ~ ~ i
- _ ~ _ , _ j ., GROUND
INDICATE-LEGENC ON
ROOF SIGN
P11DTH -,j THE REVERSE Sp E IN -
_ ,
t
... . .
_
~ LEGEND ~
~;
. ?~
~
~~
f° ~ ~ ~
-~ J 1
.
.
f~ '
~lS'~~ Rm±a 9~.Ye.J~. r c::. .. :.::tiL .:-',rn. A C;_~, :c (ed~s,n ~ ~M,_,_",_
r
i
F
I
1~
k x ..a ~ f F ~ A ((~~ ((..._.., .
Y,
f ~ k ROOF ,
~ L ~ jaw r ~ ~ ~~3 ~~ ~ .,.:.
S 7 5 ~~.' ~ D JS.1 "_...-.
. -- .,.~.. _,. .,vt3, . °- -~ etsa.uuY+~rot.>. ea,~a . _~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i ~ -/~y p4 ..~'~
(/ si' ~^~ ~~`
• P
.:~~ ~
- -~ ,---- Y - - - ------
. __ --- ~ -
I
_ .- ~
PLACE LOCATION OF SIGN ON THIS SKETCH tvITH DISTANCE ;~~ `~~~P mp,/e~ o`;y
• h9 PROPERTY LINE So ~f C.. 111"'999"' ""~1 .
HE .~) GN I S F•F'0 /" •D
T
LOCATE ANY TRAFFIC L:IGHT~ WITHIN fit?0 FEETQ a.~'~,r~•~~ joCa ~ n r ~
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS ,,j N'OfiCH: ..'
~. a
:CITY OF RICI3FI~,L~, I~~rtIAlN:ESC)TA
. rJffice of City Mn nager
Council Letter Na. 394
Agenda Dedember 13, 1976
4
The .Honorable Mayor
and:
Members of thL City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: City Council Policy Session
Qn December 6 the ciay counci met o consider the implications of
.;hai~c~ing characteristics. of the community'and the restrictions under which
we will be operating in .future years .both in tezms of the operating budget
and tl~e Capita Improvement Program. ~
I tvoul~ li,l~e to suggest that the city council arrange ~ secand meeting
for 5:30 p, m, on Thursday, January ].3 to continue consideration of these
matters. The meeting on January 13 would be directed: at establishing general
policies and objectives for future operating budgets as hell. as the Capital
Improve me:~t Program .
Respectfully submitted,
•~c ,~
Wayne S. Burggraaff ~~
City.. i1rla,~ager
WSB/eja ... ..
{',/j///
.CITY OP RZCZIF°IEhD, MIPJNESOTA
Office of City .Manager
Council Letter No: 393
Agenda December ,13 , 1976,
The. Honorable Mayor ;
and
Members of the City :Council
City_of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Resolutions l~pproving'Varicius Pay, 1~Ian_s: for 1977
'Phe .:purpose of"ihis council letter is to recommend adjustments in employee
compensation for`1977 for those city emplo~e~s not. repro tinted by:organized`
.. - bargain?n~ units.
Nan-organized. city employees have established. an informal organiaation
called the Non-organized-City Employees Group (NORCE) . Thus group is not
presently organized as a bargaining unit under the provisions of state. law, and
,~ vahiie the city rrzanager and his. s ~ ff meet periodically-with. the group to discuss
-_ salaries and other matters, no negotiations are carducted with thorn.
The municipal cote requires the .city manager to submit a for.rnal recorrim-
endation for pay plan and benefit adjustments far the non-organized city er:ipl~y~es
to the- city council. Section 2.33, subdivision. 1 of the municipal cage states:
these requirements:
"Establishment of Plan. Tliere .shall be at aill times a pay plan for ell
classes of positions included in the classification plan. Such plan shall
be established and from =_ime to time amended by-city council resolution
upon receipt of r~commendatians from th.e city manager. In making sucr
. ~ recommendations, the city .:manager shall give appropriate con Sid Eratior.
to the following factors: (1) Maintenance of equitable relationships
between classes, based ors their. relative cutiFS and responsibilities
(2) The gererai level of rates in the apprapriate labor markets for-
comparable work i.nder similar conditici~s (3) ourrent recruitment and
retention experience..
General Services Pay Plan_
The general services pay plan covers approximately thirty-five percent of
city employees., including all full time non-organized employees except for thole
<included in the manag~~ment pay plan .
a
Council Letter No. 393 -2- Dec~ernber 13-> 1976
In accordance with the municipal code provisions, it is recommended that
the general services pay plan he increased five percent for 1977. The proposed
:resolution to implement this recommendation :a attached. The five. percent in--
crease'has been .applied across the board to each of the salary grades listed
within the attached pay plan resolution.
' The following factors were considered in developing this recommendation:
`1. A T977 Richfield Police Officer FAderation salary settlement of S.5%.
2. A projected 1977 Local 49 settlement in the' neighborhood of 5.5%
to 6% .
3, A survey of other Twin City area municipalities indicating that salary.
increases for non=organized employees will be in .the area of 5 to 'S. 5%
with a fe.w going as high as 6%: ,`
4. An increase-irn the Minnea~alis-St. Paul cons~imer price. index of
5.1.% from October, 1975 to October, 19'75.
5. Analysis of comparable pay rates in other jurisdictions.
.The 1977 cost of this recommendation is estimated at $32,900.
• Part Time and Seasonal Pay Plan
In recent years it has been necessary to increase part time pay rates in•order
to~ recruit and. retain qualified employees and meet the minimum wage requirement
under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. In June of 1y76 the U.S. Supreme
Courf in the case of the Tlational League of Cities, et al vs. Usery round the '
Federal. Fair Labor Standards Act unconstitutional in its application to state and
local government Pmployees, As a result. of .this action state and local gpvern-
anent employees are now covered by the Minnesota. FLS~1 which has a lower. minimum.
wage. Effective October 1, 1976 the minimum wage under the State FLSA is $2.I 0
per hour. Therefore, the salary compensation plan far part fiime and sessonal
.employees reflects no change in: grades l through 8 because of the reduced minimum
wage qualifications. These rates will, however, allow the-city to :continue to
. compete for qualified part time and seasonal employees to-meet our needs. -
The major change in the .part time and seasonal er:zployees compensation plan
is in the Recreation Specialist :III classification, This`rate increased from a range
of $3. SO to $8.00 per hour, to $4.00 to $12.00. per hour. The increased wage for
this: olassification is directly offset. by registration costs and used only those
courses for which specialized instruction- is required..
Management Pay' Plan .
A 197? pay plan resolution covering the position classficati~ansassigned to
grades G-17 through G-21 in the management pay plan has also been attached.
- _ I
J
• ~e
Council Letter No. 393 -3- ~ \ December 13,' 1976
The grade assignments in he management pay .plan remain urichanged.
It is recommended that the minimum and maximum rates in each range
be ircrea§ed by five percent and that actual salaries be adjusted in'aecordance
with provisions of the resolution. Several criteria were .examined in developing
this recommendation. Considerationwas given to survey:-data of comparable
positions in other comparable suburb the number of employees, budget aize,
organizational structure, duties and responsibilities.
Council Salaries
On February' 9', ,1976 the city council adopted an ordinance setting council
salaries at $4, 020 anal the mayor's salary"at $5 400 per year.: Than 1976 ordn-
ance amen.drnent requires that these salaries be reviewed each 'year, A copy of
that :ordinance f attached for'your consideration.
Health Insurance' Premium Contributions
Since 1968 the,>cty has paid the full premium for single employee health
insurance. coverage, In 1975' the city `initiated a program of contributing $16~
a month. for dependent health insurance- premium cost for..non-organized employees.
The current health insurance contract provided through. the Hennepin County ,joint
Purchasing Organization requires increases for both single and dependent coverage.
The single ..premium cost will increase in 1977 from $26.54 per ,month to $_35.7.4
'.per month. The dependent premium cost will also increase in varying amounts
depending upon the type of .coverage selected-by the employee. It is recommended
that the city continue the practice of paying for the full cost of-the. single insurance
premium for employees of the. general .service and management pay plans. ' No
change is prcpased in the contribution for'the dependent coverage. The 1977.cost
of tkiis recommendation is estimated at $10, 000..
Sumtriary and Conclusion '
Throughout the process of collecting and. reviewing survey data for comparable
positions in both the general services and management pay plans we .have observed
t~:at in many cases our compensation position varies greatly when viewed internally;:.
among similar .employee subgroups (i. e. , clerical subgroup) or when cross compared
with employee subgroups:. (clerical vs: engineering/technical). On -the basis of
the extensive review which has been done in this area it appears -that the best way
to resolve these differences and inequities within- our compensation plan would.
be to'have a professional personnel consultant. conduct apay -and classification
study as proposed earlier this year in Council Letter No. 113. You will recall
that`''the class and pay study could be done for a cost of approximately $5,.000.
Summary of Recommendations
Ixi summary, the following actions are recommended by the- city manager:
Council Letter No. 393
-4-
December 13; 1976
1. That a resolution establishing the 1977 general services pay
plan be adopted.
2. That tl~ resolution establishing the 1977 part time and seasonal
pay plan be adopted.
3. That the resolution establishing the 1977 management pay plan be
adopted .
4. That the .city council review the city council salaries in accordance
with ordinance requirement..
5. Thaf the resolution establishing the proposed 1977 health insurance
contribution be adopted.
6. That the .transfer establishing moving funds from the cor~tirgency
account to the appropriate budget activities be adopted.
7. That the city council authorize the city manager to .conduct an
outside study with recommendations for a classification and pay
system of the general services and management pay plan employees.
Respectfully submitted ,
(j'e/f ~V
Wayne S. Burgg ~ f
City Manager
WSB/eja
cc: Personnel Director
i
U
' RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING- CITY'S CONTRIBUTION
TOWARD HOSPITAL-MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM
s.
WHEREAS, ahospital-medical/surgical group health insurance plan is
available from the Hennepin County Cooperative: Purchasing Insurance Group
for city employees and their families, and
WHEREAT', all permanent full. time employees .and permanent probationary
employees are eligible for plan benefits as described in the Personnel Ordinance,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council is .required to determine by resolution the city's
contribution toward the premium for health insurance
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city shall contribute $35.74
per month toward a single person premium for. all unorganized employees and
the city shall contribute $I6 per month toward the dependent health insurance
premium for all unorganized. employees .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council shall determine the city's
contribution toward fine. single and dependent health insurance premium for all
organized employees groups by the adoption of the appropriate resolutions
concerning labor contracts with the respective organized employee groups .
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of
December, 1976.
r1
U
Loren L. Lclw
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran Gity Clerk
Mayor
L ..I' ..
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATIONS FROM
T'dE 1977 CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT TO VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
•
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5590 appropriated funds for each department
of the city for the year 1977; and
WHEREAS, a contingency appropriation was made in the General Fund
for various purposes, including the. 1977 salary adjustments and the re-
lated~fr:inge benefit contributions; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No, established the 1977 pay plans for
the General Services employees; and
'' WHEREAS, Resolution Nc. determined the city's contribution.-
far single and dependent health insurance for General Services employees;
and
WHEREAS,. it is hereby determined necessary to adjust the 1977 budget
appropriation $42,922 to reflect adjustments.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that the sum of $42,922 be transferred from the contingency
appropriation of the General Fund to the follocaing departments:
DEPARTI`-ANT
AMOUNT
,Executive
Finance
Planning
Public Safety
Public Works
Health
Parks and Recreation
$ 2,404 Increase
12,065 Increase
2,563 Increase
2,966 Increase
10,789 Increase
1,612 Increase
10,523 Increase
Total Contingency Appropriation $42,922 Decrease
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of
December, 1976.
ATTEST:
Thomas J, Moran. .City Clerk
Loren L. Law Mayor
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1977
SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, Section 2.33 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield provides
that the assignment of classes to pay grades, the number of steps in each grade, the
bi-weekly rates in each grade, the method of normal progression through pay grade and
the work week in hours for each class be established by council resolution, and
WHEREAS, the city administration has prepared a 1977 pay plan for position
classifications in the general services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does establish
for the year 1977 the following pay plan, which is to be effective January 1, 1977, and
subject to the provisions of the personnel rules and regulations ordinance.
GENERAL SERVICES/BI-WEEKLY RATES
CJ
GRADE 1 2 3 4 5 6
G1 253.05 266.29 279.54 292.78 307.36
G2 266.29 279.54 292.78 307.36 323.26
G3 279.54 292.78 307.36 323.26 339.15
G4 292.78 307.36 323.26 339.15 356.38
G5 307.37 323.26 339.15 356.38 373.60
G6 323.26 339.15 356.38 373.60 392.14
G7 339.15 356.38 373.60 392.14 412.02
G8 356.38 373.60 392.14 412.02 433.21
G9 373.60 392.14 412.02 433.21 454.42
G10 392.14 412.02 433.21 454.42 476.94
G11 412.02 433.21 454.42 476.94 500.79
G12 433.21 454.42 476.94 500.79 525.96
G13 454.42 476.94 500.79 525.96 552.45
G14 476.94 500.79 525.96 552.45 580.27
G15 500.79 525.96 552.45 580.27 609.42
G16 525.96 552.45 580.27 609.42 639.90
525.96
552.45
580.27
609.42
639.90
673.02
Normal Progression Through Grades
Grades G1 Through G10
1 2 3 4
(Starting) (After 6 mos.) (After 18 mos.) (After 39 mos.)
7
707.47
5
(After 42 mos.)
Grades G11 Through G15
1 2 3 G. 5 6
(Starting) (After 1-yr.) (After 2 yrs.) (After 3 yrs.) (After 4 yrs.) (After 5 yrs.)
Grade G16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
(Starting) (After 1 yr) (After 2 yrs) (After 3 yrs) (After 4 yrs) (After 5 yrs) (After 6 yrs)
v
Resolution No.
Page 2
Position Classification Grade Hours/Week
Clerk I G1 40
Keypunch Operator G2 40
Clerk Typist I G2 40
Clerk Stenographer I G3 40
Clerk II G4 40
Liquor Store Clerk I G4 40
Telephone Operator G4 40
Clerk Typist II G4 40
Keypunch Operator II G5 40
Clerk Stenographer II G5 40
Clerk Typist III G6 40
Cashier G7 40
Accounting Clerk I G7 40
Computer Operator G7 40
Secretary I G7 40
Liquor Store Clerk II G8 40
Engineering Aide I G8 40
Janitor G8 40
Custodian G8 40
Printer G8 40
Accounting Clerk II G9 40
Secretary II G9 40
Administrative Aide G10 40
Community Center Programmer G10 40
Deputy Clerk G11 40
Engineering Aide II G11 40
Appraiser I G12 40
Programmer Analyst I G13 40
Recreation Supervisor G13 40
Engineering Technician I G13 40
Public Health Environmentalist G14 40
Administrative Analyst G14 40
Associate Planner G14 40
Naturalist G14 40
Maintenance Superintendent G15 40
Programmer Analyst II G15 40
Assistant Liquor Store Manager G15 40
Building Inspector G15 40
Electrical Inspector G15 40
Plumbing Inspector G15 40
Engineering Technician II G15 40
Appraiser II G15 40
Ice Arena Maintenance Superintendent G15 40
Accountant G16 40
Chief Water Planter Operator G16 40
Parks Superintendent G16 40
,~
Resolution No.
Grade
LG 6
Grade Assignments
Page 3
LABOR AND TRADES - BI-WEEKLY RATES
1 2 3
562.33 590.45 619.97
Normal Progression Through Grades
1 2 3
(Starting)(After 6 mos)(After 18 mos)
Position Classification Grade Hours/Week
Street Foreman LT 6 40
Sewer Foreman LT 6 40
Park Foreman LT 6 40
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of
December, 1976.
•
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
t \
~ -
.,.~
1977 EQUIVALENCY TABLE 0.0500
;3
GENERAL SERVICES
- T
$ ;
RADE HOURLY fi - a
- io-
i1 %
-CyS_ 1 5 3.16 ( 3. I~31 1 g 253.05 S ,_548. Z£L 6,~ • 579.30 12
GS. 2 3.33 't 3.3286) 266.29 576.96... 6.923.54
GS 3 3.49 G 3.4943) 279.54 605.67 7,268.04
,.
GS 5 '3.84 ( 3.84201 307.36 '665.95 7.991.36 ~
GS 6 4.04 ( 4.0408) 323.26 700.40 8,404.76
GS 7 4.24 ( 4. 3941 339.15 334.R3~ ~{
GS 8 4,45 ( 4.45481 356..38 772.16 91265.88
GS 9 4.67 ( 4.6700) 373.60 809.47 91713.60
GS 10 4.90 4
_GS 11 5.15. t 5.1503? 412.02 892.71 10,712.52
S 12 5.42 ( 5.41511 433.21 938.62 11,263.46
GS 13 5,68 t 5.68031 454.42 9 X4.58 11,814.92
GS 14 5.96 (5.96181 476.94 1.033.37 12,400.44
GS 15 6.26 ( 6.2599) 500.79 1,085.05 13,02.0..54
16 6 57 6 5 45 5 96 9 8 74 9
GS 6.91 ( 6.9056) 552.45 11196.98 14,363.70
GS 7.25 f 7.2534) 580.27 1.257..25 15,0.87.02
GS 7.6 ( 7 6 78) 6 9 4 4 844 9
GS 8.00 ( 7.9988) 639.90 1,386.45 16,637.40
GS 8.41 ( 8.4128) 673.02 1.458.21 17.498.52
i
GS 8.84 ( 8.8434) 707.47 1 532.85 18 394 22
I6'
t5 i
Iq
13
l2
1
1
10 t
~~ 9
t 8
~ t
~~ ~ _ _. _ 5
_,-
_ y
RESOLUTION N0. '
RESOLUTION RELATING T O THE 1977 SALARY COMFENSATION FLAN .
WHEREAS, Section 2.33'of th e Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield provides that
the assignment of classes to pay
` grades, the number of steps in each grade, ..the bi-weekly..
xates
in each grade, .the method of normal progression through the a rade and the work
P Y ~
.week in hours for each class be established by council resolution, and
WHEREAS, the city administr ation has prepared a 1977 pay plan,fc~r part time and
seasonal position classification s for which there are no essential) Similar osition
Y P
cl
assifications in other re ular
g
a laps
P3'P
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does establish,
for the year 1977 the following pay plan, ,which is to be effective on Januar 1 1977
Y > >
and subject to the. provisions of the personnel rules aiid regulations ordir~a~ace.
PART - TIriE .A.ND SEASONAL EMT'LOYEES -HOURLY RATES . .
GRADE 1 2 3 ,. 4 5
' °
1 1.25 1.31
1.38 1.45 1.52
2 1.81 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.21
3 2.20 2,31 2.43 2.55 2.68
'4 2.37 2.49 2.61 2.74 2..88
5 2.55 2;68 2,81 2.95 3.10 '
6 2.74 2.88 ~ 3.02 3.17. 3.33
~ 7 2.95 3.10 3.26 3.42 3,59
8 3.17 3.33 3.50 3.68 3.86
•
GRADE ASSIGNMENTS
Position Classification Grade Wa e
Recreation Attendant I 1
Recreation Attendant II 2
Inforniation Reception Clerk 3
General Clerical I 3
Recreation Attendant III 3
Recreation Worker I 4
General Clerical II 5
General Services I 5
General Services II 6
Recreation Worker IT 6
..
.
Recreation Specialist I .
.
7
Community Service Officer 8
Recreation Specialist II 8
Crime Analyst_ Intern 8
Com uter erato
p r
OP
8
Recreation Specialist III $4.00 to $12.00 per hour
Passed by the City Council o f the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th.day
ofDc
e ember 1976
Loren L. Zaw Ma or
Y
ATTEST
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
RESOLUTION N0.
•
L J
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1977
SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, Section 2.33 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield provides
that the city council shall adopt by resolution pay plans for city employees which
pay plans shall include the assignment of classes to pay grades with minimum and
maximum of progression through the pay grade, and
WHEREAS, Section 2.33 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield provides
that the City Manager shall be responsible for administering the pay plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a 1977 pay plan for certain management
positions in the city service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby does
establish for the year 1977 the following pay plan to be effective on January 1,
1977 and subject to the provisions contained herein: '
GRADE 17 - $580.44 - $787.24
Street Superintendent
Water Superintendent
Ice Arena Manager
Assistant Park & Recreation Director
Administrative Assistant
Engineering Associate
Assistant Fire Chief
Housing and Development Specialist
GRADE 18 - $611.75 - $866.33
Environmental Health Director
Chief Building Inspector
Wood Lake Manager
Personnel Director
Fire Chief
GRADE 19 - $676.01 - $955.31
Liquor Store Manager
City Assessor
GRADE 20 - $743.87 - $1,067008
Finance Director
Parks and Recreation Director
Planning Director
GRADE 21 - $821.84 - $1,160.46
Public Safety Director
Public Works Director
BE IT FURTHF'C~ RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City
Manager to adjust the individual salaries of those employees assigned to the above
pay plan. Such adjustments shall be granted according to the following criteria:
1. Employees shall be eligible for individual adjustments on the
effective day of this resolution except for employees appointed
after January 1, 1975 who shall be eligible for individual adjust-
ments on their respective anniversary date.
., ,_
Resolution No. Page 2
2. The City Manager may grant individual salary adjustments at times
other than those specified above provided the city council is ad-
vised of the adjustments and the reasons therefor at least three
weeks prior to the time the adjustments are proposed to be imple-
mented.
3. When granting individual salary adjustments the City Manager shall
consider the following factors:
a) The level of compensation necessary to attract and retain
competent and professionally trained personnel.
b) The performance
c) Comparability of nature of job and salary to sample
group management survey.
d) The relationship of salary with that of those supervised.
e) Recognition of different professional training and experience.
f) Degree of responsibility, number of employees supervised and
scope of departmental programs.
• g) Degree of competence of employee
4. The City Manager shall file with the city council each year, before
the end of the year, a report of his action in exercise of this
authority.
Positions Exempt Bi-Weekly Rate
Attorney $524.00
Health Officer $ 24.00
Emergency Services
Coordinator $100.00
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of
December, 1976.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
• Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
R'`.~ ..
CI~'Y=OR HTCHFIELT),; MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
I
Council Letter Np. 392
Agenda:: December 13 , 19 76 '
The Honorable Mayor
~ ...and.
Ni"emlaers of the City, Council
Cify of Richfield
~ Gentlemen:
Subject: Approval. of `Loan. to HRr1 for .the t urchase of Property
~ in the L•/H/N Area
- ~/irs Edith A. Johnson, 7's5 Graham Avenue; has.requasted that the
Richfield Hou ing and Redevelopment Authority purchase her single family
home, This home is located within the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet project acquisition
area for a home improvement center (see attached map). Because the HRA has
na acquisition funds at this. tir.~e , it will. be necessary to borrova funds from ;thee
city to accomplish the purchase of this property. The recommended procedure
~. provide that the HRA and the city execute a loan agreement far +~he correv, ng
of money, with the understanding that the HRI~ will .repay the borrow:d f~.~nds
with .interest to the city, The city council will have to execute the attached
`loan agreement and resolution before the ~IR.P: may pr•~~ceed with the purchase
of this property.
The estirnated amount of the city loan will be $3:0,000. ThiG amount will
cover the purchase price, which has not yet. been finalized, and the cost of
relocation, if any.' The home is a one. ar;d one-half story frame dwelling-which
was built in 1953. It has 89S square feet an the first floor with two bedrooms,
Tlae city assessor's nffice has. recorded a ctarrent market value on this property
at $24, 500.
Tree loan from the city wil'° be paid bac'K with interest at thz encl of three
years . 'i'he interest rate will b~~ five (S°~; percent z~er annum ($1 , S DO per year)
on the unpaid balance. The interest an the loan will be paid from the fallowing
two:; sources:
1. -until the land is needed far-thee L/H/N project, the home will be
rented. The gross rental income would be $250 per month, plus
utilities .
Z. VJlaen the land is ..needed for rede~~elapmen~, the home will be sold
to a rnaver far $1,500 -= $3,000.
i
_ _ ~
s
.. i
_ _
--_._~`_
~~~::L.LL:(:~1_L_LLd ~1 ~1.1-L1.1.Li_1 ~~ ~ TTII l ;1:~ ~ T: x.11- I l ~i - I~~~ ~ '-~' ~.
I. 11:1 ( {
--~•
, -(-' _. .....__ I i ..{ atrmrtwwt - psirmacanxarucncNmt t t ~ \ f1 \
~~! ~~ L: I ji !< ~ I I 1 i tenatter+at~t'as~+ei .. ~ H ~ 8~ ~Ll ~ i ~ Il ~ ~ ~ \ . .
I ~I I I; 1 _ 9^^ I T I i
- I _ - f,
' LYM W000 6 ~. I I F' __ . I .A~ OV-OM7 AV[. \
i /1 T ~. tvo. ` ~ ~q o~~. I - 11 .
It COLIAx AYE,
• `r ~ ~ 1" j /~•i euo~~s'% .__ ,y • ~~~°~r~,~~A ~ C-~i ~1_I I 1 -~ ~~',•`t I I
~ ` `
~; \~ic,• ~ ~ I ALORtEM L-{ArE' • -_L I ~A
m _
-
-, ~ > s
I I ~ t ~Tt@ '~\ - $~ ~ IP ~ ~ - \ \ ~ii 1 ~~' . ~ LARf(ELD AYE i..
•- ,~ - - ~-- i ~ .-
• 1
{iY~ ` ~_I I j fi Epr ~._Z 1 x...11 _( 66~ ` ' __ NSRRI ! AY[ T l ,M _.i.. _ i r f
T.. - - ~. _ . - - ~ - - ,~ E
p~ ._:_ _. i 11_[rrtan lttxmns¢sr~aaov~y __ .__.~.~ ~. :_1_J~ ~ . - --. ! `-1 ~ J 1 I r - {
• J
!
~l .. ' '-tuseuer ~ AvE.
.. ~ .~ -- --~ ' -T - - - -
I W[Ni WCRTH AVE. ^S
~o r j ' ~-1--T--T rr ~' -1 r- --; ,~,~ I I
* ~ t t ~ i l~ t I I t it II ~i
~ ,~ .. ... I 1 I l --~ - ~ t
I -t'- ;i-
.+61 mo .q ~ :~ ~.._L__~.-~_-J Ll_ ~.1.J_.: .1. 1---J _I _Il_L..t~ I I', ';,
' ~T ,= I I -~ ~ ~ 6tA:56L1! AYE. '
'~ u a, i ai>sn SireEriean~ { i_.. is t ~ I IJt_ 1
t i ~ '. t '~
_ ..
aa 1._. ._L. ~\ f
Y^ w NICOLLIi !IY[.
_..___ ^ _
._ ~ ~ ~ } ` ~ y t- ' ~NaauuArBaci I j yi , I \1~..•~
-.._l-..__;_ 1 1... i~~ ... I ! _L__L .1 J• ;._-! ! _L. 1. II
{~.a __~-- J~Oi01YmErFtNMtrmwi:inwstrtaieiiawutwwnmwT:. . ,.._- -r-; ~ 'I \~`,,,.
4w®sy 1 1 II I i I~ i I ~ ~ I ! ~ I ~ l
~~ {{ i (
WT t t ._..{ I I - I t - t _ -
- --
ff ,
1
• " ' 1 I
1 rl ~ 1
__ ..1 ~1
--...
STf.Yf NS 4Y[ _ ~
(1l I l! t i I f ll 1 I t i ~ ~ i ! i~ I' I ~'~
,~~
. 1. i__i_.
9 rW AYC.
' ~ X.ti y~ a ~ ~t •t wY!`uN,• ~t ,r 4'F- is Y' 1 .!~ti ~, ~ t.. AT7 em;/ry°''"4 C, gm vaE
• ~ ~ ~ I I !S b i= ~ ~ J ~ '. ~ o r~uv ~ ~~4 t! , r' l" <.,.. a 'i; ~,~a' ir„f ~°'i: Y.v +~ ~~ U ~"'°". L`°`~:'eb.,~ k~.r ~ la M, ~~3i ~~ `~
.. ~~ "~ L_..~!'___) ~ ~ ~,:.,;~'+.~:~~,::di ",6t•^ ~,f}~Y ~ ~=iG~.,E"3E°'~1...~...~l.'~ . ter f~'~a~ I
~.. ;
a.
RESOLUTION N0:
RESOLUTION AiTIT IORI ZING TIC E WCUI'ION OF t1N
AGREE^~1EN"T TO LOAN ,"40NEY TO 1'F;E RICHFIELD
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUIT-IORITY AND
PROVIDING .FOR TiiE PI;RFOF;i~1CE TI~REOF BY
ADVANCEMENT FRO1~I
•
ti11E-IERT~A.S, the HRA desires to borrow money for the. purl:ose of purchasing
certain real property pursuant to and in furtherance of the L/I-I/N Redevelopment
Project heretofore adopted by ,the City and the i-IRA, said real property being
described as follows: Lot 4, Block 3, Fairwood Shores, Hennepin County, D?inne-
so~a, and
~- t~'HEREAS, the purchase of said real.pxoperty :is necessary to accomplish
• the purposes of said L/H/N Project, and
1~FII;RF.AS, the HRA is authorized by Minnesota.' Statutes., Section 42.445, to
purchase:-real property and to borrow money fre:~ the City therefore, and
Tvl-IEREAS, the City is authorized by I~'iinnesota Statutes, Section 462.5~i, to
-make loans- to the I-LR~~ in aid of fir. of cots .
NOt~, '_rf-IERi:FORE, BE IT RESOL~TED BY T_HE CIT1' OF RICHFIELD:.
1. .That the pia}ror and City Manager be, and hereby are, authorized to
execute, as agents to the City of Richfield, are agreement with the Richfield-
Housing and Redevelopment Authority, entitled "Loan Agreement", a copy of jahlch
" is hereby given Clerk's File No. I-iP.A- , ar~d is ordered placed on fi1.e.
2. That the City Clerk be, and hereby i.s directed to advance monies to the
.Richfield-Housing and Redevelopment Authority in such amount and at such time
as is provided in the above agreement, said monies to be taken from
. all p.3},rents made by t.l~~e Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to said
agreement,
Passed by the City Council of the City of Ric$ifielci this day of
December, 1976.
ATTEST
Lorcn~L. Law Ma},oi' --
'i ~ _
Tt ~ ~3s J.~ I`'ioz=an City C1er9:
.. ,
...kr
LOAN AC;REI~IEI~IT .
ZT-ITS AGI2F.LT~~NT, entered into as of this day of 1576
by and between the Housing and Redevelopment ut-?iority o- zc =1e1 ~lrn7esota,
a body public and corporate (hereinafter :the "i-IRA"), and-the city of Richfield,
a municipal corporation organized and existing-under the laws of the State. of
Minnesota (hereinafter the "City").
WZTNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the I-IItA desires to borrow money for the purpose of .purchasing
certain real property pursuant to and in furtherance of -the L/H/N Redevelopment
Project heretofore adopted by ,the :City and th.e I-IIZA, said xeal property being
described as follows: Lod: 4, Block 3, Faixteood Shores, Hennepin County, Minne-
sota, and
jti'I°IEREAS, the purchase of said real property is nQcessary to accomplish
the purposes of said L/H/N.Project, and
ti'dI~RF.AS, the City desires to lend rnaney so that said purchase may be
accomplished, and
t4'IiEREAS, the HRA is authorized by Minnesota. Statutes, Section 462,445 to
purchase real property and to borrow money .from tl~e City therefore, and
1~~lERE.e~S, t}1e City is author. izec? by i,ii.nnescta Statutes, Section 4G?.,, 58~. to
make loans to t're H'tA in aid of projects .
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual tenants and agreements
herein set forth, the I-TRA and the City do hereby agree as folloi4~s
I. The City agrees to advanc.~ to the ~Il~A money in an amount to be detel-mined
by the I-II~-t aL- such time as a decision has been made by the HRA to purchase such
~rop::;rt7 , said amount to be equal to the purchase pr.}.ce of said. property plus
ar~y -relocation benefits payable, and .
- II . The IiRA agrees to repay trio swn so .advanced, plus interest, as follo~~s
A. Interest s}call accrue on unpaid principal at the rate of
5.00% per annum from the date of advancement until repai.d..
B. Payments-shall be applied. first to rec~uce interest acc~~ui~c3
. at the. date of payment, and the remainder, is any, shall
reduce t:he principal balance.
C. The HItA may make payment or payme3:ts in any amount and at
any L-ime,-provided that the entire unpaid principal together
with accrued interest shall be repaid no later than three years
from -the date of advancement of funds to the ILTtA.
III , This agreement steal]. be void and of: no effect if advancement of. funds
by ~:}~e City as provided Herein is not nYade bcforc January 3:I., x.977.
.,
' HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AU'II~ORI?'Y
~ ~.
Y
~~ Its Chairman
-. Dated :.
~'
ILs Executive Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD
I3y __
Its Mayor
Dated: ..:.
ILs City Ai?nager •
..
/~. ~ ,
CITY OF RICHFIELD, ;MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter: No 391
'P.genda December,l3, 1976
.:The Honorable Mayor.
and t
Members of the City Council .
Cify of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Hearing on Corrrmunity Development Block Gram `Program
The,:city council has sched.uaed =two public hearings orr thee-city',$ application
for the Community Development .Block Grant Program' for Year III. The first hearing
is December 13, 1976 and. the second hearing is scheduled for December ~', 1976,
Inasmuch as the .city is a part of the- Hennepin County Urban County application;
the hearings are technically-being held as joint hearings with Hennepin County.
,The purpose of the public r~earings is to. consider the amended housing
assistance plan and the amended community development plan. Both of these
puns were adopted by the.ct,~= council in 1975 and the amended plans ..generally:
fallow the original plans adopt d in 197.5.
In the -case: of the community development plan, of v~hich a copy is attached,
there are the fallowing changes;
1. Community development funds for the Il/H/N co~r~mercial irnprc~eernent
project,hav.~ been deleted from thu Year ICI appJ.ication. Use of these '
monies for the L/H/N project is being discontinued bec~~use :mara costly.
~t'ederal relocation requirements E~rhich the- city v~=ould be required t~ pay
through the L/H./N projaci if the community developmznt .i~~ids were used
far the project.
2 . Prior to -this arner~dment, $90 , 500 in community developnzer~t funds were
~to~ be used in park dev°lopment irs 197.7. Because the community develop-
meet funds ~tihich were to be users in the. L/H/N have been shifted to
parks aevelopment, a` total of '$198, 000 will be a=~ailable for parks
develcorient in the Fear III grant.
..,,
-A ~ ,~ ,
Council Letter No. 39 i -2- vecember 13, 1976 '
~'
3. Community development funds for housing rehabilitation remain'
unchanged. 3.
The amended'housir~g assistaxice plan is also attached. The changes in
.that .plan. are. as follows:. I'
1. The current year program goal for eased housing was reduced from
52 to 30. units to reflect the acfiual al.iocation of units . The split
~b~tween elderly-and non-elderly units is~changed accordingly.
Z , Thy: third year program goal for leased housing ...was reduced from 143
units to 112 units. This amendment is necessary. sU that we dc, not
jeopardize the use. of community development funding.
In the first year of co:rxsit~nzty d~:uelo~ment blodk grant funding, the city
received approximately $99, 000 as its .share of the I7rban Herinepix~. County
Entitlement. In 1970 tl-iis amount ~nras $204, 000. It is estimated that the city
will receive apprc~~imately X236, OC-O for Year III, federal fiscal year. 197.8.
in preparation for the public hearings on this subject,. adequate legal
notices have been :published in the newspapEr and a :special story ryas beeiz
included i.n the city's winter g~.zarfierly report to be mailed to all residents of
Ric-hfield this corning week. Letters have been s~n~t to all'citzer? advisory
commissions offering an opportunity. for suggestions from those groups. It is
the cpini.c7n of the staff that these and other efforts made by the city meet. the
x•er~uii°emut?ts of tree federal regulations for participationin' tYie developmext
of the cc,nmun;ty developTM?erit block grant applicatiori,
l:t i.s recor~itr~e~.~ded that tYxe city council hoar testimony. at both the December
13 and I;ercxnl~rx• ~7, 1975 hearings. Final aciion aNprovirg .and adopting the
comi~~uzz:ty development .plan should ba takaF~ afi thc~ :uecember 27, 3.976 h~arir~g.
. Resp~:ctfully sixbmitted,
r ~ ! l / ,~"
~rVayne S. burggraaff
City T~7anager
cc; DepaxtmF.r~t Directors
i•
1975-1977
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
Richfield, Minnesota
1. Community Development Plan Summary
long term objectives
' short terms objectives
2. Statement of Need fog- Community Development Projects
3. Housing Assistance Plan
~.
f.. ..
f ~
CON~1[JNITY DEVELOPMENT PL~F1N SUI~~IARY
Both the. long term and short term objectives address the statement of need.
~,
Long Term Development ObZectives
- To conservethe residential aspects of Richfield.
- To improve the residential environment of the .community.
- To eliminate deterioration and blighting influences to residential and commercial
areas . ....
- To :improve the service delivery system of city government.
- To provide a greater range of housing choices.
Short Term Development Objectives
- Improve and eliminate deterioration ire residential neighborhoods surrounding the
Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Commercial area and provide planning and relocaticin assist-
ance. ... .
-.Provide far renewal of approximately 10 deteriorated homes.
- Provide for the rehabilitatioi of approximately. 53 homes.
- Provide minor-park development and improvements to existing parks.
- Eliminate backwash water discharge. into Legion Lake Park.
- Rsconstri:ct a facility for senior citizens in the old library.
-.Provide xehabilitation funds for 76 Richfield homernlners. .
a ' ~ ~.
CON1~1IlNITY DEVELOPMENT PLaN
STATEA~~NT OF NEED
- Senior Citi'ien Center: Reconstnictian' of the vacated library building for
seniro citizens. The facility's reconstruction will make the physical improve-
ments necessary to delivery integrated housing and other .social as well as
recreatanal serrriees.
Estimated Cost and Source of Funds
1975
Comimmzty -Development Funds $ 50,004.00
Special. Revenue Funds 66,004.00
Total Cost $115,000.00
llata Source: 1975-1980 Capital Program
- Water Backu~rash System: This project consists of the installation of a water
system to recycle backwash water at the city's water treatrr~ent plant. The system
is required by the AZinnesota Pollution Control Agency to prevent. the di scharge of
untreated backwash water into Legion Lake. Park.
Estimated Cost and Seurce of Fundi~
1975
CommLmity Development Funds $ 30,000.00
Ydater. User Fees 50,531.00_
Total Cost $ 80,531.00
Data Source: 1975-19S0 Capital Program
-Housing Rehabilitation: This project is to provide a interest right down and
grant program .for the rehabilitation of both renter and owner occupied single fam-
,ily housing. An estimated total of 53 units will be rehabilitated.
Estimated Cost and Source of Funds
1975 1976 1977
Community Development Funds $ 10,000.00. $ 37,500.00 $ 37,500.00
... , .._0_ . ......,~~ . ~ ' '7.58000:00
3 Total Cast $ 14,000.00 $ 37,500.00 $ 52,SOG.00
-Ne~•J`Nome Pra ram: The purpose of this program is to assist in the elimination
spot renewal
of residential deterioration. The program consists of the purchase on-the open
market of existing vacant homes and lots which are. in a dilapidated condition.
The method of financing will bo'to establish a revolving fund through funds
gained in selling city owned lots in New Ford Town-and through Community Develop--
meat funding. The revolving fund will. be repaid from the resale of land.
Estimated-Cost and Source of funds
. {to start revolving funds 197b. 1977
Community Development Fundy $ 5fl,~3fl0
Sale of Lats ~C;000
Total Cost $lfl0,i100
-Park Development: Deve1 opment of one major parr and one m-i nor
park in 1977-7978.
Estimated Gast and Source of Funds
1975 197E 1977
Community Development Funds $ 8-,855 $35,500 $195,000
Special. Revenue Funds 19,741 35 000 86,000
I Total Cost $19,741 $73,500 $283 ,~JOD
t ~ t 1'.
!
J
`
•
'
(n .)
(c
c'j
~ 3 (
',
1 ? 'n
1 ~~
u' ~ . -~ r
r~ .~ [
.
+~ ~ ~ ul
t
f i_
.:
~
fl
O cn
1 ~ cJ
t •f
. i'J
C) ..
cn
1- uJ .
c
-. •
;S p
c) J
Q
f-
,
F - :.J ~j O ~~
cl C)
:
..1 f- nJ ,
.
~ .. ..
t C
~
W .• lU Q
-)
Ill (L .
t r-
`~
111 [~
(7
W W
r_
C J C7 ~ }
~~ F- 0 ~ U N
_-
-
{p
' - Z ^: ~ o z
F FJ
N-._._ UJ cT
...._ LL ql.
Q ~
W Q
~ C7 Ili co
O >
~
. ~
j
1 ...
c~.- _
f __
~ 'J1 111 of ;.
~,
~ :-• Il:
I
to c
f J
__
1R
,
.
1
i'i
..J
, ~
-: 'T
i._ ~-
.-~ n
ui c
_
uJ .
~
- f
~~ _ (,J lIJ Fl
. ~- ,f „1
F cu
{
.
. ~
-
__-
N
C
`
~
~H UJ ._.
uJCI~~LCJ-
~~
' !U
f
~ C~ I- ua p
_
-----
_.
4 ~~
~y ~
~
~
'
~~ J Cf_
Ul ~ UJ f- .-;
F' f. K I- _
w O "U
~Tj (v
~ Ir _
.
win m
f ! Q. ~ ~
O n'
2 ~
~ W
Z. W
~ ~
U >-
= F-
LL Z
O
F-
W
~O
~ U
Q
a
w
~. O
RS R3
U U
J .
._.._----J ..
O ._..
.
O
O
•1' O
A
r . 00
O O
N O
~
~
Ln al
M r-
~ _
r
N ENO
_.
_.~ .
Vl O. S.. N r r- r- 'r- •r C •r •r .r
'
N N S.. !i5 fCj lCf f[3 U N S.. ~~ L , f
c~ H O C O O O O Q.. N~ Cl.~ ~
!
N. Q1 i 3 J .i .J ..J t/) CL' to GL Cn , ,
'
._ ....2...E L2 0
__..
_
_ _ _ _ .' . .... '
~.
O O O O 1 '
r
• ~ p n
cf- O O ~ O .~ - -
r- O ~
r M 49 ~~ .:
.
O .
O 00 .
N O •N
n n
K ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
M r
I.C> N
~ ~ . .
C O
n n
r M N N
O O to cn
N Cif
~ ~ N N
N N
N :V
._.
_ ..
_...
_..
_ ..
._
- __ ._ _.
... _._._._.._..
K
T
K
K
K
R
NNNd'COCYJ
O O ~ ~ ~ ~
NNNN O>
•
n n n ~'
~~rMLf')1~01 N
N NN_NNNN
~
7 O
~
H ~
a (Cj
~ ~
(J .r
W .T•
n -Q
} ~
f- ~
~ (Y
F-
U O
Q C
T3 •r
r- N
CJ ~
•r O
4.- x
U
'
~ r
L).
E
N
X
IJ.I n n w
Cf- ~' ct- N N N
N N N O O t\ r
try to O
N
n « V .
~f~
GY V cY cY'
' r M L[) 01 ~ N N N N N CO
~ d' d' d' ci' d' ~
r 1 ~
'C3 [6 C O
O ~~ N ~ ~
~
O N S.. O
•r
LJ
. rct O N S_
C U S- ~. ~_
~
E ~
~ ~ •O N 'O ~
O ~-
O
r- C
U CrS -1~ r N C1J N
'~ ~ .r ~.-
4- Y r• U 4- . N
'~ O U N O .~ >' F--
~ O ~ r- U O
~ Odd •r 5-U
p, •~° • O t}- ~ G1
r• rt5 O N
•r
N~
H N
•N ~ ~ .1-J +-~ +~ D1 ~
CU N L1 •F-~ 23 O C S -I-~ c~
~ •r O •r -1-~ Cll 0J -N N •r
C r• ~ .r.. ~ ~ N r
Y •r- N •r r U CJ S S-
S..
[Cf ~ > 'N
'S3 N U .r > C) O i-~ N
CL d G] ~ -Q O (~ ~ N C
tCS S_ r- O -1°>
N M
LLB •r LL' {J N •r
J
`T .
O
F
Q
2
4
c7
Q1
~ ~
•r ~
•F-~ O .
_..._.. :. . ~f~ _.Jr.. _.__...:_.__ . T~-... _ .._.._.
f ~ n.
O •r ~ N ~ O
O r- •r r- C ~ ~ .
d rt3 N n.
•N Y •r ~ O -N
r ~ C S. Q r
~$ ~ •r O O O
•r U (6 CU O
v ~ E > o
•r to J O r
~ •r Y -1-> D Y
O C U C S..
~ O O rCf Y RS N
N = r L d ~
O ('-'- i d fCS 1
-d-> 1 Y 1 Q. Y Y
. fCS Y ~ Y 1 i... S..
N C S- (CS S.. Y (~ (CS
-E-~ O (Cf d tCS i- ~ ~
O S.. ~... d (C7 1
4) 2 O d. -N Y
~ O O C71 r 5-
N 4J fCS N S_ ~ Q) [6
> U T3 S- ~ C > , CL
OI-+ •r Q.1 ..Q O N
S-. $.- C}-- N ~ fn -I-~
rz -v a) ~- cai aJ o ~-
c s cv ~ s-. o ~
F• Air T~-~
~T
.nr
,pa1A;
rot4 PuiV n
,r
~° F•. ']^^"A. T ~ ._.y.. '.Ti^-~ tf r . ,,,
\ ~~ ~' fY~11r
a ~
~..
.fit,
i ~
~
p ... .1• .. ^Rfr•
Y S r .yam,.
't ~ ~ ~
-~
`~
~
~ • .
( T.,F3'. 1. l 4 '
M.. }T. ( ! ~~:
3
4 •S
J 1
^'~
R
~,
y
~
~
r
~
~`, ~r~ 'k.zSA 3 "'. ;i .e
,. G,:fi
~4i^.
•ttv~„ ' 1*s.r.-~~? '" 7.
<~.
]h ~
i 3
•
~ dl r ~ rn •
• .-~ ~ ` . ~ ~ as ~ . c
O .. C •,... •r- ~ •r..
r N L U ~ i
N .L: Q 41:.~
~ N N ~ N
t~
O O O
GTE O O O
.;r N O d'
N
i
ice
~.
`i .
....
~.
+~
J
/\
`./
...
v
~~
u
M
i P
r N M
r- O O O ...
-.
N
Cal
C31
CSl
v may- d' ~•
N N N
3
N
S..
o ~ +-~ ~ +>
~., ~ c x ~
•~ a~ s- E as ~
cn rts n. ci a
rts o.. O o
.C r C r
U C N O N
N •r
'[7 ~G •r .~G .~ .Y
~ S.- : ~. r VS 5...
rts as .~ ms rcs m
~ c~.. u~ ~ 3 ct
.. GRAFT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN.
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
A Housing Assistance. Plan, as outlined in "t'itle I of the Housing .and Community
Develapmer~t Act of 1974, consists pf four maing parts:
I. Survey of Housing Conditions<(Table I}
II. Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income
Households (Table II)
. ..
III. Annual Goal for Housing.Assistance (Table IIi)
IV. General Locations of Prorosed Housing for
Lower Income Households (Table I1,')
The purpose of the Housing Assistance Plan into provide an assessment of
housing conditions and needs, and to set realistic annual goals for meeting
a portion of those needs in conjunction with community development activities
to be undertaken in Richfield.
The v~,~~ious parts of the Plan,-along with an expi~r;aticn of how each part was
cie,~el o;~ed fol 1 cws .
PART I.' SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS
This part is to "accurately survey the condition of the housing stock in the
community„,
Two sources of data were used as the most accurate information available at
this time on conditions of housing in Richfield. They are:
1, 1970 Census - 4th Count and 6th Count (Special Run)
2: Report on Survey of Housing Conditions, Metropolitan
Council, prepared by Economic Research Corporation,
January,. 1975
The limitations on-the accuracy of the Census data are-that it is now seven ,years
old, and that the housing "conditions" being measured are the age of the. structure
anc3 the lack of some or all plumbing facilities. Nonethe less, it is possible to
gain information form this data, and it is possible. to separate rental housing
conditions from owner occupied housing conditions.
1970 Densus 6th Count data was used to determine .the number of substandard
units in Richfield, as well as the total occupied and vacant units by tenure as
shown 'on Table I. Substandard units here are those units which have incomplete
{-~l umbi ng faci 1 i ti es . ~ _
Suitable for Rehabilitation units were determined from 1970 Census Fourth Count.
..These estimates were made ta!cinq all occupied units. built prior to 1939, and
thin the range of values and rents affordable ray low and moderate income persons-
. ($199/month rent, X19,999 value) - but exciudina those units of very low value
and rent (below $10,000 value and below 1C0/month as beiriq not capable of
rc-~habilitaion. Very few units were excluded in this process as being not capable
of rehabilitation. (Owner-occupied 39, renter-occupied 11)
The total thus achieved as shown on Table I was compared to the most recent survey
information, Report on Survey of Housing Conditions, prepared for .the Metropolitan
Council by economic Research Corporation. This survey was conducted throughout
the seven-county metropolitan area., including-the City of Richfield, during the
sprisag and summer of 1974. All structures vtere given a visual exterior inspection
aasd rated according to uniform cri teri a wh i cl; avtarded "points" to strr~ctures dec~end-
ing +~n the number and severity of s'cructurai defects which a-acre vi s i b l d cn .the
exter~i or•~.
The purpose of the original survey yeas to determine the number of su~~tandard
structures it the metropolitan area. In this survey, Richfield i?ad ('. substanda:~d
structures.
Estimates on the number of housing units vJhich could be rehabilitated were. then
~prepare~ using the orginal survey information. These estirates shove that 333
structures need some or possibly major rehabilitation in Richfield, ~.~hich compares
favorably to the 1.970 Census figure of 401 structures shown on Table I.
•
,:!ice
o t~
yW
• °'
a
z
Em
~
u
.O
~~
' • d.
~~ ~ ~ _ 1
~ J
,
t~
• \
t
i
i
• ~
l --
o ~, .
~
U
•
p J w F
e V 47
W < J a ~
w F• m a r
'
d'
l6 a
M O. 4- -Y
-
7 ~ Q N N ~ - d U .
L v ~ ~
LL ro ~ ...
i ;;N _ , °1c om
w w s. rt +~
a ~ r '
' iii ~ ~ - p O '
1- ~ W Q r- v N
~; z' z
Z- O ~ O
+•> zs a7
• Q $
O J s-.~ M U~ N
Z O
S Q
~
~ 47.. ~
_ F-
G LO CO h _ O tC M
O W ~ O h h~ O)
' l0 lD M ct. O~
~ ~ F- lL) lf
) r O- N t0 h i->
f• ~}• ~}' CY l0 r C
a +~ rn ro E
~ N +~ E
N L Q7 N
« ^O: ,~.t
z
O Ll +-~
•
~ .C
Q LL''
J Q Cl'
.
v~ F" m~ F-
~
~ .-.
w
M V' h O N
Cri O V 2 ~
_ .r p
~ p
z =y Q u A_ cy
~
O ~n _ ?~ rtf = i
/) ~' C7 rc ~ ~ - ~ U N '
' Z {- T -p O •O
Z a _
» N E .c C
O 7 = i
0
O O Z Q -~
4
U
~ s ` n
o
[]
O
a o - c
xs
v_ O
0 o ~ _ ~ r-
V W O W < tf') h 00
' M CO l0 c~ O RS
O y f. _ N O7 M .t2
) d h
N - ~ V i i~
~
y Z ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ tl N r F- r
S• v7
H - m Z N t7r rs O O
C O {- 7 ~ ~ •U J N •N L
w = Z J N A N N
Z
C O U 6 s
7.
~
tlo 00 O E N
m N ~ ~ Z - O Ol ~ r0 ~ •'-
~ ~
O 7
O Q
} O _ Q)
O ~
C ~O
S
- Q J ¢
r ~
~ - cu '6 O •r QJ
L U s
>
7a N F-
U S m~r-
¢ C J
M
M
N
1.L)
r
'ct
~
r .
+
N
rc) C 4- C
J ' ~ m
HLL V' l D
C
-
Q
f m
N M i M M r
°- ~ r3 T3 O>
3
~ f
Z
l1J u- d
~ ~
rc y
H il U r
n i
~ e .N s E
O
O a
a ~
a' w w l
~ N O O C rt)
= m t-
° c u ci ro .c s..
,
a 'Q
O
N
v
z
_
-
° a7 E+
r~
U to O•r• O
o h- ~ ~ - g m u~
3a
o
_
•
Z I [~ J ~ _ u a7 a..
~
~
w x a C' ~ C L O N
i e
C
~ L O
)
' 7
. R3 ~
e
7
U -
a O ~ tS
) N cY OJ N -
p Ri •r
d O ~.
a J O F
- O
Ol ~ M
N o
N ~ ~. > ti. ~~ cv
o d ~ _ ~ ~o ^ ~ o . a
~
• c3' V' ~ c N M
u N
~ 7
~
S
d
Q C a rn
F
- -- N o
.n
N .
N U'
W p O
Q z r
- o
~ N O
.~ !tl
~
T a - C
N U
Q
N
'. tl
ti
e N. U
Q N
j r N V ~ O ~
•
V .~
~ L
~
U.1 O
Z ti ~• O __
_ ~ ~p
N
7 b
tl ~ - Q -
C C a ~ x .Q
.n
S F E
~ Q u
o -o
~ ~ t 4
J c o E N vi
•
a
~
o
~ o
F-
• ltA ~
u
• W
` 1--• `. p ~ O .~ v
O
u ~ ~ u M O c o =
~ o O = O o ci -° ~ E
'[1 .. WSJ' Ci- F- ~_ •~ __ ~ ~ 1l
> >
I Q ~ ~ v n
Z O z
_O ~ I -o
•Q ~ U
•
Q
. U 4- U v
u o _n
~ v
° ~
° v « O O o ~
~ U p ? -d. v •o c ~ o u vi c ~ u
~. _, v v° ~ N ro° ~ ~ u ~ o 0 0
a ~ Q <! ~ C ~ U C U ~ N
7
u a
O O f• u n n o _
o
r ri ~f ~ p .- r ri
~
- - ^
1 ~ N nt V
~~ N b r m m
~~~~
.~ i
I•
PART II HOUSING_ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
~, The purpose of this Part is to determine the number of households currently resid-
ing in Richfield as~well as those expected to reside in Richfield that will require
ho-using assistance,
Far the purposes of this Part, the households "in need.." are-those (,l) whose
incomes. are within the limits of the Section * Housing Assistance Payments
Program, and (2) are likely to apply for such a Program because of current
"inadequate living conditions".
Income limits for the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program are as
follows
(Moderate) Low)
Lower Income Very Low Income
Fami icy Size 80% of iYiedi an 50% of Median
1 .$ 7,800 $ 4,700
2 l0,Ofl0 6,250
3 11,50 ~ 7,050
4 12,500 7,800
5 -- 13,250 8,45G
6 14,050 9,Oa0
7 14,850 9,700
8 or more 15,600 10,300
BotE~, families and the elderly are eligible for assistance.
Section 8 Horsing Assistance Payments Program is a new rental assistance
program authorized by the Housing and Ccn;7uarjity De+~~ lopm~.:nt Act of 1974. .
Pn eligible r?ci pi ent of rental assistance +~~ot:~1 d pay 15 to 25% of income for
rent, and HUD would pay the difference betyreen this amount and the fair market
t~dnt the property ovrner titi-ould normally receive for the unit.
"Inadequdte living conditions" include:
~~ - 'Lacking plumbing facilities
Overcrowed
-• Paying mor•e• than 25% of income for rent
- Owners. in housing over 30 years old and valued at less than .
$10,000
• All'of these factors were combined in a special compu er tabulation of. 197:0
n us data with a breakdown b size of household as shown in Table IIa.
Ce s Y
The total households needing assistance in Richfield are shown om Table II. It
includes all renter households.(1,103) within income limits and living in "inadequate
. conditions" except for non-elderly one-person households, vrho would not be
elig;ibie. It also includes 20 elderly owner househol.ds_having low or very low
income and living in inadequate living conditions.
Larger families (families with 4 or more minor children) are separated out to
umber of un'ts needed with 3 or more bedrooms. This number was
determine the n ~
readhed by counting half of all income-eligible/inadequately-housed 5-person
househo ds, and a71 6 or more person households in the same category. This totally
31-large families:.
Elderly households needing ssistance were drawn from the same special-tab of
1970 Census data.. 299 is the number of olderly renters and owners with'iow or
very low incomes and in "inadequate living conditions".
The nj.~mber of handicapped (person disabled more Char, 5 months and unable to '
~~ork~}.•in Richfieidwas 392 in 1970 Census. Four per cent of all households in
Eichfield were found to be income eligible and inadequately housed.. This four.
per cent need factor applied to 392 gives us an estimated 16 handicapped eligible
for Section 8 housing subsidies and in need of assistance. Thus, the total
elderly and handicapped is 315 (299.16).
In Migration .
According to Metropolitan Council estimates, 101 new households are expected to
reside in Richfield 1975-1980. Lde estimate four per cent of these viii be
"in neEd" or 4 households of which 20%, of about 1, maybe expected to be
handicapped or elderly.
G
•
.
0
6
Qr
+ {.
I
w
~ Y
v
~;
•~
E u~
. ~ Q~
' Em H
a
J
~-`
- ~. LL O
' O
=
W
~
s N
:~.
~
~ W
:\ ~
V
Z
..
. ~
W
~ O
J
Z
w
a (~
0
~
~
w N
D
W
W
O
2
m Z
W
U
~
~
O
Z Z
Q
F"
H
Q
O
Z
N
N
. ~
=
LL ~
z
4;`.
o
~
w N
U
S
t-
Q
a
w
~
W
.!
~ m
!4-
1
`
• Z
Q
[L
w
U
7_
Q
1-
/1
Q
I,
Z
N
O
S
J
A
•
~, E h
~ O
O
W JLL~` 4
n
7 ~
~~ i
jy
~ w
y
~
Q a
~ O
s LL~q
O ~n W
u
o
w
< ~
~ s a c
ra
O 2 ~' « U d cr
Z
~ Z
LL
K
W O 0..
D ,. ~
a' F' ~ O JOZ N
~o
-
O
J
Q
N
J
F
O ~
6~ ~
w Y $ ~ .~,
E ~
M
<~
y
Q C v
a j
u
u. ~ e
1
0
O J
0
w
~
r n~
J V c
re -"
r
~
w
=
a o~
"
-
. M d1l
M
O
_ m
a
O LL
O - _
w
S O
C
a
a 1 w W
J >-
,°~
J Q
v
N
h
W m Q o!V
j ~ w O Z N
Z Z LL
J J Q ~
W = ~.
_
Y
a
a 1 J
a
J
~
~ ~ ~
Z f ~ ~
O
~
w
U 1 F
Q e°
J
LL
a
u L ~
W
-~
LL m O O
K ~ -~ E o °
~ h
N N
Q a ~ ,
a C ~
J G u•'. ~
N
Q W`i
0
y y Y M
J v C ~~ (h Ol l0
n c
~ _
~
J
i
w Q O
"`a l0
~ «'o ~ ,~
_ Oa o
a N
J „
j Q 4
n
~
Q7
n7
.
J
a au~ ~ ~ o
w O
J Q
w
O 7
_ N
~ ~ J
H _
-
OO
N
,k
~ •°
o
O
~ !~
~
o~
W V W
o
.n
U.y
' 4: -
~' N
a
N oa
F-b --
V
~ c
W a
C ~7
W
_ w_
O w
J U m e
~~ U ~
W w
~~ -
m
w q
O Z 1-- ~ G. a+ o C 7 b
W N ~~ W ti ~ C Q V
1' d ~ ~'
S Q
o N V
O tj U
~ ~ n
W~ W C
J~ ~
~ ~
" ?U
N
~ -
Q 4- O 7_ S o. W x W ~L = F C7
J U O K = b ~ b NO ~ ` ~ J h_ _N .b = u C
LL
1 W O d - C c
LL 0 ~~ y F
-
` ~ 1
0 Q
W ~ - O~ 'f1JV
~ OT
z O~
K Oy
r- u~
d
2 ~ ~ ~ _ . ~.
4 V-
z 4 :D U U W
- - wy "' w v ~ ~ n ~ ro m o
'~
C
O
v
c
~ E
~~
c°i++
i .C
d ~
L ~
s .-~
~ H
Cr'
ro ~
~ •-
T ~
.D ~
V1 Q)
r i.
~> ~
Z~
QI
c~
.~ ~
~~
i ro
~ h
V h
~~
r ~
i i
o ro
~~
U
N ro
4- 7
c
~ ~
rn~
a ~ ro
~~
Z ro
C ~ ro
e ~
.N ~
~~
a ~
7 .~
~ i r-
o ~
a 4- O
L
G to
O i
S O N
W ~ ~
i-~ C
N
~ ~
~ C.7 C
W Z
~ ~ L.L
.J ~
Q
r
c
LL:
V
7
(~
I _
~ N ;y
p
F i ~~
..
~ J u1W
a S •'
F ~~
. a a
,i. h h
Z OR j a In
W JU
R J Z ___... _ ._
O a e
~D }yy ~ .
J y
0 ~^
Q N Q p U
' - u. tl• a
.,.
O
i W 7
" ff (~.
a
O u a
-0 0 R O a c
, j Q y
n
'
i•.
7. p~ W Z
0 ° E K U
W U 3.
Z
J W, ,~
W
- W
.~iyZ Q <
~ Z
W a < a W
rc s ¢ .. w y J a
O O 6 O }. 4 o f0 N a
LL ~~
Q 0.
S Q: N m
'LS~. M O a
~n a
~ a
~
a
~ UI V ~
L'1 1' p
'117 J
O ~ Q Ih
h h. ¢E ~
a s o ..
- w W J O
?
~ ~
O ~ J
O a~
2
~ 4' o m ~
- O
7 a o
C
~'
.J `
~ ~
~
^
y LL
° Z _
- U a ° a C
.D ~ 1 u C~ W ~ Q u O N
~ lt.l
L>i Z 4
m
~ w
Q a W ¢ Z
G Z a W p a
° Q~ ..
. ..
:°
J1J O
z V Y N U W=
Z ~
i.
z
U
a a
c Q Q W
_
-
.p Q
~ .
a 1 .
w a J a s
> N ul a
~
V U~ ~ ~ •
~ ~ ~
. Z. ~
< Z ~ °
N
to -
O ~'~ .. .v ^I h
a ~ ~ -
~ ~
O Z a
U 1 o
w
~
S - J ~ '-•
J p n
v
~„.
~/i
o~ 6
a m >
~ J W W V
Q f E o l
t o ~
~- O
x a a a_ ~- J y
`a
w N h h-
Z 00
1-
-' W JZ
~ .
~ J .
w J
p ~
nn
~ J
~ ~ a
N
N
Q LJ ao;,
f
-
Z z ~ ° ,\
~° ° a
° ~ ° ° a °
a ,n
fL
~
eff ~ z
~U ~
c
r c c
. 97:1 op ~
, w a z Wo
° ^I
Z
,~ C 7 a J
7_ °~ = u
Y ~ W i~
Q
a Q Z W - -
N x J a F
~ `+ ID m a ¢ N N
Q °^ ^ ^
0
h
2 _ u '" h
~ o
O w
s a `
J ~~
n . <4
cn °
U ( w " ~'
• :C
¢
1 °] r
O ~. c
a
~w
O ~ Z Y
~ !I N
es om`
W E
~
~ ~ ~ .-. to ~ i
F
-
~ ~ U y ~N -
h ~ :J H o 0 J w~ ~
U J: N 2< _~ l~l ~~ w w
>-
C
J U H W y
j O
~ H
~
. .. a
a ~~ ] -
O b
o a
' O
y
T~ Q
moo: y
„~
a ~ T _ .~
~ rt .~ x C7
4 ~
°
~ Q:
w ~ W ~
1' ~ N (7
C: : rn ~n
d
~t
~ J
Q
L)
Q
CJ
O
7. [O _
F.
PART .I'II' ANNURL GOALS FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE
This portion of the Housing Assistance Plan is to establish realistic annual
goals in order to meet .some of the housing needs identified in Part II.
The constraints on setting real=istic goals are:
1. Lack of information on funding availability from HUD.
2. HUD allocation and distribution funds to Richfield .and the '
rest of the metropolitan area.
3. Capability and capacity of Richfield in undertaking a housing
. assistance program.
Given these constraints, and the identified need for «ssisting x,129 households
as shown in Part II, the follotiaing goals are proposed (and shown on Table III):
First Year Goals
1. Utilize the existing housing stock through the Section 8
Existing Housing Program on a scattered basis.
2. Serve elderly as a~all as non-elderly in approximate proportion
to need.
3. begin rehabilitation program to improve substandard housing...
through the use of Community Development clock Grant Funds.
• 4. Construc'c new building. of 150 units for elderly.
Three Year Goals
5. Co:~struct 5 homes for i~arger families on sites scattered
throughout .Richfield.
E-. Complete rehabilitation of 75 homes throughout Richfield
through the use of Community Development Block Grant funds
and t~~linnesota Housing Finance Agency. rehabilitation loans.
7. Gc~mi~ i c} .e rehabi 1 i tati on of 50 rental housing units through
SeL'cion 8 Substantial Rehabilitation Program.
f~
~ s_
~ ..
•
!
,'
;.`
Form Approved
on(s r(a. ~3R-I
U.S. DEPAR'(MENT OF.HOUSINC AND URBAN DEVE!__OPMENT
HOUSINGASSISTAtI•_E PLAN
TAfiLE III.. GOALS FUR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE
CU'r2KENT YEAR GOAL
ig6 i of 2 pages
i. NAME OF' APPLICANT
City of Richfield 3. CJ ORIGINAL
AMEN OM EN T, DATE:
' 2. AVPLICAi'10N/G kANT NUlAH Ek 4. PROGRAM VEARI
•
~ FROM: TO:
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSIST E-0
TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE `~,
AlL
HOUSEHOLDS ELOERL:Y OR
HANDICAPPED
(I-1 persons)
FAMILY
(4 or less
persons)
-- LARGE
FAMILY
(5 ur more
prroans)
-
(o) (62 (c2 (d2 (a2
A. NEtV RENTAL UNITS
t 1. Section 8-HUD A
Z
a 2._^_State A ne Total fSu ~o lines a and 6) _
o. Section 8 MNFA
- -
0
5
6
` 7
s 6. Other
3, Other Assisted New Rental Housing
(Identify) -- Total ._ ~
0 -
ro. __- ._~
4. Total (Sum oJlines 1,2,nnd 3)
_ _-
--
-
_.
~.
B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS' .
s 1. Section 8-HUD 50
to 2. State Agent=Total (Swn pf lints a and b) -_ -_ -_ __
t t o: Section 8 -- -- -- ---._.
tz 6. Otfier
- ---
t3 _
_ _
3. Outer Assisted Rehobiiitolion of Rental Housing
(ldenti(v1 - Total ,
_--
__,_
t a o, -------- -- --- --- -
t s _
b. -- ---'-- -- ?
~
is 1. Total (Sumo lines I, 2, end 3) ~~- .
~~ C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS -_
__ 5- ----~-'---
--
~.^ . 2
5.-_
5
~ ~_-~
~.
17 _;.
5
5
4
7% 26
17%
,.
i
i -
I ,.
Poge.2 oft pages `
- - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT•
' MOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
- TABLE I11. -GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE ,
THREE YEAR GOAL
~,-
• i,
l,
1
r
r
L
~1. NAME OF APPLICANT. ~ -
City of RTChf-geld ~ - 3. ~ DRI GI NAL
n•AMENDMEN T, DATE:
2. AP PLICA TtON/GRANT NUMBFFe 4. PROGRAM YEAR
0 -
TO:
FROM:
- ~ ~ NUMBER OF HOUSEHOL DS TO 6E ASSISTED
TYPES. AND SOURCESOF.ASSIST~ANCE
• _
ALL
HOUSEHOLDS- 'ELDERLY oa
HANDICAPPED
J1-7 Person s) FAMILY
(1 ur fcs s
Person sl LARGE
FAMILY
(fur more
Persons)
- (al -(b) (c? , fd) (o)
A. NEW RENTAL UNITS
t 1. SC t'o 8-
z 2. State A enc -Toto1 (turn r,J lines a and b) _
3 0. Section 8 (~HFA
a b. Other
s 3. Other Assisted New Rentol Hovsing
(IdentiJyJ . Total
- a.
~
u b
4. Total lSmnoJlines (, ?, and 31
l5D
150
6. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS
q L Section 8-HUD _.~
to 2. State Agency-Total (Burn of lanes a and b)
t t o. S
ction 8
e
t2 _
_
b. Other _
13
3. Other Assisted Rehobilitotian of Rentol Hovsing
(Identify) - Totol
_-_-
- _
_
t a -
a, -
-
--- ----- -- -- ---
I s b, - _ --- --- --
I5 14. Total (Sam of lines 1, 2, and ,?; .
C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS:
t~ 1. Section 8-HUD 1d43 ~_ _46- _ --4
t e 2. State Agency-Totol (Sam of fines a and GJ
t9 0. Section
8 _ __.__
zo -_~~
_
b. Other _ - _
,t 3. Other Assisted Existing Rentol Housing
(ldenti/~)- Total ,
:z a. ---
: s b. ... ._--
za 4. Totol (Born u/ lines 1, ?, and 3J
D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO t10ME0WNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS
^s 1. CD
6!ock Grants 22 ~ 13
ze _
2. Section 235
27' 3. Other Rehobilitation Assistance to Hameowners or
Prospective Homeowners (Identify) -Total
_
2J b. MHFA Grants $
ao 4. Tolal (J'urn of fines 1,2, and .?j
E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
CTIVE HOMEOWNERS
PRO SPE
-
3t _
1. Section 235 ---_- ~--- - _
'<' 2. Oth_ar (ldenei p1_Total __ _
-
-- ___~;_
" ~
o Nevl Home _ Program __. _
---- __ ~ - ----5--
~
rs ' b.
-.--
3. Total (Brun of lines f and 2J
• --
5 - --
36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS
(Sum o(fines rl ~l, R•l, C. 1, U4, and f.':f ` ' 432 235 ~ 205 42
I%
PERCENT OF ALL tOUSEHOLDS
S00°o
49 %i• °.
43 °.
°
G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES (attneh urlrlitiona! pages)
*These figures furnished by _Metropolitan Council.
z
R
i;
0.:
• *'
+,
r
t
t
Furm Approvw~
. Vlr,ts no. um•,., .
U.S. PLPARTMEN7 OF tIUUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
„ HOUSING ASSISTANC[ PLAN '
i ~ TABLE tY - GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED lOY/ER INCOME HOUSING
L NAME OF AP f'~ICAtlT - ~ ~. ~ ORIGINAL .
City of Richfield ~-_~ AMEN OMEN 7, DATE:
1
~.5. AFPLIC ATI.O NF GriaNT NU61BEli A• •P"RU GttAM YEAR
4 - I - '•
1 FROM: 1976. TO. 1978
A. IDEN 7IFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON FtAP IN T:IlS APPLtCAT1UN '
1. Nevr Cnnstrocti~n: Census Tract Numbers
#248
' .. ~ ._
2: Reitabititation; Census Tract Numbers . '
#244, 245, 241, 242, 243;246;247;248..02;249.0"L;249.02;249.03.
LHN-Parks~Prog.ram-Street .Improvement •„
& E%PLANATION OF SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIOtiS
1. +tdew G~nstruction
A proposed •150 unit building for the elderly. The project will
be desig-nod to serve low and moderate income elderly. The site
.will be located at the intersection of 78th Street ar,d Chicago.
•"Avenue. Mass transit service is available from the site. Shop-
. ing facilities are located nearby. .
~ Rehat,itiiation
.Rehabilitation with community development funds will take place
in census tracks-where other community development acticity is
scheduled. Ttiis-ncludes the census tracks which contain the
' Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet commercial area, those schedule neighborhood
park developments and the city's street irnprovement program.
'~
.'#r ._
- ~ ~ 'r
Iy
~•.. ..1 .
Y
H r
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM AND
THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
WHEREf~S, the City Council of the Ci y of Richfield has revietived
tii~ Community' Development Plan and Program aid the Housing Assistance
Pion fin accord with the Housing and Community Development Rct of 1974,
and
WHCREAS, the City.Counci7`.finds a need to provide community
development for the assistance oi' 1 ~a4v and moderate i r~come people and
the el.irriinatiori of blighting conditions,:,and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds a need to provide subsidized
_ housing for~iow and moderate income people including elderly, and
WHEREAS, tine City Counci 1 wi 11 review the Community Development
Plan and Program and the Housing P,ssistance Plan on an annual basis,
and ..
WEIEREAS, the Community Development Plan and Program and the
Housing Assistance Plan w.i1i be made part of Hennepin County "brban
County" Entitlement Grant application.
NOW, THERE{=ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Richfield does i~ereby adopt the Community Development Plan and
Program and the. Ho using Assistance Plan and authorize the City Manager
. to submit a Community Development Block Grant application and prepare
plans to implement the Housing Assistance Plan.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield -this 27th
day of December, 1976.
Loren L. i.aw '~ Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk .
-• <~
~1TY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA :
Office of City Manager
Council-Letter No. 390 ;
Agenda December 13, 1.976-
The FTonorable IVlayor
and
Members of the City.Gouncil ~~
City of Richfield
Gentlemen: '.
Subject; -.Hearing on Specal;LTse Permit for Jimmy's Leman Tree
>; Restaurant, Inca.::
Mr. James Assimes; lessee, 818.West 772 Street.,, has requested the. issuance
o~f a special use: permit for a restaurant with °on-salq'" liquor, 'for jimmy's Lemon
Tree Re taurant, Tnc.,` located at that address. At the October 12 and November
`8, 19.76-city council meetings; the city council held public hearings on 'this
request. "The hearing ;was contnued`to the December,l3, 1976 city council meeting.
• During the .hearings, -considerable testimony :was pre.s;ented expressing concern
over potential traffic congestion problems which could occur if the special use
`permit were granted.. Specific concern was directed at insufficient off-street:..
parking; parking congestion on streets leading to the restaurarit; and raffic
congestion at entrances to the restaurant parking. Concern.was also expressed
that granting of"the special use•permt could have a potentially adverse impact
on re idential property values in the neighborhood.
During .the. November 8 -city council hearing, the. city council discussed the
,need for additional studies:'in these areas, and directed the city: manager to take
.the fallowing actions: .
1. Retain a traffic engineer consultant to conduct traffic studies relating
to additional traffic in the area , and to examine the need for off-street
parking.
2 . Retain: an appraiser to develop informafiiori on whether or not'the granting
of the's.pecial use permit and the subsequent issuance of a liquor license
could be.expected to adversely affect pro-perty va ues in the, area.
3. .Continue the hearing. on this... special use permit application to December
13, 1976 to provide for completion of the e studies and provide the
opportunity ~to gather additional data.
I
Council Letter No. 390 -2- December 13 1976
~~
Traffic,:. Parking and appraisal Reports
' The city manager retained the consultant firm of-:Bather, Rngrose & Wolsfeld
~B.RW) to conduct. a tra'ffid and parking analysis and; the.janski and. Gibson
apprai al firm to develop information on the effect this special use permit would
have on surrounding residential values .
_,
Consultant,Traffic and Parking Analysis
The following three major points were brought out in the traffic and parking
.analysis assuming the permit was granted:.
T. Parking demand for the expanded restaurant would exceed spaces
available. This was determined.`by applying the :actual parking--to'-
seat ratio which exists at ;the Lemon Tree Restaurant in Brooklyn
Center which has aliquor-.license, Based on actual measured demand
' of 0.36 parking spaces per seat, the forecast demand in Richfield
fora 300-seat restaurant is 98 spaces against 39 ;spaces which are
available to the restaurant resulting inane sHor~rage-`of 59 spaces.
The net spaces available are those directly. in front of the restaurant
and those wthir_ fifty feet to the-.east or west:. (The- requirement is
24 spaces short when considering all spaces available in the immediate
parking lot.)
2. Traffic: on Colfax between -76th .Street and 772 Street would ircrease
by TO percent-. or 100. vehicles. per day due to increased restaurant
• traffic,
3. A serious problem would develop, at the: intersection of Lyndale Avenue
and 772 Street. Vehicles heading north on Lynda e currently make 156
left-turn movements on to 772 Street during the peak p, m . hours.
With the restaurant expansion,:.the number'of left-turn moverlents is
estimated to increase to 218. The 772-Lyndale intersection is already
operating at capacity. Any increase, ...particularly an increase of this.
magnitude would-create a-serious intersection capacity problem resulting :
in delayed,. traffic stacking up south on Lyndale. behind left-turning
vehicles to the point that it would interfere with east to west freeway
exit and the west to east freeway exit.
~~raiser's Analysis '
It is the opinion of the appraiser,.. O, r, jan~ski (letter attached) that the
proposed expanded restaurant withliquor will suppress property value in this
neighborhood: Thus, the proposed use: and operation would' have a detrimental
effecfi on property in the area and on he investment of people. residing in the area .
_.
_.
JGouncl Letter No. 390 -3,- December 13, 1976
Staff's Comments .on Land Use Effect on'the Neighborhood
There is not-any physical visual separation of'this proposed expanded use
from nearby.-residents., In effect, a mixing of incompatible hard uses exists at
the present.-time;. Expanding the restaurant w'i11 increase :.the intensity of .use of
the property, thereby. creating a greater need to separate these incompatible
commercial":and residential land uses. The applicant: is .not proposing to separate"
the expanded restaurant use or to improve the visual impact at the rear. of the `
restaurant,
Tie nefghb~irhnod' immediately to he north`of the a.pplicant's business is
surrounded"by heavily used arterial streets and. by a commercial area to the
south. Because the risighborhood is isolated by street and commercial uses,
the effects of intensifying the commercial uses withouf mitigating existing
detrimental blighting effects will intensify, blighting.,lnfluence on the' neghbflrhocd
and be detrimental, to both public and private improvements in the area:
• Staff Recommendation
On thebasis of the recommendations contained .in the' traffic analysis and
the .letter from the. appraiser, in w!iich staff concurs;-ardfrom the previous findings
• in Council Letter No. 32fi of October 12, 197fi, it is the opinion of the staff that the
rb osed use will not be in substantial compliance with Section 3.33, subdivision
p P
4 of the zoning ordinance... The expanded operation. of the restaurant as proposed
` would..-create undue traffic hazards and congestion in the parking area on and
adjacent to this site . Adequate off-street parking space is not available for
restaurant patrons and employees.
Moreover, the operation of the expanded restaurant is 'not in compliance-.with
Section 3.4i . The use and operation. of the expanded restaurant would be detri-
mental to the health of the neighbors living in the immediate area due to increased
traffic; to property value effects, .and o other businesses in the- immediate area
due to a shortage of parking and" increased traffic congestion and hazards . The use'
and operation of the expanded restaurant would also be detrimental to the safety
of patrons and employees. arriving at the restaurant on Lynda le Avenue due to `
congestion and •traffic hazards created. by turning movements . The. use and operation
of the restaurant would be detrimental to both private and"pubIic improvements`
-in the immediate neighborhood:
Respectfully. submitted,
~.,
• Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
CITY OF RICHFI~LD9 MINNESOTA
Inter-Offiice Memorandum .
DATE December 7, 1976 ~
TO ~ Planning Director
FROM Environmental Health Director
SUBJECT Noise Survey
A noise survey was conducted on 77th Street in the vicinity of the Lemon
,Tree at 818 West 772 Street. -.The purpose of.:the survey was to determine
the noise levels under existing conditions so that projections of noise.
levels can be made of increased vehicle numbers. Noise tables are provided
to approximate noise levels based on traffic counts, etc..; whichshould be
available in your department. .Mark Hendrickson has used those tables.
Noise levels were taken between 10:30 A.M. and 11:30 A.M., December 1,
1976, on 77th Street intersections of Aldrich, Bryant and Colfax Avenues.
77th and Aldrich: 20 ft. from southeast corner of house at 764+ Aldrich
• 55-60 dBA background (includes ~+9~+ Freeway)
65 dBA car going east on 77th with a left turn on
Aldrich (no stop)
67 dBA Leif Bros. truck (no stop)
68 dBA car going north on Aldrich (no stop)
77th and Bryant: 20.ft. north of Lemon Tree Restaurant -north side
of building -
55-57 dBA background noise
63 dBA car going east on 77th Street
65 dBA small plane going overhead eastward direction
66 dBA plane going west.
_ ~ ~ 70 tallow truck going to .Lemon Tree
77th and Colfax: 20 ft'. from southwest side bf house at 76L~5 CoifaX
56-59 dBA ~+9~+ Fr. eeway background -noise
Noise levels increased to 60 dBA with car going south on Colfax
70 dBA car going south on Colfax and a plane cverhead
61+ dBA Loud car on freeway
68 dBA pickup truck accelerating, going south after
stopping on Colfax
6~ dBA car going north on Colfax after coming to a
stop
76th and Aldrich: 20 ft. south bf curb, south~~rest side of street
55 dBA background
76 dBA car going approximately 35 mph on 76th Street
60-80 dBA all kinds of traffic, including cars and
. trucks going about 35 mph. '
. .~
.
J"~
;`
r, Re:---Noise Survey -- 77th .Street I
is • Page.. 2
December 7~ 1976
The Minnesota. State Pollution Control Agency has adopted statewide noise
standards. In residence axeas, nighttime noise levels (2200-0700} must not
exceed 50 dBA 50~ of the time nor~55 dBA for more than 10~ of the time.
Daytime noise levels must not exceed 60 dBA 50% of the time nor 65 dBA 10~
of the time.
StJtM'1AI2Y . + •~
The report s}~caws that background noise from the freeway duringrthe morning `.,
hours at the locations tested was not in violation of da3rtime~~standards but
may be during nighttime hours. Local traffic was a problem and any increase ~~
in traffic flow at this time will increase the problem. Other factors
affecting the noise level caused by traffic will be driver attitudes,
signing of streets and truck traffic along with loading and unloading
practices. It is also quite apparent that traffic at speeds of 35 mph
or greater increase noise levels. Automobiles accelerating but going at
speeds less than 35 mph will at times. increase noise levels above the
• accepted levels. ~~,
~.
I. F. Roesler ~. __
Environmental Health Director
IFR:ml
City of Richfield
+b?00 Portland Avenue South
~,achf"ield, Minnesota 55423 '
,.
attention: Mr. Richard Kxier, Director of Planning
~entieroen:
~n accordance with your request and that of Mr. Clayton. LeF`evere,
•
City Attorney, I have considered the proposition ~f expanding the
~.,emon Tree Restaurant and the issuance of an on'-sale liquor
license and its probable effect upon market value of residential
properties located on Aldrich, Bryant and Colfax Avenues South_
3~et~sveen ?bth Street and West 77th Street, Richfield,.. Minnesota.
l 3~ave inspected the neighborhood bounded by West 76th Street,
~!'~~: rst 77z~ Street= Lyndale Avenue and Co1fa~. A °renue South, -and.
l have familiarized myself with the Traffic and_I'arizing Analysis
involved in this proposition prepared by Bather~Ringrose-Wolsfeld,
lnc. , 7101 York Avenue South, Edina, Ainnesota. , as v~~ell as the
Noise Survey prepared by I,~F. Roesler, Environmental Health
l~igector, City of Richfield,-
weed upon my investigation, my general. real est~.te and appraisal
e~~erience; and the information i.n the Traffic and Parking Analysis
~.nd 'Noise Surveys, it is my judgment that residential properties
i~ the area indicated ~~-ill suffer a diminution in value, Of the
~.esidential streets affected, Colfax vaill be affected more than
Bryant, and Z3ryant more than Aldrich Avenue.
Very truly yours,
' ~Z~Z~
~anski MAI
O.J,J ,
~OJJ;rnlf
I
/aps9~i2t~J+.S4 lN~a"'i'I'!'dd°!'GVF' E3EAL. G'~a'1"AfEC AI~F'FtA1ScF2S (NA1; c SUCIk~`'( O~ ~~cAl_ ES~~/a'Y"~ ,0.PF'RAISERS (S~~y
AAI4ERIGA~S P.-fat-i'1' ~JF W~'i' lxeSSQGfA`f"!QN • Pdyb~Jhl~r:s,4't~3.,.l3 ~kCfAf~D (J~ ftER1L'1"R7RS
CITY OF RICI~FIELD, MiNNES.OTA
Clffice of City Manager
Council Letter No. 389:
.Agenda December l3, 1976 ~
The :Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the' City Council
City of Richfield ~ ,~~G~''
.Gentlemen:
"Subject: Continuation of the T977 Permanent Street Paving
Program Hearing for Area 14A (Rich Acres)
On September 27, 1976 the city council continued the hearing on that
portion of the 1977 permanent street pavin ro ram °known as District 14A
gP g
(Rich Ages} ir.•order to obtain information from the Minne ota Pollution Control
Agency regarding the implication of PCA noise standards. on Rich Acres.
~ The city council requested that the staff contact the Minnesota Pollution.-
•, Control Agency and arrange for I~llr. Peter Gove, the Director ~f`the Min:esot
~ Pollution Control Agency, to attend a city council meeting.. Mr. Gove has been
contacted and indicated that he would be able to attend the city council meeting
of December 13, 1976. Therefore ,• the city staff has scheduled the continuation
of the permanent street paving program hearing for.. this date .
~ On December 3, 1976, Mrs.. Wilde and Mr. Eberz of the city ,staff met with
IVir. Gove to discuss the Pollution Control Agancy noise standards as it relates.
to Rich Acres. Mr. Gove indicated at that meeting that the PCA noise regulations
-could not be used. as the .sole basis-.for property acquisition.: He indicated that
the Metropolitan Airport would be required to comply with PCA noise standards
by 1,985, but t'he question of acquisition of the area known as "Rich Acres"
would not be .dictated by these noise standards:
The city staff again contacted Mr. ,Claude Schmidt of the .Metropolitan Air=
orts`-Commission an r vi w
d e e
P ed the situation regarding Rich Acres with him.
` Mr. Schmidt indicated that` the airport has n4~:plans to purchase those homes in
Rich Acres.
S'v. v~Q,e.~ W oM,~
~. ~ ~e'~~,~. ~+w'v~,~,, "~,,,, ~~~.~, 1N`gc- ~, SPCA
_ _
~., a~ .
F
X
y v
~I
,;` -~~.~ ~ I'~ETROP~I~.~T3~N ,~,~R~€~~TS CQ~(~1S~~flN
~ ~"'' • ~ •S ?. O. BOX 1700 b TWIN[ CITY ARRPORT u MINNESOTA 55111
' ~~~«s.,~~x~~`G. OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIflECTOR • PHONE (612}.726-5778
December 8, 1976•
II
4
Wayne Burggraaff,
City Manager of Richfield
6700 .Portland Avenue.
Richfield, Minnesota 5543
Dear Mr. liurggraaff: .
Thin will confirm the telephone conversation with-Mr. Eberz, of the Staff
of .the City of` Richfield, concerning Rich Acres.
The Metropolitan Airports Commission has no plans to acquire this property.
We recognize the standards adopted by the Minnesota Pollution Contro l
Agency (MPCA) may have some influence on our planning for this particula r
area. However, in our opinion, any action by the Commission to acquire
.property or change land use will be deferred until the noise from-air-
craft operations has been reduced to the anticipated level thru action
such as introduction of newer and quieter aircraft into the air carrier
fleet and .the proposed operational procedures by the Federal government
have been implemented. Our present planning does not include any land
use decisions prior to the mid 1g80's.
It should also be recognized that the MPCA has the statutory responsibility
to establish noise standards, promulgate regulations and enforce the stand-
ards and regulations..
The foregoing paragraph outlines our plans and although we don't antici-
pate the MPCA will require land use decisions sooner than the afore-
mentioned date, we maybe required to take earlier action.
If you have. any questions on this matter, pie~se don't hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
,. ~`, .
Claude C. Schmidt,
Director of Operations and Environmental Affairs
cc: R. G. Glumack ~, `~ `.1
1~.~ `,r~ ~ ' ~ci76 ... '
,~,;,;a
i ~~ :3 .:
t
gar'(`'' `~J ~~
• OFFICE LOCATION-664.0 28th AVE. SO.-=WEST T1=I~MINAL AREA-MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AfRPORT
5
CITY OF RTCHFT
Office of..ELD~ 1F;,11NN~SOTA
City Ma Hager
'~ "council Letter No ~
. X88
Agenda December ~ 3, 197 -
The .Honorable 6
Mayor
and
Members of the
Cit City Cauncil
Y of Richfield
Gentlemen: -
subJect; presentation b •
_At the Y League o f Minnesota Cities
October g
manager to make- 197 budget hearin _ -
Palifiies arrar~ nts for 9 the
and the ~ game city cou
gue of the . ncii asked: the
to the city COUnCLI for Minneso Metropolitan Asso city
these or a to C1-ties to ciation of Ailunic_
g nizatio the Purpose of make individual"
these. Prase ns. The members ~fcxPlainzng the Presentations
to wl~ethe ntations sere the cit .services Provi
r to made the Y council. indieated ded,;by
continue its mEmb city: council. ~ that after
budget Year. Funds ~rsl7ip in these would make a deci
Ship dues o f both were provided in the. ado organjzation~ for t sign as
.organizations, Pted 1.977 bud he 1977
~~ get. for. member_
Duan~n .November
Miedtke 8; 1976 Mr. Vern. Peterson. E
Metropolita a member of tlie.
n Munici Boar • .Xecutive .Director
Dean, Lund Palities and a~ represented and i1/Ia
. Executive Director made a Prase the Association of Yor
to be a t the De ce n to ti o
Presentatio mbar 13 °f the League of n to the city council,-
n concernin 1976 city council Minnesota
we will a g the Lea meetin Cities will plan
ttempt to consider thisgue pro J and make
neCa sar gram. I have a similar
Y tO wait for- item at about advised Mr.
an extended .8:30 p, m. Lund. that
~.-, cu The city~s merrrbers ~ Perica of tim°, so it witI not be
rrentlY $5,162 hip Ques
scntatio Per Year. for the League of Minnesot
n on this organizatio. r' Lund will be a Cities is
question m the n of prepal'ed to
s fro ter which he ma ke a brief
city council, will k~~ ha Pre-
PPY tc answer any..
It is recommended
city council that folio
make a decision on whe h~°nside of this m
League membershi ration
Ps in 1977, to continue after that the
both the l~ssociation and
£es ectfulI
Y subrr •.~ted
./' s ~
~,
~- ~ .~ ~-
Wayne S. Bur ~
City \~anagcrggraaff sr` ~'
:~
., -
. ,_ r
1 '" _ / ~%
E S
-CITY OF RIGHF?ELD, MINNESOTA
Officd of City lvlanager
Council Letter_No. 387
Agenda. December 13, 1'97'6
The Honorable Mayor.
4 'and.
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
i
Gentlemen•
Subj'~ct: Public Recreational Swimming
~,
Assuming that the city council will take affirmative action on the agreement
.with. the school district that has been "recommended by the Joint Facilities
Committee, a schedule has been. developed for ar experimental" public. recreational
. swimming. program to begin in January.:
Approval of the agreement with the school district will result in a substantial
loss of revenue to the city due to; rate adjustments. for. game .time use of the ice
~, arena::- IvIoreover, the city is presently at its.levy limit and was unable to"Ievy
any property taxes to support a public recreational swimming program .during the
fall, winter and spring months. Therefore, it is necessary that any costs in-
~curred in a public recreational swimming .program be paid for by user fees.
The public recreational swimming program which has been developed would
be scheduled on' an experimental basis for the months of ja'nuary,and February.
'Following those't~,vo months the program could be reduced,-;,expanded, or contin-
ued at the same level depending on experience during the experimental. two..
month period. "
Public recreational swimming' would be avai able every Tuesday evening from
6:'30 p, m. to 8:30 p, m. at WestJunior High School pool. Swimming would also be
available every Thursday evening-for the same time period at East" junior High
pool. There would be public recreational swimming every Sunday afternoon from
3:00 p. m. to 5:00 p. m. at West junior .High pool.. The program- would start on
Tuesday, January 4, 1977 and continue on this schedule through the end of
February. During the .second half of February usage would "be evaluated and,
if neces ary, .new schedules would be announced for the subsequent months .
It is estima' ed that it would -cost the city approximately $21 per hour
.to rent a fully staffed East pool including a cashier. The=equivalent hourly
cost for the. West pool is estimated at $26 per k~our.. In addition, there would
be certain miscellaneous costs for special notices and other matters which could`
be expected to total approximately $300. Therefore, the total additional :cost to
Council Letter No. 387 -Z- December- 13, 1976
the city for operatingthis public recreational swimming program-during January
and February is approximately $ ~ 500. Those new direct costs do not include
any additional costs for staff time which would be involved in instituting and
I
administering-this program.
Swimmers would pay 50~ per hour per person for public recreational swimming. -: ~
~hzs is the -same rate which was charged earlier this year. by the cYiool district
when the district provided public recreational swimming. It is also the same
rate charged for public recreational `swimming in Bloomington. It would- be
.necessary.. for an average number of 63 .individuals to swimtn each hour; that the
.pool is in operation in order to meet-the anticipated'program operating costs.
If tha number of. participants exceeds the average 63 person level,. additional
revenues would be generated.: However, it should be noted that ariy significant
increase over 60 swimmers'per_pool hour would require the employment of addi-
- tional.-lifeguard$ which could increase. the hourly .rates.
Ii is recommended that the, city council approve this program on an experi-
menial.basis. as described in this Getter. The city's winter quarterly report has
been printed and will. be ready to mail early during the week of December 12.
Following city council action on this matter at the December 13 meeting, we
-will prepare a special insert .which will be included in the .:quarterly report so
• that notice of the. new swimming program.. can be mailed to each mailing address
wifihin the City of Richfield.
Respectfully subm' ted,
~..~ .
Wayne S . Burggraa ff
City 1Vlanager
WSB/eja
cc: Park and Recreation Director
Finance Director
/ -
f-
CITX OF ItIC;TiF°ELD, MINt]ESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council :Letter No. 386
- Agenda December 13, 1976
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the: City:: Council
City of Richfield ~-,
Gentlemen: .
Subject: appointments at December 13, 1976 City Council Meeting
.The following appointments should be made at the December I3,. 19.76
-city council mee ing:
South Hennepin Human Services Council
I)ue to the death of John Bleedorn it is necessary for the city council to
.appoint a new. representative tc the South Hennepin Human Services Council..
The appointment`~roould :be to fill the unexpired term which .will end in February,
1978.
• MTC Advisory Committee on Transit
Our-MTC Commissioner has asked the city council to submit the name of
a Richfield resident which he could consider in making an appointment to the
MTC Advisory 'Committee on Transit. This was discussed briefly at -the November
22 city council meeting and it was decided that council members should agree
on a name at the next meetin ~ ''~Se.L•at ~.
c~,
g ~ W
~ ~
Advisory Board of fIealth
As you know, it is necessary for an Advisory Board of Health to be appointed
to meet one of the requirements of the Community Health Services Act. The board
must be composed of at least nine .members . -One-third of the members must be `
.consumers, i.e., persons who. relate to the overall health services delivery
system as users of the system; one-third 'of the members will be providers with
provider being designated as a li::ensed health professional. The remaining,
~.
CITY OF RZCHFtELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager ~'
Council Letter No. 385
Agerida'December 13, 1976
The-Honorable Tvlayor
and
1~/iembers of the. City Council
`City of Richfield..
Gentlemen: ,
Subject: Hearing on Renewal of On--Sale and Sunday Liquor
Licen es,-for Minotte's
At the November 22, 1'976 city council meeting, the citycouncil set
December 13, 1976 a~ the dafie for apublic-hearing on the request for renewal
of the on-sale and Sunday liquor license for IViinotte's.
City ordinance, Section 11. G6, subdivision 6, requires: that ap~Lications '
far the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to
-the date of expiration of the license. The present on-sale `and Sunday liquor
licenses expire December 31, 1976 and Minotte's has not yet filed all items
required=by the application for the license renewals.
It`is recommended that the council continue the hearing on renewal of
'the: on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses for Minotte's to December 27, 1y76.
Respectfully submitted,
... .. ~ .
G~~
Wayne S. Burggraaff '
.City. Manager
WSs%eja
cc: City. C lerk
Public .Safety Director
~.
t
', ~ CITY CAF RICHFIELD,. MINNESOTA
Office; of City Manager
Council Letter No. 384
Agenda December 13 , 197ti
The Honorable Ntayor
and
Members of thz City Council
City cif Richfield
Gentlemen,
.Subject:- Purchase• in Excess of $1, 000
Chapter 6, ,Section 6.05 of the ,city charter stipulates, that the city council
must approve the purchase of merchandise, ,materials, equipment or construction
when the amount exceeds $1,`000. The council agenda of December 13, 19.76
contains one such item related to the Park and Recreation Department.
The 1976/77 Cormunity Development Block Grant includes funding for
fusilier improvements at tfie Richfield Community Center.. These improvements
include the purchase and installation of acoustical file for. the ceiling of the
general purpose room on the main or upper floor of the center.. The city has
received three written quotations for this improvement.
It is recommended that the city council approve the low quotation of
Acpustics Associates, Inc. in the amount of $1, 627.0.0.
Respectfully submitted,
.. .: ~ .
~~~
'' Wayne S. Burggraaff _
City Manager
WSB/eja `
cc: .Finance Dire rtor _
Park. and Recreation Director
-
' .. .
_
~: _ CITY OF' I~ICHF'IEhD, 1VTTNNESOTA
• Office of City ManagEr
Council better No. 383
Agenda: December 13, 1976
The Honorable `:Mayor •
and
Members of the City. Council
I ,:City: of Richfield _
`Gentlemen: -
. Subject: Approval of` 1977 AgreemYnt with Richfield Police
~ SupervisorY Employees.Bargaining Unit
_ .The purpose of this council letter is to submit a tentative labor agreement
'
which has
been negotiated betvi~een the City of .Richfield -and the Richfield
Police Supervisory Employees bargaining unit for the year 1977
Tn
e bar
ini
.
:
ga
ng
unit represents nine supervisory employees in the police division why are not
represented by the police `officers bargaining unit.
i.ast year the city entered into;a t~vo year 197677 agreement vaitl~ the ,police
officers bargaining unit which represents officers, agents and dispatchers
.
-The city's agreement with. the supervisory bargaining unit cowered manly 1976,
,Therefore,:. it was necessary. to negotiate a .new agreemert with this bargaining
unit for next year.
A copy of the agreement which has. been negotiated is attached to this
council letter. The proposedagreementwitb the supervisor bar ainin t;n'
Y g g xt
reflects l:he, same percentage salary adustment as does the approved police
officer's agreement for 1977. -The attached agreement also.-.includes the sarne
changes contained in the 1977 pr~lice officer's agreement ire the area of college
..incentive pay increments, training.pay and health insurance ~rer,?ium contributions
,
the only difference in the -two ~avreetnents is that there have been mar'cet salary
'
ad
ustments fo
J r the positions of ser ean~ 1' t -. .
g xe itenant a
nd captain t~ te;
lect the
_ .
fact that sa la r s urve sin -
Y Y dica ted Rich ' ~ ~ '
fie_d sa_a
ri
,. s for h
tese o'
p sitions to
be
.
below average. ;
The agreement has been approved by -the Richfield Police Supervisors
Employees bargaining .unit.
It is recommended that the city council adapt the attachod resolution approving
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF RICHFIELD AND THE RICHFIELD
POLICE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES BARGAINING UNIT
FOR THE YEAR 1977
WHEREAS, the-City Manager and the Richfield Police Supervisory Employees
~ Bargaining Unit have reached a complete understanding concerning rates of pay,
hours and other conditions of employment for the year 1977, and:
~ WHEREAS, the Personnel Ordinance required that contracts between the
-City and the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate bargaining
unit shall be implemented by_council resolution..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve
the Labor Agreement between the Cityof Richfield and the Richfield Police
Supervisory Employees Bargaining Unit for the-year 1977 and orders the provisions
~ of the laboragreement to be implemented affective January 1, 1977.
Passed by the City Council_of the City of Richfield this 13th day of December,
1977.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
yaavaaau~ ~, aVl vl Cill IiLC~7 UlerK' ~' ~~
RESOLUTION NO.
A T RTZI RANSFER OF
RESOLUTION UTriO NG T
APPROPRIATION FROM THE 1977 CONTINGENCY
' TO PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS„ Resolution No. 559Q appropriated- funds for each department
of the City for the year 1977, and
WHEREAS, a contingency appropriation was made in the General Fund for
various purposes , .including the 1977 salary adjustments and related fr.nge
benefit contributions , .and
WHEREAS, the labor contract between the City of Richfield and the
'chfi~e d o 'ce ervis ees for 77 rovides fora a lan and
i 1 1~ u o Em l0 19
R P S p rY P Y P P Y P
certain supplemental wage benefits, and
WI-IEREAS, it is hereby determined. necessary to adjust tr~~ 1977 budget
appropriation S11 , 928 to reflect adjustments required by the .labor
contract . .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that the sum. of $11, 928 be transferred from the contingercy
appropriation of the General Fund to the Public Safety Department.
Passed. by the. Council of the City of Richfield this 13 day of December,.
1976.
Loren L. Law
ATTEST:
Mayor
Thomas j. Moran City Clerk
MEMORAI~TDUM OF CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE- :CITY OF RICHFIELD
AN D
THE RICHFIELD POLICE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES
FOR THE PERIOD
JANUARY 1 , 1977 TO DECEMBER 31 , 1977
.PROPOSED MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
AND
THE RICHFIELD POLICE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES
ARTICLE I. -PREAMBLE AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
7.'his Agreement made and entered 'into this day of December, 19 ~ 6 by and.
between the City of Richfield (hereinafter referred to as the Employer) and the
Richfield Police Supervisory. Employees (hereinafter referred to as Supervisors) .
The intent and purpose of this Agreement is to:
1.. Provide an orderly procedure for the resolution of disputes concerning
this Agreement's interpretation and/or application;
2. To set forth herein the full and complete understanding of the parties
concerning rates of pay, hours and .other conditions of employment for
the duration of the Agreement.
The Employer and the Supervisors through this Agreement shall continue their
dedication to the highest quality police service and protection to the residents of
Richfield. Both parties recognize the Agreement as a pledge of this dedication.
ARTICLE II.' -DEFINITIONS
EMPLOYEE means a supervisory employee who is a member of the Richfield
Police. Supervisory Employees .
REGULAR BASE PAY means the employee's monthly rate of pay exclusive of any
longevity or overtime pay or any other supplemental pay.
•
1
EMPLOYER-means the City of Richfield or its designated representative.
SHIFT means a continuous eight (8) to (10) hour work period, as designated
on the official divisional schedule. •
REST BREAKS means two fifteen. t15) minute periods during the scheduled shift
'~; during which the employee remains on'continuous duty and is responsible for
assigned duties .
~~~~
LUNCH BREAK means a thirty (30) minute period during the scheduled-s~.ift
during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for
assigned duties .
EMERGENCY means a situation or condition so defined by the City of Richfield .
DIVISION means the Police Division of the Department of Public Safety.
DEPARTMENT HEAD .means the Director of Public Safety or his designated
representative .
ARTICLE III. -RECOGNITION
Section 1: The Employer recognizes the Supervisors as the exclusive bargaining
representative under Minnesota Statutes {1971) Section 179.71, subdivision 3, for
the following position classifications . Police Sergeant, Police Lieutenant, and
Police Captain.
Section 2: Should there be any dispute as to a new position established durixig
the .life of this Agreement both parties agree to refer such dispute to the State Bureau
it
of Mediation Services .
•
2,
ARTICLE IV. - SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES SECURITY
Section 1: During the life. of this Agreement, the Employer agrees to deduct
monthly- Supervisors .dues for Employees who are members of -the Supervisor's Unit
and who request- in writing to have their regular monthly Supervisors dues checked off.
The Employer shall remit such deduction to the appropriate designated officer of ,the
Supervisor's Unit.
Section 2: The. Supervisors agree to indemnify, and hold-the Employer harmless
against any and all claims,: suits, orders or judgment brought or issued against the'
Employer as a result of any action taken or not taken by the Employer under the
provisions -of this Article.
ARTICLE V . - EMi~LOYER SECURIT'~
Neither the Supervisors , their officers or agents , nor arty of the employees
covered by this Agreement, will engage in, encourage, sanction, support or
suggest any strikes, slowdowns, resignations, absenteeism, the willful absence
from one's position, .the stoppage of work or the abstinence in whole or part of the
full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment. In the event
that any employee violates this Article, the Supervisors shall immediately notify
any such employee in writing to cease and desist from sucl-i action and shall instruct
them to immediately return to their normal duties . Any or all employees who violate
any of the provisions of this Article may be discharged or otherwise disciplined.
3
i
ARTICLE VI. -EMPLOYER AUTHORITY
Section l: The Supervisors recognize the prerogative of the Employer to
operate- and manage the affairs of the Police Division of the .Department of Public
.Safety in all respects in accordance with. existing and .future laws and regulations
of appropriate. authorities. including personnel policies and division work rules.
The prerogatives and authority which the Employer has not officially abridged, - - --
delegated or modified by this Agreement are retained by the Employer such as,
but not limited to: direct employees, hire, promote, transfer, assign., retain
employees in positions , and suspend , demote or discharge or take :disciplinary
action against employees, relieve employees from duties because. of lack of work
or other legitimate reasons, maintain the efficiency of the government operations;
determine the methods, means, job classifications and personnel by which such
operations are to be conducted, .take whatever actions may be necessary to carry out
the missions of the Employer in situations of emergency; determine reasonable
schedules of work and establish the methods and processes by which work is performed.
Section 2: The Employer's r_on-exercise of any function hereby reserved to it,
or its exercising any such function in a particular way shall not be deemed a waiver
of its right to exercise such function or preclude the Employer the express provisions
of this Agreement.
Section 3: The enumeration of the rights and duties of the Employer in this
Agreement shall nod be deemed to exclude other inherent management rights .and
management functions not expressly delegated in this Agreement are reserved to the
Em to er.
p Y
4
I•
ARTICLE VII. -GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Section 1: Grievances are disputes over. the interpretation or applicat;.on of
the express provisions of this Agreement. The parties recognizing that an orderly
grievance procedure is necessary, agree that each step must be adhered to as set forth
herein or the grievance is forfeited.
All grievances must be filed within twenty-one (21) working days after occurrence
of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance, 'otherwise the right to file a
grievance is forfeited and no grievance shall be deemed to exist.
i•
I~
Section 2: The Employer shall recognize Stewards selected by the Supervisors
as grievance representatives of the bargaining unit. The Supervisors shall. notify
the Employer in writing of the Stewards 'and of their successors when so named .
Stewards shall process grievances at times other than during their normal-work
schedules unless specifically permitted to do so by the Employer.
Section 3: First Step. The Steward shall submit the girevance in writing to ,
the Director of Public Safety. A meeting between the Director of Public Safety, or
his representative, and the stewards(s) shall be held at a time mutually agreeable
to the parties within ten (10) working days following receipt of the written report.
The Director of Public Safety, or his representative, shall give a written answer
to the steward (s) ovithin five (5} working days following the meeting .
Section 4: Second Step. If the girevance is not resolved in the.First Step, the
Supervisors shall notify the Director of Public Safety in writing of the desire to
appeal within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the Director's
5
•
written answer.. If such request is made, tree grievance shall be reviewed at a
I•
meeting between the City Manager, or his representative, the steward (s) and the -
Director of Public Safety, or his representative R within fifteen. (1S) working ,days
after receipt by the Director of Public Safety of the notice~of desire to appeal.,
A written answer shall be given by the City Manager, or his representative,
within fifteen (15) working days after the date of the Second Step meeting.
Section 5: If both. parties , having exhausted 'the grievance steps provided
herein, cannot settle a grievance, either party may submit the issue in dispute
to arbitration as provided in the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1.971 .
If either party so chooses, the issues in dispute may be submitted to a three
member board of arbitration with each party appointing one member of the arbitration
board and the third member, who shall serve as the neutral chairman, to be selected
according to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971 .
Section 6: If either party so chooses, the issue(s) in dispute may be submitted
to a panel of three (3) arbitrators whose neutral chairman'shall be a member of the
American Arbitration Association National Panel of Labor Arbitrators . Each party
shall, within s-even {7) calendar days of the notification to pr-oceed to arbitration,
appoint orie member of the. arbitration board. The two .members thus chosen shall.
endeavor to select the third member within seven (7) calendar days who shall serge
as neutral chairman. If the two members cannot agree upon a third AAA arbitrator
within the said seven (7) days, then either party may request the American
Arbitration Association to submit a list of five (5) names from which the parties
shall select a neutral chairman.' Tha parties shall, within seven (7) days after
6
i
he neutral. chairman b strikin alternately
s h a list select t g
the receipt of uc Y
-one name each and the remaining name shall be chairman of the arbitration
board. If the parties cannot decide who shall strike .the first name., theparty
entitled to strike the first name shall be determined by the toss of a coin: The
decision by a majority vote of thearbitrationboard shall be final and shall be .
rendered within thirty (30)• days from the .date of the arbitration hearing.
Section 7: If a grievance is not presented within, the. time limits set forth
above, it shall be considered "Waived" . If a grievance i.s not appealed to the
~ • next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, `it
a.ll be considered as settled on the basis of the Employer's last ansvaer. If
sh
the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified
time limits, the Supervisors may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that Step
and immediately appeal the girevance to the next Step. The time limit in each
Step may be extended by mutual v~rrifiten agreement of the Employer and the
Supervisors representatives involved in each Step. The term "working days" as
used in this Article shall mean the days TJlonday through Friday, inclusive.
Section 8: The arbitrator or arbitration board, shall have no right to arnend,
modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the provisions of this Agreement.
The arbitrator or arbitration board shall consider and decide only the specific
issues (s) submitted to it in writing by the Employer and/or ti'ie Supervisors, and
shalT~ave no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so .submitted
to it. The arbitrator or arbitration board shall be withoat power to make decisions
contra to or inconsistent with or. modifying or varying in any tnray fhe application
~'
. of laws and rules and regulations izaving the farce and effect of. law. The
7
arbitrator or,arbitration board shall submit in writing its decision within
thirty (30) calendar days following c ose of the hearing or the submission of
briefs by the parties , whichever is later,- unless the parties agree to an
~ extension thereof. The decision shall be based solely upon his interpretation
of the meaning or application of the express terms of the Agreement to the
facts of the grievance presented .
Section 9: All fees and e~; enses of the impartial chairman shall be shared
p
equally by the Employer paying one-half of such fees and expenses and the
Supervisors .paying the other half.
If one party chooses to proceed to arbitration as per Article VII, Section. 6,
If over the objections of the other party, the party requesting this procedure
shall assume the additional expenses over and above those cvhich might be
normally incurred as per Article VII, Section 5.
ARTICLE VIII. -WORK SGHEDIILE
Section I. The sole authority in establishing work schedules is the Employer.
The normal work day shall be eight (II) to ten (10) consecutive hours. as designated
on the official divisional schedule, and the normal work week shall bean averaged
.forty (40) hours .
Section 2 Service to the public may require the establishment of daily, weekly,
h de art from a da or
seasonal or annual work schedules whz.c p the norm 1 work y
the normal work week. The Employer shall, except in the case of emergency,
give the Supervisors notice of such a change in the work schedule as far in
advance as is reasonably practicable.
8
ARTICLE IX. - SICK.LEAVE
Section l: Sick leave shall be accrued by employees at the rate of eight
hours per: calendar month, up to a maximum. of 800 hours. Thereafterthe rate of
accrual shall be two hours per calendar month with no maximum accumulation..
Section 2: Sick cave shall not be considered as a right and may not be
used at the employee`s discretion. Sick leave may be used only in case of
actual illness or injury, legal quarantine,. to receive dental or .medical care,
or for serious illness or death in the employee's .immediate family. Immediate
family shall be defined as wife, husband, children,- mother,. father, brother,
sister, .grandmother, grandfather, mother-in-law, and father--law . Brother-
in-law and sister-in-law shall be considered as within the definition. of immediate
family only in the case of death.- For serious illness or death in the immediate
family, there shall be a maximum of three days sick leave permitted for any single
occurrence.
Section 3: To be eligible for payment of sick leave, the employee will .notify
the department two hours prior to the starting time of his scheduled shift. This-
notice may be waived if the employee could not reasonably be expected to comply
because of unusual circumstances.
Section 4: The Employer has the right to verify the reported sickness of an
employee and may require a doctor's certificate for absence due to sickness in
those cases where there appears to be an abuse of sick leave. In all instances,
the burden of proof for the use of sick leave rests with the employee.
•
y i
ARTICLE X. - INTURY-0N-DUTY LEAVE:
Section 1: In those cases where an employee is injured. on duty through no
misconduct of his own and while safely performing his assigned duties, he shall
bE eligible for Injury-0n-Duty Leave. The employee or his representative, must
report his injury within forty-eight (48) hours of its occurrence to qualify for
Injury-0n-Duty Leave. The Employer shall review each case and shall make
a determination on the employee's eligibility for such leave.
Section 2: If the employee is found to be eligible for Injury-On-.Duty Leave,
he shall receive supplementary payments, from the Employer equal to-the difference
between the total amount of all other Employer injury related benefits., i. e. ,
Workmen's Compensation, pension disability benefits, and his normal rate of pay
•
for a maximum of ninety (9Q) consecutive calendar days. Such supplementary
payments shall not be charged against the employee's accrued sick leave.
Section 3: Injury-Gn-Duty Leave shall extend for a maximum of ninety (90)
consecutive calendar days immediately following the date of injury. The Employer
may require the injured employee to be examined by a physician selected by the
Employer in order to determine whether the employee is .able to return to work
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.
Section 4: Injury-On-Duty Leave shall be terminated by the Employer at
such time as (1} the employee is able to return to work; (2) a duly qualified physician
determines-that the employee is completely able to perform duties for the Employer
within the Department of Public Safety for which he is or may reasonable become
qualified to perform- by experience; education or training.
-k 10
ARTIC7~E XI. -- V~CATInP~?_LEAVE
Section 1: All employees shall be eligible. for vacation leave except that no
employee-shall be allowed to use vacation leave until after the completion of one
full year of employment.
Section 2: Employees shall accrue v«caticn leave according to the following
schedule•
A. Frorn the beginning of continuous employment through the fifth (5th) year
of continuous employment, each employee shall earn vacation at the
rate of twelve (12) days per year. .
B. Fro.n the beginning of the sixth (6th) year ana on through the tenth (10th)
year of continuous employment-each employee shall -earn vacation at the
rate of fifteen (15) days per year.
C. From the beginning of the eleventh (11th) year and on through the fifteenth
• 15th ear each em loyee shall earn vacation at the rate of eighteen (18)
( )Y p
days per year.
D. From the beginning of the sixteenth (16th) year and on, each employee shall
earn vacation at the rate of twenty (20) days per year.
Section 3: Vacation Ieave must be taken within a twelve month period following
the comple~tioxi of the year in which the vacation has been accrued . -This. proviaon
can be waived if written authorization is obtained from the Director of Public Safety
or his representative. Employees shall use vacation leave in the «mounts of not
less than one hour,
Section 4: In the event an employee voluntarily terminates his employment
with the Employer or is discharged, he shall be paid for his accumulated vacation hours `
l
11
Ii
as of his termination date, provided he-has given two weeks notice of his
termination`. Employeeswho voluntarily terminate prior to completing a year
of continuous and active city service shall not be eligible for terminal.
vacation. pay.
Section 5: Department Head lipproval. All vacation leave scheduhs must
be approved by the department head or his designated representative and filed
in the prescribed manner with the personnel office. In approving such schedules,
the department head or his designated representative shall consider the needs of
the municipal service and the `seniority and wishes of the employee and shall
respond to the employee's request within a reasonable length of time.
ARTICLE XII. - HOLIDAY.' LEAVE
Section 1: Employees shall receive eighty-eight (88} hours of holiday leave
per year. Eight (8) hours of holiday leave shall be granted for each of the following
eligible holidays; New Year's Day; Lincoln's Birthday; Washington's Birthday;
Good Friday; Memorial Day (the last Monday in May): Independence Day, July 4;
.Labor Day (the first Monday in September); Columbus Day (second Monday in
October); Veteran's Day, November' 11; Thanksgiving Day (the fourth Thursday
in November); and Christmas Day, December 25th.
Section 2; Holiday leave must be taken within a twelve month period
following completion of the year in which the leave has been accrued,
It
12
Section 3: Holiday leave may be taken at any time during the year with the
provision. that all such leave requests must be approved by the department head
or his designated representative.- In approving such schedules,`the department
head or his designated representative shall consider the needs of the municipal
service and the seniority and wishes of the employee and shall respond to the
employees request within a reasonable length of time. Employees. shall be
charged for the use of holiday leave in the amount of not less than two hours
per.' occurre nce .
Section 4: In .the event an employee voluntarily. terminates his employment
with the employer or is discharged,. he shall be paid for his accumulated holiday'
leave hours as of his termination date, provided he has given two weeks written
notice of his termination. Employees who voluntarily terminate prior to completing
a year of continuous and active city service shall not be eligible for terminal
holiday leave pay.
Section 5: In the event an employee terminates his employment with the
employer or is discharged and has used more holiday leave than accrued at the
date of termination, an adjustment will be made in the employee's compensation
resulting in the employee being paid only for holiday leave accrued to the date
of termination.
ARTICTE XIII. -OVERTIME PAY .
Section 1: Employees may from time to time be required to perform duties
• in excess of their normally scheduled work shifts. Such assignments may be
13
LA
at-the reasonable discretion of the employer.. Employees shall be rewired to
perform such work unless excused by the. employer.
Section.2: Overtime compensation either in the form of pay or time off is
not provided for the positions of lieutenant or captain. However, the department
head may grant reasonable periods' of time off when he feels such time off is
. warranted .
Section 3: Sergeants shall. be compensated for time worked in excess of
one regularly scheduled duty shift within a 24-hour period. Such compensation
shall be at the rate of time and'one half the employees regular base rate of pay.
Change of shifts within a 24-hour period and normal job .related administrative
duties such as attendance at staff meetings does not qualify for overtimes. An
exception to this provision includes training time as noted in Article XVI.
ARTICLE XN. -CALL BACK FAY
Section l: A police sergeant called back to work at a time other than his
normally scheduled shift for reasons other than in-service training or jbb
related administrative duties such as attendance at staff meetings, shall receive
a minimum of two hours pay at time and one-half the employee's regular basepay
rate. Reporting early for shift or an extension of a shift shall not qualify for this
minimum.
i•
ARTICLE XV. -COURT PAY
Section 1: A police sergeant required to testify in court during off-duty hours
shall receive a minimum of two. (2) hours pay at time. and one--half the employee's
]. 4
.regular base .rate of .pay. Reporting -early for a shift or an extension of a shift
for court does-not qualify for this, minimum.
ARTICLE XVI. - TRAINTNG PAY
14 Section 1: An employee required to report for duty other than for his scheduled: .
shift for in-.service training shall recev4~ compensation at a time and one-half .rate,
either in the form of compensatory time or pay based on the employee's regular base
Ili pay rate .
Sec ion 2: The erriployee may determine to be compensated by pay or compen-'
~ satory time by indicating his selection on his timecard for the period in which the
, . .
training occurred .
i,
Section s: All compensatory leave trust be taken within. a twelve month period.
following the year in which it was accrued.
Section 4: All compensatory leave requests must be approved by the department
head or his designated representative . Tn approving such schedules the department
head or his designated representative shall consider the needs of the municipal
service and the seniority and wishes of the employee and shall respond to the
employee's request within a reasonable length of tip .
ARTICLE XVII. -INSURANCE
Section 1: -The Employer shall pay the full cost of the individual cmployee's
health insurance premium of the Employer`s group health coverage.
Section 2; The Employer shall pay $24.50 per month toward the cost of the
'
e.
dependent health- insurance premium of the Employer's group health cov~rag
II 15
I•
Section. 3: Thee Employer shall provide the employee with term life and
accidental death and dismemberment insurance in the amount of $5, G00.
Se'ctian 4: The Employer shall continue to provide the employee wiih full
false .arrest insurance.
.ARTICLE XVILl'. -TUITION REIMETJRSEMENT
Section 1: The Employer shall continue to. provide the. benefits of the
Richfield Employee Advancement Program.. '
Section 2: Under provisions of the Richfield Employee Advancement Program,
the employee may receive reimbursement of the cost of tuition of those courses
which have a direct relationship to the responsibilities embodied in the employee's
position classification. The employee shall initially make payment for the full.
cost of such tuition, but shall be reimbursed upon submission of a satisfactory
grade for the course taken and a paid receipt for the tuition cost. Participating
employees shall be required to receive department head approval of each course
taken in order to be eligible for reimbursement.
ARTICLE XIX. -COLLEGE INCENTIVE PAY
Section 1: Eligible employees shall receive forty-five cents ($.45) per month
for each approved college quarter credit earned . The maximum allowance for college
incentive pay shall be $97.2 per year for one-hundred and eighty (i 80) approved
college quarter credits .
16
Section 2: College credits earned- by an employee must be approved by the
Director of Public Safety in order for the employee to receive. college incentive
pay for such credits. In order for college credits to be approved, such credits
must apply toward the attainment- of a four year job-related college degree .
Section 8: Employees must complete two years of service before becoming
eligible to receive incentive pay.
Section 4: The Director of Public Safety may withhold all or part of an
employee's college incentive pay if the employee receives an unsatisfactory
summary evaluation on his work progress report.'
Section 5: Participating employees shall be required to earn at least three (3)
college quarter credits per year in order to continue to be eligible for college
incentive pay. This requirement. may be waived by the Director of Public Safety
in individual cases. This provision would not apply once an employee has been
granted his four year college degree .
Section 6; An employee must receive a passing grade equivalent to a "C" or
better in order to receive college incentive pay for credits earned,
Section 7; Effective on the first day of the pay period closest to January 1, 1973,
eligible employees shall receive college incentive pay for approved credits up to
a maximum of one-hundred and eighty (180) quarter credits or the equivalent
number of semester credits ,
Section 8: College incentive pay shall be applied quarterly to the employee's
regular rate of pay.
~~
17
Section 9: Employees appointed after January 1, 1973, shall not receive
college incentive pay for the number. of college quarter credits which were required
by the Employer at the time of the employee's initial appointment.
ARTICLE XX, -LONGEVITY
Section 1: Eligible employees shall receive a longevity payment of 1% based.
on current bi-weekly base salary after the completion of fivQ years of continuous.
service, Eligible employees shall receive a longevity payment of 2% after the
completion of ten years of continuous service, such. payment to be-based upon the
employee`s regular base rate,
Section 2: Employees appointed after January 1, 1973 shall not be eligible
•
for longevity pay during their employment with the Employer.
Section 3: Employees appointed prior to January 1, 1973 who have less than
five years of service as of January 1, 1973 shall be given the option to either
receive longevity pay as per Article XX, or to receive college incentive pay for
approved college quarter. credits , At the time the employee should elect to receive
college incentive pay, he shall no longer be eligible to receive longevity pay.
Section 4: Employees receiving longevity pay as of January 1, 1973, may
choose to either continue receiving longevity pay or receive college incentive pay
for approved college quarter credits . At the time an employee should elect to
receive college incentive pay, he shall no longer be eligible for longevity pay.
ARTICLE XXI -CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
•
Section 1: The clothing allowance will be up to $200 per year. This allowance
is for the maintenance, repair and replacement of uniforms and equipment initially
18
•
r~
u
provided by the Employer and for civilian clothing for those employees assigned
to work in plainclothes .
ARTICLE XXII. -SENIORITY VACATION RIGHTS AND ASSIGNMENTS
Section l: For purposes of this Agreement, seniority shall mean the length..
of continuous service an employee has worked within a position classification -
commencing with-the employee1s first fullday'of work within that classification..
Section 2; Vacation selection rights shall be determined within work groups
by seniority provided requests for vacation leave are submitted by June 1.
Section 3: The Employer and Supervisor agree with the principle that seniority
shall be a factor in mak inq assignments .
Section 4: The Employer agrees to furnish the Supervisor with an up-to-date
list every twelve (12) months showing the position. classification, appointment
date and length of continuous service for employees represented by the Supervisors.
ARTICLE XXIII. -SAFETY
Section 1: Both the Employer and the Supervisor agree to maintain sanitary-
and safe working conditions and equipment.
ARTICLE XX1V. -SAVINGS CLAUSE
Section 1: This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the
State of Minnesota, and the signed municipality. In the event any provision of
this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent
19
_~
jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within
the time provided, such provision shall`be voided. All other provis-ions shall
continue in full force and ..effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated-at
the request of either party.
ARTICLE XXV. -CONTRACT ARBITRATION .
Section l: If the Employer and Supervisor are unable tc reach an agreement
on a future written contract or memorandum of contract, eitY~er party may submit
the issue(s) in dispute to arbitration as provided in the Public Employment Labor
Relations Act of 1971.
If either party so chooses the issue(s) in dispute may be submitted to a
three member board of arbitration with each party appointing one member of the
arbitration board and the third member,--who shall serve as the neutral chairman,
to be selected according to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor
Relations Act of 1971.
Section 2: If either party so chooses, the issue(s) in dispute may be sub-
mitted to a panel of three (3} arbitrators whose neutral chairman shall be a
member of the American Arbitration Association National Panel of Labor
Arbitrators. Each party shall, within seven {7) calendar days of the notification
to proceed to arbitration, appoint one member of the arbitration board . The two
members thus chosen shall endeavor to select the third member within seven (7)
calendar days who shall serve as neutral chairman. If the two members. cannot
~.
. 20
I~
agree upon,a third AAA arbitrator within the said seven (7) days, then either
party may request the American Arbitration Association to submit a list of five
(5) names from .which the parties shall select a neutral chairman.. The parties
shall, within seven (7) days after the receipt of such a list, select the neutral
chairman by s riking alternately one name each an:d the remaining name shall
be chairman of the arbitration board. If the parties cannot decide who shall
strike the first name, the party entitled to strike the first name shall be
determined by the. toss of a coin, The decision by a majority vote of the
arbitration board shali be final and shall be rendered within thirty (30) days from ~I
the date of the. arbitration hearing .
Section 3: All fees and expenses of the impartial chairman shall be shared
.equally by the Employer paying one-half. of such fees. and expenses and the 'i
•
Supervisor paying the other half .
If one -party chooses to proceed to arbitration as per Article X,~V, Section 2 ,
over the objections. of the otherpa.rty, the party requesting this procedure shall
assume the additional expenses over and above those- which might be normally
incurred as per Article XXV, Section 1.
ARTICLE XXVI. -SALARY SCHEDULE
Section. l: The following is •the pay schedule for 1977 to be implemented
by Employer on January 1, 1977. •
2I
..
1977 Monthly Pay Rates
Grade 1 2 3 ~ 4 5
P 4 $1315.94 $1388.12 $1416..25 $1544.58 $1630.99
P 5 $1423.33 $1501.41 $1583.77 $1.670.68 $1763.28
,P 6 $1539.00 $1623.43 $1712.48 $1806.42 $190.5.93
Normal P,:ogressi.on Through Grade
1 2 3 4 5
(Starting) (After. l year) (After L years) (After 3 years) (After 4 years)
Grade Assignment
Position Classification Grade Hours/Week
Police Sergeant PF 4 40
Police Lieutenant PF 5 40
. Police Capiain PF 6 40
ARTICLE XXVII, -COMPLETE AGREEMENT AND WAIVER OF BARGAINING
Section l: ,The parties acknowledge that .during the r~egotiation.s that resulted
in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands
and proposals with respect to any subject or matter not removed by law from the
area of collective bargaining and that the understandings and agreements arrived
at by the parties after the exercise of that right and the opportunity are set forth
in this .Agreement. Therefore, the Employer and the Supervisor for the. life of
this Agreement each voluntarily waive the right and each agrees that the other
shall not be obligated to bargain collectively with respect to any subject or matter
non specifically referred to or covered in this. Agreement even though. such subject
or matter may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or
both of the parties at the time of negotiations or signing of this Agreement.
22
t
ARTICLE XXVIII. -TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from January 1 , 1977 to
December 31 , 1977 and shall be automatically renewed from year to year
thereafter unless either party- shall notify the other in writing on or before
June 1, 1977 that it desires to modify or terminate this Agreement.
In witness, thereof, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be
executed this day of December, 1977.
FOR THE CTTY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE RICHFIELD POLICE SUPERVISORY
EMPLOYEES
. ..
_...- .._
•
23
. , , ,,
1977 EC.~IJIVALF'NCY TABLE
_____
•
PUBLIC SAFETY -POLICE MANAGEMENT
'~
GRADE
HOURLY RATE
BI--WEEKLY RATE
MONTHLY RATE
ANNUAL RATE
1
P 4 (sergeant)
Step l 7,59 (7.5919) 607.35 1,31.94 15,791.28
2
';
8,00
(8.0083)
640.67.
1,388.12
16,652,44
•. .
3
8,17
(8,1706)
653.65
1,4Y6,25
16,995.G0
4 ,8.91 (8.9110). 712.88. 1,544.58 18,534.96
5 9.40 (9.4095) 752.76 1,630.99 19,571.88
P 5 {Lieutenant)
Step l
',,
8.21 .
(8,2115) ...
656.92
• 2 8.66 (8.66.19} 692.95
3 9.13. (9.1371) 730.97
4 9.63 (9.6385) 771.08
~~ ~ 5 10.17 (10,1727) 813 .82
P 6(Captain)
Step 1
2
3
4
S
8.87 (8.8788)
.9.36 (9.3659)
9.87 (9.8796)
10.4.2 (10.4216)
10.99 (10.9957)
710.30
749.27
790.37
833.73
•879."66
1,423.33
1,501.41
1,583.77
1,670.68
1,763.28
1,539.00
R
1,623,43
1,712..48
1,806.42
1,905.93
17,079.96
18,016.92
19,005.24
20,048.16
21,159.36
18,468.00
19,481.16
20,549.7F~
23,677.04
22,871.16
/o
CITY OF RTCHFIEhD, IVfINNE~OTA
Office of City Manage.
Council he ter No. 382
Agenda December 13, 1976
The Honorable Mayor
and
Nfenibers of the City Council.
City' of Ri.ch>:ield..
C;entlemen:
Subject: Authorization to Call for Bids
' The 1976/81 Capital Improvement Program reserves funds. for -City Prgject
No. 692: Improvements to the Central .Garage.. This. project involves a variety
ref,. repairs- and improvemer_ts to the existing garagE which ere necessary to
conform with Occupational Safety and Health :Act requirements. The project is
proposed to be implemented. over tree' next three years, .with the first stago to
be completed this year.
As part of .this year's project, formal bids are to be solicited-for the
purpose of installing concrete floors. and adequate drainage .for the east side
garage building. The floor- space to be improved is approximately 8,GOC
square feet in size. The city staff estimates the work will cost approximately
. $25,00G.
Specifications have. been prepared for these improvements, and it is,
therefore, recommended that.. the city ccuncil authorize this call for bids.
i
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
1NSB/e j a
cc:- Public Works Director.
Finance Director _
j
CITYCOF RICHFIELD,. MINhIESOTA
Office of City 1vIanager
Council Letter No, 381
- Agenda December l3, 1976
The Honorable Mayor.
and .. -
Members. of the City Council
City ~f Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: :Request from the 1'eli.ov~~ Cab Company for Fleefi Expatzsion
_ _ ~ Attached to his council letter as a letter recentjy received from the Yellow
Taxi Company of Minneapolis., indicating their desire to expand thPi~ taxi fleet
by ten vehicles . The Richfield City- Ordinance provides that re maximum
number of taxi cab licenses to be granted is limited to fifty-seven. Currently,.
all-but two of these licenses have been issued to the following companies; -
Xellw~r Cab ~ 1
Southwest Cab 19
,Gopher Rad~'o Cab 15
Total 55-
If the council wishes to take actior. providing for expansion of the taxi
fleet operated by the Yellow Taxi Company, it would be necessary to amend the
ordinance by either eliminating or increasing the maximum number of licenses
which can b~ .issued.. A copy of the existing, ordinance provision is atfiached.
It is recommended that the city council consider this request at the December
i3, 1976'city council meeting.
- Respectfully submitt
~... •
~ Wayne S. ~urggraaff
' -City Manager
~N"SB/bll
cc; City Clerk
Public Safety Director
CAB SERVICE 332.7171
... ---
~ <z=~- ~ "
,~ ~,
MINNEAPOLIS AND SUBURBAN Y_ELLAVV CAE-AIR_L_INE LaMOUSINES
--- _ t~ .
,s ~ '
o~~/~inne~~'oZ~g~
OFFICE 127 1ST AVE. N.E., IvtINNEAPOUS, tv11NNESOTA 55413
.November 24, 1976-
"Y~~c
:~a
Mr. Wayne S. Burggraaf f , City Managax - '
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota-55423
Dear Mr. Burggraaff:
The Yellow Taxi Comp any .would like to expand its fleet by
ten vehicles. The purpose of this expansion is to allow
greater flexibility during the change in shifts between
2:00 and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. The company finds that
these additional cars could be used as over-flow d=.zring
certain hours.
Would you please place this on the Council. agenda at your
earliest convenience end would you kindly notify ma of the
date of hearing.
a mince ly,
ac~C F. Daly, Jr.
x~cutive Vice President
•
JFD : an
~;~ 197
~~ NO! ~
~ilCi4ll"~U Ll`t~{ ~d:bSldS~~
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
~ ~
..
~ T
(1) No licensee or~his employees shall permit more persons to ride in a
taxicab or auto livery than are provided for by its normal seating capacity,.
(2) The rates, fare-s and char;es being ci,arged by the liceesee shall, at
all times, be kept on file by the licensee with the city clerk, No change in the
filed rates, fares or charges shall be made by the licensee without first filing
such revised rates, fares or charges ~,=ith the city clerk at least 30 days prior
to the effective date of such change.. (Bi11.1974-6) 4/22/74
Subd. 12, Maximum Number of Licenses-Granted.- The maximum number of taxicab "'"~
licenses to be granted pursuan to this section until next amended shall be
limited to 57. (Bill 19.74.27) 12/'9/74
Subd. 13. Repealed 3/11/74. Bill No, 1974-4,
Subde 14< Fubli:c Gonveni.ence and Necessi.tyo The council shall consider at the
hearing whethex the proposed incree.se or decrease will promote the public con-
venience and necessity,
Subd, 15o Suspension or. Revoc~cati.on, Taxicab .licenses may be revoked or sus-
pended at any time, for cause, by the council after notice and opport~.znit3= for
hearing.
6.2I TAXICAB DRIVERS..
Subdivision 1, Definitions., The following terms have the meanings ascribed to
them in this section:
(1) "Ta.xicab Driver." means an}= person who operates a taxicabs as defined
in Section 6.20 of this chapter,
.Subd, 2. License Required, No person shall operate a taxicab unless the
operator possesses ~a current taxicab driver's license.
Subd.. 3. Scope o£ Secti~r.> ,Notwithstanding the provisions of Subdivision 2 o.f
this section, any taxicab driver licensed to operate in another municipality in
this staL-e may carry passengers from such municipality into the city and receive
local passengers for caxriage to L-he l;_censing municipality without procuring a
license under this section; provided, however, such foreign taxicab driver does
not solicit business on the streets of the city nor pick up passengers., except
where a trip .for such passengers has been arranged at a central office of the
company for whom the driver does business, which office is located outside the
boundaries of the city, While in the city the foreign driver shall observe all
the regulations and cond.tians of this section.
Subd. 4. Li.cens_e AP lp i.e.ation -- Requirements, Any person desiring a taxicab
driver`s license .shall make applicati.i.on to the clerlce Each applicant shall
meet the following requirements in making such application:
(1) He must possess a valid chauffer's license issued by the State of
Minnesota,
(2) He must be a United States Citi_zer~, over 18 years old, a resident of
Hennepin County or any county contiguous thereto and able to read and write the
English language, (Bi.ll No, 1973-I7) 9/1.0/73. .
.. ,~
199 1.219/'74
Oi~D1NANCE~CO®E --Ci~'Y OF F1tC~#FIELD, MiNi\I1`SOTA
_~
,,
CT ~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MTNNE`SOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 380
Agenda' December' 13, 1976
The 'Honorable Mayor
- and :`
It/lembers of the-City Council
City a~ Richfie:ld
Gentlemen:
Subject; Hearing on Rens:~al of Qn-Sale and Sunday Liquor
Licenses, Left Guard, Tnc.
At the November 22 , 1976 city c,ouricil meeting the city council set December
13, 1976 as the `.date for a public hearing on the request for renewal of the on,
.sale and Sunday liquor license for the Left Guard, Ir~c.
The a,pptication for renewal of this- license was submitted-by Mr. Marno M.
l~'IcDer~nott, President for the corporation. The .other member of the corporation
i.s 3.i.~t2d as VJil.lam Max McGee.; Secretary. The application was submitted
within the, prescribed time limit. and. properly verified by the city .clerk in accord-
ance with ordinance requirements. "All necessary information-.including an
accountant's statement, sure ybond,- insurance certificate.:, palitical cantributior.~_-
certifcates.-and',license fees- have been filed along with ti'ie applicafiion.
__
The` present on-sale anal Sunday liquor license for tfie .Left Guard,. Inc, will -
expire December 31,.1976.; The current renewal application is fora sixth renewal
key thie present owners ,who received their first license on juiy 24, 1972 .
Application Investigation -
j
T~r'accordance.with the ordinance the public safety director did make-an
investigation of ;information required by Section 1.1.06, subdivision 4 of the on-
saie liquor ordinance.
The public safety departrrient report, indicates that there have been changes
in the corporate ff~structure within the past year. The Left Guard, Inc, of Minnesota
separated from the parent organization of Wisconsin in April. .The secretary. ~f
the. present applicant-was affiliated with the Wisconsin corporation... However,
Mr, McDermott is a new corporate member. `
i
~,
Council Letter No. 380
-2-~ December 13, 1.976
No ordinance viclations have been recorded against the establishment within
the past year. During the year, there were 20 reported police incidents.. In each
instance, the management of the establishment were cooperative with the police
division o~ .the ,public safety department in attempting to resolve the problems.
Thy manager and employees of the establishment have taken an active part in
polzcing their own premises. In addition, it appears that a, number of the problems
experienced in past years were non-recurring, and the management lZas sought to~
address such problems as they have arisen. Based on this information, it is the
recommendation of the public safety department that con.sideration'be given to
renewing the license in accordance with the appl.i~ation.
A copy of the report frorn the public safety director commenting on the police:
investigation of this applicai.:ion for license renewal is attached. The detailed
incident reports are not attached due to volume'of pages, but are available for
review in the city manager's office.
Acrauntant's Report
The on-sale; iiqucr ordinance requires that the applicant file with the crty
clerk a statement made by a certified public accountant which shows the.. total
g~~oss sales and he total food sales of the restaurant for the preceding 12 month
period . This information toget-her with a comparison of the previous year 'is as
follows;
12 Months Ending 12 Months Ending
October, 31, 1975 October 3l , 1976
dotal Sales $1,416,576.66 $.1519;452.13-
~'ood Sales $ 494; 722.35 $ 619,, 013.79
of-Food Sales o Total 34.9% - 40.7%
'% of Liquor Sales to~Total 65.1% 5.9.3%
~,
The purpose of obtaining this information is that the state statute requires thee.
serving of .:food to be a principal-part of the business of a restaurant which has
an on--sale 'liquor 1i:cense . :Council members .will recall .that originally the city_
ordinance included a defiri.tion of the phrase. "principal part of the business"
stating that more tr~an 50% of the gross retail sales of licensed premises must:
be derived from the sale of food. That definition was deleted in .,1971 leaving
only the statutory requirement w;^i.ch does not include a def,in.ition of the phrase .
i
T`he city attorney h.as advised: that "principal- part of the business" may be
xiterpreted to refer to percent of gross sales,-but::also to ;such things as the
a;nount of investrriezit necessary `to erve food compared- to the serving of beverages;
or tlZe number of employees engaged. in the preparation and serving of food compared
wii:h beverages; or the amount of space provided for the preparation and serving of
.food as compared with beverages. In short, the state statute could be defined in
a number of ways and in no way infers that the definition must be limited to
percent of gross retail sales.
, _~ ' 1
}
~ ..
Council Letter No. 3S0 --3~ December 13, 1976
Health and Safety'Regulati.on.s
Various improvements dealing with health and safety r'egulati.ons have been
required of, the Left Guard, Inc, over the past years. In addition, routine
en~zi.ronmental health inspections and'.fire prevention inspections; are conducted
at the establishrnient,
At the _present time the fire division of the .public safety department. reports
t~iat Left Guard, :Inc . Y?as complied with all the fire code regulations ; and the
environmental health department also reports that the applic«nt is in compliance
with applicable health :and safety laws,.
Off-Street -F'arkintLGontract Provisions
The original off-street parking contract for:.Left Guard, Inc. ,was approved .
b the Richfield City Council on June 12, 1972, The :parking contract was amended `
Y
in Deceriber; 1975, and the applicant is currently completing the work necessary.: ,
to complete execution of .that amended contract.
j _,
'I ~ Miscellaneous Information
The applicant has filed the necessary political. contribution declarations
indicating that officers of `the. corporation have not made any political .contributions
during the past year,
The city assessor reports that the following :information .concerning market
i value and taxes reflect that data as it appears on .city records;
12 Months Ending ~ 12 Months Ending
October 31 , 1975 October 31 , 1976
rket-Value $1,100,000.00 $980,000.00
Ma
4 2 8
51 677.1 52 9 7.9
Taxes Paid ,
Recommendation'
It is recommended that the appiicantion for renewal of the on-sale and
Sunday liquor licenses by the Left Guard, Inc. be both grented and issued
subJect to t'r~e fo~aowing provision: .
;.
1. That the applicant complete compliance with the .provisions- of the am
amended off-street parking contract.
Respectfully- submitted,
~ ' ,~
G~~a~~r-
Wayne- S, Purggraaff
City Manac er
o. -.-. ~. ,_~
M,EMOR'ANDUM
Date: Decemker 1, 1976
To: Wayne S: Burggraaff
City Manager
From: Thomas A. Morgan, Jr.
Director of Public Safety -
Subject: LIQUOR LICENSE RE(~EWAL - THE LEFT GUARD CORPORATION
As a part of the liquor license renewal process,-the Public Safety Department
-has conducted the required criminal investigation into the operation of i;he
Left Guard Corporation. I am attaching a copy of Police Agent Slater's report
on this background investigation for your information. By way of summary I
might just mention that we have found no problems in our investigation of the
two principals involved in this license renewal application, Mr: Marno McDermott
and Mr. William McGee. Neither have we found any problems with the-application
for. the manager of the establishment, Mrs. Marilyn Giynn.
In addition to our investigation of the liquor license applicants we have also
reviewed the Police Division incident records involving the Left-Guard restau-
rant itself. To date we have had twenty various calls to that establishment
broken down into the following categories:
.Thefts (occurring vaithin building) 5
Vandalism and Thefts from Automobiles
(occurring in parking lot) 6
Simple Assaults 2
Customer Disputes 2
Arrests on Complaints
(Primarily citizen's arrests) 5
Total Incidents to Date 20
While this does involve a significant number of police actions, it is by no
means the largest number of incidents occurring at a single establishment within
our community. Seven of the twenty calls were initiated by the Left Guard manage-
. ment requesting our assistance in resolving problems with customers. Addition-
ally, one of the five theft complaints involves the Left Guard as the victim..
'~, Many ofi these complaints can be directly attributed to the fact-that the Left
Guard has made a .very credible attempt to police their ov~rn premises. .
-~
. Wayne S. Burggraaff
'.December 1, 1976
..Page Two
`:
For your review prior to the council consideration of this matter I am including
copies of he tvaenty incident reports. generated as a result of Public Safety
Department activity at the Left Guard during this past year,. to date.
From a Public Safety prospective, there does-not appear to be a basis to recom-
mend the denial of the liquor license for the Left Guard Corporation nor a
denial for'the license to the manager of the corporation,
4~.r`
1"AM : s p
Enclosures
'~
a
~ Q
h • r
~.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, NiINNESC7TA
Inter-Office Nlemerandum
uarE ~ 1,1/5/74
TO LT. STEVENS
FROM AGENT SLATER
•
SJBJECT Liquor License for Left Guard
S have done the relicensing application investigation for
. The Left Guard Corporation at 7717 Nieol.let Av, So. , Richfield, Tdiian..
There are t*.~o owners in-this Corporation, one is a T•Zarno Milo McDermott,
Jr 19100 ~fii~r~.etonka Blvd. Deep Haven, T~linn. D. 0. B. 8/1T+/38. The
second owner zs William. P~Isx T~tcGee, 1513 Fast Burnsville CrosstozN-n, ,~~,.~~
Bux°nsvi.lle, T•~izzn. D6 0. B. 7/16%32. Both of these. men ocrn 50, %of the
stock in The-Left Guard Corporation. Each has irrsested X130,000.00.
The third application was for the Managers T•Sarilyn Ruth Glynn, 7317
Third Avenue South Richfield, Trli.nn. D. 0. B. 11/307. T~Lr•s, Glynn
has no ir,.terest in the business other than she is employed as the
t•~anager of The Left Guard Corporation.
A11 of the record checks came back as being .clear. They have
had no problens since the initial-investigation. I observed on the
application for the year of 1976 that the Sur,zui.t State Bark of Bloon~noton,
Minn. 1515 .East 78th Street is listed as hava.ng ~250:OOa.00 in the
Corporation,. .and in the application that was turned in for the year 1877
that the Summit State Bank of B:LOOminb~i;on .had u150,oao.00 in the
Corporation. T checked with T~Ir. Jack Piices President oT".the Summit State
Bank in regards to this. He stated. that the Left Guard has never borro~•red.
X250.,000.00, Ho~4~ever, the reason far this being an there was treat
apparently the Summit Bank had agreed that should the need arise, ~25G,OOa,
X10 ~rould be at The Left Guard disposals should they .need. it. The Left
Guard as of this date has borroTsred and c~:res to the Stanrnit Bank of Bloo::;.ir.3g-ton,
Mi.ni~.. t]•i.e sum of X150,000.00. A.ecording to S.ir. Price, those mens T~ir. T•TeGee
and M..r'. T+IcDermott are of the .highest quality business men and he stated that
he .would not, should they need it, hesitate to loan them more money Iic+v'^°,rer,
he feels that this will not be necessary the way •the business is goir..g at tY!is
time.,
I also noticed that the x~.r~e of the people that natir o-tirn the buildin;
at 7717 I3icollet Av. So. Richfield, T•Tinn, is Clark Tnterprises, Ixzc. which
formally t~ras Relocation Leasing Corporation of J~1i]•waul.ee, I~~Tiseorsin. I~t is
also noted in here that The Left Guard has a .lease for traenty years .dated
1972. This lease is far w10p500.00 per month.. In computing this it ecmes
out to 'a126,U0a.00 a year rent that the Left Guard has to pay. on this. Usa.ng
the general rule of thunb at approximately 5n of the gross sales of-which the
Left Guard had $k1,51g,T152.13. Computing this appro:~i.mately by the rule of
thumb at ~~ would be about wr75s972..00 annually rent, making a difference of
X50,028.00 that was felt might be in excess.. Also the Left Guard Gorpora-tian
'J
f 1 tf ~ ~ ~ ,
,. ,.
~ _ t
CITY ~F RlCFfFlELQ, MINNESOTA
r
~~ ~ Inter-Office_ ~Aemorandum
___~__.
DATE 11 6
/5/'?
TO Lt. Stevens
.FROM Agent Slater
Sus~ECT Liquor License for Left. Guard Page - 2
. _ i
i
I
r ~
pays t~.xes; ma.interianee and i~a •uranceo .
Tn talking with I~lrs. Glynns the Manager' she stated while
this was .high tine Left Guard has been able to meet this with no
- appa.re:~t problems. In the personal backgrour~l check and the
financial bac'~ound check this trriter can find no reason. why on'`
our pare: the Left Guard Corporation should 'be denied their liced:se.
_ _ _..~_ I
_ I
"~
J. S1a-t;erp Investigative Da.vision
JS:Is
CITY OF RTCHI'IEI.D, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
°•Gouncil Letter No. <379
agenda December 13 , 1976
The Honorable Maycir
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield ,
Gentlemen:
Sub~~ect: .Request for Variance, 130.2 Fast 6Gtli Street
At their November 23, 1976 .meefing, the planning commission"h~Id a
public hearing on a request. for- variance far an office building, located at
1302 Ea t 66th Street. Subsequent to that hearing, a legs notice. was
published that the council would hold a. hearing on this variance request
tin December 13, 1976.
Since. the planning commission hearing, the applicant'. has :indicated a
desire to-make some minor modifications in the `site plan and off-street parking
provisions for the proposed project. It,is recommended that the city council
continue tha hearing on the .variance until the December 27 1976 city council.
meeting, at which time the council. can consider both the request for variance and :
the off-street parkng,contract
Respectfully submitted, ' I
'~
~Tayne :S. Burggraaff
_ - amity IVlanager
V1jSB/b1.1
ce; Planning Director -
{
GIT4' OF RICHFIEI;D, MTN'i~ESOTA
Offi~„e of City ?~'ianager
Council Letter No. 378
Agenda December i 3 , .19 76
The Honorable Mayor
and
T~%[embers of'fihe City Council `;
•
City of Ri chfie'ld
Gentlemen:
Subject: Authorization to Call`for Bids` - .Chemicals for
Water Treatrrient Plant
On the December I3 197& city council agenda there is an item providing
for cify council authorization to call for bids on certain chemicals to be used
for water treatment processing in 1977.
The bids for chemicals used at the ~rvater treatment plant will include -lime,
•
liquid aluminum sulfate, .liquid androus ammonia and sodium silico fluoride.
It is proposed .that bids ore the chemicals be received on Illecember 30,
1976: Funds areprovided. in the 1977 budget fcr these items and it is recomm-
ended that the city council authorize a call for. bids..`
Respectfully submit d,
~-
:Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/eja
cc: Public Work$ Director
Finance Director
,_
-CITY; OF RICHFIELD, TJIiN.T3ESOT1~
..
..Office of City Manager
o
. Council .Letter No. 377
Agenda Deceml.?er 13 , 19 76
The Honorable Mayor_ .
and
IVZembers of the 'City Council
Gity of P.chfield ,
Gentlemen;
Subject: Non-Intoxicating IVIa1t Liquor Ordi°nance Amendment
Defining political Panties
At the November 8, 1976 °city council meeting the council. gave first
reading consideration to an ordinance amendment which more clearly def.,ines
the term "political party" as it is used in the lion-intoxicating malt liquor
ordinance.
. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is .recommended
that this: amendment be gi~ren second reading consideration at the December 13,
1976 city council meeting,
Respectfully sub 'tted,
~~w~ ~.
uwi'
Wayne S: Burggraaff:
City Manager.
WSB/bll
cc: City Clerk j _
City Attorney
I
~-
-~
I•
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XI,
• SEC'1'TON 11.132, SUBDIVISION 2
OF THE ORDIPIANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN;
Subdivision 2 of Section 11.02 of .the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to the sale and dispensing of non-intoxicating malt
. liquors, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Subd. 2. Limitation of Application. Iv'othing in this section shall be
construed to prohibit or restrict the serving of non-intoxicating malt liquor
to guests in a private home. -The council may also permit any non-.profit
social organization, lodge, labor organization, political party, church o~
corporation not .included in the definition of a-bona .fide club to serve
non-intoxicating malt liquor without a license, free of charge, for a period
not exceeding 12 hours and not more than three times per calendar year.
'Political party' as used in this subdivision includes city-wide political
party organization but does not include individual candidates or the campaign
committees of individual candidates."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this.
_ day of 197b.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran., City Clerk
X: _
CLTY OF RIC~IFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City 1Vlanager
Council Letter No. 376
Agenda December 13, 1976
The Honorable .Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
' , Gentlemen•
Subject: Resolution Transferring Funas to .Close 187.5
City Project No. 667 .
The T975,permanent; treet improvement project was `financed with a
.,::permanent bond issue totaling $4, 600, OOfl which was-issued at the time
the contracts were awarded. The completed project, which was assessed
in ,1976, involved an actual cost of $4,862,225. ..The additional '$262,225
resulted from more than the estimated construction units being required for
the project due to changes in street widths and other items.
In order,to close cit ro'ect No. 667 it is necessary to transfer
P l
Y
~•
$262, 225.. from prepayments in~the bond reserve fund' to. avoid the sale of
additional bonds in this amount. '
A resolution has been prepared and is attached hereto providing for this
transfer of funds. It is recommended that the resolution be adopted. -
I~
Respectfully submi d,
4
~} ~~
Wayne S. Burggraaff '
__ City Manager ', ,
WSB/eja _
i
cc: Finance Director
City Atto~ney .
,_ _
..
,;
.. ~
F
,.
,
6
RESOL,TJ'I"TON N0.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATION OF SPECIAL' ASSESSMENT
PREPAYMENTS TO THE 1975 PERMANENT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
AND.CLOSING CITY PROJECT N0. 667 -
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5224 ordered the 1975 Permanent Street improvement.,-
City Project No. 667, and
WHEREAS, .Resolution No. 5350 authorized the issuance and sale of $4,.600,000
improvement bonds of 1975, and
WHEREAS, the 1975 Permanent Street Improvement was completed in 1976
and the special assessment roll for such. project has been sdopted, and
WIiERE~S, actual cost of construction exceeded the borrowing by $262,225
and it is .necessary to appropriate additional funds for cor~structio~. in order..
to close the project, and
WHEREAS, .over. one-third of special assesments adopted on this project
have ,been. prepaid by the property owners. -
NOW, THEREFORE, IiE IT RESOLVED by .the City. Council of the Gity of
Richfield as follows:
• ayments on
re
t
p
p
1. The .sum of $262.,2?.5 from special assessmen
City Project No. 667 is hereby appropriated for construction.
2. That City Project No. 667ebe closed.
Passed by the City Council- of the City of Richfield this 13th day of
December, 1976.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran. City Clerk
Gentlemen:
Subje~Ct: Designation of Banks and°-Savings and Loan Associations
a 4fficiaT Depositories of the City for 1977- and Approval
of Co 11a tera 1 ,
This item .provides for city council approval of official depositories for the - -
Lity of Richfield for 1.9.77 and the collateral pledged by ,two of these depositories .
The terms of the designations are set forth in the attached resolutions .
The depositories, named in the attached resolutions that have pledged
collateral are the: Richfield Bank and Trust Company, which is pledging collateral:
in the amount of ,$1, 30.0, 00.0; and the Summit State Bank, which is pledging
rollateraT in the 'amount of $2,185,000. ~ Both banks have submitted the recess-
ary documents to the city pledging -these amounts of collateral for the year 1977.:.
T~~ addition to these collateral .pledges,, city funds are also.:protected by the
1,ederal De osit insurance Corporation in 'the a-mount of $i 00, 000. The city will
p
continue to use these two depositories in .the same manner as in 'past years.
In November: 1974, the federal government'°amended the Federal Savings
and Liman Insurance Corpcration`Law (similar to FDIC) to allow far automa is
protection of puT~'lc accounts up, to'$100, 000. In 19;75, the city .council passed
a reso cation allowing the city to inves a maximum of $100, 000 (the amount covered
by FSLIC] in certain savings and loan associations.
i
It is reques~ed that -.the city council again name :the following institutions a s
ad~titional depositories, with the. understanding that the city would `not invest '
beyond the insurance coverage:
`First Federal Savings of Minneapolis=Richfield
`Twin-City Federal Savings and Loan As n..;
- £ & M Savings Bank, Minneapolis
i Minnesota. Federal. , St. Louis Park :. ~' ~ ~ - -
Home Federal Savings, Ml?ls. =: Bloomington branch
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE RICHFIELD BANK & TRUST COMPANY
A DEPOSITORY OF FUNDS OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAR
1977 AND APPROVING COLLATERAL
BE IT RESOLVED. by the City Council of the City of Richfieldd as follows;
r
That, in accordance.-with .law, the Richfield Bank & Trust Company. be a.nd
hereby is designated a depository of the funds of the City of Richfield, subject
to modification and revocation at any time by said City, and suhject to the following
terms. and: conditions:
The said .depository shall not be required to give bonds or other securities
for such deposits provided that the total sum thereof shall not at any time exceed
in any depository the sums for which its deposits are-insured cinder the Acts of
Congress of the.United States relating to insurance of bank deposits; but that in
case such deposits in any such depository shall at any time exceed such insured sum,
.said depository shall immediately furnish bonds or other-security for such excess
`according to .law, approved by the City .Council of said City.
That. said. depository shall pay on demand all deposits. therein; and shall
pay all time deposits, at_or after the end of the period for which the same shall .
be deposited, on demand.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be maintained a general account
in which shall be deposited .all moneys not otherwise specifically provided for.
Checks on this account shall be signed by the following officers or their facsimile
signatures;
LOREN L. LAW, Mayor
WAYNE S.,BURGGRAAFF, Manager
THOMAS J. MORAN, Treasurer
BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED, that there shall be a daily interest savings
account. All withdrawals from said account will be for transfers to the general
checking account.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that collateral in the amount of $1,300,000
deposited for safekeeping at the Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, is
hereby approved.
Passed- by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of
December, 1976.
Loren L. Law
ATTEST:
~:.
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
Mayo r --
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE SUMMIT STATE BANK A DEPOSITOKY OF
FUNDS OF THE CITY OF RICHF'tELD FOR '.E`HE YLAR .1977 AND APPROVING
COLLATERAL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows;
That, in accordance with law, the Sununit State Bank be, and hereby is desig-
nated a depository of the funds of the City of Richfield, subject. to modification
and revocation at any time by said City and subject to the following terms and
conditions;
The said depository shall not be required to give bonds or other securities for
such deposits provided that the: total sum thereof shall not at any. time exceed in any
depositary 'the sum for which its deposits are insured under the Acts of Congress of
the United States relating to insurance of bank deposits; but not in case such deposits
_. ... in any. such depository-shall at any time exceed such nsured~sum, said depository. shall
immediately furnish binds or other security for such excess according to law, approved
by the City Council of said City.
That. said depository shall pay on demand all deposits therein; and. shall pay all
time deposits, at or after the end of the period for-which, the same shall be deposited;
on demand.
BE T7.' FURTHER RESOLVED; that there snali be maintained a general account in which
shall be deposited all moneys from liquor and swimming poolfice arena operations.
Checks on this account shall be signed by the following officers or their facsimile
s i.gnature s
LOREN L. LAW, Mayor
• WAYNE S. BURGGFAAFF, yiarager
THOMAS J. MORAN, Treasurer
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be maintained a city payroll .account.
There shall be issued a single check bi-weekly for an amount equal to the bi-weekly
city. payroll, payable to the Director of Finance for deposits in such payroll account.
'thereafter, the Director of Finance is authorized to issue payroll checks on said
accounts bearing only his signature as city treasurer for all wages or salaries included.
in said bi-weekly payroll.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED., that there shalt be a daily interest savings account..
A1.1 withdrawls from said account will be for transfers to the general checking account.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that collateral in the amount of $2,1&5,-000, deposited
for safekeeping at. the Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis and the Federal Reserve
Banlc, is hereby approved.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of December, 1976..
Loren Z. Law N1a.yor
ATTEST:
V
r
_ ..
:~.N
....
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION }')Ef>aGNAT.TNtT C7IRTAIN SAVINGS
AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND. BANKS AS DEPOSITORIES
FOR Ti1E INVESTMENT OF CITY- FUNDS IN 1977
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MIIQNESOTA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.66 and 118.17, '
municipal funds may be deposited in any.Savi.ngs axLd Loan Associations which has
its deposits insured by the Federal Savinsgs and-Loan Insurance Corporation, and
~,1HEREAS, the amount of said deposits niay not .exceed the Federal Sa~rings
and Loam Insurance Corporation insurance covering such deposits which insurance.
amount is presently $100,000, and
WHEREAS; the deposit of City funds in Savings and Loan Associations-and
banks would provide greater flexibility i.n the City's inzTestment program and
maximize interest income thereon;- i
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield;
Minnesota as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that it is in the best interests of
.the proper management of City funds that c~rtai.n Savings and Loan .Associations
• and Banks be desiignated as additional depositories for City funds for_ 1977.
2. The following Savings and Loan Associations and Banks are hereby
designated as additional depositories for municipal funds:
First Federal Savings of Minneapolis
6445 Pdicollet Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Twin City Federal Savings and Loan
Marquette at 8th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55:'02
Farmers & Mechanics Savings~Bank
Marquette at 6th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
_ Minnesota Federal Savings
Knollwood
~ St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55432
Home Federal Savings
500 West 98th Street ~
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420
First National Bank of St. Paul
332 Minnesota Street
I St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
__
I'
Resolution No. Page 2
3. It is further found and determined that thepurpose of such
depository designation is to facilitate the proper. and advantageous
investment of City funds and that such designation is not exclusive
nor does it preclude the deposit of any City funds in other officially
designated depositories of the City.
4. The Treasurer is hereby authorized to deposit City funds in any
or all.of the depositories herein designated. up to the amount of $100,000
or such other amount as may be subsequently permitted by law, such deposits
to be in the form of demand accounts for Public Unit Savings Certificates
purchased by the City, payable to the pity of Richfield on the signature
of the City Treasurer. Such deposits may be made and withdrawn from time
to time by the Treasurer as his best judgment and the interests of the City
dictates.
5. The investment of funds and the reporting thereof pursuant to this
resolution sha11 be conducted in accordance with established policies of
the City regarding the investment of City funds. '
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day
of December, 1976.
Loren L. Law
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
Mayor
•
. /~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, NtINNESOTA
Office of City.. Manager
~,
Council Letter No,>374
Agenda December 13 , 19 76
The Hanorabie Mayor:.... ,
and:
l~;~embers of'the -City Council
:City of Richfield
Gentlemen•
Subject: Renewal of Interceptor Sewer Maintenance Agreement
wiah the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Thin agenda item provides for the'renevgal of an agreement with the Metrop-
olitan `Waste Control Commission.. to rEimburse the City of Richfield for mainten-
once costs an interceptor sewers owned by the commission.
The interceptor sewers throughout the City' of Richfield are the''property of
the- Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. I3owever, the- most efficient and
.economical .mean:. of insuring proper maintenance of the sewers is for the city
to_provide the maintenance and be reimbursed by the Waste,Control Commission.
A11 communities within the s-even county area served by the Waste :Control
Cemmission use this .same arrangement. '
The 'attached statemerfi of a-greement renewal provides fQr a one year exten-
sion of the existing agreement under the same general terms and conditions w h
the exception of uection 6.OZ which has been. amended to provide- that an estim-
aced reimbursement of $2, 000 be paid in twelve monthly installments instead of
four quarterly installments. The ba ir, agreement provides that. al-I city costs
will be reimbursed-and that if the estimated reimbursement is not adequate, an
additional adjustment is made on arc annual basis. The total-reimbursement
under"the terms of this agreement in 197.5 was $2,611.99.
This agreement has been reviewed by the. city' staff and it is recommended
that it be- approved :and that the Mayor and City Manager be ,authorized to execute
the agreement onlbehalf of the city..
~' Respectfully submit ed,
~. _ I
- ~
.. ~ ~ - -
`~~~~~ f
,
I:
Wayne S. Burggraaff
.city 1Viarager
- tiVSL/eja
cc: Public Works Director....:
Finance Director
STATEi~1E~dT OF AGREEi1EPJT REilEt•lAL
NTERCEPTOR h~1AIP~TEPdA~~lCE AGREEF1Ei}T fd0. 131
The i~9etropolitan Haste Control ,Commission and' the City of Richfield
agree- to renely the Interceptor Piai ntenance Agreement iJo. 131 ti•~hi ch is
currently in force betureen these parties. The terms of the Agreement
for the rene~val.period shall be the same as those contained in the Agree-
ment which was executed for_the January 1, 197G -.December 37, 7976 period
with 'the exception"of Section 6.02:
"Section G.02 Gost Estimates; Payments." .The parties. estimate that
the total amount o`P costs ~vhich the Gommission ~ai11 be required to pay
to the- it4uni ci pal i ty for performance o f th i s. Agreement i n 1977 4vi 11 be
- •~2,OD0. Such amount shall be paid in.twelvemonthly installments-
as an advance payment of such costs. On or before February 1, 1978,. the
Municipality will submit to the Commission a detailed statement of the
actual costs incurred by the 19unicipality which the board is required
~ to pay in accordance with Section b. 07, and will. remit to the Gommission
any amount paid to the Municipality which is in excess of such actual
costs. If the total of the monthly advances paid by the board is less
than the actual amount of such costs, the Commission shall pay to the
i~)unici pal i ty on or before ~•tarch 1, 1978 an .amount .equal to .the difference
between the actual costs and the monthly advances previously paid.
_~ ~ The Municipali-cy shat? keep detailed records supporting all costs of
the types specified in Section 6.01 ~-rf~ich it expects the Commission to
pay, and shall make the same available to the Cor?nission-on request.
The renewal period for Interceptor Maintenance Agreement Pdo. 731 shall be
January 7, 7977 -- December 31, 1977. That both parties agree to the rene~va1 -
period and terms is evidenced by the signatures affixed to this statement. .
FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
FOR THE METROPOLITA~~ WASTE COilTROL COi~iMISSIO~J
IL. S
Title Jose h D. Strauss, Chairman
(Title) ichard J ougherty, hi f ministrator
Dated Dated
•